Fiscal Year 1989 IM 0 agS s !e Ann ll IIe ISIT mp s1Ocoe 88-8 sa a a 8 Sf v1*i-a 1 e .. FY 1989 STATISTICAL HIGHLIGHTS ITEM APPROPRIATION (S MILLIONS) Navigation Flood Control Total Flood Control Mississippi River and Tributaries' Multipurpose including power Beach Erosion Control Total New Work s Other Work* TOTAL NAVIGATION (Calendar Year)* Ton-Miles of Commerce (Millions) Foreign, Coastal Ports Foreign, Great Lakes Ports Domestic, Coastal (Intraterritory not compiled) Domestic, Great Lakes Domestic, Inland Domestic, Local TOTAL Tons of Commerce (Millions) Foreign, Coastal Ports Foreign, Great Lakes Ports Domestic, Coastal and Intraterritory Domestic, Great Lakes Domestic, Inland Domestic, Local TOTAL FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED ($ Billions) FLOOD DAMAGES SUSTAINED (S Billions) POWER Installed (Cumulative in millions of kw) Generated (Billions of kwh) RESERVOIR STORAGE (Millions of acre-feet) All Purpose Flood Control (Maximum) Water Supply Irrigation PUBLIC ATTENDANCE AT RESERVOIRS Recreation Days of Use (in Millions) Visitor Days (in Millions) 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 519 512 443 299 304 257 577 522 607 485 856 840 787 673 676 647 832 774 772 873 (222) (205) (206) (227) (225) (203) (291) (177) (145) (211) 73 73 69 93 112 171 221 247 275 538 27 27 23 17 12 25 5 7 12 9 1,475 1,452.0 1,322.0 1,082.0 1,104.0 1,127.0 1,685.0 1,580.0 1,666.0 1,906.0 1,770 1,826.0 1,813.0 1,658.0 1,797.0 1,567.0 1,734.0 1,417.0 1,331.0 1,296.0 3,245 3,278.0 3,135.0 2,740.0 2,901.0 2,688.0 3,419.0 2,997.0 2,997.0 3,201.0 56,208.2 50,985.0 47,274.2 44,769.3 46.508.8 45,286.7 51,2627 58,929.2 60,569.8 24,448.4 22,003.3 24.235.2 27,171.9 32,249.4 24,309.4 27,165.5 35,294.0 33,679.6 561,594.9 586,818.7 580,888.7 610,976.5 593,923.1 649,749.4 632.707.0 634,765.3 631,149.2 58,159.4 50,076.4 43,198.2 48,184.0 49,784.4 43,088.2 35,623.3 62,148.3 61,747.1 269,035.7 257,336.4 248,116.9 232,707.5 242,855.4 225,628.2 217.026.7 231,184.1 227,343.0 1,238.4 1,183.9 1,197.2 1,102.0 1,157.1 1,099.7 1,111.7 1,315.6 1,596.4 970,685.0 968,403.7 944,910.5 964,911.2 966,478.2 989,161.6 964,896.9 1,023,636.5 1,016,085.1 923.7 845.1 791.4 723.0 744.5 702.7 769.2 823.9 860.8 52.5 45.9 45.7 51.3 58.8 48.4 50.4 63.2 60.6 330.3 328.2 312.0 313.2 311.1 312.8 313.9 325.1 333.2 109.7 96.5 87.4 92.0 98.0 83.5 72.1 115.4 115.1 588.1 569.8 560.5 534.7 542.5 487.1 496.5 520.7 535.0 83.7 82.0 77.4 74.2 81.1 73.2 75.6 93.2 94.2 2,088.0 1,967.5 1,874.4 1,788.4 1.836.0 1,707.7 1,776.7 1,941.5 1,998.9 8.3 2.1 5.2 27.3 10.8 16.8 23.2 4.3 1.2 7.3 1.1 0.5 17 6 0.5 4 4 1.5 1 1.5 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.1' 20.1' 19.7' 19.7' 19.2' 19.0' 81.6 72.2 74.0 80.7 88.3 91.2 88.2 75.8 77.3 77.8 273.6 273.6 272.1 270.6 269.0 268.5 262.3 123.3 123.3 123.0 123.0 123.0 122.7 120.4 9.5 9.5 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.1 8.9 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 191 191 181 506 502 482 480 480 469 457 FUNDING General Investigation 142,405 138.767 136,287 128.272 ConstructioGnen eral 1,184,735 1,200,175 1,152,150 919,345 Operations and Maintenance, General 1,370,714 1,421.733 1,389,846 1,319.973 Regulatory Program 63,752 55,262 Flood Control Mississippi River & Tributaries 332,550 317,704 310,797 314,760 General Expenses 120,000 115,000 115,000 107,000 FloodC ontrol& CoastalE mergencies 20,000 20,000 10,000 25,000 Revolving Fund 0 0 12,000 7,000 Permanent Appropriations 9,000 9,000 *0 8.000 TOTAL 3,245,261 3,278.091 3,135,080 2,830,050 1 Included in Flood Control Total. 2 Advanced engineering and design, and construction. (Including major rehabilitation projects.) Savings and slippages applied to projects. 3 Operation and maintenance, surveys, administrative and misc, programs and activities. 4 Includes New Melones and Spettisham, built by the Corps and operated by others. 5 All Federal agencies changed to 'Visitor Days' at the direction of OMB. * For further information on waterborne commerce, see Waterborne Commerce of the United States, published annually. It may be obtained by writing the Commander, U.S. Army Engineer District, New Orleans, ATTN: CELMN-ED-S, P. O. Box 60267, New Orleans, LA 70160-0267. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY WASHINGTON, DC 20310-0103 21 JAN 1992 TO: THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE AND THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SUBJECT: Annual Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1989 I am submitting Volume II of the Annual Report on Civil Works Activities for the Fiscal Year 1989 in accordance with Section 8 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1988 and Section 925(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. This volume of field reports contains narrative summaries and statistics on water resources development projects of the Army Corps of Engineers where there has been activity between October 1988 and September 1989. Nancy P. Dorn Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) HECSA TECzN L LIU ARY CONTENTS New England Division .................................................................. 1-1 North Atlantic Division: New York, NY, District ............................................................... 2-1 Philadelphia, PA, District ........................................................... 3-1 Baltimore, MD, District ................................................................ 4-1 Norfolk, VA, District .................................................................. 5-1 South Atlantic Division: Wilmington, NC, District .......................................................... 6-1 Charleston, SC, District ................................................................ 7-1 Savannah, GA, District ................................................................ 8-1 Jacksonville, FL, District ............................................ 9-1 Mobile, AL, District .................................................................... 10-1 Lower Mississippi Valley Division: New Orleans, LA, District ..................................... 11-1 Vicksburg, MS, District ............................................................... 12-1 Memphis, TN, District ......................................................... ...... 13-1 St. Louis, MO, District ................................................................ 14-1 Ohio River Division: Nashville, TN, District ................................................................. 15-1 Louisville, KY, District ................................................................ 16-1 Huntington, WV, District ......................................................... 17-1 Pittsburgh, PA, District ................................................................ 18-1 O hio R iver ............................................................................... 19-1 North Central Division Buffalo, NY, District ................................................................... 20-1 Detroit, MI, District .................................................................... 21-1 Chicago, IL, District ........................................................... 22-1 Rock Island, IL, District ............................................................... 23-1 St. Paul, MN, District .................................................................. 24-1 Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN................. 25-1 Missouri River Division: Omaha, NE, District .................................................................... 26-1 Kansas City, MO, District ............................................................ 27-1 Southwestern Division: Little Rock, AR, District ........................................................... 28-1 Tulsa, OK, District .................................................................. 29-1 Fort Worth, TX, District............................................................. 30-1 Galveston, TX, District .............................................................. 31-1 Albuquerque, NM, District .......................................................... 32-1 South Pacific Division: Los Angeles District .................................................................. 33-1 San Francisco, CA, District ......................................................... 34-1 Sacramento.CA, District ............................................................. 35-1 Pacific Ocean Division ................................................................ North Pacific Division: Portland, OR, District ................................................................ 37-1 Seattle, WA, District ................................................................... 38-1 Walla Walla, WA, District ........................................................... 39-1 Alaska, AK, District .................................................................. 40-1 Board of Engineers for River & Harbors ................................................. 41-1 Mississippi River Commission ............................................................ 42-1 Construction Engineering Research Laboratory ......................................... 43-1 Cold Regions Research & Engineering Laboratory ..................................... 44-1 Waterways Experiment Station ............................................................ 45-1 Engineer Topographic Laboratories ....................................................... 46-1 Water Resources Support Center .......................................................... 47-1 Pernmanent International Association of Navigation Congresses ...................... 48-1 International Boundary Waters Board .................................................... 49-1 Investigation of Projects Under Federal Power Act .......................................... 50-1 Regulatory Sunken Vessel Removal & National Emergency Preparedness .............. 51-1 Natural Disaster Preparedness, Response & Recovery Activities........................... 52-1 California Debris Comnission .............................................................. 53-1 Appendices: Flood Control Reservoirs Operable ............................................... .. A-1 Flood Control Projects Under Construction......................................... .B-1 Navigation Locks and Dams Operable ............................................ .. C-1 Navigation Projects Under Construction ........................................... .D-1 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power in Operation ........................ .E-1 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Under Construction ................ F-1 Flood Damages Sustained and Prevented .......................................... G-1 In d ex ............................... ....................................................... 36-1 I-1 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION * The New England Division, an operating division with both district and division functions, comprises all of New England except western Vermont and small portions of Massachusetts and Connecticut along their western boundaries, and includes small portions of southeastern New York, all embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Long Island Sound and the Atlantic Ocean east of the New York-Connecticut State line. It also includes Fishers Island, NY. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control ............... 2. Branford Harbor, CT ............... 3. Cape Cod Canal, MA ................ 4. Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA ........ 5. Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI .... 6. Green Harbor, MA ................. 7. Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI ... 8. Hyannis Harbor, MA ................ 9. Jonesport Harbor, ME .............. 10. Milford Harbor, CT ................. 11. Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), MA ... 12. New Haven Harbor, CT ............. 13. Plymouth Harbor, MA ............. 14. Point Judith Pond and Harbor of Refuge, Point Judith, RI .......... 15. Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, ME and NH ....... 16. Providence River and Harbor, RI ..... 17. Rockport Harbor, ME ................ 18. Rockport Harbor and Pigeon Cove, Rockport, MA ................. 19. Rye Harbor, NH .................... 20. Saco River, M E ..................... 21. Sesuit Harbor, MA .................. 22. W ells Harbor, ME .................. 23. Wood Island Harbor and Pool at Biddeford, ME ..................... 24. Reconnaissance and condition surveys 25. Other authorized navigation projects 26. Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) .................. 27. Authorized bridge alteration ......... Beach Erosion Control 28. Revere Beach, MA .................. 29. Roosevelt Campobello International Park, Lubec, M E .................... 30. Inspection of completed beach erosion control projects ..................... Page 1-3 1-3 1-3 1-4 1-4 1-4 1-4 1-5 1-5 1-5 1-5 1-6 1-6 1-7 1-7 1-8 1-8 1-9 1-9 1-9 1-10 1-10 1-10 1-11 1-11 1-11 1-11 1-11 1-11 1-12 31. 32. Other authorized beach erosion control projects .................... Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization) ........... Flood Control 33. Blackstone River Basin, MA and RI .. 33A. West Hill Dam, MA ................ 34. Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), MA ................. 35. Connecticut River Basin, VT, NH, MA and CT ................... 35A. Ball Mountain Lake, VT ............ 35B. Barre Falls Dam, MA ............... 35C. Beaver Brook, Keene, NH ........... 35D. Birch Hill Dam, MA ................ 35E. Colebrook River Lake, CT........... 35F. Conant Brook Dam, MA........... 35G. Farmington River, Simsbury, CT .... 35H. Knightville Dam, MA .............. 35I. Littleville Lake, MA ................ 35J. North Hartland Lake, VT ........... 35K. North Springfield Lake, VT .......... 35L. Otter Brook Lake, NH .............. 35M. Riverdale, West Springfield, MA ..... 35N. Surry Mountain Lake, NH ......... 350. Townshend Lake, VT ............... 35P. Tully Lake, MA ................... 35Q. Union Village Dam, VT ............. 35R. West Springfield, MA ............... 36. Housatonic River Basin, CT and MA 36A. Black Rock Lake, CT ............... 36B. Hancock Brook Lake, CT ............ 36C. Hop Brook Lake, CT ................ 36D. Northfield Brook Lake, CT .......... 36E. Thomaston Dam, CT ................ 37. Merrimack River Basin, NH and MA 37A. Blackwater Dam, NH ............... 37B. Edward MacDowell Lake, NH ....... 1-1 Page 1-12 1-12 1-12 1-12 1-12 1-12 1-13 1-13 1-14 1-14 1-14 1-14 1-14 1-15 1-15 1-15 1-15 1-15 1-16 1-16 1-16 1-16 1-17 1-17 1-17 1-17 1-18 1-18 1-18 1-18 1-18 1-19 1-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Page 37C. Franklin Falls Dam, NH ............ 37D. Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH ....... 38. New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA ...................... 39. New London, CT ................... 40. Brockton, MA ...................... 41. Little River, Belfast, ME ........... . 42. Perley Brook, Fort Kent, ME ........ 43. Roughans Point, Revere, MA ........ 44. Stamford, CT ....................... 45. Thames River Basin, CT, RI and MA 45A. Buffumville Lake, MA .............. 45B. East Brimfield Lake, MA ............ 45C. Hodges Village Dam, MA ........... 45D. Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT .......... 45E. West Thompson Lake, CT .......... 45F. Westville Lake, MA ................. 46. Town Brook, Quincy and Braintree, M A ..................... 47. West River, New Haven, CT ......... 48. Inspection of completed flood control projects ..................... 49. Flood control reservoir operations .......................... 50. Hurricane barrier operations ........ 51. Other authorized flood control projects 52. Flood control work under special authorization ................ 53. Deauthorized projects ............... General Investigations 54. Surveys ........................... 55. Collection and Study of Basic Data ... 1-19 56. Planning, Engineering and Design ... 1-19 57. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ......................... 1-20 1-20 Tables 1-20 Table 1-A Cost & Financial Statement ..... 1-20 Table 1-B Authorizing Legislation ......... 1-21 Table 1-C Other Authorized 1-21 Navigation Projects ............. 1-21 Table 1-D Other Authorized Beach 1-22 Erosion Control Projects ........ 1-22 Table 1-E Other Authorized 1-22 Flood Control Projects .......... 1-22 Table 1-F Other Authorized Multiple- 1-22 Purpose Projects including 1-22 Power ........................ 1-22 Table 1-G Deauthorized Projects ........... Table 1-H Navigation Activities 1-23 Pursuant to Sec. 107 ............ 1-23 Table 1-I Beach Erosion Activities Pursuant to Sec. 103 ............ 1-23 Table 1-J Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Sec. 205 ............ 1-24 Table 1-K Blackstone River Basin ......... 1-24 Table 1-L Connecticut River Basin ........ 1-24 Table 1-M Housatonic River Basin ......... Table 1-N Merrimack River Basin ......... 1-24 Table 1-0 Thames River Basin ............ 1-25 Table 1-P Boston Harbor, MA ............. Table 1-Q Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .............. 1-25 1-25 1-2 Page 1-25 1-25 1-26 1-34 1-39 1-42 1-43 1-44 1-45 1-47 1-47 1-48 1-48 1-49 1-51 1-52 1-53 1-53 1-54 __ NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. The program is conducted in all navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels and associated waters under the New England Division jurisdiction. Existing project. The purpose of the program is to provide technical assistance in the eradication or control of aquatic plants that are causing or have the potential to cause major economic problems in the above waterways. The plant control is done in the interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health and research. The program is administered by the Chief of Engineers, under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, and in cooperation with other Federal and state agencies. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing program). Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute at least 50 percent of the cost of planning beyond the reconnaissance stage and at least 50 percent of the cost of controlling the aquatic plants,and in addition must hold the United States free from damages that may occur from control operations. Operations during fiscal year. On request, technical information was provided to local interests on specific aquatic weed problems. These problems included nuisance growth of Eurasian water-milfoil and excessive aquatic plant growth and basin filling due to nutrient enrichment. We continue to work closely with the States. 2. BRANFORD HARBOR, CT Location. On north shore of Long Island Sound, 5 miles east of New Haven Harbor, Connecticut. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12372). Existing project. A channel 8.5 feet deep and 100 feet wide from outer harbor to upper wharf in Branford Harbor, about 2.3 miles. The existing project was completed in 1907. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities, comprising two wharves near head of the harbor and one at mouth of river, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $71,951 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications and accomplishing pre-dredge surveys in connection with maintenance of the Federal channel. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded in September 1989. Work had not started at close of fiscal year. 3. CAPE COD CANAL, MA Location. This waterway is a sea level canal; extending from head of Buzzards Bay, MA, to a point on Cape Cod Bay about 15 miles southeast of Plymouth Harbor, MA. In general direction canal trends from Buzzards Bay easterly to Cape Cod Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13246). Existing project. For description of existing project see Annual Report for 1975. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Navigational improvements were completed in April 1963, with completion of East Boat Basin extension. Initial recreational development consists of public use facilities at various locations, which were completed in February 1965. Improvements to public use facilities at the East Boat Basin were completed in May 1974. Construction of public use facilities at Bourne Scenic Park were completed in May 1976. Canal is crossed by two high-level highway bridges and a vertical-lift railroad bridge. Initial major rehabilitation of Bourne Highway Bridge was completed in December 1965. More recent major rehabilitation of the two highway bridges crossing the canal is completed. Rehabilitation of the Bourne Highway Bridge was completed in 1981. The Sagamore Highway Bridge was completed in 1982. Minor rehabilitation of stone breakwater was completed in October 1963. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Terminal facilities. There are seven terminals on the canal, of which three are privately owned. Four are used for receipt and freezing of fish and two are used for receipt and storage of oil. Seventh terminal is State pier, owned by Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and on north bank of canal at Bourne Neck. Terminals are adequate for purposes for which they are used. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract for construction of a restroom at the East Boat Basin was completed last fiscal year. Final payment was still pending at close of fiscal year. A continuing contract to repair the abutment decks of the Bourne and Sagamore Bridges was completed in November 1988. Payments of $713,640 have been made to date on this contract. A contract for mooring dolphins and marine railway repairs in the West Boat Basin, awarded last fiscal year, was completed in March 1989. Payments of $540,414 have been made thru this fiscal year with final payment still pending. A contract for rehabilitation of the vertical lift railroad bridge was awarded in November 1988. Complications from the re-evaluation of bidders and legal proceedings between the Corps and Bay Colony Railroad may result in termination of this contract. Work was not started at close of fiscal year. A contract for painting the Sagamore highway bridge was awarded in May 1989. At end of the fiscal year the contract was 42 percent complete with earnings of $350,000. Other fiscal year 1989 costs for work accomplished by hired labor and contract were: overhaul patrol boat WAMPANOG $27,042; engineering and design for preparation of plans and specifications for major rehabilitation of railroad bridge $194,439; engineering and design of various ongoing maintenance contracts $198,554; replacement and repair of project maintenance equipment $68,000; replacement parts, repairs and service contract for com- 1-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 puterized electronic traffic control system $48,830; resource management activities $43,000; supervision and administration of contract activities $156,554; operation and maintenance of railroad bridges $321,806; vessel traffic control activities $1,555,681; operation of recreational areas $499,600; supervision and administration by Division Office $146,451; real estate activities $34,716; operating cost of roads, bridges, and project facilities $1,043,077 and $135,283 for project condition surveys. 4. CHATHAM (STAGE) HARBOR, MA Location. At northeastern corner of Nantucket Sound, about 16 miles east of Hyannis Harbor, MA and 66 miles south of Providence Harbor, RI at northern extremity of Cape Cod. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13237). Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1942. Existing project. An entrance channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Chatham Roads into upper harbor. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Construction of existing project was initiated in September and completed in October 1957. By 1961, a break in barrier beach connecting Morris and Monomoy Islands caused Federal Channel to fill in completely. Local interests dredged an emergency channel to obtain 8-foot depth in June 1962 and performed additional dredging in 1963. Minimal maintenance dredging by the Federal Government in April and May 1964 provided access to inner harbor for 1964 boating season. A new 10-foot channel through Harding Beach to Morris Island was completed in July 1965. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The town operates a wharf on the north side of the inner harbor which is leased out to commercial users. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $5,585 were incurred for preparation of an environmental assessment and for preparation of plans and specifications in connection with proposed maintenance dredging to remove severe shoals from the 10-foot entrance channel. Work was deferred due to funding constraints. Hired labor costs of $63,892 were incurred for project condition surveys. 5. GREAT SALT POND, BLOCK ISLAND, RI Location. On west shore of Block Island, about 11 miles southwest by south from Point Judith Harbor, RI, and 18 miles southeasterly from Stonington Harbor, CT. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13217). Existing project. Provides for a channel 18 feet deep from ocean to pond 300 feet wide with a central depth of 25 feet for a width of 150 feet; a riprap jetty at the entrance on a southerly side extending 350 feet beyond 18-foot contour (actual length 1,691 feet, including 837 feet built by State); stone revetment and sand fences to protect banks through original beach. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). South jetty was completed in 1905. Local cooperation. Not required on active portion of project. Terminal facilities. Consist of a wharf with about 600 feet of publicly available berthage and several privately owned and operated small wharves and piers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $10,849 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications for proposed maintenance dredging. Work was deferred due to delays in securing State approval and subsequent funding constraints. 6. GREEN HARBOR, MA Location. On west side of Massachusetts Bay within the town of Marshfield about 30 miles southeast of Boston and 9 miles north of Plymouth Harbor. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13253). Existing project. Provides for channel 6 feet deep (8 feet at entrance), 100 feet wide extending about 4,000 feet from deep water to head of navigation with small turning basin at upstream limit; 5-acre anchorage near Town Pier, 6 feet deep; sealing, rebuilding in part, and a 200-foot extension of existing west jetty at elevation + 12, with dike to beach berm at elevation + 14 feet, and raising east jetty to elevation + 14. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Construction was completed in October 1969. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Major terminal facility is Town Pier in village of Brant Rock. Facility is a bulkheaded, earth-filled landing and parking area about 290 feet wide, extending 210 feet into harbor. A marina service is south of Town Pier; and a facility for recreational craft has been developed on south side of harbor near head of navigation. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs included $281 for work by Waterways Experiment Station personnel to complete a report on possible entrance modifications (total cost of study to date is $89,192); $7,071 for preparation of plans and specifications, and $1,057 in connection with resolving a claim associated with a fiscal year 1987 dredging contract. Further dredging proposed for fiscal year 1989 was deferred due to funding constraints. 7. HARBOR OF REFUGE, BLOCK ISLAND, RI Location. On east side of Block Island, near south end of inner curve of shoreline 13 miles south-southwest from Point Judith Harbor and about 25 miles southeasterly from Stonington Harbor, CT. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13217). Existing project. For description of existing project, see Annual Report for 1976. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Completed in 1916 except for inactive portion. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Two wharves in harbor, both steel 1-4 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION sheetpile bulkhead which comprises southern and eastern limits of basin. Total docking space amounts to 500 feet. No mechanical-handling facilities are available. One wharf owned by town and open to public, is considered inadequate for present general needs of boating in harbor. There is limited room for expansion of terminal facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: An emergency contract for maintenance dredging of the 15- foot entrance channel was awarded in August 1989 after required state approvals were secured. The contract was 71 percent complete at end of fiscal year with earnings of $91,600. Hired labor costs of $21,141 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications, $8,928 for pre-dredge surveys and $774 for supervision and inspection. 8. HYANNIS HARBOR, MA Location. On south shore of Cape Cod about 16 miles west of Chatham, Massachusetts and 20 miles northeast of Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13237). Existing project. A stone breakwater 1,170 feet long, lying about 0.7 mile offshore, dredging to 15.5 feet deep in protected area behind breakwater; a channel 12 feet deep with widths of 150 and 100 feet in outer and inner harbors respectively, an anchorage area 12 feet deep and about 5 acres in area adjacent to inner harbor channel north of Harbor Bluff; and a riprap jetty 1,000 feet long extending south from Dunbar Point. Mean spring tidal ranges in outer harbor 3.1 and 3.7 feet, respectively. Breakwater was completed in 1882 and dredging behind breakwater in 1906. Rehabilitation was necessary to restore breakwater to its designed purpose of providing a harbor of refuge. Restoration was completed in November 1961. Construction of 12-foot channel and anchorage was initiated in May and completed in November 1959. Commonwealth of Massachusetts constructed the jetty extending south from Dunbar Point in 1962. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are two town wharves in the inner harbor. One has a bulkhead frontage of about 800 feet. Other private landings are available. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: An additional payment of $11,347 was made on a contract for maintenance dredging completed in a previous fiscal year. A previous contract claim remained unresolved through the end of the fiscal year. 9. JONESPORT HARBOR, ME Location. Jonesport Harbor is situated on the north side of Moosabec Reach in Washington County, Maine about 190 miles northeast of Portland, Maine, and about 40 miles southwest of the Canadian border at Eastport, Maine. Existing project. Provides for a combined rubble mound and cellular steel sheet pile breakwater, 1,200 feet in length; a 15-acre anchorage composed of 9 acres, 6 feet deep, and 6 acres, 8 feet deep; and an entrance channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep. Latest approved cost estimate (July 1989) is $8,500,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. For full description see Annual Report for 1987. Local interests contributed $33,000 this fiscal year for a total to date of $833,000 toward their 10 percent cash contribution during construction. Local interests must pay an additional 10 percent of project costs within a period of 30 years following completion. Terminal facilities. There are thirteen privately owned wharves in the harbor, twelve of which are used by local fishermen and one which is used for receiving about three million gallons of petroleum annually. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The breakwater and improvement dredging contract awarded in previous fiscal year was completed in November 1988. Final quantities are still pending with contract payments of $7,142,984 to date. Removal of rock encountered during dredging of anchorage area is expected to be accomplished in fiscal year 1990 by amendment to the existing contract. 10. MILFORD HARBOR, CT Location. On north shore of Long Island Sound, about 8 miles west of New Haven Harbor, CT. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12370). Previous projects. For details, see Annual Report for 1915 and Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel, an anchorage and two riprap jetties. For further detailed description, see Annual Report for 1974. Project is complete except for an inactive 8-foot east basin anchorage. Burns Point jetty was repaired in 1963. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Specifically authorized project. Fully complied with for completed portion. Disposal areas are required for maintenance. Terminal facilities. Three bulkhead wharves near entrance are used by oyster industry. City wharf and launching ramp near head of navigation are open to public use. Connecticut State Shellfish Commission operates a small wharf not open to public. There are several yacht landings. Facilities are adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $514 were incurred in connection with closing out the maintenance dredging contract completed last fiscal year. The final Federal portion of the contract was $496,879. Hired labor costs of $11,599 were incurred for project condition surveys. 11. NANTUCKET (HARBOR OF REFUGE), MA Location. On north shore of Nantucket Island about 26 miles southeast of Hyannis Harbor, Massachusetts. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13241). 1-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Previous project. For details see page 1747, Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. A channel 15 feet deep, without prescribed width, through the bar at entrance, about 1.6 miles long, a riprap jetty on east side about 6,987 feet long, and a jetty on the west side 5,755 feet long. Existing project is complete. Channel completed in 1930; east jetty completed in 1907; and minor rehabilitation ofjetty completed in 1963. Approximately 4,955 feet of west jetty have been constructed. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Five piers affording about 3,200 feet of berthing space. Facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the 15-foot channel by the Government-owned hopper dredge CURRITUCK was accomplished from 7 November to 9 December 1988 at a rental cost of $218,462. Approximately 55,600 cubic yards of material were removed. Hired labor costs of $36,538 were incurred for surveys associated with the dredging. 12. NEW HAVEN HARBOR, CT Location. On north shore of Long Island Sound, about 75 miles east of New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12371). Previous project. For details, see Annual Report for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. A main channel 35 feet deep, 400 to 800 feet wide, from Long Island Sound to Tomlinson Bridge; two anchorage basins below Tomlinson Bridge of 16- and 15-foot depths; a pile-and-riprap dike about 4,200 feet long, to contract tidal flow at Fort Hale Bar; a channel 12 feet deep and 100 to 150 feet wide, from southwest corner of 16-foot anchorage basin via City Point and West Haven wharf front to Kimberly Avenue Bridge; thence 12 feet deep and prevailing width of 75 feet up West River to about 600 feet upstream of Kimberly Avenue Bridge, and an anchorage basin 6 feet deep in West River opposite Mars wharf; a channel 100 feet wide and 12 feet deep from 15-foot anchorage basin toward Brewery Street, about 300 feet; a channel in Quinnipiac River 22 feet deep and 250 to 400 feet wide to a point about 1,000 feet above Ferry Street, thence 16 feet deep and 200 feet wide to Grand Avenue, with turning basin 22 feet deep, 200 to 800 feet wide, and 700 feet long at mouth of Mill River; a channel up Mill River 12 feet deep, 200 feet wide to junction of two branches above Chapel Street, thence to Grand Avenue, 100 feet wide in East Branch and generally 125 feet wide in West Branch; and removal of certain obstructive rocks in Morris Cove. Modification authorized by 1986 Water Resources Development Act provides for deepening the main ship channel to 40 feet; widening main ship channel from 400 to 500 feet; widening ship channel bend at Southwest Ledge from 500 feet to a minimum of 780 feet, straightening the channel bend downstream of the existing turning basin and; revising the configuration of the existing 35-foot deep turning basin to provide a common, smaller 40-foot turning basin. Total estimated cost (July 1988) for new work is $33,250,000 exclusive of $4,205,246 for new work completed before 1953 and amounts expended on previous projects. The 22-foot channel and turning basin is to be restudied. Estimated cost (1960) of this portion is $980,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Assurances for 1986 modifications have not been requested. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas necessary for construction and later maintenance of the project; pay 100 percent of the costs for local improvements, presently estimated at $6,735,000; pay 25 percent of project costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction, presently estimated at $6,630,000; and pay an additional 10 percent of project costs within the 30-year period following construction, offset by a credit for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations (except utility relocations) and dredged material disposal areas. Terminal facilities. Port of New Haven is served by 24 waterfront facilities; most are within city limits of New Haven. Improved waterways within port area along which facilities are located include West River, Main Harbor, West and East Branches of Mill River, and Quinnipiac River channels. Facilities are all privately owned and operated with exception of city wharf and U.S. Coast Guard wharf. Depths alongside piers and wharves range from 35 to zero feet at mean low water. Some of the facilities have rail connections and all are accessible by paved streets. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Ports of Southern New England No. 4, revised 1983). Operations during fiscal year. New work: The modification authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 was officially placed in the "inactive" category as of October 5, 1989 due to insufficient economic justification. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the West River channel under a contract awarded last fiscal year was completed in February 1989. A total of 107,051 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $776,055. Final contract amount was $851,055. Hired labor costs of $333,882 were incurred for sampling and testing, supervision and inspection, after dredge surveys and plotting. 13. PLYMOUTH HARBOR, MA Location. Harbor is 45 miles by water south of Boston. Its outer anchorage, the "Cow Yard," is common to Plymouth, Duxbury, and Kingston. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13253). Previous projects. For details, see Annual Report for 1815 and 1938. Existing project. Provides for: protecting by riprap sections of Long Beach damaged by storm of November 1898, and restoring Eel River to its former course; dredging a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide, increased 1-6 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION at entrance and on curves, from the bay to town wharves, formerly in areas south of State Pier, a distance of about 2.5 miles, with a suitable turning basin at inner end; dredging a channel 150 feet wide, 15 feet deep, extending northwesterly about 0.3 miles from a point off site of northerly Craigs Wharf (now State Pier) with a turning basin 300 feet square, and of same depth, at its northwesterly end; maintenance of area dredged to 18 feet deep by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, connecting 15- foot channel with 18-foot channel in vicinity of State Pier; a rubblestone breakwater extending 1,400 feet easterly from a point north of Town Wharf, and thence southeasterly for 2,100 feet; an anchorage 8 feet deep and 60 acres in area inside breakwater; and elimination of authorized 18-foot anchorage from existing project; recreational development, to provide for sport fishing from breakwater, consisting of stone causeway about 360 feet long from westerly end of breakwater to land, guardrail along top of breakwater and causeway, footbridge spanning a navigation opening through breakwater, and public access, parking and sanitary facilities for sport fisherman use. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Project is complete. Construction of anchorage 8 feet deep and 60 acres in area inside breakwater was completed in 1967. Construction of the rubblestone breakwater was completed in 1971. Rehabilitation of Long Beach Dike was completed in 1971. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are three wharves of pile and timber construction; one is owned by the state, one by the town, and the third by Plymouth Yacht Club. State and town wharves are open to public use. In addition, there are two boatyards with marine railway facilities along waterfront, equipped for boat building and repairs. Local interests will maintain existing public landings open to all on equal terms, and provide all necessary mooring facilities in anchorage. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $9,268 were incurred for work on an environmental assessment and preparation of plans and specifications for repairs to a section of Plymouth Long Beach Dike. 14. POINT JUDITH POND AND HARBOR OF REFUGE, POINT JUDITH, RI Location. Point Judith marks southwestern entrance to Narragansett Bay. Harbor lies in shallow bight west of point, about 14 miles southwest of Newport Harbor, RI, and 33 miles east of New London Harbor, CT. Point Judith Pond is a shallow salt pond, with a length north and south of about 4 miles, lying in rear of sandy beach of Rhode Island shore, just west of Point Judith Harbor by a narrow opening through sand dunes. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 13218 and 13219). Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1948. Existing project. For description of existing project see Annual Report for 1977. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). All work for project authorized prior to 1949 was completed in 1950. Breakwaters were completed in 1914 and dredging of shoals in project area was done in 1921. Main and east shore arm breakwater had deteriorated and required restoration to project design. In 1962 reconstruction of east arm breakwater and main breakwater dock facilities were completed. Rehabilitation required for remainder of breakwater restoration was completed in October 1963. The extension of the 15-foot channel was completed in April 1977. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Consist of one town wharf of steel sheetpile bulkhead construction which comprises southern and eastern limits of basin. Total docking space amounts to 500 feet. No mechanical handling facilities are available. Wharf is owned by the town and open to the public. State of Rhode Island maintains two state piers, one in Galilee and one in Jerusalem, each having about 500 feet of berthing space. A facility comprising a bulkhead with 15 finger piers projecting channelward there from provides berthing space of about 4,000 linear feet. This facility is used for receipt of fish and fish products. Mechanical handling facilities including fish pumps, are available for discharge of cargo. In addition, there are approximately 10 small privately owned wharves used in the fishing business and passenger traffic. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Payment of $155,360 was made for claims relating to the main breakwater repair contract which was terminated in fiscal year 1984. Total contract costs through the end of the fiscal year amounted to $3,180,673. Hired labor costs associated with claims resolution this fiscal year totalled $11,593. Adjustments totalling $14,703 were made to correct prior year charges associated with the claim resolution. 15. PORTSMOUTH HARBOR AND PISCATAQUA RIVER, ME AND NH Location. Piscataqua River forms a portion of boundary between Maine and New Hampshire. Mouth of this river is called Portsmouth Harbor. It is 45 miles northeast of Boston Harbor, MA and 37 miles southwest of Portland Harbor, ME. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13278). Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1892. Existing project. Removal of ledge rock areas in vicinity of Gangway Rock, southwest point of Badgers Island and Boiling Rock to 35 feet deep; widening 35-foot channel at bends by removal of ledge rock areas in vicinity of Henderson Point, Gangway Rock, Badgers Island, Maine-New Hampshire Interstate Bridge and Boiling Rock; and extending channel from above Boiling Rock to a point about 1,700 feet above Atlantic Terminal Sales dock in Newington generally 400 feet wide, and 35 feet deep below mean low water with manuevering basins above Boiling Rock and at head of project; channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide from Little Harbor through Rye-New 1-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Castle drawbridge, then northerly between mainland and Leach's Island to deep water in vicinity of Shapleigh and Goat Islands, channel 75 feet wide 6 feet deep up Sagamore Creek to public landing on downstream side of Sagamore Avenue bridge and anchorage strip, 6 feet deep, 75 feet wide, totalling 3 acres, adjacent to channel in Sagamore Creek. Public Law 86-645, Sec. 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended in 1965 and by Chief of Engineers, December 23, 1965 authorized construction of the 6-foot channels and anchorages. Modification authorized by 1986 Water Resources Development Act provides for: widening of the 35-foot deep channel from 600 feet to 1,000 feet between two vertical lift bridges; widening northern limit of 35-foot deep channel adjacent to Badgers Island by 100 feet; and widening southern limit of existing 35-foot deep channel at Goat Island from 400 to 550 feet. Total estimated cost (September 1989) for new work is $22,200,000 exclusive of $5,384,043 for new work completed before 1971 and amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Assurances for 1986 modification were executed on February 4, 1988. Local interests must pay the initial 25 percent of project costs concurrent with project construction and reimburse the additional 10 percent within the 30-year period following completion of construction. In addition, local interests must do the following, for which there is no estimate of cost: provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way necessary for construction and later maintenance of the project including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and later disposal of dredged material and including necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the costs of such retaining works; provide and maintain adequate terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms; provide and maintain adequate depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals; accomplish all alterations and relocations of transportation facilities (excluding railroads, combined highway and railroad and publicly owned highway bridges and approaches thereto), storm drains, sewer outfalls, utilities and other structures and improvements made necessary by the project; prohibit the erection of any structure, within a distance to be determined by the Chief of Engineers, from the bottom edge of the proposed channel and turning basin. Terminal facilities. Waterfront terminals are chiefly on south bank of Piscataqua River in Portsmouth and Newington, U.S. Navy Yard is on opposite bank at Kittery, Maine. Eighteen piers, wharves, and landings represent available terminals for handling the port's waterborne commerce. Navy Yard is not used for commercial activities. On Maine side of river are a town landing and two docks. On New Hampshire side there are 13 terminals, 6 of which include a public landing, 2 docks, 3 facilities used for vessel mooring and landings, are at Portsmouth. In addition there are a number of private recreational boat docks. Terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series 1 for Ports of Searsport and Portland, Maine, and Portsmouth, NH). Operations during fiscal year. New work: The contract for improvement dredging was awarded in July 1989. The contract was 7 percent complete ending the fiscal year. Contract payments of $780,000 Federal and $260,000 Contributed Funds have been processed ending this fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $39,957 were incurred for project condition surveys in preparation for scheduled maintenance dredging. 16. PROVIDENCE RIVER and HARBOR, RI Location. Formed at city of Providence by junction of Seekonk River and two small streams which rise in northern Rhode Island. It is tidal and flows southerly in a deep channel between broad flats about 8 miles, emptying into Narragansett Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 13224 and 13225). Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1915, 1936 and 1938. Existing project. Channel 40 feet deep, generally 600 feet wide from deep water in Narragansett Bay just south of Prudence Island Light to turn below Field Point at Providence, thence up to 1,700 feet wide to existing project limit at Fox Point, with easing of bends to minimum radius of 5,000 feet, excluding marginal strip 75 feet wide channelward of established harbor lines; channel 30 feet deep and 150 feet wide, extending northeastward from upper end of existing project to vicinity of India Point at mouth of Seekonk River. Existing project was completed in January 1976 with the removal of rock and unclassified material in the 40-foot channel. Dredging of ordinary material in the 40-foot channel was completed in June 1971. The 35-foot channel was completed in 1949. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Assurances have been received. However, local interests have yet to provide berthing areas commensurate to channel depths. Terminal facilities. There are 27 water terminal facilities serving port of Providence, Rhode Island. Threefourths of all facilities have railway connections. Four facilities are owned by city of Providence and two by State of Rhode Island. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port and Terminal Facilities of Southern New England No. 4, revised in 1952). Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract costs of $251,000 were expended for activity under the Dredged Material Management Program. In addition, hired labor costs of $54,092 were incurred for surveys, sampling and testing. 17. ROCKPORT HARBOR, ME Location. On the westerly side of Penobscot Bay, about 6 miles north of Rockland, Maine. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 13305 and 13307). 1-8 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Remove the ledge at the entrance to the depth of 15 feet at mean low tide thereby widening the entrance channel about 250 feet. The mean range in tides is 9.8 feet. Project was completed in December 1913. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. The major facility is a town operated marine park. There is a Rockport Boat Club, apprenticeshop, marina and a town operated commercial bulkhead. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $6,704 were incurred in connection with closing out the maintenance dredging contract completed in fiscal year 1988 and for project condition surveys. 18. ROCKPORT HARBOR AND PIGEON COVE, ROCKPORT, MA Location. The town of Rockport is located on the seaward end of Cape Ann on the northeast Massachusetts coast about 35 miles north of Boston. The town is bordered by the city of Gloucester to the west, Essex Bay to the north, Massachusetts Bay to the south, and Sandy Bay to the east. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 13278 and 13279). Existing project. Rebuilding the two breakwaters at entrance of harbor with rubblestone to a height of 18.5 feet and removing the principal rocks in the harbor. This work was completed in 1905. Current modification: An access channel- 10 feet deep at mean low water (MLW) by 80 feet wide, leading from deep water outside the existing Federal breakwaters 1,100 feet to the town wharf at the center of the harbor. At the wharf the 10-foot channel branches to form two 40-foot-wide channels leading to the north and south inner anchorage basins which are separated by the wharf. The North Basin would have an area of 1.7 acres and a depth of -8 feet MLW. The South Basin would have an area of 1.3 acres and a depth of -8 feet MLW. Two additional outer harbor anchorages, both 8 feet deep at MLW would be located along the 80-foot wide access channel between the breakwaters and the town wharf. The plan of improvement developed for Pigeon Cove consists of a 75-foot wide channel -10 feet deep MLW extending from deep water outside the breakwater 550 feet across the southeast end of the cove to the public pier and offloading facilities. An anchorage area north of the channel would be dredged to -8 feet deep MLW. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. For the current modification: contribute in cash, prior to construction, 3.3 percent of the first cost of construction; provide, maintain and operate without cost to the United States, an adequate public landing with provisions for the sale of motor fuel, lubricants and potable water open and available to the use of all on equal terms; provide without cost to the United States all necessary lands, easements and rights-of-way; hold and save the United States free from damages that may result from construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; accomplish without cost to the United States alterations and relocations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage and other utility facilities; provide and maintain mooring facilities as needed for transient and local vessels as well as necessary access roads, parking areas and other needed public-use shore facilities; assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limitations; establish regulations prohibiting the discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the waters of the harbor. Terminal facilities. There are four commercial wharves, one of granite, the others of timber construction. There is one yacht club with a public landing. Facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Final adjustments on claims for improvement dredging completed in a previous fiscal year were made in May 1989. Final contract amount was $1,167,381. 19. RYE HARBOR, NH Location. On Atlantic coast of New Hampshire about five miles south of Portsmouth Harbor. It is a natural cove of about 39 acres protected by two breakwaters. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13283). Existing project. Provides for dredging a channel 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep for 600 feet through entrance, thence 8 feet deep for 1,700 feet within harbor; dredging two 5-acre anchorages, one 8 feet deep and the other 6 feet deep; and maintaining existing breakwaters. Project depths refer to mean low water. Mean range of tide is 8.4 feet. Existing project was essentially completed in October 1962. Removal of ledge encountered during dredging process was completed in July 1964. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Much of the shoreline around Rye Harbor is undeveloped State property. Private ownership is limited to about 500 feet on the north shore west of Ragged Neck State Park, and to the south shore between the bridge and breakwater. State docking facilities and a boat launching ramp are available at the head of the harbor. Primarily, berthing is in the Federal and State anchorages. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $16,082 were incurred for preparation and review of plans and specifications for proposed maintenance dredging and $7,600 for pre-dredge surveys. New specifications reflected a change from upland disposal to the Cape Arundel Disposal Site. 20. SACO RIVER, ME Location. Rises in White Mountain region of New Hampshire at an elevation about 1,900 feet above sea 1-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 level, flows about 105 miles in a general southeasterly direction, and discharges into Atlantic Ocean about 16 miles southwest of Portland, Maine. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13287). Existing project. For description of completed existing portion of project see Annual Report for 1978. For a description of completed improvement of project see Annual Report for 1983. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are five wharves of solid fill construction at Saco and Biddeford, none of which has railroad connection; and a small pier near mouth of river used for summer passenger business. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Bids were opened in November 1988 for proposed maintenance dredging of the entrance channel and three downstream anchorages. Only one bid was received, and it was rejected as being substantially above the awardable limit. The bidder protested the reasonableness of the government estimate. Costs for the year included $7,591 for preparation of plans and specifications, $15,647 for performing and plotting pre-dredge surveys, and $8,918 for review of the bid protest by NED and East Coast Dredge Estimating Team personnel. Funds in the amount of $3,780 were deobligated from a fiscal year 1988 contract for locating and removing navigation hazards and spindles from the entrance area. 21. SESUIT HARBOR, MA Location. Sesuit Harbor is located on the north shore of Dennis in Barnstable County, about 85 miles southeast of Boston, MA. The town of Dennis is bordered on the north by Cape Cod Bay, Brewster and Harwich on the east, Nantucket Sound on the south, and Yarmouth on the west. Land area within the town is 20.66 square miles and has a tidal shoreline of 29.8 miles. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13250). Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep below mean low water and 100 feet wide from deep water in Cape Cod Bay to a point opposite the Dennis Yacht Club thence reducing in width to 80 feet at the entrance to the inner harbor basin, for a total channel length of 2,400 feet. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Project was completed in August 1982. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs in the amount of $865 were incurred in connection with closing out a maintenance dredging contract for work in fiscal year 1988. Funds in the amount of $1,103 were deobligated upon final payment. Hired labor costs of $1,397 were incurred for project condition surveys. 22. WELLS HARBOR, ME Location. In town of Wells at mouth of Webhannet River about 20 miles northeast of Portsmouth Harbor and about 34 miles southwest of Portland Harbor. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13286). Existing project. Repairs to an old Government pier about 750 feet long, made of cribwork ballasted with stone extending seaward from Drakes Island; and anchorage basin 7.4 acres in area and 6 feet deep; a channel 100 to 150 feet wide, extending from deep water in the Atlantic Ocean to inner end of basin, with seaward section 8 feet deep, and harbor section 6 feet deep; and two converging stone jetties, one extending 940 feet easterly from Wells Beach and the other 840 feet southerly from Drakes Island, separated so as to provide a clear opening 400 feet wide, and for revetment of seaward face of tip of Wells Beach. Extension of the Wells Beach jetty to a total length of 2,140 feet and extension of Drakes Island jetty to a total length of 1,865 feet, and dredging a 300- by 450-foot settling basin south of the anchorage, was authorized by the Chief of Engineers on September 20, 1965. Project was completed in April 1967. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one wharf of pile and timber construction on the north side of the anchorage. Facility is owned and operated by the town of Wells and is considered adequate. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $63,945 were incurred for project condition surveys, sampling and testing, wave study and environmental assessment. 23. WOOD ISLAND HARBOR AND POOL AT BIDDEFORD, ME Location. This harbor is situated at the southern end of Saco Bay, ME, immediately south of the mouth of the Saco River. It is 20 miles southwest of Portland, Maine, and 30 miles northeast of Portsmouth, New Hampshire. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 13286). Existing project. Provides for a basin in the Pool 6 feet deep, approximately 9.7 acres in extent, and three icebreakers south of Fishermen's Wharf. The existing project was completed in 1956. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are five wharves in the harbor. Three are of pile and timber, and the other two are solid-fill construction. One wharf is used for the receipt of seafood, two are used in connection with a yacht club, and the remaining two are private. There is no public-owned wharf but one of the wharves is open to the public free of charge. None of the wharves have railroad connections. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract for maintenance dredging of the 6-foot anchorage was awarded in December 1988 and completed in May 1989. A total of 38,452 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $329,478. Hired labor costs included $6,393 for preparation of plans and specifications, $60,725 1-10 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION for supervision and inspection, $23,334 for performing and plotting pre- and after-dredge surveys, and $11,040 for field and NED laboratory work to examine suspended solids concentrations in dredging area waters. 24. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 1-Q at end of chapter). 25. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 1-C at end of chapter). 26. NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Table 1-H at end of chapter). Alterations of Bridges 27. AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION Location. Chelsea Street Highway Bridge, MA. Construction was completed in October 1961 with a Federal cost of $138,518. In addition non-Federal contributed funds amounted to $8,062. For details see page 63 of Annual Report for 1962. Beach Erosion Control 28. REVERE BEACH, MA Location. In the city of Revere, Suffolk County, Massachusetts, approximately 7 miles north of the main entrance channel to Boston Harbor and 6 miles northeast of the city of Boston. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Chart No. 13275 and U.S. Geological Survey Maps, Boston Bay quadrangle). Existing project. Placement of sandfill along 13,000 feet of beach. The top of the sandfill will be placed at 18 feet above mean low water, including a 50-foot wide berm, sloping one-foot vertical in 15 feet horizontal to meet the existing beach. The total width of the beach will extend approximately 300 feet, of which, about 185 feet is above the mean high water line. The estimated total first cost (October 1988) of the project is $8,900,000 of which 35 percent is non-Federal. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested. Consistent with the cost sharing and financing concepts contained in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662), local interests are required to: contribute in cash 35 percent of the cost of construction of the project, presently estimated at $3,115,000; contribute in cash 35 percent of the periodic nourishment cost for an initial period of 50 years, now estimated at $22,000 annually, such contribution to be prior to each nourishment operation; assure the continued performance of the periodic nourishment and repair of the project after the first 50 years and during the economic life as may be required to serve the intended purpose; assure that water pollution that would endanger the health of bathers would not be permitted; hold the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; provide all necessary lands, easements and rights-of-way for the initial construction and subsequent nourishment of the project; assure continued public ownership of the shore and its administration for public use during the economic life of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction engineering and design continued, including the completion of contract plans and specifications. Major efforts concentrated on the obtaining of all required local permits by the non-Federal sponsor, coordination with the state regarding Coastal Zone Management consistency determination, and coordination of construction of this project with other major work concurrently planned for the Revere Beach Reservation by the sponsor. These actions must be finalized prior to execution of the Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA), and thus the LCA execution and initiation of construction (for which initial funds have been appropriated) have been delayed. 29. ROOSEVELT CAMPOBELLO INTERNATIONAL PARK, LUBEC, ME Location. The Roosevelt Campobello International Park is located on the southeast end of Campobello Island. The island is politically part of New Brunswick, Canada and is separated from Lubec, Maine by the Lubec Narrows and connected by FDR Memorial Bridge. It is approximately 120 miles east of Bangor, Maine. Existing project. Stone slope protection to provide shoreline protection for the lighthouse at Mulholland Point. The stone protection extends 375 feet around the point at a height of about 10 feet and ties into stable ground at either end of the area protected. The upper slope, above the stone protection, is graded and seeded. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and utility relocations necessary for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The contract for shoreline protection, awarded last fiscal year, was completed in March 1989. Final contract amount was $123,827. 1-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 30. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections of beach erosion projects were not conducted in fiscal year 1989. 31. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 1-D at end of chapter). 32. BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103 PUBLIC LAW 87-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Table 1-I at end of chapter). Flood Control 33. BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MA AND RI Works covered by this plan include a dam and reservoir on West River and local protection works at three cities on Blackstone River. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized plan for a reservoir on West River and local protection works at Worcester, MA, and Woonsocket and Pawtucket, RI, substantially in accordance with House Document 624, 78th Congress, 2nd session. Flood Control Act of 1960 authorized a local flood protection project at lower Woonsocket, RI, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 87, 85th Congress, 2nd session. Local protection nonstructural project authorized in 1982 for Belmont Park section of Warwick, RI along the Pawtuxet River. Streambank protection projects on the Blackstone River in Millbury, MA and on the Clear River in Burrillville, RI were authorized in 1985. (See Table 1-K at end of chapter on reservoir and local protection projects, Blackstone River Basin, for projects comprising authorized plan). 33A. WEST HILL DAM, MA Location. Dam is on West River, MA, 3 miles above its confluence with Blackstone River and 2.5 miles northeast of Uxbridge, MA. (See Geological Survey maps- Blackstone, MA and RI, Milford, MA and Grafton, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Work on contract for dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in June 1959 and completed in June 1961. Construction of recreational facilities was completed in June 1967. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract for seepage control awarded last fiscal year was completed in July 1989. Final contract amount was $198,829. A contract to install picnic shelters at various recreation parks was awarded in November 1988. The West Hill shelter was completed in July 1989 at a cost of $11,420. 34. CHARLES RIVER (NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREAS), MA Location. The Charles River extends inland from Boston Harbor southwesterly toward the Massachusetts- Rhode Island border and is some 80 miles long with a watershed covering 307 square miles. Existing project. The project provides for Federal acquisition and protection of 17 natural valley storage areas totalling 8,102 acres in what is known as the Middle and Upper watershed of the Charles River. The acquisition in fee or by easement of the major natural valley storage areas within the Charles River watershed is intended as a multiple-purpose project for flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife management. The latest cost estimate for new work is $9,000,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Land acquisition is complete. A total of 3,210 acres have been acquired in fee at a cost of $2,152,853 and restrictive easements have been obtained for 4,892 acres at a cost of $591,193. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to prevent modifications or alteration of existing roadways, utilities, bridges, culverts, and any other improvements that might affect the drainage characteristics of the natural storage areas; adopt and enforce regulations to restrict development of flood plan lands; and operate and maintain the existing dams along the Charles River. Local assurances have been received. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Resolution of remaining condemnation cases continued. Two tracts remain to be settled. Fiscal year costs totalled $4,284 in hired labor costs for miscellaneous project administration activities and $1,102 for condemnation trial activity. Maintenance: Hired labor costs for project surveillance and inspection as well as land use administration were $127,825. 35. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN VT, NH, MA and CT Location. Works covered by this project are a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River in Vermont, New Hampshire and Massachusetts, within a radius of 230 miles from Hartford, CT and local protection works at several cities in the basin. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended by Act of May 25, 1937, authorized construction of 10 reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River in accordance with plans in House Document 412, 74th Congress, 2nd session, as the same may be revised upon further investigation of 1936 flood. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved a general comprehensive plan for control of floods and other purposes in Connecticut River Valley, as set forth in House Document 455, 75th Congress, 2nd session, and authorized $11,524,000 for construction of local flood protection projects in the plan. Act of October 1-12 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION 15, 1940, modified Act of June 18, 1938, to provide additional protection at East Hartford, CT, as set forth in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3rd session. Act of August 18, 1941, modified comprehensive plan approved in 1938 to include improvements recommended in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3rd session, and House Document 724, 76th Congress, 3rd session, with such further modifications as may be found justifiable in discretion of Secretary of the Army and Chief of Engineers. Latter Act also authorized to be appropriated additional $6 million for local protection works and $10 million for reservoirs. Act of October 26, 1942, further modified plan by including construction of Gully Brook conduit at Hartford, CT. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized expenditure of $30 million in addition to previous authorization for comprehensive plan approved in 1938 and modified plan by directing specific consideration of an alternative plan of Vermont State Water Conservation Board instead of Williamsville Reservoir in West River Basin, VT; directing consultation with affected states during course of investigations and transmission of proposal and plans to each affected state for written views and recommendations for reservoir projects heretofore authorized for construction at Cambridgeport, Ludlow, South Tunbridge, and Gaysville, and resubmission of projects or modifications for construction of Sugar Hill site. Flood Control Act of 1950 modified project for flood control at Hartford, CT, authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938, as amended to include Folly Brook dike and conduit. Flood Control Act of 1954 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to provide for construction of a reservoir on Otter Brook at South Keene, NH, in lieu of any reservoir or reservoirs heretofore authorized. This Act further modified plan for West River Basin of Connecticut River in Vermont to consist of three reservoirs at Ball Mountain, The Island, and Townshend sites, in lieu of plan of eight reservoirs authorized in Flood Control Act of 1944. Flood Control Act of 1958 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to include construction of Littleville Reservoir on Middle Branch of Westfield River, MA and Mad River Reservoir on Mad River, above Winsted, CT. Flood Control Act of 1960 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for flood protection on Chicopee River, MA, substantially in accordance with House Document 434, 86th Congress; plan for flood protection on Westfield River, MA, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 109, 86th Congress; plan for flood control and related purposes on Farmington River, CT, substantially in accordance with House Document 443, 86th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1968 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for construction of Beaver Brook Reservoir, on Beaver Brook in Keene, NH, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 60, 90th Congress; and plan for protection on Park River, CT, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 43, 90th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1970 deauthorized the construction of a reservoir at Claremont, NH. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 deauthorized the construction of Gaysville Lake, Vermont project. Flood control projects at Cambridgeport Lake, Brockway Lake, Victory Lake, South Tunbridge Lake, Ludlow Lake and The Island Lake, Vermont; Honey Hill Lake, West Canaan Lake, and the Alternative to Sugar Hill Reservoir, New Hampshire, were deauthorized in August 1977 in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974. The authorization for Beaver Brook Lake, New Hampshire project expired in April 1978 due to lack of local cooperation. Local protection projects at Gardner, MA, Hartford, VT, Wethersfield, CT, and Keene, NH authorized and constructed in accordance with Section 205 of 1948 Flood Control Act. Emergency streambank erosion control projects at Brownsville, VT and Conway, MA authorized in accordance with Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act were completed in 1987. (See Table 1-L at end of chapter for reservoirs and local protection works for Connecticut River Basin). Water Resources Development Act of 1986 modified the comprehensive plan for the control of flood-waters in the Connecticut River Basin, Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and Connecticut, authorized by Section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1572) by authorizing the design, construction, operation, and maintenance of facilities at Townshend Dam, West River, Vermont to enable upstream migrant adult Atlantic salmon to bypass that dam and Ball Mountain Dam, Vermont, and to provide at both Townshend and Ball Mountain Dams facilities as necessary for the downstream passage of juvenile Atlantic salmon. The estimated project cost is $1,000,000. 35A. BALL MOUNTAIN LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on West River, 29 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, VT. It is 2 miles north of village of Jamaica, VT. (See Geological Survey map for Londonderry, VT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1957 and completed in November 1961. Construction of initial recreation facilities was initiated in June 1975 and completed in June 1977. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $435,932. 35B. BARRE FALLS DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Ware River in town of Barre, MA, 31.9 miles above confluence of Ware and Swift Rivers. It is 13 miles, northwest of Worcester, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Barre, MA, and Wachusett Mountain, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1956 and completed in May 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. 1-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to install picnic shelters at various recreation parks was awarded in November 1988. The Barre Falls shelter was completed in September 1989 at a cost of $11,306. 35C. BEAVER BROOK, KEENE, NH Location. Keene is located in southwestern New Hampshire approximately 15 miles north of the Massachusetts border and 12 miles east of the Vermont border. Existing project. Consists of structural modifications to the outlet of the Three Mile Swamp and widening the Beaver Brook channel in the reach between Water Street and Marlboro Street. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Hired labor costs of $28,273 were incurred for preparation of the operation and maintenance manual to be furnished to local interests. 35D. BIRCH HILL DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Millers River, 27.3 miles above its junction with the Connecticut River. It is 1.3 miles east of South Royalston, MA and 7.5 miles northwest of city of Gardner, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Royalston and Winchendon, MA-NH and Templeton, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in June 1940 and completed in February 1942. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests have contributed $32,000 as their required 50 percent cost sharing of recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract, for guard rail replacement was awarded in February 1989 and completed in September 1989. Contract amount was $40,414. A contract to repair bridges was awarded in August 1989. Work had not started at fiscal year end. 35E. COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is in town of Colebrook, Litchfield County, CT, on West Branch Farmington River about 3.9 miles upstream from its confluence with Still River at Riverton, CT, and about 1.5 miles upstream from Goodwin (Hogback) Dam. (See Geological Survey map for Winsted, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1965 and completed in June 1969. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in August 1969 and completed in June 1970. Local cooperation. Water supply contract was signed by Hartford Connecticut Metropolitan Water District. Repayment is being made in accordance with provisions of 1958 Water Supply Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Final payment on the contract awarded last fiscal year to replace the emergency generators at various locations was made in December 1988. Total contract amount was $54,060 of which $20,829 was the Colebrook River Lake portion. A contract awarded last fiscal year to repaint the service and reservoir bridges was terminated for default. A three megawatt hydropower facility has been under construction by the Metropolitan District of Greater Hartford for the last several years at Colebrook Lake. This generating facility, consisting of six turbines upstream of the intake works, began generation of power in 1989. 35F. CONANT BROOK DAM, MA Location. Site is in south central part of Massachusetts in town of Monson. Damsite, across Conant Brook, is about 2 miles southeast of community of Monson. (See Geological Survey map for Monson, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, highway relocations, and appurtenances was initiated in June 1964 and completed in December 1966. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract for pavement repairs was awarded in February 1989. The contract was 73 percent complete at fiscal year end with earnings to date of $27,594. 35G. FARMINGTON RIVER, SIMSBURY, CT Location. The town of Simsbury is located in the central portion of Hartford County in north-central Connecticut, approximately 25 miles east of the New York- Connecticut state line and 14 miles northwest of the city of Hartford, Connecticut. Existing project. The proposed project includes concrete grid block and stone slope protection along 900 feet of eroding Farmington River streambank. The project will protect the river bank and an adjacent 3-foot diameter sewer trunk line which has failed twice in the past 3 years. Local cooperation. The local sponsor shall provide, during the period of construction, a cash contribution of 5 percent of total project costs; provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations and alterations of buildings, utilities, highways, railroads, bridges, sewers, and related and special facilities determined by the Govern- 1-14 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION ment to be necessary for construction of the project; provide an additional cash contribution such that the total non-Federal contribution is 25 percent of total project costs; pay all costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limitation of $500,000; no less than once each year, inform affected interests of the limitations of the protection afforded by the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Surveys, including topographic and river cross sections, were completed during fiscal year 1989. Project layout and cross section design were initiated. 35H. KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Westfield River, 27.5 miles above its confluence with Connecticut River. It is 4 miles north of town of Huntington, MA, and about 12 miles west of city of Northampton, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Westhampton, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 and completed in December 1941. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Final payment on the contract awarded last fiscal year to replace the emergency generators at various locations was made in December 1988. Total contract amount was $54,060 of which $15,160 was the Knightville Dam portion. A contract to install picnic shelters at various recreation parks was awarded in November 1988. The Knightville shelter was completed in August 1989 at a cost of $11,420. 35I. LITTLEVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Middle Branch of Westfield River, 1 mile above its confluence with main stem of Westfield River and 25.2 miles above confluence of Westfield River with Connecticut River, in town of Chester. (See Geological Survey map for Chester, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated under a multicomponent contract in June 1962 and completed in September 1965. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, and Title III, Water Supply Act of 1958 applies and fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract for access road pavement repairs was awarded in June 1989 and completed in September 1989. Earnings thru end of fiscal year were $24,658 with final payment pending at close of fiscal year. A contract for drainage repairs was awarded in June 1989. Work had not started at close of fiscal year. 35J. NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on Ottauquechee River, 1.5 miles above its junction with Connecticut River and 1 mile northwest of North Hartland, VT. Reservoir extends upstream 5.5 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Hanover, NH-VT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in June 1958 and completed in June 1961. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to install picnic shelters at various recreation parks was awarded in November 1988. The contract was 54 percent complete at fiscal year end with total earnings of $68,294. Work on the North Hartland shelter had not started at close of fiscal year. 35K. NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT Location. Dam is in town of Springfield, VT, on Black River, 8.7 miles above its junction with Connecticut River, and 3 miles northwest of Springfield, VT. (See Geological Survey maps for Ludlow, VT and Claremont, NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in May 1958 and completed in November 1960. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to repair and repaint the spillway bridge awarded last fiscal year was completed in August 1989. Final payment was pending at fiscal year end. Earnings thru end of fiscal year were $297,362. A contract for slope protection was awarded in September 1988 and completed in June 1989. Final contract amount was $368,115. A contract to install picnic shelters at various recreation parks was awarded in November 1988. The contract was 54 percent complete at fiscal year end with total earnings of $68,294. Work on the North Springfield shelter had not started at close of fiscal year. 35L. OTTER BROOK LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Otter Brook, 2.4 miles upstream from its junction with The Branch, which flows 2.5 miles to Ashuelot River at Keene. (See National Ocean Survey maps for Keene, NH-VT, and Monadnock, NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and completed in August 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordi- 1-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 nary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $583,497. 35M. RIVERDALE, WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA Location. The town of West Springfield is situated in southwestern Massachusetts about 90 miles west of Boston and 135 miles northwest of New York City, on the west bank of Connecticut River. Riverdale is in the northern portion of the town of West Springfield. Existing project. The existing Local Protection Project constructed in 1950 involved the construction of approximately 12,700 feet of earth levee, two pumping stations and three stop-log storage structures. The levee provides protection against a flood greater than any of record reduced by the approved plan of reservoirs. The grades are all points above the maximum stage of the greatest flood of record, that of March 1936. A plan of improvement authorized in 1987 calls for the expansion of the gravity outflow and pumping capacity of the existing Riverdale Pumping Station. This includes adding a 24-inch, diesel powered pump into the existing station. The proposed project also includes jacking a separate 5- foot diameter, reinforced concrete culvert through the dike, running parallel to the existing culvert to increase the gravity outflow capacity. The new gravity conduit will be equipped with an ungated inlet and an outlet structure which includes a 60" x 6" self contained, electronically operated sluice gate. During emergencies, the gate could be operated manually from a new bridge and tower structure on the river side of the dike. An existing 9-foot diameter culvert, about 400 feet downstream on Bagg Brook will be replaced with a realigned 8-foot x 13-foot corrugated metal arch and a 50-foot long transition aligned to tie smoothly into the existing downstream channel. Project cost estimate for the modification is $818,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Formal assurances for improvement authorized in 1987 have been requested. The local sponsor shall be solely responsible for operating, maintaining, replacing, and rehabilitating the project; provide, during the period of construction, a cash contribution of 5 percent of total project costs, currently estimated to be $40,900; provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations and alterations of buildings, utilities, highways, sewers, and related and special facilities determined by the Government to be neceissary for construction of the project, currently estimated to be $2,000; provide during the period of construction an additional cash contribution of 19.8 percent, presently estimated at $161,600, that the total contribution equals 25 percent of total project costs; prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstruction of or encroachment on the project that would reduce the level of protection it affords, or that would hinder operation and maintenance; and the local sponsor will assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of $5 million. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Plans and specifications are completed and a water quality certificate has been received from the State. Letter received from town of West Springfield in July 1989 confirmed town's desire to go forward with the project. The town has obtained appraisals for land easements required for construction. Initiation of construction dependent upon execution of the Local Cooperation Agreement and receipt of the sponsor's required cost-sharing funds. 35N. SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Ashuelot River, 34.6 miles above its junction with Connecticut River and 5 miles north of Keene, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Keene and Bellows Falls, NH-VT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 and completed in June 1942. Initial phase of additional recreational facilities completed in September 1969, secondary phase in 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $351,551. 350. TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on West River, 19.1 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, VT, and about 2 miles west of Townshend, VT. Reservoir extends upstream about 4 miles. (See Geological Survey maps for Saxtons River, VT, and Londonderry, VT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1958 and completed in June 1961. Initial phase of additional recreational facilities completed in October 1969. Secondary phase completed in September 1971. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to install picnic shelters at various recreation parks was awarded in November 1988. The contract was 54 percent complete at fiscal year end with total earnings of $68,294. Work on the Townshend shelter had not started at close of fiscal year. 35P. TULLY LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on East Branch of Tully River, 3.9 miles above its junction with Millers River. It is 1 mile north of Fryville, MA and 3.5 miles north of Athol, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Royalston, MA-NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam 1-16 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1947 and completed in September 1949. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development, in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreational Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to install picnic shelters at various recreation parks was awarded in November 1988. The contract was 54 percent complete at fiscal year end with total earnings of $68,294. Work on the Tully shelter was completed in September 1989 but payment was not processed prior to close of fiscal year. A contract for pavement repairs of the administration area was awarded in July 1989 and completed in September 1989. Final contract amount was $18,339. Earnings thru end of fiscal year were $17,139. A contract for inlet channel erosion repair was awarded in July 1989. Work had not started at close of fiscal year. 35Q. UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT Location. Dam is on Ompompanoosuc River, 4 miles above its junction with Connecticut River. It is one-fourth mile north of Union Village, VT and 11 miles north of White River Junction, VT. (See Geological Survey maps for Strafford, VT and Mount Cube, NH-VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in March 1947 and completed in June 1950. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $474,338. 35R. WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA Location. The West Springfield Local Protective works are located in the town of West Springfield, MA. The project is on the west bank of the Connecticut River, 76 miles above its mouth. (See Geological Survey maps for Springfield South and West Springfield, MA-CT). Existing Project. This project consists of a system of earth levees and concrete floodwalls approximately 24,500 feet in length. The system starts at high ground, in the vicinity of Harrison Place, and extends downstream along the Connecticut River and up the north bank of the Westfield River to high ground at the Boston & Albany Railroad. The work involved raising 13,700 feet of existing levee, constructing 2,300 feet of floodwall, improving 2,400 feet of river bank, and treating 6,100 feet of existing levee foundation. Three pumping stations with appurtenant drainage facilities were also constructed for the disposal of interior drainage. The project, with the approved plan of reservoirs, is designed to protect against a flood greater than any of record. The levee and floodwall grades are, at all points, above the maximum stage of the greatest flood of record, that of March 1936. The project is a unit of the comprehensive plan of flood control and other purposes in the Connecticut River Basin and was authorized by the Flood Control Act approved June 28, 1938. Construction of project work was initiated in March 1939 and completed in July 1942 with the exception of foundation treatment along the Westfield River south of Agawam Bridge, which was initiated in May 1947 and completed in November 1947, and relief well and drainage system, which was initiated in August 1952 and completed in July 1953. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project). Modified Project. A modification of the project was authorized in October 1982 providing for the raising of the floodwall sections by one foot and the provision of a flood forecasting system. Work for flood wall modification began in April 1984 and was completed in August 1984. The National Weather Service and the town of West Springfield have entered into a Memorandum of Agreement for the installation and operation of an automated flood forecasting system. This system includes a centralized micro-computer, four precipitation gages, two river gages and a repeater site. When fully functional, the automated flood forecasting system will provide the town with timely and accurate forecasts of potential flooding along both the Connecticut and Westfield Rivers. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Installation of flood forecasting equipment began during August 1989. The system has been installed and its operation is currently being tested. 36. HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT AND MA Seven flood control reservoirs on tributaries of the Naugatuck River, principal tributary of the Housatonic River, and three local protection projects have been specifically authorized as part of an overall plan for flood control in the Housatonic River Basin. The Naugatuck and Housatonic Rivers converge 12 miles above mouth of Housatonic River. A project for emergency snagging and clearing of the Blackberry River, a tributary of the Housatonic River, was authorized under authority contained in Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Emergency bank protection projects at: Alford, Green River, MA; Sheffield, MA; Salisbury, CT; and Squantz Pond, Fairfield, CT were authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. Projects for local flood protection for: West Branch, Torrington, CT; East Branch, Torrington, CT; Pittsfield, MA; and Waterbury-Watertown, CT were authorized under authority provided by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-M on dams, reservoirs, and local protection projects for Housatonic River Basin). 36A. BLACK ROCK LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is on Branch Brook about 2 miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck River in towns of Thomaston and Watertown, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT). 1-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Road relocation completed in November 1967. Contract for construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated in July 1967 and completed in July 1971. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $285,311. 36B. HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Hancock Brook in town of Plymouth, CT, about 3.4 miles above its confluence with Naugatuck River. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in July 1963 and completed in August 1966. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $90,163. 36C. HOP BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is on Hop Brook in city of Waterbury and towns of Middlebury and Naugatuck, CT, about 1.4 miles upstream of confluence of Naugatuck River and Hop Brook. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in December 1965 and completed in December 1968. Construction of a public use facility was completed in November 1973. Construction of an additional restroom was completed in 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to install picnic shelters at various recreation parks was awarded in November 1988. The Hop Brook shelter was completed in August 1989 at a cost of $11,420. 36D. NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Northfield Brook about 1.3 miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck River, in town of Thomaston, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated in May 1963 and completed in October 1965. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in November 1966 and completed in August 1967. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $210,899. 36E. THOMASTON DAM, CT Location. On Naugatuck River about 30.4 miles above its junction with Housatonic River and about 1.6 miles north of Thomaston, CT. Reservoir extends upstream about 6.4 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1958 and completed in November 1960. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $432,468. 37. MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, NH AND MA Works covered by comprehensive plan are on Merrimack River and its tributaries in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Flood Control Act of 1936 authorized construction of a system of flood control reservoirs in Merrimack River Basin for reduction of flood heights in Merrimack Valley. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes as approved by Chief of Engineers pursuant to preliminary examinations and surveys authorized by Act of June 22, 1936, and modified project to provide in addition to construction of a system of flood control reservoirs, related flood control works which may be found justified by the Chief of Engineers. All operations pertaining to flood control in Merrimack River Basin are now carried on under and reported under projects for individual units of comprehensive plan referred to above. No further expenditures are contemplated under general project for flood control in Merrimack River Basin. For 1-18 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION final cost and financial summary, see Annual Report for 1946. A comprehensive plan for development of water resources of the North Nashua River Basin, a principal tributary of the Merrimack River, was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act substantially in accordance with Senate Document 113, 89th Congress. Plan provides for construction of coordinated system of four reservoirs and three local protection projects for flood protection, water supply, recreation and allied purposes. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 deauthorized two of the reservoirs and one of the local protection projects. The 1966 Flood Control Act also authorized construction of Saxonville local protection project substantially in accordance with Senate Document 61, 89th Congress. An emergency bank protection project at Amesbury, MA was authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-N at the end of chapter for reservoirs and related flood control works for Merrimack River Basin). 37A. BLACKWATER DAM, NH Location. Dam is on Blackwater River, NH, 8.2 miles above confluence with Contoocook River and 118.8 miles above mouth of Merrimack River. It is in the town of Webster, just above village of Swetts Mills, 18 miles by highway northwest of Concord, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Penacook and Mount Kearsarge, NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete except for construction of public facilities. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1940 and completed in November 1941. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Final payment on a contract to replace the emergency generators at three damsites, completed last fiscal year, is still pending. To date the contractor has received $61,663 of which $21,863 is for Blackwater Dam portion. 37B. EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Nubanusit Brook, a tributary of Contoocook River, one-half mile upstream from village of West Peterborough, NH, and 14 miles east of Keene, NH. (See Geological Survey map for Peterboro and Manadnock, NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1948 and completed in March 1950. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract for drainage improvements was awarded in October 1988. The contract was 98 percent complete at fiscal year end with earnings of $22,269. 37C. FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, NH Location. Dam is on Pemigewasset River, NH, main tributary of Merrimack River, and about 2.5 miles upstream of Franklin, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Penacook and Holderness, NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1939 and completed in October 1943. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to replace the gate hoist cable was awarded in June 1989 and completed in August 1989. Total contract amount was $24,990. A contract to replace the emergency generator was awarded in July 1989. Work had not started at close of fiscal year. 37D. HOPKINTON-EVERETT LAKES, NH Location. Hopkinton Dam is on Contoocook River, NH, 17.3 miles above its junction with Merrimack River and about one-half mile upstream from village of West Hopkinton. Everett Dam is on Piscataquog River, NH, 16 miles above its junction with Merrimack River and about 1.3 miles southeast of village of East Weare. Two interconnecting canals were provided to enable the two reservoir areas to function as one. (See Geological Survey map for Hillsboro, NH, and Concord, NH). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of two dams and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1959 and completed in December 1962. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in November 1974 and completed in September 1975. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Final payment on a contract to replace the emergency generators at three damsites, completed last fiscal year, is still pending. To date the contractor has received $61,663 of which $47,800 is for Hopkinton-Everett portion. Final payment on a contract for restroom renovations, completed last fiscal year, was $24,409. The contract to replace fuel tanks and furnaces awarded in June 1988 was completed in December 1988. Final contract amount was $28,905. A contract to install picnic shelters at various recreation parks was awarded in November 1988. The contract was 54 percent complete at fiscal year end with total earnings 1-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 of $68,294. Work on the Hopkinton-Everett shelters was not completed at close of fiscal year. 38. NEW BEDFORD FAIRHAVEN, AND ACUSHNET, MA Location. Main harbor barrier is across New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbor in vicinity of Palmer Island. Supplemental dikes and walls are provided in Clark Cove area of New Bedford and Fairhaven. (See Geological survey maps for New Bedford North, New Bedford South, Marion, and Sconticut Neck, MA and National Ocean Survey Charts 13230, 13070 and 13218). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of barrier and appurtenances was initiated in October 1962 and completed in January 1966. Construction of the pumping station was initiated in October 1962 and completed in June 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operating costs included $14,751 for replacement of gate stem on conduit number 2; $126,478 for project operations and $32,192 for administrative activities. 39. NEW LONDON, CT Location. In the city of New London, CT, about 45 miles southeast of Hartford, CT, and 50 miles southwest of Providence, RI. (See Geological Survey map for New London, CT). Existing project. The hurricane protection project consists of approximately 715 feet of rock-faced earthfill dike and 800 feet of I-walls around the northerly shore of Shaw Cove and the regrading of approximately 21 acres of land along the west shore of the cove to elevation 12.5 feet mean sea level. Top of dike and floodwalls are 14.5 feet mean sea level. Appurtenant structures include a street gate, pressure conduit and a pumping station to discharge interior drainage. Latest estimate (December 1984) for the project is $11,560,000 for construction and $1,140,000 for lands and damages including relocations, a total of $12,700,000 for new work. Total includes local costs of $1,140,000 for lands and relocations and a $2,310,000 cash contribution. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Project construction is complete. Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) Provide lands and rights-of-way for construction; (b) make alterations and relocations; (c) bear 30 percent of construction cost with credit allowed for (a) and (b); (d) hold the United States free from damages; and (e) maintain and operate all works. Assurances have been provided. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The City of New London finally completed its appraisal of project lands and submitted paperwork to the Corps for review and approval. New England Division completed its review, and the appraisal documents and figures are currently under review for approval at Corps headquarters. Final cost-sharing determination and project fiscal closeout are dependent upon the approved value of lands. 40. BROCKTON, MA Location. Brockton is located in Plymouth County, 18 miles south of Boston and 25 miles northwest of Providence, Rhode Island. Existing Project. The authorization provides for planning, engineering and design of flood control works for the protection of Brockton, particularly along Salisbury Brook, as well as improvements to ponds and a reservoir located in the uppermost part of the watershed. Proposed flood control measures included floodwalls and dikes, new bridges and culverts, utility relocations, stream diversions, and floodproofing. Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested. Local interests would be required to contribute 50 percent of planning and engineering costs and 25 percent of construction cost including design of any measures that were subsequently authorized. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Draft report was finalized, however very low benefit to cost ratios computed for all of the plans prompted a recommendation that the project be reclassified from the active to the inactive category. Upon subsequent OCE approval of that recommendation the local and Congressional interests were informed of the change in the project's status. A probable snagging and clearing project under the authority of Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, as amended, was identified and studies under that authority were initiated. 41. LITTLE RIVER, BELFAST, ME Location. The town of Belfast, Maine, is located approximately 20 miles south of Bangor, Maine and lies on Maine's southern shoreline on Belfast Bay. Existing project. The plan to resolve the streambank erosion problem downstream of the southern abutment of the Little River Lower Dam would consist of approximately 80 linear feet of precast concrete modular wall. This wall would vary in height from 10 to 20 feet and vary in depth from 4 to 8 feet. A 10-foot long cast-inplace concrete wall about 7 feet high will tie the modular wall into the downstream bank. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and utility relocations necessary for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States; contribute 25 percent of actual cost of construction and preparation of plans and specifications, (a minimum cash contribution of 5 percent of these costs is required); assume the responsibility for all costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $500,000; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project. 1-20 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for emergency streambank protection, awarded last fiscal year, was completed in December 1988. Contract payments to date were $127,029 with final quantities still pending at close of fiscal year. 42. PERLEY BROOK, FORT KENT, ME Location. Fort Kent, Maine, is located in northern Aroostook County, about 50 miles northwest of Presque Isle, Maine, and adjacent to the United States-Canada border. Perley Brook is a tributary of the Fish River. Existing project. The project includes stone revetment along 100 linear feet of 6- to 10-foot high embankment adjacent to Route 161, the excavation of 4 river shoal areas, and placing gabions around the existing highway culverts. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and utility relocations necessary for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States; contribute 25 percent of actual cost of construction and preparation of plans and specifications, (a minimum cash contribution of 5 percent of these costs is required); assume the responsibility for all costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $500,000; prevent future encroachment which might interfere with proper functioning of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: An emergency streambank protection contract was awarded in December 1988 and completed in August 1989. Contract payments this fiscal year were $51,634. Final payment was still pending at close of fiscal year. 43. ROUGHANS POINT, REVERE, MA Location. The city of Revere is located in Suffolk County on the Massachusetts coast about 2 miles northeast of the East Boston section of the city of Boston. Roughans Point is a low-lying, ocean front area of Revere. The area has 55 acres which lie below elevation 10 feet NGVD. Existing project. Consists of stabilizing the existing facilities along the shore with a 4,080-foot long armor stone revetment to dissipate incoming waves. The revetment would extend from a point 400 feet north of Eliot Circle southerly to a point 200 feet south of the intersection of Winthrop Parkway and Leverett Avenue. The plan also calls for "backwater" protection by constructing an earth berm one foot high and 200 feet long on the existing median strip between Bennington Street and State Road. Interior drainage improvements consist of a new intake structure at the existing pump station, a new gravity drain and two sluice gates. The total estimated project cost (March 1989) is $11,000,000. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested. Local interests must provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-ofway necessary for construction of the structural elements of the project, including ponding areas, borrow areas, and disposal areas for excavated material, presently estimated at $1,080,000; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction, operation and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacements, presently estimated at $13,000 annually; pay an amount in cash, presently estimated at $2,770,000, to bring the total non-Federal share to 35 percent of project costs allocated to storm damage reduction; provide and maintain necessary access roads; accomplish without cost to the United States all alterations and relocations of buildings, streets, storm drains, utilities, highway bridges, and other structures made necessary by construction of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction engineering and design continued with project layout, development of cross sections, and analysis of impacts to existing floodwall. 44. STAMFORD, CT Location. In Fairfield County on north shore of Long Island Sound, about 30 miles east of New York City and 20 miles southwest of Bridgeport, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Stamford, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement see Annual Report for 1974. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Project was completed in 1969. Local interests still owe a substantial amount based on claims settlements, including interest payment under the Contract Disputes Act. Local cooperation. Local interests will provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; make modifications to existing storm drainage system which may be required to obtain full benefits of protection plan, all necessary modifications to existing sanitary sewer facilities required to prevent entry of tidal-waters, and all changes, alterations and additions to or relocations of any buildings and utilities made necessary by construction of project; bear 30 percent of total first cost, estimated at $4,340,000 and consisting of cost items listed above plus a cash contribution estimated at $3,150,000; contribute in cash, in lieu of cost of annual maintenance and operation of tidal portion of East Branch barrier which is to be operated and maintained by the United States, an amount estimated at $880,000; maintain and operate all works after completion with exception of tidal portion of East Branch barrier and aids to navigation; and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances received and cash contributions have been deposited except for $662,000 outstanding which is local share of final claims settlement including interest payment. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $209,717. 1-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 45. THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT, RI, AND MA Works covered by this plan are a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Thames River in Massachusetts and Connecticut, within a radius of 45 miles from Norwich, CT, and a channel enlargement on Shetucket River where it discharges into Thames River at Norwich. Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, approved plan for a system of reservoirs and channel improvements in Thames River Basin in accordance with House Document 885, 76th Congress, 3rd session, and authorized $6 million for initiation and partial accomplishment of project. Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, authorized completion of approved plan. Flood Control Act of July 14, 1960, authorized project for West Thompson Reservoir, substantially as recommended in Senate Document 41, 86th Congress, 2nd session. (See Table 1-0 at end of chapter on reservoirs and local protection districts, Thames River Basin, for projects comprising approved plan). 45A. BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Little River, 1.3 miles above its junction with French River and 8 miles northeast of Southbridge, MA. Reservoir extends upstream about 1.7 miles northerly and 1.9 miles southerly. (See Geological Survey maps for Webster, MA and CT, and Leicester, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and completed in June 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $214,535. 45B. EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 64.5 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River and 1 mile southwest of village of Fiskdale, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Whales, MA and CT, Southbridge, MA and CT, East Brookfield, MA, and Warren, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1958 and completed in June 1960. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $355,006. 45C. HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA Location. Dam is on French River, 15 miles above its confluence with Quinebaug River, at Hodges Village in town of Oxford, MA, about 5 miles north of Webster, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Webster, MA, and CT, Leicester, MA, Worcester South, MA, and Oxford, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works, initiated in March 1958, was completed in December 1959. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Final payment on the contract for pavement repairs, completed last fiscal year, was made in November 1988. The final contract amount was $41,272. 45D. MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT Location. Dam is at Mansfield Hollow, CT, on Natchaug River, 5.3 miles above its confluence with Willimantic River. It is 4 miles northeast of city of Willimantic, CT. (See Geological Survey maps for Spring Hill and Willimantic, CT). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, initiated in 1949, was completed in May 1952. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted at a total cost of $331,485. 45E. WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River in town of Thompson, CT. Site is in village of West Thompson, 2 miles upstream from city of Putnam, CT. (See Geological Survey map, for Putnam, CT). Existing Project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, road relocation, and appurtenances was initiated in August 1963 and completed in October 1965. Initial phase of recreation facilities was completed in May 1976. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. Final payment of a contract to paint the spillway and service bridges, completed last fiscal year, was processed. Total contract amount was $24,995. A contract to install picnic shelters at various recreation parks was awarded in November 1988. The West Thompson shelter was completed in August 1989 at a cost of $11,420. 45F. WESTVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 56.7 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River, in towns of Stur- 1-22 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION bridge and Southbridge, MA, and 1.3 miles west of center of Southbridge. (See Geological Survey maps for Southbridge, MA and RI, and East Brookfield, MA). Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in April 1960 and completed in August 1962. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to install picnic shelters at various recreation parks was awarded in November 1988. The Westville shelter was completed in July 1989 at a cost of $11,306. 46. TOWN BROOK, QUINCY AND BRAINTREE, MA Location. The project is located in the city of Quincy and the town of Braintree on the south side of Massachusetts Bay, along the eastern shore of Massachusetts, 7 miles south of Boston in Norfolk County. The watershed is approximately 4.5 square miles. Existing project. Provides for the construction of a 12-foot diameter, 4,060-foot long, concrete lined tunnel in bedrock approximately 190 feet below ground, intake and outlet structures, and improvements to the Town River downstream of the outlet shaft. New reinforced concrete box outlets will be constructed under the Southern Artery and an adjacent automobile dealer parking lot. In conjunction with this, the left bank of the Town River below the Southern Artery will be widened to provide sufficient channel capacity. The tunnel and its appurtenances will be supplemented by reconstruction of the Old Quincy Reservoir Dam, located at the headwaters of Town Brook, including a new spillway and outlet structure. The estimated total project cost (October 1988) is $36,700,000, exclusive of the reconstruction cost which is a non-Federal responsibility, and includes $6,100,000 in approved-for-credit compatible work that has been accomplished by the project sponsor. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested. Local interests are required to provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, presently estimated at $260,000; reconstruct Old Quincy Dam to insure its structural integrity, presently estimated at $3,360,000; pay a cash contribution for the costs allocated to flood control, presently estimated at $2,815,000; so that the total contribution of local interests is equal to 25 percent of costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacements, presently estimated at $23,000 annually. In addition, local interests must do the following, for which there is no estimate of cost: prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent encroachment on both the improvements and unimproved channels, and manage all project-related channels to preserve capacities for local drainage as well as for project functions. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Preconstruction engineering and design continued, including preparation of plans and specifications for the tunnel and inlet/outlet structures as well as for the reconstruction of the Old Quincy Dam. Extensive coordination work with the project sponsor (the Metropolitan District Commission) and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts resulted in the obtaining of the required wetlands permit and water quality certificate this fiscal year-both prerequisites to execution of the Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) and initiation of construction. Initial construction funds have been appropriated, but the LCA has not yet been signed. 47. WEST RIVER, NEW HAVEN, CT Location. New Haven, Connecticut is located in southern New Haven County, about 35 miles south of Hartford, Connecticut. The project area is located upstream of the intersection of Route 63 and West River in northwestern New Haven. Existing project. The West River will be widened for 1,150 feet from its existing 25- to 30-foot width to a 50- to 70-foot width; a 1,150-foot modular wall will be built along the right bank and a 600-foot cantilever sheet pile wall will be built along the left bank. For Wintergreen Brook the channel will have a 20- to 30-foot width, and a 550-foot sheet pile wall and 450-foot dike on the right bank. A recreational walkway on top of the modular wall with lighting and fencing to connect two existing city parks is also included. The estimated total project cost (April 1988) is $6,100,000. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on January 17, 1989 between the Corps and the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) for the project. Local interests are required to provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations, presently estimated at $1,700,000; pay a cash contribution for the costs allocated to flood control, presently estimated at 5 percent or $291,000 so that the total contribution of local interests is equal to 25 percent of costs allocated to flood control; pay 50 percent of the costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated to be $140,000; assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $5,000,000; bear all costs of operation and maintenance, presently estimated at $7,000 annually. In addition, local interests must do the following, for which there is no estimate of cost: participate in and comply with applicable Federal flood plain management and flood insurance programs; prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent encroachment on the project which would reduce level of protection afforded; notify, not less than once a year, affected interests of the limitations of the protection afforded by the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work: State DEP/ city of New Haven have been pursuing necessary real estate acquisition involving 15 parcels and relocations required before project can be issued for bids. 48. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS In accordance with provisions of the Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended, local flood protection works con- 1-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 structed with Federal funds are transferred to local interests to operate and maintain. To insure compliance with regulations prescribed for their operation and maintenance, regular inspections of the following projects were made during the fiscal year: CONNECTICUT: April 1989-Bridgeport, Colchester, East Branch, Hall Meadow, Mad River, Milford, North Canaan, Salisbury, Sucker Brook, Torrington, Waterbury, Winsted, Woodbury; May 1989-Ansonia, Danbury, Derby, East Hartford, Hartford, New Fairfield, New London, Norwalk, Pawcatuck, Stamford, Wethersfield. MAINE: May 1989-Beals, Blaine, Castine, Cherryfield, Fort Kent, Gouldsboro, Harpswell, Hartland, Indian Island, Islesboro, Lubec, Machias, Ogunquit, Perry, Whiting. MASSACHUSETTS: April 1989-Alford, Canton, Conway, Gardner, Haverhill, Huntington, Lancaster, Lee, Lowell, Pittsfield, Scituate, Sheffield, Springfield, Three Rivers, Ware, West Warren, Westfield, Worcester; May 1989-Amesbury, Blackstone, Charles River Dam, Chicopee, Chicopee Falls, Fitchburg, Hayward Creek, Holyoke, Millbury, Northampton, Quincy, Riverdale, Saxonville, Sheffield, Smelt Brook, West Springfield. NEW HAMPSHIRE: April 1989-Lincoln, Shelburne, Wilton; May 1989-Charlestown, Farmington, Nashua, North Stratford, West Stewartstown. RHODE ISLAND: April 1989-Burrillville; May 1989-Woonsocket; August 1989-Lower Woonsocket. VERMONT: April 1989-Brownsville, Weston; May 1989-Saxtons River. 49. FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS A coordinated system of reservoirs, many of which are multipurpose in nature and all containing significant amounts of storage for flood control purposes, has been established in five major flood producing basins in New England. During periods of flood flows, regulation of reservoirs is fully coordinated within each basin dependent upon its location in the watershed, its available storage capacity and origin of the flood. In addition to flood control releases, water supply, flow augmentation and hydropower releases were made from selected reservoirs. Winter pools are maintained at many projects to submerge the flood control gates and keep them from freezing. There were no significant storm events in New England during fiscal year. As a result there was no substantial flood control storage at any Corps reservoirs in New England and no flood control benefits associated with regulation of the reservoirs. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN Regulation for canoe activities occurred at Ball Mountain- October 1988, April 1989, and May 1989; Birch Hill, Tully, Knightville, Littleville, and Otter Brook- April 1989; and Surry Mountain-May 1989. Non-flood releases were made from Colebrook Lake for low flow augmentation in July and September 1989 and for water supply throughout the year. Non-flood releases from North Hartland Lake have been controlled by the Vermont Electric Generation and Transmission Cooperative for hydropower throughout fiscal year 1989. MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN Blackwater was regulated for canoe races in April 1989. THAMES RIVER BASIN Regulation activities in the basin included regulation for canoeing at Mansfield Hollow in June 1989, East Brimfield in April 1989, and Hodges Village in May 1989. Also the permanent pool at West Thompson was raised on several occasions during fiscal year 1989 to accommodate AKC retriever trials and powerboat competitions. 50. HURRICANE BARRIER OPERATIONS Five hurricane barriers are situated along the southern coast of New England, protecting coastal communities from tidal flooding associated with hurricanes and severe coastal storms. The Corps operates the navigational elements of the Stamford, Connecticut and the New Bedford-Fairhaven, Massachusetts barriers. The Fox Point, Rhode Island and the Pawcatuck and New London, Connecticut barriers are operated by the local communities. A brief resume of operations for the fiscal year follows: STAMFORD BARRIER. The barrier gates were operated on seven different occasions for coastal storms during fiscal year 1989. Benefits associated with the operation of the Stamford Barrier totalled $250,000 for FY 1989. NEW BEDFORD BARRIER. The New Bedford Barrier was operated on four different occasions during fiscal year 1989; however none of the closures resulted in damages prevented. FOX POINT HURRICANE BARRIER. The Fox Point Hurricane Barrier was not operated during fiscal year 1989 and did not experience damaging tidal flood conditions. PAWCATUCK HURRICANE BARRIER. The Pawcatuck Hurricane Barrier was not operated during fiscal year 1989 and did not experience damaging tidal flood conditions. NEW LONDON HURRICANE BARRIER. The New London Hurricane Barrier was not operated during fiscal year 1989 and did not experience damaging tidal flood conditions. 51. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 1-E at end of chapter). 52. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205. Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 1-J at end of chapter). 1-24 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION Snagging and clearing activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Fiscal year costs were as follows: Blackberry River, North Canaan, CT ........ $3,426 Salisbury Brook, Brockton, MA ............. 31,974 Emergency Bank Protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. Fiscal year costs were as follows: Belfast, M E ............................... $93,388 (See Section 41 of Text) Blackstone River, Millbury, MA............. 1,349 Chelsea Creek, East Boston, MA ............ 25,578 Clear River, Burrillville, RI................. 731 Connecticut River, Guildhall, VT............ 7,267 Connecticut River, Whately, MA ............ 2,454 Covered Bridge, Sheffield, MA .............. 1,752 Farmington River, Barkhamsted, CT ........ 5,904 Farmington River, Simsbury, CT ............ 23,646 (See Section 35G of Text) Housatonic River, Sheffield, MA ............ 384 Housatonic River, Shelton, CT .............. 8,354 Kennebec River, Bingham, ME ............. .4,532 Konkapot River, Monterey, MA ............. 6,767 Machias River, Machias, ME ................ 595 Machias River, Machiasport, ME ............ 1,956 Marginal Way, Ogunquit, ME .............. 348 Merrimack River, Merrimac, MA............ 7,500 Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT ................ 2,003 Nashua River, Leominster, MA ............. 28,838 Neponset River, Canton, MA ................ 7,500 North Nashua River, Fitchburg, MA ........ 6,421 Ocean Grove Beach, Swansea, MA .......... 9,566 Perley Brook, Fort Kent, ME .............. 47,116 (See Section 42 of Text) Pleasant Point, Perry, ME .................. 895 South River, Conway, MA .................. 1,664 Surf Street, Saco, ME ...................... 137 Town River Bay, Quincy, MA ............... 17,865 Emergency flood control activities-repair,f lood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for fiscal year were $160,348 for disaster preparedness. 53. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Table 1-G at end of chapter). General Investigations 54. SURVEYS Costs for the fiscal year for surveys from regular funds were $2,653,914 of which $16,337 was for one navigation study; $1,345,970 for seven flood damage prevention studies; $279,247 for one shore protection study; $601,498 for three comprehensive studies; and $410,862 for coordination studies. 55. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The Division Engineer is the U.S. member on Saint Croix River Board of Control. Annual inspections are made of conditions on the Saint Croix River and a continuing program of compilation of basic hydrologic information is carried out. Division Engineer's representatives during the past year kept closely in touch with development in the basin and cooperated with their Canadian counterparts assisting in development of basins' resources. Total costs for the fiscal year were $14,663. Total costs to 30 September 1989 are $224,185 Flood plain studies comprise compilation and dissemination, upon responsible local request, of information on floods and potential flood damages, including identification of areas subject to inundation by floods of various magnitudes and frequencies, and general criteria for guidance in use of flood plain area; and engineering advice to local interests for their use in planning to ameliorate flood hazard. Total costs for the fiscal year were $479,061. Total costs to 30 September 1989 are $6,016,330. 56. PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Total costs for Planning, Engineering and Design were $15,279 for local protection studies for Brockton, Massachusetts. 57. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Preconstruction Engineering and Design costs were - $1,902 for the navigation project at New Haven Harbor, Connecticut and $116,622 for the local protection project at Massachusetts Coastal, Roughans Point, Revere, Massachusetts. 1-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 1-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 1. Aquatic Plant Control 2. Branford Harbor, CT 3. Cape Cod Canal, MA (Contributed Funds) 4. Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 5. Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI 6. Green Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 7. Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI 8. Hyannis Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 30,000 31,931 12,003 12,003 12,000 8,770 25,920 25,920 12,000 12,000 281,496 14,169 9,454 275,046 - - 9,537 - - 9,537 40,481 88,571 1,142,320 39,481 83,722 1,136,471 - - - 32,786,2191,2 - - - - 32,786,2191,2 6,093,171 5,850,021 4,363,013 5,338,954 102,248,572 6,101,729 5,709,255 4,289,169 5,646,961 102,072,159 - - - - 115,432 - - - - 115,432 - - - - 390,677 - - - 390,677 - - - - 26,609,000 - - - - 26,609,000 - - - - 266,70541 - - - - 266,70541 19,880 692,982 19,880 692,995 T -T 20,482 - 20,482 - - - 58,116 310,696 44,232 268,600 9,658 - 14,664 14,664 15,184 16,473 192,442 192,442 2,000 6,490 X8,043 70,392 2,711,39042 27,436 70,326 2,710,71742 - - 43,500 - - 43,500 - - 189,0376 - - 189,0376 10,000 18,085 578,321 10,000 17,934 578,169 - - 254,512 - - 254,512 55,764 24,947 2,156,706 122,179 25,356 2,156,514 - - 168,000 - - 168,000 - - 576,856 - - 576,856 1,000 167,854 1,777,116 884 144,297 1,679,578 - - 484,499 - - 484,499 - - 643,1957 -188 11,347 642,4927 - - 103,001 - - 103,001 1-26 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 9. Jonesport Harbor, ME (Contributed Funds-Required) 10. Milford Harbor, CT (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds-Other) 11. Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), MA 12. New Haven Harbor, CT 13. Plymouth Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds-Required) 14. Point Judith Pond and Harbor of Refuge, RI (Contributed Funds) 15. Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, ME and NH (Contributed Funds-Required) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 205,000 2 261,017 57,390 57,390 547 547 22,564 25,795 426,000 425,264 13,349 2,800 2,800 1-27 ,860,000 3,830,000 550,000 7,750,000 38,658 6,481,959 478,037 7,499,833 80,000 720,000 33,000 833,000 - 763,675 50,560 814,235 - - - 90,50644 - - - 90,50644 35,275 597,049 11,599 1,323,68246 35,274 596,536 12,113 1,323,68246 - - - 11,380 - - - 11,380 200,000 -26,575 - 173,425 - 173,425 - 173,425 - - - 502,66147 - - - 502,66147 14,099 18,858 256,143 733,706 14,099 17,858 257,143 733,706 - - - 211,649 - - - 211,649 600,000 51,000 -83,000 4,773,2468 276,753 288,070 - 1,902 4,768,1678 15,514 306,241 980,519 14,091,9989 16,214 140,632 1,142,399 14,088,2199 - - - 2,127,21812 - - - 2,127,21812 70,000 315,743 10,360 1,321,00446 69,405 315,712 10,128 1,320,14646 - - - 573,000 - - - 541,611 - - - 894,475 - - - 894,475 - - - 2,714,51011 - - - 2,714,51011 927,000 1,152,000 153,000 6,074,884 920,741 1,161,963 152,249 6,073,338 - - - 1,926,000 - - - 1,926,000 - - - 17,587 - - - 17,587 200,258 100,000 4,400,000 10,084,30110 138,211 69,157 1,378,000 6,969,4110 12,121 8,169 40,157 1,997,406 12,121 8,169 39,957 1,997,206 - - 1,000,000 1,099,707 - - 400,000 499,707 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 16. Providence River and Harbor, RI 17. Rockport Harbor, ME 18. Rockport Harbor and Pigeon Cove, Rockport, MA (Contributed Funds-Required) 19. Rye Harbor, NH (Contributed Funds-Required) (Contributed Funds-Other) 20. Saco River, ME 21. Sesuit Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds-Required) 22. Wells Harbor, ME (Contributed Funds) 23. Wood Island Harbor and Pool at Biddeford, ME (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 50,000 47,420 39,000 44,819 44,819 78,829 88,333 19,817 19,817 1,] 1,C 31,640 1 31,596 1 127,000 058,356 39,000 52,077 51,644 31,856 31,981 - - 25,417,0224 - - 25,417,0224 - 252,000 4,082,5023 - 232,283 4,062,7853 - - 32,0005 - - 32,0005 58,654 5,855 250,669 57,849 6,704 250,669 45,000 180,000 1,787,000 96,638 216,411 1,783,930 - 12,430 51,430 - 12,151 51,151 41,225 40,969 41,225 40,651 130,342 130,342 262,724 261,973 - - 61,338 - - 61,338 - - 81,548 - - 81,548 - - 1,064,983 - - 1,064,983 17,666 81,007 1,775,500 17,151 81,385 1,775,288 - - 226,306 - - 226,306 9,704 222,502 9,050 212,396 60,326 60,326 58,270 58,270 -9,603 1,158 263,111 263,111 124,588 124,588 - - 360,973 - - 360,973 7,711 63,945 1,686,852 7,209 63,945 1,686,316 17,216 481,690 16,827 481,344 212,000 212,000 143,112 143,112 571,883 571,148 12,000 12,000 1-28 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 28. Revere Beach, MA New Work Approp. Cost (Contributed New Work Funds) Contrib. Cost 29. Roosevelt Campobello New Work International Park, Approp. Lubec, ME Cost 33A. West Hill Dam, New Work MA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 34. Charles River New Work (Natural Valley) Approp. Storage Areas), MA Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 35A. Ball Mountain New Work Lake, VT Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 35B. Barre Falls Dam, New Work MA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 35C. Beaver Brook, New Work Keene, NH Approp. Cost 35D. Birch Hill Dam, MA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed New Work Funds) Contrib. Cost 35E. Colebrook River New Work Lake, CT Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 35F. Conant Brook New Work Dam, MA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 35G. Farmington River, New Work Simsbury, Ct Approp. Cost 34,807 125,000 150,000 50,000 124,486 65,132 105,664 44,200 200,000 - 41,990 17,207 157,390 808,71213 778,89413 142,965 142,965 244,200 216,587 - - - - 2,306,90214 - - - - 2,306,90214 264,000 360,200 441,500 639,400 4,165,334 243,999 338,096 447,811 690,987 4,154,959 191,000 - - - 8,606,000 96,871 46,706 34,804 7,236 8,562,933 198,000 236,100 122,300 124,300 956,700 156,239 248,942 147,186 127,825 950,264 - - - - 11,039,29815 - - - - 11,039,29815 606,000 337,200 311,200 418,700 6,544,839 660,207 352,118 374,174 435,932 6,537,816 - - - - 1,967,819 - - - - 1,967,819 405,000 436,400 316,300 451,400 4,890,727 334,097 476,702 368,633 478,718 4,874,472 1,775,000 240,000 45,000 15,000 2,586,000 1,731,994 330,001 27,978 28,273 2,582,120 - - - - 4,815,67916 - - - - 4,815,67916 217,000 363,500 481,400 476,400 5,089,027 215,317 281,087 414,096 623,168 5,077,076 - - - - 32,00017 - - - - 32,00017 - - - - 14,263,971 - - - - 14,263,971 190,000 308,100 185,002 275,495 126,000 112,500 115,990 102,705 - 40,000 - 35,436 310,000 130,800 2,748,344 303,553 178,771 2,746,009 - - 2,950,530 - - 2,950,530 98,700 105,900 1,397,780 104,497 126,417 1,395,145 - 40,000 80,000 4,540 23,646 63,622 1-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 35H. Knightville Dam, MA 35I. Littleville Lake, MA 35J. North Hartland Lake, VT 35K. North Springfield Lake,VT 35L. Otter Brook Lake, NH 35M. Riverdale, West Springfield, MA (Contributed Funds) 35N. Surry Mountain Lake, NH 350. Townshend Lake, VT 35P. Tully Lake, MA (Contributed Funds) 35Q. Union Village Dam, VT New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 3,415,64018 - 3,415,64018 296,000 384,000 389,800 507,500 6,210,204 301,828 319,196 415,920 522,977 6,177,192 - - - - 7,013,412 - - - - 7,013,412 464,000 268,500 349,500 561,200 4,389,091 290,889 426,542 325,743 574,335 4,356,024 - - - - 7,312,22519 - - - - 7,312,22519 279,000 298,300 264,500 433,900 4,769,515 264,351 323,690 259,848 381,073 4,690,367 - - - - 6,831,52620 - - - - 6,831,52620 861,000 559,000 950,500 1,196,369 8,687,966 972,541 504,542 837,834 1,314,280 8,625,876 - - - - 4,360,44821 - - - - 4,360,44821 356,000 299,100 426,500 456,600 4,901,814 448,103 299,796 315,702 583,497 4,898,335 20,000 105,000 - 15,000 1,278,000 7,125 109,734 8,035 826 1,263,720 - - - - 25,000 - - - - 25,000 - - - - 2,833,61022 - - - - 2,833,61022 280,000 289,100 302,100 330,000 5,414,643 294,216 282,718 309,004 351,551 5,412,861 - - - - 7,398,41323 - - - - 7,398,41323 472,000 456,300 295,200 392,000 6,219,971 541,835 469,469 314,617 402,749 6,188,681 - - - - 1,666,75224 - - - - 1,666,75224 313,000 323,000 338,000 455,900 4,716,886 310,633 397,130 340,252 452,772 4,690,470 - - - - 40,00017 - - - - 40,00017 - - - - 4,095,16025 - - - - 4,095,16025 216,000 251,900 257,000 482,900 4,517,356 243,036 245,621 250,154 474,338 4,487,403 1-30 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 35R. West Springfield, MA (Contributed Funds) 36A. Black Rock Lake, CT 36B. Hancock Brook Lake, CT 36C. Hop Brook Lake, CT 36D. Northfield Brook Lake, CT 36E. Thomaston Dam, CT 37A. Blackwater Dam, NH 37B. Edward MacDowell Lake, NH 37C. Franklin Falls Dam, NH 37D. Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - - 1,793,72443 37 649 5,522 21,368 1,789,14143 - - - - 13,000 - - - 12,390 12,390 - - - - 8,182,300 - - - - 8,182,300 191,000 213,400 171,400 272,300 2,827,709 172,852 203,952 184,866 285,311 2,824,751 - - - - 4,178,911 - - - - 4,178,911 84,000 68,700 112,400 87,900 1,344,649 80,751 62,798 116,469 90,163 1,341,757 - - - - 6,151,56226 - - - - 6,151,56226 531,000 523,900 925,600 920,300 6,300,685 499,564 542,357 855,669 1,029,440 6,250,283 - - - - 2,850,51227 - - - - 2,850,51227 200,000 165,300 195,300 158,500 2,166,811 202,038 173,108 152,753 210,899 2,161,421 - - - - 14,282,112 - - - - 14,282,112 343,000 621,400 385,200 349,400 5,648,767 533,544 352,751 586,787 432,468 5,644,564 - - - - 1,319,74628 - - - - 1,319,74628 248,000 216,000 254,700 323,300 3,644,985 213,093 239,615 251,657 336,978 3,643,394 - - - - 2,014,25329 - - - - 2,014,25329 277,000 379,700 301,000 341,400 4,393,492 254,523 349,964 359,584 350,042 4,390,239 - - - - 7,950,48730 - - - - 7,950,48730 367,000 389,122 345,500 561,500 6,690,259 438,508 361,738 386,402 556,450 6,683,473 - - - - 21,452,44031 - - - - 21,452,44031 512,500 528,722 860,500 817,400 8,395,162 502,046 568,737 774,061 962,420 8,385,672 1-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 38. New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA (Contributed Funds) 39. New London, CT (Contributed Funds-Required) (Other Contributed Funds) 40. Brockton, MA 41. Little River, Belfast, ME (Contributed Funds-Required) 42. Perley Brook, Fort Kent, ME (Contributed Funds-Required) 43. Roughans Point, Revere, MA 44. Stamford, CT (Contributed Funds-Required) (Other Contributed Funds) 45A. Buffumville Lake, MA 45B. East Brimfield Lake, MA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - - 11,510,088 - - - - 11,510,088 120,000 122,400 118,300 193,400 3,993,964 115,033 119,269 120,493 173,421 3,965,716 - - - - 6,513,76332 - - - - 6,513,76332 - - - - 9,272,046 124,061 24,802 -76,348 4,726 9,196,370 - - - - 2,255,00033 54,932 - 21 1 - 2,251,29433 6,500 - - - 222,250 3,500 - - - 219,250 - - 60,000 15,000 75,000 - - 59,721 15,279 75,000 - 20,000 132,000 15,000 167,000 - 19,840 39,065 93,388 152,293 - - 43,000 - 43,000 - - - 43,000 43,000 - 12,500 25,000 50,000 87,500 - 11,945 24,418 47,116 83,479 - - - 18,600 18,600 - - - 18,599 18,599 183,000 150,000 67,000 245,000 660,779 74,673 106,972 53,023 116,622 351,290 - - - - 9,911,300 - 22 - - 9,900,640 156,000 113,100 124,600 195,700 2,891,772 185,598 117,216 110,349 209,717 2,887,929 - - - - 3,367,97034 - - - - 3,367,45334 - - - - 210,000 - - - - 209,969 - - - - 2,998,60335 - - - - 2,998,60335 243,000 213,400 228,900 205,700 3,737,322 256,020 202,934 238,894 214,535 3,735,385 - - - - 7,057,04336 - - - - 7,057,04336 215,000 254,400 212,000 339,300 3,326,383 211,889 225,428 237,777 355,006 3,325,154 1-32 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 45C. Hodges Village New Work Dam, MA Approp. - - - - 4,461,26837 Cost - - - - 4,461,26837 Maint. Approp. 271,500 484,400 437,500 510,200 4,416,188 Cost 295,212 383,725 548,646 496,116 4,388,375 45D. Mansfield Hollow New Work Lake, CT Approp. - - - - 6,447,16438 Cost - - - - 6,447,16438 Maint. Approp. 178,000 335,400 268,300 309,500 4,003,997 Cost 173,872 322,863 258,483 331,485 3,998,003 45E. West Thompson New Work Lake, CT Approp. - - - - 7,001,22039 Cost - - - - 7,001,22039 Maint. Approp. 423,000 318,400 345,300 404,100 4,424,798 Cost 423,571 322,774 329,781 425,327 4,411,677 45F. Westville Lake, New Work MA Approp. - - - - 5,684,68340 Cost - - - - 5,684,68340 Maint. Approp. 382,000 409,900 325,300 257,100 4,061,396 Cost 342,850 461,487 322,201 304,048 4,057,487 46. Town Brook, Quincy New Work and Braintree, MA Approp. 250,000 350,000 250,000 550,000 1,420,740 Cost 217,001 345,011 297,725 509,110 1,368,847 47. West River, New New Work Haven, CT Approp. 100,000 195,000 75,000 25,000 595,000 Cost 79,088 209,861 66,149 34,747 589,534 1 Includes $6,138,157 from Public Works Funds and 28 Includes $2,881 Code 711 funds. $4,849,740 from Emergency Relief Funds. 29 Includes $6,432 Code 711 funds. 2 Includes $389,929 Code 711 funds and $511,089 Code 30 Includes $4,671 Code 711 funds. 713 funds. 31 Includes $179,727 Code 711 funds. SIncludes $650,136 for previous projects. 32 Cash for construction only. Excludes $164,020 4 Includes $3,761,412 for previous projects. expended to date for land condemnation. 6 Excludes $15,000 expended for previous project. 3 Excludes $22,517 expended to date for land 6 Improvement adequate for commerce. condemnations. 7 Excludes $129,757 expended for rehabilitation; 34 Cash for construction only. Excludes $199,410 breakwater repaired in 1961. expended to date for land condemnations. 8 Includes $331,626 for previous projects. Includes 6 Includes $71,943 Code 711 funds. $290,877 National Industrial Recovery Funds and $59,207 36 Includes $207,700 Code 711 funds. Public Works Funds. 37 Includes $6,255 Code 711 funds and $40,353 Code 9 Includes $32,570 for previous projects. 713 funds. lo Includes $130,393 for previous projects. 38 Includes $68,717 Code 711 funds. 11 Includes $12,000 for previous projects. 39 Includes $315,420 Code 711 funds. 12 Includes $188,647 for previous projects. 40 Includes $67,667 Code 711 funds. 13 Excludes $73,800 for previous project. 41 Includes $7,889 for previous project. 14 Includes $18,310 Code 711 funds. 42 Includes $83,276 for maintenance of previous 15 Includes $504,062 Code 711 funds. project. 16 Includes $618,469 Code 711 funds and $32,000 Code 43 Includes $245,000 Public Works Funds. 713 funds. 44 Includes $42,340 for previous project. 17 Recreational cost sharing. 45 Includes $3,160 for previous project. is Includes $199,303 Code 711 funds. 46 Includes $2,013 for previous projects. In addition 19 Includes $229,436 Code 711 funds. $400 was expended for maintenance from Contributed 20 Includes $59,536 Code 711 funds. Funds. 21 Includes $364,688 Code 711 funds. 47 Includes $45,835 for new work for previous project; 22 Includes $470,077 Code 711 funds. excludes $211,649 expended for rehabilitation; jetty 23 Includes $245,168 Code 711 funds. repaired in 1963. 24 Includes $3,695 Code 711 funds and $115,138 Code 713 funds. 25 Includes $88,931 Code 711 funds. 26 Includes $143,538 Code 711 funds. 27 Includes $20,000 Code 711 funds. 1-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 1-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 June 13, 1902 March 2, 1907 Jan. 21, 1927 (Section 2) Included in Public Works Administration program, Sept. 6, 1933 June 26, 1934 (Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act) Included in Public Works Administration Program, Apr. 29, 1935 Included in Emergency Relief Program, May 28, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 Mar. 2, 1945 June 3, 1896 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960, as amended July 11, 1870 Aug. 2, 1882 Aug. 5, 1886 June 3, 1896 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text). Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious Aquatic Plant growths from the waters and streams in the U.S. Research and planning costs to be borne by U.S. Provided for continued research. BRANFORD HARBOR, CT (See Section 2 of Text). Channel between upper and lower wharves in the river. Channel at the mouth of the harbor. CAPE COD CANAL, MA (See Section 3 of Text). Purchase canal from Boston, Cape Cod & New York Canal Co., in accordance with contract dated July 29, 1921, executed by that company. Construct 3 bridges and widen canal to 250 feet Operation and care of works of improvement provided for the funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Construct a mooring basin. Dredging and bank protection. Existing project for main canal adopted. 15-foot channel and turning basin in Onset Bay. Extend East Boat Basin for an area of about 4.3 acres to a depth of 8 feet. CHATHAM (STAGE) HARBOR, MA (See Section 4 of Text). Entrance Channel 10 feet deep, 150 feet wide from Chatham Roads into upper harbor. GREAT SALT POND, BLOCK ISLAND, RI (See Section 5 of Text). Channel and jetties. Extending south jetty and dredging Channel and basin in inner harbor. GREEN HARBOR, MA (See Section 6 of Text). Channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide from deep water to head of navigation; anchorage near town pier; sealing, rebuilding in part and extension of existing west jetty. HARBOR OF REFUGE, BLOCK ISLAND, RI (See Section 7 of Text). The main breakwater Repairs to basin walls and cliff protection east of harbor. Breakwater inclosing inner harbor. Raising crest of main breakwater and making it sandtight. H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 87-874, 87th Cong. H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong. H. Doc. 100, 56th Cong., 2nd sess. and Annual Report for 1901, page 1188. Specified in Act. H. Doc. 139, 67th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 795, 71st. Cong., 3rd sess. Do. Do. Do. Rivers and Harbor Committee Doc. 15, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 431, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 168, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 456, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report 1942. H. Doc. 57, 54th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act. Annual Report for 1900, p. 1276. H. Doc. 330, 77th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, December 15, 1965. Annual Report 1868, p. 785 and S. Misc. Doc. 81, 40th Cong., 2nd sess. S. Ex. Doc. 26, 47th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 27, 48th Cong., 2nd sess. and Annual Report 1885, p. 610. H. Doc. 83, 54th Cong., 1st sess. 1-34 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1827 July 11, 1871 Aug. 5, 1886 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 June 2, 1874 October 16, 1879 June 13, 1902 August 26, 1937 June 14, 1880 August 5, 1886 Aug. 2, 1882 Mar. 3, 1899 July 25, 1912 Do. July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19352 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 Aug. 16, 1949 Aug. 9, 1955 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 4, 1913 Sept. 22, 1922 Oct. 23, 1962 July 9, 1965 Sept. 16, 1890 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 June 30, 1948 July 14, 1960, as amended HYANNIS HARBOR, MA (See Section 8 of Text). Breakwater. Present dimensions of breakwater. Dredging behind breakwater. Channel, anchorage and jetty. JONESPORT HARBOR, ME (See Section 9 of Text). A steel sheetpile breakwater 1200 feet in length. A 15-acre anchorage composed of 9 acres 6 feet deep and 6 acres 8 feet deep. An entrance channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep. MILFORD HARBOR, CT (See Section 10 of Text). East jetty at the mouth of the river. West jetty at the mouth of the river. Entrance channel. Anchorage west of channel and present project dimensions of channel above Merwin's Wharf NANTUCKET (HARBOR OF REFUGE), MA (See Section 11 of Text). West jetty.3 East jetty and dredging when necessary. NEW HAVEN HARBOR, CT (See Section 12 of Text) Sandy Point dike. The 16-foot anchorage basin. Present project dimensions of channels in Mill River. Present project dimensions of West River channel and anchorage. 18- and 16-foot channels in Quinnipiac River. 25-foot channel 30-foot channel and anchorage and present location of 16-foot anchorage. 35-foot main channel, elimination of 30-foot anchorage, present location and extent of 16.-foot anchorage Brewery Street channel declared non-navigable. Abandonment of upper end of West River. Deepen main ship channel to 40 feet; widen main ship channel to 500 feet; widen at Southwest Ledge to minimum of 780 feet; straighten channel downstream of turning basin. PLYMOUTH HARBOR, MA (See Section 13 of Text). Beach protection. Dredging 18-foot channel. Dredging 15-foot extension, including turning basin. Rubblestone breakwater. Anchorages are 8 feet deep inside breakwater. Elimination of authorized 18-foot anchorage from existing project. Recreational development POINT JUDITH POND AND HARBOR OF REFUGE, POINT JUDITH, RI (See Section 14 of Text). The main breakwater. Present dimensions of eastern shore arm. Western shore arm. Removing 3 shoals from the harbor arm. Abandons project for entrance to Point Judith Ponds, and authorizes channels and anchorages in lower pond and upper pond. Extension of existing 15-foot channel. S. Doc. 32, 18th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 63, 41st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Ex. Doc. 96, 48th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 98, 77th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 481, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. Authorized by H. Res. September 23, 1976 and S. Res. October 1, 1976 pursuant to Section 201 of cited Act. H. Ex. Doc. 107, 42nd Cong., 3rd sess., and Annual Report 1873, p. 1042. Authorized by Dept., October 16, 1879. Annual Report for 1879, p. 342. H. Doc. 280, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 77, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 18, 45th Cong., 2nd sess. and Annual Report for 1880, page 423. Annual Report for 1885, page 579. Plans approved by a Board of Engineers, October 2, 1882. H. Doc. 82, 55th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 26, 62nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 535 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 686, 69th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 479, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 307, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 517, 79th Cong., 2nd sess.' H.R. 3511, 81st Cong., 1st sess., P.L. 234 Annual Report for 1899, p. 1089. H. Doc. 1194, 62nd Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 996, 66th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 124, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 66, 51st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 60, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 911, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 2001, 64th Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 15, 80th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, September 29, 1976. 1-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 July 14, 1960, as amended Nov. 17, 1986 August 26, 1937 Aug. 11, 1888 June 25, 1910 July 14, 1960, as amended July 14, 1960, as amended Mar. 2, 1827 June 23, 1866 Sept. 19, 1890 June 25, 1910 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 July 14, 1960, as amended July 14, 1960, as amended June 10, 1872 July 14, 1960, as amended in 1965 PORTSMOUTH HARBOR & PISCATAQUA RIVER, ME and NH (See Section 15 of Text). Removal of ledge rock; widening 35-foot channel; extending channel and maneuvering basins above Boiling Rock and at head of project. Modified existing project for widening and extending 35-foot channel Construct 6-foot channels and anchorages Widen 35-foot channel to 1,000 feet between two vertical lift bridges; widen northern limit of 35-foot channel by 100 feet and widen southern limit to 550 feet at Goat Island. PROVIDENCE RIVER and HARBOR, RI (See Section 16 of Text). 35-foot channel. ROCKPORT HARBOR, ME (See Section 17 of Text). Dredge an area about 400 feet by 600 feet in front of wharves at the head of the harbor to a depth of 12 feet at mean low tide and for removal of a small ledge. Remove the ledge at the entrance to a depth of 15 feet at mean low tide; widening the entrance channel to 250 feet. ROCKPORT HARBOR AND PIGEON COVE, ROCKPORT, MA (See Section 18 of Text). An access channel -10 feet deep by 80 feet wide. Two outer harbor anchorages between the breakwater and the town wharf. Pigeon Cove consists of 75-foot wide channel -10 feet deep; dredge anchorage area north of channel to -8 feet. RYE HARBOR, NH (See Section 19 of Text). Dredge channel 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep for 600 feet through entrance, thence 8 feet deep within harbor; dredge 2 anchorages and maintain existing breakwaters. SACO RIVER, ME (See Section 20 of Text). Extension of piers, placing of buoys, and removal of obstruction at entrance to harbor. Breakwater on north side of mouth of river. Jetty on north side of mouth of river. Channel improvements and jetty extension on south side of mouth of river. Present project channel dimensions and extensions of north breakwater about 1,600 feet. Extension of north breakwater to Sharps Ledge. Anchorage and maneuvering basin. SESUIT HARBOR, MA (See Section 21 of Text). Channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide. WELLS HARBOR, ME (See Section 22 of Text). Repairs of old government pier about 750 feet long; anchorage basin; channel 100 to 150 feet wide. Two stone jetties. Annual Report 1892. H. Doc. 556, 82nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 482, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, December 23, 1965. Annual Report 1915, 1936, 1938. H. Doc. 173, 75th Cong., 1st sess. River and Harbor Act. H. Ex. Doc. 141, 50th Cong., 1st sess. River and Harbor Act. H. Doc. 963, 60th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, March 27, 1986. H. Doc. 439. 86th Cong., 2nd sess. S. Ex. Doc. 44, 48th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report 1884, p. 482 H. Doc. 752, 61st Cong., 2nd sess.' H. Doc. 477, 68th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 74th Cong., 1st sess.' P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, November 14, 1967. P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. February 6, 1980. H. Doc. 202, 86th Cong., 2nd sess. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, September 20, 1965. 1-36 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Sept. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 July 7, 1964 Mar. 7, 1974 June 30, 1948, as amended July 24, 1946, as amended June 30, 1948, as amended June 28, 1938 June 30, 1948, as amended July 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 22, 1976 November 17, 1986 July 24, 1946, as amended July 24, 1946, as amended WOOD ISLAND HARBOR and POOL at BIDDEFORD, ME (See Section 23 of Text). Dredged basin 6 feet deep and construction of three ice breakers REVERE BEACH, MA (See Section 28 of Text). Placement of sandfill for protection and improvement. Raising and widening of about 13,000 feet of beach by placement of sandfill. ROOSEVELT CAMPOBELLO INTERNATIONAL PARK LUBEC, ME (See Section 29 of Text). Stone slope protection for the lighthouse at Mulholland Point. CHARLES RIVER (NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREAS), MA (See Section 34 of Text). Federal acquisition and perpetual protection of 17 crucial natural valley storage areas totalling 8,422 acres in what is known as the Middle and Upper watershed of the Charles River. BEAVER BROOK, KEENE, NH (See Section 35C of Text). Construct improvements to reduce the damaging effects of floods. FARMINGTON RIVER, SIMSBURY, CT (See Section 35G of Text). Bank protection by clearing and grubbing existing slope and refilling eroded areas with compacted granular fill. RIVERDALE, WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA (See Section 35M of Text). Construct improvements to existing pumping station. WEST SPRINGFIELD, MA (See Section 35R of Text). A system of earth levees and concrete floodwalls approx. 24,500 feet long. Work involves raising 13,700 feet of existing levee; constructing 2,300 feet of floodwall; improving 2,400 feet of river bank; treating 6,100 feet of existing levee foundation. Three pumping stations with appurtenant drainage facilities also constructed. Raise the floodwall section of the West Springfield project by 1 foot in combination with a flood forecasting system. NEW BEDFORD, FAIRHAVEN AND ACUSHNET, MA (See Section 38 of Text). Hurricane barriers in New Bedford Harbor. NEW LONDON, CT (See Section 39 of Text). Hurricane barrier protecting city of New London from tidal damage. BROCKTON, MA (See Section 40 of Text). Flood control works for protection of Brockton. LITTLE RIVER, BELFAST, ME (See Section 41 of Text). Replace existing wing wall with approximately 80 linear feet of precast concrete modular wall. PERLEY BROOK, FORT KENT, ME (See Section 42 of Text). Construct stone revetment along 100 linear feet adjacent to Route 161. Excavate four river shoals. H. Doc. 49, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 146, 82nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 211, 91st Cong., 2nd sess. Authorized by H. Res. 15 Dec. 70 and S. Res. 17 Dec. 70 pursuant to Section 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. Roosevelt Campobello International Park Act, P.L. 88-363. Chief of Engineers report dated December 6, 1972. P.L. 80-858, Section 205. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, June 21, 1985. P.L. 79-526, Section 14. Approved by Chief of Engineers, September 27, 1988. P.L. 80-858, Section 205. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, June 13, 1986. H. Doc. 455, 75th Cong., 2nd sess. P.L. 80-858, Section 205. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, October 5, 1982. S. Doc. 59, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 478, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. P.L. 99-662, W.R.D.A. of 1986 (Section 401 (c)). P.L. 79-526, Section 14. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 23, 1988. P.L. 79-526, Section 14. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, August 22, 1988. 1-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents ROUGHANS POINT, REVERE, MA (See Section 43 of Text). Nov. 17, 1986 Stabilize existing facilities along the shore with a 4,080-foot long armor stone revetment. Construct earth berm 1-foot high and 200 feet long on existing median strip between Bennington Street and State Road. STAMFORD, CT (See Section 44 of Text). July 14, 1960 Hurricane barrier protecting areas of Stamford from tidal H. Doc. 210, 86th Cong., 1st sess. damage. TOWN BROOK, QUINCY & BRAINTREE, MA (See Section 46 of Text). Nov. 17, 1986 Construct 12-foot diameter, 4,060-foot long, concrete lined H. Doc. 39, 99th Cong., 1st sess. tunnel in bedrock approximately 190 feet below ground. WEST RIVER, WEST HAVEN, CT (See Section 47 of Text). June 30, 1948, Widen river for 1,150 feet to 50-70 feet. Widen the Wintergreen P.L. 80-858, Section 205. Approved as amended Brook channel to 20-30 feet. Construct recreational walkway by Secretary of the Army, connecting two existing city parks. September 26, 1988. 'Contains latest maps. 2Also Public Works Administration, September 6, 1933. 3Inactive (a portion 800 feet long). 1-38 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-C OTHER AUTHORIZING NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1989 Full Report See Contributed Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Andrews River, MA 16"15 Apponaug Cove, RI' Bagaduce River, ME 3 ,4'5 Bar Harbor, ME' Bass Harbor, ME 1,6 Bass Harbor Bar, ME' Beals Harbor, ME1' Belfast Harbor, ME' Bellamy River, NH"3 '4 Beverly Harbor, MA' Black Rock Harbor, CT' Boothbay Harbor, ME' Boston Harbor, MA 1 ,22 Bridgeport Harbor, CT' Bristol Harbor, Bristol, RI Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, ME 1,6 Bucksport Harbor, ME' Bullocks Point Cove, RI' Bunker Harbor, ME1" 6 Buttermilk Bay Channel, MA1,6 Camden Harbor, ME' Canapitsit Channel, MA"'4 Cape Porpoise Harbor, ME' Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, ME' Cathance River, ME"3 Clinton Harbor, CT' Coasters Island Harbor, RI"4 Cobscook Bay, ME",3'4 Cocheco River, NH1" 3 '4 Cohasset Harbor, MA' Connecticut River (above Hartford), CTS Connecticut River below Hartford, CT' Corea Harbor, Gouldsboro, ME 1" 6 Criehaven Harbor, ME' Cross Rip Shoals Nantucket Sound, MA' Cuttyhunk Harbor, MA' Damariscotta River, ME 1,4 Deer Island Thoroughfare, ME"4 Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA" Duck Island Harbor, CT' Duxbury Harbor, MA' East Boothbay Harbor, ME' Edgartown Harbor, MA' Essex River, MA' Exeter River, NH",4 Fall River Harbor, MA5 Falmouth Harbor, MA' Fivemile River Harbor, CT5 Frenchboro Harbor ME' Georges River, ME1 Gloucester Harbor and Annisquam River, MA' Greenwich Bay, RI' Greenwich Harbor, CT' Guilford Harbor, CT' Hampton Harbor, NH1" 6 Harraseeket River, ME1"4 Hay (West Harbor), Fisher's Island, NY 1 Hendrick's Harbor, ME' Hingham Harbor, MA 1 Housatonic River, CT5 Ipswich River, MA Island End River, Chelsea, MA 1,6 Isle Au Haut Thoroughfare, ME' Isle of Shoals Harbor, ME and NH' 1988 1964 1912 1932 1965 1920 1959 1971 1897 1951 1988 1953 1984 1983 1987 1976 1907 1979 1969 1985 1960 1899 1977 1964 1884 1985 1911 1866 1913 1979 1932 1988 1984 1939 1954 1987 1906 1916 1968 1953 1978 1953 1978 1948 1913 1984 1978 1969 1978 1978 1983 1893 1969 1983 1988 1896 1931 1957 1954 1983 1969 1983 1980 1977 $ 219,042 156,8742 28,000 406,591 188,859 4,076 184,880 61,56132 34,643 246,048 18,000 25,313,08333 4,491,11949 316,288 277,420 18,421 170,902 95,372 163,855 102,400 9,113 175,037 190,438 21,000 104,957 5,500 4,173 119,089 267,76738 116,324 1,541,18552,53 797,954 40,776 24,200 27,176 5,000 40,000 94,584 482,166 421,29729 6,500 65,61435 21,759 27,454 6,164,75740 123,763 35,490 657,345 25,788 1,296,93436 2,000 198,758 137,222 200,000 30,963 8,401 28,204 28,316 859,691 5,618 311,850 137,653 80,691 $ 490,220 23,429 39 2,187 21,475 12,175 119,267 252,763 16,821 1,573,091 22,983 9,919,43819 2,009,75450 16,838 20,833 76,667 28,406 213,32346 138,880 12,279 347,865 9,021 974,711 13,161 42,617 259,978 15,822 15,284,83954 83,243 8,125 54,328 1,054,58947 905 362,224 399,546 843,179 17,238 62,980 83,93814 3,032 2,064,76734 312,100 188,802 24,616 246,413 1,494,557 6,527 204,872 1,266,169 2,116,805 5,309 38,026 6,325 162,626 2,397,757 32,947 180,786 643,364 1-39 187,500 100,000 147,887 123,757 69,323 20,000 127,000 130,410 11,643 35,00030 10,000 35,000 25,000 100,000 25,500 193,761 222,010 192,33648 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1989 Full Report See Contributed Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Josias River, ME' 1977 115,565 122,173 26,813 Kennebec River, ME' 1987 1,599,94031 2,319,407 Kennebunk River, ME' 1985 261,417 1,234,403 88,917 Kingston Harbor (North Plymouth), MA' 1895 8,940 - Lagoon Pond, Martha's Vineyard, MA"1,6 1976 99,098 9,089 80,990 Lamprey River, NH" ,4 1913 19,980 33,563 Little Harbor, NH1 ,4 ,26 1977 133,227 266,119 Little Harbor, Woods Hole, MA"4 1906 18,000 5,224 Lubec Channel, ME' 1956 380,322 23,941 Lynn Harbor, MA' 1956 755,576 206,203 Machias River, ME' 1972 32,000 212,337 Malden River, MA",20 1922 104,853 45,097 62,000 Matinicus Harbor, ME1 1962 14,00021 8,989 Medomak River, ME' 1953 17,000 92,359 Menemsha Creek, MA' 1981 56,926 629,644 12,500 Merrimack River, MA' 1940 369,891 233,998 Mianus River, CT' 1985 132,435 659,390 46,500 Moosabec Bar, ME' 1930 11,400 25,227 Mystic River, CT' 1957 197,582 143,385 14,000 Mystic River, MA' 1986 3,222,777 2,009,244 Narraguagus River, ME' 1969 821,144 71,087 New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA' 1953 1,857,618 708,967 20,385 New Harbor, ME' 1966 118,62024 26,944 7,015 New Haven Breakwater, CT' 1950 1,242,246 40,273 New London Harbor, CT' 1986 638,77417 1,849,944 Newburyport Harbor, MA5 1988 569,22523 4,549,271 Newport Harbor, RI' 1953 733,524 128,223 Niantic Bay and Harbor, CT"1 ,6 1972 66,464 111,789 67,500 Northeast Harbor, ME' 1954 138,942 51,047 Norwalk Harbor, CT' 1983 531,12939 3,784,09242 34,500 Owl's Head Harbor, ME13 1968 124,158 13,867 4,383 Patchogue River, CT 1,22 1984 355,445 621,988 56,694 Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay and Watch Hill Cove, RI & CT' 1978 318,78728 658,630 20,000 Pawtuxet Cove, RI' 1975 295,356 152,105 295,356 Penobscot River, ME' 1985 501,020 917,306 Pepperell Cove, ME5 1969 171,351 46,882 Pig Island Gut, ME"1,6 1966 191,753 86,456 Pleasant River, ME' 1892 3,500 217 Pollock Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, MA' 1956 1,083,504 846,590 Portland Harbor, ME' 1985 9,588,71027 7,903,331 Potowomut River, RI' 1882 5,000 50 Provincetown Harbor, MA5 1985 3,548,95441 1,053,966 760,000 Red Brook Harbor, Bourne, MA6,8 1972 38,764 - Richmond Harbor, ME",4 1883 20,000 - Richmond's Island Harbor, ME 1,4 1882 119,844 1,808 Rockland Harbor, ME 1976 1,948,462 452,800 255,000 Rockport and Old Harbors, Rockport, MA 1986 22,000 194,963 Royal River, ME",6 1986 336,704 728,62212 49,56251 St. Croix River, ME' 1950 179,550 36,392 19,892 Sakonnet Harbor, RI' 1983 764,651 192,164 21,928 Sakonnet River, RI , o 1909 38,427 9,549 Salem Harbor, MA' 1969 1,693,202 509,290 Sandy Bay (Harbor of Refuge), Cape Ann, MA' s 1922 1,925,553 16,060 Sasanoa River, ME1 3'4 1915 35,000 124 Scarboro River, ME' 1976 392,635 1,239,293 10,000 Scituate Harbor, MA' 1971 379,851 148,751 69,976 Searsport Harbor, ME' 1966 572,56816 45,270 Seekonk River, RI' 1954 672,214 793,234 67,792 South Bristol Harbor ME' 1971 89,593 12,706 2,663 Southport Harbor, Cft 1962 96,9277 374,913 18,525 Southwest Harbor, ME' 1962 180,042 66,540 7,501 Stamford Harbor, CT5 1980 892,82437 1,727,72045 169,636 Stockton Harbor, ME 1,3,4 1915 33,000 23,216 1-40 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1989 Contributed Full Report Funds See Annual Operation and Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Stonington Harbor, CT' 1959 377,328 123,060 Stonington Harbor, ME1" 6 1985 898,500 5,067 Stony Creek, Branford, CT 1'6 1978 112,487 313,602 92,000 Sullivan Falls Harbor, ME' 1914 19,871 - Taunton River, MA5 1948 442,895 32,917 Tenants Harbor, ME' 1920 18,750 13,292 Thames River, CT' 1967 1,471,919 1,603,730 Union River, ME3", 15 1912 146,855 130,375 Vineyard Haven, MA' 1943 27,186 8,699 Wareham Harbor, MA5 1896 95,997 10,296 Warren River, RI 1890 5,000- Warwick Cove, RI"6 1975 155,430 51,196 107,220 Wellfleet Harbor, MA' 1981 157,63425 926,068 32,000 Westcott Cove, CT' 1978 55,960 291,377 21,000 Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT5 1972 19,308 180,824 Westport River, MA4,9 1942 -- Weymouth Back River, MA' 1944 48,740 26,411 20,000 Weymouth-Fore & Town Rvrs., MA"1 22 1979 and 1983 30,194,61343 1,394,14544 630,133 Wickford Harbor, RI1 ,22 1973 233,410 70,435 49,094 Wilson Point Harbor, CT 1,4 1895 54,177- Winnipesaukee Lake NH' 1952 7,500 29,870 Winter Harbor, ME1, 1976 162,937 9,935 Winthrop Harbor, MA' 1895 8,992 38,515 Woods Hole Channel, MA' 1940 230,000 51,718 York Harbor, ME' 1977 239,654 351,090 32,161 1 Completed. 2 Excludes costs of $137,583 for local cooperation requirements, which includes $104,583 cash contribution. 3 Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress, 1st session. " No commerce reported. s Completed except for inactive portion. 6 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, Sec. 107). SIncludes $37,714 Emergency Relief Funds. Excludes $18,525 Contributed Funds, of which $1,785 was for work outside approved project. 8 Inactive. 9 Awaiting local cooperation. Improvement to be restudied. o1C0 ommerce included under Tiverton Harbor, RI. 11 Authorized work remaining on project is comprised of an incomplete and an inactive portion. 12 Excludes $20,000 expended from Contributed Funds, Other for maintenance. 13 Recommendation for abandonment of existing project made in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress, 1st session. Portion of project authorized by the Chief of Engineers (P.L. 86-645, Sec. 107) is complete. 4 Excludes $5,000 Contributed Funds expended. 15 Improvement adequate for commerce. 16 Costs to local interests for berth improvements are estimated to be $60,000. 17 Includes $40,800 for previous project. 18iAs bandonment recommended in H. Doc. 411, 64th Congress, 1st session, and in River and Harbor Committee Doc. 3, 65th Congress, 1st session. 19 Includes $17,879 for previous projects. Excludes $17,767 Contributed Funds. 20 Under State maintenance. 21 Excludes $114,327 expended for rehabilitation; breakwater repaired in 1962. 22 Portion of project authorized by Chief of Engineers. 23 Excludes $1,415,524 expended for Major Rehabilitation. 24 All assurances of local cooperation have not been fulfilled. Public landing at Back Cove has not been constructed. Portion of project authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, Sec. 107). 25 Includes $11,350 for previous project. 26 H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. recommended eliminatin maintenance dredging. 27Includes $692,435 for previous projects. 28 Includes $133,357 for previous project. 29 Includes $37,000 for new work for previous project. 30 Excludes local requirements of $65,000 consisting of $13,000 for public wharf and $52,000 for additional construction costs. 31 Includes $509,411 for previous projects. 32 Includes $22,000 for previous projects. 33 Includes $1,465,123 for previous projects. Includes $935,303 Emergency Relief Funds and $1,030,806 Public Works Funds. 34 Includes $81,410 for previous project. 35 Includes $15,614 for new work for previous projects. 1-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS 36 Includes $21,000 for previous projects. 3 Includes $135,143 for previous project. 38 Includes $10,000 for previous project. 3 Includes $162,517 for previous project. 40 Includes $330,204 for previous project. 41 Includes $215,801 for previous project. 42 Includes $66,120 for previous projects. 43 Includes for previous projects $735,900 (Weymouth, Fore River) and $25,000 (Town River). Includes for previous project $5,250 (Weymouth, Fore River) and $12,577 (Weymouth, Town River). 45 Includes $59,420 for previous project. 46 Includes $35,214 for previous project. 47 Excludes $50,000 Contributed Funds expended for maintenance. 48 Excludes $582,188 Contributed Funds, Other expended. 49 Includes $378,450 for previous project 50 Includes $11,949 for maintenance of previous project. 5' Excludes $18,000 Contributed Funds, Other. 52 Includes $287,374 for previous projects and excludes $9,000 for subproject "Eightmile River, CT". S3Excludes $60,000 expended for Major Rehabilitation. 64 Includes $366,348 for previous projects. TABLE 1-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to Amount See Annual Sept. 30, 1989 Expended by Project Report For Construction Local Interest Burial Hill Beach, Westport, CT' 1958 $ 5,810 $ 11,612 Calf Pasture Beach Park, Norwalk, CT' 1964 56,386 120,179 Clark Point Beach, New Bedford, MA' 1982 228,081 228,080 Cliff Walk, Newport, RI6 1984 405,491 955,237 Compo Beach, Westport, CT' 1962 84,544 169,089 Cove Island, Stamford, CT' 1961 47,131 94,262 Cummings Park, Stamford, CT' 1963 26,886 53,771 Guilford Point Beach (Jacobs Beach), Guilford, CT' 1961 15,620 31,241 Gulf Beach, Milford, CTi 1958 21,303 42,606 Hammonasset Beach, Madison, CT' 1956 163,183 326,366 Hampton Beach, Hampton, NH' 1966 260,868 385,641 Jennings Beach, Fairfield, CT' 1956 14,401 28,802 Lighthouse Point Park (Area 9), CT' 1961 3,930 7,859 Lynn-Nahant Beach, MA 1986 50,000- Middle Beach, CT' 1958 8,810 17,620 Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, RI3 1963 14,512 29,024 Nantasket Beach, MA4 1971- North Scituate Beach, Scituate, MA' 1969 106,552 106,552 Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Martha's Vineyard, MA' 1976 273,334 198,583 Oakland Beach, Warwick, RI' 1982 559,200 181,175 Plum Island, MA' 1977 118,882 104,875 Prospect Beach, West Haven, CT' 1958 104,573 240,819 Quincy Shore Beach, Quincy, MA' 1962 621,440 1,242,880 Sand Hill Cove Beach, RI' 1959 40,143 82,000 Sasco Hill Beach, Fairfield, CT' 1961 23,759 47,518 Seaside Park, CT' 1958 150,000 329,921 Sherwood Island State Park, Westport, CT' 1983 1,186,830 889,330 Short Beach, CT' s-- Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT 1964 62,560 270,695 Southport Beach, CT' 1960 17,631 35,263 Town Beach, Plymouth, MA6 1964 5,490 10,981 Wallis Sands State Beach, Rye, NH' 1966 65,131 435,942 Wessagusset Beach, Weymouth, MA' 1971 180,944 200,208 Willard Beach, South Portland, ME 1983 171,000 - Winthrop Beach, MA' 1960 176,567 353,134 Woodmont Shore, Milford, CT' 1961 53,838 111,6792 1 Completed. 2 Excludes $118,215 expended for work beyond scope of project. 3 Additional Federal participation will be required based on Public Law 87-874. " Project inactive. 5 Project completed at no cost to Federal Government by using fill from Federal navigation improvement at Housatonic River. 6 Completed except for inactive portion. 1-42 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Alford, Green River, MA3"4 Alley Bay, Beals, ME3,4,"0� Amesbury, Powwow River, MA3'4 Ansonia-Derby, CT3 Bagaduce River, ME3,4"� Big River Reservoir, RI Blackstone River, Millbury, MA3'4,1o Bound Brook, Scituate, MA3'4 Canton, MA3'4 Charles River Dam, MA3 Charlestown, NH3'4 Cherryfield, ME3,4 Chicopee, MA3 Chicopee Falls, MA3 Clear River, Burrillville, RI3,4 Cocheco River, NH3,4 Connecticut River, North Stratford, NH 3,4 Connecticut River, W. Stewartstown, NH3,4 Covered Bridge, Sheffield, MA3'4," � Danbury, CTa Derby, CT3 East Branch Dam, CT 3 East Hartford, CT3 Fitchburg, MA (See No. Nashua River) Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT3'4 Fort Kent, ME3,4 Fox Point Barrier, RI3 Gardner, MA3'4 Gulf Street, Milford, CT3 '4 "0 Hall Meadow Brook Dam, CT3 Hartford, CT3 Hartford, White River, VT3'4 Hayward Creek, Braintree-Quincy, MA3'4 Holmes Bay, Whiting, ME3 ,4",o Holyoke, MA3 Housatonic River, Pittsfield, MA3'4 Housatonic River, Salisbury, CT3,4," 0� Housatonic River, Sheffield, MA 3,4," 0 Huntington, MA3,4,10 Island Avenue, Quincy, MA3,4 Islesboro (The Narrows), ME3,4,10 Johnson Bay, Lubec, ME 3,4",10 Keene, NH '4 Lancaster, Israel River, NH 3,4 Lee, Housatonic River, MA3,4"o Little River Dike, Westfield, MA3 Lowell, MA3 Lower Woonsocket, RI3 Machias River, Machias, ME 3,4 Mad River Lake, CT3 Marginal Way, Ogunquit, ME3'4 Merriconeag Sound, Harpswell ME3 ,4",10� Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT ,4,1o Nashua, NH3 Nonewaug River, Woodbury, CT3,4",10� Northampton, MA3 North Canaan, Blackberry River, CT3,4 North Nashua River, Fitchburg, MA3 North Nashua River, Lancaster, MA3,4"10 Norwalk, CT3.4 Norwich, CT3 Park River, Hartford, CT3 Pawcatuck, CT Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI3,4 Penobscot River, Old Town, ME3 4 Phillips Lake, MA Pleasant Point, Perry, ME3,4 1977 1979 1978 1977 1985 1987 1986 1974 1964 1981 1976 1963 1954 1978 1987 1963 1982 1976 1988 1978 1977 1973 1951 1979 1979 1976 1970 1988 1970 1960 1973 1979 1980 1953 1985 1982 1981 1960 1983 1985 1985 1955 1982 1976 1945 1977 1987 1973 1987 1980 1988 1950 1985 1950 1977 1981 1979 1952 1960 1986 1966 1986 1986 1982 1987 $ 41,419 190,500 132,113 18,266,040 129,500 249,999 47,300 180,6706 41,170,921 113,330 203,000 1,433,6007 2,183,912 168,000 183,100 180,000 54,703 250,000 13,143,000 7,582,642 1,959,836 2,135,447 220,284 1,997,820 11,112,801 495,691 250,000 2,572,357 6,094,1009 332,236 2,235,470 207,390 3,418,000 739,003 102,800 205,608 3,900 172,000 165,500 163,082 44,100 551,606 37,852 5,000 490,600"11 6,600,681 152,000 4,773,020 243,000 107,681 110,000 270,0008 222,500 680,00017 73,865 3,241,42123 81,671 52,150 1,209,000 60,150,864 644,311 3,171,309 178,045 300,000 189,000 1-43 ', - 21 4,576 92,891 5,554,08815 385 411,29222 166,526 2 19 7,637 3,679,50014 15,000 21,000 2,781,100 24,447 13 1,266,63820 327 16 214,106 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 1-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Port 5 Facility, Bridgeport, CT3 '4 ,10 1986 227,500 - Prestile Stream, Blaine, ME3 ,4 ,10 1980 73,674 - St. John River Basin, ME24 - 13,070 - Salmon River, Colchester, CT3'4 1983 247,100- Sand Cove, Gouldsboro, ME 1984 127,500- Saxonville, MA3 1981 4,218,700 - 6 Sebasticook River, Hartland, ME3'4 1985 1,857,475- Shelburne, Androscoggin River, NH 3,4,10 1977 37,657- Smelt Brook, Weymouth-Braintree, MA3,4 1978 1,803,739 - South River, Conway, MA 1987 133,500- Springdale, MA3 1952 700,000 - Springfield, MA3 1950 577,000s18 5,350 Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, C'T3,4 1983 116,296- Stony Brook, Wilton, NH3'4 1973 19,500- Sucker Brook Dam, CT3 1976 2,227,712 58,800 Three Rivers, MA3 1970 1,577,18912 Torrington, East Branch, CT3 4 1963 389,200 - Torrington, West Branch, CT3' 4 1963 228,300- Trumbull Lake, CT' 1983 1,498,799 - Village of Saxtons, VyT, 3 4' 10 1985 140,500- Ware, MA3'4 1963 400,000- Waterbury-Watertown, CT3,4 1963 263,300- Weston, VT3'4 1957 13,000 1,800 West Branch, Westfield River, Huntington, MA3'4 1983 116,492- West Warren, MA3,4 1964 389,200 41,000 Whitmanville Lake, MA 1979 605,023- Winsted, CT3 1954 245,500- Woonsocket, RI3 1962 4,040,000 224,476 Worcester Diversion, MA3 1978 5,086,859 79,316 1 Inactive. 2 Excludes $1,146,828 expended from Contributed Funds, Other. 3 Completed. 4 Authorized by Chief of Engineers. s Reflects FY1967 settlement of outstanding claims. 6 Excludes $8,503 Contributed Funds, Other. 7 Includes $295,000 Public Works Administration funds. 8 Excludes $147,366 Flood Control and Coastal Emergency funds expended. 9 Excludes $835,000 Public Works Administration funds. 'o Emergency Bank Protection. 11 Excludes $794,374 Public Works Administration funds. 12 Excludes $565,168 Contributed Funds, Other. 13 Excludes $3,000 Contributed Funds, Other. TABLE 1-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MU 14 Cash for construction only. Excludes $245,000 expended for land condemnation. 15 Excludes $1,674,567 Contributed Funds, Other. 16 Excludes $259,408 Contributed Funds, Other. i1s Excludes $280,000 Public Works Administration funds. Excludes $355,000 Public Works Administration funds. 19 Excludes $406,653 Contributed Funds, Other. 20 Excludes $488,920 Contributed Funds, Other. 21 Excludes $727,460 Contributed Funds, Other. 22 Excludes $12,000 expended for land condemnations and $25,184 Contributed Funds, Other for relocations. 23 Excludes $1,370,000 Public Works Administration funds expended on Fitchburg, MA. 24 Irrigation demonstration project. LTI-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to September 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project, ME' 1935 6,384,394 1 Work discontinued in 1937. Facilities transferred to War Assets Administration. 1-44 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Funds Expended Full Report See Annual Date Contributed Project Report for Deauthorized Federal Funds Alternative for Sugar Hill Reservoir -Aug 1977 $ - $- Andover Lake, CT -. Aug 1977 - - Bagaduce River, ME (uncompleted portion) - Oct 1978 - - Baker Brook, MA 1972 Nov 1979 94,000 - Bar Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion) 1932 Nov 1986 - - Beards Brook Reservoir, NH 1949 Aug 1977 78,000 - Beaver Brook Lake, NH 1973 Apr 1978 378,300 - Bennington Reservoir, NH 1949 Aug 1977 205,000 - Black Rock Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1986 Nov 1986 - - Brant Rock Beach, Marshfield, MA 1961 Nov 1979 - - Bridgeport Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1980 Nov 1979 - - Brockway Lake, VT 1946 Aug 1977 - - Cambridgeport Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Chicopee, MA (uncompleted portion) 1954 Aug 1977 - - Claremont Lake, NH 1968 Dec 1970 242,700 - Clyde, RI 1948 Apr 1951 8,800 - Connecticut River below Hartford, CT (uncompleted portion) 1979 Oct 1978 - - Cotuit Harbor, MA 1962 Oct 1978 8,541 - Dickey-Lincoln School Lakes, ME 1984 Nov 1986 26,285,298 - Eastport Harbor, ME 1984 Nov 1983 638,675 141,530 Edgartown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1978 Nov 1986 - - Fall River Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1984 Nov 1986 - - Fivemile River Harbor, CT (uncompleted - - portion) 1969 Oct 1978 Gaysville Lake, VT 1970 Oct 1976 206,600 - Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI (uncompleted portion) 1983 Nov 1986 - - Greenwich Point Beach, CT 1959 Oct 1978 - - Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI (uncompleted portion) 1983 Nov 1986 - - Housatonic River, CT (uncompleted portion) 1979 Nov 1979 - - Honey Hill Lake, NH 1949 Aug 1977 92,000 - Ipswich River, MA (uncompleted portion) 1969 Nov 1986 - - Kennebec River, ME (uncompleted portion) 1986 Nov 1986 - - Ludlow Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Lynn Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1956 Nov 1986 - - Manchester Harbor, MA 1949 Nov 1979 23,986 - Marblehead Harbor, MA 1968 Oct 1978 43,711 - Mattapoisett Harbor, MA 1950 Oct 1978 - - Milford Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1981 Nov 1986 - - Monoosnoc Brook, MA 1967 Nov 1986 - - Monoosnoc Lake, MA 1967 Nov 1986 - - Mountain Brook Dam, NH 1949 Aug 1977 57,000 - Mystic, CT 1968 Aug 1972 67,700 - Mystic River, CT (uncompleted portion) 1986 Nov 1986 - - Nantucket, Harbor of Refuge, MA (uncompleted portion) 1965 Nov 1986 - - Napatree Beach, RI - Nov 1979 - - Narragansett Pier, RI 1966 Nov 1970 115,590 - New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA (uncompleted portion) 1953 Nov 1986 - - Newburyport Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1986 Nov 1986 - - New Haven Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1986 Nov 1986 - - Nookagee Lake, MA 1976 Nov 1986 563,677 - North Andover and Lawrence, MA 1949 Aug 1977 20,000 - North Hampton Beach, North Hampton, NH 1963 Nov 1981 - - Norwalk-Wilton, CT 1973 Nov 1979 - - Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay, RI and CT (uncompleted portion) 1978 Nov 1986 - - 1-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 1-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Funds Expended Full Report See Annual Date Contributed Project Report for Deauthorized Federal Funds Pawcatuck River, RI & CT (uncompleted portion) 1979 Nov 1979 - - Pawtucket, RI 1949 Nov 1977 - - Pepperell Cove, ME (uncompleted portion) 1969 Nov 1981 - - Pleasant Bay, MA 1971 Nov 1986 - - Point Judith, RI 1968 Nov 1977 198,477 - Pontiac Diversion, RI 1948 Apr 1951 24,200 - Providence River and Harbor, RI (uncompleted portion) 1976 Nov 1986 - - Provincetown Beach (Herring Cove), MA 1961 Oct 1978 - - Provincetown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1979 Oct 1978 - - Rockland Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion) 1976 Nov 1986 - - Saco River, ME (uncompleted portion) 1979 Oct 1979 - - Sakonnet Harbor, RI (uncompleted portion) 1982 June 1982 176,000 - Salem Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1969 Nov 1986 - - Sandy Bay, Cape Ann, MA (uncompleted portion) 1922 Oct 1978 - - Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT' 1964 Nov 1986 - - South Coventry Lake, CT 1951 Aug 1977 96,000 - South Tunbridge Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Stamford Harbor, CT (2 projects uncompleted portions) 1979 Oct 1978 - - Stonington Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1959 Nov 1986 - - Stonington Harbor, ME 1961 Nov 1979 2,543 - Stratford, CT 1973 Mar 1977 934,500 - Sugar Hill Reservoir, NH 1946 Dec 1944 - - Thames River, CT (uncompleted portion) 1967 Nov 1986 - - The Island Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Thumperton Beach, Eastham, MA 1961 Nov 1979 - - Town Neck Beach, Sandwich, MA 1961 Nov 1986 - - Wareham-Marion, MA 1965 Aug 1977 81,715 - Victory Lake, VT 1967 Aug 1977 168,400 - West Brookfield Reservoir, MA 1948 July 1960 67,000 - West Canaan Lake, NH 1948 Aug 1977 92,000 - Westerly, RI 1966 Nov 1986 - - Westfield, MA 1967 Se p 1969 507,200 - Westport, CT 1965 Feb 1970 29,634 - Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT (uncompleted portion) 1972 Nov 1979 - - Williamsville Reservoir, VT 1949 Dec 1944 146,500 - Winthrop Beach, MA (uncompleted portion) 1960 Nov 1986 - - 1 Walnut Beach and impermeable groins. 1-46 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-H NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Study Identification Costs Bar Harbor, ME $47,709 Bass Harbor, Tremont, ME 59,073 Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, ME 33,018 Gloucester Harbor, Gloucester, MA 17,288 Green Harbor, Marshfield, MA 3,696 Hockanum River, Manchester, CT 67,508 Nantucket Inner Harbor-Polpis, MA 2,498 Narraguagus River, Milbridge, ME 24,218 Nasketucket Bay, Fairhaven, MA 15,285 Oak Bluffs Harbor, Oak Bluffs, MA 2,275 Perkins Cove, Ogunquit, ME 9,175 Pig Island Gut, Beals, ME 26,741 Pine Point Harbor, Scarborough, ME 4,867 Plymouth Harbor, Plymouth, MA 17,621 Point Judith Pond, RI 39,563 Provincetown Harbor, MA 82,395 Saugus and Pine Rivers, MA 47,624 Scituate Harbor, MA 33,018 Stonington Harbor, Stonington, CT 25,916 Winthrop Harbor, Winthrop, MA 45,300 Wood Island Harbor, Biddeford, ME 34,789 TABLE 1-I BEACH EROSION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103, PUBLIC LAW 78-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Study Identification Costs Bullock Neck, East Providence, RI $ 9,602 North Nantasket Beach, Hull, MA 3,816 Ocean Grove Beach, Swansea, MA 13,932 Prospect Beach, West Haven, CT 16,134 Town Beaches, Sandwich, MA 15,500 West Haven Beaches, CT 16,106 Woodmont Beach, CT 58,613 1-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 1-J FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Aroostook River, Fort Fairfield, ME Bay View Beach, Milford, CT Esopus Creek, Hurley, NY Esopus Creek, Shandaken, NY Esopus Creek (Pine Hill), Shandaken, NY Esopus Creek, Ulster, NY Mad River, Waterbury, CT Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI Point Beach, Milford, CT Point of Pines, Revere, MA Rippowam River, Stamford, CT Sandberg Creek, Wawrsing, NY Saugatuck Shores, Westport, CT Spicket River, Salem, NH Winnipesaukee River, NH TABLE 1-K BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MA AND RI (See Section 33 of Text) RESERVOIR Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Black- Reservoir Lands stone Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total West Hill2 Worcester, MA 25.8 51 Earthfill 12,400 $1,366,902 $940,000 $2,306,902 1 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 See individual report for details. 1-48 Fiscal Year Costs $24,286 8,369 8,807 13,444 4,842 6,777 74,586 841 6,710 1,989 1,243 7,503 5,162 7,206 95 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-K (Continued) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Black- Lands , . stone and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Worcester, MA 48 Diversion tunnel and channel $4,923,500 $1,179,0002 $6,102,500 Woonsocket, RI 15 Channel improvement 3,740,100 1,069,0003 4,809,100 Lower Woonsocket, Flood wall, conduits and RI 13 channel improvement 8,356,239 435,000 8,791,239 Blackstone River, Millbury, MA 32 Slope protection 254,575 - 254,5755 Clear River, Burrillville, RI 23 Retaining wall 168,000 - 168,000 Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI - Land acquisition 4,125,000 - 4,125,0004 1 Includes relocation. 4 $3,300,000 Federal; $825,000 non-Federal. 2 $158,000 Federal; $1,021,000 non-Federal. 5 $249,999 Federal; $4,576 non-Federal. 3$300,000 Federal; $769,000 non-Federal. TABLE 1-L CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT, NH, MA AND CT (See Section 35 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Conne- Reservoir Lands cticut Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total Vermont: Union Village2 White River 228.4 170 Earthfill 38,000 $3,186,860 $ 908,300 $4,095,160 Junction North Hartland2 White River 211.7 185 Earthfill 71,400 6,349,225 963,000 7,312,225 Junction North Springfield2 Springfield 191.3 120 Earthfill 50,600 4,781,526 2,050,000 6,831,526 Ball Mountain2 Brattleboro 178.2 265 Rockfill- 54,600 10,689,298 350,000 11,039,298 earth Townshend2 Brattleboro 168.3 133 Earthfill 33,200 5,520,413 1,878,000 7,398,413 New Hampshire: Surry Mountain 2 Keene 174.4 86 Earthfill 32,500 2,448,610 385,000 2,833,610 Otter Brook2 Keene 171.2 133 Earthfill 18,300 2,982,048 1,378,400 4,360,448 Massachusetts: Birch Hill2 Gardner 153.3 56 Earthfill 49,900 1,740,679 3,075,000 4,815,679 Tully2 Athol 148.7 62 Earthfill 22,000 1,298,752 368,000 1,666,752 Barre Falls2 Worcester 130.2 62 Rockfill- 24,000 1,928,819 39,000 1,967,819 earth Knightville2 Northampton 102.8 160 Earthfill 49,000 2,594,440 821,200 3,415,640 Littleville2 Northampton 102.0 150 Earthfill 32,400 5,863,412 1,150,000 7,013,412 Conant Brook 2 Springfield 122.0 85 Rockfill- 3,740 1,935,530 1,015,000 2,950,530 earth Connecticut: Colebrook River 2 Winsted 116.0 223 Rockfill- 98,500 8,341,971 5,922,000 14,263,971 earth Mad River Winsted 120.0 178 Earthfill 9,700 4,773,020 2,210,000' 6,983,020 Sucker Brook Winsted 118.5 68 Earthfill 1,480 2,227,712 180,0003 2,407,712 1 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 For details, see individual report. 3 Non-Federal cost. 4 Non-Federal $670,000; Federal $1,540,000. 1-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 1-L (Continued) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Conne- Lands cticut and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages1 Total Beaver Brook, Keene, NH 170.4 Channel improvement $2,582,120 - $2,582,120 Charlestown, NH 181 Riverbank protection 113,330 - 113,330 Chicopee, MA 80 Wall and levee 1,434,000 $ 250,000 1,684,000 Chicopee Falls, MA 83 Wall and levee 2,600,000 70,000 2,670,000 East Hartford, CT 52 Wall and levee 2,135,447 271,000 2,406,447 Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT 50 Channel improvement 220,284 - 220,284 Gardner, MA 163 Dam and levee 495,691 35,000 530,691 Hartford, CT 52 Wall and levee 6,930,0004 1,150,000 8,080,000 Hartford, White River, VT 216 Channel improvement 332,236 - 332,236 Holyoke, MA 85 Wall and levee 3,418,000 150,000 3,568,000 Huntington, MA 100 Riverbank protection 3,900 - 3,900 Israel R., Lancaster, NH 314 Gabion overflow weir 551,606 - 551,606 Keene, NH 167 Channel improvement 44,100 - 44,100 Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT 200.3 Streambank stabilization 110,000 - 110,000 Northampton, MA 94 Wall and levee 960,0005 150,000 1,110,000 North Stratford NH 345 Slope protection 180,000 - 180,000 Park River, CT 51 Conduit 60,150,864 1,300,000 61,450,864 Riverdale, MA 80 Wall and levee 1,263,724 50,000 1,313,720 Salmon R., Colchester, CT2 38 Slope protection 247,100 - 247,100 South River, Conway, MA 107 Slope protection 133,500 - 133,500 Springdale, MA 84 Wall and levee 700,000 57,000 757,000 Springfield, MA 76 Wall and levee 932,0006 272,000 1,204,000 Three Rivers, MA 98 Wall and levee 1,577,189 700,000 2,277,189 Ware, MA 110 Channel improvement 400,000 85,000 485,000 Weston, VT 195 Channel improvement 13,000 2,000 15,000 West Springfield, MA 76 Wall and levee 1,789,1413 30,000 1,819,141 West Warren, MA 111 Wall and levee 389,200 64,000 453,200 Winsted, CT 115 Channel improvement 245,500 30,000 275,500 1 To be borne by local interests. Also includes local interests portion of relocation. 2 For details see individual report. 3 Includes $245,000 Public Works Administration funds. 4 Includes $835,000 Public Works Administration funds. * Includes $280,000 Public Works Administration funds. 6 Includes $355,000 Public Works Administration funds. 1-50 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-M HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT AND MA (See Section 36 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS1 Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Nagua- Reservoir Lands tuck Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages 2 Total Hall Meadow4 Torrington, CT 41.0 73 Rock and 8,620 $2,572,357 $1,290,0003 $3,862,357 earthfill East Branch6 Torrington, CT 43.7 92 Earthfill 4,350 1,959,836 1,290,0003 3,249,836 Thomaston Torrington, CT 30.5 142 Rock and 42,000 6,382,112 7,900,000 14,282,112 earthfill Northfield Brook Torrington, CT 30.6 118 Earthfill 2,432 1,875,512 975,000 2,850,512 Black Rock Waterbury, CT 29.0 154 Earthfill 8,700 5,223,700 2,958,600 8,182,300 Hancock Brook Waterbury, CT 25.0 57 Earthfill 4,030 1,593,911 2,585,000 4,178,911 Hop Brook Waterbury, CT 15.9 97 Earthfill 6,970 2,701,562 3,450,000 6,151,562 1 For details of projects, see individual reports. 4 For last full report, see Annual Report for 1970. 2 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 5 For last full report, see Annual Report for 1973. 3 Includes cost of lands borne by local interests. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS' Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Housa- Lands tonic and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages 2 Total Alford, Green River, MA 111.0 Earth dike and stone slope $ 41,419 $ - $ 41,419 protection Ansonia-Derby, CT 13.0 Wall, levee, channel 18,266,040 1,178,000 19,444,040 improvement and pumping station Danbury, CT 56.0 Walls, channel improvement 13,143,000 1,862,000 15,005,000 and bridge replacement Derby, CT 12.0 Walls, levees and pumping 7,582,642 647,000 8,229,642 station North Canaan, 83.0 Snagging and clearing project 73,865 - 73,865 Blackberry River, CT Pittsfield, MA 133.0 Stone arch culvert 739,003 85,000 824,003 Salisbury, CT 76.0 Gabionade with slope 102,800 - 102,800 protection Sheffield, MA 96.0 Stone slope protection 205,608 - 205,608 Squantz Pond, New 43.0 Timber bulkhead 116,296 - 116,296 Fairfield, CT Torrington, East Branch, 51.0 Dike and channel 389,200 - 389,200 CT improvement Torrington, West Branch, 52.0 Walls, dikes and channel 228,300 -228,300 CT Waterbury-Watertown, 32.0 Wall, dike and channel 263,300 - 263,300 CT 'For details of projects, see individual reports. 2 To be borne by local interests. Includes relocations. 1-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 1-N MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, NH, AND MA (See Section 37 of Text) RESERVOIRS Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Merri- Reservoir Lands mack Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages1 Total Franklin Falls2 Franklin, NH 118.2 140 Earthfill 154,000 $ 6,190,487 $1,760,000 $ 7,950,487 Blackwater2 Concord, NH 118.8 75 Earthfill 46,000 766,746 553,000 1,319,746 Hopkinton- Concord, NH 87.3 115 Earthfill 157,300 12,715,440 8,737,000 21,452,440 Everett 2,4 Edward Keene, NH 161.3 67 Earthfill 12,800 1,708,253 306,000 2,014,253 MacDowell 2 Phillips Fitchburg, MA 105.4 48 Earthfill 1,600 13,450,000 7,350,000 20,800,0003 Whitmanville Fitchburg, MA 110.6 76 Earthfill 9,350 11,590,000 6,210,000 17,800,000 1 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 For details, see individual report. 3 Based on "large" Phillips plan which would eliminate Nookagee Lake. 4 Substituted for Bennington and Beards Brook. Distance and height are for Everett Dam. Distance and height for Hopkinton Dam are 118 miles and 76 feet, respectively. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Merri- Lands mack and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Amesbury, Powwow and 3.0 Wall and reventment $ 132,113 $ - $ 132,113 Merrimack Rivers, MA2 Nashua, NH2 55.0 Wall and levee 270,000 3,000 273,0004 Lowell, MA2 39.0 Wall and levee 490,6006 90,000 580,600 North Nashua River, MA2,3 100.5 Channel improvement 3,241,421 - 3,241,421 Saxonville, MA2 69.0 Wall, levee, channel 4,218,700 530,000 4,748,700 1 To be borne by local interests. 2 Project completed. 3 Excludes $1,370,000 Public Works Administration funds expended on Fitchburg, MA. 4 Excludes $15,000 expended from Contributed Funds. 5 Excludes $794,374 Public Works Administration funds. 1-52 NEW ENGLAND DIVISION TABLE 1-0 THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT, RI AND MA (See Section 45 of Text) RESERVOIRS Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Reservoir Lands Thames Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total Hodges Village2 Webster, MA 74.5 55 Earthfill 13,000 $1,317,268 $3,144,000 $4,461,268 Buffumville2 Webster, MA 74.4 66 Earthfill 12,700 2,157,603 841,000 2,998,603 East Brimfield2 Southbridge, MA 82.8 55 Earthfill 30,000 1,337,043 5,720,000 7,057,043 Westville2 Southbridge, MA 75.2 80 Earthfill 11,000 2,284,683 3,400,000 5,684,683 West Thompson2 Putman, CT 59.3 70 Earthfill 25,600 5,036,220 1,965,000 7,001,220 Mansfield Hollow2 Willimantic, CT 40.0 70 Earthfill 52,000 4,107,164 2,340,000 6,447,164 1 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 For details, see individual report. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Lands Thames and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Norwich, CT 15.0 Channel improvements $1,209,000 $72,000 $1:281,000 1 Borne by local interests. TABLE 1-P BOSTON HARBOR, MA Total Federal Cost for Existing Project to September 1989 Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular $21,881,851 $9,194,920 $31,076,771 Public Works 1,030,806 - 1,030,806 Emergency Relief 935,303 - 935,303 $23,847,960 $9,194,9201 $33,042,880 1 Excludes $17,767 contributed funds. 1-53 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 1-Q RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Date Survey Project Conducted Prqject Conducted Connecticut Clinton Harbor Connecticut River (Brownstone Bar) Niantic River North Cove Norwalk Harbor Stony Creek Rhode Island Sakonnet Harbor Maine Bass Harbor Bunker Harbor Corea Harbor Kennebec River Little Harbor New Harbor Pepperell Cove South Bristol Southwest Harbor Tenants Harbor Wells Harbor Winter Harbor York Harbor Massachusetts Jul 1989 Andrews River Sep 1989 Chatham Harbor Oct 1988 Falmouth Harbor Apr 1989 Green Harbor Dec 1988 Hyannis Harbor Jan 1989 Merrimack River Mystic River Newburyport Feb 1989 Onset Bay Owls Head Scituate Harbor Mar 1989 Mar 1989 Oct 1988 Apr 1989 Mar 1989 Sep 1989 May 1989 Mar 1989 Aug 1989 May 1989 Sep 1989 Oct 1988 Mar 1989 Jul 1989 Jul 1989 May 1989 Feb/Apr 1989 Apr/Aug 1989 Aug 1989 Nov 1988 Apr 1989 Jul 1989 May 1989 Jun 1989 New Hampshire Hampton Harbor Piscataqua River (disposal area) Piscataqua River (Simplex Reach) Portsmouth Harbor (Back Channel) Rye Harbor Apr 1989 Nov 1988 Feb 1989 Feb 1989 Jan 1989 Major activities under the Dredged Material Management Program included in the Providence River and New Haven programs for fiscal year 1989 were: (1) monitoring surveys at the Portland, New London, Rockland and, Foul Area disposal sites; (2) completion of the site designation reports of the Cape Arundel disposal site; and (3) maintenance, replacement, and repositioning of disposal site buoys. Additionally, several monitoring study reports were completed and a public symposium was held. Total cost of contracts was $251,000 and $189,000 for Providence River and New Haven, respectively. Labor costs of $81,000 for program management, sampling and testing, and environmental analysis were incurred for New Haven in fiscal year 1989. 1-54 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT * This district comprises western Vermont, small portions of western Massachusetts and Connecticut, eastern New York including Long Island, and northeastern New Jersey, embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Lake Champlain and St. Lawrence River system east thereof and to the Atlantic Ocean from New York-Connecticut State Line to, but not including Manasquan Inlet, N.J. It exercises jurisdiction, however, over all matters pertaining to improvement of Great Lakes to Hudson River waterway. Under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, the District Engineer, as Supervisor of New York Harbor, also exercises jurisdiction under the laws enacted for the preservation of the tidal waters of New York Harbor, its adjacent or tributary waters, and the waters of Long Island Sound. IMPROVEMENTS I. Aquatic Plant Control ............................. 2-2 2. Bay Ridge-Red Hook Channels, N.Y ........... 2-2 3. East Chester Creek, N.Y .......................... 2-2 4. East Rockaway Inlet, N.Y ........................ 2-3 5. Fire Island to Jones Inlet, N.Y..................... 2-3 6. Hempstead Harbor, N.Y. .... ............... 2-4 7. Hudson River, N.Y................................. 2-4 8. Hudson River Channel, N.Y. & N.J .............. 2-5 9. Kill Van Kull-Newark Bay, N.J. & N.Y........... 2-6 10. Long Island Intracoastal W/W, N.Y ............. 2-6 11. Moriches Iilet, N.Y ............................... 2-6 12. Narrows of Lake Champlain, N.Y ................ 2-7 13. Newark Bay, Hackensack & Passaic Rivers, N.J ............................... 2-7 14. New York and New Jersey Channels .............. 2-8 15. New York Harbor-Collection and Removal of Drift .................................. 2-9 16. New York Harbor-Entrance Channels and Anchorage Areas ............................. 2-9 17. Portchester Harbor, N.Y..........................2-10 18. Rondout Harbor, N.Y ............................ 2-10 19. Supervisor of New York Harbor ................. 2-11 20. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .......... 2-11 21. Other authorized navigation projects.............2-11 22. Navigation work under special authorization ..... 2-11 Beach Erosion Control 23. East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y...........................2-12 24. Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, N.J............... 2-12 25. Other Authorized Beach erosion control projects ................................... 2-13 26. Beach erosion control work under special authorization ............................. 2-13 27. Ardsley, N.Y.......................................2-13 28. Liberty State Park Levee and Seawall, N.J........2-13 29. Passaic River Basin, N.J. & N.Y..................2-14 30. Inspection of completed flood control projects ... 2-15 31. Other authorized flood control projects .......... 2-15 32. Flood control work under special authorization ............................. 2-15 33. Emergency streambank and shoreline protection under special authorization ........... 2-15 34. 35. 36. General Investigations Surveys ........................................... 2-15 Collection and study of basic data ................ 2-15 Deauthorized projects.............................2-15 Tables Table 2-A Cost & Financial Statement...............2-16 Table 2-B Authorizing Legislation ................... 2-20 Table 2-C Hudson River, N.Y. Features of Lock and Dam Included in Existing Project ........................... 2-25 Table 2-E Supervisor of New York Harbor Statement of Activities .................... 2-25 Table 2-F Reconnaissance & Condition Surveys...... 2-26 Table 2-G Other Authorized Navigation Projects..... 2-27 Table 2-41 Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control............................ 2-29 Table 2-1 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .......................... 2-29 Table 2-J Surveys ..................................... 2-30 Table 2-L Costs for Flood Plain Management Services..................... ................ 2-30 Table 2-M Deauthorized Projects .................... 2-30 Table 2-N Section 107 Reconnaissance Reports ...... 2-31 Table 2-0 Section 103 Report ........................ 2-32 Table 2-P Section 205 Projects ....................... 2-32 Table 2-Q Section 14 Reports and Plans and Specs ...................... 2-32 Navigation Page Flood Control Page REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in New York District. Existing Project. Provides for control and progressive eradication of water chestnut, Eurasian water milfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from the navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests were required to provide 30 percent of the cost of the program except as modified by 1962 River and Harbor Act and agree to hold the United States free from damages. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 changed the local responsibility from 30% to 50%. In FY 87 the States involved in the program were permitted to keep the cost sharing at 30% by order of the Secretary of the Army. Starting FY 88, however, local sponsors contributed 50% of the costs. Operations and results during period. FY 1989 has been the eighth year of a control program started in FY 1982 for the removal of nuisance aquatic plants in Lake Champlain. This work has performed for the removal of water chestnut in the southern part of the lake at a cost of $121,300. Condition as of September 30. Reconnaissance report covering the aquatic plant problems of the North Atlantic Division areas was completed in August 1967. Planning for the water chestnut control in the Hudson-Mohawk basin was completed by the New York District, contracts for $189,363 accomplished during FY 1970 through FY 1976. The General Design Memorandum for this program was completed in March 1982 by the State of Vermont. The total Federal cost of this control program to date is $1,490,650. 2. BAY RIDGE AND RED HOOK CHANNELS, N.Y. Location. These channels lie along cast shore of Upper Bay, New York Harbor and, with Buttermilk Channel, form an easterly channel along Brooklyn waterfront from the Narrows to East River. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12327 and 12334). Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938, pages 1768 and 195, respectively. Existing projects. A channel 1,200 feet wide and 40 feet deep at mean low water from the Narrows to Bay Ridge Avenue, Brooklyn, thence 1,750 feet wide to junction of Bay Ridge and Red Hook Channels, thence 1,200 feet wide through Red Hook Channel to junction with Buttermilk Channel and a channel of same depth extending into Gowanus Bay from junction of Bay Ridge Channel with Red Hook Channel, narrowing uniformly in width to about 500 feet at 28th Street, Brooklyn. Section included in project is 4 miles long. Mean tidal range, 4.7 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.6 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 5.2 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $4,277,197 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978. Vol. 2 Operations and results during period. A contract for the removal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 40 feet below mean low water in Bay Ridge and Red Hook Channels, N.Y. was awarded on I May 1989. Work commenced on 30 July 1989 and was completed on 18 September 1989. A total of 801,000 cubic yards of material was removed for a total project cost of $3,090,241. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced March 1901 and completed June 1940. 3. EAST CHESTER CREEK, N.Y. Location. This creek, also known as Hutchinson River, is a small tidal stream emptying into East Chester Bay, an indentation in north shore of Long Island Sound immediately north of Throgs Neck, 12 miles southwest of Connecticut State line and 21 miles by water northeast of the Battery, New York City. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12366). Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1929, 1938 and 1949, pages 1761, 167, 163, and 208, respectively. Existing project. A channel 10 feet deep at mean low water and generally 150 feet wide from Long Island Sound through East Chester Bay to a point 700 feet below Boston Post Road Bridge, and thence 70 feet wide extending to a point where the creek divides into a Y, thence approximately 1,000 feet into east branch of the Y and approximately 500 feet into west branch of the Y; a passing basin south of Boston Post Road Bridge; widening channel at Boston Post Road Bridge; and construction of a check dam at head of navigation. Section included in project is 5 miles. Mean tidal range, 7.3 feet in the estuary; mean range of spring tides, 8.6 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 8.1 feet above mean high water. Estimate of cost for new work is $2,550,000 (October 1976) exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and inclusive of an estimated $40,000 non-Federal cost for lowering utilities, (See Table 2-B for authorizing legislation.) 2-2 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950, provides that local interests furnish lands, rights-of-way, and suitable areas for disposal of dredged material during construction and future maintenance, and hold the United states free from damages. City of New York has complied with requirements. Assurances are yet to be received from other local interests concerned with improvement. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1965, Vol. 2, Part 2. Operations and results during period. A contract for the removal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 8 feet below mean low water in East Chester Creek, N.Y. was awarded on 21 April 1989. Work commenced on 28 September 1989 and was completed on 3 November 1989. A total of 29,237 cubic yards of material was removed fora total project cost of $972,107. Condition as of September 30. No work has been accomplished under the existing project. Work under the 1930 project was completed in August 1941. 4. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Long Island between main body of island and western end of Long Beach. It is 10 miles east of Rockaway Inlet and about 27 miles by water south and east from the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12353.) Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 250 feet wide from 12-foot contour in Long Beach Channel protected by a jetty. Mean tidal range, 4.3 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.2 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 5.6 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $603,969, including $100,000 contributed funds (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 39 terminals in Oceanside, Island Park, Long Beach, and East Rockaway. Nine of these are oil terminals, one of which has a railroad spur. Other terminals are repair and mooring docks with a berthage of 7,655 feet. Of these, 21 have marine railways and I has mechanical-handling facilities. There are public wharves at East Rockaway and Woodmere. Waterfront on north side of Long Beach has been bulkheaded. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during period. A contract for the removal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 14 feet below mean low water in East Rockaway Inlet, N.Y. was awarded on 19 April 1989. Work commenced on 20 April 1989 and was completed on 29 May 1989. A total of 225,000 cubic yards of material was removed for a total project cost of $855,866. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began February 1933 and is 100 percent complete. East jetty, 4,250 feet long was completed in July 1934. Project channel was completed in May 1935. 5. FIRE ISLAND TO JONES INLET, N.Y. Location. On south shore of Long Island, about 50 miles by water south and east of the Battery, New York City. Fire Island Inlet is the main entrance into Great South Bay from the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. A jetty at Fire Island Inlet extending generally southwest and south for 5,000 feet from high ground on Democrat Point at the west end of Fire Island and a channel generally parallel to the jetty 18 feet deep and 500 feet wide from a littoral reservoir (sediment trap) in the ocean to deep water in the inlet. Mean tidal ranges at the ocean and inlet ends of Democrat Point are 4.1 feet and 2.4 feet respectively. Irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 2.5 feet below mean low water up to 6.2 feet above mean high water on the ocean side. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Requires cost sharing and lands, easements and rights-of-way. Terminal facilities. None within the area immediately adjacent to the Federal improvements. Operations and results during period. An engineering and design effort for Fire Island Inlet, N.Y. was conducted at a cost of $30,120 during this period in anticipation of dredging in FY90. The contract for the removal of 994,568 cubic yards of sand lying above the plane of 14 feet below mean low water in Fire Island Inlet was awarded on 29 September 1988. Work commenced on 17 October 1988 and was completed on 9 May 1989. The total cost of the work completed during the period was $6,567,180. Condition as of September 30. Dredging under the existing project was commenced in late 1973. As a result of three consecutive dredging operations completed in 1977, the project channel was brought to the approximate authorized dimension at that time. Due to local concerns about inlet dredging and erosion at Oak Beach, maintenance had been deferred since 1979 which has allowed the complete shoaling of the authorized project channel. To facilitate navigation in this period the existing natural channel was dredged in FY 1985 and in FY 1987. In FY 1987 sand was deposited offshore of Gilgo Beach by hopper dredge. 422,460 cy was dredged at a cost of $882,000 operations and maintenance funds. O&M funds were also used during FY 1987 and 1988 to make repairs to the inner portion of the jetty. In March 1988 the District recommended a plan to maintain a realigned channel in the vicinity of the natural channel 2-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 toa depth of 14 feet (plus 2 feet of allowable overdepth) and a width of 450 feet. The plan also recommended placement of the dredged material along Gilgo Beach for shore protection purposes. The recommended plan was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works on 2 August 1988. 6. HEMPSTEAD HARBOR, N.Y. Location. On the north shore of Long Island, 25 miles by water northeast of the Battery, New York City, and 13 miles southwest of Stamford Harbor, Conn. (Chart No. 12366.) Previous project. For details see page 165, Annual Report for 1953. Existing project. (a) a channel 13 feet at mean low water and 150 feet wide from deep water in the harbor to North Hempstead Turnpike Viaduct, a distance of 2.1 miles; (b) thence 6 feet at mean low water and 50-80 feet wide to head of navigation, a distance of 0.2 mile; and (c) a turning basin off west side of channel north of Viaduct 9 feet deep at mean low water, 190 in net width and 470 feet in maximum length. Dredging the 13-foot channel is subject to the condition that no work shall be done by the United States within 50 feet of any established pierhead line, wharf or other structure. Section included in project is about 2.3 miles long. Mean tidal range, 7.1 feet; mean range of spring tides, 8.4 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and barometric pressure vary from 3.6 feet below mean low water up to 8.3 feet above mean high water. The present work in Hempstead Harbor involves removal of derelict barges and other debris in the shallow waters along the shore line. Estimated cost is $4,400,00 Federal funds and $2,200,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Complied with except for provisions of River and Harbor Act of 1968, which require local interests to furnish lands, easements and rights-of-way for construction and maintenance, and for construction and maintenance of aids to navigation; hold the United States free from damages; provide depths in berthing areas and access channels commensurate with related project depths; and make necessary utility or other relocations or alterations. Local interests must pay 33% of the construction cost of the barge removal project. A local cooperation agreement will be signed during FY 1990. Operations and results during fiscal year. The final GDM will be completed early in 1990. Plans and specs are also being prepared leading to a projected construction award in Sept. 1990. N.Y. State has approved the required cost sharing, but the work will be contingent on the availability of the State funding. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work under the existing project was commenced March 1912 and is about 16% completed. The 6-foot channel was completed October 1912. 7. HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. Location. Originates in Adirondack Mountains, about 250 miles in a direct line and 315 miles along its course from the Battery, New York City, and flows generally southerly into New York Bay. Section under improvement extends from New York City about 156 miles to Waterford. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12335, 12341, 12343, 12347, 12348, and 14786.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938, pages 164 and 226, respectively. Existing projects. A channel 600 feet wide from New York City to Kingston, and thence 400 feet wide to Albany, with widening at bends, a turning basin 700 feet wide and 1,200 feet long at Albany, and 2 anchorages, 1 near Hudson and I near Stuyvesant, each 400 feet wide and an average length of 2,400 feet; all with depths of 32 feet in soft material and 34 feet in rock to 2,200 feet south of the Mall Bridge; thence 27 feet deep and 400 feet wide to 900 feet south of Mall Bridge, thence 14 feet deep at lower low water and generally 400 feet wide to Federal lock at Troy; and thence of same depth and 200 feet wide to southern limit of State barge canal at Waterford; and removal of State dam at Troy and construction of a lock and dam about 2.5 miles below Waterford. Channel is to be formed by dredging and rock excavation, and maintained by dredging and constructing new, and raising and repairing old, longitudinal dikes, built partly under previous projects and partly by the State of New York. In the tidal section below the Federal dam at Troy, the assumed lowest low water plane downstream to Albany is 3 feet below mean sea level. Mean tidal range is about 5 feet below the dam and about 4.9 feet at Albany. The normal pool level above the dam from Troy to Waterford is 14.3 feet above mean sea level, with the mean range of pool level in seasons of moderate rains being 2.2 feet. (See Table 2-C for features of lock and dam included in existing project.) New work for completed project cost $39,050,019 exclusive of amounts of expended on previous projects. Widening to form harbors at Albany and Troy, N.Y., to 12 feet deep at a cost of $522,000 (1954) and completion of 27-foot channel at Albany at a cost of $642,000 (1957) was placed in deferred for restudy category. All three features of work are excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. Construction of mooring facilities has been authorized. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish suitable soil disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 6 Operations and results during period. A contract in the amount of $2,449,700 was awarded on September 29, 1988 to 2-4 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT American Dredging Company for removal of approximately 390,000 cubic yards of material from the Federal channel. Dredging operations associated with the Contract were completed during the first quarter of FY 1989, however, due to ice conditions forming earlier than anticipated, the total Hudson River Contract dredging quantity was reduced to 239,612 cubic yards at a total Hudson River dredging cost of $1,463,558. Operations and maintenance in the amount of $711,432 was expended on engineering and design, supervision and administration and surveys for contract work during FY 1989 for this project. Government plant and hired labor were employed through the fiscal year in the removal of stumps, snags, and other obstructions which constituted a potential hazards to navigation at a cost of $201,096 for maintenance in FY 1989. Government plant and hired labor were employed through the fiscal year performing dredging and project condition surveys at a cost of $178,807 for maintenance in FY 1989. Government plant and hired labor were employed throughout the fiscal year with operation and maintenance of the Troy Lock and Dam including the associated buildings and grounds. Operation of the Lock was suspended for the 1988 navigation season on November 28, 1988 and was resumed for the 1989 navigation season on May 1, 1989. Total cost incurrred for the operation and maintenance of the Troy Lock and Dam and the associated building and grounds was $483,686 for FY 1989. In addition, a continuing contract in the amount of $1,738,025 was awarded to the Hull Corporation on September 30, 1988 to perform Interim Repairs to the Troy Lock and Dam. These repairs are required to insure continued operability and safety of the Troy Lock and Dam. Funds in the amount of $1,200,000 were expended on work performed under the continuing contract in FY 1989. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began in July 1910 and was substantially completed in November 1965. New lock and dam at Troy, removal of dam at Troy and construction of 15,545 linear feet of dikes also are complete. In reconstruction of old dikes 39,676 linear feet were raised to adopted crest height. Channel from New York City to Albany is complete to a depth of 32 feet except for the 1,500 linear-foot section at the northern end of the 32-foot project which has never been dredged to project depth. Additionally, the 1,300 linear feet of the 27-foot project remains undredged. Channel from Albany to Waterford is complete to a depth of 14 feet except for a small part of the widening to form a harbor at Troy. Work remaining under the project consists of completion of the 12-foot harbor at Troy and dredging the 27-foot and the remainder of the 32-foot channels at Albany which are not deemed necessary at this time; and reconstruction of dikes. 8. HUDSON RIVER CHANNEL, N.Y. & N.J. Location. Hudson River empties into Upper Bay of New York Harbor at the Battery, New York City. Section included under this title extends from deep water in Upper New York Bay about 14.5 miles to just north of Harlem River (Spuyten Duyvil Creek). Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1915 and 1938, pages 1765, and 213 respectively. Existing project. A channel 48 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide, suitably widened at bends from West 59th Street, Manhattan, to West 40th Street, thence 45 feet deep of same width to deep water in Upper Bay; a channel 40 feet deep to full width of river extending from northline of 59th Street to south side of Little Basin, and thence a channel of same depth to deep water in Upper New York Bay off Ellis Island, substantially as shown on maps in H. Doc. 309, 72d Cong., I1st sees., subject to provision that no dredging be done under project within 50 feet of pierhead lines; a channel 750 feet wide and 30 feet deepalong Weehawken-Edgewater waterfront; removal of a shoal on New York side between West 59th and West 61st Streets to a depth of 40 feet; and removal of an obstruction north of mouth of Spuyten Duyvil Creek to depth surrounding river bottom. Channel included in project is about II miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range at the Battery, 4.4 feet, and West 129th Street, 4.1 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.3 and 4.9 feet respectively; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.8 feet below mean low water at the Battery up to 6.2 feet above mean high water and at West 129th Street from 3.6 feet below mean low water up to 5.3 feet above mean high water. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Operations and results during period. A contract for the removal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 40 feet below mean low water in Hudson River Channel, N.Y. was awarded on 7 April 89. Work commenced on 13 April 1989and was completed on 24 April 1989. A total of approximately 40,000 cubic yards of material was removed for a total project cost of $294.998. Conditions as of September 30. Work under existing project as commenced April 1913 and completed September 1952. Widening and deepening Weehawken-Edgewater Channel to project dimensions was completed in August 1937. Widening 40-foot channel for full width of river from Ellis Island to West 59th Street, Manhattan, was completed in March 1939. Widening 48-foot project to full project width of 2,000 feet from West 40th Street to West 59th Street was completed in November 1950. Deepening 45-foot channel for a width of 2,000 feet from Upper Bay to West 40th Street was completed to project dimensions in September 1952. 2-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 9. KILL VAN KULL - NEWARK BAY CHANNEL, N.J. & N.Y. Location. The project includes Kill Van Kull connecting upper New York Bay with Newark Bay, and channels in lower Newark Bay serving Port Newark and Elizabeth Marine Terminal. These terminals are located on the west shore of Newark Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12333.) Existing project. Deepening the existing Kill Van Kull channel and channels in lower Newark Bay, including turning and maneuvering areas, as well as deepening the Elizabeth and Port Newark channels. The deepening to be done from the existing 35 foot depth incrementally to 40 feet and then 44 feet. The Federal cost of construction is estimated at $270,800,000 with an additional 177,340,000 to be contributed by local interests (Oct. 89 P.L.). Local cooperation. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the local cooperating agency, has entered into a local cooperation agreement with the Government which was executed on 30 May 1986. A supplemental agreement was executed on 21 May 1987. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period, and condition as of Sept. 30. Stage I, channel deepening to 40 feet in five contracts, is underway. Contract No. 1, awarded in June 1987, is completed. Contract No. 2 was awarded in July 1988. Contract No. 3 was awarded in Sept. 1988 after a mistake in bid claim by the initial low bidder caused a delay in the award procedure. Contract No. 4 is planned to remove rock and hard material in the Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay. This work will be awarded in two contracts, 4A and 4B with the first award scheduled for October 1990. Contract No. 5 was awarded in May 1988 and was completed in July 1989. 10. LONG ISLAND INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, N.Y. Location. Extends from East Rockaway Inlet, on the south side of Long Island, to Great Peconic Bay at the eastern end of Long Island. Section included under this project extends from Great South Bay opposite Patchogue to the South end of Shinnecock Canal. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep at mean low water from the federally improved channel in Great South Bay, opposite Patchogue to south end of Shinnecock Canal. Section included in project is 34 miles long. Mean tidal range varies from I foot in Shinnecock Bay to 0.7 foot in Patchogue Bay; mean range of spring tides varies from 1.2 feet to 0.8 foot; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 1.8 feet below mean low water to 12 feet above mean high water. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except local interest, must furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. There are 17 boat repair and storage yards within the areas immediately adjacent to the Federal improvement. There is ample room for expansion and development of terminals when future commerce warrants. Operations and results during period. An engineering and design effort for Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, N.Y. was conducted during this period in anticipation dredging in FY90. The total cost of the work was $71,296. Condition as of September 30. Original work under the existing project was commenced October 1939 and completed September 1940. 11. MORICHES INLET, N.Y. Location. On the south shore of Long Island, about 80 miles by water east of the Battery, New York City. It is an opening through the narrow sandy barrier beach on the south shore of Long Island which separates the Atlantic Ocean from a series of interconnected bays. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. Provides for a channel, 10 feet deep at mean low water and 200 feet wide extending from that depth in the Atlantic Ocean to Moriches Bay, a distance of 0.7 mile; thence a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to the Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, a distance of 1. I miles; rehabilitation of the existing jetties and revetments. Estimate of cost of work is $12,989,000 (October 1988 P.L.) including $50,000 from Coast Guard and $4,544,000 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. In accordance with the project authorization, local interests are required to furnish all easements, rights-of-way including relocations that are necessary for improvements at an overall 35% cost sharing basis. The annual Operations and Maintenance cost is estimated to be $1,860,000 of which the local share is 50% or $930,000 per year. An Agreement of Local Cooperation was executed on 30 June 1986. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation is the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. No terminals are within the area immediately adjacent to the Federal improvement. However, several yacht clubs, boatyards, and public wharfs and landings, and numerous private landings are located in Moriches Bay. The yacht clubs and boatyards have equipment for servicing boats. There are boat basins open to the public. The facilities existing in the bay are considered adequate for present and probable future needs under present conditions of Moriches Inlet. There is room for expansion should future commerce warrant. 2-6 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT Operations and results during period. Work was initiated on rehabilitation of the east jetty. After this is complete similar work is scheduled for the west jetty. Present plans call for award of a contract for channel dredging in mid 1990 but this will be contingent on cost sharing by the State. Condition as of September 30. Pre-construction planning resumed in October 1977. Coordination continued with Federal, State and local agencies on current problems and need for all project purposes (i.e., navigation; beach erosion control; water quality improvement). A post authorization change was approved in September 1983 to allow construction of each project purpose separately which clarified authority to defer all purposes except navigation. In January 1980, a breach occurred adjacent to the eastern jetty. Emergency funds ($11.3 million) were authorized under the authority of PL84-99 to close the breach. About 1,185,000 yards of sand fill were used to effect closure of the breach by March 1981. 12. NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, N.Y.& VT. Location. This waterway, 37 miles long, comprises southern end of Lake Champlain and extends from Whitehall to Crown Point, N.Y. at southern extremity of lake, northerly to Benson Landing, Vt. (See N.O.S. Chart 14784). Previous projects. For details, see Annual Reports for 1931, and 1963, pages 256 and 177, respectively. Existing project. A channel extending from Whitehall, N.Y. at head of Lake Champlain to Benson Landing, 12 feet deep at low lake level and generally 150 feet wide, and installation of fender booms at Putts Rock, Putts Leap, Narrows near Dresden, Pulpit Point and Cedar Mountain. Reference plane of low lake level is 93 feet above mean sea level. Section included in project is about 13.5 miles. Usual annual variation of lake level is 5.8 feet and extreme variation varies from 0.6 foot below up to 8.8 feet above low lake level. Widening channel throughout its entire length to project width of 200feet is inactive and excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during period. Government plant and hired labor were employed intermittently during the fiscal year in removal of stumps and snags that posed a potential hazard to navigation at a cost of $23,202. Government plant and hired labor were employed in replacing deteriorated fender booms at a cost of $8,648. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $23,403 were expended in FY 1989 on preliminary engineering and design, and surveys for future maintenance dredging. Condition as of September 30. Work under the existing project was commenced June 1919 and is about 77 percent complete. A channel 12 feet deep at low lake level and least width of 150 feet has been excavated throughout the length of the improvement, except at the Elbow, where the width is 110 feet. Fender booms have been placed at the elbow. (Putts Leap and Putts Rock.) 13. NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK AND PASSAIC RIVERS, N.J. Location. Newark Bay is an estuary about 1.25 miles wide and 6 miles long extending southerly from confluence of Hackensack and Passaic Rivers to New York and New Jersey Channels. Hackensack River rises near Haverstraw, Rockland County, N.Y. and flows about 45 miles into Newark Bay. Passaic River rises in highlands of northeastern New Jersey and flow; about 80 miles into Newark Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12333 and 12337.) Previous projects. For details see 1926 Annual Report, pages 265 and 266; and Annual Reports for 1929, 1938, 1954, and 1976, pages 301, 244, 134, and 2-11 respectively. Existing project. A main channel 700 feet wide to the branch channel to Port Newark, thence 500 feet wide to a turning basin 1,300 feet long and 900 feet wide at the junction of the Hackensack and Passaic River channels, length about 4.7 miles; a maneuvering area south of the removed Central Railroad of New Jersey Bridge 2,200 feet long and 300 feet wide with depths of 38 feet in the south half and 35 feet in the north half; a combined bend cutoff and maneuvering area at the south side of the junction with Elizabeth branch channel; and widening bends at the Kill Van Kull and Port Newark Channels. (Authorized depth 35 feet except as noted above.) (adopted 1966.); including a triangular area east of Shooters Island with a depth of 37 feet. At Port Newark - A branch channel 800 feet wide leading to an inshore channel 400 feet wide 1.6 miles (adopted 1945). Authorized depth 37 feet in rock and 35 feet in soft material; a pierhead channel 200 feet wide along the east bulkhead between the Port Newark and Elizabeth branch channels, length 4,100 feet. Authorized depth 35 feet (adopted 1962.) At Elizabeth Marine Terminal - A branch channel 500 feet wide, length about 1.4 miles; a pierhead channel along the east bulkhead 290 feet wide, length about 1.1 miles; a south channel along the south bulkhead 290 feet wide, length about 2,600 feet, a southern approach area just above former Central Railroad of New Jersey Bridge enlarged for turning and maneuvering, with a maximum length of about 2,700 feet and width (between the pierhead channel and Newark Bay channel) of about 80G feet. Authorized depth 35 feet (adopted 1962.) NOTE: The above channels and areas were completed. However the authorized depths, except for the Newark Bay channel north of the Port Newark entrance, have been modified by the Kill Van Kull- Newark Bay project, which specifies deepening to 40 and 44 feet. This work is now underway. 2-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1954 provides local interests furnish lands, rights-of-way, the suitable spoildisposal areas for initial construction and future maintenance; provide depths commensurate with channel depth in approaches and berths at terminals of companies which would use improvement; and hold the United States free from damages. River and Harbor Act of 1962 provides that local interests must provide lands, easements and rights-of-way for maintenance and construction, hold United States free from damages, provide and maintain adequate public terminal and transfer facilities, and accomplish without cost to the United States, removal or relocation of pipelines, cable and other utilities. Assurances were furnished by Port of New York Authority and accepted Jine 12, 1964. Local cooperation required by previous modifications is fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. The engineering and design effort for the Passaic River and the lower portion of the Hackensack River was initiated during this period. This effort consisted of performing sampling and testing of bottom sediment to determine material characteristics and disposal options. The total cost of the work was $103,511. Condition as of September 30. Work under the active portion of the original project began June 1976 and is 100 percent complete. Work remaining to complete existing original project consists of deepening the Hackensack River channel to depths of 32 feet and 15 feet. 14. NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS Location. Extends from deep water northwest of Sandy Hook, through Lower New York Bay and Raritan Bay, to Perth Amboy, and thence through Arthur Kill, Lower Newark Bay, and Kill Van Kull to deep water in Upper New York Bay. This route is approximately along boundary line between states of New York and New Jersey. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12333, 12331, and 12327.) Previous projects. For details see 1963 Annual Report pages 184 and 185. Existing project. A channel through Lower New York Bay, Raritan Bay, Arthur Kill, Lower Newark Bay, and Kill Van Kull to Upper New York Bay and Raritan Bay and in Arthur Kill to a point 1,000 feet north of Smith Creek, widened to 800 feet in vicinity of Seguine Point and Wards Point, respectively; thence 500 wide to a point 1,000 feet south of Piles Creek; thence 500 to 600 feet wide and passing north of Shooters Island and protected by a dike on its northern side to junction of channel into Newark Bay; thence 800 feet wide through Kill Van Kull to Constable Hook; thence 1,000 feet wide for a point opposite the east end of Constable Hook to a point near the intersection with the channel along New Jersey pierhead line; and thence 1,400 feet wide through Kill Van Kull to Upper New York Bay; with an anchorage 38 feet deep to accommodate five vessels south of Perth Amboy, all with suitable easing at bends and junctions. Section included in project is 30.8 miles long. In addition, construction of a dike north of Shooters Island and two secondary channels 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, one south of Shooters Island and the other in Raritan Bay connecting with Raritan River, were completed under previous projects and maintained under existing project. A triangular area at the eastern end of the 30 foot channel south of Shooters Island was deepened to 35 feet in order to provide additional widening in the vicinity of Bergen Point and is included in the Newark Bay project. All depths refer to plane of mean low water. Mean range of tides varies between 4.7 and 5.1 feet; mean range of spring tides 5.7 to 6.3 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.9 feet above mean high water. Anchorage at Sandy Hook, and cutoff at junction of Main Ship Channel are deferred for restudy and excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Location cooperation. Fully complied with except for the middle section of Arthur Kill where local interest must furnish spoil disposal areas for maintenance. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. A continuing contract for the removal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 25,35 and 37 feet below mean low water in N.Y. & N.J. Channels, Perth Amboy Anchorage was awarded on 11 August 1988. Work commenced on 12 September 1988 and was completed on 7 February 1989. A total of 351,065 cubic yards of material was removed for a total project cost of $1,222,679. Conditions as September 30. Work under active portion of existing project began in October 1933. Work completed consists of providing authorized project depth and widths throughout entire channel from Lower New York Bay to Upper New York Bay and providing depths of 37 and 25 feet in Perth Amboy Anchorage. In addition to above mentioned work, construction of dike north of Shooters Island, two secondary channels 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, one south of Shooters Island, the other in Raritan Bay connecting with Raritan River were completed under previous projects. Work remaining under existing project consists of dredging cutoff at junction of Main Ship Channel to dimensions authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 30, 1935, and May 17, 1950, dredging anchorage in vicinity of Sandy Hook. 2-8 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT 15. NEW YORK HARBOR - COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Applies to Lower and Upper Bays, New York Harbor; East River, Harlem River, Hudson River Channel, N.Y., New York and New Jersey Channels, Newark Bay, N.J. and their tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection, removal and disposal of drift, derelict vessels, deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores of New York Harbor and tributary waters, and for the repair of certain other piers, wharves and shore structures. Work authorized before Act of 1970 was restricted solely to removal of drift from waterways and was funded as a maintenance activity. Estimate of first cost under the 1987 Supplemental Appropriations Act is $137,670,000 (October 87 P.L.) including $26,970,000 cash contribution from local interests plus $56,770,000 to be contributed for repair and disposal of deteriorated shore structures in use. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation conditions of the plans currently under review by the Chief of Engineers provide that local interests must furnish all lands, easements and rights-of-way required for the improvement; hold the United States free from damages; enact and enforce local legislation to prevent creation of sources of drift, contribute in cash one third of the first cost of the Federal work, and make necessary repairs to deteriorated structures in use so as to eliminate them as a source of drift. These conditions are subject to approval by the Secretary of the Army and the President, as stipulated in Section 113 of the authorizing law, Public Law 91-611. Operations and results (New work - cumulative to date): A total of five Liberty State Park contracts have been completed at a cost of $10,321,121. East River-Manhattan Waterfront contract was completed at a cost of $1,477,806. A contract for the removal of Piers 17 and 18 on the East River was completed at a cost of $219,604. The City of Elizabeth contract was completed at a cost of $791,656. The Stapleton, Staten Island contract was completed at a cost of $2,910,400. A contract for the City of Hoboken was completed at a cost of $2,123,404. Work along the Jersey City South waterfront was completed at a cost of $979,580. Contract Number One at Weehawken to Edgewater was completed at a cost of $1,697,487. The Brooklyn Reach One contract was completed at a cost of $5,092,920. Work is continuing on the Weehawken to Edgewater contract No. 2. The Bayonne (mainland) contract has been completed at a cost of $735,800. Engineering and design is in progress for Brooklyn Reach 2. Maintenance. U.S. Debris Boats Driftmaster, Gelberman and Hayward and auxiliary plant were assigned the task of removing and disposing of floating debris that is a hazard to navigation. Removal and disposal of 571,645 cubic feet (4,466 cords) of floating debris consisting mainly of driftwood, ranging in size from small blocks to large timbers, including pilings, pieces of wreckage, derelict vessels and sections of deteriorated pier structure was accomplished at a cost of $3,856,047 in FY 1989. Conditions as of September 30. For work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act, removal of drift sources has been completed in New Jersey at Liberty State Park, the City of Elizabeth, Hoboken, and parts of Jersey City, Weehawken and Edgewater. In New York City, work has been completed along the Manhattan side of the East River inclusive of Piers 17 and 18, Stapleton, Staten Island. Removal work is currently underway at Brooklyn. 16. NEW YORK HARBOR-ENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS Location. In Upper and Lower Bays, New York Harbor is 330 miles southwest by water of Boston Harbor, Mass, and 165 miles northwest of entrance to Delaware Bay, N.J. The Upper Bay extends about 5.5 miles southerly from junction of Hudson and East Rivers opposite the Battery, New York City to the Narrows. Lower Bay extends about 9 miles from the Narrows. Lower Bay extends about 9 miles from the Narrows to the sea. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12327, 12334, 12335, and 12349.) Existing project. Ambrose Channel 45 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide, extending about 10.2 miles from sea to deep water in the Lower bay; Anchorage Channel, an extension of Ambrose Channel, with same depth and width, in the Upper bay, opposite anchorage grounds, about 5.7 miles long; a southerly entrance channel, Sandy Hook Channel (East Section) 35 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide extending 3.4 miles from 35-foot ocean contour to Bayside Channel along an alignment generally west of the South Channel; and elimination from authorized project of that portion of Bayside- Gedney Channel east of junction with new southerly entrance channel; for Bayside Channel 35 feet deep and 800 feet wide, extending about 5.3 miles from Bayside Channel to deep water in Lower bay; a channel along New Jersey pierhead line connecting Kill Van Kull with deep water in anchorage Channel, south of Liberty Island anchorage, 20 feet deep for 500 feet wide with widening at bends to 800 feet and about 3 miles long; an anchorage in vicinity of Liberty (Bedloes) Island (about 160 acres in extent) 20 feet deep; and for removal of Craven Shoal to 30 feet deep; for a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 2.3 miles long, extending from bell buoy 23 to Hoffman and Swinburne Island; for an anchorage area in Red Hooks Flats to depths of 45, 40 and 35 feet and an anchorage area in Gravesend Bay to 47 feet deep. Project depths refer to mean low water. Mean tidal range is 4.7 feet at Fort Hamilton; mean range of spring tides, 5.7 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.2 feet above mean high water. 2-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Location cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See Port Series no. 5, revised Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Dredge "McFarland" was employed in June & July 1989 to restore project dimensions in New York Harbor Red Hook Flats Anchorage. Removed 222,212 cubic yards at a cost of $1,470,000. Conditions as of September 30. Work under existing project began in 1885 and is 100 percent complete. Main Ship and Bayside-Gedney Channels were completed to 30 feet deep in February 1891. Deepening of Bayside-Gedney Channel to 35 feet for a width of 800 feet was completed in June 1939. Ambrose Channel was completed to 40 feet deep for a width of 2,000 feet in April 1914 and substantially completed to 45 feet for a width of 2,000 feet in 1951. Relocation of Anchorage Channel was completed to 40 feet deep in October 1932. Center 800 feet was dredged to 45 feet in June 1947 and westerly 600-foot strip in April 1948. Easterly 600-foot strip was substantially completed in June 1953. Channel between Staten Island and Hoffman and Swinburne Islands was completed in December 1920 up to within 300 feet of southerly limits of the project. Dredged channel meets all needs of navigation and no further work of improvement is contemplated for the present. Channel along New Jersey pierhead line from Kill Van Kull to Anchorage Channel was completed in March 1939. Widening at bends near southerly and northerly ends authorized in 1948 was completed to depths of 45, and 35 feet in October 1976. Anchorage Channel was relocated to the westward in 1982. Red Hook Flats Anchorage was accordingly increased in area. No dredging was required. Liberty (Bedloes) Island anchorage was completed to 20 feet in October 1944. Sandy Hook Channel (east section was completed to a depth of 35 feet in June 1963. Gravesend Bay was completed to a 47-foot depth in November 1977. 17. PORT CHESTER HARBOR, N.Y. Location. At boundary between States of New York and Connecticut, comprises the tidal mouth, about 1.7 miles long, of Byram River whose source is in Byram Lake about 12 miles north of Port Chester. River empties into Long Island Sound about 32 miles by water east of the Battery, New York City. (See Coast and Survey Chart 12367.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1915, 1758, and Annual Report for 1938, page 157. Existing project. An anchorage basin near breakwater constructed at Byram Point under a previous project, 12 feet deep, for fenders on east bank opposite southern end of Fox Island, and a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 150 feet wide from Long Island Sound to mouth of river at southerly point of Fox Island; thence 10 feet deep and 100 feet .wide to 900 feet below fixed bridge at Mill St'eet in Portchester, including a turning basin opposite steamboat landing; thence 3 feet deep and 175 to 100 feet wide to 100 feet below bridge. Section included in project is about 1.7 miles long. Mean tidal range, 7. I feet; mean range of spring tides, 8.5 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and barometric pressure vary from 4 feet below mean low water up to 8.6 feet above mean high water. Cost of new work for completed project was $358,475, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects, and $5,500 to be contributed by local interests. Widening turning basin and construction offenders on bank opposite southern end of Fox Island, at a cost of $93,000, (1954) is inactive and excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1930 provides that local interests contribute $5,500 in cash toward widening channel at turning basin. This condition has not been fulfilled and there is no indication as to when compliance may be expected. Terminal facilities. There are 34 terminals in Port Chester between Fox Island and Mill Street Bridge, with a total berthage of about 5,300 feet, of which 3,120 feet are available for dockage. Village of Port Chester owns several bulkheads which are used as public landings for small pleasure craft. Several boatyards with storage space for 75 boats and equipped with a total of 3 marine railways are available for pleasure craft. Facilities adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during period. An engineering and design effort for Port Chester Harbor, N.Y. was conducted during this period in anticipation dredging in FY90. The total cost of work was $101,998. Condition as of September 31. Work on active portion of existing project was completed October 1938. Controlling mean low water depth (June 1952 and Nov. 1965) was 12 feet for a width of 140-50 feet from Long Island Sound to Fox Island, 8 feet in anchorage, thence 10 feet fora width of 90-40 to turning basin, 10 feet in turning basin, thence depths varyfrom 3 to zero feet for full width to upper limit of 3-foot project. Work remaining under existing project consists of turning basin and constructing fenders on bank opposite southern end of Fox Island (inactive). 18. RONDOUT HARBOR, N.Y. Location. Comprises tidal mouth about 3.5 miles long, of Creek, whose source is about 18 miles west of Roundout. Creek empties into Hudson River from the west, about 89 miles north of the Battery, New York City, and 55 miles south Albany. Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide, widening at bends, and 14 feet deep from deep water in Hudson River to highway bridge, 1.3 miles above mouth, thence 12 feet deep to 3.5 miles above mouth, two parallel dikes 350 feet apart to maintain channel, and a branch dike to extend upstream from outer end of north dike to protect that dike from running ice 2-10 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT in Hudson River. Mean tidal range, 3.7 feet; mean range of spring tides, 4.2 feet; extreme range, 8.2 feet; irregular fluctuations due to freshets vary from 2 feet below mean low water up to 2.5 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $131,140. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1965 provides local interests furnish lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance of the Federal project as modified and for construction and maintenance of aids to navigation upon request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable spoil-disposal areas and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads and embankments therefore or the cost of such retaining works; hold the United States free from damages, and provide and maintain depths in berthing areas serving terminals commensurate with depths provided in related project areas. Assurances of local compliance were furnished by town of Ulster on June 9, by city of Kingston on June 17, and by town of Esopus on June 20, 1966. Terminal facilities. Seventeen timber wharves with available dockage of 12,132 feet along waterway. Four terminals are equipped with transfer facilities; all are private owned. Terminals adequate for present needs of commerce. (For latest full description see Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports on Upper Hudson River, 1941, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during period. A contract in the amount of $2,737,750 was awarded to the Hull Corporation on March I I, 1988 for rehabilitation of the dike system. Funds in the amount of $614,539 was expended on this contract during the period and the continuing contract was completed during the third quarter of fiscal year 1989 at a total contract cost of $2,614,539. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $87,554 were expended on engineering and design, supervision and administration, and surveys for contract work during FY 1989 on the project. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work under existing project was commenced April 1873 and is about 87 percent complete. Part of diking originally proposed was not built because it was deemed of doubtful usefulness. Two parallel dikes of an aggregate length of about 5,000 feet, generally 350 feet apart, with a now obsolete spur from the old lighthouse south of south dike were built across the bar at mouth of creek. A branch dike about 1,000 feet long, extending northerly from outer end of north dike, was also constructed. Work remaining consists of removal of shoals in the 12 and 14 foot projects and rehabiliation of deteriorated sections of the parallel and branch dikes. 19. SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTION AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS) The District Engineer, New York District, was designed Supervisor of New York Harbor under the provisions of the River and Harbor Act of June 29, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 441-451), as amended July 12, 1952. Under this Act, the supervisor of New York Harbor is charged with the mission of preventing the deposit of obstructive and injurious materials in New York Harbor and its adjacent and tributary waters, including Long Island Sound. The River and Harbor Act of August 18, 1894 (33 U.SC. 452) makes it unlawful for any person or persons to engage in fishing or dredging for shellfish in any of the channels leading to and from New York Harbor, or to interfere in any way with the safe navigation of those channels by ocean steamships and ships of deep draft; the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403, 307, 409) prohibits obstructions to navigable waters such as unauthorized structures, unauthorized fill, deposit of refuse, and willfuil or negligent abandonment of vessels. Other laws relating to the supervision of New York Harbor and its tributary waters are the Clean Water Act, the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1969, the fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 1920, the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Deepwater Port Act of 1972, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act. Direct supervision of the waters under jurisdiction of the New York District was accomplished by means of a patrol vessel whose scope of duty includes surveillance of the waterfront for unauthorized construction or fill, surveillance of the 3- mile limit of tows enroute to dumping grounds in the Atlantic Ocean to ensure that material is not illegally deposited in the waters of New York Harbor, and investigation of wrecks and abandoned vessels. In addition to the patrol vessels, whose range of patrol was limited to New York Harbor, inspectors utilizing government vehicles equipped with two-way radios patrolled shorefront facilities and property. These inspectors operate out of field offices located at Hauppage, New York and one inspector working at the New York District Office. Their duties include inspection of authorized construction, fill or excavation in waterways, including wetland areas, to ensure that work is performed in accordance with the Corps permit. The inspectors also patrol all waterways in their respective areas and inform the public of the Corps role and jurisdiction as well as provide assistance in the preparation of permit applications. (See Table 2-E at end of chapter.) 20. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 2-F at end of chapter.) 21. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 2-G at end of chapter.) 22. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 645, 86th Congress as amended (Pre-authorization). (See Table 2-N at end of chapter.) 2-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 BEACH EROSION CONTROL 23. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET & JAMAICA BAY, N.Y. Location. Atlantic coast of New York City, between East Rockaway and Rockaway Inlets, and the lands within and surrounding Jamaica Bay. The coastal area (about 10 miles long) is a peninsula in Queens County separating the ocean and the bay. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12327, 12350, and 12326.) Existing project. The project provides for approximately 8.7 million cubic yards of sand fill including the advanced placement of a two year supply of beach nourishment of the shore protection works for 10 years after completion of the initial beach fill. Federal participation (50 percent) includes first cost and periodic beach nourishment, the total estimated at $25,400,000 (Oct. 1986 P.L.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way, including borrow areas; bear 50 percent of total first cost presently estimated at $25,400,000 consisting of a cash contribution of $8,813,500 the final apportionment of costs to be made after actual costs and values have been determined and $16,586,500 for periodic nourishment, hold the United States free from damages; maintain, during economic life of project, continued public ownership and use of non-Federal publicly-owned shores upon which Federal participation in beach protection is based; maintain and operate all works after completion, control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; local cooperation agreement was executed by the State May 17, 1974 and approved for Secretary of Army May 21, 1974. On May 22, 1974 sent to State an approved Escrow Agreement. Operations and results during period and condition as of September 30. A draft report on monitoring study of the completed project has been provided to the Waterways Experiment Station who will publish an official report. Final Environmental Impact Statement on file with Council of Environmental Quality on April 16, 1971. Initial beach restoration completed in FY 1977. Contract for first increment of periodic nourishment was completed in August 1982. Contract for construction of stone groin at Beach 149th Street was completed in September 1982. Periodic nourishment contracts Nos. 3, 4, and 5 have been completed. Additional legislation is necessary in order to continue this project, and the State must request that the work be done. Funding is not yet available. 24. SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, N.J. Location. The northern portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey extending from Sandy Hook southerly to Barnegat Inlet - length about 48 miles. Erosion has seriously reduced the width of most beaches in the study area with consequent exposure of the shore to storm damage. Because of this erosion of the shore the area does not provide sufficient recreational beaches for the proper accommodation of the present and prospective tributary population. SECTION I - SEA BRIGHT TO OCEAN TOWNSHIP, N.J. Location. That portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey in Monmouth County extending from Sea Bright southerly to Ocean Township - length about 12 miles. Sea Bright is about 30 miles by water south of the Battery, New York City. Authorized project. The Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (PL 100-676) authorized a plan substantially in accordance with the plan recommended in the General Design Memorandum for the project dated May, 1988. In general' the plan provides for beach erosion control along approximately 12 miles of coastline, extending from Sea Bright southward to Ocean Township. New Jersey, by artificial placement of sand to widen the beach berm to 100 feet at an elevation of 10 feet above mean low water with an additional 2 foot high berm cap to provide an extra increment of protection from overtopping. The project also provides for the notching of 15 groins, a feeder beach in the vicinity of Long Branch and periodic nourishment throughout the economic life of the project. Total estimated Federal cost is $409,700,000. Total estimated non-Federal cost for all requirements of local cooperation is $229,600 000. Local cooperation. Includes reconstruction of sea wall at Sea Bright and all lands easements, rights of way and drainage outfall extensions. Operations and results during period and condition as of September 30. Construction has not been initiated, but project is in active status. The final GDM is currently under review at the Washington level. SECTION II - ASBURY PARK TO MANASQUAN, N.J. Location. That portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey in Monmouth County extending from Asbury Park southerly to Manasquan - length about 9 miles. Recommended project. Provides for Federal participation in the restoration and protection of the shore from Asbury Park to Manasquan by artificial placement of sand to widen the beach to a minimum width of 100 feet at an elevation of 10 feet above mean low water. The project provides for Federal participation in periodic nourishment costs for a period of 50 years from the year that the total quantity of fill placed has equalled that required to restore the beach to project dimensions. Total estimated Federal cost is $210,400,000. Total estimated non-Federal cost is $137,300,000 (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 2-12 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT Operations and results during period, and conditions as of September 30. The project is in active status with work on the Preconstruction Engineering & Design (PED) effort initiated in FY 1987. The PED effort which is continuing will result in the development of a General Design Memorandum (GDM), Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), as well as the Plans and Specifications. 25. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-H at end of chapter.) 26. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach Erosion Control activities pursuant to Section 103 Public Law 826, 84th congress as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 2-0 at end of chapter.) FLOOD CONTROL 27. ARDSLEY, N.Y. Location. The Village of Ardsley in Westchester County, New York is located on the Saw Mill River approximately 5 miles upstream from its junction with the Hudson River. (See U.S Geological Survey Map, White Plains, N.Y.) Existing project. The Federal flood control project provides for relocation of the existing channel from the upstream limit of the project downstream for approximately 1,000 feet, and approximately 290 feet of concrete channel upstream of the New Ashford Avenue Bridge. Upstream of the concrete channel along the left bank of the Saw Mill River, 425 feet of floodwall will be constructed running north of the Conrail Bridge. Ponding areas, drainage ditches and other drainage structures will be provided. The total estimated Federal cost for the project is $5,676,000 exclusive of land, relocations and other work to be provided by local interests at an estimated cost of $1,892,000 (October 1988 P.L.) Local cooperation. In accordance with cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in S.1567, local interests are required to furnish all lands, easements and rights-of-way including relocations that are necessary for flood control improvements. The local sponsor has contributed a total cash contribution of $840,000 of which $150,000 was contributed in FY 1987 and FY 1988. The final cash payment for FY 1989 was made in January 1989 in the amount of $690,000. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, the local sponsor, in an II December 1973 letter, indicated its intent to comply with the items of local cooperation and reaffirmed this on 15 August 1979 and 23 August 1985. The State of New York, in a 18 October 1985 letter, expressed this willingness to assume responsibility as local sponsor in accordance with the Cost sharing and financing concepts agreed to by the Administration and Senator Majority Leadership Compromise as reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Operation and results during period and condition as of September 30. Construction of the downstream reach (the base bid) began in April 1988 and was completed in June 1988. Construction of Option Iland Option II began in July 88 and were scheduled for completion in November 89. The project will be turned over to the local sponsors for operation and maintenance. 28. LIBERTY STATE PARK LEVEE AND SEAWALL, N.J. Location. At Liberty Park, in Jersey City, Hudson County, New Jersey, directly behind Ellis Island and Statue of Liberty, In Upper New York Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12334.) Existing project. Construction of a levee and seawall, and pedestrian walkways; over environmentally sensitive areas. The construction of the levee project will allow the creation of a large Greenpark to include a wetlands preserve, an inland water course and boat basin, a marina, an amphitheater, indoor and outdoor recreation facilities, picnic areas, historic areas, community facilities, restaurants, plaza, and many other areas for both active and passive recreational and aesthetic benefit to visitors. The stone armored levee will also serve as a settlement-free base for subsequent construction of a tree-lined promenade, the Liberty Walk, curving along the water's edge. The Federal cost of construction is estimated at $19,150,000; with an additional $19,150,000 a contribution by local interests including lands, certain relocations, utilities, and interior drainage. Local cooperation. In accordance with the project authorization, local interests are required to furnish all land, easements and rights-of-way including relocations, save those existing utilities passing through the proposed levee, necessary for the flood control improvements and to operate and maintain the project at an annual cost estimated to total $58,000. The State will assume all costs for construction of an interior drainage system to provide (10) year level of protection estimated to be $5,100,000. Local interest have agreed to voluntarily pay 50% of project cost. The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection is the local sponsor. The local cooperation agreement was executed on 26 June 1986. Operation and results during period and conditions as of September 30. Phase I is completed. A contract for the levee and seawall was awarded in February 1987 and construction was completed in February 1988 with the exception of the Ellis Island Bridge location. A contract for the pedestrian walkways was awarded in June 88. The work was scheduled for completion in Dec. 89. The completed project will be turned over to the local sponsor for operation and maintenance. 2-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 29. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, N.J. & N.Y. Location. The Passaic River Basin, comprising 787 square miles in northeastern New Jersey and 148 square miles in southern New York State, is located in the greater New York City Metropolitan area. The Passaic River Basin is roughly elliptical in shape 26 miles long and 56 miles wide - and contains portions of Bergen, Essex, Morris, Passaic, Hudson, Somerset, Sussex and Union Counties in New Jersey. The Basin also includes parts of Orange and Rockland Counties in New York. Previous projects. Three Federal flood control projects have been completed by the Corps of Engineers in Passaic River Basin. A $67,400 desnagging, debris removal, and channel restoration project was completed in 1951 along Beaver Brook and the Pequannock Township Ditch, tributaries of the Pompton River in Pequannock Township, N.J. Along the Pompton River, a channel clearing project including shoal removal and channel restoration was implemented in the two-mile reach from the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Bridge to the Erie Railroad (Greenwood Lake Branch) Bridge. This work, in Pequannock Township, Wayne Township and Lincoln Park Borough, N.J., was completed in 1954 at a cost of $50,000. At $1.5 million basin-wide project to improve the Flood Warning and Preparedness System was completed in 1988. This project includes enhanced and increased number of rain and stream flow gauges in combination with a state-of-the-art communication and computer system designed to improve the timeliness, occupancy and reliablity of flood warning in the Passaic River Basin. The project was implemented by the Corps of Engineers in conjunction with the National Weather Service and U.S. Geological Survey, the State of New Jersey is the non-Federal sponsor of the project. Existing project. The project was authorized for Phase I advance engineering and design study in Section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 in accordance with the February 18, 1976 report of the Chief of Engineers. the estimate of Federal cost under the authorizing legislation is $880,000,000 (October 1989 P.L.), plus a $208,700,000 cash contribution from local interests and $101,300,000 for items of work to be contributed by local interests. The rcommended plan for flood protection navigation, hurricane protection and recreation, included a flood detention reservior, channel diversions and modifications, levees and floodwalls, and streambank filling and grading. These works would provide protection against a storm with a recurrence interval of 235 years, which is 20 percent larger than the October 1903 flood of record. Six independent tributary local protection plans were also recommended. However, because of a lack of public support for structural components of the project in the New Jersey portion of the Basin, the entire project was reformulated during the Phase I study. The House Public Works Committee Report (94-1702) on the 1976 Water Resources Development Act directed "... the reformulation of the plan for water management and flood control for the entire Passaic Basin." This report further stated that local opposition to any plan which relies upon extensive use of dikes, dams and levees, such as those proposed in previous survey reports, mandates that the following alternatives, or any combination thereof, shall be the only ones surveyed and considered: (a) A full range of nonstructural flood control alternatives to include land acquisition, flood plain mapping, flood-proofing, developing early warning systems and relocation of buildings; (b) A tunnel diversion plan; (c) A system of tunnels addressing the needs of the entire basin; (d) Plans that combine local protection works where locally acceptable and nonstructural solutions including improvements to stream carrying capacity in accordance with different needs in the Lower Basin and in the Central Basin; (e) Evaluation of fulfilling water supply objectives together with flood control; (f) Aquifer recharge and underground storage; and (g) Reservoir management in the headwaters. The Phase I Study considered these alternatives in the formulation of revised plans. Conditions as of September 30. The reformulation study was initiated in October 1977 under the existing authorization and Congressional Guidance in House Report 94-1702. The overall study was completed in December 1989 at an estimated cost of $21,300,000. A wide range of feasible Basinwide alternative plans were developed. These alternatives, which were presented for extensive public review, included tunnel diversions, channel modification, levees and floodwalls, and nonstructural measures. In April 1984, the Passaic Basin experienced flooding estimated to be the worst in 40 years. Local protection plans were completed for tributary flood damage areas along the Ramapo and Mahwah Rivers at Mahwah, N.J., and Suffern, N.Y., Molly Ann's Brook at Haledon, Prospect Park and Paterson, N.J., the Ramapo River at Oakland, N.J., and the Lower Saddle River in Bergen County, N.J. These projects were authorized in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. In June 1984, The State of New Jersey selected a dual inlet diversion tunnel plan as the local option for detailed plan formulation. The Phase I General Design Memorandum and draft Environmental Ilupact Statement, (EIS), recommending the Pompton River/ Passaic Dual Inlet Tunnel Diversion Plan, were completed during FY 1988. The Phase I report was approved by the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors (BERH) on July 23, 1988 and by the office of the Chief of Engineers on 3 February 1989. The final EIS was filed with EPA in December 1988, with the comment period ending in January 1989. The report is currently under review by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works. 2-14 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT 30. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections of (26) completed flood control works and beach erosion and hurricane protection projects were performed to determine the extent of compliance by local interests with operation and maintenance requirements. 31. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-I at end of chapter.) 32. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Natural Disaster and Emergency Flood Control Activities. Pursuant to Public Law 84-99 and antecedent legislation provides for advance preparation, emergency operations, rehabilitation, emergency drinking water, advance measures and drought assistance. Under disaster preparedness, the New York District completed revisions of various emergency manuals and phamphlets, attended meetings and seminars dealing with emergency response and preparation, and purchased supplies and equipment to maintain its' flood fighting and response capability. Under emergency operations, the New York District provided technical assistance and sandbags to local and county governmental organizations which requested such aid during several minor storm/flood events. 33. EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION Activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended (Preauthorization). (See Table 2-Q at end of chapter.) 34. SURVEYS (See Table 2-J at end of chapter.) 35. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for the period of $112,847 for flood plain management services are set forth in Table 2-L at the end of chapter. 36. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS A total of 23 projects were deauthorized by Congressional Action pursuant to Section 12 of Public Law 93-251. Water Resources Development Act of 1976. (See Table 2-M at end of chapter.) 2-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 2-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Total Cost to in Text Projects September 30, 1989 1. Aquatic Plant Control 2. Bay Ridge & Red Hook Channels, N.Y. 3. East Chester Creek, N.Y. 4. East Rockaway Inlet 5. Fire Island To Jones Inlet, N.Y. 6. Hempstead Harbor, N.Y. 7. Hudson River, N.Y. 8. Hudson River Channel, N.Y. NeW Work Approp., Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 220,000 170,000 160,000 277,065 182,791 141,905 140,000 121,294 164,000 2,842,000 583,200 3,091,000 159,069 2,847,961 583,099 3,090,000 - 50,000 - 47,489 2,030,000 2,042,166 82,000 969,000 79,892 972,107 50,000 416,000 855.000 49,360 414,791 855,866 1,593,806 1,541,631 5,523,297 5,523,297 36,685,188 36,683,110 592,056 592,056 2,572,042 2,571,301 83,969 533,334 8,842,736 8,842,603 594,355 594,355 425,000 438,934 60,000 8,082,492 58,340 2,008,955 486,000 6,567,178 - 57,000 360,000 - 37,024 306,703 1,792,600 4,545,900 1,666,000 2,110,000 1,873,853 4,549,347 1,643,954 2,114,916 - 295,000 - 294,998 1 2 27 16 28 13,753,896 13,816,270 456,468 383,195 75,194 75,194 44,249,803 678 44,249,865 37,697,315 37,578,496 6,771,870 6,771,870 25,265,637 25,265,635 2-16 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Total Cost to in Text Projects September 30, 1989 9. Kill Van Kull-Newark Bay, N.J. & N.Y. 10. Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, N.Y. 11. Moriches Inlet, N.Y. 12. Narrows of Lake Champlain, N.Y. 13. Newark Bay, Hackensack & Passaic River, N.J. 14. New York and New Jersey Channels 15. New York Harbor- Collection and Removal of Drift New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 240,000 7,100,000 44,374,000 14,904,000 254,025 1,504,912 10,607,346 42,443,863 975,000 776,000 2,447,785 971,074 769,107 2,434.114 95,000 64,000 82,000 82,930 47,000 71,296 3,475,000 3,138,000 1,103.000 167,509 2,568,517 3,821,785 66,618,000 54,825,146 235,964 235,964 7,949,647 7,962,366 7,857,000 7,634,093 9,422 9,422 36,000 30,379 25,000 29,900 55,000 55,253 - 630,000 - 630,000 955,000 803,000 974,943 956,975 799,434 891,906 1,332,000 794,000 3,103,000 1,397,900 792,986 1,679,987 58,000 103,511 97,000 1,222,679 2,105,000 3,657,000 6,100,000 1,269,000 2,351,181 1,992,556 2,872,931 3,137,515 3,210,000 3,145,000 3,343,000 3,656,000 3,270,340 2,988,000 3,299,714 3,856,047 681,811 681,8 11 1,137,693 1,137,206 12 29,014,510 2229 9,014,511 30,041,979 24 25,006,278 73,053,435 ... 73,053,435 10,302,359 44,353,226 454,773 454,773 40,360,000 26,573,925 64,321,767 19 64,576,675 2-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 2-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Total Cost to in Text Projects September 30, 1989 16. New York Harbor- Entrance Channels 17. Port Chester Harbor N.Y. 18. Rondout Harbor, N.Y. 19. Supervisor of New York Harbor 23. East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Required Contributed Funds) 24. Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, N.J. 27. Ardsley, N.Y. 28. Liberty State Park and Seawall, N.J. (Required Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 45,009,710 20 45,009,710 4,033,000 2,013,000 1,142,900 4,708,000 4,130,537 2,022,305 1,108,460 4,699,288 - 102,000 - 101,998 58,000 58,000 75,000 2,163,000 727,000 70,814 2,166,223 702,093 577,000 600,000 610,000 725,000 576,363 593,071 613,715 724,927 3,445,000 3,212,342 3,145,000 2,909,104 50,000 3,526,000 96,784 189,818 3,535,315 162,226 1,435,000 2,300,000 2,000,000 1,200,000 1,435,815 2,186,594 2,112,616 946,329 83,000 300,000 2,146,000 2,680,000 83,000 237,963 496,676 4,186,689 25,000 7,175,000 6,900,000 4,303,000 20,250 6,093,751 3,202,496 7,553,581 - 7,170,000 - - - 5,999,657 - - 2-18 48,246,424 51,032,528 433,470 433,470 1,162,795 1,162,096 142,437 142,437 3,165,462 3,139,567 30,075,447 30,554,469 24,921,356 24,905,686 17,120,961 19,438,942 8,235,000 7,932,649 5,569,000 5,336,652 18,603,043 17,050,166 7,170,000 5,999,657 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT 1. Of which $12,500 is for North Atlantic Division Accounts. 2. Of which $12,127 is for North Atlantic Division Accounts. 4. Excludes $100,000 for new work expended from contributed funds and includes $82,600 for new work expended from public work fund. 6. Includes $5, 112,694 for new work for previous project. 7. Includes $238,350 for new work expended from public works funds and $311,461 emergency relief funds. Excludes $81,373 expended from contributed funds. 8. Excludes $454,273 expended between August 18, 1915 and June 30, 1935, for operation and care of lock and dam at Troy, N.Y., under permanent indefinite appropriation. Excludes $23,735 reimbursement for repairs to Troy Lock. 9. Includes $346,797 for maintenance for previous projects. 12. 15. Includes $115,000 for new work for previous projects. Includes $12,809,975 for new work for previous projects and $6,621 for new work for Lemon Creek, Staten Island, N.Y. 18. Includes $1,160,380 for maintenance for previous project, and $1,621 for maintenance of Lemon Creek, Staten Island, N.Y. 19. Includes $2,491,206 expended to date for construction of a land-based overfire air pit incinerator ($1,493,393 in maintenance funds and $997,813, in O & M funds.) 20. Includes $116,530 applied to removing wrecks authorized by acts prior to adoption of existing projects. 22. Includes $1,836,403 for new work expended from contributed funds. 23. Excludes $285,600 for new work expended from contributed funds. 24. Includes $1,490,715 for maintenance for previous projects. 26. Includes $111,419 for maintenance for previous projects and $64,560 extended form public works funds. 27. Includes $1,246,100 for new work for previous projects and $64,560 extended from public works funds. 28. Excludes $90,190 for new work expended from contributed funds. 17. Includes $807,000 for new work expended from public works funds and $2,023,308 for new work expended from emergency relief funds. 2-19 TABLE 2-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 2-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents River and Harbor Act of 1958 Section 104 and Harbor Act of 1958 Section 302 River and Harbor act of 1965 March 3, 1989 March 2, 1907 July 30, 1930 May 17, 1950 July 3, 1930 August 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 1958 River & Harbor Act 1962 River & Harbor Act June 25, 1910 August 13, 1968 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and Progressive Eratication of obnoxious Aquatic Plant growths Provided that all research and Planning cost to be borne fully by the United States Modified project to include control of waterchestnut BAY RIDGE AND RED HOOK CHANNELS, N.Y. (See Section 2 of Text) Channel 40 feet deep and 1,200 feet wide Dredging to obtain first a depth of 35 feet, subsequently increasing depth of 40 feet for full width. Widening of Bay Ridge Channel to 1,780 feet. EAST CHESTER CREEK, N.Y. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 150 to 70 feet wide. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, N.Y. (See Section 4 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide, and a jetty. FIRE ISLAND TO JONES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 5 of Text) construction of jetty. Channel 10 feet deep. Three dredging operations with sand serving as nourishment to the beaches westerly of the inlet. Extension of existing jetty, a littoral reservoir, a navigation channel and dikes, sand deposit on westerly beaches HEMPSTEAD HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 6 of Text) Channel 6 feet deep, 50-80 feet wide. Channel 13 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and turning basin 9 feet deep. H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 337, 54th Cong., 2nd sess. (Annual Report 1899, P. 1177.) Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 44, 71st Cong. 2nd sess. H. Doc. 749, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 19, 71st Cong., I1st sess. Rivers & Harbor Committee Doc. 33, 75th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 762, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 411, 84th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 115, 89th Cong., Ist sess. Rivers & Harbors Com. Doc. 1, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 101, 90th Cong., I st sess. (contains latest published map). 2-20 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 25, 1910 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 July 1, 1935 August 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 September 3, 1954 P.L. 89-72 March 4, 1913 March 4, 1915 August 8, 1917 March 3, 1925 January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep from Hudson to Waterford, remove State lock and dam at Troy and construct a new lock and dam. Channel 27 feet deep from Hudson to Albany, NY Channel 27 feet below Hudson. Operation and care of lock and dam at Troy were included in project. Relocation of 12 foot channel between Troy and Waterford. Deepen channel between Albany and Waterford to 14 feet with no change in depths for harbors in front of Albany & Troy. Deepen channel between New York City and Albany to 32 feet and construct a turning basin and 2 anchorages. Mooring facilities HUDSON RIVER CHANNEL, N.Y. (See Section 8 of Text) Channel 30 feet deep from Ellis Island t Neward St., 40 feet deep through shoal from Newark St. to Castle Point and channel 26 by 550 feet along Weehawken-Edgewater waterfront. Remove shoal east side of river between West 19th and West 32nd Sts.; remove rock near Battery to 40 feet; remove obstruction near Spuyten Duyvil Creek. Additional dredging through shoal from Newark St. to Castle Point. Remove shoal between West 32nd and West 61st Sts. to 40 feet and widen 40 foot channel between the Battery and Canal St. to 2,000 feet. Channel 30 by 750 feet along Weehawken-Edgewater waterfront. Modification of conditions of local cooperation affecting channel along Weehawken-Edgewater waterfront. Channel 40 feet deep between pierhead lines from 20th St., Manhattan, to a point 1,300 feet below Newark St. Hoboken, thence 2,800 feet wide to deep water off Ellis Island. Channel 30 feet deep between 40 foot channel and channel along Jersey City waterfront. Widen 40 foot channel to full width of river from north line of 59th St. to south side of Little Basin, thence a channel of same depth to deep water off Ellis Island. Waiver all conditions of local cooperation affecting channel along Weehawken-Edgewater waterfront. Channel 45 and 48 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide. H. Doc. 719, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 350, 68th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 210, 70th Cong., Ist sess. S. Doc. 155, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 572, 75th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 228, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 719, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report 1914, pp. 234-235 H. Doc. 1697, 64th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 313, 68th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 450, 70th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 309, 72nd Cong.. 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 49, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. Senate committee print, 75th Cong., Ist sess. 2-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 2-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (PL99-88) August 26, 1937 July 14, 1960 August 8, 1917 March 2, 1907 February 27, 1911 July 25, 1912 January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 March 22, 1945 March 2, 1945 September 3, 1954 October 23, 1962 November 7, 1966 KILL VAN KULL-NEWARK BAY, N.J. & N.Y. (See Section 9 of Text) Deepening existing 35 foot channels in increments to 40 feet and then 44 feet. LONG ISLAND INTRACOASTAL WATER, N.Y. (See Section 10 of Text) Channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide. MORICHES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 11 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide in inlet and 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide in the Bay, and 2 jetties. NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, N.Y. AND VERMONT (See Section 12 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide. NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK & PASSAIC RIVER, N.J. (See Section 13 of Text) 16-foot channel in Passaic River Widening 16-foot channel in Passaic River 20-foot channel in Passaic River 10-foot channel in Passaic River 30-foot channel in Passaic River 35 and 37 feet in main channel of Newark Bay and branch channel to an inshore channel at Port Newark terminal and remove portion of rock area at Bergen Point to same depths. Modification of local cooperation for 10-foot channel in Passaic River 34-32 foot channel in Hackensack River including approach channel in Newark Bay from branch channel at Port Newark Terminal and a 25-foot turning basin. 35-foot channels at Port Elizabeth Widening 35-foot channel in Newark Bay, provision of two maneuvering areas, widening entrance: into Port Elizabeth and Port Newark branch channels, deepening and widening Newark Bay 32-foot channel and provision of a turning basin at junction of Hackeesack and Passaic Rivers; and deepening 12-foot channel in Hackernsack River to 15 feet. H. Doc. 181, 75th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 126, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H Doc. 1387, 62nd Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 441, 59th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 441, 59th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 707, 62nd Cong., H. Doc. 284, 60th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 156, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 250, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 430, 76th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 252, 82nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 289, 88th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 494, 89th Cong., 2nd sess. 2-22 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents September 6, 1933 August 30, 1965 May 28, 1935 May 17, 1950 October 27, 1965 March 4, 1915 July 3, 1930 December 31, 1970 March 7, 1974 July 5, 1884 March 3, 1899 June 25, 1910 August 8, 1917 August 8, 1917 June 25, 1910 NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS (See Section 14 of Text) Anchorage off Perth Amboy to 35 feet. Channels 35 feet deep from lower bay to upper bay, except between vicinity of Smith Creek and vicinity of Piles Creek to 30 feet with anchorage 38 feet deep at Sandy Hook and Perth Amboy. Channel 35 feet deep from vicinity of Smith Creek to vicinity of Piles Creek. Widen entrance to Kill Van Kull to 1,400 feet narrowing to a minimum width of 1,000 feet. NEW YORK HARBOR, COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 15 of Text) Allotment from appropriations made for New York Harbor and its immediate tributaries may be used for collection and removal of drift in these waterways. Carrying on this work as a separate and distinct project. Increase scope of project to include removal and disposal of derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores; and the repair of other shore structures; all subject to approval by Secretary of the Army and the President. Removal and disposal of derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores and the repair of other shore structures. NEW YORK HARBOR, ENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS (See Section 16 of Text) Main-Ship-Bayside-Gedney to 30 feet for width of 1,000 feet (Dimensions fixed by Secretary of War, December 27, 1986 by authority of Act of August 5, 1886). Ambrose Channel (East Channel) to 40 feet. Maintenance of entrance channel under I head. Anchorage Channel, extension of Ambrose Channel into Upper Bay. Removal of Craven Shoal PORT CHESTER HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 17 of Text) Entrance channel 12 feet deep, thence 10 feet deep to and and including turning basin, thence 3 feet deep to head of improvement. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 17, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 133, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 233, 8 I1st Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 108, 98th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 91-611, 91st Cong., H.R. 1987 P.L. 93-251, 93rd Cong. Annual Reports 1887, p. 62 and 1888, p. 63 H. Doc. 159, 55th Cong., 2nd Sess. (contains published map.) H. Doc. 518, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 557, 64th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 1165, 60th Cong., 2nd sess. Widening turning basin, dredging anchorage basin, and construct- Rivers and Harbors Committee ing fenders on east bank. Doe. 23, 70th Cong., 2nd sess. (contains published map). 2-23 July 3, 1930 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 2-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 10, 1872 August 30, 1935 October 27, 1965 1965 Flood Control Act 1974 Water Resources Development Act July 3, 1958 Section 201 Flood Control Act of 1965 1976 Water Resources Development Act 1976 Water Resources Development Act Section 101 (a) RONDOUT HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 18 of Text) Parallel dikes, branch dike, and entrance channel 14 feet deep. Extension of 14 foot channel and for 12 foot channel. Extend 12 food channel from mile 1'.8 to 3.5 S. Ex. Doc. 35, 42nd Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report 1872, p. 810 Rivers & Harbors Conm. Doc. 17, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 288, 89th Cong., Ist sess. (contains latest published map.) EAST ROCKAWAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET AND JAMAICA BAY, N.Y. (See Section 23 of Text) Hurricane barrier, dikes, levees, floodwalls, fill, placement, stoplog structures, stairways, ramps, road raising, fishing platforms, annual nourishment. Authorized beach erosion control aspect to be constructed independent of the hurricane flood protection aspect of this project. SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, N.J. (See Section 24 of Text) Restoration of beach to minimum width of 100 feet at height of 10 feet above mlw, and construction of 23 new groins and extension of 14 existing groins. ARDSLEY, N.Y (See Section 27 of Text) Channel improvement, concrete flume, flood walls, levees, various drainage structures. LIBERTY STATE PARK LEVEE AND SEAWALL, N.J. (See Section 28 of Text) Approximately 7,000 feet of seawall and elevated pedistrian walkway. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, N.J. & N.Y., PHASE I (See Section 29 of Text) Advanced engineering and design study, involving reformulation of plans for flood control and water resource management. H. Doc. 215, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 332, 85th Cong., 2nd sess., modified by Appr. Act for Energy & Water Dev. for FY 85 H. Doc. 215/89/1 H. Rpt. 94-1702 2-24 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-C HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. FEATURES OF LOCK AND DAM INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT (see Section 7 of Text) Location: Below Waterford 2.2 miles Above Battery, New York City 152.6 miles Locks: Clear Width 44.4 feet Greatest length available for full width 492.5 feet Lift at lowest stages 17.3 feet Depth on miter sills: Upper (at normal pool level) 16.3 Lower (at lowest low water) 13.0 feet Character of foundation: Rock Kind of dam: Fixed Crest Type of construction: Concrete Complete: 1917 Cost $1,463,014 TABLE 2-E SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR (See Section 19 of Text) STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES - FY 1989 1. Number of Patrols a. Shore 241 b. Vessel 239 c. Air (helicopter) 5 TOTAL 485 2. Number of Inspections a. Shore Facilities 241 b. Vessels 239 TOTAL 480 3. Disposition of Cases a. Voluntary Restoration 34 b. After-the-fact Permit Applications Accepted 17 c. Permit not required or already under permit 72 d. Submitted for litigation to OCE or US Attorney 2 e. Other Misc. 19 f. Cases pending as of October 1, 1988 222 TOTAL 366 2-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 2-F RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS - FY 1989 NAME OF PROJECT DATE SURVEY CONDUCTED NEW JERSEY Cheesequake Creek................................................ . .. ..... ............ * Keyport Harbor ....................................................................... ................ Aug 89 Matawan Creek ............................................................... .. ..... .................. Aug 89 Newark Bay Hackensack & Passaic Rivers................... ............... Apr 89, Jun 89, Aug 89 Raritan River Cutoff ..................................................................... ......... .......... * R aritan R iver ...................................................... ......... . ...... .... . ................ Sep 89 Shark River.......................................................................... .... ....... ...... . ..... * Shoal Harbor & Compton Creek ................................ ................................ Sep 89 Shrewsbury River .................................................................... ................... Jul 89 NEW YORK Bay Ridge & Red Hook Channels ..................................................................... Sep 89 B ronx R iver ............................................................................................ Jun 89 Brow ns C reek ......................................................................................... O ct 88 Butterm ilk C hannel .................................................................................... Sep 89 Eastchester C reek ........................................................................................... * East Rockaway Inlet ......................................................................... Jan 89, Sep 89 East R iver .......................................... .................................................. Jun 89 Fire Island Inlet .......................................................................................... * Flushing Bay & C reek .................................................................................. O ct 88 G len C ove C reek ...................................................................................... Feb 89 G reat South Bay....................................................................................... M ay 89 H arlem R iver ........................................................................................... Sep 89 H em pstead H arbor........................................................................................... * H udson R iver C hannel........................................................ ............................... * H untington H arbor .......................................................................................... * Jam aica B ay .................................................................................................. * Jones Inlet .............................................. ................................................ O ct 88 Long Island Intra. W'Way ........................................................................... Aug 89 Lake M ontauk H arbor ...................................................................................... * M am aroneck H arbor.................................................................................. Oct 88 M anhasset Bay .............................................................................................. * M attituck H arbor ............................................................................................ * N ew tow n C reek ........................................................................................ A ug 89 N ew Y ork H arbor ...................................................................................... M ar 89 New York & New Jersey Channels .......................................................... Dec 88, Feb 89 Port Chester Hatbor ...................................................... Dec 88 Sheepshead Bay ....................................................................................... Feb 89 Shinnecock Inlet........................................................ Apr 89 Tarrytow n H arbor ........................................................................................... * *Items for which no date is furnished reflect costs for gathering data only. Total cost of Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys in Fiscal Year 1989 was $2,057,354. 2-26 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-G OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sept. 30, 1989 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Bronx River Browns Creek Burlington Harbor, Vt. 1 Buttermilk Channel, N.Y. Channel between North & South Hero Island, Lake Champlain, Vt.' 2 Coney Island Channel, N.Y. East River, N.Y. Echo Bay Harbor, N.Y.1 Flushing Bay & Creek, N.Y. Glen Cove Creek, N.Y. Gordons Landing, Lake Champlain, Vt.12 Gowanus Creek Channel, N.Y. Great Chazy River, N.Y. Great Kills Harbor, N.Y. 12 Great Lakes to Hudson River Waterway, N.Y. Great South Bay, N.Y.1 Greenport Harbor, N.Y. 1 Harlem River, N.Y. 1 Huntington Harbor, N.Y. Jamaica Bay, N.Y. Jones Inlet Keyport Harbor, N.J. Lake Montauk Larchmont Harbor, N.Y. Lemon Creek, N.Y. (Inactive) 23 Little Neck Bay, N.Y. 1 Mamaroneck Harbor, N.Y. Manhasset Bay, N.Y. (Inactive) 3 Matawan Creek, N.J. Mattituck Harbor, N.Y. Milton Harbor, N.Y. Newtown Creek, N.Y. New Rochelle Harbor, N.Y. 12 New York State Barge Canal, N.Y. Northport Harbor, N.Y. 1 Orowoc Creek, N.Y.(Inactive) 3 Otter Creek, Vt. Peconic River, N.Y.1 Peekskill Harbor, N.Y.1 Plattsburgh Harbor, N.Y. Port Henry Harbor, N.Y.' Port Jefferson Harbor Raritan River Raritan R-Arthur Kill Cut/Off, N.J. Rouses Point, Lake Champlain, N.Y.' Sag Harbor, N.Y. 1 St. Albans Harbor, Lake Champlain, Vt.12 Sandy Hook Bay, N.J. Sandy Hook Bay at Leonardo, N.J.1 2 Saugerties Harbor, N.Y. 1987 1987 1966 1988 1909 1973 1988 1953 1988 1986 1982 1972 1980 1962 1976 1974 1953 1969 1953 1988 1987 1985 1987 1970 1937 1969 1981 1948 1984 1981 1984 1986 1971 1988 1956 1949 1977 1953 1951 1986 1931 1977 1987 1988 1895 1964 1917 1985 1967 1988 2-27 $1,149,946 33,976 706,414 s 4,590,201 31,000 111,371 32,723,662 64,584 2,102,905 29,760 34,750 346,831 18,000 137,301 15 266,857 74,681 3,616,119 91,081 4,545,753 1,822,530 40,475 791,680 76,065 6,621 1,741,210 19 513,764 21,000 I77,925' 151,373 18 1,168,354 73,214 8 78,644 23 60,254 25,000 19,400 198,415 69,406 25 221,128 31 1,551,470 810,500 98,468 121,805 26 3,125 508,936 56,470 81,905 $2,844,853 673,369 299,574 4,392,907 1,288 294,109 5,126,798 21,571 5,665,299 130,760 115 255,291 292,919 88,029 457 1,290,469 21,720 480,777 57,527 4,814,926 12,720,892 868,630 979,952 267,768 1,621 537 650,510 4,636 257,237 1,063,786 986,520 1,690,748 152,411 11,487 4,951 27,059 116,500 66,037 256,415 1,299 359,294 13,701,319 3,142,336 249 11,710 385 3,902,330 93,964 429,18028 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 2-G (continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sept. 30, 1989 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Shark River Sheepshead Bay, N.Y.1 Shoal Harbor & Compton Creek, N.J. Shrewsbury River, N.J. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co. bridge across Arthur Kill, N.Y. Sumpawanus (Babylon Creek) Inlet, N.Y.' 2 Tarrytown Harbor, N.Y.' Wallabout Channel, N.Y.' Wappinger Creek, N.Y.N.Y.12 Washington Canal and South River, N.J.' Waycake Creek, N.J. 23 Westchester Creek Woodbridge Creek, N.J.' 1,987 1948 1984 1986 1973 1895 1974 1953 1950 1953 1949 1987 1953 150,000 33,828 124,572 20 1,145,457 7,730,476 7,000 69,836 18,174 13,000 206,116 175,933 48,823 1,161,722 5,364 1,227,183 2,556,404 431,199 36,312 44,691 212,82730 2,781 3,871,311 178,398 1. Completed. 2. No commerce reported. 3. Awaiting local cooperation. 5. A portion of this project is classified "inactive." 6. Includes $69,036 for new work and $26,921 for maintenance for previous project. Excludes $10,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 8. Includes $43,175 for new work for previous projects. 9. Includes cost of maintenance prior to July 1, 1886. Excludes $1,425,133 for rehabilitation. 14. Excludes $94,366 for rehabilitation. 15. Excludes $104,805 for new work expended from contributed funds. 17. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended from contributed funds and $31,454 to be contributed. 18. Excludes $119,276 required contributed funds and $72,619 other contributed funds. 19. Excludes $1,741,210 for new work expended from contributed funds. 20. Includes $17,000 for new work for previous projects. 21. Includes $169,700 for maintenance for previous projects. 23. Excludes $15,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 24. Includes $16,369 for maintenance for previous projects. 25. Excludes $1,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 26. Excludes $66,758 for rehabilitation. 28. Includes $15,000 for maintenance for previous projects. 30. Includes $84,934 for maintenance for previous projects. 31. Includes costs for new work $171,427 and maintenance $10,646 for previous projects. 32. Excludes $34,580 for new work from contributed funds. 2-28 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-H OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sept. 30, 1989 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Atlantic Coast of N.J., Sandy Hoof to Barnegat Inlets 1959 Fire Island Inlet to Jones Inlet, N.Y. 1981 18,044,667 217,899 North Shore of Long Island, Suffolk County, N.Y. 1979 8,800,000 Perth Amboy, N.J. 1966 - - TABLE 2-I OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Projects Report For Construction Maintenance Adams, Hossie River Basin, Mass.1 Bennington, Vt. Byram River at Pemberwick, Conn.1 '3 East Barre Dam, Winooski River, Vt.' East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part II) Elizabeth, N.J. Fire Island to Montauk Point, N.Y. Herkimer, N.Y. Hoosic Falls, Hoosic River Basin, N.Y.' Lamoille River, Vt.: Hardwich Dams4'5'6 Missisquoi River at Richford, Vt.1'3 North Adams, Hoosic River Basin, Mass. North Ellenville, N.Y. Rahway, N.J. Rahway, South Branch, N.J. Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, N.J. Rosendale, N.Y. Rutland, Otter Creek, Vt.4 Sandburg Creek, Spring Glen, N.Y. Sawmill R. Elmsford & Greenburgh, N.Y. South Amsterdam, Mohawk River, N.Y.1 South Ellenville, N.Y. South Orange, N.J. Staten Island, N.Y, Wappinger Creek at Pleasant Valley, N.Y.1'3 Waterbury Reservoir Winooski River Basin, Vt. Winooski River, Vt.1 Wrightsville Dam, Winooski River Basin, Vt. Yonkers,. N.Y. 6,282,307 2 670,000 363,515 2,898,334 1964 1974 1959 1963 1976 1985 1984 1973 1956 1939 1965 1968 1978 1971 1979 1981 1975 1963 1976 1987 1967 1984 1981 1983 1959 1976 1940 1970 1984 1,185,365 54,165,128 12,512,957 6 1,240,255 9 1,064,626 238,169 15,571,688 ' 3,900,650 973,142 8 15,863,723 11,0671,256 3,684,966 211,015 109,702 59,142 1,564,976 289,702 6,857,484 644,998 142,075 1,438,845 5,897,427 1,549,929 13,641,771 10 2-29 - 143,753 262 8,200 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 2-I (continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 1. Completed. 6. Includes $3,788,341 contributed funds. 2. Excludes costs of $913,360 under other contributed 7. Excludes cost of $21,000 under other contributed funds. funds. 8. Excludes cost of $51,500 under other contributed funds. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Sec. 205, P8uthbl c oLnwg 8a8s, mened.9. 9. UUnnccoommpplleetteedd ppoorrttiioonn hhaass bbeeeenn ddeeaauutthhoorriizzeedd oonn AAuugust Public Law 858, 80th Cong. as amended. 5, 1977. 4. Inactive. 10. Includes $622,871 contributed funds. 5. Includes $213,507 emergency relief funds. TABLE 2-J SURVEYS Study Class Cost Navigation Studies Flood Control Studies Beach Erosion Studies Special Studies' TOTAL SURVEYS $700,634 3,886,861 1,534,125 957,741 7,077,361 'Includes review of Authorized Projects, Inspection of Dams, Coordination Studies with Other Agencies, Planning Assistance to States, International Water Studies Investigations, Review of FERC Licenses and Preconstruction Engineering and Design. TABLE 2-L COSTS FOR FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES Studies and Services Cost Flood Plain Technical Services $52,847 Flood Plain Management Unit 60,000 TOTAL. 112,847 TABLE 2-M DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed Operation See Annual And Funds Funds sad Projects Report For Authority Expended Construction Expended Maintenasce Bronx River, N.Y. 4'd Brown's Creek, N.Y. Cheesequake Creek, I.J.4' 1981 1980 1953 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1982 1,149,946 33,976 40,000 1,159,946 33,976 S 40,000 '120,000 1,947,853* 505,369 30,675 2-30 NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT TABLE 2-M (continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Coney Island Creek, N.Y. 4 '6 East Rockaway (Debs) Inlet, N.Y. Elizabeth, N.J. Glen Cove Harbor, N.Y. Hudson River, NYC to Albany 4'18 Huntington Harbor, N.Y. Irvington Harbor, N.Y. Lamoille River, Vt. Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic River, N.J.16 N.Y. & N.J. Channels4' 18 Portchester Harbor, N.Y. 2'3 Proctor, Otter Creek, Basin, Vt.6'7 Rahway River 6'7 Raritan River, N.Y.4'6 Rome Mohawk River, N.Y. 6'7 Swanton Harbor, Vt. (Inactive) 6 Ticonderoga River, N.Y.1'6 Waterbury (1941 Act), Vt.7'6 Waterford, N.Y. 6'7 Westchester Creek, N.Y. 1952 Aug. 1982 1963 Aug. 1977 1948 Aug. 1977 1966 Aug. 1977 1982 Aug. 1982 1953 Aug. 1977 1947 Aug. 1977 1939 Aug. 1977 1982 1982 1967 1937 1948 1981 1959 1888 1895 1951 1939 1981 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1977 Nov. 1983 Nov. 1981 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1982 69,489 3,503,969 13 60,481 165,882 69,489 100,000 1,622 829,421 60,481 165,882 4'11 49,035 68,581,451 49,837 433,470 1,551,470 7,000 167,760 9,253 175,933 19,546 49,837 433,470 37,000 4 1,617,470 s15 7,000 70,500 4 16,500 9,253 175,933 - 441,656 - - 66,000 No commerce reported. Completed. A portion of this project is classified "inactive." Uncomplete portion deauthorized. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended from contributed and $31,454 to be contributed. Inactive. Entire project deauthorized. Excludes $71,423 for rehabilitation. Deferred. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Under Section 12 Public Law 93-251. Includes $93,882 for Rehabilitation. Includes $10,000 expended from contributed funds. Includes $100,000 expended from contributed funds. Includes $19,546 expended from contributed funds. Includes $66,000 expended from contributed funds. 1912 authorization. 1935 authorization. 1910 construction dikes. TABLE 2-N SECTION 107 (See Section 22 of Text) Name of Project Cost to Sept. 30, 1989 COMPLETE RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Belford, N.J. Keyport Harbor, N.J. LaPlatte R. Shelburne Bay, Vt. 2-31 59,391 2,455 51,566 307 10,113,903 235 1,260 2,921,311 I. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. $32,358 39,516 1,224 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 2-0 SECTION 103 (See Section 26 of Text) Name of Project Cost to Sept. 30, 1989 COMPLETE RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Asharoken Beach, Huntington, N.Y. $7,045 TABLE 2-P SECTION 205 (See Section 32 of Text) Name of Project Cost to Sept. 30, 1989 COMPLETE RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Great Chazy River, Champlain, N.Y. $30,025 Hackensack River, N. Milford, N.J. 502 COMPLETE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Ramapo River, Monroe, N.Y. 465 Yonkers, Nepera Park, N.Y. 5,098 CONTINUE CONSTRUCTION Wallhill River (Black Dirt), N.Y. 5,414 COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION Passaic River Basin, N.Y. & N.J. 54,672 TABLE 2-Q SECTION 14 (See Section 33 of Tett) Name of Project Cost to Sept. 30, 1989 COMPLETE RECONNAISSANCE REPORT Arnolds Bay, Vt. Crown Point, N.Y. Fire Island to Jones, N.Y. COMPLETE FEASIBILITY REPORT Pascack Brook, N.J. Spring Lake, N.J. COMPLETE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Green Brook, Green Brook, N.J. Green Brook (Regional Center), N.J. $36,005 1,717 46 14,545 32,443 97,900 20,112 2-32 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT * This district comprises a portion of southeastern New York, eastern Pennsylvania, western and southern New Jersey, northern and southeastern Delaware, and a small Part of northeastern Maryland embraced in the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from Manasquan River, NJ inclusive, to south boundary of Delaware. It also includes Chesapeake and Delaware Canal and approach channel thereto in Chesapeake Bay and Elk River, MD. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Absecon Creek, NJ.......................................... 3-2 2. Alloway Creek, NJ .......................................... 3-2 3. Barnegat Inlet, NJ ......................................... 3-2 4. Big Timber Creek, NJ..................................... 3-3 5. Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp., NJ........................................... 3-3 6. Cedar Creek, NJ............................................. 3-4 7. Cohansey River, NJ...................................... 3-4 8. Cold Spring Inlet, NJ...................................... 3.4 9. Cooper River, NJ............................................. 3-4 10. Delaware River between Philadelphia, PA ,and Trenton, NJ................ 3-5 11. Delaware River, PA, NJ, and DE Philadelphia to the Sea................................... 3-5 12. Indian River Inlet and Bay, DE ..................... 3-6 13. Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, DE, and MD................... 3-7 14. Inland Waterway from Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, DE....................................... 3-8 15. Mispillion River, DE ...................................... 3-9 16. Murderkll River, DE ..................................... 3-9 17. Navigation Work Under Special A uthorization.................................................. 3-9 18. New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway .............. 3-9 19. Pepper Creek, DE.......................................... 3-10 20. Schuylkill River, PA...................................... 3-10 21. Wilmington Harbor, DE................................ 3-11 Beach Erosion Control Page 22. Shoreline Erosion Control ............................ 3-12 23. Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization........................ 3-12 Flood Control Local Protection Page 24. Beltzville Lake, PA........................................ 3-12 25. Blue Marsh Lake, PA.................................... 3-12 26. Delaware Coast Protection, DE....................3-13 27. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization................................................ 3-13 28. Emergency Bank Protection ......................... 3-13 29. Francis E. Walter Dam, PA .......................... 3-13 30. General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, PA ................................................ 3-14 31. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects............................................. 3-14 32. Inspection of Non-Federal Levees ................ 3-14 33. Prompton Lake, PA ....................................... 3-15 34. Reconnaissance and Conditions Surveys ......................................................... 3-15 35. National Emergency Preparedness.............. 3-15 36. Tam aqua, PA ................................................ 3-15 General Investigations Page 37. Surveys ......................................................... 3-15 38. Collection and Study of Basic Data.............. 3-16 39. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design ... 3-16 Tables Page TABLE 3-A Cost and Financial Statement........ 3-17 TABLE 3-B Authorizing Legislation .................. 3-21 TABLE 3-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects......................... 3-26 TABLE 3-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects................. 3-28 TABLE 3-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects............................... 3-28 TABLE 3-F Multiple Purpose Project Including Power .............................. 3-29 TABLE 3-G Deauthorized Projects..................... 3-29 * All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 3-1 "REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1989" NAVIGATION 1. ABSECON CREEK, NJ Location: This creek rises in and flows easterly 5 miles through Atlantic County, NJ emptying into Ab.- secon Bay about 5 miles northwest of Atlantic City. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1217.) Existing project: This provides for a channel 5 feet deep, at mean low water, 80 feet wide from deep water in Absecon Bay across the flats to the mouth of the creek, a distance of 1 mile thence 50 feet wide to the highway bridge at Absecon village a further distance of 2 miles, including a turning basin at the head of navigation. The mean range of tide is 3.4 feet. The extreme range of tide is from 1 foot below mean low water to about 1 foot above mean high water. Cost for new work for completed project was $11,935. The existing project was adopted by the River and Harbor Act of July 25, 1912 (H.Doc. 71, 62d Cong., 1st sess). The latest published map is in that document. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation: None required. Terminal facilities: There are four pile and timber wharves and landings on this stream. The facilities, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: BCR update was accomplished. 2. ALLOWAY CREEK, NJ Location: This creek rises in Salem County, NJ, flows southwesterly 15 miles below Philadelphia, PA. The drainage area is 60 square miles. The length of the tidal reach is about 14 miles. At the mouth and at Quinton the high-water widths are 260 feet and 102 feet, respectively; the low-water widths at the same points are 245 feet and 90 feet. (See U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 294) Previous project: None Existing project: This provides for a channel 6 feet deep at mean low water beginning at Fosters Bottle, 1 mile above the mouth, where a cut-off was provided, which shortened the distance 1 mile, thence upstream to Quinton, a distance of 8 miles, 75 feet wide to a point 1,000 feet above Upper Hancock Bridge, and thence 60 feet wide to Quinton, including dikes at "The Square," and above Upper Hancock Bridge, and an increased width at "The Canal" to 150 feet between low-water lines. The mean range of tide at the mouth is 6 feet, at Hancock Bridge 5 feet, and at Quinton 4 feet. The extreme range of tide is from about 1 foot below mean low water to about 2 feet above mean high water. The existing project was adopted by the following River and Harbor acts: The act of September 19, 1890 (H. Doc. No. 60, 51st Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report for 1890, p. 910), provided for all features except the dike above Upper Hancock Bridge, which was added in 1896, and the cut-off at Fosters Bottle, which was provided for by the river and harbor act of March 2, 1907. There is no published map. Local cooperation: As required by law, all land needed for the cut-off at Fosters Bottle was furnished by local interests free of cost to the United States, title to the land having been approved by the Department of Justice, July 30, 1908. Terminal facilities: There are two pile and timber wharves on this stream. All are privately owned, but may be used by the public when not in use by owners. The facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: BCR economic update was completed. 3. BARNEGAT INLET, NJ Location: On the east coast of New Jersey about 50 miles south of Sandy Hook, between Island Beach on the north and Long Beach on the south (See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Chart Nos. 825 and 1216). This inlet is main entrance to Barnegat Bay, largest of the bays on New Jersey coast which are separated from the ocean by narrow barrier beaches. Previous Project: None Existingproject: The existing project, adopted as HD 73-19 in 1935 and modified as HD 74-85 in 1937 and HD 79-358 in 1946, provides for a channel eight feet deep through the inlet and ten feet deep through the outer bar, protected by two converging stone jetties and a channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics extending in a northwesterly direction from the gorge in the inlet to Oyster Creek channel and through the latter channel to deep water in the bay. The project was modified in 1946 to provide for the maintenance of a channel eight feet deep and 200 feet wide to connect Barnegat Light Harbor with the main inlet channel. The project length is about 4.5 miles. (For details see page 203, Annual Report 1964.) The Supplemental Appropriation Act of 1985 contained language stating that the existing project has not worked as projected and, in fact, has created a hazard to navigation. As a result, the following administratively approved modifications are to be constructed as design deficiency correction measures: a new south jetty 4,270 feet in length along an alignment generally parallel to the existing north jetty, extending from the existing groin located near the Barnegat Lighthouse to the tip of the existing south jetty; a navigation channel 300 feet wide to a depth of 10 feet below mean low water from the outer bar in the Atlantic Ocean to the north end of the existing sand dike in Barnegat Bay; remove the shoal located between the north jetty and the proposed navigation channel; jetty sport fishing facilities on the new jetty. All dredged material from initial construction would be placed on the shores of Barnegat Light between the existing and new south jetties, and would be stabilized by vegetation and sand fence. Dredged material from main- 3-2 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT tenance operations would be placed on the down draft beaches, the area between the existing and new south jetties, or in other locations as determined by a shoreline monitoring program. Estimated cost for new work (October 1987) Federal share is $27,700,000 and non-Federal is $15,200,000. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1989.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. A local cooperation agreement for the approved modification was executed on 19 May 1986 and a modification to the local cooperation agreement was executed on 20 March 1987. Terminal facilities: There are four docks or terminals in inner harbor at Barnegat Light which furnish adequate facilities for present commerce of locality. Operations during fiscal year: New Work, contract: Construction of South Jetty and hydrographic survey. New Work, hired labor: Engineering and design, and supervision and administration. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, surveys, and supervision and administration. Work also included maintenance dredging by Dredge CURRITUCK from October 1, 1988 to November 2, 1988 removing 50,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $154,000. Dredging by the U. S. Government Side Casting Dredge Merritt was accomplished from February 23, 1989 to May 14, 1989 removing 85,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $342,300. From August 9, 1989 to September 8, 1989, U. S. Government Side Casting Dredge FRY did dredging removing 40,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $213,900. 4. BIG TIMBER CREEK, NJ Location: This creek rises in Camden and Gloucester Counties, NJ, and with its south branch flows northwesterly 16 miles along the boundary line between the two counties, emptying in to Delaware River opposite the south portion of Philadelphia, PA. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 280 and 295.) Existing project: This provides for a channel 10 feet deep at mean low water, generally 75 feet wide from the 10-foot contour in Delaware River to the mouth and within the creek to Marters sand plant, 3 1/2 miles above the mouth, and thence 60 feet wide to Clements Bridge, 5 miles above the mouth, including four cutoffs. The total length of the section included in the project is about 5 1/2 and at Clements Bridge 4.3 feet. The extreme tidal range is from about 1 1/2 feet below mean low water to about 2 feet above mean high water. The cost for new work for the completed project was $58,665, exclusive of $50,000 contributed funds. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal facilities: There are four wharves and one boatyard for the repair and storage of small boats at Westville. The wharves are privately owned but open to public use. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: BCR update was completed. CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TWP., NJ Location: The proposed project is located in Cape May County and extends along the beach front from the northern side of Cape May Inlet to the boundary of Lower Township, and Cape May City. Existing project: The plan, as presented in HD 94- 641, was authorized for the Phase I Design Memorandum Stage of Advance Engineering and Design by Section 101a of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976, proposes the following features: breakwater on the updrift side of Cape May Inlet; beachfill from Cape May Inlet to Cape May Point; provision of a dune with sand fence and grass from Cape May Inlet to Wilmington Avenue; construction of two groins in Cape May City and seven groins in Lower Township; inclusion of all groins comprising the existing project; and periodic nourishment of the beaches and maintenance of the dune and dikes. The Phase I GDM, completed in August 1980 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1981, determined that only beach erosion control measures in Cape May City are warranted. The plan proposed in that document consists of modifying the existing navigation project for Cape May Inlet to provide; a weir-breakwater at Cape May Inlet with construction being deferred pending demonstration of need; two new groins at Trenton and Baltimore Avenues in Cape May City; placement of beachfill between Cape May Inlet and the terminal groin at Third Avenue in Cape May City; maintenance of two new groins and existing groins in Cape May; periodic beach maintenance with material obtained from deposition basin on the northeast side of Cape May Inlet; and institution of a beach monitoring program in Lower Township area. Project estimate costs (October 1987) is Federal, $74,500,000 non-Federal costs are $8,300,000. The existing authority is for Phase I studies as provided by Section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 in accordance with the provision of House Document 94-641. Continuation of planning and engineering for this proposed project was initiated in October 1977. The Phase I GDM was completed in August 1980 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1981. Phase II AE&D studies were completed in July 1983. The project was authorized for separable elements under Section 501(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1989.) Local cooperation: The State of New Jersey furnished a letter of intent on 6 May 1981 regarding their 3-3 5. "REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1989" willingness to comply with the above items of local cooperation. In addition, a draft Section 221 local cooperation agreement has been coordinated with letter of intent on 31 May 1983 regarding compliance with the items of local cooperation. Operations during fiscal year: New work, contract: Work was accomplished on Groin contract, and USCG Beachfill contract. New Work, hired labor: Work was accomplished on reevaluation of benefits, plans and specifications, and supervision and administration. 6. CEDAR CREEK, NJ Location: In the northeastern corner of Sussex County, DE, approximately five miles east of the Town of Milford. The area is accessible via State Route 36. Existing project: Cedar Creek, with headwaters in Sussex County, meanders northward through coastal salt marsh to its terminus at Mispillion River. The creek currenty ranges in depth from 13 feet below mean low water at the Route 36 bridge to less than 5 feet at several locations. The channel width varies from approximatel 75 feet to 250 feet. Tidal range in the lower reaches of the creek is approximatel 4 feetExisting project was adopted by the Chief of Engineers, 10 December 1979, under the small navigation program, section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. Local cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal facilities: Five marinas are located along the lower stretch of the creek, with residential areas being situated near the Delaware Bay shore. The area is sparsely poplulated, and there are no major metropolitan areas nearby. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Ecomomic analysis and BCR update. 7. COHANSEY RIVER, NJ Location: Rises in Salem County, NJ, flows southerly and southwesterly 27 miles through Cumberland County, and empties into Delaware Bay about 62 miles below Philadelphia, PA.(See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1218).. Previous projects: For details see page 1785, Annual Report for 1915,and page 348, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: A channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide from that depth in Delaware Bay through a neck of land at the mouth and within the river to the south side of Glass Street in Bridgeton, 19 miles above the mouth; thence a channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide to Broad Street; and thence 75 feet wide to Commerce Street Bridge, 19.25 miles above the mouth; and a turning basin 12 feet deep and 800 feet long formed by widening the channel on the south side to a maximum widthof 250 feet just below Glass Street. Section included in project is about 19.5 miles long. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. Extreme tidal range is from about 2 feet below mean low water to about 3 feet above mean high water. Completed project cost $110,756 for new work, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects.(See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1989.) Existing project was completed in 1939. Local cooperation: Complied with except local interest must furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for required maintenance. Terminal facilities: Twenty wharves, of which 16 are at Bridgeton and 4 at Greenwich. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included plans and specifications on dredging and supervision and administration. COLD SPRING INLET, NJ Location: In Cape May County, southern New Jersey, about 3 miles east of Cape May City and about 16 miles northeast of Delaware breakwater. Inlet connects Cape May Harbor and New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway with the Atlantic Ocean and is about 1 mile long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 234, 827 and 1219). Existing project: An entrance channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide, protected by two parallel jetties, and extending from the 25-foot depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to a line 500 feet harborward of a line joining the inner ends of the jetties, thence 20 feet deep and 300 feet wide to deep water in Cape May Harbor. The total length of the section included in the project is about 2.25 miles. Extreme tidal range, due to ocean storms, is about 11 feet. Project was completed in 1942.(For details see page 238, Annual Report for 1962. See table at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1989.) Local cooperation: Complied with Act of 1907, except work of deepening and enlarging inner harbor which is 80 percent complete. Terminal facilities: See page 238 Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included maintenance dredging by U. S. Government Side Casting Dredge Merritt from October 1, 1988 to October 7, 1988 removing 5,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $27,300. From September 1989 to September 30, 1989, U. S. Government Side Casting Dredge FRY did dredging removing 20,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $151,800. Work also included plans and specifications. 9. COOPER RIVER, NJ Location: This river rises in Camden County, NJ, 3-4 8. PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT flows northwesterly 13 miles, passing through the northern part of the city of Camden, and empties into Delaware River opposite the central portion of Philadelphia, PA. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 280 and 295.) Existing project: This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 70 feet wide in Delaware River to the mouth and within the river to what was formerly Brownings Chemical Works, 1 1/2 miles above the mouth. The total length of the section included in the project is about 1 3/4 miles. The mean tidal range at the mouth is 6 feet. The extreme tidal range is about 14 feet. The cost for new work for the completed project was $33,102. The existing project was adopted by the River and Harbor Act of June 3, 1896 (H.Doc. 176, 53d Cong., 3d sess., and Annual Report for 1895, page 1102 et seq.) The latest published map is in House Document 134, 63d Congress, 1st session. Local cooperation: None required. Terminal facilities: There are 11 wharves on the river, all in the city of Camden; 10 are privately owned and 1 is owned by the city. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: BCR update was accomplished. 10. DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA, AND TRENTON, NJ Location: Rises in southeastern New York, flows generally southerly 367 miles, forming boundary line between New York and New Jersey on the east and Pennsylvania and Delaware on the west, and empties into Delaware Bay.(See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 280, 294, 295, and 296.) Previous projects: For details see page 1778 of annual report for 1915, page 311 of Annual Report for 1924, page 220 of Annual Report for 1934, and page 296, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: A channel from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, 23.5 miles to upstream end of Newbold Island 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with suitable widening of bends, including relocation of channel at Delair Railroad bridge, and reconstruction of bridge, thence 5.5 miles to upper end of Trenton Marine Terminal, 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with a turning basin 800 feet wide and 1,700 feet long at the terminal; and maintenance of a channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide from upper end of 34-foot channel to Penn Central railroad Bridge at Trenton, dredged under a previous project. Project also provides for an auxiliary channel 20 feet deep and 200 feet wide east of Burlington Island, extending easterly from main channel to upper end of U.S.Pipe and Foundry Co.'s property at East Burlington, with a turning basin 450 feet wide at upper end; for initial excavation, only, of a cross channel 8 feet deep and 200 feet wide through artificial island opposite Delanco, NJ, and for construction of such bank protection works as may be necessary. Section included in project is about 30.5 miles long, excluding auxiliary channel east of Burlington Island, which is 1.4 miles long, and cross channel opposite Delanco. Lower end is about 55 miles above river mouth at Liston Point and about 105 miles above Harbor of Refuge at mouth of Delaware Bay. Freshets, which occur usually during February and March, attain a height of 9 to 20 feet above mean low water in the vicinity of Trenton. Navigation is occasionally suspended during a portion of winter months due to ice. Existing project is 90 percent complete. A 40-foot channel under the 1954 modification from Allegheny Avenue to upper end of Newbold Island was completed April 1964. Work remaining is dredging from upper end of Newbold Island to Trenton Marine Terminal and widening turning basin at terminal which is in deferred category. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1989.) Local cooperation: Modification authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act provides local interests must provide suitable terminal facilities, furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance, and hold the United States free from damages. Local interest complied with requirements, except city of Trenton has not provided suitable terminal facilities. Terminal facilities: There are 21 piers, wharves, and docks from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, PA to Trenton, NJ facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port Series No. 8 (revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Stream gaging by USGS and maintenance dredging by Gates Construction Company from October 1, 1988 to April 11, 1989 removing 1,142,465 cubic yards of material at a cost of $4,498,431 was accomplished. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, surveys, BCR update, engineering and design, and supervision and administration was accomplished. 11. DELAWARE RIVER, PA, NJ, AND DE, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA Location: See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 394, 295, and 280. Previous projects: For details see page 1779 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 299, Annual Report for 1938 Existing project: Provides for a channel from deep water in Delaware Bay to a point in the bay, near Ship John Light, 40 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; thence to Philadelphia Naval Base, 40 feet deep and 800 feet wide, 3-5 "REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1989" with 1,200-foot width at Bulkhead Bar and 1,000-foot width at other bends; thence to Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor, along west side of channel; and for anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek, each 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with respective length of 8,000, 5,200, 12,650, and 11,500 feet; anchorage at Gloucester 30 feet deep and about 3,500 feet long. Project also provides for construction of dikes and training works for regulation and control of tidal flow; for maintenance of an area on north side of channel opposite Philadelphia Naval Base between Shipway 3 and Schuylkill River to 40 feet deep and width of 150 feet on Mifflin Range and 200 feet on West Horseshoe Range; and for maintenance of any areas dredged by local interests to 35 feet deep between channel and a line 100 feet channelward of pierhead line between Point House wharf and Philadelphia Naval Base, when in opinion of Chief of Engineers such areas are so located as to be of benefit to generate navigation. Section included in project is about 96.5 miles long. All depths refer to plane of mean low water. Under influence of heavy and long-continued winds extreme tidal range is about 14 feet. Normal maximum velocity of tidal currents in the dredged channel varies between 2 and 3.5 miles per hour. Storm tides may increase maximum to as much as 4.5 miles per hour. Estimated cost for new work is $71,630,000 (July 1972) exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Channel to 37 deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 37 feet deep and 60 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor along east side of channel and Port Richmond anchorage to 37 feet deep, except for that portion of channel which forms a part of 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide channel portion is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1960) of this portion of project is $2,951,000. Existing project, excluding work deferred for restudy, is about 66 percent complete. The 40-foot channel from Naval Base to the sea was completed in 1942. Dredging Naval Base to Allegheny Avenue to 40 feet deep was completed in 1962. Enlarging anchorage at Marcus Hook was completed in 1967. Work remaining is to construct new anchorages at Reedy Point and Deepwater Point, and enlarge Mantua Creek anchorage, channel dredging from 35 to 37 feet deep over a width of 500 feet through Horseshoe Bend and about 600 feet through Philadelphia Harbor, and deepening Port Richmond Anchorage to 37 feet, all of which have been deferred for restudy. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1989.) Local cooperation: Requirements under 1938 River and Harbor Act for maintaining channel and anchorage in Philadelphia Harbor annually by cities of Philadelphia and Camden were removed (see 1962 Annual Report for details). Terminal facilities: There are 217 piers, wharves, and docks between Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia and the sea, 135 on the waterfront of Philadelphia, Camden, and Gloucester, and 82 below Philadelphia. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series Nos. 7, revised 1967, and 8, revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included general maintenance of disposal area and construction of dikes and sluices. Maintenance dredgingby American Dredging Company from 1 October 1988 to 29 March 1989 removing a total of 2,968,505 cubic yards of material at a cost of $5,009,355; and from 5 December 1988 to 18 December 1988 removing 50,000 at a cost of $352,186. Dredging was accomplished by Norfolk Dredging Company from 10 August 1989 to 30 September 1989 removing 1,050,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,110,000 and by Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company form 22 July 1989 to 31 August 1989 removing 100,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,060,067. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included construction of dikes and sluices, disposal ditching, and plans and specifications on maintenance dredging, subsurface testing, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. Dredging by U.S. Government Hopper Dredge McFarland at the Brandywine Range removing 271,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $814,100 from 23 July 1989 to 16 August 1989; at the Reedy Island Range removing 141,500 cubic yards of material at a cost of $591,150 from 16 August 1989 to 2 September 1989; at the Baker Range removing 123,800 cubic yards of material at a cost of $420,000 from 02 September 1989 to 14 September 1989; and the Reedy Island Range removing 115,525 cubic yards of material at a cost of $560,000 from 15 September 1989 to 30 September 1989. 12. INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DE Location: Indian River rises in Sussex County, DE, and flows easterly 13 miles into Indian River Bay which is a shallow lagoon 6 miles long and 2 miles wide on the Delaware Coast about midway between Cape Henlopen and the Maryland State line. The inlet is an opening through the barrier beach separating Indian River Bay and the Atlantic Ocean (See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No.1219.) Previous projects: Adopted by River and Harbor Act of August 2, 1882. For further details see page 744, Annual Report for 1888. Existing project: This provides for the fixation of the inlet by the construction of two parallel jetties of steelsheet pile and stone design extending to approximately the 14-foot depth curve in the ocean, and for dredging an entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide, for a distance of 7,000 feet inshore from the jetties; thence a channel 9 feet deep, 100 feet wide in the bay, and 80 feet wide in the river, to and including a turning basin 9 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at Old Landing; thence a channel 4 feet deep and 60 feet wide to the highway bridge at Millsboro. The project also provides 3-6 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT that the interior channel dimensions may, at the discretion of the Chief of Engineers, be modified as found desirable to increase the hydraulic efficiency of the channel, without increasing the cost. The total length of the section included in the project is about 13.75 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range at the highway bridge is about 6 feet. Existing project was completed in 1951. For details see Annual Report for 1963.(See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1989.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with except that local interest are required to furnish suitable areas for disposal of dredged material during maintenance as and when needed, and provide terminal facilities. Terminal facilities: There is a privately owned basin with berthing facilities for small boats located .75 miles west of the highway bridge near the inlet and .25 miles north of the inlet channel, connected therewith by a channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide; a U.S. Coast Guard wharf on the north side of the inlet channel in the same locality; and two wharves at Oak Orchard in Indian River Bay. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included inlet scour and repair to South Jetty. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included inlet scour and supervision and administration. 13. INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE, AND MD Location: The Waterway begins at Reedy Point on Delaware River, about 41 miles below Philadelphia, PA, and passes through the sea level Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, a distance of 14 miles, to Back Creek, at Chesapeake City, MD. It then passes for 5 miles down Back Creek, thence 9 miles down Elk River to Chesapeake Bay and thence 18 miles down Chesapeake Bay to a point near Pooles Island. A branch channel connects Delaware River at Delaware City, DE, with main channel at a point about 1.5 miles west of Reedy Point.(See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 294, 1226, 570, and 572.) Previous projects: For details see Annual Report for 1934, page 242, and Annual Report for 1938, page 312. Existing project: A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to water of natural 35-foot depth in Chesapeake Bay including a cutoff at Penn Central Railroad crossing, and having a maximum radius of curvature of 7,000 feet at bends; a high-level, fixed railroad bridge with vertical clearance of 135 feet and horizontal clearance of 600 feet at the railroad crossing over the cutoff (economic study of railroad crossing requested by Office of Management and Budget resulted in construction of a single track vertical lift bridge in lieu of a high-level fixed railroad bridge); high-level fixed highway bridges over canal at Reedy Point, St. Georges, Summit, and Chesapeake City; a bascule drawbridge across Delaware City Branch Channel; extension of entrance jetties at Reedy Point; and anchorage in Elk River, 35 feet deep and 1,200 feet wide, with an average length of 3,700 feet; enlargement of anchorage and moor. ing basin in Back Creek to afford an area about 400 feet wide, 1000 feet long, and 12 feet deep;dredging Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, and deepening existing basin to same depth; revetment of banks of canal as required between Delaware and Elk Rivers, and on banks of Delaware City Branch Channel east of Fifth Street Bridge; and construction of bulkheads. Total of section included in project, excluding Delaware City Branch Channel, which is about 2 miles long, is about 46 miles. All depths refer to plane of low water in Delaware River. Extreme tidal range is from 6.3 feet above mean high water to 3 feet below mean low water. Existing project is about 89 percent completed. Channel 27 feet deep and 250 to 400 feet wide. Delaware River to Pooles Island, completed in 1938. High-level fixed highway bridges were completed at St. Georges (4-lane) in 1942; at Chesapeake City (2-lane) in 1949; and at Summit (4-lane) in 1960. Relocation of Penn Central Railroad bridge was completed December 21, 1965. Enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide St. Georges and Summit bridges and Summit and Goose Island was completed on June 20, 1972 and February 18, 1972, respectively. Removing the old Penn Central railroad bridge was completed on January 21,1972. Channel work for Part II is about 87 percent complete. Work remaining consists of completing channel enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide between Reedy Point Bridge and St. Georges Bridge; widening and deepening the channel between Delaware River and Reedy Point Bridge, the completion of recreation facilities, and miscellaneous completion items. Deepening of the Delaware City Branch Channel from 6 to 8 feet from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with the canal has been deferred for study. Original cost of canal including purchase was $10,709,755; estimated cost of new work for modifications of 1935 and 1954 is federal cost $135,300,000 and nonfederal cost $15,234,000 (October 1987). Major Rehabilitation of St. Georges and Summit Bridges are estimated at $23,700,000 federal cost. Portion of project comprising completion of Delaware City Branch Channel from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with canal is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is $145,000 (July 1954).(See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1989. See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation: River and Harbor Act of 1954 provided that local interests furnish lands and rights-ofway required for bridges. Assurances accepted and 3-7 "REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1989" approved February 16, 1955. Requirements for Summit and Reedy Point Bridges have been met. Terminal facilities: Ample mooring facilities at eastern and western ends of canal and bulkheads at Delaware City and St. Georges were constructed by the United States. A small-boat harbor was provided and a wharf constructed at Chesapeake City. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included aerial mapping, and painting of Summit Bridge. There was also maintenance dredging by Great Lakes and Dock Company from 22 November 1988 to 28 December 1988 removing a total of 773,560 at a cost of $1,430,523. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance and design of disposal areas and bridges, maintenance of rip-rap, roadways, canal banks, night lighting, building, grounds, and banks. Also accomplished was environmental drainage of disposal areas, lease of equipment, bridge inspections, engineering surveys, environmental monitoring, and advance maintenance dredging. Also accomplished were plans and specifications, sub-surface testing of disposal areas, mosquito control, construction of dikes and sluices, ditching, operation and maintenance of museum, engineering and design, and supervision and administration were completed. 14. INLAND WATERWAY from REHOB(YOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DE & MD Location: The Waterway begins at Reedy Pint on Delaware River, about 41 miles below Philadephia, PA, and passes through the sea level Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, a distance of 14 miles, to Back Creek, at Chesapeake City, MD. It then passes for 5 miles down Back Creek, thence 9 miles down Elk River to Chesapeake Bay and thence 18 miles down Chesapeake Bay to a point near Pooles Island. A branch channel connects Delaware River at Delaware City, DE, with main channel at a point about 1.5 miles west of Reedy Point. (See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 294, 1226, 570, and 572. Previous project: For details see Annual Report for 1934, page 242, and Annual Report for 1938, page 312. Existing project: A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to water of natural 35-foot depth in Chesapeak Bay including a cutoff at Penn Central Railroad crossing, and having a maximum radius of curvature of 7,000 feet at bends; a high-level, fixed railroad bridge with vertical clearance of 135 feet and horizontal clearance of 600 feet at the railroad crossing over the cutoff (economic study of railroad crossing requested by Office of Management and Budget resulted in construction of a single track vertical lift bridge in lieu of a high-level fixed railroad bridge); high-level fixed highway bridges over canal at Reedy Point, St. Georges, Summit, and Chesapeake City; a bascule drawbridge across Delaware City Branch Channel; extension of entrance jetties at Reedy Point; and extension of entrance jetties at Reedy Point; and anchorage in Elk River, 35 feet deep and 1,200 feet wvide, with an average length of 3,700 feet; enlargement of anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to afford an area about 400 feet wide, 1,000 feet long, and 12 feet deep; dredging Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, and deepening existing basin to same depth; revetment of banks of canal as required between Delaware and Elk Rivers, and on banks of Delaware City Branch Channel east of Fifth Street Bridge; and construction of bulkheads. Total of section included in project, excluding Delaware City Branch Channel, which is about 2 miles long, is about 46 miles. All depths refer to plane of low water in Delaware River. Extreme tidal range is from 6.3 feet above mean high water to 3 feet below mean low water. Existing project is about 89 percent completed. Channel 27 feet deep and 250 to 400 feet wide. Delaware River to Pooles Island, completed in 1938. High-level fixed highway bridges were completed at St. Georges (4-lane) in 1942; at Chesapeake City (2-land) in 1949; and at Summit (4-Lane) in 1960. Relocation of Penn Central Railroad bridge was completed December 21, 1965. Enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide St. Georges and Summit bridges and Summit and Goose Island was completed on June 20, 1972 and February 18, 1972, respectively. Removing the old Penn Central railroad bridge was completed on January 21,1972. Channel work for Part II is about 87 percent complete. Work remaining consists of completing channel enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide between Reedy Point Bridge and St. Georges Bridge; widening and deepening the channel between Delaware River and Reedy Point Bridge, the completion of recreation facilities, and miscellaneous completion items. Deepening of the Delaware City Branch Channel from 6 to 8 feet from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with canal has been deferred for study. Original cost of canal including purchase was $10,709,755; estimated cost of new work for modification of 1935 and 1954 is $139,574,000 (October 1985). Total estimated cost of new work including original purchase is $147,534,000. Portion of project comprising completion of Delaware City Branch Channel from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with canal is to be restudies and excluded from foregoing estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is #145,000 (July 1954).(See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1989. See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation: River and Harbor Act of 1954 provided that local interest furnish lands and rights-ofway required for bridges. Assurances accepted and approve February 16, 1955. Requirements for Summit and Reedy Point Bridges have been met. Terminal facilities: Ample mooring facilities at eastern and western ends of canal and bulkheads at Delaware City and St. Georges were constructed by the United 3-8 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT States. A small-boat harbor was provided and a wharf constructed at Chesapeake City. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Plans and specifications and surveys were accomplished. 15. MISPILLION RIVER, DE Location: Rises in Kent and Sussex Counties, DE, flows northeasterly 15 miles along the boundary line between the two counties and empties into Delaware Bay about 16 miles above Cape Henlopen.(See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1218.) Previous projects: For details see page 1786, Annual Report for 1915, page 448 of Annual Report for 1918, and page 327 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: Project is about 31 percent complete. Four cutoffs for 6-foot channel were completed in 1923; 6-foot channel from Delaware Bay to Milford in 1924; and jetties at the mouth in 1939. Work remaining is dredging channel to 9-foot depth, 80 feet wide in Delaware Bay to the mouth, thence 60 feet wide to Milford, with the provision of three cutoffs to eliminate bends, and a turning basin at Milford. Controlling depths at mean low water; in October 1964 from Delaware Bay to mouth 7.1 feet, and thence to fixed highway bridge at Milford, 6.1 feet. For details see page 243 of Annual Report for 1957. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1989.) Local cooperation: Assurances required by 1954 River and Harbor Act have not been furnished. For details see page 243, Annual Report for 1957. Prior requirements fully complies with. Terminal facilities: For details see page 244, Annual Report for 1957. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included dredging by Cottrell Engineering Company from 31 May 1989 to 28 June 1989 removing 7,259 cubic yards of material at a cost of $181,804. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included maintenance dredging, and supervision and administration. 16. MURDERKILL RIVER, DE Location: Rises in Kent County, DE, flows northeasterly 19 miles through county, and empties into Delaware Bay about 25 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart no. 1218.) Existing project: Provides for a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water, 150 feet wide in Delaware Bay to mouth, and thence 80 feet wide to Frederica, 7.5 miles above mouth. Total length of section included in project is about 8.5 miles. Extreme tidal range is from about 1 foot below mean low water to about 2 feet above mean high water. Estimated cost for new work revised in 1954 is $38,000. Portion comprising widening channel to project width throughout its length is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion last revised in 1954 was $86,000. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of July 13, 1892 (H. Ex. Doc. 21,52d Cong., 1st Sess. See page 981 Annual Report for 1892). Latest published map is in House Document 1058,62d Congress 3d Session. Existing project about 30 percent complete, including revision to be restudied. Channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide was completed in 1911. Work remaining is widening the channel to project width. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1989.) Local cooperation: None required. Terminal facilities: There are a number of light timber wharves on both sides of river near mouth and two wharves at Frederica, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included maintenance dredging by Cottrell Engineering Company from 31 May 1989 to 28 June 1989 removing 39,291 cubic yards of material at a cost of $305,695. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included supervision and administration and maintenance dredging. 17. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant To Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Name of Project Cost to 30 September 1989 Feasibility Reports Wills Hole Thorofare, Pt. Pleasant, NJ $ 19,340 18. NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY Location: A sea level inland water route approximately parallel with New Jersey coast, extends from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, about 26 miles south of Sandy Hook, NJ to Delaware Bay about 3 miles above Cape May point. Waterway extends through inlet and up Manasquan River about 2 miles; thence by Point Pleasant Canal through high ground for 2 miles to head of Barnegat Bay. It then passes through a series of bays, lagoons, and thoroughfares along New Jersey coast to Cape May Harbor; thence across Cape May County to Delaware Bay through a land cut by way of New England Creek basin.(See U.S.Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts, 234, 795, 825, 826, 827, 1216, 1217, 1218, and 1219.) Existing project: This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and generally 100 feet wide, 3-9 "REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1989" extending from the Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, NJ to Delaware Bay above Cape May, NJ, by the further improvement of Manasquan River and Inlet, NJ, and the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway, and by the construction of a canal of similar dimensions from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay via the New England Creek basin, with adequate jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance. The total length of the project is about 117 miles. Normal tide range in sections of the waterway remote from inlets is 0.5 foot. Estimated cost for new work is $71,549 (July 1969), exclusive of $1,824,940 Navy Department funds and $99,000 contributed by local interests. Portion of project extending from Manasquan River to Cape May Harbor is to be restudied and excluded from new work costs estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is $6,470,000 (July 1954). Existing project was adopted by 1945 River and Harbor Act (H.Doc 133, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.) Latest published map is in project document. River and Harbor Act of 1946 (Public Law 525,79th Cong., 2nd Sess., as extended by Public Law 240,82d Cong.), authorized use for a period not to exceed 6 years, of funds from appropriations heretofore or hereafter made for maintenance and improvement of rivers and harbors, for maintenance of canal from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay constructed as an emergency wartime project with Navy Department funds, including cost of maintaining temporary railroad andcseashore highway bridges over canal. Existing project is about 25 percent complete. A canal 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay was completed in 1942 as well as two parallel stone jetties at Delaware Bay entrances and a temporary highway and a railroad bridge in 1944, all with Navy Department funds. Work remaining consists of dredging a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet to Cape May Harbor, has been deferred for restudy; however, the project between Ottens Harbor and Richardson Channel and from that point to Cape May are being maintained to 10 feet and 12 feet, respectively, since they were originally dredged to these depths by the State. Section 860 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized, for preconstruction engineering and design, a 15 foot depth in the Vicinity of Cape May Harbor, titled as Cold Spring Inlet. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1989.) Local cooperation: The project is subject to the conditions that the State of New Jersey cede to the United States all right, title, and interest that it has acquired to lands, easements, rights-of-way, and structures other than bridges for the Bayhead-Manasquan Canal; that the State of New Jersey furnish, free of cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and disposal areas required for construction of the Cape May Canal and for improvement of the proposed waterway and for their subsequent maintenance; that local interests provide, maintain, and operate suitable bridges over the waterway; that the State of New Jersey donate to the United States the navigation aids in use on the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway; and that the State of New Jersey hold and save the United States and its agents free from any claims for damages resulting from the work of improvement. Compliance with these conditions was completed January 15, 1954, except that local interests are required to furnish disposal areas for the construction and the subsequent maintenance of the proposed improvement. Terminal facilities: See Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included Pt. Pleasant bulkhead coating Phase 2, and lease equipment. Bank stabilization, water supply study, repair of bulkhead and dredging of Cape May Canal was accomplished. There was maintenance dredging by Barnegat Bay Dredging Company from 26 June 1989 to 30 September 1989 removing a total of 110,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $565,347. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, bank stabilization, coating of Pt. Pleasant Canal bulkhead, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 19. PEPPER CREEK, DE Location: Rises in south central part of Sussex County, DE, and flows north to Dagsboro about 48 miles south of Dover, DE, thence east-northeast to Indian River Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 411 and 1219 and Army Map Service Quadrangle Sheet 5961 II SW, of Frankford, DE) Existing project: A channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from such depth in Indian River Bay 3.9 miles to Cattail Marsh. Existing project was adopted by the Chief of Engineers, June 12, 1963, under the small navigation program, section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. Tidal range in creek is 1 foot at mean sea level. Tidal range in the ocean at Indian River Inlet is 3.8 feet. Costs for completed project were $138,094 Federal, and $41,500 non-Federal. Local cooperation: Project was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in detailed project report, "Small Navigation Project For Pepper Creek, DE." Assurances of cooperation were received from Delaware State Highway Department, January 16, 1964, and approve by District Engineer, February 25, 1964. Contributed funds of $41,500 were received from local interests, March 30, 1964. Terminal facilities: Launching and unloading facilities exist at Helms Landing, Timmons Cove, and Pools Landing. Facilities consist of wooden bulkheads which permit boats to anchor alongside and unload onto trucks on the shore. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: BCR update was accomplished. 20. SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA Location: Rises in Schuylkill County, PA, flows 3-10 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT generally southeasterly 150 miles, and empties into Delaware River at Philadelphia, PA (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 295 and 280.) Previous project: For details see page 325, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project: This provides for a channel 33 feet deep and 400 feet wide in Delaware River the mouth and within the river to 29th Street, .75 mile above the mouth; thence the same depth and 300 feet wide to Passyunk Avenue Bridge, 3.5 miles above the mouth; thence 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide to Gibson Point, 4.5 miles above the mouth; and thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide to University Avenue Bridge, 6 miles above the mouth, including widening at bends. The total length of the section included in the project is about 6.5 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range, due to freshets and prolonged heavy winds, is about 14 feet. The cost for new work for the completed existing project was $2,809,007. Existing project was completed in September 1962. For details see Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1989. See Table 3-B at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation: The River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946, imposed the condition that the City of Philadelphia agree to remove 60,000 cubic yards, place measurement, of material annually from that portion of those portions of the project which the District Engineer may designate until such time as adequate municipal sewage-treatment works are constructed and placed in effective operation. Compliance with this condition has been met through the completion of sewage-treatment works by the City of Philadelphia. All other requirements have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities: There are 38 wharves, piers, and docks within limits of improvement. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No. 7, Revised 1967, Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, plans and specifications on dredging, and supervision and administration. 21 WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE Location: Formed by Christina River, which rises in New Castle County, DE, flows northeasterly 16 miles, passing through the City of Wilmington, DE, and empties into Delaware River about 29 miles below Philadelphia, PA (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 294.) Previous projects: For details see page 1785 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 308 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: This provides for a channel 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide from west edge of Delaware River ship channel to Lobdell Canal, a distance of about 1.2 miles; thence 21 feet deep and 250 feet wide for the distance of .8 mile to the mouth of Brandywine River; thence the same depth and 200 feet wide for a distance of about 2.2 miles to a point approximately 4.2 miles from the Delaware River ship channel; thence decreasing to a depth of 10 feet in a distance of 750 feet to Penn Central Railroad bridge No.4; and thence 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide for a distance of of about 5.6 miles to Newport, DE, approximately 9.9 miles above Delaware River ship channel, including a turning basin 38 feet deep opposite the Wilmington Marine terminal and extending upstream from the mouth to Lobdell Canal, 320 feet wide, 2,900 feet long on the north side of the channel and decreasing to a length of 2,000 feet on the north side of the basin. It also provides for the removal of about 1,200 feet of the outer end of a stone-filled, pile-and-timber crib jetty constructed 2,150 feet long on the north side of the entrance; for a steel sheet-pile jetty 2,300 feet long, with 120-foot inshore wing, on the south side of the entrance, and for a V-shaped stone-filled pile-and-timber jetty at the mouth of Brandywine River 430 feet along the north side of Brandywine and 260 feet long on the Christina. Depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range, due to prolonged heavy winds, is about 13 feet. Existing project was completed in 1962. (For details see page 222, Annual Report 1962.) Authority from Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of July 1960 provide for channel and turning basin deepening from 35 to 38 feet and the turning basin widened from 200 to 320 feet. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1989. See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal facilities: There are 18 piers, wharves, and docks within limits of the improvement. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No.8, revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included plans and specifications, water quality and shad monitoring, lease of equipment, drainage and construction of dikes and sluices, construction of disposal area, subsurface testing, investigation of a sunken vessel, and USGS Stream Gaging. There was maintenance dredging by Great Lakes and Dock Company from 21 October 1988 to 07 November 1988 removing a total of 496,668 cubic yards of material at a cost of $447,501; and by American Dredging Company from 02 August 1989 to 23 August 1989 removing a total of 436,328 cubic yards of material at a cost of $473,605. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, disposal area and dredge monitoring, surveys, environmental coordination for reef design, maintenance of Stream Gaging by USGS, ditching, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 3-11 "REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1989" Beach Erosion Control: 22. SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEMONSTRATION Location: Demonstration projects were undertaken at a total of 16 sites nationwide, 6 of which are located in the Delaware Bay and include Pickering Beach, Kitts Hummock, Slaughter Beach, Bowers Beach, Broadkill Beach, and Lewes, Delaware. The latter three sites were only monitored as there are presently Federal and State projects in progress. Existing project: Section 54 of Water Resources Development Act of 1974 authorized a nationwide, 5 year program to test and evaluate low cost shoreline erosion control measures, both structural and vegetative, which can be implemented by individual private property owners. The emphasis of the program was not to solve individual problems, so much as to explore the effectiveness of various ways to control erosion at different types of shorelines, and provide this information to private and public landowners. The construction and evaluation at all sites are completed and information dissemination has been started. Development and dissemination of public information guide books. As such we are the repository of these guide books. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Dissemination of reports as requested by OCE. 23. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization). Name of project Cost to 30 September 1989 Detailed Project Reports North Shore-Indian River Inlet $301,306 South Shore-Indian River Inlet 475,017 Flood Control 24. BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA Location: Damsite is on Pohopoco Creek about 4.5 miles' upstream from its confluence with Lehigh River and 4 miles east of Lehighton, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Map for Lehighton, PA-1960.) Existing project: This is a multiple-purpose development project providing water supply, flood control, and recreation. Plan of improvement provides for an earth and rock fill dam 4,200 feet long rising 170 feet above creekbed; a spillway around the north end of dam; and gate control outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, has a reservoir capacity of 68,250 acre-feet at spillway crest level with 1,390 acre-feet of inactive storage, 39,830 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 27,030 acre-feet for flood control. The cost of project was $22,931,400 including $6,100,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project. The construction of the dam and appurtenances was completed in 1971. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1989.) Local cooperation: Project was approved subject to certain requirements of cooperation by local interests as defined in approved House Document. Resolution of Delaware River Basin Commission providing assurances of repayment of water supply and pollution control costs was accepted June 7, 1965. A contract for repayment of water supply costs was signed October 16,1966. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included recreation safety program, USGS Stream Gaging equipment, snow survey program, repair and maintenance of specific gages, water quality testing and monitoring, bulkhead water quality monitoring, painting of service bridge, monumentation survey, and repair outlet channel side slope. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of reservoir, instrumentation and surveillance, safety inspection, and USGS Stream Gaging. Work also included water quality testing and monitoring, test and evaluation of emergency bulkhead, water control, plans and specifications on bulkhead, replacement of valves, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 25. BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA Location: Dam site is on Tulpehocken Creek about 1.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Plum Creek and about 6 miles northwest of Reading, PA(See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Bernville, PA) Existing project: This is a multiple-purpose development project providing water supply, flood control, and recreation. Construction started in 1974 and was completed in 1980. The dam is 1,775 feet long and rises 98 feet above creekbed, with spillway about 1,500 feet south of dam, and gate-controlled outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, has a capacity of 50,010 acre-feet at spillway crest level, with 3,000 acrefeet of inactive storage, 14,620 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 32,390 acre-feet for flood control.(For details see H.Doc 533 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.) Cost of project $63,163,791. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1989.) (H. Doc. 533, 87th Cong., 2d Sess., contains latest published maps.) Local cooperation: Project was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as prescribed in House Document cited above. Delaware River Basin Commission on December 29, 1964, adopted a prelimi- 3-12 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT nary resolution providing for repayment of water supply costs. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included maintenance, recreation safety program, sewage treatment plant, sewage vacuum system, USGS Stream Gaging, snow survey and NOAA Weather Service Cooperation. Work also included maintenance and repair of specific gages, water quality testing and monitoring, installation of computer terminal and peripherals, lawn maintenance, janitorial services, trash removal, purchase and repair of water supply equipment, and cost incurred for Lower Heidelberg Township police department. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of reservoir and recreation area, annual safety inspection, instrumentation and surveillance, installation of WCDS equipment, reservoir regulation data collection, water quality testing and monitoring. There was joint use of water facilities, erosion control, repair access road, plans and specifications on treatment plant roof, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. Also incurred were costs for seasonal employment at recreation area and boat launch repairs. 26. DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DE Location: The project is located in Sussex County, Delaware, on the Atlantic Ocean and starts immediately south of Delaware Bay extending in a southerly direction a distance of 24.5 miles to Fenwick Island on the Delaware-Maryland border. Previous Project: The previous project, adopted as HD 85-216 in 1958 and modified by P.L. 87-874 in 1962, provided for Federal participation in the cost of restoration and subsequent periodic nourishment, and the initial periodic nourishment was completed in 1957 by local interests. The second increment of beach replenishment by local interest was completed in 1963. Existing project: Provides a plan of improvement which consists of the construction of a sand bypass system and periodic nourishment until 2027. (For details, see S. Doc. 90,90th Cong. 2d Sess.) Estimated cost of project (October 1986) $9,720,000 includes $5,180,000 required non-Federal costs. The construction of the feeder beach north of Indian River Inlet was completed in 1973 and nourished in 1978, and 1984. Other work undertaken has been engineering and design associated for the remaining portion of the project. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1989.) Section 869 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 deauthorized the unshceduled portion of the project. Local cooperation: Assurances of local cooperation were provided by the State of Delaware, January 13, 1981. Operations during fiscal year: New work, contract: Work included initial construction of sand bypassing plant. New work, hired labor: Work included planning management, engineering and design and supervision and administration. 27. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 838, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Name of Project Cost to 30 Sept. 1989 Reconnaissance Reports Assunpink Creek Basin, NJ $37,645 Lehigh River Basin, PA 43,462 Newton Creek, Collingswood, NJ 19,485 Newton Creek, Woodlynne, NJ 15,863 Shabakunk Creek, Ewing, NJ 51,919 Willsey Creek, Wurtsboro, NJ 69,058 Feasibility Reports Palmerton, PA Construction Pennypack Creek, Hatboro, PA 8,490 $54,019 Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs were $200,762 for disaster preparedness. 28. EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION Emergency Bank Protection Section 14, Public Law 79-526. Feasibility Reports Manasquan River, NJ Reconnaissance Reports Buckwha Creek, PA Ontelaunee Creek, Lehigh County, PA Little Neshaminy Creek, PA $31,934 $ 4,280 $ 9,661 $ 7,819 29. FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA Location: Reservoir is in northeastern Pennsylvania on Lehigh River between White Haven and Stoddartsville. Dam is about 0.4 mile below mouth of Bear Creek, about 60 miles above confluence of Lehigh River and Delaware River at Easton, PA(See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Stoddartsville, PA) Existing project: Plan of improvement authorized by 1946 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 587,79th Cong.,2d Sess.) provided for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. Modification of project, authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc.522,87th Cong., 2d Sess.), provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present single-purpose flood 3-13 "REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1989" control project. Plan of improvement requires altering spillway, increasing height of dam, constructing a new intake tower, extending outlet tunnel by addition of a concrete conduit, and constructing new dikes and raising existing dikes. Modified dam will rise 264 feet above riverbed and be 3,500 feet long. Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, will have a reservoir capacity of 181,000 acre-feet spillway crest level with 3,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 70,000 acre-feet for water supply and recreation and 108,000 acre-feet for flood control. Estimated Federal cost of new work (October 1986) is $14,270,000 including $107,730,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Project as authorized under the 1946 Flood Control Act was completed June 1961. Settlement for lands was completed October 1962. The advance engineering and design for the modified project is completed. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1989.) Local cooperation: None required under 1946 Flood Control Act. Under 1962 Flood Control Act, project was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. The Delaware River Basin Commission expressed its support by a resolution dated 23 April 1980 and reiterated its sponsorship for the modified project in August 1985, October 1985, and July 1988. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included general maintenance, USGS Stream Gage repair & maintenance, repair access road, analysis mapping, snow surveys, NOAA Weather Service, water quality testing and monitoring, and monumentation of surveys. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of reservoir and recreation facilities, instrumentation and surveillance of reservoir, repair access road, safety inspection, initial reservoir filling plan, emergency planning, USGS Cooperative Stream Gaging, installation of WCDS equipment, reservoir regulation data collection, water quality testing and monitoring, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 30. GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA Location: In Dyberry Creek valley in central part of Wayne County, PA, between borough of Honesdale and village of Tanners Falls. Dam is about 3 miles above confluence of Dyberry Creek and Lackawaxen River in Honesdale and 29 miles above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware Rivers. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, I-onesdale, PA) Existing project: A single-purpose flood control reservoir with a capacity of 24,500 acre-feet formed by an earth embankment, about 1,225 feet long at crest and rising 109 feet above creek bed. It also has a tunnel with intake structure and a chute-type spillway with a stilling basin in left abutment. Reservoir controls runoff from a drainage area of 65 square miles which is 91 percent of watershed of Dyberry Creek and 39 percent of Lackawaxen River watershed above Honesdale, PA. Construction of project was authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act (H.Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.). Federal cost of new work was $4,064,510. Non-Federal funds not required. Project completed in June 1960. (See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1989.) Local cooperation: Assurances of Compliance with requirements of local cooperation were accepted July 30, 1956. For details see page 251, Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included instrumentation survey, USGS Stream Gaging, and NOAA Weather Service. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of the reservoir, instrumentation and surveillance, safety inspection and training, water control, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 31 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To ascertain whether local interests were maintaining and operating completed projects as required, inspections were made as follows: PROJECT Lehigh River at Allentown, PA Lehigh River at Bethlehem, PA Delaware River at East Branch, NY Rancocas Creek at Mount Holly, NJ Chester Creek at Chester, PA Beach Erosion & Hurricane Protection 27 & INSPECTION DATES 9 November 1988 19 May 1989 14 November 1988 15 May 1989 3 November 1988 11 May 1989 28 October 1988 19 May 1989 25 May 1989 29 September 1989 Local interests are satisfactorily maintaining and operating projects in accordance with regulation. Costs during the period were $16,577. Total costs were $16,934. 32. INSPECTION OF NON-FEDERAL LEVEES Inspection of non-Federal levees was conducted at a cost of $357,000 at the following sites: Stroudsburg, East Stroudsburg, PA 13 June 1989 Hawley, PA 14 June 1989 Port Jervis, NJ 27 October 1988 33. PROMPTON LAKE, PA. Location: In Lackawaxen River Valley in central part 3-14 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT of Wayne County, PA, between borough of Prompton and village of Aldenville. Dam is within corporate limits of Prompton, 4 miles upstream from Honesdale, PA, and approximately 30 miles above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware River. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, PA) Existing project: Plan of improvement authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.) provides for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. Modification of project authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H.Doc 522, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.) provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present single-purpose flood control project. Plan of improvement requires construction of control tower with gates and service bridge, placing an impervious blanket on valley walls and floor upstream from dam, widening spillway, and clearing land and relocating roads in reservoir. Dam, completed under 1948 Flood Control Act which will not be modified, is 1,230 feet long and rises 140 feet above riverbed. Existing spillway, cut into rock of right abutment, will be modified and present uncontrolled outlet works discharging into a concrete conduit along right bank, and will be provided with gates and a control tower. Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River basin has a capacity of 52,000 acre-feet: 3,500 acre-feet for inactive storage, 28,200 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 20,300 acre-feet for flood control. Estimated Federal cost of new work (October 1987) is $45,600,000 including $40,000,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Project as authorized under the 1948 Flood Control Act was completed in November 1960. (For details, see page 358, Annual Report for 1963.) Work accomplished under the 1962 Flood Control Act was preconstruction engineering and design. Local cooperation: Project modification was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. Assurances of compliance under Flood Control Act of 1948 have been met. Delaware River Basin Commission on March 18, 1966, gave their view that the need for water supply was not urgent at that time. However recent studies conducted by DRBC have determined that there is now a need for water supply. In August 1983, DRBC expressed their strong support for the project modification. Preconstruction engineering and design was initiated in 1966 and suspended in 1968 and resumed in FY 1986. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, contract: Work included instrumentation survey, USGS Cooperative Stream Gaging, NOAA Weather Service, repair and maintenance of specific gages, water quality monitoring and testing, and installation of relief well. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of reservoir, instrumentation and surveillance, periodic inspection, water quality monitoring and testing, repair access road, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. 34. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition Surveys Cedar Creek, DE Mispillion River, DE Murderkill, DE Cohansey River, NJ Broadkill River, DE Date Survey Conducted 16 November 1988 23 November 1988 10 February 1989 16 March 1989 11 April 1989 35. TAMAQUA, PA Location: The authorized project is located in Tamaqua Borough and Walker Township, PA. Both municipalities are within Schuylkill County. Existing project: The project as authorized provides for a 2,930-foot long tunnel, 10 feet in diameter with appurtenant structures, through Sharp Mountain. The tunnel would extend from Wabash Creek on the west boundary of Tamaqua to the Little Schuylkill River just south of its confluence with Wabash Creek. The proposed basin, and a 70-foot long highway bridge. The Phase I portion of the advance engineering and design was completed in 1981. The findings from that phase resulted in the addition of a small dry detention dam to the project plan. Phase II of advance engineering and design was completed in 1984 and reduced the level of protection to 100-year. This reduced the tunnel's diameter to 9 feet. Estimated cost of project (October 1987) is $12,300,000 including $3,075,000 required non-Federal costs. The local sponsor, by letter of October 2, 1985, requested the project be constructed in two stages. It was also requested that the tunnel be constructed first followed by the dam. Local cooperation: The Borough of Tamaqua is the local sponsor. The borough, by letter of June 25, 1968, indicated its intention to comply with the items of local cooperation. The assurance was reaffirmed by the Borough on September 2, 1977, September 2, 1980, and again on October 2, 1985. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Engineering and design work was accomplished. 36. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS The total fiscal year cost for this category amounted to $64,714. General Investigations 37. SURVEYS Cost for the period were $771,442 for navigation studies: $89,700 for flood control studies: $533,195 for special studies: a total of $1,394,337. 3-15 "REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1989" 38. COLLECTION AND STUDY 39. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING OF BASIC DATA AND DESIGN Cost and expenditures during the period for flood plain Cost and expenditures during the period $153,538 for information studies were $344,371. navigation studies; 336,588 for flood control: a total of 490,126. 3-16 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 SEPT. 30,1989 Absecon Creek, NJ (Regular Funds) Alloway Creek, NJ (Regular Funds) 3. Barnegat Inlet, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 18,000 16,504 20,000 19,356 110,000 4,425,000 61,094 1,442,663 515,000 619,000 509,472 624,227 - 1,992,000 - 226,659 5,218,000 7,025,000 3,795,557 8,449,126 711,000 734,000 709,603 727,581 - 4,550,000 1,616,239 3,523,181 4. Big Timber Creek, NJ New Work (Regular Approp Funds) Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (Contributed New Work Funds) Approp. Cost 5. Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp., ,NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Ceder Creek, DE (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 7. Cohansey River, NJ (Regular Funds) 8. Cold Springs Inlet, NJ (Regular Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 18,000 17,939 - 150,000 125,000 4,759,000 - 130,150 139,258 3,502,390 - - - 200,000 - - - 58,993 - - - 287,200 - - - 285,095 - - - 35,100 - - - 35,100 1,434,000 132,000 324,000 1,424,916 137,808 327,772 57,300 56,228 266,000 158,000 331,000 173,000 264,703 151,386 333,407 178,547 3-17 2. 11,935 11,935 185,6821 184,186 21,398 21,398 55,761 55,117 17,451,849 14,407,286 12,589,135 12,578,736 6,842,000 5,669,079 58,665 58,665 71,9861 71,925 50,000 50,000 5,184,000 3,921,798 200,000 58,993 256,100 256,100 287,200 285,095 35,100 35,100 146,75621 146,75621 2,786,231 2,785,022 879,275 879,275 3,318,507 3,318,164 1,134,346 1,134,346 "REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1989" TABLE 3-A (Contined) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 SEPT. 30,1989 (Contributed Funds) 9. Cooper River, NJ (Regular Funds) 10. Delaware River Between Philadelphia, PA and Trenton,NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11. Delaware River PA,NJ and DE Philadelphia to the Sea (Regular Funds)* Rehab. 12. Indian River Inlet and Bay, DE (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 13. Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, DE and MD (Regular Funds) 14. Inland Waterway, Rehoboth Bay to,Delaware Bay, DE and MD (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 18,000 17,284 3,005,000 261,000 4,729,000 1,757,000 3,009,484 260,475 4,730,789 1,756,834 14,309,000 14,655,000 14,287,846 14,662,843 12,145,000 13,316,400 12,143,791 13,275,220 150,000 10 150,000 10 33,102 33,102 397,244 1 396,528 1 72,147,800 3 72,147,800 3 39,588,860 4 39,588,296 4 15,000 15,000 57,879,872 5 57,879,872 5 364,060,552 6 363,986,655 6 508,324 508,324 511,2107 511,210 64,000 30,000 400,000 65,196 30,145 388,801 11,129,053 21,925,400 10,272,600 11,295,557 21,846,349 10,345,251 - 6,095,000 3,697,000 - 6,065,412 3,713,393 208,000 335,800 208,523 338,986 1,200 -1,155 23,000 33,809 6,566,500 6,527,440 576,000 578,316 43,400 44,600 3,280,923 3,280,490 1,323,775 1,323,775 210,000 210,000 132,535,5918 132,532,598 8 198,329,2589 198,238,406 10,368,000 10,357,121 561,514 561,514 1,912,378 1,912,278 60,000 60,000 3-18 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT TABLE 3-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 SEPT. 30,1989 15. Mispillion River, DE (Regular Funds) 16. Murderkill River, DE (Regular funds) 17. New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 18. Pepper Creek, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed (Funds) 19. Schuylkill River, PA (Regular Funds) 20. Wilmington Harbor, DE (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 24. Beltzville Lake, PA (Regular Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Appro Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Appro Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 211,000 37,000 210,107 34,758 153,000 41,000 149,713 43,653 63,300 197,000 66,775 196,938 800 335,100 540 335,016 2,563,300 2,533,000 3,185,000 1,648,000 2,560,237 2,478,900 3,239,387 1,643,711 18,000 16,947 125,000 104,000 954,000 141,000 125,433 97,895 957,727 140,940 4,207,700 13,826,200 10,887,000 4,217,572 13,768,314 10,869,878 - - 225,850 - - 82,437 5,585,800 5,613,926 97,431 515,000 617,500 658,000 406,500 496,875 635,506 637,498 427,026 385,34818* 385,34818 1,878,86619 1,871,807 19 253,491 253,491 37,630 37,630 1,645,255 1,644,276 71,54911 71,549 1 29,511,871 12 29,504,577 12 1,196,581 1,196,581 99,000 99,000 138,094 2 138,094 2 19,797 1 18,744 38,988 38,988 3,334,007 13 3,334,00713 27,266,033 27,263,381 1,954,725 14 1,954,725 14 65,304,465 65,249,248 285,850 239,868 22,931,831 22,931,130 7,000,175 6,998,294 3-19 "REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1989" TABLE 3-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 SEPT. 30,1989 25. Blue Marsh Lake, PA (Regular Funds) 26. Delaware Coast Protection (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 29. Francis E. Walter Dam, PA (Regular Funds) 30. General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Resevoir,PA (Regular Funds) 33. Prompton Lake PA 36. Tamaqua, PA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Appro Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost -1,551 1,053,000 1,058,095 550,000 148,701 1,052 -1,730 -113 11,874 1,106,322 1,308,000 1,442,500 1,122,178 1,282,070 1,429,509 9,080 - 1,100,000 13,587 920,187 - 424,000 - 328,272 - - - 900,000 - - - 712,986 460,000 474,500 451,000 549,000 449,970 465,297 465,096 546,206 222,000 155,500 145,000 129,000 210,796 156,995 151,308 114,381 287,000 296,000 1,031,000 506,700 295,841 282,282 1,043,084 497,921 - 50,000 - 34,712 40,000 53,887 11,399 12,448 63,180,300 63,177,976 10,419,022 10,356,391 4,103,95320 3,139,746 20 215,350 215,350 1,033,473 1,033,473 12,403,432 15 12,216,418 15 6,468,021 6,449,222 4,073,105 4,073,105 2,042,064 2,023,716 4,609,48316 4,609,48316 4,533,862 4,521,011 625,00017 625,00017 * Total Adjusted to correct discrepancies in prior years. ** For Construction, General funds only on legislative Phase I AE&D, or support work for Phase II AE&D. 1: Includes cost incurred for prepariation of Environmental Impact Statement. 2. Excludes $12,774 for study report under General Investigations. 3. Includes $2,489,173 for new work for previous projects, $105,000 for preauthorization studies and minus $142,015 adjustment (new work) to Delaware River, Philadelphia to Sea project from this project under 1954 modification. 4. Included $552,720 for maintenance for previous projects, and $685,000 Jobs Bill Funds. 5. Excludes $12,976,054 for new work for previous projects and $142,015 adjustment from Delaware River, Philadelphia to Trenton, NJ under 1954 modification. 6. Includes $1,025,409 for maintenance of previous projects, and $8,000 Jobs Bill funds. 7. Excludes $10,000 for previous project. 8. Includes $10,709,755 for new work for previous projects. 9. Includes $6,903,748 for maintenance for previous projects, and $9,500 Jobs Bill funds. 10. Includes $50,000 Navy Department Funds. 11. Excludes $1,824,940 Navy Department Funds. 12. Excludes $286,953 Navy Department funds expended for maintenance. 13. Includes $525,000 for previous projects. 14. Includes $402,121 for new work for previous project, and $206,177 emergency relief funds. 15. Includes $40,000 appropriated and expended under Code 710 Recreation Facilities. 16. Includes $63,000 appropriated and $61,551 expended under Code 710 Recreation Facilities, excludes $23,600 preauthorization studies under 1948 modification. 17. Transfer from Baltimore District in Fiscal Year 1989. 18. Includes $148,798 for new work on previous projects. 19. Includes $61,172 for maintenance on previous projects. 20. Includes $704,000 AE&D. 21. Includes $36,000 for new work for previous projects. 22. Includes $1,399 transferred from revolving fund. 3-20 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT TABLE 3-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 25, 1912 Sept. 19,1890 Dec 10, 1896 March 2, 1907 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 July 2, 1985 July 3, 1990 Aug. 30, 1935 Nov 17, 1986 Dec 10, 1979 Mar 2, 1907 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 2, 1907 Mar 2, 1945 ABSECON CREEK, NJ (See Section 1 of Text) Channel 5 feet deep, 80 feet wide in Absecon Bay to mouth of creek. ALLOWAY CREEK, NJ (See Section 2 of Text) Formation of a channel 6 feet deep by dredging and 60 feet wide from Quinton to 1,000 feet above upper Hancock Bridge; and a channel of same depth and 75 feet wide to the "Square". To provide for dike formed by a single row of piles above Upper Hancock Bridge. Construction of a cut-off at Fosters Bottle BARNEGAT INLET, NJ (See Section 3 of Text) An 8-foot depth through inlet to Oyster Creek Channel across inner bar, 10-foot depth through outer bar and for jetties. A channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics from gorge to Oyster Creek Channel, and thence to deep water in bay. Maintenance dredging of channel to connect main inlet channel with Barnegat City Harbor. Construction of a parallel, 4270 foot rubble mound south jetty and dredging a channel 10 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 11,300 feet long. BIG TIMBER CREEK NJ (See Section 4 of Text) For a 10 foot depth from Delaware River to Marters sand plant. Extension of project to Clements Bridge. CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP, NJ (See Section 5 of Text) Consists of beach fill; dune fill; new groins; maintenance of existing groins; rehabilitation of an existing seawall; and a breakwater with weir and deposition basin at Cape May Inlet. Project may be constructed separately or in combination with any other feature of the project. CEDAR CREEK, NJ (See Section 6 of Text) Creek ranges in depth from 13 feet at the Route 36 bridge to less than 5 feet at several locations. Channel with varies from 75 feet to 250 feet. COHANSEY RIVER, NJ (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 7 feet deep over entire project. Channel 12 feet deep to Glass Street, thence 8 feet to Commerce Street with turning basin. COLD SPRING INLET, NJ (See Section 8 of Text) An inlet channel 25 feet deep and jetties. A 20-foot channel to deep water in harbor H.Doc. 71, 62d Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 60,51st Cong., 1st sess. River and Harbor Act of 1894 River and Harbor Act of 1906 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 73d Con.,2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 85, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc.358, 79th Cong 2d sess. H. Doc.236, 99th Cong 2d sess. H.Doc No.217, 70th Cong. 1st sess. Rivers and Habors Comm. Doc. No.15, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers & Harbors Act of 1968 WRDA of 1986 River and Harbor Act of 1960. H. Doc.645,59th Cong 1st sess. Senate Committee print, 75th Cong.,lst sess. H. Doc.388,59th Cong 2nd sess. H. Doc.262,77th Cong 1st sess. 3-21 "REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1989" TABLE 3-B Acts June 3, 1896 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized COOPER RIVER, NJ (See Section 9 of Text) Provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 70 feet wide in Delaware River to the mouth and 1 1/2 miles above the mouth. Documents H.Doc 176,53d Cong., 3d sess. July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 30, 19352 Aug 26,1937 July 24, 1946 Sept 3, 1954 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 19353 June 20, 19384 Mar 2, 19455 Mar 2, 19455 Mar 2, 19455 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 Aug 26, 1937 DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA AND TRENTON, NJ (See Section 10 of Text) A channel 28 feet deep, 300 feet wide between Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA and Delair Bridge Channel 25 feet deep from Delair Bridge to Trenton, NJ, and maintenance of 12-foot channel from upper end of 25-foot project to Penn Central R.R. Bridge at Ferry St., Trenton. Auxiliary channel, 20 feet deep east of Burlington Island. A cross channel 8 feet deep, opposite Delanco, NJ Anchorage at mouth of Biles Creek A channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide between Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA, and upstream end of Newbold Island, thence 35 feet deep to Trenton Marine Terminal and turning basin to 800 feet wide. Relocate channel at railroad bridge at Delair and suitably reconstruct bridge. Construct necessary bank protection works; and eliminate authorized anchorage near mouth of Biles Creek, PA DELAWARE RIVER, PA, NJ, AND DE, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA (See Section 11 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep from Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA to Delaware Bay. Anchorages 35 feet deep at Port Richmond and Mantua Creek, a 30 foot anchorage at Gloucester, NJ and extend 1,000 foot channel in Philadelphia Harbor to Horseshoe Bend. An anchorage 35 feet deep at Marcus Hook, PA A channel 37 feet deep from Philadelphia - Camden Bridge to Navy Yard, thence 40 feet deep to deep water in Delaware Bay. A 37-foot depth channel from Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA to Philadelphia-Camden Bridge A 37-foot depth in an enlargement of anchorage near Mantua Creek and Marcus Hook. Maintain enlarged channel opposite Philadelphia Navy Yard. A channel from Allegheny Ave., to Naval Base 40 feet deep, 400 feet wide along west side of channel throughPhiladelphia Harbor and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend. Anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with mean lengths of 8,000, 5,200,13,650 and 11,500 feet respectively. INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DE (See Section 12 of text) A 15-foot inlet channel, steel and stone jetties, 6 foot channel from end of inlet channel to deep water in the bay and authority to modify interior inlet channel. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 66, 74th Cong., 1st sess Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 90, 74th Cong.,2d sess. H. Doc. 679, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 358, 831d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 733, 61st Cong. 2d sess. H. Doc. j304 , 71st Cong. 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.5, 73d Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 159, 75th Cong. 3d sess. H. Doc. 5 0,76th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 340, 77th Cong. 1st sess. Specified in Act. H. Doc. P58 , 83rd Cong. 2d sess. H. Doc. 185, 85th Cong. 1st sess. 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 75th Cong. 1st sess. 3-22 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT TABLE 3-B Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Mar 2, 1945 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 7, 1939 Sept 3, 1954 Aug 30, 1935 July 25, 1912 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 2, 1945 Mar 2, 1919 Aug 26, 1937 Sep 3, 1954 July 13, 1982 A 9-foot channel from inlet to Old Landing, including basin, and 4-foot channel to highway bridge at Millsboro. INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE & MD (See Section 13 of Text) A sea level channel 27 feet deep, 250 feet wide from Delaware River to Elk River and 400 feet wide down Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to deep water at or near Pooles Island; alter existing bridges over canal; enlarge Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, with a basin same depth and revetment of both banks east of Fifth Street; enlarge anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to 400 feet wide, 1,000 feet long and 12 feet deep; extend jetties at Reedy Point; and construct bulkheads. Construct a 4-lane high-level fixed highway bridge at or near St. Georges. A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay. For an 8-foot depth and width increased to 150 feet in Delaware Bay. INLAND WATERWAY FROM REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DE (See Section 14 of Text) For a 6-foot depth canal to connect Rehoboth Bay and Delaware Bay. For a 6-foot depth entrance near Lewes, for jetties, for widening the canal from Broadkill River to Lewes and basin. For a 10-foot depth from Delawareay to Lewes and in basin, and for extending jetties. MISPILLION RIVER, DE (See Section 15 of Text) A 6-foot depth and extension of south jetty. Extension of north jetty. A channel 9 feet deep, 80 feet wide from like depth in Delaware Bay to the landward end of the jetties and thence 60 feet wide to Milford, including 3 cutoffs, with a turning basin at Milford. MURDERKILL RIVER, DE (See Section 16 of Text) A channel 7 feet deep at low water from Frederica to the 7 foot curve in Delaware Bay, 80 feet wide down to the mouth, and 150 feet wide at bottom and 250 feet wide at top from the mouth to the 7 foot curve in the bay. Embankment of dredged material on each side to a height of at least 2 feet above high spring tides. NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (See Section 18 of text) A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and generally 100 feet wide, extending from the Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, NJ to Delaware Bay above H.Doc. 133,76th Cong., 1st Sess.) Rivers and Harbors 3-23 Documents H. Doc. 330,76tp Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 201, 72d Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Docs. 18 and 24,1736 Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 310, 76th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 23, 83d Cong. 2d sess. H.Doc.2175,73d Cong. 2d sess. . H.Doc 823,60th Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 61st Cong., 3d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc 56 75th Cong., 2nd sess H.Doc 344, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. p78, 62d Cong. 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 83 74th Cong., 2d sess S. Doc 229, 81st Cong., 2d sess H.Ex.Doc. 21, 52d Cong., 1st Sess.)(See page 981 Annual Report of 1892.) July 1, 1954 "REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1989" TABLE 3-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov 17, 1986 Aug 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 July 24, 1946 Committee Doc.525 79th Cong., 2d sess. WRDA of 1986 H. Doc. 1270, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 40, 71st Cong., 2d sess 1 H. Doc. 699, 79th Cong., 2d sess1 Cape May, NJ. Construction of a canal of similar dimensions from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay via the New England Creek basin, with adequate jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance. To increase the depth of the 2,000, foot reach of the Waterway in Cape May County to 15 feet. SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA (See Section 20 of Text) Depths of 35 feet from mouth to Girard Point thence 30 feet, 26, and 22 feet to University Avenue Bridge, Philadelphia. A depth of 30 feet instead of 35 feet between the mouth and the conditional restoration and maintenance of the channel below Passyunk Ave., by the United States. A depth of 33 feet from the channel in Delaware River to Passyunk Ave., restoration of the project channel dimensions between Passyunk Ave., and University Ave., and full maintenance of the entire project. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE (See Section 21 of Text) Depths of 21,10 and 7 feet and jetties. Purchase or construct a dredge and auxiliaries including a wharf and depot, and maintenance of project. Entrance channel and basin with 25-foot depth and construction by local interests of new south jetty. A 30-foot depth between Delaware River and Lobdell Canal and modification or removal of a portion of north jetty. Completion of new south jetty by the United States subject to provision that city of Wilmington reimburse the United States for cost, without interest, of any part of structure that may subsequently be occupied and utilized for city activities. Permit temporary occupancy by city of Wilmington of any part of south jetty for city activities under revocable license, provided occupied portion of jetty is properly maintained without expense to the United States. A 35-foot depth between Delaware River ship channel and Lobdell Canal including turning basin of same depth, opposite Wilmington Marine Terminal, 200 feet wide, 2,900 feet long on north side of channel, and 2,000 feet long on north side of basin. BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA (See Section 24 of Text) Provides for multiple-purpose development for water supply flood control and recreation BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA (See Section 25 of Text) Provides for multiple purpose development for water supply, flood, control, and recreation. Site is located on Tulpehocken Creek about 1 1/2 miles upstream from its confluence with Plum Creek and about six miles northwest of Reading, PA. H. Doc.522, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 3-24 H. Doc. 66, 54th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1897 p. 1250k H. Doc. 359, 62d Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 114, 67th Cong., 1st sess. and S. Committee Print, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 71st Cong. 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32 73d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 658, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 88, 86th Cong., 2d sess. June 3,1896 July 25,1912 Sep 22,1922 July 3,1930 Aug 30, 19358 Oct 17, 1940 July 14, 1960 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT TABLE 3-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION (Section 26 of Text) Provides for Federal participation in the cost H. Doc.90, 90th Cong of restoration and subsequent periodic nourishment, 2nd sess. not to exceed 10 years, of the shore from Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet. Nov 17, 1986 Project is modified to authorized the construction WRDA of 1986 of sand bypass facilities and stone revetmen erosion Sec. 869 control measures at Indian River Inlet, DE. FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA (Section 29 of Text) Provided for a single-purpose flood control reservoir H. Doc 587, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Provides for a multiple-purpose development for H. Doc 522,87th Cong., water supply and recreation. 2d sess. GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA (Section 30 of Text) A single-purpose flood control reservoir with a H. Doc 113, 80th Cong., capacity of 24,500 acre-feet formed by an earth 1st sess. embankment. PROMPTON LAKE, PA (Section 33 of Text) Provides for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st sess. Provides for multiple-purpose development for water H. Doc 522, 87th Cong., supply and recreation in addition to present single- 2d sess. purpose flood control project. 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Also Public Works Administration, September 6, 1933, and Emergency Relief Administration, May 28,1935 3. Also Public Works Administration. 4. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Naval Base to Philadelphia-Camden Bridge, deferred for restudy. 5. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Philadelphia-Camden Bridge to Allegheny Ave. deferred for restudy. 6. Extension of jetties considered to be active. 7. The 10 and 12 foot anchorages are considered inactive. 8. Also May 28,1935,under Emergency Relief Administration. 9. Deauthorized the remaining portion of the project. 10. Extension of jetties considered to be active. 3-25 "REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1989" TABLE 3-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1989 See Annual Operation and Active Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance Absecon Inlet, NJ Appoquinimink River,DE Broadkill River, DE Delaware River, Pennsville, NJ Double Creek, NJ' Harbor of Refuge Inland Waterway from Chincoteague Bay to Delaware Bay Little River, DE Mantua Creek, NJ Maurice River, NJ Delaware Bay to Millville Millville fixed bridge to upper end of project ** Neshaminy State Park Harbor, PA Oldmans Creek, NJ Raccoon Creek, NJ St. Jones River, DE Delaware Bay to Lebanon 1'9 Jetties and entrance at mouth Manasquan River, NJ Salem River, NJ Schuylkill River above Fairmount Dam, PA' Smyrna River, DE Delaware River tp Wharf at Smyrna Landing Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed bridge. Toms River, NJ Channel 5 feet deep 1 Channel 12 feet deep 6 Tuckerton Creek, NJ Waterway from Indian River Inlet to Rehoboth Bay, DE Woodbury Creek, NJ' COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED SEE TABLE 3-G COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED SEE TABLE 3-G COMPLETED SEE TABLE 3-G COMPLETED COMPLETED COMPLETED 1988 1934 1976 1912 1985 1981 1980 1966 1948 1968 1941 1981 1961 1986 1988 1955 1949 1950 1986 1981 1940 534,20920 36,973 68,228 256,624 7,800 516,230 168,41211 12,016 169,687 143,98417 128,20313 31,188 83,66512 207,102 8,006,80714,16 107,63418 4,291,810 198,844 10,050 60,242 90,908 27,09310 5,965,67421 41,270 243,641 3 1,104,769 98,36014 288,310 339,340 ..- 161,913 54,601 32,125 341,734 66,093 3,417,55715 2,103,00419 3 197,327 33,311 638,860 253,833 56,474 3-26 PHILADELPHIA, PA. DISTRICT TABLE 3-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1989 See Annual Operation and Active Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control INACTIVE 1975 87,594 - Dennis Creek, NJ' INACTIVE 1897 4,701 - Goshen Creek, NJ1 INACTIVE 1905 15,359 870 Ice Harbor at Marcus Hook, PA1'4 INACTIVE 1928 208,964 14,336 Ice Harbor at New Castle, DE" 4 INACTIVE 1898 224,704 - Leipsic River, DE 1 INACTIVE 1931 36,956 32,345 Little Egg Harbor, NJ "1 2 INACTIVE -5 15,048 - Maurice River, NJ-Channel 8 feet deep, Delaware Bay to mouth INACTIVE 1948 - - For Last Full Report Cost to September 30,1989 See Annual Operation and Deferred Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance St. Jones River, DE 1961 - - Delaware Bay to Lebanon 1' 10 - 207,102 66,093 Jetties and new entrance at mouth7 DEFERRED - - - Completed. Maintenance assumed by local interests. Harbor not now required by commerce. Last appropriation for project was in 1852. No information is at hand relative to work done. Includes $3,000 for new work for previous projects. Deferred Includes $54,590 new work and $28,935 maintenance funds ex pended on previous projects. Includes $55,085 new work and $22,723 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. Includes $2,950 new work funds expended on previous projects. Entire amount expended on previous projects repealed in 1905. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds and includes $25,330 for aintenance for previous project. 12. Includes $757 new work funds expended on previous projects. 13. Excludes $327,957 contributed funds allotted expended for new work. 14. Includes $39,000 for new work for previous projects. 15. Includes $2,054 for maintenance for previous projects. 16. Includes $555,600 for previous project. 17. Incl. $43,000 New Work funds expended on previous projects. 18. Includes $55,809 for new work funds expended on previous project. 19. Includes $1,285 for reconnaissance and condition survey in FY 1957, $1,792 operation and maintenace cost incurred for preparation of environmental impact statement, and $48,000 expended for maintenance on previous project. 20. Includes $116,497 for new work for previous projects. 21. Includes $23,786 for maintenance for previous projects. * Operation and maintenance figure includes cost incurred for preparation of environmental impact statements. ** Projects authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 3-27 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. "REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1989" OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 3-D BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30,1989 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Brigantine Island ACTIVE - - Corson Inlet and Ludlam Beach,NJ ACTIVE 1978 314,400 Great Egg Harbor Inlet and Peck Beach, NJ ACTIVE 1978 387,882 5 Hereford Inlet ACTIVE - - Long Beach Island ACTIVE - - Townsend Inlet and Seven Mile Beach, NJ ACTIVE - - Atlantic City, NJ INACTIVE 1972 2,083,289 -1 Ocean City, NJ INACTIVE 1969 395,8313 1 Stone Harbor, NJ INACTIVE 1961 - -1 Barnegat Light, NJ DEFERRED 1964 70,908 -1 Cape May City, NJ DEFERRED 1961 22,9572 1 Long Beach Island, NJ DEFERRED 1964 40,665 -1 North Wildwood, NJ DEFERRED 1961 - -1 Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet, DE4 1965 326,116 -1 Ventnor, Margate and Longport,NJ DEFERRED 1961 - -1 1.Operation and maintenance required under Public Works Accelera- 3.Excludes cost of $1,146,325 to local interests and $272,766 Federal tion Program for by law to be assumed by local interests. Extension participation expended under extension of five existing groins cornof five existing groins completed pleted 11 May 1964. 2.Excludes $58,585 Accelerated Public 11 May 1964. Works funds ex- 4.This project was included in and modified by the Delaware Coast pended for extension project. 5.Excludes $130,175 for Preconstruction Engineering and Design. * NO CURRENT YEAR FUNDS. OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 3-E FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1989 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allentown, Lehigh River, PA COMPLETED 1961 1,615,581 1 Bethlehem, Lehigh River, PA COMPLETED 1966 4,520,995 -1 Mt. Holly, NJ COMPLETED 1946 283,655 -1 Pottstown, PA ACTIVE 1984 487,366 - Hay Creek, Birdsboro, PA INACTIVE 1984 335,299 1. Maintenance assumed by local interest as required by authorizing 3. $1,316,464 expended for preconstruction planning only. project. 2. Ne project deferred. 3-28 TABLE 3-F REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS, U.S. ARMY 1988 MULTIPURPOSE PROJECT INCLUDING POWER For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1989 See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Tocks Island Lake, PA, NJ and NY2 1979 65,106,2601 Tocks Island (Relocation of U.S. Route 209 only) PA 1979 195,223 - 1. Includes $3,489,088 for AE&D. thority to proceed with the project. Legislation would be required to 2. National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 terminated Corps' au- proceed with the project. TABLE 3-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual And Funds Funds Navigation Projects Report For Authority Expended Expended Appoquinimink River, DE1 1931 3 Oct 78 HD 95-351 $ 78,243 - Aquashicola Reservoir, PA 1963 17 Nov 86 PL 99-662 46 Stat. 918 - - Chester River, 17 Nov 86 Delaware County, PA 1931 PL 99-662 52 Stat. 323 $ 7,139 - Delaware River, Mouth of 5 Aug 77 Neversink 1917 HD 94-192 - - Maurice River, NJ 1948 Section 12 PL 93-251 Millville fixec2bridge to upper end of project - - Maiden Creek Reservoir, PA 1963 17 Nov 86 PL 99-662 46 Stat. 918 - - Oldmans Creek, NJ 3 1941 2 Nov 79 Section 12 PL 93-251 $ 63,313 - Rancocas River, NJ4 1942 2 Nov 79 Section 12 PL 93-251 $ 57,590 - Smyrna River, DE5 1949 2 Nov 79 Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed HD 95-157 $396,169 - bridge. Toms River, NJ6 1950 2 Nov 79 Channel 12 feet deep Section 12 PL 93-251 $ 43,361 - Trexler Lake, PA 1981 17 Nov 86 PL 99-662 76 Stat. 1180 - - Flood Control Projects 2 Nov 79 Lehigh River at Bethlehem, PA7 Section 12 1966 PL 93-251 $4,520,995 - 1. Includes $36,973 new work, and $41,270 for maintenance. 2. There is no need now for this portion of the project. 3. Includes $31,188 new work, and $32,125 for maintenance. 4. Includes $44,500 new work, and $13,090 for maintenance. 5. Includes $143,759 new work, $55,085 previous project, $174,602 for maintenance, and $22,723 maintenance, previous project. 6. Includes $10,050 new work, and $33,311 for maintenance. 7. Maintenance assumed by local interest. 3-29 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT * This district comprises the watershed of Susquehanna River and its tributaries from headwaters in south central New York State through central Pennsylvania to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; watershed of the Potomac River and its tributaries from headwaters in Maryland, eastern West Virginia, and Northern Virginia to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; District of Columbia; and southwestern portion of Delaware. It includes that portion of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries north of Smith Point, MD, on western shore of the bay, and includes that portion of Maryland between Chesapeake Bay and Atlantic Ocean. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD and VA ................ 4-3 2. Baltimore Harbor, MD, Collection and Removal of Drift ......... 4-4 3. Cambridge Harbor, MD.................4-4 4. Crisfield Harbor, MD .................. 4-5 5. Fishing Bay, MD ....................... 4-5 6. Herring Bay and Rockhold Creek, M D .. ........... ............. 4-5 7. Herring Creek, Tall Timbers, MD ........ 4-6 8. Honga River and Tar Bay, MD ........................ 4-6 9. Little Wicomico River, VA ............... 4-6 10. Monroe Bay and Creek, VA ............... 4-7 11. Nanticoke River (Including Northwest Fork), DE & MD ........... 4-7 12. Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD ................. 4-7 13. Pocomoke River, MD .................. 4-8 14. Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC, Collection and Removal of Drift .................. 4-8 15. Potomac River-Aquatic Plant Control, MD, VA, DC ............. 4-8 16. Potomac River below Washington, DC............. .......... 4-9 17. Prevention of Obstructions and Injurious Deposits, Baltimore Harbor, MD ................. 4-9 18. Shallow Creek, MD............ .......... 4-9 19. St. Catherines Sound, MD ................ 4-9 20. Washington Harbor, DC ................. 4-10 21. Wicomico River, MD .................... 4-10 22. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ..... 4-11 23. Navigation work under special authorization ............... ......... 4-1 1 Navigation (cont'd) Beach Erosion Control 24. Beach Erosion Control Work under special authorization Page . .. . . . . . . .... 4-11 Flood Control 25. Cumberland, MD, and Ridgeley, WV ....... 4-11 26. Hills Point Road, Dorchester Co., MD .................. 4-11 27. Isle of Wight Bay, Ocean City, M D ...................... 4-11 28. Jennings Randolph Lake, MD and WV ..... 4-12 29. Lackawanna River Basin, PA ............. 4-12 29A. Aylesworth Creek Lake, PA .............. 4-12 30. Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA ........... .......... 4-13 31. Southern New York Flood Control Projects ............ .......... 4-13 31A. Addison, NY ......................... 4-13 31B. Almond Lake, NY ..................... 4-13 31C. Arkport Dam, NY ...................... 4-13 31D. Avoca, NY ........................... 4-14 31E. Binghamton, NY ...................... 4-14 31F. Canisteo, NY ......................... 4-14 31G. Corning, NY ......................... 4-15 31H. East Sidney Lake, NY..................4-15 31I. Elmira, NY ........................... 4-15 31J. Hornell, NY .......................... 4-16 31K. Lisle, NY . ............. ............. 4-16 31L. Oxford, NY ................ .......... 4-16 31M. Whitney Point Lake, NY ............... 4-16 31N. Whitney Point Village, NY .............. 4-17 32. Spring Brook Creek, Pittston Township, PA ................. 4-17 33. Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA ................ .......... 4-17 4-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Flood Control (cont'd) Page 34. Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects, NY and PA .................. 4-17 34A. Cowanesque Lake, PA ................... 4-18 34B. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA .............. 4-18 35. Tunkhannock Creek, Tunkhannock Township, PA ............ 4-19 36. West Branch of Susquehanna River, PA .................. ......... 4-19 36A. Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA ................ 4-19 36B. Curwensville Lake, PA ................. 4-19 36C. Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA .......... 4-19 37. York, Indian Rock Dam, PA .............. 4-20 38. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ...................... 4-20 39. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ........................... 4-20 40. Flood Control Work under special authorization ......................... 4-20 Water Supply 41. Washington Aqueduct .................. 4-20 General Investigations 42. 43. 44. Surveys ...................... ....... 4-21 Collection and Study of Basic Data ....... 4-21 Pre-construction Engineering and D esign .......................... .... 4-21 Tables Table 4-A Cost and Financial Statement .... Table 4-B Authorizing Legislation ......... Table 4-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............ Table 4-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ............... Table 4-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............... Table 4-F Not Applicable Table 4-G Deauthorized Projects .......... Table 4-H Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ............. Table 4-I Inspection of Completed Projects ........... ..... 4-22 ..... 4-27 .... .4-33 .... .4-35 ..... 4-36 ..... 4-37 ..... 4-38 ..... 4-39 4-2 Page BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Navigation 1. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MD AND VA Location. Baltimore Harbor is at the head of the navigable portion of Patapsco River about 12 miles from Chesapeake Bay. The Patapsco River rises near the town of Westminster in Carroll County, MD, and flows generally southeast for about 65 miles to enter Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12278.) Existing Project. a. A uniform main channel depth of 50 feet between Cape Charles, VA, and Fort McHenry at Baltimore, MD, with dimensions as follows: (1) Cape Henry Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide from the 50-foot depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to that depth in Chesapeake Bay, a distance of 3.0 miles; (2) York Spit Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in Chesapeake Bay near York Spit, a distance of 18.4 miles; (3) Rappahannock Shoal Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in the Chesapeake Bay opposite the Rappahannock River, a distance of 10.3 miles; and (4) Baltimore Harbor Approach Channels: 50 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide, widened at the approach and bends, from the 50- foot depth curve in Chesapeake Bay opposite the mouth of the Magothy River to Fort McHenry on the Patapsco River, a distance of 20.2 miles. b. Branch channels with dimensions as follows: (1) Connecting Channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal Approach Channel: 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 15.6 miles long from the Cutoff Angle in the main channel to the 35-foot depth curves in the natural channel on the east side of Chesapeake Bay which is part of the inland waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay. The channel includes the Brewerton Extension and Swan Point and Tolchester Sections; (2) Curtis Bay: 50 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 2.3 miles long from the main channel to and including a turning basin at the head of Curtis Bay; (3) Curtis Creek: (a) a channel, 35 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 50-foot channel in Curtis Bay to 750 feet downstream of the Pennington Avenue Bridge; (b) a channel, 22 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 35-foot channel to and along the marginal wharf of the Curtis Bay Ordnance Depot; (c) an irregular shaped 3-acre basin, with a depth of 18 feet, adjacent to the head of the 22-foot channel; (d) a basin, 15 feet deep and 450 feet wide, from the end of the 22-foot channel to the end of the marginal wharf; and (e) a channel, 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from the 22-foot channel south of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Bridge to the vicinity of Arundel Cove, a distance of 2,800 feet, thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for a distance of 2,100 feet, with an anchorage basin, 700 feet square, adjacent to the channel and southwest of the wharf of the Coast Guard Depot at Curtis Bay; (4) Middle Branch: (a) Ferry Bar East Section: a channel, 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide, from the main channel at Fort McHenry to Ferry Bar, a distance of 1.5 miles; (b) Ferry Bar West Section: a channel, 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide, from the Ferry Bar East Section to Ferry Bar, a distance of 0.8 mile; (c) Spring Garden Section: a channel, 27 feet deep and 250 feet wide, from Ferry Bar to and including a turning and anchorage basin immediately below the Western Maryland Railway Bridge, a distance of 1.0 mile; and (5) Northwest Branch: Federal maintenance of 39-foot or 35-foot deep channels after either depth has been provided by local interests: (a) East Channel: a channel, 49 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.0 mile long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction; and (b) West Channel: a channel, 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.3 miles long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction. c. The following anchorages: (1) Quarantine Anchorage: 35 feet deep, 3,500 feet long, and 600 feet wide; (2) Riverview Anchorage No. 2: 30 feet deep, 2,400 feet long, and 1,200 feet wide; (3) Riverview Anchorage No. 1: 35 feet deep, 4,500 feet long, and 1,500 feet wide; and (4) Fort McHenry Anchorage: 35 feet deep, 3,500 feet long, and 400 feet wide. The mean range of tide is 2.8 feet at the Cape Henry Channel, 2.3 feet at the York Spit Channel, 1.4 feet at the Rappahannock Shoal Channel, 0.8 foot at the Craighill Entrance, 0.9 foot in the Cutoff Section, 1.1 feet at Fort McHenry, and 1.2 feet at Pooles Island in the upper Chesapeake Bay. Depths refer to mean low water. Estimated cost for new work is $376,441,000 which includes: $8,330,000 for completed work through the River and Harbor Act of 1945; $38,411,000 for work completed under the River and Harbor Act of 1958 of which $33,991,000 is Corps of Engineers, $60,000 is U.S. Coast Guard and $4,360,000 is non-Federal; and $329,700,000 (October 1988 prices) for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970, of which $460,000 is U.S. Coast Guard and $329,240,000 is Corps of Engineers and non- Federal. Widening 35-foot depth from Port Covington Channel from 150 to 400 feet to Ferry Bar, widening 27-foot depth channel from 150 to 250 feet to Hanover Street Bridge, and providing a channel 27 feet deep by 250 feet wide to Western Maryland Railway Bridge with an anchorage and turning basin at upper end is considered inactive and is excluded from the foregoing estimate. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion is $1,603,000. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-3 of Fiscal Year 1982 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. The Port of Baltimore has 45 miles of waterfront of which 25 miles are industrially developed. There are 94 covered and open overseas piers for the loading and discharging of 173 ships, providing 84 general cargo, 65 specialized cargo, and 24 public bulk cargo berths. The existing ground storage is equivalent to 53,700 railroad cars of cargo. There are 31 public general merchandise warehouses, with 4.9 million square feet of storage space and 4.7 million cubic feet of cold storage space. Eight ship-building, ship repair, and ship dismantling yards are available for handling up to 90 vessels. The three grain elevators in the port have a capacity of about 13 million bushels. Latest description of terminal facilities is in "Port Series No. 10 (revised 1983)" on Port of Baltimore, MD, (issued by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors). 4-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work, Baltimore District: Construction of the work authorized by the River & Harbor Act of 1970 was initiated in February 1987. Condition surveys of the project were made. New work dredging, by contract, of 12,702,000 cubic yards at a cost of $43,854,300 to deepen the Craighill Entrance, Craighill Channel, Craighill Upper Range, Cutoff Angle, Brewerton Channel, Brewerton Angle, Fort McHenry Channel, and Curtis Bay Channel from 42 to 50 feet, and to complete deepening the East Channel, Northwest Branch from 35 feet to 49 feet (Maryland Channels II contract) commenced on August 18, 1989 and was approximately 15 percent complete as of September 30, 1989. New Work, Norfolk District: New work dredging, by contract, to deepen a portion of the York Spit Channel (Contract II) from 42 to 50 feet commenced on May 14, 1988 and was completed on March 19, 1989. Approximately 10,164,760 cubic yards of material were dredged and deposited in the approved Wolf Trap Alternate open water disposal area in the Chesapeake Bay at a cost of $22,570,200. New work dredging, by contract, of 3,023,800 cubic yards of material at a cost of $13,972,100, to deepen the Cape Henry Channel from 42 to 50 feet commenced on April 5, 1989, and was 87% complete as of September 30, 1989. Approximately 2,668,800 cubic yards of material were dredged, of which 1,335,800 cubic yards were deposited at the Dam Neck ocean disposal area, 1,200,000 cubic yards were placed on Virginia Beach, and 133,000 cubic yards were placed on East Ocean View beach. Maintenance, Baltimore District: Condition surveys of the project channels were made. Maintenance dredging, by contract, of 1,559,100 cubic yards of material from the Craighill Entrance, Craighill Channel, Craighill Upper Range, Cutoff Angle, Brewerton Channel, Brewerton Angle, and Fort McHenry Channel at a cost of $4,926,400 commenced on August 18, 1989, in conjunction with new work dredging of the work authorized under the River and Harbor Act of 1970 and was approximately 15% complete as of September 30, 1989. Maintenance, Norfolk District: A condition survey of the Rappahannock Shoal Channel was made. Maintenance dredging of 213,200 cubic yards of material from the York Spit Channel (Contract II) at a cost of $437,060 commenced on May 14, 1988 in conjunction with new work dredging of the work authorized under the River and Harbor Act of 1970 and was completed on March 19, 1989. Maintenance dredging of 213,200 cubic yards of material from the Cape Henry Channel at a cost of $437,060 commenced on April 5, 1989 in conjunction with new work dredging of the work authorized under the River and Harbor Act of 1970 and was 87% complete as of September 30, 1989. 2. BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to Baltimore Harbor, MD, and its tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary waters, and authorizes the Secretary of the Army to allot such amounts as may be necessary for work from appropriations for maintenance and improvement of existing river and harbor works or other available appropriations, and that this work shall be carried as a separate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. Purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Section 1 of this text. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations, by hired labor, consisted of collection and disposal of 16,740 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. 3. CAMBRIDGE HARBOR, MD Location. This harbor is a tidal estuary on the south side of Choptank River about 18 miles above its mouth. It is approximately 70 miles southeast of Baltimore Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Previous project. For details see page 1789 of Annual Report for 1915, page 424 of Annual Report for 1924, and page 373 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel 150 feet wide and 25 feet deep at mean low water from that depth in the Choptank River for an approximate distance of 2,000 feet; then widen into a triangular shaped turning basin 25 feet deep, 1,400 feet long and 750 feet wvide; then continue with a channel 150 feet wide and 16 feet deep to the Market Street Bridge over Cambridge Creek; then 100 feet wide and 16 feet deep to the head of the harbor with a turning basin of the same depth and irregular dimensions comprising approximately 2.4 acres; an anchorage basin 10 feet deep, 400 feet long and 175 feet wide on the west side of the channel; another basin of the same depth, 225 feet long, and 200 feet wide on the east side of the channel below the bridge; and a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in the Choptank River to the municipal boat basin north of the harbor entrance. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. The waterfront of Cambridge is generally built of solid bulkhead wharves and pile and timber piers, only a few of which have mechanical freighthandling facilities. With the exception of a State owned terminal which is open to the public, the wharves are privately owned. There are town marine railways with boatrepair shops, five oil and gasoline terminals, two large fertilizer companies and one large packing house located on the shore of Cambridge Creek. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was completed November 11, 1988. A total of 36,000 cubic yards of material was removed. 4-4 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 4. CRISFIELD HARBOR, MD Location. Along western limits of town of Crisfield on east bank of Little Annemessex River, an estuary of Tangier Sound on east side of Chesapeake Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Previous project. For details see page 279 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water, 425 feet wide from the 12-foot depth curve in Tangier Sound to Somers Cove Light, thence 266 feet wide to the bend about 1,800 feet southwest of railroad pier, and thence of irregular width to a point opposite Consumers Ice Co.; a spur channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the ice plant to Hop Point; a channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the 7-foot depth curve in Little Annemessex River via Cedar Creek, a landcut, and Daugherty Creek Canal to Big Annemessex River; a mooring basin 7 feet deep, 160 feet wide and about 875 feet long roughly parallel to Brick Kiln Road, with a channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide leading therefrom to 7-foot project channel connecting Little Annemessex and Big Annemessex Rivers; and an anchorage basin in Somers Cove 10 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long, with an approach channel 10 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the 10-foot depth curve in Little Annemessex River through the present entrance to Somers Cove. Mean range of tide at Crisfield is about 1.9 feet. Local cooperation. Local interests have furnished spoil disposal areas as needed for proposed fiscal year 1990 maintenance dredging. Terminal facilities. Waterfront of Crisfield Harbor is built up principally with solid-bulkhead wharves and pileand- timber piers. Most wharves are privately owned, but are open to the public for transaction of business with the owners. Few of the terminals have mechanical freighthandling devices, but most of the freight is transferred by hand. There are three boat-repair yards with marine railways having capacities up to 250 tons. Existing terminals are adequate for present and reasonably prospective commerce. Sufficient areas are available north of Hop Point and on Somers Cove for construction of additional terminals as needed. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging in fiscal year 1990. 5. FISHING BAY, MD Location. McCreadys, Goose, and Farm Creeks are small tidal estuaries of Fishing Bay, a large estuary at head of Tangier Sound. Fishing Bay is connected by Hooper Strait with Chesapeake Bay to the west about 15 miles above mouth of Potomac River. Goose Creek enters the bay about 3.5 miles above the mouth. Farm Creek enters Fishing Bay about 6 miles above the mouth and approximately opposite mouth of McCreadys Creek. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. Provides for channels 6 feet deep and generally 60 feet wide at mean low water, suitable widened where necessary to offer adequate sheltered anchorage space from deep water in Fishing Bay to vicinity of county or packing house wharves in McCreadys, Farm, and Goose Creeks. Mean range of tide is about 2 feet. Terminal Facilities. A public wharf built with aid of Federal funds is on McCreadys Creek about 200 feet above the mouth. There is a privately owned pile-andtimber pier about 1,500 feet above the mouth of Goose Creek. There are two privately owned wharves on Farm Creek and a public wharf owned by Dorchester County. Private wharves on each of the waterways are open to the public for transaction of business with the owners. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was completed on June 22, 1989, at Goose Creek. A total of 28,021 cubic yards of material was removed. Dredging of McCready Creek and Farm Creek are planned for fiscal year 1990. 6. HERRING BAY AND ROCKHOLD CREEK, MD Location. Herring Bay is a wide-mouthed indentation on the west side of Chesapeake Bay about 20 miles below Annapolis, MD. It is about 3 miles long from north to south and penetrates the shore for a depth of about 1 mile. Rockhold Creek, which is about 2.5 miles long, is an estuary which extends northward from the northerly end of Herring Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1225.) Existing project. Provides for channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from 7-foot contour in Herring Bay to vicinity of county wharf on Rockhold Creek, with turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 150 feet long at head of channel, and a stone breakwater approximately 900 feet long east of entrance channel. Mean range of tide is about 1.5 feet and extreme tidal range about 4 feet. The Federal cost of new work for completed project was $50,591. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are to furnish disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. Consists of a public wharf on Rockhold Creek about 600 feet below the county bridge, open to all, together with a few private landing stages. No freight-handling devices are installed on any of the wharves which are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Modification for fiscal year 1988 maintenance dredging contract was paid to settle the contractor's claim. 4-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 7. HERRING CREEK, TALL TIMBERS, MD Location. Herring Creek in St. Marys County, MD, is a small tidal stream 13 miles in length which flows in a westerly direction and enters the north bank of the Potomac River 16 miles upstream of its mouth at Chesapeake Bay and 92 miles downstream from Washington, DC (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 557.) Existing project. This provides for an entrance channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, and approximately 1,630 feet long extending from deep water in the Potomac River to deep water within the creek, a turning basin of irregular shape 6 feet deep adjacent to the proposed public wharf, and riprap-stone jetties on the upstream and downstream sides of the entrance channel 770 and 650 feet long, respectively. The plane of reference is mean low water. The tidal ranges are: Mean, 1.6 feet; irregular, 1.9 feet; and extreme, approximately 7 feet. The project was modified in 1986 under Section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968. The modification consists of constructing 250 feet of beachfill, 2,187 linear feet of stone revetment and upgrading 350 linear feet of existing revetment along the Tall Timbers waterfront south of the project inlet to preclude shoreline erosion induced by the project jetties. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) includes the following provisions: 1. Compliance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions Policies Act of 1970. 2. Provide without cost to the United States, when and as required all lands, easements, rights-of-way and soil-disposal areas necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project. 3. Hold and save the United States free from damages to other property resulting from the improvement. Terminal facilities. There are a number of small wharves and landings within the creek, all privately owned. The facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Locals were reimbursed $215,359 required by the modified Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA). Maintenance: Maintenance of the beachfill portion of the project was deferred due to the inability of local interests to obtain the necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way. 8. HONGA RIVER AND TAR BAY (BARREN ISLAND GAPS), MD Location. Honga River is a tidal estuary of Chesapeake Bay and penetrates Dorchester County on Eastern Shore of Maryland between Hooper Islands and the mainlands; Tar Bay lies between Barren Island and the mainland and Hooper Islands. Fishing Creek connects Tar Bay and Honga River. Back Creek is a branch of Honga River extending into Hooper Islands; the mouth is about 2 miles south of Fishing Creek. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep at mean low water from the 7-foot contour in Chesapeake Bay, through Tar Bay and Fishing Creek to the 7-foot contour in Honga River, 25,300 feet long, and a channel in Back Creek 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the 7-foot depth curve in Honga River to a point near the head of Back Creek with a turning basin of the same depth 150 feet long and 200 feet wide at the head of channel, about 5,500 feet long. Mean range of tide is about 1.4 feet. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $66,119. Local cooperation. Local interests furnished spoil placement areas for maintenance dredging in fiscal year 1990. Terminal facilities. Numerous small private wharves are scattered along Fishing Creek and Back Creek. A public wharf is on Fishing Creek. A public wharf, 4 oyster houses, and a marine railway are on Back Creek. Facilities are adequate for existing and reasonable prospective commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging in fiscal year 1990. 9. LITTLE WICOMICO RIVER, VA Location. A tidal estuary 6 miles long in Northumberland County, VA, flowing southeasterly to Potomac River, which it enters on the right bank one-half mile upstream of its mouth and about 108 miles downstream from Washington, DC. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1223.) Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 4,800 feet long, extending from deep water in the Potomac River to deep water in the Little Wicomico River; two stone jetties, extending to the 8-foot contour in Potomac River; and bulkhead walls from the inner ends thereof extending sufficiently into Little Wicomico River to stabilize the dredged inner channel. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal ranges in Potomac River at the entrance are: Mean 1.2 feet; irregular, 2.5 feet; and extreme, about 7 feet. Mean tidal range within the river is about 1 foot. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $81,885, exclusive of $5,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two wharves open to the public and numerous small wharves and stagings for private use, an oyster shucking, and packing plant, and a marine railway and boat-building yard. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 4-6 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 10. MONROE BAY AND CREEK, VA Location. Monroe Bay is an indentation on the right bank of Potomac River in Westmoreland County, VA, 34 miles upstream of Chesapeake Bay and 75 miles downstream from Washington, DC. Monroe Creek is a tidal stream 5 miles long which flows southerly and discharges into Monroe Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 558.) Existing project. A channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 950 feet long, through the bar at the entrance, and within the creek a channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 2,500 feet long, with turning and anchorage basin 500 feet wide at upper end in vicinity of Colonial Beach waterworks. The mean range of tide is 1.6 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $12,460. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are numerous wharves and landings in the creek, of which 3 are open to the public. There are two marine railways. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the entrance channel to Monroe Creek, by contract, began on March 15, 1989 and was completed on April 6, 1989. A total of 8,561 cubic yards of material was removed and deposited ashore in an approved disposal area at a cost of $139,842. 11. NANTICOKE RIVER (INCLUDING NORTHWEST FORK), DE & MD Location. Headwaters of Nanticoke River consist of numerous branches rising mainly in the northern portion of Sussex County, DE. The river is about 50 miles long and flows southwesterly from its source to Tangier Sound. Northwest Fork is a branch of Nanticoke River which rises in Kent County, DE, and flows past Federalsburg, MD, generally southerly through Dorchester County, MD, to its junction with the main river opposite Riverton, MD. It is about 30 miles long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 77.) Existing project. Nanticoke River: Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 12-foot depth curve in Tangier Sound to the highway bridge at Seaford, DE, with a turning basin at the upper end. Disjointed sections included in the project is about 4 miles long, extending over 32 miles of river; lower end of the first section of the project is about 8 miles above the mouth of the river. Mean range of tide is 3.4 feet, and the extreme tidal range is 4.3 feet. Northwest Fork: Dredging a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide at mean low water from upper Browns wharf to within one-half mile of the southern boundary of town of Federalsburg, with a turning basin at the upper end. Section included in the project is about 4 miles long, and its lower end is 11.75 miles above the mouth of the river. Mean range of tide is 2.6 feet. Local cooperation. Local interests furnished a spoil disposal area for proposed fiscal year 1990 maintenance dredging. Locals are also required to hold and save the United States free from all damages. Terminal facilities. Waterfront at Seaford consists largely of unconnected pile-and-timber bulkhead wharves with earthfills. One public wharf is used as a launching ramp. Remaining wharves are privately owned. A rail siding extends along a considerable portion of waterfront and offers facilities for interchange of rail and water traffic. Existing terminals are reasonably adequate for present and prospective commerce. Terminal facilities on Northwest Fork are all privately owned and open to general public use. They consist of one solid bulkhead wharf of 80-foot frontage and 3 landings each with 60-foot frontages. Depths of water are from 2 to 8 feet. Landings are log revetments backed by earthfill and are in poor condition. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design was accomplished in connection with proposed fiscal year 1990 maintenance dredging. 12. OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD Location. Ocean City is on a barrier island between Sinepuxent Bay and Atlantic Ocean about 35 miles south of entrance to Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1220.) Existing project. This provides for an inlet channel 300 feet wide and 16 feet deep from the 16-foot depth curve in Atlantic Ocean through the inlet to the channel in the Isle of Wight Bay, protected on the south side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 8.8 feet above mean low water and a top width of 18 feet, and on the north side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 9 feet above mean low water and a top width of generally 20 feet, thence generally 200 feet wide and 16 feet deep to the project harbor; a depth of 14 feet and 150 feet wide to the head of the harbor, a length of approximately 3,400 feet; a channel 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Sinepuxent Bay from the inlet to Green Point, and thence 100 feet wide in Chincoteague Bay; and for a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet channel to a point opposite North Eighth Street in Ocean City, thence 75 feet wide into the Isle of Wight Bay. Depths in the inlet channel and harbor refer to project datum. Depths in the bay channels refer to mean low water. The elevation of mean low water in the bays above mean low water in the ocean at Ocean City varies from about 0.8 foot in the vicinity of the inlet to 1.7 feet at their heads. The mean range of ocean tide is 3.4 feet. The extreme range is from 3 feet below mean low water to about 3.5 feet above mean high water, a total of 9.9 feet. In the bays the mean range of tide varies from approximately 2.5 feet at the inlet to 0.3 foot at their heads. Greater fluctuations are caused by prolonged high winds. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $1,190,530, exclusive of $500,000 contributed by local interests and exclusive of $3,700,000 for rehabilitating the south jetty. 4-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests must furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. On bay side of Ocean City: two storage basins, for pleasure and small commercial craft, and numerous privately owned pile-and-timber piers and bulkhead wharves. At project harbor: a public landing about 1,000 feet long, several privately constructed bulkhead wharves open to the public for transaction of business with the owners, and a boat repair yard with a marine railway capable of handling boats up to about 150 tons. All piers and wharves are accessible by highway. Port facilities have been expanded to include all available space in the Fish Harbor. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. Hydrographic surveys determined that no maintenance dredging was required this fiscal year. 13. POCOMOKE RIVER, MD Location. Pocomoke River is a tributary of Pocomoke Sound, a tidal estuary on the east side of Chesapeake Bay about 40 miles north of Cape Charles, VA. Existing project. Provides for a channel 11 feet deep at mean low water and 150 feet wide from the 11-foot depth in Pocomoke Sound to Tulls Point, thence 100 feet wide to deep water in Pocomoke River above Williams Point, and for construction of a dike along the offshore side of channel between Tulls Point and the end of the existing dike; and a channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 to 130 feet wide from Shad Landing to the bridge at Snow Hill. Length of project is about 8.7 miles from Pocomoke Sound to Williams Point, and about 4.5 miles from Shad Landing to Snow Hill, MD. Shad Landing is about 25.7 miles above the mouth of the river. Mean range of tide is 2.4 feet in Pocomoke Sound and 2.5 feet in the river at Snow Hill. Prolonged high winds on Chesapeake Bay frequently cause greater fluctuations. Estimated cost (1969) for new work is $1,071,458 exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects. Extension of channel above the bridge at Snow Hill, 100 feet wide, 9 feet deep and widened to 150 feet to form a turning basin at upper end, if considered inactive and is excluded from the foregoing estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is $22,000 (1956). Local cooperation. Complied with for section of project from Pocomoke Sound to Pocomoke River and from Shad Landing to the highway bridge at Snow Hill, authorized by acts of June 3, 1896, and August 30, 1935, except local interests must furnish releases from damage to oyster beds and spoil disposal areas as required for future maintenance. Terms for the section of the project above the highway bridge at Snow Hill, authorized by act of March 2, 1945, required local interests to furnish all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas for initial work and future maintenance, hold the United States free from damages resulting from the improvement; and contribute one-half the initial cost of that portion of project, but not to exceed $4,250. This portion is considered inactive. Terms for the 11-foot depth channel from Pocomoke Sound to deep water in Pocomoke River above Williams Point, authorized by act of September 3, 1954, require local interests provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas for construction and future maintenance of the project; and hold the United States free from damages due to construction and maintenance, including such damages as may occur to the public or leased oyster beds. Terminal facilities. Waterfronts at Pocomoke City and Snow Hill are built up principally with earthfilled timber bulkheads, the majority of which are privately owned. A few of the warehouses and factories on the river at these communities have railroad sidings and mechanical freighthandling facilities. Any appreciable increase in commerce at Pocomoke City or Snow Hill would necessitate construction of new facilities and repair of existing structures. Adequate space is available for development of additional terminals. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with proposed fiscal year 1990 maintenance dredging. 14. POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, Washington, DC and their tributaries. Existing project. Collection and removal of drift from the waters of the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tributaries in the Washington area from the head of tidewater to Mount Vernon, VA. Total length of project, considering both sides of the waterway, is about 50 miles. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Section 23 of this text. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations by hired labor consisted of collection and disposal of 203,040 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. 15. POTOMAC RIVER AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, MD, VA, DC Location. The project is located in the Potomac River and its tributaries with the northern boundary at Chain Bridge in Washington, DC extending southward to the U.S. Route 301 Bridge (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Chart 12289). Existing project. On July 2, 1986 the Chief of Engineers under the authority of Section 302 of the 1965 River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized the control of hydrilla and other nuisance plants using mechanical harvesting to clear a 60 foot wide, 6 foot deep connecting channel from open waters to eligible public use areas. 4-8 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on June 6, 1986 between the Corps, MD, VA, DC and Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments. The LCA which must be reexecuted annually expired on September 30, 1989 included the following provisions: 1. Local sponsors share 50 percent of the program cost; 2. Local sponsors provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; 3. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments is responsible for coordinating local interests and issuing work orders for the program. Terminal facilities. There are 75 marina activities between DC and the U.S. Route 50 Bridge providing approximately 3,400 commercial and recreational boat slips and 50 boat ramps. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Harvesting operations resulted in 36 acres of nuisance aquatic plants at sites in Maryland and Virginia. There were no harvesting operations conducted in District of Columbia this fiscal year. 16. POTOMAC RIVER BELOW WASHINGTON, DC Location. Potomac River is formed 21 miles below Cumberland, MD, and flows southeasterly about 285 miles and enters Chesapeake Bay, about 80 miles from Atlantic Ocean. Washington, DC is 108 miles upstream of mouth, and head of tidewater is at mile 117. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 557, 558, 559, and 560.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide between the mouth of the river and Giesboro Point at Washington, DC a distance of 108 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal ranges are: mean, 1.3 feet at mouth, 2.9 feet at Washington; irregular, 2 feet at mouth, 4.5 feet at Washington; extreme, about 6 feet at mouth, 10.7 feet at Washington. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $153,836. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. In general, the improvement is a main river channel, and terminal facilities are only served where the channel runs close to either bank of river. In all, 11 wharves are thus served. These wharves are of open and solid fill construction and bulkhead type. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 17. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS & INJURIOUS DEPOSITS, BALTIMORE, MD Location. Project applies to tidal waters of the harbor of Baltimore and its adjacent and tributary waters and to all tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and in Maryland. Existing project. Patrol and inspection throughout the project location to detect violations of sections 13 and 15 of the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 and to investigate obstructions to navigation pursuant to Federal regulations (33 CFR 209.109). Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintanance: Operations, by Supervisor of Harbor of Baltimore included inspections of approximately 75 Federal navigation channels within the project location to insure channels are not obstructed to general navigation by debris, sunken vessels/wrecks and/or fishing appurtenance. There were two detailed investigations of obstructions or sunken vessels/wrecks. Neither of these affected approaches to private docks and required no further action. 18. SHALLOW CREEK, BALTIMORE, MD Location. Shallow Creek is a tidal water tributary of the Chesapeake Bay and is located directly adjacent to Fort Howard Veteran's Hospital in southeast Baltimore County, approximately 10 miles southeast of Baltimore, Maryland. (See NOAA Chart No. 12278.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 50 feet wide and 5 feet deep from that depth in Chesapeake Bay to and including a turning basin of the same depth, 100 feet wide and 100 feet long at the head of the channel. Total project length is 4,000 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except local interests are required to provide or pay to the Government the full cost of providing dredged material disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. There are a number of small wharves and landings within the creek, all privately owned. The facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A dredging contract was completed on March 9, 1988. A total of 36,000 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $401,924. 19. ST. CATHERINES SOUND, MD Location. St. Catherines Sound, a tidal estuary of the Potomac River, is in St. Marys County, MD. It is situated near the junction of the Potomac and Wicomico Rivers, 34 miles upstream of the Chesapeake Bay, and 76 miles south of Washington, DC. It is 2 miles in length and flows in a southeasterly direction parallel with the Potomac River. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 558.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 700 feet long at the lower entrance from the Potomac River and a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide and 3,300 feet long at the upper entrance from the Wicomico River. Mean range of tide is 1.9 feet. The cost to the Federal Government for new work for the completed project was $29,947, exclusive of $600 contributed by local interests. 4-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Local cooperation. Fully complied with, except that local interests are to furnish releases from damages and spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Total actual costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of the project authorization, including required non-Federal contributions, amount to $600. Terminal facilities. There are numerous privately owned wharves and stagings located in St. Catherines Sound and White Neck Creek, a tributary of St. Catherines Sound, of which three are open to the public. There are two marine railways in White Neck Creek. The terminal facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was awarded on April 16, 1989 and completed on April 29, 1989. A total of 17,724 cubic yards of material was removed. 20. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC Location. Within District of Columbia at junction of Anacostia River with Potomac River which flows southeasterly 108 miles to Chesapeake Bay. It is southerly 202 miles by water from Baltimore, MD, and northerly 195 miles from Norfolk, VA. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12289.) Existing projects. A combination and extension of latest projects for Potomac River at Washington, DC, and Anacostia River, DC. The Washington Harbor project provides for a channel in the Potomac River from Giesboro Point to Key Bridge, a second channel from Giesboro Point to the end of Washington Channel, and a third channel from the mouth of the Anacostia River to the foot of 15th Street, SE, with turning basins opposite the Naval Weapons Plant (800 feet wide and 2,400 feet long) and at the head of the Anacostia Channel (400 feet square). Channel dimensions are 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide except upstream from Anacostia Bridge where the width is reduced to 200 feet and from Giesboro Point to a point 3,000 feet downstream of Arlington Memorial Bridge and above Easby Point where channel dimensions are 20 feet deep and 200 feet wide. Channel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia Channel, 5,000 feet; Washington Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; and operation and maintenance of the inlet gates and lock and the outlet gates of the Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush Washington Channel. Plane of reference is low-water datum which is 0.35 foot below mean low tide as observed from 1932 to 1942. Tidal ranges are: mean, 2.9 feet; irregular, 4.5 feet; and extreme, 10.7 feet. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $162,006. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are four wharves generally of bulkhead type on Virginia Channel that are privately owned and not open to the public except by special arrangement. On Washington Channel there are four piers under jurisdiction of District of Columbia, two of which are open to the public and one open to the public by special arrangement. In Anacostia River there are four privately owned piers and eight governmental piers and slips. None of the piers are open to the public except by special arrangement. Terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The tidal basin gates were inspected and maintained by hired labor. 21. WICOMICO RIVER, MD Location. Wicomico River has its source in northern part of Wicomico County, MD, and flows generally southwardly emptying into Monie Bay, a tributary of Tangier Sound on the east side of Chesapeake Bay about 85 miles southeast of Baltimore. Webster Cove is site of improved small-boat harbor on southeast bank of Wicomico River about 3 miles above the mouth. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 567 and 1224.) Existing project. Channel 14 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to Salisbury, section included in project is 37 miles long, including about 12 miles from mouth of river to Chesapeake Bay; 14 feet deep in channels and turning basins in north and south prongs with channel widths of 100 feet, and a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide extending from 6-foot contour in Wicomico River to and including a basin in Webster Cove of same depth, 100 feet wide and 400 feet long; and extension of basin 200 feet long and 100 feet wide on each side. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet and extreme tidal range is 4.4 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $421,609, exclusive of amounts expended on previous project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with, except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed and hold the United States free from such damages as may occur to public or leased oyster beds. Terminal facilities. Present waterfront at Salisbury consists of pile-and-timber bulkheads with earthfills. Some wharves have warehouses and factories with mechanical freight-handling facilities and rail sidings. All terminals are privately owned. A shipyard, with two marine railways with capacities of 1,200 and 500 tons, respectively, is on right bank of river below prongs. Areas for development of new terminals on north prong are limited. Areas for considerable expansion of terminal facilities are available on main river. There is a pileand- timber wharf about 4 miles above mouth of river at Mount Vernon. A wharf of similar construction is at White Haven. There is a county wharf at head of basin in Webster Cove, a pile-and-timber pier at oyster house on southwest side of basin, a T-shaped pile-and-timber pier at cafe on southwest side of basin and several small timber piers on walkways that local interests constructed around the basin. Fueling facilities are available at the T-shaped pier. Sufficient areas are available for construction of additional facilities when required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was completed on December 4, 1988. A total of 200,000 cubic yards of material was removed. 4-10 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 22. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 4-H at end of chapter.) 23. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $14,990 for Cambridge Harbor, MD; $28,521 for Island Creek, St. Marys Co., MD; $26,805 for Solomon Island Harbors, MD; and $9,527 for Tedious Creek, Dorchester Co., MD. Beach Erosion Control 24. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach Erosion Control pursuant to Sec. 103 of Public Law 727, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $40,566 for town of North Beach, MD. Non-Federal contributed costs for the fiscal year were $1,346 for town of North Beach, MD. Flood Control 25. CUMBERLAND, MD, AND RIDGELEY, WV Location. On North Branch of Potomac River, 21 miles upstream from its junction with the South Branch of the Potomac River and 197 miles upstream from Washington, DC. (See Geological Survey Quadrangles, Frostburg and Flintstone, MD, WV, and PA.) Existing project. Channel improvements of North Branch of Potomac River from the Western Maryland Railway bridge in South Cumberland upstream to the mouth of Wills Creek, with levees and fill along the left bank and levees along the right bank from downstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, WV, to a point about 150 feet above Johnson Street Bridge; channel improvements along Wills Creek from its mouth upstream to a point in the Narrows about 500 feet upstream from the highway bridge on U.S. Highway 40; levee and flood wall in West Cumberland, MD, on the left bank of the North Branch of the Potomac River from the mouth of Wills Creek upstream to Kelly Boulevard; levee and flood wall in Ridgeley, WV, on the right bank of the North Branch of the Potomac River from Carpenter Avenue upstream to Patapsco Street near the upstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, WV; interior drainage facilities in Cumberland and West Cumberland, MD, and Ridgeley, WV; removal of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal dam and construction of a new industrial dam on the North Branch of the Potomac River immediately above mouth of Wills Creek; and alteration and reconstruction of highway and railroad bridges. Federal costs of new work for the completed project were $15,633,970, which includes $49,998 emergency relief funds and is exclusive of $197,513 public works acceleration funds. Estimated cost to local interests is $2,900,000 of which $1,402,001 is contributed funds and $1,497,999 is for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Removal of gravel deposits, grass cutting of areas channelward of levees, and removal of brush and debris from channel were accomplished as required in channel area. 26. HILLS POINT ROAD, DORCHESTER CO., MD Location. Hills Point Road (Maryland State Route 343) is located in Dorchester County on Brannock Bay approximately 10 miles west of Cambridge, Maryland. (See NOAA Chart No. 12266.) Existing project. On August 19, 1988, the Chief of Engineers, under the authority provided by Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended, authorized the construction of stream bank protection. The work consists of five offshore stone rubble mound breakwaters, each 50 feet long, located a distance of about 100 feet offshore. The project also provides for bank stabilization with beachfill and planting of vegetation to prevent erosion of the roadway. The project is designed to prevent erosion and storm damage to Hills Point Road which services the community of Thomas, Maryland. The estimated project implementation cost is $191,700 of which $47,900 will be funded by the sponsor. Local cooperation. The July 19, 1988 Local Cooperation Agreement between DOA and Dorchester County, MD, in brief requires the local sponsor to: Provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide modifications and relocations of buildings, roads, bridges, and related utilities; operate and maintain completed works; hold and save U.S. from damages; pay 25 percent of the total project costs; provide cash contribution not less than 5 percent of total project costs; assume responsibility for all costs in excess of the $500,000 Federal limitation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The construction contract was awarded on December 27, 1988 in the amount of $148,728 and was physically completed on May 3, 1989. 27. ISLE OF WIGHT BAY, OCEAN CITY, MD Location. The project is located on Chicago Avenue along the Isle of Wight Bay between 2nd and 4th Streets, in downtown Ocean City, Worcester County, Maryland. Ocean City is located on the Atlantic Ocean approximately 20 miles south of the Maryland-Delaware line. (See NOAA Chart No. 12211.) 4-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Existing project. On October 6, 1988 the Chief of Engineers, under the authority provided by Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended, authorized the construction of shoreline protection. The work consists of the placement of 3,500 tons of stone against a deteriorated steel sheetpile bulkhead along Chicago Avenue. This stone is required to prevent the bayward movement of the bulkhead due to increased scour at the toe of bulkhead. The estimated project implementation cost is $520,000 of which the sponsor will be paying $127,600. Local cooperation. The July 14, 1988 Local Cooperation Agreement between DOA and Ocean City, in brief, requires the local sponsor to: Provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide modifications and relocations of buildings, roads, bridges, and related utilities; operate and maintain completed works; hold and save U.S. from damages; pay 25 percent of the total project costs; provide cash contribution not less than 5 percent of total project costs; assume responsibility for all costs in excess of the $500,000 Federal limitation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The construction contract was awarded on December 6, 1988 in the amount of $394,240 and is 99 percent complete. 28. JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD & WV Location. Project is located on the North Branch Potomac River on the state line between Garrett County, MD, and Mineral County, WV. The damsite is located approximately 7.9 miles upstream from the confluence with Savage River at Bloomington, MD. It is also about 5 air miles southwest of the tritowns of Luke and Westernport, MD, and Piedmont, WV. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheets, "Kitzmiller" and "Westernport," MD.) Existing project. The improvement consists of a rolled earth and rock fill dam with an impervious core and an 800-foot long dike on the left bank. Top of dam is 296 feet above streambed with a total length of 2,130 feet. When filled to spillway crest, the reservoir will extend about 6.6 miles upstream and inundate 965 acres. Flood control storage of 36,200 acre-feet is provided. Storage available for low flow augmentation for water supply and water quality improvement is 92,000 acre-feet. The reservoir controls a drainage area of 263 square miles. Recreation facilities are provided for picnicking, camping and boating. Estimated cost (October 1986) of new work is $176,270,300 of which $58,521,700 is required non- Federal reimbursement. Local cooperation. See page 4-15 of the 1977 Annual Report for requirements. A water supply contract between the Federal Government and the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission in concert with the Fairfax County Water Authority, VA, and the District of Columbia has been executed for repayment of all water supply costs. The first of 50 annual payments began in July 1981. Federally approved water quality standards put into effect by Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia are considered satisfactory assurances of intent to control pollution. Satisfactory assurances have been received from Maryland, West Virginia, and Virginia that they will protect downstream channels from encroachment that would adversely affect operation of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 29. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA Flood Control Act of 1962 authorized construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local protection works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, PA, substantially as recommended by the Chief of Engineers (S. Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.). The Basin includes an area of 346 square miles in northeastern Pennsylvania. 29A. AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA Location. Project is located in Lackawanna County on Aylesworth Creek about one mile above its confluence with the Lackawanna River, near the community of East Jermyn, PA. Existing project. Provides for an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 90 feet above streambed and a top length of 1,200 feet. The spillway located adjacent to the left abutment is an open cut channel 80 feet wide with a concrete sill. The outlet works consist of a 3-foot diameter uncontrolled conduit. Project controls a drainage area of 6.2 square miles and provides flood control storage of 1,700 acre-feet equivalent to 5.1 inches of runoff from the drainage areas. The lake will extend about 4,600 feet and inundate 87 acres when filled to spillway crest. Recreation facilities constructed by local interest include a bathing beach, bathhouse, and picnic area. Federal cost of new work was $2,268,200 of which $2,153,559 was for construction and $114,641 for lands and damages. In addition $52,200 Federal and $52,200 non-Federal funds were expended for construction of bathhouse facilities under the recreation facilities for completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. The Aylesworth Creek Reservoir Park Authority, representing the Boroughs of Archbald and Jermyn, operate and maintain limited day use facilities including a small beach. In September 1978 a cost-sharing agreement for construction of bathhouse facilities was signed. The cost for the facilities which were completed in July 1979 was $104,400 of which $52,200 was Federal and $52,200 was non- Federal. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 4-12 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 30. RAYSTOWN LAKE, RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA Location. Dam site is on Raystown Branch, about 5.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Juniata River. Project is about 10 miles south of Huntingdon, PA. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Huntingdon, Mt. Union, Broad Top and Everett, PA.) Existing project. The rock and earthfill dam rises 225 feet above streambed with a gated concrete spillway and auxiliary spillway in the right abutment. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 762,000 acre-feet, of which 248,000 acre-feet are for flood control, 476,000 acre-feet for recreation and water quality control, and the balance for sediment reserve. At full flood control pool elevation, the reservoir would inundate 10,800 acres and extend 34 miles upstream. Recreation facilities are provided for boating, fishing, camping, swimming, hunting, hiking, and picnicking. Federal cost for new work was $77,408,700 of which $46,120,931 was for construction and $31,287,769 was for lands and damages including relocations. Construction of a private hydroelectric plant at Raystown Lake was completed May 1988. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 31. SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Authorized plan provides for construction of reservoirs and related flood control works for protection of towns in New York and Pennsylvania. The improvements are located in the upper watershed of the Susquehanna River to and including the Chemung River. 31A. ADDISON, NY Location. At confluence of Tuscaroroa Creek and Canisteo River in the City of Addison, NY. (See Geological Survey map for Addison, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 3,100 feet of earth levee and 700 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Canisteo River, extending from high ground on Steuben Street near the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad to the mouth of Tuscarora Creek; removal of existing dam, mill, and raceway from the channel; construction of about 2,200 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from Tuscarora Street to Canisteo River; construction of 4,600 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from high ground at the southwest edge of the village to high ground at the southeast edge of the village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 31B. ALMOND LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located two miles upstream from Hornell, NY, on Canacadea Creek, a tributary of the Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Hornell, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,260 feet long rising 90 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and a gated outlet conduit in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5-foot by 10-foot service gates and three emergency gates of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 14,640 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a draining area of 56 square miles, 36 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell, NY. Recreation facilities include a boat-launching ramp and dock, bathing beach, picnic area, and tent and trailer camping area. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests have developed recreational facilities at the lake in conjunction with the Federal Government. These facilities are operated and maintained by the Steuben County Board of Supervisors. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. 31C. ARKPORT DAM, NY Location. Dam is located five miles upstream from Hornell, NY, on the Canisteo River, a tributary of the Chemung River which flows into the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Arkport, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,200 feet long, exclusive of spillway, rises 113 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and an ungated outlet in the right abutment. The outlet structure consists of an 8-foot diameter reinforced concrete lined conduit, 660 feet long. A cast iron nozzle is placed in the lower end of the conduit, reducing the outlet size to 4 feet 4 inches. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 7,950 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 31 square miles, 20 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 4-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 31D. AVOCA, NY Location. On the Cohocton River at the Village of Avoca, NY, about 30 miles upstream from the confluence of the Cohocton and Chemung Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Avoca, NY.) Existing project. Provides for improvement and realignment of about 8,300 feet of Cohocton River channel, extending from above the Erie Railroad to below the junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; construction of about 8,500 feet of earth levee on left bank of the Cohocton River, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to about 1,300 feet below the junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; and 4,500 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Salmon Creek, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to the Erie Railroad; a new highway bridge for U.S. Highway 15 over Cohocton River, raising of the Erie Railroad bridge 4 feet; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 31E. BINGHAMTON, NY Location. At the confluence of the Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers in the City of Binghamton, NY. (See Geological Survey map for Binghamton, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of earth levees, concrete flood walls, and appurtenant drainage structures, consisting of about 850 feet of channel excavation and about 1,375 feet of earth levee along Phelps Creek, Town of Port Dickinson; new concrete wall on the right bank of the Chenango River, extending downstream from high ground near the city limits to an existing flood wall below DeForest Street, a distance of about 520 feet; about 150 feet of concrete wall just below Cutler Dam; about 180 feet of concrete wall at the pumphouse near McDonald Avenue; raising existing earth levees on the right bank of Chenango River, extending from Cutler Dam downstream for about 1,220 feet; about 2,915 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Chenango River north of the city limits in the Village of Port Dickinson, extending from Church Street to high ground just north of the city line; about 3,900 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Chenango River, extending from DeForest Street to Cutler Dam; new concrete flood walls and riverbank revetment for about 5,570 feet extending on the left bank of Chenango River from Cutler Dam to the junction with the Susquehanna River; about 540 feet of new concrete flood wall and raising about 1,085 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Susquehanna River, extending from the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad downstream to Tompkins Street Bridge; about 1,940 feet of earth levee; about 1,940 feet of concrete flood wall and capping about 125 feet of concrete flood wall, on the right bank of the Susquehanna River from Stuyvesent Street to mouth of Chenango River; about 8,380 feet of earth levee, about 2,180 feet of new concrete flood wall and raising about 125 feet of existing flood wall on the left bank of the Susquehanna River extending from Pierce Creek to high ground at State Highway 17; a debris dam and flume between Corbett and Hotchkiss Streets and a concrete pressure conduit, 1,060 feet long to carry flow of Park Creek from Vestal Avenue to the Susquehanna River; about 665 feet of levee extending from the Erie Railroad to high ground along the right bank of Chamberlain Creek near the mouth; closure structures at Erie Railroad and at Court Street; a weir, a drop structure, and about 1,800 feet of earth levee, about 2,235 feet of channel excavation, about 645 feet of channel paving and raising, about 470 feet of existing concrete flood wall, and about 200 feet of new concrete flood wall for improvement of Pierce Creek from its mouth to about 1,000 feet above Conklin Avenue; and appurtenant drainage structures. Improvement, supplemented by authorized flood control dams above the area, will provide protection for the City of Binghamton against a flood discharge about 20 percent greater than the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935 on the Chenango River and in March 1936 on the Susquehanna River. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract to correct the underseepage at the First Ward Area, was awarded in January 1988 and work was completed in January 1989. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 31F. CANISTEO, NY Location. On Purdy and Bennetts Creeks in the Town of Canisteo, NY, situated along the south side of the Canisteo River, at the confluence of Bennetts Creek and the Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 8,000 feet of earth levees on the right bank of the Canisteo River, extending from high ground 1,570 feet west of State Highway Route 21 above the Town to a point at the intersection of Ordway Lane and East Main Street; about 7,400 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Purdy and Bennetts Creeks, extending from the Main Street Bridge to high ground above Greenwood Street; 1,000 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Bennetts Creek extending upstream from the Main Street Bridge; a concrete check dam with wing levees from Greenwood Street; a new highway bridge at Greenwood Street; alterations to existing timber check dams in Bennetts Creek; channel excavation in Bennetts and Purdy Creeks; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 4-14 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 31G. CORNING, NY Location. On the Chemung River in the City of Corning, NY, about 44 miles upstream from the confluence of Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Corning, NY.) Existing project. Flood protection for this community was originally authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1936. Plan of improvement provides for construction of a pumping station, earth levees, and concrete flood walls, consisting of: about 4,300 feet of earth levee, enlargement of about 8,610 feet of existing earth levee and about 3,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Chemung River, extending from the Erie Railroad Bridge to high ground at Park Avenue below the City; about 200 feet of concrete flood walls; about 2,500 feet of earth levees and enlargement of about 11,500 feet of existing earth levee on the left bank of the Chemung and Cohocton Rivers, extending from the Erie Railroad Bridge over Cohocton River to the mouth of Post Creek; about 2,500 feet of earth levee and enlargement of about 4,700 feet of existing earth levee on the right bank of Post Creek from its mouth to Watkins Street; realignment of about 3,000 feet of channel, about 8,800 feet of earth levee, about 3,000 feet of channel excavation, a pressure conduit about 400 feet long, a drop structure and a weir for improvement of Cutler Creek, extending from its mouth to high ground at Deckertown Road and Hornby Road; and appurtenant drainage structures. Flood protection on Monkey Run was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1950. Plan of improvement provides for construction of 2,010 feet of open flume, 2,320 feet of pressure conduit storm sewers, and appurtenant facilities between the existing improved channel above Sixth Street and the Chemung River at a point immediately east of Pine Street East. Modified improvement will provide protection for the City of Corning against a flood discharge in Chemung River approximately equal to the maximum flood of record, which occurred in May 1945, and on tributary streams against floods of greater magnitude than known to date. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operaton and maintenance of the project continued. 31H. EAST SIDNEY LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located near East Sidney, NY, on the Ouleout Creek, about five miles above the confluence of the creek with the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Franklin, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill and concrete structure, 2,010 feet long, including spillway, rises 130 feet above the streambed and consists of a concrete gravity-type section with a compacted earth-dike section at the right abutment. The outlet works consist of five rectangular conduits each 3.5 feet by 5.85 feet and 105 feet long. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 33,500 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 102 square miles which is 93 percent of the Ouleout Creek drainage area, and 5 percent of the watershed of the Susquehanna River upstream from Binghamton, NY, exclusive of the separately controlled Chenango River. Recreation facilities include a bathing beach, picnic and camping areas, and boat-launching and docking facilities. Local cooperation. None required. The Town of Sidney, NY, cooperated in the development of recreation facilities and operates and maintains all the facilities with the exception of the recreational pool, which is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. A contract was awarded on April 12, 1989 in the amount of $950,500 to stabilize the weir, the estimated completion date is February 28, 1990. 31I. ELMIRA, NY Location. On the Chemung River in the City of Elmira, NY, about 27 miles upstream from the confluence of the Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Elmira, NY.) Existing project. Provides for about 17,700 feet of earth levees, and about 4,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Chemung River, extending from South Hoffman Street to a point below the city near the upper end of Big Island; about 12,100 feet of earth levee and about 6,300 feet of concrete wall on the left bank of the Chemung River extending from Durland Avenue to the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad at the mouth of Newton Creek; about 10,000 feet of earth levee on right bank of Newton Creek, extending from about the intersection of Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad and East Church Street to high ground near intersection of Sullivan and Warren Streets; about 4,300 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Divan Creek; about 2,000 feet of concrete conduit enclosing Hoffman Brook from West Second Street to the Chemung River; clearing islands and riverbanks of trees and brush for about 3.5 miles in the Chemung River; about 14,300 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Seely Creek, extending from the Erie Railroad to high ground approximately 1,000 feet northwest of the intersection of South Broadway and Pennsylvania Avenue; a pumping plant for disposal of interior drainage; an interceptor sewer about 6,000 feet long varying in size from 48 to 96 inches in diameter; and appurtenant structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 4-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 31J. HORNELL, NY Location. On the Canisteo River in the City of Hornell, NY, about 42 miles upstream from the confluence of the Canisteo and Tioga Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and earth levees, concrete flood walls, and check dams consisting of: realignment of about 4,600 feet of the Canisteo River channel, and about 5,800 feet of earth levee on its right bank, extending from Seneca Street upstream to the junction of the Pittsburgh, Shawmut & Northern Railroad and the Erie Railroad; about 4,500 feet of earth levee, extending on both sides of Seneca Street from the Canisteo River to Wrightman Avenue and the junction of Cleveland Avenue and Bethesda Drive; about 7,200 feet of earth levee, about 2,500 feet of concrete flood wall, and raising about 1,500 feet of existing concrete flood wall, on the right bank of the Canisteo River, and about 12,000 feet of channel improvement, extending from Seneca Street to the Erie Railroad; about 2,500 feet of earth levee, about 2,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the left bank of the Canisteo River extending from a point opposite Walnut Street to the Erie Railroad; a ring-earth levee about 2,800 feet long around the sewage-disposal plant on the left bank of the Canisteo River; about 4,500 feet of realignment and improvement of the Canisteo River Channel with about 4,500 feet of earth levee on its right bank extending from Cedar Street downstream to about 1,400 feet above East Avenue; about 2,400 feet of channel paving, 1,400 feet of earth levee, raising about 1,900 feet of concrete flood wall, and construction of one check dam on Canacadea Creek; about 1,600 feet of channel paving and construction of three check dams on Chauncey Run with about 300 feet of new wall and about 300 feet of capping; a weir, a check dam, 3,030 feet of channel paving, 4,800 feet of flood walls and levees, and related work on existing walls, on Crosby Creek; removal of 6 bridges, erection of 4 bridges, miscellaneous bridge structures, and 3 drop structures; and appurtenant drainage structures and small stream control works. Improvement, supplemented by Arkport and Almond Reservoirs above the area, provides protection for the City of Hornell against a flood discharge approximately double the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. An overall engineering analysis of the condition of the project continued. 31K. LISLE, NY Location. On the Tioughnioga River in the Village of Lisle, NY, about 12 miles upstream from the confluence of the Tioughnioga and Chenango Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Lisle, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and construction of earth levees and concrete flood walls, consisting of: relocation of about 3,000 feet of Dudley Creek Channel, extending from 1,200 feet west of the intersection of Cortland and Main Streets to the confluence with Tioughnioga River, realignment of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga River Channel east of the Village; about 4,150 feet of earth levee and 970 feet of concrete wall on the right bank of Dudley Creek and Tioughnioga River; realignment of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga Street to the railroad crossing on River Street; raising about 1,860 feet of the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western single track railroad over the levee; relocation of about 1,600 feet of Cortland Street; a new bridge over relocated Dudley Creek; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 31L. OXFORD, NY Location. On the Chenango River in the Village of Oxford, NY, about 40 miles upstream from the confluence of the Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Oxford, NY.) Existing project. Provides for earth levees and clearing of Chenango River Channel, consisting of about 2,100 feet of earth levees on the left bank of the Chenango River, extending from high ground near Cemetery Drive and running mostly along the railroad to high ground near Main Street; removal of dam and island below Main Street; raising the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad over the levee; and appurtenant closure and drainage structures. Improvement provides protection for the Village of Oxford on the left bank against a flood discharge substantially larger than the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 31M. WHITNEY POINT LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located near Whitney Point, NY, on the Otselic River about 0.7 mile upstream from its confluence with Tioughnioga River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point and Willet, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 4,900 feet long, exclusive of a spillway, rises 95 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and gated outlet in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5-foot by 10-foot gates and one emergency gate of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 86,440 4-16 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 255 square miles, the entire watershed of Otselic River, or 16 percent of the Chenango River watershed upstream from Binghamton, NY. Recreation facilities, constructed in cooperation with local interests, provide for swimming, picnicking, camping, boating, fishing, and hunting. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests operate and maintain all of the recreation facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. A contract was awarded on April 13, 1989 in the amount of $328,820 to stabilize the weir, the estimated completion date is February 28, 1990. 31N. WHITNEY POINT VILLAGE, NY Location. On the Tioughnioga River at the confluence of the Tioughnioga and Otselic Rivers, tributaries of the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and earth levees, consisting of realignment of about 1,800 feet of Tioughnioga River Channel, above the confluence with Otselic River; about 7,100 feet of earth levee along the right bank of the Tioughnioga River, extending from high ground on Main Street above the village to Collins Street just below the Village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 32. SPRING BROOK CREEK, PITTSTON TOWNSHIP, PA Location. The project is located in the Township of Pittston along the banks of Spring Brook Creek adjacent to PA state route 502. Pittston Township is located in northeastern Luzerne County, PA approximately 1 mile southeast of Scranton, PA. (See USGS quad sheets "Pittston, PA" and "Avoca, PA".) Existing project. On January 26, 1989, the Chief of Engineers, under the authority provided by Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended, authorized construction of streambank protection. The work consists of the excavation and backfilling of the existing streambank and placement of approximately 870 feet of stone riprap. Additional riprap is being placed as a betterment that was proposed by the sponsor. The estimated project implementation cost is $460,000, of which the sponsor will be paying $115,000 as well as providing $40,000 for the betterment. Local cooperation. The July 24, 1989 Local Cooperation Agreement between DOA and Pittston Township, in brief, requires the local sponsor to: Provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide modifications and relocations of buildings, roads, bridges, and related utilities; operate and maintain completed works; hold and save U.S. from damages; pay 25 percent of the total project costs; provide cash contribution not less than 5 percent of total project costs; assume responsibility for all costs in excess of the $500,000 Federal limitation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The construction contract was awarded on September 30, 1989 in the amount of $325,000 and is scheduled for completion in Spring 1990. 33. STILLWATER LAKE LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Location. Dam is on the Lackawanna River, 39 miles from the mouth of the stream and about 4 miles upstream from Forest City, Susquehanna County, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheet, Honesdale, PA.) Existing project. Dam is earthfill type, rising 77 feet above the streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit and side channel spillway in the left abutment. Reservoir capacity is 12,000 acre-feet, of which 11,600 acre-feet is flood control storage and the remainder utilized to maintain the existing water supply reservoir for Forest City, PA, at this site. Reservoir area is 422 acres,and the pool extends about 2.1 miles upstream. Reservoir controls 52 percent of the watershed above Carbondale, 26 percent above Olyphant, and 17 percent above Scranton. Federal cost of new work, completed in 1965, was $5,725,700 of which $4,500,500 was for construction and $1,225,200 was for lands and damages. Local cooperation. None required. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. 34. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY AND PA Plan of improvement authorized by the 1958 Flood Control Act provides for construction of Cowanesque Lake, PA, Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA, local protection works at Elkland, PA, and Nichols, NY, and channel improvements at Cortland, NY. This project plan supplemented the comprehensive flood control program for Southern New York and Northern Pennsylvania which 4-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 included the Southern New York flood control project and Stillwater, Genegantslet, and South Plymouth Reservoirs. 34A. COWANESQUE LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on the Cowanesque River about 2.2 miles above its confluence with Tioga River at Lawrenceville, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, PA.) Existing project. The project constructed under the Flood Control Act of 1958 provides for an earthfill dam 3,100 feet long and rising 151 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled spillway in the right abutment, a gated conduit in the Valley floor, and flood control storage is 82,000 acre-feet. Relocation of the Town of Nelson to a new townsite was authorized by Section 121 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976. The Federal cost of this new work was $106,030,700 of which $61,743,600 was for construction and $44,287,100 was for lands and damages and relocations (which includes $5,755,000 for relocation of the Town of Nelson). Within the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers the project was modified in March 1983 in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended. The modification provides for reallocating 25,600 acre-feet of present flood control storage for water supply storage by raising the permanent pool from elevation 1,045 to 1,080 mean sea level. Other features include modifying the existing intake tower and two access ramps, stabilizing the reservoir slope near the relocated Town of Nelson, replacing existing day-use recreation facilities, and expanding both day-and overnight-use recreation facilities to accommodate an expected increase in annual visitation due to the larger pool. Estimated cost (October 1988) of the modification is $54,314,000 of which $1,110,000 is Federal (for expanded recreation facilities) and $53,204,000 is non- Federal (which includes $39,414,000 for reimbursement of the cost of existing flood control storage reallocated to water supply storage, $12,680,000 cash contribution for the water supply modification, and $1,110,000 cash contribution for expanded recreation facilities). Local cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976, which authorized relocation of the Town of Nelson, provides that before the Secretary of the Army acquires any real estate property for the new townsite, appropriate non-Federal interests shall furnish binding contractual commitments that all lots in the new townsite will be either occupied when available, replacements for open space and vacant lots in the existing town, or will be purchased by non-Federal interests at the fair market value. The required contractual agreement for local cooperation was executed with Nelson Township on August 25, 1977. The March 1983 project modification (discussed above) requires non-Federal interests repay 100 percent of the investment cost of project modifications allocated to water supply, to terrestial wildlife habitat mitigation, and to in-kind replacement recreation, plus the allocated share of the project's original cost (escalated to current price levels). Additionally, they are required to pay annual costs of operation, maintenance, and major replacements allocated to water supply and to provide 50 percent of the cost of expanded recreation facilities, as well as, all operation, maintenance, and replacement costs for the expanded facilities. Water supply and recreation contracts were executed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) and the Susquehanna River Basin Commission on June 30, 1986. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Contract work was completed on the slope modification, intake tower and access ramp modification and the cultural and historical field work. Work progressed on recreation, fish and wildlife and reservoir clearing. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 34B. TIOGA-HAMMOND LAKES, PA Location. The dams are located in Tioga County, PA, upstream from the confluence of the Tioga River and Crooked Creek. Tioga Dam is located on the Tioga River and Hammond Dam on Crooked Creek, approximately opposite the Tioga damsite, about 3.3 miles above its mouth and less than one mile from the Village of Brooklyn. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, PA.) Existing project. Tioga Dam is 2,600 feet long, rising 140 feet above the streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit. Hammond Dam is 5,900 feet long, and has a maximum height of 121.5 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway. Both dams are of earth and rockfill construction. The Tioga-Hammond Lakes project controls a total drainage area of 402 square miles, with Tioga Dam controlling 280 square miles of the Tioga River Basin and Hammond Dam controlling 122 square miles of the Crooked Creek Basin. Recreation facilities are provided for swimming, camping, picnicking, boating, and fishing. Estimated Federal cost (October 1988) of new work is $193,120,000 of which $125,029,000 is for completed construction, $60,591,000 is for lands and damages and relocations and $7,500,000 is for construction of the Mill Creek recreation facilities. Local cooperation. None required on the completed portion of the project; however, construction of the Mill Creek Area recreation facilities relies on local interests providing specialized facilities including buildings, lodges, demonstration centers, and non-water oriented equipment and accepting full responsibility for operation and malntenance of the entire recreation area. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Planning for the joint development of the Mill Creek Recreation Area continued by the Baltimore District and Mansfield University including preparation of plans and specifications for construction of the Federal project. The design of the Federal project is 95% complete. Progress was slowed down due to non-Federal sponsor lack of funds. Local sponsor fund-raising has been less than successful. Project will be terminated if local sponsor cannot raise non-Federal share. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 4-18 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 35. TUNKHANNOCK CREEK, TUNKHANNOCK, PA Location. The project is situated on Tunkhannock Creek adjacent to Saint Peter's Episcopal Church located in the town of Tunkhannock, Wyoming County, PA. The town of Tunkhannock is located approximately 15 miles northwest of Scranton, PA. (See USGS quad. sheet titled Tunkhannock, PA.) Existing project. On September 22, 1988, the Chief of Engineers, under the authority provided by Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended, authorized the construction of streambank protection. The work consists of the removal of a shoal in the creek and the placement of fill material capped with stone riprap along approximately 250 feet of the streambank. The estimated project implementation cost is $223,400 of which $55,000 will be funded by the Local sponsor. Local cooperation. The November 25, 1988 Local Cooperation Agreement between DOA and Tunkhannock Township, in brief, requires the local sponsor to: Provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide modifications and relocations of buildings, roads, bridges, and related utilities; operate and maintain completed works; hold and save U.S. from damages; pay 25 percent of the total project costs; provide cash contribution not less than 5 percent of total project costs; assume responsibility for all costs in excess of the $500,000 Federal limitation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The construction contract was awarded on September 30, 1989 in the amount of $160,000 and is scheduled for completion in Spring 1990. 36. WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA A system of three flood control reservoirs, in the headwaters of the West Branch Susquehanna River, PA, are known as Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush (formerly known as Kettle Creek) and Foster Joseph Sayers (formerly known as Blanchard) on the West Branch about 2.5 miles upstream from Curwensville, PA; on Kettle Creek 8.4 miles above the mouth and 17 miles upstream from Renovo, PA; and on Bald Eagle Creek about one mile upstream from Blanchard, PA, respectively. In accordance with the terms of local cooperation, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania furnished assurances that it will coordinate operation of George B. Stevenson Reservoir (formerly known as First Fork Reservoir) with operation of Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush, and Foster Joseph Sayers Reservoirs to secure optimum flood control benefits from system operation. George B. Stevenson Reservoir on the First Fork Sinnemahoning Creek in Cameron and Potter Counties, PA, was constructed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania at a first cost of $12,240,000 and an estimated $30,000 annually for operation and maintenance. 36A. ALVIN R. BUSH DAM, PA Location. Alvin R. Bush Dam (formerly Kettle Creek Dam) is located on Kettle Creek about 8.4 miles above the mouth and 15 miles upstream from Renovo, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Keating, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure,about 1,350 feet long, rises 165 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled spillway located in rock adjacent to the right abutment, and has a horseshoe-shaped outlet tunnel with 3 service gates. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 75,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 226 square miles or about 92 percent of the Kettle Creek watershed. Recreation facilities are provided for camping, fishing, boating, picnicking, hiking, winter sports, hunting, and swimming by the State of Pennsylvania at Kettle Creek State Park. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 36B. CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on the West Branch of the Susquehanna River approximately 2.5 miles upstream from Curwensville, Clearfield County, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Curwensville, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 1,850 feet long, rises 131 feet above the streambed, and has an open-cut concrete sill 1,750 feet from the left abutment. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consist of a 15-foot diameter circular outlet conduit with 3 slide control gates 5.5 feet wide and 12 feet high. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 124,200 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 365 square miles, or about 98 percent of the West Branch Susquehanna River at Curwensville and about 75 percent at Clearfield. Clearfield County provides recreation including boating, fishing, picnicking, and swimming. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of project continued. 36C. FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA Location. Dam is located on Bald Eagle Creek in Centre County, PA, about one mile upstream from Blanchard and about 14 miles above the confluence of Bald Eagle Creek with the West Branch Susquehanna River at Lock Haven, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Howard, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 6,835 feet long, rises 100 feet above the streambed, and has an open-cut concrete chute and uncontrolled concrete 4-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OFTHE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 weir 600 feet wide located in rock in a saddle adjacent to the left abutment. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consist of a 15-foot diameter circular outlet conduit with two hydraulically-operated wheel gates 7 feet wide and 15 feet high. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 99,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 339 square miles or 88 percent of the drainage area above Beech Creek and 43 percent of the Bald Eagle Creek drainage area. Recreation facilities are provided for boating, camping, fishing, picnicking, hunting, swimming, hiking, and winter sports by the State of Pennsylvania at Bald Eagle State Park. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 37. YORK, INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA Location. On Codorus Creek 10 miles above its confluence with the Susquehanna River. Codorus Creek has tributary branches in York County in the south and central parts of Pennsylvania. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Pennsylvania-York and Hanover.) Existing project. Indian Rock Dam is an earth and rockfill dam about 1,000 feet long at the top, rising 83 feet above the streambed, with a reservoir providing for control storage of 28,000 acre-feet. Dam is on the main branch of Codorus Creek about 3 miles above York. Outlet works are in the right abutment and the uncontrolled spillway is on the right bank. Reservoir will control entire drainage area of the main branch of Codorus Creek and 41 percent of the drainage area above York. Improvements in Codorus Creek in the vicinity of and through the City of York provide for 22,969 feet of channel extending from 300 feet above Richland Avenue to a point downstream from the Pennsylvania Railroad crossing known as Black Bridge. Improvements, which will increase channel capacity to 24,000 cubic feet per second, include widening and deepening the channel, bank protection, removal of York Roller Mill Dam, and a low water channel about 3,900 feet long in the vicinity of York Roller Mill Dam. Cost of new work for the completed project was $5,061,167, of which $4,566,446 (regular funds) and $11,588 (emergency relief funds) were for construction and $483,133 (regular funds) was for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. An overall engineering analysis of the condition of the Codorus Creek Local Flood Protection continued. 38. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Projects in New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, District of Columbia, and Virginia were inspected during the period by hired labor. See Table 4-I. 39. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Operations and results during fiscal year. The operation of George B. Stevenson Dam, PA, was coordinated with the operation of Alvin R. Bush, Curwensville, and Foster Joseph Sayers Dams in the West Branch Susquehanna River Basin in order to secure optimum flood control benefits from the system operation. Costs during the period were $38,797. Supplemental instructions for the operation of Savage River Dam, MD, were provided, during periods of high water, to insure maximum protection for downstream localities. Costs during the period were $60,257. 40. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Cost for the period was $259,634 for the Disaster Preparedness Program. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (pre-authorization). Fiscal year costs were $9,712 for Conklin-Kirkwood NY. Non-structural study for Conklin-Broome (Ice Jam) NY; $88,783 for Gwynns Falls, Baltimore, MD; $7,021 for Solomons Creek, Ashley, PA; $26,527 for Sterrick Creek, PA; $5,238 for Spring Brook, Trout Creek, PA; $35,826 for Binghamton (Lourdes Hospital Area), NY; $2,965 for Hunting Creek, Thurmont, MD; and $38,569 for Frankstown Branch, PA. Non-Federal contributed costs for the fiscal year were $82,410 for Gwynns Falls, MD. Water Supply 41. WASHINGTON AQUEDUCT Location. The diversion dam and raw water supply intakes at Great Falls, the two collecting conduits, part of Dalecarlia receiving reservoir, the booster pumping station and the Little Falls raw water pumping station are located in Maryland. All other structures of the water supply system including parts of the raw water collecting system, two purification plants, pumping stations, storage reservoirs, and transmission mains are in the District of Columbia. Federal owned water mains are maintained in Virginia and Maryland. Existing project. Control of the water supply system is vested in Chief of Engineers (See Acts of March 3, 1859, and March 2, 1867, November 22, 1973 and Sec. 1800 of Revised Statutes). The project includes: administration; operation and maintenance of the collection, 4-20 ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT purification, pumping, and transmission facilities; protection of the water supply system; engineering; and construction of major water system additions and improvements. Authority to supply water to Arlington County, the City of Falls Church, and other jurisdictions in Virginia is contained in Public Law 119, 69th Congress, approved April 14, 1926; and Public Law 118, 80th Congress, June 26, 1947. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-19 of the Fiscal Year 1981 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. An uninterrupted and adequate supply of purified water was furnished to the District of Columbia; Arlington County, and Falls Church, VA; and to Federal establishments in the District of Columbia, Arlington County, VA and Montgomery and Prince Georges Counties in Maryland. Total consumption for Fiscal Year 1989 was 66,339 million gallons; the maximum daily consumption was 232 million gallons and average daily consumption was 181 million gallons. The average amount furnished Arlington County and Falls Church, VA was 41.1 million gallons per day. The Corps of Engineers was reimbursed in the amount of $5,316,969 for water furnished to the Virginia communities by the Washington Aqueduct. The treated water delivered to the 1.1 million consumers served by the Washington Aqueduct met or surpassed all Water Quality standards promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under the Safe Drinking Water Act (P.I. 93-523.) General Investigations 42. SURVEYS Federal costs for the fiscal year were $2,652,060 of which $1,295,810 was for flood damage prevention studies, $430,503 for shoreline protection studies, $563,103 for special studies, $116,987 for special investigations, $24,000 for interagency Water Resource development, and $221,657 for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests. Non-Federal contributed costs for the fiscal year were $49,928 for shoreline protection studies, and $722,408 for flood damage prevention studies. 43. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for flood plain management activities and general planning guidance during the period was $401,104. Providing assistance and guidance to local interests on methods and procedures for preventing and reducing flood damages was in progress at end of fiscal year. 44. PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Susquehanna Basin at Harrisburg, PA-The authorized project provides for an impervious railroad embankment/ floodwall line of protection 3,800 feet long, a pump station and floodgates for interior drainage, a dry detention dam along Asylum Run (a small tributary of Paxton Creek), an enlarged earth and concrete channel for Paxton Creek about 4 miles long, and minor recreation and fish and wildlife facilities. The General Design Memorandum was terminated during the fiscal year due to lack of economic justification. Non-structural flood control measures are being identified to reduce the effects of future flood events. The planning and engineering cost is $2,952,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $89,211. Lock Haven, PA-The authorized project provides for 36,600 feet of levee, 1,000 feet of flood wall, five closure structures, one pumping station, non-structural flood control measures for Woodward Township, and minor recreation facilities. Plans and specifications were essentially completed for the West Branch Susquehanna River levees. The planning and engineering cost is $4,547,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $961,841. Wyoming Valley, PA (Levee Raising)-The authorized project provides for raising the existing levees and flood walls between 3 and 5 feet, modifying closure structures, relocating utilities, and providing some new flood walls and levees to maintain the system's integrity. The plan also includes raising four other local protection projects, removing an abandoned railroad bridge, and providing non-structural measures to mitigate any significant induced damages and the potential of a catastrophic failure of an existing project. Preparation of a Phase II General Design Memorandum continued during the fiscal year. The estimated planning and engineering cost is $7,700,000 and costs during the fiscal year were $1,651,689. Atlantic Coast of Maryland & Assateague Island, VA-The authorized project provides for constructing a steel sheet pile bulkhead about 1.5 miles, and constructing a sand dune about 6.7 miles for hurricane protection. Preparation of a General Design Memorandum was essentially completed during the fiscal year. The estimated planning and engineering cost is $2,640,000 and costs during the fiscal year were $905,318. Washington, DC & Vicinity-The authorized project would provide for raising the grade of a portion of P Street, filling an area near the Lincoln Memorial (along 23rd Street) regrading the area adjacent to 17th Street and constructing a removable closure structure across 17th Street. These measures were authorized to restore the design level of protection of the existing project and to reduce the need for emergency closure in the event of a flood. Preparation of a General Design Memorandum continued during the fiscal year and total costs were $640,225. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $2,300,000. 4-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 4-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 1. Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD and VA 2. Baltimore Harbor MD Collection & Removal of Drift 3. Cambridge Harbor, MD 4. Crisfield Harbor, MD 5. Fishing Bay, MD 6. Herring Bay & Rockhold Creek, MD 7. Herring Creek, Tall Timber, MD 8. Honga River and Tar Bay, MD 9. Little Wicomico River, VA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5,904,000 25,579,000 31,700,000 5,585,736 25,840,645 28,277,257 7,440,7912 5,992,204' 2,501,5046 7,440,790 5,992,0276 2,498,018' 14,100,000 124,134,7121 17,579,367 124,062,4191 3,748,4858 85,659,84410 3,752,0649 85,659,75510 - 17,674,000 22,186,480 13,178,920 - 17,198,010 21,171,953 13,769,831 236,000 239,574 217,000 217,002 10,000 10,000 20,000 20,000 503,200 478,502 138,000 137,999 398,500 423,195 79,100 79,100 215,359 210,742 228,000 228,000 176,700 176,699 26,870 5,869 50,200 50,200 48,000 48,000 187,400 187,400 99,400 99,403 224,000 223,999 61,000 61,001 -7,680 13,321 53,000 52,995 331,000 330,999 4,000 4,001 220,359 218,397 3,000 3,000 - -215,359 4,617 -215,359 38,000 38,000 138,600 134,210 24,555 28,946 70,000 70,000 45,000 45,001 53,039,400 52,139,794 4,016,210 4,016,208 195,97411 195,97411 925,958 925,958 19,190 19,190 349,15412 349,15412 673,521 673,516 33,87413 33,87413 1,094,592 1,094,591 50,591 50,591 803,648 803,648 1,506,259 1,504,297 148,329 148,329 10,306 10,306 66,11914 66,11914 3,106,926 3,106,926 81,88516 81,88516 1,457,207 1,457,207 4-22 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 10. Monroe Bay and Creek, VA 11. Nanticoke River (Including Northwest Fork DE & MD 12. Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD 13. Pocomoke River, MD 14. Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC, Collection & Removal of Drift 15. Potomac River- Aquatic Plant Control, MD, VA, DC 16. Potomac River below Washington, DC 17. Prevention of Obstructions & Injurious Deposits, Baltimore Harbor, MD 18. Shallow Creek, MD 19. St. Catherines Sound, MD 12,460 12,460 180,000 180,000 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 422,600 493,639 38,000 47,143 12,100 12,102 497,000 497,399 1 51,800 51,800 53,200 53,196 74,100 74,100 36,000 36,000 516,000 516,324 175,000 257,475 -20,278 27,202 55,900 56,312 372,000 372,000 905 905 40,000 40,000 33,000 33,000 575,800 575,767 162,065 127,424 80,781 120,462 100,000 99,574 444,000 444,000 39,214 387,685 387,685 143,13416 143,13416 689,777 689,773 350,19317 350,19317 9,777,708 9,777,708 4,335,900 4,335,900 191,72618 191,72618 1,606,535 1,606,535 7,793,175 7,793,174 1,764,065 1,747,947 291,866 287,333 153,836 153,836 2,032,574 2,032,559 5,357,040 5,357,040 274,405 268,314 226,843 222,138 29,9471m 29,9471) 648,618 648,618 417,000 432,664 378,000 323,826 54,363 35,825 84,000 84,040 43,500 7,600 481,200 480,942 164,000 156,250 177,000 103,844 85,000 85,011 230,000 220,595 219,843 212,538 7,000 9,600 53,000 53,000 324,000 324,000 4-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 20. Washington Harbor, DC 21. Wicomico River, MD 25. Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV 26. Hills Point Road, Dorchester Co., MD 27. Isle of Wight Bay, Ocean City, MD 28. Jennings Randolph Lake, MD & WV 29A. Aylesworth Creek Lake, PA 30. Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA 31A. Addison, NY 31B. Almond Lake, NY Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Total to FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 - - - - 3,191,07720 - - - - 3,191,07720 44,000 44,000 47,800 47,800 32,000 32,000 20,000 19,996 4,894,29621,22 4,894,29221,22 471,60923 471,6092' 49,000 49,001 61,000 61,000 46,100 13,362 26,678 366,000 365,999 64,000 63,998 30,953 9,500 9,337 993,000 993,000 71,000 71,002 23,000 24,589 39,600 71,000 57,902 742,000 742,002 72,000 72,000 120,800 115,991 8,320 45,794 313,800 231,421 127,612 85,083 55,000 55,000 1,759,000 1,121,700 1,113,900 1,244,200 1,759,018 1,111,628 1,119,760 1,247,520 101,000 101,071 116,900 116,104 113,000 113,740 214,000 213,962 2,108,000 2,149,400 2,279,865 2,568,100 2,138,283 2,160,024 2,263,777 2,587,911 14,100 14,091 234,000 234,127 9,300 9,309 324,800 322,169 6,700 6,700 307,535 308,416 13,800 13,780 322,000 323,336 8,063,737 8,063,737 15,633,97024 15,633,97024 846,229 846,229 189,900 184,895 47,920 45,794 394,300 298,660 127,612 85,083 176,325,300 176,321,783 9,213,778 9,212,846 2,320,400 2,320,400 1,407,502 1,407,401 77,408,770 77,408,770 24,821,160 24,817,454 827,050 827,050 207,955 207,935 5,760,211 5,760,211 3,977,175 3,976,747 4-24 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 31C. Arkport Dam, NY 31D. Avoca, NY 31E. Binghamton, NY 31F. Canisteo, NY 31G. Corning, NY 31H. East Sidney Lake, NY 311. Elmira, NY 31J. Hornell, NY 31K. Lisle, NY 31L. Oxford, NY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 148,000 148,073 24,300 24,300 383,000 40,480 35,200 35,200 25,900 25,874 38,500 38,500 330,000 329,995 28,300 28,297 135,900 135,901 26,100 26,098 11,300 11,290 199,900 199,401 31,300 31,300 320,000 20,392 28,700 28,700 27,800 27,827 50,100 50,100 378,800 378,421 27,600 27,603 242,400 242,399 28,600 28,602 9,100 9,110 144,100 143,850 9,200 9,200 415,000 396,857 17,400 17,400 45,100 45,100 43,800 43,800 142,000 141,763 9,100 9,098 30,000 50,271 30,700 30,700 42,400 42,366 26,700 26,655 364,500 1,130,600 364,266 1,130,829 7,900 7,900 266,000 266,000 22,600 22,600 5,900 5,900 12,100 12,100 567,400 567,337 32,000 31,998 11,000 11,000 4-25 1,910,00025 1,910,00025 2,077,174 2,076,179 436,37426 436,37426 430,261 430,258 3,460,00027 3,460,00027 490,581 490,581 1,183,11128 1,183,11128 733,435 733,400 3,322,00029 3,322,00029 762,158 762,113 6,049,504 6,049,504 5,321,219 5,320,819 6,883,305 6,883,305 312,149 312,149 4,558,69880 4,558,69880 4,065,933 4,065,866 661,19991 661,19931 725,322 725,320 131,00032 131,00032 226,732 226,732 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 31M. Whitney Point Lake, NY 31N. Whitney Point Village, NY 32. Spring Brook Creek, Pittston Twp, PA 33. Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA 34A. Cowanesque Lake, PA 34B. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA 35. Tunkhannock Creek, Tunkhannock, PA 36A. Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA 36B. Curwensville Lake, PA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 644,000 643,908 18,400 18,380 218,000 218,056 195,000 418,395 894,200 897,042 90,000 65,546 1,329,800 1,330,248 43,500 33,209 463,000 452,583 628,000 628,049 403,800 398,680 16,600 16,620 17,500 11,736 223,800 223,206 532,000 535,149 16,300 16,300 54,000 38,986 239,800 239,286 622,000 278,000 197,929 699,422 974,300 938,900 970,947 939,625 1,277,000 5,010,000 577,849 4,451,354 360,000 265,978 1,412,600 1,403,881 7,352 537,700 546,080 456,300 455,574 140,000 167,374 1,888,400 1,892,334 2,281 369,200 369,237 449,300 448,896 731,700 733,420 20,100 20,098 287,000 20,976 315,000 392,400 393,128 5,421,539 5,421,539 5,762,640 5,762,210 424,096 424,096 376,661 376,659 358,500 71,698 315,000 5,725,700 5,725,700 2,916,209 2,915,810 - 108,860,700 -524,248 108,330,971 1,110,400 1,111,622 5,341,000 5,572,939 3,779 1,333,600 1,337,198 131,600 1,902 52,933 426,000 427,276 449,600 450,171 7,692,954 7,690,900 11,628,000 10,602,142 19,244,800 19,152,477 13,019,254 13,017,998 175,100 44,744 52.933 7,103,001 7,103,001 5,463,522 5,462,764 20,396,060 20,396,060 7,344,589 7,344,001 4-26 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 39C. Foster Joseph New Work Sayers Dam, PA Approp. - - - - 30,887,063" Cost - - - - 30,887,063" Maint. Approp. 424,000 549,400 518,100 550,300 6,523,884 Cost 423,980 549,169 516,250 551,937 6,523,411 37. York, Indian New Work Rock Dam, PA Approp. - - - - 5,061,167' Cost - - - - 5,061,167" Maint. Approp. 548,000 384,300 547,500 617,400 6,416,417"5 Cost 557,982 384,227 546,776 617,951 6,416,139" 1. Includes $8,764,003 for previous projects. 17. Includes $283,008 public works funds and $67,185 2. Includes $967,791 for sections of project in Norfolk emergency relief funds; excludes $500,000 contributed funds. District. 18. Unconstructed portion of the project is inactive. In- 3. Includes $967,791 for sections of project in Norfolk cludes $20,500 for previous project. District. 19. Excludes $600 contributed funds. 4. Includes $127,604 for sections of project in Norfolk 20. Includes $3,029,001 for previous project. District. 21. Includes $1,831,609 for previous project. 5. Includes $127,518 for sections of project in Norfolk 22. Excludes $4,000 for emergency dredging under pro- District. visions of Section 3, 1945 River and Harbor Act. 6. Includes $558,504 for sections of project in Norfolk 23. Includes $50,000 for previous project and excludes District. $14,000 contributed funds. 7. Includes $555,057 for sections of project in Norfolk 24. Includes $49,998 emergency relief funds. District. 25. Includes $62,577 emergency relief funds. 8. Includes $310,485 for sections of project in Norfolk 26. Includes $109,944 emergency relief funds. District. 27. Excludes $163,096 contributed funds. 9. Includes $314,269 for sections of project in Norfolk 28. Includes $207,520 rehabilitation funds. District. 29. Excludes $34,729 contributed funds. 10. Includes $399,802 for previous projects. 30. Includes $250,899 emergency relief funds and excludes 11. Excludes $3,998 contributed funds and includes $15,000 contributed funds. $61,321 for previous project. 31. Includes $71,557 emergency relief funds. 12. Includes $87,740 for previous project. 32. Includes $73,465 emergency relief funds. 13. Includes $2,839 for previous project. 33. Excludes $263,900 contributed funds in accordance 14. Excludes $2,200 contributed funds and includes with the Tri-party Agreement for construction of sanitary $27,668 emergency relief funds. system for public use. 15. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 34. Includes $11,588 emergency relief funds. 16. Includes $5,000 for previous project. 35. Includes $15,000 for deferred maintenance. TABLE 4-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MD and VA Aug. 8, Branch channel 35 feet deep to head of Curtis Bay, and one 35 feet deep and 1917 400 feet wide Fort McHenry to Port Covington entrance channel, thence 150 feet wide to Ferry Bar, and thence 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Hanover Street Bridge, widen approaches and bends, and enlarge anchorage basin near entrance. Inclusion of Patapsco River and tributaries into one project for Baltimore Harbor.' Jan. 21, Change in location of anchorage near upper end of Fort McHenry Channel. 1927 Jul. 3, Increased anchorage facilities. 1930 H. Doc. 799, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. 4-27 1. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 4-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized Jul. 3, For 37-foot depth in that portion of channel to Baltimore lying between 37-foot 1930 depth curve near Baltimore Light to Sparrows Point entrance channel; widen angle between Fort McHenry and Ferry Bar section; and for width of 400 feet in Curtis Bay section. Oct. 17, For 22-, 18-, and 15-foot channels in Curtis Creek from 22-foot depth below 1940 Pennington Avenue Bridge to upper end of marginal wharf of U.S. Ordnance Depot. Mar. 2, Uniform main channel 39 feet deep from the ocean through York Spit section 1945 and Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, additional anchorage area, 2,400 feet long, 1,200 feet wide, and 30 feet deep; a connecting channel 400 feet wide and 27 feet deep from Cutoff Brewerton Angle in main channel to Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay; a channel in Curtis Creek 200 feet wide and 35 feet deep from head of existing 35-foot project channel in Curtis Bay to a point in the creek about 750 feet below Pennington Avenue Bridge. Mar. 2, A channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 22-foot depth curve south of 1945 Baltimore & Ohio R.R. bridge about 2,800 feet to vicinity of Arundel Cove, thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for about 2,100 feet; with an anchorage basin about 700 feet square adjacent to channel southwesterly of Coast Guard wharf. Jul. 3, Main channel 42 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide in Cape Henry section at 1958 entrance to Chesapeake Bay and in York Spit section; 42 feet deep and 800 feet wide in Rappahannock Spit section and in approach channel to Baltimore Harbor from Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, with widening at entrance and bends; channels 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide in Curtis Bay and Ferry Bar sections of harbor; a connecting channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide from main channel to approach channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; and for three disjointed sections of channels of same depth and width in Chesapeake Bay leading to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; and to provide Federal maintenance of 39-foot depth in Northwest Branch, in areas dredged to that depth by local interests. Dec. 31, Deepening of the Cape Henry Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1970 1,000 feet, with widening at bends; deepening of the Spit Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1,000 feet, with widening at bends; enlargement of the Rappahannock Shoal Channel to a depth of 50 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; deepening of the main ship channel from Chesapeake Bay to Fort McHenry to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 800 feet, with widening at bends and at the Craighill Entrance; deepening of the Curtis Bay Channel to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide and 980-foot long turning basin at the head of channel to the same depth; deepening of the Northwest Branch-East Channel to a depth of 49 feet from the depth existing at the time of construction at a width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide and 950-foot long turning basin at the head of the channel to the same depth; and deepening and extension of the Northwest Branch-West Channel to a depth of 40 feet from the depth existing at the time of construction, at a width of 600 feet, and with an irregularly shaped turning basin at the head of the channel 40 feet deep and about 2,000 feet long with a maximum width of 1,150 feet. BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD-COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Jun. 30, Collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary 1948 waters. CAMBRIDGE HARBOR, MD Mar. 3, Channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide to the drawbridge 10 feet deep and 1925 100 feet wide from the bridge to the upper end of the harbor with a turning basin. Aug. 26, Channel 14 feet deep from that depth in Choptank River to the head of the 1937 harbor with widths of 150 feet below the Market St. Bridge in Cambridge and 100 feet above, and a turning basin of the same depth at the head of the channel; for an anchorage basin 10 feet deep, 400 feet long, and 175 feet wide H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. Adopted as a national defense project. (No printed report.) H. Doc. 741, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. In accordance with plans on file in the Office, Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 181, 94th Cong., 1st Sess. River and Harbor Act of 1948 H. Doc. 210, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 7, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 4-28 Documents 2. 3. I BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents on the west side of the channel and a second basin of the same depth 225 feet long and 200 feet wide on the east side of the channel; and a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in Choptank River to the municipal boat basin. Jun. 30, Modification providing for deepening of the channel in Choptank River and 1948 Cambridge Creek to 16 feet, with a turning basin of the same depth and of irregular dimensions comprising approximately 2.4 acres. Jun. 16, Modification providing for Federal maintenance of locally constructed channel 1978 150 feet wide and 25 feet deep, from that depth in the Choptank River to and including a irregularly shaped turning basin of the same depth, with such modifications as in the discretion of the Chief of Engineers may be advised at an added first cost to the United States presently estimated at $257,000. 4. Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 CRISFIELD HARBOR, MD A 12-foot channel of varying widths to opposite Consumers Ice Co., thence 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from ice plant to Hop Point. 7-foot channel 100 feet wide from opposite Hop Point to an anchorage parallel to Brick Kiln Road. For the 7 foot x 60 foot channel in Little Annemessex River... Mar. 3, A mooring basin 7 feet deep, 160 feet wide, and about 875 feet long roughly 1945 parallel to Brick Kiln Rd., with a channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide leading therefrom to the 7-foot project channel connecting Little Annemessex and Big Annemessex Rivers. Sep. 3, An anchorage basin in Somers Cove 10 feet by 600 feet by 1,000 feet with an 1954 approach channel 10 feet by 100 feet from 10-foot depth in Little Annemessex River through a land cut in Jersey Island to south side of basin. Aug. 14, Change location and dimensions of approach channel to Somers Cove to plan 1958 No. 2 through the present entrance, at no increase in Federal cost of modification. FISHING BAY, MD Aug. 26, Provided for channels 6 feet deep and generally 60 feet wide at mean low 1937 water, suitably widened where necessary to offer adequate sheltered anchorage space from deep water and in Fishing Bay to vicinity of county or packing house wharves in McCreadys, Farm, and Goose Creeks. HERRING BAY & ROCKHOLD CREEK, MD Jul. 3, A channel 60 feet wide, 5 feet deep, from the 6-foot contour in Herring Bay 1930 to the 3-foot contour in Rockhold Creek. Jun. 20, For the present project channel dimensions, 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide, 1938 the turning basin 7 feet deep, and a stone breakwater 900 feet long. HERRING CREEK, TALL TIMBERS, MD Jul. 3, Provides for an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide with a 1950 turning basin of irregular shape and 6 feet deep, and riprap stone jetties on the upstream and downstream sides of the entrance channel 770 and 650 feet long, respectively. The project length is 1,630 feet. Mar. 7, 1986 Sec 111 Constructing 250 feet of beachfill, 2,187 linear feet of stone revetment, and upgrading 350 feet of existing revetment along the Tall Timbers waterfront. HONGA RIVER AND TAR BAY (BARREN ISLAND GAPS), MD Aug. 30, Channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from the 7-foot contour in Chesapeake 1935 Bay through Tar Bay and Fishing Creek to the 7-foot contour in Honga River. H. Doc. 381, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 355, 95th Cong., 2 Sess. 1 H. Doc. 355, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 72, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 457, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 435, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 435, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 186, 75th Cong., 1st Sess 1 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 34, 71st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 595, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.' H. Doc. 159 84th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 Detailed Project Report July 18, 1985 Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 35, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 4-29 5. 6. 7. 8. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun. 30, Modification providing for a channel in Back Creek 7 feet deep and 60 feet 1948 wide from the 7-foot depth curve in Honga River to a point near the head of Back Creek, with a turning basin of the same depth, 150 feet long and 200 feet wide. LITTLE WICOMICO RIVER, VA Aug. 30, A channel 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Potomac River to deep water 1935 in Little WVicomico River; two stone jetties 1,000 feet and 1,300 feet long at the entrance; and 1,004 linear feet of timber bulkhead to stabilize the dredged inner channel. MONROE BAY AND CREEK, VA Jul. 3, A channel 8 feet deep, 100 wide, and 950 feet long, through the bar at the 1930 entrance, and within the creek a channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 2,500 feet long, with turning and anchorage basin 500 feet wide at upper end. 11. Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 25, 1910 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1945 NANTICOKE RIVER (INCLUDING NORTHWEST FORK), DE & MD A 9-foot channel, 100 feet wide up to Seaford, DE, with a turning basin. Slight widening between bridges in harbor at Seaford, DE. A channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide in Northwest Fork, together with turning basin. A channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide from 12-foot contour in Tangier Sound to highway bridge at Seaford, DE. OCEAN CITY HARBOR & INLET & SINEPUXENT BAY, MD Aug. 30, Construction of an inlet between the Atlantic Ocean and Sinepuxent Bay, 1935$ 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide, protected by jetties; a channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet to Ocean City, 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Green Point, and 100 feet wide into Chincoteague Bay. Aug. 30, Modification providing a 10-foot by 100-foot channel from the inlet to the 1935' west side of the bay with two turning basins; a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet channel to opposite North 8th Street, Ocean City, and 75 feet wide into Isle of Wight Bay. Sep. 3, Modification providing for raising the north jetty to an elevation 9 feet 19456 above mean low water, and a channel 300 feet wide and 16 feet deep from the ocean through the inlet to the Isle of Wight Bay Channel, thence 200 feet to the project harbor, and a depth of 14 feet in the project harbor. Channel depths refer to project datum, 13. Jun. 3, 1896 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 POCOMOKE RIVER, MD A 9-foot channel from Shad Landing to Snow Hill. A channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Pocomoke Sound to Pocomoke River. Extend channel above bridge at Snow Hill, 100 feet wide, 9 feet deep, widened to 150 feet to form a turning basin at upper end. Channel 11 feet deep by 150 feet wide from Pocomoke Sound to Tulls Point, thence a channel of the same depth and 100 feet wide to deep water in Pocomoke River above Williams Point, and dike construction along south side of channel from existing dike to Tulls Point. POTOMAC & ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC-COLLECTION & REMOVAL OF DRIFT Oct. 27, Collection and removal of drift from waters of the Potomac and Anacostia 1965 Rivers and their tributaries in the Washington, DC area from the head of the tidewater to Mount Vernon, VA. 9. 4-30 10. H. Doc. 580, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess.1 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 24, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 172 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 323, 53rd Cong., 3rd Sess., and Annual Report, 1985, p. 1165. H. Doc. 674, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 869, 60th Cong., 1st Sess.2 S. Doc. 69, 77th Cong., 1st Sess., Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 60, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 444, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. Annual Report for 1895, p. 1167. H. Doc. 227, 74th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 429, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 486, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 286, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. 12. 14. BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents POTOMAC RIVER AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, MD, VA, DC Jul. 2, Control of Hydrilla and other nuisance plants using mechanical harvesting 1986 to clear a 60 foot wide, 6 foot deep connecting channel from open waters to eligible public use areas. POTOMAC RIVER BELOW WASHINGTON, DC Mar. 3, A channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide between mouth at Chesapeake Bay 1899 and Giesboro Point at Washington, DC, a distance of 108 miles. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS & INJURIOUS DEPOSITS, BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD Aug. 28, Continuous patrol and inspection of Baltimore Harbor, Chesapeake Bay, 1958 and its tributaries to prevent and detect violations, and issue permits as required for transporting and depositing waste materials in navigable waters. (The project is limited to the tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries that lie within the State of Maryland.) 18. May 22, 1987 Sec. 107 SHALLOW CREEK Dredging a navigation channel, 5 feet deep at mean low water, 50 feet wide, and 2,700 feet long from the Patapsco River to a turning basin, 100 feet wide by 100 feet long at the head of creek. ST. CATHERINES SOUND, MD Mar. 2, Channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 700 feet long at the lower entrance 1945 from the Potomac River and a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide and 3,330 feet long at the Upper entrance from the Wicomico River. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC Aug. 30, Provides for: (a) Virginia Channel, from Giesboro Point to area for 25,000 1935 square feet; (b) Washington Channel, from Haines Point to head of Washington Channel, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide; (c) Anacostia River from Giesboro Point to Anacostia Bridge, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with turning basin 800 feet wide and about 2,400 feet long of same depth opposite Naval Weapons Plant; (d) Anacostia River from Anacostia Bridge 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide to turning basin 400 feet square of same depth at foot of 15th Street SE Channel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia Channel, 25,000 feet; Washington Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; and (e) operation and maintenance of inlet gates and lock and outlet gates of Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush Washington Channel. 21. Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 WICOMICO RIVER, MD Channel 9 feet deep from Main Street Bridge to about 2 miles below. Extend 9-foot depth into north prong from Main Street Bridge to the Salisbury Dam and turning basin. Extend 9-foot depth into south prong to head of navigation at Cathell Street, including a turning basin, and extend project down to mouth of river in Monie Bay. A 12-foot channel below the Main Street Bridge. A 14-foot channel, 150 feet wide; depths of 14 feet in the north and south prongs and a basin 6 feet deep at Webster Cove and approach channel thereto of the same depth. Sep. 3, Enlarge existing basin at Webster Cove, by dredging an extension 6 feet 1954 deep, 100 feet wide, and 200 feet long on each side of existing basin to form a T-shaped harbor. 16. 17. 4-31 15. State Design memorandum July 2, 1986 H. Doc. 33, 52nd Cong., 1st Sess. River and Harbor Act, June 29, 1888 as amended by Public Law 85-802, dated August 28, 1958 Detailed Project Report Jan. 1986 H. Doc. 242, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 22, 74th Cong., 1st Sess.1 H. Doc. 20, 51st Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report 1890, p. 947, H. Doc. 569, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1509, 63rd Cong., 3rd Sess. Senate Committee Print, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.1 H. Doc. 619, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. 19. 20. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun. 22, 1936 Jul. 24, 1946 Aug. 19, 1988 Sec. 14 Oct. 6, 1988 Sec. 14 Oct. 23, 1962 25. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA Oct. 23, Construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local pro- 1962 tection works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, Pennsylvania. RAYSTOWN LAKE, RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA Oct.23, Construction of dam and appurtenant facilities. 1962 Jun. 22, 1936 modified by Acts of Jun. 28, 1938; Aug. 18, 1941; Dec. 22, 1944; May 17, 1950; and Jul. 3, 1958 Jan. 26, 1989 Sec. 14 Aug. 18, 1941 SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Construction of detention reservoirs and related flood control works for protection of Binghamton, Hornell, Corning and other towns in New York and Pennsylvania. SPRING BROOK CREEK, PITTSTON TOWNSHIP, PA Consists of the excavation and backfilling of the existing streambank and placement of approximately 870 feet of stone riprap. STILLWATER LAKE, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Construction of a flood control reservoir. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY AND PA Jul. 3, Construction of Cowanesque and Tioga-Hammond reservoirs, local flood 1958 protection works at Elkland, PA, and Nichols, NY and channel improvement at Cortland, NY. Oct. 22, Modification in connection with the construction of Cowanesque Lake to 1976 relocate the Town of Nelson, PA, to a new townsite. Mar. 1, Modification of Cowanesque Lake to include water supply as provided by 1983 Section 4 of the Flood Control Act of 1944 (PL 78-534) and Section 301 of Water Supply Act of 1958 (PL 85-500). CUMBERLAND, MD AND RIDGELEY, WV Levees, retaining walls, movable dam, and channel clearing for Cumberland, West Cumberland and South Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV. Levees, wall, channel improvement, remove Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Dam and construct new industrial dam. HILLS POINT ROAD, DORCHESTER CO., MD Consists of five offshore stone rubble mound breakwaters, each 50 feet long, located a distance of about 100 feet offshore. Also the project provides for bank stabilization with beachfill and planting of vegetation to prevent erosion of the roadway. ISLE OF WIGHT BAY, OCEAN CITY, MD Consists of the placement of 3,500 tons of steel sheetpile bulkhead along Chicago Avenue. JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD & WV Construction of Bloomington Lake project. 4-32 26. H. Doc. 101, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. Report on file in Office, Chief of Engineers. Detailed Project Report Dec. 1988 Initial Appraisal Report Jul. 1986 H. Doc. 469, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 565, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. Initial Appraisal Report Nov. 1985 H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 394, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 35. TUNKHANNOCK CREEK, TUNKHANNOCK TOWNSHIP, PA Sep. 22, Consists of the removal of a shoal in the creek and the placement of fill Initial Appraisal 1988 material capped with riprap along approximately 250 feet of the Report Mar. 1986 Sec. 14 streambank. 36. WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA Sep. 3, Construction of three flood control reservoirs. H. Doc. 29, 1954 84th Cong., 1st Sess. 37. YORK, INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA Jun. 22, Construction of Indian Rock Dam and channel improvements on Codorus H. Doc. 702, 1936 Creek. 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. 1. Contains latest published maps. September 16, 1933. The site chosen for the inlet under this 2. Exclusive of portion considered inactive. Inactive por- authorization was that opened just south of Ocean City by tion is widening 35-foot depth channel from 150 to 400 feet from natural forces during a severe storm in August 1933. This Port Covington to Ferry Bar, widening 27-foot depth channel eliminated the necessity for an 8-foot channel from the inlet to from 150 to 250 feet to Hanover Street Bridge, and providing Ocean City. a channel 27 feet deep by 250 feet wide to Western Maryland 4. Included in Emergency Relief program 1935. Railway Bridge with an anchorage and turning basin at the 5. Raising of the north jetty to an elevation of 9 feet above upper end. mean low water was accomplished with maintenance funds in 3. Included in Public Works Administration program 1956. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS TABLE 4-C Cost to September 30, 1989 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Accotink Creek, VA' Anacostia River and Flats2 Annapolis Harbor, MD Aquia Creek, VA Back Creek, MD Betterton Harbor, MD Black Walnut Harbor, MD Bonum Creek, VA' Branson Cove, Lower Machodoc River, VA Breton Bay, MD7 Broad Creek River, DE Broad Creek, MD Chester River, MD Choptank River, MD" Claiborne Harbor, MD 2 Corsica River, MD Cypress Creek, MD Duck Point Cove, MD Elk and Little Elk Rivers, MD ' s Fishing Creek, MD Goose Creek, MD'6 Island Creek, MD Completed Deferred Completed Inactive Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1878 1953 1946 1928 1946 1960 1982 1982 1950 1950 1964 1962 1988 1979 1987 1948 1947 1982 1932 1987 1973 1948 $ 5,000 3,910,582 34,250' 52,4654 23,061 3,482 32,631 202,0006 15,755 47,924'8 64,510' 28,227 70,49510 96,796 42,974 39,07112 3,057 25,289 90,1211' 111,242 75,900 6,230 - 17,366 11,770 41,378 431,478 155,314 17,675 12,621 114,373 82,630 1,638,924 94,095 669,933 90,736 10,528 325,765 53,80816 1,422,100 8,312 54,828 4-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS TABLE 4-C (Continued) Cost to September 30, 1989 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Island Creek, St. Georges Island, MD Completed 1988 23,836 478,009 Knapps Narrows, MD Completed 1988 46,12118 1,887,575 La Trappe, MD Completed 1980 8,064 40,475 Little Creek, Kent Island, MD Completed 1958 23,0001 7,327 Lowes Wharf, MD Completed 1986 21,000 317,829 Lower Machodoc Creek, VA Completed 1904 9,916 25,143 Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, MD Completed 1988 1,787,15818 640,938 Madison Bay, MD6 Completed 1977 125,550 33,353 Manokin River, MD 19 Completed 1919 34,78820 43,534 Middle River and Dark Head Creek, MD Completed 1947 38,71521 34,354 Muddy Hook and Tyler Coves, MD6 Completed 1984 64,001 425,780 Nan Cove, MD6 Completed 1965 34,861"2 22,498 Nanticoke River at Bivalve, MD'3 Completed 1983 240,817 142,131 Nanticoke River, MD Completed 1971 73,243 76,895" Neabsco Creek, MD Inactive 1978 14,600 - Neale Sound, MD Completed 1988 12,60024 348,771 Neavitt Harbor, MD6 Completed 1968 36,500 34,533 Nomini Bay and Creek, VA25 Completed 1946 78,446 42,063 Northeast River, MD Completed 1984 28,48928 937,074 Occoquan Creek, VA18 Completed 1971 66,25387 203,198 Parish Creek, MD Completed 1988 19,17028 516,648 Patuxent River, MD12 Completed 1905 14,00029 - Potomac River and Tributaries at and below Washington, DC, Elimination of Waterchestnut Completed 1977 - 184,394 Potomac River at Alexandria, VA Completed 1965 95,214 506,394 Potomac River at Lower Cedar Point, MD Completed 1920 10,234 6,216 Potomac River at Mt. Vernon, VA18 Completed 1984 17,000 331,219 Potomac River North Side of Washington Channel, DC' Completed 1956 1,744,69250 27,461" Queenstown Harbor, MD Completed 1985 72,85881 321,803 Rhodes Point to Tylerton, MD Completed 1988 304,000 1,003,857 Rock Hall Harbor, MD Completed 1982 1,072,5002 77,113 Shad Landing State Park, MD Completed 1966 33,53183 14,921 Slaughter Creek, MD Completed 1987 4,140 591,570 St. Georges Creek, MD Completed 1985 147,650 - St. Jeromes Creek, MD Completed 1988 44,3574 443,542 St. Michaels Harbor, MD6 Completed 1964 16,723" 14,403 St. Patricks Creek, MD Completed 1987 15,752 133,403 St. Peters Creek, MD6 Completed 1963 46,74098 31,716 Smith Creek, MD Completed 1936 5,252 16,448 Susquehanna River above and below Havre De Grace, MD Completed 1985 293,570"7 929,019 Susquehanna River at Williamsport, PA9 Completed 1974 57,031"8 41,437 Tilghman Island Harbor, MD Completed 1983 424,80039 386,985 Town Creek, MD Completed 1950 43,220 41,959 Tred Avon River, MD Completed 1988 523,310 845,243 Tuckahoe River, MD Completed 1980 9,727 23,489 Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare, MD Completed 1988 193,175 2,554,411 Tyaskin Creek, MD Completed 1923 16,297' o 54,302 Upper Machodoc Creek, VA Completed 1971 20,281 34,777 Upper Thorofare, MD Completed 1987 62,446 814,657 Warwick River, MD Completed 1984 22,041^' 148,728 4-34 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS TABLE 4-C (Continued) Cost to September 30, 1989 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance 1. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized August 5, 1977. 2. Project deferred for restudy. 3. Includes $8,476 for previous project. 4. Includes $31,065 for previous project. 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 6. Unconstructed portion of the project is inactive. 7. Excludes $3,998 contributed funds. 8. Includes $37,500 for previous project. 9. Includes $50,000 for previous project. 10. Includes $38,041 for previous project. 11. Authorization for the unconstructed portion of the project was withdrawn by the Chief of Engineers January 22, 1979. 12. Includes $30,000 for previous project. 13. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 2, 1979. 14. Includes $79,626 for previous project and excludes $8,414 contributed funds. 15. Includes $24,321 for previous project. 16. Includes $46,121 public works funds. 17. Excludes $1,100 contributed funds. 18. Includes $5,000 for previous project. 19. Abandonment recommended in 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 20. Includes $2,000 expended outside project limits. 21. Excludes $111,581 expended by Navy Department and $54,000 from contributed funds. 22. Excludes $565 contributed funds. 23. Excludes $101,162 Public Health Service funds expended for waterchestnut removal. 24. Excludes $1,000 contributed funds. 25. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 26. Includes $20,640 for previous project. 27. Includes $25,000 for previous project. 28. Includes $19,170 Works Progress Administration funds. 29. Includes $10,617 for previous project. 30. Excludes $389,000 contributed funds. 31. Includes $19,000 for previous project. 32. Excludes $672,880 contributed funds. 33. Excludes $24,125 contributed funds. 34. Includes $26,500 for previous project. 35. Excludes $600 contributed funds. 36. Excludes $6,984 contributed funds. 37. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 6, 1977. Includes $22,905 Works Progress funds and $97,390 for previous project. 38. Excludes $40,000 contributed funds. 39. Excludes $16,409 contributed funds. 40. Includes $10,158 for previous project. 41. Includes $6,000 for previous project. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH TABLE 4-D EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1989 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Oxford, MD' Completed 1978 $ 97,750' - Colonial Beach, VA Active 1986 518,0308 - 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 2. Excludes $80,648 contributed funds. 3. Excludes $414,977 contributed funds. 4-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 4-E Cost to September 30, 1989 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Anacostia River and Tributaries, Flood Protection and Navigation Improvements, DC and MD Completed 1980 $ 6,042,325 $1,417,655 Anacostia River and Tributaries, Prince Georges Co., MD2 Completed 1977 1,000,0008 - Bainbridge, NY'4 Completed 1959 382,000 - Bath, NY6 Completed 1970 638,332 - Bayard, WV' Completed 1965 55,2188 - Black Walnut Point, MD Completed 1985 200,500 - Bridgewater, VA' Completed 1953 136,500 - Bull Run, PA Completed 1984 2,742,000 - Conklin-Kirkwood, NY' Completed 1955 71,000 - Cortland, NY' Completed 1970 324,486 - Elkland, PA Completed 1971 1,297,850 - Endicott Johnson City and Vestal, NY Completed 1979 7,034,5348 - Forest Heights, MD' Completed 1964 430,000' - Fourmile Run, VA Completed 1987 52,480,000 - Greene, NY' Completed 1951 37,000 - Kingston-Edwardsville, PA Completed 1979 4,731,39410� - Kitzmiller, MD' Completed 1965 501,500" - Latta Brook Rd., NY Completed 1984 115,500 - Lock Haven, PA' 2 Active 1980 450,000'1 - Nichols, NY Completed 1974 1,487,800 - Norwich, NY' Completed 1950 94,500 - Painted Post, NY5 Completed 1970 414,181 - Plymouth, PA Completed 1958 1,911,689" - Savage River Dam, MD Completed 1954 2,271,93916 33,999 Scranton, PA'8 Completed 1971 2,006,800 - Sunbury, PA Completed 1953 6,063,000 7 - Swoyersville-Forty Fort, PA Completed 1968 2,728,113 - Tyrone, PA8 Deferred 1980 6,401,016 - Unadilla, NY Completed 1970 1,000,000 9 - Upper Marlboro, MD' Completed 1965 590,013 - Verona Lake, VA20 Deferred 1978 992,000 - Washington, DC and Vicinity Completed 1953 331,9271 - Wilkes-Barre, Hanover Township, PA Completed 1958 3,853,4572" - Williamsport, PA Completed 1979 12,964,893" - Wyoming Valley, PA Completed 1987 25,624,499 - 1. Local interests will not accept operation and maintenance responsibility of the project until the severe erosion and sedimentation of the project caused by tropical storm Eloise is corrected and the project is restored to design condition. 2. Excludes $357,022 contributed funds. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 4. Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects. 5. Excludes $182,672 Public Works Acceleration funds and $4,290 contributed funds. 6. Unit of Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects. 7. Excludes $154,694 contributed funds. 8. Excludes $87,720 contributed funds. 9. Includes $1,162,548 emergency relief funds and excludes $225,877 emergency relief funds expended prior to adoption of project. 10. Excludes $6,616 contributed funds. 11. Authorized for Phase I design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design. 12. Excludes $481,000 for Phase I funded under General Investigations beginning October 1, 1978. 13. Includes $4,357 emergency relief funds. 14. Includes $200,000 expended from contributed funds. 15. Unit of Lackawanna River Basin Projects. 16. Excludes $140,504 contributed funds. 17. The unconstructed portion of the project was reclassified to the deferred category January 8, 1981. 18. Excludes $132,578 contributed funds. 19. Authorized for the design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design. 20. Cost of previous project. Includes $106,500 emergency relief funds. 21. Includes $872,715 emergency relief funds. Excludes $36,375 emergency relief funds expended for new work before adoption of project. 22. Includes $1,887 emergency relief funds and excludes $110,835 contributed funds. 4-36 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS TABLE 4-G For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Almond Village, NY1' 2 Baltimore Harbor & Channels, MD (Ferry Bar & Spring Garden Channel) Broadwater Creek, MD Cadle Creek, MD2 Channel Connecting Plain Dealing Creek and Oak Creek, MD Coan River, VA Copes Corner Lakes, NY 2 Cuckold Creek, MD4 Cunninghill Cove, MD 4 Davenport Center Lake, NY 2 Fall Brook Lake, PA5 Genegantslet Lake, NY 1970 1920 1949 1949 1940 1937 1970 1978 1977 1970 1970 1954 1950 1937 1950 1950 1949 1941 Governors Run, MD Harpers Ferry, WV Hellens Creek, MD Lake Ogleton, MD Mill Creek, MD Moorefield, WV May 26, 1953 1941 Flood Control Act Nov. 17, 1986 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1914 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Jan. 22, 1979 1960 River and Harbor Act Jan. 22, 1979 1960 River and Harbor Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Oct. 3, 1978 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 4-37 $ 24,622* 787,710 212 112 106,7009 5,720 11,200 286,4009 46,100 214,5789 7,928k REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 4-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Saint Georges Creek, MD 1971 Sep. 23, 1986 $ -- 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Sixes Bridge Lake, MD & PAe 1974 Dec. 29, 1981 -- 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act South Plymouth Lake, NY 1953 May 6, 1981 100,036- 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Waterway from Little Choptank River to 1939 Aug. 5, 1977 305- Choptank River, MD 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act West Oneonta Lake, NY2 1970 May 6, 1981 189,1003 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 1. Local cooperation withdrawn, project authorization 5. Unit of Lackawanna River Basin Projects. expired May 26, 1953. 6. Authorized for the design memorandum stage of ad- 2. Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects. vanced engineering and design. 3. Cost for preliminary work only. 4. Project authorization was withdrawn by the Chief of Engineers. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS TABLE 4-H Date Survey Project Completed MARYLAND Back Creek Black Walnut Harbor Chester River Lower Thorofare, Deal Island Madison Bay Muddy Hook and Tyler Coves Neavitt Harbor Northeast River Rhodes Point to Tylerton St. Michaels Harbor St. Peters Creek Smith Creek Town Creek Upper Thorofare Warwick River VIRGINIA Potomac River at Mt. Vernon Occoquan Creek August 1989 Sept ember 1989 July 1989 April 1989 March 1989 September 1989 March 1989 August 1989 September 1989 March 1989 April 1989 May 1989 April 1989 April 1989 September 1989 September 1989 December 1988 4-38 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PROJECTS TABLE 4-I Date Inspected MARYLAND Anacostia River Basin Cumberland Forest Heights Kitzmiller Savage River Dam Upper Marlboro NEW YORK Addison Avoca Bainbridge Bath Binghamton Canisteo Cincinnatus Conklin-Kirkwood Corning-Monkey Run Cortland Elmira Endicott-Johnson City & Vestal Greene Hornell Lisle Nichols Norwich Owego Oxford Painted Post Port Dickinson Sherburne Unadilla Vestal Whitney Point Village PENNSYLVANIA Elkland Sunbury Williamsport VIRGINIA Bridgewater Fourmile Run WEST VIRGINIA Bayard October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 4-39 Project NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT * NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT This district comprises the State of Virginia, except the Potomac, Roanoke, and Ohio River Basins; the entire area on the eastern shore of Virginia except for the project for Pocomoke River, Maryland and Virginia. On the west shore of Chesapeake Bay, all waterways south of Smith Point, VA, at the mouth of the Potomac River except the project for Little Wicomico River, VA. North Carolina, only the Chowan River Basin downstream to and including the mouth of the Meherrin River, and the Dismal Swamp Canal Route of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway to the Albemarle Sound. West Virginia, only the James River Basin. IMPROVEMENTS NAVIGATION PAGE 1. Appomattox River, VA ................. 5-2 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL ................. 5-2 3. Baltimore Harbor and Channels (Norfolk District) .................... 5-2 4. Cape Charles City Harbor, VA ............... 5-2 5. Chincoteague Inlet, VA.................. 5-3 6. Deep Creek, Newport News, VA ........... . 5-4 7. Greenvale Creek, VA ................... 5-4 8. Hampton Creek, VA .................. 5-4 9. Hampton Roads, VA (Collection and Removal of Drift) ........... 5-4 10. Horn Harbor, VA ..................... 5-5 11. James River, VA .................... 5-5 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Little Machipongo River, VA ............... 5-5 Norfolk Harbor and Channels (Deepening), VA ... 5-6 a. Atlantic Ocean Channel, VA ........... 5-6 b. Channel to Newport News, VA .......... 5-6 c. Norfolk Harbor Channels, VA ............ 5-6 d. Thimble Shoal Channel, VA ............ 5-7 Rudee Inlet, VA...................... 5-7 Supervision of the Harbor of Hampton Roads (Prevention of Obstructive and Injurious Deposits) .......... 5-8 Waterway on the Coast of VA ............. 5-8 Whitings Creek, VA .................. 5-8 Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ....................... 5-8 BEACH EROSION CONTROL 19. Tangier Island Shore Protection . . . . 20. Virginia Beach, VA ............ PAGE ........ 5-8 ..... ... 5-9 FLOOD CONTROL 21. Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA ....... 5-9 22. Richmond, VA ...................... 5-9 23. Scottsville, VA ....... .. ... .......... 5-10 24. Virginia Beach Streams, Canal Number 2, VA ................... 5-10 25. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization . . . . . . . . .. . . .... .. 5-10 26. Emergency Flood Control Activities .......... 5-10 GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 27. Surveys .......................... 5-10 28. Collection and Study of Basic Data .......... 5-10 TABLES TABLE 5-A Cost and Financial Statement . . . .. . . . . 5-11 TABLE 5-B Authorizing Legislation ............ 5-16 TABLE 5-C Data Relative to the Completed Locks . . .. 5-20 TABLE 5-D Other Authorized Navigation Projects . . . . 5-21 TABLE 5-E Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ................. 5-22 TABLE 5-F Other Authorized Flood Control Projects . . . 5-22 TABLE 5-G Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys . . . 5-23 5-1 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1989 Navigation 1. APPOMATTOX RIVER, VA Location. This river rises in Appomattox County, VA, flows northeasterly 137 miles, and empties into the James River at Hopewell, VA. The portion under improvement extends from its mouth to Petersburg, VA, adistanceof 11 miles, which is the length of the tidal and navigable reach. (See U.S. Coast Geodetic Survey Chart No. 531.) Previous Projects. For details seepage 469 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. This provides for a channel 80 feet wide and 10 feet deep from the mouth of the river to a point 400 feet above Lieutenant Run; thence 80 feet wide and of such depth, not exceeding 10 feet, as can be obtained without rock excavation to the head of navigation atPetersburg; including a basin at the mouth of Poes Run 200 feet long, 150 feet wide, and 20 feet deep: and a turning basin at the mouth of Lieutenant Run 500 feet long, 140 to 160 feet wide, and 12 feet deep in the upper 300 feet, the removal of rock to a depth of 18 feet in the north half of the lower 200 feet, and removal of soft material to rock in the south half of the lower 200 feet of this basin. All depths are referred to mean low water. The project also provides for a dam at Petersburg and the excavation for a width of from 200 to 300 feet of a diversion channel connecting the river above the dam with the river at a point 2.5 miles below; for about 1.7 miles of levees on the low grounds between the navigable and the diversion channels; for a highway bridge and a railway bridge across the diversion channel; and for other work incidental to the diversion channel. Under ordinary conditions the mean tidal range is 2.9 feet and the extremes 2.4 and 3.3 feet. There are no records available of the heights of stage due to ordinary floods. These are estimated at 6 to 8 feet above mean low water at Petersburg, where the extremes are from 15.6 feet to 17.1 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 212 of Annual Report for 1969. Terminal Facilities. There are about 2,500 feet of wooden bulkhead and a shore landing in Petersburg Harbor. These facilities are in an abandoned, dilapidated condition and have not been used by commercial traffic on the river since 1950. There are two large recreational facilities now in operation on the Appomattox River. One is located about 2 miles downstream from Petersburg, VA and the other is at Hopewell, VA near the confluence of the Appomattox and the James. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration amounted to $211,957. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (NORFOLK DISTRICT) Location. Two inland water routes approximately paralleling Atlantic coast south of Norfolk, VA between a point in Southern Branch of Elizabeth River, Va 2,500 feet upstream of Norfolk & Western Railway bridge and Virginia-North Carolina state line in North Landing River, a distance of 27.2 miles; and 64.6 miles between mouth of Deep Creek, VA and mouth of Pasquotank River, NC. These routes are shown on National Ocean Service Chart 12206. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 90 to 250 feet wide following Southern Branch of Elizabeth River, 5.2 miles, Virginia Land Cut, 8.3 miles, and North Landing River, 13.7 miles; and construction of tidal guard lock at Great Bridge, VA. It also provides channels 10 feet deep at mean low water and 90 to 100 feet wide in Deep Creek, 3.1 miles, Turners Cut, 4.3 miles and Pasquotank River, 35.1 miles; maintaining Dismal Swamp Canal, 22.1 miles, to about 9 feet deep mean canal level over a width of 50 feet; protection of banks in Turners Cut with sheet piling, and cutting certain sharp points in Pasquotank River to shorten its course. (See Table 5-C at end of chapter on Data Relative to Completed Locks included in Project.) Project includes operating and care of completed locks, dams and bridges, under maintenance. Southern Branch of Elizabeth River and Deep Creek sections of the two routes are tidal, mean range being about 3 feet with extremes of minus 3.5 and plus 9.6 feet Remaining sections are nontidal with fluctuations of 1 to 2 feet in level due to winds. Cost for new work for completed project was $3,396,276. Protection of canal property at Great Bridge portion is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $265,000. For details of previous projects, see page 476 of Annual Report for FY 1938. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. See Annual Report for FY 1970. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work on the 5-year operation and maintenance contract, awarded Feb 88 is progressing satisfactorily. A contract to maintain approximately 250 lineal feet of bulkheading and 1,000 feet of riprap at Deep Creek on the Dismal Swamp Canal was awarded at the end of fiscal year 1988 and was completed at the end of fiscal year 1989. Ordinary operation and maintenance of the project was accomplished to include care of locks and dams, condition and operation studies, outgranting, engineering and design, supervision and administration. 3. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (NORFOLK DISTRICT) Existing project. Provides for deep water approach channels in Baltimore Harbor. Northern portion including Baltimore Harbor is under jurisdiction of Baltimore District. Portion under jurisdiction of Norfolk District is more fully described below. 3A. CAPE HENRY CHANNEL, VA Location. At mouth of Chesapeake Bay opposite Cape Henry. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12222.) Existing project. A channel about 2.3 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet deep at mean low water through shoal at mouth 5-2 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT of Chesapeake Bay opposite Cape Henry. Under ordinary conditions mean range of tide 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation due to combined effect of wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 3B. RAPPAHANNOCK SHOAL CHANNEL, VA Location. In lower Chesapeake Bay opposite mouth of RappahannockRiver and about 50 miles northerly from Atlantic Ocean at entrance of Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12225.) Existing project. A channel about 9.9 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet deep at mean low water between contours of that depth in Chesapeake Bay, opposite Rappahannock River. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation due to combined effect of wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 3C. YORK SPIT CHANNEL, VA Location. In lower Chesapeake Bay opposite mouth of York River and about 20 miles northerly from Atlantic Ocean at entrance of Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12221.) Existing project. A channel about 18.2 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 50 feet deep at mean low water between contours of that depth in Chesapeake Bay opposite York Spit. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation, due to combined effect of wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. For details of previous projects see Annual Report for 1932. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Terminal facilities. These three channels form the access between lower and upper Chesapeake Bay. Operations during fiscal year. A dredging contract on York Spit Channel began May 14, 1988 and was completed March 18, 1989. A total 4,657,882 cubic yards of material were removed of which all were new work. A dredging contract on Cape Henry Channel began April 5, 1989 and was completed November 5, 1989. A total 2,977,772 cubic yards of credited material were removed of which 2,911,735 were new work and 66,037 were maintenance. Other operations performed included condition studies, engineering and design and supervision and inspections. 4. CAPE CHARLES CITY HARBOR, VA Location. Town of Cape Charles, VA is on Chesapeake Bay on west side of peninsula separating the bay from Atlantic Ocean. It is about 11 miles north of the southern extremity of the peninsula and 45 miles south of Maryland-Virginia State line. Cape Charles City Harbor is an artificial land-locked harbor on the south side of the town. (See National Ocean Service Chart 12222.) Existing project. A channel 18 feet deep and 500 feet wide from that depth in Chesapeake Bay through Cherrystone Bar and inlet to the entrance to Cape Charles City Harbor, a distance of 2.71 miles; a basin in the harbor of the same depth 400 to 800 feet wide and 3,000 feet long; a channel 10 feet deep, 100 to 180 feet wide and 260 feet long connecting a basin of same depth 180 feet wide and 420 feet long at head of Mud Creek, and a harbor of refuge on the north side of Mud Creek, 7 feet deep, 200 to 250 feet wide, and 375 feet long connected to Mud Creek with an entrance channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide. Project also provides for protective works in form of a stone jetty on north side of harbor entrance and sand mole 1,350 feet long south of harbor entrance. All depths are referred to mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.3 feet with extremes of 2.5 feet below and 8 feet above mean low water. Cost for new work for completed project was $628,644, including $6,000 from contributed funds. Widening the basin an additional 200 feet is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $207,000. Local cooperation. Items of local cooperation in connection with Harbor of refuge have been complied with. Terminal facilities. The Pennsylvania Railroad owns a wooden pier 200 feet long and two transfer ships in the outer harbor. On the south side of the harbor, Bay Shore Concrete owns an 800-foot bulkhead. A bulkhead providing 200 feet of berthing space is on the south side of the main harbor and is owned by a fish plant. There are about 1400 feet of city-owned bulkhead open to the public. The Coast Guard owns a 100-foot pier on Mud Creek. The harbor of refuge should accommodate about 50 boats when berthing facilities are completed. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A modification was completed to the dredging contract on the entrance channel, turning basin, and Mud Creek. Other operations performed included condition studies, engineering and design and supervision and inspections. 5. CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA Location. Chincoteague Inlet at the southern end of Assateague Island provides access to the Atlantic Ocean from the inland waterway near the town of Chincoteague, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart 12211.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar in the Atlantic Ocean and to the mouth of the inlet, a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet through the canal and then along Chincoteague Channel to a point approximately 2,000 feet north of the state highway bridge to Chincoteague, a distance of about 6.6 miles. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. All depths are referred to mean low water. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. For details see Annual Report for 1974. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities at Chincoteague are considered adequate for current and prospective traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A dredging contract of the entrance channel began on November 26, 1989 and was completed December 14, 1989. A total 121,184 cubic yards of credited material were removed under this contract. Other operations performed included condition studies, engineering and design and supervision and inspections. 5-3 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1989 6. DEEP CREEK, NEWPORT NEWS, VA Location. Deep Creek is a tidal estuary of the James River, lying wholly in the city of Newport News, Va. It is about 3 miles in length, flows in a southeasterly direction, and empties into the James River on its northerly side about 10.5 miles upstream from the mouth of the James River. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 12222.) Previous projects. For details, see page 360 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. This provides for an approach channel 8 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide extending from the 8-foot depth contour in James River to a point where the natural creek entrance to Deep Creek is constricted, a distance of 9,040 feet: thence 8-feet deep and 60 feet wide through the constricted entrance, a distance of 700 feet: the enlargement of the harbor in Deep Creek opposite Menchville, extending upstream to a point near Parkers Landing and to the foot of Maxwells Lane, form 6.4 acres to about 20 acres with depth of 8 feet, 400 to 740 feet wide and 1,940 feet long, and a harbor 300 feet wide by 600 feet long to a depth of 6 feet upstream of the existing harbor. Under ordinary conditions the mean tidal range is 3 feet. The extremes of irregular fluctuations referred to mean low water due to the combined effect of wind and tides are minus 2 feet and plus 9.8 feet. Local cooperation. (a) Fully complied with for initial construction under Section 122 of the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. The Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, is authorized and directed to review the requirement of local cooperation with respect to providing a spoil disposal area for the project at Deep Creek, Warwick County (now within the city of Newport News), Virginia authorized by the Act of August 26, 1937 (commonly referred to as the River and Harbor Act of 1937, 50 Stat. 846), to determine if (1) such requirement should be eliminated, and (2) Craney Island disposal area should be used as the spoil disposal area for dredged material from such project. (b) Beginning on the date of enactment of this section. (1) the requirement of local cooperation described in subsection (a) shall be suspended, and (2) Craney Island disposal area shall be used as the spoil disposal area for dredged material from such project until Congress, by a statute enacted after the date on which the report required by subsection (a) is submitted, removes such suspension. Terminal facilities. There are four privately owned piers and one public county pier and bulkhead of wooden construction at Menchville. One pier is used for pleasure craft only. The remainder are commercial. There is also a shore landing for the receipt of sand and gravel, several privately owned wooden piers and two marinas are on the south side of the harbor. The wharves have no rail connections, but are served by State highways. The existing facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration costs amounted to $26,297. 7. GREENVALE CREEK, VA Location. A tidal estuary that enters the north side of Rappahannock River about 20 miles above its mouth. It is wholly in Lancaster County, Virginia about 60 miles north of Norfolk, Virginia. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12237.) Existing project. A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from that depth in Rappahannock River about 950 feet to the mouth of Greenvale Creek, then 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the mouth into the creek for about 2,400 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see Annual Report for 1965. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. For details see page 215 of Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration costs amounted to $79,932. 8. HAMPTON CREEK, VA Location. A tidal estuary of Hampton Roads within the city of Hampton, Va. It is about 3 miles long, flows southerly and empties into Hampton Roads about 1.5 miles west of Fort Monroe. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey charts 400 and 1222.) Previous projects. For details, see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel 12 feet deep from vicinity of Old Point Comfort across Hampton Flats and up the creek to Hampton Highway Bridge at Queen Street about 2.8 miles, with a width of 200 feet in outer portion of channel and 150 feet in the creek, suitably widened at the bends; a channel in Herberts Creek 180 feet wide and 12 feet deep, extending from the channel in Hampton Creek upstream to Kecoughtan Road about 0.6 mile. Under ordinary conditions, the mean tidal range is 2.6 feet. Local cooperation. The conditions imposed by the River and Harbor Acts of August 30, 1935, and March 2, 1945, pertaining to the initial construction, have been fully complied with. The River and Harbor Act of October 27, 1965 deleted requirement for providing spoil disposal areas for maintenance. Local interests have contributed toward disposal costs for material deposited in Craney Island Disposal Area. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities are adequate for existing commerce. (For details see page 319 of Annual Report for 1967.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration costs amounted to $93,122. 9. HAMPTON ROADS, VIRGINIA COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Hampton Roads is a natural harbor 300 miles south of New York and 180 miles south of Washington, D.C. Its principal tributaries are James River, affording a natural deep harbor at Newport News, VA; Elizabeth River, with its Southern, Eastern, and Western Branches providing harbors for Norfolk and Portsmouth, VA; and Hampton Creek, serving the harbor at 5-4 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT Hampton, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12248, 12245 and 12253.) Existing project. Collection and removal of drift in Hampton Roads and its tributary waters authorizes the Secretary of the Army to allot necessary amounts of work from appropriations for maintenance and improvement of existing river and harbor works or from other available appropriations and that this work shall be carried on as a separate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. The purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. No advance estimate of the amount of work is required. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Norfolk Harbor, VA and Channel to Newport News, VA. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of the project resulted in collection and disposal of 85,400 cubic feet of a variety of floating refuse. Operations were performed using government plant and hired labor. 10. HORN HARBOR, VA Location. A tidal estuary 4 miles long in Mathews County, VA, entering Chesapeake Bay on its western shore 43 miles northerly of Norfolk, VA. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 494.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide across entrance bar. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is about 2 feet with winds causing additional variations of 2 to 3 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 3 wharves, 5 piers, and a marine railway within the harbor. Wharves are open to the public. Existing facilities are considered adequate. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration costs amounted to $58,169. 11. JAMES RIVER, VA Location. The river is formed by junction of the Cowpasture and Jackson Rivers in Botetourt County, VA, flows easterly 340 miles and empties into Hampton Roads at Newport News, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12248 and 12251.) Existing project. A channel 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide form the mouth to Richmond Deepwater Terminal, and a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the Deepwater terminal to Richmond Lock; amooring basin 35 feet deep, 180 to 220 feet wide and 2,100 feet long alongside the channel opposite waterfront at Hopewell; enlargement of the turning basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal to 825 feet wide, 2,770 feet long and 35 feet deep; a turning basin in Richmond Harbor 200 feet wide, 600 feet long and 18 feet deep; and construction of spur and training dikes. Depth of channels are referred to mean low water. Total length of channel included in the project is 87 miles, which is the navigable section. Mean tidal ranges under ordinary conditions for different parts of the river are: mouth, 2.6 feet; Jamestown, 2 feet; City Point, 2.6 feet; and Richmond, 3.2 feet. Spring tide ranges under ordinary conditions at the same localities are mouth, 3.1 feet; Jamestown, 2.4 feet; City Point, 3 feet; Richmond, 3.2 feet. Ordinary fluctuations of stage at Richmond, due to floods are 6 to 12 feet above mean low water. Extreme fluctuations are 16 to 32 feet. Flood heights below Richmond diminish rapidly. The extreme according to available information is about 11 feet lower at Dutch gap, 14 miles below and 17 to 18 feet lower, 20 miles below. The estimated (1971) total cost for new work is $71,145,940 including required non-Federal cost for conditions of local cooperation imposed by the River and Harbor Act of 1930, 1945, and 1950, estimated (1939) to be $1,949,700; and by the River and Harbor Act of 1962, estimated (1971) to be $2,950,000. For previous projects, see Annual Report for 1938. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for conditions imposed by River and Harbor Act of 1962. Terminal facilities. River commerce at Richmond is handled by city-owned terminals, city wharf, Richmond dock, and 16 privately-owned wharves within or in the immediate vicinity of Richmond Harbor. The city's Upper Terminal, located on the north bank within the manufacturing section of Richmond, provides for 750 feet of concrete wharf and 80,000 square feet of warehouse and transit shed. The other terminal is located approximately 4 miles downstream from the Upper Terminal which provides about 1,250 feet of wharf and 2 concrete warehouses with about 190,000 square feet of floor space. This deepwater terminal at the head of the 25-foot deep improved channel serves oceangoing vessels and larger ships engaged in coastwide trading. Below the deepwater terminals the improvement is served by 42 wharves. Richmond terminals and wharves together with wharves between Richmond and the river's mouth are adequate for river's commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A dredging contract on the shoals above Hopewell began on September 27, 1988 and was completed November 21, 1988. A total 191,274 cubic yards of credited material were removed under this contract. Other operations performed included condition studies, engineering and design and supervision and inspections. 12. LITTLE MACHIPONGO RIVER, VA Location. This river, locally known as Parting Creek, has its source in the marsh of Bell Neck, Northampton County Va., flows in a southerly and easterly direction about 5 miles, and empties into Great Machipongo River, about 12 miles by water from Great Machipongo Inlet, and about 28 miles by water from Cape Charles, VA. The Great Machipongo Inlet and the Great Machipongo River are the waterways connecting with the Atlantic Ocean, and have a controlling depth of 16 feet. Willis Wharf, a town with a population of about 500, is located on the west bank about 1 mile above its junction with the Great Machipongo River. The high-water width varies from about 450 feet at the mouth to 350 feet at Willis Wharf. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 1221.) Existing project. This project provides for a channel 8 feet deep at mean low water and 80 feet wide from the town of Willis Wharf to deep water in the river below. The mean range of tide is about 0.7 foot below mean low water to about 2 feet above mean high water. Localcooperation. None required for existing project. However, for the turning basin, Northampton County, Virginia, must agree to the following items of local cooperation: 5-5 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1989 (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and maintenance. (b) Hold and save the United States free from damages that may result from construction, operation, and maintenance except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. (c) Assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $2,000,000. (d) Accomplish without cost to the United States such alterations and relocations that the Chief of Engineers may deem necessary with respect to sewer, water supply, drainage, electrical, and other utility facilities. (e) The county in acquiring lands, easements, rights-of-way, and disposal areas for project construction, operation, and maintenance will comply with the provisions of the "Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970," Public Law 91-646 approved January 2, 1971. (f) The county will comply with Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88-352), which states that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination in connection with this project on the grounds of race, color, or national origin. Terminal facilities. At the town of Willis Wharf, there are three wharves with a total wharfage space of about 300 feet, five bulkheads with a total wharfage space of about 1,140 feet, and two marine railways which will accommodate vessels up to 50 feet in length. All facilities are privately owned, being used for packing seafoods and servicing fishing vessels. The wharves have no railroad connections, but are served by local roads connecting with the country and State highway system. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work dredging a turning basin was accomplished at a total cost of$121,819 during the fiscal year. 13. NORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS (DEEPENING), VA The four projects, Atlantic Ocean Channel, VA; Channel to Newport News, VA; Norfolk Harbor, VA; and Thimble Shoal Channel, VA, are grouped under the above heading for construction purposes only. Estimated Federal cost (1988) for new work for all three projects is $97,800,000, exclusive of amounts expended for previous projects. Details of each project are given below. 13A.ATLANTIC OCEAN CHANNEL, VA Location. The Atlantic Ocean Channel is located offshore of Virginia Beach, VA in the Atlantic Ocean. It extends southeastward from a point approximately 3.5 nautical miles offshore of Cape Henry to approximately 10 nautical miles offshore of Rudee Inlet, Virginia Beach, VA. Previous project. None. Existing project. A channel 57 feet deep at mean low water, 1,000 feet wide and approximately 10 miles long between 57-foot contours in the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay and the Atlantic Ocean. Local cooperation: See "Norfolk Harbor" writeup. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Preparation of the General Design Memorandum for construction was completed. 13B. CHANNEL TO NEWPORT NEWS, VA Location. West of north entrance to Norfolk Harbor Channel, connects deep water in James River with Hampton Roads. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 400.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Dredging a channel 55 feet deep at mean low water and 800 feet wide from Norfolk Harbor Channel in Hampton Roads to Newport News, a distance of about 4.5 miles, and two deep-draft anchorage berths opposite Newport News 45 feet deep over a 1,200-foot swinging radius. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.7 feet and extremes 2.1 and 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuations due to combined wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. Local cooperation. See "Norfolk Harbor" Writeup. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 11, (Revised 1971, Part II) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A dredging contract to deepen the entire channel to 50 feet was completed December 2, 1988 with 1,028,286 cubic yards of credited material being removed. Other operations performed included quantity surveys and supervision and inspection. 13C. NORFOLK HARBOR CHANNELS, VA Location. Norfolk, VA is 187 miles south of Baltimore, MDI) and 30 miles from entrance to Chesapeake Bay at Cape Charles and Cape Henry. Harbor extends 18.3 miles from 40-foot contour in Hampton Roads to a point 2,500 feet above Norfolk and Western Railway bridge over a Southern Branch of Elizabeth River. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 400 and 452.) Previous Projects. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. HAMPTON ROADS AND ELIZABETH RIVER: A channel 55 feet deep and 1,500 feet wide from that depth in Hampton Roads to a point approximately 6.3 miles upstream from the Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel; thence 55 feet deep and 800 feet wide to Lamberts Point; thence 45 feet deep and 750 feet wide to the junctSioOnU oTfH SEouRtNhe rBnR BArNanCcHh :a nd Eastern Branch. A channel 45 feet deep and 450 feet wide from the junction with the Eastern Branch to the Norfolk and Portsmouth Belt Line Railway Bridge; thence 45 feet deep and 375 feet wide to the Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge; thence 40 feet deep and 250 feet to 500 feet wide to the U.S. Routes 460 and 13 highway bridge; thence 35 feet deep and 250 to 300 feet wide to a point 0.8 mile above Interstate 64 high level bridge. Project includes an approach and turning basin 45 feet deep opposite the Norfolk Naval Shipyard; a turning basin at the mouth of St. Julians Creek 40 feet deep, 400 to 600 feet long, and 800 feet wide; a turning basin at the mouth of Milldam Creek 40 feet deep and 800 5-6 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT feet square and a turning basin at the mouth of Mains Creek, the upstream end of the project, 35 feet deep and 800 feet square. EASTERN BRANCH: A channel 25 feet deep and 500 feet wide from the junction of the branches to Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge, from the Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide to the Campostella Bridge, channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide to the Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge (formerly Virginian), including a turning basin 25 feet deep and approximately 5.5 acres in size located at the upstream end of the project. WESTERN BRANCH: A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide to a point 0.78 mile from the 40-foot channel, thence 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide for a distance of 0.38 mile; thence 18 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 0.57 mile to a point 0.34 mile above the West Norfolk Bridge. SCOTTS CREEK: A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from the 40-foot channel for a distance of 0.73 mile. ANCHORAGES: Three fixed mooring anchorage facilities with a depth of 55 feet, each capable of accommodating two large vessels simultaneously; two anchorages opposite Sewells Point, 45 feet deep over a swing radius of 2,300 feet; anchorage area on the west side of the 55-foot channel opposite Lamberts Point aggregating 173 acres consisting of open space 1,500 feet square and 38 feet deep, one space 1,500 feet square and 35 feet deep, and one space 3,000 feet long, 1,000 feet wide and 20 feet deep; and a 45-acre anchorage, 12 feet deep, near Pinners Point. DISPOSAL AREA: a disposal area of about 2,500 acres adjacent to and north of Craney Island, enclosed by stonefaced levee of sand; rehandling basin, approach and exit channels connecting rehandling basin and Norfolk Harbor 55-foot channel and hopper dredge unloading facility. Local cooperation. The local sponsor (Commonwealth of VA) shall: (1) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for implementation and later maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers; including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the public interest for initial and later disposal of dredged material; (2) Accomplish without cost to the United States, all alterations and relocations of buildings, transportation facilities, tunnels, storm drains, utilities, and other structures and improvements including pier modifications made necessary by plan implementation, except for altering or replacement costs for obstructive railroad and public highway bridges, such costs to be apportioned in accordance with the principles of Section 6 of the Bridge Alteration Act of June 21, 1940, as amended; (3) Provide and maintain without cost to the United States depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals; (4) Hold and save the United States free from damage due to implementation, operation, and maintenance of the project except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (5) Prohibit the erection of any structures within a distance to be determined by the Chief of Engineers from the bottom edge of the proposed 55-foot, 45-foot, and 40-foot channels and turning basin; and (6) Provide without cost to the United States, all retaining dikes, wasteweirs, bulkheads, and embankments, or the costs of such retaining works required for the project including all monitoring features and stilling basins. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 11, (revised 1971, Part II) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Operations during fiscal year. MAINTENANCE: Operation and maintenance of the Craney Island portion of the project consisted of operation and maintenance of roads, service facilities, rental equipment and government plant, engineering and design and supervision and inspection. 13D. THIMBLE SHOAL CHANNEL, VA Location. In lower portion of Chesapeake Bay between Hampton Roads and the ocean, 20 miles northeast of center of Norfolk Harbor, extending southeasterly 13.4 miles from a point 1-1/4 miles east of Thimble Shoal Lighthouse toward entrance to Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 1222.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1966. Existing projects. Provides for dredging a channel 55 feet deep at mean low water, 1,000 feet wide and approximately 13.4 miles long between 55-foot contours in lower Chesapeake Bay. Local cooperation. See "Norfolk Harbor" writeup. Terminal facilities. Project serves as an entrance channel to Hampton Roads. See "Norfolk Harbor," "Newport News Channel, VA," etc. Operations during fiscal year. New Work and Maintenance: Preconstruction engineering and design is complete for deepening the channel from 45 to 55 feet. Maintenance dredging was performed July 20 through August 19, 1989 with 102,945 cubic yards of credited material removed. Other operations performed included condition surveys, budgeting and scheduling and engineering and design. 14. RUDEE INLET, VA Location. Rudee Inlet is located on the Atlantic Ocean at Virginia Beach in an area where boating is a major activity. It provides a gateway to a variety of oceanic pursuits varying from pleasure cruising to commercial deep sea fishing. Existing project. An entrance channel 10-ft deep, 110 to 72-ft wide and 1605-ft long; an inner channel 7-ft deep, 72 to 53-ft wide and 2,495-ft long including a safety area 7-ft deep, and approximately 1.9 acres in size and a turning basin 7-ft deep, 175-ft wide and 1,570-ft long; a sand trap 18-ft deep and approximately 3.3 acres in size; and a weir and jetty system at the mouth of the inlet. Local cooperation. The Local Sponsor is the City of Virginia Beach.An addendum to the Local Cooperation Agreement with the City of Virginia Beach was signed October 2, 1989. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Plans and specifications are complete. Dredging was pending local cooperation at the end of the fiscal year. 5-7 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1989 15. SUPERVISOR OF NORFOLK HARBOR (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIVE AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS) The District Engineer, Norfolk District, was designated Supervisor of the harbor of Hampton Roads under the provisions of the River and Harbor Act of June 29, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 441-451) as amended July 12, 1952. Under this Act, the Supervisor of the harbor of Hampton Roads is charged with the mission of preventing the deposit of obstructive and injurious materials in the tidal waters of the harbors of Norfolk, Portsmouth, Newport News, Hampton Roads, and their adjacent and tributary waters, so much of the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries as lies within the State of Virginia, and so much of the Atlantic Ocean and its tributaries as lies within the jurisdiction of the United States within or to the east of the State of Virginia. The River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403,407,409) as amended prohibits obstructions to navigable waters such as unauthorized structures, unauthorized fill, deposit of refuse, and sinking of vessels. Other laws relating to the supervision of Norfolk Harbor and its tributary waters are the Clean Water Act, the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1969, the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 1920, the National Historic Prevention Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Deepwater Port Act of 1972, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act. Direct supervision of the waters under the jurisdiction of the Norfolk District was accomplished by means of two patrol vessels performing inspections, removing debris and investigating navigational hazards and sunken or abandoned vessels. A derrickboat and crane barge performed removal of sunken vessels and navigational hazards and supported Federal dredging projects. In addition, surveillance of the harbor was performed regarding the Corps' regulatory program, using also two small outboard craft, motor vehicles from land and occasional chartered aerial reconnaissance. This regulatory surveillance involved compliance surveys of permitted activities and evaluation of navigational impacts of proposed piers and other structures. 16. WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA Location. Between barrier beach along Atlantic Ocean on the east and Virginia portion of mainland peninsula on the west. It extends for 83.7 miles from south end of Chincoteague Bay through a number of creeks, thoroughfares and bays to enter Chesapeake Bay in the vicinity of Fisherman Island, just south of Cape Charles on the southern tip of the peninsula. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12211, 12210, and 12221.) Existing projects. An inland waterway 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to Chincoteague Bay, VA. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. Greater fluctuations in water level are caused by high winds and storms. A modification of the project approved during 1970 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 authorized relocation of portions of the waterway and widening of 100 feet. (See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. For details see Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging was accomplished March 26 through May 19, 1989. A total of 282,529 cubic yards of credited material were removed. Other work performed included a long term disposal analysis, before and after dredging surveys, condition studies, engineering and design and supervision and inspection. 17. WHITINGS CREEK, VA Location. Whitings Creek lies entirely within Middlesex County, VA, and is a small tidal estuary 1.5 miles long flowing in a westerly direction and entering the right bank of the Rappahannock River about 13 miles upstream of its mouth at Chesapeake Bay. The creek is 73 miles northerly of Norfolk, VA. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 534.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 4 feet deep, 70 feet wide and 3,100 feet long from the 4-foot contour in the Rappahannock River across the offshore bar into the creek. The plane of reference is mean low water. The tidal ranges are: mean, 1.5 feet; irregular, 2 feet; and extreme approximately 7.8 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 353 of Annual Report for 1962. Terminal facilities. There is a public wharf and parking facility on the project. In addition there are a number of privatelyowned wharves and landings on the creek. These facilities are considered adequate. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance engineering and design and supervision and administration costs amounted to $58,169. 18. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION The District continued work on four studies: Eastern Branch of the Elizabeth River, VA; Scotts Creek, VA, Tylers Beach, VA; and Bennett Creek, VA. Total expenditures amounted to $62,088. 19. TANGIER ISLAND SHORE PROTECTION Location. Tangier Island is a marshy island about 5 miles long and 1-1/2 miles wide, approximately 65 miles north of Norfolk, VA and 15 miles southwest of Crisfield, MD. Located in Accomack County, VA, it is the southernmost of a series of islands separating the Chesapeake Bay from Tangier and Pocomoke Sounds. Existing project. The project will consist of a 5,700-foot long stone riprap seawall along the western side of the populated portion of the island. The crest elevation of the seawall will be 6 feet above low water. The seawall will extend from the Tangier Channel on the north to a point south to the airport runway. 5-8 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT Local cooperation. The local sponsor is the state of Virginia acting through the Virginia Port Authority. Requirements are described in full on page 5-8 of Annual Report for FY 88. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction was initiated in February 1989 and was in progress at the end of the fiscal year. BEACH EROSION CONTROL 20. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA Location. On the Atlantic Seaboard, 22 miles north of Virginia- North Carolina State line, 3.5 miles south of Cape Henry, and 19 miles east of Norfolk, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart 12207.) Existing project. Federal participation in restoration and protection of shore of Virginia Beach between Rudee Inlet and 49th Street by artificial placement of sand to provide a minimum beach width of 100 feet at elevation 7 feet above mean low water, and maintenance of such beach by periodic replenishment of losses to ensure continuous protection; including construction of a groin system to be undertaken at such times as estimated annual charges therewith would be less than the annual cost of beach replenishment alone. The United States shall participate in the first cost of the project to the full extent of its proportionate share of cost as a landowner, plus one third total first cost of restoring and protecting all publicly-owned sections of the shore. The 1962 modification provided that the United States shall further participate in periodic beach nourishment of the beach in the amount of one third the cost for 25 years from date of commencement of operations in placing an initial quantity of nourishment material equal to deficiency in the design beach at that time. Section 103 of the 1962 River and Harbor Act increased Federal participation to one-half of the cost incurred after October 23, 1962. Estimated Federal cost (1987) is $5,000,000. Estimated cost to local interests is $5,000,000. Construction of the groin system is not included in the above estimate. The 1962 estimate for this work was $549,000 Federal cost and $531,000 cost to local interests. The 1974 modification which provides for structural and nonstructural improvements was authorized for construction by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Structural measures will be provided for the 6 mile reach of shoreline between Rudee Inlet and 89th Street This will include maintaining the beach at an elevation of 5.4 feet and a width of 100 feet and construction of a stepped-face concrete seawall just seaward of the existing bulkhead from Rudee Inlet to 58th Street, and raising and strengthening sand dunes from 58th Street to 89th Streets. The estimated cost (1989) of the structural improvements are Federal $35,900,000 and non-Federal $19,400,000. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 5-11 of Annual Report for FY 81 and for 1962 modification and on page 5-11 of FY 87 Annual Report for 1974 modification. The city of Virginia Beach has complied with the 1962 requirements. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project, as authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1962, expired Feb 87. Federal participation has been extended from 25 years to 35 years, on March 10, 1988 by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works. The 1974 modification project is in the preconstruction engineering and design phase. FLOOD CONTROL 21. GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA Location. Gathright Dam is on the Jackson River, a tributary of James River at mile 43.4 in Alleghany County. Gathright Dam site is in the reach of the Jackson River known as the Gorge, about 19 miles upstream from Covington, VA At the elevation of the top of the conservation pool, the lake extends upstream about 9 miles. (See Falling Spring and Mountain Grove, Virginia-West Virginia quadrangles of geological survey.) Existing project. GathrightDam consists ofa 1,172-footlong, rolled-rock-fill dam with an impervious core, with the top at elevation 1,684.5; outlet works consisting of a concrete intake structure located in the right bank 500 feet upstream from the axis of the dam; a 1,075-foot long outlet tunnel through the right abutment and a stilling basin; and a 2,450-foot long fixed-crest emergency spillway excavated in a low saddle in the divide at Fortney Branch about 2.5 miles south of the dam. Discharges through the maximum conservation pool elevation 1,582 will be provided for water quality control. The reservoir area at elevation 1,582 will be 2, 530 acres. A total of 302,000 acre-feet of storage between elevation 1,582 and the spillway crest (elevation 1,663.5) will be reserved for flood control. At the spillway crest the reservoir will have an area of 4,540 acres.(See Table 5-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Care of service and recreationalfacilities, watercontrol management, testing and monitoring, supervision and administration and engineering and design. 22. RICHMOND, VA Location. The city of Richmond, the capital of Virginia, is located in the Piedmont Plateau and is bordered on the north by Henrico County and on the south by Chesterfield County. The James River flows directly through Richmond separating its business district into two areas, the Shockoe Creek area on the north bank and the industrial-commercial complex on the south bank. Previous project. None. Existing project. The project will provide a system of floodwalls and levees on both sides of the river in the downtown area which would protect against a flood higher than that which occurred in June 1972 which is the maximum flood of recent record. The project to be constructed is that generally described in House Document 98-178, 98th Congress, 2nd Session with modifications recommended by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on February 21, 1984. The present construction cost of the project is now estimated at $99,700,000. 5-9 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1989 Local Cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement was signed with the city of Richmond on June 16, 1986. For details see Annual Report for 1986. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design continued. Construction was initiated December 1988 and is continuing. Completion is scheduled for Sep 1993. 23. SCOTTSVILLE, VA Location. The town of Scottsville, VA is located in Albemarle and Fluvanna Counties, on the north bank of the James River, 185 miles above its mouth. Previous project. None. Existing project. A combination of earth levee, floodwall and pump station in the downtown area. The town encompasses 130 acres and the 1980 population was 250. It includes small commercial establishments and dwellings including many of historical value. A relatively large tire manufacturing plant is located adjacent to the town in Albemarle County and is the largest employer in the area with about 270 employees. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 5-11 of FY 85 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction, initiated in FY 85, was completed November 21, 1988 and turned over to the town of Scottsville in December 1988 (by letter). 24. VIRGINIA BEACH STREAMS CANAL NUMBER 2, VA Location. The canal number 2 watershed with a drainage area of about 37 square miles lies within the city of Virginia Beach. The city consists of 255 square miles of primarily low, flat terrain with about 75 percent of the area below elevation 15 feet, mean sea level. The existing canal, from the Eastern Branch of the Lynnhaven River to the North Landing River is about 12 miles long and follows a north-south alignment. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12205.) Existing project. The project will provide for channelization of an existing canal for a length of 1.1 miles. The canal bottom width will range from 45 feet to 80 feet and a depth from -4 feet mean sea level to -8 feet mean sea level with a flow capacity great enough to carry a 100-year flood. Its construction will require dredging 741,000 cubic yards of material. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 5-14 of FY 81 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction initiated in FY 88 is continuing. 25. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION The District completed work on two studies: James River Eagle Rock, VA, and James River Buchanan, VA. The District continued work on one study: Scottsville, VA. Total expenditures amounted to $270,946. 26. EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES During FY 89, $174,385 was spent on the National Emergency Preparedness Program. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 27. SURVEYS Total cost of surveys during the fiscal year amounted to $566,428. Work performed consisted of: Navigation Studies, $55,690; Miscellaneous Activities, $40,586; Coordination Studies With Other Agencies, $196,000; Supplemental Preauthorization Studies, $274,152. 28. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the fiscal year, cost of collection and study of Basic Data was $154,051 consisting of $47,370 for Management Service Unit, $50,036 for Technical Services, and $56,645 on a Hurricane Evacuation Study. 5-10 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Sect. Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 To 30 Sep 1989 In Text 1. Appomattox River, VA (Regular Funds) New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost - 870,341 - 870,341 26,053 26,053 212,025 1,101,218 211,957 1,101,150 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, beween Norfolk, VA and St. John's River, FL (Norfolk District) (Regular Funds) 3. Baltimore Harbor and Channels (Norfolk District) (Regular Funds) 4. Cape Charles City Harbor, VA (Regular Funds) 5. Chincoteague Inlet, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Deep Creek, Newport News, VA (Regular Funds) 7. Greenvale Creek, VA (Regular Funds) New Work Approp - Cost - Maint Approp 1,964,374 Cost 1,931,265 Major Rehab Approp- Cost - Recreation Approp - Cost - New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 968,902 967,792 113,223 113,222 - 3,688,3721 - 3,688,372 2,699,229 2,723,252 2,484,827 2,255,274 52,608,6652 1,754,396 3,046,911 52,607,846 - 479,947 - 479,947 - 59,871 - 59,871 - 8,015,0733 - 8,015,073 127,604 127,518 558,504 555,057 495,612 1,259,327 184,301 1,570,639 319,453 10,651,949 323,236 10,651,089 - 622,6444 - 622,644 34,670 2,396,540 34,670 2,396,540 227,000 227,000 65,107 1,041,410 65,508 1,041,409 408,732 397,984 713,341 7,607,997 723,695 7,607,602 3,850 3,850 288,278 - 288,278 13,059 13,059 26,297 2,093,557 26,297 2,093,557 20,003 20,003 5-11 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1989 TABLE 5-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Sect. Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 To 30 Sep 1989 In Text 8. Hampton Creek, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 9. Hampton Roads, VA (Collection and Removal of Drift) 10. Horn Harbor, VA (Regular Funds) 11. James River, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 12. Little Machipongo River, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 13. Norfolk Harbor and Channels (Deepening), VA (Regular Funds) Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 37,196 37,196 6,014 6,014 92,119 92,009 321,258 321,148 - 186,237 - 186,237 304 304 93,122 1,210,378 93,122 1,210,378 62,969 62,969 90,636 90,636 185,105 185,163 260,000 257,865 191,000 193,135 88,366 88,366 2,311,895 2,312,981 63,000 15,127 2,424 2,424 935,997 1,045,823 8,063 1,434 84,934 243,262 84,735 243,463 802,909 800,216 10,879 4,664 26,083 26,083 193,000 3,584,984 193,000 3,584,984 58,169 58,169 13,987 13,987 235,023 235,023 7,639,9045 7,639,904 900,219 31,162,606 898,399 31,157,027 - 413,456 - 379,792 120,000 120,608 14,843 14,843 5,600 1,211 2,075,000 2,042,215 4,615,000 2,625,036 213,500 211,872 514,516 514,516 5,600 1,211 5,796,000 2,207,000 14,784,8096 5,903,145 3,532,235 14,102,631 - 143,000 - 143,000 143,0006 143,0006 5-12 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Sect. Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 To 30 Sep 1989 In Text (Contributed Funds) 13a. Atlantic Ocean Channel, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 13b. Channel to Newport News, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 13c. Norfolk Harbor, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 13d. Thimble Shoal Channel, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 14. Rudee Inlet, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 2,945,500 5,650,000 1,594,000 10,189,0006 2,239,892 5,928,863 2,005,552 10,174,3076 208,750 218,413 316,470 320,816 (2,589) (2,459) 1,278,130 1,214,701 5,369,398 4,840,919 (8,897) 625 225,293 51,948 178,371 2,238,183 130,937 2,300,473 (100) (100) 143,000 143,000 309,005 337,269 334,020 1,344,891 44,748 44,898 143,0006 143,0006 753,3526 608,255 06 06 3,086,2466 4,097,117 231 5,763,639 331 5,763,639 54,000 3,335,818 1,424,410 4,814,228 49,784 3,135,118 1,780,206 4,965,108 386,827 2,127,386 1,015,121 4,826,6676 386,484 2,210,361 1,185,908 4,997,454 3,031,795 3,259,794 3,967,562 3,384,391 85,281,4027 4,094,369 3,633,105 85,276,374 - 134,500 1,565,962 - 112,104 1,491,775 271,650 4,058,699 288,285 2,106,990 - 188,611 - 169,820 - 2,756,500 - 2,078,004 30,000 29,482 10,000 545 1,205,138 1,340,363 799,059 692,850 748,220 1,301,970 16,000 23,170 104,989 1,805,4516 145,452 1,749,331 548,854 6,118,5446 664,167 4,399,805 1,089,830 13,103,233 1,214,710 13,103,112 64,601 3,569,3216 79,894 3,459,868 143,000 143,000 1,799 50,000 6,592 143,000 143,000 251,000 249,962 50,000 6,592 5-13 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1989 TABLE 5-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Sect. Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 To 30 Sep 1989 In Text 15. Supervision of the Harbor of Hampton Roads, VA (Prevention of Obstructive and Injurious Deposits) (Regular Funds) 16. Waterway on the Coast of VA (Regular Funds) 17. Whitings Creek, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 18. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization 19. Tangier Island Shore Protection, VA 20. Virginia Beach, VA (Regular Funds) 21. Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA (Regular Funds) 22. Richmond, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 23. Scottsville, VA (Regular Funds) Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 260,225 354,000 261,036 348,498 529,000 515,277 518,000 6,504,824 536,031 6,503,630 850,498 850,498 1,048,097 900,425 1,027,841 1,174,569 718,660 711,922 26,196 26,196 996,215 13,653,445 999,506 13,648,245 58,169 58,169 21,630 21,630 196,698 196,698 500 500 130,220 44,800 97,959 62,088 27,000 2,733,000 2,760,000 20,662 1,707,235 1,727,897 1,130,000 1,158,971 880,842 851,948 1,613,000 1,602,465 1,505,000 1,465,942 300,000 298,670 919,322 916,775 1,153,000 1,055,916 772,000 728,838 0 1,330 513,000 7,860,195 157,402 7,387,165 - 80,970,527 - 80,970,527 1,020,000 1,086,000 10,283,164 987,565 1,159,993 10,267,825 1,400,000 3,800,000 7,966,182 1,254,904 3,339,978 7,253,263 90,012 - 100,000 722,029 1,024,288 40,000 1,201,415 90,012 0 - 3,443,500 254,947 3,401,908 5-14 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Sect. Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 To 30 Sep 1989 In Text (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp 32,954 - - - 32,954 Cost - - - 32,000 32,000 24. Virginia Beach New Work Streams, Canal Approp 408,000 1,200,000 1,739,000 982,000 4,764,000 Number 2, VA Cost 43,661 28,022 1,973,718 1,537,182 4,002,583 (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp - - 110,205 205,000 315,205 Cost - - 103,205 180,158 283,363 25. Flood Control Work Cost 7,500 67,065 17,796 15,999 Under Special Authorization 26. Emergency Flood Cost 112,610 132,649 218,347 174,385 Control Activities 27. Survey Cost 705,175 452,575 307,349 550,842 28. Collection and Cost 181,707 119,383 156,603 154,051 Study of Basic Data 1 Includes $292,096 for previous projects. 2 Includes $52,804 for previous projects. 3 Costs prior to 1942 are included in the project "Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD (BaltimoreDistrict)." Costs listed are for York Spit Channel, VA; Cape Henry Channel, VA and Rappahannock Channel, VA. 4 Includes $445,291 military funds expended from new work dredging on existing project and $83,041 expended military funds for construction of a wharf. 5 Includes $763,000 for previous projects. 6 Excludes previous projects. See Annual Report for FY 1986. 7 Includes $72,039 for previous projects. 5-15 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1989 TABLE 5-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents March 3, 1871 June 13, 1902 March 3, 1909 June 25, 1910 Jan. 21, 1927 Mar. 2, 1945 APPOMATTOX RIVER, VA (See Section 1 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep at mean high water and 60 feet wide. Diversion channel and work incidental thereto. Increasing channel to width of 80 feet and maintenance of diversion works. Channel 80 feet wide and 10 feet deep at mean low water between mouth and Petersburg. Existing project dimensions. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (NORFOLK DISTRICT) (See Section 2 of Text) Mar. 3, 1899 Existing project dimensions and original route, waterway from Norfolk, VA to sounds of North Carolina July 25, 1912 July 25, 1912 Mar. 3, 1925 Original route to Norfolk-Beaufort Inlet section Purchase of Albemarle & Chesapeake Co. Canal Purchase of Lake Drummond Canal (Dismal Swamp Canal) July 3, 1930 Construct a tidal lock at Great Bridge at a cost not to exceed $500,000 June 26, 1934 Operating and care of works of improvement provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors Mar. 2, 1945 Construct dikes for protection of canal property against floodtides Annual Report 1874, pt. II p. 54 H. Doc. 139, 56 Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1901, p. 1467 H. Doc. 952, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 215, 69th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 223, 76th Cong., 1st sess.(1) H. Doc. 317, 54th Cong., 1st sess. AR 1896 H. Doc. 131, 55th Cong., 3rd sess. AR 1899 H. Doc. 391, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 589, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 67th Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 23, 71st Cong., 1st sess.1 Not available H. Doc. 117, 76th Cong., 1st sess. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (NORFOLK DISTRICT) (See Section 3 of Text) CAPE HENRY CHANNEL, VA (See Section 3 of Text) July 3, 1958 Channel 42 feet deep; 1,000 feet wide Dec. 31, 1970 Channel depth increased to 50 feet RAPPAHANNOCK SHOAL CHANNEL, VA (See Section 3 of Text) July 3, 1958 Channel 42 feet deep and 800 feet wide Dec. 31, 1970 Channel width increased to 1,000 feet and depth increased to 50 feet Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 4, 1913 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 Dec. 31, 1970 Sept. 19, 1890 July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) YORK SPIT CHANNEL, VA (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide Channel width increased to 1,000 feet Channel depth increased to 37 feet Channel depth increased to 39 feet Channel depth increased to 42 feet Channel depth increased to 50 feet CAPE CHARLES CITY HARBOR, VA (See Section 4 of Text) Dredging a channel through Cherrystone Inlet and bar CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA (See Section 5 of Text) Existing Project DEEP CREEK, NEWPORT NEWS, VA (See Section 6 of Text) Aug. 26, 1937 Channel 6 feet deep from James River to Hicks Landing with widths of 80 feet and 50 feet; a turning basin 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 105 feet long; an anchorage basin 6 feet deep and 6.4 acres in area; and a timber jetty 800 feet long on the north side of the anchorage. Jun. 30, 1948 Existing project dimensions and elimination of timber jetty. Jul. 14, 1960 Widening of Federal entrance channel to 100 feet and extend harbor upstream 600 feet. July 14, 1960 (Sec. 107) GREENVALE CREEK (See Section 7 of Text) Existing Project H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Report, Sept. 21, 1970 H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Report, Sept, 21, 1970 H. Doc. 186, 57th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 190, 62nd Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 29, 71st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 741, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Chief of Engineers Report Sept. 21, 1970 Unknown Approved in 1972 H. Doc. 76, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 601, 80th Cong., 2d sess. Approved in 1979 Approved in 1965 5-16 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents HAMPTON CREEK, VA (See Section 8 of Text) Sept. 19, 1980 Channel 9 feet deep, varying from 300 feet wide on bar at mouth Annual Report, 1889, p. 974 to 200 feet wide at Hampton Highway Bridge. Aug. 30, 1935 Channel 12 feet deep and 200 feet wide across Hampton Flats River and Harbors Committee Doc. and 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Hampton Creek 34, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Mar. 2, 1945 Channel in Herberts Creek 80 to 100 feet wide and 12 feet deep H. Doc. 559, 76th Cong., 3d sess. (2) from Hampton Creek to Kecoughtan Roads. Oct. 27, 1965 Delete requirement for providing spoil-disposal area. H. Doc. 201, 89th Cong., 1st sess. HAMPTON ROADS AND HARBORS OF NORFOLK AND NEWPORT NEWS, VA COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 9 of Text) May 17, 1950 Collection and removal of floating debris in Hampton Roads and specified in Act its tributary waters HORN HARBOR (See Section 10 of Text) July 3, 1930 Existing project H. Doc. 124, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Aug. 30, 1935 Removed requirement for local contribution River & Harbors Comm. Doc. 22, 73d Cong., 2nd sess. JAMES RIVER, VA (See Section 11 of Text) July 5, 1884 Channel 22 feet deep from mouth of Richmond and construct spur and training dikes June 13, 1902 Extension of improvement to Richmond lock gate Mar. 3, 1905 Form a tumrning basin by widening channel at Richmond July 3, 1930 Channel 25 feet deep mouth to Richmond Deepwater Terminal Aug. 26, 1937 Removal of Trigg cofferdam Mar. 2, 1945 Tumrning basin at Richmond Harbor May 17, 1950 Maintaining turning basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal Oct. 23, 1962 Channel depth increased to 35 feet to Richmond Deepwater Terminal UTTLE MACHIPONGO RIVER, VA (See Section 12 of Text) July 3, 1930 Existing Project NORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS (DEEPENING), VA (See Section 13 of Text) Oct. 17, 1986 ATLANTIC OCEAN CHANNEL, VA (See Section 13A of Text) Construct a 60 foot channel CHANNEL TO NEWPORT NEWS, VA (See Section 13B of Text) Oct. 17, 1986 Deepen existing 45-foot channel to 55 feet NORFOLK HARBOR CHANNEL, VA (See Section 13C of Text) Hampton Roads and ElIzabeth River Mar. 2, 1907 Channel 30 feet deep to Navy Yard June 25, 1910 Depth of 35 feet to Navy Yard Aug. 8, 1917 Depth of 40 feet and width of 750 feet to mouth of Southern Branch Sept. 3, 1954 Widen 40-foot channel to 1,500 feet from 40-foot contour in Hampton Roads to a point just south of Norfolk International Terminal Oct. 27, 1965 45 feet deep Ft. Wool to Lambert Point, 800 feet wide Norfolk Intemrnational Terminal to Lambert Point Oct. 17, 1986 Deepen existing 45 foot channel to 55 feet deep SOUTHERN BRANCH June 25, 1910 Channel with a depth of 22 and 25 feet Aug. 8, 1917 Depth of 40 feet and width of 450 feet from mouth to Belt Line RR Bridge Mar. 30, 1925 Channel 30 feet deep and 375 feet wide to Virginia RR bridge: S. Ex. Doc. 714, 47th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 314, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 68 74th Cong., 1st sess.2 H. Doc. 738, 77th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 191, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 586, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 260, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 381, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 226, 68th Cong., 1st sess. 5-17 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1989 TABLE 5-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents thence 25 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide to Norfolk & Western RR bridge Aug. 30, 1935 Depth of 25 feet and width of 200 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to a point 2,500 feet above with a turning basin 500 feet square June 30, 1948 Approach and turning area 40 feet deep and a maximum width of 830 feet opposite Norfolk Naval Shipyard: thence a channel 35 feet deep and 375 and 250 feet wide to a point 1900 feet above Norfolk & Western RR bridge and a tumrning basin 35 feet deep and 600 feet at upstream end Oct. 27, 1965 45 feet deep Belt Line bridge to Old Virginia bridge, 35-foot deep tumrning basin opposite St. Julians Creek Oct. 22, 1976 Extend existing 35-foot project to a channel 35 feet deep and 250 feet wide upstream 1.5 miles to the Norfolk and Portsmouth Belt ULine RR bridge and a turning basin at the mouth of Mains Creek 35 feet deep and 800 feet square Oct. 17, 1986 Deepen existing 40-foot portions to 45-feet deep Deepen portion of the 35-foot, from mile point 15 to Gilmerton Bridge, to 40 feet deep EASTERN BRANCH Mar. 2, 1907 Width of 500 feet and depth of 25 and 22 feet Removal of shoals at mouth Mar. 3, 1925 Depth of 25 feet and width of 200 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to Virginia RR bridge July 3, 1930 30-foot channel to a point opposite terminal of Imperial Tobacco Co. in Berkley Mar. 2, 1945 Depth of 25 feet and width of 300 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to Campostella bridge WESTERN BRANCH Mar. 4, 1913 Channel 24 feet deep and 300 & 400 feet wide to West Norfolk highway bridge July 3, 1930 For 18-foot channel to a point about 3,000 feet above West Norfolk highway bridge SCOTTS CREEK July 3, 1930 Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide to a point 100 feet above the Atlantic Coast Line RR bridge June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Sept, 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 17, 1986 ANCHORAGES 30-foot anchorage at Lambert Point 12-foot anchorage at Pinner Point An anchorage 38 feet deep and 1,500 feet square: anchorage 35 feet deep and 1,500 feet square: and an anchorage 20 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 3,000 feet long Two anchorages opposite Sewells Point 45 feet deep with 1,200-foot swinging radius Construct a 55-foot anchorage and increase the radius to 1500 feet for an existing 45-foot anchorage THIMBLE SHOAL CHANNEL, VA (See Section 13D of Text) Aug. 8, 1917 A channel 40-feet deep and 750 feet wide Sep. 3, 1954 Channel width increased to 1,000 feet with side channels on either side 32-feet deep and 450 feet wide Oct. 27, 1965 A channel 45 feet deep and 100 feet wide Oct. 17, 1986 Deepen existing 45-foot channel to 55-feet RUDEE INLET, VA (See Section 14 of Text) Oct. 17, 1986 Project Authorized June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA (See Section 16 of Text) Existing project adopted Project modified Project widened to 100 feet, partially relocated, and H. Doc. 182, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess.2 H. Doc. 545, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 355, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 373, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 226, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 37, 71st Cong., 1st sess.3 H. Doc. 224, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 556, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 265, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 189, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 605, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess.1 S. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Docs. 187 & 143, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 957, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 268, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Approved in 1970 5-18 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized (Sec. 107) incorporated in Delaware Bay-Chesapeake Bay Waterway in Delaware-Maryland-Virginia WHITINGS CREEK (See Section 17 of Text) Mar. 2., 1945 Existing Project H. Doc TANGIER ISLAND SHORE PROTECTION (See Section 19 of Text) Oct. 17, 1986 Project authorized Unpub VIRGINIA BEACH, VA (See Section 20 of Text) Sept. 3, 1954 Project authorized H. Doc Oct. 23, 1962 Project modified H. Doc Mar. 7, 1974 Project modification authorized for Phase I Advanced H. Doc Engineering and Design Oct. 17, 1986 Project Modified Chief c May 2 GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA (See Section 21 of Text) July 24, 1946 Project authorized H. Doc RICHMOND, VA (See Section 22 of Text) Aug. 15, 1985 Existing project H. Doc Oct. 17, 1986 Project authorized for construction H. Doc SCOTTSVILLE, VA (See Section 23 of Text) 1948 (Sec. 205) Project approved H. Doc VA. BEACH STREAMS, CANAL NO.2, VA BEACH, VA (See Section 24 of Text) Oct. 27, 1965 Project authorized H. Doc (Sec. 201) .582, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. lished report 186, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. .382, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. .365, 92nd Cong., 2nd sess. Df Engineers Report, 2, 1985 .325, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. 178, 98th Cong., 2nd sess. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. . 551, 84th Cong., 1st sess. .640, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. 1Contains latest published map. 2Included in Emergency Relief Administration Program May 23, 1935. 3For latest published map, see H. Doc. 1246, 62nd Cong., 3d sess. 5-19 Documents Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1989 TABLE 5-C ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLORIDA: DATA RELATIVE TO THE COMPLETED LOCKS (See Section 1 of Text) Dimensions Greatest Length Depth on Width Available Miter Sills Year Miles of for Full Character Opened From Location Chamber Width Uft Upper Lower of to Cost Norfolk, VA feet (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation Navigation 12.4 Albemarle and 75 600 2.7 1 1 Piles in sand 1932 $499,913 Chesapeake Canal and shells (Great Bridge, VA) 10.7 Dismal Swamp 52 300 12 12 12 Natural earth 1940 $348,879 Canal (Deep Creek) with cutoff walls 33.1 Dismal Swamp 52 300 12 12 13 Natural earth 1941 $372,556 Canal with cutoff walls (South Mills, NC) 116 feet at mean low water. 5-20 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30,1989 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Appomattox River, VA21 1980 $870,341 1,101,150- Aberdeen Creek, VA2 1975 109,643 201,364- Blackwater River VA Active portion" 1975 342,118 151,750 19,300 Broad Creek, VA2 1986 27,888 605,355 500 Cape Charles, VA 1984 622,644 2,396,540- Carters Creek, VA Active portion2 3 1951 28,398 3,277- Channel to Newport News, VA 1985 4,097,117 5,763,639 4,965,108 Channel from Phoebus, VA to deepwater in Hampton Roads2 1944 11,500 39,468 1,200 Channel connecting York River, VA Back Creek to Slaights Wharf2 1950 14,855 38,024 2,500 Chesconessex Creek, VA2 1968 25,516 32,042 Chincoteague Bay, VA 1984 25,126 376,150- Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge, VA 1985 49,396 134,483- Chowan River, NC2 1975 107,220 - 5,700 Cockrells Creek, VA4 1949 - - Cranes Creek, VA 1986 6,274 409,072- Davis Creek, VA 2 1971 97,612 163,122 4,000 Deep Creek, Accomack Co., VA 1974 83,000 43,158 Deep Creek, Newport News, VA2 1980 288,278 2,093,557 Dymers Creek, VA2 1953 5,582 4,610- Finney Creek at Wachapreague, VA 1988 68,656 - 7,763 Greenvale Creek, VA2 1986 20,003 321,148- Hampton Creek, VA 1981 186,237 1,210,378 62,969 Horn Harbor, VA2 1964 13,987 235,023 Hoskins Creek, VA2 1977 44,100 668,527 500 Jackson Creek, VA2 1971 8,500 34,514 Jarvis Creek, VA4 1979 39,259 -- Kings Creek, VA4 1957 5,593 -- Lafayette River, VA2 1982 242,047 155,592 188,962 Little Machipongo River VA 1987 211,872 514,516 1,211 Little River (Creek) VA 13 1966 168,623 481,972 16,955 Locklies Creek, VA 1928 11,581 9,560- Lynnhaven Inlet, VA 1987 445,354 2,842,591- Meherrin River, VA 1987 - 54,764- Millford Haven VA2 1950 24,568 32,803- Mill Creek, VAA 1937 5,445 4,346- Mulberry Creek, VA2 1950 2,393 2,458 Nandua Creek, VA2 1950 6,988 39,939 Nansemond River, VA6 1978 167,477 439,225 Newport News Creek, VA2 1962 135,600 179,981 Nottoway River, VA2 1986 44,295 8,734 43,000 Occohannock Creek, VA Active portion2 1951 13,859 78,283- Onancock River, VA2 5 1963 187,914 466,018- Oyster Channel, VA2 1984 119,117 670,184- Pagan River, VA2 6 1950 51,425 294,213 Pamunkey River. VA Active portion 1964 31,376 161,183 Parker Creek, VA 1987 15,530 230,924 Parrotts Creek, VA2 1957 37,045 45,725 Portsmouth Harbor, VA Channel to Nansemond Ordnance Depot2 1947 165,566 66,162 Queens Creek 2 1979 26,949 142,004 Quinby Creek, VA 1987 104,176 1,072,662 Rappahannock River, VA9 1012 1983 414,633 1,959,306 Rappahannock River at Bowlers Wharf, VA4 1950 - - Starlings Creek, VA 1981 66,242 675,430- Tangier Channel, VA 1988 116,550 2,886,076- Taskinas Creek, VA 1975 7,479- 135- Totuskey Creek, VA 1970 167,869 451,032 2,000 Tylers Beach, VA2 1982 261,201 410,129 Urbanna Creek, VA2 7 1963 55,724 107,913- 5-21 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1989 TABLE 5-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1989 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Whitings Creek, VA 1971 21,630 196,698 500 Winter Harbor, VA2 1981 171,334 307,279 2,973 Willoughby Channel, VA2 1953 8,500 41,700- Wishart Point Channel, VA2 1975 118,762 102,527 30,625 York River, VA Active portion2 1986 180,904 285,104- 1Includes $22,500 for previous projects. lncludes $30,000 for new work and $7,000 for maintenance for previous 2Completed. projects. 3in addition, $700 for maintenance was expended from contributed funds. SIn addition, $168,091 was expended for rehabilitation. 4lnactive. 10Includes $197,146 for previous new work projects. sIncludes $33,549 for new work and $24,754 for maintenance for 11Includes $15,000 for new work for previous projects. Sprevious projects. 12 lncludes $113,500 for previous maintenance projects. Includes $20,671 for new work for previous projects. 3 7 Federal funds expended by the U.S. Navy for new work. In addition, $61,087 was expended for rehabilitation. TABLE 5-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1989 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Anderson Park, VA 1979 $471,474 - $176,671 Newport News, VA Hampton Institute, VA 1976 $156,906 - $175,845 Saxis Island, VA 1987 $273,600 - $ 3,145 TABLE 5-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1989 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Buena Vista, VA 1977 $417,9001 -- Newmarket Creek, VA 1970 1,000,000 12,283 $550,097 Norfolk Floodwall, VA 1973 1,851,933 32,877 516,256 Richmond Filtration Plant, VA 1985 478,224 - - Salem Church Lake, VA 1976 1,896,7161 2-- 1 Preconstruction planning terminated. 2 Includes $144,785 for previous projects. 5-22 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-G RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS PROJECT NAME MONTH/YEAR TYPE OF SURVEY Chincoteague Inlet, Accomack Co., VA James River City Point Shoal Jordan Point - Windmill Point Richmond Harbor, Richmond, VA Rocklanding Shoal Channel Tribell Shoal Channel Little Machipongo River, Accomack Co., VA Lower Northlanding River, Va. Beach, VA Newport News Creek, Newport News, VA Norfolk Harbor 40-FT Channel Onancock River, Accomack Co., VA North Branch Oyster Channel, Northampton Co., VA Queens Creek, Mathews Co., VA Rappahannock Shoal Channel Waterway on the Coast of VA Bradford Bay Fishermans Inlet Magothy Bay Channel Metompkin Bay Channel York River Entrance Channel Jun 89 Jun 89 May 89 May 89 May 89 May 89 Jan 89 Feb 89 Jan 89 Oct 88 Apr 89 Mar 89 Mar 89 Apr 89 Feb 89 Feb 89 Feb 89 May 89 Sep 89 Jun 89 Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Reconnaissance Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition 5-23 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT * This district comprises central and eastern North Carolina and a portion of south-central Virginia, embraced in drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from the southern boundary of Virginia to the Shallotte River, inclusive, with exception of the Meherrin River Basin above Murfreesboro, N. C., the Chowan River Basin above the confluence of the Nottaway and Blackwater Rivers, and the Pasquotank River and its tributaries for navigation only. Also included are those portions of the Yadkin- Pee-Dee and Catawba River basins within the state of N. C. as well as a portion of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway from the northern boundary of North Carolina to Little River, S. C., and a portion of the waterway from Norfolk, Va., to the Sounds of North Carolina, south of the north shore of Albemarle Sound. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R & HActof 1965)................. ......... 6-2 2. Atlantic Beach Channels, N. C............... 6-3 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla. (Wilmington District)..............6-3 4. Beaufort Harbor, N. C................... 6-4 5. Belhaven Harbor, N. C.................. 6-5 6. Cape Fear River, N. C. Above Wilmington...... 6-5 7. Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N. C................... 8. Far Creek, N. C.................... 9. Lockwoods Folly River, N. C............. 10. Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N. C............ 11. Morehead City Harbor, N. C............... 12. Ocracoke Inlet, N. C................... . 13. Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N. C............. 14. Roanoke River, N. C.................... 15. Silver Lake Harbor, N. C................. 16. Smith's Creek (Pamlico County), N. C....... 17. Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N. C................ 18. Wilmington Harbor, N. C................. .... 6-6 S... 6-6 .... 6-6 .... 6-7 .... 6-8 S... 6-8 .... 6-8 .... 6-8 S... 6-9 S... 6-9 ... 6-9 ... 6-10 Flood Control 19. Cape Fear River Basin, N. C..................6-11 19A. B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, N. C......... 6-11 19B. Randleman Lake, N. C.... ............ 6-11 20. Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N. C..............6-12 21. Dan River, Madison Wastewater Treatment Plant, N. C.......................6-12 22. Leesville, Va., Roanoke River, Sec. 32, Demo. Project......................6-13 23. Neuse River Basin, N. C..................... 6-13 23A. Falls Lake, N. C.................. .......... 6-13 24. Stuart, Va....................... ....... 25. Wrightsville Beach, N. C................... 26. Yadkin River Basin, N. C. and S. C........... 26A. W. Kerr Scott Damn and Reservoir, N. C....................... 27. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................... 28. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization..................... Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 29. Roanoke River Basin, Va. and N. C.... 29A. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, Va. and N. C.................. 29B. Philpott Lake, Va.............. 30. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations.............. Page S..6-14 .. 6-14 . 6-14 S.6-14 .. 6-15 . 6-15 ......... 6-15 ....... 6-15 ......... 6-16 ......... 6-16 General Investigations 31. 32. 33. Surveys......................... Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... Preconstruction Engineering and Design. Tables ...... 6-17 ...... 6-17 ...... 6-17 Page Table 6-A Cost and Financial Statement.......... 6-18 Table 6-B Authorizing Legislation............... 6-22 Table 6-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects.................6-25 Table 6-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects....................6-26 Table 6-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects........................6-27 6-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Page Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects................ 6-28 Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys...................6-29 Table 6-I Navigation Work Under Special Authorization....... Table 6-J Dams and Reservoirs...... . Table 6-K Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization....... .......... 6-29 .......... 6-30 .......... 6-31 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Wilmington District. Existing project. The existing project provides for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with the report of the Chief of Engineers, House Document 251, 89th Congress, 1st session. The project was authorized by Section 302, 1965 River and Harbor Act (H.D. 25, 89th Cong., 1st sess.). The Act provides that research and planning costs shall be borne fully by the United States. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project, and participate to the extent of 50 percent of the cost of the program. Recon studies are 100 percent Federal. Requirements are being met. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Operations for FY 89 included chemical control of 70 acres of alligatorweed and 25 acres of hydrilla, biological control on 210 acres of hydrilla, and monitoring of past biological control on 175 acres of hydrilla. All alligatorweed control in FY 89 was by the application of rodeo herbicide. Annual herbicide treatments in areas under maintenance control, including the Scuppernong Basin (7 acres), Little River Basin (1 acre), New River Basin (3 acres), Pasquotank River Basin (12 acres) and Mackeys Creek (5 acres) continued in FY 89. Maintenance control on about 80% of the project area has been achieved on the Alligator River Basin (17 acres treated in FY 89) and the Lumber River (18 acres treated in FY 89). Total maintenance control of both of these areas is expected by FY 90. Sweetwater Creek (a tributary to the Roanoke River) continues to be a problem area with significant annual reinfestation of the navigation channel by alligatorweed from the adjacent swamp. Seven acres of alligatorweed were treated in Sweetwater Creek in FY 89. No new alligatorweed treatment areas were added to the program in FY 89. Hydrilla control efforts included both chemical and biological control. Twenty-five acres of hydrilla in high use areas of Fred Bond Park Lake were treated with Aquathol Granular at a rate of 75 lbs./ac. Fred Bond Park Lake was previously stocked with triploid grass carp (FY 87) with no noticeable effect by the spring of 1989. New biological hydrilla control sites which were stocked with triploid grass carp in FY 89 include: Crabtree Project Lakes (95 acres of hydrilla @ 7-17 fish/surface acre), Lake Holt (100 acres of hydrilla @ 33 fish/surface acre), and Big Lake at William B. Umstead State Park (15 acres of Hydrilla @ 20 fish/surface acre). Two lakes which were infested with hydrilla, Lake Wheeler (100 acres) and Lake Rogers (75 acres), were stocked with triploid grass carp in FY 87 at a rate of 20 fish per vegetated acre. Lake Wheeler was also stocked in the fall of 1985 (also at a rate of 20 fish per vegetated acre) with marginal results. Monitoring of these sites to determine the effectiveness of the stocking continued in FY 89. Planning included field investigations and the preparation of an Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for the Inclusion of New Hydrilla Control Sites in the North Carolina Aquatic Plant Control Program. Several reconnaissance investigations of aquatic weed problems in response to requests by others were also made in FY 89. Control work was accomplished for a Federal cost of $35,496. Planning was accomplished at a Federal cost of $40,149. Condition at end of fiscal year. Annual alligatorweed maintenance control continues to be effective. All sites under maintenance control in FY 89 are expected to remain under maintenance control and should require only spot treatments in FY 90. Results from FY 89 maintenance alligatorweed control in the Alligator River and Lumber River Basins have been excellent and both are expected to be under total maintenance control in FY 90. Alligatorweed control in Sweetwater Creek resulted in some reduction in infested area with the creek channel open for recreational navigation throughout the summer and fall; however, reinfestation from adjacent swamps is expected. The triploid grass carp stocked in Lake Wheeler for hydrilla control continued to provide weed control throughout the FY 89 recreation season and long-term control is expected. Some hydrilla reduction has occurred in Lake Rogers; however, control is not occurring as quickly as expected. Good hydrilla control in Lake Rogers is not expected until FY 91. Grass carp had no noticeable effect on hydrilla growth in Fred Bond Park Lake; however, chemical control has been excellent in FY 89 and the grass carp are expected to provide long-term residual hydrilla 6-2 Tables Table 6-F Table 6-G Table 6-H WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT control. Although evidence of grass carp feeding has been observed in all of the triploid grass carp stocking sites for FY 89, control is not expected until FY 92. Investigations of aquatic weed problems, in response to requests by county governments and municipalities, may result in the addition of new treatment sites and species in future years. 2. ATLANTIC BEACH CHANNELS, N. C. Location. In Carteret County, on south side of Bogue Sound, 3 miles west of Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Existing project. A channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway in Bogue Sound to the marina east of Money Island; and a channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from the intersection of Money Island and Causeway Channel in Bogue Sound to the southern end of Causeway Channel. The length of channels is 28 miles. Existing project was authorized November 23, 1965, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance, and aids to navigation, including suitable spoil-disposal areas, and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor or the cost of such works; hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all equally in both Money Island Channel and Causeway Channel; provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local channels commensurate with the depths provided in the related project areas; and provide a cash contribution toward the first costs of the project, expressed as a percentage of the Federal construction costs, of 50 percent for Money Island Channel, and 41.5 percent for Causeway Channel. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Numerous wharves and piers exist along Causeway Channel, and a marina near Money Island has berthing facilities for about 100 boats. Existing facilities are not adequate, and additional facilities will be provided by local interests. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Design for future year pipeline dredging cost $9,419. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed April 1966. 3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (WILMINGTON DISTRICT) Location. The project is located on the east coast of the United States, between Norfolk, Va., and St. Johns River, Florida. The section within Wilmington District begins at the Virginia-North Carolina State line and extends generally southerly and southwestwardly to Little River, S. C., a total of 308 statute miles. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 830 to 842, inclusive.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1926, 1932, and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a waterway, 12 feet deep, with widths varying from 90 feet in land cuts to 300 feet in open waters; the construction, operation and maintenance of suitable bridges; saltwaterintrusion preventive measures in the vicinity of Fairfield, N. C.; a channel in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from the Intracoastal Waterway in Bogue Sound to and including a basin in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and 600 feet long; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide between the Intracoastal Waterway and the gorge in Bogue Inlet, then 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar; a channel, 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to a turning basin, 200 feet wide and 350 feet long, at Swansboro; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide in New River Inlet, and a connecting channel of the same dimensions to the Intracoastal Waterway near the mouth of New River; a channel, 10 feet deep, and 90 feet wide in New River, between the Intracoastal Waterway and the Seaboard Coastline Railroad bridge at Jacksonville, N. C.; a channel through New Topsail Inlet, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide and a channel from New Topsail Inlet to the Intracoastal Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide; a channel, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide, in Banks Channel, from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling the barrier beach, to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; a channel, 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide, across the ocean bar at Masonboro Inlet, with suitable jetties at the entrance, thence 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to the channel of the Intracoastal Waterway at Wrightsville Beach by way of Banks and Motte Channels; a turning basin, 15 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 700 feet long, on the east side of Banks Channel near Masonboro Inlet, with three 15-pile dolphins therein; a channel, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar at Carolina Beach Inlet to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; a channel, 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, to and including a turning basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long, at Carolina Beach; a yacht basin, 230 feet wide, 450 feet long, and 12 feet deep, at the town of Southport, connected to the waterway by a suitable channel of the same depth; and maintenance of the general navigation features of the North Carolina State Ports Authority Small-Boat Harbor at Southport, consisting of an entrance channel, 150 feet wide and 400 feet long, an eastern harbor-access channel, 70 feet wide and 430 feet long, a western harbor-access channel, 60 feet wide and 185 feet long, to a turning basin, 180 feet wide and 550 feet long, all to a depth of 6 feet. A modification providing for the replacement of five Federally owned and operated highway bridges was authorized in December 1970. A modification providing for 100 percent Federal funding for Walter B. Jones (formerly Wilkerson Creek) and Joseph P. Knapp (formerly Coinjock) bridges was authorized in October 1976. A modification providing for 100 percent Federal funding at Core Creek, Hobucken, and Fairfield bridges was authorized in November 1986. Estimated Federal cost is $65,800,000 (1989). The tidal lock at Snow's Cut was deauthorized September 23, 1986, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. The 12-foot~deep channel in Peltier Creek was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The south jetty at 6-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Masonboro Inlet has an estimated Federal cost of $9,410,000 (1989) and is complete except for the training wall. A Section 111 project to mitigate damages caused by the north jetty was authorized in October 1980 and was completed in April 1981. Length of channels and basins total 347.7 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. In the waterway north of Neuse River, variations in water surface due to winds seldom exceed 2 feet above or below mean stage. Between Beaufort and the Cape Fear River, normal tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlets to 1 foot at points between. Average range of tide is 4 feet on the ocean side of Bogue Inlet and 2.5 feet just inside the inlet. At New River, tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlet to 1 foot at the head of the marshes and zero at Tar Landing, 31 miles above. From Cape Fear River, N. C., to Little River, S. C., mean tidal range varies between 4.7 feet in Cape Fear River and 4 feet at the intermediate inlets, and 2 feet at points midway between the inlets. On October 15, 1954 (Hurricane Hazel), the tide at Holden Beach reached an elevation of 17.6 feet. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date except for the uncompleted modifications. The State of North Carolina has agreed to keep the bridges toll free and upon completion of each bridge, accept maintenance, replacement, and ownership responsibilities thereof. They have withdrawn their offer to contribute 25 percent of the first cost. The Water Resources Acts of 1976 and 1986 modified the terms of local cooperation to delete the non-Federal cost-sharing requirement for all five bridges. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Design of Core Creek Bridge was continued at a cost of $496,701. Design of Hobucken Bridge was initiated at a cost of $53,671. The supplement for the Masonboro Inlet South Jetty GDM cost $302. Maintenance: Through Channel -During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $72,645. Between October 24, 1988 and January 2, 1989, the contract dredge Marion removed 190,435 cubic yards from shoals in the Alligator-Pungo landcut at a cost of $555,246. Between March 26 and April 26, 1989, the contract dredge Hampton Roads removed 149,952 cubic yards from shoals in the through channel between Bear and Brown inlets at a cost of $313,017. Between January 8 and August 6, 1989, the contract dredge Richmond removed 749,206 cubic yards from shoals in the through channel between New River and the S. C. state line at a cost of $2,429,161. Costs in connection with prior year pipeline dredging was $12,909. Design for FY 90 pipeline dredging cost $32,498. Marking of easements along the AIWW cost $9,051. Marking easements and investigating encroachments in Hyde County cost $84,520. Disposal area stabilization at Swansboro and New River cost $30,485. Mosquito control in disposal areas cost $44,920. Archeological investigations of sounds and inlets cost $2,500. Condition and operation studies cost $458,590. Periodic inspection of three remaining bridges cost $34,915. Longterm environmental dredging and monitoring study cost $101,730. Master plan supplement for Snow's Cut cost $11,312. Three highway bridges and utilities were operated and maintained at a cost of $526,528. Bogue Inlet - During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 75,502 cubic yards from shoals in Bogue Inlet at a cost of $273,347. Condition and operation studies cost $27,163. Environmental coordination and investigation of disposal site cost $412. A marine archeological survey of the inlet cost $446. Carolina Beach Inlet -During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 44,422 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $110,522. During intermittent periods the U. S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 68,665 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $237,140. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 13,389 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $56,010. Monitoring of Carolina Beach Inlet cost $9,239. Marine archeological survey of wrecks cost $74. Condition and operation studies cost $22,726. Masonboro Inlet - Monitoring at Masonboro Inlet cost $14,082. Condition and operation studies cost $4,357. New River Inlet - During intermittent periods the U. S. debris boat Snell maintained dredge mooring dolphins at a cost of $12,000. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 99,736 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $242,189. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 105,538 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $293,039. Condition and operation studies cost $34,567. New Topsail Inlet - Cost in connection with prior year pipeline dredging in Topsail Creek was $21,379. During intermittent periods the U. S. debris boat Snell repaired mooring dolphins at a cost of $16,868. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 91,098 cubic yards from shoals in New Topsail Inlet at a cost of $206,868. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 33,068 cubic yards from shoals in New Topsail Inlet at a cost of $136,519. Condition and operation studies cost $23,597. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in September 1983 except for the training wall, three tieup dolphins at Masonboro Inlet and the three remaining bridges. Joseph P. Knapp Bridge was completed on November 13, 1986. Design of Core Creek Bridge was initiated in FY 87 and Hobucken in FY 89. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1989 was $136,816,982, of which $42,615,329 was for new work including $86,851 in contributed funds and $94,201,653 was for maintenance, including $667,300 in contributed funds. 4. BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is just inside Beaufort Inlet, adjacent to Morehead City Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for stopping erosion at Beaufort Inlet by jetties and sand fences at Fort Macon and Shackleford points and other shore protection; channels 15 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide in Bulkhead and Gallants Channels, ex- 6-4 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT cept for a depth of 12 feet in the upper 5,000 feet of Gallants Channel; a harbor of refuge in Town Creek 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long connected to Gallants Channel by a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 1,400 feet long; a basin 12 feet deep, 600 feet wide in front of the town of Beaufort except for a channel 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide through the basin; a stone bulkhead from Town Marsh across Bird Shoal to the west end of Carrot Island; a channel 14 feet deep, 70 feet wide, and 1,900 feet long from Bulkhead Channel to a turning basin 14 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 300 feet long near the upper end of Morgan Creek; and a channel in Taylors Creek 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide, extending about 2.6 miles easterly from about opposite Marsh Street in Beaufort to Lennoxville Point at North River, except for an 800-footlong section at the east end which is 12 feet deep. Total length of channels is 7.3 miles. Average tidal range is 2.5 feet at Beaufort and 3.5 feet at the inlet. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are fifty waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 2,000 feet. These facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Cost in connection with prior year pipeline dredging was $852. Survey cost in connection with cancelled dredging contract was $3,060. Between March 29 and June 29, 1989, the contract dredge Cherokee removed 30,117 cubic yards from shoals in Bulkhead Channel at a cost of $90,047. Condition and operation studies cost $7,841. Contributed funds of $750 were returned. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in October 1965 except for the Morgan Creek modification which was completed November 12, 1983. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Costs under existing project to September 30, 1989, were $827,040 for new work, including $34,000 contributed funds and $3,778,513 for maintenance, including $326,225 contributed funds, a total of $4,605,553. 5. BELHAVEN HARBOR, N. C. Location. The town of Belhaven is at the junction of Pantego Creek and Pungo River, about 11 miles above the mouth of the latter. The harbor consists of the lower reaches of Pantego Creek and is about 6,000 feet long. Pungo River forms part of the Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk and the St. Johns River. Norfolk is 130 miles north of Belhaven and Beaufort 66 miles south. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 123.) Existing project. This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide, extending from deep water in Pungo River to a point about 800 feet east of the highway bridge, with a turning basin 800 feet long and 300 feet wide at the upper end; and for the construction of timber breakwaters at the mouth of Pantego Creek. Pungo River is a nontidal stream with little slope. Variations in the water surface, due to winds, seldom exceed 2 feet above or below mean stage. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930 and June 20, 1938. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 12 wharves along the town waterfront, all of timber construction; one is owned by the town and is open to all without charge; four have rail connections. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Adjustment in cost of timber breakwater repair resulted in a decrease of $1,305. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in September 1940. 6. CAPE FEAR RIVER, N. C. ABOVE WILMINGTON Location. The river is formed by confluence of the Deep and Haw Rivers at Moncure, Chatham County, N. C., and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Cape Fear, near the southern extremity of the State. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 426.) Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing projects. The authorized project provides for a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Wilmington to a turning basin 400 feet wide and 550 feet long at Navassa (2.9 miles); a channel 12 feet deep and 140 feet wide from Navassa to mileboard 30 at Acme, with five channel cutoffs, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide to eliminate sharp bends; a channel 8 feet deep from mileboard 30 to Fayetteville by constructing three locks and dams and by dredging river shoals; and recreational facilities at the locks and dams. Total length of the project channels is 113.9 miles. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910; June 26, 1934; August 30, 1935; August 26, 1937; October 27, 1965; and Section 4, Flood Control Act of 1944. For further details see Annual Reports for 1962 and 1970. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are twelve waterfront facilities on the river, with a total frontage of 1,190 feet. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U. S. debris boat Snell snagged and cleared and maintained the buoy systems at the locks at a cost of $197,450. Periodic inspections of locks and dams cost $9,849. Emergency electrical repairs at three locks and dams cost $21,894. Construction of a metal building at lock and dam No. 1 cost $24,349. Repair of damage to pile clusters at lock and dam No. 2 cost $6,327. Condition and operation studies cost $65,763. Operation and maintenance of three locks and dams cost $248,391. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in June 1970. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1989, were $18,598,940 of which $3,610,454 (including $1,226,385 public works) was for new work and $14,988,486 for maintenance. 6-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 7. CHANNEL FROM BACK SOUND TO LOOKOUT BIGHT, N. C. Location. The project is located on the coast of North Carolina, 8 miles east of Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 7 feet deep from Back Sound, through Shackleford Banks to Lookout Bight. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 26, 1937, and March 2, 1945. For details see Annual Report for 1959. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Not required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Disposal area stabilization and monitoring at Bardens Inlet cost $7,067. Improvement of disposal area cost $142,818. Condition and operation studies cost $7,048. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in May 1965. 8. FAR CREEK, N.C. Location. Flows easterly from Engelhard into Pamlico Sound, about 95 miles south of Norfolk, Va. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1232). Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep and 80 to 100 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to highway bridge at Engelhard, with a turning basin 12 feet deep, 200 feet wide and 900 feet long at the head. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930, and May 17, 1950. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Project is served by 12 waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 2,300 feet, all privately owned. Existing facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Design for future years pipeline dredging cost $6,602. Condition and operation studies cost $2,098. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed June 1957. 9. LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, N. C. Location. The project is located on the south coast of North Carolina about 12 miles west of Cape Fear River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1236 and Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep at low water from the ocean to the bridge at Supply 12.5 miles above, to be obtained by dredging through oyster rocks and mudflats. The completed river portion of the project above the waterway was reclassified to the active category in 1971. Lunar tidal ranges in Lockwoods Folly River are 4.5 feet at the inlet and 2 feet at the head of navigation at Supply. The existing project was authorized by the 1890 River and Harbor Act. (See Annual Report for 1887, page 1099.) A modification to enlarge the channel from 6 to 12 feet deep and from 100 to 150 feet wide across the ocean bar for a distance of 4,700 feet was approved by the Chief of Engineers on June 3, 1980, under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. During dredging operations it became apparent that establishment of the 12-foot project would not be possible with currently available equipment. Therefore, the Chief of Engineers, on December 20, 1983, approved the District's recommendation that further construction activity for the Lockwoods Folly Inlet project be suspended until suitable equipment becomes available and that the project be maintained at an 8-foot project depth in the interim. Local cooperation. For the new modification local interests must: (a) pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest, one-half of the first costs of construction allocated to recreational boating; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages resulting from changes in groundwater levels, saltwater intrusion, or wave action due to the construction works, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractor; (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers and, (d) provide depths in berthing areas commensurate with the project depths, and provide service facilities. Terminal facilities. Thirty-one piers and wharves on the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway at Holden Beach, about 1.25 miles west of Lockwoods Folly Inlet, with a total frontage of about 1,980 feet available. At Dixons Landing, about 2 miles upstream of the inlet, there are five wharves with a total frontage of 240 feet. Numerous natural landings are used for loading and unloading small boats. Berthing space in the vicinity of Lockwoods Folly Inlet totals about 2,220 feet. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 43,610 cubic yards from shoals in Lockwoods Folly Inlet at a cost of $91,492. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 89,145 cubic yards from shoals in Lockwoods Folly Inlet at a cost of $229,404. Cost in connection with prior year pipeline dredging was $241. General archeological investigations cost $1,533. Archeological investigations of the Bendigo and new wrecks cost $2,295. Condition and operation studies cost $28,421. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the project was completed in June 1965 except for the latest modification. Work was initiated on the latest modification on September 23, 1982, with a depth of 8 feet being reached in October 1982. The project will be maintained at the 8-foot depth until suitable equipment for deepening to 12 feet becomes available. 6-6 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT 10. MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, N. C. Location. The project is located on the northeastern side of Roanoke Island, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1229.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the Atlantic Ocean through Oregon Inlet with connecting 12-foot channels, 100 feet wide, to Pamlico Sound, Manteo, and Wanchese; and a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide connecting the Manteo-Oregon Inlet Channel with Albemarle Sound. Length of channels is 25.4 miles. A newly authorized modification provides for stabilization of Oregon Inlet with a dual rubble-mound jetty system, including means for sand transfer to the downdrift beach; a channel, 20 feet deep and 400 feet wide, through the ocean bar at Oregon Inlet; a channel, 14 feet deep and 120 feet wide, from the gorge in Oregon Inlet to and through Roanoke Sound to and including a 15-acre basin of the same depth at Wanchese; and a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 12-foot-deep channel in Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay through Roanoke and Albemarle Sounds to deep water near the northern end of Croatan Sound. The 12-foot Croatan Sound channel has been deferred due to lack of economic justification. The estimated Federal cost for the modification is $86,100,000 (1989). The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910; October 17, 1940; May 17, 1950; and December 31, 1970; and under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. For the new modification, local interests must: (a) provide all lands, easements, and rightsof- way for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, including suitable areas required for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent maintenance; (c) continue to provide and maintain adequate terminal and transfer facilities, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (d) provide and maintain necessary mooring and berthing facilities in any enlarged basin, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (e) provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in the related project areas; (f) accomplish such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, electrical powerlines, telephone lines, or other utility facilities as well as their maintenance; (g) establish a competent and properly constituted public body empowered to regulate the use, growth, and free development of the harbor facilities, with the understanding that said facilities will be open to all on equal terms; (h) and establish regulations prohibiting the discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the water of the harbor by the users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; (i) pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreational navigation presently estimated at $12,700,000, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreational navigation facilities presently estimated at $1,294,000 annually; (j) pay 10 percent of the costs allocated to navigation during construction presently estimated at $8,200,000; (k) pay an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations (except utility relocations), and dredged material disposal areas presently estimated at $7,300,000. Reasonable assurances have been received. The State of N. C. has constructed the Wanchese Harbor portion and was reimbursed under Sec. 215, PL 90483. Terminal facilities. The project is served by 33 waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 3,320 feet. Additional wharves and facilities will be provided with the enlarged basin at Wanchese. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U. S. debris boat Snell maintained dredging ranges and mooring dolphins at a cost of $33,307. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 91,987 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $181,041. Adjustment for correction of prior year cost resulted in cost of $112,000 for the Merritt. Merritt cost also includes $559,000 which should have been charged to the Schweizer. During intermittent periods the U. S. sidecasting dredge Schweizer removed 870,982 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $1,748,231 including the $559,000 that was charged to the Merritt. During intermittent periods the U. S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 77,638 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $53,976. Cost in connection with prior year hopper dredging was $105,104. A claim in connection with FY 86 hopper dredging cost $178. Between January 6 and February 11, May 5-28 and July 9 and August 11, 1989, the contract dredges Hampton Roads, Cherokee and Marion removed 546,901 cubic yards from shoals in Old House Channel and Channel to Wanchese at a cost of $1,332,274. Between August 31 and September 30, 1989, the contract dredge Hampton Roads removed 110,000 cubic yards from shoals in the vicinity of Oregon Inlet at a cost of $156,099. Between April 3-27, 1989, the contract dredges Atchafalaya and Mermentau removed 159,000 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $556,118. Between January 7 and April 3, 1989, the contract dredge A tchafalaya removed 290,000 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $687,056. Cost in connection with prior year hopper dredging was $1,884. Design for cancelled pipeline dredging contract was $4,250. Expansion of disposal islands cost $14,996. Improvements to disposal areas cost $230,143. Environmental coordination for realignment of intersection from Old House Channel to the inlet cost $8,272. Archeological investigations cost $3,396. Project monitoring cost $35,549. Condition and operation studies cost $181,523. Contributed funds of $418,000 were received for depositing of dredge material on Pea Island. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for the latest modification. (For further details, see Annual Report of 1962.) 6-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 11. MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the northern shore of Bogue Sound, adjacent to Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Previous project. For details see page 470 of Annual Report for 1935. Existing project. The authorized project provides for deepening of the channel, from the 42-foot-depth contour in the Atlantic Ocean through the ocean bar to the gorge in Beaufort Inlet, to 42 feet over a bottom width of 450 feet, thence to a depth of 40 feet in the east leg of the turning basin including the 1,200-foot diameter turning area, with widths of 600 feet in the cutoff channel, and 400 feet wide to the turning basin and connecting shallow-draft channels. Project deepening was completed on August 2, 1978. Jetties at Beaufort Inlet were reclassified to the "active" category on March 8, 1972. The jetties were deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. In general the project as it now exists was authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act (S.D. 54, 84th Cong., 1st sess.) and the River and Harbor Act of December 31, 1970. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Twenty-six waterfront facilities serve the port, with a total frontage of 1,250 feet. Marine terminals provide 5,300 feet of berthing space, with a depth alongside of 35 feet, and facilities for transfer of cargoes between rail and water carriers. Improvements to facilities were completed in 1969. For further details see Port Series No. 12, revised 1987, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between March 29 and June 29, 1989, the contract dredge Cherokee removed 269,178 cubic yards from shoals in the inner harbor and 46,758 cubic yards from shoals at the State Ports at a Federal cost of $568,453 and contributed funds cost of $82,762. Between June 20 and August 24, 1989, the contract dredges Mermentau and A tchafalaya removed 539,192 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $1,016,406. Design for cancelled pipeline dredging contract cost $9,180. Cost in connection with prior years dredging was $3,616. Monitoring at Morehead City Harbor cost $39,397. Ocean dumping monitoring in conjunction with EPA cost $11,123. Condition and operation studies cost $126,912. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete except for the jetties. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1989, was $52,503,694 of which $6,501,569 was for new work (including $553,477 public works funds) and $46,002,125 for maintenance, including $1,256,686 contributed funds. 12. OCRACOKE INLET, N. C. Location. The inlet connects Pamlico Sound with the Atlantic Ocean, about 30 miles southwest of Cape Hatteras and 43 miles northeast of Cape Lookout. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel across the ocean bar 18 feet deep and 400 feet wide. Construction of a jetty extending from Ocracoke Island to the Atlantic Ocean was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of July 14, 1960. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Archeological investigation of the inlet cost $695. Condition and operation studies cost $8,553. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in August 1971. 13. PAMLICO AND TAR RIVERS, N. C. Location. The two names apply to the same river, known as the Tar above and as the Pamlico below Washington, N. C. This stream rises in Person County, flows southeasterly 180 miles to Washington, thence 38 miles to Pamlico Sound. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 537.) Previous project. For details see page 502 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 200 feet wide from 12-foot contour in the river below Washington to Atlantic Coastline Railroad bridge at Washington; thence 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide to a turning basin of same depth, 200 feet wide, 300 feet long, in Hardee Creek, 1,500 feet above its mouth; thence 6 feet deep, 75 feet wide to Greenville; thence 20 inches deep, 60 feet wide to Tarboro; and thence to clear the natural channel to Little Falls. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 14, 1876; March 3, 1879; August 11, 1888; March 2, 1907; July 25, 1912; July 3,1930; and August 26, 1937. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 54 wharves on the portion of this river under improvement, of which 34 are along the waterfront at Washington, 19 between Washington and the mouth, and only 1 in usable condition above Washington. They have a frontage of 3,570 feet. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between July 22 and 25, 1989, the U. S. debris boat Snell snagged and cleared at a cost of $18,100. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. (For details see Annual Report for 1962.) 14. ROANOKE RIVER, N. C. Location. Rises in Blue Ridge Mountains, west of Roanoke, Va., flows southeasterly about 398 miles, and empties into westerly end of Albemarle Sound, N. C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1228 and Post Route Map of North Carolina.) 6-8 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Albemarle Sound to 1 mile above Plymouth, N. C.; thence a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide to Hamilton; and thence a channel 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide to Palmyra Landing. Project authorized by River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1871; July 3, 1930; and June 20, 1938. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Thirty-two waterfront facilities serve the waterway. Facilities appear adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between April 4 and 17, 1989, the U. S. debris boat Snell snagged and cleared at a cost of $22,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. 15. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located at the southwest end of Ocracoke Island, a portion of the Outer Banks on the southeast coast of North Carolina, separating Pamlico Sound from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for basin depths of 12 feet in Silver Lake Harbor; an entrance channel 12 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from the basin to Teaches Hole Channel; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Big Foot Slough Bar to the 12-foot contour in Pamlico Sound; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Teaches Hole Channel to the gorge in Ocracoke Inlet; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, across Bluff Shoal; and for rubble-mound training walls on the north and south sides of the entrance channel, 300 feet and 400 feet long, respectively. Mean tidal ranges are 1.9 feet in the throat of Ocracoke Inlet and 1 foot at Ocracoke. Variations in the water surface of Pamlico Sound are generally due to winds and seldom exceed 1 or 2 feet above or below mean stage. Severe storms have raised the water surface as much as 7 feet above normal water level at Ocracoke. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Twelve waterfront facilities serve the harbor. These facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between February 28 and May 3, 1989, the contract dredges Enterprise and Marion removed 193,695 cubic yards from shoals in Big Foot Slough and Teaches Hole Channels at a cost of $658,970. Condition and operation studies cost $10,530. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed July 28, 1970. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) 16. SMITHS CREEK (PAMLICO COUNTY), N. C. Location. Smiths Creek rises in Pamlico County, flows generally southerly, and empties into Neuse River at the town of Oriental, 25 miles southeast of New Bern, N. C. It is about 5 miles long but navigable for only 2 or 3 miles above its mouth. (See U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 538.) Existing project. This project provides for a rubblemound breakwater starting at a point on the mainland in Oriental and extending 800 feet southwesterly; and an entrance channel in Smiths Creek, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from that depth in Neuse River to and including a basin, generally parallel to the breakwater 10 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 800 feet long at Oriental. The total length of the channel and basin is about 5,000 feet. Variations in water level due to winds seldom exceed 2 feet above or below mean stage. Observations of 4 years duration show that the extreme range of wind tides is 8.3 feet. The existing project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910, and September 3, 1954. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facitilies. There are 16 wharves in this harbor, all of timber construction with pile foundations. They have a frontage varying from 6 to 40 feet, the total frontage being about 400 feet. None have rail connections. One wharf was built by the town and is to be maintained in perpetuity as a public wharf. The remaining wharves are all privately owned but are generally open to the public when not required by their owners. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Design for future year dredging cost $2,508. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in March 1956. 17. WATERWAY CONNECTING PAMLICO SOUND AND BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located in Core Sound, west of the outer banks of eastern North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 420 and 1233.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a through channel to Core Sound 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to Beaufort Harbor; an alternative route of the same dimensions through Back Sound by way of channels at the east and west ends of Harkers Island; a channel 7 feet deep and 70 feet wide from the through channel to the local harbor at Cedar Island, including the authorized passage and future maintenance of a channel through the existing private basin, and an access channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide and about 400 feet long to a basin the same depth, 60 feet by 100 feet; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide from the through channel to Atlantic; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide, with a basin 200 feet by 500 feet, the same depth, at Sealevel; a channel 5 feet deep and 75 feet wide, with basin 150 feet by 130 feet, the same depth, at Davis; a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide with a basin 100 feet by 600 feet, the same depth, at Marshallberg; an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from Back Sound to harbor of refuge 120 feet by 250 feet, the same depth in Brooks Creek at the west end of Harkers Island; and a channel 7 feet deep and 70 feet wide, from the existing side channel at Atlantic, N.C., to the 6-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 mouth of Little Port Brook; thence 7 feet deep and 50 feet wide, along the Brook to a basin 600 feet long, 180 feet wide, and 7 feet deep, with a breakwater, beginning at a point between the mouth of Little Port Brook and White Point, running along the channel approximately 2,000 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. The length of the authorized channels is about 50.6 miles. (See Table 6-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date for completed portion. Terminal facilities. Sixteen small wharves serve the waterway. Additional facilities are needed along Core Sound. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between February 28 and May 3, 1989, the contract dredges Enterprise and Marion removed 30,753 cubic yards from shoals in Wainwright Slough at a cost of $269,200. Condition and operation studies cost $597. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in September 1972. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1961.) 18. WILMINGTON HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the Cape Fear River, on southeast coast of North Carolina, between the Atlantic Ocean and Wilmington, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 426.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1804 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 533 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide from the Atlantic Ocean through the ocean bar and entrance channels to Southport, thence 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the upper end of the anchorage basin (foot of Castle Street) at Wilmington, thence 32 feet deep and 400 feet wide, to Hilton Bridge over Northeast Cape Fear River; a 38-footdeep anchorage basin at Wilmington; a 32-foot-deep turning basin opposite the principal terminals; a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide, about 3 miles long, in Cape Fear River; and a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Hilton Bridge over Northeast Cape Fear River to a point 1.66 miles above, including a turning basin of the same depth, 700 feet wide and 500 feet long, at a point 1.25 miles above the bridge. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930; March 2, 1945; May 17, 1950; October 23, 1962; and March 10, 1964; under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. A modification to widen the existing anchorage basin by 100 feet was authorized on July 13, 1982, under Sec. 5 of the Cong. Appro. Act of March 4, 1915. A modification to widen the 38-foot by 400-foot Fourth East Jetty Channel to 500 feet; deepen the 32-foot by 400-foot channel between Castle Street and the N. C. 133 bridge to 35 feet; widen the 32-foot by 1000-foot by 800-foot turning basin just above the mouth of the Northeast Cape Fear River by 50 feet on the west side and deepen to 35 feet; and environmental improvements to include acquiring, by easements or fee title, about 2,800 acres of wetlands, river bluffs and ecotones and provision for a minimum number of specially designed corridors across the wetlands for industrial access to the river was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of November 17, 1986 (PL 99-662). The estimated Federal cost is $9,180,000 (1989). (For further details of authorization, see 1962 Annual Report.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date except for latest modification. In accordance with the cost-sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the non-Federal sponsor must (1) provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas including necessary retaining dikes presently estimated at $870,000, and bear all operation and maintenance costs for dikes presently estimated at $4,000 annually; (2) modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project, presently estimated at $8,400,000; (3) pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction presently estimated at $1,730,000 and reimburse an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction (which is entirely offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-ofway, relocations (except utility relocations), and dredged material disposal areas); and (4) pay 25 percent of the first costs allocated to fish and wildlife enhancement presently estimated at $1,270,000, and pay 25 percent of the costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of fish and wildlife facilities presently estimated at $14,000 annually. Terminal facilities. Forty-three principal wharves, piers, and docks at port of Wilmington, with a berthing space of about 20,000 linear feet serve the harbor. These facilities handle general cargo and petroleum products. (For further details, see Port Series No. 12, revised 1987, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U. S. debris boat Snell snagged and moved buoys at a cost of $88,767. Between January 17 and 31, 1989, the U. S. hopper dredge McFarland removed 235,557 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $638,453. Between January 3 and March 14, 1989, the contract dredge Enterprise removed 959,982 cubic yards from shoals in the anchorage basin and 93,046 from shoals at the State Ports at a Federal cost of $776,461 and a contributed funds cost of $123,751. Between August 10 and September 30, 1989, the contract dredge Manhattan Island removed 888,851 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $1,797,282. Between December 9 and 28, 1988 and February 1 and 2, 1989, the contract dredge Hampton Roads removed 97,285 cubic yards from shoals in the 32-foot project at a cost of $222,569. Contributed funds of $7,259 were expended for spillway pipe and installation. Cost in connection with prior year bucket and barge contract was $3,597. Environmental analysis of proposed dredged material disposal sites cost $20,259. Ocean dumping monitoring cost $8,873. Endangered species study cost $9,628. Sec. 933 dredge material disposal study for Bald Head Island cost $5,685. Condition and operation studies cost $316,777. Contributed funds of $100,728 were expended for dike repair and construction on Eagle Island. 6-10 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the project was completed October 1982 except for latest modification. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1989, was $75,181,778 of which $14,089,612 was for new work and $65,212,255 was for maintenance, including $4,242,024 contributed funds. Flood Control 19. CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Work covered by this project consists of a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. Public Law 88-253, approved December 30, 1963, authorized three principal dams and reservoirs and a series of smaller reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in accordance with the comprehensive plans in House Document 508, 87th Congress, 2d session. The act also provides that the appropriate agencies of the Departments of the Army and Agriculture shall conduct joint investigations and surveys and prepare a report on the upper tributaries of the Cape Fear River in the interest of watershed protection and flood prevention, and the conservation, development, utilization, and disposal of water. The report was prepared in compliance with provisions of Public Law 87-639. The study was unfavorable and has been submitted to Congress. No further action will be taken. A list of the dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensive plan follows. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) Estimates of cost as given are based on 1960 price levels, except the ones for B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake and Randleman Lake, which were revised in 1989, and Howards Mill Lake in 1980. These three projects have been authorized for construction in accordance with the above authorization. Howards Mill Lake was reclassified to the "deferred" category in October 1980 due to the current lack of economic justification. Local cooperation. Requirements are given in the individual project reports. 19A. B. EVERETT JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is located on the Haw River, N. C., 4.3 miles above its mouth, and 2.5 miles north of Moncure, N.C. Existing project. The project provides for an earth dam 1,330 feet long with a maximum height of 112 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled, unpaved chute spillway, and a controlled 19-foot diameter outlet structure. Some saddle dikes are required beyond the spillway. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 753,500 acre-feet, of which 538,400 acre-feet is for flood control and a conservation pool of 215,100 acre-feet for water-quality control, water supply, and sedimentation. The reservoir will be operated as a unit of a coordinated system for control of floods in the Cape Fear River Basin and for water supply, water-quality control, and other purposes. Estimated cost for new work is $143,500,000 (1989), consisting of $85,130,000 for construction, and $58,370,000 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The existing project was authorized by Public Law 88-253 approved December 30, 1963 (H.D. 508, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must protect downstream channels from encroachments and obstructions which would adversely affect operation of the project; reimburse the Federal Government for all costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, presently estimated at $3,600,000 and bear all annual costs for operation, maintenance, and major replacements allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, an amount presently estimated at $42,000 annually; and contribute toward the cost of the ranger security buildings, an amount presently estimated at $100,000. A contract between the State of N. C. and the United States for water supply storage space was executed by ASA (CW) on April 10, 1988. In addition, the State of N. C. has leased the project for public park, recreational, fish, wildlife, and other natural resource management purposes and the estimated cost to the State for O&M under this lease is $778,000 annually. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Relocation of Public Service Gasline was initiated at a cost of $175,000. Construction of wildlife subimpoundments was completed at a cost of $102,887. The N. C. maintenance center was completed at a cost of $323,356. Ebenezer Church recreation area was completed at a cost of $1,267,006. Poplar Point recreation area was continued at a cost of $590,695. Crosswinds recreation area was continued at a cost of $240,450. Seaforth recreation area was completed at a cost of $921,711. Repairs at Crosswinds Marina due to slope failure cost $85,427. The State administration center was continued at a cost of $558,922. Total Federal expenditures were $5,392,728, including the above items. Contributed funds of $31,572 were expended for the maintenance center security building. Status of plans and specs: New Hope Overlook and Robeson Creek, 15 percent; and Rivers End and Wilderness Island O&M roads, 1 percent. Maintenance: Automatic gate control system and piezometer reading equipment cost $54,086. Sedimentation surveys cost $16,816. Drought management plan cost $3,705. Embankment criteria report cost $23,373. Periodic inspection report cost $27,093. Archeological surveys cost $1,186. Ditch repairs and electric modifications to intake tower cost $37,073. Normal operation and maintenance cost $814,315. Maintenance and operation of dams cost $73,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. All facilities are basically complete expect for Public Service Gasline, recreation facilities, and project operations facilities. Impoundment was completed in February 1982 with dedication on May 1, 1982. Project completion is scheduled for June 1993. 19B. RANDLEMAN LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is located on Deep River, N. C., 6-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 about 15 miles south of Greensboro and about 2 miles upstream from the town of Randleman. The damsite and about two-thirds of the reservoir would lie in Randolph County. The upper one-third of the reservoir would lie in Guilford County. Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of an earth dam 2,300 feet long with a maximum height of 110 feet above the streambed to create a reservoir with gross storage of 108,000 acre-feet, consisting of 46,000 acre-feet for flood control and a conservation pool of 62,000 acre-feet for water supply, water-quality control and sedimentation. Randleman Lake is the second project of the comprehensive plan of development for the Cape Fear River Basin, providing reservoir storage for flood control, water supply, and recreation. Estimated cost of new work is $117,000,000 (1989), consisting of $57,956,000 for construction and $59,044,000 for lands and damages, including relocations. The existing project was authorized by the 1968 Flood Control Act (H.D. 343, 90th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Based on the termination of Federal interest in the project by the ASA(CW), no local cooperation is required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Project coordination cost $308. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preconstruction planning was completed in FY 1982. The Piedmont Triad Regional Water Authority is building a water supply and possible recreation facility at Randleman. All pertinent data that may be useful in the construction has been provided. 20. CAROLINA BEACH AND VICINITY, N. C. Location. The project is in New Hanover County, about 15 miles southeast of Wilmington, N. C., on the peninsula which separates lower Cape Fear River from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Map 834.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of a dune with a base generally bordering at or near the building line, with a crown width of 25 feet at an elevation of 15 feet above mean low water, together with integral construction of a beach berm with a crown width of 50 feet at elevation 12, extending about 31,800 feet from the northern limits of Carolina Beach to the southern limits of Kure Beach; initial deposition of sufficient material north of Carolina Beach to serve as a feeder beach; and Federal participation in the cost of beach nourishment for a period not to exceed 10 years from the year of completion of initial placement. Along the northern 2,050 feet, the project includes a rock revetment at elevation 12 fronted by a 130-foot-wide berm at elevation 8. The area south of Carolina Beach was reclassified to the active category, June 1985. Approved estimated Federal cost for new work is $16,400,000 (1989). The project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H.D. 418, 87th Cong. 2d sess.). The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized Federal participation in future nourishment for 50 years. This cost has not been included. Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) Provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction; (b) make required relocations and alterations of streets, utilities, or structures; (c) contribute 37.9 percent of the total first cost, with credit allowed for (a) and (b); (d) hold the United States free from damages; (e) maintain all works after completion; (f) maintain continued public ownership of the shore; (g) adopt and enforce appropriate ordinances to provide for preservation of improvement and its protective vegetation; (h) control water pollution to extent necessary to safeguard health of bathers; and (i) at least annually inform interests affected that project will not provide any substantial protection from ocean surges higher in elevation than that of Hurricane Hazel, October 15, 1954. Requirements have been fulfilled to date for the town of Carolina Beach portion of the project only. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: An economic reanalysis of the area south of Carolina Beach Beach was initiated at a cost of $179,364. Final cost from project nourishment in FY 1988 resulted in a decrease in Federal cost of $2,600 and an increase in contributed funds cost of $3,510. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction was completed August 12, 1982, except for grassing which was completed in September 1983. The second increment of renourishment was completed in May 1988. 21. DAN RIVER, MADISON WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT, N. C. Location. The town of Madison is located in northcentral North Carolina in Rockingham County about 25 miles north of Greensboro, N. C. The Madison Wastewater Treatment Plant, which is the object of this project, is located on the west bank of the Dan River, about 3,500 feet upstream from its confluence with the Mayo River. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Mayodan, N. C.) Existing project. The project provides for a riprap layer placed on a layer of stone fill and extension of an 18-inch outfall pipe. The protection extends 500 feet. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers on February 17, 1988, under Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and disposal areas, and all alterations and relocations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities, and other structures and improvements necessary for construction; provide, during the process of construction, an amount equal to not less than 25 percent of total project costs, at least 5 percent of which will be cash with credit to be allowed for the above items; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; and assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $500,000. Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Final cost adjustments resulted in a decrease in Federal cost of $2,881 and an increase in contributed funds cost of $3,908. 6-12 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in August 1988. 22. LEESVILLE, VA., ROANOKE RIVER, SEC. 32, DEMO. PROJECT Location. The project is located on the Roanoke (Staunton) River in southwest Virginia near the Town of Leesville in Campbell and Pittsylvania Counties. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Leesville, Va.) Existing project. The project provides for a total of about 2,200 linear feet of streambank protection on two separate sites along a 3-mile segment of the river between Leesville Dam and the town of Leesville. Three methods of erosion control were used, they were: stone rubble with vegetation, rubber tire mattress and rock windrow. The project was funded for construction by the Chief of Engineers in February 1978, under Section 32, P.L. 93-251. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Monitoring of Leesville and Little Rockfish Creek cost $3,330. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in March 1981. The project is functioning as designed. 23. NEUSE RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Works covered by this project consist of a series of dams and reservoirs in the Neuse River Basin in North Carolina within a radius of 50 miles from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1965 authorized construction of the Falls project as the key project in the recommended general plan of development of the Neuse River Basin. The plan will serve as a guide for immediate and future development of the basin's water resources as set forth in House Document 175, 89th Congress, 1st Session. A list of projects included in the general plan of development follows. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) Estimated costs as given are based on 1963 price levels, except for Falls Lake which was revised in 1989. 23A. FALLS LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is on the Neuse River about 10 miles north of the city of Raleigh, North Carolina. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an earth dam 1,915 feet long with a maximum height of 95 feet above streambed. The dam has a 30-foot top width. An uncontrolled chute spillway, 100 feet wide, is located in the east abutment. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 374,450 acre-feet, of which 243,050 acre-feet is for flood rnntrnl. 45.000 acre-feet for water supply for the city of Raleigh, 61,330 acre-feet for water quality control, and 25,070 acre-feet for sediment storage. The reservoir will be operated as the initial unit of a coordinated system for control of floods in the Neuse River Basin for water supply, water quality control, recreation, and other purposes. Estimated cost of new work is $180,000,000 (1989) consisting of $85,858,000 for construction and $94,142,000 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The project was authorized by the 1965 Flood Control Act (H.D. 175, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) Local cooperation. Local interests must prevent encroachment on downstream channels that would interfere with the operation of the reservoir; pay the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, the entire amount of construction cost allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $13,800,000 and entire amount of operation, maintenance, and replacement costs allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $98,000 annually, the final amounts to be determined after actual costs are known; administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees), with interest, one-half of the separable cost of the project allocated to recreation and one-fourth of the separable cost allocated to fish and wildlife enhancement, the amount involved currently being estimated at $19,800,000, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife lands and facilities, the amount involved currently being estimated at $1,340,000 on an average annual basis. Formal assurances have been received. The N. C. Department of Natural and Economic Resources has been authorized by an act of legislation to assure payment of all non- Federal costs allocable to water supply in all Federal projects as required by law. The State will require repayment of water supply costs, by the users. A contract between the city of Raleigh and the United States for water-supply storage space was approved by the Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement for cost sharing of recreational lands and facilities in accordance with P.L. 89-72 was approved by the Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement in accordance with Section 221 of P.L. 91-611 was executed on October 10, 1972. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Wildlife subimpoundments were continued at a cost of $2,359,963. State maintenance center was completed at a cost of $1,090,587. Rolling View campground and recreation facilities were continued at a cost of $593,362. State administration center was continued at a cost of $129,138. Rehabilitation of the Mangum House was continued at a cost of $202,933. Total Federal expenditures were $6,188,558, including the above items. Status of plans and specs: Beaverdam recreation area, 98 percent; Holly Point recreation area, 25 percent; and B.W. Wells and Shinleaf Peninsula recreation area, 5 percent. Maintenance: Repairs for erosion on the I-85 utility fill cost $168,860. Intake tower gate maintenance cost $108,986. Normal operation and maintenance cost $770,991. Maintenance and operation of dams cost $73,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Reservoir filling was completed on December 7, 1983. Dedication ceremonies were held on April 30, 1983. All facilities are basically complete except for fish and wildlife facilities, recreation 6-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 facilities, State management and 0 & M facilities and project modifications due to the water storage shortage. 24. STUART, VA. Location. The project is located on the South Mayo River at Stuart, Va., above and below Route 8 highway. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Stuart, Va.) Existing project. The recommended plan consists of a 100-foot bottom-width high flow diversion channel combined with downstream river widening. A weir will be placed across the entrance to the diversion channel and a bench channel design will be used for the downstream river widening. The South Mayo River above Route 8 highway will be widened to a 50-foot bottom width, using a trapezoidal channel design and the commercial site northwest of Route 8 will be filled to the elevation of approximately the 200-year frequency flood. All river widening, except for a short distance above Route 8, will be done on the north bank. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers on February 1, 1985, under Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and spoil disposal areas, and all alterations and relocations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities, and other structures and improvements necessary for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $4 million; prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstruction or encroachments; continue to enforce flood plain regulations that comply with FEMA guidelines; and at least annually, inform affected interests regarding the limitations of the protection afforded by the project. Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction was completed at a cost of $2,107. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed and turned over to locals in November 1987. 25. WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, N. C. Location. A small island 10 miles east of Wilmington, N. C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Map p. 834.) Existing project. Construct a dune with a base bordering at or near the building line, with a crown width of 25 feet at elevation 15 feet above mean low water, together with integral construction of a beach berm with a crown width of 50 feet at elevation 12, extending about 14,000 feet from Moores Inlet on the north to Masonboro Inlet on the south. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H.D. 511, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized Federal participation in future nourishment for the life of the project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A reevaluation report to determine if the Federal government will continue to participate in future nourishment for the life of the project cost $50,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. All work under the initial authorization has been completed. 26. YADKIN RIVER BASIN, N. C. AND S. C. Location. The river rises on the eastern slope of the Blue Ridge Mountains in western North Carolina, flows generally easterly about 100 miles to the vicinity of Donnaha, North Carolina, thence southeasterly 104 miles to its confluence with Uwharrie River near Badin, North Carolina, where its name changes to Great Pee Dee River. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of July 24, 1946, authorized construction of four flood control dams in the Upper Yadkin River Basin, two on the Yadkin River above Wilkesboro, North Carolina, and two on Reddies River, a tributary stream. Studies made subsequent to authorization established the economic advantage of providing needed flood-control storage in only two reservoirs, one on the Reddies and one on the Yadkin. Present planning considers only the two-reservoir plan, W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir constructed 1962 and Reddies River Lake. W. Kerr Scott was transferred to the Wilmington District from Charleston in fiscal year 1980. Any future work on Reddies River will also be done by the Wilmington District. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) 26A. W. KERR SCOTT DAM AND RESERVOIR, N. C. Location. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir is on Yadkin River, North Carolina, about 6 miles upstream from Wilkesboro. At full flood-control pool elevation (1,075 feet mean sea level), the reservoir extends 15.7 miles upstream to the Wilkes-Caldwell County line. Existing project. The project consists of a rolled earthfill dam 1,740 feet long, with top of dam at elevation 1,107.5 feet mean sea level or about 148 feet above streambed elevation; a spillway near the north abutment of the dam in a rock cut with crest elevation 1,075; and outlet works consisting of an intake structure, control tower, and a circular concrete conduit 12.25 feet in diameter through the base of the dam near the south abutment. The reservoir has a gross capacity of 153,000 acre-feet of which 112,000 acre-feet are reserved for flood control, 33,000 acre-feet will be used as required for water supply, and 8,000 acrefeet being contained in the minimum pool. Estimated cost is $9,110,000 (1983) for new work. The existing project was authorized by the 1946 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. For details, see page 413 of Annual Report for 1963. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Seismic studies cost $6,003. Design of the management center cost $18,103. Liquefaction study cost $45,114. Drought management plan cost $1,013. Periodic inspections cost $21,876. Intake tower gate maintenance cost $29,383. Design for stilling basin repairs cost $17,766. Ar- 6-14 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT cheological surveys cost $1,549. Updating flood control data cost $57,753. Downstream economic study cost $1,787. Normal operation and maintenance cost $1,077,973. Maintenance and operation of dams cost $73,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was commenced in August 1960 and placed in operation for flood control and water storage purposes in August 1962. 27. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation, inspections were made for the following projects during fiscal year 1988: Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N. C.; Gapway Swamp, Columbus County, N. C.; Old Field Swamp, Robeson County, N. C.; Gardners Creek, Martin County, N. C.; New River, Beaufort County, N. C.; Filberts Creek, Edenton, N. C.; Pantego and Cucklers Creek, Beaufort County, River, Beaufort County, N. C.; and Filberts Creek, Edenton, N. C.; Pantego and Cucklers Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N. C.; Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N. C.; Pasquotank Dike, Pasquotank County, N. C.; Perquimans River, Perquimans County, N. C.; Core Creek, Craven County, N. C.; Princeville Dike, Edgecombe County, N. C.; Swift Creek, Pitt County, N. C.; Carolina Beach, New Hanover County, N. C.; Wrightsville Beach, New Hanover County, N. C.; Goldsboro, Neuse River, Wayne County, N. C.; Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.; Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N. C.; Black River, Harnett County, N. C.; Lick Run, Roanoke, Va.; Deep Creek, Edgecombe County, N. C.; Joyce Creek, Camden County, N. C.; Ararat River, Surry County, N. C.; South Mayo River, Stuart, Va; and Leith Creek, Scotland County, N. C. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation on local flood protection works where appropriate. Cost for the period was $40,500. Total cost to September 30, 1989, was $453,059, charged to operations. 28. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 6-K.) Emergency flood control activities and hurricane flood and shore-protection activities at Federally authorized projects (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). National Emergency Preparedness Program cost $154,118. Disaster Preparedness Program cost $92,433. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 29. ROANOKE RIVER BASIN, VA. AND N. C. Location. The project is on the Roanoke River and its tributaries in Virginia and North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles from Danville, Virginia. Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1944 approved a general plan for the comprehensive development of the Roanoke River Basin for flood control and other purposes, and authorized construction of John H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs. (See Table 6-J for a list of dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensive plan.) Local cooperation. None required. John H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs are the only projects in the comprehensive plan that have been authorized for construction. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) 29A. JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA. AND N. C. Location. The project is on Roanoke River, about 178.7 river miles above its mouth, in Mecklenburg County, Virginia, and 20.3 miles downstream from Clarksville, Virginia. The reservoir extends upstream on Roanoke River 56 miles and on Dan River 34 miles. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete gravity dam with wing and saddle dikes on the right and left banks, with a total length of about 22,285 feet. The reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated system of reservoirs in the Roanoke River Basin for control of floods, generation of hydroelectric power, regulation of low-water flow, and for other purposes. The power installation is 204,000 kilowatts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Estimated cost is $67,529,000 (1983) for construction and $24,521,000 for lands and damages, including relocation of highways, railroads, and utilities, a total of $92,050,000 for new work. The existing project was authorized by the 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Cost-sharing with the State of N. C. at various sites cost $2,131. Maintenance: Final cost on the management center was $4,276. Work in connection with acquistion of land in South Boston area cost $4,810. Study on the impact of water withdrawals cost $951. Work on the fire protection system for the powerhouse cost $3,301. Replacement of the powerhouse computer was continued at a cost of $117,161. Periodic inspection of the dam bridge cost $155. Final guide taking line study cost $81. Investigation and stability analysis of earth dikes cost $66,957. Investigation and stability analysis of Island Creek dam cost $25,200. Adjustment in cost of courtesy docks caused a decrease of $23,826. Northbend Park water system improvements cost $361,807. Replacement of powerhouse roof cost $236,784. Recreational road paving cost $145,229. Design and award for management center exhibits cost $26,657. Design for renovation of Rudds Creek recreation area cost $45,250. The real estate DM for acquisition in the South Boston area cost $55,685. Investigation of deep seated sliding of the dam cost $335,159. Drought management plan cost $5,908. Periodic inspection and evaluation of dam cost $13,342. Archeological survey cost $12,552. Design of quardrails for the earth dikes cost $19,245. Vegetative erosion control research cost $1,540. Powerhouse power study cost $2,472. Normal operation and maintenance cost $4,800,035. Maintenance and operation of dams cost $73,000. 6-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for additional recreational facilities. Production of power and protection from floods are provided by project. 29B. PHILPOTT LAKE, VA. Location. On Smith River, Virginia, 44.3 miles above its junction with Dan River, and 35 miles upstream from Virginia-North Carolina State line in Franklin and Henry Counties. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete gravity dam 892 feet long and with a maximum height of 220 feet. Reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for flood control in the Roanoke River Basin, generation of hydroelectric power, regulation of low-water flow, and for other purposes. The powerhouse has a total installation of 14,000 kilowatts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Federal cost estimate is $13,933,000 (1983) for construction and $1,157,000 for lands and damages, a total of $15,090,000. Existing project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Construction of management and visitors center was completed at a cost of $5,148. Replacement of the powerhouse computer was continued at a cost of $50,602. Periodic inspection and evaluation of the dam cost $8,906. Construction of the exhibits for the management center cost $167,580. Installation of a tile field for Salthouse Branch recreation area cost $58,890. Design of a boathouse and bulkhead at Philpott Park cost $1,292. Normal operation and maintenance cost $1,527,461. Maintenance and operation of dams cost $73,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for additional recreational facilities, and is providing power and flood protection. 30. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, located iri the Cape Fear River Basin, North Carolina, began fiscal year 1989 at elevation 210.52 feet m.s.l. or 5.48 feet below normal pool. The minimum elevation of the fiscal year occurred on October 3 at elevation 210.32 feet, m.s.l., or 5.68 feet below normal pool. Jordan fluctuated near elevation 211 feet, m.s.l. until the end of October when heavy rainfall pushed the lake level up to near elevation 214 feet m.s.l. Excessive rainfall near the end of November pushed the lake level up to the normal pool elevation of 216 feet m.s.l. Jordan Lake remained near normal pool through mid-February when a series of rainfall events followed causing the lake to rise to the highest elevation of the fiscal year at 226.72 feet m.s.l., or 10.72 feet above normal pool on March 9. Jordan Lake was drawn down to within one foot of normal pool when another rainfall event pushed the lake level to elevation 224.99 feet M.S.L. at the end of March. Three other lake level peaks of 219.27, 221.62 and 218.48 feet m.s.1. occurred on April 11, May 4 and July 18, respectively. Otherwise, Jordan Lake remained near normal pool for the remainder of the year. On September 30, Jordan Lake was at 216.18 feet m.s.1, or 0.18 foot above normal pool. Total flood and conservation storage utilized during the year was 35 percent and 49 percent, respectively. Flood damages prevented during fiscal year 1989 were $1,123,600 making the cumulative total since inception of the project at $12,490,600. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $131,938. Falls Lake, located in the Neuse River Basin, North Carolina, began fiscal year 1989 at elevation 246.90 feet m.s.l., or 4.1 feet below rule curve. Downstream minimum flow requirements kept the lake level near elevation 247 feet m.s.l. throughout October, even with greater than normal rainfall. The minimum elevation for the fiscal year occurred on October 31 at 246.77 feet M.S.L., or 3.33 feet below rule curve. Heavy rainfall events on October 31 and November 1 brought the lake level up to near elevation 249 feet m.s.l. where it remained until early January. Rainfall at the end of December and early January brought the lake level up near the rule curve elevation of 250.1 feet m.s.l. where it remained until mid February. Multiple storm events caused a significant rise to elevation 258.09 feet m.s.l., or 7.99 feet above rule curve on March 8 which was the maximum elevation for the fiscal year. After dropping to elevation 252 feet m.s.l., another storm caused the lake level to rise to elevation 256.05 feet m.s.l. on March 26. The lake level returned to near rule curve in mid April. Heavy rains in late April and early May caused Falls Lake to rise to elevation 255.27 feet m.s.l. on May 3. The lake level returned to near the rule curve level of 251 feet m.s.l. by mid May and remained there until mid July when rainfall caused a rise to elevation 253.90 feet m.s.l. Two other minor lake rises occurred in August with the higher peak at elevation 253.02 feet m.s.l. With the threat of Hurricanes Gabrielle and Hugo, the Falls Lake level was brought below the rule curve to near the bottom of the controlled flood pool level of 250.1 feet m.s.l. during September. Falls Lake ended the fiscal year at elevation 250.33 feet m.s.l. Total flood and conservation storage utilized during the year was 51 percent and 38 percent, respectively. Flood damages prevented during fiscal year 1989 were $10,545,000 making the cumulative total since inception of the project at $32,103,000. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $120,571. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, located in the Roanoke River Basin, Virginia and North Carolina, began fiscal year 1989 at elevation 297.36 feet m.s.l. or 2.1 feet below rule curve. The Kerr Reservoir level reached the rule curve at the end of October and rose to elevation 298.3 feet m.s.1. in early November. The reservoir level was drawn back down to rule curve by mid December. The minimum elevation of the fiscal year was 295.06 feet m.s.l., or 0.44 foot below rule curve on December 19. Kerr Reservoir fluctuated slightly above rule curve through the middle of February 1989. Excessive rainfall then pushed the reservoir level to elevation 302.63 feet m.s.l., or about five feet above rule curve. The distance between rule curve and actual pool level decreased as the rule curve rose to elevation 301 feet m.s.L in the month of March. Kerr Reservoir reached the rule curve by mid April. Heavy 6-16 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT rainfall during the last few days of April and the beginning of May caused Kerr Reservoir to rise to elevation 309.96 feet m.s.l., or 7.96 feet above rule curve on May 11. This was the maximum elevation for the fiscal year. Kerr Reservoir was drawn down to rule curve by the end of May. Again excessive rainfall during the first two weeks in June caused the lake to rise and fluctuate about four feet above rule curve through the end of June. Kerr Reservoir continued to fluctuate one to two feet above rule curve through the end of September due to cyclic rainfall events. On September 30, Kerr Reservoir elevation was 301.55 feet m.s.l., or 2.05 feet above rule curve. In cooperation with state and federal fish and wildlife agencies, the Wilmington District agreed to test a new fish flow regime in the lower Roanoke River to enhance the striped bass fish spawning. Fish flows commenced on the first of April and concluded on June 15. Flow rates under the new plan for the striped bass coincide with natural flow rates with heavier flows being released in April and lower flow rates occurring in June. Preliminary reports from state fisheries personnel indicate that the fish flow season was of average success. Total flood and current contractural power pool storage utilized during the year was 43 percent and 73 percent, respectively. Gross generation for the fiscal year amounted to 498,707,000 kilowatt hours and net marketed power revenue was $6,000,318 making a cumulative total since inception of $135,946,363. Flood damages prevented during fiscal year 1989 were $2,300,000, making the cumulative total since inception of the project at $141,507,000. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $343,924. Philpott Lake, located on the Smith River in the Dan River Basin, Virginia, began fiscal year 1989 at elevation 965.32 feet m.s.l., or 6.18 feet below rule curve. This low lake level was due to the continuing effects of the drought which occurred during the summer of 1988. The minimum elevation of the fiscal year occurred on November 4 at elevation 963.54 feet m.s.l., or 7.96 feet below rule curve. Philpott Lake rose only three feet by mid February because of below normal rainfall. Heavy rains during mid February to early March produced a rapid rise in lake level to the rule curve elevation of 973.2 feet m.s.l. on March 25. Philpott Lake remained at or near rule curve during April. Above normal rainfall occurred during the remainder of the fiscal year producing several peak elevations near elevation 976 feet m.s.l. The highest elevation of the fiscal year was 976.64 feet m.s.l., or 3.14 feet above rule curve on May 8. Philpott Lake ended the fiscal year at elevation 974.35 feet or 2.85 feet above rule curve. Total flood and current contractural power pool storage utilized during the year was 23 percent and 49 percent, respectively. Gross generation for the fiscal year amounted to 24,280,840 kilowatt hours and net marketed power revenue was $1,283,507 making a cumulative total since inception of $18,482,284. Flood damages prevented during fiscal year 1989 were $8,921,000, making the cumulative total since inception of the project at $151,756,000. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $141,827. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, located in the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin, North Carolina, began fiscal year 1989 at elevation 1,028.07 feet m.s.l., or 1.93 feet below normal pool. This was also the minimum elevation of the fiscal year. The reservoir rose gradually to normal pool by November 5. W. Kerr Scott Reservoir remained near normal pool through early December when below average rainfall and streamflows caused the elevation to drop to 1,028.74 feet m.s.l. on November 19. The reservoir returned to normal pool by early January and remained there through the end of the fiscal year except for three peak elevations between elevations 1,033 and 1,035 feet m.s.1. A fourth event caused by the remnants of Hurricane Hugo produced the maximum elevation of the fiscal year of 1,039.43 feet m.s.l., or 9.43 feet above normal pool on September 23. W. Kerr Scott Reservoir ended fiscal year 1989 at elevation 1,030.60 feet m.s.1. Total flood and conservation storage utilized during the year was 13 percent and 7 percent, respectively. Flood damages prevented during fiscal year 1989 were $3,470,000 making the cumulative total since inception of the project at $67,762,000. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $115,589. General Investigations 31. SURVEYS Cost for the period was $1,009,361, of which $138,588 was for navigation studies, $678,675 was for flood control studies, $86,105 was for beach erosion studies, $56,355 for Special Investigations, $7,401 for FERC licenses review, $15,969 for interagency water resources development, $3,000 for soil conservation service, $6,291 for hydrologic studies, and $16,977 for cooperation with states. Contributed funds in the amount of $137,500 were expended for navigation studies. 32. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain information studies, as authorized by Section 206, 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended, comprise compilation and dissemination, upon the request of a State or a political subdivision thereof, of information on floods and flood damages, including identification of areas subject to inundation by floods of various magnitudes and frequencies, and general criteria for guidance of Federal and non- Federal interests and agencies in the use of flood plain areas; and provide advice to other Federal agencies and local interests for their use in planning to ameliorate the flood hazard. Total costs for the period were $328,834. Total costs to September 30, 1989 were $4,619,459. 33. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Preconstruction engineering and design (PED) for Wilmington Harbor, Northeast Cape Fear River, N. C., was continued at a cost of $166,198. PED was continued on Roanoke River Upper Basin, Virginia, Headwaters Area at a cost of $515,241. PED was continued on Brunswick County Beaches, N. C., at a cost of $86,400. 6-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 6-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sept. 30, 1989 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Atlantic Beach Channels, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. & St. Johns River, Fla. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Belhaven Harbor, N.C. 6. Cape Fear River, N. C. above Wilmington 7. Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N. C. 8. Far Creek, N. C. New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 100,000 83,917 58,000 73,934 66,000 20,711 78,000 75,645 9,419 9,419 6,469,000 7,324,248 9,777,600 9,563,186 718,630 653,300 51,200 51,221 135,000 113,712 8,742,100 8,535,338 220,000 326,924 4,627,900 5,002,474 570,000 550,674 6,375,785 6,462,571 -65,330 444,000 444,000 - 116,142 - 116,142 13,800 13,800 73,200 63,200 618,000 967,000 468,696 1,111,720 13,000 12,754 63,000 62,713 1,100 100 21,400 20,428 42,000 41,250 250,100 260,100 704,300 707,999 293,500 292,720 -1,000 106,200 101,800 750 -1,305 -1,305 479,777 31,809 31,8091 18,501 18,501 76,049 76,049 10,600 10,6002 42,776,9733 42,727,1853 93,830,445' 93,641,987' 86,851 86,8515 667,300 667,300 818,0406 818,0406 3,470,514' 3,465,142 34,000 34,000 326,225 326,225 126,687 126,687 376,401 376,401 - 3,759,5738 - 3,759,5738 577,200 15,002,114 9 574,023 14,996,664 9 - 88,328 - 88,328 154,800 2,780,471 156,933 2,780,096 8,700 8,700 164,642 164,642 1,190,704 1,190,704 6-18 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sept. 30, 1989 9. Lockwoods Folly River, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10. Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11. Morehead City Harbor, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 12. Ocracoke Inlet, N. C. 13. Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N.C. 14. Roanoke River, N.C. 15. Silver Lake Harbor, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 16. Smith Creek (Pamlico County), N. C. 17. Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib: Cost 746,200 746,165 287,500 280,694 - 165,000 109,007 158,185 4,126,500 4,598,700 4,315,962 4,605,597 - 156,000 - 156,000 6,262,000 6,310,359 261,550 122,543 11,000 12,438 1,639,000 1,595,803 -54,579 299,670 11,700 11,497 400 432 588,000 603,609 17,681 3,508,600 3,469,509 1,356,500 1,87 1,355,855 1,77 - 8 - 8 9,500 9,656 44,227 44,227 346,700 353,386 241,272 0 241,2721 " 4,608,046 4,608,046 92,650 92,65012 - 7,649,945 13 - 7,649,94513 5,526,300 47,702,007 5,445,397 47,568,125 418,000 1,645,940 - 1,221,732 11 45 45 168,000 177,145 232,732 232,732 831,000 875,000 1,325 1,325 22,878 21,878 - 6,546,053"14 - 6,546,0531' 13,400 45,172,173 15 15,087 45,029,99615 39,778 1,264,414 32,762 1,256,686 -- 346,240 - 346,240 8,000 937,344 9,248 937,344 - 674,651 - 674,651 8,000 885,205 8,000 885,205 22,000 22,000 651,300 651,300 13,200 12,692 239,310 259,337 669,500 669,500 2,000 2,508 269,200 269,797 404,584 404,584 572,409 572,409 184,284 184,284 5,802,418 5,802,418 75,000 75,000 113,273 113,273 52,912 52,912 502,567 502,567 2,940,709 2,940,333 2,452 2,452 6-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sept. 30, 1989 18. Wilmington Harbor, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 19A. B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 19B. Randleman Lake, N. C. 20. Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 21. Dan River, Madison, N. C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 22. Leesville, Va. - Roanoke River Sec. 32 Demo. Project 23A. Falls Lake, N. C. 24. Stuart, Va. 25. Wrightsville Beach, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 26A. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N. C. 29A. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, Va. & N.C. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 2,590,000 2,553,489 452,560 398,651 8,10 8,59 81 87 2' 2,322,500 2,357,116 338,215 86,662 9,000 9,834,000 5,667 8,662,787 4,400 911,000 9,704 893,708 - 100,000 - 20,000 - 490,000 7,356 498,881 -40,739 -52,624 40,789 17,840 37,000 35,586 23 2,694,000 7,045,000 3,876,795 5,969,059 1,748,000 1,164,000 1,461,526 1,331,436 570,000 1,540,000 202,768 1,623,188 1,216,100 1,236,000 1,159,355 1,252,762 5,400 199,367 6,857,000 6,576,725 - 373 5,222,900 5,372,772 4,158,100 4,119,530 220,843 404,819 8,974,000 8,007,874 979,500 954,485 10521 14,415 137,000 142,284 920,000 914,556 1,100,000 975,979 123,000 108,787 40,000 29,915 5,218,000 4,913,377 830,400 966,316 -100,000 186,740 - 18,715,226 18 - 18,715,22618 3,868,100 61,596,02017 " 3,888,351 61,572,84517 422,041 4,763,64418 231,738 4,421,07518 3,647,000 5,392,728 1,002,400 1,050,647 31,572 308 270,000 176,764 -120,511 3,510 -18,508 -2,881 -6,177 3,908 3,330 5,050,000 6,188,558 1,095,000 1,121,837 -9,600 2,107 50,000 50,000 136,612,641 133,790,266 7,219,25619 7,163,634 20 1,821,494 1,787,376 4,797,588 4,785,659 9,088,533 8,958,252 6,674,45422 6,674,45422 141,49223 141,492 24 33,823 33,823 367,755 367,755 152,327,996 151,370,501 7,364,60019 7,329,83120 2,220,400 25 2,220,400 26 1,597,100 1,597,100 1,466,088 1,466,08827 -- - 8,841,326 - - 8,841,326 1,556,600 1,307,000 16,666,14828 1,597,277 1,351,320 16,606,86429 - - 94,402,927 2,480 2,131 94,402,927 6,653,600 5,245,400 76,973,94230 5,698,688 6,333,731 76,566,188'31 6-20 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sept. 30, 1989 29B. Philpott Lake, Va. New Work: Approp. -5,400 - - - 14,796,384 Cost 22,770 - - - 14,796,384 Maint: Approp. 2,089,000 1,672,000 1,942,000 1,796,600 24,355,906 32 Cost 2,082,671 1,759,343 1,821,459 1,892,879 24,206,309 3 1. Includes $2,369 refund to local interests in FY 82. 2. Includes $2,055 refund to local interests. 3. Includes $198,707 for previous projects. 4. Includes $107,634 for previous projects. 5. Includes $13,934 refund to local interests. 6. Includes $25,000 for previous projects. 7. Includes $12,854 for previous projects. 8. Includes $149,119 for previous projects. 9. Includes $8,178 for previous projects. 10. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 64, $3,000; FY 65, -$2,755; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $2,000; FY 74, $9,000; FY 75, $25,000; FY 76 & 76T, $20,000; FY 77, $2,500; FY 78, $8,800; FY 79, $3,000; FY 81, $1,680; and preconstruction planning funds: FY 80, $15,000 and FY 81, $19,320. 11. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 64, $219; FY 65, $26; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $1,448; FY 73, $552; FY 74, $9,000; FY 75, $11,925; FY 76 & 76T, $27,977; FY 77, $7,598; FY 78, $7,449; FY 79, $4,351; FY 81, $1,680; and preconstruction planning costs: FY 80, $5,686 and FY 81, $1,471. 12. Includes $69,145 refund to local interests. 13. Adjusted by $6,361 to reflect actual cost. 14. Includes $44,484 for previous projects. 15. Includes $284,557 for previous projects. 16. Includes $4,625,614 for new work on previous projects. 17. Includes $602,614 for previous projects. 18. Includes refunds to local interests: FY 78, $92,374; FY 79, $8,000; FY 80, $14,007; FY 81, $1,847; FY 82, $2,823; FY 85, $60,000. 19. Includes maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000. 20. Includes maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000. 21. Amount should not have been on records. Will be deducted in FY 90. 22. Includes refunds to local interests: FY 83, $400,000; FY 84, $128,345; FY 85, $82,600. 23. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 87, $37,000; FY 88, $2,926; and preconstruction planning and construction funds: FY 88, $120,074. 24. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 87, $35,586; FY 88, $4,340; and preconstruction planning and construction costs: FY 88, $104,447. 25. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 83, $45,000; FY 84, $9,986; and preconstruction funds: FY 84, $50,014; FY 85, $115,000. 26. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 83, $42,496; FY 84, $12,490; and preconstruction costs: FY 84, $23,281; FY 85, $127,330. 27. Includes $61,585 refund to local interests. 28. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 74, $4,000; FY 75, $5,500; FY 76 & 76T, $3,600; FY 77, $5,800; FY 78, $7,200; FY 79, $8,000; FY 80, $10,000; FY 81, $10,000; FY 82, $11,040; FY 83, $7,000; FY 84, $9,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000. 29. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 74, $4,000; FY 75, $4,400; FY 76 & 76T, $4,666; FY 77, $5,193; FY 78, $6,824; FY 79, $7,506; FY 80, $11,312; FY 81, $9,688; FY 82, $9,727; FY 83, $7,000; FY 84, $8,444; FY 85, $2,379; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000. 30. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 74, $35,000; FY 76 & 76T, $48,000; FY 77, $51,400; FY 78, $115,100; FY 79, $63,000; FY 80, $60,000; FY 81, $80,000; FY 82, $67,160; FY 83, $77,759; FY 84, $73,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 79, $167,646; FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000. 31. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 75, $35,000; FY 76 & 76T, $13,606; FY 77, $85,692; FY 78, $114,604; FY 79, $1,120; FY 80, $118,718; FY 81, $83,760; FY 82, $67,160; FY 83, $77,759; FY 84, $67,850; FY 85, $5,149; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 79, $167,350; FY 80, $296; FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000. 32. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 75, $47,000; FY 78, $40,400; FY 79, $22,000; FY 80, $25,000; FY 81, $20,000; FY 82, $20,240; FY 83, $21,000; FY 84, $19,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000. 33. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 75, $13,741; FY 76 & 76T, $31,666; FY 77, $1,593; FY 78, $39,771; FY 79, $22,629; FY 80, $24,619; FY 81, $20,381; FY 82, $20,240; FY 83, $21,000; FY 84, $19,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000. 6-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 6-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 25, 1912 July 25, 1912 August 8, 1917 July 18, 1918 January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 March 4, 19332 June 26, 19343 August 26, 1937 August 26, 1937 June 20, 1938 June 20, 1938 March 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 November 29, 1963, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 April 7, 1966, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 November 7, 1966 November 7, 1966 December 31, 1970 ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., and ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (See Section 3 of text) Original route of the Norfolk-Beaufort Inlet section. Purchase of canal. Change in route; following changes approved by Secretary of War, April 14, 1919: Albemarle Sound-Pamlico Sound section: Changed from "Alligator River-Rose Bay route" to "Alligator River- Pungo River route." Pamlico Sound-Neuse River section: Changed from "Pamlico Sound-Brant Shoal Neuse River route" to "Goose Creek-Bay River route." Alligator River-Pungo route (proposed land cut connecting the rivers): Changed from a straight line to a bent line approaching nearer town of Fairfield, N. C. A 12-foot channel 90 feet wide from Beaufort to Cape Fear River, N. C., including highway bridge and tidal lock." An 8-foot channel 75 feet wide from Cape Fear River to Winyah Bay, S. C. Construct a suitable bridge near Fairfield, N. C. Operating and care of works of improvements provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Increasing dimensions of waterway to 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide. A 12-foot side channel 90 feet wide to Swansboro. A yacht basin near Southport, 12 feet deep, 230 feet wide, and 450 feet long, with connecting channel. A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from New River Inlet to Inland Waterway. Six mooring basins.5 A 12-foot channel in New River. 8 Vicinity of Fairfield - drainage. Masonboro Inlet and connecting channels, including jetties at the inlet.7 A 12-foot channel and basin in Peltier Creek.8 A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from Intracoastal Waterway to Bogue Inlet gorge. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide through New Topsail Inlet, thence a 7-foot channel 80 ft. wide to Intracoastal Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek; and a 7-foot channel 80 feet wide in Banks Channel from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling barrier beach, to Intracoastal Waterway. Maintenance of a channel, 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, from the through channel of the waterway to and including a basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long at Carolina Beach. Maintenance of general navigation features of N. C. State Ports Authority Small Boat Harbor at Southport. Replacement of Federally-owned and operated highway bridges at Coinjock, Fairfield, Wilkerson Creek, Hobucken, and Core Creek. H. D. 391, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. D. 589, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. D. 1478, 63d Cong., 3d sess. and H. D. 1136, 64th Cong., 1st sess.' Approved by Secretary of War, May 15, 1919. H. D. 450, 69th Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 41, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 75th Cong., 1st sess.' H. D. 549, 75th Cong., 3d sess.' H. D. 691, 75th Cong., 3d sess.' H. D. 660, 76th Cong., 3d sess.' H. D. 421, 80th Cong., 1st sess.' H. D. 723, 80th Cong., 2d sess.' H. D. 341, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' H. D. 379, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' Detailed Project Report April 1963. Detailed Project Report July 1965 H. D. 515, 89th Cong., 2d sess.' H.D. 514, 89th Cong., 2d sess.' H. D. 142, 92nd Cong., 1st sess. 6-22 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents October 22, 1976 August 13, 1968 February 18, 1982, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 September 7, 1983, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 November 17, 1986 March 3, 1881 March 2, 1907 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 May 21, 1965, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 August 12, 1983, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 July 3, 1930 October 17, 1940 February 7, 1967, sec. 107 July 14, 1960 August 30, 19359 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 Modification of terms of local cooperation to allow for full Federal funding of Wilkerson Creek and Coinjock Bridges. Mitigation of damages caused by north jetty at Masonboro Inlet. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide through Carolina Beach Inlet to the Intracoastal Waterway. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide from the gorge in Bogue Inlet through the ocean bar. Modification of terms of local cooperation to allow for full Federal funding of Core Creek, Hobucken, and Fairfield Bridges. BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 4 of text) A 9-foot channel 200 feet wide through Bulkhead Channel to Beaufort; a 6-foot channel 100 feet wide to North River and Core Sound; and construct jetties on Shackleford Point. Repairs to Fort Macon jetties and additional jetties and shore protection. Bulkhead across Bird Shoal. Increase in depth to 12 feet in Bulkhead Channel, Gallants Channel, and in front of Beaufort. Increase in width and length of basin in front of Beaufort, all to 12 feet deep. Increase in depth to 12 feet and in width to 100 feet in Taylors Creek; transfer to Beaufort Harbor project. Channels 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide in Bulkhead, Gallants and Taylors Creek channels, and through turning basin in front of Beaufort; and harbor of refuge in Town Creek, 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long connected to Gallants Channel by channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 1,400 feet long. A channel 14 feet deep, 70 feet wide, and 1,900 feet long, from Bulkhead Channel to a turning basin 14 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 300 feet long near the upper end of Morgan Creek. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 15 of text) Entrance channel, 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide, from Pamlico Sound to the 3-foot contour in the lake, and training wall at entrance. Channel, 10 feet deep, and anchorage basin of same depth, 100 feet wide across Big Foot Slough and 60 feet wide in entrance. Basin depth of 12 feet in Silver Lake Harbor; channels 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, in Teaches Hole and Big Foot Slough Channels and across Bluff Shoal; entrance channel, same depth, 60 feet wide; and training wall on south side of entrance channel. WATERWAY CONNECTING PAMLICO SOUND AND BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 17 of text) A 7-foot channel 75 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to Beaufort Harbor via Wainright Channel. A 7-foot channel 75 feet wide to Atlantic. Channels 7 feet deep, 75 feet wide, at east and west ends of Harkers Island and side channel 5 feet deep, 75 feet wide, with basin 150 by 130 feet, same depth, at Davis. H. D. 597, 94th Cong., 2d sess. Approved by OCE Oct. 2, 1980 Detailed Project Report June 1980 Detailed Project Report May 1983 Annual Report, 1881, p. 1013 Specified in act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 68th Cong., 2d sess.1 H. D. 776, 69th Cong., 2d sess.1 H. D. 334, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' H. D. 111, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' Detailed Project Report April 1965 Detailed Project Report June 1983 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. D. 325, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' Detailed Project Report July 9, 1965 H. D. 485, 72d Cong., 2d sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 92, 74th Cong., 2d sess.' H. D. 99, 77th Cong., 1st sess.' 6-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 6-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents March 2, 1945 A 7-foot side channel 75 feet wide, with basin 200 feet by S. D. 247, 77th Cong., 2d sess.' 500 feet, same depth, at Sealevel. May 17, 1950 A 6-foot side channel 60 feet wide, with basin 100 feet by H. D. 68, 81st Cong., 1st sess.1 about 600 feet, same depth, at Marshallberg. July 11, 1963, A side channel 7 feet deep, 70 feet wide to local harbor at Detailed Project Report sec. 107 Cedar Island and an access channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet Dec. 12, 1962 July 14, 1960 wide and about 400 feet long to a basin same depth, 60 by 100 feet. September 22, 1967, An entrance channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, from Back Detailed Project Report sec. 107 Sound to harbor of refuge 120 by 250 feet, same depth, at March 13, 1967 July 14, 1960 west end of Harkers Island in Brook Creek. February 17, 1969, A channel 7 feet deep, 70 feet wide, from existing side Detailed Project Report sec. 107 channel at Atlantic to a basin 600 by 180 feet, same depth, Dec. 21, 1967 July 14, 1960 with a breakwater, between mouth of Little Port Brook and White Point. April 3, 1975, Deepening the existing 5-foot channel and basin at Davis Detailed Project Report sec. 107 to 7 feet. Feb. 8, 1974 July 14, 196010 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Public Law No. 443, 72d Cong. 3. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 4. Tidal lock in land cut between Myrtle Sound and Cape Fear River, deauthorized September 23, 1986, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 5. Deauthorized August 5, 1977 under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 6. A 12-foot by 90-foot channel in New River from Intracoastal Waterway to and including a basin at Jacksonville, N. C. 7. Jetties on each side of Masonboro Inlet. 8. A 6-foot by 50-foot channel provided under Section 3, River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945; 12-foot by 90-foot project deauthorized November 17, 1986 under authority of Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. 9. Included in the Public Works Administration Program, Jan. 3, 1934. 10. Deauthorized by the Chief of Engineers March 31, 1982. 6-24 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report for Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control (R & H Act of 1958 and 1962) 1969 70,664 - Avon Harbor, N. C.1 1986 74,096 440,364 Bay River, N. C.1 1950 44,382 49,627 Black River, N. C. 1969 12,358 124,846 Cashie River, N. C. 1950 40,403 15,905 Channel Connecting Thoroughfare Bay with Cedar Bay, N. C.1 1975 69,610 25,615 Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, N. C. 1975 42,029 5,685 Chowan River, N. C. 1950-- Contentnea Creek, N. C.1 1941 64,395 32,247 Drum Inlet, N. C.1 1979 166,119 1,050,579 Edenton Harbor, N. C.1 1960 73,750 47,642 Fishing Creek, N. C.' 1922 22,715 8,633 Knobb's Creek, N. C.1 , 2 19613 80,500 48,969 Mackay Creek, N. C.' 1938 13,375 6,273 Neuse River, N. C.1 1982 477,223 s 328,607 Newbegun Creek, N. C. 1928* 4,802 247 Northeast Cape Fear River, N. C.' 1950 10,688 61,139 Pembroke Creek, N. C. 1976 60,000 - Perquimans River, N. C.1 1910 13,750 414 Rollinson Channel, N. C. 1988 589,105 1,742,951 Scuppernong River, N. C.1 1950 81,164 80,682 Shallotte River, N. C. 1988' 18,181 527,557 Smiths Creek (Wilmington), N. C.' 1950 8,507 18 South River, N. C.' 1936 12,452 23,686 Stumpy Point Bay, N. C.' 1984 268,381 736,815 Swift Creek, N. C.' 1940 1,600 5,422 Trent River, N. C.1 ,4 1968 115,199 143,579 Wallace Channel, Pamlico Sound, N. C. 1965 132,834 85,299 Waterway - Norfolk, Va. to Sounds of N. C. 1976 751,196 2,893,812 Waterway Connecting Swanquarter Bay with Deep Bay, N. C. 1984 911,099 182,725 Wrights Creek, N. C.' 1984 68,325 166,602 1. Completed. 2. Transferred from Norfolk District (FY 1970); Meherrin River, N. C., Transferred to Norfolk District. 3. Report of Norfolk District. 4. 8-foot modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 5. Includes $1,959 refund to local interests on Dawson Creek, N. C. 6-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 6-D For Last Cost to September 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N. C. 1984 490,000 - Fort Macon Park, N. C.' 1973 620,000 - 1. Uncompleted portion of project was deauthorized November 17, 1986, under authority of Sec. 1002, PL 994662. 6-26 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Ararat River, Mount Airy, N.C.' Black River, Harnett County, N. C.' Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N. C.' Brunswick County Beaches, N. C. (Cape Fear to North Carolina - South Carolina State Line)" Conetoe Creek, N. C.' Contentnea Creek, N. C.' Core Creek, N. C.' Deep Creek, Edgecombe County, N. C.' Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N. C.' Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N. C.' Filberts Creek, N. C.' Gapway Swamp, N. C. & S. C.','10 Gardners Creek, N. C.' Genoa Sewer Facility, Wayne County, N. C.' Goldsboro, Neuse River, N. C. Howards Mill Lake, N. C. 12 Joyce Creek, Camden County, N. C.' Leith's Creek, Scotland County, N. C.', '3 Lick Run, Roanoke, Va.' Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N. C.' Little Sugar Creek, Charlotte, N. C.','10 New River, N. C.' New River, Onslow County, N. C.' Northeast Cape Fear River, N. C.' Old Field Swamp, N. C.',' 0 Pantego Creek and Cucklers Creek, N. C. Pasquotank River, N. C. Perquimans River, N. C.' Pungo Creek, N. C.' Pungo River, N. C.' Reddies River Lake, N. C.' 3 Roaring River Lake, N. C.13 Simmons Bay, N. C.'10 South Creek, N. C.' Swift Creek, Pitt and Craven Counties, N. C.' Tar River, N. C. Tar River, N. C.' Tar River and tributaries, N. C.' Tar River, Princeville, N. C. Trent River, N. C.' Waccamaw River & Seven Creeks, N.C. & S.C.', 10 White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N. C.' 1987 1984 1972 1976 1960 1939-1943 & 1958 1965 1984 1963 1971 1970 1969 1972 1985 1984 1980 1984 1982 1974 1978 1979 1950 & 1956 1972 1961 1969 1963 1960 1961 1972 1971 1980 1978 1963 1971 1966 1964 1947 1943 1967 1953 1961 1963 1. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under special continuing authority. 2. Includes $17,356 refund to local interests. 3. Adjusted to reflect actual cost. 4. Includes $3,081 refund to local interests. 5. Includes $116,508 refund to local interests. 6. Includes $1,519 refund to local interests. 7. Includes $387 refund to local interests. 8. Includes $338 refund to local interests. 9. Adjusted $3,000 to include preauthorization cost prior to FY 1960. 10. Transferred from Charleston District, FY 1980. 11. Reclassified to inactive category February 3, 1976. 12. Reclassified to deferred category October 2, 1980. 13. Transferred from Charleston District, FY 1984. 14. Includes $1,057 refund to local interests. 6-27 4,901,854 475,574 283,846 572,114 s 29,867 50,889 236,223s 394,055 223,413 138,117 6 37,777 3 374,005 54,5978 167,800 50,430 698,400 606,189' 430,151 1,280,317 113,657 763,022 51,896 580,977 95,873 86,600 517,948 80,931 6,366 582,270 296,6022,3 985,800 370,000 186,435 194,3677 611,096 81,266 18,624 22,660 390,249 64,769 67,821 623,687 61,473 - - - - - - - - 623,687 _- - -147 214,286 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 6-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Report Date Funds Funds Project For Deauthorized Expended Expended Adkin Branch, N. C. AIWW - Mooring Basins AIWW - Peltier Creek, 12-foot project AIWW - Tidal Lock in Snows Cut Bodie Island, N. C. Cape Lookout, N. C. Conoho Creek, N. C. Contentnea Creek, N. C. Davis, N. C. Fort Macon State Park, N. C., Remaining Work Harbor of Refuge, N. C. Hominy Swamp, N. C. Hyde County Dike, N. C. MacKay Creek, N. C. Mann's Harbor, N. C. Mill Creek, N. C. Mocassin Swamp, N. C. Morehead City Harbor, N. C., Jetties at Beaufort Inlet Moyock Creek, N. C. Nahunta Swamp, N. C. Neuse River, N. C. Neuse River Barrier, N. C. Neuse River, 300 ft.-wide channel in front of New Bern North River Dike, N. C. Ocracoke Inlet Jetty, N. C. Ocracoke Island, N. C. Roanoke River, 50 mile long Channel from Palmyra Landing to Weldon Rockfish Creek, N. C. Scuppernong River, N. C. Six Runs Creek, N. C. Sweetwater Creek, N. C. Thoroughfare Swamp, N. C. Topsail Beach and Surf City, N. C. Tranters Creek, N. C. Trent River, Basins and Access Channels at New Bern, N. C. 1. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 2. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 205 of the 1948 FC Act, as amended. 3. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. 4. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 107 of the R&H Act of 1960 as amended. 5. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 1002, PL 9.662. 6-28 1982 None None None None None 1974 1972 1982 1973 1934 1973 None 1976 1973 1973 1973 1986 1973 1973 None None None None 1986 1975 1983 1976 1987 1971 1973 1976 None 1974 None 8 Sept. 812 5 Aug. 771 17 Nov. 865 23 Sept. 86' 5 Aug. 77' 5 Aug. 77' 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 783 31 Mar. 824 17 Nov. 865 1 Nov. 81' 31 Mar. 782 5 Aug. 77' 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 784 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 17 Nov. 865 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 784 5 Aug. 77' 5 Aug. 77' 5 Aug. 77' 17 Nov. 865 17 Nov. 865 17 Nov. 865 31 Mar. 782 20 Apr. 882 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 5 Aug. 77' 11 Jan. 852 5 Aug. 77' 219,477 79,782 4,250 25,419 1,396,653 107,472 130,900 7,265 116,395 36,680 - 64,416 65,673 30,911 129,592 157,721 234,032 64,977 64,584 132,767 139,339 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-H RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Project Date Survey Conducted None NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization) TABLE 6-I Study Identification Fiscal Period Cost Bogue Inlet, N. C. 10,000 Harkers Island Harbor, N. C. -157 New River Inlet, N. C. 26,145 Whittaker Creek, Oriental, N. C. 32,888 Wilmington Harbor, N. C., Bald Head Island' 39,591 Wilmington Harbor, N. C., Passing Lane 97,322 2 Wilmington Harbor, N. C., Turns and Bends 136,794 3 Wilmington Harbor, N. C., Turning Basin 63,313 1. Section 111 project. 2. Includes $48,446 contributed funds. 3. Includes $52,301 contributed funds. 6-29 TABLE 6-J DAMS AND RESERVOIRS See Miles Height Reservoir Power Estimated Section Project Name Nearest City River Above of Type Capacity Development Construc- Cost Lands Total in Text Mouth Dam (ft) (acre-feet) (kilowatts) tion and Damages' 19. Cape Fear River Basin, N.C. 23. Neuse River Basin. N.C. 24. Yadkin River Basin, N.C.&S.C. 29. Roanoke River Basin, Va. and N.C. B. Everett Jordan 2 Howards Mill 2 , 14 Randleman 2 Small reservoirs Falls2 Wilson Mills Beulahtown Bakers Mills Little Buffalo Buckhorn Wiggins Mill Stantonsburg Great Swamp Black Creek Aycock Swamp Hillsboro Orange W. Kerr Scott. N.C. John H. Kerr, Va., and N.C. 2 Philpott, Va. 2 Gaston, Va. and N.C. 6 Roanoke Rapids, N.C. 7 Smith Mountain, Va. 8 Leesville, Va. 9 Taber, Va. Melrose. Va. Randolph, Va. Stuart, Va. and N.C. Schoolfield. Va. and N.C. Moncure, N.C. Carthage, N.C. Randleman, N.C. Falls, N.C. Wilson Mills, N.C. Kenly, N.C. Princeton, N.C. Kenly, N.C. Wilson, N.C. Wilson, N.C. Stantonsburg, N.C. Fremont, N.C. Wilson, N.C. Fremont, N.C. Durham, N.C. Durham, N.C. Wilkesboro, N.C. Boydton, Va. Bassett, Va. Roanoke Rapids, N.C. Roanoke Rapids, N.C. Altavista, Va. Altavista, Va. Altavista, Va. Prookneal. Va. Chase City, Va. Spray. N.C. Danville. Va. Haw Deep Deep Various Neuse Neuse Little Little Little Buffalo Creek Contentnea Creek Contentnea Creek Tisnot Swamp Great Swamp Black Creek Aycock Swamp Eno Little Yadkin Pee Dee Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke 4.3 55.0 85.0 404.0 178.7 336.2 144.9 137.0 314.2 293.7 275.0 262.9 227.8 297.2 265.9 112 106 110 20 to 70 + 92 81 50 53 51 63 42 36 39 33 37 136 107 E E E E E CG,E E E 148 E 753,500 233,000 108,000 923,000 374,450 201,000 81,000 36,000 13,000 119,000 35,000 48,000 18,000 17,000 7,000 123,000 57,000 153,000 - 85,130,000 58,370,000 - 18,874,000 14,726,000 - 57,956,000 59,044,000 - 85,858,000 94,142,000 -5,749,343 3,360,657 144 CG,E 2,808,000 204,000 67,529,000 24,521,000 92,050,0005 220 108 75 244 95 54 110 147 138 126 CG 1 1 CG,E CG CG CG,E CG CG,E CG,E E CG,E 249,800 432,000 59,300 825,000 76,900 34,000 120,000 350,000 163,000 248,000 14,000 54,000 83,000 41,000 20,000 12,000 43,000 48,000 15,000 80,000 13,933,000 27,000,000 31,300,000 28,000,000 9,100,000 8,000,000 17,700,000 22,100,000 9,000,000 27,800,000 1,157,000 3,500,000 800,000 3,800,000 1,000,000 1,700,000 6,000,000 4,700,000 1,100,000 6,400,000 1. Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2. For details, see individual report. 3. Includes $3,600,000 presently allocated to water supply to be reimbursed in the future by local interests and $100,000 cash contribution for construction of ranger security buildings. 4. Includes $12,900,000 presently allocated to water supply and $18,700,000 recreation and fish and wildlife to be reimbursed in the future by local interests. 5. Exclusive of transmission lines. 6. Construction completed in 1963 by Virginia Elect.ic and Power (o. 7. Based on modified plan developed in fiscal year 1949. Construction completed June 1955 by Virginia Electric and Power Co. 8. Construction completed in February 1966 by Appalachian Power Co. 9. Construction completed in June 1963 by Appalachian Power Co. 10. Includes cost of earth dam on Whipping Creek. 11. Authorizing legislation provided for earth dam; concrete gravity dam constructed. 12. Includes $1,600,000 presently allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife. 13. Includes $69,993,000 presently allocated to water supply, $8,371,000 allocated to recreation and $7,836,000 to flood control to be paid by local interests during construction. 14. Reclassified to the deferred category October 2, 1980. Key Earth Concrete Gravity 143,500,000' 33,600,0002 117,000,000'" 38,454,000 180,000,000' 13,000,000 9,300,000 6,600,000 1,100,000 17,300,000 6,700,000 5,100,000 1,800,000 1,500,000 550,000 8,100,000 3;500,000 9,110,000 0 0 C 0 15,090,000 30,500,000 32,100,000 31,800,000 10,100,000 9,700,000 23,700,000 ' 26,800,000 10,100,000 36,000,000 E CG WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended TABLE 6-K (Preauthorization) Study Identification Fiscal Period Cost Blackberry Creek, Henry County, VA. 34,970 Buffalo Creek, Lee County, N. C. 2,283 Dry Branch, Salem, VA. 41,596 First Broad River, Polkville, N. C. 2,176 Great Coharie Creek, N. C. 30,816 Lower Creek, Lenoir, N. C.' 26,051 Maggoddee Creek, Franklin County, VA. 1,232 Mason Creek, VA. 87,529 Matrimony Creek, Rockingham County, N. C. 997 Nags Nead, N. C.2 51,342 Neuse River, Oriental, N. C.3 32,654 Roanoke Island, Dare County, N. C.2 5,675 Sandy River, Danville, VA. 10,000 South Fork Catawba River, Cramerton, N. C. 9,597 Tinker Creek and Tributaries, VA. 65,000 1. 2. 3. Includes $72,675 contributed funds. Section 103 project. Section 14 project. 6-31 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT* This district comprises all of South Carolina (except local watersheds draining into the Savannah River). It embraces the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean between Little River and Port Royal Sound, except watersheds of Mackey and Skull Creeks, and excluding Hilton Head Island. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control, SC ................. 7-1 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL ........ 7-2 3. Charleston Harbor, SC ..................... 7-2 4. Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC ........ 7-3 5. Cooper River Seismic Modification, SC ...... 7-3 6. Folly River, SC ........................... 7-4 7. Georgetown Harbor, SC ................... 7-4 8. Jeremy Creek, SC ......................... 7-4 9. Little River Inlet, NC & SC ................ 7-5 10. M urrells Inlet, SC ........................ 7-5 11. Port Royal Harbor, SC .................... .7-6 12. Shipyard River, SC ....................... 7-6 13. Town Creek, SC ........................... 7-6 14. Reconnaissance And Condition Surveys ..... 7-7 15. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ....... 7-7 16. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .... ..................... 7-7 Beach Erosion 17. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ......................... . 7-7 18. Beach Erosion Work Under Special Authorization ............. .............. 7-7 Flood Control 19. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................................. 7-7 20. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..... 7-7 21. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............................ 7-7 Miscellaneous 22. Streambank Erosion Under Special Authorization ............................ 7-7 General Investigations 23. Active Investigations ..................... 7-7 Tables Table 7-A Cost and Financial Statement ...... 7-8 Table 7-B Authorizing Legislation ........... 7-10 Table 7-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......................... 7-13 Table 7-D Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .................... 7-13 Table 7-E Other Authorized Beach Erosion Projects .......................... 7-13 Table 7-F Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .......................... 7-14 Table 7-G Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............. 7-14 Table 7-H Other Authorized Streambank Erosion Projects .................. 7-14 Table 7-I Active General Investigations ....... 7-15 *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, S.C. Location. The project includes all public waters in the State of South Carolina. Existing Project. The project provides for the control and progressive eradication of noxious aquatic plant growths from public waters in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, and public health. Local Cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and contribute 50 percent of the total cost. The South Carolina Water Resources Commission is designated as the State's lead agency for aquatic plant management and meets local interest requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Aquatic plants now infest approximately 30,000 acres, with the worst problems being in Lake Marion. During FY 89, 2,445 acres of aquatic plants in 23 water bodies were treated with herbicides. Grass carp were purchased 7-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 and stocked in three lakes to control aquatic plants in 4,105 acres. The total cost of work performed in FY 89 was $491,838. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is ongoing. Federal costs for the project to date have been $3,544,880 for new work. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (CHARLESTON DISTRICT) Location. The project starts near Little River at the North Carolina-South Carolina state line and extends generally south along the coast of South Carolina 62 miles to Winyah Bay; thence 63.5 miles to Charleston; thence 84.5 miles to and including Port Royal Sound; a total of 210 miles (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11513, 11521, 11531, 11534, and 11535.) Previous projects.For further details see page 613 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. The project provides for a waterway twelve feet deep and not less than 90 feet wide with a branch channel of the same dimensions to McClellanville and construction of three bridges crossing the waterway in Horry County, South Carolina. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. There are rail-water terminals at Georgetown, Charleston, Johns Island, and Port Royal and numerous open-pile wharves mostly for shipping agricultural products, fish, oysters, pulpwood, wood products, and petroleum products. Marinas are located at convenient intervals along the waterway where limited supplies and repair facilities are available for both commercial vessels and pleasure craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and recreation requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance was performed by pipeline dredge: (a) in the Winyah Bay to Charleston area, removing 1,098,845 cubic yards of material at a cost of $785,227 and (b) in the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW) to Port Royal area, removing 503,204 cubic yards at a cost of $443,869. The mosquito abatement control contract costs were $3,670. The cost of operating the Snagboat Snell in the Charleston to Little River area was $120,950. Costs of $236,683 were incurred for contract dike management. Condition and operation studies, natural resource management, inspections and reports, real estate, project operations management, lands and damages, water control management, bank stabilization, engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $747,202. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was c1o9m36p. letFede deinr al1 9c4o0s; tst horfe ee xbisrtiidngge sp rwojeercet ctoo mdpalteet ehda vine been $7,345,888 for new work and $49,008,381 for maintenance, for a total of $56,354,269. 3. CHARLESTON HARBOR, S.C. Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina about 15 miles south of the midpoint of the coastline, 50 miles southwest of Winyah Bay, S.C., and 80 miles northeast of the mouth of Savannah River. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) Previous projects. The existing project provides for a channel 35 feet deep with varying widths from the Atlantic Ocean to the mouth of Goose Creek, a total of 26.3 miles, together with a 35-foot depth by 500-foot width channel via Town Creek. Also, a ten foot depth by 110-foot width channel on the Mount Pleasant side of the harbor into Shem Creek to U.S. Highway 17 Bridge, and a 30-foot anchorage basin in the lower harbor between Castle Pinckney and Fort Moultrie. A 40-foot channel estimated to cost $6,060,000 (1960) was authorized to be executed when found necessary in the interest of national defense from the 40-foot contour in Atlantic Ocean to U.S. Naval Base. For further details see page 425 of the Annual Report for 1962; page 1808 of the Annual Report for 1915; page 579 of the Annual Report for 1926; and page 562 of the Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project as authorized by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act provides for deepening of the 35-foot channel to 40 feet (42 feet in the ocean bar and entrance channel) from the 42-foot ocean contour to Goose Creek, a total distance of 26.9 miles, construction of one turning basin, modification of existing turning basins, deepening and modification of the anchorage basin, deepening Shipyard River to 38 feet, maintain the Wando River Channel to 35 feet at federal expense and the deepening of this channel to 40 feet. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with their responsibility to date. Terminal facilities. Piers and slips extend for about one mile along the eastern waterfront of the City of Charleston with an additional mile of marginal wharves. The South Carolina State Ports Authority operates eight piers for fruit, wood, cold storage facilities and general cargo, a grain elevator and a beltline railway which serves the entire Cooper River waterfront. Modern facilities are also at wharves of seven major petroleum companies including storage tank farms. Modern facilities for marine repairs and servicing are available at Detyens Shipyard, located approximately ten miles northeast of Charleston on the Wando River. The U.S. Navy Department has modern facilities for maintenance of naval vessels including nuclear-powered submarines. Loading docks and storage areas for missile-carrying type vessels have also been constructed and are being operated by the U.S. Navy. For further details see Port Series No. 13, 1980, Corps of Engineers. 7-2 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: All new work is cost shared 75/25, federal/nonfederal respectively. Contract dredging was performed: (a) by pipeline dredge in the Rebellion to Folly Reach during October 1988-May 1989, removing 877,918 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $1,156,660, (b) in the Shutes to Myers Bend Reach by pipeline dredge during October 1988-February 1989, removing 1,044,777 cubic yards, at a cost of $876,882, (c) by hopper dredge in the Entrance Channel during October 1988-April 1989, removing 2,363,653 cubic yards, at a cost of $3,929,297, (d) in Shipyard River by pipeline dredge during the period April 1989-June 1989 removing 295,868 cubic yards at a cost of $273,048, (e) during May-September 1989 by pipeline dredge in the Wando River, removing 1,328,117 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,655,070, and (f) during June- September 1989 in the Entrance Channel (Stations +28+00 to -370+00) by hopper dredge, removing 1,085,085 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,834,819, for a total contract cost of $9,725,776. Cultural resources costs were $2,226, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $835,427 and $434,889, respectively. Federal costs for the project were $8,248,738. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed by pipeline dredges (a) on Shoal 6a during the period May-September 1989, removing 90,886 cubic yards of material, at a net cost of $278,062, (b) in Shipyard River during April-June 1989, removing 83,450 cubic yards of material at a cost of $77,837, (c) in the Anchorage Basin during the months of October 1988-May 1989, removing 493,587 cubic yards at a cost of $1,059,652 and (d) on Shoal 6a and Shoal 6a Turning Basin during the period October 1988- February 1989, removing 96,586 cubic yards at a cost of $231,885. Total contract maintenance dredging cost for FY 89 was $1,647,436. Dike management costs were $701,214. The cost of mosquito abatement for FY 89 was $59,938. Condition and operation studies, water control management, natural resource management, project operations management, lands and damages, engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $754,807. Condition at end of fiscal year. Jetties protecting the entrance channel across the bar were completed in 1895. The previous project was completed in October 1962 except for the national defense portion. Federal costs under the previous project to date have been $10,165,564 for new work and $101,269,918 for maintenance, a total cost of $111,435,482. Federal costs through FY 89 for the existing project have been $11,640,460 for new work. No new work maintenance costs have been incurred. 4. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, S.C. Location.Cooper River is located in Charleston and Berkeley Counties, S.C., and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Charleston (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) Existing project. The major cause of the shoaling problem in Charleston Harbor was the diversion of fresh water from the Santee River through Pinopolis Dam into the salt water of Charleston Harbor, which caused density currents which trapped sediments resulting in a phenomenal rate of depostion. The most practical solution of the shoaling problem was to redivert most of the Santee River waters above Pinopolis Dam back into the lower Santee River through a canal beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to the Santee River, as authorized by the 1968 River and Harbor Act, provided that the discharge through the existing Pinopolis Hydroplant be reduced to a flow which would not establish a density current in the harbor. This flow was estimated at 3,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) during the design phase of the project, but after operational tests this flow is estimated at 4,500 cfs. The excess water impounded in Lake Moultrie is being directed through a new canal above St. Stephen, South Carolina, to enter the Santee River at a point well below the Lake Marion Spillway (Wilson Dam). A new hydroelectric facility was constructed on the new canal at the edge of the swamp adjacent to the Santee River. This plant replaces those features made less effective at Pinopolis through curtailment of flows. The average flow of 11,000 cfs at the new powerplant, plus the 4,500 cfs average release planned for Pinopolis, approximates the historical average flow at Pinopolis. The three generators at the new plant are rated at 28,000 kilowatts each, for a total of 84,000 kilowatts. In the interest of fish and wildlife resources of the area, the project includes a herring lift at the new powerhouse site and a relocated fish hatchery. Estimated cost of the project (1985) is $191,600,000, all Federal. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Funds were received for initiation of construction during FY 75. Costs during FY 89 were $9,484 for engineering and design and supervision and administration. Maintenance: Funds of $3,745,712 were spent for maintenance of completed work. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated March 1977. The project is 99% complete. The power-on-line date was March 1985. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $189,808,221 for new work and $15,589,011 for maintenance, a total of $205,397,232. 5. COOPER RIVER SEISMIC MODIFICATION, S.C. Location. The Cooper River Seismic Project is located in Berkeley County, South Carolina, about 50 miles north of Charleston, South Carolina. Existing project. The Santee-Cooper Project was 7-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 constructed in the early 1940's using the latest state-ofthe- art design for that time. The project is currently licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) as project number 199. The FERC requires that the project receive independent inspections at least once every five years. It was during the 1977 inspection that the seismic deficiency of both the West and North Dams was noted. This was confirmed again in the 1982 inspection. As a result of studying the possible consequences of the loss of both dams, the S.C. Congressional Delegation introduced legislation which was approved in the 1983 Supplemental Appropriations Act to provide $2 million for design and $20 million for construction of remedial measures. The design and construction responsibility was assigned to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Corps began to study various alternatives to provide remedial measures for the liquifiable foundation of the West Dam in August 1983. Current estimated cost of the project is $30,400,000, of which $29,500,000 is Federal and $900,000 is non- Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements are fully satisfied. An LCA was signed on 29 March 1988. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The contract was advertised on 7 March 1988 and awarded on 29 April 1988 for $21,069,540. As of the end of FY 89, construction was 66% complete. FY 89 costs totaled $13,123,808 with $348,958 being used for engineering and design, $962,623 for supervision and administration, and $11,812,227 for the contract. Federal costs for the contract to date have been $12,949,325. Condition at end of fiscal year. Federal costs thru FY 89 for the existing project have been $18,001,788. 6. FOLLY RIVER, S.C. Location. The project begins in Folly River and Folly Creek north of the Town of Folly Beach and follows a southwesterly course into the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11521.) Existing project. The project provides: an entrance channel, eleven feet deep by 100 feet wide extending from the Stono River one mile through the ocean bar; a channel within Folly River nine feet deep and 80 feet wide, extending three miles downstream from U.S. Highway 171 to the confluence of Folly and Stono Rivers; and a channel within Folly Creek nine feet deep by 80 feet wide extending three miles downstream from Highway 171 to the confluence with Folly River. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed in Folly River by the sidecaster dredge Fry during June-July 1989, at a cost of $213,900. Costs incurred for maintenance dredging performed in FY 88 were $14. Condition and operations studies, water control management, inspections and reports, engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $46,002. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in FY 1979. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $337,736 for new work and $2,087,662 for maintenance, a total of $2,425,398. 7. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, S.C. Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina 50 miles northeast of Charleston Harbor and 90 miles southwest of the entrance to Cape Fear River, North Carolina. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11532.) Previous projects. For further details see page 1806 of Annual Report for 1915; page 549 of Annual Report for 1938; and page 442 of Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorizations provide for a channel 27 feet deep with varying widths of 600 feet to 400 feet from the Atlantic Ocean to and including a turning basin at the U.S. Highway 17 bridge over Sampit River, with a side channel 2,400 feet long and not less than 200 feet wide leading to a turning basin at the upper end of the built-up portion of the city waterfront, a total of 17.9 miles. The project also provides for the continued maintenance to a depth of 18 feet and a width of 400 feet for the bypassed portion of Sampit River opposite the City of Georgetown. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities at the Port of Georgetown, suitable for oceangoing vessels, consist of one marginal concrete pier and one of creosoted-timber construction. For intracoastal waterway traffic there are a number of smaller wharves and landings along the Georgetown waterfront on the old channel. For further details, see Port Series No. 13, 1980, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed (a) in the Sampit River and Upper Winyah Bay from November 1988-April 1989, removing a total of 1,757,228 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,779,295. Contract dike management costs were $294,901.Mosquito abatement control costs were $28,062. Water control management, natural resources management, condition and operation studies, project operations management, income credits to operations, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $743,155. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1951. The jetties were completed in 1903-1904. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $4,615,903 for new work and $50,411,796 for maintenance, a total of $55,027,699. 8. JEREMY CREEK, S.C. Location. Jeremy Creek is located at McClellanville, S.C. approximately 40 miles northeast of Charleston 7-4 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT and 20 miles southwest of Georgetown. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11531 and 11518.) Existing project. The dredging of Jeremy Creek or "Side Channel to McClellanville" was authorized as a part of the channel from Charleston to McClellanville (or part of what is now the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway) by the River and Harbor Act of 2 March 1907. The project provides for a waterway twelve feet deep at mean low water and a width of not less than 90 feet. Local cooperation. Local requirements have been met by the S.C. Coastal Council. Terminal facilities. There are three shrimping facilities, one oyster packing shed, a crabbing operation, an icehouse, a fuel dock and a public launching ramp located on Jeremy Creek. The commercial facilities are privately owned, but are open to all on an equal basis. The existing facilities are considered adequate for present and near future commerce. There are areas along the east bluff shore available for the expansion of existing facilities or the construction of new ones. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed during the period January 1989, removing 57,834 cubic yards of material at a cost of $43,546. Condition and operations studies, water control management, inspection and reports, and project operations management costs were $10,515. Condition at end of fiscal year. Federal costs of existing project to date have been $49,987 for new work and $64,897 for maintenance, a total of $114,884. 9. LITTLE RIVER INLET, N.C. AND S.C. Location. The project is located near the North Carolina-South Carolina state line. Little River enters the Atlantic Ocean at Little River Inlet at the state line and affords the only connection between the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and the ocean along 68 miles of coastline from Shallotte, N.C. to Georgetown, S.C. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11535.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel twelve by 300 feet across the ocean bar; thence a ten by 90-foot inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. The entrance channel is stabilized by jetties extending seaward 3,200 feet and 3,000 feet long on the north and south sides of the inlet, respectively. Emergency dredging on an annual basis was authorized by the Water Resources Act of 1974. Previous work was done under the authority of the River and Harbor Act of 1945, Section 3, P.L. 79-14. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. There are eight marinas, numerous private docks, and several public boat ramps located in or near Little River. It is expected that existing facilities will expand and new ones will be added as demands for services exceed current capacity. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: A 5-year monitoring program was initiated in 1981 to provide information for management of the project and to determine the effect of the project on nearby coastal areas. Charleston District (CESAC) collects the data and Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC) performs data analysis and interpretation. Following conclusion of the initial 5- year monitoring plan (February 1986), CERC presented results of their preliminary analysis to CESAC and South Atlantic Division at a meeting in Charleston on 8 April 1986. The data indicated that coastal processes in the vicinity of the inlet have not reached an equilibrium condition and recommended continued monitoring at a reduced level. This effort is currently underway. Condition and operation studies and water control management, inspection and reports, project operations management, and engineering and design costs were $57,918. Condition at end of fiscal year. The initial construction contract was awarded 14 January 1981. The project was completed in FY 1984. Federal costs for the existing project have been $17,037,428 for new work and $2,413,462 for maintenance, a total of $19,450,890. 10. MURRELLS INLET, S.C. Location. The project is located on the coast of South Carolina, in Georgetown County, about 13 miles southwest of the City of Myrtle Beach. The inlet is the ocean entrance through a barrier beach to several tidal streams in the Murrells Inlet-Garden City estuarine area. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11535.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel twelve by 300 feet across the seaward bar; thence a ten by 90-foot inner channel to a turning basin at the old Army crashboat dock. The entrance channel is stabilized by ocean jetties extending seaward 3,445 feet and 3,319 feet on the north and south sides of the inlet, respectively. The recreational project includes a walkway on the south jetty with access road and parking area. Emergency dredging on an annual basis was authorized by the Water Resources Act of 1974. Previous work was done under the authority of the River and Harbor Act of 1945, Section 3, P.L. 79-14. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. There are five marinas and numerous private docks located about the Murrells Inlet Harbor. There are several public boat ramps in the area. Facilities are expected to be expanded and new ones added as demands for services outstrip capacity. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: No maintenance dredging was performed during FY 89. A monitoring program was initiated in April 1978 to provide site specific information for proper management of the project and to provide data on coastal response to the project. Charleston District collects most of the data and Coastal Engineering Research 7-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Center (CERC) performs data analysis and interpretation. The monitoring program has been adjusted several times based on CERC recommendations. Currently the program includes daily littoral environmental observations (LEO), annual aerial photography, jetty surveys and site inspections, semi-annual surveys of beaches and the deposition basis. Channel surveys are not scheduled but are conducted on an "as needed" basis. Results of the monitoring program have led to recommendations for dredging the deposition basin, nourishment of a reach of eroded beach at North Litchfield Beach and erosion protection of a section of the south jetty sand dike. Natural resource management, lands and damages, condition and operation studies, water control management costs and engineering and design, supervision and administration costs were $124,252. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1981. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $13,407,465 for new work and $3,442,935 for maintenance, a total of $16,850,400. 11. PORT ROYAL HARBOR, S.C. Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina 47 miles southwest of Charleston Harbor and 23 miles northeast of Savannah River, Georgia. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11516.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the ocean through Port Royal Sound to Port Royal, South Carolina, 27 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar and in Port Royal Sound for approximately 12.7 miles, thence 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Beaufort River and Battery Creek for approximately 8.3 miles to and including a turning basin 27 feet deep and 600 feet wide opposite the wharf of the South Carolina State Ports Authority. (See the table at the end of the chapter for acts authorizing the existing project.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. The South Carolina State Ports Authority constructed a marginal concrete wharf and operates modern terminal facilities which are considered adequate for present commerce of the port. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed in the Entrance Channel by hopper dredge during the period August 1989 to September 1989, removing 31,091 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $400,000. Natural resource management, condition and operation studies, water control management, project operations management, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $73,388. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1959. Federal costs for the existing project to date have been $1,786,100 for new work and $7,403,970 for maintenance, a total of $9,190,070. 12. SHIPYARD RIVER, S.C. Location. This waterway is a tidal tributary of Charleston Harbor, South Carolina. It has its source about one-half mile below the U.S. Naval Base, whence it flows southerly about three miles and empties into the Cooper River about three-fourths miles above Drum Island. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11524.) Previous projects. For details, see page 610 of Annual Report for 1932 and page 463 of Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 30 feet deep from Cooper River to MacAlloy Corporation's plant, including two turning basins, one opposite Gulf Oil Corporation Terminal and another at the upper end of project. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Terminal facilities. In the lower three-quarters of a mile of the channel are large marginal wharves of the Gulf Oil Corporation and Shipyard River Terminal Company. These wharves accommodate deep-draft, oceangoing vessels for handling petroleum products, coal and fertilizer materials. In the upper channel is MacAlloy Corporation's wharf for handling ores. For further details see Port Series No. 13, 1980, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: No maintenance dredging was performed. FY 1989 diking costs were $72,916. Condition and operations studies, water control management, project operations management, engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $23,272. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1951. Federal costs under the existing project to date have been $487,824 for new work and $9,290,273 for maintenance for a total of $9,778,097. 13. TOWN CREEK, S.C. Location. Town Creek Channel begins at the AIWW directly south of the Town of McClellanville in Charleston County, S.C. The channel follows Five Fathom Creek in a southerly direction to the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11531.) Existing project. The project provides a channel ten feet deep by 80 feet wide from the AIWW to the mouth of Five Fathom Creek, a distance of 6.2 miles. The project includes an entrance channel twelve feet deep by 100 feet wide across the ocean bar, a distance of 4.0 miles. (See table at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing projects.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed in the entrance channel by the sidecaster dredge Schweizer during May-July 1989 at a cost of $347,200. Condition and operations studies, water control management, inspection and reports, project operations manage- 7-6 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT ment, engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $45,759. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in 1975. Federal costs under the existing project to date have been $219,521 for new work and $3,395,130 for maintenance, a total of $3,614,651. 14. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Costs incurred for condition surveys were as follows: Adams Creek, S.C. $1,075 Ashley Creek, S.C. 345 Edisto River, S.C. 200 Great Pee Dee River, S.C. 200 Lynches River & Clark Creek, S.C. 200 Mingo Creek, S.C. 200 Salkehatchie River, S.C. 200 Santee River, S.C. 200 Village Creek, S.C. 1,928 Waccamaw River, N.C. & S.C. 200 Wateree River, S.C. 200 Total $4,948 15. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION REPORTS (See Table 7-C.) 16. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Work Under Special Authorization Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization) and Section III, Public Law 90-433, as amended. (See Table 7-D.) Snagging and clearing for navigation (Sec. 3 of 1934 River and Harbor Act, Public Law 14, 79th Congress.) None. Beach Erosion 17. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 7-E.) 18. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, 1960 River & Harbor Act, as amended, consisted of one reconnaissance study on Pawleys Island, S.C. FY 1989 costs on this study were $7,907. Flood Control 19. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation, inspections were made of the following projects during June 1989: Buck Creek, Cow Castle Creek, Cowpens Swamp, Crabtree Swamp, Eagle Creek, Gapway Swamp, Kingstree Branch, N. Edisto River, Pompion Hill Chapel, Sawmill Branch, Scotts Creek, Simpson Creek, Shot Pouch Creek, Todd Swamp, Turkey Creek, and Wilson Branch. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation on local flood protection works when appropriate. Cost for the period was $16,353. 20. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 7-F.) 21. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). (See Table 7-G). Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and Antecedent Legislation). Federal costs for FY 1989 were $176,116 for Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies, $2 for Inspection of Non-Federal Levees, and $147,950 for the National Emergency Preparedness Program. Miscellaneous 22. STREAMBANK EROSION UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION The only streambank erosion activity pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act (as amended) was Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW), Myrtle Beach Wastewater Treatment Facility, S.C. and AIWW, Laurel Hill Bluff, S.C. FY 1989 costs for these projects were $2,519 and $25,000, respectively. (See Table 7-H for previous work in this category. General Investigations 23. ACTIVE INVESTIGATIONS See Table 7-I which covers: Surveys, Collections, and Study of Basic Data, and Research and Development Activities. 7-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 7-A See Section in COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Text Project 1 Aquatic Plant Control, SC (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va. and the St. Johns River, FL 3 Charleston Harbor, SC (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4 Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC 5 Cooper River Seismic Modification, SC 6 Folly River, SC 7 Georgetown Harbor, SC 8 Jeremy Creek, SC 9 Little River Inlet, NC and SC (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) .--- --.- , .. r" _ 7-8 --- Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp, Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost FY 86 638,000 585,625 00 00 3,024,000 3,080,530 00 4,476,000 4,575,020 0 0 4,700,000 5,804,764 2,948,000 3,349,732 198,000 233,086 00 334,000 325,791 00 3,242,000 3,263,966 00 00 -33,000 437 87,000 94,771 0 0 FY 87 566,000 602,642 00 00 754,000 674,155 00 2,831,000 2,924,406 00 0 426,587 3,572,000 3,863,929 745,000 749,898 00 328,000 343,680 00 3,544,000 3,241,898 00 5,000 4,073 00 52,000 55,353 00 FY 88 550,000 337,950 00 00 1,328,000 1,011,405 5,385,000 2,769,772 4,294,000 4,067,062 1,297,000 923,083 -13,000 37,675 2,226,000 2,192,630 20,755,000 1,786,164 0 0 313,000 313,587 0 0 1,292,000 1,493,218 00 6,000 3,763 00 88,000 78,974 00 FY 89 427,000 491,838 00 00 2,019,400 2,337,601 7,045,000 8,248,738 2,914,900 3,163,395 2,763,000 2,749,580 125,000 9,484 3,764,200 3,745,712 3,602,000 13,123,808 0 0 260,600 259,916 00 2,893,400 2,845,413 00 51,000 54,061 00 52,000 57,918 00 Total Cost to Sept. 30, 1989 3,710,605 3,544,880 52,028 52,028 7,455,3781/ 7,455,3781/ 49,193,4042/ 49,077,8032/ 23,217,5643/ 21,806,0243/ 101,320,4874/ 101,269,9184/ 4,060,000 3,672,663 191,594,583 189,808,221 15,841,200 15,589,011 27,600,000 18,001,788 337,736 337,736 2,089,600 2,087,662 7,061,7555/ 7,061,7555/ 50,723,1806/ 50,526,3526/ 49,987 49,987 65,000 64,897 17,037,428 17,037,428 2,417,676 2,413,462 1,521,920 1,521,920 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT TABLE 7-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sept. 30, 1989 10 Murrells Inlet, SC New Work: (Regular Funds) Approp. 0 0 0 0 13,419,240 Cost -24 342 0 0 13,407,465 Maint: Approp. 107,600 118,100 2,111,000 143,000 3,538,2697/ Cost 103,438 125,715 2,104,198 124,252 3,509,9357/ (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. 0 0 0 0 1,380,000 Cost 0 0 0 0 1,379,148 11 Port Royal Harbor, New Work: SC Approp. 0 0 0 0 1,786,100 Cost 0 0 0 0 1,786,100 Maint: Approp. 892,000 52,000 84,000 474,000 7,416,408 Cost 896,186 51,385 72,789 473,388 7,403,970 12 Shipyard River, New Work: SC Approp. 0 0 0 0 491,9748/ Cost 0 0 0 0 491,9748/ Maint: Approp. 106,000 34,500 327,000 40,000 9,293,692 Cost 107,700 32,891 273,810 96,188 9,290,273 13 Town Creek, SC New Work: (Regular Funds) Approp. 0 0 0 0 219,521 Cost 0 0 0 0 219,521 Maint: Approp. 325,000 422,000 352,000 393,000 3,396,000 Cost 525,242 435,622 352,155 392,959 3,395,130 (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. 0 0 0 0 8,600 Cost 0 0 0 0 8,600 1/ Includes $109,490 for new work for previous project. 2/ Includes $69,422 for maintenance of previous projects. 3/ Includes $10,165,564 for previous projects and $622,000 for Preconstruction, Engineering and Design. 4/ Includes $401,989 for maintenance of previous projects. In addition, $600 for maintenance expended from contributed funds. Includes $2,445,852 for new work for previous projects. Includes $114,556 for maintenance of previous projects. Includes $67,000 accomplished under authority of Section 3, P. L. 79-11 incurred through FY 73. Includes $4,150 for new work on previous projects. 7-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents R&H Act of Oct. 27, 1965 R&H Act of Sep. 19, 1890 R&H Act of June 13, 1902 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1907 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1907 R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act of July 3, 1930 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 19351' R&H Act of Aug. 30, 19352 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 19352 R&H Act of Aug. 26, 1937 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act of June 18, 1878 R&H Act of Aug. 8, 1917 R&H Act of July 18, 1918 R&H Act of Jan. 21, 1927 R&H Act of Oct. 17, 1940 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act of Sep. 3, 1945 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, SC (See Section 1 of text.) Provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water-milfoil and other obnoxious acquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the U.S., in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and state agencies. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL. (See Section 2 of text.) Channel from Minim Creek to Winyah Bay. Channel from Charleston to a point opposite McClellanville. Branch channel to McClellanville. Extending the channel to Minim Creek, thence through the Esterville-Minim Canal to Winyah Bay. Cut across the Santee Delta at Four Mile Creek. Widening and deepening the waterway from Charleston to Beaufort. A waterway eight feet deep and 75 feet wide from Cape Fear River to Winyah Bay. Construction of bridges across the waterway in Horry County, S.C. Cutoff between Ashepoo and Coosaw Rivers. Enlarging the channel from Winyah Bay to Charleston including the branch channel to McClellanville, to depth of ten feet and bottom width of 90 feet. Increasing dimensions of waterway to twelve feet deep and 90 feet wide. Anchorage Basin 125 feet wide, 335 feet long, twelve feet deep, near Myrtle Beach, S.C.4 (Deauthorized by 1986 WRDA) CHARLESTON HARBOR, S.C. (See Section 3 of text.) 2 jetties.5 Increase in depth to 30 feet with width of 500 feet between the jetties and 1,000 feet seaward thereof. The 40-foot channel to the Naval Base. Act provided that the 40-foot channel should not be undertaken "until the proposed new drydocks at this navy yard, carrying a depth of 40 feet of water over the blocks, has been authorized." This dock was authorized in the Naval Appropriations Act approved July 1, 1918 (40 Stat. L. 725). A 30-foot channel from the sea to Goose Creek via Cooper River, together with a 30-foot channel through Town Creek for commercial purposes. The act also provided that the 40-foot channel be prosecuted only as found necessary for national defense. The 35-foot channel depth from the sea to the head of the project via Cooper River and Town Creek, also a channel in Shem Creek to Mount Pleasant, 110 feet wide and ten feet deep, including a turning basin at the upper end. An anchorage area 30 feet deep in the water area between Castle Pinckney and Fort Moultrie. (Deauthorized by 1986 WRDA) Deepen the 30-foot channel north and east of Drum Island to 35 feet. Sec. 302, 1965 Rivers and Harbors Act (H.D. 251, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.) Annual Report, 1889, p. 1184. H.D. 84, 56th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report 1900, p. 1908 Annual Report 1903, p. 1133. H.D. 178, 63rd Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 237, 68th Cong., 1st sess. S.D. 178, 68th Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 41, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 14, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 129, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 11, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess.3 H.D. 327, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report 1878, pp. 553-572. H.D. 288, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 1946, 64th Cong., 2nd sess., pt. 1, pp. 21-29, 57, 58, and 61-63. H.D. 249, 69th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 259, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 156, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.D. 136, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess.3 7-10 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents R&H Act of July 14, 1960 Water Resources Development Act of Oct. 22, 1976 Water Resources Development Act of 17 Nov. 1986 R&H Act of Aug. 13, 1968 Authorized by Chief of Engrs. on Dec. 23, 1977 under authority of Section 107 R&H Act of 1960, as amended. R&H Act of Aug. 5, 1886 R&H Act of June 25, 1910 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act of June 30, 1948 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1907 R&H Act of 1945, Sec. 3 Auth. by Senate Public Works Comm. and the House Public Works Comm. on Oct. 12, 1972, under auth. of Sec. 201, P.L. 89-298, 1965 FC Act. Shem Creek Channel modified by extending 1,150 feet upstream and downstream from mouth to Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Project is authorized for the Phase I design memorandum stage of Advanced Engineering and Design. Deepening 35 foot channel to 40 feet (42 feet in the ocean bar and entrance channel) from the 42 foot ocean contour to Goose Creek, a distance of 26.9 miles, construction of one turning basin, modification of existing turning basins, deepening and modification of the anchorage basin, deepening Shipyard River to 38 feet, maintain the Wando River Channel to 35 feet at Federal expense and the deepening of this channel to 40 feet if economically justified. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON, S.C. (ST. STEPHEN PROJECT) (See Section 4 of text.) Redivert most of the Santee river waters above Pinopolis Dam into the Lower Santee River through a canal beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to the Santee River in the vicinity of St. Stephen, South Carolina. COOPER RIVER SEISMIC MODIFICATION, S.C. (See Section 5 of text.) Install a closure structure in the diversion canal between Lake Marion and Lake Moultrie and construct such measures as necessary to improve the seismic stability of the Pinopolis West Dam on the Cooper River. FOLLY RIVER, S.C. (See Section 6 of text.) Consists of stable all-tide channel nine feet deep and 80 feet wide in Folly River and an entrance channel at Stono Inlet 100 feet wide and eleven feet deep. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, S.C. (See Section 7 of text.) Jetties and earthen dike to protect south jetty. Previous project channel dimensions and training wall. 27-foot channel from ocean, including a turning basin in Sampit River. Cutoff and side channel in Sampit River. JEREMY CREEK, S.C. (See Section 8 of text.) To provide a waterway twelve feet deep at mean low water and a width of not less than 90 feet. LITTLE RIVER INLET, N.C. AND S.C. (See Section 9 of text.) Provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the ocean bar; thence ten feet by 90-foot inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. H.D. 35, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 436, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 99-1013, 99th Cong., 2nd sess., P.L. 99-662. Rivers and Harbors Act of 1968, S.D. 88, 90th Cong. H.D. 3069, 98th Cong., 1st sess. Detailed Project Report H.Ex. Doc. 258 48th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report 1885, pp. 1154-1170, and H. Ex. Doc. 117, 50th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report 1889, pp. 1110-1111. H.D. 395, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. and Annual Report 1904, pp. 1591-1605. H.D. 211, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 21, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Detailed Project Report P.L. 79-14 H.D. 362, 92nd Cong. 7-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Water Resources Development Act of 1974. R&H Act of 1945, Sec. 3 Auth. by the House Committee on Public Works on Nov. 10, 1971 and the Senate Committee on Public Works on Nov. 18, P.L. 89-298, 1965 FC Act. Water Resources Development Act of 1974. R&H Act of Sept. 3, 1954 R&H Act of July 25, 1912 R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act of July 3, 1930 R&H Act of Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act of Aug. 26, 19372 R&H Act of Mar. 2, 1945 Auth. by Chief of Engrs. on Feb. 12, 1974 under Auth. of Sec. 107 of R&H Act of 1960, as amended. Authorized emergency dredging operations as the Chief of Engineers determines necessary to maintain channel depths sufficient to permit free and safe movement of vessels until such time as the authorized project is constructed. MURRELLS INLET, S.C. (See Section 10 of text.) Provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the seaward bar, thence ten by 90-foot inner channel to a turning basin at the old Army crash boat dock. Authorized emergency dredging operations as the Chief of Engineers determines necessary to maintain channel depths sufficient to permit free and safe movement of vessels until such time as the authorized project is constructed. PORT ROYAL HARBOR, S.C. (See Section 11 of text.) A channel from the ocean through Port Royal Sound to Port Royal, S.C.; 27 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar and in Port Royal Sound for approximately 12.7 miles; thence 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Beaufort River and Battery Creek for approximately 8.3 miles to and including a turning basin 27 feet deep and 600 feet wide opposite wharf of the S.C. State Ports SHIPYARD RIVER, S.C. (See Section 12 of text.) Channel depth of 15 feet and width of 100 feet. Deepening of channel to 18 feet from deep water in Cooper River upstream 1-1/16 miles. Channel depths of twelve to twenty feet. 28-feet from Cooper River to Gulf Oil Corp's terminal, and the deepening of the channel above that point to twenty feet from the depth of twelve feet previously authorized without local cooperation. Enlargement of the channel to a depth of 30 feet and a width of 200 feet up to the Gulf Oil Corp's terminal, with a turning basin 30 feet deep at the latter point. Extension of the existing 30-foot channel to vicinity of the Pittsburg Metallurgical Co. Plant, with a turning basin at the upper end. TOWN CREEK, S.C. (See Section 13 of text.) An entrance channel twelve feet deep by 100 feet wide across the ocean bar a distance of 4.0 miles and a channel ten feet deep by 80 feet wide from the mouth of Five Fathom Creek to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, a distance of 6.2 miles. H.D. 10203, 93rd Cong., 2nd sess. P.L. 79-14 H.D. 137, 92nd Cong. H.D. 10203, 93rd Cong., 2nd sess. River and Harbor Act, H.D. 469, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. S.D. 350, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 288, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 93, 79th Cong., 1st sess. Detailed Project Report. 1/ Included in Public Works Administration Program September 6, 1933. 2/ Included in Emergency Relief Administration Program May 28, 1935. 3/ Contains latest published maps. 4/ Inactive. 5/ Completed under previous projects. 6/ For national defense. 7-12 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT TABLE 7-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 15 of Text) For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Report For Construction Maintenance Adams Creek, S.C. 1 1978 $125,697 $ 22,111 Aquatic Plant Control, N.C. and S.C. 1 5 1968 379,680 -- Archers Creek, S.C. 1914 20,646 -- Ashley River, S.C. 1 1955 260,996 535,049 Edisto River, S.C. 1 2 1938 33,103 1,100 Great Pee Dee River, S.C.'1 3 1950 183,712 269,873 Mingo Creek, S.C. 1 2 1950 29,050 7,350 Lynches River and Clark Creek, S.C. 1 1982 9,500 84,370 Salkahatchie River, S.C. 1 2 4 1896 15,841 200 Santee River, N.C. & S.C.1 1950 99,750 180,833 Village Creek, S.C. 1985 26,500 107,044 Waccamaw River, N.C. & S.C. 1 1978 262,814 278,370 Wateree River, S.C. 1940 60,000 151,984 1/ Completed. 2/ No commerce reported. 3/ Curtailment recommended in 1926 (H.D. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Session.) 4/ Abandonment recommended in 1926 (H.D. 69th Cong., 1st Session.) 5/ Pilot Program. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 7-D (See Section 16 of Text) Study Identifications Section Fiscal Year Costs Brookgreen Gardens, S.C. 107 $ 3,971 Shipyard River, S.C. 107 16,676 OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS TABLE 7-E (See Section 17 of the Text) For Last Full Report See Annual Operations & Project Report For Construction Maintenance Hunting Island Beach, S.C. 1984 $2,872,7171 1/ Excludes $1,249,336 contributed funds. 7-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 7-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Report For Construction Maintenance Buck Creek, N.C. & S.C. 1 2 1970 $ 298,167 -- Cow Castle Creek, S.C. 1 2 1985 250,000 -- Cowpens Swamp, S.C. 1 2 1960 18,679 -- Crabtree Swamp, S.C. 1 2 1969 97,000 -- Eagle Creek, S.C. 1 2 1986 1,245,063 -- Edisto River, S.C. 1 3 1947 6,379 -- Edisto River, North Fork, S.C. 1 2 1969 127,660 -- Edisto River, Vicinity Canaday's Landing, S.C. 1 2 1958 3,160 -- Gapway Swamp, S.C. 1 1969 339,197-- Kingstree Branch, Williamsburg County, S.C. 1 1978 247,242 -- Leith's Creek, S.C. 1 2 1982 430,951 -- Reddies River Lake, N.C. 1980 985,800 -- Reedy River, S.C. 1 3 1974 4,500 -- Roaring River, Wilkes County, N.C. 1 4 1978 370,000 -- Saluda River, S.C. 1 2 1963 99,000 -- Sawmill Branch, S.C. 1 2 1971 248,605 -- Shot Pouch Creek, Sumter County, S.C. 1 2 1971 77,400 -- Simpson Creek, S.C. 1 2 1957 81,000 -- Todd Swamp, S.C. 1 2 1964 29,000 -- Turkey Creek, Sumter County, S.C. 1 2 1974 319,669-- Wilson Creek, Sumter County, S.C. 1 2 1985 277,111 -- 1/ Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 3/ Discontinued due to lack of interest. 2/ Completed. 4/ Phase I only. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 7-G PREAUTHORIZATION STUDIES (See Section 21 of Text) Study Identifications Section Fiscal Year Costs Camp Branch/Lynches Lake, Lake City, S.C. 205 $ 140 Crooked Creek, Bennettsville, S.C. 205 1,496 Hemingway Creek, S.C. 205 17,429 Kinley Creek, Lexington County, S.C. 205 18,070 Maple Swamp, S.C. 205 26,233 Rawls Creek, S.C. 205 41,674 Socastee Creek, Horry County, S.C. 205 7,422 OTHER AUTHORIZED STREAMBANK EROSION PROJECTS TABLE 7-H (See Section 22 of the Text) For Last Full Report See Annual Operations & Project Report For Construction Maintenance Cooper River, Pompion Hill Chapel, S.C. 1987 $211,000 1/ -- 1/ Completed. 7-14 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT TABLE 7-I ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS ITEM FISCAL YEAR COSTS FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION STUDIES (CATEGORY 120) Gills Creek, S.C. $ 50,185 SHORELINE PROTECTION STUDIES (CATEGORY 130) Myrtle Beach, S.C. $ 107 South Carolina Shores 204,176 MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITIES (CATEGORY 170) Special Investigations $ 64,846 FERC Licensing Activities 4,604 Interagency Water Resources Development 15,898 COORDINATION STUDIES WITH OTHER AGENCIES (CATEGORY 180) Department of Agriculture, SCS $ 2,903 Planning Assistance to States 64,542 TOTAL (CATEGORY 100) $407,261 FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES (CATEGORY 250) $241,196 HYDROLOGIC STUDIES (CATEGORY 260) Hydrologic Studies 5,000 TOTAL (CATEGORY 200) $246,196 CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING (CATEGORY 400) Charleston Harbor Deepening, S.C. $ 65 TOTAL (CATEGORY 400) $ 65 ADVANCE ENGINEERING & DESIGN (CATEGORY 600) Charleston Harbor Deepening, S.C. $ 19,561 Folly Beach, S.C. 237,938 TOTAL (CATEGORY 600) $257,499 TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $911,021 7-15 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT * The District comprises drainage basins that flow into the Atlantic Ocean between Port Royal Sound, SC, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL, and includes the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between these points. This area covers the headwaters of the Savannah River in southwestern North Carolina, eastern Georgia, and a small portion of northeastern Florida. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers............................ 8-1 2. Aquatic Plant Control .............. 8-2 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA, and St. Johns River, FL (Savannah District) .......... 8-2 4. Brunswick Harbor, GA ............. 8-3 5. Savannah Harbor, GA ............. 8-4 6. Savannah River Below Augusta, GA ....................... 8-5 7. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .......................... 8-5 8. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........................... 8-5 9. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ....................... 8-5 Beach Erosion Control 10. Beach Erosion Control Work Under Special Authorization ........ 11. Tybee Island, GA ................ ... 8-5 ... 8-6 Flood Control 12. Broadway Lake, Anderson County, SC ............................... 8-6 12A. Savannah River Basin at Oates Creek ....................... 8-6 13. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................... 8-7 14. Flood Control Work Under Special 8- Authorization ....................... 8-7 Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection 16. Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Under Special Authorization ..................... 8-7 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 17. Savannah River Basin, GA and SC ..... 8-7 17A. J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, GA and SC (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake, GA and SC) ....................... 8-7 17B. Hartwell Lake, GA and SC .......... 8-8 17C. Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, GA and SC) .................. 8-8 18. West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, GA and FL ............. 8-9 General Investigations 19. Surveys ........................... 8-9 20. Collection and Study of89 Basic Data ......................... 8-9 21. Research and Development .......... 8-9 22. Continuation of Planning and Engineering.................... 8-9 Tables Table 8-A Cost and Financial Statement .. 8-10 Table 8-B Authorizing Legislation ....... 8-11 Table 8-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...................... 8-16 Table 8-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ....................... 8-17 Table 8-E Savannah River Basin, GA and SC Dams and Lakes ............ 8-17 Navigation 1. ALTAMAHA, OCONEE, AND OCMULGEE RIVERS, GA Location. These rivers are entirely within the State of Georgia. (See National Oceanic and Atmnospheric Administration Survey Map of Georgia, formerly U. S. Geological Survey Map of Georgia.) For a full description of these rivers, see page 636, Annual Report for 1932. Previous projects. Prior projects for the Altamaha River have been adopted, and expenditures made under them, by the River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1881, and September 19, 1890; for the Oconee River by the River and Harbor Acts of June 18, 1878, September 19, 1890, and March 3, 1905; for the Ocmulgee River, by the River and Harbor Acts of August 14, 1876, and September 19, 1890. For Further Details, see page 1815, Annual Report for 1915, and page 589, Annual Report for 1938. 8-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Existing project. The authorized project provides for an appropriation of $40,000 annually for the Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers, to maintain a 3-foot depth during ordinary summer low water and to gradually increase channel depth so far as practicable without sacrificing the maintenance work. This project covers the entire Altamaha River (including a channel between the river and Darien, GA), a length of 137 miles. The lower 139 miles of the Oconee River has a mean tidal range of 6.4 feet at its mouth which gradually decreases to mile 33, where there is no perceptible tidal effect. At Doctortown, mile 59, ordinary floods attain a height of about 10 feet above low water, and at extreme floods, a height of about 15 feet above low water. On the Oconee River at Dublin the ordinary fluctuations attain a height of 22 feet, and the extreme fluctuations a height of 32 feet above low water. On the Ocmulgee River at Macon the ordinary fluctuations attain a height of 15 feet, and the extreme fluctuations a height of 25 feet above low water. There is no approved estimated cost for improvement or for maintenance. Published maps of these rivers are in the following documents; Altamaha River, HED 282, 51st Cong., 2d sess., Oconee River, HED 211, 51st Cong., 1st sess., Ocmulgee River, HED 215, 51st Cong., 1st sess., and Lower Altamaha River and Darien Harbor, GA, HD 610, 77th Cong., 2d sess. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Along these rivers there are numerous natural shore landings which are considered ample for existing commerce. Facilities for recreational boats have been constructed at several points. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: There were no maintenance costs this fiscal year. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is such that the percentage of completion cannot be stated. Channel depths have been increased by excavating rock shoals and sandbars, by constructing contraction and bank-protection works, and by closing cutoffs. Navigation has been rendered safer by removing obstructions. Many of the closing dams and contractions and bank-protection works need repairs. The notice of availability on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 21, 1977. 2. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Savannah District. Existing project. The project provides for control of water-hyacinth, lynhbya, alligator weed, Eurasian water milfoil, and other noxious aquatic plants from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interests of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes. The project provides for continued research for developing the most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers, H. S. 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. The authorizing act provides that research costs shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 8-C for Authorizing Legislation.) The Final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with EPA on August 6, 1979, and its notice of availability appeared in the Federal Register August 17, 1979. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement). Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and participate to the extent of 50 percent of the cost of the planning and actual control operations of the program. Requirements are being met. Operations and results during fiscal year. The Georgia Game and Fish Division, Department of Natural Resources, who maintain surveillance of potential aquatic plant problem areas, reported nuisance aquatic plant infestation in Lakes Jackson, Blackshear, Worth, and in Ebenezer Creek. Total projected cost of the FY 90 program will be $185,457 of which the portion contributed by the Federal government is $92,730. FY 90 treatments include introduction of biological control agents and chemical applications. 3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND THE ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (SAVANNAH DISTRICT) Location. This 161-mile section of waterway connects Port Royal Sound, SC, with Cumberland Sound, GA and FL. (See NOAA charts 11489-11507, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 838-841, inclusive.) Previous project. (Between Savannah, GA, and Femandina, FL) For details see pages 1814, 8-2 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT 1821-1823 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 585 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep at mean low water and not less than 90 feet wide between Port Royal Sound, SC, and Savannah, GA; 12 feet deep at mean low water, with widths of 90 feet in land cuts and narrow streams and 150 feet in open waters between Savannah, GA, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL; and a suitable anchorage basin at Isle of Hope, GA. Mean tidal range between Port Royal, SC, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL is from 6 to 8 feet with fluctuations from 1.5 to 2.5 feet due to winds and lunar phases. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Exclusive or adequate terminal facilities at port of entry, this improvement serves numerous wharves, some of which are open to the public on equal terms. Facilities are considered ample for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The District utilized an 8(a) Minority Contractor to dredge the Intracoastal Waterway during this Fiscal Year. The contractor removed a total of 1,090,420 cubic yards of sediment for a total cost of $1,649,045.75, the highest price yet paid by the District for maintenance work on the project. The contract was stopped after the total pay amount was reached, even though there was material remaining in the portions of the project south of the Jekyll Island Bridge. The District has scheduled a smaller scale contract for FY 90 to complete the remainder of the work. The District also performed work in conjunction with the Jekyll Island Authority to construct a dike across an abandoned marina on Jekyll Island. The Corps will utilize the site as a disposal area until sufficient elevations are reached to allow marsh vegetation to establish on the material. Once the vegetation is established, the dike will be allowed to erode and approximately 50 acres of marsh will be created. Condition at end of fiscal year. The main channel of the existing project, completed in 1941, is maintained at 12 feet. The former main channel, now an altemate route through the westerly end of the south channel and northerly end of Wilmington River, will be maintained to a depth of 7 feet mean low water for traffic points north and south of Savannah Harbor. Relocation of the main channel from the Frederica to Mackay River near St. Simons Island, GA, was accomplished after construction of a new bridge for the Torras Causeway. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 29, 1976. Total expenditures for the project are $21,430,862 of which $ 958,096 was for new work. Costs of existing completed project to September 30, 1989, were $21,430,862 of which $958,096 was for new work and $20,472,766 was for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 4. BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA Location. The harbor entrance is 70 statute miles south of the entrance to Savannah Harbor, GA, and 25 statute miles north of the entrance to Fernandina Harbor, FL. (See NOAA Chart 11215, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 447.) Previous projects. For details see page 1818 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 591 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a stone jetty 4,350 feet long at the entrance to East River and the following channels: 32 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the bar; 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide through St. Simons Sound, Brunswick River, and East River to the foot of Second Avenue; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Turtle River to the Allied Chemical Co. wharf, formerly the Atlantic Refining Co.; 27 feet deep and 350 feet wide in East River from Second Avenue to its confluence with Academy Creek; 24 feet deep and 150 feet wide from St. Simons Sound to the mouth of Mill Creek; and a channel in Terry Creek 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide from St. Simons Sound to the mouth of Mill Creek; and a channel in Terry Creek 10 feet deep and 80 feet wide from its mouth to a point immediately above the wharf of the former Glynn Canning Company. All depths refer to mean low water. Mean tidal range on the bar is 6.5 feet, at the City of Brunswick 7.3, and 7.6 feet at the upper end of the harbor. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Eighteen wharves and piers, almost all privately owned, have a berthing space of 7,530 linear feet. The Port of Brunswick and the State of Georgia have a transit shed and modemrn docks with 1,640 feet of berthing space (three general cargo berths) on East River. For further details see Port Series No. 14, Corps of Engineers (revised 1982). Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of two maintenance projects were completed in the Brunswick Harbor during FY 89. They were both dredging of the East River. The District used two contractors to dredge the East River twice durina the fiscal year. The first was Atkin- 8-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 son Dredging Company, of Chesapeake, Virginia. Their dredge, the Hampton Roads, removed 194,622 cubic yards of silt at a total contract price of $504,573.10. Later during the fiscal year, it became necessary for another contract to remove shoaling that had occurred after the previous contract. Southern Dredging Company used the pipeline dredge Clinton to remove 377,397 cubic yards at a price of $414,697.00. These contracts maintained the East River portion of the channel, as well as performing reimbursed work for others. The work for others consisted of dredging in front of three of Georgia Ports Authority's (GPA) docks at the contract price. The GPA then reimbursed the District for the work performed outside of the Navigation channel. No work was performed on the Entrance Channel this fiscal year due to funding problems. Total operation and maintenance cost amounted to $1,063,076 for FY 89. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in December 1960. General condition of the harbor works is satisfactory, providing maintenance dredging continues. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 3, 1975. Authorized depths were maintained throughout the fiscal year. Costs for existing completed project to September 30, 1989 were $67,611,303 of which $4,573,433 was for new work and $63,037,870 was for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 5. SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA Location. Harbor entrance is 75 statute miles south of Charleston, SC, and 70 miles north of Brunswick Harbor, GA. (See NOAA Chart 11512, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 440.) Previous projects. For details see page 1810 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 578 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide across the ocean bar about 7.0 miles; 38 feet deep and 500 feet wide to the Seaboard Coast Line terminal; 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the vicinity of Garden City (Georgia Ports Authority terminal) and 36 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the vicinity of the Savannah Sugar Refinery of Savannah Foods and Industries, Inc. about 22.6 miles; and 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide to a point 1,500 feet below the Atlantic Coastal Highway Bridge, about 1.5 miles, a total length of 31.1 miles; Fig island and Marsh Island Turning Basins 34 feet deep by 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long in the vicinity of the Seaboard Coast Line terminal, and American Oil Company terminal; Kings Island Tumrning Basin 38 feet deep by 1,500 feet wide by 1,600 feet long in the vicinity of the Garden City terminal of the Georgia Ports Authority; Argyle Island and Port Wentworth Turning Basins 30 feet deep by 600 feet long near Savannah Refinery terminal and at the extreme upper limit of the project near the Continental Can Company terminal; and a 1,200 foot long by 1,050 foot wide by 40 foot deep Oyster Bed Island Turning Basin in the vicinity of Georgia Ports Authority's LASH facility. The project also provides for sediment control works consisting of a tide gate structure across Back River; a sediment basin 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide; about 2 miles long, with an entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep and 300 feet wide; a drainage canal across Argyle Island 15 feet deep and 300 feet wide; control works and canals for supplying fresh water to the Savannah National Wildlife Refuge; and facilities to mitigate damages to presently improved areas other than refuge lands. Mean range of tide is 7.9 feet at the upper end of the harbor and 6.9 feet at the lower end. Extreme ranges are about 11.1 and 10.7 feet, respectively. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide suitable disposal areas and retaining dikes for construction and future maintenance of the project. The Chatham County Board of Commissioners, as local assurers, have met all requirements to date. Terminal facilities. Sixty-one piers and wharves adequately serve existing waterborne commerce of the port. These facilities, with use of dolphins, have a combined berthing space of 46,930 linear feet at mean low water. Included in the berthing space are six container berths with 271 acres of handling area. All have railway and highway connections. LASH facilities are located at the entrance to the harbor and have depths ranging up to 38 feet mean low water. The berthing space of LASH facilities is included in the above combined berthing space. For further details, see Port Series No. 14, Corps of Engineers (revised 1982) and Annual Report for 1962. Maintenance. The District had two dredging contracts in the Savannah Harbor during FY89, the Navigation Channel from Station 79 to 112 + 500 and the Sediment Basin. The Ship Channel contract removed 828,683 cubic yards of sediment at a cost of $922,776.50. The work was performed by Southern Dredging Company's pipeline dredge Clinton. This contract insured that the Upper Harbor and the Turning Basins remained available for ships to use. The other contract was the removal of 3,264,924 cubic yards of silt from the Sediment Basin by Atkinson Dredging for $906,147.66. The extreme low price is the result of dredging in the Sediment Basin, an area where the tidegate structure allows the silt to settle out of the water column in a location away from the 8-4 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT ship channel and close to disposal areas. Funding problems led to the delay of the Entrance Channel dredging until FY 90. Total operational costs for the harbor were $1,183,821 including such items as salinity monitoring, surveying, and cultural resource surveys. Total operation and maintenance costs for the fiscal year amounted to $3,620,820 of which $132,098 was spent on the operation of the Tidegate structure. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Training walls, jetties, and other structures are in fair condition. Authorized channels are maintained by a planned dredging program with work at critical areas when necessary. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register June 25,1976. Notices of availability on two Final Supplements to the Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register September 25, 1978, and January 8, 1980. Costs of existing projects to September 30, 1988, were $199,560,700 of which $46,651,552 was for new work and $152,909,148 was for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 6. SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA Location. Savannah River is formed by the confluence of the Tugaloo and Seneca Rivers on the boundary line between South Carolina and Georgia. It flows southeast 314 miles, forming the boundary line between two states, and empties into the Atlantic Ocean 16.6 miles below Savannah, GA. (See NOAA Charts 11514 and 11515, formerly Geological Survey maps of South Carolina and Georgia.) Previous project. For details see page 1813 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 581 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 feet deep and 90 feet wide (at ordinary summer flow of 5,800 second-feet at Augusta, GA) from the upper end of the Savannah Harbor to the head of navigation at Augusta, 3 miles above the Fifth Street Bridge, a total distance of about 181 miles. A lock and dam is located approximately 15 miles below the upper limit of the project at New Savannah Bluff. Improvement is to be obtained by construction of contraction works, closure of cutoffs, bank protection, dredging, removal of snags, over hanging trees and wrecks, and open-river regulation. Mean tidal variation at the mouth of the river is 7 feet. Freshet variation above the normal pool level (elevation 114.5 mean sea level) of New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam at mile 187 is ordinarily about 13 feet with an extreme of 34 feet. Latest approved project cost estimate for providing a 9-foot channel (September 1963) is $6,576,000 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. The only water terminals served by this improvement are at Augusta, Sylvania, and at or near Savannah. Augusta provided a municipal dock valued at $50,000 and Georgia Ports Authority constructed a state port at Augusta, GA, costing about $418,000. These facilities were expanded in 1965 at an additional cost of about $250,000. These are supplemented by natural landings along the river and extensive facilities at Savannah. Operations and results during fiscal year. In general, open-channel works are in good condition. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register February 18, 1977. The total cost for the year was $212,123. There were no dredging projects during this fiscal year. Inspection of completed works amounted to $16,852. 7. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Survey Section performed condition surveys on the following active O&M navigation projects: Savannah Harbor Brunswick Harbor AIWW Savannah River Below Augusta General regulatory function expenditures for the fiscal year were $1,387,804. 8. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 8-C.) 9. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER AUTHORIZATION SPECIAL The Valona, GA, detailed project study was continued in FY 89 for a total expense of $24,379.06. Feasibility studies were initiated for the South Brunswick River, Brunswick Harbor, Georgia. $69,576.76 of the $97,000 initial work allowance was expended in FY 89. Total expenditures for this category was $78,653.39. Beach ErosIon Control 10. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION A reconnaissance investigation was completed and expanded to the feasibility phase on the shoreline 8-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 erosion problems at Crooked River State Park, GA, at a fiscal year cost of $29,464.33. 11. TYBEE ISLAND, GA Location. Tybee Island is located directly south of the Savannah River entrance, about 17 miles east of the City of Savannah, GA. (See NOAA Charts 11512, 11513, and 11509, formerly U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 440, 1240, and 1241, and on maps included in HD 92-105, 92nd Cong.) The only portion of the island that has developed is bounded on the north by the south channel of the Savannah River, on the east by the Atlantic Ocean, and on the south and west by Tybee Creek and other small tidal streams. This area, hereinafter referred to as "Tybee Island," is occupied by the City of Tybee Island. The ocean face of this area has a wide sandy beach. Tybee Island is about 3.5 miles long from its northerly tip to the mouth of Tybee Creek with an average width of about 0.5 mile. Behind the beach lies a line of sand dunes, a number of which have been removed during the years to make room for Improvements and for various other reasons. Those that remain are from 10 to 20 feet high. The ground elevation west of the dunes is from 10 to 18 feet and slopes westward to the salt marsh. Existing project. The approved project plan of improvement provides for an 800-foot rock groin at the north end of the island, with a 225-foot tie-in to high ground. An additional 1,200-foot extension of this groin is deferred, as are two additional intermediate groins (480 feet long); these will be added at a later date, if needed. The plan also provides for the initial restoration of approximately 13,300 feet of beach, from the vicinity of 18th Street to the terminal groin located at the northern end of the island. Periodic nourishment will be provided as needed to maintain suitable beach dimensions. In 1981, the plan was modified and now calls for the addition of a groin at the south end and modification and rehabilitation of the north rock groin and renourishment. Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) contribute in cash the required percentage of the first cost (including costs for construction, engineering and design, and administration; and excluding the cost of lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocation) of all items of work to be provided by the Corps of Engineers. The local contribution is presently estimated at 51.0 percent to be paid in a lump sum prior to start of construction or in installments prior to the start of pertinent work items in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers, the final apportionment of cost to be made after the actual costs have been determined; (b) provide maintenance and repair of the groins, and provide (after the first 10 years of project life) periodic nourishment of the restored beach as may be required to serve the intended purpose during the life of the project; (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-ofway, and relocations required for construction and subsequent nourishment of the project; (e) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (f) provide without cost to the United States access and facilities necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based, and maintain continued public use of the beach and administer it for public use during the life of the project, and provide further that construction on the project shall not be started until local interests furnish lands for beach access and parking, satisfactory to the Chief of Engineers, for the reach from First Street to the terminal groin. To date, local cooperation is being provided as required. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. In January 1987, the South Groin contract was completed at a cost of $607,392. In February 1987, the first periodic renourishment contract was awarded, calling for the placement of approximately 1 million cubic yards of sand on two reaches of the island; the south end from the mouth of Tybee Creek to 14th Street, and the north end from the North terminal groin to about 6th Street. The contract was completed in May 1987 at a contract cost of $1,988,843. FLOOD CONTROL 12. BROADWAY LAKE Location. Broadway Lake is located about 4 miles southeast of Anderson, South Carolina. It is formed at the junction of Broadway Creek and Neals Creek in the headwaters of Rocky River, a tributary of the Savannah River. Operations and results during the fiscal year. The project was deauthorized during FY 88 under procedures specified in PL 99-662, section 1001(b), dated November 17, 1986. 12A. SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN AT OATES CREEK, GA. Oates Creek is a major drainage outlet for flood waters from an urban area of Augusta, GA. A flood control study of Oates Creek was authorized and completed as part of the Savannah River Basin study. The Qates Creek study area is located just south of Augusta, in Richmond County. The recommended plan is a channel and bridge modification flood control plan and has received support from Federal, State, and local governmental agencies with no environmental opposition. The local sponsor, Richmond County, expressed support for the project and intent to participate financially. 8-6 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT The plan consists of improvements to approximately 12,300 feet of channel and consists of concrete- lined channels, grass-lined channels, a low levee, modifications of bridges and culverts, and relocation of utilities. The CP&E effort began in October 1983 and consisted of the preparation of a General Design Memorandum (Sep 1986). Upon the completion and approval of the General Design Memorandum, negotiations were initiated with the local sponsor to develop a Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA). The LCA was signed by Richmond County and the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) on 10 March 1988. Fiscal year expenditures were $271,390 Federal and 320,000 Non-federal. 13. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 8-D.) 14. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization studies). Feasibility studies continued through FY 89 on Placentia Canal, GA, and Springfield Canal, GA. The efforts expended on Placentia Canal resulted in the approval of the Detailed Project Report at no additional costs for FY89. Feasibility studies continued in FY 89 on Springfield Canal, GA, at a cost of $7,959.44. Reconnaissance studies were completed in FY 89 for: Big Indian Creek, GA - $9,148.21; Conley Creek, Clayton Co. GA - $8,959.70; Panther Creek, Clayton Co. GA - $9,682.17; Rum Creek, Clayton Co., GA - $9,882.11; St. Augustine Creek, Chatham Co. GA - $9,760.34. None of these recommended further studies. Two reconnaissance studies were expanded to full efforts in FY 88 and completed in FY 89. Expenditures in FY 89 for these two studies were Hunger and Hardship Creek, GA - $8,189.54 and Reeves Creek, GA - $5,097.04. The total fiscal year cost for pre-authorization studies was $68,678.55. Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong. and antecedent legislation). Revisions to emergency manuals, emergency operations, and exercises fiscal year costs were $209,290. Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection 16. EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION. No work was performed in FY 89 under authorization of Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946 as amended. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 17. SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA AND SC Location. Works covered by this project consist of a series of 11 dams and lakes on the Savannah River and its tributaries in GA and SC. (See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1944 approved the general plan for comprehensive development of the Savannah River basin for flood control and other purposes (H.D/ 657, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and authorized construction of the J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir Project on the Savannah River in Georgia and South Carolina as the initial step of this development. The Flood Control Act of 1950 authorized construction of Hartwell Lake under the general plan. Richard B. Russell (formerly Trotters Shoals) was authorized for construction by the Flood Control Act of 1966 at an estimated cost of $84,900,000. J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, Hartwell Lake, and Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake are the only projects in the comprehensive plan that have been constructed. (See Table 8-E on Dams and Lakes.) Duke Power Company has completed construction on the Keowee-Toxaway power complex on the Keowee River in the headwaters of Hartwell Lake and construction of the Jocassee pump-storage power project in the headwaters of the Keowee- Toxaway project. The Keowee-Toxaway power complex is located on the Newry-OId Pickens site identified in the approved comprehensive plan. Individual reports on J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, Hartwell, and Richard B. Russell Lakes follow. Local cooperation. None required. 17A. J. STROM THURMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake) GA AND SC Location. J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir is located at mile 237.7 on the Savannah River about 22 miles upstream from Augusta, GA. (See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, the final cost of which was $79,156,300. The dam has a concrete section 2,282 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet and a controlled spillway 1,1096 feet long. The concrete section is flanked on the west side by a rolled-earth embankment of 2,069 feet and on the east side by a similar embankment of 1,329 feet. The total length of the dam is 5,680 feet. The lake covers 71,100 acres at maximum power pool eleva- 8-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 tion 330. It provides a total storage capacity of 2,900,000 acre-feet allocated as follows: flood control 390,000 acre-feet; hydropower 1,405,000 acre-feet; dead storage 1,465,000 acre-feet. Seven 40,000-kilowatt generators have a combined generating capacity of 280,000 kilowatts with an average annual output of 700 million kilowatt-hours of electrical energy. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Gross generations of electric energy for the period was 331,177,004 kilowatt-hours, most of which was delivered to the Southeastern Power Administration. Prevented flood damages were estimated at zero due to the extreme drought in 1989. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance costs during the fiscal year amounted to $10,858,490. The notice of availability on the Final Environmental Impact Statement on J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir Operation and Maintenance appeared in the December 18, 1981 Federal Register. In FY 89 5,775,600 persons visited the facility. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Construction is complete except for providing additional recreational development.(See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 17B. HARTWELL LAKE, GA AND SC Location. Hartwell Lake is on the Savannah River 305 miles above its mouth and 89 miles upstream from Augusta, GA.(See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The dam is a concrete gravitytype structure 1,900 feet long with a maximum height of 204 feet and a controlled spillway 568 feet in length. The concrete section is flanked on the east and west abutments by earth embankments totaling 13,390 feet in length and by a saddle dike 2,590 feet long also on the west side. Total length of the dam is 17,880 feet. At maximum conservation pool elevation of 660 feet the lake covers 55,950 acres. Total capacity of the lake is 2,843,000 acre-feet of storage allocated as follows: flood control - 293,000 acre-feet, hydropower - 1,416,000 acre-feet, dead storage - 1,134,000 acre-feet. Four 66,000 kilowatt generators having a generating capacity of 264,000 kilowatts were installed initially with provisions for a future unit. A fifth 80,000 kilowatt generating unit has been installed which increased the rated capacity to 344,000 kilowatts. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during the fiscal year. Cost of activities during this fiscal year amounted to $8,003,569. The fiscal year upper diversion dam rehabilitation cost amounted to $21,922 used mainly for monitoring activities. Gross generation of electrical energy for the period amounted to 253,014,700 kilowatthours, most of which was delivered to the Southeastern Power Administration. Flood damages prevented were estimated to be zero due to the extreme drought of 1989. Maintenance. Operation and maintenance costs during the fiscal year amounted to $8,003,569. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement on the operation and maintenance of Hartwell Dam and Lake appeared in the Federal Register on August 21,1978. Approximately 15,034,800 persons visited the lake in FY 89. 17C. RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA AND SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, GA AND SC) Location. Richard B. Russell Dam is located on the Savannah River 275.1 miles above its mouth, 29.9 miles below Hartwell Dam, and about 37.4 miles above J. Strom Thurmond Dam (formerly Clarks Hill Dam). (See NOAA Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake substantially in accordance with the recommendations. The latest approved (fiscal year 1989) cost estimate for the project is $555,000,000 of which $430,289,000 is for construction; $28,580,000 for lands and damages; $4,683,000 for cultural resources; and $91,498,000 for engineering/design and supervision/administration. Approval was received in January 1977 to include minimum provisions for pumped storage. A Feasibility Report and Final Environmental Impact Statement to address the installation and operation of four 75 MW reversible pump-turbines were prepared in 1979 with the Record of Decision signed in August 1980. The Richard B. Russell Fish and Wildlife Mitigation Plan was completed in 1981, approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) in September 1982, and the provisions are being implemented. Since 1986, the District has been conducting various fishery studies in the Russell tailrace and J. Strom Thurmond Lake (formerly Clarks Hill Lake) downstream. In addition, the District is conducting water quality studies, hydraulic modeling, and an evaluation of various fish protection measures associated with hydroelectric projects. The results of 8-8 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT these study efforts will be used to evaluate the need for fish protection at the Richard B. Russell Project associated with pumped storage operations. This evaluation will be presented in a supplement to the Final Environmental Impact Statement(SEIS) on pumped storage. The draft SEIS is scheduled to be coordinated in the summer of 1989. McCalla State Park Recreation Facilities is scheduled to be awarded in FY 90. During FY 89 268,265,000 kilowatts of power were generated. Maintenance. The operation and maintenance cost for the fiscal year amounted to $3,497,898. These funds were for management of lake activities. Approximately 802,000 persons visited the lake in FY 89. Condition at the end of fiscal year. The project is 88 percent complete. Costs of project to September 30, 1989 were $501,596,457 of which $482,507,225 was used for new work and $19,089,232 for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) 18. WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER Location. The West Point Lake is located on the Chattahoochee River, 2.8 miles upstream from West Point, GA, and was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1962 (H.D. 570, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). The project was designed and constructed for flood control, power, recreation, fish and wildlife development, and stream flow regulation for downstream navigation. Design and construction was accomplished by the Savannah District, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers for the Mobile District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. For more detail, see the Mobile, AL, District's Report of the Chief of Engineers, U. S. Army 1987. General Investigation 19. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $823,594 of which $145,140 was for navigation studies; $514,002 for flood control studies; $54,999 for special investigations; $82,973 for coordination with other agencies; $15,289 for dam safety criteria studies, and $11,191 for review of completed projects. 20. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Work continued under the Flood Plain Management Services on the compilation of flood information, potential flood damages, and identification of those areas subject to inundation. Fiscal year expenditures for Flood Plain Management Services were $92,357 while expenditures for Technical Services were $108,987. Flood Plain Management Services included responses to other Federal agencies to aide them in fulfilling the requirements of EO 11988 (Management of Base Flood Area). Through the Technical Services Program, flood problems in several areas were analyzed and possible improvements were identified. During FY 89, the Flood Plain Management Services Branch continued the Coastal Georgia Hurricane Evacuation Study. This study is a three year joint effort of the state of Georgia, local officials, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. Funds available for the study in FY 89 were $24,611 of which $6,000 came from the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Flood Plain Management Program funds. Fiscal year expenditures were $21,107. The hydrologic studies costs were $3,500. 21. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT No funds were expended for research and development during the fiscal year. 22. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Lake Lanier Reregulation Dam. In FY 88, the Lake Lanier Reregulation Dam General Design Memorandum was completed at a total cost of $2,206,000. The recommended plan is for reallocation of Lake Lanier storage from hydropower to water supply. Savannah Harbor Widening. The Savannah Harbor Widening project is designed to increase the width of the navigation channel from 400 to 500 feet along a 5.6 mile section of the Savannah River. During FY 89 the Chatham County Commissioners, the local sponsor, worked at acquiring the necessary LERR's as required bythe LCA. Fiscal year expenditures were $150,161. 8-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 8-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 1989 1. Altamaha, Oconee, & Ocmulgee Rivers, GA 2. Aquatic Plant Control (1965 R&H Act) 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, VA, and the St. John's River, FL 4. Brunswick Harbor, GA 5. Savannah Harbor, GA 6. Savannah River below Augusta, GA 11. Tybee Island, GA 12. Broadway Lake, SC 13. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Works 17.A J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, GA and SC New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 821,457 1 821,457 1 46 3,684 -- 50,000 205,000 90,000 58,950 143,065 78,264 -- 1,917,9822 3 -- 1,917,9822 3 75,000 39,402 711,159 588,238 -- -- -- -- 958,096 4 -- -- -- -- 958,096 4 608,000 1,531,800 391,500 2,036,500 20,516,721 s 752,177 1,536,950 393,423 2,010,362 20,472,766 6 -- -- -- -- 4,573,608 6 -- -- -- -- 4,573,608 6 8,101,443 3,050,000 4,406,400 651,500 63,144,794 7 8,110,481 2,974,663 4,066,019 1,063,076 63,037,870 7 -- 1,870,000 -- 315,648 -- 48,057,721 8 150,161 46,651,552 8 3,635,000 2,866,500 3,479,400 3,581,000 153,018,040 s 3,528,413 2,799,769 3,752,042 3,620,820 152,909,148 9 -- -- -- -- 6,740,031 10 -- -- -- -- 6,740,03110 543,000 804,000 726,000 153,550 17,824,042 550,000 788,320 753,458 212,123 17,783,489 1,053,000 387,000 209,486 1,225,729 4,980 18,500 21,000 16,000 29,646 18,135 19,141 -- 4,357,24911 -- 4,357,24911 17,000 16,852 99,000 99,000 238,018 237,859 -- -- -- -- 84,841,29012 -- -- -- -- 84,840,26312 6,386,000 7,997,022 8,437,800 10,508,885 96,105,73913 6,288,836 7,739,609 8,872,632 10,858,490 95,856,27513 8-10 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 1989 17.B Hartwell Lake, GA and SC 17.C Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals) 17.D Oates Creek, Richmond County GA New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost -35,000 73,980 -12,213 9,709 -- 115,937,98514 15 -26,878 115,874,81914 15 6,404,500 6,823,622 7,654,400 7,566,035 83,608,461 1e 6,208,294 6,725,929 7,895,745 8,003,569 84,157,97318 69,000 82,425 6,849 27,831 9,310,000 19,000,000 28,700,000 7,217,141 9,753,114 17,772,233 3,734,000 3,599,922 3,233,598 3,760,665 21,922 6,619,000 6,609,526 12,800,000 487,299,509 31,104,225 482,506,542 3,685,000 3,419,698 10,263,920 3,866,344 3,497,898 19,089,232 -- 348,000 1,800,000 -- 224,921 271,390 2,148,000 496,311 1. Includes $760,610 for previous projects. 2. Includes $111,950 for previous projects. 3. Does not include $69,356 contributed funds. 4. Includes $194,497 for previous projects. 5. Includes $134,789 for previous projects. Does not include $35,000 appropriated but unexpended of contributed funds in FYs 86 and 87. 6. Includes $643,456 for previous projects and $97,521 expended from Public Works Funds for existing project. Does not include $10,000 contributed funds. 7. Includes $54,414 for previous projects, $4,995 expended from Public Works Funds for existing project, and $2,150,000 under 1983 Job Bill Act. Does not include contributed funds by Brunswick and Georgia Port Authority. 8. Includes $7,260,384 for previous projects. Does not include $46,847 for removal of sunken vessels or contributed funds. 9. Includes $298,894 for previous projects and $855,941 contributed funds. TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZIN 10. Includes $93,480 for previous projects and $1,634,562 from Public Works Fund. 11. Does not include $3,756,758 contributed funds. 12. Does not Include $395,634 accelerated Public Works Funds. Includes $4,558,613 appropriated under Code 710. Also includes $1,000,000 expended under the 1983 Job Bill Act. 13. Includes $316,760 under special recreation use fees and $736,000 under the 1983 Job Bill Act. 14. Includes $17,515,000 appropriated for construction of 5th Unit of which $17,469,002 has been expended. 15. Does not include $276,200 accelerated Public Works Funds. Includes $4,861,000 appropriated under Code 710 of which $4,851,306 has been expended and $545,000 expended under the 1983 Job Bill Act. 16. Includes $576,019 expended special recreation use fees. IG LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. July 25, 1912 & March 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 Section 302 ALTAMAHA, OCONEE, AND OCMULGEE RIVERS, GA Channel 3 feet deep and 60 to 100 feet wide. HD 443,62D Cong., 2d sess. HD 610, 77th Cong., 2d sess. Provides for control and progressive eradication of noxious aquatic plant growths. HD251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 8-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 3. June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 July 13, 1892 Mar. 3, 1905 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 June 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 15, 1981 4. Mar. 3, 1879 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1919 July 3, 1930 July 3, 1930 ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA, (SAVANNAH DISTRICT) Section from Beaufort, SC, to Savannah, GA Route No. 2 adopted. Route No. 1 adopted. Section from Savannah, GA, to Fernandina, FL. Original 7-foot channel. Provided for Skidaway Narrows. Incorporated alternative routes previously improved as separate projects and the auxilIary channels. Section from Cumberland Sound, GA and FL to St. Johns River, FL. Consolidation of the HD 295, 53d Cong., 3d sess. HD 295, 53d Cong., 3d sess. HD 41, 52d Cong., 1st sess. HD 450, 58th Cong., 2d sess. HD 1236, 60th Cong.,2d sess. 3 sections shown above, into "Waterway between Beaufort, SC, and St. Johns River, FL." Section from Beaufort, SC, to Cumberland Sound, GA and FL. Removing logs and snags from Generals Cut. Improving Back River to provide a channel 7 feet deep and 150 wide. Channel 75 feet wide between Beaufort, SC, and Savannah, GA. Channel from Baileys Cut to Dover Creek. A 7-foot protected channel around St. Andrews Sound. A 12-foot channel between Beaufort, SC, and Savannah, GA, via Beaufort River and Port Royal Sound. A 12-foot channel between Savannah, GA, and Fernandina, FL, various cutoffs; and anchorage basin at Thunderbolt, GA. An alternate route 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide in that part of Frederica River, GA, not now traversed by the main route, at no additional cost to the United States. Main channel relocated in the from Frederica River to Mackay River in the vicinity of Torras Causeway. BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA Construction of East River jetty. Channels in the inner and outer harbors of 30-foot depth at mean high water, with widths varying from 150 feet in Academy Creek to 400 feet across the outer bar, extension of training wall in East River and construction of two spur dikes. Channels 27 feet deep at mean low water over the bar and at Brunswick point; and 24 feet deep at mean low water in the inner harbor and provides for a cut from Academy Creek to Turtle River, if deemed advisable. A channel in Back River 230 feet deep and 150 feet wide. Increased Channel dimensions of the bar, Brunswick Point, East River, and Turtle River, as given in the then existing HD 581, 63d Cong., 2d sess. HD 1391, 62d Cong., 3d sess. SD 178, 68th Cong., 2d sess. SD 43, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Senate committee print, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 75th Cong.,3d sess. HD 618, 75th Cong., 3d sess. HD 114, 77th Cong.,1st sess. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under the Small Navigation Project Authority, Sec. 107, PL 86-645 as amended. Annual Report, 1980, p.959. HD 407,59th Cong., 1st sess. HD 393,64th Cong., 1st sess. SD 57, 71st Cong., 2d sess. SD 132, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 8-12 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT June 20, 1938 May 17, 1950 Oct. 22, 1976 Oct. 17, 1986 5. Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Jan. 21, 1927 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 7, 1945 project. A 10-foot channel in Terry Creek. Increased channel dimensions of the bar, St. Simons Sound, Brunswick River, East River, and Turtle River, as given in the existing project. Provides for Phase I AE&D studies for deepening portions of existing harbor (East River and Entrance Channel) and for provision of a navigation channel to Colonels Island. Incorporated Georgia Port Authority's 30 foot deep by 300 foot wide by 8000 foot channel in South Brunswick River serving Colonel's Island into Brunswick Harbor Navigation Project. SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA Tentative provisions for a 26-foot channel from the Quarantine Station to the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge. Definite provision for the 26-foot channel. A 21-foot channel from the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge to the foot of Kings Island. A 30-foot depth from the sea to the Quarantine Station. A 21-foot channel above Kings Island. Channel 30 feet deep, with general width 50 feet, from the ocean to the Quarantine Station, thence 26 feet deep, general width 400 feet, to the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge, thence 21 feet deep and 300 feet wide to Kings Island. Widening at West Broad and Barnard Streets; anchorage basin; mooring dolphins; regulating dam across South Channel; relocation of the Inland Waterway; dredging Drakes Cut to 13 feet; widening to 525 ft. at Kings Island; extension of training walls, revetments, and jetties. Consolidation of projects relating to Savannah Harbor. Channel 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge to the foot of Kings Island. Authorized the 30-foot project and eliminated from the project (a) the relating dam across South Channel; (b) the relocation of the Inland waterway; and (c) the further extension of training walls, revetments, and jetties. Deepening the channel and turning basin above the Seaboard Air Line Ry. Bridge from 26 to 30 feet and widening the channel opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals to a maximum of 550 feet for a length of 5,000 feet. Deepening the channels to 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar; 34 feet deep and generally 400 feet wide, increased to 550 feet opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals, with a turning basin 34 feet deep at the Mexican Petroleum Corp. HD 690, 75th Cong., 3d sess. HD 110, 81st Cong.,1st sess. Report of Chief of Engineers dated Aug. 18, 1976. HR 6,99th Cong. 2d sess. Section 846 HD 181,59th Cong.,1st sess. HD 563, 62d Cong., 2d sess. HD 1471, 64th Cong.,2d sess. HD 261,69th Cong., 1st sess. HD 262,69th Cong., 1st sess. SD 39,71st Cong., 1st sess. HD 276, 73d Cong., 2d sess. HD 283,76th Cong., 1st sess. HD 227,79th Cong., 1st sess. 8-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 July 24, 1946 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 SPCW Resolution June 15, 1976 and HPWTC of June 9, 1976 under authority of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 Oct. 17, 1986 Refinery; and with such modifications thereof as the Secretary of War and the Chief of Engineers may consider desirable. Extending channel 30 feet deep, 200 feet wide upstream from Atlantic Creosoting Terminal to a point 1,500 feet below the Atlantic Coastal Highway Bridge, with turning basin 30 feet deep at upper end. Deepening the channel to 34 feet and widening to 400 feet from the upper end of the presently authorized 34-foot channel in the vicinity of the American Oil Company Refinery wharf, to the Savannah Sugar Refinery Corp. with a turning basin at the upper end of the proposed improvement, made by widening the channel to 600 feet for a length of 700 feet and providing approaches. Enlargement of turning basin near Kings Island to a width of 900 feet and a length of 1,000 feet, with suitable approaches, at a depth of 34 feet. Deepening the bar channel from 36 feet to 40 feet, the channel between the bar channel and Garden City Terminal from 34 feet to 38 feet. and the channel from the Garden City Terminal to the vicinity of the Savannah Sugar Refining Corp., from 30 feet to 36 feet; widening the bar channel from 500 feet to 600 feet, the channel between Fort Pulaski and the Atlantic Coast Line Terminal from 400 feet to 500 feet, and the channel between Garden City Terminal and the Savannah Sugar Refinery Corp. from 200 feet to 400 feet; providing necessary wideners of the bends; constructing a new turning basin 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long by 34 feet deep opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals; and enlargement of existing turning basin at the American Oil Company Terminal from 600 feet wide by 600 feet long to 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long. Providing sediment control works consisting of tide gate structure across Back River; sediment basin 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide about 2 miles long, with entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep and 300 feet wide; control works and canals for supplying fresh water to Savannah National Wildlife Refuge; and facilities to mitigate damages to presently improved areas other than refuge lands. Provided for modification of the existing project to include (1) incorporation of the LASH Turning Basin as an element of the existing Federal navigation project for maintenance purposes, (2) enlargement of Kings Island Turning Basin to 1,500 feet by 38 feet. Savannah Harbor widening as described in Report of Chief of Engineers date Dec. HD 678, 79th Cong., 2d sess. HD 110, 83d Cong., 1st sess. SD 115,87th Cong., 1st sess. HD 226,89th Cong., 1st sess. HD 223,89th Cong., 1st sess. HD 94-520, 94th Cong. dated June 8, 1976. HD 6, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Dated Oct 17, 1986 8-14 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT 19, 1978. Widen channel from 400 feet to 500 feet between Kings Island tumrning Basin and Fig Island Turning Basin. Allows planning, engineering and design to remove drift and debris as part of operations and maintenance. 6. Sep. 19, 1980 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 11. SPWC Resolution June 22, 1971 HPWC of June 23, 1972 under authority of Sec. 201 of FC Act of 1965 Oct. 17, 1986 12A. Water Resources Development Act of Mar. 7, 1974 12B. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Oct. 17,1986. 17A. Flood Control Act of Dec. 22, 1944 Oct. 17, 1986 Jan. 1988 17B. Flood Control Act of May 17, 1950. Flood Control Act of July 3, 1958. SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA For a 5-foot channel. HD 255, 51st Cong., 2d sess. & Annual Report,1980,pg.1328 Special improvement by bank protection HD 962,60th Cong., 1st sess. work of 20 or 25 miles of the river immediately below Augusta. The present 6-foot channel project and HD 101,70th Cong., 1st sess. Lock and Dam, GA. Provision made for locating the lock Senate Committee Print, 73d and dam at New Savannah Bluff. Cong., 2d sess. Conditions of local cooperation modified. Rivers and Harbors Com.,Doc. 39, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Provides for a 9-foot channel. SD 6, 81st Cong., 1st sess. TYBEE ISLAND, GA Project will provide for beach erosion HD 105, 92d Cong. control, consisting of beach restoration, groin nourishment. Extends authority for renourishment with HR 6 99th Cong., 2d sess. Federal participation from 15 to 50 years. Dated Oct.17, 1986 Section 867 BROADWAY LAKE, SC Provided for undertaking a demonstration PL 93-251, 93d Cong. removal of silt and aquatic growth from Broadway Lake. OATES CREEK, GA Provided for construction of the Oates HR 699th Cong., 2d sess. Creek Project. dated Oct. 17, 1986 Section 401 J. STROM THURMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR Approved the general plan for the HD 657, 78th Cong., 2d sess. comprehensive development of the Savannah River Basin and provided for construction of the Project. Recreation and fish and wildlife added as HR 699th Cong., 2d sess. name changed. (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake). Section 864 HJR 376 HARTWELL LAKE, GA AND SC Provided for construction of Hartwell HD 657, 78th Cong., 2d sess. Project. PL 516,81st Cong., 2d sess. Provided for the completion of the PL 85-500, 85th Cong., Hartwell Project. 2d sess. 8-15 Section 201 Section 867 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Water Resources Development Act of 1976. 17C. Flood Control Act of Nov. 7, 1966. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, dated Oct. 17, 1986 Provides for installation of 5th unit. RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA Provided for construction of the Trotters Shoals Project. Authorized mitigation plan, based on Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated May 11, 1982, House Document numbered 97-244 PL 94-587, Sec. 182b. 85th Cong. SD 52, 89th Cong., 1st sess. HR 699th Cong., 2d sess. Section 601 TABLE 8-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 8 In text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act 1962) Bellville Point, GA Cedar Point, GA Darien Harbor, GA Fancy Bluff Creek, GA 1 St. Mary's River, GA and FL, and North River, GA Sapelo Harbor, GA 2 3 Satilla River, GA 1 5 6 Completed 1968 Completed 1986 Completed 1982 Completed 1975 Completed 1935 Completed 1951 Completed 1929 Completed 1951 Savannah River above Augusta, GA 2 3 4 See Notes Savannah River at Augusta, GA 2 3 5 1929 See Notes 1929 1. Channel adequate for commerce. 2. Project recommended for abandonment in H.D. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 3. No commerce reported. 4. About 84 percent completed. Owing to construction of two power dams which submerged much of the work under the present and former projects, this improvement cannot be completed as originally planned. 5. Excludes $185,000 contributed funds ($172,151 for construction and $12,849 for operation and maintenance). 6. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized demonstration project on the Umbrella Creek - Dover Creek for the purpose of reducing shoaling. Monitor for 10 years, develop a hydrodynamic model. 8-16 $25,700 656,233 199,723 8,000 15,688 17,906 9,452 69,600 200,556 185,433 7,200 69,936 19,594 57,172 5,870 17,444 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 14 In text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Augusta, Savannah River, GA Curry Creek Dam and Lake, GA 1 Dunn Branch, Woodbine, Camden County, GA Macon, GA Oates Creek, GA Peacock Creek, Liberty County, GA Completed See Note Completed Completed Authorized Completed 1941 1974 1977 1955 N/A 1976 $643,016 132,640 380,043 745,400 2 582,163 $38,242 5,219 38,243 5,219 1. Feasibility report completed. Project not authorized for construction. 2. Authorized by HR 6, Water Resource Development Act of 1986 dated Oct. 17, 1986. First Federal cost of $9,600,000 and non-federal cost of $4,100,000. SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA AND SC DAMS AND LAKES (See Section 16 in text) Estimated Cost Name River Federal Non-Federal Total J. Strom Thurmond Dam & Reservoir, GA and SC Hartwell, GA and SC Goat Island, GA and SC 6 Middleton Shoals, GA and SC 6 Chattooga Units(4), GA and SC Tallow Hill, GA Anthony Shoals, GA Newry-OId Pickens, SC 6 Savannah Savannah Savannah Savannah Chattooga Broad Broad Keowee $79,156,000 4 89,240,000 36,400,000 16,500,000 41,700,000 39,000,000 18,100,000 29,500,000 $79,156,0001 4 89,240,0002 36,400,0003 16,500,0003 41,700,0003 39,000,0003 18,100,0003 29,500,0003 1. Final Cost. (Excludes $127,000 for preauthorization study.) 2. Approved Aug. 1963. (Excludes $73,000 for preauthorization study.) 3. Approved July 1954. 4. Excludes Code 710 funds. 5. Replaced by Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake (formerly Trotters Shoals Lake). 6. Site of Duke Power Co. Keowee - Toxaway Project. 8-17 TABLE 8-E JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT* JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT With the exception of a small area in the northeastern section of Florida, this district comprises a portion of south-central Georgia and all of peninsular Florida, embracing the watersheds tributary to Navigation the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico from, and including the harbor at Fernandina, Florida, to and including the Aucilla River. It also includes Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. IMPROVEMENTS Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of (1965) ......................... ............ 2 2. Arecibo Harbor, P.R ...................... 2 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla ............... ............ 2 4. Bakers Haulover Inlet, Fla ............... 3 5. Canaveral Harbor, Fla .................... 3 6. Channel from Naples to Big M arco Pass ................. ............ 4 7. Charlotte Harbor, Fla ..................... 4 8. Cross Florida Barge Canal ................ 4 9. Eau Gallie Harbor, Fla ................... 5 10. Fernandina Harbor, Fla .................. 5 11. Fort Myers Beach, Fla .................... 5 12. Fort Pierce Harbor, Fla .................. 6 13. Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, Fla ............... 6 14. Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to M iam i, Fla .................. ............. 7 15. Jacksonville Harbor, Fla .................. 7 16. Jacksonville Harbor (Mill Cove), Fla. ...... 8 17. John's Pass, Fla .............. ............. 9 18. Longboat Pass, Fla............ ............ 9 19. Manatee Harbor, Fla ..................... 9 20. Mayaguez Harbor, P.R ................... 10 21. Melbourne Harbor, Fla ................... 10 22. Miami Harbor, Fla ........................ 10 23. New Pass, Sarasota, Fla .................. 11 24. Okeechobee Waterway, Fla ............... 11 25. Oklawaha River, Fla ...................... 12 26. Palm Beach Harbor, Fla................... 12 27. Ponce de Leon Inlet, Fla............. 13 28. Ponce Harbor, P.R....................... 13 29. Port Everglades Harbor, Fla............. 14 30. Removal of Aquatic Growth From Navigable Waters in the State of Florida ....... 14 31. St. Augustine Harbor, Fla ................ 15 32. St. Johns River, Jacksonville to Lake Harney, Fla. ......................... 15 33. St. Lucie Inlet, Fla ........................ 15 34. San Juan Harbor, P.R .................... 16 35. Tampa Harbor, Fla ....................... 17 Navigation (cont.) Page 36. Navigation Projects on which Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys only were Conducted during Period ....... 18 37. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................................... 38. Navigation Work under Special Authorization ............. ............... 18 18 Beach Erosion Control 39. Brevard County, Fla ...................... 18 40. Broward County, Fla. Beach Erosion Control and Hillsboro Inlet, Fla., Navigation Project ......................... 19 41. Duval County, Fla ......................... 19 42. Indian River County, Fla ................. 19 43. Palm Beach County, Fla. from Martin County line to Lake Worth Inlet and from South Lake Worth Inlet to Broward County line ...................... 20 44. Pinellas County, Fla ...................... 20 45. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ............................ 21 46. Beach Erosion Control Activities under Special Authorization............... 21 Flood Control 47. Central and Southern Florida ............. 21 48. Dade County, Fla ......................... 23 49. Dade County, N. of Haulover Beach, Fla ...................... 23 50. Four River Basins, Fla ................... 24 51. Portugues and Bucana Rivers, P.R ....... 24 52. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............................ 25 53. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................................... 25 54. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization .............. ............... 25 General Investigations 55. Surveys ............... ..................... 25 56. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........ 25 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 9-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (R&H) ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water-milfoil, and other noxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economical control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers, House Document 251, 89th Congress, 1st session. The Water Resource Development Act of 1986 amended the R&H Act of 1965 requiring the local sponsor to share 50 percent of planning costs and 50 percent of research cost that are local in nature. The cost of research that is regional or national in scope shall be borne fully by the United States. Local cooperation. Florida Dept. of Natural Resources holds the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and contributes 50 percent of cost of operations. Compliance with requirements of local cooperation is on schedule. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: There were 24,501 acres of hyacinth and/or water lettuce, 10,195 acres of hydrilla and 194 acres of minor plant controlled during the period. Costs incurred for engineering and design and supervision and administration were $229,575 and $36,562, respectively, and $2,510,571 for operations. Condition at end of fiscal year. Operations by the Corps and the State of Florida are in progress, water hyacinths within Florida are under maintenance control. Hydrilla is continuing to spread throughout the state and is causing major problems in some areas. 2. ARECIBO HARBOR, P. R. Location. The harbor is located on the north shore of Puerto Rico about 40 miles west of San Juan Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25668.) Previous project. For details see page 504 of 1956 Annual Report. Existing project. The project provides for a channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with flare at entrance and widening at inner end to form a maneuvering area, and a stone breakwater 1,200 feet long. Place of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A bulkhead wharf 688 by 220 feet providing a deep water berthing space of approximately 500 feet, and a 300 by 100 foot transit shed. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and Design costs were $18,387.56. Condition at end of fiscal year: Project was completed in 1944. Breakwater was repaired in 1952. Wave action has since caused damage. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1989 were $1,128,075 for new work and $4,310,118 for maintenance, a total of $5,438,193. 3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLD, VA. AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT) Location. That part of Intracoastal Waterway between southerly limit of Fernandina Harbor, Florida, at junction of Lanceford Creek and Amelia River, and St, Johns River, Fla. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11489.) Previous project. For Details see page 605 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. Channel 12, 90 to 150 feet wide from Fernandina Harbor to St. Johns River about 22 miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 6 feet at Fernandina and 3.8 feet at St. Johns River. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of 1913 (HD 898/62/2) and 1938 (HD 618/75/3). Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There is a commercial marina located at Sisters Creek. No other facilities exist along this section of the waterway and none are currently required. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1941. Total costs under the existing project to September 30, 1989, have been $263,659 9-2 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT for new work and $5,300,742 for maintenance, a total of $5,564,401. 4. BAKERS HAULOVER INLET, FLA. Location. The Harbor connects the Intracoastal Waterway and the Atlantic Ocean and is located 2 miles north of Miami Beach in Dade County, Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 11 x 200 feet, thence 8 x 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, and a marina basin 8 x 200 feet. The length of the project is 1.02 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in December 1964. Project depths have been restored. 5. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLA. Location. The harbor is located on the east coast of Florida in Canaveral Bight, about 146 miles south of the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor and 69 miles north of the entrance to Fort Pierce Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11478 and 11484.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for maintenance of the 44-foot-deep entrance channel and 35-foot-depth turning basin; construction and operation of a sand transfer plant; relocation of the perimeter dike about 4,000 feet westward and extension of the harbor westward; two entrance jetties 100 feet long (constructed of native stone core and granite sides and cap); a lock; a channel and turning basin 31 feet deep near the relocated dike; and a barge canal 12 by 125 feet from the turning basin to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Plane of reference is mean low water (Banana River) for barge canal. The project is about 11.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 3.5 feet at the entrance and practically non-tidal in Banana and Indian Rivers. (See Table 9-C for Data Relative to Lock.) Estimated cost (Oct. 1989 price levels) of the 1962 modification to the project is $17,062,000 Federal cost and $4,695,000 non-Federal cost ($138,000 contributed funds and $4,557,000 other costs); $700,000 costs to NASA and $85,000 costs to U.S. Coast Guard. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must; provide all lands, rights-of-way, spoil-disposal areas, retaining dikes, and embankments; hold United States free from damages; provide and maintain four-lane bridge and roadway subject to Federal contribution of 65.3 percent of constructing roadway subject to Federal contribution of 65.3 percent of cost of constructing bridge and 51.2 percent of constructing roadway; provide public terminal and transfer facilities; and make alterations as required in berthing facilities. For further details see Senate Document 140, 87th Congress, 2nd session. Non- Federal contribution for new work is $1,106,000. Terminal facilities. Canaveral Harbor has 27 commercial waterfront facilities. The General Cargo Facilities consist of 1,900 feet of usable berthing space and 5 transit sheds with a total shed storage space capacity of 168,000 square feet. The Oil Handling Facilities operate with 3,760 feet of usable berthing space and 22 storage tanks providing a total of 1,195,620 barrels of tank storage. Available warehouse storage includes 28,000 square feet of dry storage and 2,500,000 cubic feet of cold storage. Two hundred sixty-six acres of open storage is also available. Two cruise ship berths totaling 1200 feet long by 41-foot depth and two 8800 square foot cruise terminals are also located on the south side. The western cruise ship berth is equipped with a roll on/ off ramp and is adjacent to 20 acres of trailer storage area. Hoisting facilities consist of one 45-ton floating crane and crawler and mobile cranes, with capacities from 70 to 200 tons, available from local crane rental services. There are tow water-front marine repair facilities with the nearest drydock facilities located at Port Everglades and Jacksonville. Two tugs with ratings of 1,600 and 2,250 horsepower are also available. There is no rail service available at the port. The nearest rail service is the Florida East Coast Railway located 9 miles away. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series #16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Harbor extension contract underway at a cost of $2,658,723. Engineering and design costs were $12,060. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation of lock and dam amounted to $361,968 for the fiscal year. Natural resource management cost $73,233. Condition and operation studies, environmental studies and periodic inspections cost $301,334. Real estate management was $23,201. Contracts for FY 89 for maintenance dredging of the entrance channel and the inner channel were $3,870,391. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $235,810 and $80,056 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is about 97 percent completed. The perimeter dike and jetties are in good condition. 9-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Work remaining to complete the project is completion of the harbor extension and construction of the sand transfer plant. 6. CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG MARCO PASS, FLA. Location. Naples Bay is on the southwestern side of the Florida peninsula about 35 miles south of the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River and approximately 1 mile inland and parallel to the Gulf of Mexico coastline. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11430.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an interior channel 6 by 70 feet from Naples to Big Marco Pass; a channel 12 by 150 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Gordon Pass, thence 10 by 100- 70 feet to a 10-foot-depth turning basin in the upper Naples Bay; and an 8-foot depth turning basin at the municipal yacht basin. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see Annual Report of 1962. Local cooperation.. Fully complied with to date. Contributed funds for new work were $159,975. Terminal facilities. Four seafood packing houses, 4 marine repair yards; a municipal pier and basin for use by recreational boats; and numerous private piers and slips for both commercial and recreational craft are available. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. 7. CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FLA. Location. The Harbor is located on the west coast of Florida about 68 miles south of the entrance to Tampa Bay and 150 miles north of Key West. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11429.) Previous projects. For details, see page 457 of 1959 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 32 by 300 feet, inCreased to 700 feet at the bend, from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Boca Grande to and including a turning basin 200 feet square at the municipal terminal at Punta Gorda. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 29.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is one foot at Port Boca Grande and 1.4 feet at Punta Gorda. Extreme range is about 3 feet at Port Boca Grande and 3.8 feet at Punta Gorda. Strong southwesterly winds raise water level about 1.5 feet; strong northerly and easterly winds lower it about one foot. (See Table 9-B for Authorized Legislation.) Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1988 price levels) $2,350,000 Federal and $2,360,000 non- Federal ($2,360,000 contributed funds.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation is fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of a phosphate wharf at Port Boca Grande and a municipal earthfill pier about 850 feet long at Punta Gorda, both open to the public. Railway connections are available at Port Boca Grande, and highway and railway connections are available at Punta Gorda. There is a tank farm at Port Boca Grande for storage and rehandling of bunker fuel oil and numerous facilities are available in the area for docking and servicing small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $156,941. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $26,169 and $484, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1959. Total costs under existing project through September 30, 1989 have been $533,169 for new work and $12,477,580 for maintenance, a total of $13,010,749. In addition, $15,563 was expended from contributed funds for new work in Boca Grande entrance channel. 8. CROSS FLORIDA BARGE CANAL Location. The proposed canal extends up the St. Johns River, past Palatka, thence up the valley of the Oklawaha River across the divide south of Ocala, and down the valley of the Withlacoochee River to the Gulf of Mexico, about 95 miles north of Tampa, Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a lock canal with project depth of 12 feet and a minimum bottom width of 150 feet, with five locks and two earth dams. Project including the section in the St. Johns River is 184 miles long. (See Table 9D for Locks and Dams.) Operation and maintenance of the locks and dams is a Federal responsibility. Estimated cost of new work (1970) is $179,000,000 Federal, and $19,500,000 non-Federal for lands, rights-of-way, and other costs. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction of canal; 9-4 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT hold the United States free from damages; and operate and maintain all highway bridges and roadways built in connection with project. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design costs were $159,240. Maintenance: (See Table 9-E for work accomplished.) Regulation. a. Lake Ocklawaha. During the period the lake continued to be regulated at 18.0 feet, NGVD by discharging through the Rodman spillway. b. Lake Rousseau. During the period, the lake continued to be regulated at 27.5 ft., NGVD by discharging through the Inglis Main and Bypass Spillways. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project commenced February 25, 1964, and is 36 percent completed. Inglis Lock, Dam, and Spillway; Rodman Dam and Spillway, Eureka Lock, Dam, and Spillway; Henry H. Buckman Lock; and canal from Palatka to Lake Ocklawaha and from Withlacoochee River to Gulf of Mexico, including Inglis Bypass Channel, are completed. Construction work on the project was terminated in FY 1971 by order of the President. A restudy report and environmental impact statement were completed in February 1977. 9. EAU GALLIE HARBOR, FLA. Location. The Harbor is located on Indian River about midway of the State of Florida, 176 miles south of Jacksonville Harbor and 174 miles north of Miami Harbor. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 8 x 100 feet from Indian River to and including a 300 x 600-foot turning basin in Eau Gallie. The project is about 2,700 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The harbor is almost nontidal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A privately owned boatyard in Eau Gallie Harbor provides more than 600 feet of docking space used chiefly by pleasure boats. There are also two marine railways and repair and storage facilities available. The facilities are considered adequate for the present needs of navigation. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1939. In December 1982, the controlling depth of the channel was 5 feet. 10. FERNANDINA HARBOR, FLA. Location. Entrance to the harbor is located on the northeast coast of Florida about 95 miles south of the entrance to Savannah Harbor, Georgia, and 22 miles north of the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11503.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 32-foot-depth channel (maximum channel in active status: 28 feet) generally 300-400 feet wide from deep water in the ocean to the junction of Lanceford Creek with Amelia River; an 800-footwide turning basin at the first bend below Lanceford Creek; and two jetties, 19,150 and 11,200 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is 7 miles long. Mean tidal range is 5.8 feet on the bar and 6 feet in the inner harbor. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $875,000. Terminal facilities. There are two large wharves operated by industrial plants; twelve wharves serving fishing boats, recreational craft, and other vessels; three oil handling wharves with pipelines; and a Municipal Marina and Sportsman's Wharf with public facilities for small craft. Total berthing space is approximately 4,065 feet. Most terminals are served by rail, and all have highway access. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Post Series No. 16 (Part 2), 1964.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design costs were $74,855. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $59,696. Maintenance dredging by government, Hopper and Contract Dredge, was $664,893.* Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the existing project is complete. Jetties are in poor condition and are badly in need of repair. Remaining work is to deepen the inner harbor channel and turning basin to 32 feet when and if the presently inactive 1950 authorization is reactivated. The entrance channel has been deepened to 40 feet for the Kings Bay project. *Engineering and design and supervision and administration were $38,592 and $3,839 respectively. 11. FORT MYERS BEACH, FLA. Location. Fort Myers Beach is on Estero Island near the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River, about 20 miles below Fort Myers and 110 miles south of Tampa, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11427.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 by 150 feet from that depth in San 9-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Carlos Bay into Matanzas Pass, thence 11 by 125 feet in Matanzas Pass to and including a turning basin 2,000 feet upstream from the upper shrimp terminals. Plane of reference is mean low water. Project is 2.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 1.7 feet. Spring range is about 2.3 feet. Strong northerly winds lower the water surface 1 to 2 feet; strong southerly winds have an opposite effect. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are three shrimppacking houses and several fish-packing houses, two marine railways, a fuel terminal and an ice manufacturing plant in the area. There are several commercial facilities for servicing shrimp boats. Recreational craft facilities include nine marinas, a boat motor testing laboratory which is closed, and numerous privately owned piers and wharves. All terminals have highway access. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $11,488. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. 12. FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FLA. Location. On east coast of Florida, about 218 miles south of entrance to St. Johns River and about 124 miles north of entrance to Miami Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11475.) Existing project. A channel 350 feet wide at the 27-foot contour in the ocean, tapering to a width of 200 feet at Sta. 100 + 00, thence 200 feet wide to Sta. 30 + 00, and thence flaring to a turning basin 900 feet wide. Entrance channel is 27 feet deep to Sta. 130 + 00 and thence 25 feet deep to and including the turning basin. Project includes the maintenance of two jetties and shore revetments at the inlet. Length of project is about 3.5 miles. Mean tidal range is 2.6 feet at the entrance and 0.7 feet at terminals. (See Table 9-B for Authorization Legislation.) For further details see 1961 Annual Report. Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1988 price levels) $4,290,000 Federal and $2,418,000 non-Federal ($1,650,000 contributed funds, $660,000 reimbursement, and $108,000 other cost); $20,000 costs to Coast Guard. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $18,574. A 25% contribution and an additional 10% reimbursement over 30 years from locals is required. Terminal facilities. Two earth-filled piers forming a slip 200 feet by 300 feet, with bulkhead wharf at inner end, affording berthing space of about 1,653 feet. The south pier and bulkhead wharf are municipally owned. Facilities also include a cooling plant, a warehouse and a fruit packing house. The north pier is served by railway and both piers by highway connections. North of the turning basin local interests have provided deep-draft berthing and pier facilities. Also available is a bulkhead wharf with a depth of 25 feet with ample room for open storage and with tank storage for petroleum in the rear. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ocean disposal studies cost $18,895. Maintenance dredging costs were $411,021. Engineering and design costs, and supervision and administration costs were $45,258, and $31,114 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1938 except for the fishing walkway atop the south jetty which was completed by local interests in 1968. Local interests installed lighting atop the jetty in 1969. The south jetty and revetments are in good condition. 13. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FLA. Location. The Waterway extends from the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River at Punta Rassa, Florida, to the mouth of Anclote River, Florida, following in general an almost continuous series of protected inside waterways along the gulf coast of Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Charts Nos. 11411, 11425 and 11427.) Previous projects. For details see page 767 of 1945 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 by 100 feet from Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River; deepening the existing channel at Caseys Pass to 9 feet; a channel 6 by 80 feet (Cats Point Channel) along the southeastern side of Boca Ciega Bay past Frenchman Creek and Gulfport; maintenance of bulkheads, revetments, and two jetties built at Caseys Pass under previous project; and improvement and maintenance of Sunshine Skyway Channel. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project includes about 160 miles of channels. 9-6 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT Mean ranges of tide are 1.7 feet at Punta Rassa, 1 foot at Port Boca Grande, 1.4 feet in Tampa Bay at Anna Maria, and 2 feet at entrance to Anclote River. Extreme ranges are about 4.5 feet at Punta Rassa, about 3 to 4 feet between Port Boca Grande and Corey Causeway over Boca Ciega Bay, and about 5.5 feet at entrance to Anclote River. Southerly winds over the area generally raise water level by 1 to 1.5 feet; northerly winds lower water level by 1 to 2 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities include one municipal concrete pier, one railway pier, one freight wharf, one marginal wharf 500 feet long on terminal island, and eleven privately owned landings, all at Sarasota. Municipal pier and freight wharf are open to the public. All piers have highway connections. There are six wharves along Boca Ciega Bay and a number of small privately owned piers and wharves at various points along waterway for use of commercial fishing boats and recreational craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance of channel slopes and berms cost $8,955. Real estate audits and administration costs were $18,965. Condition and operations studies cost $35,348. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. A contract to maintain the jetties at Casey's Pass was completed in 1983. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1989 were $7,597,078 for new work and $5,673,153 for maintenance, a total of $13,270,231. In addition, $14,473 contributed funds were expended for Sunshine Skyway and Boca Ciega Bay channels. 14. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FLA. Location. The waterway extends from Jacksonville to Miami, Florida, following the St. Johns River to the mouth of Pablo Creek and thence following in general an almost continuous series of protected inside waterways along the Atlantic coast of Florida to Miami. (NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11489, 11485, 11472 and 11467.) Previous projects. For details, see pages 618-619 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 by 125 feet from Jacksonville to Miami, modified to 10-foot depth from Fort Pierce to Miami by Chief Engineer's report of July 22, 1960; side channels at Sabastian and Daytona Beach and turning basins at Sabastian and Vero Beach, all to an 8-foot depth, and operation and maintenance of Palm Valley highway bridge. Project is 370 miles long, including 21 miles in Jacksonville Harbor. Mean range of the tide is 3.8 feet at St. Johns River, 0.7 foot in the Indian River at Fort Pierce, 1.8 feet in Lake Worth at Port of Palm Beach terminals, 2.3 feet at the Port of Palm Beach terminals, 2.3 feet at the Port Everglades terminals, and 2 feet in Biscayne Bay. The extreme range is about 7 feet at St. Johns River, 1.5 feet at Fort Pierce, and 3 feet in Biscayne Bay. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal effect is imperceptible at points along waterway distant from inlets. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $61,000. Terminal facilities. There are a number of privately owned piers, wharves, and landings at various points along waterway. Terminals with railway connections are available at Jacksonville, Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Port Everglades, and Miami. Municipal piers or wharves have been constructed at Titusville, Cocoa, Melbourne, and Vero Beach for handling general freight and at St. Augustine, Daytona Beach, New Smyrna Beach, Eau Gallie, West Palm Beach, Delray Beach, Fort Lauderdale, and Miami for use of recreational craft. Yacht basins, open to the public, have been provided at Jacksonville Beach, Daytona Beach, Titusville, Eau Gallie, Vero Beach, Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale, Hollywood, and Miami. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details on facilities at Jacksonville, see Port Series No. 15, 1969, and at Palm Beach, Port Everglades, and Miami, see Port Series No. 16, Revised 1972.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The cost for maintenance dredging in FY 88 was $330,578. Condition and operation studies and Environmental studies cost was $303,752. Real estate management was $166,418. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $156,359 and $26,202, respectively. The highway bridge bear Palm Valley was operated and maintained at a cost of $60,506. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project as modified by the Chief of Engineers is complete except for construction of the channel and turning basin at Sebastian, Florida, which is in an inactive status. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1989, were $19,156,822 for new work; $30,196,444 for maintenance, a total of $49,353,266 regular funds. In addition, $2,199,842 has been expended from public works funds for new work. 15. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FLA. Location. The authorized project comprises the 9-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 lower 24.9 miles of St. Johns River which empties into the Atlantic Ocean near the northeasterly corner of the Florida peninsula. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11491.) Previous projects. For details, see page 607 of Annual Report, 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 38 by 400-1,200 feet from the ocean to mile 20 via Dame Point-Fulton Cutoff, thence 34 feet to Commodore Point, and thence 30 feet deep to the F.E.C. Railway bridge at Jacksonville, including a 30 foot channel in Arlington Cut and in the Old Dame Point- Fulton Channel; maintenance of the existing 42 and 40-foot-depth entrance channel; maintenance of jetties at channel entrance; and constructin of training walls and revetments. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 26.8 miles long. Mean tidal range is 5.3 feet on the bar, 4.9 feet at Mayport, 2.6 feet at Dame Point, and 1.1 feet at Jacksonville. The extreme range varies from about 9 feet on the bar to about 1.5 feet at Jacksonville. Strong northeasterly winds raise the water level about 2 feet at Mayport and Jacksonville. Strong southwesterly winds lower the water about 1.5 feet at Mayport and 1 foot at Jacksonville. (See Table 9- B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with requirements of local cooperation for work performed to date. For work authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act, local interests were required to contribute 2.6 percent of the contract price plus supervision and administration for work provided by the Corps; provide all lands and rightsof- way; save the United States free from damages; and provide and maintain public terminal and transfer facilities. Assurances of local cooperation for this work were accepted February 11, 1966. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $927,654. Terminal facilities. Jacksonville Harbor has 84 waterfront facilities. Available at the General Cargo Facilities are 11,140 feet of usable berthing space and 12 transit sheds with a total storage space of 1,009,800 square feet. The Oil Handling Facilities consist of 7,843 feet of usable berthing space and 179 storage tanks providing a total of 8,478,900 barrels of tank storage. Warehouse storage at the port includes 3,266,900 square feet of dry storage and 4,071,100 cubic feet of cold storage. Available open storage is 233 acres. Four fixed cranes with capacities from 40 to 100 tons are located at the port. Available locally are crawler and truck cranes with capacities up to 100 tons. Various phases of marine repair work are accomplished by 7 waterfront repair facilities and numerous other companies located offwater. Drydock facilities consist of 6 floating drydocks with capacities from 800 to 33,000 tons. Floating equipment includes 25 tugs with up to 3,300 horsepower and 16 tank barges with capacities up to 20,700 barrels. Three major railroads furnish rail service from port docks to all points outside of Jacksonville. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series #15, Rev. 1978.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies cost $253,097. Real estate management $43,844. Cost shared recreation development $1,872. Maintenance dredging costs were $25,154. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $141,396 and $12,493 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the modification to the project, authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act, is completed. The north jetty is in fair condition and partially submerged at high tide. The south jetty was repaired in FY 1985 to prevent further damage to the Mayport Naval Station. Revetments and retaining walls were in poor condition. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1989, were $44,165,055 for new work, $59,767,275 for maintenance, a total of $103,932,330 regular funds. In addition $290,013 has been expended from public works funds for new work. 16. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR (MILL COVE), FLA. Location. The authorized project comprises the upper 6 square miles of the Upper St. Johns River near the Jacksonville Harbor which empties into the Atlantic Ocean near the northeasterly corner of the Florida peninsula. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11491.) Previous project. None. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 38 feet deep by 400-1,200 feet wide from ocean to mile 20 via Dame Point-Fulton Cutoff, thence 34 feet to Commodore Point, and thence 30 feet deep to the FEC railway bridge at Jacksonville, including a 30-foot channel in Arlington cut in the old Dame Point-Fulton channel; maintenance of the existing 42 and 40 foot depth entrance channel; widening of channel by 100 feet near mile 5 and by 200 feet near mile 7; maintenance of jetties at channel entrance; construction of training walls and revetments; a navigation and floodway channel 26 x 200 feet along south side of Commodore Point; on approach and mooring basin 9-8 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT 20 feet deep, 1,300 feet long at 20 foot depth contour and 600 feet long at pierhead line near Naval Reserve Armory in south Jacksonville; a depth of 24 feet between that depth contour and the pierhead line from Hogan Creek to the foot of Laura St.; and a depth of 28 feet to within 60 feet of pierhead line between foot of Laura St. and St. Elmo W. Acosta (formerly Upper State) bridge. Length of project is about 26.8 miles. In addition the Navy has provided funds for a deeper Jax Harbor entrance channel 42 feet deep and 800 long. Intersecting with the Navy's Mayport entrance channel to the Mayport Turning basin also an extension of the existing project to provide 38 foot depth at the Navy fuel depot, Drummond Creek. Mean tidal range is 4.9 feet at entrance, 4.5 feet at Mayport, 3.0 feet at Dame Point, and 1.2 feet at Jacksonville. Strong northeasterly winds raise the water level about 2 feet at Mayport and Jacksonville. Strong southwesterly winds lower the water about 1.5 feet at Mayport and 1 foot at Jacksonville (See Table 9-B for authorizing legislation.) Cost estimate for new work (Oct. 1988 price levels) was $4,164,000 Federal. Local cooperation. In conformance with Section 221, Public Law 91-611, and prior to commencement of construction, the Jacksonville Port Authority, as local sponsor, must provide written agreement to the following local cooperation requirements: provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages that may result due to construction and maintenance other than damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; accomplish without cost to the United States such utility and other relocations or alterations as necessary for construction. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Mill Cove Restoration Project cost was $2,893,518. Engineering and design and supervision and administrations costs were $628 and $87,425, respectively. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total cost under existing project through September 30, 1989 was $3,356,050 Federal funds. 17. JOHNS PASS, FLA. Location. A natural inlet on the west coast of Florida connecting Boca Ciega Bay with Gulf of Mexico. The pass is located about 8 miles morthwest of lower Tampa Bay directly across Boca Ciega Bay from St. Petersburg, Fla. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11411.) Existing project. Channel 10 by 150 feet in the gulf, thence 8 by 100 feet inside pass, and 6 by 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, and suitable protective measures over a frontage of approximately one thousand linear feet of shore along the north end of Treasure Island. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 1.5 feet. Project is about 2.6 miles long. Project was authorized December 2, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act and by Section 110 of the 1966 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Only small marinas and repair yards for recreational craft in the general vicinity. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and Design Costs to support maintenance dredging were $32,425. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1968. 18. LONGBOAT PASS, FLA. Location. Longboat Pass is located on the west coast of Florida about 11 miles northwest of Sarasota and 23 miles south of St. Petersburg. Located in Manatee County, it is one of several natural inlets connecting Sarasota Bay, a tidal estuary, with the Gulf of Mexico. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11425). Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 12 by 150 feet from the Gulf to Longboat Pass Bridge, thence a channel 10 by 100 feet from Longboat Pass Bridge along a north to northeasterly alignment to the Intracoastal Waterway to Cortez Bridge. The mean tidal range is 2.2 feet and the maximum tidal range is about 5 feet. Currents are predominantly tidal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See 1978 Annual Report for detailed local cooperation requirements. Contributed funds for new work were $172,324. Terminal facilities. From Sarasota north to Tampa Bay there are about 28 small craft facilities 9-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 including marinas, boat repair yards, and boat basins along the Intracoastal Waterway. Nine of them are located within 2 miles of Longboat Pass. Numerous private mooring piers and wharves also exist in the area. The marina and repair facilities appear adequate for the general boating needs of the area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design costs to support maintenance dredging were $49,954. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. 19. MANATEE HARBOR, FLA. Location. The project is located in Manatee County on the east side of Tampa Bay 10 miles from The Gulf of Mexico. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11414). Existing project. The authorized project provides for maintenance of the existing 40-foot deep draft navigation channel and turning basis which extends from the Tampa Bay Channel to berthing facilities at Port Manatee. Also provide initial construction for a widener at the northwest end of the Manatee Harbor Channel and initial construction to deepen approximately 6.6 acres adjacent to the southern berthing area to provide a larger turning basis. All material from the project will be placed on upland sites west and northeast of the port slip. Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1988 price levels) $8,205,000 Federal and $13,400,000 non-Federal ($3,250,000 contributed funds and $9,330,000 for other costs and reimbursements). Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. A 25% contribution and an additional 10% reimbursement over 30 years from locals are required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities at Port Manatee consist of 675 acres of port operational lands, a ship basin 1,500 feet long by 788 feet wide; and an approximately 3-mile access channel, with a design width of 400 feet, which connects with the Federally authorized Tampa Bay Channel. The Manatee project was constructed between August 1968 and February 1970. The required design depth was 40 feet, and the dredging contractor was allowed a pay overdepth of 2 feet. Port Manatee also operates its own terminal railroad, which is licensed under the Interstate Commerce Commission, and publishes a switching tariff as a Class III railroad. It also maintains and operates two switch engines and about 30,000 feet of track which connect with the Seaboard Coastline Railroad. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost was $218,089. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has not started. LCA will be negotiated in 4th Quarter FY 1990. Construction scheduled to start late FY 1990. 20. MAYAGUEZ HARBOR, P.R. Location. The project is on the west coast of Puerto Rico, about 110 miles by water from San Juan Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25673). Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 30 by 1,000 foot approach channel to the deep water terminal, decreasing to a 500 foot width opposite westerly end of terminal, thence the same width to easterly end of terminal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A modern deep water terminal is located in the northeast section of the harbor consisting of a bulkhead wharf about 1,270 feet long with a storage transit shed 800 by 60 feet immediately shoreward. The Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company, an agency of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, owns a bulkhead wharf of about 200 feet in line with the existing deep water terminal plant located within the industrial harbor area. In addition, Bumble Bee Packing Company, Inc., owns and operates a dock of about 200 feet for docking tuna fish boats. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design costs to support FY 89 maintenance dredging were $716. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1934. 21. MELBOURNE HARBOR, FLA. Location. The project is on Indian River about midway of the State of Florida, 179 miles south of Jacksonville Harbor and 171 miles north of Miami Harbor. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 8 x 100 feet from Indian River to a 400- x 800-foot turning basin in Crane Creek. Project is about 3,150 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The harbor is almost non-tidal. Terminal facilities. The Municipal Marina on the north end of the turning basin has a 350-foot steel bulkhead with eleven finger piers about 40 feet long each. There are also two privately owned storage and repair facilities and several privately owned 9-10 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT boathouses and docks. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1938. As of September 1984 channel depths as authorized were available throughout the project. 22. MIAMI HARBOR, FLA. Location. Miami is near the northern end of Biscayne Bay, about 71 miles south of the entrance to Palm Beach Harbor. Miami River has its source in the Everglades and flows southeasterly to enter Biscayne Bay at Miami. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11468). Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 38- by 500-foot channel from the ocean to the outer end of the north jetty, thence 36 by 400 feet through the entrance and across Biscayne Bay to and including a turning basin at the municipal terminals; a 36-foot depth turning basin at Fisher Island; two rubblestone jetties at the entrance; a channel 15 by 200 feet from the mouth of Miami River to the turning basin at the municipal terminals; a channel 8 by 200 feet from the mouth of Miami River to the Intracoastal Waterway and thence 100 feet wide to Government Cut; a channel 15 feet deep in Miami River varying in width from 250 feet at mouth to 90 feet inland; and a channel 12 by 100 feet from Miami to a harbor refuge in Palmer Lake. Plane of reference is mean low water, except for 15-foot channel in Miami River where depths are based on flood conditions. Total length of the project is about 15.3 miles. Mean tidal variation is 2.5 feet at entrance and 2 feet in the bay. Extreme variation is about 4.5 feet at entrance and 3 feet in Biscayne Bay. Strong easterly winds raise the water level about 1.5 feet at entrance and 1 foot in the bay. Strong westerly winds lower water level about 1 foot at entrance and about 0.5 foot in the bay. (See Table 9-B for Authorization Legislation). Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. See 1978 Annual Report for detailed local cooperation requirements. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $2,300,710. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1968 modification to the project were accepted December 18, 1968. Terminal facilities. There are 91 commercial waterfront facilities serving the port. The General Cargo Facilities include 21,373 feet of usable berthing space, 13 transit sheds with a total capacity of 474,300 square feet, and 9 freight stations with a total storage capacity of 270,400 square feet. Oil Handling Facilities consist of 2,714 feet of usable berthing space and 36 storage tanks with a total storage capacity of 744,475 barrels. Available sharehouse storage includes dry storage at 1,450,500 square feet and cold storage at 11,204,000 cubic feet. There are 117.1 acres of open storage at the port. Hoisting Facilities located at the port include two 40-ton cranes and cranes with capacities up to 200 tons available through local rental. Twelve waterfront repair yards and two offwater yards serve the port. Drydock facilities available include 7 marine railways and 4 boat lifts with haulout capacities ranging from 40 to 1,000 tons and lifting capacities ranging from 70 to 500 tons. Nine tugs, with ratings up to 3,000 horsepower, and thirteen tank barges, with capacities up to 35,000 barrels, are also available. Rail Facilities at the port are served by the Seaboard Coast Line and the Florida Coast Railway. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series #16, Rev. 1982). Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operations studies cost $122,825. Engineering and design costs were $46,268 and Real Estate activities were $350. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the modification to the project, authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1968, is complete. South and north jetties are in good condition. 23. NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FLA. Location. Sarasota Bay is a tidal lagoon along the west coast of Florida immediately south of Tampa Bay. New Pass is a gulf inlet across the bay from Sarasota, Fla. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11425). Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide in the Gulf of Mexico diminishing to 8 by 100 feet through New Pass and extending across Sarasota Bay to the Intracoastal Waterway with side channels to, and turning basins at, Payne Terminal and city pier. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet in Sarasota Bay; mean spring range is 1.7 feet. Project is about 4 miles long. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Consist of Payne Terminal, a slip 200 by 650 feet, and city pier, 400 feet long with 9-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 two finger piers equipped with adequate facilities at each location. Operations and results during fiscal yar. Maintenance: Engineering and design costs to support FY 90 maintenance dredging were $65,413. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1964. 24. OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FLA. Location. The waterway traverses the southern part of the Florida peninsula via the Caloosahatchee River, Lake Okeechobee, and St. Lucie Canal, connecting coastal waterways along the Gulf and Atlantic Shores. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11428). Previous projects. For details, see page 785 of 1949 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for replacing the old locks on the St. Lucie Canal by a single new lock; a channel 10 by 100 feet from Ft. Myers for about 5 miles upstream, thence 8 by 80 to 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami; near Stuart; an 8-foot depth basin at Stuart; a side channel at Ft. Myers; operation and care of St. Lucie Lock; and mainenance of features completed under previous projects as follows: a 12- by 200-foot channel from the Gulf to Punta Rassa, thence 10 by 100 feet to Fort Myers with a 10-foot depth basin at Fort Myers; a 6- by 80-foot channel along the south shore of Lake Okeechobee from Clewiston to St. Lucie Canal; a 6- by 60-foot channel in Taylor Creek from the town of Okeechobee to the Lake; and operation and care of Moore Haven and Ortona Locks. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation). For further details see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completion portion of project. Non-Federal contribution amounted to $503,700. Terminal facilities. There are 3 freight piers, 1 municipal recreation pier, 4 privately owned piers, and a municipal yacht basin on the Caloosahatchee River near Fort Myers. The Corps has provided a boat basin, launching ramp, and a 120-foot wharf on the Caloosahatchee River about one-quarter mile below Ortona Lock. there are tie-up dolphins above and below all 5 locks. Commercial yacht basins are provided on the south side of the Caloosahatchee River about halfway between Ortona and Moore Haven Locks and about 3 miles east of LaBelle. A commercial/municipal yacht basin is provided on the north side of the St. Lucie Canal at Indiantown. There are numerous small wooden-pile landings along the Caloosahatchee River on St. Lucie Canal, and on the St. Lucie River, including one railroad terminal pier, municipal pier, and a pier for handling petroleum products at Stuart. Also, 550 feet of wharves have been provided on the west side of Taylor Creek immediately landward of Hurricane Gate No. 6 and 150 feet on the east side of the creek. A yacht basin has been provided on the west side of the creek immediately landward of the hurricane gate. The installations of Taylor Creek are privately owned, but are open to the public. A breakwater protected harbor is available at Pahokee. There is a 440-foot marginal wharf on the Industrial Canal at Clewiston; a 125-foot wharf at LaBelle; a 150-foot wharf at Belle Glade; a 125-foot wharf at Moore Haven; a 50-foot wharf at Alva; and a 30-foot wharf on Taylor Creek at the town of Okeechobee. A docking facility for loading raw sugar was constructed in 1967 on Herbert Hoover Dike near Belle Glade. All have highway and/or railway connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9-F for work accomplished.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for providing the 8-foot depth basin at Stuart, which is inactive. Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1988, were $5,178,315 for new work, $27,430, 845 for maintenance ($67,558 excluded which represents services rendered without reimbursement), a total of $32,609,160. 25. OKLAWAHA RIVER, FLA. Location. The river has its source in a system of large lakes in the central part of the Florida peninsula and flows generally northerly, then easterly, emptying into St. Johns River 22 miles above Palatka. The extreme head of the system is considered to be Lake Apopka, 120 miles above the river's mouth. Previous projects. For details, see page 613 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 6 feet deep from the river mouth to the head of Silver Springs Run; clearing a channel to Lake Griffin; maintaining dikes to obtain a navigable depth of about 4 feet to Leesburg and construction of a lock and dam at Moss Bluff. The project length is about 85.7 miles in the river and 5.4 miles in Silver Springs Run. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 9-12 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Several private and public landings and boat-launching ramps are locatedalong the river. Public recreation-craft basins and boat launching ramps are near Silver Springs and State Road 40 and 316 bridges. There is a municipal wharf on Lake Griffin at Leesburg. A dam has created Lake Ocklawaha (13,000 acres) with egress to the St. Johns River through Buckman Lock. Along the lake are 4 launching ramps; Payne's Landing, Orange Springs, Kenwood Landing, and Rodman Recreation Area. Access below the dam is at the Ocklawaha Boat launch ramp and at State Road 19. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations at end of fiscal year. Maintenance: Channel maintenance costs were $71,731. Real estate management costs were $802. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for providing a 6-foot depth channel from the mouth of the river to the head of Silver Springs run, which is in an inactive status. The Moss Bluff lock and dam structure was replaced under the Four River Basins, Fla., flood control project. Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1988 have been $311,352 for new work and $2,165,596 for maintenance, a total of $2,476,948. 26. PALM BEACH HARBOR, FLA. Location. The authorized project is located on the east coast of Florida about 71 miles north of the entrance to Miami Harbor and about 264 miles southeasterly from the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11472.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 35 by 400 feet merging with an inner channel 33 by 300 feet to and including a turning basin; tank revetment; and restoring jetties. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 1.6 miles long. Mean range of tide in the ocean at the entrance is 2.8 feet and at the turning basin, 2.2 feet. Extreme range of tide is about 4.5 feet at the inlet and 3 feet at the terminals. Seven-foot tidal ranges have occurred during storms. For details, see 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local ooperation. Fully complied with to date. For requirements, see 1961 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. The port has 13 commercial waterfront facilities. The General Carge Facilities include 5,156 feet of usable berthing space and 6 transit sheds with a total of 118,030 square feet storage capacity. The Oil Handling Facilities consist of 10 storage tanks with a total capacity of 2,029,600 barrels. Usable berthing space is not available at the Oil Handling Facilities. Dry storage is available at 150,500 square feet, cold storage at 19,200 cubic feet and open storage at 27.1 acres. Seven cranes with capacities from 15 to 230 tons are located at the port. There are no floating cranes, repair facilities or drydock facilities located at the port. A 100 ton vertical boat lift is located on the Intracoastal Waterway south of the port for heavy lifts. Two tugs with ratings of 900 and 1000 horsepower are available. The Palm Beach Belt Line which connects with the Florida East Coast Railway serves the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series #16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design were $26. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies for the project totaled $43,899.* A continuing contract for maintenance dredging was $816,152. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $27,285 and $37,490 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The Project was completed in 1967. Jetties and revetment are in need of repair. The south jetty was completed in FY 86. *Real Estate costs were $6,167. 27. PONCE DE LEON INLET, FLA. Location. Ponce de Leon Inlet is on the Atlantic coast of Florida about 65 miles south of St. Augustine Harbor and 57 miles morth of Canaveral Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11485.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 15 by 200 feet across the ocean bar, thence 12 by 200 feet and 12 by 100 feet through the inlet; thence southward in Indian River North, 12 by 100 feet, and northward in Halifax River, 7 by 100 feet, each leg continuing to the Intracoastal Waterway; ocean jetties on the north and south of the inlet 4,200 and 2,700 feet long, respectively, and weir in the north jetty with an impoundment basin inside the jetty. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 4.1 feet in the ocean and 2.3 feet inside the inlet. The project is about 5 miles long. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $2,415,600. Terminal facilities. None in the immediate area. 9-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Real estate management costs were $6,238. Engineering and design and administrative costs were $19,838 and $166,221, respectively.* Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. Repair of the north jetty was completed in FY 86. *A continuing Contract for Maintenance dredging was awarded in the amount of $2,609,099. 28. PONCE HARBOR, P.R. Location. Ponce Harbor is an open bay about midway on the south coast of Puerto Rico. From the center of the city of Ponce, the harbor is about 3 miles south. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25677.) Previous project. For details, see page 12 of Annual Report for 1975. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a seawall 362 feet long extending northwesterly across the rock reef from near the landward end of the municipal pier, 30 feet deep and containing about 18 acres; a breakwater 2400 feet long extending southwesterly from Punta Carenero; a channel 36 feet deep by 600 feet wide extending from the Caribbean Sea approximately 2.8 miles up to the port, thence a channel 400 feet wide by 36 feet deep into the harbor, and a 36-foot-deep, irregularly shaped turning basin with a diameter of 950 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 0.6 foot, extreme varies between about 1 foot below and 2 feet above mean low water. Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1988 price levels) is $6,420,000 Federal ($6,410,00 Corps and $10,000 U.S. Coast Guard) and $4,049,000 non-Federal (other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Sould provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide and maintain at local expense depths in berthing areas and local access channels; hold United States free from any damages resulting from construction and maintenance of the project; relocate without cost to the United States all cables, sewer mains, water supply, drainage and other utility installations as required; provide adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms. A letter has been received from mayor of Ponce, assuring compliance with local requirements and to cost share the project. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $774,068. A 25% contribution is required and an additional 10% reimbursement over 30 years from locals. Terminal facilities. The municipality of Ponce owns and operates the only deep-draft terminal facilities in Ponce Harbor, which consist of a municipal pier 515 feet long and 108 feet wide, and a bulkhead wharf 3,811 feet long. Both are equipped for transfer and storage of freight. A 40 ton container lift shore crane is available for the handling of loaded containers. The municipal pier has a steel transit shed 386 by 85 feet. The bulkhead wharf has four steel transit sheds totaling over 103,000 square feet. Three concrete and steel warehouses are available providing 800,000 square feet for general storage. Open storage areas for structural steel, lumber, and other bulk and package commodities are also provided. Bulk cement is handled and loaded into cement cargo ships by the use of a private pipeline loading facility. A tuna fish processing and canning factory is located on the premises, with direct access to the bulkhead wharf. Existing facilities are open to the public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $9,441 and $222,912 respectively. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 1976 modification of the project has not commenced. South and north jetties are in fair condition. 29. PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FLA. Location. The harbor is on the east coat of Florida about 23 miles north of Miami and about 48 miles south of Palm Beach Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11470.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an ocean entrance channel 45 by 500 feet through an ocean bar tapering to 42 by 450 feet between rubblestone entrance jetties, and continuing at that depth to an irregularly flared entrance and turning basin of same depth; enlarging Pier 7 channel to 36 by 400 feet for distance of about 1,600 feet; maintenance of the locally dredged channel opposite Berth 18 to 36 feet deep over a length of 700 feet with varying widths of 200 to 150 feet; construction of a south jetty fishing walkway; and, maintenance of the jetties. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 1.9 miles long. Mean range of tide is 2.5 feet at the entrance and 2.3 feet at the terminals; extreme range is about 4.5 feet with storm tides of about 6.5 feet. Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1980 price levels) of the 1974 authorization is $33,800,000 Federal (Corps of Engineers) cost and $7,062,000 non- Federal cost, $160,000 contributed funds and 9-14 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT $6,902,000 other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local Cooperation has been fully complied with for work completed to date. For work under House Document 144/93/1, local interest must: provide all lands, easements, and rights-ofway; save United States free from damages; accomplish utility and other relocations or alterations; provide depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in the related project areas; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into waters of the channel by users thereof; prohibit erection of any structure within 100 feet of project channel as authorized at time of construction; provide and maintain public terminal and transfer facilities; contribute 50 percent of total first costs of recreational jetty fishing facility; and operate and maintain jetty fishing facility. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1974 authorization have been furnished by the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. There are 22 commercial waterfront facilities serving the port. The General Cargo Facilities include 13,807 feet of usable berthing space, 7 transit sheds with a total capacity of 393,870 square feet, and 6 container yards with space for 3,965 containers. Oil Handling Facilities consist of 232 storage tanks with a total storage capacity of 9,564,800 barrels. There is no usable berthing space located at the Oil Handling Facilities. Dry storage is available at 225,000 cubic feet and open storage at 100.3 acres. Hoisting facilities available from a local firm include 5 cranes with capacities from 20 to 155 tons. No floating cranes or derricks for heavy lifts are available at the port. There are 2 marine repair yards. Drydock facilities include 2 drydocks with capacities of 2,200 and 3,200 tons and a 4,270-ton vertical boat lift. Three tugs with ratings up to 4,290 horsepower serve the port. The Port Everglades Belt Line connects with the Seaboard Coast Line railroad to serve the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series #16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract underway for canals and channels cost $244. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $2,618 and $4,648, respectively. Maintenance: Condition and operations studies were $20,668. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work required to complete the project is construction authorized in House Document 144/93/1. 30. REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA. Location. Water hyacinth, hydrilla and water lettuce are found in freshwater streams and lakes in various parts of the district. Existing project. The authorized project provides for destruction or removal of aquatic growth in navigable waters of the State so far as they constitute an obstruction to navigation and commerce, using any mechanical, chemical or other means not injurious to cattle, and use of log booms to close sloughs and backwaters as an auxiliary means. No estimate of the final cost of work has been made. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details, see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Non required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations continued during the year. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) (See Table 9-G for spraying operations.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is for maintenance of navigable waterways. During the year 20,807 acres of floating vegetation (water hyacinths and/or water lettuce), and 2,714 acres of hydrilla were controlled in approximately 2,200 miles of waterways. Hyacinths in Lake Okeechobee and in St. Johns River Watershed are under maintenance control. 31. ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR FLA. Location. The harbor is on the east coast of Florida, about 35 miles south of the entrance to St. Johns River and about 180 miles north of Fort Pierce Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11485.) Previous project. For details see page 412 of Annual Report for 1958. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 16 feet by 200 feet along the best natural alinement as may exist from time to time across the new inlet bar, thence 12 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; a sandtrap groin on the north side of the inlet extending seaward from the shore of Vilano Beach, and a sand-tight jetty on the south side of the channel extending seaward from the shore of Conch Island parallel to and coextensive with the groin, future landward extension of the groin and jetty; and a channel 10 by 100 feet in San Sebastian River from the Intracoastal Waterway to King Street Bridge, with a turning basin near the upper end. Length of the inlet channel is about 1.5 miles, and length of the San Sebastian River channel is about 2.6 miles. Plane 9-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 of reference is mean low water. The mean tidal range is 4.5 feet in the ocean at St. Augustine Inlet and 4.2 feet at the city waterfront. Strong northerly winds, mostly in the winter, lower the water surface about 1 foot. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are several timber docks on the Matanzas waterfront of St. Augustine. In this area of the harbor is a concrete dock which serves as a municipal yacht pier. It has fuel facilities, 19 slips and accommodates boats up to 60 ft. in length. A large public boat ramp is also available. The principal terminals are the numerous shrimp docks in the San Sebastian River which flows southward through the city into the Matanzas River south of the bridge; these consist of timber wharves, with frame and corrugated iron warehouses thereon, and 9 marine railways for small boats. There is also a marine supply facility and several boat yards. The present terminals have highway connections and several of the shrimp docks have rail connections. They are considered adequate for existing commerce and recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is completed except for the North Jetty which is in a deferred status. The groin is in good condition except for the 300 feet which has subsided to about elevation 3.0 feet, mean low water. The jetty is in good condition, but is submerged at high tide. Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1989 were $1,405,131 for new work and $4,714,107 for maintenance, a total of $6,119,238. 32. ST. JOHN'S RIVER, FLA., JACKSONVILLE TO LAKE HARNEY Location. Rises in marshes of Brevard County, Fla., near east coast, and flows northwesterly to Jacksonville, thence easterly into the Atlantic Ocean, 122 miles south of Savannah River. River is about 285 miles long, of which 161.5 miles are included in project. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11492.) Previous projects. Adopted by River and Harbor Acts of June 14, 1880 and July 5, 1884. For further details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. Channel 13 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Florida East Coast Railway bridge at Jacksonville to Palatka, thence 12 by 100 feet to Sanford, and thence 5 by 100 feet to Lake Harney, with side channel to Enterprise and maintenance of two jetties. Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of March 2, 1945 (H. Doc. 445, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and July 24, 1946 (S. Doc. 208, 79th Cong., 2d sess.). For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Terminal facilities. There are 36 piers and wharves along project, including municipal piers and wharves at Green Cove Springs and Palatka, 12 Navy piers at Green Cove Springs, a municipal recreational pier at Sanford, and 19 privately owned piers, 5 of which have nearby tank storage facilities for petroleum projects. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Active portion is complete. Condition of project as a whole is adequate for present needs of navigation. (For more detailed information refer to Annual Report for F.Y. 1963). 33. ST. LUCIE INLET, FLA. Location. The inlet is on the east coast of Florida about 19 miles south of the entrance to Fort Pierce Harbor, Florida, and 100 miles north of the entrance to Miami Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11472.) Previous project. For details see page 764 of Annual Report for 1949. Existing project. The authorized project provides for extending the north jetty about 500 feet and modifying existing jetty to provide a sand bypass weir section about 500 feet long; excavation of a sand impoundment basin adjacent to the bypass weir in the north jetty; construction of a south jetty consisting of a rubblemound structure about 2,400 feet long with walkway for recreational fishing; channel between existing bar cut and the Intracoastal Waterway 10 by 500 feet through the bar cut, tapering to 150 feet through the inlet, and 100 feet wide and 7 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of material to the south beach during each two year maintenance period. Plane of reference is mean low water. Total project length is about 1.9 miles. Mean tidal range is 2.6 feet on the ocean side and about 1 foot on the land side of the inlet. The estimated cost of the 1974 modification (Oct. 1979 price levels) to the project is $6,290,000 Federal cost and $2,525,000 non-Federal cost ($2,260,000 contributed funds and $265,000 other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must: contribute 19.9 percent of construction cost allocated to navigation in the combined project, 23.2 percent allocated to beach erosion, and 50 percent of construction cost of jetty fishing walkway; provide 9-16 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT 39.8 percent of the annual maintenance cost allocated to navigation and 23.2 percent of the annual costs for maintenance dredging allocated to beach erosion control for periodic beach nourishment and 100 percent of the annual jetty maintenance costs allocated to beach erosion control; maintain jetty fishing walkway; agree that each five years the amount of local cost sharing for maintenance is to be adjusted; provide all lands, easements, and rightsof- way; hold United States free from damages; provide marina with mooring facilities and utilities; provide and maintain depths in berthing area and local access and feeder channels commensurate with the depths provided in the project; accomplish such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utility facilities, and take action to place in effect statutes and/or regulations which will protect the water quality for the authorized uses of the project. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1974 modification were signed by the local sponsor on August 24, 1978. Non-Federal controbution for new work was $3,086,026. Terminal facilities. A municipal pier provides facilities for docking and servicing charter fishing and small recreational craft. At Stuart there is a dock for handling bulk petroleum products and several marinas which provide facilities for mooring, servicing and minor repair of small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operations studies and environmental dredging studies cost $2,818. Maintenance dredging cost was $312,899. Engineering and design costs and supervision and administration costs were $563 and $47,518 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work required to complete the project is construction authorized in House Document 294/93/1. Total Federal costs under existing project through September 30, 1989 were $10,948,511 for new work (including $3,086,026 contributed funds) and $6,609,412 for maintenance, a total of $17,557,923. 34. SAN JUAN HARBOR, P. R. Location. San Juan Harbor is on the north coast of Puerto Rico and about 35 miles from the island's east end and 1100 miles southeast of Miami, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25670.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1916, 1938. Existing project. Modification of the authorized project to provide the deepening of the Bar Channel to 48 feet and shifting its alinement 350 feet west; deepening Anegado and Army Terminal to 40 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel, the Cruise Ship Basin, Puerto Nuevo Channel, and San Antonio Channel to 36 feet; and deepening Anchorage Area E to 38 feet while reducing its size and constructing six mooring dolphins within its limits. A 1500-footlong extension to San Antonio Channel would be added to the Federal project and Sabana approach deepened to 32 feet. Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1989 levels) $49,570,000 Federal and $29,200,000 non- Federal ($19,100,000 contributed funds, $7,630,000 reimbursement, and $2,470,000 other costs). Local cooperation. Should provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from any damages; provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access and feeder channels; provide alterations as required in sewer water supply, and other utility facilities. It is further recommended that local interests be reimbursed for work performed by them on the project subsequent to project authorization. A 25% contribution and an additional 10% reimbursement over 30 years from locals are required. Terminal facilities. There are 28 piers and bulkhead wharves in the harbor capable of docking deep-draft vessels, which have an aggregate berthing length of about 23,700 feet. Eleven piers and bulkhead wharves are on the north shore, two piers and a three-level ramp facility for roll-on/roll-off operations at Front Graving Dock turning basin and channel, nine at the eastern side and three at the western side of the Army Terminal basin and channel, and three on the south shore of San Antonio Channel. One pier and bulkhead wharf are privately owned, seven are U.S. Government property, and 24 owned by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Twenty piers and wharves are equipped with mechanical crane transfer facilities. Five wharves are equipped with a special crane for the handling of loaded containers. Twenty-four are open to general public. Pier No. 6 has been repaired and improved in 1985. There is an aggregate length of about 1,339 feet of berthing space at Catano Point used principally by small vessels within the 18-foot draft range. This space is also open to the public. In addition, there are 10 piers and bulkhead wharves with approximately 6,910 feet of berthing space owned and operated by different agencies of the Federal Government. This space is not open to the public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Breakwater and jetty maintenance costs were $16,446. Maintenance dredging costs were $2,160,000. Engineering and design and supervision and 9-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 administrative costs were $32,476 and $54,372 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Remaining work to complete project is modification authorized in 1976. Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1989 were $13,027,284 for new work and $14,337,931 for maintenance, a total of $27,365,215 regular funds. In addition, $747,684 was expended for new work and $44,730 for maintenance from public works funds and $100,000 for new work from contributed funds. Existing project includes the entrance channel and turning basin to Army Terminal which cost $1,543,712; this expenditure was made from military appropriations and is not included in above costs. 35. TAMPA HARBOR, FLA. Location. Tampa Harbor is in a large natural indentation of the Gulf of Mexico about midway of the west coast of Florida. The entrance is about 220 miles north of Key West and about 330 miles southeast of Pensacola. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11413 and 11414.) Previous projects. For details see page 665 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Sutton and Tampa; 46 by 700 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Mullet Key; 44 by 600 feet in Mullet Key Cut Channel; 44 by 500 feet in Tampa Bay from Mullet Key Cut to Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels; 44 by 500 feet in Hillsborough Bay from junction with Tampa Bay and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port Sutton entrance channel, thence 42 by 400 feet to the junction with Seddon and Garrison Channels; 44 by 400 feet in Port Sutton entrance channel; 42 by 400 feet in Sparkman Channel; 40 by 300 feet in Ybor Channel; 42 by 400 feet in Port Tampa Channel; 44 by 400-500 feet in East Bay entrance channel; 44 by 300 feet in East Bay approach channel; 30 by 300 feet in Seddon and Garrison Channels; 30 by 200 feet in Alafia River; 9 by 100 feet in Hillsborough River to a point 2,000 feet above Columbus River bridge; a breakwater; turning basins at Port Sutton, Ybor Channel, Port Tampa, East Bay, mouth of Hillsborough River, and in Alafia River; and maintenance of a channel 12 by 200 feet in Hillsborough River, 44 by 200 feet in Port Sutton terminal channel, and 34 x 300 in East Bay Channel. (The 46-foot and 44-foot depth portions of the project include a 5-foot underkeel clearance. Special studies on the project concluded that a 4-foot underkeel is sufficient. Therefore, a 1-foot overdepth has been placed in an inactive status, resulting in active project depths of 45 and 43 feet, respectively.) Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 67 miles long, including 10 miles in Hillsborough River and 3.6 miles in Alafia River. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet at the lower end of the bay, 1.6 feet at Port Tampa, and 1.8 feet at Tampa. Extreme range is about 3.8 (feet at the lower end of the bay and 4.8 feet at Tampa. Strong southwesterly winds raise the water level about 1.5 feet. Strong northerly winds, which usually occur in the winter, lower the water level about 2 feet. Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1988 price levels) of the 1970 modification to the project is $211,562,000 Federal ($209,267,000 Corps and $2,295,000 U.S. Coast Guard) cost and $13,418,000 non-Federal cost ($13,000,000 contributed funds and $418,000 other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details, see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Local cooperation has been fully complied with for work completed to date. See 1978 Annual Report for requirements for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970, HD 401/ 91/2 and HD 150/91/1. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1970 authorization were approved by the Secretary of the Army on January 10, 1973. The LCA for branch channels was signed 20 June 1986. An amendment to the LCA reflecting cost sharing requirements of WRDA of 1986 for section 6 was signed 31 Aug. 1987. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $1,083,162. A 25% contribution is required and an additional 10% reimbursement over 30 years from locals. Terminal facilities. There are 102 commercial waterfront facilities serving Tampa Harbor. The General Cargo Facilities consist of 7,226 feet of usable berthing space and 15 transit sheds with a total of 585,200 square feet of shed storage space. The Oil Handling Facilities include 16,440 feet of usable berthing space and 316 storage tanks for a total capacity of 11,610,350 barrels. Dry storage is available at 1,904,750 square feet, cold storage at 14,309,000 cubic feet, and open storage at 59.4 acres. There are 2 wharves available for coal storage at 750,000 tons total storage and grain elevators with a 3,400,000 bushel total capacity. One elevator on Ybor Channel is a 1,000,000 bushel capacity. Hoisting Facilities include 13 cranes, fixed and mobile, with capacities from 45 to 150 tons and other crawler and mobile cranes available locally. Marine repair yards include 9 waterfront repair facilities and numerous other offwater companies engaged in various phases of marine repair. There are 4 floating and 4 graving docks available at the port with capacities ranging from 548 to 5,400 long tons. Floating equipment includes 24 tugs with up to 3,350 horsepower and 4 companies with tank barges of 9-18 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT capacities up to 14,000 barrels. The Seaboard System Railroad serves the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series -17 revised 1979). Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Continuing dredging contract costs were $1,587,118 (federal) and $320,372 (non-Federal). Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $23,903 and $265,979, respectively. Maintenance: District Radio Communication Network cost was $9,500. Condition and operation studies cost was $71,339. Real estate management cost was $179. Maintenance dredging cost was $3,177,585. Engineering and design and supervision and administrative costs were $51,849 and $128,480 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970 (HD 401/91/ 2 is 65 percent complete). Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1989 were: Main project: $197,158,668 for new work and $23,071,663 for maintenance, a total of $220,230,331 regular funds. In addition, $853,050 was expended for new work from public funds, $1,463,000 from emergency relief funds, and $1,029, 180 from contributed funds. On Hillsborough River $270,466 was expended for new work. 36. NAVIGATION PROJECTS ON WHICH RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS ONLY WERE CONDUCTED DURING PIERIOD. (See Table 9-H). 37. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 9-I.) 38. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Fiscal year costs for Aquadilla Harbor, P.R., $27,347; Benner Bay-Mangrove Lagoon, V.I., $1,550; Blount Island, FL, $7,609; Cedar Island-Keaton Beach Channel, FL, $799,064; Madiera Beach Channels, FL, $0; Miami River Park, FL, $1,245; North Lake Channel, Hollywood, FL, $0; Rockhouse Creek, FL, $0. Snagging and clearing for navigation (Sec. 3 of 1945 River and Harbor Act, Public Law 14, 79th Congress.) No costs incurred. Beach Erosion Control 39. BREVARD COUNTY, FLA. Location. The project is on the east coast of Florida at approximately the midpoint of the peninsula. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11484 and 11476). Existing project. The authorization provides for a protective and recreational beach with a berm 50 feet wide at elevation 10 feet above mean low water and a natural seaward slope as would be shaped by wave action, along 14,600 feet of beach at the city of Cape Canaveral and 10,600 feet of beach at Indialantic and Melbourne beach, and for periodic nourishment of the restored beach at Indialantic and Melbourne beach limited initially to a period of 10 years. Nourishment of the restored beach at the city of Cape Canaveral would be provided by the authorized sand-transfer plant for construction at Canaveral Harbor. The project also provides for improvement of the Federally owned shores for beach erosion control or hurricane protection to be accomplished by the Federal agencies involved, subject to their own determination of economic justitification. The areas involved include 4.9 miles of shore at Kennedy Space Center, 4.0 miles at Cape Kennedy Air Force Station, and 2.3 miles at Patrick Air Force Base. Mean tidal range in the area is 3.5 feet. Estimated cost of the project (Oct. 1988 price levels) is $8,700,000 Federal costs and $8,803,000 non-Federal cost ($8,700,000 cash contribution and $103,000 for lands). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 percent of all first costs of the work and 50 percent of the nourishment cost at Indialantic and Melbourne Beach for the first 10 years of the project life; provide lands and rights-of-way; provide, after the first 10 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the restored beach at Indialantic and Melbourne beach during project life; maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; control water pollution; and hold the uNited States free from damages. Assurances of local cooperation were approved by the Secretary of the Army on July 9, 1973. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $2,262,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $16,410. 9-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial beach fill has been provided at Indialantic and Melbourne beaches. 40. BROWARD COUNTY, FLA. BEACH EROSION CONTROL AND HILLSBORO INLET, FLA., NAVIGATION PROJECT Location. Broward County is on lower east coast of Florida, 300 miles south of Jacksonville and about 30 miles north of Miami. Hillsboro Inlet is northern part of Broward County. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466.) Existing project. The authorization provides for Federal participation toward cost of a shore restoration and protection project and a project to and maintain a channel adequate for small craft navigation. Plan provides for restoration of a protection and recreational beach at four locations generally 100 feet wide with berm elevation of 10 feet above mean low water, a navigation channel 8 by 100 feet from the Intracoastal Waterway to a point 1,500 feet oceanward in Hillsboro Inlet, thence 10 by 150 feet in the ocean; jetties on north and south sides of ocean entrance; a permanently based floating dredge; and on a deferred basis, a trestle-mounted sand-transfer plant, if needed. Navigation portion of the project is in an inactive status. Mean range of tide in areas is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Cost estimate for new work (Oct. 1987 price levels) is $25,700,000 Federal and $21,900,000 non-Federal contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 90.5 percent of the first cost of beach restoration in the reach between north county line and Hillsboro Inlet, 90 percent of first cost allocated to beach restoration, and 50 percent of first cost allocated to navigation for reach between Hillsboro Inlet and Port Everglades and 72.4 percent of beach restoration in reach between Port Everglades and south county line; provide all lands and rights-of-way; obtain approval of Chief of Engineers of plans and specifications if local interest construct beach erosion features; and furnish assurances that they will hold the United States free from damages, provide and maintain adequate public landing or wharf at Hillsboro Inlet, establish a public body to cooperate financially and to provide and operate local facilities for navigation, control water pollution, maintain ownership of publicly owned shores, and maintain all project works except the jetties (maintenance of the channel to revert to the United States if sandtransfer plant is constructed). Assurances of local cooperation were accepted November 22, 1968. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $1,758,841. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design costs were $12,777. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was constructed by local interests and is complete. 41. DUVAL COUNTY, FLA. Location. On upper east coast of Florida, within 20 miles of Florida-Georgia line. Ocean shoreline is about 16 miles long. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11488). Existing project. Provides for Federal participation toward cost of construction with artificial fill, a beach 60 feet wide at elevation 11 feet above mean low water with a natural slope seaward, and for periodic nourishment for 10 years. Federal participation to be 100 percent of the first cost of construction applicable to the Federal shore and 50 percent applicable to the other publicly owned shore and 55.5 percent of periodic nourishment cost for first 10 years of project life. Mean tidal range at south jetty in St. Johns River is 4.9 feet. Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1988 price levels) $16,300,000 Federal and $13,884,000 non-Federal ($11,500,000 contributed funds and $2,334,000 for other costs). Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1965 (HD 273/89/1). Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 percent of first cost of constructing non-Federal publicly owned shores; contribute 44.5 percent of periodic nourishment costs for first 10 years of project life; provide all lands, rights-of-way, and relocations; hold the United States free from damages; control water pollution; and furnish assurances that they will maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based during economic life of project. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted on November 29, 1973. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $10,667,650. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: A contract for beach nourishment continued at a cost of $1,609,268. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $416,334 and $1,019, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial beach fill and four year advance nourishment has been completed. 42. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLA. Location: Indian River County is on the east coast of Florida, midway between Jacksonville and Miami. The authorized project comprises 2.65 miles 9-20 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT of beach along the ocean shore of Vero Beach and 1.7 miles along the Sebasian Inlet State Park. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11474 and 11476). Existing project. The authorized project provides nourishment for 8,870 feet (1.68 miles) of the State Park, south of Sebastian Inlet. The initial beach fill would consist of 202,000 cubic yards of nourishment material. An estimated 202,000 cubic yards of periodic nourishment at 5-year intervals would be required. The Federal share of the first cost was estimated to be 65% of this segment. The plan also provided for nourishment of 9,180 feet (1.74 miles) of Vero Beach. The initial beach fill consisted of 572,000 cubic yards of material, including advance nourishment. The restored beach would have a 20-foot-wide level berm at an elevation of 15 feet above mean low water. The beach fill as designed would provide protection against a 10-year return interval storm. An estimated 120,000 cubic yards of period nourishment would be required at 5-year intervals. In additional to the beach fill a 'Sabecon" reef breakwater was recommended. The structure would be placed 500 feet offshore of the new beach and would be 400 feet in length, with a zero mean low water crest elevation. The Federal share of the first cost was estimated to be 43.7 percent for this segment. The project was authorized on November 17, 1986 (Public Law 99-662 by the 1986 Water Resource Development Act.) Estimated cost of new work (Oct. 1988 price levels) $26,300,000 Federal and $28,000,000 non-Federal ($27,900,000 contributed funds and $100,000 for other costs). Local cooperation. The authorization of a beach erosion control project for Indian River County, Florida was made with the provision that the State and local interests will, in addition to the general requirements, agree to comply with the following requriements: provide all necessary lands, easements and rights-of-way; including borrow areas and disposal areas for excavated material, and relocations; hold and save the United States free from claims for damages; assure continued conditions of public ownership and public use of the shore; assure maintenance and repair during the economic life of the project; provide and maintain inecessary access roads, parking areas and other public use facilities; provide a cash contribution for periodic nourishments for the life of the project; provide an additional cash contribution for the Sebasian Inlet State Park Beach. The project, as authorized, provides that the work may be accomplished in separate units or features and that the written agreement with non-Federal interests be obtained. The Indian River County Board of Commissioners, by letter dated December 21, 1984 and January 15, 1987, affirmed their support for the project and their willingness and ability to share in project costs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design costs $207,547. Condition at end of fiscal year. total cost under existing project through September 30, 1989 was $46,539 Federal funds. 43. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLA. Location. Palm Beach County is on east coast of Florida about 300 miles south of Jacksonville and 70 miles north of Miami. Northerly reach of the project is separated from the southerly reach by Palm Beach Island. Project consists of about 12.2 miles of ocean coastline. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466). Existing project. Provides for Federal participation toward the cost of local shore project for restoration of beaches to a general width of 100 feet with a berm elevation of 10 feet above mean low water, and periodic nourishment for 10 years from the year of intial nourishment, as follows: 62.1 percent of the cost for the Martin County line- Jupiter Inlet segment; 55.8 percent of cost for Jupiter Inlet-Lake Worth Inlet segment; and 50 percent for south Lake Worth Inlet-Delray Beach; and 53 percent of cost for Delray Beach-Boca Raton inlet segment. Mean range of tide is 2.8 feet in the Atlantic ocean at Palm Beach and 2.3 feet at Boca Raton Inlet. Estimated cost (Oct. 1988 price levels) is $5,500,000 Federal and $15,400,000 cash contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must obtain approval by Chief of Engineers of plans and specifications prior to commencement of work and furnish assurances that they will maintain public ownership of publicly owned shores, maintain protective measures and provide periodic nourishment of protective beaches, and control water pollution. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Continuing beach replenishment costs were $36,769. Engineering and design costs were $75,450. Condition at end of fiscal year. Local interests provided initial beach fill at Delray Beach which was completed in August 1973. A periodic nourishment contract at Delray Beach was awarded in FY 1978 by local interests and the contract has been completed. 44. PINELLAS COUNTY, FLA. Location. Pinellas County is on the Gulf coast of Florida, about midway of the peninsula. It extends 9-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 northerly about 39 miles from the main entrance to Tampa Bay to the vicinity of the mouth of Anclote river. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11411.) Previous project. For details see page 429 of Annual Report for 1965. Existing project. The authorized project provides for Federal participation in preserving and protecting the shores of Pinellas County, Florida, by: restoration of 5,000 feet of beach at Clearwater Beach Island; restoration of 49,000 feet of beach at Sand Key; restoration of 9,200 feet of beach at Treasure Island; construction of 600 feet of revetment at Long Key; and advance nourishment of Long Key and periodic nourishment of each island. Estimated cost (Oct. 1988 price levels) is $22,000,000 Federal funds and $23,662,000 non- Federal funds ($23,600,000 contributed funds and $62,000 other costs). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) contribute in cash the required percentages of the first costs of work provided by the Corps of Engineers, the percentages varying with the type of beach ownership; 94.1 to 50 percent of the beach restoration at Clearwater Beach; 98.1 to 50 percent of the improvement at Sand Key; 94.3 to 50 percent of the improvement at Treasure Island; and 50 percent of the first cost of the revetment at Long Key; (b) contribute in cash an amount computed in accordance with the cost sharing provision contained in P.L. 826, 84th Congress as amended by P.L. 87- 874, for beach nourishment cost for the first 10 years of the project life; (c) provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; (d) assure maintenance and repair of the stone revetment of Long Key; (e) assure periodic nourishment of the restored beaches; (f) assure public ownership of beaches; (g) assure against water pollution; (h) hold the United States free from damages; and (i) provide beach for public use. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted March 22, 1967. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for Redington shore breakwater and groin cost $454,413. Contract for Long Key breakwater and beach nourishment costs were $2,653,972. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs for the fiscal year were $781,005 and $18,100, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced in 1969 and is 28 percent completed. Total costs under existing project through September 30, 1989 were $6,944,777 Federal funds and $4,321,634 contributed funds for new work and $5,625 for maintenance. 45. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 9-J.) 46. BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section 103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization) Reports incurring costs during the fiscal year were Boca de Congrejos, P.R., $2,923; Dunedin Shores, Florida, $8,906; Guanica Public Beach, P.R., $232; Gulfport, Florida, $7; Key Biscayne, Fla., $41,518; Puerto Nuevo Beach, P.R., $8,781; E.G. Simmons Hillsborough County, FL, $24; Ft. Clinch State Park, FL, $0; Ft. Louise Augusta, VI, $53; Ft. Pierce Beach, FL, $3,344 and Palm Beach County, FL, (Reimb) $112,220. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section III, Public Law 90-433 Mitigation of Shore Damages Attributable to Navigation Projects. No costs were incurred under the above authorization. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Shoreline Erosion Control Act of 1974, Public Law 93-251. No costs were incurred under the above authorization. Flood Control 47. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA Location. The project is located generally within the southeastern eighteen counties of Florida covering an area of about 15,200 square miles. It is comprised of the Upper St. Johns River basin in the northeastern section of project, Kissimmee River basin in central section above the Lake Okeechobee-Everglades area in the central and southwestern section, and the east coast Everglades area in southeastern section. Previous projects. Completed works for control of Lake Okeechobee were included in and constructed under the navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway, Fla. (formerly Caloosahatchee River and Lake Okeechobee drainage area, Fla.) and under provisions of River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930, and August 30, 1935. For further information, see Annual Reports, 1948 and 1949. Existing project. The authorized project is for flood relief and water conservation and provides principally for: an east coast protective levee extending from the Homestead area north to the eastern shore of Lake Okeechobee near the St. Lucie Canal; three conservation areas for water impoundment in the 9-22 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT Everglades area west of the east coast protective levee with control structures to effect transfer of water as necessary; local protective works along the lower east coast; encirclement of the Lake Okeechobee agricultural area by levees and canals; enlargement of portions of Miami, North New River, Hillsboro, and West Palm Beach Canals; enlargement of the existing Lake Okeechobee levees and construction of new levees on the northeast and northwest shore of the lake; increased outlet capacity for improved control of Lake Okeechobee; floodway channels in the Kissimmee River basin, with suitable control structures to prevent over-drainage; an interrelated system of canals, levees, pumping stations, and structures in southwest Dade County to control water levels; and facilities for regulating floods in the Upper St. Johns River basin; a system of canals and control structures for gravity drainage of Martin County and distribution of available water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie Counties; and works to improve the supply, distribution, and conservation of water resources in central and southern Florida, including the Lake Okeechobee agricultural area, Everglades National Park, and other related areas. The project will provide water control and protection from recurrence of the devastating floodwaters from the Everglades and local sources, for the highly developed urban area along the lower east coast of Florida and for the productive agricultural areas around Lake Okeechobee (including towns around lake), in the Upper St. Johns and Kissimmee River basins, and in South Dade County. Project also provides for navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft, consisting of locks and channel dredging in the upper Kissimmee and St. Johns basins. The project includes a total of 990 miles of levees, 978 miles of canals, 30 pumping plants, 212 floodway control and diversion structures, 56 railroad bridge relocations, and 2 highway bridge relocations. The project also provides that upon completion, local interests assume operation and maintenance of all completed works except levees, channels, locks, and control works for regulation of Lake Okeechobee and the main control structures of conservation areas, which will be operated and maintained by the United States. The principal features of the hurricane gates, constructed under previous projects for Okeechobee Waterway and maintained under existing project since July 1, 1950, are set forth in Table 9-K. See also Table 9-L for principal features of locks and dams. Estimated cost for new work (Oct. 1988 price levels) is $872,000,000 Federal funds ($869,600,000 Corps and $2,400,000 U.S. Coast Guard) and $216,255,000 contributed funds, exclusive of river and harbor funds expended on previous projects. Estimated cost to local interests of lands, rightsof- way, and relocations is $308,748,000. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. (See Table 9-M for local cash contribution.) Local interests must also: provide lands, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas; hold the United States free from damages; bear the cost of maintenance and operation of all works except those having to do with regulation of Lake Okeechobee and the main control structures of conservation areas; construct and maintain lateral drainage facilities; prohibit encroachment on flood-carrying capacity of the improved channels; and assume cost of all new highway bridges, relocations of existing bridges and alterations to utilities incident to construction of the project. In addition, for small boat navigation channels, local interests must provide, maintain, and operate adequate public landings, sanitary and access facilities, and establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the locks and channels by users thereof. Assurances of local cooperation have been accepted by the District Engineer for all items of work authorized to date except those for the Small Boat navigation feature added in 1970 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9-N for work accomplished.) Operations and care. a. Features completed under previous navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway and being maintained under this project are: a levee about 70 miles long following in general the south shore of Lake Okeechobee and a north shore levee 15.8 miles long; spillways at Ortona and St. Lucie locks; 5 hurricane gates; 20 gated drainage culverts through the levee; and 16 spillways along St. Lucie Canal. b. Features completed under existing project that are to be maintained with operation and maintenance funds are: (1) Levees 47, 48, 49 and 50- total length 63 miles and enlargement of existing levees L-D1, L-D2, L-D3, L-D4, and L-D9, (2) spillway structures S-10, S-11, S-12, S-18C, S-77, and S-78 (3) C-43, Sec. 4 (Caloosahatchee River), and (4) W.P. Franklin Lock and Dam. In addition to the actual facilities listed above it is necessary under operation and maintenance to continue meteorological studies, water level records, stream gaging stations, etc., for proper regulation of the level of Lake Okeechobee and storage of water in Conservation Areas 1, 2 and 3. 9-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Corps of Engineers - The Corps of Engineers operates and maintains the major outlets to Lake Okeechobee and Water Conservation Area Nos. 1, 2A and 3A in central and southern Florida. South Florida Water Management District - SFWMD is responsible for operation and maintenance of the remainder of the project facilities, including major pumping stations, spillways, locks (except on Okeechobee Waterway), levees and culverts. Condition at end offiscal year. The scheduled work of project is 81 percent complete. Planning for the entire project began in November 1948 and has been continued. For construction completed prior to Fiscal Year 1980 see Annual Reports for 1960-1979. Construction completed under existing project during the fiscal year is set forth in Table 9-0. All Federally maintained features of the project were generally in good condition at the end of the fiscal year. (For status of work under contract at end of fiscal year see Table 9P.) Total Federal costs under the existing project through September 30, 1989 were $313,397,919 for new work, $59,031,926 for maintenance, a total of $372,429,845. In addition, $53,510,956 has been expended from contributed funds for new work. 48. DADE COUNTY, FLA. Location. Dade County is on the southeast coast of Florida. Project area consists of that part of the Atlantic shoreline of the county from Government Cut north to Bakers Haulover Inlet and at Haulover Beach Park. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466.) Existing project. Project provides for a protective and recreational beach having a dune at elevation 11.5 feet and a level berm 50 feet wide at elevation 9 feet, mean low water, for beach erosion control and hurricane protection between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet; a protective and recreational beach with a berm elevation of 9 feet for beach erosion control at Haulover Beach Park; and Federal participation in the initial construction and in periodic nourishment of both the above reaches for the first 10 years of project life. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide in the area is 2.5 feet. Estimated cost of the project (Oct. 1988 price levels) is $49,700,000 Federal cost and $42,839,000 non-Federal cost ($41,000,000 cash contribution and $1,839,000 other costs.). Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1968 (HD 335/90/2). Local cooperation. Local interests must (a) contribute for the first cost of the work: between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet amounts ranging from 60.2 percent of the cost of the fill within the project limit with existing shorefront ownership, and 100 percent of the cost of fill required landward of the project limit; and for the work at Haulover Beach Park, contribute 21.3 percent of the entire first cost excluding costs for lands, easements, rightsof- way, relocations, and preproject work, but including credit for preproject work; (b) contribute in cost for the first 10 years of project life, amounts ranging from 88.9 percent of the nourishment cost for the beach, with existing ownership, to 60.7 percent with public ownership, and the entire maintenance cost for the dune, all between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet; (c) provide all lands and rights-of-way; (d) hold United States free from damages; (e) assure continued public ownership and use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; (f) assure maintenance of the groin, and after the first 10 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the protective beach and maintenance of the dune during the economic life of the project; (g) assure that water pollution will not be permitted; (h) prevent removal or relocation by man of fill from the beach berm and dune; (i) prevent the erection of barriers to the littoral movement of material that would interfere with the nourishment of the beach; (j) maintain at the parks qualifying for 70 percent Federal participation a zone that excludes permanent human habitation; (k) at least annually inform interests affected that the project will not provide complete protection from a hurricane tide level equal to or higher in elevation than that of the hurricane of September 1926; and (1) establish in public ownership for public use the beaches within project limits as a requirement for Federal participation in the allocated beach erosion control costs of improvement of shores presently in private ownership. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted January 16, 1973. A supplemental agreement for Bal Harbour portion was approved 30 June 1976. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $26,136,085. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Continuing beach replenishment cost was $28,318. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $131,245 and $-52, respectively. 49. DADE COUNTY, NORTH OF HAULOVER BEACH, FLA. Location. On the southeast coast of Florida. Project area consists of that part of the Atlantic shoreline 9-24 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT extending 2.5 miles north of Haulover Beach Park. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466.) Existing project. The existing shore protection project for Dade County provides for Federal participation in the cost of construction of a beach fill for the purpose of erosion control and hurricane protection along 9.3 miles of shore between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet and for the construction of a beach fill for the purpose of erosion control along the 1.2 miles of shore fronting Haulover Beach Park and provides for protection and nourishment of 2.5 miles of beach shore north of Haulover Beach Park and for extension of the period of Federal participation in the nourishment of the existing project from 10 years to the life of the project. Cost estimate for new work (Oct. 1988 price levels) was $12,100,000 Federal and $10,900,000 non- Federal cash contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Consistent with the cost-sharing and financing concepts agreed to be the administration and the Senate Majority Leadership, local interests will be required to provide lands, easements and rights-of-way and relocations, pay 50% of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation, pay 35% of the cost allocated to storm damage prevention, hold the United States free from damages, control water pollution and furnish assurances that they will maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based during economic life of project. Assurances of local cooperation have been requested from local sponsors. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $8,075,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Continuing beach replenishment costs were $4,394,957. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $34,114 and $99,110, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Continuation of planning and engineering. 50. FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLA. Location. The Four River Basins area covers about 6,000 square miles within 14 counties in central and southwest peninsular Florida. Project includes all or part of the four main stream basins - the Hillsborough, Oklawaha, Withlacoochee, and Peace Rivers - and all of three smaller coastal basins north of Tampa, Florida, drained by the Pithlachascotee and Anclote Rivers and Lake Tarpon. Existing project. The authorized project provided for improvements for control of floods and drainage, and for water conservation through construction of necessary canals, levees, reservoirs, and control structures. More specifically, the project provided for: Green Swamp Area - a conservation area and three storage reservoirs with necessary canals and control structures; Hillsborough River - four floodstorage reservoirs, with necessary channels, control structures, and levees; Oklawaha River - a levee on the north shore of Lake Apopka, improvement of part of the river channel and a west bank levee below Moss Bluff lock and dam, and replacement of the lock and dam; Withlacoochee River - one floodstorage reservoir with outlet canals and control structures; Peace River - Peace Creek canal and control structures and improvements to the existing water control and drainage features; Gulf Coastal Areas-Lake Tarpon; outlet canal and control structure; Anclote River: control structure and channel improvement; Pithlachascotee River: reservoir with outlet canals and control structures. (See Table 9-Q on Moss Bluff Lock.) Estimated cost for new work (Oct. 1988 price level) is $156,000,000 Federal funds and $132,400,000 non- Federal cost. ($32,900,000 contributed funds; $99,500,000 for lands and damages.) (See Table 9- B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish all lands, and rights-of-way; provide all alterations or replacements of public and private utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), etc.; hold the United States free from damages; operate and maintain all project works after completion; construct and maintain such associated works as are necessary to realize benefits made available by the project works; and contribute in cash 17 percent of the first cost of construction and 50 percent of recreation costs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Continuing contracts for recreation facilities cost was $803,608. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $62,249 and $213,743, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced April 18, 1966 and the scheduled work is 98 percent complete. See Table 9-R for construction of major features of the project completed to date. 51. PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS P.R. (This project authorized as Lago de Cerrillos, Lago de Portugues, and Channel Improvement at Ponce.) Location. Portugues and Bucana Rivers originate on the southern slopes of Cordillera Central divide of Puerto Rico and flow from this central ridge of 9-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 the island to the Caribbean Sea. Their drainage areas are 22.6 and 31.4 square miles, respectively. Ponce, the second largest city in Puerto Rico, is located in the lower coastal area along Portugues River and is the only urban community in the two basins. Existing project. The authorized project provides for two multiple-purpose reservoirs for flood control, water supply, general recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement - one on Portugues River and the other on Cerrillos River, a tributary to the Bucana River; enlargement of about 5.7 miles of the Bucana River, with an additional 0.2-mile tieback levee at the upstream terminus of the improvement; enlargement of 2.1 miles of the Portugues River, with an additional 0.5 mile of tieback levee at the upstream terminus of the improvement; and a 1.3 mile diversion channel connecting Portugues River to lower Bucana River. Estimated cost of the project (Oct. 1988 price level) is $313,000,000 Federal cost and $91,500,000 non-Federal cost ($11,700,000 contributed funds; $59,252,000 for lands and damages; $20,548,000 for relocations; and highway bridges and approaches). (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from damages; operate and maintain all project works after completion; repay construction cost allocated to water supply in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958; pay one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; prohibit discharge of inadequately treated sewage and other pollutants into the reservoir; and prevent encroachment on downstream channels. Assurances of local cooperation have not been completed, except for Cerrillos Reservoir which was signed March 15, 1982. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $220,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract for Cerrillos Dam & Spillway continued at a cost of $11,095,213, hired labor costs were $16,109. Contract for the Upper Portugues for Bucana Debris Basin excavation and Portugues channel improvement and debris control basin has respective costs of $77,397 and $14,730. Contracts for Section 6D and Gabion Levee Project has respective costs of $21,992 and $746,456. Cost for Entrance Channels, Contract #2 was $1,136,259. Ponce Channel Recreation cost for Ceiba Park was $303,S78. Hired Labor costs for Channels and Canals was $5,442. Cultural resource investigations cost $167,000. Area office equipment cost $45,426. Buildings, grounds and utilities cost was $12,366. Engineering and design and supervision and administrations costs were $21,153,063 and $4,366,762 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced in September 1975 and is 60 percent complete. 52. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Features transferred to the Central and Southern Florida Flood Control District and Southwest Florida Water Management District were inspected quarterly during the fiscal year at a total cost of $27,180. 53. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 9-S.) 54. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 685, 84th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 9-T.) Emergency flood control activities - repair,f lood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $115,950 for the Disaster Preparedness Program, and $137,311 for national emergency and mobilization readiness plans. Emergency streambank and shoreline protection activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended (preauthorization.) Federal costs for the fiscal year were $142,172 for Barrio Barrero, Rincon, Puerto Rico; and $206,652 for Highway 187, El Terraplan, Puerto Rico. General Investigations 55. SURVEYS Hired labor costs during the fiscal year (all Federal funds) were: navigation studies, $409,968, flood damage prevention studies $1,598,544, shoreline protection studies, $0; for a total of $2,008,512. Review of authorized projectsd cost was $32,164; Special investigations cost was $50,693; and coordination with other agencys and non-Federal interests costs were $150,643. 9-26 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT 56. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The requirement for preparation of regular flood plain information studies has been rescinded. FPI studies that deal with land use changes will continue to be prepared. FPMS Unit Jacksonville, Fla., $89,137. Technical services, $95,377, Black Creek, FL flood warning and evacuation study, $6,985, Puerto Rico hurricane evacuation study, $38,804; and Southeast Florida hurricane evacuation study, $47,956; and Gold Coast hurricane evacuation study, $41. 9-27 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sept. 30, 1989 Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) (Federal Funds) Arecibo Harbor, P.R. (Federal Funds) Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. and St. John's River, Fla. (Federal Funds) Bakers Haulover Inlet, Fla. (Federal Funds) Canaveral Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Charlotte Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) Cross-Florida Barge Canal (Federal Funds) EHaaurb Gora,l lFiela. (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 2,300,000 2,516,000 2,405,0000 2,450,000 2,190,290 2,666,855 2,333,423 2,510,571 341,000 365,282 8,429 8,630 0 18,387 467 18,387 5,032 5,032 7,525 10,290 148,000 2,886,993 3,853,000 4,014,577 33,523 623,853 642,523 1116,918 199,761 25,000 82,642 1,563,000 1,603,791 172,000 202,624 2,979,000 2,894,020 1,034,500 1,032,134 43,100 -22,317 -20,216 50,000 42,756 150,000 10,931 1,720,500 1,745,887 -2,616 -410,000 302,675 3,537,000 2,728,192 12,441 103,000 946,841 4,850,000 109,295 2,404,000 1,837,662 11,902 4,966,850 4,945,994 171 183,290 183,595 3,107,979 3,096,182 29,165,670 29,124,998 1,128,0751 1,128,0751 4,291.731 4,291.731 361,2252 361,2252 5,300,742 5,300,742 243,2353 243,2353 185,688 185,688 14,138,9104 14,137,8614 46,179,671 45,312,869 1,106,000 1,092,235 305,290 305,290 1,606,530 1,606,531 159,975 159,975 533,169b 533,1696 11,722,526 12,661,181 68,197,473 63,306,681 26,676,942 26,061,664 9,627 9,627 710,900 705,668 9-28 TABLE 9-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sept. 30, 1989 10. Fernandina Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 11. Fort Myers Beach Channel, Fla. (Federal Funds) 12. Fort Pierce Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 13. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River Fla. (Federal Funds) 14. Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 15. Jacksonville Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 16. Jacksonville Harbor (Mill Cove), Fla. (Federal Funds) 17. Johns Pass, Fla. (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 17,575 577,562 594,389 367,561 377,389 136,675 153,614 88,200 98,667 391,036 486,735 61,000 771,854 781,020 25,000 50,000 62,193 68,000 11,778 150,000 1,365,000 143,378 308,847 4,000 87,500 81,006 403,000 401,755 5,636 320,000 175,651 106,000 1,929,000 99,824 146,521 3,095,500 3,093,169 1,736,000 909,058 61,000 4,000,300 3,952,929 3,695,000 857,548 25,000 961,000 2,581,000 148,856 3,277,997 268,015 269,265 9-29 89,000 56,997 766,950 766,931 59,000 17,858 10,145 11,488 506,326 506,288 61,209 63,268 904,692 983,309 399,700 415,056 4,354,8167 4,243,4747 25,015,969 23,951,500 875,000 828,912 158,1408 158,1408 1,184,091 1,184,315 356,056 356,056 5,019,361 4,870,791 18,574 18,574 8,112,5579 8,112,5579 7,975,94710 6,187,16910 19,251,59811 19,251,59811 32,161,65912 31,392,97512 61,000 61,000 47,596,27813 47,596,278s13 63,597,28914 60,725,73114 102,813 102,813 927,654's15 927,65415 25,000 25,000 3,992,000 3,504,906 82,0981e 82,0981e 1,440,075 1,440,075 450,000 78,053 32,245 32,245 TABLE 9-A (Continued) TABLE 9-A (Continued) See Section in Text Project 18. Longboat Pass, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 19. Manatee Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) 20. Mayaguez Harbor, P.R. (Federal Funds) 21. Melbourne Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) 22. Miami Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 23. New Pass Sarasota, Fla. (Federal Funds) 24. Okeechobee Waterway, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 25. Oklawaha River, Fla. (Federal Funds) 26. Palm Beach Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) .... .. COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 New Work: Approp. - - - Cost - - - Maint: Approp. 232,525 - - Cost 245,401 - - New Work: Approp. - - - Cost - - - New Work: Approp. - - 478,00( Cost - - 224,28 New Work: Approp. - - - Cost - - - Maint: Approp. 11,154 - - Cost 11,632 - 19,47 New Work: Approp. - - - Cost - - - Maint: Approp. 251,338 - - Cost 252,188 - - New Work: Approp. 5,190,000 1,650,000 - Cost 3,871,286 1,820,111 - Maint: Approp. 129,211 - 127,00 Cost 183,359 1,097 74,31 New Work: Approp. - 38,000 - Cost - 11,885 - New Work: Approp. - - - Cost - - - Maint: Approp. 75,893 - - Cost 77,449 - 52,28 New AWpporrokp:. - 5,000 Cost - 4,940 Maint: Approp. 1,683,000 1,735,200 2,587,00 Cost 1,779,336 1,795,491 1,749,66 New Work: Approp. - - - Cost - - - New Work: Approp. ... Cost .... Maint: Approp. 45,572 55,000 58,00 Cost 48,143 58,759 62,28 New Work: Approp. - 20,000 - Cost - 7,183 - Maint: Approp. 685,212 793,000 979,00 Cost 711,384 780,280 181,13 08 1 00 9 02 04 03 9-30 -. Total Cost to FY 89 Sept. 30, 1989 - 1,020,233 - 1,020,233 49,954 1,450,441 49,954 1,450,441 - 172,324 - 172,324 200,000 678,000 218,089 442,377 - 328,187 - 168,903 716 1,033,390 716 1,052,861 - 17,696 - 17,696 - 634,864 - 634,863 - 32,636,06617 - 30,739,66717 203,755 2,842,580 203,754 2,789,478 - 2,300,71018 - 2,274,59518 - 45,811's19 - 45,811's19 65,422 3,173,726 65,414 3,226,006 - 21,405,5902 - 21,405,5302 2,931,330 38,798,49621 2,952,854 37,958,89321 - 503,700 - 503,700 - 315,264 - - 315,264 - 72,595 2,233,9152 72,535 2,238,1302 - 6,924,02124 - 6,911,2042 934,651 11,916,7692 930,993 11,100,1202 -. COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sept. 30, 1989 27. Ponce de Leon Inlet, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 28. Ponce Harbor, P.R. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 29. Port Everglades Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) 30. Removal of Aquatic Growth (Federal Funds) 31. St. Augustine Harbor, Fla. (Federal Funds) 32, St. Johns River, Fla. Jacksonville to Lake Harney (Federal Funds) 33. St. Lucie Inlet, Fla. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 34. San Juan Harbor, P.R. (Federal Funds) 35. Tampa Harbor, Fla. (Main Project) (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 106,192 108,285 25,795 23,506 24,117 53,000 283,422 36,810 36,790 132,500 140,306 136,000 114,769 2,802,500 2,801,297 200,000 775,000 1,325,000 77,861 45,078 1,954,609 10,200,000 10,098,627 574,329 42,012 62,523 85,000 24,077 199,739 679,406 -45,000 7,266 20,698 20,668 1,953,277 1,953,277 18,305,586 18,273,838 2,415,600 2,415,600 1,379,000 612,663 2,782,9072 2,530,2462 1,612,870 1,327,870 774,068 721,418 54,463,7737 54,415,3707 1,718,178 1,643,155 2,474,000 2,738,000 2,736,000 2,815,387 36,300,757 2,477,801 2,744,421 2,511,647 2,820,856 36,054,434 367,049 387,772 16,039, 20,077 30,986 60,091 57,293 74,172 2,339,241 2,376,226 1,354,000 1,669,404 255,000 262,361 11,543 3,167 92,000 93,740 115,050 114,847 200,000 158,499 430,000 431,706 44,450 1,811,737 364,279 363,799 110,000 2,260,504 81,330 2,263,294 1,650,000 1,661,897 2,436,000 3,438,932 8,750 9,531 17,967 884,410 857,218 1,476,4342 1,476,4342 4,714,107 4,714,107 1,171,2432 1,171,2432 1,300,2993o 1,300,2993 7,863,60231 7,862,48531 5,172,285 5,161,473 3,086,026 3,086,026 13,744,9683 13,744,9683 16,696,6353 16,670,7553 197,708,6433 197,625,4363 22,972,9323 23,945,9883 1,083,162 1,038,711 9-31 TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Secetion in Text Project Funding 39. Brevard County, New Work: Fla. Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost Maint: Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost 40. Broward County, New Work: Fla. Beach Erosion Approp. Control and Hills- Cost boro Inlet, Fla., Maint: Navigation Project Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost 41. Duval County, New Work: Fla. Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost 42. Indian River New Work: County Fla. Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost 43. Palm Beach New Work: County, Fla. from Approp. Martin County line Cost to Lake Worth Maint: Inlet to Broward Approp. County line Cost Federal Funds 44. Pinellas County, New Work: Fla. Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost Maint: Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost 47. Central and New Work: Southern Florida Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost Maint: Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost 48. Dade County, New Work: Fla. Approp. (Federal Funds) Cost (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost 49. Dade County, New Work: N. of Haulover Approp. Beach, Fla. Cost (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Total Cost to FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sept. 30, 1989 3,598 13,667 4,275 - 244,000- 17,615 14,771 - -506,000 3,544,000 500,000 1,221,457 564,947 2,881,443 - 3,955,250 272,094 1,862,188 1,160,445 - - 200,000 - - 46,539 -300,000 234,000 - 35,599 58,893 - 803,000 885,000 2,200,000 943,102 746,218 1,503,562 549,250 1,435,000 868,000 439,840 407,100 2,123,578 6,065,000 9,814,000 15,300,000 7,814,088 9,487,398 11,613,403 4,733,500 4,507,200 5,211,000 4,916,056 4,517,244 3,627,164 1,322,261 179,183 8,230 813,118 1,025,861 1,224,366 940,000 1,759,116 3,359,000 200,000 3,101,419 -513 741,000 1,985,000- 683,129 1,601,237 324,658 135,000 100,000 6,883,000 12,939 45,309 5,928,340 - 1,500,000 6,575,000 - - 4,425,621 9-32 16,410 12,777 2,511,000 380,337 174,579 100,000 207,547 64,028 2,992,000 674,349 135,542 241,027 16,100,000 17,603,265 4,807,619 4,685,876 971,000 1,407,080 1,711,000 149,102 576,000 10,408 351,400 -576,000 2,182,572 2,346,492 2,309,101 29,001 29,001 2,262,000 2,257,081 11,277,100 11,028,031 26,884 26,884 1,758,8413 1,758,8413 15,467,900 12,208,386 10,667,650 8,533,253 300,000 254,086 4,797,834 3,962,330 13,621 13,621 7,789,693 6,538,456 5,625 5,625 5,541,183 5,409,601 333,335,39740 329,833,82640 65,760,280 64,010,545 56,532,049 56,219,098 38,553,9567 36,416,00137 26,136,0853 25,122,436@ 7,133,000 6,337,988 7,499,000 6,608,193 TABLE 9-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sept. 30, 1989 50. Four River New Work: Basins, Fla. Approp. 903,000 566,000 696,000 400,000 74,042,09541 Federal Funds) Cost 1,714,126 581,791 778,523 342,380 73,943,89041 Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. 360,000 - 735,000 425,981 13,907,841 Cost 347,003 259,425 252,986 856,061 13,738,949 51. Portugues and New Work: Bucana Rivers, Approp. 20,949,000 39,697,000 29,080,000 8,500,000 218,651,568 P.R. Cost 21,238,471 27,285,097 16,547,880 30,861,960 214,396,989 Federal Funds) Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. - - 220,000 50,000 270,000 Cost - - 171,698 22,901 194,599 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT 1. Excludes $288,000 contributed funds for new work. 2. Includes $97,566 for previous project. 3. Excludes $243,235 contributed funds for new work. 4. Excludes $700,000 contributed by NASA in connection with construction of lock. 5. Includes $113,000 for new work on previous project; excludes $15,563 expended for new work on existing project from contributed funds. 6. Excludes $113,744 for maintenance and operations of dams. 7. Includes $174,880 expended for recreation facilities. 8. Includes $10,128 cost for reconnaissance and detailed project report prepared under Sec. 107 modification to the project. Excludes $1,095 contributed funds for new work. 9. Includes $515,479 for new work for previous projects: $8,472 for new work on Sunshine Skyway Channel; and $9,707 for new work for Cats Point Channel. Excludes $14,473 contributed funds for new work. 10. Includes $450,749 for maintenance for previous project. 11. Includes $94,776 for work for previous projects. Excludes $2,199,842 expended from public works funds for new work. 12. Includes $213,222 for maintenance on previous projects and $3,179 operating and care under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation. 13. Includes $3,520,137 new work on previous project and $290,013 for new work expended from public works funds. 14. Includes $543,399 maintenance on previous projects. 15. Includes unused contributed funds of $64,136 returned to local interests. 16. Project authorized December 2, 1964, by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 R&H Act and by Section 110 of the 1966 R&H Act. Cost of new work excludes $53,732 contributed funds. 17. Includes $5,502,126 expended from public work funds for new work. Includes costs of $6,777,906 for recreation facilities. 18. Includes $381,479 work-in-kind and $172,314 in costs for north jetty recreation facility. 19. Excludes $45,811 contributed funds for new work. 20. Includes $16,222,275 for new work under previous project, $626,925 for recreational facilities (Code 710), and $27,574 for reconnaissance and detailed project report prepared under Section 107 modification to the project. 21. Includes $7,581,150 for maintenance for previous projects. Excludes $1,000 for maintenance from contributed funds on previous projects, $67,558 which represents services rendered without reimbursement, and $113,744 for maintenance and operations of dams. 22. Includes $3,912 for new work for previous projects. 23. Includes $11,414 for operating and care under provisions for the permanent indefinite appropriation. 24. Includes $80,000 new work from public works funds. Excludes $509,506 contributed funds. 25. Includes $30,000 for maintenance from public works funds. 26. Includes $11,588 expended for restudy, but excludes $21,960 expended for new work from contributed funds. 27. Excludes $1,033,069 contributed funds. 28. Includes $71,303 for new work on previous project. Excludes $137,500 contributed fund. 29. Baresford cutoff and completion of cutoffs and easing of bends in Putnam Lake and Volusia Counties in inactive status were deauthorized by Public Law 93-251 section 12. Includes $29,566 for new work under previous project. 30. Includes $25,838 under previous project. 31. Includes $26,689 for new work under previous project. 32. Includes $747,684 for new work under previous project. Excludes $100,000 expended for new work from contributed funds. 33. Includes $44,730 in maintenance under previous project. 34. Includes $853,050 for new work under previous project. Excludes $270,466 for new work for Hillsborough River and $13,939 for new work from contributed funds. Includes $215,000 Appropriation and $139,792 cost for new work East Bay Channel. 35. Includes $17,107 for maintenance under previous project. ' 36. Excludes work-in-kind. 37. Includes $2,294,134 for reimbursement costs to Bal SHarbor. 38. Excludes unused contributed funds of $17,969 returned to local interests. 39. Excludes $300,083 in property for services furnished by local interests in lieu of cash contribution. 40. Excludes $15,543 for property received without reimbursement and R&H Funds, expended on previous projects (see cost and financial statement for Okeechobee Waterway, Fla., project for these costs). Excludes $100,000 advanced by local interests toward federal costs. Includes $175,000 appropriation and $175,000 cost for new work at C&SF St. Johns Water Mgtm. District. 41. Includes costs of $89,691 for recreation facilities at Moss Bluff and $2,638,272 at Lake Tarpon. 9-33 TABLE 9-A (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1988 TABLE 9-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents October 27, 1965 August 26, 1937 March 4, 1913 June 20, 1939 July 14, 1960 March 2, 1945 October 23, 1962 Report of the Chief of Engineers Oct. 1985 June 20, 1938 July 14, 1960 July 25, 1912 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 August 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 P.O. 675/77 July 23, 1942 November 17, 1986 June 20, 1938 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious aquatic plants, and continuedresearch to develop best method of control ARECIBO HARBOR, P.R. (See Section 2 of Text) Construction of breakwater 1,200 feet long and dredging channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide with flare at entrance and widening at inner end to form a maneuvering area. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA. AND THE ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 7 x 100 feet Channel 12 feet deep and 90-150 feet wide with cutoffs BAKERS HAULOVER (See Section 4 of Text) Channel 11 x 200 feet in ocean entrance, thence 8 x 100 feet to Intracoastal Waterway; Marina basin 8 x 200 feet; reconstruction of jetties and protection of inlet shores. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 5 of Text) Entrance channel jetties, a turning basin enclosed by a dike, and a barge canal with a lock. Maintain improved channel, turning basin, enlarge barge channel and lock, relocate dike, provide channel and turning basin west of 35- foot turning basin, construct and operate sand-transfer plant Mitigation of fish and wildlife losses at Port Canaveral West Turning Basin Project. CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG MARCO PASS, FLA. (See Section 6 of Text) Interior channel 6 x 70 feet Channel 12 x 150 feet from the Gulf to Gordon Pass, thence 10 x 100 feet to a point 400 feet south of U.S. Highway 41 Bridge, thence 10 x 70 feet to bridge and two turning basins CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 24 x 300 feet through Gulf through Boca Grande entrance Depth of 27 feet at entrance and width of 500 feet at the bend Channel 10 x 100 feet to Punta Gorda and a turning basin Depth of 30 feet at entrance and width of 700 feet at bend Depth of 32 feet in entrance channel CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL (See Section 8 of Text) Barge Canal 12 x 150 feet Establishment of the Cross Florida National Conservation Area. EAU GALLIE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 9 of Text) Channel 8 x 100 feet and a turning basin H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 898, 62nd Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 618, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 189, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 367, 77th cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 140, 87th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, 17 November 1986 99th Congress 2nd Sess. H.Doc. 596, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 183, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 699, 62nd Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 113, 66th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 95, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 186, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 109, 79th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662 17 November 1986 99th Congress, 2nd sess. H.Doc. 497, 75th Cong., 3rd sess. 9-34 TABLE 9-B (Continued) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents June 14, 1880 July 13, 1892 March 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 March 3, 1925 June 20, 1938 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 Auth. by Chief of Engineers December 6, 1968, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act. Def. Act of March 4, 1931 War Dept. Approp. Act, March 4, 1933 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 May 10-16, 1957 Auth. March 1, 1962 By Senate and House Public Works Committee Auth. by Chief of Engineers March 1, 1963, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act FERNANDINA HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 10 of Text) Entrance jetties Raising and extending jetties to provide 19-foot depth Improvement of inner harbor to obtain 20- to 24-foot depth and 400- to 600-foot channel width Combining improvement of Fernandina Harbor and Cumberland Sound under the general heading of Fernandina Harbor Provided for a 26-foot channel Provided for the 28-foot channel and turning basin Provided for reducing the maximum width of turning basin from 1,000 to 800 feet, for shifting channel line in this vicinity 50 feet northwesterly and for including in authorized project small area dredged by Rayonier, Inc. Provided for 32-foot channel and turning basin FORT MYERS BEACH, FLA. (See Section 11 of Text) 12- x 150 foot channel in San Carlos Bay, thence 11 x 125 feet in Matanzas Pass to upper shrimp terminals Extension of 11- x 125-foot channel easterly about 2,000 feet to and including a turning basin adjacent to natural deep water in Matanzas Pass FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 12 of Text) Expenditure of $20,000 for dredging channel, maintenance by local interests Expenditure of up to $30,000 for dredging channel Maintaining channels, jetties, and revetments, and enlarging channels and turning basin to existing project dimensions INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FLA. (See Section 13 of Text) 9- x 100-foot channel; deepening channel at Caseys Pass to 9 feet and construction of highway bridge at Venice Original route may be modified at no excess cost to U.S. Any route in Venice-Lemon Bay area may be used Use of alternate Route C-1 in Venice-Lemon Bay area Local interests to bear costs of Venice Avenue highway bridge and any other necessary crossing over Route C-1 Sunshine Skyway Channel to be improved and maintained to 9 x 100 feet Annual Report 1879 Annual Report 1891 & 1896 H.Doc. 388, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 227, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 284, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 284, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 662, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 183, 86th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 252, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 371, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act Specified in Act Specified in Act H.DOc. 109, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 109, 85th Cong., 1st sess. 6- x 80-foot channel in Boca Ciega Bay January 21, 1927 INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FLA. (See Section 14 of Text) Channel 8 x 75 feet from Jacksonville to Miami H.Doc. 586, 69th Cong., 2d sess. 9-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1988 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 PARA June 26, 1934 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 Do. Do. July 3, 1958 Chief of Enginers Report of July 22, 1960, Mod. 12-foot channel March 2, 1907 Report of the Chief of Engineers 12 Feb 1982 Auth. by Chief of Engineers December 2, 1964 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act and Sec. 110 of 1966 R&H Act Auth. by Chief of Engineers April 20, 1976 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act, as amended Report of the Chief of Engineers 12 May 1980 August 30, 1935 August 20, 1937 July 3, 1930 Channel width of 100 feet Operation and care of Palm Valley Bridge Turning basin at Jacksonville Beach Channel 12 x 125 feet Side channel and turning basin at Sebastian Turning basin at Vero Beach Maintenance of side channel at Daytona Beach Channel 10 x 125 feet from Ft. Pierce to Miami JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 15 of Text) ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. OPPOSITE THE CITY OF JACKSONVILLE The 24-foot area from Hogan Creek to Florida East Coast Railroad bridge JACKSONVILLE HARBOR (MILL COVE), FLORIDA (See Section 16 of Text) Enlarge weir structure and west opening controlling flow into Mill Cove, to reduce shoaling and improve navigation as well as circulation. JOHN'S PASS, FLA. (See Section 17 of Text) Channel 10 x 150 feet in gulf, 8 x 100 feet inside pass, 6 x 100 feet to IWW-2.6 miles long. LONGBOAT PASS, FLA. (See Section 18 of Text) 12- x 150-foot entrance channel from Gulf of Mexico to Longboat Bridge; 10- x 100-foot channel from Longboat Bridge northeasterly to IWW; channel from north channel to Cortez Bridge MANATEE HARBOR, FLORIDA (See Section 19 of Text) Provide for maintenance of the existing 40-ft. deep draft navigation channel and turning basin from Tampa Bay to Port Manatee. Initial construction of a widener at Manatee Harbor and deepen area adjacent to berthing area. MAYAGUEZ HARBOR P.R. (See Section 20 of Text) Approach channel 30 feet deep to and along deep water terminal MELBOURNE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 21 of Text) Channel 8 x 100 feet and a turning basin MIAMI HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 22 of Text) MIAMI RIVER The 15-foot channel in Miami River, 150 feet wide at the mouth 9-36 S.Doc. 71, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 180, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 740, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 336, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 261, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 222, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 663, 59th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662 17 November 1986 99th Congress, 2nd sess. P.L. 99-662 17 November 1986 99th Congress, 2nd Sess. H.Doc. 215, 72nd Cong. 1st sess. & River and Harbor Committee Doc. 1, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 390, 74th Cong., 2nd sess. Specified in Act REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1988 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Auth. by Chief of Engineers November 5, 1968, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act September 19, 1890 March 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 July 27, 1916 PARA June 26, 1934 March 13, 1934 December 10, 1934 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 Report of the Chief of Engineers, 10 December 1985 October 27, 1965 March 3, 1925 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 H.R. September 23, 1976 S.R. October 1, 1976 Enlarge existing 8- x 90-foot section of Okeechobee Waterway for about 5 miles upstream from Ft. Myers to 10 x 100 feet OKLAWAHA RIVER, FLA. (See Section 25 of Text) Clearing obstructions for channel 4 feet deep from mouth to Leesburg Channel 6 feet deep from mouth to head of Silver Springs Run Maintenance of levels in the lakes at head of river Acceptance of certain artificial waterways in lieu of portions of natural river bed Operation and care of lock and dam provided for with funds from appropriations for rivers and harbors PALM BEACH HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 26 of Text) Maintenance of improvement previously constructed by local interests Deepening the channels and turning basin, as constructed by local interests, to 20 feet Authorized the work previously approved by Public Works Administration, and widening the channels to existing project dimensions, enlarging the 700-foot-square turning basin eastward removing the obstructive point on south side of the inlet, revetting the banks of the inlet, and restoring existing jetties Deepening the channels and turning basin to 25 feet Extending the turning basin 550 feet southward over a 900-foot width, with a flare to the east; provided that local interests may be reimbursed not to exceed $305,000 for work done by them on this modification subsequent to July 1, 1949 An entrance channel 35 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 0.8 mile long, merging with an inner channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 0.3 mile long, thence flaring into a turning basin, 1,400 feet northsouth by a minimum of 1,200 feet east-west Assume maintenance PONCE DE LEON INLET, FLA. (See Section 27 of Text) Widening and deepening channels; jetties on north and south side of inlet; a weir in the north jetty and an impoundment basin inside the weir PONCE HARBOR, P.R. (See Section 28 of Text) Dredging 3 continuous areas, aggregating 153 acres, to depths of 30, 18, and 9 feet, and construction of a seawall, costs to be shared by U.S. and local interests Modified conditions of local cooperation to provide that U.S. undertake all dredging at Federal expense and return local funds previously contributed for dredging, all other portions of the improvement hereafter to be at the expense of local interests Eliminate previously authorized 9-foot dredging area, and provided for dredging 30-foot-depth area and 18 acres off the municipal pier and for construction of the breakwater off Punta Carenero Eliminate previously authorized 18-foot and a portion of the 30-foot project outside the proposed 36-foot and a portion of the adjacent to the municipal bulkhead. Channel 36 x 600 feet from Caribbean Sea to harbor; channel 36 x 400 feet into harbor; and a 36-foot turning basin 9-37 Annual Report, 1889, p. 1360 H.Doc. 782, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Acts Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 185, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Recommended by Chief of Engineers to Public Works Administration October 17, 1934 H.Doc. 185, 173d Cong., 2d sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 42, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 530, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 704, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 283, 86th Cong., 1st sess. (contains latest published map) P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986 99th Cong. 2nd sess. H.Doc. 74, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 532, 67th Cong., 4th sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 745, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 532, 94th Cong., 2d sess. TABLE 9-B (Continued) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents PWA Program September 6, 1933 June 13, 1902 March 2, 1907 March 4, 1913 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 August 13, 1968 Auth. by Chief of Engineers April 20, 1964 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act PARA June 26, 1934 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 Do. March 2, 1945 Do. The channel at the Dinner Key Airport An 18-foot channel in a landcut across the peninsula and construction of the north jetty Construction of the south jetty and increase of channel width to 100 feet Modification of local cooperation requirements imposed by the Act of July 25, 1912 A channel 25 feet deep with present widths from the ocean to Biscayne Bay, thence 200 feet wide across the bay to but not including the municipal turning basin, and extension of both jetties A channel width of 300 feet across the bay and enlarging the municipal turning basin, with expenditures thereon limited to $200,000 A depth of 30 feet from the ocean to and in the turning basin, with the existing authorized project widths, including the 300-foot width in the channel across the bay Extending the turning basin 200 feet to the southward The Virginia Key improvement For incorporation of the project for Miami River in that for Miami Harbor, the widening at the mouth of Miami River to existing project widths; the channels from the mouth of Miami River to the turning basin and to Government Cut; and the channel from Miami River to the harbor of refuge, provided that local interest contribute one-third of the cost Deletion of Virginia Key development and the Dinner Key approach channel, widening the existing ship channel by easing the ocean bend and increasing the width of the 300-foot-wide section to 500 feet, enlarging the existing turning basin 300 feet along both the south and northeasterly sides, and dredging a turning basin along the north side of Fisher Island about 39 acres in extent and 30 feet in depth Enlarging existing entrance channel to 38 x 500 feet, deepening existing 400-foot-wide channel across Biscayne Bay to 36 feet; deepening existing turning basins at Biscayne Blvd. terminal and Fisher Island to 36 feet NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FLA. (See Section 23 of Text) 10- x 150-foot entrance channel; 8- x 100-foot inner channels; and 8-foot-deep turning basins at Payne Terminal and City Pier OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FLA. (See Section 24 of Text) Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from R&H appropriations New lock and wier structure in St. Lucie Canal Deepening to 8 feet from Ft. Myers to JacksonvilleMiami waterway near Stuart view channel across lake from Clewiston Channel to yacht basin at Ft. Myers and a basin at Stuart Deepening to 8 feet from Ft. Myers to JacksonvilleMiami waterway near Stuart via channel across lake from Clewiston Channel to yacht basin at Ft. Myers and a basin at Stuart S.Doc. 95, 72d Cong., 1st sess. and specified in Act H.Doc. 622, 56th Cong., 1st sess. (Annual Report 1900, p. 1987) Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 516, 67th Cong., 4th sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Sen. Comm. Print. 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 86, 74th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 251, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 91, 79th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 71, 85th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 93, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 696, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 736, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 696, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 736, 79th, Cong., 2d sess. 9-38 TABLE 9-B (Continued) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 H.R. May 9, 1974 S.R. May 31, 1974 March 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 March 3, 1905 June 20, 1938 May 17, 150 March 3, 1899 March 2, 1919 June 14, 1880 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 March 2, 1945 November 7, 1966 PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 29 of Text) Maintenance of harbor constructed by local interests H.Doc. 357, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Enlarge entrance channel and complete turning basin to 1,200 feet Rivers and Harbors Committee square Doc. 25, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Widen turning basin 350 feet on north side H.Doc. 545, 75th Cong., 3d sess. Widen turning basin 200 feet on north side, 500 feet on south side and H.Doc. 768, 78th Cong., 2d sess. enlarge flare at entrance channel Deepen and widen entrance channel on a new alinement and increase H.Doc. 346, 85th Cong., 2d sess. turning basin in size and depth Deepen and widen entrance channel, enlarge turning basin, widen H.Doc. 144, 93d. Cong., Pier 7 channel, maintenance of Berth 18 channel, and planning for 1st sess. a south jetty fishing walkway with construction contingent upon need as developed by detailed postauthorization studies REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA (See Section 30 of Text) Construction and operation of a suitable vessel and use of log booms for Annual Report 1899 removal of water hyacinths in the navigable waters of the State Extermination and removal of water hyacinths by any mechanical, Specified in Act chemical, or other means Prohibits use of any chemical process injurious to cattle Specified in Act ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 31 of Text) Channel 27 x 200 feet protected by a groin H.Doc. 555, 75th Cong., 3d sess. Channel 16 x 200 feet across bar, and thence 12 feet deep to H.Doc. 133, 81st Cong., Intracoastal Waterway; jetty on south side of inlet; future landward 1st sess. extension of groin and jetty; and channel 10 x 100 feet in San Sebastian River ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA., JACKSONVILLE TO LAKE HARNEY (See Section 32 of Text) A channel 13 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Jacksonville to Palatka H.Doc. 523, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report for 1989, p. 1343 The improvement of Deep Creek H.Doc. 699, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. Two jetties at Volusia Bar (Maintenance only; new work completed Annual Report for 1879, under previous project.) pp. 795-798 A channel 100 feet wide, 8 feet deep from Palatka to Sanford with a H.Doc. 1111, 60th Cong., side channel to Enterprise, and thence 5 feet deep to Lake Harney 2d sess. Cutoffs at Butcher Bend, Shake Creek, and Starks Landing, and H.Doc. 691, 69th Cong., easing bends at other points 2d sess. A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Palatka to Sanford, H.Doc. 603, 76th Cong., with a side channel to Enterprise and with cutoffs and easing of 3d sess. bends Combining the two projects above into a single project for St. Johns H.Doc. 445, 78th Cong., River, Fla., Jacksonville to Lake Harney, and for a cutoff 5 feet 2d sess. deep and 75 feet wide between Lake Monroe and the vicinity of Osteen Bridge (Woodruff Creek Cutoff) A channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Palatka to Sanford, and S.Doc. 208, 79th Cong., in the branch to Enterprise 2d sess. ST. LUCIE INLET, FLA. (See Section 33 of Text) Channel 10 x 200 feet H.Doc. 391, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Modification to maintain existing channel 6 x 100 feet H.Doc. 508, 89th Cong., 2d sess. 9-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1988 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents H.R. May 9, 1974 S.R. May 31, 1974 August 8, 1917 September 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 October 17, 1940 March 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 August 4, 1976 Report of the Chief of Engineers 23 Dec. 1982 March 3, 1899 March 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 Extending north jetty and modifying existing jetty to provide a sand bypass weir section; excavation of sand impoundment basin; construction of south jetty with walkway for recreational fishing; channel 10 x 500 feet through bar cut, tapering to 150 feet through the inlet, and 100 feet and 7 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of material to the south beach during each two-year maintenance period SAN JUAN HARBOR, P.R. (See Section 34 of Text) Anchorage (inner harbor) area of 206 acres and San Antonio Channel to 30-foot depth Substitution of a 68-acre area 30 feet deep along southeasterly side of anchorage area, for one 25 acres in extent and of same depth extending easterly from eastern end of the San Antonio project channel Modified condition of local cooperation Entrance channel across outer bar 38 feet deep and 800 feet wide, and thence across bay to anchorage area (Anegado Reach Channel) 30 feet deep and 700 feet wide and increasing anchorage area to 239 acres to 30-foot depth Widening Anegado Reach Channel and increasing anchorage area to 329 acres Removal to 8-foot depth of Anegado, Largo, and Capitanejo Shoals, and dredging to 30-foot depth the entrance channel and turning basin to the Graving Dock Maintenance of the 30-foot depth entrance channel and turning basin to the Army Terminal Deepening portions of entrance and approach channels and basins to Army Terminal and San Antonio Pier areas to 35-45 feet; new 32- foot depth Puerto Nuevo Channel; new 36-foot depth anchorage A bar channel 48 by 800 feet, shifting the centerline 350 feet west; deepening Anegado Channel in steps from 46 to 40 feet while reducing reducing width to 800 feet; deepening Army Terminal Channel and turning basin to 40 feet while widening the channel to 450 feet; deepening Puerto Nuevo Channel to 40 feet and widening it to 400 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel to 40 feet at existing 400-foot width; deepening San Antonio Channel to 38 feet at varying widths, minimum of 500 feet; deepening cruise ship basin to 36 feet at an irregular width; maintaining Sabana Approach Channel at 30 by 250 feet; provide a 38-foot depth in Anchorage Area "E" with irregular width; six mooring dolphins for vessels using the area Modification of the authorized project to provide the deepening of the Bar Channel to 48 feet and shifting its alinement 350 feet to the west; deepening Anegado, and Army Terminal to 40 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel, and Cruise Ship Basin, Puerto Nuevo Channel, and San Antonio Channel to 36 feet; and deepening Anchorage Area E to 38 feet while reducing its size and constructing six mooring dolphins within its limits. A 1500-footlong extension to San Antonio Channel would be added to the Federal project and Sabana approach deepened to 32 feet. TAMPA HARBOR, FLA. (See Section 35 of Text) TAMPA BAY For a channel 27 feet deep from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Tampa, 500 feet wide across the bar and 300 feet wide in the bay For a channel depth of 26 feet with sufficient width from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Tampa TAMPA AND HILLSBOROUGH BAYS For a depth of 24 feet in Hillsborough Bay 9-40 H.Doc. 294, 93rd Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 865, 63d Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 45, 71st Cong., 2d sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 38, 74th Cong., 1st sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 42, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 364, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 38, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 574, 94th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986 99th Cong. 2nd Sess. H.Doc. 52, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Also printed in Annual Report 1899, p. 1640) Channel dimensions specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 634, 61st Cong., 2d sess. TABLE 9-B (Continued) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents August, 8, 1917 March 3, 1899 September 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 Do. March 2, 1945 Do. Do. May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 October 23, 1962 December 31, 1970 Do. Do. Do. For a 27-foot depth from Gulf of Mexico up to and in the several channels of Hillsborough Bay, the widths to be 500 feet on the bar, 300 feet in Tampa Bay, Ybor, and Garrison Channels, and 200 feet in Hillsborough Bay, Sparkman, and Seddon Channels, with turning basins at the mouth of Hillsborough and at Ybor Estuary HILLSBOROUGH RIVER For a 12-foot channel to within 100 feet of the Lafayette St. highway bridge (maintenance only; new work completed under a previous project under the title Improving Hillsborough Bay, Fla.) TAMPA HARBOR Consolidation of the above projects to form a single project for Tampa Harbor Increasing the depth of Egmont Channel to 29 feet and the width of Sparkman Channel to 300 feet For a depth of 32 feet and a width of 600 feet on Egmont Bar, a depth of 30 feet and a width of 400 feet in Mullet Key Cut, and a depth of 30 feet and a width of 300 feet in all other project channels in Tampa Harbor (except in Hillsborough River and in the channel leading to Alafia River); and for a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 500 feet in maximum width at the entrance to the Port Tampa terminals For widening the bend between Sparkman Channel and Cut D of Hillsborough Bay Channel by 250 feet; widening Ybor Channel to 400 feet and extending the turning basin at the west end of Garrison Channel (mouth of Hillsborough River) easterly for 300 feet For construction of a breakwater at Peter O. Knight Field, Davis Islands, its maintenance to be assumed by local interest For widening Sparkman Channel to 400 feet and Ybor Channel to 500 feet; widening the bend between Sparkman and Garrison Channels an additional 250 feet to extend the turning basin westerly; and widening the bend between Seddon and Garrison Channels by 150 feet (in lieu of 300 feet previously authorized) to extend the turning basin easterly For a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in the Hillsborough River for about 2.4 miles above the upper end of the existing 12-foot channel, and for the removal of obstructions thence to the Florida Avenue Bridge For a channel 25 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Hillsborough Bay channel to and including a turning basin in the Alafia River (Revoked by Act of May 17, 1950) For deepening Egmont Channel to 36 feet; enlarging Mullet Key Cut, Tampa Bay Channel, Hillsborough Bay Channel, Port Tampa Channel and Port Tampa turning basin to present project dimensions; deepening Sparkman Channel and Ybor turning basin to 34 feet; a channel 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Hillsborough Bay Channel to and inclduing a turning basin in Alafia River, 700 feet wide and 1,200 feet long (in lieu of the improvement previously authorized); and substantial widening at entrance, bends, and turns Extended removal of obstructions in Hillsborough River to City Water Works Dam. Maintenance of cleared channel to be assumed by local interests Channel and turning basin at Port Sutton 30 feet deep, Ybor Channel 34 x 400 feet For federal maintenance of Port Sutton Channel, 280 feet wide and an irregularly shaped turning basin.both to a depth of 34 feet Enlarge entrance channel across Egmont Bar to 46 x 700 feet from the Gulf to Mullet Key Enlarge Mullet Key Cut Channel to 44 x 600 feet Enlarge Tampa Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from Mullet Key Cut through Tampa Bay to the junction of Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels 9-41 H.Doc. 634, 61st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 545, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1898, pp. 1357-1360 Specified in Act H.Doc. 100, 70th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 22, 72d Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 164, 75th Cong., 3d sess. Sen. Comm. Print. 76th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 183, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 119, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 16, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 258, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 567, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 529, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 150, 91st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 401, 91st Cong., 2d sess. Do. Do. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1988 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. August 15, 1985 Report of the Chief of Engineers 25 Jan. 1979 W.R.D.A. 17 November 1986 BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS August 13, 1968 October 27, 1965 Report of the Chief of Engineers 2 April 1982 August 13, 1968 Enlarge Hillsborough Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from the junction with Tampa Bay and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port Sutton entrance channel, and thence deepening to a depth of 42 feet at the existing width of 400 feet to the function with Seddon and Sparkman Channels Enlarge Port Sutton entrance channel to 44 x 400 feet Enlarge Port Sutton turning basin to a depth of 44 feet and a turning diameter of 1,200 feet Deepening Sparkman Channel to 42 x 400 feet Deepening Ybor Channel to 40 x 300 feet Enlarge turning basin at the entrance to Ybor Channel to a depth of 42 feet and an additional width of 200 feet on the southwest edge of the present basin Deepening Port Tampa Channel to 42 feet at its existing width from the junction with Hillsborough and Tampa Bay Channels to the turning basin Deepening the Port Tampa turning basin to 42 feet over its existing length of 2,000 feet and width of 900 feet An entrance channel in East Bay 44 x 400 feet and 500 feet north from the Port Sutton turning basin for a distance of about 2,000 feet A turning basin in East Bay at a depth of 44 feet and with a turning diameter of 1,200 feet An approach channel in East Bay 44 x 300 feet north from the East Bay turning basin for a distance of about 2,500 feet Maintenance of Port Sutton Terminal channel to 44 x 200 feet for a distance of 4,000 feet Maintenance of East Bay channel to 34 x 300 feet for a distance of 5,500 feet TAMPA HARBOR BRANCH CHANNELS Enlarging Hillsborough Bay Cut D, Sparkman Channel, Port Tampa Channel and existing turning basins at the entrance to Ybor Channel and at Port Tampa, all to a depth of 41 ft. with varying lengths and widths and deepening Ybor Channel to a depth of 39 feet. This work will be associated with the Main Channel deepening. TAMPA HARBOR EAST BAY CHANNEL Maintenance dredging BREVARD COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 39 of Text) Federalparticipation in cost of shore protection project BROWARD COUNTY, FLA. BEACH EROSION CONTROL AND HILLSBORO INLET, FLA., NAVIGATION PROJECT (See Section 40 of Text) Improvement for beach erosion control in Broward County, Fla. and a combined beach erosion and navigation improvement to Hillsborough Inlet and the shore south thereof to Port Everglades CHARLOTTE COUNTY, FLORIDA Shoreline Protection DADE COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 41 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection and hurricane-flood control project 9-42 Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. H.Doc. 236, 99th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662 17 November 1986 99th Congress, 2nd Sess. P.L. 99-662 17 November 1986 99th Congress, 2nd Sess. H.Doc. 352, 90th Cong., 2nd sess. H.Doc. 91, 89th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662 17 November 1986 99th Congress, 2nd Sess. H.Doc. 335, 90th Cong., 2d sess. ] TABLE 9-B (Continued) JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents August 15, 1985 Report of the Chief of Engineers 27 Dec 1983 October 27, 1965 W.R.D.A. 17 November 1986 Report of the Chief of Engineers 22 April 1984 October 23, 1962 November 7, 1966 Report of the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors 23 April 1985 Report of the Chief of Engineers 28 Feb. 1986 Report of the Chief of Engineers 26 Feb. 1980 FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS June 30, 1948 September 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 October 23, 1962 Do. DADE COUNTY-NORTH OF HAULOVER BEACH, FLA. (See Section 42 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection and hurricane-flood control project Extending of existing shore protection project for Dade County to provide for protective beach fill and subsequent nourishment along 2.5 miles of shore north of Haulover Beach Park. DUVAL COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 43 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA (See Section 42 of Text) The plans provide for a 2.65 mile beach fill along the ocean shore of Vero Beach a 1.7 mile beach fill along the ocean shore of Sebastian Inlet State park and for periodic nourishment of the new beaches. MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA Modification of existing project from 6200-ft. long to 8770-ft. long beach fill stabilized with two groins and periodic nourishment. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLA., FROM MARTIN COUNTY LINE TO LAKE WORTH INLET AND FROM SOUTH LAKE WORTH INLET TO BROWARD COUNTY LINE (See Section 44 of Text) Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project and sandtransfer plant PINELLAS COUNTY, FLA. (See Section 45 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project Restoration of 5,000 ft. of beach at Clearwater Beach Island, 49,000 ft. of beach at sand Key, 92,000 ft. of beach at Treasure Island, and construction of 600 ft. of revetment at Long Key. Also, renourishment of each island. SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA Shoreline protection along 12,600 ft. of shoreline on central Longboat and 21,100 ft. on Manasota Key in the vicinity of Venice, Florida and periodic nourishment of these areas. ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FLORIDA Shoreline protection along 2.5 miles of problem area in the St. Augustine Beach and Coquina Gables area and periodic nourishment CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA (See Section 48 of Text) First phase of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes Modification and expansion of authorization to include entire comprehensive plan of improvement Canals, levees, and water-control and drainage structures in the Nicodemus Slough area, Glades County Flood protection on Boggy Creek, near Orlando Flood protection in the Cutler Drain area, near Miami H.Doc. 236, 99th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662 17 November 1986 99th Congress, 2nd sess. H.Doc. 273, 89th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662 17 Nov. 1986 99th Congress 2d sess. P.L. 99-662 17 November 1986 99th Congress, 2nd sess. H.Doc. 164, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 519, 89th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662 17 November 1986 99th Congress, 2nd sess. P.L. 99-662 17 November 1986 99th Congress, 2nd sess. P.L. 99-662 17 November 1986 99th Congress, 2nd sess. H.Doc. 643, 80th Cong., 2d sess. (Contains latest published map). H.Doc. 643, 80th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 53, 86th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 125, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 123, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 9-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1988 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Do. Do. Do. October 27, 1965 Do. August 13, 1968 Do. Approved December 17, 1970 under the provisions of Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 October 23, 1962 December 31, 1970 Report of the Chief of Engineers 25 April, 1986 Flood control and drainage works for South Dade County Project Shingle Creek between Clear Lake and Lake Tohopekaliga for flood control and major drainage, including development of Reedy Creek Swamp Improvement of easterly section of West Palm Beach Canal for flood control and major drainage Primary works for flood control and major drainage in southwest Dade County Primary works for flood control and major drainage in Hendry County Gravity drainage in Martin County and distribution of available water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie Counties Improvement of supply, distribution and conservation of water resources in Central and Southern Florida, including Lake Okeechobee agricultural area, Everglades National Park and other related areas Navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLA. (See Section 49 of Text) Control of floods and improvement of drainage, and for water conservation through construction of necessary canals, levees, reservoirs, and control structures PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, P.R. (See Section 50 of Text) LAGO de CERRILLOS, P.R. Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply and recreation LAGO de PORTUGUES, P.R. Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply and recreation PONCE, P.R. Diversion and enlargement of existing channels through Ponce for flood control RIO PUERTO NUEVO, P.R. Project for flood control S.Doc. 138, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 139, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 146, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 20, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 102, 88th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 101, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 369, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 394, 91st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 585, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 422, 91st Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662 17 November 1986 99th Congress, 2nd sess. 9-44 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT TABLE 9-C CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLA. PROJECT DATA RELATIVE TO LOCK (See Section 5 of Text) Distance to nearest town 9.9 miles via 12-foot barge canal and Intracoastal Waterway Name of nearest town Cocoa, Fla. Distance from Intracoastal Waterway 6.5 miles Lock Dimensions 909 wide; 6009 long' Lift Varies with tide Depth of sills (mlw, ocean) 14 feet Character of foundation Piles in sand Year completed and opened to navigation 1965 Contract cost $2,979,592 156 x 400 feet authorized. At request of NASA lock was constructed increased to 600 feet to be compatible with increased width. Oper- 90 feet wide with NASA bearing additional cost ($700,000). Length ation and maintenance of lock is a Federal responsibility. TABLE 9-D CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL PROJECT LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 8 of Text) Henry H. R. N. Buckman Eureka Lock Bert Dosh Dunnellon Inglis Lock Lock and Dam Lock Lock and Dam Nearest town Palatka, Sparr, Ocala, Dunnellon, Inglis, (miles) 11.2 15.8 8.9 2.5 3.2 Miles from Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway 90.4 111.4 127.7 156.5 168.6 Lock dimensions (ft.)' 84 x 600 84 x 600 84 x 600 84 x 600 84 x 600 Normal lift (ft.) 20 20 0-152 12-272 28 Depth over sills at normal pool levels: Upper (ft.) 14 17 16-312 16-312 18 Lower (ft.) 15 14 16 18 15 Character of Piles in Piles in Piles in Rock Rock foundation sand sand sand Kind of dam Movable Movable None None Movable Type const. Earth3 Earth3 - - Earth3 Percent complete 100 100 0 0 100 Estimated contract $6,094,000 $7,975,000 $7,430,000 $9,500,000 $7,800,000 cost 'Clear width and greatest available length. 2Pool level varies with natural ground water profile from minimum elevation of 40 feet to maximum elevation of 55 feet. 3With concrete spillway and movable gates. 9-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1988 TABLE 9-E CROSSFLORIDA BARGE CANAL OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 8 of Text) Work Performed Cost Operation and Maintenance: Operations of locks, operations and maintenance of dams, spillways, reservoirs and bypasses, debris removal, performance monitoring system $ 566,811 Buildings and grounds maintenance, trash removal, potable water testing 81,758 Natural Resource Management 13,900 Operation and maintenance of recreation facilities, sanitary facilities, service and maintenance of traffic counters and contract maintenance of grounds 245,278 Condition and operations studies and periodic inspections 76,299 Energy Conservation 3,219 Water quality studies, data collection and processing, reimbursement to USGS, water control analysis, Lake Oklawaha and Inglis Bypass, and water management control 156,088 Real Estate audits, inspections and outgrants 4,018 OSHA medical exams 3,955 Supervision and Administration 22,123 Sub-Total 1,173,449 Maintenance: Maintenance of dams and spillways and contract maintenance $ 1,255,188 Maintenance of locks and lock repair contract 39,960 Maintenance of roads, bridges 205 Maintenance of Recreational Facilities 10,975 Maintenance, Recreational Roads and Bridges 10,241 SRUF 31,349 Maintenance of permanent operating equipment (Recreation) 1,221 Maintenance and purchase of non-recreational permanent operating equipment 196,964 Bank stabilization-maintenance of slopes and berms, Rodman and Inglis dams, and bank 91,065 stabilization contract Maintenance of canals, clearing and snagging 67,423 Engineering and Design 27,147 Supervision and Inspection 193,368 Real Estate encroachments 3,186 Sub-Total 1,928,292 Income Credits 6,090 Sub-Total 1,928,292 Grand Total 3,095,651 9-46 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT FOR FY 1988 TABLE 9-F OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 24 of Text) Work Performed Cost Operations and Maintenance: Operations: Operations of Locks, and Permance Monitoring System 773,810 Contract maintenance buildings grounds, potable water testing, repair and replacement of project signs, operation and maintenance of District communications network 166,581 Natural resource management 77,316 Management of recreation areas and facilities 255,478 Real estate management and energy conservation reports 32,759 OSHA medical exams and inspections 6,609 Condition and operation studies, periodic inspections 79,354 Supervision and Administration 62,448 Sub-Total 1,454,355 Maintenance: 907,228 Maintenance of locks and dams Real estate acquisitions, surveys, encroachments and 62,444 monumentation Maintenance of Roads and levees and floodwalls 164,669 Maintenance of recreational facilities, recreational 30,791 permanent operating equipment, and recreation roads Maintenance of permanent operating equipment, 64,526 non-recreational Channel and canal maintenance 53,532 Engineering and Design 73,333 Supervision and Inspection 158,076 Sub-Total 1,514,659 Income Credits 18,158 Total 2,951,856 9-47 TABLE 9-G REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA CONTROL OPERATIONS (See Section 30 of Text) Locality Acres Controlled Cost St. John's River and tributaries and Withlacoohee, Kissimmee and Crystal Rivers 11,631 1,481,403 Okeechobee Waterway and tributaries 5,443 855,060 Acquisition and maintenance of airboats, - 131,300 engines and work tools Income credits OSHA medical exams Engineering design - 181,833 Supervision and Administration - 171,260 Total 17,074 2,820,856 TABLE 9-H NAVIGATION PROJECTS ON WHICH RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS ONLY WERE CONDUCTED DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 36 of Text) Date Cost Incurred Survey During Project Conducted Period AIWW, Jacksonville to Miami, Fla. 10-88 2,665 AIWW, Norfolk to St. Johns River, Fla. 12-88 9,258 Anclote River, Fla. 9-87 2,711 Arecibo Harbor, P.R. 5-89 12,570 Bakers Haulover Inlet, Fla. 6-89 383 Channel, Naples to Big Marco, Fla. 6-86 1,254 Clearwater Pass, Fla. 9-89 36,970 Fort Myers Beach, Fla. 8-88 1,973 Fort Pierce Harbor, Fla. 5-89 4,548 Johns Pass, Fla. 10-89 28,991 Longboat Pass, Fla. 10-89 23,592 Mayaguez Harbor, P.R. 6-89 11,750 Miami Harbor, Fla. 8-89 6,612 Miami River, Fla. 1-89 9,035 New Pass, Fla. 10-89 1,095 Oklawaha River, Fla. 11-84 4,414 *Palm Beach Harbor, Fla. 8-89 1,058 Pass-A-Grille Pass, Fla. 2-89 200 San Juan Harbor, P.R. 10-89 1,525 St. Augustine Harbor, Fla. 6-89 1,250 Withlacoochee River, Fla. 11-88 60,436 *Port Everglades 5-89 2,372 Total 224,662 9-48 JACKSONVILLE, FLA. DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 37 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1988 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Anclote River, Fla. 1974 267,427 636,153 Aquatic Plant Control, Fla. (R&H Acts of 1958 & 1962) 1968 2,619,7002- Atlantic Gulf Ship Canal, Fla. 1939 5,099,153- Bayport, Fla.3 1972 58,4954 - Cedar Keys Harbor, Fla. 1977 168,5696 76,023 Christiansted Harbor, St. Croix, V.I.6 1964 303,317 57,800 Clearwater Pass, Fla.21 1980 46,3497 1,257,241 Courtenay Channel, Fla.' 1940 22,346 26,779 Crystal River, Fla.' 1941 25,000 128,000 Everglades Harbor, Fla.' 1964 221,5098 51,034 Fajardo Harbor, P.R.8 1945 - - Guayanes Harbor, P.R.3 1945 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway St. Marks to Tampa Bay, Fla.3 1974 38,850- Homosassa River, Fla.' 1937 3,9999 23,334 Horseshoe Cove, Fla. 1977 347,521 161,864 Hudson River, Fla.3 1974 9,889- Intracoastal Waterway, Miami to Key West, Fla.3 1963 243,079 28,046 Key West Harbor, Fla.' 1972 1,548,89210 534,623 Kissimmee River, Fla.' 1931 23,479 112,954 Lake Crescent and Dunns Creek, Fla." 1931 10,276 9,035 Largo Sound Channel, Fla. 1,12 1966 117,44313 51,149 Little Manatee River, Fla.3, 11 1949 11,90314- Manatee River, Fla.'5 1970 123,350 194,516 New River, Fla.' 1956 36,518 31,296 Orange River, Fla.' 1962 2,000 24,918 Ozona, Fla, channel and turning basin1 1963 105,527 15,089 Palm Beach, Fla, side channel and basin3 1946 - - Pass-A-Grille Pass, Fla., 1, 16 1966 41,29717 60,468 Pithlachascotee River, Fla. 1973 400,00018 261,401 Rice Creek, Fla.' 1957 85,208'19 18,814 St. Petersburg Harbor, Fla. 1983 255,60820 1,570,45921 St. Thomas Harbor, V.I.3 1949 1,989- Steinhatchee River, Fla.' 1940 135,053 43,329 Suwannee River, Fla.'5 1977 76,41822 219,261 Withlacoochee River, Fla.15 1969 614,91223 431,187 1. Complete. 2. Excludes $918,205 contributed funds. 3. Inactive. 4. Includes $41,222 for reconnaissance and detailed project reports under Section 107 of the R&H Act of 1960. 5. Includes $82,500 expended under previous project. Excludes $1,473 contributed funds. 6. Project as modified by Chief of Engineers in report of June 30, 1961, is complete. Previously authorized depth of 25 feet in inactive status. 7. Excludes $42,783 contributed funds. 8. Excludes $36,000 contributed funds. 9. In addition, $1,000 expended from contributed funds. 10. Includes $27,500 for new work under previous project. Excludes $35,371 contributed funds. 11. Deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. 12. Authorized April 20, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 R&H Act. 13. Includes $25,008 for detailed project report but excludes $86,716 expended from contributed funds. 14. Expended on restudy. 15. Inactive portion of project deauthorized by Public Law 93251, Section 12. 16. Authorized November 19, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Sections 107 of R&H Act of 1960. 17. Excludes $41,297 contributed funds. 18. Excludes $215,728 contributed funds. 19. Excludes $93,000 contributed funds. 20. Includes $32,689 under previous project. 21. Includes $20,532 under previous project. 22. Includes $10,154 expended under previous project. 23. Includes $30,000 expended under previous project. 9-49 TABLE 9-I TABLE 9-J OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS (See Section 46 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1988 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Cape Florida State Park 1969 34,8621 El Tuque Beach, Ponce, P.R. 1985 1,396,730 - Key West, Fla. 1963 96,3402 3,794 Lee County, Fla. 1971 - - Lido Key, Fla. 1971 - - Mullet Key, Fla. 1973 436,2013 1,656 Manatee County, Fla. 1983 217,600 - Punta Salinas, P.R. 1984 855,5114 - Palm Beach County, Fla., from Lake Worth Inlet to South Lake Worth Inlet 1970 195,1405 6,257 San Juan, Puerto Rico 1965 - - Virginia Key and Key Biscayne, Fla. 1978 1,708,7386 1,022 1. Includes $2,462 cost of reconnaissance and detailed project 4. Excludes $360,000 contributed funds. reports but excludes $13,818 contributed funds. 5. Excludes $781,188 in property or services furnished by local 2. Excludes $192,168 contributed funds. interests in lieu of cash contribution. 3. Excludes $187,133 contributed funds. 6. Excludes $825,771 contributed funds. TABLE 9-K CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF HURRICANE GATES (See Section 48 of Text) Depth Character Over of Year Gate' Nearest Town Distance Sills Founda- Corn- Actual No. Name (miles) (ft.) tion pleted Cost 2. Clewiston, Fla. 0.5 10 Pile 1935 $309,748 3. Lake Harbor, Fla. 0.5 10 Rock 1935 316,938 4. Belle Glade, Fla. 4.0 10 Rock 1935 350,025 5. Canal Point, Fla. 0.0 10 Rock 1935 262,465 6. Okeechobee, Fla. 0.5 7 Pile 1936 373,273 'All are 50 feet wide with available length unlimited. They are Gate No. 6 has an auxiliary culvert spillway with automatic conconstructed of concrete with steel sector gates and have no lift. trol. Moore Haven Lock serves as Hurricane Gate Structure 1. 9-50 TABLE 9-L CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 48 of Text) Miles Elevation From Lock Normal of Normal Character Kind Kind Nearest Nearest Dimensions lift Pool Depth of of of of Percent Contract Town Town (ft.) (ft.) surface (ft.) sills (ft.) foundation Dam Construction Complete Cost W.P. Franklin At Olga Lock and Dam' S-65 Lock Frostpr S-65A Lock S-65B Lock S-65C Lock S-65D Lock S-65E Lock )of 0 23 Avon Park 26 Sebring 20 Sebring 25 Okeechobee 14 Okeechobee 10 Moore Haven Moore Haven 0.5 Lock (HGS-1 Mod.) S-310 Clewiston 0.5 (HGS-2 Mod.) S-193 Okeechobee 0.5 (HGS-6 Mod.) S0308B Pahokee 11 (Port Mayaca) S-57 Ashton 9 S-58 Ashton 5 S-59 Kissimmee 6 S-60 Ashton 6 S-61 St. Cloud 6 S-62 Ashton 10 S-63 Ashton 12 S-63A Ashton 14 S-96 Sebastian 14 S-96A Sebastian 16 S-53 Eau Gallie 8 S.-55 Christmas 12 S-157 Sebastian 4 S-158 Titusville 15 56 x 400 2.5 3.0 14 Piles in Movable Reinforced clay concrete 30 x 90 4.2 48.5-52.33 6 Earth None Reinforced foundation, concrete sand rigid frame 30 x 90 6.3 46.3 6 Earth None Reinforced foundation, concrete sand rigid frame 30 x 90 6.0 40.0 6 Earth None Reinforced foundation, concrete sand rigid frame 30 x 90 7.2 34.0 6 Earth None Reinforced foundation, concrete sand rigid frame 30 x 90 5.8 26.8 6 Earth None Reinforced foundation, concrete sand rigid frame 30 x 90 4.6 21.0 6 Earth None Reinforced foundation, concrete sand 50 x 250 9.4 15.5-17.53 11 Piles in None Steel sheet pile sand lockwalls 50 x 60 50 x 60 56 x 400 20 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 90 30 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 90 20 x 60 20 x 60 20 x 60 20 x 60 20 x 60 20 x 60 5.0 7.5 4.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 5.0 4.5 4.0 7.5 3.5 10.0 20.0 4.5 15.5-17.53 15.5-17.53 15.5-17.53 62.0 64.0 58.0 64.0 55.0 61.0 62.0 57.0 24.0 25.0 17.5 14.0 20.0 4.0 12.9 7.5 18 6 666 6 6 6 666 66 66 Slab on sand Piles in sand and slab on sand Slab on sand Earth foundation, sand Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. None None Fixed None None None None None None None None None None None None None None Reinforced concrete Reinforced concrete Reinforced concrete Concrete and steel sheet pile Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. 100 $3,803,655.00 100 $1,211,464,70 100 $1,531,489.91 100 $1,068,396.69 100 $1,357,246.12 100 $1,242,908.51 100 $1,320,039.84 0 $369,0002 100 0 100 0 00 10 100 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 $3,448,406 $523,0002 $8,308,700.00 $2,004,0002 $2,004,0002 $2,000,0002 $2,004,0002 $689,217 $2,004,0002 $2,004,0002 $1,962,0002 $1,757,0002 $1,672,0002 $1,623,0002 $1,664,0002 $2,116,0002 $1,913,0002 1Operation and care of W.P. Franklin Lock and Dam (S-79) is a Federal responsibility. 3The normal pool level varies seasonally between the two elevations. 2Estimated (Oct. 1984). c 0 z C -1 r r LT!J vM I r d y d n y et TABLE 9-M CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT LOCAL COOPERATION (See Section 48 of Text) Flood Control Act Work Authorized Cash Contributions' June 30, 1948 First phase of comprehensive plan 15.0 Sept. 3, 1954 Second phase of comprehensive plan 20.0 July 14, 1960 Nicodemus Slough area 31.5 Oct. 23, 1962 West Palm Beach Canal 12.8 Boggy Creek Basin 29.7 Shingle Creek Basin 25.9 South Dade County area 19.2 Reedy Creek Swamp 50.0 Oct. 27, 1965 Southwest Dade County 46.0 Hendry County area 19.5 Aug. 13, 1968 Martin County Flood Control Features 34.0 Irrigation Features 49.0 Backflow Features 20.0 PL 89-72 Recreation Features 50.0 Water Resources - St. Lucie 20.0 Recreation Features 50.0 Approved Dec. 17, 1970 Navigation improvements suitable for 50.0 under Provisions of recreational craft Section 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act 'Computed on total contract cost and supervision and administration except for Reedy Creek Swamp and Recreation Features which are computed on all costs, including engineering and design and land. 9-52 TABLE 9-N CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 48 of Text) Work Performed Cost New Work: Construction of: Railroad bridges $ 0 Channels and canals 0 Levees 6,154,146 Floodway control and diversion structures 6,512,829 Pumping Plants 0 Buildings, grounds and utilities 0 Cultural Resource Preservation 12,354 Equipment operation 0 Depreciation 0 Engineering and design 4,516,957 Supervision and administration 1,657,330 Total cost 18,833,616 Operations: Operation of locks, dams, reservoirs and performance system 568,848 Maintenance, buildings and grounds, operation of District communications network, repair and replacement of project signs 83,635 Patrol, inspection, and maintenance of Herbert Hoover Dike, HGS 3, 4, and 5, operation and maintenance of drainage ditches, culverts and 16 spillways, and pumping costs 1,072,943 Natural resource management 157,407 Operation and Maintenance of recreation facilities, service and maintenance of traffic counters, master planning 221,010 Condition and operation studies, periodic inspections, dam safety studies 63,300 Water quality/water control studies, data collection, regulation of Lake Okeechobee and three conservation areas 933,135 Energy conservation 2,153 Real Estate outgranting 1,000 OSHA Insps. 382 Supervision and Administration 76,769 Sub-Total 3,180,582 Maintenance: Real Estate encroachments and boundary monumentation contract 246,113 Maintenance of locks and dams 18,885 Maintenance of non-recreational roads and bridges Repair and stabilization of Crown Road, Herbert Hoover Dike, removal of weeks, rebuilding and regrading of levee slopes, modification and maintenance of safety barriers, HGS 3, 4, and 5, cleaning landslide toe ditches, repair of culverts, replacement of fences, removal of trees, topping of trees, control of Melaleuca, replacement of rip rap on slopes and berms 449,142 Maintenance of recreational facilities 36,451 Maintenance of recreational roads and bridges 25,313 Maintenance of recreational permit Op. Equip. 1,370 Maintenance of hydrometrological network 21,119 Maintenance and purchase of non-recreational permanent operating equipment 337,190 Bank stabilization contract 133,662 Non-dredging channel maintenance and debris removal Engineering and Design 89,796 Supervision and Inspection 150,644 Income credits 4,391 Sub-Total 1,505,294 Total 4,685,876 Special recreation user fees 44,420 9-53 TABLE 9-0 CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED UNDER EXISTING PROJECT DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 48 of Text) Date transferred to Flood Control District Construction for Operation and Feature Period Maintenance Channels and Canals: C-151 East End May 1982 - June 1987 Structures: May 1982 - June 1987 S-155 TABLE 9-P CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT STATUS OF WORK UNDER CONTRACT AT END OF FISCAL YEAR (See Section 48 of Text) Construction Approx.* Feature Started Complete Levees: Herbert Hoover Dike Revetment 1st Contract (4 miles) March 1983 100 3rd Contract February 1985 45 4th Contract July 1985 98 5th Contract August 1986 32 6th Contract December 1986 100 Structures: HGS-4 Replacement (S-351) January 1986 91 HGS-5 Replacement (S-352) April 1987 88 HGS-3 (S-354) August 1988 0 TABLE 9-Q FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT MOSS BLUFF LOCK (See Section 49 of Text) Nearest town 20 miles Name of nearest town Ocala, Fla. Distance above mouth of River 65.5 miles Lock dimensions 30 x 125 feet Normal lift 18.0 feet Elevation of normal pool surface 58 feet Depth of sills 12 feet Character of foundation Piles in sand Kind of dam None Type of construction Reinforced concrete Percent complete 100 Estimated Cost (including dam and spillway) $1,990,138 9-54 TABLE 9-R FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT CONDITION AT END OF FISCAL YEAR (See Section 49 of Text) Date transferred to Construction Southwest Florida Feature Period for Operation and Maintenance Bridges: B-194 Alteration of Facilities B-195 B-594 Alteration of Facilities B-196 SCL RR Br., B-196 Channels and Canals: C-135 C-135, Sec. 1A C-135, Sec. 1B C-135, Sec. 1C & 2 C-135, Sec. 3A C-135, Sec. 3B C-135, Sec. 4A C-136 C-231, Phase I C-231, Phase II C-331 C-531 C-534 C-135 Structures: S-160 S-161 S-162 S-353 Moss Bluff Lock and Spillway S-551 Levees: L-212, Sec. 1 L-212, Sec. 2 L-112 L-112 & Floodway S-155 S-163 S-159 Middle & Lower S-159 Upper Recreation: Morris Bridge & Flint Creek Sites Dead River Sites July 1968 - Mar. 1970 May 1971 - Jan. 1973 Jan. 1973- Jan. 1974 Oct. 1972 - Jan. 1975 Dec. 1972 - July 1975 May 1967- Dec. 1968 July 1966- Aug. 1967 May 1968- Sep. 1972 Jan. 1971- Dec. 1973 Dec. 1972- Apr. 1975 Feb. 1975- Aug. 1977 Apr. 1976-Jan. 1979 Aug. 1975- May 1977 July 1973- Apr. 1975 July 1973- Jan. 1974 July 1967- Sep. 1968 Apr. 1966 - Jan. 1969 June 1970 - July 1971 March 1977 - Oct. 1980 May 1967- Dec. 1968 Aug. 1975- May 1977 Apr. 1975 - June 1977 July 1967- Sep. 1968 Apr. 1967 - Mar. 1969 July 1970- Feb. 1972 June 1968 - July 1970 July 1970- Sep. 1971 March 1977- Oct. 1980 May 1978 - July 1981 May 1978 - July 1981 May 1978 - July 1981 April 1979 - Aug. 1981 June 1979 - Sep. 1981 December 1982 - August 1984 March 1985- July 1986 Not transferred Do. Do. Do. July 1975 Dec. 1968 Oct. 1967 Not transferred Not transferred Oct. 1977 Not transferred Not transferred Nov. 1977 Dec. 1975 Dec. 1975 Sep. 1968 Apr. 1969 Nov. 1971 Dec. 1968 Nov. 1977 Apr. 1977 Nov. 1968 Dec. 1975 Not transferred Dec. 1975 Dec. 1975 Oct. 1980 Jan. 1983 Jan. 1983 Jan. 1983 Oct. 1981 Jan. 1985 Dec. 1986 9-55 TABLE 9-S OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 52 of Text) For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1985 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Arch Creek, Dade County, Fla. 1960 $66,4851 Biscayne Bay, Fla., Hurricane Protection2 1966 - - Hillsborough Bay, Fla.2 1969 - - Phillippi Creek Basin, Fla.2 1966 1. Excludes $11,734 cost of preauthorization studies. Project 2. Deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. was authorized February 20, 1959, by Chief of Engineers under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as Modified by P.L. 685, 84th Congress. TABLE 9-T FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 685, (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Section 53 of Text) Study Identification Period Costs Detailed Project Report: Alligator Creek Basin, CL Fla. $ 0 Bear Creek, Adel, Ga. 0 Crane Creek, Melbourne, Fla. 0 Estate Mon Bijou, St. Croix, V.I. 37,082 Ft. Clinch State Park, Fla. 0 Lagrange Gut, Frederiksted, V.I. 7,454 Manatee River, Manatee County, Fla. 0 Naquabo River, P.R. 59,708 Parceles Figueroa, P.R. 1,615 Ponce Regional, P.R. 847 Rio Anton Ruiz-Runta Santiago, P.R. 1,855 Rio Cibuco, Vega Baja, P.R. 125,050 Rio Descalabrada, Santa Isabel 29,317 Rio Guamani, Guayana, P.R. 20,731 Rio Manati, Barceloneta, P.R. 1,141 Rio Niqua, Arroyo, P.R. 873 Rio Tallaboa-Penuelas, P.R. 0 Sabana Grande, P.R. 1,133,364 Savan Gut, St. Thomas, V.I. 272,366 Seminole Basin, Largo, Fla. 125 Sion Farm, St. Croix, V.I. 0 Sugar Creek, Valdosta, Ga. 0 Turpentine Run, St. Thomas, V.I. 132,812 Wares Creek, Bradenton, Fla. 5,445 9-56 MOBILE, AL., DISTRICT * This district comprises a small portion of southeastern Tennessee, western Georgia, western Florida, all of Alabama south of Tennessee River Basin, eastern Mississippi, and a small portion of southeastern Louisiana embraced in drainage basins tributary to the Gulf of Mexico, west of Aucilla River Basin, to and including the Pascagoula River Basin. The Pear River Basin, Mississippi was included as part of the Mobile District until October 1, 1981, when responsibilities were transferred to Vicksburg District, Lower Mississippi Valley Division. A section of the Gulf Intracoastal Water from St. Marks, Florida, to Lake Borgne Light No. 29, Louisiana is also within Mobile District IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Apalachicola Bay, FL ................................ 10-3 2. Aquatic Plant Control (R & H Act of 1965) .................................... 10-3 3. Bayou Coden, AL ....................................... 10-3 4. Bayou La Batre, AL..................................... 10-4 5. Biloxi Harbor, MS ....................................... 10-4 6. Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL................................................... 10-5 6A. Jackson Port, Vicinity of Jackson, AL ............................... 10-6 6B. Oliver Lock and Dam (Replacement), AL...................................... 10-6 7. Bon Secour River, AL.................................. 10-7 8. Dauphin Island, AL...................................... 10-7 9. Dog and Fowl Rivers, AL............................ 10-8 10. East Pass Channel From Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, FL...................... 10-8 11. Fly Creek, Fairhope, AL .............................. 10-9 12. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and Mexican Border............................................ 10-9 13. Gulfport Harbor, MS.................................. 10-10 14. Mobile Harbor, AL ................................... 10-10 15. Panama City Harbor, FL ......................... 10..-.1 1 16. Pascagoula Harbor, MS.............................. 10-12 17. Pensacola Harbor, FL................................. 10-12 18. Perdido Pass Channel, AL ................ 10-13 19. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS ............................. 10-13 20. Deauthorized Projects ............................... 10-14 21. Other Authorized Navigation Projects.................................... 10-14 22. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization................................. 10-14 23. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys...................................... 10-14 Page Beach Erosion Control 24. Beach Erosion Control Projects Under Special Authorization...................... 10-14 25. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Project ........................................... 10-15 Flood Control 26. County Line Road Bridge, Itawamba Co., MS .................................... 10-15 27. Cribbs Mill Creek, Tuscaloosa, AL .......................................... 10-15 28. Eslava Creek, Mobile, AL.......................... 10-15 29. Gulf Breeze, Santa Rosa Co., FL ................................... 10-15 30. Highway 39 Bridge, Gainesville, AL .......................................... 10-16 31. Hintonville Road Bridge, Perry Co., M S............................................. 10-16 32. Hurricane Creek, Prentiss Co., M S......................................... 10-16 33. Leaf and Bowie Rivers, Hattiesburg, MS ........................................ 10-17 34. Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, AL .............................................. 10-17 35. Magby Creek, Columbus, MS .......................................... 10-17 36. Mill Creek, Dalton, GA.............................. 10-18 37. Murder Creek, Brewton, AL ...................... 10-18 38. Okatibbee Lake, MS ................................. 10-18 39. Raccoon Creek, Baconton, GA............................................. 10-19 40. Sewerline Protection, Valley, M S ................................................ 10-19 41. Sope Creek, M arietta, GA ............................................. 10-19 42. Sowashee Creek, M eridan, M S ............................................. 10-20 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, 1989 Flood Control Page 43. Tallahalla Creek, Laurel, MS .................. 10-20 44. Threemile Creek, Mobile, AL.................. 10-20 45. Tombigbee River (East Fork), MS & AL............................10-21 46. Tombigbee River and Tributaries, MS & AL.............................. 10-21 47 Upper Gordon Creek, Hattiesburg, MS ...................................... 10-21 48. Village Creek, Birmingham, AL ...................................... 10-22 49. Whorton's Bend Road, Etowah Co., AL ...................................... 10-22 50. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization.................... 10-23 51. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............................. 10-23 52. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............................. 10-23 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 53. Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL & GA .......... 10-23 53A. Carters Dam and Reservoir, GA ............. 10-24 53B. Claiborne Lock and Dam, AL.................. 10-24 53C. Coosa River, Montgomery to Gadsden, AL ............................................ 10-25 53D. Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL ................................................. 10-25 53E. Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, AL ....... 10-25 54. Allatoona Dam Coosa River Basin, GA ............................ 10-26 Multiple Purpose Projects Includ. Power Page 55. Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, AL, FL & GA...................... 10-26 55A. Buford Dam, Lake Sidney Lanier, GA..........................10-27 55B. George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, AL & GA.......................................10-28 55C. Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, FL & GA ....................................... 10-28 55D. Walter F. George Lock and Dam, AL & GA.......................................10-29 55E. West Point Lake Chattahoochee River Basin, AL & GA.... 10-29 56. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations...............................10-30 57. Deauthorized Projects...............................10-30 Miscellaneous 58. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (FC&CE) ........................... 10-30 59. National Emergency Preparedness Program (NEPP)......................................10-30 60. Regulatory Functions Program................10-30 General Investigations 61. Surveys....................................................10-31 62. Collection and Study of Basic Data ......... 10-31 63. Advance Engineering and Design...........10-31 64. Continuation of Planning and Engineering........................................ 10-32 65. Rivers and Harbors Contributed Funds.................................... 10-32 Tables Table 10-A Table 10-B Table 10-C Table 10-D Table 10-E Table 10-G Table 10-H Table 10-I Table 10-J Cost & Financial Statement ...................................... 10-33 Authorizing Legislation...............10-39 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................... 10-49 Other Authorized Beach Control Erosion Control Project... 10-49 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects............................10-50 Deauthorized Projects..................10-50 Navigation Work Under Special Authorization...................10-51 Beach Erosion Control Project Under Special Authorization................................10-51 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization..................10-51 Table 10-K Table 10-L Table 10-M Table 10-N Table 10-0 Table 10-P Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ......................................... 10-52 Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL and GA Development Proposed Under Existing Project...........................10-52 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, Al, GA, and FL, Locks and Dams and Multiple-Purpose Development Included In Existing Projects...........................10-53 Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL....................................10-54 Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS .................................. 10-55 Completed Flood Insurance Studies And Flood Hazard Information Reports For FY 1982 Thru FY 1989 ......... 10-56 10-2 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT Navigation 1. APALACHICOLA BAY, FL Location. The project is on the coast of northwest Florida 160 miles east of Pensacola Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11401.) Previous project. For details, see page 1833, Annual Report for 1915, and page 689, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 10- foot depth in Apalachicola Bay, across St. George Island, to within 300 feet of the gulf shore, thence increasing uniformly in width to 200 feet at the shore and continuing with that width to the 10-foot depth in the Gulf of Mexico, with twin jetties extending from the dune line to the outer end of the channel; (b) an inner bar channel, 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide, in Apalachicola Bay; (c) a boat basin 200 feet by 880 feet and nine feet deep at Apalachicola, Florida, with a connecting channel 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide through Scipio Creek to Apalachicola River, (d) a channel known as Link Channel, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, in Apalachicola Bay; (e) a channel generally parallel to the shore at Eastpoint, Florida, 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long, and a connecting channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to water at the same depth in St. George Sound, with twin breakwaters on either side parallel to the shore and having a total length of 5,300 feet; (f) a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide through Bulkhead Shoals, connecting Apalachicola Bay with St. George Sound; and (g) a 6-foot by 100-foot channel about one mile long, generally parallel to the shore at Two Mile, Florida, with a 6-foot by 100-foot connecting channel to water of the same depth in Apalachicola Bay. Mean range of tide throughout this harbor is 1.6 feet. Extreme range, except during storms, is about three feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of pile-and-timber wharves which are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Condition surveys and other miscellaneous costs amounted to $76,043. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, authorized by the 1954 River and Harbor Act, was completed in 1959, including reimbursement to local interests for approved work, as authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act. Improvements at Two Mile except for modifications authorized in 1975 were completed in September 1964. Construction of the breakwater and channel improvements authorized in 1975 at Two Mile was completed in September 1977. Construction of breakwaters at Eastpoint authorized in 1983 was completed in March 1984. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1989 is $2,033,461 for new work and $3,766,330 for maintenance, a total of $5,799,791. 2. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels and other allied waters in Mobile District. Existing project. The authorized project provides for management and control of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, hydrilla, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economical control measures to be administered by the Chief of Engineers, under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies. Research and planning cost prior to construction shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. Local interests shall agree to hold and save the United States free from claims that may occur from control operations and to participate to the extent of 50 percent of such operations. Requirements are being met in the state of Alabama by the Department of Conservation and NIatural Resources. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contract for field work with State of Alabama was $13,196 less than award. Water quality studies and overhead amounted to $5,793. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal cost under the existing project as of September 30, 1989 is $634,524. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $21,225. 3. BAYOU CODEN, AL Location. The project is located in a small tidal stream on the southern coast of Mobile County, Alabama, emptying into Mississippi Sound about 7.6 miles northwest of 10-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Cedar Point, the southern tip of western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, page 843. Existing project. The project provides for a channel eight feet deep by 60 feet wide extending from La Belle Avenue bridge south for about 3,000 feet through the bayou to Portersville Bay, thence eight feet deep by 100 feet wide extending about 2.3 miles westward across Portersville Bay to connect with the Bayou La Batre channel, and a tumrning basin eight feet deep by 60 feet wide by 100 feet long on the west side of the bayou channel about 500 feet south of the La Belle Avenue bridge. Mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned pile-andtimber piers used in connection with fishing industry in this locality are adequate for existing commerce. A marina which will accommodate about 12 small recreational craft, and a slip with facilities for loading oyster shells are located near the mouth of the bayou, and are maintained by the Alabama Department of Conservation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Pre-dredging cost totaled $39,999. Condition surveys cost $10,395. Water control management totaled $1,767. Condition at end of fiscal year. That portion of the project authorized prior to the 1969 modification was completed in 1956. Construction authorized in 1969 was initiated March 31, 1975 and completed March 26, 1976. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1989 is $330,701 for new -work and $806,612 for maintenance, a total of $1,137,313. Contributed funds expended for new work amount to $100,000 and $50,000 for maintenance. 4. BAYOU LA BATRE, AL Location. Bayou La Batre is a tidal stream about 10 miles long, emptying into Mississippi Sound on the southern coast of Mobile County, Al., about 10 miles. northwest of Cedar Point, the southern tip of the western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, page 844. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 12-foot by 100-foot channel from the 12-foot depth in Mississippi Sound to a point about 2,800 feet south of the highway bridge, thence a channel 12 feet deep by 75 feet wide to the bridge, an overall distance of about 33,500 feet, with the channel widened at a point 0.6 mile below the bridge to provide a turning basin 12 feet deep and about 2.6 acres in area. Mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.75 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Wooden wharves have been provided at seafood processing plants and public launching ramps are available. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Pre-dredging cost totaled $60,014. Condition surveys cost $31,560. Engineering and design and water control management cost $24,604. Supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs total $3,237. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was modified December 30, 1966 under the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers to include a turning basin. The project was completed in March 1967. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1989 is $311,095 for new work and $3,226,406 for maintenance, a total of $3,537,501. Contributed funds from local interests for new work amount to $10,500. 5. BILOXI HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located on Mississippi Sound in southeastern Mississippi, 32 miles by water west of Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi, and 14 miles east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 584, Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a continuous channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 23 miles long from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Mississippi Sound east of Deer Island, Biloxi Bay, Back Bay, Cranes Neck, and a land cut to Gulfport Lake, including a 500-foot by 2,600-foot basin in the lake, thence a 12- foot deep by 100-foot wide channel for about two miles westward from the west end of the lake, terminating in a 300-foot by 500-foot basin; a 12-foot by 100-foot channel 10-4 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT from the main channel in Big Lake to and up Bayou Bernard to the Air Force oil terminal at about mile 2.6; a 12- foot by 150-foot spur channel from the main channel in Biloxi Bay for about one mile, terminating in a 400-foot by 600-foot turning basin opposite Ott Bayou; continuation of maintenance of the 12- by 150-foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles to Biloxi's south waterfront; a 10-foot by 150-foot channel from Mississippi Sound, passing west of Deer Island to a point where it connects to the 12-foot by 150-foot lateral channel at Biloxi's south waterfront. Construction for the modifications lateral channel authorized by River and Harbor Act of Nov. 7, 1966 was commenced in FY 1974 and completed in Feb. 1975. Further modifications to the project were authorized by the Chief of Engineers on March 28, 1979, which provided for a channel 10 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 300 feet long extending northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel, and into a rectangular basin, approximately 300 by 370 feet. This work was completed in April 1980. Cost of modification as authorized by the 1966 River and Harbor Act was $664,390. That portion of the project providing for an entrance channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide, and about 1,800 feet long into Old Fort Bayou, as authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act, is inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion was $6,000. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of wooden piling-andtimber piers for small craft and fishing boats, a bulk gasoline terminal, several boat ways, and concrete products plant are available. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 2,581,347 cubic yards at a cost of $1,025,173. Condition surveys cost $150,525. Engineering and design, water control management, and miscellaneous costs totaled $93,195. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, prior to the modification authorized in 1966, was commenced in 1931 and completed in 1962. The 1966 modification was completed in FY 1975. The 1979 modification was completed in FY 1980. Total Federal cost under existing project as of 30 September 1989 is $1,431,919 for new work and $9,666,563 for maintenance, a total of $11,098,482. Contributed funds for new work amount to $102,600. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $238,640. 6. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL Location. Black Warrior River rises in nothern Alabama above Birmingham and flows generally southwesterly to unite with the Tombigbee River at Demopolis, Alabama. Thence the Tombigbee flows south, uniting with the Alabama River to form the Mobile River 45 miles above the head of Mobile Bay. Distance by water from Mobile to vicinity of Birmingham is about 415 miles. Previous project. For details see page 732, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides essentially for a channel 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the mouth of the Tombigbee River, 45 miles above Mobile, to the vicinity of Birmingham, via the Tombigbee and Black Warrior Rivers, to mile 430.4 on Sipsey Fork, mile 429.6 on Mulberry Fork and mile 407.8 on Locust Fork, and for maintenance by snagging of Mobile River above the mouth of Chickasaw Creek, a total waterway distance of about 408 miles. The total lift of 255 feet is accomplished by six locks and dams. The original construction program, consisting of 17 dams and 18 lifts, was completed in 1915. Replacement of the original structures with new locks and dams, under the modernization program is as follows: William Bacon Oliver replaced locks 10, 11, and 12; Demopolis replaced locks 4, 5, 6, and 7; Armistead I. Selden replaced locks 8 and 9; Coffeeville (Jackson) replaced locks 1, 2, and 3; and Holt replaced locks 13, 14, 15, and 16. Thus, 16 of the original locks have been replaced by five new locks. Bankhead Lock and Dam (Lock 17) rehabilitation to replace the original double lift lock with a single lift lock was completed in 1980. The Coffeeville Lock and Dam wildlife refuge, authorized in 1960, includes 4,250 acres within the reservoir area and along its boundaries. A replacement lock for the old Oliver Lock has been authorized and will be located 2,300 feet downstream. The replacement lock will have dimensions of 110 feet by 600 feet. A fixed crest spillway will extend 815 feet across the river. Minimum provision will be provided to allow construction of a hydropower plant. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Tidal influence extends upstream from Mobile 101.6 miles to the old lock 1, where tidal effect is apparent only at low stages of the river. At Mobile the mean and extreme tidal ranges are 1.5 and 3.6 feet, respectively. These are at times slightly increased by the effect of winds. The greatest fluctuation of river stages is at Demopolis, Ala., the maximum being 59.7 feet. Maximum fluctuations at other points are 40 feet at lock 1,100.6 miles from Mobile; 10-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 57.8 feet at Tuscaloosa, 346.1 miles from Mobile; 13 feet at Birmingport, 404.9 miles from Mobile; and 27 feet at Cordova, 424.3 miles from Mobile. Ordinary fluctuations at these points are at old lock 1, 20 feet; at Demopolis, 35 feet; at Tuscaloosa, 40 feet; at Birmingport, four feet; and at Cordova, seven feet. Works of improvement reduced the amount of fluctuations at different points by three to 10 feet. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Docks, storage facilities, and handling equipment have been provided as required at most loading and unloading points along the waterway. These include facilities for handling petroleum and petroleum products, coal, ores, sand and gravel, pulpwood, manufactures, and various other commodities. While most terminal facilities are privately owned, many are available for use by the general public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Table 10-N for existing locks and dams.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contract dredging of the river system removed 1,037,184 cubic yards of material at a cost of $2,465,400. Condition surveys costs $659,400. Engineering and design cost $987,100. Supervision, administration and other general charges for the overall river project totaled $2,347,054. Recreation and resource management cost $2,592,200. Recreation attendance CY 1988 totaled 6,496,372 user days. Other maintenance costs for the system include: Coffeeville Lock and Dam, $1,821,100; Demopolis Lock and Dam, $596,100; Selden Lock and Dam, $645,300; Oliver Lock and Dam, $378,900; Bankhead Lock and Dam, $935,700; Holt Lock and Dam, $553,900. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work on the project, commenced in 1887, was essentially completed in 1915. Since then three of the original locks and dams (10, 11 and 12) were replaced by William Bacon Oliver (Tuscaloosa) Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1939; four original lock and dams (4, 5, 6 and 7) were replaced by Demopolis Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1954; two original locks and dams (8 and 9) were replaced by Warrior Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in October 1957; three original locks and d1ams (1, 2 and 3) were replaced by Coffeeville Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1960; and four original locks and dams (13, 14, 15 and 16) were replaced by Holt Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in June 1966. Rehabilitation of the spillway at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam commenced in 1966, and physically completed February 6, 1970. Replacement of the double lift lock with a single lift lock at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam commenced in April 1970 and was completed in 1980. The cost to September 30, 1989 for replacement of the lock was $52,292,880. The power plant at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam was built and is operated by the Alabama Power Co. Engineering and design and land acquisition for the new Oliver Lock and Dam are complete. Project construction began in November 1986 and is scheduled for completion in 1992. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1989 is $88,461,935 for new work and $220,234,873 for maintenance, and $52,292,880 for major rehabilitation, a total of $360,989,688. 6A. JACKSON PORT, JACKSON, AL Location. The project is located on the Tombigbee River in Clarke County in southwest Alabama in the city of Jackson, Alabama, approximately 90 miles north of Mobile, Alabama. Existing project. None. The authorized Port would be located on the Black Warrior-Tombigbee River System, which is a federally authorized 9 x 200 feet navigation project connecting Birmingham, Alabama with the Port of Mobile. In conjunction with the realignment project on the existing navigation project, the plan is to construct a spur canal 9 feet deep, 290 feet wide, and 680 feet long. Local cooperation. Local Cooperation Agreement is scheduled for execution in December 1989. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design $59,078; and supervision and administration $8,459. A total Federal cost of $67,537 for new work. Condition at end of fiscal year. No feasible project could be found that warranted Federal participation. However, the report is being modified to show impacts of the new channel realignment proposed in the GDM. Studies under the project authority will continue until all project feasibility can be satisfied. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1989 is $147, 026. 6B. OLIVER LOCK AND DAM (REPLACEMENT), AL Location. The project is located at mile 338.1 on the Black Warrior-Tombigbee River System at Tuscaloosa, Alabama. The Black Warrior-Tombigbee River System 10-6 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT extends 429 miles north from Mobile to the vicinity of Birmingham, Alabama. Existing project. The existing authorized channel is 9 x 200 feet and there are six (6) locks having a total lift of 255 feet. Five (5) of the locks have chamber dimensions of 110 x 600 feet while Oliver Lock has dimensions of 95 x 460 feet. Original work on the waterway was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1884. The 17 original locks have been replaced by the existing six (6) locks with Oliver Lock being the first of the replacements completed in 1940. Plan of improvement is to replace the existing Oliver Lock with a lock located 2,300 feet downstream. The replacement lock will have dimensions of 110 x 600 feet. A fixed-crest spillway will extend 800 feet across the river. Minimum provisions will be provided to allow construction of a hydropower plant. Land acquisition is complete. Construction was initiated in November 1986 with the award of the Alabama Power Company relocation contract. The first stage cofferdam and river diversion contract was awarded in February 1987. For other information see description of Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers project. Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement is not required. One-half of the total cost of construction of the navigation lock and dam will be paid by amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Minor real estate cost $7,244; construction contracts $10,638,218; engineering and design $262,825; and $1,114,439 for supervision and administration and miscellaneous expenditures. A total Federal cost of $4,150,000 for new work. Contributed funds expended in FY 1989 totaled $11,988,032. Condition at end of fiscal year. River Diversion and the Phase I Cofferdam have been completed. Excavation was completed and concrete placement began in March 1989. Concrete placement is continuing and the first monolith reached its final elevation in November 1989. Concrete placement will be completed in the lock chamber during the summer of 1990. Scheduled completion date is December 1992 with an estimated cost of $111,000,000. Total Federal (Corps of Engineers) cost under existing project to September 30, 1989 is $29,550,360 for new work. Contributed funds (Inland Waterways Trust) expended total $30,761,808. 7. BON SECOUR RIVER, AL Location. Rises 2 miles south of Foley, Ala., and flows southerly about 8 miles, emptying into Bon Secour Bay, an arm of Mobile Bay in southwest Alabama. Existing project. A 10- by 80-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Bon Secour Bay to mouth of Bon Secour River and extending up river to vicinity of Swifts Landing, thence 6 by 8 feet up river to a point about 600 feet above Oak Landing with two turning and maneuvering areas 150 feet wide and 1,100 to 1,200 feet long opposite Swifts Landing and ice loading dock. Plane of reference is mean low water. Overall length of improvement is about 4.7 miles. Mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Existing project was authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 16, 1963, under authority in Section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of pile-and-timber marginal wharves used by the seafood industry and a marine ways are located along the existing project. These, together with numerous privately owned piers, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and supervision and administration cost $93,934. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was commenced in July and completed in October 1964. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1989 is $118,615 for new work and $383,453 for maintenance, a total of $502,068. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $9,700. 8. DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, AL Location. The project is located between Dauphin and Little Dauphin Island on the west side of the entrance to Mobile Bay, about 30 miles south of Mobile, Alabama and 55 miles west of Pensacola, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for* (a) A channel seven feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to an anchorage basin of the same depth, and about seven acres in area, in the marsh just north of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a channel four feet deep and 40 feet wide from the anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay; and a jetty and revetment to protect the entrance channel; and (b) an anchorage basin seven feet deep and 10-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 500 feet square at Dauphin Island Village, with an entrance channel of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 8,300 feet long, extending to the 7-foot hydrographic contour in Mississippi Sound. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet, and extreme, except during storms is about four feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Several privately-owned wharves for handling seafood, a public dock and mooring slip, and a pier for recreational craft are located on the village basin. A marina, public launching ramp, and a number of private piers are located on the bay. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and designs $28,634; supervision and administration $4,358. Maintenance: Condition surveys cost $9,240. Water control management and other miscellaneous costs amounted to $67,947. Contract dredging removed 150,000 cubic yards at a cost of $221,513. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in July 1959. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1989 is $327,949 for new work and $1,733,643 for maintenance, a total of $2,061,592. 9. DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, AL Location. Dog and Fowl Rivers are primarily tidal streams emptying into the west side of Mobile Bay, 8.5 and 17 miles, respectively, south of central Mobile (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Existing project. The Dog River project provides for a 7 by 100-foot channel to provide access to the Mobile ship channel. The total length to be dredged is 3,300 feet. The Fowl River project provides for a channel eight feet deep and 100 feet wide from Mobile Bay into and up Fowl River to deep water about 6,700 feet above its mouth. Total length of the channel is about 2.6 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 1.5 feet in Dog River. Extreme range during storms is about 3.6 feet. This segment of the project was completed in November, 1973. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of a boatyard for fabricating steel vessel hulls, nine marinas, four marine ways, a yacht basin on Dog River, two marinas on Fowl River, and numerous timber piers and docks on both rivers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Cost to complete contract dredging of the Dog River Channel to specifications was $11,851. Maintenance: Condition surveys and water control management cost $10,606. Supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs total $4,681. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing Fowl River portion of the project was commenced in August 1973 and completed in November 1973. Work on the Dog River channel was initiated and completed during FY 1986. Total Federal cost on the existing project as of September 30, 1989 is $2,003,783; $11,851 for new work and $1,991,932 for maintenance. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $195,250. 10. EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FL Location. East Pass Channel is located in the entrance from the Gulf into Choctawhatchee Bay at eastern end of Santa Rosa Island, 48 miles east of the entrance into Pensacola Bay and 49 miles west of the new entrance to St. Andrews Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11388.) Previous project. For details see page 672 of Annual Report for 1937. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 12-foot by 180-foot channel from the Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, and a 6-foot by 10-foot channel from East Pass Channel into Old Pass Lagoon. The project consists also of two converging jetties spaced 1,000 feet apart at the seaward end. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet; extreme range, except during storms, is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Responsibilities of local cooperation have been complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned pile-andtimber piers used in connection with the fishing industry in this locality are considered adequate for existing commerce. 10-8 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys cost $58,028. Supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs totaled $43,293. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 1965 modification was commenced October 1967 and completed January 1969. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1989 is $916,715 for new work and $7,607,517 for maintenance, a total of $8,524,232. Contributed funds for new work from local interests amount to $398,000. 11. FLY CREEK, AL Location. Fly Creek (Volanta Bayou) is a small stream about 4.5 miles long rising in Baldwin County, Ala., 3 miles east of town of Fairhope, from whence it flows northerly, thence westerly and southerly, to form an estuary on eastern shore of Mobile Bay just north of Fairhope and about 13 miles southeast of Mobile, Ala. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 11376.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long from 6-foot depth in Mobile Bay to a turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 350 feet long, in Fly Creek. Mean tidal range in vicinity of project is about 1.3 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Existing project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950, (H. Doc. 194, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.). The project document contains the latest published map. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Fairhope Yacht Club has facilities for small recreational craft on both banks near mouth of creek, consisting of a small pile-and-timber service wharf, several sheet metal boat sheds, boat slips, and other mooring facilities. There is also a marginal timber wharf and shed for commercial fishing boats on right-bank of creek immediately above first bend. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Environmental studies cost $31,843. Supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs totaled $8,008. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was commenced in August and completed in October, 1957. Total project costs as of September 30, 1989 amounted to $502,033 of which $29,000 was for new work and $473,033 for maintenance. 12. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL AND MEXICAN BORDER (MOBILE DISTRICT) Location. The project extends westward from Apalachee Bay, Florida, along the Gulf coast to the Rigolets, Louisiana, via a series of coastal lakes, bays, sounds, and land cuts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Previous project. For details see page 906, Annual Report for 1930. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low water from Apalachee Bay, Florida, to Mobile Bay, Alabama, and 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay, Alabama to Rigolets, Louisiana (Lake Borgne Light No. 29), and for a tributary channel (Gulf County Canal), 12 feet deep, 125 feet wide and about six miles long connecting Intracoastal Waterway at White City, Florida, with St. Joseph Bay. The waterway between the 12-foot depth contours in Apalachee Bay and Lake Borgne Light No. 29 at the Rigolets is 379 miles long. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Responsibilities of local cooperation have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities are available for public use at Carrabelle, Apalachicola, Panama City, and Pensacola, Florida; Mobile and Bayou LaBatre, Alabama; and Pascagoula, Biloxi, Gulfport, Pass Christain, and Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Carrabelle-Apalachicola Bay section: Contract dredging removed 685,754 cubic yards of material at a cost of $358,000. Condition surveys, water control management and miscellaneous costs totaled $170,900. Apalachicola Bay - St. Andrew Bay section: Contract dredging removed 90,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $130,406. Condition surveys cost $62,000. Routine maintenance of channels cost $38,100. Miscellaneous costs totaled $24,100. 10-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 St. Andrew Bay - Choctawhatchee Bay section: Bank stabilization cost $586,900. Condition surveys cost $62,100. Dredged material disposal facility maintenance cost $158,400. Supervision, administration and miscellaneous costs totaled $268,800. Choctawhatchee Bay - Pensacola Bay section: Condition surveys cost $20,800. Water control management and miscellaneous costs totaled $1,200. Pensacola Bay - Mobile Bay section: Condition surveys cost $68,400. Miscellaneous costs totaled $102,300. Mobile Bay - Rigolets section: Condition surveys, water control management, supervision and administration costs totaled $56,200. Condition surveys, water control management and miscellaneous cost pertaining to the waterway in general and not site specific totaled $258,600. Direct charges to Mobile Area Office for supervision and administration were $170,600 and to Panama Area Office totaled $89,300. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete except for the portion between Apalachicola Bay and St. Marks, Florida, which has been deauthorized. Modification of the Gulf County Canal to provide a 12- foot by 125-foot channel was commenced July 1968 and completed June 1969. Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1989 is $62,758,271, of which $6,480,299 was for new work and $56,277,972 for maintenance. 13. GULFPORT HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located on Mississippi Sound in southeastern Mississippi, about 35 miles west of Pascagoula, Mississippi, and 60 miles east of New Orleans. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 747, Annual Report for 1938, and page 995, Annual Report for 1948. Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A channel 32 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and about eight miles long across Ship Island Bar, a channel 30 feet deep, 220 feet wide, and about 11 miles long through Mississippi Sound, and an anchorage basin at Gulfport 30 feet deep, 1,320 feet wide, and 2,640 feet long; and (b) maintenance of the existing commercial smallboat harbor about 26 acres in area, and a straight-approach channel, 100 feet wide and about 4,300 feet long, from deep water in Mississippi Sound to a smallboat basin, all at a depth of eight feet. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.75 feet, and extreme range, except during storms, is about 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. It is proposed to modify the existing ship channel to 36 x 300 feet in Mississippi Sound, and 38 x 400 feet across the bar, with changes in the channel alignment and the entrance to the anchorage basin for safe and unrestricted navigation. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Conditions of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing modem rail-cooperation terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and Design for Gulfport Harbor cost $3,540. Maintenance: Contract dredging removed a total of 470,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $163,500. Condition surveys cost $136,500. Supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs amounted to $115,393. ' Condition at end of fiscal year. The main harbor was commenced 1932 and completed April 1950. Maintenance for small boat harbor and approach channel, constructed by local interests in 1950, was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1989 is $969,000 for new work and $35,801,954 for maintenance, a total of $36,770,954. 14. MOBILE HARBOR, AL Location. The project is located along the lower five miles of Mobile River, in southwestern Alabama, 91 miles by water west of Pensacola Harbor, Florida, 90 miles east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi, and 144 by water northeast of mouth of Mississippi River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Previous project. For details see page 503, Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A 42-foot by 600-foot channel about 1.5 miles long across Mobile Bar, (b) a 40-foot by 400-foot channel in Mobile Bay to mouth of Mobile River, (c) a 40-foot channel in Mobile River to highway bridge, varying from 500 to 775 feet wide; (d) a 25-foot channel from highway bridge to and up Chickasaw Creek to a point 400 feet south of mouth of Shell Bayou, widths being 500 feet in Mobile River and 250 feet in Chickasaw Creek; (e) a turning basin 40 feet deep, 2,500 feet long, and 800 to 1,000 feet wide, opposite Alabama State Docks; (f) a turning basin 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and 1,600 feet long opposite Magazine Point; (g) a 27-foot by 150-foot chan- 10-10 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT nel from Mobile Bay Channel along Arlington pier to a turning basin 800 feet long and 600 feet wide opposite Brookley Complex ocean terminal, and continuing thence a turning basin 250 feet wide and 800 feet long in Garrows Bend, thence a 22-foot by 150-foot channel to the causeway linking McDuffie Island to the mainland; (h) a channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the main ship channel in Mobile Bay and extending northwesterly for about 5.3 miles to the shore of Mobile Bay, including an anchorage basin near the shoreline, thence a land cut 40 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 1.9 miles long to and including a 42 acre trapezoid turning basin 40 feet deep, and a barge channel 12-by 100-feet, extending 6500 feet and terminating in a 300-by 300-foot turning basin; and (i) maintenance of Three Mile Creek by snagging, from its intersection with Industrial Canal to Mobile River. The project provides also for an anchorage area 32 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 2,000 feet long opposite site formerly occupied by the U.S. Quarantine Station at McDuffle (Sand) Island. Prior to widening the Mobile Bay Channel as authorized in 1954, the Quarantine Station anchorage area was maintained to a project width of 200 feet. Construction by local interests of a solid-fill causeway across Garrows Bend Channel between McDuffie Island and the mainland is also provided for under existing project. Total length of the bay and river channels is about 41.7 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range at the lower end of the improvement is 1.2 feet and at the upper end 1.5 feet. Extreme tidal range is 3.4 feet at the lower end and 3.6 feet at the upper end. Further authorization provides for future development to deepen and widen entrance channel over the bar to 57 feet by 700 feet about 7.4 miles long, deepen and widen bay channel to 55 feet by 550 feet about 27.0 miles long, deepen and widen an additional 4.2 miles of bay channel to 55 feet by 650 feet and provide 55 foot deep anchorage area and turning basin in vicinity of Little Sand Island. All dredged material will be placed in an approved disposal area in the Gulf of Mexico. (See Table 10- B for authorizing legislation.) Although the authorized project is for the construction of a 55 foot by 550 foot channel, the plan of improvement, which is currently under construction, consists of deepening the entrance channel from 42 feet to 47 feet for a distance of 6.1 miles from the Gulf of Mexico to Mobile Bay; and deepening the bay channel from 40 feet to 45 feet from the mouth of the bay north for a distance of 31.2 miles to the McDuffie Coal Terminal. Completion of this project element is scheduled for June 1990. Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement was signed by the local sponsor to construct the project in increments. The first increment is described above. Terminal facilities. Modemrn rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 18, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contract cost $13,960,266, engineering and design $83,808, and supervision and administration cost $251,497 Maintenance: Contract dredging removed 11,000,000 cubic yards of material from Mobile Harbor and Theodore ship channel at a cost of $2,424,813. Condition surveys cost $1,038,417. Dredged material disposal facility construction cost $1,655,549 and disposal facility maintenance cost $444,107. Water control management, engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $583,636. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced in 1931 and completed in July 1965 except for the Theodore Channel portion, which was essentially completed in August 1981. For details see Annual Report for 1965. Current estimated Federal cost is $258,550,000, and non-Federal cash contributions is $221,450,000. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1989 is $90,103,445 for new work and $100,407,099 for maintenance, a total of $190,510,544. Contributed funds expended amounted to $16,851,076 for new work. 15. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL Location. The project is located on the northwest coast of Florida, 102 miles east of entrance to Pensacola Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11389.) Previous project. For details see page 710, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project (as modified) provides for a channel about 3.7 miles long extending from deep water in St. Andrew Bay to the Gulf of Mexico, 300 feet wide and 40 feet deep in the bay and 450 feet wide, 42 feet deep and about 1.1 miles long in the approach channel in the Gulf, protected by two jetties, each about 700 feet long; branch channels 38 feet deep and 300 feet wide, leading from the inner end of the main entrance channel westward to the Port Authority terminal at Dyers Point and eastward to the Bay Harbor terminal, about 3.4 and 3.6 miles in length, respectively; turning and maneuvering areas comprising about 55 acres opposite Dyers Point, and 42 acres opposite Bay Harbor, both at a depth of 38 feet; and an anchoring and loading basin for LASH type intermodal carriers, 40 feet deep and contain- 10-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 ing about 177 acres in St. Andrew Bay near the inner end of the main entrance channel; a channel in Watson Bayou, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in St. Andrew Bay to the highway bridge, about 1.75 miles; channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep in Grand Lagoon to a point about 2,400 feet east of State Highway 392 Bridge, with branches to serve terminal facilities. The east and west jetties have been reworked and are presently about 2,075 and 2,896 feet long, respectively. Mean tidal range is about normally 1.3 feet and 3.0 feet extreme. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Available terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys cost $40,946. Engineering and design, water control management, and miscellaneous costs totaled $53,478. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project (prior to modifications) was completed in November 1949. Repairs to jetties were commenced in June 1961 and completed October 1968. Modifications to the project at Grand Lagoon were completed in January 1972. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1989 is $1,638,045 for new work and $8,349,849 for maintenance, a total of $9,987,894. Contributed funds expended for new work amount to $80,000. 16. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located along lower 6.8 miles of Pascagoula River, the lower six miles of Dog River, and in Bayou Casotte (about four miles east of the mouth of Pascagoula River), in southeastern Mississippi, about 38 miles west of Mobile, Alabama, and about 100 miles east of New Orleans, Louisiana. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 741, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for (a) An entrance channel 40 feet deep and 350 feet wide from the Gulf of Mexico through Horn Island Pass, including an impounding area for littoral drift, 40 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 1,500 feet long adjacent to the channel at the west end of Petit Bois Island; (b) a channel 38 feet deep and 350 feet wide in Mississippi Sound and Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge at Pascagoula, including a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 950 feet wide (including channel area) on the west side of the river below the railroad bridge; (c) a channel 38 feet deep and 225 feet wide from the ship channel in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 38 feet deep and 300 feet wide for about one mile to a turning basin 38 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and 1,750 feet long; (d) a 22-foot deep by 150-foot wide channel up Pascagoula River from the railroad bridge to the mouth of Escatawpa (or Dog) River, then up Escatawpa River to Highway 613 (formerly 63) bridge; (e) a 12-foot by 125-foot channel from the highway bridge, via Robertson and Bounds Lakes, to mile 6 on Escatawpa River, and (f) a 12-foot by 80-foot channel extending from deep water in the Pascagoula River (about one-half mile north of the railroad bridge) to a tuning basin in Krebs Lake a distance of about 1,500 feet, then along the south bank of the lake a channel 10-foot by 60-foot and terminating at a second turning basin, a distance of 2,700 feet from the first. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme range is 3 75 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Pre-dredging cost totaled $50,000. Condition surveys cost $66,715. Water control management, supervision and administration, and miscellaneous costs totaled $403,919. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in August 1965 and the Krebs Lake project was completed in November 1983. Total Federal cost of existing project to September 30, 1989 is $6,572,985 for new work and $41,391,975 for maintenance, a total of $47,964,960. Contributed funds expended for maintenance amounted to $3,104,623. 17. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL Location. The project is located in a landlocked bay on the coast of northwest Florida about 50 miles east of the entrance to Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 490 and 11382.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1938. 10-12 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT Existing project. The authorized project provides for: (a) A 35-foot by 500-foot entrance channel about five miles long, from the Gulf of Mexico to lower Pensacola Bay; (b) a 33-foot by 300-foot bay channel; (c) two 33- foot by 300-foot parallel approach channels to opposite ends of the inner harbor channel; (d) an inner harbor channel 500 feet wide, 33 feet deep, and 3,950 feet long; (e) a 30-foot by 250-foot approach channel to the pierhead line south of Muscogee wharf; and (f) a 15-foot by 100-foot entrance channel into Bayou Chico, thence a channel 14 feet deep, 75 feet wide, and about 4,400 feet long to a turning basin 14 feet deep and 500 feet square. Mean range of tide throughout the harbor is about 1.1 feet near the entrance and about 1.6 feet at the head of bay. Extreme tidal range, except during storms, is about three feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Modification of the Bayou Chico project to provide for enlarging the entrance channel to 21 by 100 feet, the bayou channel to 20 feet by 100 feet, and deepening the turning basin to 20 feet has been deferred for restudy. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Modem rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce (See Port Series No. 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Corps of Engineers dredges removed 272,652 cubic yards from harbor channel at a cost of $670,045. Condition surveys cost $21,007. Water control management and miscellaneous costs totaled $287,491. Condition at end of fiscal year. New work is completed except for features which are deferred for restudy. The modification authorized in 1962 was commenced in March and completed in May 1965. Total Federal cost of the existing project to September 30, 1989 is $1,469,693 for new work and $8,155,547 for maintenance, a total of $9,625,240. 18. PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, AL Location. The project is located about midway between Pensacola, Florida and Mobile, Alabama. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart 11378.) Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide for about 1,300 feet from the Gulf of Mexico into the inlet, thence nine feet deep and 100 feet wide for about 2,200 feet to the highway bridge, where the channel branches into two arms, each having dimensions of 9 by 100 feet, one of which extends about 3,400 feet into Terry Cove and the other about 3,200 feet into the southern arm of Perdido Bay. The project also provides for two jetties spaced 600 feet apart at the seaward end. The east jetty has a low weir section, 1,000 feet long to permit passage of littoral drift into a dredged deposition basin 800 feet by 1,200 feet located between the east jetty and the navigation channel. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet and extreme is 2.8 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Six marinas, numerous timber piers, docks, and several launching ramps are available. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys cost $36,789. Water control management and miscellaneous costs totaled $20,943. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced in May 1968 and completed in March 1969. Total Federal cost of the existing project to September 30, 1989 is $629,860 for new work and $6,065,346 for maintenance, a total of $6,695,206. Contributions from local interest amount to $510,000 for new work and $10,325 for maintenance. 19. TENNESSEE-TOMBGIBEE WATERWAY, AL AND MS Location. The waterway extends from mile 215 in Pickwick pool on the Tennessee River, southerly through northeastern Mississippi and western Alabama, a total of 234 miles, to the confluence of the Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers at Demopolis, Alabama. Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1953. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a waterway 234 miles long, connecting the Tennessee and Tombigbee Rivers via the East Fork of Tombigbee River and Mackeys and Yellow Creeks. The plan of improvement consists of three sections. (1) the river section, a 9- foot by 300-foot channel for 149 miles between Demopolis and Amory, Mississippi; (2) the lateral canal section, 12 feet by 300 feet for 46 miles from Amory to Bay Springs; and (3) the divide section, a 12-foot by 300- foot channel (except in the 27 mile long divide cut in which the bottom width would be 280 feet) for 39 miles from Bay Springs through the dividing ridge to the Tennessee River; the total lift of 341 feet to be accomplished by 10 locks. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) 10-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Local cooperation. Local interests must make and maintain alterations in highways and highway bridges and in sewer, water-supply, and drainage facilities and provide and maintain suitable and adequate river and canal terminals. Officials of the State of Mississippi were notified of these requirements on December 13, 1949, and officials of the State of Alabama were notified on December 20, 1949. Legislation enabling boards of supervisors of the various counties concerned to enter into agreements with the United States relative to navigation projects was adopted by the State of Mississippi in 1950. A compact between the States of Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky and Florida has been formed for the purpose of promoting the project. The name of this organization is the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Development Authority. During its 1962 session the Mississippi Legislature authorized the formation of the Tombigbee River Valley Water Management District. The District was organized in accordance with the enabling legislation and is empowered to fulfill the requirements of local cooperation for the portion of the project in Mississippi. A satisfactory resolution has been furnished. During its 1967 session the Alabama Legislature authorized the formation of a public corporation to be named the Tombigbee Valley Development Authority for the purpose of further development of the Tombigbee River and tributary streams. The organization was formed in accordance with the enabling legislation and in a referendum held December 5, 1967 the voters of Alabama authorized a bond issue not to exceed $10,000,000 to finance participation in this project and the Tombigbee River and Tributaries project. A satisfactory resolution has been furnished. Terminal facilities. Docks, storage facilities and handling equipment are still being developed along this new waterway. As of September 30, 1989, twelve such facilities were operational, while five were under construction, and five more are planned. The operational facilities are handling grain, wood chips, and logs. When all facilities are complete, about half will be publicly owned and operated. Additional ports and terminals must be completed before the waterway can achieve its full potential. (See Table 10-N for existing locks and dams.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Project construction cost $3,348,383, engineering and design cost $425,478 and supervision and administration cost $1,331,154, a total of $5,105,015 for new work. Maintenance: Contract dredging on the river system removed 968,300 cubic yards at a total cost of $1,546,000. Total cost for operation and maintenance of the project for FY 89 amounted to $19,614,116, which included general charges of $7,361,100; Gainesville Lock and Dam, $474,900; Tom Bevill Lock and Dam, $799,700; Columbus Lock and Dam, $719,700; Aberdeen Lock and Dam, $640,300; Lock A, $415,200;, Lock B, $476,600; Lock C, $444,400; Lock D, $385,400; Lock E, $422,600,; Bay Springs Lock and Dam, $499,700. Recreation costs totaled $5,428,500. Recreation attendance for CY 1988 totaled 6,742,000 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal cost under the existing project as of September 30, 1989 is $1,001,496,660 for new work, and $104,194,509 for maintenance for a total of $1,105,691,169. Construction formally began December 12, 1972 and overall project is essentially complete. The waterway was opened for navigation in January 1985. 20. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Table 10-G.) 21. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 10-C.) 22. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization). Studies conducted under this authority amounted to $151,537 in FY 1989. (See Table 10-H.) 23. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 10-K.) Beach Erosion Control 24. BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Studies conducted under Section 103, 1962 River and Harbor Act, as amended, amounted to $243 in FY 1989. (See Table 10-I.) 10-14 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT 25. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT (See Table 10-D.) Flood Control 26. COUNTY LINE ROAD BRIDGE, ITAWAMBA COUNTY, MS Location. County Line Road Bridge crossed Mantachie Creek in Itawamba County, Mississippi and is located approximately one mile west of Centerville along an unnumbered county road between County Hwy. 363 and the county line. The Mantachie Creek drainage area is located in northeast Mississippi and is a part of Tombigbee River Basin. Existing Project. The project would provide protection for both banks and the channel at the bridge crossing Mantachie Creek. The banks and channel would be graded and protected with 24 inches of riprap on 6 inches of bedding material and filter fabric. This would preclude any streambank erosion from high velocities or from sudden drawdown associated with receding floodwaters. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $17,979. Supervision and administration costs amounted to $2,418. Contributed funds expended in FY 1989 $8,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract was awarded in August 1989 and is scheduled to be completed in March 1990. Estimated Federal cost is $99,000; and the non-Federal portion is $33,000. Total Federal cost to date is $30,497 for new work. 27. CRIBBS MILL CREEK, TUSCALOOSA, AL Location. Cribbs Mill Creek begins in the northeastern part of the city of Tuscaloosa, AL and flows generally southwestward through the city into the Warrior River. Existing project. The project consists of channel modification of about 7,300 feet of the creek. Modification would consist of widening the existing channel. The proposed plan would extend upstream from 1-359 to the confluence of Tributary 1 with the creek. Work would also be performed on 600 feet of Tributary 5. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $39,071. Supervision and administration costs amounted to $5,382. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract was awarded in November 1989 and is scheduled to be completed in September 1990. Estimated Federal cost is $1,800,000; and the non-Federal portion is $1,200,000. Total Federal cost to date is $417,602. 28. ESLAVA CREEK, MOBILE, AL Location. The city of Mobile, Alabama, which is located on the Gulf Coast of Alabama. The project begins at Pine Hill Drive and ends 2.1 miles upstream at Emogene Street. Existing project. None. The plan of improvement consists of channel enlargement, bank stabilization measures, and increasing the size of the box culvert at Airport Boulevard by adding an additional barrel. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement with the city of Mobile was completed on September 14, 1987. The local sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contract $180,074; engineering and design $89,193; and supervision and administration $24,373. A total Federal cost of $1,608,651 for new work. Contributed funds expended in FY 1989 $25,500. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preparation of plans and specifications are completed. The first increment of work was awarded in February 1988 and completed in August 1988. The second increment of work is awaiting for the city to obtain necessary rights-of-way for construction. Anticipate a construction contract to be awarded in July 1990 and construction to be completed in September 1991. Current estimated Federal cost is $2,580,775; and the non-Federal portion is $1,046,800 for land and relocation, and $190,925 cash contributions. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1989 is $1,608,651. Contributed funds expended $25,500. 29. GULF BREEZE, SANTA ROSA CO., FL Location. East End of the Old Highway 98 Bridge over Pensacola Bay at Gulf Breeze, Florida. 10-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Existing project. The recommended plan will take emergency actions to stop shoreline erosion around a water supply pumping station for the City of Gulf Breeze, FL. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Project construction costs amounted to $90,103; engineering and design cost $9,004; and supervision and administration costs amounted to $9,131. Contributed funds expended in FY 1989 $36,094. Condition at end of fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded on 10 January 1989 and construction was completed in May, 1989. Total Federal cost to date is $136,183 for new work. 30. HIGHWAY 39 BRIDGE, GAINESVILLE, AL Location. The project is located on the Tombigbee River, upstream of the Highway 39 bridge in Gainesville, AL. Existing project. The authorized project provides for slope protection for a 2000-foot reach of the east bank of the Tombigbee River, immediately upstream of the existing Highway 39 bridge. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) requires any flood control project not under construction by April 30, 1986 to enter a binding agreement with the Secretary of the Army to pay 100% of the operation and maintenance, and replacement and rehabilitation costs of the project, and to pay the required non-Federal share of the costs of construction. Subject to the cost sharing requirements of the WRDA of 1986, a non-federal sponsor has not been identified. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $1,974. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total cost of the project to date is $70,364. 31. HINTONVILLE ROAD BRIDGE, PERRY CO., MS Location. The Hintonville Road Bridge crosses Thompson Creek in Perry County, Mississippi and is located approximately one mile east of Hintonville along an unnumbered county road. The Thompson Creek drainage area is located in southeast Mississippi and is part of the Pascagoula River Basin. Existing project. The project would provide protection for the bridge side slopes channel bottom, and to realign the channel thru the center span of the bridge. The banks 350 feet upstream and 200 feet downstream from the bridge would be graded and protected with 24 inches of riprap on 6 inches of bedding material and filter fabric for 100 feet upstream and 150 feet downstream of the bridge. A 40-foot bottom width channel would be excavated and riprapped thru the center span of the bridge. A stone training dike would be constructed on the left bank of the project channel to direct low flows through the project channel and away from the left bank and left bridge abutment. The dike would be protected with 12 inches of riprap and 6 inches of bedding material and filter fabric. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost $26,835. Supervision and administration costs amounted to $2,719. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract was awarded in September 1989 and is scheduled to be completed in May 1990. Estimated Federal cost is $264,000; and the non-Federal portion is $88,000. Total Federal cost to date is $39,663 for new work. 32. HURRICANE CREEK, PRENTISS CO., MS Location. Southeast Prentiss County, Mississippi. Marietta-Hazeldell Road Bridge crosses Hurricane Creek Tributary to Big Brown Creek and is located about 20 miles northeast of Tupelo, Mississippi. Existing project. The project would provide emergency streambank protection to the banks and the bottoms of the channel to retard erosion at the Marietta-Hazeldell Road Bridge crossing Hurricane Creek, a tributary to Big Brown Creek. The banks and bottoms would be graded and protected with 12 inches of riprap on 6 inches of bedding material and filter fabric upstream of and downstream from the bridge. Through the bridge section, 18 inches of riprap would be placed on 6 inches of bedding materials and filter fabric. This wouldi preclude any streambank erosion from high velocities or sudden drawdown associated with receding floodwaters. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during flecal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost $13,054. Supervision and administration costs amounted to $1,224. 10-16 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded on 10 August 1989 and construction was essentially completed in December, 1989. Total Federal cost to date is $21,296. 33. LEAF AND BOWIE RIVERS, HATTIESBURG, MS Location. The Leaf River forms the east boundary of the city of Hattiesburg, the county seat of Forrest County, located in south-central Mississippi. The river separates Hattiesburg from the smaller city of Petal. Bowie River flows southeasterly along the northern boundary of Hattiesburg and joins the Leaf River at the northeast corner of the city. Existing project. The project provides for channel snagging, overbank clearing within the flood plains, riprap protection of the Southern Railroad and River Avenue Bridge piers and removal of the Petal sewage lagoon. Work will also include installation of a flood warning system. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Project construction contract costs amounted to $41,125. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was essentially completed in FY 1987. The remaining work consists of minor grassing and installation of the flood warning system. Total Federal cost as of September 30, 1989 is $1,584,214. 34. LITTLE COVE CREEK, GLENCOE, AL Location. Glencoe, Alabama is located five miles southeast of Gadsden, Alabama. Little Cove Creek is approximately seven miles long, originating in the foothills of Colvin mountain about five miles southeast of Glencoe. It flows northwest for five miles paralleling U.S. Highway 431, until it reaches the east edge of Glencoe. The creek flows two miles north to Hokes Bluff where it joins Cove Creek north of U.S. Highway 431. Existing project. The existing project on Little Cove Creek was constructed under the Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 and was completed in 1963. This project consisted of enlargement and realignment of 10,840 feet along Little Cove Creek to provide a channel bottom width of 25 feet and an average depth of 6 feet. Also included in the project were associated channel and overbank clearing and bridge modification work. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost $16,691. Supervision and administration costs amounted to $2,172. Work accomplished to date: A supplement to the Detailed Project Report was completed in September 1988. Current recommendations for rehabilitation of project consists of an upstream transition section to prevent head cutting and extending the project downstream to provide an adequate outlet for the existing project and reshaping of its existing channel side slopes and grassing these slopes. Problems, issues, and constraints: The Detailed Project Report estimated the benefit-to-cost ratio to be 0.15 to 1, clearly indicating that the work is not economically justified. After review of the report, concern was expressed over the economics of the project. A more detailed economic analysis was completed in December 1989. A revision to the supplement will be issued in February 1990. Estimated Federal cost is $790,800; and the non- Federal portion is $53,200. Total Federal cost to date is $124,916 for new work. 35. MAGBY CREEK COLUMBUS, MS Location. Magby Creek originates in Pickens County, Alabama about 13 miles east of the Mississippi-Alabama State line. From its source, the creek flows in a westerly direction through a rural area of Mississippi and Alabama for a distance of 25 miles to enter the Luxapalila Creek .6 miles above Propst Park in Columbus, MS. Existing project. The project consists of clearing and snagging Magby Creek from mile 0.83 upstream to mile 2.06. An additional 60 feet on the right overbank will be cleared of underbrush and any trees less than 6 inches in diameter. This 60 feet will alternate to the left bank, where there are deep bands, creating a straighter floodway effect. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Project construction costs amounted to $6,000, engineering and design cost $26,032, and supervision and administration costs amounted to $2,142. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preparation of Plans and Specifications were initiated in August 1987 and essentially completed. A construction contract was awarded in July, 1989 and construction was completed in November, 1989. Total Federal cost to date is $126,506 for new work. 10-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 36. MILL CREEK, DALTON, GA Location. The Mill Creek watershed comprises an area of 51.0 square miles in northeastern Walker County and west central Whitfield County, Georgia. The creek rises about 8 miles southwest of Dalton and flows in a northerly direction to its confluence with the North Fork of Mill Creek. From this point the creek flows generally in an easterly direction through the northern part of Dalton and enters Coahulla Creek 5.5 miles above its mouth. Existing project. The recommended plan consists of clearing and snagging Mill Creek from its mouth to downstream face of Willowdale Drive or a distance of 8.6 miles. This work would involve the clearing of all material, trees, shrubs, and any underbrush within the creek banks. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost $5,552. Supervision and administration costs amounted to $5,802. Condition at end of fiscal year. The Detail Project Report was revised and submitted in November 1987. These revisions reflected the changes due to cost sharing and contained a revised local cooperation agreement. The project advertised for a construction contract in August, 1989, and a construction contract was awarded on 6 November 1989. Project construction is scheduled to be completed in May, 1990. Estimated Federal cost is $300,000; and the non-Federal portion is $200,000. Total Federal cost to date is $251,045 for new work. 37. MURDER CREEK, BREWTON, AL Location. The project is located in the city of Brewton, AL near the confluence of Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks in the commercial district of downtown Brewton. Previous project. A limited stream clearing and snagging project was completed in 1980 on portions of both creeks to remove obstructions to flows. This jnterim measure was undertaken to reduce flooding in Brewton and East Brewton. Further, an evacuation plan for East Brewton was implemented under the Section 205 authority. The project involved removal of damageable structures from the low-lying flood plain of Murder Creek. Existing project. The authorized non-structural project provides for the alleviation of flood problems at Brewton by the removal of 31 damageable structures from the 10- year flood plains of Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate acquisitions during FY 1989 cost $211,236; engineering and design $3,690; and $610 for supervision and administration. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total cost of project as of September 30, 1989 is $1,160,438. 38. OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS Location. The project is located on Okatibbee Creek 37.7 miles above its mouth, in Lauderdale County, Mississippi, seven miles northwest of Meridian. Existing project. The project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, fish and wildlife, and recreation. The dam consists of a compacted earth fill 6,540 feet long with the top elevation 369.8 feet above national geodetic datum, with top width of 18 feet. The spilway, which is located 1,500 feet east of the east end of the dam, is an unpaved free overflow type, 1,500 feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 359. A sluice intake structure near the center of the dam serves a 9.0-foot diameter concrete conduit. Storage allocated for water supply and water quality control varies seasonally form 21,400 acre-feet to 34,300 acre-feet between a minimum elevation of 328 and top-of-conservation- pool elevation varying from 339 to 343. Storage varying from 46,500 to 59,500 acre-feet between the top of the conservation pool and elevation 352 has been reserved exclusively for storage of flood waters. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None Maintenance: Costs for the year for ordinary maintenance and recreational management amount to $1,057,387. Recreation attendance at the reservoir during CY 1988 totaled 1,135,392 recreational user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1965, and was completed in November 1968. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1989 is $9,739,528 for new work and $11,345,920 for maintenance, a total of $21,085,448. 10-18 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT 39. RACCOON CREEK BACONTON, GA Location. The community of Baconton is located in northwest Mitchell County approximately 20 miles due south of Albany and 40 miles northeast of Bainbridge, Georgia. Raccoon Creek rises in the northeastern portion of Mitchell County known as the Tifton Upland and flows almost due west across the Daugherty Plains, where it enters the Flint River at river mile 81.1 on the Flint. The total drainage area, as it flows by Baconton, is 98 square miles. The total drainage area is comprised mostly of agricultural lands, which grow pecans, soybeans, and peanuts. The floodplain in Baconton varies in width from about 2,000 to 6,000 feet with an average fall of about 1 foot per mile. Exiting project. The flood control project would consist of raising about 1500 feet of South Jackson Street near the West Daniels Street bridge to elevation 176.0 feet NGVE. The channel and 30 feet on each overbank of Raccoon Creek would be cleared and snagged from State Hwy. 3 to U.S. Hwy. 19. Raising South Jackson Street would prevent overbank flows from entering downtown Baconton. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost $43,243. Supervision and administration costs amounted to $3,394. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preparation of plans and specifications were initiated in August 1988. A construction contract was advertised in May 1989, and a contract was awarded on 29 August 1989. The project is scheduled to be completed in February, 1990. Estimated Federal cost is $285,000; and the non-Federal portion is $95,000. Total Federal cost to date is $173,143 for new work. 40. SEWERLINE PROTECTION, VALLEY, AL Location. Valley, Alabama is located on the west bank of the Chattahoochee River in the southeast corner of Chambers County. The West Point Lake and Dam is located approximately 11 miles up river from Valley and controls a drainage area of approximately 3600 square miles. A sanitary sewage line and pumping station were built in 1972 to provide service from approximately 200 homes and several businesses located near Valley. This line serves as the only sewage transport for this area. Existing project. The project provides for the restoration of approximately 1600 linear feet of streambank. This work consisted of approximately 1550 cubic yards of No. 5 riprap on 4445 square yards of filter fabric. Reshaping of the bank was done by placing backfill material as opposed to cutting the existing streambank. The reshaped bank was then grassed. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $1,628. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in FY 1985 and completed in FY 1986 at a total cost to date of $180,937 for new work. 41. SOPE CREEK, MARIETTA, GA Location. The project is located in Marietta, Georgia in Cobb County which is in the north-central section of Georgia, just north-northwest of Atlanta. Sope Creek is a small tributary of the Chattahoochee River and flows generally from northwest to southeast from its beginning in the city of Marietta. Existing project. The project provides for flood control measures along Sope Creek in Cobb County, Georgia. The project provides for both a structural and nonstructural component. The structural component provides for clearing and snagging of the creek. This would involve the clearing of all material, trees, shrubs and any underbrush less than 12 inches in diameter from a strip 30 feet wide on each side of the creek and removing all trees, shrubs and underbrush within the creek banks. Snagging would involve the removal of all fallen trees and debris which are in the creek. The nonstructural component provides for the evacuation of 13 structures located on the west side of the creek within the Fox Hills subdivision. The project provides for purchase and removal of the structures. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction cost $76,158, engineering and design $10,086, and supervision and administration cost $20,104. Condition at end of fiscal year. All 13 homes have been acquired and a clearing and snagging construction contract was awarded to Small Business Administration Program 8(a) in 1988. The 8(a) contract defaulted. A construction contract was awarded in December 1988 and project construction was completed in September 1989. Total Federal cost to date is $1,525,444 for new work. 10-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 42. SOWASHEE CREEK, MERIDIAN, MS Location. The project is located in East Central Mississippi, Lauderdale County, in the city of Meridian, which is approximately 90 miles east of Jackson, Mississippi. Existing project. In 1955, the Corps of Engineers completed channel improvement on the lower 10.5 miles of Sowashee Creek. This work was accomplished under the authority of Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. The plan of improvement consists of a combination of channel enlargement (3.9 miles), and clearing and snagging (6.6 miles) over a reach of 10.5 miles. One (1) railroad bridge and several highway roads and bridges and utilities will require modification for the channel improvement. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement with the Pat Harrison Waterway District was completed on September 23, 1987. The local sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contract cost $1,183,662; engineering and design $315,571; and supervision and administration $54,572, a total Federal cost of $3,487,725 for new work. Condition at end of fiscal year. The initial construction contract was awarded on December 18, 1987 and project completion is scheduled for November 1991. Current estimated Federal cost is $13,520,000; and the non- Federal portion is $5,104,000 for land and relocation, $980,000 cash contributions, and $458,000 for recreational facilities. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1989 is $3,487,725 for new work. Contributed funds expended $59,025. 43. TALLAHALLA CREEK, LAUREL, MS Location. The Pascagoula River Basin lies in southeastern Mississippi and a small part of southwestern Alabama. The Pascagoula River system drains an area of 9700 square miles. The study area, located in Jones County, includes the city of Laurel and the unincorporated communities of Walters and Pendorf as well as the outlying areas of the city of Ellisville adjacent to the Tallahala Creek Flood plain. Existing project. The project along Tallahalla Creek would consist of channel clearing and snagging with overbank clearing of brush and trees less than 4 inches diameter for a distance of 30 feet on each bank. The project would begin about 1.5 miles below Queensburg Avenue Bridge and extend 7.25 miles to US Highway 84. Also, a flood warning system would be installed in the Tallahalla Creek Basin to relay data to a base station. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost $43,282. Supervision and administration costs amounted to $3,030. Condition at end of fiscal year. The advertisement for bids for clearing and snagging portion of the project was cancelled in August, 1989 due to erosion at two sites along Masonites Lagoon Dikes. Redesign of the project is underway to rectify the erosion problems and prevent velocities increases along the dikes due to project construction. It is anticipated that a construction contract will be awarded in May, 1990. A flood warning system for the Tallahala Creek basin is scheduled to be awarded in January, 1990. Estimated Federal cost is $822,640; and the non-Federal portion is $307,360. Total Federal cost to date is $62,080 for new work. 44. THREEMILE CREEK, MOBILE, AL Location. The project is located near the Gulf of Mexico in the southwest corner of the state of Alabama and in the city of Mobile, approximately 180 miles southwest of Montgomery, Alabama. Threemile Creek originates in the western part of Mobile and flows easterly about 14 miles to enter Mobile River near the Alabama State Docks. The drainage area of the basin consists of 39 square miles of urbanized area. Existing project. None. The authorized flood control project will consist of channel widening and deepening from about 2,000 feet downstream of Stone Street to a point about 6,300 feet upstream of Interstate 65 or a total distance of 5.6 miles. The plan also includes development of certain recreational facilities of the type associated with urban parks. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement with the city of Mobile, Alabama was completed on September 30, 1987. The local sponsor has agreed to make all payments concurrently with project construction. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction contracts $670,562; engineering and design $143,359; and supervision and administration $98,612. A total Federal cost of $2,136,257 for new work. 10-20 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and Specifications were initiated in December 1986 and a construction contract was awarded on 30 September 1987 for the first increment of work. Preparation of Plans and Specifications on the remaining work is essentially completed. The first increment of work was completed in October 1988. The remaining work depends on the local sponsor obtaining necessary real estate and relocations for project. Current estimated Federal cost is $16,691,000; and the non-Federal portion is $6,563,000 for land and relocation, $1,216,000 cash contributions, and $160,000 for recreational facilities. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1989 is $2,136,257 for new work. Contributed funds expended $112,458. 45. TOMBIGBEE RIVER (EAST FORK), MS AND AL Location. The project is located on the Tombigbee River and its tributaries between the junction of Browns and Mackeys Creek in Itawamba County, Mississippi, for a distance of 53 miles along the East Fork of the Tombigbee River, from Walkers Bridge at the junction of Browns and Mackeys Creeks to the Monroe County line. Existing project. Provides for alleviation of floods from the Tombigbee River by clearing and snagging and excavation of 13 cut-off channels, and other related channel improvements. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with on work done under the 1936 Flood Control Act. Work to be done under authority of the 1941 Flood Control Act requires local interest to provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; and maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance of channels cost $66,102. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project for Itawamba County, as authorized in the 1936 Flood Control Act, was completed during fiscal year 1940. No work has been done on the extension of the project authorized in the 1941 Flood Control Act. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1989 is $134,801 for new work and $2,711,371 for maintenance, a total of $2,846,172. 46. TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MS AND AL Location. The Tombigbee River rises in extreme northeast Mississippi and flows southerly through eastemrn Mississippi and westemrn Alabama, emptying into the Mobile River about 45 miles above its mouth at Mobile, Alabama. Tributaries to be improved for flood control are all in northeast Mississippi and northwest Alabama. Existing project. The authorized project provides for improvement of 22 tributaries of the Tombigbee River Basin by means of channel clearing and snagging. Approved estimate of cost (1989) for new work is $43,411,000; consisting of $38,364,000 Federal funds, and $5,047,000 non-Federal funds. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction; make all roads, highway bridge, and utility changes, alterations, additions, and relocations necessary for the project; hold the United States free from damages; prevent future encroachments along the improved channels; maintain all works after completion, with the exception of Twenty Mile Creek from mile 11.7 to mile 22.0. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate cost $160,493; Channel and canals contract cost $733,789, engineering and design $283,582, and supervision and administration cost $113,631. Total Federal cost to date is $23,606,623 for new work. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in July 1965, and is proceeding stream by stream as funds are made available. Total Federal cost of existing project as of September 30, 1989 is $23,606,623 for new work. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $63,342. 47. UPPER GORDON CREEK, HATTIESBURG, MS Location. The proposed project on Gordons Creek is located in Hattiesburg, MS. Existing project. A Federal project on the lower 2.5 miles was constructed in 1979 under the Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948. The project consisted of clearing and snagging from the creek's confluence with the Leaf River upstream to Bay Street and channel widening to a 40-foot bottom width between Bay and Broad Streets. 10-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 The first increment of Work Phase I will consist of real estate acquisition of nine (9) residences on Brookland Street and South 17th Avenue and removed from floodplain; habitat mitigation and channel enlargement for 1.1 miles between Broad and Hardy Streets; and flood damages mitigation downstream of Broad Street. The second increment of Work Phase II will consist of channel enlargement from US Hwy. 11 upstream about 2.7 miles to South 40th Avenue and Lincoln Road. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design cost $148,089. Supervision and administration costs amounted to $5,495. Work Accomplished to Date: Preparation of Plans and Specifications for Contract I is essentially completed. It is anticipated a construction contract would be awarded in the fourth quarter FY 1990, provided necessary right-ofways for Contract I channel improvement are available and necessary relocations are performed by local sponsors. Also, initiation of the mitigation of damages downstream of Broad Street and real estate acquisition of nine residences upstream of Hardy Street have been initiated. Plans and specifications for Contract II were initiated in December, 1989, and are 60 percent completed. It is anticipated a construction contract for the second and final increment of work will be awarded in second quarter FY 1991. Estimated Federal cost is $4,412,250; and the non-Federal portion is $3,087,750. Total Federal cost to date is $608,276 for new work. 48. VILLAGE CREEK, BIRMINGHAM, AL Location. The project is located in central Alabama, Jefferson County, in the city of Birmingham, Alabama. Existing project. None. The project is basically nonstructural and includes evacuating 642 structures, in six (6) separate neighborhoods, from the floodplain; enlarging 2 miles of the stream channel in the vicinity of the Municipal Airport which also involves modification of three (3) bridges, demolishing two (2) unused bridges, and relocating two (2) waterlines and other utilities, installing three (3) emergency floodwarning devices; and creating an area of 210 acres which can be utilized for future recreation development. Channel enlargements (2 miles) will reduce annual damages near Municipal Airport by 82 percent and evacuation of 627 structures will reduce annual damages in residential areas by 61 percent. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement with the city of Birmingham, Alabama war completed on December 14, 1988. The local sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with the project construction. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Real Estate cost $1,695,226; engineering and design $39,589; Cultural Resources $285,515; and supervision and administration $51,241. A total Federal cost of $2,308,622 for new work. Condition at end of fiscal year. Real Estate design memorandum complete February 1988. Real Estate acquisition scheduled to start January 1989. Project scheduled to be completed June 1994. Current estimated Federal cost is $31,965,000; and the non-Federal portion is $1,960,000 for land and relocation, and $10,075,000 cash contributions. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1989 is $2,308,622 for new work. 49. WHORTON'S BEND ROAD, ETOWAH CO., AL Location. The area under consideration is approximately 500 feet along the right bank of the Coosa River upstream of the State Highway 77 bridge on Whorton's Bend Road in Etowah County, Alabama, south of Gadsden. Existing project. The project would provide emergency streambank protection along the left bank of the Coosa River to retard erosion of Whorton's Bend Road. The project consists of excavation and grading of approximately 1850 cubic yards (cy) of earth and of placement of 11,070 cy of riprap graded for a minimum layer thickness of 30 inches. This would preclude any streambank erosion with the Alabama Power operations on the Coosa River and receding floodwaters. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Project construction costs amounted to $205,985, engineering and design cost $37,689, and supervision and administration costs amounted to $48,308. Contributed funds expended in FY 1989 $114,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded in February, 1989 and construction was essentially completed in November, 1989. Estimated Federal cost is $370,000; and the non-Federal portion is $139,000. Total Federal cost to date is $308,377 for new work. 10-22 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT 50. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Snagging and Clearing for flood control pursuant to Section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. Emergency streambank and shoreline protection pursuant to Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. (See Table 10-J) Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work under Public law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation, and disaster relief and assistance under Public law 288, 93d Congress. (See Table 10-J) 51. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Local flood protection works for which inspection is performed under this heading consist of levee projects at West Point, Georgia, ont eh Chattahoochee River, Beaver C reek at Montezuma, Georgia, in the Flint River Basin; Elba and Geneva, Alabama in the Choctawhatchee River Basin; Rome, Georgia, and Little Wills Creek at Collinsville, Alabama, in the Alabama-Coosa River Basin. Channel recitification projects include Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, Alabama and Black Creek, Gadsden, Alabama in the Alabama-Coosa River Basin; Big Brown Creek, Donivan Creek, Twenty Mile Creek and Mantachie Creek, near Fulton, Mississippi, Burketts Creek and Stanifer Creek near Amory, Mississippi, Houlka Creek and Sakatonchee Creek in Chickasaw and Clay Counties, Mississippi, James Creek in Monroe County, Mississippi, and Luxapalila Creek, Lowndes County, Mississippi, all in the Tombigbee River Basin; Sowashee Creek, Meridian, Mississippi in the Pascagoula River Basin; Burnt Corn and Murder Creeks, Brewton, Alabama in the Conecuh River Basin; Autauga Creek, Prattville, Alabama; Poley Bridge, Goose Pone and Walnut Creeks, Clanton, Alabama; Pinchgut Creek, and Cahaba River, Trussville, Alabama; Town Creek, Americus, Georgia; and Lake Douglas in Bainbridge, Georgia. Shore protection and erosion control projects include Harrison County, Mississippi; Leaf River, Mahned, Mississippi; Chattahoochee River at La Grange, Troup County, Georgia; Pumpkinvine Creek, Emerson, Georgia; and Chickasawbogue Creek, US Highway 43 Bridge, Linden, Alabama. The project at Rome and Montezuma, Georgia and Collinsyville, Alabama include pumping stations. Inspections were made during FY 89 to determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation of the project. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in the maintenance and operation of the local flood protection works under their jurisdiction where appropriate. Followup for compliance of the deficient projects continued during the year. Fiscal year costs were $70,070. Total cost to September 30,1989 is $564,478 charged to maintenance. 52. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 10-E.) Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 53. ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, AL AND GA Location. Alabama River is formed 18 miles above Montgomery, Alabama, by the junctions of the Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers. It then flows southwesterly through Alabama 318 miles and unites with the Tombigbee River about 45 miles north of Mobile, in southwestern Alabama, to form the Mobile River. (See Geological Survey maps for central and southwest Alabama.) The Coosa River is formed at Rome, Georgia, in northwest Georgia, by the junction of the Oostanaula and Etowah Rivers, which have their sources in southeastern Tennessee and northern Georgia. From Rome the Coosa River flows southwesterly through Georgia and Alabama 286 miles and unites with the Tallapoosa River near Montgomery, Alabama, at about the center of the State, to form the Alabama River. (See Geological Survey maps for northeast Alabama, southeast Tennessee, and northwest Georgia.) Previous project. Projects for Alabama River. for details see page 1837, Annual Report for 1915; page 725, Annual Report for 1938; and page 592, Annual Report for 1944. Projects for Coosa River: for details see page 1837, Annual Report for 1915; page 728, Annual Report for 1938; and page 594, Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorized project provides for full development of the Alabama-Coosa Rivers and tributaries for navigation, flood control, power, recreation, and other purposes, in accordance with plans under preparation by Chief of Engineers, subject to modifications thereof which may be advisable for increasing development of hydroelectric power. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Public Law 436, 83rd Congress, 10-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 suspended authorization of the comprehensive plan, insofar as it provides for development of hydroelectric power for Coosa River, to permit non-Federal interests to develop the Coosa River by construction of a series of dams in accordance with conditions of a license issued pursuant to Federal Power Act and in accordance with certain other provisions and requirements of the aforementioned public law. The plan was further modified by the WRDA of 1986 to authorize planning, engineering and design for the project generally in accordance with the plans contained in Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design, dated May 1982. The present phase of improvement provides for construction of Robert F. Henry and Millers Ferry multiple-purpose improvements. Claiborne Lock and Dam, and supplemental channel work providing for a nine-foot deep navigation channel from the mouth of the Alabama River to Montgomery, Alabama, and for construction of Carters Dam, a multiple-purpose improvement on Coosawattee River, Georgia. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation will be determined as formulation of plans for development of projects progress. No action in the matter of local cooperation has been initiated. Terminal facilities. On the east bank of the river a natural landing connects with city streets at Montgomery. Wofford Oil Company has a small wharf about 10 miles below Montgomery equipped for handling petroleum products. There are also various natural landings along the river. Facilities and natural landings on Alabama River are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract maintenance dredging of the river system removed 420,828 cubic yards at a cost of $1,528,800. General charges for water control management, condition surveys, engineering and design, supervision and administration amounted to $3,376,511. Claibome Lock and Dam charges were $500,700 with recreation and resource management costs of $998,500. Non-dredging channel maintenance cost $1,898,500. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated on Carters Dam in April 1962, on Millers Ferry Lock and Dam in April 1962, on Millers Ferry Lock and Dam in April 1963, Claibome Lock and Dam in May 1965, and Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam in March 1966. Carters Dam was completed in FY 1980. The authorized nine-foot navigation channel to Montgomery, Alabama was opened to traffic in January 1972. Overall construction is essentially complete at Millers Ferry Lock and Dam. Construction of Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam is essentially complete. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1989 is $61,480,533, including $3,245,400 for new work and $58,235,133 for maintenance. (See Table 10-L.) 53A. CARTERS DAM AND RESERVOIR, GA Location. The damsite is in Murray County, Georgia, on the Coosawattee River 26.8 miles above its junction with Conasauga River, one of the headwater tributaries of the Alabama-Coosa system. It is 60 miles north of Atlanta near the town of Carters, Georgia. The reservoir is in both Murray and Gilmer Counties. Existing project. The authorized project consists of a 1,950-foot long rockfill dam across the river, three saddle dikes on the left bank, a 258-foot long high-level, gated spillway on the left bank, a powerhouse on the right bank having two conventional units with a generating capacity of 125,000 kilowatts each and two pump-generating units of the same size, and a regulating dam 2,855 feet long with a gated spilway 208 feet long 1.5 miles downstream from the main dam. The lake has an area of 3,220 acres, at maximum power pool elevation 1,072, total capacity of 472,800 acre-feet, of which 134,900 acre-feet is usable for power and 95,700 acre-feet reserved for flood control and 242,200 acre-feet dead storage. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the dam, reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities and administration totaled $4,958,589. Gross power generation amounted to 411,135,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1989, of which 408,343,700 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance during CY 1988 totaled 964,073 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction which commenced in April 1962 was essentially completed in September 1980. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1989 is $135,415,018, including $111,140,340 for new work and $33,087,925 for maintenance. 53B. CLAIBORNE LOCK AND DAM, AL Location. The site is in Monroe County at mile 81.8 on the Alabama River, 15 miles northwest of Monroevine and 5.7 miles upstream from the U.S. Highway 84 bridge. Existing project. The authorized project consists of a short earth dike on the right bank, a combination of a fixed-crest and gated spillway extending across the river 10-24 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT channel and into the left bank, a navigation lock and mound on the left bank, and an earth dike extending across the left overbank to high ground. Normal upper pool is elevation 35 and the minimum pool will be elevation 32 to provide storage for reregulation of Millers Ferry powerplant releases. The 60-mile long reservoir has an area of 5,850 acres and a volume of 96,360 acre-feet. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa projects. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the lock and dam totaled $500,700. Recreation attendance during CY 1988 totaled 652,000 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1965 and was completed in FY 1976 at a total cost of $27,997,450. 53C. COOSA RIVER, MONTGOMERY TO GADSDEN, AL Location. The Coosa River is one of the two major tributaries forming the Alabama River approximately 18 miles northeast of Montgomery, Alabama. From its source at the juncture of the Etowah and Oostanaula Rivers in northwest Georgia, it flows southwesterly about 286 miles to join with the Tallapoosa River in forming the Alabama River. Existing project. The improvement of the Alabama- Coosa River for navigation to Rome, Georgia was authorized by Congress in the River and Harbor Act of 1945. A report in House Document 320, transmitted to Congress on January 27, 1960, recommended that the navigation project for the Coosa River from Montgomery to Gadsden be accomplished after the waterway to Montgomery was assured.The plan of improvement identified in House Document 320 provided for a waterway 9 feet deep with widths of 200 feet to Montgomery, Alabama, and 150 feet to Rome, Georgia. The waterway to Montgomery has essentially been completed. The plan for the Coosa River segment of the waterway between Montgomery and Gadsden was further modified by the WRDA of 1986 to authorize planning, engineering and design for the project generally in accordance with the plans contained in Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design, dated May 1982. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1989 is $14,986,400 for new work. 53D. MILLERS FERRY LOCK AND DAM, AL Location. The site is in Wilcox County at mile 142.2 on the Alabama River, 10 miles northwest of Camden, Alabama, and 30 miles southwest of Selma. Existing project. The project consists of an earth dike on the right bank, a concrete, gravity-gated spillway in the river channel, a lock and mound on the left bank, an earth dike extending downstream paralleling the lock, to the powerhouse intake structure; a powerhouse, and an earth dike extending to high ground on the left bank. Normal upper pool is at elevation 80. The powerplant contains three 25,000 kilowatt units. The 103-mile long reservoir has an area of 17,200 areas at normal pool level and a total capacity of 331,800 acre-feet. The lock chamber is 84 by 600 feet with a 13-foot depth over the miter sills. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of lock, dam, powerhouse, reservoir, and administration cost $3,917,320. Gross power generation amounted to 408,898,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1989, of which 405,912,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance at William "Bill" Dannelly Reservoir during CY 1988 totaled 2,445,718 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1963. The lock was placed in temporary operations in June 1968 and opened to full use in November 1969. The powerhouse units were placed on line during April and May 1970. The project was essentially completed in 1980. Total Federal cost of the project as of September 30, 1989 is $63,125,300 for new work and $38,383,287 for maintenance, a total of $101,508,587. 53E. ROBERT F. HENRY LOCK AN D DAM, AL Location. The site is in Lowndes and Autauga Counties at mile 245.4 on the Alabama River, 26 miles west of Montgomery. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a navigation lock, a gated spillway, and a power plant located at mile 245.4. The normal upper pool is at elevation 125.0 and the minimum lower pool due to the Millers Ferry Lock and Dam is at elevation 80.0. The structures consist of earth dikes and a power plant on the right bank, a gated spillway in the river channel, a lock and mound on 10-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 the left bank, and an earth dike extending upstream parallel to the Western Railway of Alabama. The total length of the structures is about 14,962 feet with maximum height above the foundation at the power plant intake about 101 feet. The power plant contains four 17,000-kw. units. The 88-mile long reservoir has an area of 12,300 acres at normal pool level and a total capacity of 234,200 acre-feet. The lock has a chamber 84 feet wide and 600 feet long and provides a 12-foot depth over the lower miter sill. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa project Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance costs amounted to $2,289,096. Gross power generation amounted to 372,600,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1989, of which 370,849,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance during CY 1988 totaled 2,830,500 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in March 1966 and is essentially complete. The first powerhouse unit was placed in operation in June 1975, with the last unit on line in November 1975. Total Federal cost of the project as of September 30, 1989 is $106,782,654, including $83,360,800 for new work and $23,421,854 for maintenance. 54. ALLATOONA DAM, COOSA RIVER BASIN, GA Location. The project is on Etowah River in Bartow County, Georgia, about 48 miles upstream from Rome, Georgia, about five miles due east of Cartersville, Georgia, and about 2,000 feet downstream from mouth of Allatoona Creek. The reservoir extends about 28 miles up the Etowah River at maximum power-pool elevation of 840 feet above mean sea level. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, regulation of streamflow for navigation, and development of hydroelectric power. Height above the river bottom of the concrete, gravity-type dam is about 190 feet, from elevation 690 feet to 880 feet national geodetic datum. The spillway, with crest at elevation 835, is controlled by nine tainter gates, 40 feet wide by twenty-six feet high, and two tainter gates, 20 feet wide by twenty-six feet high; having a combined discharge capacity of 321,000 cubic feet per second with the water surface at elevation 870.3 One 48- inch diameter sluicing conduit with a free discharge valve and four sluices, 5 feet-8 inches wide by 10 feet high, are included in dam. Installed generating capacity consists of two 36,000 kilowatt units and one 2,000 kilowatt unit, or a total of 74,000 kilowatts. Ultimate installed capacity will be 110,000 kilowatts. The reservoir, covering 19,200 acres at elevation 860, has a storage capacity of 670,000 acrefeet. The initial construction cost was $31,424,738, excluding the addition of recreation facilities at the completed project. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. (Sec. 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies). Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the dam, reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities, and administration totaled $5,267,320. Gross power generation amounted to 132,174,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1989 of which 131,046,500 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Allatoona Lake during CY 1988 totaled 13,320,349 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the existing project began in March 1944 and was completed in October 1955. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1989 is $35,709,085 for new work and $69,392,007 for maintenance, a total of $105,101,092. 55. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, AL, GA, AND FL Location. The Apalachicola River is formed at the southwest comer of the State of Georgia by the junction of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers and flows south 108 miles emptying into Apalachicola Bay. Florida River enters the Apalachicola River from the east at mile 45.4 and the River Styz also enters from the east at mile 36.7 and Chipola River enters from the west at mile 28.2. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11401.) The Chattahoochee River, 418 miles long, rises in northeast Georgia and flows southwesterly to West Point, and thence southerly to join the Flint River at the southwest comrner of Georgia, forming the Apalachicola River. (See Geological Survey maps for northwest Georgia.) The Flint River, 330 miles long, rises in west central Georgia, flows generally southeasterly to Albany, and thence southwest to the southwest comer of the State, where it joins the Chattahoochee River to form the Apalachicola River. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Previous project. For details see page 484 of Annual Report for 1963. 10-26 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT Existing project. The authorized project provides for development of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and recreation. Navigation features of the existing project consist of a continuous 9-foot by 100-foot channel in the Apalachicola River from the intersection of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to the confluence of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, 104 miles, thence to Columbus, Georgia, on the Chattahoochee River, 164 miles, and to Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, 29 miles, and a 3-foot by 100-foot channel on the Flint River from Bainbridge to Albany, Georgia, 74 miles, thence a channel suitable for light draft vessels at moderate stage to Montezuma, Georgia, 79 miles to be accomplished by dredging, contract works, and construction of three locks and dams (Jim Woodruff, George W. Andrews, and Walter F. George) along the 9-foot depth channel, two multipurpose dams (West Point and Buford) on the Chattahoochee River. Three multipurpose dams (Lower Auchumpkee Creek, Lazer Creek, and Spewrell Bluff) on the Flint River were authorized in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The project also provides for minor improvements of certain streams tributary to the Apalachicola River, including a 9-foot by 100-foot side channel, approximately 2,000 feet long, from Apalachicola River to Apalachicola River Industrial Park at Blountstown, Fla. Plane side of reference is mean low water. Hydropower and flood control storage is provided at Sidney Lanier, Walter F. George, and West Point, and hydropower is provided at Jim Woodruff. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. The project was originally authorized in section 2 of the River and Harbor Act of 1945, was further modified by the WRDA of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Mean range of tide at the mouth of Apalachicola River is 1.6 feet. At the point where the river is formed the variation between low and high water is about 37 feet. On the Chattahoochee River, variation between average low and high water is about 20 feet, and extreme fluctuation is 65.3 feet at Eufaula. On the Flint River the extreme fluctuation of stage due to flood is 40 feet, while average variation between low and high water is about 21.5 feet. A water supply study is currently being conducted on the upper portion of the ACF River System. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. About 200 feet of public docks, in addition to private wharves, are available at Apalachicola, Florida. There are numerous constructed and natural landings along the entire system for launching small craft. For details of other terminal facilities, which are considered adequate for existing commerce, see individual project descriptions. See also Table 10-M on locks and dams and multiple-purpose development included in existing project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contract dredging on the river system removed 767,858 cubic yards at a total cost of $1,199,000. George W. Andrews Lake recreational and resource management costs totalpd $377,200. Operation and maintenance of George W. Andrews Lock and Dam cost $338,400. All other costs for the project amounted to $1,718,007. Recreational attendance during CY 1988 totaled 379,269 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Improvement of Apalachicola River channel by dredging to provide project dimensions throughout is complete. All major construction on Lake Sidney Lanier Dam, George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, and Walter F. George Lock and Dam, is complete. West Point is essentially complete with the exception of adding recreation facilities. Channel rectification in Apalachicola River was completed December 1970. More detailed information concerning condition at the end of fiscal year for individual locks and dams and multiple-purpose developments comprising the system is presented under their respective project titles elsewhere in this report. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1989 is $4,452,162 for new work and $88,390,651 for maintenance, a total of $92,842,813. (See Tables 10-A and 10-M for fiscal year costs and summaries of overall project.) 55A. BUFORD DAM, LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA Location. Buford Dam is on the Chattahoochee River about 348.9 miles above its mouth, 50 miles above Atlanta and five miles northwest of Buford, Georgia. The reservoir, Lake Sidney Lanier, extends about 47 miles upstream along the Chattahoochee River, and about 21 miles up the Chestatee River, which enters the Chattahoochee River 14.5 miles above the dam. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a rolled-earth dam 1,630 feet long with crest at elevation 1,106 feet national geodetic datum, or about 192 feet above streambed elevation; three earth saddle dikes with a total length of 5,406 feet; a chute spiliway with crest at elevation 1,085; a powerhouse in a deep cut with steel penstocks in tunnels, and concrete intake structure at the upstream end of the tunnels; and a flood control sluice tunnel paralleling the power tunnels. The Lake Sidney Lanier reservoir has a gross capacity of 2,554,000 acre-feet of which 637,000 acre-feet of storage is reserved for flood 10-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 control storage. The power installations consist of one generating unit of 6,000 kilowatts and two units of 40,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 86,000 kilowatts. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost $8,015,948. Gross power generation amounted to 98,198,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1989, of which 96,733,400 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Lake Sidney Lanier during CY 1988 totaled 17,102,500 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in March 1950 and was completed in June 1960. The reservoir was in useful operation for flood control in February 1956. The first power generating unit was placed on the line June 19, 1957; the second on July 26, 1957; and the third on October 10, 1957. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1989 is $53,028,418 for new work and $88,390,651 for maintenance, a total of $141,419,069. (See also Table 10-M.) 55B. GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee River about 46.5 miles above its mouth and about one mile below the town of Columbia, Alabama, near the head of Jim Woodruff Reservoir. (See Geological Survey maps for southeast Alabama). The pool extends up the navigation channel about 28 miles upstream to Walter F. George Lock and Dam. Existing project. This single-purpose project provides for a concrete fixed-crest spillway 340 feet long extending into the right bank with a crest at elevation 102 feet national geodetic datum, a concrete gate spillway adjacent to the lock 280 feet long with crest at elevation 82 feet national geodetic datum, a single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 82 feet by 450 feet, and a maximum lift of 25 feet. Depths are 13 feet over the lower sill and 19 feet over the upper sill at normal pool elevation. The underlying foundation is limestone. The project provides for maintenance and care. The House Committee on Public Works, by resolution adopted May 19, 1953, approved the plan as proposed by the Chief of Engineers for a high dam at Walter F. George site and a low dam at the Fort Benning site and a high dam at the upper Columbia site, construction of which was authorized by the 1946 River and Harbor Act as the initiation and partial accomplishment of the plan for full development of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint River system. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must operate all movable span bridges, provide suitable public terminals, and hold the United States free from damages. These conditions are being complied with. Terminal facilities. At Columbia, Alabama, there is a public wharf with concrete deck for handling general cargo and a bulk petroleum terminal with an unloading dock. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of lock and dam cost $338,900. Recreational and resource management cost $377,200. Recreational attendance during CY 1988 totaled 379,269 user days. Maintenance cost included under overall Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint project. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the lock and dam began in March 1959 and was completed in November 1963. (See also Table 10-M). 55C. JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GA AND FL Location. The project is located on the Apalachicola River 107.6 miles above its mouth, about 1,000 feet below confluence of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, and 1.5 miles northwest of Chattahoochee, Florida. Reservoir extends about 46.5 miles upstream along the Chattahoochee River to the vicinity of Columbia, Alabama, and about 47 miles upstream along Flint River, or 17 miles above Bainbridge, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete open-crest spillway 1,634 feet long on the right bank, with a crest at elevation 79 feet national geodetic datum; a single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 82 by 450 feet, a maximum lift of 33 feet, and depth over the sills of 14 feet; a gated spillway of 766 feet long with the bridge at elevation 107 feet national geodetic datum, or about 67 feet above the streambed elevation; a powerhouse with an intake section constituting a portion of the dam; an earth section 506 feet long to accommodate the switchyard and substation; and an overflow dike section 2,130 feet long on the left bank, with a crest at elevation 85. The underlying foundation is limestone. At the normal pool elevation of 77, the reservoir has a total 10-28 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT capacity of 406,160 acre-feet. The power installation consists of three units of 10,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 30,000 kilowatts. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Required cooperation is being fulfilled. Easements for rights-of-way and spoil-disposal areas were provided as required along the Apalachicola River. Adequate public terminals were constructed by local interests at Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, and at Columbia, Alabama, on the Chattahoochee River. Facilities are being planned for other localities on the project. Terminal facilities. A public wharf with concrete deck for handling general cargo, a bulk storage terminal for petroleum, a grain elevator, and private riverside facilities at Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost $6,029,775. Gross power generation, Jim Woodruff Powerhouse, amounted to 202,719,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1989, of which 200,869,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Lake Seminole during CY 1988 totaled 3,702,657 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the lock was commenced in 1947, and completed in 1957. The pool was opened to navigation in May 1954, and the pool was raised to project level in January 1957. The first power-generating unit was placed on-the-line on February 1, the second on March 1, and the third on April 26, 1957. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1989 is $47,978,751 for new work and $62,357,100 for maintenance, a total of $110,335,851. (See also Table 10-M.) 55D.WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee River about 75.2 miles above its mouth and about 1.5 miles above Fort Gaines, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps for southw.est Georgia.) " Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete dam, gated spillway, and single-lift lock, with earth embankments at either side. The non-overflow section of the dam includes a powerhouse and an intake structure. The gated spillway is 708 feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 163 feet national geodetic datum. The two earth embankments, of almost equal lengths, have a total length of 12,128 feet, with a crest elevation at 215, and a maximum height of about 68 feet The nonoverflow section of the concrete dam is 200 feet long, with the deck of the powerhouse section at elevation 208. The lock, with usable chamber dimensions of 82 feet by 450 feet, has a lift of 88 feet with the normal upper pool elevation at 190. Depths are 13 feet over the lower sill and 18 feet over the upper sill at normal pool elevation. The underlying foundation is limestone. Total reservoir capacity is 934,400 acre-feet, with 244,000 acre-feet reserved for power. The power installation consists of four units of. 32,500 kilowatts each, or a total of 130,000 kilowatts. The project provides for maintenance, including operation and care. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must maintain and operate all utility and highway facilities which may be relocated or otherwise altered as part of the improvement, provide suitable public terminal facilities, and hold the United States free from damages. Local agencies and other organizations have indicated their willingness and ability to comply. Terminal facilities. Public wharves at Eufaula and Phenix City, Alabama, and Columbus, Georgia, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost for FY 1989 was $7,664,649. Gross power generation amounted to 369,182,000 kilowatt hours, of which 366,566,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance during CY 1988 totaled 6,805,616 user days. Major rehabilitation costs $1,111. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in 1963. The lock was opened to navigation in June 1963. The first power generating unit was placed onthe- line in March, the second in May, the third in September, and the fourth in November 1963. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1989 is $88,295,780 for new work, major rehabilitation cost $10,457,685 and $84,597,062 for maintenance, a total cost of $183,350,527. (See also Table 10-M.) 55E. WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA AND AL Location. The damsite is on the Chattahoochee River 2.8 miles upstream from West Point, Georgia, 201.4 miles 10-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 above the mouth of the Chattahoochee River, and 309.2 miles above the mouth of the Apalachicola River. At the full power pool elevation of 635 feet above national geodetic datum, the reservoir would lie in Troup and Heard Counties, Georgia, and in Chambers and Randolph Counties, Alabama (See Geological Survey maps of Georgia and Alabama.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for flood control, power, recreation, fish and wildlife development, and streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. The project provides for a gravity-type concrete dam 896 feet long with earth embankments at either end 1,111 feet long on the east end and 5,243 feet long on the west end. The total length of the dam and spillway is 7,250 feet. The main dam consists of a concrete non-overflow section, 185 feet long on the west side and an earth embankment retaining wall on the east side; a gravity concrete spillway 390 feet long, including piers and abutments, with six tainter gates, each 50 feet by 41 feet. A monolith intakepowerhouse section and erection bay 321 feet long is constructed directly west and adjacent to the spillway. At the full power-pool elevation of 635 the reservoir provides a total storage of 605,000 acre-feet of which 307,000 acrefeet is usable. During the critical flood season the reservoir is operated with maximum power pool elevation at 625 feet to provide flood storage between elevations 625 and 635. The initial power installation of 73,375 kilowatts consisting of units 1, 2 and 3 were placed on operation in March and April, 1975. The ultimate installation is 108,375 kilowatts. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) A flammable storage area will be constructed near the existing dam maintenance area. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Cultural Resources facility contract cost $35,616. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the project totaled $5,771,673. Gross power generation amounted to 158,964,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1989, of which 157,964,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance during CY 1988 totaled 7,259,633 user days. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project, which was initiated in June 1966, was essentially complete at the end of FY 1984. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1989 is $131,565,287 for new work and $47,633,546 for maintenance, a total of $179,198,833. (See also Table 10-M.) 56. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Mobile District monitors flood control operations of Alabama Power Company's Weiss, H. Neely Henry, and Logan Martin Dams on Coosa River, Alabama, and their Lewis Smith Dam on Sipsey Fork (headwaters of Black Warrior River, Alabama), for compliance with regulation plans prepared in accordance with Public Law 436, 83rd Congress, and Federal Power Commission licenses. Fiscal year cost for these activities on the Weiss, H. Neely Henry, and Logan Martin Dams are included under operation and maintenance costs for the Alabama-Coosa Rivers. Fiscal year cost for the Lewis Smith Dam is included under the overall operation and maintenance costs for the Black Warrior-Tombigbee Rivers System. 57. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Table 10-G.) Miscellaneous 58. FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES (FC & CE) Disaster Preparedness Program ............................ $659,985 Emergency Operations..............................................42,645 Advance M easures......................................................8,492 Total FC & CE $711,122 59. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM (NEPP) Mobilization Preparedness.................................... $121,770 Government Preparedness ......................................... 96,785 Emergency Facilities.........................................................38 Total NEPP $218,593 60. REGULATORY FUNCTIONS PROGRAM Permit Evaluation............................................... $1,600,225 Enforcement..................... 165,739 Studies.........................49,484 Other Navigation Regulations .............. 15,765 Total Regulatory $1,831,213 10-30 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT General Investigations 61. SURVEYS During FY 1989, costs of $1,028,540 were incurred as shown below: Flood Damage Preventive Studies ........................ $810,484 Navigation Studies ......................................... .. 118,521 Dam Safety ................................................................. 12,450 Special Investigations ................................................ 42,888 Coordination with Other Agencies, and non-Federal Interests..........................................32,514 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission................1...1,526 Review of Authorized Projects......................................157 Total Surveys $1,028,540 62. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Collection and study of basic data continued during the fiscal year with the initiation of Flood Insurance studies, the cost of which was reimbursable by FEMA. In addition, Flood Plain Management services were performed at a cost of $268,964. (See Table 10-P for listings of studies completed during FY 1989.) Costs incurred for environmental data studies total $1,479. The National Program for inspection of non-Federal dams cost $117. 63. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Gulfport Harbor, MS. The authorized plan of improvement consists of modifying the existing ship channel to 36 x 300 feet in Mississippi Sound, and 38 x 400 feet across the bar, with changes in the channel alignment and the entrance to the anchorage basin for safe and unrestricted navigation. Dredged material disposal will be in the Gulf of Mexico. The General Design Memorandum (GDM) was completed in June 1989, and approved by SAD in August 1989. A Feasibility Review Conference was held in August 1989, and the Project Guidance Memorandum was received by the district in late November 1989. Revisions to the GDM, and preparation of the Project Management Plan are underway. Preparation of plans and specifications will be initiated as soon as additional funds are made available. Fiscal year 1989 expenditures for AE & D were $366,549. Pascagoula Harbor, MS. The authorized plan of improvement calls for. Deepening and widening the Gulf entrance channel to 44 x 550 feet, relocating that channel about 500 feet westwardly, and providing for future realignment as conditions warrant. Deepening the main ship channel in Mississippi Sound to 42 feet. Deepening and widening the Bayou Casotte Channel to 42 x 350 feet, and constructing a turning basin at the mouth of Bayou Casotte. Provide for bend widening at those locations presenting a problem to navigation and allow for reconfigurating the impoundment basin at the entrance channel. A resurvey of project economics and initial coordination on environmental issues have been initiated. Indications are that the project is economical. A letter of assurance was received from Jackson County Port Authority. Feasiblity study completed and the GDM preparation is nearing completion. Fiscal year 1989 expenditures for AE & D were $802,444. Montgomery to Gadsden, Coosa River Channel, AL. The authorized improvements consist of five (5) locks with chamber dimensions of 84 x 600 feet to be constructed in the existing Alabama Power Company dams which will provide a navigation channel 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Montgomery to Gadsden, Alabama, and a barge canal on Black Creek (9' x 150') with a turnming basin of 350' x 600'. Based on data provided in the economic reevaluation, which is currently being finalized, there does not appear to be an economically favorable alternative for the development of navigation along the Coosa River Channel between Montgomery and Gadsden, Alabama. The final report is scheduled to be completed at the District level by January 1990. Fiscal year 1989 expenditures for AE & D were $198,062. Fort Toulouse, AL. The authorized plan consists of a curved 4500-foot long cutoff within the inside of the bend opposite the unstable slope, 3600 feet of riprap protection on the outside of the curved channel, and closure of the existing river channel adjacent to the Fort and Indian Mounds with two (2) dikes, filled in between with dredged material. The plan which will be recommended in the General Design Memorandum consists of approximately 1200 feet of riprap bank protection adjacent to the Fort and Indian Mounds with a 700-foot free standing stone dike from the Indian Mound downstream. Plans and Specifications are scheduled to be initiated in FY 1990 and construction initiated in FY 1991. Fiscal year 1989 expenditures for AE & D were $9,685. Moundville, AL. The authorized plan for bank protection consists of the upper 1600 feet of the project protected 10-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 with riprap armor up to elevation 130.0 on a graded slope with a stone toe dike constructed at the base of the slope; and also the lower 800 feet of the project protected with sheet pile cells, back filled with grass covered pervious material. The General Design Memorandum plan consists of approximately 800 linear feet of riprap slope protection, with a stone toe dike, extending up the bank to elevation 125.0 with protective vegetation extending to the top of the bank. Steeper upper bank sections will be protected by the use of a 250 feet long gabion wall. Plans and Specifications are scheduled to be initiated in FY 1990 and construction initiated in FY 1991. Fiscal year 1989 expenditures for AE & D were $10,166. Total Fiscal year 1989 expenditures for advance engineering and design were $1,608,888. Panama City Beaches, FL. The authorized plan consists of the placement of a protective beach to elevation 4', with a storm berm to elevation 7', together providing a 110-foot wide beach, with an artificial dune system having a top width of 30 feet at elevation 15 and stabilized by vegetation. A comprehensive damage survey was completed during FY 1989 as part of the reevaluation effort. Fully controlled aerial photographs were taken early in FY 89, first for use in the damage survey and also for later development of topographic maps. The Reevaluation Report was completed with favorable results and submitted in September 1989. Fiscal year 1989 expenditures for AE & D were $221,983. 64. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING William Bacon Oliver Lock and Dam (Replacement), AL. The project is located at mile 338.1 on the Warrior-Tombigbee River System at Tuscaloosa, Alabama. The plan consists of replacing the existing Oliver Lock with a lock located 2,300 feet downstream. The replacement lock will have dimensions of 110 x 600 feet. A fixed-crest spillway will extend 800 feet across the river. Construction was initiated in November 1986 and is scheduled to be completed in December 1992. Fiscal year 1989 expenditures for CP & E were $4,488. (See also section 6A Text). Bayou La Batre, AL. The authorized plan for the project consists of an 18-foot deep channel from the turning basin within Bayou La Batre, extending into Mississippi Sound then along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway alignment connecting with the existing Pascagoula ship channel. Extensions of the existing channel to above the Highway 188 bridge at a depth of 14 feet and into Snake Bayou at a depth of 12 feet are also incrementally justified. The Final Feasibility report was completed, and has been through all required Washington level review. The project will be proposed for authorization in the 1990 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA). Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) work is proceeding on schedule and will be completed in September 1991. Provided that the project is authorized in the 1990 WRDA, construction funding is appropriated in the 1992 Fiscal Year, and the requirements of local sponsorship are met, project construction would likely begin in June 1992 and complete in November 1994. Fiscal year 1989 expenditures for CP & E were $40,077. 65. RIVERS AND HARBORS CONTRIBUTED FUNDS Contributed funds required for authorized Federal studies included $9,194 for Bayou La Batre, AL; $17,435 for Mississippi Gulf Coast Area, MS; $48,458 for Valley Creek, AL; and $36,915 for Escatawpa River, MS; a total of $112,002 for contributed funds. 10-32 TABLE 10-A See Section is Taext Project Navigation 1. Apalachicola Bay 2. Aquatic Plant Control (Contributed Funds) 3. Bayou Coden, AL (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Bayou La Batre, AL (Contributed Funds) 5. Biloxi Harbor, MS (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Black Warrior & Tombigbee Rivers, AL 6A. Jackson Port Jackson, AL 6B. Oliver Lock & Dam (Replacement), AL (Contributed Funds) 7. Bon Secour River, AL (Contributed Funds) 8. Dauphin Island, Bay, AL MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Tetal Cet to Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY!9 Set304 1989 New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Woik: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contnib. Cost New Work: Approp. Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. 683,000 689,170 27,000 36,475 322,000 325,982 326,000 326,248 140,000 145,490 2,001,000 2,014,130 166,536 166,535 468 8,424,000 9,317,927 -62,000 482 2,850,000 1,055,336 23,000 26,531 55,000 55,015 93,000 37,674 16,000 16,251 50,000 50,674 -25,800 723 510,000 510,101 72,104 72,105 -4,000 29,220 14,942,300 14,993,606 50,000 22,766 6,205,000 5,246,606 10,181,000 7,513,161 72,000 71,942 47,900 49,892 76,085 7,200 7,808 41,300 40,995 198,200 198,391 2,837 13,494,000 13,252,508 70,000 56,722 16,866,000 11,230,691 16,866,000 11,260,615 19,200 20,008 10,000 76,000 76,043 45,000 -7,398 58,000 52,161 119,000 119,415 1,273,000 1,268,893 13,772,500 13,982,154 45,000 67,537 4,150,000 12,017,726 4,150,000 11,988,032 94,500 93,934 30,00 2,03,4611 2,033,4611 3,766,7071 3,766.3301 697,687 634,524 21,225 21,225 330701 330,701 812,733 806,612 100,000 100,000 50,000 50,000 311,095 311,095 3,227,152 3,226,406 10,5004 10,500' 1,431,9195 1,431.919" 9,671,306 9,666,563 102,600 102,600 238,640 238,640 88,461,935' 88,461,935 220,409,4765 220,234,873" 52,292,880 52,292,880 165,000 147,026 30,106,000 29,550,360 31,197,000 30,761,808 118,615 118,615 384,178 383,453 9,700 9,700 332,864 10-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section In Text Project 9. Dog and Fowl Rivers, AL (Contributed Funds) 10. East Pass Channel Fromn Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, FL (Contributed Funds) 11. Fly Creek, AL 12. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and Mexican Border 13. Gulfport Harbor, MS 14. Mobile, Harbor, AL (Contributed Funds) 15. Panama City Harbor, FL (Contributed Funds) 16. Pascagoula Harbor, MS (Contributed Funds) 17. Pensacola Harbor, FL (Cotributed Funds) Funding Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Apptrorxpp.. Cos Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.m: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maimnt.: Approp. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp.. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Main.: Approp. Cost Main.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Main: Contrib. Cost FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 .- 209143 32992 163,000 165,309 217,000 124,622 922,000 925,433 8,150o 55,893 588,000 768,130 1,000 15,356 3,502,000 3,515,992 185,000 187,812 -112,000 -70,000 130,000 89,275 8,646,000 8,796,672 2,685,000 1,968,039 617,000 620,887 3,154,000 3,162,738 75,456 75,456 19,000 20,328 80,000 79,698 -20,000 60,784 91,000 90,207 25,257 425,500 337,172 80,000 79,255 2,967,000 2,926,095 769,000 652,807 1,733,000 1,733,914 1,015,000 444,538 4,889,000 4,759,579 1,650,000 1,612,400 125,000 123,729 2,653,000 2,593,971 305,885 279,250 114,000 114,524 40,800 41,305 3,402 81,200 81,699 112,200 200,069 40,400 30,566 10,000 5,576,000 5,577,136 124,842 2,220,600 2,220,857 24,003,000 7,172,578 7,324,000 7,032,275 2,171,000 2,972,467 1,045,700 1,044,813 2,083,200 2,143.997 940,413 651,209 887,100 886,252 28,77 298,500 298,700 3,567 11,851 19,500 15,287 101,000 101,321 30,000 39,851 -10,000 2,522,000 2,554,913 3,540 415,000 415,393 1,000,000 14,295,571 5,680,300 6,146,522 5,070,000 5,277,168 93,000 94,424 516,000 520,634 163,162 417,737 981,000 978,543 312,350 297,587 10-34 Total Cost to Sept , 30,1989 327,949 1,734,326 1,733,643 391,354 391,354 1,977,293 1,991,932 197,450 195,250 916,715 916,715 7,607,860 7,607,517 398,000 398,000 29,000 29,000 474,021 473,033 6,480,299 6,480,2999 56,293,72210 56,277,9721o 969,000n 969,000n 35,802,49812 35,801,95412 9,265,93513 90,103,445 100,419,48314 100,407,099" 16,858,500 16,851,076 1,638,0451' 1,638,0451s 8,351,03416 8,349,84916 80,000 80,000 6,572,9857 6,S72,98517 41,393,6201s 41,391,9751 3,220,884 3,104,623 1,469,6939 1,469,69319 8,159,338w 8,155,547w 312,350 297,587 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section In Text Project 18. Perdido Pass Channel, AL (Contributed Funds) 19. Tennessee- Tombigbee Waterway AL and MS Flood Control 26. County Line Road Bridge, Itawamba Co., MS 27. Cribbs Mill Creek, Tuscaloosa, AL 28. Eslava Creek, Mobile, AL (Contributed Funds) 29. Gulf Breeze, Santa Rosa Co., FL 30. Hwy. 39 Bridge Gainesville, AL 31. Hintonville Road Bridge, Perry Co., MS 32. Hurricane Creek Prentiss Co., MS 33. Leaf and Bowie Rivers, Hauttiesburg, 34. Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, AL 35. Magby Creek, Columbus, MS 36. Mill Creek, Dalton, GA 37. Murder Creek, Brewton, AL 38. Okatibbee Dam, MS 39. Raccoon Creek, Baconton, GA 40. Sewerline Protection Valley, AL 41. Sope Creek, Marietta, GA 42. Sowashee Creek, Meridian, MS Fuanding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. New Work: Approp. Cost NAepwp rWopo.rk: Cost NAewpp Wropo.rk: Cost New Work: Approp. Cost NAewpp Wroopr.k: Cost New Work: CAopsptrop. New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 - -. - - 936,000 944,695 26,496,000 24,174,109 13,159,425 13,171,967 80,000 71,962 100,000 66,674 50,000 1,254 1,340,000 1,067,472 80,000 7,414 20,000 27,370 10,000 9,342 550,000 234,624 119,906 793,000 877,052 44,491 150,482 -20,000 314,854 28,000 27,430 31,600 32,761 - - -5,060,000 6,160,000 15,256,360 7,898,488 18,816,000 18,970,000 18,765,500 18,516,261 - 25,000 - 10,100 65,000 45,000 58,145 48,771 147,000 1,105,000 181,328 974,600 - 196,000 - 88,000 - 53,000 - 27,945 50,000 62,867 4,269 - 50,000 - 10,109 7,500 15,000 7,018 155,000 290,108 113,765 - 50,000 62,866 35,773 25.500 - 4,703 9,606 10,000 15,000 12,502 162 390,000 200,000 427,607 186,048 283 73 1,031,800 1,050,000 1,020,843 995,073 36,800 48,000 38,208 16,177 -14,000- 2,924- -165,000 95,000 18,584 67,609 350,000 2,400,000 226,458 1,707,461 10-35 Total Cot to Sept. 30, 1989 58,000 57,732 11,000,000 5,105,015 19,043,400 19,614,116 84,000 20,397 85,000 44,453 1,435,000 293,640 25,500 93,500 108,238 1,974 224,000 29,554 34,000 14,278 41,125 15,000 18,863 63.750 34,174 10,000 11,354 215,536 1,000,000 1,057,387 261,000 46,637 -63 1,628 25,000 106,349 1,100,000 1,553,805 629,860 629,860 6,065,817 6,065,346 510,000 510,000 10,325 10,325 1,012,378,2002 1,001,496,66021 104,512,156m 104,194,50922 109,000 30,497 469,327 417,602 2,884,121 1,608,651 196,000 113,500 146,500 136,183 100,000 70,364 274,000 39,663 56,500 21,296 1,585,000 1,584,214 145,000 124,916 169,250 126,506 265,000 251,045 1,240,000 1,160,438 9,739,528 9,739,528 11,369,692 11,345,920 423,300 173,143 180,937 180,937 1,540,000 1,525,444 3,850,000 3,487,725 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section FY86 FY87 - 60,000 - - In Text Project Funding (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 43. Tallahalla Creek, New Work: Laurel, MS Approp. Cost 44. Three Mile Creek, New Work: Mobile, AL Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 45. Tombigbee River New Work: (East Fork), Approp. MS and AL Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 46. Tombigbee River New Work: Tributaries, Approp. MS and AL Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 47. Upper Gordon Creek, New Work: Hattiesburg, MS Approp. Cost 48. Village Creek, New Work: Birmingham, AL Approp. Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost 49. Whorton's Bend Road, New Work: Etowah, Co., AL Approp. Cost Multiple Purpose Projects, Lock and Dam 53. Alabama-Coosa New Work: Rivers, AL and GA Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 53A. Carters Dam and New Work: Reservoir, GA Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 53B. Claibome Lock and New Work: Dam, AL Approp. Cost 53C. Coosa River, New Work: Montgomery to Approp. Gadsden, AL Cost 53D. Millers Ferry Lock New Work: and Dam, AL Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 53E. Robert F. Henry New Work: Lock and Dam, AL Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 54. Allatoona Dam New Work: Coosa River Basin, Approp. GA Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 300,000 218,592 29,000 125,000 125,246 3,027,000 1,811,493 77,000 31,309 50,000 47,052 10,000 415 4,866,800 4,818,838 3,064,800 2,923,539 153,000 164,098 2,297,000 3,297,214 50,000 45,287 2,691,000 3,259,533 -106,000 866 2,437,000 2.507,840 5,745 38,776 2,360,000 2,392,094 -187,000 793 1,844,575 1,858,604 7,671 5,278,000 5,746,764 2,136 2,585,000 2,608,238 2,024,800 2,040,427 5,315,800 5,327,800 10-36 FY88 430,000 124,999 42,000 15,767 4,348,000 1,005,132 436,000 28,300 141,000 141,928 2,932,600 2,280,647 60,000 103,363 225,000 189,999 71,000 19,980 5,360,000 5,292,445 3,773,000 3,854,658 FY89 290,000 59,025 130,000 46,312 -2,300,000 912,533 112,458 66,000 66,102 1,291,495 250,000 153,585 2,310,000 2,071,571 647,000 487,000 320,000 287,982 8,300,100 8,392,210 4,905,500 4,958,589 3,780,000 3,917,320 2,220,000 2,289,096 4,977,900 5,267,320 Total Cost to Sept. 30,1989 780,000 184,025 172,000 62,080 2,348,000 2,136,257 465,000 140,758 134,801 134,801 2,712,100 2,711,371 24,565,825 23,606,623 94,700 63,342 717,000 608,276 2,585,000 2,308,622 647,000 487,000 401,000 308,377 3,245,400 3,245,400 58,278,560 58,235,133 111,140,340 111,140,340 33,209,600 33,087,925 27,997.450 27,997,450 14,986400 14,986,4003 63,125,300 63,125,300 38,432,865 38,383,287 83,360,800 83,360,800 23,455,153 23,421,854 35,709,085" 35,709,085- 69,483,223 69,392,007 657 3,106,500 3,030,927 2,286,000 2,261,938 6,100,000 5,962,769 -49,000 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cot to in Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 55. Apalachicola, New Work: Chattahoochee Approp. - - - - 4,452,162 and Flint Rivers, Cost - - - 4,452,162" AL and GA Maint.: Approp. 3,088,000 5,120,000 4,208,600 3,608,500 80,167,37 Cost 3,909,709 5,198,930 4,159,830 3,633,107 80,125,563 55A. Buford Dam New Work: Lake Sidney Approp. - - 53,030,038 Laer, GA Cost -2,038 2,041 - - 38,418" Maint.: Approp. 7,152,000 9,729,900 8,394,600 7,533,100 68,501,507 Cost 7,328,659 9,107,400 8,654,475 8,015,948 88,390,651 55B. George W. Andrews New Work: Lock and Dam, Approp. - - - - 13,038,427k AL and GA Cost - - - - 13,038,427" Maint.: A.p3 0 30 30 30 30 ACposptrop. 3o 3o 3o 3o so 55C. Jim Woodruff Lock New Work: and Dam, GA and Approp. - - - 48,017,851 FL Cost 796 - - - 47,978,7513 Maint.: Approp. 4,768,000 6,451,800 7,131,800 5,728,500 62,432,380 Cost 4,910,998 5,630,585 7,709,369 6,029,775 62,357,100 55D. Walter F. George New Work: Lock and Dam Approp. - - - 88,295,78032 Al and GA Cost7 - - - 88,295,780 Maint.: Approp. 7,063,000 6,894,800 8,188,000 7,421,000 84,673,364 Cost 7,347,633 6,823,873 8,140,417 7,664,649 84,597,062 Major Rehab.: Approp. -700,000 -- 23,000 - 10,477,000 Cost 468,153 4,240 204,570 1,111 10,457,685 55E. West Point Lake, New Work: Chattahoochee River Approp. - - 11,400 - 131,568,7603s Basin, GA and AL Cost 1,432 9,149 19,162 35,616 131,565,287s Maint.: Approp. 5,266,000 6,368,800 6,009,000 5,753,000 47,762,100 Cost 5,288,528 6,372,604 6,122,806 5,771,673 47,633,546 1. Includes $134,613 for previous projects and $28,500 for DPR on Two-Mile. 2. Includes $168,766 for previous projects. 3. Includes $5,650 for previous projects. 4. Cost for providing spoil dikes for work authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act. 5. Includes $44,382 for previous projects of which $5,000 was contributed funds. 6. Includes $96,509 for previous projects of which $10,200 was contributed funds. 7. Includes $606,931 for previous projects and $1,243,661 for recreational facilities on completed projects. 8. Includes $50,000 for previous projects. 9. Includes $45,605 for previous projects. 10. Includes $65,137 for previous projects. 11. Includes $269,017 for previous projects. 12. Includes $2,312,297 for previous projects and $442,836 Special O and M Funds. 13. Includes $6,683,104 for previous projects, $14,000 Public Work funds, and $41,242 Emergency Relief funds. 14. Includes $4,096,681 for previous projects and $494,136 Special O and M funds. 15. Includes $203,560 for previous projects, $581,959 Public Works funds, $457,467 rehabilitation of jetties under existing project and $48,001 for Grand Lagoon modification. 16. Includes $513,604 for previous projects. 17. Includes $904,442 for previous projects. 18. Includes $412,624 for previous projects, $124,565 Special O and M funds, and $829,472 Emergency Work Funds. 19. Includes $594,688 for previous projects. 20. Includes $126,649 for previous projects. 21. Includes $1,993,000 transferred to National Park Service; $210,249 GI funds expended during FY 1957 thn FY 1961. Previous project cost amounted to $197,651. 22. Includes $234,331 for previous projects. 23. Includes $3,692,483 for previous projects. 24. Includes $2,978,050 for previous projects. 25. Includes $3,347,489 for recreational facilities. 26. Includes $1,883,193 Federal funds, $1,924 contributed funds for previous projects; and $809,553 for Laser Creek design and $301,310 for Rysco Channel. 27. Includes $2,246,233 for previous projects. 28. Includes $8,233,325 for recreaional facilities. 29. Includes $84,014 for recreational facilities. 30. Included under maintenance for overall Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers project. 31. Includes $1,515,822 for recreational facilities. 32. Includes $2,441,029 for recreational facilities. 33. Includes $35,045 for previous project costs. 10-37 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documaents Mar. 2, 1907 Jan. 21, 1927 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Nov. 21, 19631 Feb. 5, 19751 Aug. 11, 1983 Jul 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 2, 19691 Oct. 27, 1965 APALACHICOLA BAY, FL. (See Section 1 of Text) Channel 18 feet deep through West Pass and Link Channels. 10 feet deep across the inner bar, and 9 feet deep through Bulkhead Shoals. Modify project to provide for channel 10 feet deep from mouth of inner bar channel to Gulf via Link and West Pass Channels, and 10-foot depth in Bulkhead Shoals Channel. At Eastpoint, Fl., a channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long, parallel to shore, with connecting channel 6 feet deep aqd 100 feet wide to St. George Sound, and at Apalachicola, Fl., a small-boat basin 200 feet and 9 feet deep, with a connecting channel 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide through Scipio Creek to the Apalachicola River. Modify project to provide for a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 10-foot depth in Apalachicola Bay across St. George Island to within 300 feet of the Gulf shore, thence increasing uniformly in width to 200 feet at shore and continuing at this width to the 10-foot depth in the Gulf, with two jetties extending from the dune line on St. George Island to the outer end of channel, and for abandonment of West Pass Channel upon completion of channel through St. George Island. Modify improvement of Apalachicola Bay, Fl., authorized by River and Harbor Act of Sept. 3, 1954 to provide that the Secretary of the Army shall reimburse local interests for such approved work as they may have done based upon the reduction in the amount of material which will have to be removed to provide project dimensions at such time as Federal dredging of the channel is undertaken. A channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide and about 1 mile long, parallel to shore at Two Mile, Fl., with a 6-by 100-foot connecting channel to water of the same depth in Apalachicola Bay. A channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from the eastern end of the existing Two Mile channel and generally paralleling the shoreline for a distance of about 9,000 feet to intersect with the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway about 1,650 feet south of Gorrie Bridge at Apalachicola, and a breakwater built to elevation 4.0 feet above mean low water along the seaward side of the existing channel parallel to the shore at Two Mile. The total length of the breakwater of about 6,150 feet, includes two 860-foot legs paralleling the existing entrance channel. Modify Eastpoint project to include breakwaters with a total length of 5,300 feet. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 2 of Text) Aquatic plant control for N.C., S.C., Ga., FL, AL, Ms., and La. Research and planning costs to be borne by U.S. Provided for continued research. BAYOU CODEN, AL. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel4 by 40feet Channel 8 by 60 feet to connect with Bayou La Batre channel. BAYOU LA BATRE, AL. (See Section 4 of Text) A 12- by 100-foot channel from that depth in Mississippi Sound to a point about 2,800 feet south of the highway bridge, thence a channel 12 by 75 feet to the bridge, an overall distance of about 33,500 feet. H. Doc. 422, 59th Cong., 1st Seas. H. Doc. 106, 69th Cong., 1st Seas. H. Doc. 156, 82d Cong., 1st Seas. H. Doc. 557, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. DPR(Sec. 107) DPR (Sec. 107) DPR (Sec. 107) H Doc 37, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 87-874 87th Cong. H. Doc. 251,89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 824, 77th Cong., 24 Seuss. DPR (Sec 107) H. Doc. 327, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. 10-39 TABLE 10-B TABLE 10-B (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Doueta Jul. 3, 1930 Jun 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Nov. 7, 1966 Mar. 28, 19791 Jul. 5, 1884 Mar. 3, 1899 Sep. 19, 1890 Sep. 19, 1890 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1909 Aug. 22, 1911 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 BILOXI HARBOR, MS. (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mississippi Sound west and north of Deer Island to deep water in Back Bay of Biloxi Relocation of channel. Entrance channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide into Old Fort Bayou. Entrance channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide through Cranes Neck into Bayou Bernard. Maintain channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide from Biloxi Harbor to Ott Bayou. Continuous channel 12 feet deep from Mississippi Sound the Air Force terminal on Bayou Bernard via Bak Bay and Cranes Neck. A 23-mile-long through channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through: Mississippi Sound, Biloxi Bay (east of Deer Island), Back Bay, Big Lake, and via land cut to Gulfport Lake, including a 500-by 2,600-foot turning basin in the lake, thence, a channel 12 by 100 feet from the western end of Gulfport Lake for about 2 miles to a 300- by 500- foot turning basin; adoption for maintenance of a 12- by 150- foot spur channel from the main channel in Biloxi Bay, westward about 1 mile to a 400- by 600- foot turning basin opposite Ott Bayou, and abandonment of the existing 6-by 40- foot channel into Ott Bayou; continuation of maintenance of the 12- by 150-foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles from the main channel in Biloxi Bay to a point opposite Oak Street; continuation of maintenance of the channel west of Deer Island. A channel 10 feet deep; 100 feet wide and 300 feet long extending northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel and, into a rectangular basin approximately 300 feet by 370 feet. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL. (See Section 6 of Text) Original appropriation for improving Black Warrior River. Original project for slack-water improvement authorized by Secretary of War, Apr. 19, 1887 Construction of the first locks between Tuscaloosa and Demopolis. (Maintenance of the section of Tombigbee River below lock 1 to its mouth (66 miles) included in the existing project.) Construction of locks and dams 1, 2, and 3. Merging of the individual project for the Black Warrior and Warrior Rivers and the Tombigbee River below Demopolis. Construction of locks and dams 14, 15,16, and 17. Provided for reconstruction of obsolete structures, modified in plan and location, to provide efficient and economical maintenance and operation. Lift of lock 17 changed to 63 feet, and construction of locks and dams 18 and 19 eliminated from the project Extension of slack-water improvement to Sanders Ferry on Mulberry Fork and Nichols Shoal on Locust Fork. Raising of various dams 2 feet and raising the lock walls 2 feet at lock 1 to provide a minimum depth of 8 feet at low water, widening the channel to 150 feet where practicable. For snagging Mobile River from the mouth of Chickasaw Creek to the junction of the Alabama and Tombigbee Riven. H. Doc. 754.69th Cong., 2d Ses. H. Dec. 639.75th Cong., 34 Se. H. Doc. 258.76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 326.76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 256. 81st Cong., 1st Seus. H. Doc. 271, 86th Cong., 2d Ses. H. Doc. 513, 89th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) Annual Report, 1887, pt. 2, P. 1302. H. Doc. 178, 56th Cong., 2d Seas., and Annual Re ort 1901, pt. 3, p. 1858 HD. ec. 165, 57th Cong., 1st Seas., and Annumal Report, 1902, p. 1293 Public Law 317 H. Doc. 72, 62d Cong., 1st Seas. Annual Report, 1918, p. 876 H. Doc. 728, 71st Cong., 3d Seas. 10-40 TABLE 10-B (Continued) MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 26, 1934 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Dec. 21, 1982 Jul. 30, 1983 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 18, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 15, 1985 May 16, 19631 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Increase channel dimensions to 9 by 200 feet; construct crest gates at lock and dam 17; add flashboards at all dams; Sunflower Bend Cutoff. Construction of a lock and dam below Tuscaloosa to replace original locks and dams 10, 11, and 12 Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers harbors. Recreation facilities. Construction of a lock and dam near Demopolis to replace existing dams 4, 5, 6, and 7. Provide increased spillway capacity at dam 1. Coffeeville Lock and Dam Wildlife Refuge. Provides for a wider navigation opening at the Franklin Ferry Bridge, Jefferson County, Al. Authorized to widen, as necessary for safe passage. the navigation opening of Franklin Ferry Bridge, Jefferson County, Al. Conduct a feasibility study of protection from erosion problems on the southemrn bank from river mile 253 to river mile 255. MOUND STATE PARK (See Section 23 of Text) Correct erosion problems along the banks of the Warrior River in order to protect Mound State Park, near Moundville, Alabama. JACKSON PORT, AL (See Section 6A of Text) Construct a spur canal 9 feet deep, 280 feet wide, and 680 feet long in conjunction with the realignment project on the existing navigation project. (Jackson Port) OLIVER LOCK AND DAM (REPLACEMENT), AL (See Section 6B of Text) Construction of a lock and dam to replace the William Bacon Oliver Lock and Dam. Construction and land acquisition for Oliver Lock Replacement BON SECOUR RIVER, AL. (See Section 7 of Text) A 10-by 100-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Bon Secour Bay to mouth of Bon Secour River and extending up river to vicinity of Swift's Landing, thence 6 by 80 feet up river to a point 600 feet above OakLanding, with two turning and maneuvering areas 150 feet wide and 1,100 to 1,200 feet long opposite Swift's Landing and ice loading dock. Overall length of improvement is about 4.7 miles. DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, AL. (See Section 8 of Text) A channel 7 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to an anchorage basin of same depth, about 7 acres in area, in marsh just north of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a channel 4 feet deep and 40 feet wide from anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay; and a jetty and revetment to protect entrance channel; and (b) an anchorage basin 7 feet deep and 500 feet square at Dauphin Island Village, with an entrance channel of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 8,300 feet long, extending to 7-foot hydrographic contour in Mississippi Sound. H. Doc. 56, 73d Cong., 1st Sea., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 45.73d Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26. 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 382, 76th Cong., 1st Seas. S. Doc. 50, 86th Cong., 1st Seas. Public Law 97,377 Public Law 98-63 Water Resource Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act 1987 (P.L. 99-591) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) The Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) DPR (Sec. 107) H. Dc. 333, 76th Cong., 1st Seas. H. Doc. 394, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. 10-41 TABLE 10-B (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Doe May 19, 19691 Jul. 3, 1930 Oct. 24, 1951 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 1, 1980 May 17, 1950 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul 3, 1930 Jul3, 1930 Jul 23, 1942 Jun. 17, 1943 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 Mar. 3, 1899 DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, AL (See Section 9 of Text) To provide stiall craft navigation on west side of Mobile Bay. EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FL. (See Section 10 of Text) Maintenance of 6-foot channel by 100-foot channel from Choctawhatchee Bay into Gulf. Maintenance of 12-foot channel from Choctawhatchee Bay into Gulf, and maintenance of 6-foot channel into Old Pass Lagoon. Construction of twin jetties. (Present project dimensions.) Modifications to provide a channel length of approximately 3,800 feet in lieu of 2,000 feet from the East Pa Channel into Old Pass Lagoon, with no changes in width and depth. FLY CREEK, FAIRHOPE, AL (See Section 11 of Text), A channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long from 6-foot depth in Mobile Bay to a turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 350 feet long, in Fly Creek. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL., AND MEXICAN BORDER (Mobile District) (See Section 12 of Text) APALACHICOLA RIVER TO ST. ANDREW BAY, FL. A channel 5 feet deep at mean low water and 65 feet wide at the bottom. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO WEST BAY, FL. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water, with no reference to width. CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO PENSACOLA BAY, FL. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. PENSACOLA BAY, FL., TO MOBILE BAY, AL. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water aid 100 feet wide at the bottom. MOBILE BAY, AL, TO NEW ORLEANS, LA. A channel 300 feet wide and 10 feet from the 10 foot contour in Mobile Bay to the 10-foot contour in Mississippi Sound. A channel 100 feet wide and 9 feet deep from Lake Pontchartrain to Mississippi Sound. APALACHEE BAY, FL., TO NEW ORLEANS, LA. A channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low water, except in the section between Mobile, Al., and New Orleans, La., where the width is to be 150 feet. Conditional acquisition of Gulf County Canal, Fl. and enlargement of the canal to 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide. Construction of a movable span in the Georgia, Florida & Alabama R.R. bridge crossing the Ochlockonee River. Abandonment and closure of original channel between Big Lagoon and Pensacola Bay and construction of a new channel to enter the bay north of original entrance. Authorized enlargement of Gulf County Canal to 12 by 125 feet. GULFPORT HARBOR, MS. (See Section 13 of Text) A channel 19 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the anchorage basin at Ship Island to Gulfport, Ms., and an anchorage basin next to the shore end 19 feet deep and not less than 2,640 feet by 1,320 feet in area. 10-42 DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 209, 70th Congress 1st Sees. H. Doc. 470, 81st Cong., 2dSeas. H. Doc. 194. 88th Cong., 2d Ses. Energy and Water Development Approprisation H. Doc. 194, 81st Cong., lit Sess. H. Doc. 670, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comnmittee Doc. 52, 72d Cong., 2d Sees. H. Doc. 259, 72d Cong., 1st Seas. H. Doc. 565, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 42, 73d Cong., 2d Seses. H. Doc. 42, 71st Cong., 1st Seas. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 341,71st Cong., 2d Sess. Public Law 675, 77th Cong., 2d Seas., and H. Doc. 96, 79th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 257, 76th Cong., 1st Seas., and Public Law 75, 78th Cong. 1st Seas. H. Doc. 442, 76th Cong., 1st Seas. H. Doc. 325, 81st Cong., 1st Seas. Public Law 89-789, 89th Cong. 2d Ses. H. Dc. 120, 55th Cong., 3d Sess. TABLE 10-B (Continued) Acts MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 23, 1930 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 3, 1958 Aug. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 26, 1970 (SR) Dec. 15, 1970 (HR) Combined Ship Island Pass with Gulfport Harbor project. Increased depth to 26 feet and width to 300 feet across ShipIsland Bar anddepth to 19 feet in channel from anchorage basin at Ship Island to anchorage basin at Gulfport. Authorized relocation of channel across Ship Island Bar. Increased depth to 27 feet and width to 300 feet across Ship Island Bar, 26 feet deep and 220 feet wide through Ms. Sound and depth of 26 feet in the anchorage basim at Oulfport. Increased depth of 32 feet and width to 30 feet across Ship Island Bar, 30 feet deep and 220 feet wide through Ms. Sound and a depth of 30 feet in the anchorage basin at Gulfport Maintenance of the existing commercial rsmall-boat harbor and an approach channel 100 feet wide and 4,300 feet long, from deep water in Ms. Sound to the small-boat basin, all at a depth of 8 feet. Modify the existing Ship Channel to 36 x 300 feet in Mississippi Sound, and 38 x 400 feet across the bar, with changes in the channel alignment and the entrance to the anchorage basin for safe and unrestricted navigation. Modification of FY 1985 Supplemental Apopriations Act. Dredged material from project shall be disposed of in open water in the Gulf of Mexico in accordance with all provisions of Federal law. Modify the WRDA of 1986 and authorize disposal of dredged material in open waters of the Gulf of Mexico; and by Thin-layer disposal in Mississippi Sound under a demonstration program. MOBILE HARBOR, AL. (See Section 14 of Text) For improvement of Threemile Creek by snagging from Mobile River to the Industrial Canal. Adoption of existing channel through Garrows Bend from Choctaw Point to Arlington pier, 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide, with 2 turnin; basins. Adoption of the existing channel alongside Arlington pier from the of Garrows Bend Channel, 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide. A channel 25 feet deep and generally 500 feet wide in Mobile River from the highway bridge to the mouth of Chickasaw Creek, then 25 feet deep and 250 feet wide in Chickasaw Creek to a point about 400 feet below Shell Bayou. Enlarging Mobile Bay Channel to 42 by 600 feet, Enlarging Mobile Bay Channel to 40 by 400 feet. Deepening Mobile River Channel below highway bridge to 40 feet over present widths, including existing turning basins and anchorage areas. Widening river channel opposite Magazine Point to provide a 40- by 800- by 1,400-foot turning basin. The turning basin was further modified for maintenance by SAD letter of 27 November 1973 under authority contained in ER-1130-2-307 to increase the turning basin's dimensions to 1000' x 1600'. Closure of Garrows Bend Channel by construction and operation of an earth-filled causeway across said channel (work to be done by local interests). To provide a channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the main ship channel in Moble Bay and extending northwesterly for about 5.3 miles to the shore of Mobile Bay including an anchorage and turning basin near the shoreline, thence a land-cut 40 feet deep, 300 feet wide and about 1.9 miles long to and including a trapezoidal turning basin 40 feet deep and approximately 42 acres, 40 feet deep; a barge channel 12- by 100-feet extending 6500-feet and terminating in a 300-foot by 300-foot terminal basin H. Doc. 2, 60th Cong., 1st Seas. H. Doc. 692, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 112, 81st Cong., 1st Seass. S. Doc. 123, 84th Cong., 2d Sess. The Supplemental Appopriations Act, 1985 (P.L 99-88) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (P.L. 100-676) Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 69, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 739, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Dec. 74, 83d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 74, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. (Under provision of Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act) 10-43 Documents TABLE 10-B (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Doamnemats Aug. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Mar. 23, 1967' Jun. 14, 1972 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 4, 1915 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 14, 1960 Jul. 14, 1967 Oct. 23, 1962 Deepen and widen entrance channel over the bar to 57 by 700 feet, a distance of about 7.4 miles, deepen and widen Mobile Bay Channel from mouth of bay to south of Mobile River, 55 by 550 feet, a distance of about 27.0 miles, deepen and widen an additional 4.2 miles of Mobile Bay Channel to 55 by 650 feet, provide 55 foot deep anchorage area and turning basin in vicinity of Little Sand Island, and construct a 1710 acre disposal area adjacent to the Brookley Industrial Complex. Modification of FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act. Dredged material from project shall be disposed of in open water in the Gulf of Mexico in accordance with all provisions of Federal law. PANAMA CITY BEACHES, FL Shoreline protection to provide a 110-foot wide beach with an artificial dune system and stabilization of vegetation. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL. (See Section 15 of Text) Channels 27 and 29 feet deep. Abandonment of project adopted by act of June 25, 1910. Maintenance of a channel in Watson Bayou 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in St. Andrew Bay to the highway bridge. Channels 32 and 34 feet deep. A channel 8 by 100 feet in Grand Lagoon from St. Andrew Bay to a point about 2,400 feet east of State Highway 392. Bridge with branches to serve shore facilities which terminate at the bridge. Channels 38, 40, 42 feet deep. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS. (See Section 16 of Text) Provides for through channel from the Gulf to mile 4 on Dog River, 25 by 300 feet through Horn Island Pass. thence 22 by 225 feet across Mississippi Souind and up 150 feet in Pascagoula River above bridge, and up Dog River to mile 4, all subject to financial participation by local interests. Waived requirement for financial participation by local interests. 63d Cong., 2d Sess. Cutoff channel, 12 by 125 feet, from State Highway 63 bridge to mile 4 on Dog River, via Robertson and Bounds Lakes. Modification to provide for channel dimensions of 35 by 325 feet through Horn Island Pass, thence 30 by 275 feet across Mississippi Sound and up Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge, and a turning basin just below the bridge. Reimbursement of local interests for work done on Dog River cutoff ($44,000). Modification to provide for maintenance of 12- by 125-foot channel to mile 6 on Dog River, and maintenance of 30- by 225-foot side channel from main ship channel in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 30 by 300 feet in Bayou Casotte to a turning basin of the same depth 1 mile above the mouth. Deepening the Horn Island Pass channel to 38 feet and deepening the main ship channel in Mississippi Sound, the river channel to the railroad bridge, and the turning basin all to 33 feet Enlarging Horn Island Pass Channel to 40 by 350 feet provision of an impounding area adjacent to and east of channel 40 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 1,500 feet The Supplemental 47ians Act, 1985 .L99 -88) Water Resources Developmnt Act of 1986 (P.L 99-662) Water Resources Developmeant Act of 1986 (P.L 99-662) H. Doc. 33, 73d Cong., 1st Seas. H. Dec. 555, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Dec. 559, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) H. Dec. 196, 924 Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 682, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. River and Harbor Committee Doc. 12, H. Doc. 188, 81st Cong., lst Sess. H. Dec. 98, 86th Cong., H. Doc. 98, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Chief of Engineers Report dated Nov. 3,1960. H. Dec. 560, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 10-44 TABLE 10-B (Continued) MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 11, 19831 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 27, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 24, 1946 long, enlarging main channel in Mississippi Sound and river channel to railroad bridge to 38 by 350 feet, and deepening turning basin in river and Bayou Casotte channels and basin to 38 feet. Modification to provide for channel dimensions 12 x 80 feet extending about 2,750 feet from deep waters in the Pascagoula River into Krebs Lake to a turning basin, thence, along the south bank of the lake a channel with dimensions of 10 x 60 feet terminating at a second turning basin, a distance of about 2,750 feet. The project was constructed by hydraulic dredging with the disposal placed in an unpland diked area. Deepen and widen gulf entrance channel to 44 by 550 feet; widen Horn Island channel to 600 feet, relocating that channel about 500 feet westwardly; deepen Mississippi Sound portion to 42 feet; widen and deepen Bayou Casotte to 42 350 feet and construct turning basin. Disposal of all new work material in Gulf of Mexico. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL. (See Section 17 of Text) A channel 30 feet deep at mean low water and 500 feet wide from the Gulf of Mexico to the dock line at the east end of the city of Pensacola, and also provided that $150,000 may be used in constructing or purchasing a seagoing suction dredge. Modified the existing project for the present inner channels and the deepening of the entrance channel to 32 feet. Improvement of Bayou Chico. Maintenance of the entrance channel from the Gulf of Mexico to lower Pensacola Bay, a distance of about 5 miles to dimensions of 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide; maintenance of a channel along the south side of the aircraft carrier mooring basin, a distance of about 2.5 miles, to dimensions of 33 feet deep and 300 feet wide; a bay channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and about 2.1 miles long; parallel approach channels to opposite ends of the inner-harbor channel, about 1.3 and 1.4 miles in length, each 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and flared at the junctions with the inner-harbor channel; and deepening the existing 500-foot wide inner-harbor channel to a depth of 33 feet and lengthening it to 3,950 feet, PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, AL. (See Section 18 of Text) A 12- by 150-foot channel stabilized by twin rubblemount jetties, from the Gulf of Mexico into Perdido Pass, thence 9 by 100 feet into Perdido Bay with a spur channel of the same dimensions into Terry Cove. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL AND MS (See Section 19 of Text) A waterway connecting Tennessee and Tombigbee Rivers via East Fork of Tombigbee River, Mackeys and Yellow Creeks. Plan of improvement consists of three sections: river section 9- by 300-foot channel for 149 miles between Demopolis and Amory, Ms.; canal section, 12 by 300 feet for 46 miles from Amory to Bay Springs; divide section 12 by 300 feet (except in the 27 mile-long divide cut in which bottom width be 280 feet) for 39 miles from Bay Springs through dividing ridge to Tennessee. Total lift of 341 feet to be accomplished by 10 locks. Total length of project is 234 miles. 10-45 DPR (Sec. 107) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L 99-662) H. Dec. 253, 72d Cong., 1st Seas. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 96, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 528, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 94, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 486, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. TABLE 10-B (Continued) REPORT TO THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 7, 19884 Nov. 17, 19872 Sep. 10, 19872 Oct. 7, 19884 Jul. 2, 1986 Oct. 7, 19884 Oct. 7, 19884 Oct. 3, 19852 Aug. 15, 1985 Oct. 13, 19882 Oct. 13, 19882 Apr. 18, 19862 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 13, 19882 TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WILDLIFE MITIGATION Acquire from willing sellers in a timely manner at fair market value 88,000 acres of land for mitigation of wildlife losses resulting from construction and operation of the project for the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway. COUNTY LINE ROAD BRIDGE, ITAWAMBA CO., MS (See Section 26 of Text) Provides protection for both banks and the channel at the bridge crossing Mantachie Creek. CRIBBS MILL CREEK, TUSCALOOSA, AL (See Section 27 of Text) Channel modification of about 7,300 feet of the creek. Modification consists of widening the existing channel. ESLAVA CREEK, MOBILE, AL (See Section 28 of Text) Channel enlargement, bank stabilization measures, and increasing the size of the box culvert at Airport Boulevard by adding an additional barrel. GULF BREEZE, SANTA ROSA CO., FL (See Section 29 of Text) Emergency action to stop shoreline erosion around a water supply pumping station for the City of Gulf Breeze, FL. HIGHWAY 39 BRIDGE, GAINESVILLE, AL (See Section 30 of Text) Slope protection for a 2000-foot reach of the east bank of the Tombigbee River, immediately upstream of the existing Highway 39 Bridge. HINTONVILLE ROAD BRIDGE, PERRY CO., MS (See Section 31 of Text) Provides protection for the bridge side slopes channel bottom, and to realign the channel thru the center span of the bridge. HURRICANE CREEK, PRENTISS CO.,MS (See Section 32 of Text) Provides emergency streambank protection to the banks and the bottom of the channel to retard erosion at the Marietta-Hazeldell Road Bridge crossing Hurricane Creek. LEAF AND BOWIE RIVERS, HATTIESBURG, MS (See Section 33 of Text) Channel snagging; overbank clearing within the flood plains; riprap protection of the Southern Railroad and River Avenue Bridge piers, and removal of the Petal sewage lagoon. Work also includes installation of a flood warning system. LITTLE COVE CREEK, GLENCOE, AL (See Section 34 of Text) The project consists of enlargement and realignment of 10,840 feet along Little Cove Creek to provide a channel bottom width of 25 feet and an average depth of 6 feet. Also included in the project were associated channel and overbank clearing and bridge modification work. MAGBY CREEK, COLUMBUS, MS (See Section 35 of Text) For clearing and snagging Magby Creek from mile 0.83 upstream to mile 2.06. MILL CREEK, DALTON, GA (See Section 36 of Text) For clearing and snagging Mill Creek from its mouth to downstream face of Willowdale Drive or a distance of 8.6 miles. MURDER CREEK, BREWTON, AL (See Section 37 of Text) Non-structural project providing for the alleviation of flood problems at Brewton by the removal of 31 damageable structures from the 10-year flood plains of Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks. OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS (See Section 38 of Text) Provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control water supply, water quality control, and recreation. RACCOON CREEK, BACONTON, GA (See Section 39 of text) Raise about 1500 feet of South Jackson Street Bridge to elevation 176.0 feet NOVE. Clear and snag from Hwy. 3 to U.S. Hwy. 19. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 14) Urgent Supplemental Appropriation Act, 1986, (Public Law 99-349). DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 205) Supplemental Appropriation Act of 1985, (Public Law 99-88). DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 205) H. Doc. 549, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 205) 10-46 TABLE 10-B (Continued) MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Apr. 18, 19854 Aug. 23, 19842 Nov. 17, 1986 Sep. 30, 19882 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 18, 1941 Jul. 23, 1958 Jul. 8, 1980 Oct 13, 19882 Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 13, 19884 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 28, 1954 SEWERLINE PROTECTION, VALLEY, AL (See Section 40 of Text) The project provides for the restoration of approximately 1600 linear feet of streambank. This will consist of placing 1550 cubic yards of riprap on 4445 square yards of filter fabric. SOPE CREEK, MARIETTA, GA (See Section 41 of Text) The project provides for flood control measures along Sope Creek in Cobb County, Georgia, by clearing and snagging and evaluation of 13 structures. SOWASHEE CREEK, MERIDIAN, MS (See Section 42 of Text) Channel enlargement, and clearing and snagging over a reach of 10.5 miles. One railroad bridge and several highway roads and bridges and utilities will require will require modification for the channel improvement. Development of recreation facilities. TALLAHALLA CREEK, LAUREL, MS (See Section 43 of Text) Channel clearing and snagging with overbank clearing of brush and trees less than 4 inches diameter for a distance of 30 feet on each bank. THREEMILE CREEK, MOBILE, AL (See Section 44 of Text) Channel widening and deepening from about 2,000 feet downstream of Stone Street to a point about 6,300 feet upstream of Interstate 65 or a total distance of 5.6 miles. Development of recreational facilities. TOMBIGBEE RIVER (EAST FORK), MS AND AL (See Section 45 of Text) Provides for alleviation of floods from the Tombigbee River by clearing, snagging, and excavation of 13 cut-off channels, and other related channel improvements. TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MS AND AL (See Section 46 of Text) Provides for improvement of 22 tributaries of Tombigbee River. Extends project limits on Twenty Mile Creek and eliminates local cooperation for this remedial work. UPPER GORDON CREEK, HATTIESBURG, MS (See Section 47 of Text) Real Estate acquisition of nine (9) residences; habitat mitigation and channel enlargement. VILLAGE CREEK, JEFFERSON COUNTY, BIRMINGHAM, AL (See Section 48 of Text) Basically nonstructural and includes evacuating 642 structures in six separate neighborhoods from floodplain; enlarge 2 miles of channel and relocate necessary facilities; Install flood warning devices. WHORTON'S BEND ROAD, ETOWAH CO., AL (S Section 49 of Text) Pruvides emergency streambank protection along the left bank of the Coosa River to retard erosion on Whorton's Bend Road. MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, AL. AND GA. (See Section 53 of Text) Provides for full development of Alabama-Coosa Rivers and tributaries for navigation, flood control, power, recreation, and other purposes. Authorized construction of Carters Lake, GA Claibomrne Lock and Dam, AL, Jones Bluff Lock and Dam, AL, and Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL. Suspended comprehensive plan to permit non-Federal interests to develop Coosa River by constructing series of dams. DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 205) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) DPR (Sec. 205) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L 99-662) Special Report on Record in OCT. (Public Law 222,) 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 167, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. Supplemental Appropriations and Recession Act, DPR (Sec. 205) 1980 (P.L. 96-304) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L 99-662) DPR (Sec. 14) H. Doc. 414, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 436, 83rd Cong. 10-47 TABLE 10-B (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Docmmemnts May 25, 1982 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Dec. 22, 1944 Jan. 27, 1981 Nov. 17, 1986 Jul. 24, 1944 Jul. 24, 1946 Dec. 22, 1944 Dec. 22, 1944 May 19, 1953 Oct. 23, 1963 Designated change of name from Jones Bluff to Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam. Modification to the plan for the Coosa River segment of the waterway between Montgomery and Gadsden, AL to carry out planning, engineering, and design in accordance with the Montgomery to Gadsden, Coosa River Channel, AL, Design Memorandum No. 1., General Design, dated May 1982. FORT TOULOUSE (See Section 23 of Text) Preserve and protect the Fort Toulouse National Historic Landmark and Taskigi Indian Mound by instituting bank stabilization measures. ALLATOONA LAKE, COOSA RIVER BASIN, GA (See Section 54 of Text) Provides for dam and reservoir for flood control, regulation of stream flow for navigation, development of hydroelectric power and recreation. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, AL., GA. AND FL. (See Section 55 of Text) Development of Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and recreation. Modified general plan for full development of Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint River System and authonzed construction of Lake Sidney Lanier multipurpose reservoir. Authorized recreation facilities. Modified the existing project to provide for nine foot deep by 100-foot wide side channel into the Apalachicola River Industrial Park, Blountstown, F1. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT Modified Rivers and Harbors Act of 1945 to restore and maintain access to bendways and interconnecting waterways in the course of routine mamintenance dredging; and to acquire lands for and to construct, operate, and maintain water-related public use and access facilities. LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA. (See Section 55A of Text) Provision of recreation facilities. GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, AL. AND GA. (See Section 55B of Text) Construction of high dam at Walter F. George site and low dam at George W. Andrews site. Provided recreation facilities. JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GA. AND FL. (See Section 55C of Text) Provided recreation facilities. WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL, AND GA. (See Section 55D of Text) Authorized construction of high dam at Walter F. George site and low dam at Columbia site. WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA. AND AL. (See Section 55E of Text) Authorized construction for flood control, power recreation, fish and wildlife development, and streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 205 of Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 14 of Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. 10-48 S.2034 97th Cong., 2d Seas. Water Resources Developnent Act of 1986 (P.L 99-662) Water Resources Develomnent Act of 1986 (P.L 99-662) Public Law 228, 77th Cong., 1st Seas. H. Dc. 674, 76 Cong., 3d Seas. H. Doc. 342, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 300, 80th Cong., 1st Seas. DPR (Sec. 107) Water Resources Developnent Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) H. Doc. 300, 80th Cong., 1st Seas. H. Comm. on Public Works H. Doc. 570, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 1 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 22 of Text) For Last Full Report See Annual Report For Blackwater River, FL Bluff Creek, MS1 Cahaba River, AL2 Cadet Bayou, MS Carrabelle Bar and Harbor, FL Choctawhatchee River, FL and AL Escambia-Conecuh Rivers, AL and FL Holmes Creek, FL LaGrange Bayou, FL Leaf and Chickasawhay River, MS2 Noxubee River, MS1 Ochlockonee (Ochlociey) River, GA and FL1 2 Old Town Creek, MS" Oostanaula and Coosawattee River, GA1 2 Panacea Harbor, FL Pascagoula River, MS Pass Christian Harbor, MS Port St. Joe Harbor, FL Removing Water Hyacinths St. Marks River, FL Tallapoosa River, AL2 Tombigbee River at Columbus Port, MS Upper Chipola River, FL, from Marianna to its mouth1 2 Wolf and Jordan Rivers, MS 1. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 2. Uncompleted portion of project deauthorized by H. Doc. 1981 1963 1894 1984 1979 1973 1981 1931 1972 1919 1902 1900 1887 1907 1979 1956 1976 1984 1984 1965 1893 1988 Consta $41 4' 8' 48: 17: 20 28S 2? 4 3: 12 1 5 1,96( 1,71( 4. 50 1941 1979 Cost to September 30,1989 Operation and ruction Maintenance 1,650 $302,539 1,000 6,883 5,000 7,921 1,137,227 1,627 379,413 1,885 291,694 8,499 1,102,094 8,562 36,800 9,496 133,038 3,090 42,676 7,528 14,472 5.000 v,v 3,000 2,656 2,383 5,000 9,313 0,862 0,809 3,972 D,500 36,781 29,195 92,443 179,535 139,653 2,947,5113 1,100,471 84,115 63,193 481,515 96- 157, 1st Session. 3. Includes $80,000 contributed funds. TABLE 10-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT (See Section 26 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation ad Report For Construction Maltemance2 Harrison County, MS, shore protection 1 1953 $1,133,000 1. Completed. 2. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of local interests. 10-49 TABLE 10-E REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 48 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30,1989 Full Report See Annual Operaon Report For Construction Malate Alabama River at Montgomery, AL 1965 $144,194 - Armuchee Creek, GA 1966 115,547- Beaver Creek, Montezuma, GA 1958 149,815- Big Brown Creek, Prentiss Co, MS 1987 137,500 Biloxi River at Lorraine Road, Harrison County, MS 1985 132,174 - Black Creek, Gadsden, AL 1953 125,389- Black Warrior River, U.S. Hwy. 11 Bridge, Fosters, AL 1986 181,500- Boligee Canal, Boligee, AL 1987 178,600 Burketts Creek, Amory, MS 1984 1,366,454- Chattahoochee River, Eufaula, AL 1988 206,600- Chickasaw Bogue Creek, U.S. Highway 43 Bridge, Linden, AL 1985 121,718- Clanton, AL 1964 274,024- Collinsville, AL 1940 71,119- Goodfood Creek, Chickasaw Co., MS 1988 91,500- Gordons Creek, Hattiesburg, MS 1985 802,026- Houlka Creek, Chickasaw & Clay Counties, MS 1982 238,219 Houston School Rd. Bridge, Itawamba Co., MS 1988 59,300- Interstate 59 Bridges, Fosters, AL 1987 155,200- Lake Douglas, Decatur County, GA 1970 164,998- Leaf River, County Road Bridge, Mahned, MS 1986 231,618- Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, AL 1965 113,849- Martin Creek, Prentiss County, MS 1988 78,500- Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, AL 1980 190,974 Murder Creek, East Brewton, AL 1986 903,474- Noxubee River Relief Bridge, Shuqualak, MS 1988 119,500- Old Hwy. 82 Bridge, Columbus, MS 1987 143,500- Osborne Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS 1985 250,000- Prattville, Autauga Creek, AL 1946 649,280- Pumpkinvine Creek, Emerson, GA 1985 85,029 - Rome, Coosa River, GA 1955 384,550- Sowashee Creek, Meridian, MS 1956 142,637- Sun Creek, Okibbeha County, MS 1984 55,569- Tallabinella Creek, Chickasaw County, MS 1988 81,000- Tallahala Creek, Pascagoula River, MS 1988 3,945,757 Town Creek, Americus, GA 1965 340,409- Trim Cane Creek, Okibbeha County, MS 1984 145,519- Trussville, AL 1965 141,334- Twenty Mile Creek, Airport Road Bridge, Frankstown, MS 1986 215,860- West Point, Chattahoochee River, GA 1955 599,637- Wolf Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS 1985 114,753 Wolf Creek, U.S. Hwy. 45 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS 1986 154,641 Yellow Jacket Creek, Hogansville, GA 1966 330,734 1. Engineering, design, supervision, and administration (no 2. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of local interests. construction work has been done. Includes $17,000 for pre-authorization studies. TABLE 10-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Year of Last Deauthorization Date Project Type Full Report Document Deauthorized Bayou Galere, MS1 Navigation 1946 H. Doc. 192,94th Cong., Aug 5, 1977 1st Seas., as amended. GIWW; Apalachicola Bay to Navigation 1986 Public Law 99-662, Nov 17, 1986 St. Marks River, FL 99th Congress Lazer Creek Lake, GA Hydroelectric power 1986 Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress Nov 17, 1986 Lower Auchumpkee Creek, Hydroelectric power 1986 Public Law 99-662, Nov 17, 1986 GA 99th Congress Pensacola Harbor Modification, FL Navigation 1986 Public Law 99-662, Nov 17, 1986 99th Conrs Spewrell Bluff Lake, GA Hydroelectric power 1986 Public Law 99-662, Nov 17, 1986 99th Congress 1. H. Doc. 96-157 deauthorized uncompleted portions of certain projects as shown in Table 10-C. 10-50 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-H NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATON (See Section 23 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Authority 1989 Costa Bayou Cumbest, Jackson Co., MS 107 $1,122 Eastpoint Channel, FL 107 2,063 Little Lagoon, Gulf Shores, AL 107 20,136 Ocean Springs Harbor, MS 107 9,519 Scipio Creek, Franklin, FL 107 25,135 Soldiers & Palmetto Creek, AL 107 23,084 South Fork, Bon Secour River, AL 107 5,642 Weeks Bay, AL 107 19,993 Total $106,6941 1. Excludes construction costs of $11,851 for Dog River Channel, AL, and $32,992 for Fort Gaines, Dauphin Island, AL. These costs are reflective in respective project cost TABLE 10-I BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 25 of Text) FIscal Year Study Authority 1989 Costs Boggy Bayou Shoreline, Valparaiso, FL 103 2 Total $243 TABLE 10-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 46 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Authority 1989 Costs Five Mile, Brookside, AL 205 256 Greens Creek, Petal, MS 205 41,860 Indian Camp Creek & Tribs, Noxubee, MS 205 2,733 IrondaleAL 205 52,941 Mill Creek, Sumrall, MS 205 4,484 Mixons Creek, Lamar Co., MS 205 10,642 Proctor Creek, Atlanta, GA 205 4,362 Silver Creek, Rome, GA 205 2,937 Tishtony Creek, Mantachie, MS 205 3,374 Alabama River, Selma, AL 14 15,433 Boggy Bayou Shoreline, Valpariso, FL 14 7,750 Portersville Bay Shoreline, AL 14 2 Total $170,076 10-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 10-K RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 24 of Text) Cost Durh Project Date of Survey ical Year Bayou La Batre, AL July, 1989 20,740 Bayou Texar, FL April, 1988 2,148 Biloxi Harbor, MS June, 1989 670 Blackwater River, FL August, 1989 10,452 Bon Secour, AL May, 1989 639 Cadet Bayou, MS January & August, 1989 9,837 Carrabelle Harbor, FL November, 1989 7,778 Escambia Bay, FL April, 1989 24,224 Fly Creek, AL April, 1989 188 La Grange Bayou, FL August, 1988 2,372 Panama City, FL September, 1989 295 Pensacola Harbor, FL November, 1989 435 St. Marks River, FL October, 1989 16,760 Wolf and Jordan Rivers, MS August, 1989.9 Total $106,078 TABLE 10-L ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, ALA. AND GA. DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED UNDER EXISTING PROJECT (See Sections 49 and 50 of Text) Clalborne Millers Ferry Robert F. Henry Carters Allatoonma Proposed Structures Lock and Dam Lock and Dam Lock and Dam Lake Dam3 Dam Miles above mouth of river 81.11 42.21 245.41 26.82 47.84 Nearest town Claibomrne, Ala. Camden, Ala. Benton, Ala. Carters, Ga. Cartersville, Ga. Distance (miles) 7 10 3 2 4 Greatest lock length available for full width (feet) 600 600 600 - - Width of lock chamber (feet) 84 84 84 - - Maximum lift (feet) 30 48 47 - - Elevation of normal pool surface (mean sea level) 35 80 125 1072 840 Depth over sills at low water 13 Upper 15 Upper 15 -- (feet) Lower 13 Lower 12 Character of foundation Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Kind of spillway Gated and Gated Gated Gated Gated Fixed Crest Height of dam (feet) 95.5 99.5 94 451 190 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Rock-fill Concrete Earth Core Total reservoir capacity (acre-feet) 96,360 331,800 234,200 472,800 670,050 Power development (kw) - 75,000 68,000 500,000 74,000 Percent complete 100 100 100 100 100 Cost to date: $27,997,450 $63,125,300 $83,360,800 $111,140,340 $35,709,085 1. Above mouth of Alabama River (river miles) 2. Above mouth of Coosawattee River (river miles). 3. Reregulation dam (Carters) 25.3 (river miles). 4. Above mouth of Etowah River (river miles). 5. Includes cost of added recreation facilities as shown in Table 10A. 10-52 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-M APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, ALA., GA., AND FLA., LOCKS AND DAMS AND MULTIPLE-PURPOSE DEVELOPMENT INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 51 of Text) Existing Projects Jim George W. Walter F. Buford Dam Woodruff Andrews Geoge Lake Lock Lock Lock West Point Sidney and Dam and Dam and Dam Lake Lanier Miles above mouth 107.61 46.52 75.02 201.42 348.32 Nearest town Chattahoochee FL., Columbia, Al. Ft. Gaines, Ga. West Point, Ga. Buford, Ga. Distance (miles) 1 1 2 2.8 5 Greatest lock length 450 450 450 - - available for full width (feet) Width of chamber (feet) 82 82 82 -- Maximum lift (feet) 33 25 88 - - Elevation of normal pool 77 102 190(Summer) 635(Summer) 1071(Summer) surface (msl) 185(Winter) 625(Winter) 1070(Winter) Depth over sills at low 14 13 13 -- water (feet) Character of foundation Limestone Limestone Limestone Rock Rock Kind of spillway Fixed-gated Fixed-gated Gated Gated Fixed Height of dam (feet) 67 62 114 95 192 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Earth and Earth and Earth and Earth Total reservoir capacity 367,300 18,180 934,400 604,500 2,554,000 (acre-feet) Power-development 30,000 - 130,000 73,875 86,000 (kilowatts) Percent complete 100 100 100 100 100 Year opened to navigation 1954 1962 1963 - - Estimated cost:... Cost to date:3 $47,978,751 $13,038,427 $98,753,4654 $131,565,287 $53,028,418 Above the mouth of Apalachicola River (river miles). Above mouth of Chattahoochee River (river miles). Includes cost of added recreational facilities as shown in Table 10-A. 4. Includes $333,198 cost of land for wildlife refuge and $10,457,685 for major rehabilitation. 10-53 1. 2. 3. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 10-N BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, ALA. (See Section 6 of Text) Armistead L William John Heis Coffeevlle Demopolls Selden Bacon Oliver Holt Bankhead Lock Lock Lock Lock Lock Lock and Dam and Dam and Dam and Dam and Dam and Dam 1 Miles above Mobile2 116.7 213.2 261.1 338.2 347.0 365.5 Nearest town (Alabama) Coffeeville Demopolis Eutaw Tuscaloosa Tuscaloosa Oak Grove Distance (miles) 3(within city) 6 15 Lock Greatest length available for full width (feet) 600 600 600 450 600 600 Width of chamber (feet) 110 110 110 95 110 110 Maximum lift (feet) 34 40 22 28 64 68 Depth over sills at low water (feet) 13.0 13.0 13.2 12.0 13.0 14.0 Character of foundation Rock Rock Sand, clay Hard shale Shale, Sandstone sandstone Kind of spillway FixedGated Fixed Gated Fixed Gated Gated Type construction Lock Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Dam Concrete Concrete Earth- Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Year completed 1965 1962 1962 1940 1969 1985 Year opened to navigation 1960 1954 1957 1939 1966 1975 Actual cost of lock and dam3 $21,597,264 $19,774,583 $13,295,553 $4,450,874 $28,100,000 $52,292,880 1. Single life lock. 2. Navigation mileage from foot of Government Street, Mobile, Ala. 3. Excludes cost of adding recreation facilities. 10-54 MOBILE, ALABAMA DISTRICT TABLE 10-0 TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, ALABAMA AND MISSISSIPPI (See Section 19 of Text) Galusve A terile Columbus Aberdeen Lock A Lock B Lock C Lock D Lock E Bay Springs Lock Lock Lock Lock and and ad ad sad Lock and sadDam sad Dam and Dam and Dam Spliway Splway Spillway Spillway Spliway and Dam Miles above mouths 266 307 335 358 371 376 39 398 407 412 Nearst town Gainesville, AL Aliceville, AL Columbus, MS Aberdeen, MS Amory, MS Smithville, MS Fulton, MS Fultn, MS Belmont, MS Tupelo, MS Greatest lock length 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 mavailable for full mwidth (feet) Width of Chamber (feet) 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 Maximum lift (feet) 36 27 27 27 30 25 25 30 30 84 Elevation of normal 109 136 163 190 220 245 270 300 330 (Summer)414 mpool surface (mu) (Wir)409 Depth over sinalts 15 15 15 15 15 18 18 18 18 18 mlow water (feet) Characterof foundation Moomevill e Eutaw Form. Emaw Form. Etaw Form. Eumaw Form. Eutaw Fon. Gordo Foun. Euaw Form. Godo Form. Sandstone Chalk Sad & Clay Sand & Cay Sand Lam. Sand Sand & Clay Clay Sand Clay and Shale. Kind of spillway Flied & Fixed & Gated Gated Gated Gated Gated Gaed Gated N/A Gated Gated Height of dam (feet) 56 57 57 57 46 48 53 52 44.5 103 Type of onruction Concate Canesee Cancte Canaute Canaste Conaste Conaste Coaue Canaste Canaste &Eahth &Bank & Eath & Earth & Eah & Bah &Bank &arth &Earth Total reservoir capacity 45,290 655 59,483 31,564 4,400 19,000 13,300 24,900 6,900 (Swnmer)180,000 m(ace-feet) (Winter)I43,000 Percentcomplete 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Yearopmed to 1978 1979 1981 1984 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 Estimatsed Cost $103,214,000 151,255,000 182,650,000 128,262,000 102,685,000 96,905,000 71,375,000 98,205,000 88,173,000 147,000,000 Cost to date $100,010,600 143,190,800 174,620,500 112,620,200 92,190,500 93,106,700 62,197,000 89,610,800 76,917,700 130398,000 1. Miles aboe Mobile, Aleae(M ile0isa Bankhead Tunne US. Highway 90) 10-55 TABLE 10-P REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 COMPLETED FLOOD INSURANCE STUDIES AND FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION REPORTS FOR FY 1982 THRU FY 19891 (See Section 58 of Text) Date Federal Study Requesting Agency Completed Cost Flood Insurance Studies Anniston, Alabama Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 82 $80,900 Calhoun County, Alabama Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 82 61,200 Cave Springs, Georgia Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jan 84 22,500 Floyd County, Georgia Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Dec 84 230,000 Columbus, Mississippi Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Feb 85 36,000 Lowndes County, Mississippi Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Feb $5 229,000 Aberdeen, Mississippi Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May 85 35,000 Amory, Mississippi Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May 85 50,000 Cherokee County, Georgia Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) July 85 168,000 Monroe County, Mississippi Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Oct 85 140,000 Dale County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Dec 86 82,000 Lauderdale County, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Mar 87 144,000 Houston County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 87 114,000 St. Clair County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jun 87 43,000 Marengo County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Nov 87 36,000 Greene County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Mar 88 18,550 Covington County, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 88 35,000 Pickens County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 88 50,000 Fulton County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May 88 180,000 Monroe County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jun 88 33,000 Colquitt County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Sep 88 48,000 Murray County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Sep 88 68,000 Special Flood Hazard Information Chattahoochee River, Supplement Atlanta Reg. Planning Mar 82 5,000 to Buford to Whitesburg Report Commission Oothcalooga Creek Gordon Co., Ga Board of Jun 82 10,000 Commissioners Canton Creek, Ga. City of Canton, Ga. Dec 82 3,000 Oktasasi Creek, Ala. Alexander City, Ala. Jan 83 3,000 Cordele Creek & City of Cordele, Ga. May 83 4,000 Malcolm Branch, GA. Hull Branch, MS East Central Planning and Jun 84 7,000 Development District Percosin Creek & Tribs., GA City of Albany, GA Nov 84 14,000 Coosawattee, Ellijay and Cartecay City of Ellijay, GA Jul 86 22,000 Rivers, Vicinity of Ellijay, GA Rocky Creek and Basie Branch, MS Ellisville, MS Jan 87 19,000 Springers Branch, MS Starkville, MS May 87 13,000 Dixie Creek, GA La Grange, GA Jun 87 15,000 Little Scooba Creek, MS Scooba, MS Jun 87 18,000 Dearmenville & Golden Springs, AL Anniston, AL Mar 88 9,000 1. For list of reports completed by Mobile District for FY 1965 thru FY 1974, see FY 1974 Annual Report, page 10-50; reports completed in FY 1975 see FY 1975 Annual Report, page 10-44; and for reports completed in FY 1976 and FY 1977, see FY 1977 Annual Report, page 10-46. See page 10-48 FY 1978 Annual Report for FY 1978 reports, and see page 10-43 FY 1984 Annual Report for FY 1979 through FY 1984 reports. 10-56 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT * District comprises a portion of Louisiana, embraced in drainage basins tributary to Mississippi River and Gulf of Mexico, except Mississippi River above mile 325.5 above Head of Passes (AHP), drainage area of Ouchita-Black River Basin, and small eastern and western portions of Louisiana tributary to Pearl River and Sabine River and Lake. It includes sections of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from Lake Borgne Light 29 at the mouth of Pearl River to Sabine River, and the Passes of the Mississippi River. It exercises jurisdiction over flood control work on Mississippi River from mile 325.5 AHP to Gulf of Mexico; Atchafalaya River; and in Atchafalaya Basin; and maintenance of project navigation channel of Mississippi River below mile 325.5 AHP, under supervision of President, Mississippi River commission (MRC), and Division Engineer, Lower Mississippi Valley Division. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to Gulf of Mexico, LA................. 2. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA ...... 3. Mississippi River Ship Channel, Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA .............. 4. Waterway from Intracoastal Waterway to Bayou Dulac, LA (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, LA ......................... 5. Navigaton work under special authorization.................. Flood Control 6. Grand Isle and vicinity, LA ........... 7. Lake Pontchartrain and vicinity, LA, (hurricane protection) ............. 8. Larose to Golden Meadow, LA (hurricane protection)................. 9. Morgan City and vicinity, LA (hurricane protection)................. Page Flood Control (cont.) 10. New Orleans to Venice, LA 11-2 (hurricane protection).............. 11-3 11. Westwego to Harvey Canal, LA (hurricane protection)............... 11-4 12. Inspection of completed .flood control projects..................... 13. Flood control work under special authorization ...................... 11-5 11-5 Tables Table 11-A Cost and Financial Statement ......... Table 11-B Authorizing Legislation ..... 11-6 Table 11-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................... 11-6 Table 11-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............ 11-7 Table 11-E Active General 11-8 Investigations .............. 11-8 11-1 Page 11-10 11-11 11-12 11-14 11-17 11-19 11-21 . REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 1. MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO GULF OF MEXICO, LA Definitions. AHP is an abbreviation for Above Head of Passes and is a means of referring to river mileage for the lower Mississippi River. Likewise, BHP is an abbreviation for Below Head of Passes and is used to refer to mileages in the Mississippi River passes. LWRP is an abbreviation for Low Water Reference Plane and refers to the datum from which the project depth is measured. Its value varies from +2.53 feet NGVD at Baton Rouge to +0.48 feet NGVD at New Orleans. LDB and RDB are left and right descending bank, respectively. This usage eliminates the need for a potentially confusing reference to cardinal directions (N, E, SE, etc.) on a meandering river. Location. This reach of the river flows southeasterly through southeastern portion of Louisiana. At Head of Passes, approximately 233.8 miles below U.S. Highway 190 bridge at Baton Rouge, river branches into three main passes: Southwest Pass, South Pass, and Pass a Loutre, two of which, Southwest Pass and South Pass, are improved under existing project. Head of Passes to mouths of Southwest and South Passes are 20.1 and 13.5 miles, respectively. Mouth of Southwest Pass is 141 miles west of Mobile, AL, and 349 miles east of Galveston, TX. Mouth of South Pass is 18.5 miles northeast of mouth of Southwest Pass. (Refer to NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11361, 11364, and 11369; MRC alluvial valley map, and Zachary, Baton Rouge, White Castle, Donaldsonville, Thibodaux, Mount Airy, Bonnet Carre', Hahnville, New Orleans, St. Bernard, Barataria, Pointe a la Hache, Black Bay, Empire, Forts, West Delta, East Delta, and Southwest Pass quadrangles and 1988 (55th edition) folio of flood control and navigation maps, Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Gulf of Mexico, LA, published by the MRC.) Previous projects. For details see page 552 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions as follows: Between a line one-tenth mile below U.S. Highway 190 bridge at Baton Rouge (Mile 233.8 AHP) to Philadelphia Point (Mile 181.0 AHP) in the vicinity of Donaldsonville, 40 feet deep (LWRP) by 500 feet wide; from Philadelphia Point to the downstream limit of the Port of New Orleans (Mile 86.7 AHP), 45 feet deep (LWRP) by 500 feet wide; in addition, within the limits of the Port of New Orleans (Miles 104.5 to 86.7 AHP), 35 feet deep (LWRP) laterally between the 45 ft channel and a line 100 feet from the face of the wharves on the LDB; from Mile 86.7 AHP through Head of Passes (Mile 0.0), 45 feet deep (NGVD) by 750 feet wide; in Southwest Pass, Miles 0.0 to 17.0 BHP, 45 feet deep (NGVD) by 750 feet wide; thence tapering to 600 feet wide at mile 17.5 BHP, these dimensions extending through the jetty channel and bar channel, mile 21.5 BHP. Plane of reference below New Orleans is mean low gulf. Plane of reference above and through New Orleans is low water reference plane. General plan of improvement of Southwest Pass provides for constructing pass to uniform cross section with about 1,420-foot surface width by means of jetties, spur dikes, and bulkheads; for channel maintenance by dredging from Cubits Gap, Mile 3.5 AHP through the gulf entrance channel, Mile 21.5 BHP; for construction of small revetted openings through narrow portions of banks of pass for purpose of strengthening and nourishment of banks; for closure of minor outlets not required for maintenance of banks; for construction of sills to prevent enlargement of the Venice Jump and Cubits Gap; for repairs to sill across Pass a Loutre and bank revetment at Head of Passes; for construction of dikes with a view to reducing width of river above Head of Passes; for construction of a submerged deflecting dike above Head of Passes; and for other minor work. East jetty is about 24,950 feet long and west jetty 19,699 feet. Jetties are composed of a substructure of brush mattresses, orginally built to about elevation of mean low gulf, surmounted with a superstructure of concrete blocks and large riprap and/or stone rubble mound of core and cover stone. Spur dikes are constructed of round timber piles and/or triangular prestressed concrete piles, with riprap at the landward ends to connect the dikes to the bank line. General plan of improvement of South Pass provides for construction and maintenance of jetties and spur dikes; for channel maintenance by dredging from Head of Passes through the Gulf Entrance Channel beyond mile 13.5 BHP; maintenance of a sill across Pass a Loutre, and for seaward extension of east jetty at mouth of pass; removal of west dike and construction of spur dikes and bank revetment at Head of Passes; removal of false point at head of South Pass to bottom elevation of minus 45 feet and revetment of new bank line and construction and maintenance of east and west headland structure at Head of Passes. East jetty foundation is 12,070 feet long; inner east jetty is 11,170 feet long; west jetty is 7,820 feet long; and inner west jetty is 4,710 feet long. Jetties are composed of a substructure of brush mattresses surmounted by a superstructure of stone and/or concrete blocks and large riprap. Plane of reference is mean low gulf. Variation of water surface is 16 inches at mouths and 10 inches at head of the passes, due to tides. Extreme range of tides at mouths of passes due to hurricanes is about 10 feet. At New Orleans extreme range of water surface is about 20 feet due to floods. At Baton Rouge extreme range is about 45 feet due to floods. Estimated cost of existing project (October 1987) is $268,000,000 Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $29,000 and $2,000,000 non-Federal pipeline relocations. Local cooperation. None required, except for modification of project in connection with Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, which is reported separately. Terminal facilities. Piers, wharves, or docks serve the Port of New Orleans. Most wharves on east or left bank parallel riverbank forming nearly a continuous 11-2 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT covered quay about 10 miles long. Public wharves controlled by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans (the Dock Board), cover 62 percent of improved waterfront. These facilities include a shipside grain elevator, general cargo and cotton wharves, fruit landings, bunkering facilities, terminal warehouses, railroad terminals, marine railways, and drydocks. (For further details see Port Series No. 20, "The Port of New Orleans, LA" revised 1977.) A foreign trade zone is located in Port of New Orleans. City of Baton Rouge has a reinforced concrete dock for deep-sea vessels with mechanical-handling facility. Attached to downstream end of wharf is a floating wharf boat 231 by 40.5 feet, of 2,000-ton capacity. Facilities are served by a transfer boat and municipal terminal having a capacity of 40 cars per day. Private terminals for handling oil, grain, bauxite ore, and other products are at points on both sides of river between New Orleans and Baton Rouge. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details, see "Port Facilities" included in "Flood Control and Navigation Maps of the Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to the Gulf of Mexico, LA," published annually by the MRC, and Port Series No. 19, vol. 1, "Port St. Joe, FL, Pensacola, FL, Baton Rouge, LA, and Lake Charles, LA," revised 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance during the fiscal year totalled $45,725,400. Of this amount, the following was spent on major maintenance items: (a) Baton Rouge to New Orleans: One Government dustpan dredge and one contract dustpan dredge removed approximately 6,000,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $4,645,500. (b) New Orleans Harbor: One leased cutterhead dredge removed approximately 2,700,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,506,800. (c) Cubits Gap (Mile 3.5 AHP) through Southwest Pass: Two Government hopper dredges, two leased hopper dredges, and two contract cutterhead dredges removed approximately 32,183,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $21,947,500. (d) Jetty Repairs: Repairs to the east and west jetties in Southwest Pass were performed at a cost of $1,499,400. (e) Pile Dike Repairs: Repairs to the pile dikes in Southwest Pass were performed by contractors at a total cost of $2,853,400. (f) Headland Dike Repairs: Repairs to the west headland dike by hired labor and to the east headland dike by contract have totalled $368,000 this fiscal year. (g) Foreshore rock dike work was conducted at a cost of $4,804,000. (h) rock bulkhead tie-ins were constructed for $3,022,000. Construction: One foreshore dike contract was awarded for Miles 10.4 to 8.0 AHP on the right descending bank. Work on bank nourishment, Miles 10.4 to 8.0 AHP on the left descending bank is 90 percent completed. Condition as of Sep. 30. The existing project is 50 percent complete. Deepening Southwest Pass to 40 feet mean low gulf, as authorized by the modification of Mar. 2, 1945, was completed in September 1963. Deepening the channel to 40 feet mean low water from Baton Rouge to New Orleans and to 40 feet mean low gulf in New Orleans Harbor, as authorized by the modifications of Oct. 23, 1962, was completed in August 1963. Seventeen miles of foreshore dike have been completed on the right descending bank from Mile 8.0 AHP to Mile 17.4 BHP and 23.5 miles on the left descending bank between Miles 11.2 AHP and 17.7 BHP. In addition, bank nourishment between Miles 4.0 and 0.5 AHP on the right descending bank and between Miles 11.2 and 4.2 AHP on the left descending bank is complete. Dredging a 45-foot channel at Belmont and Smoke Bend crossings was completed, thus extending the 45-foot channel to Donaldsonville, LA. Ongoing work includes construction of a foreshore dike from Miles 10.4 AHP to 8.0 AHP on the right descending bank, and lateral dike tie-ins and breakwater construction between Mile 17.0 BHP and Mile 19.0 BHP. Pending work includes construction of the East Jetty Head, and rehabilitation of the east and west jetties. Bank nourishment will be performed through a combination of maintenance dredging and borrow dredging for those areas where maintenance is not required. 2. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA Location. In State of Louisiana and the territorial waters of the United States and extends from existing Inner Harbor Navigation Canal at a point 7,500 feet north of existing lock and about 11,000 feet from Mississippi River, to a turning basin south of Michoud, LA, and then as a land and water cut from turning basin south of Michoud, LA, southeasterly to and along south shore of Lake Borgne and through marshes to and through Chandeleur Sound to 38-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico. (Refer to NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11340, 11360, 11363, 11369, 11371, and 11373. Also see MRC 1980 (48th edition) folio of maps, Mississippi River-Cairo, IL, to Gulf of Mexico, LA.) Existing project. Provides for a seaway canal, 36 by 500 feet, extending 76 miles as a land and water cut from Michoud southeasterly to and along south shore of Lake Borgne, and across Chandeleur Sound to Chandeleur Island and increasing gradually to 38 by 600 feet in Gulf of Mexico, with protective jetties at entrance, a permanent retention dike through Chandeleur Sound, and a wing dike along islands as required. It also provides for an inner tidewater harbor consisting of 1,000- by 2,000-foot turning basin 36 feet deep at landward end of seaway canal, and a connecting channel 36 by 500 feet wide extending westerly along Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from turning basin to Inner Harbor Navigation Canal, including construction of a suitable highway bridge with 11-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 approaches to carry Louisiana State Highway 47 (formerly 61) over channel. Plan further provides for future construction of a channel and lock in the vicinity of Meraux to furnish an additional connection between tidewater harbor and Mississippi River. Estimated cost for new work (October 1989) is $523,000,000 Federal and $285,900,000 non-Federal. This does not include modification for Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, which is reported separately. The Federal cost excludes $45,000 for aids to navigation by U.S. Coast Guard. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 11-4 of FY 1986 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. The only facility on the waterway is the Public Bulk Terminal of New Orleans constructed by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans, on left descending bank at Mile 63. Two newcontainer ship berths have begun operation at the Industrial Canal end of the seaway. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor: Engineering and economic studies continued for the new lock and connecting channels feature. A Reconnaissance Report entitled "Mississippi River - Gulf Outlet, St. Bernard Parish, Louisiana (Bank Erosion) - 10241" dated Mar. 10, 1988, recommended structural methods to provide bank erosion abatement at three critical reaches on the north bank of the channel. The study indicated that greater than 90 percent of the potential benefits of this work would accrue due to reduced Federal maintenance of the channel. The report recommended preparation of a supplement to the General Design Memorandum (GDM) for the MRGO project instead of conducting feasibility studies. This report was approved on May 6, 1988. Studies were initiated in FY 1988, and the GDM Supplement is scheduled for completion in September 1990. Maintenance dredging under two contracts in Breton Sound removed 4,900,000 cubic yards at a cost of $3,622,700. The U.S. hopper dredge Wheeler removed 300,000 cubic yards of material in the Gulf Entrance Channel at a cost of $2,643,100. South Jetty Repairs were completed at a cost of $1,190,900. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated March 1958 and entire project is 75 percent complete. The channel was opened to navigation Jul. 25, 1963, and completed Jan. 20, 1968. Paris Road Bridge was opened to traffic Jul. 21, and completed Nov. 14, 1967. Approximately 3 miles of first- and second-lift stone dikes have been constructed on north side of channel and approximately 8.27 miles of first-lift and 7.34 miles of secondlift stone dikes have been constructed on south side of channel in Breton Sound. Principal work required to complete project, construction of new ship lock, raising and extending dikes and foreshore protection. Inner Harbor Navigation Canal to Bayou Bienvenue, is in a deferred status. The site for the lock remained the major problem. President Carter, as a result of his review of water resource projects in April 1977, changed the site for the proposed shiplock to the Industrial Canal in Orleans Parish and recommended that, if justified, the existing lock should be replaced and expanded in place and that care should be taken to minimize dislocation of residents living adjacent to the site. These recommendations are being addressed in an Evaluation Report scheduled for completion in FY 1990. The foreshore protection, south bank, Chalmette Area, Station 367+00 to Station 1007+00 is complete. 3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER SHIP CHANNEL, GULF TO BATON ROUGE, LA Location. The project is located in the southeastern portion of Louisiana below Baton Rouge, consisting of the Mississippi River and its outlets to the Gulf of Mexico. Existing project. Provides more efficient deepdraft navigation access to the New Orleans and Baton Rouge reaches of the Mississippi River via Southwest Pass by enlarging the existing channel to a project depth of 55 feet and enlarging the adjacent channel along the left descending bank in New Orleans Harbor to a 40-foot depth, a turning basin at Baton Rouge, and training works in the passes to reduce maintenance. Estimated cost of existing project (Oct. 1, 1989) is $148,000,000 Federal and $347,000,000 non- Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $1,200,000. Local cooperation. The cost sharing provisions contained in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 require that prior to initiation of construction, local interests shall: (a) Provide to the Federal Government lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, and perform the necessary relocations required for construction, operation, and maintenance of the project; (b) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction or operation and maintenance of the project except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (c) Provide to the Federal Government, the non-Federal share of all other costs of construction of the project. These costs include 25 percent of the construction costs incurred for construction of the navigation channel to a depth of 45 feet, and 50 percent of the construction costs incurred for deepening the channel between 45 and 55 feet. In addition, the local sponsor shall repay the Government 10 percent of the construction costs over a 30-year period. The local sponsor may be permitted to include, toward sums to be reimbursed, all or part of the value of any lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas and relocations (other than utilities) contributed or expended by the non-Federal sponsor; (d) Be responsible for 50 percent of the incremental maintenance below 45 feet on a channel depth greater than 45 feet. 11-4 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) between the Government and the State of Louisiana was signed on Jun. 30, 1986. A supplement to the LCA was signed on Jun. 15, 1987, to comply with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662. This agreement provides for the dredging of a 45-foot channel from the gulf to Mile 181.0 AHP. The State of Louisiana has requested that we proceed with the construction of the 45-foot channel from Mile 181.0 AHP to Baton Rouge. We have entered into negotiations for the Local Cooperation Agreement for this reach. Terminal facilities. See Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico, LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. The dredging of the Belmont and Smokeband crossings between New Orleans and Mile 181.0 AHP was completed on Dec. 17, 1988. This completes the dredging of the 45-foot channel from the Gulf to Mile 181.0 AHP. As a result of the severe drought conditions in the midwest part of the country during the summer of 1988, saltwater intrusion mitigation measures for the 45-foot channel were implemented on Jul. 14, 1988. Construction of an underwater dredged material sill in the Mississippi River at mile 63.7 AHP was initiated on Jun. 30, 1988, and completed to an elevation of -45.0 feet NGVD on Aug. 1, 1988. Before the sill was built, the saltwater wedge was advancing upstream at a rate of about 2 miles per day. It was anticipated that, without the sill and with continuing low river flows, the toe of the wedge would advance to at least Mile 116 AHP. Shortly after the sill was begun, the upstream movement of the wedge slowed and on Jul. 11, 1988, the advance of the wedge stopped near Mile 104 AHP, just below the Carrollton water intake for the city of New Orleans. Assisted by increasing flows in late July and early August, the sill initiated a retreat of the wedge. By Aug. 11, the wedge had become discontinuous upstream of the sill, and surface salinities upstream of it had returned to near background levels. Once river stages returned to normal, the sill was gradually washed away. The sill will be constructed again if low river flows require protection of freshwater supply. The other part of the mitigation plan was to barge freshwater to two municipal water treatment plants at Boothville, and West Pointe a la Hache, LA, downstream of the sill. Barging was initiated on Jul. 14, 1988, and was completed on Dec. 2, 1988. Approximately 101,000,000 gallons of water were barged. Operations and Maintenance general funds were used for the barging operation. In summary, the intrusion event was dealt with effectively, and both the sill and the barging of freshwater to Lower Plaquemines Parish have been demonstrated to be practicable. Condition as of Sep. 30. The 45-foot channel is completed from the Gulf to Mile 181.0 AHP. Studies are underway to determine the most economical plan to mitigate for saltwater intrusion caused by the deeper channel. Until these studies are complete, an interim plan has been developed that will provide for the barging of fresh raw water to two water treatment plants in Plaquemines Parish. The construction of mooring facilities for the barges at both of these plants is complete. 4. WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO BAYOU DULAC, LA (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, LA) Location. Bayou LeCarpe is a tidal stream which rises about 1.5 miles southeast of Houma in Terrebonne Parish and flows southerly into Bayou Pelton, thence into Bayou Grand Caillou, which flows southwesterly into Caillou Bay, a total distance of about 40 miles. (Refer to Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1116 and Geological Survey maps of Houma, Dulac, Bayou DuLarge, and Dog Lake quadrangles.) Existing project. As modified, provides for a 10- by 45-foot channel in Bayou LeCarpe from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway 2.6 miles to Houma navigation canal; a 5- by 40-foot channel through Bayou Pelton and Bayou Grand Caillou to Bayou Dulac, a distance of about 13.7 miles. Between Miles 2.6 and 5, this project coincides with or is adjacent to 15- by 150-foot Houma navigation canal. Normal range of tide is 3 to 10 inches; from winds, 1 to 3 feet. Cost of new work, completed in August 1964, was $129,662. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 11-5 of FY 1986 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. Many terminal and transfer facilities are in Houma and along waterways which flow through area between Houma and Gulf of Mexico. All facilities are privately owned and operated. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce and for reasonably prospective commerce. Ample space exists for expansion of existing facilities or for construction of new wharves and appurtenances. Condition as of Sep. 30. The 5- by 40-foot channel was constructed from January 1938 to August 1938, and modification of Oct. 23, 1962, for enlargement of 2.54 miles of Bayou LeCarpe to 10 feet by 45 feet was initiated in May and completed August 1964. 5. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). Preauthorization studies costs as of Sep. 30, 1989, were Bayou DuLarge, LA, for $57,151; Lake Charles Ship Channel for $39,666; Bayou Grand Caillou, $2,735; North Pass-Pass Manchac, LA, $38,482; and Trinity Bayou, Terrebonne Parish, $7,500. 11-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Flood Control 6. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA Location. In south Jefferson Parish, LA, along the Gulf of Mexico, about 50 miles south of New Orleans and 45 miles northwest of Southwest Pass (Mississippi River). Existing project. The project provides protection from waves driven by hurricanes that have a frequency of recurrence of up to once in every 50 years. The plan consists of a berm and vegetated dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf shore and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. The dune would have a 10-foot-wide crown at an elevation of 11.5 feet NGVD, 1 on 5 side slopes, and protective vegetation. The sandfill berm would slope from an elevation of 8.5 feet NGVD at the toe of the dune 180 feet gulfward to an elevation of 3 feet NGVD and, from this point, would assume its natural slope to the offshore bottom. The jetty provided by the plan has a top width of 6 feet at an elevation of 4 feet mean sea level, 1 on 2 side slopes, and extends approximately 3,600 feet along the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. Estimated cost of project (October 1989) is $18,677,000 Federal and $13,899,000 non- Federal, including $8,338,000 contributed funds. Local cooperation. Local interests have the responsibility of providing rights-of-way, 30 percent of hurricane protection costs, 75 percent of beach erosion costs, and operation and maintenance of the completed work. The Louisiana Legislature, by Act 833 of 1982, authorized the Office of Public Works of the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development to provide the non-Federal assurances for the Grand Isle Hurricane Protection and Beach Erosion Project. On Jan.11, 1983, the Louisiana State Government authorized the Office of Public Works to execute the required assurances as a co-sponsor with the town of Grand Isle. The required assurances were executed on Mar. 16, 1983, the construction rights-of-way were provided on May 4, 1983, and local interest provided a cash contribution of $2,100,000 on Jun. 1, 1983, $70,000 in November 1985, $368,000 in September 1987 and $259,000 in May 1989. An additional amount of approximately $5,800,000 will be required prior to project completion based on repair estimates as of October 1989. Maintenance of the project is the responsibility of the local assurer. The local assurer will receive Federal aid for repairing erosion and other damage to the project for a period of 15 years. The average annual Federal maintenance cost identified in the Act of Assurances is $44,000; however, this is not a fixed amount. Periodic nourishment to repair erosion will not necessarily be conducted every year, but as needed, with an estimated frequency of one in eight years on the average. It is estimated that the Federal share of the maintenance cost will be 12 percent for the 15-year period. Operations and results during the fiscal year. The repair and restoration of Grand Isle will be accomplished by two separate contracts. The jetty extensions and sand bar removal contract (partial fix), which was completed in early 1988, consisted of a 500-foot extension of the west jetty and a 200- foot extension of the east jetty, removal of about 408,000 cubic yards of sand from the cuspate bar, and placement of the excavated sand on the eroded beach in the East End State Park. The dune repair and structural reinforcement contract (total fix) will accomplish all additional items of work necessary to fully restore the project, including the placement of about 1.5 million cubic yards of sand to reconstruct the beach and dune, construction of offshore breakwaters, placement of a clay core in portions of the dune, and restoration of vehicular ramps, pedestrian crossovers, and dune vegetation. The partial fix contract was awarded Sep. 16, 1987 and completed Mar. 10, 1989. Condition as of Sep. 30. Approximately 50 percent of the project is capable of providing wave damage protection for the 50-year storm in its present condition. 7. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In southeastern Louisiana, vicinity of New Orleans, in St. Charles, Jefferson, Orleans, St. Bernard, and St. Tammany Parishes, comprising lower land and water area between Mississippi River alluvial ridge and the Pleistocene escarpment to north and west. The dominant topographic feature is Lake Pontchartrain, a shallow landlocked tidal basin, about 640 square miles in area and averaging 12 feet deep, connecting with lesser Lake Maurepas to the west and through Lake Borgne and Mississippi Sound to the Gulf to the east. The lake drains about 4,700 square miles of tributary area. (Refer to Geological Survey quadrangles Yscloskey and Malheureaux Point, Drum Bay, Door Point, Lake Eugenie, Oak Mound Bayou, Mitchell Keys, Lake Eloi, and Morgan Harbor; Engineer quadrangles Slidell, Covington, Ponchatoula, Springfield, Denham Springs, Donaldsonville, Mt. Airy, Bonnet Carre', Spanish Fort, Chef Menteur, Rigolets, St. Bernard, New Orleans, and Hahnville; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1115 and 1116. Existing project. Provides protection to the greater New Orleans area and other communities bordering Lake Pontchartrain from the effects of hurricane-generated floods. The project is comprised of two major features: The Chalmette Area Plan and the High Level Plan. The Chalmette Area Plan consists of a levee and floodwall system around the Chalmette area and along the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, with connections to the Mississippi River levees. The High Level Plan will provide for heightening and strengthening the existing hurricane protection levee systems in Orleans Parish and the east bank of Jefferson Parish, repairing and rehabilitating the 11-6 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT Mandeville Seawall in St. Tammany Parish; building a new mainline hurricane levee on the east bank of the St. Charles Parish just north of U.S. Highway 61 (Airline Highway); raising and strengthening the existing levee which extends along the Jefferson- St. Charles Parish boundary between Lake Pontchartrain and Airline Highway; and deferring construction of the proposed Seabrook lock until its feasibility as a feature of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet navigation project can be determined. Areas which will be enclosed by the levee and floodwall construction will be provided protection against tidal surge resulting from the Standard Project Hurricane (SPH). The estimated project cost for work (October 1989) is $423,000,000 Federal and $177,000,000 non- Federal. Local cooperation. Provide all rights-of-way; bear 30 percent of the first cost, consisting of fair market value of providing all lands, easements, and rights-ofway, including borrow and spoil disposal areas for construction, accomplish alteration and relocation of roads, railroads, pipelines, cables, wharves, drainage structures, and other facilities; maintain and operate all works after completion; and hold and save the United States free from damages. See H. Doc. No. 231, 89th Cong., 1st sess. for more detailed requirements of local cooperation. Assuring Agency: The Orleans Levee District, Lake Borgne Basin Levee District, St. Bernard Parish Police Jury, Louisiana Office of Public Works, and Pontchartrain Levee District. The State of Louisiana formed the Jefferson Levee District and assigned to it the Jefferson Parish levees, previously the responsibility of the Pontchartrain Levee District. Basic assurances were received from the following: Orleans Levee District for the entire barrier plan and that portion of the Chalmette Area Plan in Orleans Parish; Pontchartrain Levee District for the Barrier Plan; Lake Borgne Levee District and St. Bernard Parish Police Jury for the Chalmette Area Plan in St. Bernard Parish. Supplemental assurances covering Public Law 91-646 have been received from the Orleans Levee District and the Pontchartrain Levee District. Lake Borgne Basin Levee District, St. Bernard Parish Police Jury, and the East Jefferson Levee District. The St. Tammany Parish portion of the project has been placed in an inactive status since the local sponsors have not provided acceptable assurances. Supplemental Assurances in connection with the High Level Plan were executed by the Orleans Levee District on May 29, 1985, and approved by the United States Jun. 21, 1985. Supplemental Assurances for the High Level Plan were executed by the East Jefferson Levee District for the Jefferson Parish portion of the project on Jan. 16, 1987. Supplemental Assurances for the High Level Plan were executed by the Pontchartrain Levee District for the St. Charles Parish portion of the project on Apr. 20, 1987, and accepted on behalf of the United States on Aug. 7, 1987. Supplemental Assurances for the High Level Plan are not required from St. Bernard Parish Police Jury and the Lake Borgne Basin Levee District for St. Bernard Parish. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preparation of design memorandums and plans and specifications continued by hired labor. Preparation of three design memorandums are underway. Two were completed in FY 89, and one is scheduled for completion in FY 90. A Draft Reevaluation Report (including Draft Environmental Impact Statement) recommending the tentatively selected High Level Plan (lieu of Barrier Plan) was submitted by New Orleans District to the Lower Mississippi Valley Division in December 1983. The final Reevaluation Report was submitted to LMVD on Aug. 8, 1984. A Record of Decision was signed in February 1985 by the Office, Chief of Engineers. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on Jan. 17, 1975. By Court Order dated Dec. 30, 1977, a revised Environmental Impact Statement was ordered. A draft revised Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the High Level Plan and reevaluation report which documents the proposal to adopt that plan instead of the Barrier Plan was released to the public and filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on Dec. 16, 1983. The final revised Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on Dec. 7, 1984. A draft mitigation report with corresponding EIS was prepared and distributed for public review on Mar. 16, 1988. A series of public meetings and workshops were held to facilitate participation in mitigation plan formulation by other agencies, environmental groups, local sponsors, and other interested groups. Prior to selecting the tentative plan, the three final plans were presented to the public at a meeting on Jul. 29, 1985. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction started May 1967 and is 77 percent complete. Contract work continued on nine contracts. Plans and specifications are underway on four contracts scheduled for award in FY 1990. 8. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In coastal section of Louisiana, along Bayou Lafourche, and includes lands on both banks of the bayou from Larose to 2 miles south of Golden Meadow. (Refer to Geological Survey quadrangles Cutoff, Lake Felicity, Bay Dosgris, Golden Meadow Farms, Bay Tambour, Mink Bayou, Caminada Pass, Leeville, Belle Pass, Pelican Pass, and Calumet Island; Engineer quadrangles New Orleans, Hahnville, Point a la Hache, Barataria, and Fort Livingston; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1115 and 1116. Existing project. Provides a loop levee about 40 miles long along both banks of Bayou Lafourche from Larose to South Golden Meadow; enlargement of 11-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 3 miles of existing levee at Golden Meadow; floodgates for navigation and hurricane protection in Bayou Lafourche at upper and lower bayou crossings; about 8 miles of low interior levees to regulate intercepted drainage. Estimated cost for new work (October 1989) is $70,700,000 Federal and $30,300,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas and spoil disposal areas, and accomplish alterations to roads, pipelines, cables, wharves, oil wells, and any other facilities necessary for the construction of the project; all at an estimated cost of $14,115,000; bear 30 percent of the total project cost, a sum presently estimated at $30,300,000 consisting of the items listed above, and a cash contribution presently estimated at $16,185,000 or equivalent work specifically undertaken as an integral part of the project after authorization and in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; and prevent any encroachment on ponding areas unless substitute storage capacity or equivalent pumping capacity is provided promptly without cost to the United States; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91646) and with the provisions of Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-611) in acquiring real property. The Board of Commissioners of the South Louisiana Tidal Water Control Levee District executed the required Agreement of Local Cooperation on Nov. 13, 1972, which was executed by the United States on Jul. 10, 1973, and approved on behalf of the Secretary of the Army on Aug. 29, 1973. Section 38, Paragraph 1051 et seq., Louisiana Revised Statutes created the South Lafourche Levee District. The South Lafourche Levee District assumed the rights and obligations of the South Louisiana Tidal Water Control Levee District with respect to this project. Local interests have requested and received funds from the State of Louisiana for right-of-way acquisition and relocations required to support construction work. Operations and results during fiscal year. Two contracts were awarded in FY 89 and plans and specifications are underway on one contract scheduled for award in FY 1990. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction commenced in February 1975 and is 59 percent complete. 9. MORGAN CITY AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In south-central Louisiana, Morgan City proper, and the adjacent areas. It includes the land south of Grand Lake, Six Mile Lake, and Lake Palourde extending from Morgan City westward to Charenton drainage and navigation canal. Lower Atchafalaya River and Wax Lake Outlet, the principal outlets for Atchafalaya Basin Floodway, traverse the area. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway crosses the area in an east-west direction. Numerous bayous and artificial canals excavated for drainage purposes or for access to oil developments exist throughout the area. (See Engineer quadrangles Bayou Sale, Jeanerette, Foster, Belle Isle, Point Au Fer, Morgan City, and Lake Decade; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1116.) Existing project. Morgan City: Construction of about 5.6 miles of new levees along shore of Lake Palourde and west bank of Bayou Ramos and about 0.5 mile of new levee from Southern Pacific railroad embankment near Wyandotte to tie in with Bayou Boeuf lock levee, and construction of three gravity drainage structures. Franklin and vicinity: Enlargement of about 21.6 miles of back levee and construction of about 3.5 miles of new levees to effect a complete closure of area to be protected, construction of one floodgate and eight gravity drainage structures, and alteration of existing drainage facilities where necessary. Normal range of tide is 1.6 feet. Storm and hurricane tide have produced elevations up to 10 feet while northerly storms during winter depress the gulf level as much as 3 feet below mean sea level. During low water periods on Atchafalaya River, generally September through November, the effect of tide extends about 35 miles above Morgan City. Local cooperation. For details see page 11-8 of the FY 1986 Annual Report. Operations and results during period. The GDM for the Morgan City area was completed in FY 1985. Condition as of Sep. 30. Due to lack of financial local support this project has been moved to a deferred status. 10. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION Location. includes land subject to inundation by hurricane tides extending along both banks of the Mississippi River below New Orleans from vicinity of Phoenix to Venice, LA. Existing project. Provides for improvements along Mississippi River below New Orleans, LA, for prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by increasing heights of existing back levees and modifying existing drainage facilities where necessary in three separate reaches: Reach A, on the west bank from City Price to Empire, 15 miles, 4,340 acres protected; Reach B, on the west bank from Empire to Venice, 21 miles, 4,900 acres protected; and Reach C, on the east bank from Phoenix to Bohemia (construction recently completed by local agency with credit given as equivalent work), 16 miles, 5,470 acres protected, and raising the 11-8 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT river levee on the west bank (MR&T levee) from City Price to Venice, to a grade high enough to prevent overtopping by tidal surges from the east, generally called the West Bank River Plan. Reach B was later divided into two units, Reach B-1 from Empire to Fort Jackson and Reach B-2 from Fort Jackson to Venice, LA, as a result of a request made by the local agency. Estimated cost of new work (October 1989) is $160,000,000 Federal and $68,000,000 non-Federal, including $50,551,000 cash contributions or equivalent work. Local cooperation. Provide all lands, easements, and rights-ofway including borrow areas and spoil disposal areas necessary for the construction of the project, at costs presently estimated at $7,598,000; accomplish all necessary alterations and relocations to roads, pipelines, cables, wharves, and other facilities required by the construction of the project at costs presently estimated at $11,759,000; bear 30 percent of the first cost, a sum presently estimated at $68,000,000, and cash contribution presently estimated at $50,551,000 to be paid either in a lump sum prior to initiation of construction or in installments prior to start of pertinent work items, in accordance with construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers, or as a substitute for any part of the cash contribution, accomplish in accordance with approved construction schedules items of work of equivalent value as determined by the Chief of Engineers, the final apportionment of costs to be made after actual costs and values have been determined; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate all works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; prevent any encroachment on ponding areas unless substitute storage capacity or equivalent pumping is provided promptly; and at least annually, notify those affected that the project will not provide complete protection from tidal flooding and that further local actions must be taken during hurricane emergencies. Local interests are also required to comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646), in acquiring real property. Public Law 91-611. Not applicable. Construction started prior to Jan. 1, 1972. Public Law 91-646. A constitutional amendment was provided by the Louisiana Legislature on Feb. 1, 1972, allowing local interests to comply. The estimated cost to local interests is $48,000. Assurances of local cooperation for Reaches A, B-i, B-2, and C, furnished by the Plaquemines Parish Commission Council were accepted on behalf of the United States on Apr. 14, 1965. Supplemental assurances covering provisions of the Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, furnished by the Plaquemines Parish Commission Council were accepted on behalf of the United States on Jun. 20, 1973. Local interests were requested to furnish separate assurances for the East Bank Barrier Levee on Jun. 10, 1975, Feb. 23, 1976, and again on Aug. 19, 1983. By letter dated Feb. 5, 1985, the local sponsor requested the Corps of Engineers to defer further work on the design of Reach A and direct their efforts toward earliest possible construction of the East Bank Barrier Levee or a suitable alternative thereto. The Corps, with the concurrence of the local sponsor, selected a West Bank Levee alternative to the East Bank Barrier. On Dec. 29, 1987, the local sponsor provided supplemental assurances for the West Bank River Levee. These assurances were accepted on behalf of the United States on Jan. 28, 1988. By letter dated Jul. 28, 1987, the local sponsor also requested the Corps of Engineers to advance construction on Reach A, based on the results of the geotextile test section. All negotiations for relocations are the responsibility of local interests. These mainly consist of raising several petroleum and natural gas pipelines to the levee configuration and relocation of privately owned frame structures used as fishing and boating camps. To assure that there will be no delay in construction of levees, local interests are notified well in advance so that the owners of the pipelines can be advised. Assuring Agency: Plaquemines Parish Government. Assurances for all reaches of the project have been furnished. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction during FY 89 was initiated on five contracts and continued on three others. Plans and specifications were initiated on ten construction items scheduled for award in FY 90. The levee on the west bank from Tropical Bend to Venice would impact about 14,000 acres of which approximately 9,000 acres are marsh and 4,000 acres are shallow open waters. Although most of these impacts are temporary, about 1,000 acres of marsh would be permanently lost. To compensate for this loss, a mitigation plan has been formulated which would result in the creation of natural marsh on the Delta-Breton National Wildlife Refuge. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began on the project in September 1968 and the total project is approximately 42 percent complete. 11. WESTWEGO TO HARVEY CANAL, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. The project includes the Urban area within Jefferson parish between Westwego and the Harvey Canal on the west bank of the Mississippi River in the vicinity of New Orleans, Louisiana. The project area is generally bounded by the Harvey Canal to the east, Lakes Cataouatche and Salvador to the west, the Mississippi River to the north, and Barataria Bay to the south. Tidal waters can be carried into the project area through Lakes Cataouatche and Salvador, which connect to the Gulf of Mexico through Barataria Bay, and into the Bayou Segnette 11-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 and the Harvey Canal. Fresh water comes into the area from the Mississippi River via the Harvey and Algiers Locks, direct rainfall, and pumpage from leveed areas. Existing project. The recommended plan will consist of approximately 22 miles of new and enlarged levees along the permitted alignment from the Westwego area to the V-levee, along the existing V-levee alignment to the vicinity of Estelle Pumping Station, and along the existing Harvey Canal-Bayou Barataria Levee to the Roussell Pumping Station. Existing levees will be raised approximately 2 to 5 feet. New levees, ranging from 10 to 12 feet, will also be constructed. From that point, a floodwall is proposed to parallel the Harvey Canal and tie back into the Harvey Lock. I-type and T-type floodwalls will also be used along the levee alignment mentioned above when tieing into pumping stations and where land constraints dictate. The entire project is scheduled. The estimated project cost for work (October 1989) is $55,200,000 Federal and $29,700,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Prior to construction, local interests must give assurance satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: (1) Provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow and excavated material disposal areas necessary for construction, operation, and maintenance of the project at an estimated cost of $7,370,000. (2) Accomplish all necessary alteration and relocations to roads, railroads, pipelines, cables, wharves, and other facilities required by the construction of the project at an estimated cost of $4,850,000. (3) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, except where such damages are due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. (4) Bear 35 percent of the first cost of construction, a sum currently estimated at $29,700,000. Funds provided by non-Federal interests for interim hurricane protection may be considered beneficial expenditures and may be credited as a part of the non- Federal contribution of the project pursuant to the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. (5) Maintain and operate all features of the project in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, including levees, floodgates and approach channels, drainage structures, drainage ditches or canals, floodwalls, and stoplog structures. (6) Provide a cash or in-kind contribution for fish and wildlife mitigation features of the project in an amount equal to the same percentage as the non- Federal share of the basic project, a sum currently estimated at $900,000 which is included as part of (1) above. (7) Comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocations Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (PL 91-646). (8) Comply with Section 221 of Public Law 91-611, Flood Control Act of 1970; and (9) Comply with Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (PL 88-352) that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or subjected to discrimination in connection with the project on the grounds of race, creed, or national origin. Requirements of PL 91-611 and 96-646: (1) Local interest are legally qualified to execute the assurances. (2) A constitutional amendment was provided by the Louisiana legislature on Feb. 1, 1972 allowing local interest to comply. The local sponsor (West Jefferson Levee District) has applied for and received ASA (CW) approval (May 13, 1988) for $6.7 million working credit for work accomplished during the 5-year period prior to project authorization. Operations and results during fiscal year. Two design memorandums were completed during FY 89, and one scheduled for completion in FY 90. Plans and specifications are currently underway for two contract awards in FY 90. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on Oct. 23, 1987. It has undergone departmental and public review and the Record of Decision was signed Mar. 28, 1989. The project was opposed by the Department of Interior (DOI) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). DOI and EPA opposed levee construction that would impact 33 acres along and within the perimeter of the Jean Lafitte National Historical Park, and that would further impact 59 acres along and within the perimeter of the Bayou aux Carpes Section 404(c) site. The recommended levee alignment has been changed to avoid these environmentally sensitive areas, and there is presently no known environmental opposition to the project. Two Section 404(b)(1) Evaluations were signed on Dec. 9, 1986, one for the mitigation dike and the entire alignment except that portion encroaching into the EPA 404(c) Site, and another for that portion of the alignment in the EPA 404(c) Site. An amended 404(b)(1) evaluation will be prepared for the V-levee North SPH alternative. Application will be made for a State of Louisiana Water Quality Certificate. Conditions as of Sep. 30. Construction funds were approved for FY 90. Plans and specifications are underway on two contracts scheduled for award during FY 90. 12. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (a) Various hurricane protection projects, as well as small flood control projects, were inspected during FY 1989. Also, periodic inspection and continuing evaluation of completed civil works structures were conducted in accordance with ER 1110-2-100, at various times during the year on an as needed basis. 11-10 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT Fiscal year costs for the period were $259,180. Total costs to Sep. 30, 1989, were $2,764,907. (b) Mississippi River and Tributaries floodwalls, levees and flood control projects were inspected during FY 1989. Also, periodic inspection and continuing evaluation of completed civil works structures were conducted in accordance with ER 1110-2-100, at various times during the year on an as-needed basis. Fiscal year costs for the period were $259,180. Total costs to Sep. 30, 1989 were $2,764,907. 13. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities--repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecendent legislation.) Disaster preparedness, fiscal year costs for the period were $164,979. Emergency operations: Total costs to Sep. 30, 1989, were $41,769. Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Detailed studies continued on Bayou DuPortag at a cost of $8,161; and Schneider Canal, LA, $55,425. 11-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 11-A See Section in Text Project 1. Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico, LA 2. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 3. Mississippi River Ship Channel-Gulf to Baton Rouge (Contrib. Funds) 4. Waterway from Intracoastal Waterways to Bayou Dulac, LA (Bayou Grand Caillou & LeCarpe, LA) 6. Grand Isle and Vicinity, LA (Contrib. Funds) 7. Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, LA (Hurricane Protection) (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 8. Larose to Golden Meadow, LA Hurricane Protection) (Contrib. Funds) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Total Funds to FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 1989 $ 13,251,000 16,022,664 24,957,067 25,630,318 6,933,000 7,684,892 6,663,500 6,808,104 631,000 1,074,000 1,240,276 1,239,090 56,395 31,470 30,669 1,000,000 735,330 70,000 70,000 20,358,000 21,676,920 510,988 1,102,053 4,221,000 4,073,880 20,110,000 15,429,842 25,153,650 25,117,781 594,000 691,278 8,340,000 8,373,119 3,730,000 3,591,928 1,070,453 1,396,000 849,700 861,475 532 376,800 377,601 961,000 42,691 368,000 13,375,000 13,331,227 281,518 34,518 4,813,000 5,018,844 250,000 234,087 29,132,000 29,835,724 30,889,100 30,626,352 850,000 787,029 5,164,000 4,860,872 3,270,000 3,356,435 1,168,000 1,068,455 740,000 1,930,000 368,000 13,140,000 8,425,930 349,052 436,000 4,600,000 4,007,473 105,760 15,913 2,819,615 46,691,600 45,725,384 1,450,000 1,370,207 4,469,000 4,809,722 1,167,000 820,130 318,000 671,315 1,901,000 1,849,231 259,000 258,318 9,214,000 13,770,957 636,579 404,647 2,675,000 2,386,886 105,760 84,302,989' 83,036,909' 570,738,261 569,101,899 91,167,200 90,915,496 120,287,080 120,282,641 1,240,4775 1,196,4775 9,494,000 9,450,595 2,882,000 2,810,315 10,740,776 10,732,538 637,622 641,608 1,276,032 1,276,032 12,944,500 12,827,602 2,907,000 2,796,318 217,325,000 215,605,662 5,588,321 5,828,894 54,276,000 52,167,808 2,627,481 2,599,028 11-12 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See iSne cTtieoxnt Project Funding Total Funds to FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 1989 9. Morgan City and New Work Vicinity, LA Approp. -79,000 - - - 1,953,000 (Hurricane Cost 21,762 - - - 1,975,628 Protection) 10. Mississippi New Work River Delta at Approp. 971,000 4,908,000 2,850,000 17,200,000 79,318,000 and below New Cost 1,449,660 4,546,692 3,032,675 16,623,500 78,522,984 Orleans, LA (New Orleans to Venice, LA, Hurricane Protection) (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. 1,368,989 340,000 - - 4,758,989 Cost 984,106 724,883 - - 4,758,989 1. Includes $1,729,989 for previous project. 2. Does not include allotment of $40,000 (9613123). 3. Does not include expenditures of $63,370 (9613123). 4. Includes $169,055 for previous projects and $3,379,676 from permanent indefinite appropriation. 5. Contributed by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans, for providing fill for future industrial sites adjacent to turning basin and for dredging cable and pipeline crossings. 11-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 29, 1956 Oct. 22, 1976 Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Approp. Act of 1985, dated Jul. 2, 1986 (PL 99-88) Nov. 17, 1986 (PL 99-662) LAKE CHARLES, LA The project for deepening of the project for navigation, Lake Charles, Louisiana, to a depth of 45 feet, at a total cost of $1,070,000. MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO GULF OF MEXICO, LA (See Sec. 1 of Text) Combines projects of Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to New Orleans, Mississippi River, South Pass, and Southwest Pass, adding thereto project for Mississippi River from New Orleans to Head of Passes, to provide a single project, "Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico," with channel dimensions as follows: Baton Rouge to New Orleans, 35 by 500 feet; port limits of New Orleans, 35 by 1,500 feet; New Orleans to Head of Passes, 40 by 1,000 feet, Southwest Pass, 40 by 800 feet; Southwest Pass Bar Channel, 40 b 600 feet; South Pass, 30 by 450 feet; South Pass Bar Channel 30 by 600 feet. Deepen existing channel from 35 to 40 feet by 500 feet wide from one-tenth mile below Louisiana Highway Commission bridge at Baton Rouge to upper limits of Port of New Orleans, and also 40 by 500 feet withmin presently authorized 35- by 1,500-foot channel in port limits of New Orleans. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA (See Sec. 2 of Text) Construct a seaway canal 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide from Michoud to 38-foot contour in gulf and an inner tidewater harbor consisting of a 1,000- by 2,000-foot turning basin 36 feet deep and a connecting channel 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide to Inner Harbor Navigation Canal and provides, when economically justified, for construction of a lock to Mississippi River in the vicinity of Meraux, LA. Amends above Act making the construction of bridge relocations a Federal responsibility when required by the construction of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet channel. The Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet feature is modified to provide that the replacement and expansion of the existing industrial canal lock and connecting channels or the construction of an additional lock and connecting channels shall be in the area of the existing lock or at the Violet site. MISSISSIPPI RIVER SHIP CHANNEL, GULF TO BATON ROUGE, LA (See Sec. 3 of Text) Will provide more efficient deep-draft navigation access to the New Orleans and Baton Rouge reaches of the Mississippi River via Southwest Pass by enlarging the existing channel to a project depth of 55 feet and enlarging the adjacent channel along the left descending bank in New Orleans Harbor to a 40-foot depth, a turning basin at Baton Rouge, and training works in the passes to reduce maintenance. Formalizes the cost sharing provisions of the project, permits the State of Louisiana to enact user fees to defray their portion of the project costs, and implements harbor maintenance fees to help pay for the Federal cost of the project. It also provides an option to the local sponsor to defer their initial payment for one year following initiation of construction. In terms of channel depths up to 45 feet, ,the cost sharing requirements are 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal for construction and 100 percent Federal for maintenance. For channels deeper than 45 feet, the cost sharing requirements are 50 percent Federal and 50 percent non-Federal for both construction and maintenance. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 H. Doc. 215, 76th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 36, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 245, 82nd Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 186, Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (PL 94-587) 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986. H. Doc. 2577, 99th Cong., 1st sess. WRDA of 1986, 99th Cong.. 2d sess. 11-14 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1985 Oct. 23, 1962 Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Adopted by Committee Resolutions Sep. 23, 1976, and Oct. 1, 19762 Oct. 27, 1965 Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 23, 1962 WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO BAYOU DULAC, LA (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, LA) (See Sec. 4 of Text) Channel 5 by 40 feet from Intracoastal Waterway at Houma through Bayou LeCarpe, Bayou Pelton, and Bayou Grand Caillou to Bayou Dulac, about 16.3 miles. Channel 10 by 45 feet in Bayou LeCarpe from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to Houma navigation canal. BAYOU RIGOLETTE, LA A project to construct six additional floodgates at Bayou Rigolette, LA, adjacent to the existing drainage structure, at a total cost of $2,300,000. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA (See Sec. 6 of Text) To provide hurricane protection by placement of a berm and vegetated dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf shore and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) (See. Sec. 7 of Text) Control of hurricane tides by construction of two independent units, the Lake Pontchartrain Barrier plan and the Chalmette Area plan. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, NORTH SHORE, LA The project for navigation, Lake Pontchartrain North Shore, LA: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated February 14, 1979, at a total cost of $1,310,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $655,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $655,000. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) (See Sec. 8 of Text) A loop levee about 36 miles long along both banks of Bayou Lafourche from Golden Meadow to Larose; enlargement of 3 miles of existing levee at Golden Meadow; floodgates for navigation and hurricane protection in Bayou Lafourche at upper and lower bayou crossings; about 8 miles of low interior levees to regulate intercepted drainage; and seven multibarreled culverts controlled by flapgates. MORGAN CITY AND VICINITY, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION (See Sec. 9 of Text) Construction of new levees along Lake Palourde and Bayou Ramos, levee to tie-in with Bayou Boeuf lock levee andthree gravity drainage structures in Morgan City unit and enlargement of bank levee, construction of new levee, and construction of one floodgate and five gravity drainage structures in Franklin and vicinity unit. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION (See Sec. 10 of Text) Improvements along Mississippi River below New Orleans, LA, for prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by increasing heights of existing back levees and modifying existing drainage facilities where necessary in five separate reaches. H. Doc. 206, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986. H. Doc. 639, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 231, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986., 99th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 184, 89th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 167, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 550, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 11-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 11-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents WEST BANK HURRICANE PROTECTION LEVEE, JEFFERSON PARISH, LA Water Structural and nonstructural measures to prevent flood damage Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, Resources to those areas identified in the Feb. 1984 draft Environmental 1986. Development Impact Statement for the West Bank Hurricane Protection Act, 1986 Levee, Jefferson Parish, LA, at a total cost of $61,500,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $40,000,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $21,500,000. Funds provided by non- Federal interest for interim hurricane protection may be considered beneficial expenditures and may be credited as part of the non-Federal contribution of the project pursuant to Section 104 of this Act. 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act. 11-16 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1989 For Last Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Completed See Annual and Deauthorized Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance or Reclassified Alteration of Berwick Bay Bridge' Amite River and Bayou Manchac, LA Aquatic Plant Control Program, LA Atchafalaya River Bayous Chene Boeuf, and Black, LA Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to Gulf of Mexico, LA Baton Rouge Harbor, Segment between Mi. 2.5 and 5.02 Barataria Bay Waterway, LA Bayou Bonfouca, LA Bayou Dorcheat, Loggy Bayou and Lake Bisteneau, LA3. 4.5.6 Bayou Dupre, LA7 Bayou Grosse Tete, LA8 Bayou Lacombe, LA Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche Jump Waterway, LA Bayou La Lautre, St. Malo, and Yscolskey, LA Bayou Plaquemine Brule, LA Bayou Queue de Tortue, LA Bayou Segnette Waterway, LA Bayou Teche, LA Bayou Teche & Vermilion River, LA Bayou Terrebonne, LA4.9 Bayou Vermilion, LA4 Big Pigeon and Little Pigeon Bayous, LA3 Calcasieu River and Pass, LA Calcasieu River at Coon Island, LA'o Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, LA Cascasieu River Salt Water Barrier, LA" Cane River, LA3,6 Chefuncte River and Bogue Falia, LA Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA' 2 Freshwater Bayou, LA Grand Bayou Pass, LA Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, L & Mexican Border Houma Navigation Canal, LA Inland Waterway from Franklin to Mermentau River, LA" 3 Intracoastal Waterway from the Mississippi River to Bayou Teche, LA14 Lake Borgne and Chef Menteur- Bulkheads and Jetties Lake Charles Deep Water Channel, LA'5 Leland Bowman Lock, LA Little Caillou Bayou, LA Complete Complete Complete Complete Deauthorized Complete Complete Complete Deauthorized Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Deauthorized Complete Complete 1967 1978 1984 1984 1981 19462 1984 1974 1887 1968 1969 1967 1984 1970 1950 1970 1958 1984 1983 1961 1947 1936 1984 1976 1981 1973 1910 1967 1971 1984 1950 1985 1984 1960 1956 19422 1950 1987 1973 $ - 28,234 14,193,662 $ - 69,087 30,356,691 56,440,678 501,963 1,572,685 30,997 5,000 38,915 4,716 1,624,424 96,916 33,410 33,355 238,828 754,330 2,891,822 120,089 34,900 21,049,499 320,758 104,1877 123,454 119,191 887,056 223,616 36,780 28,315 400,045 5,469,902 1,668,036 251,691 200,169 - 37,169 27,807,310 116,919,245 1,015,81410 - 5,856,200 - 4,197,262 2,500 58,342 202,817 7,116,224 7,676 2,000 463,401 452,611 18,091,741 14,48012 63,284,470 408,569,554 - 20,405,960 249,052 32,200,010 77,761 552,780 11,699 241,896 751,485 11-17 1928 1914 Nov. 1979 Nov. 1963 1931 1939 May 1981 1938 May 1956 1915 March 1923 March 1957 1916 1896 3 Oct. 1968 April 1974 Sep. 1978 Jan. 1968 1959 Dec. 1914 Aug. 1968 1939 Nov. 1979 Mar. 1985 1929 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 11-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (Continued) Cost to Sep. 1989 For Last Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Completed Project See Annual and Deauthorized Status Report For: Construction Maintenance or Reclassified Mermentau River, Bayou Nezpique, and Bay Des Cannes, LA Complete 1977 5,197,97516 114,519 Mermentau River, LA Complete 1985 4,672,579 21,397,784 Jul. 1952 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, LA Complete 1976 2,499,555 - Nov. 1974 Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, LA Complete 1986 10,008,100 13,697,084 Complete Navigation work under special authorization (Calcasieu Pass channel in Old River Bend at Cameron, LA) 17 - 1957 - 139,755 Pass Manchac, LA Complete 1950 79,845 13,545 1912 Petite Anse, Tigre, and Carlin Bayous, LA Inactive 1981 - 1,450,172 Nov. 1980 Removal of Aquatic Growth, LA 1984 - 27,352,189 Sulphur River, AR and TX3,6 - 1919 45,989 - Tangipahoa River, LA - 1985 - 1,050,201 Tickfaw, Natalbany, Ponchatoula, and Blood Rivers, LA4 Complete 1973 8,115 92,163 1921 Vinton Waterway, LA2i Deauthorized 1950 - - Nov. 1979 Waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, LAla3 - 1948 10,904 0,742 Waterway from Empire, LA, to Gulf of Mexico Complete 1981 1,068,142 1,038,671 Jun. 1950 1. Transferred to Department of Transportation. Authorized under Truman-Hobbs Act. 2. Date authorized. 3. Completed. Date will be furnished when available. 4. Includes previous project costs. 5. No commerce reported. 6. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 7. Includes $56 cost incurred in 1969. 8. Completed except that portion above mile 10.3 providing for widening from 40 feet to 60 feet, which is inactive. 9. By Public Law 88-404, that portion of Bayou Terrebonne between point where Barrow Street crosses said stream and a line determined by prolonging and extending eastern right-of-way line of New Orleans Boulevard southerly to south bank of said stream was declared nonnavigable. 10. Includes $66,000 contributed funds. 11. Operation and maintenance of the structure reported under project "Calcasieu River and Pass, LA." 12. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds. 13. Not completed; incorporated in navigation project "Mermentau River, LA." 14. Not completed; superseded for most of its length by present 12- by 125-foot Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, which coinc1i5d.e sM waiinthte noarn cpea rallels it. project; no future work schedules. 16. Includes $57,555 ($29,974 of which was from Public Works funds) for new work on previous project. Includes $114,519 for maintenance of previous project. 17. Work is under continuing authority. 11-18 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1989 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA' Amite River and Tributaries, LA Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LAl"2 Bayou Choupique, LA3 Bayou Nicholas, Coushatta, LA3 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA" 2," 2 Bayou Rapides, LA3 Black Bayou Reservoir, LA" 4' 5, 12 Black Bayou-Pine Island Area, LA3 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, LA" 7" 2 Colfax, Grant Parishes, LA"7 Cooper Lake and Channels, TX8 East Point, LA Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O' the Pines, TXS,9 Garland City, AR12 Grant Parish below Colfax, LA", Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, AR. 1,9,12 Maniece Bayou, AR." 2212 McKinney Bayou, Finn Bayou Segment, AR.10,12 Natchitoches Parish, LA" 2 Pineville, Red River, LA",3,12 Posten Bayou, AR.".12 Red River Parish, LA" , "2 Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, LA1.12 Saline Point, LA" 9 Apr. Feb. Jan. Mar. Jun. 1955 1964 1948 1954 1964 Jun. 1939 Dec. 1951 May 1963 Jul. 1978 Apr. 1976 1956 1964 1948 1954 1964 1951 1952 1945 1963 1978 1977 1938 1979 1969 1979 1976 1941 1979 1941 1970 19631o0 1956 1953 1973 1939 1953 1945 $ 1,653,189 3,034,2552 319,200 129,930 70,717 243,3362 95,179 336,063 1,655,700 741,892 70,348 20,839,300 486,069 14,175,197 1,335,842 38,809 1,018,005 88,006 970,9322 1,529,478 232,426 149,435 3,908,000 124,111 8,301,021 Aug. 1968 Jul. 1974 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1969 Aug. 1955 Dec. 1951 Mar. 1953 Mar. 1953 11-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 11-D (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1989 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Twelvemile Bayou, LA: - 1966 335,433 - May 1965 Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TXX - 1979 35,659,176 11,195,021 - 1. Authorized under project "Red River Below Denison Dam." 2. In addition, the following was expended from contributed funds: Amite River and tributaries ........... $ 430 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA ....................... 89,047 Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, LA .... 170,799 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA ..... ........................ 425,209 Maniece Bayou, AR.....................39,293 Natchitoches Parish, LA ................ 250,000 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended.) 4. Construction not initiated. 5. Inactive. 6. Includes $92,000 for preauthorization studies. 7. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7, Flood Control Act 1928, as amended by Sec. 9, Flood Control Act 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 8. These projects transferred to the Fort Worth District, Southwestern Division, during FY 1979. 9. Completed. Date will be furnished when available. 10. Date authorized. 11. Posten Bayou Project, authorized by Senate and House Resolutions, Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, deleted the plan authorized by the Flood Control Act dated Aug. 3, 1955. 12. These projects transferred to the Vicksburg District during FY 1983. 11-20 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-E ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 89 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Navigation (110) Bayou Lafourche & Lafourche-Jump Waterway, LA -1009 GIWW LA & TX Section -10032 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, St. Bernard Parish, LA (Bank Erosion) -10241 Flood Control Studies (120) Aloha-Rigolette Area, LA -12123 Amite River & Tributaries, LA -50100 Louisiana Coastal Area, LA, Hurricane Protection -12445 Louisiana Coastal Area, LA, Land Loss & Marsh Creation -12348 Louisiana Coastal Area, LA, Mississippi River Delta -12637 Louisiana Coastal Area, LA, Shore & Barrier Island Erosion -12354 Louisiana Coastal Area, LA, Louisiana Coastal Comprehensive Wetlands -12636 Mermentau, Vermilion & Calcasieu Rivers & Bayou Teche, LA -34014 Upper Bayou Teche, LA -12435 Vermilion River & Bayou Tigre, LA -12439 West Bank of Mississippi River-Vicinity of New Orleans, LA -59360 Review of Authorized Projects (160) Deauthorization Review -77000 Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations -17250 Interagency Water Resources Development Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Planning Assistance to States (186) -14822 TOTAL (Category 100) COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Services South East Louisiana Hurricane Evacuation -83001 Special Study-Lafayette Parish, LA TOTAL (Category 250) Coastal Data Collection (280) Re-evaluation of Section 54 Projects -53891 TOTAL (Category 200) ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 600) Flood Control Projects (650) Westwego to Harvey Canal, LA -75457 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $ 88,145 207,178 2 295,325 70,169 248,132 1,245 231,543 209,058 -9,829 176,529 421,415 119,439 123,433 528,133 2,199,267 0 20,604 17,466 38,070 98,340 $2,551,002 194,962 16,017 1,333 212,312 212,312 1,291,465 1,291,465 $4,054,779 11-21 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT * This district comprises western and central Mississippi, southern Arkansas, northern Louisiana, and a very small portion of southwestern Tennessee, embraced in drainage basins of eastern tributaries of Mississippi River south of Horn Lake Creek to and including Buffalo River; Pearl River Basin in Mississippi; independent tributaries of the Gulf of Mexico south of the Buffalo River Basin to the Mississippi-Louisiana state line; western tributaries of Mississippi River between White and Atchafalaya Rivers including Arkansas River Basin below a point 3 miles upstream from Pine Bluff and Arkansas River below mile 36.1 near Pendleton. AR; Ouachita and Black Rivers in Arkansas and Louisiana; and Red River in Louisiana and Arkansas to the Texas-Arkansas state line. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR ........................ 2. Red River emergency bank protection ........................... 3. Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, La ............. 4. Navigation work under special authorization ........................ Flood Control 5. Bayou Bartholomew and tributaries, AR and LA ............. 6. Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR and LA ......................... 7. Lead Bayou, MS .................... 8. Ouachita River Levees, LA.......... 9. Ouachita River and tributaries AR and LA ......................... 10. Pearl River Basin, MS and LA ...... 11. Pearl River, Slidell, St. Tammany Parish, LA .......................... 12. Porter Bayou, MS .................... 13. Red River below Denison Dam (Vicksburg Dist.) .................... 14. Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabilization (Vicksburg District) .................. Page Flood Control (cont) 12-2 12-2 12-2 12-3 15. Red River Waterway-Shreveport, LA, to Index, AR ................. 16. Inspection of completed Flood Control Projects ................... 17. Flood control work under special authorization............... Tables Table 12-A Cost and Financial Statement ................... Table 12-B Authorizing Legislation..... 12-3 Table 12-C Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR and LA (9-Foot Project), 12-4 Locks and Dams .......... 12-4 Table 12-D Other Authorized Navigation 12-4 Project................... Table 12-E Ouachita River and Tribu- 12-5 taries Existing Project ..... 12-5 Table 12-F Red River Below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) 12-6 New Projects............. 12-6 Table 12-G Red River Below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) 12-7 Incorporated Projects ...... Table 12-H Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............ 12-7 Table 12-I Active General Investigations 12-1 Page 12-7 12-7 12-8 12-9 12-11 12-14 12-15 12-17 12-18 12-19 12-20 12-22 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Navigation 1. OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMDEN, AR Location.Ouachita River rises in Polk County, AR, and flows southeasterly and southerly about 600 miles. Below its confluence with the Tensas and Little Rivers at Jonesville, LA, it is called Black River, which enters Red River 35.5 miles from the Mississippi River. Previous projects. See page 683 of Annual Report for 1962 for details. Existing project.See page 684 of Annual Report for 1962 for details of the old 6.5-foot navigation project. New work for completed project costs $7,064,031.68, exclusive of amounts expended under previous projects. Modified project and project for Red River below Fulton, AR, provide for a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in Red River between Old River and mouth of Black River, and in Black and Ouachita Rivers from mouth of Black River to Camden, AR. Authorized features for the modified project include four new locks and dams, in-river construction dredging to achieve a 9-foot navigation channel depth, and channel realignment. All 4 locks and dams are complete and in operation and initial channel dredging is complete providing 9-foot navigation depth. Remaining work consists of realignment of 25 restricted bendway sites between river miles 195 at Sterlington, LA, and river mile 335 at Camden, AR, on the Ouachita River. With these improvements in place the river system will be navigable by a fourbarge tow (two abreast) to Crossett, AR, river mile 237, and a two-barge tow (abreast) to Camden, AR. Mitigation features include the 65,000-acre Felsenthal National Wildlife Refuge in Arkansas, the 18,000-acre D'Arbonne National Wildlife Refuge in Louisiana, a series of recreation facilities along the waterway, and improvements to Catahoula Lake to preserve it for migratory waterfowl. Estimated total cost for the nine-foot navigation project is $272,833,000, which includes $256,000,000 Federal costs and $16,833,000 non-Federal costs. Local cooperation.Local interests are required to furnishing the construction rights-of-way for the realignment work. Seven of the 25 sites are within the Felsenthal National Wildlife Refuge and are already owned by the Federal Government. However, there have been no indications that the land for the remaining 18 sites will be forthcoming because of strong opposition to the realignment work by local environmental groups. The six remaining recreation facilities are unscheduled at this time due to the lack of required cost sharing agreements. Terminal facilities. Public loading docks are at Columbia, LA, and Camden and Crossett, AR. Privately owned docks and loading and unloading facilities are at Columbia, Monroe, and Sterlington. LA, and El Dorado, Calion, and Camden, AR. Two grain-handling facilities and a petroleum-loading facility are in the vicinity of Jonesville, LA, and a grain-handling facility is in the vicinity of Acme, LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. The Vicksburg District completed in FY 89 construction of Crossett Harbor Phases I and II Recreation area, Grand Marais Phases I and II Recreation area, and H. K. Thatcher Lock and Dam Access site in October 1988, November 1988, and December 1988, respectively. Maintenance dredging performed by the contract dredges Butcher, and Pontchartrain during the FY 89 removed 1,465,277 cubic yards of material from the waterways. Condition as of Sep. 30. The project is 92 percent complete and provides limited navigation as far north as Camden, AR. All four locks and dams associated with the project are complete and in operation. Design is complete for the channel alignment plan, but due to lack of right-of-way and continued opposition, this work is on hold. Design is underway for placement of mooring facilities in the lower two pools and a construction contract was awarded Jan. 31, 1989, for the installation of a hinged crest gate in the navigation pass of Felsenthal Lock and Dam. 2. RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION Location. In northwest Louisiana, southwest Arkansas, and northeast Texas, along the Red and Old Rivers between the Mississippi River and the head of the levee system above Index, AR. Existing project. Provides for realigning the banks by means of cutoffs and training works and for stabilizing banks by means of revetments, dikes, and other methods as emergency conditions may require in advance of developing the design for the entire Red River Waterway project. Estimated cost for this work (October 1989) is $83,300,000 Federal and $2,182,000 non-Federal, including a cash contribution of $7,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see pages 11-19 to 11-20, Annual Report FY 80. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work by hired labor consisted of preparing plans and specifications, surveys, and general engineering. Completion of the Candler Lake Revetment, river mile 365-R, and Temple Revetment, mile 422-L, Bear Realignment, river mile 413.5 to 422.7, was initiated. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in October 1972 and is 87 percent complete. 3. RED RIVER WATERWAYMISSISSIPPI RIVER TO SHREVEPORT, LA Location. From east central to northwest Louisiana along the Red and Old Rivers between the Mississippi River and Shreveport, LA. 12-2 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT Existing project. Provide a navigation route from the Mississippi River at the junction with Old River via Old and Red River to Shreveport, LA, developing a channel approximately 236 miles long, 9 feet deep, and 200 feet wide. The development will include five locks and dams, realignment and contraction of the river as necessary to develop an efficient channel, and bank stabilization as necessary to hold the newly developed channel in position. Facilities to provide opportunities for recreation and for fish and wildlife development are an integral part of the project. Estimated cost for new work is $1,688,317,000 Federal and $87,691,000 non-Federal, including $44,160,000 contributed funds. The Federal cost includes $317,000 for aids to navigation by U.S. Coast Guard. Local cooperation. For details see page 11-21, Annual Report FY 80. The Red River Waterway Commission, governing body of the Red River Waterway District, executed an act of assurance for all project features in Louisiana on Feb. 26, 1969, supported by resolution dated Jan. 30, 1969. The assurances were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Apr. 15, 1969. The Commission furnished amended assurances covering the provisions of Public Law 91-646 and Public Law 91-611 on May 23. 1973, for the portion of the project within Louisiana. These were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Nov. 14, 1973. Terminal facilities. Local interests are to provide adequate terminal facilities along the waterway. The Corps entered into an agreement with the City of Alexandria, LA, whereby material excavated from the Philip Bayou Realignment could be used as fill for port construction at mile 109. Construction of the realignment and port fill are complete. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor continued work on Design Memoranda, preparation of Plans and Specifications, Surveys, General Engineering, and Model Studies. The following contracts were awarded in FY 89: Pool 1 - Hog Lake dikes, Moncla Reach and Below Gin Lake capouts, and the Lock and Dam 1 Water Service; Pool 2 - Phase II of the Alexandria Front revetment, Phase I of the Lock and Dam 2 recreation facilities, and the Lock and Dam 2 Water Service; Pool 3- Fausse Revetment downstream extension and Crain Revetment; and in Pool 4 - Piermont and Howard Realignments, and Hammel and Williams downstream extension revetments. Work was also initiated on the Alexandria switchyard for the Louisiana and Arkansas Railroad Bridge relocation. Items continuing including: Pool 1 - Lorran Lake Realignment; Pool 2 - Kateland Revetment extension and initial construction dredging below Alexandria; Pool 3 - Phase III of Lock and Dam 3, Powhatan and Campti Realignments, and Eureka and Nantachie/ Red Bayou extension revetments; and in Pool 4- Nicholas, Carroll Phase II, and Gahagan Realignments. The following contracts were completed: Pool 1 - Lock and Dam 1 timber wall extension and excavation, and initial construction dredging; Pool 2 - Deloges Bluff Revetment, Darrow Realignment, Alexandria Front Revetment, and the Boyce-Raven Camp Reach; Pool 3 - Phase IIc of Lock and Dam 3, St. Maurice, Kadesh, Socot, and Ile Au Vaches Realignments, and Lumbra Revetment; and Pool 5 - Wilkerson Point Realignment, and Cupples Revetment downstream extension. Maintenance dredging was performed by the Contract Dredge Butcher during Fiscal Year 1989. All maintenance dredging was below Alexandria, LA. 2,289,151 cubic yards of material was removed from the channel. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in July 1973, and project is 56 percent complete. 4. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 87-645, as amended (preauthorization). In regard to Yellow Bend, AR, Congress has added $1,000,000 to the FY 89 Senate Energy and Water Appropriations Bill. In FY 1988, $314,575 was expended on Yellow Bend Port and construction was initiated in July 1989. Flood Control 5. BAYOU BARTHOLOMEW AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Location. Bayou Bartholomew rises in Jefferson County, AR, about 10 miles northwest of Pine Bluff and flows southerly about 370 miles to join the Ouachita River upstream from Sterlington, LA. Authorized project. Project includes ten waterretention lakes in the western tributaries of Bayou Bartholomew in Arkansas and six local levee units along the main stem of Bayou Bartholomew in Louisiana. However, because of public opposition to construction of the loop levees, preconstruction planning of the six loop levees has been deferred until such time as there is sufficient support by local interests. Channel improvements previously authorized are deferred. Latest approved (1979) estimated cost of new work is $46,913,000 including $44,800,000 Federal and $2,113,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation.Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-5 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning and design have been deferred pending favorable benefit-cost ratios. Condition as of Sep. 30. Preparation of general design memorandum has been deferred due to lack of economic justification. 12-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Status of studies. A re-evaluation study has been completed as part of the Ouachita River and Tributaries, AR and LA Study. The authorized project is not economically feasible. Project included on list for deauthorization Dec. 1989 in accordance with Sec. 1001 WRDA 1986. 6. BAYOU BODCAU AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Location. In east bank flood plain of Red River. Bayou Bodcau rises in vicinity of Hope, AR, and flows southerly through Bayou Bodcau Reservoir and Bodcau Lake to join Cypress Bayou and form Red Chute Bayou, continues through Red Chute Bayou, Flat River, and Loggy Bayou to Red River, about 40 miles below Shreveport, LA. Authorized project. Cypress Bayou-Red Chute Bayou levee: Extend existing levee from about 8 miles southeast of Benton, LA, proceeding southerly to junction of Cross and Red Chute Bayous, and then parallel to Red Chute Bayou on the right descending bank to its junction with Cutoff Bayou for a total distance of approximately 25 miles; construct landside drainage channel and several culverts with flap gates to Red Chute Bayou; construct approximately 5 miles of levee on left descending bank of Red Chute Bayou extending south from Louisiana Highway 612, and relocate utility lines as needed. Flat River-Loggy Bayou levee: Extend from lower end of existing Red River levee in vicinity of Ninock, LA, along high (left descending) bank of Red River to a point on right descending bank of Loggy Bayou, about 1 mile above its mouth, thence generally along right descending bank of Loggy Bayou, Red Chute, Cutoff Bayou, and Flat River to Taylortown to tie into existing Red River levee; close Flat River near its junction with Cutoff Bayou and install one 36-inch round corrugated metal pipe with automatic flap gate to drain isolated pockets and provide uninterrupted drainage; construct drainage structures on Flat River near its junction with Red Chute Bayou and along alignment of the Loggy Bayou in the vicinity of Grassy Lake; and make necessary utility relocations. Flat River channel improvement: Enlarge to average bottom width of 50 feet with flat side slopes and deepen by 2 to 6 feet from the confluence with Cutoff Bayou to junction with Cooper Bayou, 11.6 miles, including required relocations and modifications of utilities. The subject project was one of the Water Resources projects reviewed in March 1977 in accordance with the President's request. As a result of this review, the President recommended that project construction be halted and the project be deauthorized. Congress subsequently directed the Corps to take the following two actions: Construct levees on Red Chute Bayou below Cutoff Bayou that are required to prevent induced flood damage that would otherwise result from the abandonment of partly completed project. Initiate studies to determine if modifications to the authorized project would permit its completion in a form consistent with the current executive policy. Engineering and design work for the induced flood prevention plan below Cutoff Bayou and project modification studies were being conducted when President Reagan signed, on Dec. 4, 1981, the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill of 1982, which contained language that "reconfirmed without further study and analysis" the plan for flood control for the project as approved by the Flood Control Act of 1965. Resumption of construction was scheduled to begin in 1984. The project sponsor, however, requested that construction be delayed while a reevaluation of the project was made. The reevaluation study has been completed. A summary of study results was submitted in January 1987 which recommended no further Federal action. The Lower Mississippi Valley Division approved the report and a notice of study termination was disseminated in June 1987. Local cooperation. For details see pages 11-24 and 11-25, Annual Report for FY 80. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor forces consisted of completion of the reevaluation study. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in October 1974 and is 17 percent complete. Alternatives to provide flood protection are being considered and these efforts will continue. 7. LEAD BAYOU, MS Location. Lead Bayou is a tributary of the Sunflower River in Bolivar and Sunflower Counties, MS, approximately 30 miles from the Mississippi River near Cleveland, MS. Existing project. The plan of improvement was for enlargement of the existing Lead Bayou channel to provide a 1.5-year degree of protection to agricultural areas and a 10-year degree of protection to the small developed area near Cleveland, MS. Total estimated Federal cost was $1,724,400. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Condition as of Sep. 30. The construction contract was completed Sep. 14, 1983. The stabilization of three bridges was completed in early FY 89. 8. OUACHITA RIVER LEVEES, LA I Location. East bank of Ouachita Riber between Bastrop, LA, and Sandy Bayou. Loop levees on the west bank at West Monroe, Columbia, and Bawcomville. Existing project. There are 105.8 miles of levee on the east bank and 11.6 miles of levee in the three loops on the west bank. A letter report, approved by the 12-4 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT Chief of Engineers, authorized gravel surfacing 40.3 miles of levee, enlargement of 40.4 miles of levee, and a 5.7-mile southward extension of the east bank levee. Estimated Federal cost is $8,300,000. Estimated non-Federal cost is $14,100,000. Local cooperation. Requirements and assurances of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-6 of FY 80 Annual Report. Condition as of Sep. 30. Item 1 of the Monroe to Sandy Bayou Levee enlargement project was completed Jul. 7, 1978. Additonal work was deferred pending results of a comprehensive study of the entire Ouachita River Levee System. A summary report indicating that it is economically feasible to raise portions of the existing levee to authorized grade and that complete rehabilitation of thc levee system is necessary was approved by LMVD on Oct. 1, 1986. The study results were disseminated to the project sponsor and interested parties in October 1986. The Project was reclassified as an active project on May 7, 1987. The final summary report was sent to the Office of the Chief of Engineers. The final summary report was sent to the Office of the Chief of Engineers in July 1988 and design was initiated on the Bawcomville segment of the Ouachita River levees. A construction contract for the Bawcomville segment is scheduled for third quarter FY 90 pending approval of the Supplemental Agreement with the local sponsor. 9. OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Location. Improvements comprising comprehensive projects are on main stem Ouachita River, AR and LA, on its tributaries, Caddo and Little Missouri Rivers, and in Pine Bluff, AR. Description of Ouachita River Basin is presented in greater detail on page 690 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The authorized general plan for flood control and other purposes in the Ouachita River Basin includes the projects listed in Table 12-E. The 1966 Flood Control Act modified the Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA, project to include 10 water-retention lakes in the western tributaries of Bayou Bartholomew in Arkansas and 6 local levee units along the main stem of the bayou in Louisiana. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed features of comprehensive project. (See individual statements for further details.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations for Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, DeGray Lake, Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, and Ouachita River Levees are shown in individual reports in 1985. Condition as of Sep. 30. Pertinent data on those features which are complete or not started are in Table 12-E. Conditions of Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, DeGray Lake, and Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson are given in the individual reports in 1985 report. An overall basin study is continuing. Interim study of the Ouachita River Levees is compiete. The Interim Report recommended raising selected portions of the levee to authorized grade. The levee project has been reclassified as active. Interim milestones have been removed for Monroe-West Monroe and Arkansas Lakes. Results of these studies will be reported in the Overall Basinwide Report. A new start reconnaissancc study for flooding problems in the vicinity of Hot Springs, Garland County, AR, will be initiated under this authority during FY 89. Publication of the Final Basinwide Report will be deferred until completion of these studies. Favorable continuing authorities reports have been approved for Chauvin and Youngs Bayou. Planning and design are underway on these items. 10. PEARL RIVER BASIN, MS AND LA Location. The basin comprises most of the Southcentral portion of Mississippi and a small part of southeast Louisiana. The Pearl River begins in Neshoba County, MS, and flows southwesterly 113 miles to the vicinity of Jackson, MS, then southeasterly 233 miles to the vicinity of Bogalusa, LA. At that point, the Pearl River splits into the East and West Pearl Rivers, and flows southerly 44 and 48 miles, respectively, before entering the Rigolets and Lake Borgne. Existing projects. The Jackson-East Jackson Flood Control Project provides for improvements of the Pearl River at Jackson, MS. This project includes two levee systems totaling 13.1 miles in length, with two pumping stations, four gated outlets, and 5.34 miles of channel rectification including three cutoffs with a total length of 2.2 miles in the Pearl River. This project was authorized by the Fiood Control Act of Jul. 14, 1960. Construction began in July 1964 and work was completed in FY 68. Total Federal cost of the project was $7,190,200. The FY 83 Jobs Bill authorized extension of the Jackson-East Jackson West Bank levee system along the Fortification Street 1-55 exit. This extension was initiated and completed in FY 84. Public Law 98-63, dated Jul. 29, 1983, authorized the vicinity of Jackson project. This authority provided for additional measures to prevent recurring flood damages along the Pearl River at Jackson and included 3.3 miles of floodway clearing and enlarging the opening at the Highway 25 Bridge. This work has been completed. Mitigation lands for the clearing were purchased by the local sponsor in May 1985 and the Corps has reimbursed the local sponsor to cover the cost of these lands. Total Federal cost of this project is $1,800,000. 12-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Authorized projects. Public Law 99-88, dated Aug. 15, 1985, authorized planning, design, engineering, and construction of a levee system in Slidell, LA, to protect 3,265 residential and commercial structures from floods in the West Pearl. Public Law 99-662, dated Nov. 17, 1986, authorized construction of Shoccoe Dam and various flood control measures for Carthage-Leake County, MS. Local cooperation. For the Jackson-East Jackson and vicinity of Jackson projects, the requirements are as prescribed in Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended. This Act requires that a local sponsor provide the easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; and maintain and operate all works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. The Slidell levee project authorization required cost-sharing and new guidelines for local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement consistent with Public Law 99-88 was signed by the Slidell local sponsor and the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works on Jun. 30, 1986. The local sponsors are as follows: Jackson-East Jackson, Rankin-Hinds Pearl River Flood Control Drainage District; Vicinity of Jackson Project, Pearl River Basin Development District; Slidell Levee Project, St. Tammany Levee District. Condition as of Sep. 30. An overall basin study is essentially complete, except for alternative studies to Shoccoe Dry Dam as discussed below. Flood control feasibility studies for Jackson, MS, recommending Shoccoe Dam, and for Slidell, LA, recommending a 15-mile levee system, have been completed. Detailed engineering and design studies are underway for the Slidell levee system. As a result of upstream opposition, Shoccoe Dam is not implementable. In response to a request by the local sponsor, the Pearl River Basin Development District, reconnaissance studies to evaluate alternatives to Shoccoe for flood damage reduction in the Jackson Metropolitan Area are underway. Studies of various flood control measures for Carthage-Leake County, Columbia and Picayune, MS; Bogalusa, LA, and the Bogue Chitto Subbasin have been completed. None were found ecenomically feasible. Navigation studies have been conducted on the East and West Pearl Rivers. Results of these studies indicate that maintenance necessary to reopen the existing West Pearl River navigation project is economically justified. Studies also indicate that the East Pearl River does not have sufficient existing flows to support a 7- to 9-foot-deep navigation channel. The navigation study for Port Bienville, MS, has been terminated due to withdrawal of the Hancock County Port and Harbor Commission as local sponsor. Reconnaissance studies of flow distribution between the West Pearl River and the East Pearl River (boundary between the States of Louisiana and Mississippi) in the Lower Basin are currently underway. These studies will identify problems and potential solutions and determine if detailed feasibility studies are warranted. 11. PEARL RIVER, SLIDELL, ST. TAMMANY PARISH, LA Location. The project is located in the southeastern portion of the State of Louisiana and consists of the area bounded by the West Pearl River on the east, Interstate 10 on the west, and Lake Pontchartrain on the south. Authorized project. The project is broken into two segments of levees. The segment north of 1-10 consists of 4.5 miles of levee, a pumping station, a floodgate, and other minor drainage structures. This levee protects the Slidell area north of 1-10 from flooding associated with a 200-year hydrological event on the Pearl River. The segment south of 1-10 consists of 10.5 miles of levees, two pumping stations, floodgates, and other minor drainage structures. This levee protects the Slidell area south of 1-10 from flooding associated with a 200-year hydrological event on the Pearl River and provides the same level of protection against hurricane surges. These two levee segments total 15 miles of levee and would protect some 3,029 homes. Local cooperation. The project sponsor, St. Tammany Levee District, and the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works), in an agreement consistent with the Fiscal Year 1985 Supplemental Appropriation Act Public Law 99-88) and Senate Report 1567, signed the Local Cooperation Agreement Jun. 30. 1986. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued engineering studies in preparation of General Design Memorandum. Condition as of Sep. 30. Process of developing General Design Memorandum. No construction has taken place. 12. PORTER BAYOU. MS Location. Porter Bayou is located in Bolivar and Sunflower Counties, MS. It lies approximately 25 miles east of the Mississippi River, is approximately 5 miles south of Cleveland, MS, and travels through the town of Shaw, MS. Existing project. The plan of improvement calls for selective snagging and clearing of Porter Bayou from mile 12.5 to mile 32.3. This plan provides a 0.5-year frequency protection for the Porter Bayou area. All construction is being performed from one side of the stream, leaving the other side undisturbed. The total estimated Federal cost of the project is $860,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Condition as of Sep. 30. The construction contract was completed Nov. 16, 1983. A separate contract was let to biologically remove alligatorweed at Shaw, MS, and follow-ip with herbicide has been added. 12-6 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT 13. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT) Location. On Red River and its tributaries below Denison Dam, in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Texas, and Louisiana. (Refer to Geological Survey State maps and folio "Maps of Red River" - 1958 edition.) Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1946 approved general plan for flood control on Red River below Denison Dam, TX and OK, which provides for construction of six flood control reservoirs in combination with existing or authorized Federal and non- Federal levee improvements, modified as required, and channel stabilization at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. This act further authorized incorporation of several separate existing projects for flood damage prevention along Red River below Denison, above jurisdiction of the MRC, into this project. By Public Law 780, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess., as amended by Public Law 218, 84th Cong., 1st sess., and Public Law 645, 86th Cong., 1st sess., plan of improvement was amended to include additional projects as indicated in following lists of reservoirs and local protection works considered in general flood control plan for the Red River below Denison Dam, and existing flood control projects incorporated into project in Vicksburg District. (See Table 12-H for new projects and Table 12-I for incorporated projects.) Local cooperation. See individual reports herein. 14. RED RIVER BELOW DENSION DAM, LEVEES AND BANK STABILIZATION (VICKSBURG DISTRICT) Location. Along the main stem of the Red River from the head of the levee system immediately above Index, AR, through the southwest corner of Arkansas to the vicinity of Boyce, LA, on the right bank, and Pineville, LA. on the left bank. Existing project. Raising and strengthening existing and authorized Red River levees to provide protection against flooding and bank protection works at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. The plan consists of raising and strengthening existing and authorized Red River levees to provide against a flood approximately 20 percent greater than the flood of 1945, the flood of record, as modified by authorized reservoirs. Bank protection works are to be constructed at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. Estimated cost for new work (October 1989) is $61,516,000 Federal and $1,560,000 non- Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-10 of FY 1984 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued investigations, surveys, and preparation of plans and specifications. The Cash Bend Revetment Extension, river mile 287.5-R, was completed and the McKinney Bayou Replacement floodgate was initiated. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in February 1948 and the levees are complete and bank stabilization is 98 percent complete. 15. RED RIVER WATERWAY SHREVEPORT, LA, TO INDEX, AR Location. In northwest Louisiana, southwest Arkansas, and northeast Texas, along the Red River between Shreveport, LA, and Index, AR. Existing project. To provide for realigning the channels of Red River from Shreveport, LA, to the levee system near Index, AR, by means of dredging, cutoffs, and training works and for stabilizing its banks by means of revetments, dikes, and other methods. Facilities to provide opportunities for recreation and for fish and wildlife development are an integral part of the project. Estimated cost for new work (October 1989) is $249,000,000 Federal and $29,073,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements and assurances of local cooperation are fully described on pages 12-10 and 12-11 of Fiscal Year 1984 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued reevaluation studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction has not been initiated. Completion of a General Re-evaluation Study is currently scheduled for September 1990. The engineering and economic feasibility of constructing the authorized project must be reviewed in light of changed conditions within the project area. 16. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed work was accomplished at a cost of $196,990 for the fiscal year. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1989, is $2,475,653. No activity during the period. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1956 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Cong.). Total FY 89 costs for emergency bank protection work was $169,279. Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Detailed studies were completed on Canal 43, Desha and Lincoln Counties, AR, at a cost of $53,819; Chauvin Bayou, LA, $626,765; Youngs Bayou, LA, $207,028. Detailed studies continued on Pearl-Flowood, MS, at a cost of $1,200; Boggy Bayou, LA, $42,316; Smackover, MS, $51,201; Bawcomville, $265,208; Cooley 12-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Creek, Minden, LA, $1,273; and Gin Bayou, Itta Bena. $7,257. During FY 89 detailed studies were terminated on Sherwood, AR, $1,950. 17. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities--repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Disaster preparedness, FY costs for the period were $215,853. Advance measures - $1,420,011. Total Public Law 99 cost during FY 89 was $635,864. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in the interest of flood control (Sec. 208 of 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Cong.) No activity during the period. 12-8 TABLE 12-A VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 1. Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR (6.5-foot navigation project) Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR (9-foot navigation project) 2. Red River Emergency Bank Protection (Contrib. Funds) 3. Red River Waterway Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA (Contrib. Funds) 5. Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA 6. Bayou Bodcau and Tributaries, AR and LA 7. Lead Bayou, MS 8. Ouachita River Levees, LA 10. Pearl River Vicinity of Jackson 11. Pearl River, Slidell, St. Tammany Parish, LA 12. Porter Bayou, MS Total Funds to Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 1989 New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 5,391 6,098,000 7,064,032 3,248,900 3,495,900 1,270,000 3,073,870 91,585,000 65,955,521 1,580,000 2,251,500 154,936 153,230 0 187,980 0 2,428 21,217 40,000 52,533 7,814,000 8,537,018 5,235,000 5,033,649 2,355,000 3,497,107 68,000,000 77,210,592 1,121,100 1,117,843 -116,000 72,417 631,000 14,000 69,619 176,000 175,956 97,500 116,973 413,000 232,288 2,876,000 4,791,420 4,427,500 4,387,192 4,348,000 3,439,358 103,690,000 98,126,979 2,739,000 2,674,606 281,000 254,000 372,065 230,000 49,000 134,000 99,158 14,891 497,000 563,676 414 1,033,000 2,009,983 4,854,300 4,953,458 5,571,000 4,175,110 118,000,000 121,938,473 3,686,697 3,642,852 647,000 212,000 -92,596 89,560 292,000 265,208 3,530 0 116,973 585,000 644,866 12-9 5,248,6191 5,248,619' 228,345,524 227,579,721 83,655,267 83,438,863 29,236,000 25,883,688 6,825 6,825 620,414,000 594,529,168 12,113,297 11,516,646 2,740,000 2,275,0008 974,000 974,000 1,038,000 1,037,952 631,000 372,065 1,961,089 1,961,089 3,108,000 3,046,366 2,084,530 2,076,254 97,500 1,947,000 1,890,000 1,035,278 1,029,671 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 12-A (CONTINUED) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 1989 14. Red River below New Work Denison Dam, Approp. 957,000 963,000 1,000,000 1,300,000 60,944,000 Levees and Bank Cost 2,286,507 185,772 718,800 835,640 59,149,640 Stabilization (Vicksburg District) 15. Red River Water- New Work way, Shreveport, Approp. - 520,000 350,000 - 1,010,000 LA, to Index, AR Cost 13,684 344,324 355,688 - 855,4973 1. Includes $674,068 for new work on previous rojects. 2. Includes $3,312,000 PL 98-8 Jobs Bill. Excludes $47,854,000 previously allocated to New Orleans District. 3. Excludes New Orleans District allocation and cost. 12-10 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Dec. 31, 1970 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Nov. 17, 1986 OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMDEN, AR (See Section 1 of Text) Modification of existing project to provide for 9-foot channel and deepening canal to Felsenthal, AR. Modification of 9-foot project to provide four new locks and dams and channel improvements. Migratory waterfowl refuges on Bayou D'Arbonne in connection with the pool of the Columbia Lock and Dam and in the pool of the Felsenthal Lock and Dam. RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION (See Section 2 of Text) Realining the banks by dredging cut-offs and training works and stabilizing banks by means of revetments and dikes. RED RIVER WATERWAY-MISSISSIPPI RIVER TO SHREVEPORT, LA (See Section 3 of Text) Develop a 9 by 200 feet, approximately 236 miles long from Mississippi River at junction of Old River via Old River and Red River to Shreveport, LA, consisting of realinement, bank stabilization, and construction five locks and dams. BAYOU BARTHOLOMEW, AR AND LA (See Section 5 of Text) Authorized channel improvements on Bayou and Tributaries (see above). Modified 1950 authorization to include 10 lakes in the west escarpment in Arkansas and 6 local levees in Louisiana, and acquisition of lands for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses. The previously authorized channel improvement was deferred until it is determined that the quality and quantity of water downstream will not be adversely affected. BAYOU BODCAU AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA (See Section 6 of Text) Extend Cypress Bayou-Red Chute Bayou levee, construct stream closure landside drainage channel and three culverts on Red Chute Bayou, and clearing and snagging channel; extend Flat River-Loggy Bayou levee, close Flat River near junction with Cutoff Bayou, and construct control structures on Flat River near junction with Red Chute Bayou; and enlarge Flat River channel to 20 to 35 feet, a distance of 11.6 miles. CANEY CREEK, MS Authorizes construction of such bank stabilization measures for Caney Creek in the vicinity of Jackson, MS, between McDowell Road and Raymond Road as the Secretary determines necessary for flood damage prevention and erosion control along approximately 3,000 feet of the creek. LEAD BAYOU, MS (See Section 7 of Text) Channel enlargement. MONROE AND WEST MONROE, LA, AND OUACHITA PARISH, LA Authorizes such structural and nonstructural measures as the Secretary deems feasible to prevent flood damage to the cities of Monroe and West Monroe, LA, and Ouachita Parish, LA. 12-11 S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 112, 86th Cong., 2d sess. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Nov. 25, 1970, and H. Doc. 92-109, 92d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 506, 98th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 203, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Jun. 10, 1980. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 12-B (CONTINUED) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 13, 1983 Jul. 29, 1983 Aug. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Nov. 17, 1986 OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA (See Section 9 of Text) Authorized DeGray Lake; Murfreesboro Lake; extension of floodwall at Monroe to partially close the existing gap; local protection at Bawcomville, LA (subsequently constructed under Sec. 6, Act of May 15, 1928, with local interests contributing one third of cost); Bayou Bartholomew channel improvement, including Deep Bayou and Overflow Creek; Pine Bluff local protection; local protection at Calion, AR; and incorporation, into the Ouachita River and Tributaries project, of all existing projects and portions thereof in the basin above the lower end of the levees on the east bank of the Ouachita River. In addition, the Chief of Engineers authorized on Nov. 14, 1966, additional work on the levees. PEARL RIVER, MS AND LA (See Section 10 of Text) Construction of levee system and channel rectification, Pearl River, vicinity of Jackson, MS Accomplish the clearing and channel improvements at Hwy 25 bridge on the Pearl River in the vicinity of Jackson, MS. Design and construct protection to prevent flooding along the Pearl River in the vicinity of Jackson, MS Planning, design, engineering and construction of a levee system for Slidell, LA, pending binding cost-sharing arrangements acceptable to the Secretary of the Army or under terms and conditions provided in subsequent legislation when enacted into law. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized flood control project at Shoccoe, MS, as outlined in Report of Chief of Engineers dated March 17, 1986, and also several project features which would provide flood control to the upstream areas of the Pearl River Basin in MS. PEARL RIVER, SLIDELL, ST. TAMMANY PARISH, LA (See Section 11 of Text) Authorizes flood control improvements for Pearl River Basin, St. Tammany, LA, subject to a favorable Chief's report and approval by the Secretary of the Army for Civil Works. PEARL RIVER BASIN, SHOCCOE DAM, MS Authorizes the Pearl River Basin, including Shoccoe, MS, for the construction of the Shoccoe Dam plus upstream flood control measures at east-central Leake County, south part of Carthage, MS, Highway 35 vicinity, upstream reservoirs on the Pearl River and upstream channels on the Pearl River and elsewhere in Leake County. PORTER BAYOU, MS (See Section 12 of Text) Selective snagging and clearing of Porter Bayou, MS from mile 12.5 to mile 32.3 RED RIVER WATERWAY, LA Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized for construction the project for mitigation of wildlife losses, Red River Waterway, LA, which may include all or such portion of any land adjacent to the Loggy Bayou Wildlife Managemert Area. 12-12 S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 441, 86th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 153, 98th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 98-63, 98th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-88, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 18, 1982. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-B (CONTINUED) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM LEVEES AND BANK STABILIZATION (VICKSBURG DIST.) (See Section 14 of Text) Jul. 24, 1946 Levee and bank stabilization. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Aug. 13, 1968 Deauthorization of Morringsport Dam and Reservoir on H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., Cypress Creek: realining and stabilizing the banks of the 2d sess. Red River; and recreational facilities from the Mississippi River to Denison Dam, OK and TX. RED RIVER WATERWAY-SHREVEPORT, LA, TO INDEX, AR (See Section 15 of Text) Aug. 13, 1968 Provides for realinement of the channels of the Red River H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., from Shreveport. LA, to Index, AR. 2d sess. 12-13 TABLE 12-C OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR AND LA (9-FOOT PROJECT), LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Min. Depth Greatest on Available Lower Miles Length Max. Elev. Miter Above Width for Full Lift Normal Sill at Miles Mouth of Width at Pool Normal Pre- Total from of Lock of Lock Low Surface Pool Character cent Estimated Nearest Black Chamber Chamber Water (feet Level or Kind of Type of Com- Project Location Town River (feet) (feet) (feet) msl) (feet) Foundation Dam Construction plete Cost Jonesville, LA 10 25 84 600 30 34 14 Piling Moving Tainter gated dam; 1002 $ 42,400,000 bascule gated navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates Columbia, LA 5 117 84 600 18 52 13 do do Tainter gated dam; 952 44,000,000 fixed crest navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates Felsenthal, AR 1 227 84 600 18 701 13 Earth do Tainter gated dam; 882 99,600,000 navigation pass with inflatable dam on crest; steel mitering lock gates. Calion, AR 7 283 84 600 12 77 13 do do Tainter gated dam; 882 70,000,000 (THh. atKch. er) hinged crest gated navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates. Estimated Federal Cost $256,000,000 Estimated Non-Federal Cost 16,833,000 Total Estimated Cost 272,833,000 N- 1 1. Fish and wildlife impoundment level. Navigation pool elevation .65. 2. The percent complete reflects all work within the pool. VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1989 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Bayou Bartholomew, LA and AR 1, 2, 3, 4 - Bayous D'Arbonne and Corney, LA1, 2, 4 - Big Black River, MS 1 , 4, 5- Big Sunflower River, MS 1, 4, 6, 7- Boeuf River, LA 1 , 3, 4, 7, 8, 9- Claiborne County Port, MSCypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA15 Complete Homochitto River, MS 4 - Lake Providence Harbor, LALittle Missouri River, AR1, 4, 5 - Little River, LA 1, 4, 5, 10- Little Tallahatchie River, MS 1, 7- Madison Parish Port, LA - Mouth of Yazoo River, MS 1, 7. 11- Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR and LA, Felsenthal Canal Overton-Red River Waterway, LAPearl River, MSRed River below Fulton, AR 1, 16, 17, 18- Red River Waterway LA, AR, OK, and TX 1' 17 18 Red River Waterway, Shreveport, LA to Daingerfield, TX' Removing snags and wrecks from- Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers1 1 Rosedale Harbor, MSSaline River, AR 1 3. 4, 5- Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers, MS 1. 4. - Tensas River and Bayou Macon, LA1, 8, 12 1931 1941 1895 1942 1949 1985 1971 1910 1985 1873 1890 1913 1985 1953 193712 1985 1985 1978 1969 1976 1948 1985 1931 1939 1949 $ 45,874 19,000 15,000 560,027 30,000 2,000,000 202,817 15,482 208,537 19,992 1,500 19,000 656,000 1,179,211 8,562,908 1,963,806 $ 42,857 37,804 459,328 103,737 257,252 452,611 8,518 3,521,524 566,978 455,151 4,387,192 2,424,844 2,147,890 1 1 Dec. 1983 Dec. 1914 1 Nov. 1963 1 1 1 Dec. 1980 1 1 1 1956 1 1 1 150,800 272,500 2,493,617 12,792 173,066 85,352 2,000,000 26,900 43,481 38,367 Sep. 1978 1 12-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 12-D (CONTINUED) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1989 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Yalobusha River, MS 1, 4, 5 14 - 1937 7,000 15,936 1 Yazoo River, MS - 1987 9,341,826 1,196,781 1 64th sess. 1. Status and Date unavailable. 2. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 1962, Cong., 2d sess., and H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st 3. Channels adequate for existing commerce. 4. Inactive project. No commerce. 5. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 6. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work between Pentecost and mouth of Hushpuckena River. (Abandonment of entire project erroneously recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th cong., 1st sess.) 7. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in connection with Yazoo Basin. 8. Report of New Orleans District, pp. 919-920 for Fiscal Year 1949. 9. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work above Girard, LA (Abandonment of entire project recommended erroneously in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 10. Due to decline of traffic, local interests not sufficiently interested to provide rights-of-way and dumping privileges. 11. No additional funds available under this project. Work is being carried on under appropriation flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries. 12. Year authorized. 13. Inactive. Channel adequate for commerce. 14. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in connection with Yazoo Basin flood control pGrroejneacdt a including channel clearing and rectification and Lake on Yalobusha River. 15. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds. 16. Includes $1,553,878 for previous projects. 17. Incorporated in the project "Red River Waterway- Mississippi River Shreveport, LA" Sept. 30, 1976. 18. Emergency bank protection on this project is reported separately as "Red River Emergency Bank Protection." Two reaches, "Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA" and "Red River Waterway- Shreveport, LA, Daingerfield, TX," are also reported separately. 12-16 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-E OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 9 of Text) For Last Estimated Full Report Federal See Annual New Work Project Report for: Cost Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, AR 1985 $ 44,100,000 DeGray Lake, AR 1985 72,034,000 Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, AR 1985 20,900,000 Calion. AR 1960 970,996 Columbia, LA 1941 204,740 Existing levees and extensions thereto from Bastrop, LA, to mouth of Boeuf River and at West Monroe, LA 1961 3,025,181' Little Missouri River below Murfreesboro, AR 1957 354,802 Ozan Creek, AR 1957 57,742 Terre Noire Creek, AR 1948 123,700 Pine Bluff, AR, local protection 1954 172,582 Monroe, LA, floodwall extension (Plan B) 1984 2,561,000 Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries. AR and LA (1) 44,800,000 Ouachita River Levees (additional work) (1) 9,400,000 Total $198,704,743 1. See individual reports herein. 2. Includes $5,800,000 for water supply, to be reimbursed by local interests. 3. Actual cost of completed project. 4. Excludes the authorized Murfreesboro Lake, AR, project, which is inactive. The latest estimated cost (1954) was $4,190,000. 12-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 12-F RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT): NEW PROJECTS (See Sec. 13 of Text) Drainage Conserva- Flood Area tion Control Estimated Project (square Storage (acre- Federal Stream miles) (acre-feet) feet) Cost Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR2 and LA - 1,158 - - $25,100,0003 Bayou Nicholas-Coushatta, LA - - - - 70,7174 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA5 - - - - 243,3368 Caddo Lake, LA' Caddo Lake - - - 3,586,000 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA Red River - - - 1,950,0003 Garland City, AR16 - - - - 1,450,0008 Maniece Bayou, AR - - - - 970,0323 McKinney Bayou, AR7,8 - - - - 5,610,0003 Posten Bayou, AR and LA2 , 6,9 - - - - 560,000 Red River below Denison Dam levees and bank stabilization, TX, AR and LA" 3 - - - - 59,650,0003 Total 99,191,885 1. Details presented in individual report herein. 2. Construction on this project not started. 3. In addition, non-Federal funds are: Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR and LA ......................................................... $5,300,000 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA (cash contribution) ........................................ 89,047 Caddo Lake, LA ...................................................................................... 28,000 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA .................................................... 480,000 E ast Point .......................................................................................... 67,000 Garland City, A R ..................................................................................... 6,000 Maniece Bayou, AR (cash contribution) ................................................................. 18,000 McKinney Bayou AR(cash contribution) ............................................................. 508,000 Red River below benison Dam, levees and bank stabilization, TX, AR, and LA ...................... 1,560,000 4. For last full report, see Annual Report for 1964. 5. For last full report, see Annual Report for 1951. 6. Inactive. 7. Includes $4,330,200, Code 711, and $399,739 accelerated Public Work funds. 8. Joint-use pool (sediment). 9. Deauthorized by resolution Dec. 17, 1970, which also authorized new project "Posten Bayou, AR," under provision of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965. 12-18 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-G RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT): INCORPORATED PROJECTS (See Sec. 13 of Text) For Last Flood Estimated Full Report Control Federal See Annual Project Type of Work Act Cost Report For Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA Levee and appurtenances 1941 $ 1,653,2371 1956 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA2 Flood-control reservoir 1938 5,120,7401 4 Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA Channel improvement 1941 319,2001 1948 Bayou Pierre, LA Channel enlargement 1936 255,5291 4 Black Bayou Lake, LA5 ' 6 Flood-control reservoir 1936 714,000 1945 Colfax Grant Parish, LA Cutoff 1938 70,3481,7 1938 Grant Parish, below Colfax, LA Levees 1938 38,8091 1941 Hempstead County levee district No. 1, AR Levee enlargement 1938 88,0061 1941 Natchitoches Parish, LA Levee and appurtenances 1936 1,529,9271, 8 1956 Pineville, Red River, LA Levee and appurtenances 1941 232,4261 1953 Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, LA Bank protection 1944 3,908,0001 1953 Red River Parish, LA Levee enlargement 1936 149,4351 1939 Saline Point, LA Cutoff 1936 124,1111 1945 Wallace Lake, LA Flood-control reservoir 1936 1 ,2 19 ,3 7 1 1, 3 4 Total $15,467,134 1. Actual cost. 2. Project transferred to Vicksburg District August, 1982. 3. Includes amounts indicated for recreational facilities under Code 711, Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA, $1,027,000; Wallace Lake, LA, $17,164. 4. Included in this report. 5. Work not started. 6. Inactive. 7. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7 of Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended by Sec. 9 of Flood Control Act of 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 8. In addition, $25,000 was expended from contributed funds. 12-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 12-H OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1989 Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. If See Annual and If Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA' Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA1 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA Bayou Pierre, LA Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA' 2 Big Black River, MS3 Big Choctaw Bayou, LA3. 4 Black Bayou Reservoir, LA" 5. 6 Blakely Mt. Dam - Lake Ouachita, Ouachita River, AK Buffalo River, MS 7 Caddo Lake Dam, LA Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA Colfax, Grant Parishes, LA" 8 DeGray Lake Caddo River, AR East Point, LA Garland City, AR Grant Parish below Colfax, LA 1. 3 Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, AR1 .3 Homochitto River, MS 3 Maniece Bayou, AR" 2 McKinney Bayou Finn Bayou Segment, AR Monroe Floodwall, LA Murfreesboro Dam and Lake4 Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Little Missouri River, AK Natchez Port Area, MS 3 . 4 Natchitoches Parish, LA1. 2 Pearl River, Jackson-East Jackson, MS Pineville, Red River, LA3 , 4 Posten Bayou, AR'0 Poverty Point, LA Red River Parish, LA1 3 Nov. 1986 Aug. 1977 1956 1948 1985 1985 1951 1956 1966 1945 1985 1940 1986 1978 1938 1985 1969 1976 1941 1941 1956 1970 19639 1984 1951 1985 1969 1956 1986 1953 1973 1986 1939 $ 1,653,189 $ - 319,200 243,3362 910,185 248,823 34,023,108 3,214,406 241,130 670,750 Apr. 1955 Jan. 1948 Apr. 1961 FY 1939 Jun. 1939 3 3 54,647,790 Oct. 1955 865,382 1,655,700 70,348 72,033,992 286,069 1,335,841 38,809 88,006 205,000 970,9322 2,560,000 16,516,689 538,000 1,529,478 290,000 232,426 250,000 149,435 - Jul. 1978 37,267,153 Dec. 1971 144,650 Aug. 1968 Jul. 1974 Aug3. 1969 Aug. 1969 38,195,165 May 1950 Aug. 1955 Dec. 1951 Oct. 1985 12-20 TABLE 12-H (CONTINUED) VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1989 Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. If See Annual and If Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, LA - 1953 3,908,000 - Mar. 1953 Saline Point, LA" -3 1945 124,111 - Twelvemile Bayou, LA4 - 1966 335,433 - May 1965 Wallace Lake, LA - 1985 - 785,216 Dec. 1946 1. Authorized under project "Red River Below Denison Dam." 2. In addition, the following was expended from contributed funds: Amite River and tributaries ........... $ 430 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA ................... 89,047 Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, LA .... 170,799 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA ............................... 425,209 Maniece Bayou, AR ................... 39,293 Natchitoches Parish, LA .............. 250,000 3. Completion Date Unavailable. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Sec. 205 Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 5. Construction not initiated. 6. Inactive. 7. Deauthorized by Sec. 1002, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. 8. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7 Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended by Sec. 9, Flood Control Act 1936 and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 9. Date authorized. 10. Posten Bayou Project, authorized by Senate and House Resolutions Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, deleted the plan authorized by the flood control Act dated Aug. 3, 1955. 12-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 12-I ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 89 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) NAVIGATION (110) Lower Pearl Flow Distribution, MS. -12547 $ 88,174 Flood Control Studies (120) Ouachita River Basin, AR and LA -12046 31,288 Pearl River Basin, MS and LA -12234 169,124 Hot Springs, Garland Co., AR -12737 193,631 Jackson Metro Area, MS -12742 234,574 Subtotal 628,617 Comprehensive Studies (150) Red River Comprehensive (153) -15399 269,880 Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations (171) -17250 21,222 Interagency Water Resources (173) -14713 26,941 Subtotal 48,163 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (181) -51840 1,571 Planning Assistance to States, MS (186) -14828 35,888 Planning Assistance to States, AR (186) -14805 6,740 Subtotal 44,199 TOTAL (Category 100) 1,079,033 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Services 174,506 Hydrologic Studies (260) Hydrologic Studies (260) -53820 13,088 Subtotal 187,594 TOTAL (Category 200) 187,594 CONTINUATION OF PLANNING & ENGINEERING (Category 400) Flood Control Projects (450) Pearl River, Slidell, LA (451) -12442 15 Pearl River, Shoccoe Dam, MS (452) -12444 63 Subtotal 78 TOTAL (Category 400) 78 ADVANCE E&D (Category 600) Flood Control Projects (650) Local Protection, Red River Waterway, Shreveport to Index (651) -75023 75,793 Local Protection, Pearl River Vicinity of Jackson, MS (651) -75426 822 Reservoirs Pearl River Shoccoe Dam, MS (652) -12444 113,038 Subtotal 482,055 TOTAL (Category 600) 482,055 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $1,748,760 12-22 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT * This district comprises a portion of southeastern Missouri and southern Illinois, western portions of Kentucky and Tennessee, a small portion of northern Mississippi, and the northeastern portion of Arkansas; includes area embraced in drainage basins of eastern tributaries of the Mississippi River south of Ohio River Basin to Nonconnah and Horn Lake Creeks, inclusive, and those of western tributaries south of Little River diversion channel and Commerce, MO, including St. Francis River Basin and White River and tributaries below Peach Orchard Bluff, AR, on the right bank and below Augusta, AR, on the left bank; also includes left bank Mississippi River levee from vicinity of Memphis south to about mile 620, and right bank levees from Cade Girardeau, MO, to about mile 605. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Navigation work under special authorization ........................ Flood Control 2. Humbolt, TN ......................... 3. Inspection of completed flood control projects ............................. 4. Flood control work under special authorization ........................ Page Tables 13-1 13-1 13-2 13-2 Table 13-A Table 13-B Table 13-C Table 13-D Table 13-E Cost and Financial Statement .................. Authorizing Legislation ...... Other Authorized Navigation Projects................ Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............ Active General Investigations .............. Navigation 1. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). During this period $8,244 was expended on reconnaissance studies on Cairo Harbor, IL. Flood Control 2. HUMBOLDT, TN Location. Humboldt is located in Gibson County, TN. Existing project. Authorized July 23, 1984, under the authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. The project consists of clearing and snagging approximately 2,200 feet of existing channel and the construction of 2,600 feet of enlarged channel. The project will provide a 10-year level of protection for area residents and is expected to reduce average annual flood damages by 64 percent. The construction cost for the project is $1,368,000. The project assurances of local cooperation have been furnished. The construction contract for required channel improvement was awarded in July 1986. It has been determined that no adverse environmental impacts will result from construction of the project. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 13-4 of FY 1984 Annual Report. Condition as of Sep. 30. Channel work was completed Dec. 18, 1987. A contract for construction of a railroad drainage structure was awarded on June 2, 1987. The work was completed in April 1988. 13-1 Page 13-3 13-3 13-4 13-5 13-6 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 3. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspected completed projects at a cost of $115,991 in the period. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1988, was $1,510,315. This included in-depth inspection of projects. 4. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). During this period $116,203 was expended to complete a reconnaissance study and prepare a detailed project report on Big Creek, Millington, TN and $799 was used to initiate a reconnaissance study for Obion, TN. Emergency bank stabilization activities pursuant to Sec. 14, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., as amended. During FY 1989, $259,385 was expended on Perkins Street Bridge, Nonconnah Creek, Memphis, TN; $10,898 on Quince Road Bridge, Nonconnah Creek lateral, Memphis, TN; $14,982 on Fletcher Creek Stabilization, Memphis, TN; $11,544 on Harrington Creek Stabilization, Memphis, TN; $4,019 on Wolf River at U.S. Highway 51, Memphis, TN; $7,516 on Plainview Road Bridge over South Forked Deer River, Chester Co., TN; and $301,978 on Wolf River at Second Street, Memphis, TN. Monies on the Perkins Street and North Second Street projects were used for construction of these projects. Monies on the Harrington Creek, Wolf River at U.S. Highway 51, Plainview Road, and Fletcher Creek projects were used to continue reconnaissance studies and negotiate local cooperation agreements. Monies on the Quince Road project were used to complete reconnaissance studies and initiate preparation of construction plans and specifications for the project. Emergency flood control activities, Public Law 99, 84th Cong. Federal cost was $191,877 for disaster preparedness in FY 89. Also, $8,657 was spent on flood fight activities, $57,058 for drought assistance, and $74,335 for private levee rehabilitation. Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 208, Public Law 780, 83rd Cong., as amended. No work was accomplished this period under this authority. 13-2 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 13-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See iSne cTtieoxnt Project Funding Total Funds to FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 1989 2. Humboldt, TN New Work Approp. $333,333 $707,000 $175,000 0 $1,370,333 Cost 349,736 510,151 368,778 4,968 1,369,322 TABLE 13-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents HUMBOLDT, TN (See Sec. 2 of Text) Jun. 30, 1948, Channel improvement within the city of Humboldt. Approved Jul. 23, 1984' as amended 1. Authorized under authority of Sec. 205 of the 1948 Flood control Act, as amended. 13-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 13-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1989 Full Report Operation Project DMeoa. utahnodr izYerd. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Caruthersville Harbor, MO - 1984 $768,992 $ 2,621,754 Dec 80 Forked Deer River, TN, including South Fork1,2 - 1912 25,000 425,857 - Helena Harbor, AR - 1984 90,847 5,280,925 Sep 63 Elvis Stahr Harbor, KY - 1984 149,827 4,873,153 Jan 63 New Madrid Harbor, MO - 1984 196,373 385,509 Oct 70 Obion River, TN",3 - 1911 28,716 -- Osceola Harbor, AR - 1984 269,115 6,307,388 Nov 74 Removing snags and wrecks from Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers4'5 - 1948 - 318,8334 St. Francis and L'Anguille Rivers and Blackfish Bayou, AR"2 - 1942 92,000 300,449- White River, AR (below Newport) - 1984 169,994 22,456,705- Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN - 1984 586,500 10,845,364 1959 1. No commerce. 4. Completion date not available. 2. Existing project is for maintenance only. 5. No funrds available under this project. Work being 3. Recommended for abandonment in H. Doc. 467, 69th carried on under "Appropriation, Flood Control, Mississippi Cong., 1st sess. River and Tributaries." 13-4 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Project Big Creek Canal, Millington, TN Big Creek and L'Anguille River, White River Basin, AR' Bradford, TN Clarendon to Laconia Circle, White River Basin, AR' Cottonwood Slough pumping plant. IL Drinkwater Sewer. MO Dyersburg, TN" Dyersburg, TN (SW) Grays Creek Canal Shelby Co., TN Hatchie River, Alcorn Co., MS Huntingdon. TN Long Lake Area Helena. AR Memphis. Wolf River, and Nonconnah Creek. TN Mounds and Mound City, Ohio River Basin. IL 4 Nixon Creek. TN2' Nonconnah Blvd., Nonconnah Creek. TN Nonconnah Creek, Interceptor Sewer, Memphis, TN N. Second St., Memphis, TN (Wolf River Bridge) Sandy Creek Jackson, TN St. Francis River Highway No. 90 AR Treasure Island, MO Turner Creek, Corinth, MS US Hwy 51, Nonconnah Creek, TN W. Hickman, Area, Hickman, KY For Last Cost to Sep. 1989 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed - 1977 $ 70,363 $ - 6 May 81 6 May 81 Sep 1980 Jul 1983 1937 1984 1964 1984 1962 1981 1985 1987 1983 1983 1960 1955 1952 1983 1987 1983 1985 1985 1981 1987 1984 1983 95,061 147,000 1,494,828 229,649 1,820,869 155,280 85,200 2,900,281 Dec 1983 Feb Jun Jun Oct Aug 1964 1980 1962 1976 1985 Feb 1986 61,281 11,141,199 1,132,704 62,821 249,999 259,000 249,999 238,000 161,000 861,528 100,600 369,200 1,674,180 May 1959 Oct 19595 Dec 1951 Nov 1981 Dec 1986 Sep 1980 Dec 1984 Sep 1985 Mar 1978 Mar 1987 Mar 1983 Oct 1976 1. Inactive, awaiting local cooperation. 2. Authorized b Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Sec. 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 3. Includes $21,863 contributed funds. 4. Work being completed under Mississippi River and Tributaries project. 5. Exclusive of Cache River Pumping Station. 13-5 TABLE 13-D - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 13-E ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 89 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations (171) -17250 $ 20,754 Dam Safety Criteria Studies (173) 4,265 25,019 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Planning Assistance to States (186) 17,214 TOTAL (Category (100) $ 42,233 COLLECTIONS AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Services 232,345 TOTAL (Category 200) $232,345 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $274,578 13-6 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT * This district comprises those portions of southwestern Illinois and eastern Missouri embraced in drainage basin of Mississippi River and its western tributaries, exclusive of the Missouri River, from the mouth of the Ohio River to mile 300, and of its eastern tributaries to Hamburg Bay at mile 261 on left bank, exclusive of tributary basin of Illinois Waterway upstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam at mile 80.15 above confluence of the Illinois and Mississippi Rivers. District also includes drainage basin in Missouri tributary to the Little River diversion channel. Report on the Mississippi River between the Missouri River and mile 300 is included in separate report on the Mississippi River between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN. Report on the portion of the Illinois River downstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam is included in report of the Chicago District on the Illinois Waterway, Illinois and Indiana. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Illinois Waterway, IL (St. Louis Dist.) .................. 2. Kaskaskia Riyer, IL.............. 3. Mississippi River between Missouri and Minneapolis, MN (St. Louis Dist.) (Includes Melvin Price Locks & Dam) ............. 4. Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers, MO and IL...................... 5. Southeast Missouri Port, MO ...... Flood Control 6. East St. Louis and vicinity, IL .... 7. Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, IL ................ 8. Mauvaise Terre Drainage and Levee District, IL ........... 9. Meramec River Basin, MO ....... 9A. Pine Ford Lake, MO .............. 10. McGee Creek Drainage and Levee D istrict, IL ...................... 11. Nutwood Drainage and Levee District, IL ...................... 12. Rend Lake, Big Muddy R iver, IL ......................... 13. Wood River Drainage and Levee District, IL ................. Page Flood Control (cont.) 14-2 14-2 14-2 Page 14. Inspection of completed flood control projects.................... 15. Navigation work under special authorization ............... 16. Flood control work under special authorization ............... Multiple-Purpose Project 14-2 Including Power 14-3 17. Clarence Cannon Dam and Mark Twain Salt River, MO............. 18. Upper Mississippi River Environmental Management 14-3 Program .......................... 14-4 14-4 14-4 14-4 14-5 14-5 14-5 14-5 Tables Table 14-A Table 14-B Table 14-C Table 14-D Table 14-E Table 14-F Cost and Financial Statement................. Authorizing Legislation ..... Other Authorized Navigation Projects......... Lakes, Levees, and Recreational Facilities...... Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........... Active General Investigations (96X3121) .... 14-6 14-7 14-8 14-10 14-13 14-13 14-14 14-16 14-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Navigation 1. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL (ST. LOUIS DIST.) See report on Illinois Waterway, IL and IN, under Rock Island District. 2. KASKASKIA RIVER, IL Location. The river rises in Champaign County, IL, about 5 miles northwest of Urbana, in east-central part of state. It flows southwesterly about 325 miles and empties into Mississippi River about 8 miles above Chester, IL, or about 118 miles above mouth of Ohio River. (See Cincinnati sheet of maps of United States published by Army Map Service, scale 1:500,000.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1896, page 171. Existing project. Improvement for navigation provides a channel 9 feet deep and 225 feet wide from mouth to Fayetteville, IL. Improvement consists of enlarging present channel where required, making overbank cutoffs to eliminate sharp bends, and construction of a dam at mile 0.8 with a single lock 84 feet wide and 600 feet long, at an estimated total Federal project cost (1984) of $145,060,000. Non-Federal project cost is $7,665,000, of which $1,500,000 is local contribution. Local cooperation. State of Illinois passed legislation authorizing Illinois Department of Public Works and Buildings to enter into assurances of local cooperation with the United States. These assurances have been furnished and were accepted on behalf of the United States on Sep. 10, 1965; these assurances were supplemented on Aug. 7, 1972, to incorporate the provisions of Public Law 91-646. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project is physically complete. Hired labor performed operation and maintenance of the project. 3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN (ST. LOUIS DIST.) (INCLUDES MELVIN PRICE LOCKS & DAM) See separate section entitled "Mississippi River be tween Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN," printed in the Annual Report of the Chief of Engineers. 4. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS, MO AND IL Location. Mississippi River rises in Lake Itasca, MN, and from that lake flows southerly about 2,340 miles and empties into the Gulf of Mexico. Portion included in this report embraces the 195-mile section known as middle Mississippi, between tributary Ohio and Missouri Rivers about 974 to 1,169 miles from the gulf. See folder by Corps of Engineers of Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN. Previous projects. For details see page 1879 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1014 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for obtaining and maintaining a minimum channel depth of not less than 9 feet, a minimum width of not less than 300 feet at low water, with additional widths in bends from mouth of Ohio River (about 974 miles from gulf) to northern boundary of city of St. Louis, mile 191, thence 200 feet wide, with additional width in bends to mouth of Missouri River, mile 195; to be obtained: (1) by regulating works, for closing secondary channels, contracting river by building new banks where river width is excessive and protecting new and old banks from erosion where necessary to secure permanency at an estimated total Federal cost (1989) of $199,000,000; (2) by dredging to maintain project channels; (3) by construction of works authorized for Chain of Rocks reach in 1945 River and Harbor Act, which approved a comprehensive plan for development of the river at Chain of Rocks to provide for construction of a lateral canal at a cost of $59,720,600; and (4) by construction of a fixed-crest rock-fill dam about 900 feet below Chain of Rocks Bridge, authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act, at cost of $4,353,000, excluding $7,000 costs to Coast Guard for aids to navigation. Estimated total Federal project cost (1986) is $245,073,600. A small boat harbor opposite Chester, IL, was deauthorized and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. See H. Doc. 669 (76th Cong., 3rd sess.) for report of Chief of Engineers dated Feb. 27, 1940, containing a general plan for improvement of Mississippi River between Coon Rapids Dam and mouth of Ohio River for purposes of navigation, power development, flood control, and needs of irrigation. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regulating Works: contract was continued on stone dike and revetment construction as was engineering and design and supervision and administration. Construction on existing project began in 1881 and project has been in beneficial use practically from its inception. Projects on Dam 27 and Chain of Rocks are complete. Work on the project is about 77 percent complete. Channel as a whole has been greatly improved by the work completed to date. Dredging is required at low stages to remove temporary shoals and maintain required channel depths. River is generally above 10-foot stage, St. Louis gage, from latter part of February to the latter part of August, during which time project channel depths generally prevail without dredging. During FY 1988 and FY 1989 low water 14-2 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT conditions (drought) have increased maintenance dredging. To improve navigation depths a rock removal contract began Oct. 1988 through FY 1989 (81% of original contract). Maintenance. Work consisted of 8,725 feet of dike and 47,935 feet of revetment repair. U.S. plant and hired labor plus contract dredging performed channel dredging removing 6,079,800 cubic yards of material from main channel. Condition and operation studies, recreation planning, engineering and design, and operation and maintenance of Lock and Dam 27 continued. 5. SOUTHEAST MISSOURI PORT, MISSOURI Location. The project is located on the right bank of the Mississippi River at river mile 30 above the Ohio River in the counties of Scott and Cape Girardeau in Southeast Missouri. Existing project. Pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended, a slackwater channel, 2,000 feet long, 230 feet wide, and 9 feet deep is being constructed. This project will provide a navigation channel for development of a port and related facilities at this location. Total estimated cost is $5,410,000 (2,149,000 non-Federal). Location cooperation. On May 22, 1987, a Local Cooperation Agreement was signed between the Port District and the St. Louis District, Corps of Engineers. Results during fiscal year. Construction of the channel was completed in early Fiscal Year 1988. Soon thereafter, a large slide occurred on the south bank of the harbor at the location where Southeast Missouri Port Authority has undertaken construction of a dock. Repair of this slide was done in early Fiscal Year 1989, with repair costs shared in accordance with the local cooperation agreement. Flood Control 6. EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL Location. Project is in St. Clair and Madison Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Mississippi River between river miles 175 and 195 above the Ohio River. Project includes all bottom lands between bluffs on the east and Mississippi River and Chain of Rocks Canal on the west, and extends from Cahokia diversion channel on the north to Prairie du Pont Creek on the south. (See Corps of Engineers Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN.) Existing project. The 1936 Flood Control Act authorized raising and enlarging existing levee systems by construction or reconstruction of 19.8 miles of levee, including 3.1 miles of floodwall, together with necessary appurtenant works consisting of gravity drainage structures, highway and railroad closure structures, alterations and reconstruction of existing pumping plants, alterations to railroad bridges and approaches at levee crossings, service roads on levee crown, and seepage control measures. Work under this authorization provides the area protection against a flood of about 200-year frequency. The completed 10 miles of levee along Chain of Rocks Canal and Lock 27 provide flood protection on the landward side integral with and to the same degree as the East St. Louis levee. Final cost of work under this authorization is $22,550,100. The Flood Control Act of 1965 modified existing project to provide for channel improvements, diversion ditches, flood plain detention areas, a reservoir on Little Canteen Creek, and a pumping plant to considerably reduce damages resulting from interior flooding. This act also authorized reconstruction of a channel stabilization dam in Cahokia Creek diversion channel to provide protection to adjacent levees and bridges from scour and eventual loss. Postauthorization studies have indicated that flood plain detention areas, the reservoir on Little Canteen Creek and other related flood control measures in the Cahokia- Harding Ditch Area are not economically feasible. Also, further studies of the channel stabilization dam in Cahokia Creek diversion channel have been deferred due to lack of support from the local sponsor of the project. Estimated total Federal project cost of work under this authorization is $33,600,000 (1985), $22,020,000 for Cahokia-Harding Ditch Area, and $11,580,000 for Blue Waters Ditch. Non-Federal cost is $20,770,000. The 1988 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act authorized repair and rehabilitation of pump stations and appurtenant works, channels and bridge structures. The estimated total cost of this work, as shown in the Committee Report, is $25,000,000. (The unapproved estimated total cost, Oct. 84 price level, is $42,620,000.) Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with the requirements of local cooperation for work under the 1936 authorization. For work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965 requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-4 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Formal assurances were accepted on the Blue Waters Ditch area on Jun. 25, 1981. For work under the 1988 authorization, local interests have provided a letter of intent and a Local Cooperation Agreement is currently being processed for the first item of construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Scheduled construction of project modifications authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965 is complete. This work included ditching contracts and the Blue Waters Ditch pumping station. Work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1936 is also complete. The East St. Louis pumping station, constructed under the authority of the Flood Control Act of 1936, sustained damage during an October 1986 flood event and major repairs were accomplished with non-Corps of Engineers funds. 14-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 7. KASKASKIA ISLAND DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. In Randolph County, IL, on the right bank of the Mississippi River between miles 111 and 116 above the mouth of the Ohio River. (See Paducah, KY, IL, MO, IN, map published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Previous project. For details, see page 1375 of Annual Report for 1950. Existing project. Project area contains about 9,460 acres only partially protected against flood stage of 38.5 feet on the Chester, IL, gage. Flooding occurs about once in every 7.3 years with an average duration of 26 days, causing substantial damage. The 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 519, 87th Cong., 2nd sess.) provides for enlarging and raising the existing levee about 8 feet to provide protection against a flood having a frequency of once in 50 years. Estimated total Federal project cost (1986) is $14,100,000. Non- Federal cost is $2,100,000. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-6 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Formal assurances from the Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District were accepted on behalf of the United States on Jan. 23, 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is complete. All construction of gravity drains, levee embankment and installation of wildlife plantings is complete (1989). 8. MAUVAISE TERRE DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The levee district is in Scott County, IL, on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 63.5 and 67.0 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, IL-MO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000). Existing project. Project provides for raising a portion of the existing levee and construction of two railroad closure structures. Project will provide protection to 5,700 acres of land against a flood of 100-year frequency. Based on cost sharing requirements prior to enactment of Public Law 99-662, the estimated total Federal project cost (1987) is $1,840,000. Non-Federal cost is $185,000. Project was authorized by the Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1985, Public Law 98-360, 98th Cong., 2nd sess. Local cooperation. The village of Naples, IL, signed a letter of intent, dated Mar. 13, 1985, indicating a willingness to comply with the terms of local cooperation including provisions of the Uniform Relocations and Real Property Acquisition Policy Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-646) and Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-611). Local cooperation requirements are: furnish without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary and accomplish all relocations necessary for the construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works, save and except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractor; and maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. It has been determined that cost sharing must be in accordance with the provisions of Public Law 99-662, which requires a substantial increase in cost of local cooperation. The village of Naples has determined that they are unable to assume responsibility for cost sharing as required by Public Law 99-662. Therefore, construction of the project cannot be undertaken. Operations and results during fiscal year. It was determined that local interests will not be able to cost share on this project. Construction of the project has been deferred. 9. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, MO Location. The basin lies within the State of Missouri and comprises 3,980 square miles. The river is a west bank tributary of the Mississippi River at mile 161 above mouth of Ohio River. Major streams in the basin include the Meramec, Big, and Bourbeuse Rivers. The basin extends about 100 miles southwesterly from St. Louis into the Ozark Highlands. (See St. Louis, MO, and Rolla sheets of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. The project provides for the construction of Meramec Park and Union Lakes, authorized by the 1938 Flood Control Act; and Pine Ford, Irondale, and 1-38 Lake projects, and 19 angler-use sites, authorized by the 1966 Flood Control Act. Under the plan, Irondale and 1-38 Lakes will reduce flood damages in the upper Big and Bourbeuse Rivers. Meramec Park, Union, and Pine Ford Lakes will substantially reduce flooding in the lower basin area and will lower flood crests on the Mississippi River. Project will also provide water supply, water quality control, recreation, and fish and wildlife conservation. Public Law 97-128 authorized structural and nonstructural flood control measures along the lower Meramec River in Jefferson and St. Louis Counties, Missouri. Subsequent studies determined that a local flood protection project for Valley Park, Missouri, was justified at an estimated total cost of $11.8 million. (October 1984 price level). (See Table 14-D for additional data on this comprehensive project.) 9A. PINE FORD LAKE, MO Location. Proposed dam is on Big River at mile 43.8, about 45 miles southwest of St. Louis. The Big River is a tributary of the Meramec. Lake would extend about 34 miles up Big River. (See St. Louis, MO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) 14-4 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT Existing project. Project provides for construction of a compacted earth-fill dam with a concrete chute spillway. Dam will be 141 feet high and 2,070 feet long. Construction of new roads, improvements of existing roads, alterations to pipeline, power and telephone lines, and construction of recreational facilities are included. Maximum storage capacity will be 285,000 acre-feet. Estimated total project cost (1984) is $147,000,000, of which $8,173,200 and $22,900,000 are local reimbursements for water supply and recreation and fish and wildlife respectively. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute toward cost of project for storage allocation to water supply in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning previously funded but not completed. 10. McGEE CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The levee district is in Brown and Pike Counties, IL, on the right bank of Illinois River between miles 67.2 and 75.1 above the Mississippi River. (See Kansas City sheet of maps of United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:500,000.) Existing project. Project provides for reconstruction of 14.7 miles of levee, construction of a new pumping plant, closure structure, and seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to about 12,080 acres of agricultural land against a flood of about 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1983) is $25,500,000. Non-Federal cost is $930,000. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2nd sess.). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-9 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have executed assurances in compliance with Public Law 91-611 and Public Law 91-646. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project is complete. 11. NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The levee district is in Greene and Jersey Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 15.2 and 23.7 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, IL-MO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. Project provides for raising and enlarging 11.4 miles of levee, construction of 1.0 mile of new levee, altering discharge line of pumping station, and construction of seepage control measures. Project will provide protection to 10,360 acres of land, 9,635 of which are highly productive agricultural lands against a flood of 50-year frequency. Estimated total Federal project cost (1986) is $6,510,000. Non- Federal cost is $450,000. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2nd sess.). Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-11 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Local interests have indicated a willingness to meet the terms of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Due to a lack of economic justification the project has been recommended for deferral. 12. REND LAKE, BIG MUDDY RIVER, IL Location. The lake is in Franklin and Jefferson Counties in southern Illinois. The dam is on Big Muddy River, 103.7 miles upstream from its confluence with the Mississippi River, and about 3 miles northwest of Benton, IL. (See Belleville sheet of maps of United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000, and Geological Survey quadrangle maps, 1:62,500.) Existing project. The project provides for construction of an earth dam, ungated concrete spillway, relocation of roads and utilities, recreational facilities, access roads, and service facilities. In addition, two subimpoundment dams were constructed on upper arms of reservoir to enhance fish and wildlife value of project. Reservoir has an area of 24,800 acres, and a storage capacity of 294,000 acre-feet. Project provides flood control, water supply, low-flow regulations, conservation of fish and wildlife, recreation, and area development. Estimated total Federal project cost (1983) is $43,100,900, of which $12,197,700 is for lands and damages. Non-Federal local contribution for water supply is $9,941,300. Federal cost for code 711 recreation facilities is $1,060,900. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-12 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Assurance of local cooperation and water supply contract have been executed and approved by the Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. Real estate activities in connection with project completion were performed. Lands acquired to date are 39,819 acres in fee and 906 acres in easements. Project is essentially complete. Maintenance. Hired labor forces performed operation and maintenance of Rend Lake Reservoir. 13. WOOD RIVER DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. In Madison County, IL, on left bank of Mississippi River between river miles 195 and 203 above Ohio River. District includes bottom lands 14-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FQR FY 1989 between river and bluffs and extends from Cahokia diversion channel on the south to opposite Lock and Dam 26 at Alton, IL, on the north. Small industrial cities of Hartford, Wood River, Roxana, and East Alton and part of Alton riverfront, lie within the district. (See Corps of Engineers Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN.) Existing project. The 1938 Flood Control Act authorized raising, enlarging, and extending existing levee system to provide 20.8 miles of levees and construction of appurtenant works consisting of gravity drainage structures, highway and railroad closure structures, alterations to existing or construction of new pumping plants; surfacing service road on levee crown, making necessary alterations to railroad tracks and bridges at levee crossings, seepage corrective measures and construction of a low-water dam at mouth of Wood River. Project will afford protection to this district against a flood of about 200-year frequency. Estimated total construction cost (1982) is $18,600,000 (excluding $23,000 contributed funds). Flood Control Act of 1965 modified 1938 Flood Control Act to provide for construction of a pumping station with collector ditches and necessary appurtenant facilities for removal of water impounded by existing levee. This portion of the project has been declared inactive. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Operation and results during fiscal year. Work authorized by the 1938 Flood Control Act is complete. The remaining closure will be made as part of the Lock and Dam 26 project and will be in conjunction with removal of railroad bridge. 14. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed work was accomplished at a cost of $340,125 for the fiscal year. Total cost as of end of fiscal year is $6,829,045. 15. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). No activity during this fiscal year. 16. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Preauthorization study costs for fiscal year were $20,049 for St. Peters, MO; and $29,266 for Boise Brule Levee and Drainage District, MO; $6,862 for Lower Salt River, Pike County, MO; $6,037 for Mississippi Levee System, Monroe; E. Cape Girardeau Main Ditch, IL, $2,443; and Modoc Levee and Drainage District, Prairie, IL, $7,304. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized construction of a levee approximately onefifth of a mile long to be built in Meredosia, IL, at a total cost of $80,000. This work was accomplished by local interests. Emergency flood control activities--repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $180,731 for disaster preparedness, and $82,282 for rehabilitation. Multiple-Purpose Project Including Power 17. CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND RESERVOIR, SALT RIVER, MO Location. Salt River rises in Schuyler County, about 12 miles south of Missouri-Iowa State line. It flows southeasterly about 192 miles and empties into Mississippi River about 2 miles above Louisiana, MO, or about 284 miles above mouth of Ohio River. (See Kansas City and Quincy sheets of maps of United States published by Army Map Service, scale 1:500,000, and Geological Survey quadrangle maps, 1:250,000.) Previous project. For details, see page 645 of Annual Report for 1968. Existing project. Project provides for construction of a multiple-purpose reservoir, including power, flood control, water supply, navigation storage, pollution abatement, fish and wildlife conservation, and recreation. Dam consists of a compacted earth embankment with a concrete spillway controlled by tainter gates. Dam and spillway are about 1,700 feet long. Spillway structure consists of an ogee overflow section surmounted by four 50- by 30-foot tainter gates. Reservoir will have a storage capacity of 1,428,000 acrefeet for use of flood control, future domestic and industrial water supply, sediment storage, and power generation. Project plan provides for installation of one 27,000 KW conventional unit and one 31,000 KW reversible unit for pumped storage operations. Total Federal project cost estimate (1984) is $330,000,000 of which $22,420,000 is for lands and damages; $14,300,000 for water supply; $76,000,000 for hydropower. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 14-13 of Fiscal Year 1980 Annual Report. Assurances have been received from the State of Missouri and approved by the Chief of Engineers. 14-6 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Work is complete on all major items. Lands acquired to date are 55,277 acres in fee and 10,068 acres in easements. Project is essentially complete. 18. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Location. The portion of the Upper Mississippi River within the boundaries of the St. Louis District extends from the mouth of the Ohio River (river mile 0) to river mile 300, downstream of Lock and Dam 22. Existing project. The project is composed of five elements: Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement, Long-term Resource Monitoring, Recreation, Studies of Recreation Impacts and Navigation Traffic Monitoring. The overall program, involving five states, three Engineer Districts and two Corps of Engineers Divisions, is administered by the North Central Division. For the St. Louis District's part of the program, 16 habitat rehabilitation projects have been proposed, of which one (1) is under construction with 9 others funded for planning & preliminary engineering (DPR's) in FY 89. Through Fiscal Year 1989, funds allocated to the St. Louis District have amounted to $1,442,000. The authorization limit for the overall program, projected over a 10-year period, is $191,415,000. Local cooperation. The terms of local cooperation, as established by Public Law 99-662, will vary according to the nature of the project, land ownership and pre-existing management responsibilities. A Local Cooperation Agreement has been executed between the Missouri Department of Conservation and the Assistant Secretary of the Army for the Clarksville Refuge project, the first scheduled construction project for this program within the St. Louis District. Operations and results during the fiscal year. One (1) construction contract was awarded; one (1) detailed project report (DPR) was completed with 4 DPR's initiated on other projects. Mapping & preliminary data collection for DPR's has begun on 4 additional projects. 14-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 14-A See Section in Text Project 2. Kaskaskia River IL (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 4. Mississippi River Between Ohio and Missouri Rivers (Includes Chain of Rocks) 5. Southeast Missouri Port, MO (Contrib. Funds) 6. East St. Louis and Vicinity, IL (Contrib. Funds) 7. Kaskaskia Island Drainage & Levee District, IL 8. Mauvaise Terre Drainage & Levee District, IL 9A. Pine Ford Lake, MO 10. McGee Creek Drainage & Levee District, IL 11. Nutwood Drainage & Levee District, IL COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Funds to Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 1989 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost $14,300,000 14,204,126 1,372,000 1,177,658 18,626 0 3,541,000 3,415,685 9,545,000 9,771,652 00 00 1,890,000 2,446,626 119,000 516,340 957,000 1,626,323 0 337,089 -36,000 721 0 136,924 $ 15,000 192,628 1,134,000 1,346,290 0 0 4,594,000 4,667,633 12,262,000 12,566,762 660,000 480,601 00 -112,000 134,522 0 99,176 3,951,000 4,073,697 -15,000 49,575 0 341 130,000 75,145 $ -28,000 205,202 1,625,000 1,531,119 00 18,455,000 2,437,584 13,527,000 13,415,950 1,380,000 1,574,510 1,425,210 1,424,467 0 213,660 00 4,030,000 3,515,195 4,000 52,889 00 -7,000 161,063 00 $ 0 8 1,191,500 1,322,007 0 0 3,948,000 17,569,473 22,520,500 22,533,237 1,180,000 1,155,537 178,894 241,387 150,000 596,594 00 -500,000 143,107 00 00 0 15 14-8 $147,387,0001 147,387,0001 15,681,756 15,684,662 1,158,356 1,118,160 201,501,6002 198,941,8352 263,265,6333 262,976,8913 3,220,000 3,210,648 1,604,104 1,665,854 16,997,3264 17,351,170b 961,750 961,750 16,188,000 16,179,667 589,000 589,000 3,644,001 3,644,001 25,043,300 25,043,255 670,000 670,000 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Funds to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 1989 12. Rend Lake, Big New Work Muddy, IL Approp. 0 0 0 0 43,700,900 (Regular Funds) Cost 17,224 19,926 9,188 0 43,700,900 Maint. Approp. 2,759,600 2,558,822 3,082,000 3,065,000 34,722,6228 Cost 2,812,138 2,620,317 2,972,608 3,106,641 34,457,5928 Code 711 Funds New Work Approp. 0 0 0 0 1,060,900 Cost 0 0 0 0 1,060,900 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. 0 0 0 0 9,941,2789 Cost 0 0 0 0 9,941,2789 Maint. Contrib. 300,000 532,627 490,556 347,131 4,856,617 Cost 247,328 582,664 375,860 469,993 4,856,564 13. Wood River New Work Drainage & Levee Approp. 118,000 500,000 -44,000 0 17,163,821 o District, IL Cost 416,517 463,192 33,367 0 17,163,8210 17. Clarence Cannon New Work SDaalmt R ainvder ,R MesOer voir, Approp. 820,000 673,000 0 0 312,692,0281 Cost 1,795,702 1,625,900 678,367 325,533 312,293,70411 Maint. Approp. 3,929,600 4,077,322 4,733,000 4,727,000 29,909,982 Cost 3,633,059 4,340,515 4,496,082 5,126,986 29,843,676 1. Excludes $10,461 expended on previous project. 2. Excludes previous project cost of $1,416,620. 3. In addition $3,109 was expended for rehabilitation. 4. Includes $8,072,326 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. 5. Includes $7,921,939 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. 6. Includes $200,000 for definite project under 1938 Flood Control Act. 7. Excludes $6,800,700 for previous project. 8. Excludes $550,000 Area Development Administration Funds allotted to the State of Illinois for increased construction costs of Interstate Highway 57 to meet project requirements, and excludes $449,093 Area Redevelopment Administration Funds allotted to the Corps. 9. Includes $6,103,711 credit to State of Illinois for work in kind. 10. Funds are for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938. 11. Includes $216,628 for definite project study under 1938 Flood Control Act. 14-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 19071 Mar. 3, 19051 Jun. 25, 1910 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 19543 Jul. 3, 19584 Oct. 21, 1978 Dec. 29, 1981 Aug. 15, 1985 and Nov. 17, 1986 1960 River and Harbor Act as amended, Section 107 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 22, 1936 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 22, 1976 KASKASKIA RIVER, IL (See Section 2 of Text) Construct canal, lock, and dam to provide a 9-foot navigation channel from mouth to Fayetteville, IL. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS (See Section 4 of Text) Project for regulating works in 1881. (To obtain a minimum depth of 8 feet.) Dredging introduced as part of the project. These acts practically abrogated that part of project for middle Mississippi which proposed regulating works. Regulating works restored to project and appropriations begun with a view to completion of improvement between Ohio and Missouri Rivers within 12 years at an estimated cost of $21 million, exclusive of amounts previously expended. For 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Ohio River to northern Rivers and Harbors boundary of city of St. Louis. Project between northern boundary of St. Louis and Grafton (mouth of Illinois River) modified to provide a channel 9 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide with additional width around bends. Modified to provide construction of a lateral canal with lock at Chain of Rocks. Modified to provide construction of a small-boat harbor opposite Chester, IL. Modified to provide construction of a fixed crest rockfill dam 900 feet below Chain of Rocks Bridge. MELVIN PRICE LOCKS & DAM (FORMERLY LOCK AND DAM NO.26 (REPLACEMENT)) Construct new Dam and a 1,200 Foot Lock approximately two miles downstream of the existing structure. Change name from "Lock and Dam No. 26" to "Melvin Price Lock and Dam" upon termination of service in U.S. Congress. Construct a second lock, 600 feet long at the Lock and Dam No. 26. (Replacement) Project. SOUTHEAST MISSOURI PORT, MO (See Section 5 of Text) Construct harbor channel with adjacent landfill. CAPE GIRARDEAU, JACKSON METROPOLITAN AREA, MO As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Dec. 8, 1984, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes flood control and related recreational improvements in the Cape La Croix Creek Watershed. EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL (See Section 6 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee. Construct pumping plant and other modifications to reduce interior flooding. Construct Blue Waters Ditch as independent section. Repair and rehabilitate pump stations and appurtenant works, channels and bridges. S. Doc. 44, 87th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1881, p. 1536. Committee Doc. 9, 69th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 231, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 230, 83d Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 95-502, 95th Cong. Public Law 97-118, 97th Congress. Public Law 99-88 and Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d Sess. Special report on record in OCE. H. Doc. 329, 88th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 94-587, 94th Cong. Public Law 100-202, 100th Cong. 14-10 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 17, 1986 Jul. 14, 1984 Jun. 28, 1938 Nov. 7, 1966 Dec. 29, 1981 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 17, 1986 ELDRED AND SPANKEY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. HARTWELL DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. HILLVIEW DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. KASKASKIA ISLAND DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 7 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee. MALINE CREEK, MISSOURI As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Nov. 2, 1982, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes flood control, recreation and environmental improvements. MAUVAISE TERRE DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 8 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, MO (See Section 9 of Text) Construct reservoirs and local protection project. Construct Pine Ford, Irondale, and 1-38 dams and 19 Angler-use sites. Undertake structural & nonstructural flood control measures. MCGEE CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 10 of Text) Reconstruct existing levee and construct pumping plant to reduce flooding. MEREDOSIA LAKE AND WILLOW CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 11 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. REND LAKE, BIG MUDDY RIVER, IL (See Section 12 of Text) Construct dam at Benton, Ill., and subimpoundment dams on upper arms of reservoir. STE. GENEVIEVE, MO As outlined in the Report of the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors dated Apr. 16, 1985, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes construction of a levee and a pumping plant to protect the city from Mississippi River and Gabouri Creek floods. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 519, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d Sess. Energy and Water Development Approp. Act of 1985, 98th 'Cong., 2nd sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 525, 89th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 97-128, 97th Cong. Amended Section 1128, Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 541, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d Sess. 14-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 14-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents WOOD RIVER DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 13 of Text) Jun. 28, 1938 Construct reservoirs and local protection projects. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND RESERVOIR, SALT RIVER, MO (See Section 17 of Text) Oct. 23, 1962 Modified act of Jun. 28, 1938 by deleting the reservoir therefrom and H. Doc. 507, 87th Cong., 2d reauthorizing it as a separate multiple-purpose project. sess. Oct. 27, 1965 Changes name of project from Joanna Dam to present Public Law 89-298, 89th designation. Cong. 1. Also joint resolution, Jun. 29, 1906. 2. Contains latest published map. 3. Inactive. 4. All work completed. 5. Authorized under provision of Sec. 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965. 14-12 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1989 Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Cuivre River, MO1 - 1883 $ 12,000 $ - Grafton Small Boat Harbor, IL Nov. 1977 19622 - Mississippi River at Alton, IL Small Boat Harbor Nov. 1977 19582 - - Moccasin Springs, MO - 1969 76,4363 - Small Boat Harbor opposite Chester, IL Nov. 1977 19542 - - Small Boat Harbor opposite Hamburg, IL Nov. 1977 19502 - - Wabash Railroad Bridges, Illinois River, Meredosia, and Valley City, IL - 1961 2,653,194 1961 1. Inactive. River declared nonnavigable by act of Mar. 2. Year authorized. 23, 1900. 3. Excludes $56,605 contributed funds. TABLE 14-D LAKES, LEVEES, AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES Estimated See Required Total Estimated Sine cTtieoxnt Project Estimated Non-Federal Cost (Date to Name Federal Cost Cost Revision) 11. Meramec River Basin, MO Lakes: Union2 101,305,000 11,695,000 113,000,000 (1982) Pine Ford' 115,926,800 31,073,200 147,000,000 (1984) Irondalea 8,744,370 66,700,000 (1982) I-382 27,294,000 2,306,000 29,600,000 (1982) 1. Separate reports are included herein. 2. See 1979 Annual Report for details. 14-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 14-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1989 For Last Full Report Operation Mo. and Yr. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Deauthorized Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Angler-use sites, Meramec Basin, MO Oct. 1986 1967 $ - $ - Big Swan Drainage and Levee District, Illinois River, IL' Oct. 1986 - - Cache River Diversion, IL - 1953 2,837,114 - 1953 Cape Girardeau, MO, reaches Nos. 1, 3, and 4 Oct. 1978 1959 22,000- Cape Girardeau, MO, No. 2 - 1965 5,157,805 - 1964 Carlyle Lake, IL - 1981 46,013,699 45,612,023 Oct. 1976 Chouteau, Nameoki, and Venice Drainage and Levee District, IL- 1955 185,700 - 1955 Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL2- 1964 4,984,500 - 1963 Columbia Drainage and Levee District No. 3, IL - 1981 2,818,000 - Aug. 1981 Degognia and Fountain Bluff Levee and Drainage District, IL - 1959 5,889,500 - 1959 Dively Drainage & Levee District, IL - 1976 1,720,000 - 1976 East Cape Girardeau and Clear Creek Drainage District, IL - 1963 1,920,600 - 1963 Eldred, IL Nov. 1979 19623 - - - Emergency bank protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Price Landing, MO (see Flood Control Act of 1944) - 1950 55,415 Emergency - Oct. 1949 repairs to levees on Mississippi, Illinois, and Kaskaskia Rivers and flood fighting and rescue work (Sec. 5, Flood Control Act of 1941, as amended)4 - 1953 - 1,033,279 1951 Emergency protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Chester, I bridge (Sec. 12, Flood Control Act of 1944) - 1952 50,000 - Jan. 1952 Emergency protection for Illinois approach, Chain of Rocks Bridge (Sec. 12, Flood Control Act of 1944) - 1946 25,000 - Aug. 1945 Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5, IL- 1970 1,154,800 -1958 Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5 and Stringtown Drainage and Levee District No. 4, IL Oct. 1986 1971- Grand Tower Drainage and Levee District, IL - 1959 4,677,900 -1959 Harrisonville Levee and Drainage District IL - 1981 5,829,000 - Mar. 1981 Indian Creek Area, Illinois River, IL' Nov. 1981 - - Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, IL - 1959 297,460 - 1949 Keach Drainage and Levee District, IL' Oct. 1986 ... Lake Shelbyville, IL - 1981 47,927,562 45,704,661 Sep. 1978 Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, IL, Nos. 2, 5, 6, and 7 Nov. 1979 1979 Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, IL, Nos. 3, 4, 8, 10, and 13 Nov. 1979 1979 Levee Districts between Cowden and Vandalia, IL Oct. 1978 1978 496,000 Meramec Park Lake, MO - 1987 30,552,023 4,659,362 14-14 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1989 For Last Full Report Operation Project DMeoa.u tahnodr izYerd. See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL - 1944 249,738 - 1944 Miller Pond Drainage District, IL - 1955 164,183 - 1955 Mississippi River Agricultural - 1987 2,137,000 - - Area 8, MO Mississippi River at St. Louis, MO - 1980 79,265,166 - Jan. 1980 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 10, MO Nov. 1979 1967 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 12, MO -1967 Mississippi River, Alton to Gale, IL, underseepage measures - - 85,422 - Oct. 1962 North Alexander Drainage and Levee District, IL -1957 939,569 - 1957 Perry County Drainage and Levee District Nos. 1, 2 and 3, MO - 1987 7,968,700 - - Prairie du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, IL5 - 1970 6,005,127 - 1970 Prairie du Rocher and vicinity, IL - 1959 3,882,600 - 1959 Preston Drainage and Levee District, IL - 1959 1,866,910 - 1959 Richland Creek, IL - 1969 401,000 - - Riverland Levee District, MO Aug. 1977 19363 - - Scott County Drainage and Levee District, Illinois River, IL' Oct. 1986 -- Ste. Genevieve County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO Nov. 1977 19363 - St. Louis County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO Nov. 1977 19363 - - - SLtrainngdtionng,, Ft. Chartres and Ivy - 1957 2,123,700 - Aug. 1956 IL Union Lake, MO 6 - 1979 4,918,203 4,335 - Urban areas at Alton, IL - 1960 192,000 - - Village of New Athens, IL - 1981 1,983,000 - Sep. 1981 Valley City Drainage & Levee District, IL7 - 1967 91,952 - 1967 Wiedmer Chemical Drainage and Levee District, MO Nov. 1977 19363 1. Projects authorized or modified by Flood Control Act of Oct. 23,1962 (see H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess., for details). 2. Completed except for seepage control measures, which are inactive. 3. Year authorized. 4. Work complete, now performed under Public Law 99. 5. Includes $5,235,927 for previous project. 6. Includes $183,638 for definite project study under 1938 Flood Control Act. Includes Highway 185 funds. 7. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended). 14-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 14-F ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 89 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Culvre River, MO -12744 St. Louis Metropolitan Area, MO & IL -55040 Meramec R. Basin Missouri Study, MO. -14056 West Frankfort & Vicinity, IL -12643 Sub-total Review of Authorized Projects (160) Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations -17250 Review of FERC Licenses -53857 Dam Safety Criteria Studies Sub-total Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Dept. of Agric. - Soil Cons. Service -51840 Plan Assist to State of IL -14817 Plan Assist to State of MO -14829 Sub-total TOTAL (Category 100) COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) -82030, and -82040 Hydrology Studies (260) -53820 TOTAL (Category 200) CONTINUATION OF PLANNING & ENGINEERING (Category 400) River Des Peres, MO -12638 TOTAL (Category 400) ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 600) Cape Girardeau - Jackson -12356 Maline Creek, MO -12297 Meramec River Basin, MO -75412 TOTAL (Category 600) GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $ 9,739 82,031 1,572 160,427 253,770 20,737 247 3,999 24,983 5,247 8,326 10,350 23,923 206,013 9,739 303,729 1,179,636 203,874 6,245 $ 302,676 $ 215,752 $ 303,729 $ 1,389,755 $ 2,211,912 14-16 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT * This district comprises portions of southern Kentucky, southwestern Virginia, western North Carolina, northern Georgia and Alabama, northeastern Mississippi and practically all of Tennessee except western portion, and embraces drainage basins of Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers and their tributaries. IMPROVEMENTS Page General Investigations 1. Cumberland River, TN and KY ........ 15-2 2. Tennessee River, TN, AL and KY ...... 15-3 3. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and M S ............................ 15-4 4. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ...................... 15-4 Alteration of Bridges 5. Authorized Alteration of Bridges ...... 15-4 Flood Control 6. Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, KY and TN ......... 15-4 7. Martins Fork Lake, KY .............. 15-5 8. Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY .......................... 15-5 9. Tug and Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, W VA, VA and KY ........................ 15-5 10. Ohio River Basin (Nashville Dist.) .... 15-6 11. Inspection of completed flood control projects .................... 15-6 12. Flood control work under special authorization ...................... 15-6 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 13. Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN .......................... 15-6 14. Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN and KY ........................ 15-6 15. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN ............... 15-7 16. Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY ......................... 15-7 17. Wolf Creek Dam-Lake Cumberland, Ohio River Basin, KY ............... 15-8 Page 18. Surveys ......................... 15-8 19. Collection and study of basic data ...... 15-8 Tables Table 15-A Cost & Financial Statement ..... 15-9 Table 15-B Authorizing Legislation ........ 15-11 Table 15-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................... 15-13 Table 15-D Not Applicable Table 15-E Table 15-F Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................... 15-13 Other Authorized Multiple- Purpose Projects, Including Pow er ....................... 15-14 Table 15-G Deauthorized Projects .......... 15-14 Table 15-H Table 15-I Table 15-J Table 15-K Cumberland River, TN & KY, Principle Features ............. 15-15 Tennessee River Lock Dimensions .................. Tennessee River Total Cost of Existing Project .............. Ohio River Basin (Nashville District) Local Protection ...... 15-17 15-518 15-18 Table 15-L Reservoirs ................. 15-18 Table 15-M Table 15-N Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............... 15-19 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .......... 15-19 15-1 Navigation r REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1989 Navigation 1. CUMBERLAND RIVER, TN AND KY Location. Formed by junction of Poor and Clover Forks in Harlan County, Ky., about 694.2 miles above its mouth, and flows west to Burnside, Ky., from whence it makes a loop southwestward into Tennessee, passes Nashville, and returns northwestward to Kentucky, emptying into Ohio River near Smithland, Ky. (See Geological Survey base maps of Tennessee and Kentucky.) Previous projects. For details see pages 1898 and 1901 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1208 of Annual Report for 1938, and pages 1069 and 1070 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Below Nashville: Improvement of Cumberland River between mouth and Nashville was authorized for 9-foot navigation; increased project depth to be obtained by construction of three moderate height dams with lockage facilities, designated as Kuttawa (Eureka), Dover, and Cheatham, to replace existing locks A to F inclusive below Nashville and lock 1 above Nashville. (See table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Subsequent authorities provided for construction of hydroelectric power-generating facilities at Cheatham Dam, river mile 148.7, and modification of project for navigation on Cumberland River, Tenn. and Ky., to provide, in lieu of previously authorized works at Kuttawa, mile 32.2, and Dover, mile 100.1, for construction of a multiple-purpose improvement consisting of a dam, lock, and powerplant near mile 30.6 on lower Cumberland River and a canal for navigation and other purposes connecting this reservoir with reservoir formed by Kentucky Dam on the Tennessee River. The project is known as Barkley Dam and Lake Barkley. Provision of interconnecting canal, involving excavation of a channel through narrow watershed divide about 2.5 miles upstream from damsite, permits alternative routes available for navigation between either Cumberland or Tennessee Rivers and Ohio River, and affords integrated operation of Barkley and Kentucky Reservoirs through diversion of flows in interests of flood control and power production. Cost of modified project for 9-foot navigation and multiple-purpose development is $178,181,406 Federal funds and $102,966 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. (See table 15-H for listing of principal features.) Under flood conditions as regulated by upstream reservoirs, extreme fluctuation in stage of river below Nashville, Tenn., varies at different localities from about 16 to 55 feet above minimum pool levels. Ordinary fluctuations vary with power flows from as much as the allowable 3-foot drawdown below normal pool elevation 385 at Cheatham Lock and Dam to a range of about 7 feet at Nashville. Seasonal variation in normal headwater levels at Lake Barkley is 5 feet, which in combination with power flows produces fluctuations up to 10 feet below Cheatham Lock and Dam. Above Nashville: See pages 1693 thru 1696 of Annual Report for 1950 for information including statistical data on locks and dams 1 to 17 and 21. Completion information is shown on pages 1454 of the report for 1951. See Table 15-B for Authorizing Legislation. Construction of Old Hickory, Carthage, and Celina Dams above Nashville was also authorized for navigation and power. The dam and reservoir authorized for construction on Cumberland River near Carthage, Tenn., has been redesignated as Cordell Hull Dam and Reservoir. Cost of Old Hickory and Cordell Hull projects, including locks, is $132,140,900. Estimated cost of Celina Dam (1985) is $213,000,000. (See table 15-H at end of chapter for listing of principal features.) Under flood conditions as presently regulated, including effect of surcharge operation of Old Hickory project, extreme fluctuations of stage in this section of river vary from a range of 35 feet at Nashville (mile 191) to a maximum of 46 feet immediately below Old Hickory Dam (mile 216.2), and from an 8-foot variation in headwater at dam to 36 feet in vicinity of Carthage, Tenn., (mile 313.5), present head of navigation; with variations up to 35 feet at Celina, Tenn. (mile 380.8) and 29 feet in tailwater at Wolf Creek Dam (mile 460.9). Maximum fluctuations under ordinary conditions from power flows vary from about 7 feet at Nashville to 14 and 3 feet, respectively, in tailwater and headwater of Old Hickory Dam, and at other key points as follows: 13 feet at Carthage; 18 feet at Celina; and 19 feet at Wolf Creek Dam. Further details on project authorization for river sections below and above Nashville are shown on Table 15-B. Local cooperation. Under modified project for 9- foot navigation and multiple-purpose development, recreation features of reservoir components are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Terminal facilities. There are 41 terminals on the Cumberland River (3 municipally owned and open for public use; 4 government owned facilities and 34 privately owned facilities). A total of 21 terminals have 15-2 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT railroad connections. Principal commodities handled are petroleum products, stone, sand, gravel, coal, coke, iron, steel, chemicals, and grain. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. For further information see page 695 of Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Barkley, Cheatham, Cordell Hull, and Old Hickory locks and dams were operated as required. Operation and Maintenance improvements included completion of bendway dredging above Barkley, and continuation of rock removal at five sites on the Lower Cumberland. Contracts were awarded to revise lock lighting and purchase quoin and miter blocks at Barkley; repair dam and spillway gates and replace storage building for power plant at Cheatham; repair service base building and replace generator leads at Old Hickory. Total net energy generated at Barkley Dam (780,960,935 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to the Tennessee Valley Authority, Southern Illinois power Cooperative, Big Rivers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation, and Indiana Statewide Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., Hoosier Energy Division. Total net energy generated at Cheatham Dam (173,427,427 kw-hr), Cordell Hull (480,859,171 kw-hr), and Old Hickory (603,448,570 kw-hr) was made available for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program comprising malaria control, shoreline sanitation, land management and disposal, and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 2. TENNESSEE RIVER, TN, AL AND KY Location. Formed by junction of French Broad and Holston Rivers in eastern Tennessee, 4.4 miles above Gay Street Bridge at Knoxville, flows southwest into northern Alabama, thence in a generally westerly course across north Alabama, to northeast boundary of Mississippi, thence nearly due north across Tennessee and Kentucky, entering Ohio River at Paducah, 652.1 miles from junction of French Broad and Holston Rivers. (See Geological survey base map of Tennessee River Basin.) Previous projects. For details see pages 1902-1906, Annual Report for 1915; pages 1190-1194, 1196-1216, and 1220-1222, Annual Report for 1929; and page 1216, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Originally provided for permanent improvement of river for a navigable depth of 9 feet at low water from mouth about 650 miles to Knoxville, Tenn. Only work performed by the Corps was construction of lock at General Joe Wheeler Dam and miscellaneous appurtenant improvements at a new work cost of $2,244,236. Tennessee Valley Authority program provided for obtaining authorized 9-foot project by construction of high dams and locks and utilization of certain locks and dams previously constructed under jurisdiction of the Corps. (See Table 15-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Subsequent construction by that agency of Melton Hill Dam extends navigable channel of Tennessee River system up the Clinch River about 38 miles above damsite (mile 23.1) to vicinity of Clinton, Tenn. (See table 15-I on Tennessee River.) In accordance with general navigation laws placing control and supervision over navigable waters under direction of Secretary of the Army, the Corps of Engineers operates and maintains all locks, and maintains navigation channels and safety harbors by performing all necessary maintenance dredging and snagging operations. For information concerning other functions of the Corps under division of responsibilities for Tennessee River since adoption of Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933, see page 1084 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Authorization requires no local cooperation in construction of alternate system of low dams. It does, however, provide that if high dams are built before the United States builds projected locks and low dams which are to be replaced, the United States shall contribute to cost of substituted structures an amount equal to estimated cost of works of navigation for which substitution is made. Terminal facilities. There are 150 terminals on the Tennessee River (10 municipally owned, 16 government owned facilities and 124 privately owned facilities). A total of 81 terminals have railroad connections. Principal commodities handled are petroleum products, stone, sand, gravel, coal, coke, grain, chemicals, iron, and steel. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. A list of terminals is revised annually and can be obtained from Division Engineer, Ohio River Division, Corps of Engineers, Cincinnati, Ohio. For further information see page 698 of Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. Channel work by government plant and hired labor consisted of dredging and snagging at various locations, and maintenance of mooring facilities and safety harbors. Cost of channel maintenance was $536,777. Maintenance: All locks were operated and lock appurtenances and standby plant maintained as required. Major repairs continued at Wilson Auxiliary Lock including structural repairs to middle and lower gates, excavating and shotcreting the bluff above the lower guide wall and widening lower guide wall. Work was begun to renovate the lock operation building and paint the main lock. 15-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1989 The Guntersville Main Lock was unwatered and repaired and new quoin and miter block were purchased, gear speed reducers were overhauled and lock gate stops repaired. Lock lighting revisions were completed at Watts Bar and Fort Loudoun. Fort Loudoun was unwatered and repaired, and new miter blocks and quoin purchased. Culvert valves were repaired and painted at Watts Bar. At Kentucky Lock contracts were awarded to replace handrails and machinery gear reducers. Floating boom was repaired at Pickwick, and lock gate stops repaired at Nickajack. 3. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL AND MS Location. West Central Alabama and Northeastern Mississippi; in Marengo, Sumter, Greene and Pickens Counties, Alabama, and Noxubee, Lowndes, Clay, Monroe, Itawamba, Prentiss and Tishomingo Counties, Mississippi. Existing project. Provides for a waterway 234 miles in length, connecting the Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers by way of the East Fork of Tombigbee River, Mackeys and Yellow Creeks, affording a channel not less than 9 feet deep and 280 feet in bottom width, with 10 locks each having clear chamber dimensions of 110x600 feet. Construction of the divide section, including Bay Springs lock and dam, is assigned to the Nashville District; whereas, the prosecution of work on the river and canal sections is under the jurisdiction of the Mobile District. Only activities of the Nashville District are reported hereon. Estimated Federal cost of new work under jurisdiction of the Nashville District is $750,000,000. (See 15-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Authorization requires local interests to construct, maintain and operate all highway bridges, construct and maintain all highway relocations or alterations, make and maintain alterations as required to sewer, water supply and drainage facilities, assume cost of operation and maintenance of utility crossings, provide and maintain as required suitable and adequate river and canal terminals in accordance with plans approved by the Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Engineers. Operations during fiscal year. At the Piney Grove Recreation Site, work to provide campsites and trails was completed, and a contract for a beach and picnic area continued. The project is 99% complete. Navigation features are 100% complete. 4. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). During the period $22,864 was expended for a study of Centre South Riverport, Hamilton Co., TN., and $27,175 for study and planning for an access channel to Port of Florence, AL. Construction of a channel at Morgan County Port was begun with expenditures in FY 89 of $1,383,202 federal funds and $771,967 contributed funds. Alteration of Bridges 5. AUTHORIZED ALTERATION OF BRIDGES Work on Woodland Street bridge, under Truman- Hobbs Act, was initiated in 1965 and completed in 1966. Costs were $987,632. For details see page 922 of Annual Report for 1967. Flood Control 6. BIG SOUTH FORK NATIONAL RIVER AND RECREATION AREA, KY AND TN Location. The proposed project is located in Northeastern Tennessee and Southeastern Kentucky along the Big South Fork River and its tributaries in Pickett, Scott, Fentress, and Morgan Counties, Tennessee, and McCreary County, Kentucky. Existing project. A National Recreation Area was established in accordance with the concept included in the interagency report prepared pursuant to section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1968. Total acreage is not to exceed 125,000 acres. The act specifically establishes the National Area for the purpose of preserving and interpreting the scenic, biological, archaeological and historical resources of the river gorge area and developing the natural recreational potential of the area. The area is divided into two categories, gorge and adjacent areas, with no construction permitted except limited clearing for establishment of day-use facilities, historical sites, primitive campgrounds and access roads. Lodges and other facilities will be provided in the adjacent areas. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1974, 1976 and Water Resources Development Act of 1986. (See table 15-B for authorizing legislation.) The present authorized cost (ceiling) for the project is $156,122,000. The National Park Service operates and maintains the useable units of the area upon completion of land acquisition and construction by The Corps of Engineers. The first construction contract was awarded in June 1981. The project is 68% complete. 15-4 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and design continued. Acquired 713.24 acres fee. Stabilization of a slide on Blue Heron Road was completed. Swimming facilities were completed at the Bandy Creek campground and recreation area, and a service area and maintenance building for the National Park Service Maintenance Staff was completed. 7. MARTINS FORK LAKE, KY Location. Dam located at mile 15.6 on Martins Fork of Clover Fork, Cumberland River, about 10 miles southeast of city of Harlan, with reservoir extending about 6 miles upstream within Harlan County, southeastern Kentucky. Existing project. Multiple-purpose improvement combining flood control with water quality control and recreation development adopted by 1965 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 244, 89th Cong.), in general accordance with recommendations. Dam will be concrete type, about 504 feet long and rising 97 feet above streambed. Outlet works provide for release of water from reservoir at varying levels. Drainage area above damsite is 55.7 square miles. At full pool level, spillway crest at elevation 1341 above mean sea level, reservoir will cover 578 acres and contain 21,120 acrefeet of storage capacity. Provision is made for 17,450 acre-feet of reservoir capacity between elevations 1341 and 1300 for control of floods in winter and spring season, and 14,360 acre-feet (El. 1341-1310) during summer and fall, in conjunction with which storage of 3,090 acre-feet would be available on a seasonal basis to meet streamflow requirements for water quality control and fish life below the dam. A minimum permanent pool of 3,670 acre-feet, 274 acres in extent, will thus be provided during potential flood seasons; and during late spring and summer when flood storage can be reduced, the lake is to be operated generally at a higher level (El. 1310) to maintain a larger surface area of 340 acres for recreation and to provide the required seasonal storage for releases of water during critical low-flow periods. Project will prevent major portion of average annual flood losses at Harlan and result in significant stage reductions with related benefits along rural reaches and at other urban areas downstream. Actual cost of project including $95,000 code 710 funds is $20,479,91L First construction contract awarded in December 1972. Project completed for beneficial use in September 1978. Local cooperation. Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 (P.L. 89-72) applies in regard to non-Federal participation in recreation development, in addition to which local interests are to provide certain safeguards to ensure functioning of reservoir as intended. In May 1981 a final recreation cost-sharing contract with Harlan County was approved and certain recreation facilities have been jointly developed by the Corps and the County. These facilities, consisting of a swimming beach and a picnic area are now operated and maintained by Harlan County. Recreation investment to date (Corps and Local) is about $100,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures operated as required. 8. MIDDLESBORO, CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, KY Location. At Middlesboro, Ky., on Yellow Creek, a tributary entering Cumberland River about 660 miles above its mouth. Existing project. A system of canals and levees around one side of town, arranged so as to divert most headwaters of Yellow Creek away from present channel through heart of city. Protection is thus afforded in large measure to life and property within business district and a large part of residential section. For project details, see page 1088 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work on levees, canals, and appurtenances was accomplished by hired labor. 9. TUG AND LEVISA FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY RIVER AND UPPER CUMBERLAND, WV, VA AND KY Location. The project is located in the State of West Virginia and the Commonwealths of Kentucky and Virginia. The Cumberland portion consists of the Upper Cumberland River Basin, above Cumberland Falls, Ky. The basin is approximately 100 miles in length, averaging 30 miles in width at the lower portion and 10 miles in width upstream at Harlan, Ky. The Big Sandy Basin is within the Huntington District and the Cumberland within the Nashville District. Existing project. Provides for flood control measures for communities in the Tug and Levisa Forks and Upper Cumberland River Basins. The Cumberland portion has been assigned to the Nashville District. Only activities of the Nashville District are 15-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1989 reported hereon. Estimated Federal cost of new work under jurisdiction of the Nashville District is $261,000,000. The project was authorized by the Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1981, Section 202 of PL 96-367. Local cooperation. Authorizing legislation requires that non-federal interests shall hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction works and maintain and operate all such works after their completion in accordance with regulations by the Secretary of the Army. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and design continued. Acquired 41.04 acres fee, and 7.00 acres easement. Construction of the Floodwall/Highway contract at Pineville, and Phase II of the Wallsend Levee continued. Design continued on the Harlan structural project and the levee at Barbourville. A contract was awarded for diversion tunnels at Harlan. Nonstructural excavations continued at Harlan, Barbourville and Pineville, and the first floodproofing contract was completed at Pineville. 10. OHIO RIVER BASIN (NASHVILLE DISTRICT) Location. A series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs in Ohio River Basin within Nashville District. Existing project. The general comprehensive plans approved for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin is set forth in legislation listed in Table 15-B. Individual projects, local protection projects and lakes, considered in comprehensive plan within Nashville District are listed in Table 15-K. 11. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts, requires local interests furnish assurances they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within their respective districts. Maintenance inspections were made during fiscal year of completed protective works in localities transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation. Local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. Fiscal year cost was $17,236. Total cost to September 30, 1989 was $323,335. For project inspection data see table 15-M. 12. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control and coastal emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Actual Federal cost for the fiscal year was $208,404 for disaster preparedness. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 13. CENTER HILL LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TN Location. Dam is on Caney Fork River, 26.6 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 309.2) at Carthage, Tenn. It is in DeKalb County, Tenn., about 55 miles east of Nashville, and 14 miles southeast of Carthage, Tenn. Reservoir extends about 64 miles up main stream and about 10 miles up Falling Water River and lies within DeKalb, Putnam, White, and Warren Counties, Tenn. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production, with a permanent pool for public use and conservation purposes. In addition to main dam structure, provision was made for a rolled-earth dike to close a saddle in reservoir rim near damsite. For further details, see page 1099 of 1962 Annual Report. Actual cost of project including $8,940,642 code 710 funds is $53,412,022. Local cooperation. None required on completed project. Recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structure and its appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total net energy generated (159,154,300 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management involved land management, public relations, and maintenance of public use facilities. 14. DALE HOLLOW LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TN AND KY Location. Dam is on Obey River, 7.3 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 380.9) at Celina, Tenn. It is in Clay County, Tenn., and about 15-6 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT 80 miles northeast of Nashville, Tenn., 28 miles north of Cookeville, Tenn., and 3 miles east of Celina, Tenn. Reservoir extends about 51 miles up main stream, 10 miles up East Fork, and 6 miles up West Fork of Obey River, and lies within Cumberland and Clinton Counties, Ky., and Clay, Pickett, Overton, and Fentress Counties, Tenn. Existing project. A concrete gravity-type dam, hy-. droelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production with a permanent pool for public use and conservation purposes. See page 1096 of 1962 Annual Report for project details. Cost of project including $2,195,600 code 710 funds and $150,000 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program is $28,317,746. Local cooperation. None required on completed project; future recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total net energy generated (156,755,670 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved public relations, land management, and maintenance of public-use facilities. Major accomplishment was the replacement of two generator ACB's. 15. J. PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TN Location. Damsite is on Stones River, 6.8 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 205.9); in Davidson County, Tenn.; and about 7 miles east of Nashville, Tenn. Reservoir extends southeasterly from dam about 32 miles along main stream, 10 miles up East Fork, 6.5 miles up West Fork, and for shorter distances up other tributaries of Stones River; and lies within Davidson, Rutherford, and Wilson Counties, Tenn. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control, power production and recreation. For further details see page 703 of 1969 Annual Report. Cost of project including $3,260,400 under code 710 funds and $46,000 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program is $56,914,039. Local cooperation. Recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Total net energy generated (127,221,600 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved public relations, fish and wildlife management, and maintenance of public-use facilities. Water quality mixing pumps were installed upstream of the generator to provide better water quality downstream. 16. LAUREL RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. Damsite is at mile 2.3 on Laurel River, a tributary of Cumberland River, in southcentral Kentucky. The two streams meet about 9 miles below Cumberland Falls, a prominent physiographic feature at head of Lake Cumberland which is formed by Wolf Creek Dam. Reservoir extends 19.2 miles upstream to site of Corbin, Ky. water-supply dam and lies within Laurel and Whitley Counties. Existing project. Project approved in general accordance with recommendations of House Document 413, 86th Congress, by 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended by Public Law 88-253, was designed for purposes of flood control, power, and recreation as an integral unit of a coordinated plan for development of water resources of Cumberland River Basin. With the view of a net gain in power potential on a system basis, the plan of improvement incorporated appropriate flood control storage in the proposed project and corresponding adjustment in operations of Wolf Creek Dam-Lake Cumberland for flood control and power, which in effect constituted a transfer of reservoir capacity without entailing a change in flood control benefits. Further detailed study giving full consideration to power capabilities and marketing arrangements indicated the advantage of maintaining present storage allocation at Wolf Creek and use of all available storage capacity of Laurel River Lake for power. The power plant is complete. Recreation was completed in FY 1986. Total cost is $56,741,232. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and 15-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1989 appurtenances maintained as required. Total net energy generated (69,971,000 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior for distribution. Installation of power plant remote control instruments was accomplished in FY 89. 17. WOLF CREEK DAM-LAKE CUMBERLAND, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. Wolf Creek Dam is on Cumberland River at mile 460.9 (above mouth) in Russell County, Ky., about 10 miles southwest of Jamestown and 12 miles north of Albany, Ky. Lake Cumberland extends 101 miles up main stream, 48 miles up South Fork of Cumberland River, in Russell, Clinton, Wayne, Pulaski, McCreary, Laurel, and Whitley Counties, Ky. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production, with a permanent pool for publicuse and conservation purposes. See page 1094 of 1962 Annual Report for project details. Cost of project is $188,267,195. This cost includes $3,259,872 code 710 funds, $880,000 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed program, and $104,999,237 for major rehabilitation. Local cooperation. None required on completed project; future recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Activity involving the integrity of the structure began in 1968 when a leak or seepage developed in the embankment. The major rehab embankment contract was physically completed in September 1982. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Major maintenance work items included installing revenue meters, instrumentation automation, supplying utility water to Dam site, and erosion control work at the Kendall site. Total net energy generated (1,226,510,000 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved land management activities, public relations, and maintenance of public-use facilities. General Investigations 18. SURVEYS Costs for this period were $1,422,199 for which $1,029,240 was for navigation, $270,167 for flood damage prevention studies, $70,054 for special investigations, $32,738 for coordination studies with other agencies, and $20,000 for interagency water resource development. 19. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for this period were $54,201 for technical services to others, and $44,237 for flood plain management services, totalling $98,438. 15-8 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 15-A See Section in Text Project 1. Cumberland River, TN and KY 2. Tennessee River, TN, AL and KY 3. Tenn.-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS 5. Big South Fork National River and Rec. Area, KY and TN 6. Martins Fork Lake, KY 7. Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY 8. Tug & Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy & Cumberland River, WV, VA and KY 11. Cumberland, KY 12. Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN 13. Dale Hollow Lake Ohio River Basin, TN and KY 14. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN 15. Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Total to FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep 30, 1989 538 18,496,000 18,461,695 16,900,000 16,908,385 - 11,405,000 6,844,558 10,231,765 10,105,683 - 6,765 - 6,765 480,000 507,448 27,000 28,020 11,840,000 12,317,354 2,820,000 2,853,975 - 3,007,000 3,101,316 2,353,000 2,497,915 58,000 141,682 886,000 883,590 75,587 16,388,500 16,532,247 13,763,000 13,527,412 1,435,000 2,954,077 8,648,000 5,883,134 676,000 658,851 64,000 63,990 23,263,000 17,204,246 3,341,000 3,277,917 3,108,000 3,087,685 2,740,000 2,646,484 850,000 817,325 20,608,000 20,422,397 17,122,000 16,991,895 3,000,000 3,600,796 3,916,000 6,273,184 616,000 613,142 57,000 57,141 16,685,000 16,207,412 3,818,000 3,758,934 3,380,000 3,375,737 2,949,000 2,907,243 1,005,000 1,036,364 23,167,200 23,648,733 17,036,700 17,383,402 300,000 2,030,026 7,969,000 6,158,684 598,500 619,139 66,000 61,772 12,312,000 17,561,180 3,615,200 3,750,028 3,850,100 8,418,865 3,324,800 3,341,459 1,406,100 1,422,959 320,252,240 1.2s, 320,252,240 1,2,8 240,649,376 4 240,104,677 s 16,251,428 6 16,251,428 6 166,309,651 ' 165,935,917 8 400,000 400,000 740,895,050 738,887,431 111,823,920 9 108,661,209 o10 20,479,911 20,479,911 5,120,500 5,106,211 817,830 11 817,830 11 1,909,844 1,898,376 94,754,000 12 92,075,750 1o 66,642 66,642 53,412,022 1# 53,412,022 .1 50,792,167 16 50,722,787 17 28,317,746 18 28,317,746 19 48,869,907 2so 48,768,128 21 56,914,039 22 56,914,089 '3 34,129,386 24 33,915,118 5 56,741,282 56,741,282 9,804,100 26 9,279,900 6 15-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1989 TABLE 15.A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep 30, 1989 16. Wolf Creek Dam and New Work Lake Cumberland, Approp. - - - - 83,267,958 s7 Ohio River Basin, KY Cost 9,190 - - - 83,267,958 27 Maint. Approp. 4,847,000 5,361,000 4,434,000 5,085,400 70,226,841 28 Cost 5,055,966 5,272,882 4,460,508 5,271,224 70,158,209 29 Rehab. Approp. - - - - 104,999,237 so Cost - - - - 104,999,237 so 1. Includes $9,707,354 for abandoned and/or replaced works under the old Cumberland River system. (Amount includes $826,253 for new work and $3,266,706 for maintenance on previous projects.) 2. Includes $61,733 public works acceleration funds, and $102,966 contributed by the State of Kentucky and $6,750 contributed by Metropolitan Nashville, TN. 3. Includes $298,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 4. Includes $955,889 for special recreation use fees, and $1,938,157 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $1,892,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 5. Includes $955,889 for special recreation use fees and $1,938,157 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $1,892,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 6. Includes $14,007,193 for new work and $4,005,175 for maintenance on previous projects. 7. Includes $495,763 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $764,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 8. Includes $495,763 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $764,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 9. Includes $300,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 10. Includes $300,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 11. Includes $33,876 Emergency Relief Funds. 12. Includes $12,312,000 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 13. Includes $17,561,130 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 14. Includes $35,896 public works acceleration funds, and $148,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 15. Includes $35,896 public works acceleration funds, and $148,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 16. Includes $292,280 funds for special recreation use fees, and $393,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $91,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 17. Includes $292,280 funds for special recreation use fees, and $393,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $91,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 18. Includes $51,789 public works funds and $150,000 contributed by the State of Tennessee, and $341,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 19. Includes $51,789 public works funds and $150,000 contributed by the State of Tennessee, and $341,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 20. Includes $339,480 funds for special recreation use fees, and $393,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $482,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 21. Includes $339,480 funds for special recreation use fees, and $393,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $482,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 22. Includes $46,000 contributed by the Metropolitan Government, Nashville, TN. 23. Includes $46,000 contributed by the Metropolitan Government, Nashville, TN. 24. Includes $260,680 for special recreation use fees, and $337,078 for maintenance and operations of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $40,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 25. Includes $260,680 for special recreation use fees, and $337,078 for maintenance and operations of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $40,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 26. Includes $66,678 for maintenance and operations of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 27. Includes $96,920 public works acceleration funds, and $880,000 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 28. Includes $82,048 public works acceleration funds, and $198,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $278,780 funds for special recreation use fees, and $293,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 29. Includes $82,048 public works acceleration funds, and $198,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $278,780 funds for special recreation use fees, and $293,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 30. Includes $203,757 for claim paid on initial construction of switchyard. 15-10 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 15-B See Section in Text A AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of uthorized Act Project and Work Authorized 1. Jul 13, 1892 Jun 25, 1910 Aug 30, 1935 Jul 24, 1946 Jun 19, 1952 Sep 3, 1954 Jul 14, 1960 Aug 5, 1886 Mar 2, 1907 Mar 2, 1919 Jun 5, 1920 Jul 3, 1930 Jun 26, 1934 2 Jul 24, 1946 Oct 1, 1980 2. Jul 3, 1930 May 18, 1933 CUMBERLAND RIVER BELOW NASHVILLE Provision made for lock A Provision made for locks B to F, and for dredging below lock F. Repairing dams A to F, inclusive, and surmounting same with movable crests. Provision of 9-foot channel by the construction of 3 moderate height dams below Nashville; via, Kuttawa (Eureka), Dover, and Cheatham. Provision for hydroelectric power production as a function of Cheatham Dam. Construction of Barkley (Lower Cumberland) dam and reservoir project for navigation, flood control, hydroelectric power, and related purposes in lieu of Kuttawa and Dover navigation-only structures. Authorized change in alignment of Illinois Central Railroad. CUMBERLAND RIVER ABOVE NASHVILLE Provision made for locks and dams; the Secretary of War to determine the final plan of improvement. Dimensions of the locks fixed in accordance with reports of Mar. 30, 1&87, and Nov. 25, 1890. Adoption of the report of the Board of Engineers, dated Feb. 26, 1906, limiting the lock and dam construction to locks and dams 1 to 7, and 21. Provision made for locks and dams 8 to 17. Authorizes work to proceed in Tennessee without waiting for action of local interests in Kentucky. Raising dam 1, 3 feet. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Construction of Old Hickory, Cordell Hull (Carthage), and Celina Dams above Nashville for navigation and the development of power resources. Design and construct flood control measures for communities in the Upper Cumberland River basins. TENNESSEE RIVER Authorized navigable depth of 9 feet from mouth about 650 miles to Knoxville, Tennessee to be obtained by construction of low dams. Authorized TVA to construct such dams in the Tennessee River as will provide a 9 foot channel. Annual Report, 1890, p. 2151 H. Does. 758, 60th Cong., 1st sess.; and 1481, 60th Cong., 2d seas. 1 H. Doc. 38, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 761, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 81, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 56, 86th Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report 1884, p. 1663. Annual Report 1888, p. 1622, and Annual Report 1892, p. 1933. H. Doc. 699, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 63d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 70th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 761, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 202, PL 96-367 H. Doc. 328, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 15-11 Documents REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1989 TABLE 15-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Authorized Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 9. OHIO RIVER BASIN, NASHVILLE DISTRICT Aug 28, 1937 Jun 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Jul 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Dec 30, 1963 Jun 18, 1965 Aug 13, 1968 Jun 19, 1970 Mar 7, 1974 Authorized establishing Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, KY and TN. Total area not to exceed 125,000 acres. Mar 7, 1974 Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY Jul 24, 1946 Construction of waterway to connect above rivers and provide a 9 foot channel and minimum bottom width of 170 feet in river and canal sections and 150 feet in the divide cut, with locks 110 by 600 feet clear inside dimensions. Subsequent studies determined most practical plan consists of channel with bottom width of 300 feet (280 feet in divide cut), fewer locks with higher lifts resulted in reducing number of lifts from 18 to 10 and reduced length from 260 to 253 miles. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Project to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable at discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50,300, for local flood protection works. Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. H. Doc. 6755, 89th Cong., 1st sess. S. 3710, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. R. 15166 91st Cong., 2d sess. H. R. 10203 93rd Cong. Water Resources Develop. Act of 1974 Amended by PL 94-587, 94th Cong. H. R. 10203 93rd Cong. River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974. H. Doc. 486, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Page 1343, Part I, FY 1968 House Hearings. 1. Contains latest published maps. Included in Public Works Administration program Sept. 6, 1933. 2. Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act. 15-12 H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong., 1st sess. NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 15-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (All Projects not Specifically Identified in Text) For last Full Cost to Sep 30, 1989 Report see Operation and Project Status Annual Report Construction Maintenance Caney Fork River, TN abandoned 1895 $ 27,828 - Clinch River, TN and VA abandoned 1923 53,949 $ 7,873 Duck River, TN abandoned 1887 13,000 - Elk River, AL and TN abandoned 1904 4,000 French Broad and Little Pigeon Rivers, TN abandoned 1931 249,605 33,554 Holston River, TN abandoned 1911 5,714 - Little Tennessee River, TN abandoned 1888 5,510 - Obey River, TN abandoned 1887 11,500 - Red River, TN abandoned 1884 5,000 - South Fork of Cumberland River, KY abandoned 1892 11,967 - TABLE 15-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (All Projects not Specifically Identified in Text) For last Full Cost to Sep 30, 1989 Project Report see Operation and Status Annual Report Construction Maintenance Barbourville, KY completed 1963 $2,088,147 Coal Creek and Tributaries (Lake City), TN completed 1962 460,134 - Corbin (Lynn Camp Creek), KY completed 1969 567,703 - Middlesboro (Yellow Creek), KY completed 1949 26,309 - Paint Rock River, AL completed 1967 544,178 - Pineville, KY completed 1963 1,679,126 - 1 1. Includes $9,950 contributed funds. 15-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1989 OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS TABLE 15-F INCLUDING POWER Project Status Barkley Dam and Lake Barkley, KY and TN beneficial use Celina Dam, KY active Cheatham Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use Cordell Hull Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use Old Hickory Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use 1. Details given under "Cumberland River, TN and KY." See Table 15-H. TABLE 15-G Project Three Islands Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN Middlesboro, Yellow Creek Bell County, KY Cumberland River above Nashville, TN For last Full Report see Annual Report -... DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For last Full Report see Annual Report for 1970 Hiwassee River, Polk and Bradley Counties, TN 1923 Rossview Lake, Tennessee and Kentucky Date and Authority Authorized: FC Act 1938, PL 761, 75 Cong., 3rd sess.; FC Act 1946, PL 525, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Deauthorized: 5 Aug 1977. Authorized: FC Act, Dec 22, 1944, PL 534, 78th Congress. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Authorized: River & Harbor Act, Aug 5, 1886. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Authorized: River & Harbor Act, Aug 14, 1876. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Authorized: FC Act, Jun 28, 1938, PL 761, 75th Congress. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Cost to Sep 30, 1989 Operation and Construction Maintenancee $146,498,644 $77,576,8841 222,575 -_ 1 31,682,762 57,050,1211 79,874,492 37,705,8671 52,266,412 67,771,8551 Federal Contributed Funds Funds Expended Expended $111,855 - 123,065 - 6,779 - 15-14 , . ._...__ NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 15-H CUMBERLAND RIVER, TN AND KY: PRINCIPLE FEATURES (See Section 1 of Text) Dam and Reservoir Barkley Cheatham Old Hickory Cordell Hull Celina Nearest town Miles above mouth of river Lock dimensions (feet)1 Lift at normal pool levels (feet) Depths on guardsills at minimum pool levels (feet) Character of foundation Dam: Type Height Length, exclusive of lock section (feet) Spillway: Gross length (feet) Net length opening (feet) Crest gates: Type Number Size (feet) Operating levels at dam (feet, mean sea level) : Maximum regulated Normal operation: Full pool Minimum pool Minimum pool in advance of floods Reservoir area (acres) Reservoir capacity (acre-feet): Flood control Power drawdown Dead storage Total Canal: Length (miles) Bottom width (feet) Depth at minimum pool level (feet) Power development: Number of units Generator rating (kilowatts) Total installation (kilowatts) Kuttawa, KY, 11 miles. 30.6 110 by 800 57 11, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 157 9,959 804 660 Tainter 12 55 by 50 Ashland City, TN, 9 miles. 148.7 110 by 800 26 14, upper; 17, lower Rock Concrete gravity 75 800 480 420 Tainter 7 60 by 27 375 359 354 346 93,430 1,213,000 8,4 259,000 610,000 2,082,000 385 382 7,450 19,800 7 84,200 104,000 Old Hickory, TN, 3 miles. 216.2 84 by 400 60 14, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 98 3,605 2 325 270 Tainter 6 45 by 41 450 442 27,450 125,000 5 63,000 357,000 545,000 Carthage, TN, 5 miles. 313.5 84 by 400 59 14, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 93 1,138 2 291 225 Tainter 5 45 by 41 508 8 508 501 499 13,920 85,600 s,6 20,500 204,800 310,900 1.75 400 11 4 32,500 130,000 3 12,000 36,000 4 25,000 100,000 3 33,333 100,000 15-15 Celina, TN, 5 miles. 385.4 Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 86 2,298 290 250 Tainter 5 50 by 37 564 8 560 559 559 16,960 55,950 5 14,700 287,300 357,950 3 36,000 ~" 108,000 " -. ,,,_,_ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1989 TABLE 15-H (Continued) CUMBERLAND RIVER, (See TN AND KY: PRINCIPLE Section 1 of Text) Dam and Reservoir Barkley Celina Cheatham Cordell Hull Old Hickory Percent of project completion s - 8 8 8 Year opened to navigation 1964 - 1952 1973 1954 Cost 9 $146,500,000 $213,000,000 $31,700,000 $79,874,500 $52,266,400 1. Clear width and length available for full width. 2. Exclusive of lock section. 3. Surcharge. 4. Normal operation (elev. 375-359) during nonflood season; flood control allowance to be increased to 1,472,000 acrefeet (elev. 375-354) during season of major floodflows. 5. Surcharge storage. 6. During flood season (elev. 508-501); minimum 51,800 acre-feet (elev. 508-504) with normal operation during nonflood season. 7. Daily pondage allowance; run-of-river project. 8. Completed for full beneficial use. 9. Includes recreation facility costs. 15-16 FEATURES TABLE 15-I TENNESSEE RIVER (See Section 2 of Text) Project 1 Kentucky Pickwick Landing: Auxiliary lock Main lock Wilson: Auxiliary lock Main lock General Joe Wheeler: Auxiliary lock Main lock Guntersville: Auxiliary lock Main lock Nickajack: Auxiliary lock Main lock Chickamauga Watts Bar Fort Loudon Melton Hill (Clinch R.) .t I-s C71 1' Lock Dimensions Length Minimum Depth Width Avail- Lift on Guard Sills of able for Cham- Full Nor- Maxiher Width mal mum Lower Upper (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) o 110 600 56 73.3 12.7 11.0 Miles Above Miles from Mouth Nearest Town 22.4 0.5 above Gilbertsville, KY 206.7 4.4 above Hamburg, TN 206.7 4.4 above Hamburg TN 259.4 2.9 above Florence, AL 259.4 2.9 above Florence, AL 274.9 18.4 above Florence AL 274.9 18.4 above Florence, AL 349.0 9.1 below Guntersville, AL 349.0 9.1 below Guntersville, AL 424.7 39.4 below Chattanooga, TN 424.7 39.4 below Chattanooga, TN 471.0 6.9 above Chattanooga, TN 529.9 6.8 above Breedenton, TN 602.3 1.3 above Lenoir City, TN 23.1 22.1 above Kingston, TN 110 110 60 60 60 75 600 800 360 360 360 400 39 41.0 39 41.0 49 53.0 58 70.0 72 80.0 54 60.0 O Character f Foundation Limestone 12.8 10.0 Limestone 12.8 10.0 Limestone 11.0 4 11.2 Limestone 13.0 13.0 Limestone 13.2 14.7 Limestone 13.0 13.0 Limestone 11.8 13.0 Limestone 12.7 18.0 Limestone 13.0 13.0 Limestone 13.0 13.0 Limestone 13.0 10.0 Limestone 11.8 12.0 Shale 11.8 12.0 Limestone 13.0 13.0 Limestone Year )pened Navi- Kind Type of gation of Dam Construction 1942 Fixed Concrete and earthfill 1937 Fixed Concrete and earthfil 1984 Fixed Concrete and earthfll 1927 Fixed Concrete and earthfill 1959 - - 110 600 55 63.0 110 1000 55 63.0 60 292 94 100.0 300 110 600 94 100.0 60 400 48 51.5 110 600 48 51.5 60 360 39 45.0 110 600 39 45.0 Concrete and earthfill Concrete and earthfill Concrete and earthfill Concrete Concrete Concrete and earthfill Concrete and earthfill Concrete Cost of Each Lock and Dam a 3 $46,973,540 s 7 1,796,2956 m 3&7 7 y 7 n 3 &7 3 1. H. Doc. 328, 71st Cong., 2d sess., contains table, pp. 98 and 99, giving pertinent information concerning low dams contemplated under 1930 project. Annual Report for 1938, pp. 1218 and 1219, contains similar information pertaining to low dams in addition to existing locks and dams, including those constructed or under construction by Tennessee Valley Authority. 2. Lock and dam constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. 3. Lock and dam constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. Design for lock prepared with Corps forces and funds. 4. Tailwater in canal; flight of 2 locks. 5. Constructed by the Corps under authority of sec. 124, National Defense Act of June 3, 1916 (H. Doc. 1262, 64th Cong., 1st sess.). Actual cost of lock and dam. 6. Actual cost of lock only as constructed by the Corps; dams constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. 7. Constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. 1934 Fixed 1963 Fixed 1937 Fixed 1965 Fixed 1967 Fixed Fixed 1939 Fixed 1941 Fixed 1943 Fixed 1963 Fixed REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1989 TABLE 15-J TENNESSEE RIVER, TN, AL, AND KY TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS TO (See Section 2 of Text) SEP 30, 1988 Channel Operation & Funds New Work Maintenance Maintenance Total Regular $2,244,236 $8,963,124 $152,955,948 $164,163,308 1.2 Maintenance - - 11,665 11,665 Increase of compensation, - 5 - 5 rivers and harbors, 1919 (certified claims) Total $2,244,236 $8,963,129 $152,967,613 $164,174,9781,2s 1. In addition, surplus property value at $54,336 was tion and care of works of improvement under provisions of transferred from the project without reimbursement. Excludes appropriation for such purposes. $4,005,175 expended between 1890 and June 30, 1935, on opera- 2. Excludes $14,007,192 previous construction cost. TABLE 15-K OHIO RIVER BASIN (NASHVILLE DISTRICT) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Estimated Cost Type of Location Protection Federal Non-Federal Total Cumberland, KY Channel 520,000 240,000 760,0001 Improvement 1. Deferred. TABLE 15-L RESERVOIRS Total Federal Tributary Basin and Reservoir Stream Cost Center Hill Lake, TN Caney Fork River $58,412,022 1 Dale Hollow Lake, TN and KY Obey River 28,167,7461 J. Percy Priest Dam & Reservoir, TN Stones River 56,868,039 1,2 Laurel River Lake, KY Laurel River 56,741,232 a Martins Fork Lake, KY Martins Fork 20,479,911 1. Details of this project are in individual report. 2. Formerly Stewarts Ferry Reservoir. 3. See "Other authorized multiple-purpose projects." 15-18 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 15-M INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 10 of Text) Project Date of Inspection Barbourville, KY Corbin, KY Lake City, TN Middlesboro, KY (Yellow Creek) Middlesboro, KY (Diversion Canal) Paint Rock River, AL Pineville, KY Spring City, TN Sunbright, TN (Whiteoak Creek) May 1989 May 1989 May 1989 and Sep 1989 May 1989 and Sep 1989 May 1989 and Sep 1989 Oct. 1989 May 1989 and Sep 1989 May 1989 and Oct. 1989 May 1989 and Sep 1989 TABLE 15.N FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205 P.L. 858, 80th Congress, as amended Project FY 89 Cost Browns Creek, Nashville, TN Dry Creek, Goodlettsville, TN Lytle Creek, Murfreesboro, TN Little Limestone Creek, TN Whites & Ewing Creeks, TN Gibson Creek, TN Trace Creek, Waverly Park, TN Doe & Watanga River, Elizabethtown, TN Little Harpeth River, Brentwood, TN Beaver Dam Creek, Damascus, VA Brush Creek, Johnson City, TN Clinch River, Tazwell Co., VA Hickory Creek, Warren Co., TN $ 50,488 247,274 58,903 21,152 16,690 16,720 44,704 57,579 5,734 2,651 40,801 5,101 27,198 Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, P.L. 526, 79th Congress) Project FY 89 Cost Lake Guntersville, AL $286,027 Sheffield Water Intake, AL 24,167 Duck River, Hickman Co., TN 183,340 Pond Creek, Cheatham Co., TN 4,276 15-19 -- LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT * This district comprises a portion of southwestern Ohio, west central Kentucky, a small portion of north central Tennessee, Indiana except northern part, and southeastern Illinois except Cairo-Mounds-Mound City area, all included in drainage basin of Ohio River and its tributaries (exclusive of Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers) from mile 438 (below Pittsburgh) immediately upstream from Foster, KY. to mouth. All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation - Locks and Dams Page 1. Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio River.............................16-2 2. Green and Barren Rivers, KY............. 16-2 3. Kentucky River, KY..................... 16-2 4. Open Channel Work, Ohio River........... 16-3 5. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............................... 16-3 6. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ......................... . 16-3 Flood Control - Local Protection 7. 8. 9. Evansville, IN .......................... 16-3 Mill Creek, OH.........................16-3 Southwestern Jefferson County, KY............................16-4 Flood Control - Reservoirs 10. Barren River Lake, KY...................16-4 11. Brookville Lake, IN......................16-5 12. Buckhorn Lake, KY.....................16-5 13. Caesar Creek Lake, OH................... 16-5 14. Cagles Mill Lake, IN.....................16-6 15. Carr Fork Lake, KY....................16-6 16. Cave Run Lake, KY...................... 16-6 17. Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN.................16-6 18. Clarence J. Brown Dam & Reservoir, OH......................... 16-7 19. Green River Lake, KY.................... 16-7 20. Huntington Lake, IN.....................16-7 21. Mississinewa Lake, IN....................16-8 22. Monroe Lake, IN........................16-8 23. Nolin Lake, KY........................16-9 24. Ohio River Basin (Louisville Dist.)......................... 16-9 25. Patoka Lake, IN........................16-9 26. Rough River Lake and Channel Improvement, KY.......................16-9 27. Salamonie Lake, IN.................... 16-10 28. Taylorsville Lake, KY...................16-10 Page 29. Wabash River Basin....................16-11 30. West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH........16-11 31. William H. Harsha Lake, OH.............16-11 32. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects........................ 16-12 33. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............................... 16-12 34. Flood Control Works Under Special Authorization....................16-12 General Investigations 35. 36. 37. Surveys..............................16-12 Collection and Study of Basic Data........ 16-12 Preconstruction Engineering and Design ............................... 16-12 Tables Table 16-A Cost and Financial Statement......................16-13 Table 16-B Authorizing Legislation..........16-17 Table 16-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects........................16-18 Table 16-D Not Applicable Table 16-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects................. 16-19 Table 16-F Not Applicable Table 16-G Deauthorized Projects............ 16-21 Table 16-H Principal Features of Green and Barren Rivers and Kentucky River Navigation Systems........16-23 Table 16-I Ohio River Basin - Total Cost of Basin Plan............... 16-24 Table 16-J Wabash River Basin - Total Cost of Basin Plan..............16-28 Table 16-K Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects...........16-29 Table 16-L Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization............16-31 16-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER For report on this improvement, see the heading under Ohio River. 2. GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY. Location. Green River rises in Casey County, KY, flows northwesterly 370 miles, and empties into Ohio River about 8 miles above Evansville, IN. Barren River rises in Monroe County, KY, flows northwesterly 130 miles, and empties into Green River 1/2 mile above Lock 4 and 149.5 miles above mouth of Green River. Existing project. Six locks and dams on Green River and one on Barren River to give, with channel work in pools of dams, a navigable depth of 9 feet and width of 200 feet from Ohio River to mile 103 Green River, 3.2 miles upstream from Paradise, KY; a navigable depth of 5.5 feet from mile 103 Green River to Mammoth Cave, KY, mile 197.8 Green River, and from mouth of Barren River mile 149.5 Green River, to Bowling Green, KY, mile 30.1, Barren River. Fluctuations in stage vary considerably at different locks. At Lock 3, Green River, ordinary high stages are from 12 to 15 feet above pool level, and at Lock 1, Barren River, from 7 to 10 feet above pool. Maximum stages of record are 34 feet above normal pool stage at Lock 3, Green River, and 29 feet at Lock 1, Barren River, obtained during floods of 1937 and 1913, respectively. (See Table 16-B for authorizing legislation and Table 16-H for principal features of the locks and dams.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Coal handling facilities located on the Green River between miles 81.5 and 108.1 near South Carrollton, Rockport, Paradise and gochester, Kentucky, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Consisted of operation and maintenance of Locks and Dams 1 and 2, Green River, and removal of shoals, snags, and slides as required to maintain adequate channel for existing traffic between mouth of Green River and Dam 3 at mile 108.5 Green River. Maintenance: Contracts were awarded for cell removal on Green River and construction of access road and repair of concrete esplanade pavement at Lock and Dam 6. Routine maintenance was performed. Locks and Dams 1 and 2, Green River, are in good condition. Lock and Dam 3, Green River, and Lock and Dam 1, Barren River are in fair condition, and Lock 4, Green River, is in poor condition. Dam 4, Green River, failed May 24, 1965, when 120 feet washed out. Breach later widened, and repairs were deferred pending completion of survey report for navigation on Green River. Pool of Dam 1, Barren River, is maintained for local small boat use, but navigation through lock is suspended because of loss of lower pool. Operation activity was discontinued at Lock 4 Green River and Lock and Dam 1 Barren River in January 1974 and at Lock 3, Green River in September 1981. The residences and associated buildings and certain real estate at Lock 4 Green River and Lock and Dam 1 Barren River were disposed of in January 1975. Operation of Locks 5 and 6, Green River, was discontinued August 1951, as they were no longer used by river traffic. Controlling project depth in lower 103 miles of Green River is 9 feet; controlling depth from mile 103 to Bowling Green, KY, is 5.5 feet. Under permit issued by District Engineer on August 20, 1963, private interests dredged channel of Green River to extend 9-foot depth to coal loading teminal at mile 105.7. Channel of Green River above Lock 3 is no longer maintained. 3. KENTUCKY RIVER, KY Location. Formed by confluence of its North and Middle Forks about 4 miles east of Beattyville in east central Kentucky, (South Fork joins the main stream at that location), flows northwesterly and empties into Ohio River at Carrollton, KY, mile 545.8 below Pittsburgh, PA. Existing project. Provides for 14 locks and fixed dams to give, in connection with improvement of Ohio River, slack water navigation of 6 feet minimum depth from Ohio River to places on the three forks that are short distances above Beattyville, KY. Length of 6-foot-depth project on main stem of Kentucky River is 258.6 miles to confluence of Middle and North Forks. Cost of completed new work is $4,176,749. River frequently rises to 35 feet or higher. Extreme height at Lock 1 due to flood backwater from Ohio River is 60.3 feet, while extreme floods reach height of 47.6 feet at Lock 4, and 35.5 feet at Lock 14. At some intermediate locks extreme height of floods exceeds 40 feet. All flood heights refer to upper pool gages. Existing project was adopted by 1879 River and Harbor Act (H. Ex. Doc. 47, 45th Cong., 3d Sess., and Annual Report, 1879, p. 1398). Operation and care of locks and dams were included in project July 1, 1935, under provision of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. (See Table 16-H for principal features of the locks and dams.) On December 19, 1976 the lock operation schedules for commercial traffic and recreational craft on the Kentucky River System were reduced from continuous 24-hour yearround operation to two shift year-round operation of Locks 1 through 4, intermittent daily operation of Locks 5 through 10, and intermittent operation five days weekly of Locks 11 through 14. Since that time the hours for operation of Locks 5 through 14 have been reduced in several increments. On 1 October 1981 Locks 5 through 14 were closed to traffic and placed in caretaker status. Locks 5, 6, 8, 9, and 10 were in operation for 15 weekends during fiscal year 1982 and was again closed at the end of this period. Locks 5 through 14 were leased to the State of Kentucky on 21 May 1985. The State of Kentucky operated these locks on weekends during the summer boating seasons through the Fiscal Year. The lease is due to expire on 15 October 1989 and Locks 5 through 14 will be closed to traffic and placed in caretaker status. During the fiscal year Locks 1 through 4 continued a two shift, 16-2 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT year-round operation. Licenses. Federal Regulatory Commission License No. 539, to Kentucky Utilities Co., at Dam 7, Kentucky River, Annual charge, $4,400; total collections through September 30, 1989, $284,405. Terminal facilities. Facilities for bulk commodities and gasoline are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Consisted of operation and maintenance of Locks and Dams 1 through 4 and removal of shoals, snags, and slides as required to maintain an adequate channel for existing traffic between mouth of river and Dam 5 at mile 82.2 Kentucky River. Maintenance: Contract was awarded for upper lock guide wall replacement and routine maintenance was performed. Existing project was completed in 1917. Work accomplished was rehabilitation of the five old State locks and dams and construction of new Locks and Dams 6 to 14 inclusive. Repairs have been made to deteriorated locks and dams as required to keep locks in operation and maintain pool levels above dams except in extreme dry weather, when some pools fall below normal levels, details in Annual Reports for 1963, 1964 and 1965. Channel work was performed as required to provide for existing river traffic. Controlling navigable depth in length of river covered by existing project was 6 feet at end of fiscal year. 4. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER For report on this improvement, see this heading under Ohio River. 5. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 16-C. 6. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION None. Flood Control - Local Protection 7. EVANSVILLE, IN Location. In Vanderburgh County, IN, on right bank of Ohio River, 792.2 miles below Pittsburgh, PA. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Evansville-South, IN.) Existing project. Construction of a system of levees and concrete floodwalls, together with pumping plants for disposal of interior drainage, at Evansville. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1127. Project will provide protection for City of Evansville, IN, against Ohio River floods equal to 1937 flood (maximum of record), with a 3-foot freeboard. Estimated total cost of new work (1989) is $51,100,000 Federal, and $5,500,000 non- Federal. Existing project selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1937 Flood Control Act. Howell Section, Unit 2, was reclassified from the "active" category to the "inactive" category July 7, 1977 based on current studies that indicated this part of the project is not economically justified. Local cooperation. Section 3 of Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, as amended, applies. Fully complied with for Howell Unit 1 and Knight Township sections. Assurances for Pigeon Creek Section, Unit 1, were executed February 11, 1963. Authorizations-of-entry for Pigeon Creek Section, Unit 2, Parts 1 and 2 have been furnished. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and design studies continued. Plans and specifications for US Highway 41W Pump Plant were completed and construction contract was awarded in September 1989. Contracts for Diamond Avenue, North 1st Avenue, and Stringtown Road pumping plants and associated levee, floodwall, and power service were awarded in December 1988 and January 1989, respectively. Pumping Plants and Levee advanced to 14 percent completion. Levee Unit 2, Part 3 construction contract was awarded in November 1988 and is 88 percent completed. Knight Township, Howell, Unit 1 and Pigeon Creek, Unit 1 Sections are complete. Howell Section, Unit 2, is in the "inactive" category. Construction of Pigeon Creek Section, Unit 2, was started in April 1974 and is about 89 percent complete. Project is about 66 percent complete overall. 8. MILL CREEK, OH Location. Project is located along the 18-mile length of Mill Creek and three-fourths mile length of East Fork in Hamilton County, OH. Lower Mill Creek is in the commercial and industrial heart of the Cincinnati metropolitan area in the southwestern portion of the State. Existing project. Eighteen miles of channel improvement, 2 miles of levees, two pumping plants, modification of 29 bridges, and the addition of two pumping units at the present Mill Creek Barrier Dam, located near the Ohio River, are included in the project. Acquisition and development with appropriate landscaping of 620 acres along the creek will be provided for high-density urban oriented recreational use. Estimated cost of new work (1989) is $202,087,000, of which $42,087,000 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 as amended, applies. In addition, local interests must provide without cost to the United States all modifications and relocations of buildings, utilities, street and foot bridges, sewers, and related and special facilities as necessary for construction of project; prevent encroachment on improved channels and on ponding areas which would impair capacities; at least annually inform interests affected as to degree of protection afforded by project, and provide guidance and leadership in preventing unwise and uneconomical development of flood plain areas by encouraging prudent use of floodproofing, land regulation planning, or other flood plain management 16-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 techniques to reduce flood losses. Further, with respect to the recreational aspects of the project, local interests are required to furnish assurances that they will, if necessary, pay or contribute in kind, a portion of the cost of recreational facilities which, when added to the cost of recreation land, would amount to at least 50 percent of the total first cost of the recreation land and recreational facilities, and assure access to the recreation facilities to all on equal terms. An assurance agreement covering local cooperation requirements for the project consistent with Section 221 of the 1970 Flood Control Act and the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 was executed by the Millcreek Valley Conservancy District February 6, 1975, and for the Secretary of the Army March 28, 1975. A recreation cost sharing contract was executed by the Conservancy District February 25, 1975, and approved by the Secretary of the Army May 28, 1975. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering studies continued. Construction Contracts for: Section 8 (Barrier Dam) advanced to 44 percent completion; Levee Section 2- Slide Repair advanced to 83 percent completion; Channel Section 4A advanced to 99 percent completion; and Channel Sections 2 & 3 Fencing advanced to completion. Construction contract for Channel Section 1 was awarded in August 1989. Flood damages estimated at $1,110,000 were prevented during the 1989 flood season. Design Memoranda, Hydrology & Hydraulics, Concrete Aggregate and Stone Protection Sources, and Railroad Relocations, General Design Memoranda, Phase I and Phase II, Design of Channel - Sections 5 and 7 are complete. Construction of channel and levee - Sections 2, 3 and 7A, Phase I, are complete. Project is about 44 percent complete overall. 9. SOUTHWESTERN JEFFERSON COUNTY, KY Location. In Jefferson County, KY, on left bank of Ohio River from mile 616 to 628.6. Existing project. Construction of 68,500 feet of levee, 1,550 feet of concrete wall, four pumping plants, and other necessary appurtenances. Project provides protection for 24,100 acres against Ohio River floods equal to 1937 flood of record with 3-foot freeboard. Estimated cost of new work (1989) is $66,585,000, of which $56,668,000 is Federal, and $9,917,000 is non-Federal. Project was authorized under Flood Control Act of August 1968. Recreation as a project purpose has been deferred until such time as a water quality problem on Pond Creek is corrected. Local cooperation. Section 3 Flood Control Act of 1936 as amended applies. In addition, local interests must agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and to pay, contribute in kind or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of lands and facilities for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. Jefferson County Fiscal Court expressed intent to fulfill requirement by resolution dated April 4, 1967. Formal assurances of local cooperation for the flood protection portion of the project was executed by resolution of Jefferson County Fiscal Court, adopted September 17, 1971, and assurances for the recreation portion of the project were executed by similar resolution, adopted September 14, 1971. Authorization-of-entry for levee and floodwall sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 4A, 5 and Pond Creek Pump Plant have been furnished. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering studies continued. Contract for Pond Creek Pumps and Motors, awarded in May 1985, was advanced to completion. Contract for Levee Section 5 and Pond Creek Pumping Station awarded in September 1985 was advanced to completion. Contract for Remedial Work for Railroad Closure at Levee Section 5 was awarded in September 1986 and advanced to completion. Construction contract for repairs to Sections 1, 2, 3, 4 & 4A was awarded in September 1989. Engineering studies are about 99 percent complete. Construction of levee and floodwall Sections 1, 2, 3,4 and 4A; railroad closure at Section 4; electric service for gatewells; Riverport and Upper and Lower Mill Creek pumping plants; rehabilitation of pump stations; and relocation of Texas Gas pipeline are complete. Project is 98 percent complete overall. Project was transferred to local interest on 8 September 1989. Flood Control - Reservoirs 10. BARREN RIVER LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Barren River, 79.5 miles above its confluence with Green River and 10 miles northeast of Scottsville, KY. At flood control pool reservoir extends upstream about 40 miles in Barren and Allen Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Lucas, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earth and rockfill, 146 feet high and 3,970 feet long, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open-cut spillway. Total storage capacity is 815,200 acre-feet (768,000 for flood control and 46,600 for water supply storage). For further details, see page 1125 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of the completed project is $27,479,717 including $2,335,055 Federal funds and $108,418 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Under provision of Water Supply Act of 1958, contract with City of Glasgow for water supply storage was approved by Secretary of Army on October 4, 1965. Terms require City to pay $23,433, which is project cost allocated to water storage plus capitalized prepayment of proportionate share of operation, maintenance, and major replacement costs. A contract, with the Commonwealth of Kentucky for development of additional campsites, shoreline protection and breakwater extension at Barren 16-4 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT River Lake State Park under the cost-sharing category of the completed projects program was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 4, 1977. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contracts for control tower maintenance and bulkhead modification and roof replacement were completed. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1989 flood season prevented damages of $7,883,000. Construction started in March 1960 and all major construction and relocation items were completed in October 1964. Project was placed in operation in March 1964. Land acquisition is complete. 11. BROOKVILLE LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Whitewater River, 2.4 miles above confluence with West Fork, and about 1-1/2 miles north of Brookville, Indiana. The reservoir lies in Franklin and Union Counties, Indiana. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Brookville, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earthfill, 182 feet high and 3,004 feet long, with gate-controlled outlet works, and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 359,600 acre-feet (214,700 for flood control, 89,300 for water supply, and 35,500 for conservation). A minimum pool of 20,100 acre-feet is maihtained. Estimated cost of new work (1989) is $45,416,380 of which $37,918,888 is Federal cost and $7,497,492 is non-Federal contribution for water supply storage. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Contract with State of Indiana for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958 was approved by Secretary of Army, August 5, 1965. Under terms of contract, State paid initial costs allocated to water supply feature of project plus capitalized prepayment of proportionate share of operation and maintenance costs. Operation during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Installation of hydropower unit is complete but is not in operation pending finalization of contract with Southeastern Power Administration for purchase of surplus power. Operation for flood control during 1989 flood season prevented damages of $376,000. Routine maintenance was performed. Construction was started in November 1965 and project was placed in operation January 1974. Construction and land acquisition are complete. 12. BUCKHORN LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Middle Fork of Kentucky River, 43.4 miles above mouth, and 0.5 mile upstream from Buckhorn, Perry County, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 34 miles and lies in Leslie and Perry Counties, Kentucky. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Buckhorn, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam is earth and rockfill type, with gate controlled outlet works. Total storage capacity is 168,000 acre-feet, of which 157,600 is for flood control. For further details, see page 1120 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $11,766,206 including $386,707 for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Department of Parks of the Commonwealth of Kentucky has undertaken management of lands and recreational facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on June 29, 1962. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during 1989 flood season prevented damages of $1,463,000. Construction started in September 1956 and project was placed in operation in August 1960. All construction and land acquisition is complete. 13. CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Damsite is on Caesar Creek, about 3.0 miles above its confluence with Little Miami River, in Warren County, OH, about 3.5 miles southeast of Waynesville, OH, and 10.5 miles northeast of Lebanon, OH. Reservoir lies in Warren, Clinton, and Green Counties, OH. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Oregonia, OH.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earth and rockfill dam, four saddle dams, outlet works and an uncontrolled saddle spillway. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 242,200 acre-feet, of which 148,500 acrefeet is reserved for flood control storage. Estimated cost of new work (1989) is $62,893,882 and $5,037,000 non- Federal reimbursement for water supply storage. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1983 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. However, the State of Ohio requested inclusion in the project of storage for future municipal and industrial water supply uses. Contract with State of Ohio for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, was approved by Secretary of the Army, May 20, 1970. Under terms of contract, State will reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated plus estimated annual amount for cost of operation, maintenance and major capital replacements required for the water supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages estimated at $2,462,000 were prevented during the 1989 flood season. Construction was started in January 1968 and the project was placed in operation January 1978. Land acquisition is complete. All relocation and construction features are complete. Project is about 99 percent complete overall. 16-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 14. CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Mill Creek, 2.8 miles above its confluence with Eel River, in Putnam County, IN, and about 25 miles east of Terre Haute, IN. Reservoir extends upstream about 11 miles and is in Putnam and Owen Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Poland, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam is earth and rockfill embankment. Total storage capacity is 228,100 acre-feet, of which 201,000 acre-feet are for flood control. For details see Annual Report for 1962, page 1136. Cost of completed new work is $4,376,278 including $155,416 Federal funds, $113,094 contributed funds and $106,813 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation, None required. State of Indiana has undertaken development and management of recreation facilities for use of the public in reservoir area in accordance with license granted by Secretary cf the Army on January 17, 1952. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources for expanding the boat ramp and parking area at Site 3, Lieber State Park, under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program was signed by the State of Indiana on August 26, 1981 and approved by the Deputy Chief of Engineers on March 26, 1982. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1989 flood season prevented damages of $3,944,000. Construction started in July 1948 and completed in June 1953. 15. CARR FORK LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is 8.8 miles above mouth of Carr Fork, a tributary of North Fork of Kentucky River, 16 miles upstream from Hazard, KY. The reservoir lies entirely within Knott County. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Carrie and Vicco, KY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rock and earth fill with impervious core, 720 feet long and 130 feet high, with uncontrolled open cut spillway through left abutment. Outlet works has two control gates and 8-foot diameter conduit to stilling basin. Total storage capacity is 47,700 acre-feet (31,600 for flood control and 4,300 for water quality control). A higher level seasonal pool for recreation is provided. Estimated Federal cost of new work (1989) is $50,854,826 including $76,724 for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for reservoir project. Division of Flood Control and Water Usage of Commonwealth of Kentucky gave assurance that encroachments on downstream channel capacity will be prevented. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Real estate administrative action required for condemnation of remaining tracts was continued. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1989 flood season prevented damages of $3,450,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was placed in operation January 1976. Construction started in January 1966 is complete. All land required for the project has been acquired; however, several acquisition actions remain unsettled. 16. CAVE RUN LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is on Licking River, about 4 miles upstream from U. S. Highway 60 near Farmers, KY, and 7 miles southwest of Morehead, KY. Reservoir will be in Rowan, Bath, Morgan, and Menifee Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Salt Lick and Morehead, KY.) Existing project. Plan provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earthfill, with gate controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 614,700 acre-feet (438,500 for flood control and 28,300 for water quality control). Estimated Federal cost of new work (1989) is $114,826,300 of which $35,213,000 is U. S. Forest Service cost. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of June 22, 1936 and June 28, 1938. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Real estate administrative action required for acquisition of remaining tracts was completed. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1989 flood season prevented damages of $12,992,000. Project has been in operation since February 1974. Construction was started in June 1965 and is about 95 percent complete overall. Land acquisition is complete. All relocation and construction features are complete except recreation facilities. 17. CECIL M. HARDEN LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Raccoon Creek, 32.4 miles above its confluence with Wabash River, and 25 miles northeast of Terre Haute, IN. At flood control pool, reservoir extends upstream about 15 miles in Parke and Putnam Counties, Indiana. (See U. S. Geological Survey Map of Mansfield, IN.) Existing project. A rolled earth dam and reservoir, for flood control and allied purposes. Total storage capacity is 132,800 acre-feet of which 116,600 acre-feet are for flood control. For details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1132. Cost of completed new work is $6,987,807 made up of $6,260,134 for the initial project and $373,678 Federal cost and $353,995 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River 16-6 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from Mansfield Lake to Cecil M. Harden Lake by Public Law 93-521, December 14, 1974. Local cooperation. State of Indiana has undertaken management of lands and recreational facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on April 19, 1961. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages of $5,651,000 were prevented during the 1989 flood season. Construction started in October 1956 and all major items of work were completed December 1961. Land acquisition is complete. Project has been in operation since August 1960. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are completed. 18. CLARENCE J. BROWN DAM & RESERVOIR, OH Location. Damsite is just east of Springfield, Clark County, OH, at mile 7.3 of Buck Creek, a tributary of Mad River. (See U. S. Geological Survey maps of New Moorefield and Springfield, OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam, 6,620 feet long and 72 feet high, with gated outlet works and open cut spillway with concrete chute through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 63,700 acre-feet (32,900 for flood control and 20,800 for water quality control). Federal cost of completed project is $22,083,660. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from Buck Creek Dam and Reservoir to Clarence J. Brown Dam and Reservoir by Public Law 90-46, July 4, 1967. Local cooperation. Assurances from City of Springfield, Springfield Conservancy District, and Clark County, Ohio, covering protection against detrimental channel encroachment below dam to mouth of Buck Creek, were accepted March 5, 1964. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages of $10,000 were prevented during the 1989 flood season. Construction started in September 1966. Land acquisition and all major project features were completed in November 1973. The project was placed in operation in January 1974. 19. GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is 305.7 miles above mouth of Green River in Taylor County, KY, about 8 miles south of Campbellsville. Reservoir lies in Taylor and Adair Counties. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Cane Valley, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth and rock-fill, 141 feet high and 2,350 feet long. Outlet works is slide gate-controlled and spillway open and uncontrolled. Total storage capacity is 723,200 acre-feet (560,600 for flood control and 64,500 for low-flow augmentation). Cost of completed new work is $33,462,330, including $317,145 Federal funds and $183,732 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Taylor County, by lease approved by Secretary of Army February 15, 1968, undertook operation and maintenance of Smith Ridge public access area. In May 1980, the lease was amended to turn back responsibility for maintenance, and operation of 99 percent of the site to the Corps, with the County retaining responsibility for the marina area. Under provision of Water Supply Act of 1958, contract with City of Campbellsville for water supply storage was approved by Secretary of Army April 23, 1969. Terms require city to repay, with interest and annual charges for operation, maintenance and major replacement, the investment cost of $85,765 allocated to its water supply storage space. Total payments received through fiscal year 1984 was $21,504. The Department of Parks of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, by lease approved by Secretary of Army, October 4, 1971, has undertaken the management of the Lone Valley public access area. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages estimated at $5,052,000 during the 1989 flood season. Construction began in August 1965 and all major construction and relocation items were completed in 1972. Project has been in operation since February 1969. Project including all land acquisition complete in 1973. Construction of sanitary dump station for boats at Dam Site in conformance with EPA and State standards and rehabilitation of sewage treatment facilities, washhouses and restrooms at Smith Ridge site is complete. 20. HUNTINGTON LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is on Wabash River, about 2 miles from Huntington, IN, and 411.4 miles above mouth. Reservoir is in Huntington and Wells Counties, IN. (See U. S. Geological Survey maps of Majenica and Mt. Etna, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam consiste of a rolled earth embankment 4,700 feet long and 89 feet high, a concrete spillway and outlet section 155 feet long, and a concrete gravity section 310 feet long. Spillway is controlled by three gates, 16-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 and outlet works by six sluices. Project also provides local flood protection for Markle, IN. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 153,100 acre-feet, of which 149,000 acre-feet is reserved for flood control storage. Estimated cost for new work (1989) is $19,622,509 made up of $19,273,252 Federal cost for the initial project and $193,903 non- Federal contributed funds for low flow augmentation storage, and $155,354 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to one percent of project first cost. State of Indiana has met this obligation. Contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army May 17, 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreational facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost shared category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Repairs to the Operating Tower were completed. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages estimated at $1,484,000 during the 1989 flood control season. Land acquisition and all major construction complete. Project was placed in operation January 9, 1969. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 21. MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is 7.1 miles above mouth of Mississinewa River, which flows into Wabash River about 2 miles upstream from Peru, IN. At flood control pool level, reservoir extends upstream about 28 miles, in Wabash, Grant, and Miami Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Peoria, IN.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam 137 feet high and 8,100 feet long, gatecontrolled outlet works, and an uncontrolled open spillway through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 368,400 acre-feet, of which 345,100 acrefeet are reserved for flood control storage. Cost for completed new work is $24,381,129 made up of $23,793,145 Federal cost for the initial project, $239,200 non-Federal contributed funds for low flow augmentation storage, $174,392 Federal cost and $174,392 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to 1 percent of project first cost. State of Indiana assumed this obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages of $4,739,000 during 1989 flood season. Construction and land acquisition is complete. Project was placed in operation in May 1968. Cost shared recreation facilities cconstructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 22. MONROE LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Salt Creek, a tributary of White River, 25.9 miles above mouth, and 2 miles each of Harrodsburg, Monroe County, IN. At flood control pool level, reservoir will extend upstream 44 miles in Monroe, Brown, and Jackson Counties. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Clear Creek, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth core and rock shell, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 441,000 acre-feet (258,800 for flood control and 159,900 for low flow augmentation.) Cost of completed new work is $16,569,589 made up of $7,033,669 Federal cost for the initial project and $7,797,604 non-Federal contributed funds for low-flow regulation storage and $869,158 Federal cost and $869,158 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act, modifying comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Local cooperation. Section 3, 1944 Flood Control Act applies. Local interests must contribute 54.1 percent of project cost, this being the proportion allocated to low-flow regulation feature, plus a capitalized amount representing that part of average annual maintenance and operation cost allocated to low-flow regulation. State of Indiana assumed this cost sharing obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages of $1,634,000 during 1989 flood season. Project is complete and was placed in operation in February 1965. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 23. NOLIN LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Nolin River 7.8 miles above its 16-8 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT confluence with Green River, about 70 air miles southwest of Louisville, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 57 miles and is in Edmonson, Grayson, Hart, and Hardin Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Nolin Reservoir and Dickeys Mill, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rockfill-earth core type with gatecontrolled outlet works, and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 609,400 acre-feet, of which 545,600 acre-feet.is for flood control. For further details of project see Annual Report for 1962, page 1124. Estimated Federal cost of new work (1989) is $17,193,381 including $2,594,377 for construction of recreation facilities. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for authorized project. State of Kentucky contributed $18,195 for increased width of dam for public road. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Contracts for control tower maintenance, bulkhead modification, and ramp improvements were completed, and Stilling Basin repairs continued. Rountine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1989 flood season prevented damages estimated at $4,794,000. Construction started in January 1959. Project was completed and placed in operation in March 1963. 24. OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville District) Location. Works covered by this project are a series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs in Ohio River Basin within Louisville District. Existing project. Individual projects considered in comprehensive plan within the Louisville District. (See Table 16-B for authorizing leglsiation, and Table 16-I for cost and listing of projects in the basin plan.) Operations during fiscal year. No costs were incurred except for these projects for which individual reports are given. 25. PATOKA LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is in Dubois County, IN, 118.3 miles above mouth of Patoka River, and 50 miles westnorthwest of New Albany, IN. Reservoir extends into Dubois, Orange and Crawford Counties. (See Geological Survey map of Cuzco, IN.) Existing project. Reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth and rock fill, 1,550 feet long and 85 feet high, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 301,600 acre-feet (121,000 for flood control and 167,500 for water supply and water quality control). Estimated cost of new work (1989) is $73,664,159 of which $53,095,790 is Federal cost for other construction, and $20,568,369 is non-Federal contribution for water supply storage and recreation facilities. Project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act, and emergency measures and snagging and clearing the Patoka River downstream of Patoka Lake to insure effective operation of the project for flood control was directed by 1981 Appropriation Act for Energy and Water Development. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated, presently estimated at 29.316 percent of the joint-use facilities cost, exclusive of interests, plus $287,000 for the cost of operating and maintaining water supply storage for a period of 50 years, plus $42,000 for the cost of major capital replacements required for water supply storage space for a period of 50 years. Local interests are also required to pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to recreation. Present laws of the State of Indiana require that agency to make cash contributions during construction of the project. Local interests must also agree to prevent encroachments on channel of Patoka River from dam to mouth, and to pay allocated initial and annual maintenance and operation costs for water supply storage. Formal assurances of local cooperation, executed by the Indiana Natural Resources Commission, were accepted August 27, 1970. Contracts with State of Indiana for water supply and recreation were approved by the Secretary of the Army November 2, 1970. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1989 flood season prevented damage estimated at $1,894,000. Construction was started in July 1972. Engineering studies are complete. Land acquisition is about 99 percent complete. All major features are complete. Permanent impoundment was started in February 1978 and the project was placed in operation about August 1980. The project is about 99 percent complete overall. 26. ROUGH RIVER LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, KY Location. Dam is on Rough River, 89.3 miles above its confluence with Green River 160.3 miles above Ohio River, and about 60 miles southwest of Louisville, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 30 miles and is in Breckinridge, Hardin, and Grayson Counties, KY. Channel improvement work is on Rough River, Barnett Creek, and West Fork of Barnett Creek. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of McDaniels and Falls of Rough, KY.) Existing project. Reservoir is for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earthfill type, with gatecontrolled outlet works. Storage capacity is 334,380 acrefeet, of which 314,210 acre-feet is for flood control. Project also includes channel clearing of lower Rough River, and channel improvement on Barnett Creek, a tributary of Rough River. For further details see page 1126 of Annual 16-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $10,643,001 including $890,008 Federal funds and $22,612 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Modification of previousli approved plan to include channel improvement items was authorized by the 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for construction of reservoir unit. Provisions of Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936, are applicable to channel improvements. Assurances were obtained from Ohio County for channel improvement. Department of Parks, Commonwealth of Kentucky, has undertaken management of certain lands and recreation facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on August 18, 1961. A contract with the Commonwealth of Kentucky to improve and pave road at the Below Dam Area - State Park under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 4, 1977. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1989 flood season prevented damages estimated at $6,565,000. Construction started in November 1955 and reservoir was placed in operation in June 1959. Land acquisition and all major items of construction and relocation are complete. 27. SALAMONIE LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is 3.1 miles above mouth of Salamonie River which enters Wabash River about 6 miles upstream from Wabash, IN. Reservoir extends upstream about 27 miles at flood control pool and lies in Wabash and Huntington Counties, IN. (See U. S. Geological Survey maps of Lagro and Majenica, IN.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 133 feet and and length of 6,100 feet, gate-controlled outlet works with a 16-foot diameter conduit and an uncontrolled open spillway through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 263,600 acre-feet, of which 250,500 acrefeet is for flood control storage. Estimated project cost for new work (1989) is $17,046,151 made up of $16,244,356 Federal cost for the initial project and $170,697 non- Federal contributed funds for low-flow augmentation storage and $315,549 Federal cost and $315,549 non- Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to one percent of project first cost. State of Indiana assumed this obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe, and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. During the 1989 flood season, operation for flood control prevented damages of $2,906,000. Land acquisition and all major construction and relocation contracts are complete. Reservoir was placed in operation in spring 1967. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 28. TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is in Spencer County, KY, 60.0 miles above the confluence of Salt River and Ohio River, 4 river miles above Taylorsville and 36.9 river miles above Shepherdsville, KY. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Taylorsville, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam will be an earth and rock fill structure, 164 feet high and 1,280 feet long. Outlet works will be slide gate controlled and spillway will be uncontrolled open cut. Total storage capacity will be 291,670 acre-feet (211,230 for flood control, winter months), and 52,245 for water quality and fish and wildlife. Estimated cost of new work (1989) is $122,084,000 made up of $92,977,000 Federal cost for the initial project and $17,017,000 non- Federal contributed funds for initial recreation facilities and $6,045,000 Federal cost and $6,045,000 non-Federal contributed funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest one-half of the separable first costs of the project allocated to recreation; bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation lands and facilities. Local interests must also agree to prevent encroachments on flow-carrying capacities of stream channels below the reservoir to the extent needed to provide reasonably effective reservoir operation. Commonwealth of Kentucky has indicated intent to fulfill requirements for recreation cost sharing and has assumed responsibility for channel encroachments and pollution control. The Commonwealth furnished assurance agreements covering prevention of encroachment on capacity of stream channels in April and May 1973 and executed the recreation cost sharing contract in April 1973. On April 2, 1980 the U. S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky ruled that the 1973 recreation cost sharing contract between the Commonwealth and the United States that provded for repayment after completion was invalid under the Kentucky Constitution which prohibits one General Assembly from obligating future appropriations that would be binding on a subsequent legislature. In response to the Court's ruling, the Commonwealth and the United States entered into a new 16-10 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT contract providing for cash contributions. Contract was approved by the Secretary of the Army June 11, 1980. The contract was found to be valid and enforceable by the Court July 14, 1980. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design studies and land acquisition continued. Contracts for Possum Ridge Roads, Campground Utilities, Telephone Line relocations, and Power service were completed. Contracts for Power Service advanced to 80 percent completion. Contracts were awarded for Possum Ridge Sewage Treatment Plant and Force Main Outfall and advanced to 47 percent completion. Routine maintenance was performed. During the 1989 flood season operation for flood control prevented damages of $2,502,000. Engineering and design studies are about 93 percent complete and land acquisition is about 97 percent complete. Construction was started in June 1974. All major construction items are complete except recreation facilities. The dam gates were closed in January 1983 for permanent impoundment. Dedication ceremony was May 28, 1983. The project is about 90 percent complete overall. 29. WABASH RIVER BASIN Location. Works covered by this project are located in the Wabash River Basin, a drainage area of 33,100 square miles, covering parts of Indiana, Illinois and Ohio. Existing project. One local protection project and five reservoir projects were authorized for this basin plan. (See Table 16-B for authorizing legislation and Table 16-J for project list and total cost of basin plan.) 30. WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Dam is on West Fork of Mill Creek 6.5 miles above its junction with Mill Creek and 2 miles northeast of Mount Health, OH, and 10 miles north of downtown Cincinnati. Reservoir extends upstream about 3 miles and is in Hamilton County, OH. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Glendale, OH.) Existing project. An earth embankment dam and a reservoir for flood control, recreation, and reduction of pumping requirements at Mill Creek barrier dam in Cincinnati. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 11,300 acre-feet, of which 9,850 acre-feet is for flood control. For further details see page 1119 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $4,722,463 made up of $3,092,941 Federal cost for the initial project, $520,800 non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam, $50,000 non-Federal contributed funds in fulfillment of project authorization and $529,361 Federal cost and $529,361 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project selected for construction under additional authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1946 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests were to release necessary land under their control and give assurance that future channel encroachment below damsite would be prevented. For enlargement of reservoir to include a conservation pool, local interests would contribute onehalf additional cost of such pool, including one-half cost of relocation of sanitary sewer, and agree to hold the United States free from damages resulting from its provision. Board of County Commissioners of Hamilton County, Ohio, adopted a resolution October 8, 1947, signifying willingness to fulfill requirements including provision of conservation pool. Assurances were executed on same date. A contract with the United States for relocation of sanitary sewer outside reservoir area in order to include conservation pool in project was accepted by Hamilton County, in which the United States paid onehalf cost of such relocation work. Hamilton County Commissioners furnished $50,000, required as a local contribution toward additional cost of providing conservation pool. Hamilton County Park District has undertaken development and management of recreation facilities in reservoir area for use of the public in accordance with the license granted by Secretary of the Army on October 31, 1951. Contract for cost shared recreation development under the completed works program was executed by the Board of Park Commissioners, Hamilton County Park District, Ohio, in September 1975 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1975. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during 1989 flood season prevented damages estimated at $10.000. Construction started in March 1949 and reservoir was placed in operation in December 1952. Project is complete. Cost shared recreation development under the completed projects program is complete. 31. WILLIAM H. HARSHA LAKE, OH Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Little Miami River between Batavia and Williamsburg, OH, about 6.0 miles above Batavia and 32.6 miles above mouth of the Little Miami River. Entire project lies in Clermont County, OH. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Batavia, OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam, outlet works, an uncontrolled saddle spillway, and a dike to close a saddle north of spillway. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 294,800 acre-feet, of which 210,600 acre-feet is reserved for flood control storage. Estimated cost of new work (1989) is $55,230,000 and $3,485,840 non-Federal reimbursement for water supply storage. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from East Fork Lake to William H. Harsha Lake effective January 4, 1981 by Public Law 96-383, October 6, 1980. Local cooperation. None required. However, the State of Ohio requested inclusion in the project of storage for future municipal and industrial water supply uses. Contract with State of Ohio for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958, as amend- 16-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 ed, was approved by Secretary of the Army, May 20, 1970. Under terms of contract, State will reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated plus estimated annual amount for cost of operation, maintenance and major capital replacements required for the water supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during 1989 flood season prevented damages estimated at $4,140,000. Construction was started in May 1970. Engineering studies are 94 percent complete. All land required for project has been acquired. Major relocation and construction features are complete, except one recreation item. Project is about 94 percent complete overall and reservoir was placed in operation in February 1978. 32. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to maintain and operate local protection projects in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. Inspections were made to determine extent of compliance and to advise interests as necessary to measures required to correct deficiencies. (See Table 16-K for local protection projects and channel improvements inspected.) Fiscal year costs were $117,984. Total costs to September 30, 1989 were $3,130,001 33. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 16-E. 34. FLOOD CONTROL WORKS UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities pursuant to Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation. Costs for fiscal year were $234,827 for disaster preparedness. No funds were expended for emergency operations or repair work on local protection projects. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. Costs for fiscal year were $187,462 for preparation of Reconnaissance Studies, Summary Fact Sheets, and Detailed Project Reports on 8 projects, and $10,385 for Plans and Specifications on one project and construction on one project. See Table 16-L. Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress). Costs for fiscal year were $8,607 for Plans and Specifications on one project. See Table 16-L. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Costs for fiscal year were $20,416 for preparation of Reconnaissance Studies on 4 projects, $99,723 for start of Plans and Specifications on 5 projects, and $42,839 for construction of one project. See Table 16-L. Streambank demonstration project (Section 603, 1986 Water Resource Development Act, Public Law 662, 99th Congress). Cost for fiscal year were $28,349 for a study report at Ohio River, Gallatin County, IL. General Investigations 35. SURVEYS. Fiscal year costs were $2,406,561 consisting of $1,602,881 for three flood damage prevention studies and the Ohio River Main Stem Study; $320,611 for navigation study; $221,532 for the Wabash River Comprehensive Middle Reaches Interim, $75,059 for Special Investigations, $29,160 for review of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission licenses, $20,946 for Dam Safety criteria studies, and $136,373 for planning assistance to states. 36. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $222,562 for flood plain management services. 37. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Fiscal year costs were $3,658,216 for continuation of detailed planning and engineering studies for Olmsted Locks & Dam. Fiscal year costs were $482,251 for Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) studies on Holes Creek, West Carrollton, Ohio; Miami River, Pleasant Run, Ohio; South Frankfort, Kentucky Local Proteciton Projects; and the Louisville Waterfront Park study. 16-12 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT TABLE 16-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding 1986 1987 1988 1989 Sep 30, 1989 Navigation - Locks and Dams 2 Green and Barren New Work Rivers, KY Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 3 Kentucky River, KY New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Flood Control - Local Protection 7 Evansville, IN New Work Approp. Cost 8 Mill Creek, OH 9 Southwestern Jefferson County, KY New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Flood Control - Reservoirs 10 Barren River Lake, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 11 Brookville Lake, IN 12 Buckhorn Lake, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost > - 9 - 9 - e - 1,238,500 1,254,300 1,062,900 1,440,900 1,267,516 1,206,604 1,067,343 1,297,228 $13,808,2221 13,808,2221 31,860,212' 3 31,659,207 - - - - 4,176,749 - - - - 4,176,749 2,505,800 1,744,500 994,200 1,565,200 53,259,4894 s 2,493,699 1,735,988 947,928 1,479,695 53,095,373^ * - - - - 556,956 - - - - 556,956 -89,000 363,000 598,000 5,065,187 34,403,0436 300,448 410,957 579,623 2,864,214 32,095,146' 9,614,000 12,463,000 15,153,000 10,064,391 10,592,245 13,791,850 10,865,000 6,350,916 78,852,742 69,969,271 3,484,000 6,422,000 6,153,000 1,777,000 56,697,183 4,731,054 5,664,866 7,058,291 1,739,587 55,755,163 1,189,000 1,167,073 95 420,000 410,678 1,740,100 1,658,886 1,466,900 1,403,868 -13,805 1,196,700 1,351,926 27,479,7178 27,479,7178 17,893,126 1o 11 17,837,5709 10 11 - 45,416,38012 - 45,402,56512 416,500 468,400 533,100 5,239,189 400,067 451,075 567,567 5,224,492 - - - - 11,766,20613 - - - - 11,766,20613 791,500 660,400 651,300 675,100 10,853,71014 801,081 648,737 601,512 724,265 10,822,99714 16-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1989 TABLE 16-A CONTINUED COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding 1986 1987 1988 1989 Sep 30, 1989 Flood Control - Reservoirs 13 Caesar Creek Lake, OH 14 Cagles Mill Lake, IN 15 Carr Fork Lake, KY 16 Cave Run Lake, KY 17 Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN 18 Clarence J. Brown Dam & Reservoir, OH 19 Green River Lake, KY 20 Huntington Lake, IN New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost $ - 162,680 631,000 601,671 228 346,000 371,968 1,845 747,000 784,850 786,628 485,000 501,921 $ - 11,388 792,100 771,070 $ - 32,958 743,200 760,749 404,600 419,700 386,493 399,204 27,269 855,900 814,628 400,000 615,829 478,300 470,412 7,000 802,400 819,487 17,497 513,000 502,958 -3,725 650,900 666,348 343,900 377,443 772 882,400 915,926 17,417 517,800 515,762 $62,893,882 62,884,788 6,038,663 6,005,862 4,376,27815 4,376,27816 6,100,706 6,091,412 50,854,82617 50,852,17317 9,182,60018 9,162,14318 74,262,282 74,199,983 5,864,646 5,834,070 - - - - 6,987,80719 - - - - 6,987,80719 518,400 474,000 652,700 683,800 7,407,996 500,086 472,566 615,395 706,592 7,368,398 - - - - 22,083,660 - - - - 22,083,660 379,000 420,900 431,100 425,400 4,913,747 372,932 412,987 411,888 449,834 4,897,584 1,124,000 941,000 1,143,281 945,408 - - 33,462,33020 - - 33,462,33020 943,800 889,397 14,592,94621 900,784 945,736 14,559,95121 - - - - 19,622,5092 - - - - 19,621,764$ 483,000 464,900 1,000,300 453,100 6,613,312 458,903 431,702 1,000,638 495,401 6,593,446 16-14 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT TABLE 16-A CONTINUED COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding 1986 1987 1988 1989 Sep 30, 1989 Flood Control - Reservoirs 21 Mississinewa Lake, IN 22 Monroe Lake, IN 23 Nolin Lake, KY 24 Ohio River Basin, Louisville District 25 Patoka Lake, IN 26 Rough River Lake & Channel Improvement, KY 27 Salamonie Lake, IN New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost $ 3,003 411,000 494,721 411,200 418,700 397,788 423,085 $ - 446,700 456,896 $24,381,12924 24,379,80025 5,755,705 5,743,848 - - - - 16,569,58926 - - - - 16,569,58926 459,600 434,800 572,100 629,700 6,639,02527 467,832 413,156 591,033 624,204 6,620,58327 - - -970 1,413,000 2,011,400 2,208,900 1,424,694 1,958,358 2,265,061 - 17,193,38128 - 17,191,44129 1,291,100 20,944,3150 1,297,261 20,870,60430 - 1,526,142 - 1,526,142 8,114 379,000 385,206 20,863 412,700 408,563 15,000 13,837 386,200 377,388 2,480 431,600 432,867 73,664,15931 73,316,74432 3,645,631 3,620,544 - - - - 10,643,00133 - - - - 10,643,00133 1,095,000 1,304,500 1,007,600 1,575,300 19,402,21034 1,104,891 1,241,626 997,292 1,602,455 19,312,07134 444,000 411,700 435,400 418,578 394,597 452,523 408,768 421,912 17,046,15135 17,039,32136 5,843,181 5,825,496 16-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 16-A CONTINUED COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding 1986 1987 1988 1989 Sep 30, 1989 Flood Control - Reservoirs 28 Taylorsville Lake, KY New Work Approp. $ - $305,000 $481,000 $486,000 $86,097,309" Cost 516,124 285,296 756,351 904,636 84,990,47438 Maint. Approp. 528,000 548,900 537,000 626,800 3,377,700 Cost 535,625 541,164 515,309 626,165 3,339,135 30 West Fork of Mill New Work Creek Lake, OH Approp. - - - - 4,722,46339 Cost - - - - 4,722,46339 Maint. Approp. 285,000 296,200 392,600 280,000 4,727,689 Cost 286,138 282,997 367,143 305,440 4,711,217 31 William H. Harsha New Work Lake, OH Approp. - - - - 52,023,15740 Cost 116,209 8,270 5,378 885 52,023,15740 Maint. Approp. 481,200 444,900 442,300 453,335 4,520,101 Cost 482,245 443,723 423,889 473,034 4,501,762 1 Includes $85,000 public works funds. 2 Includes $2,000 emergency relief funds, $204,444 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters" and $3,842,667 expended from 1888 to 30 June 1936, for operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation. $ Includes $725,715 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 4 Includes $316,871 under "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters," and $6,405,372 expended between July 5, 1885 and June 30, 1937 on operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation. a Includes $149,700 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. Includes $11,812 emergency relief funds and $63,187 contributed funds. ' Includes $1,518 contributed funds. 8 Includes $2,224,948 Code 711 funds, $110,107 Code 713 Federal funds and $108,418 Code 713 non-Federal funds. 9 Includes $100,000 Supplemental funds. 1o Includes $326,900 Special Recreation Use Fees. 11 Includes $214,675 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water." 12 Includes $7,497,492 contributed funds and $100,706 Code 711 funds. 18 Includes $61,451 public work acceleration executive 1963 funds, $143,088 Code 711 funds, and $243,619 Code 712 funds. 14 Includes $52,240 Special Recreation Use Fees. 15 Includes $35,814 Code 711 funds, $119,602 Code 713 funds, and $113,094 contributed funds. 16 Includes $35,814 Code 711 funds, $119,602 Code 713 funds, and $106,813 contributed funds. 17 Includes $76,724 Code 711 funds. 18 Includes $51,854 Special Recreation Use Fees. 19 Includes $19,683 Code 711 funds, $353,995 Code 713 funds, and $353,995 non-Federal contributions in kind for recreation facilities. 2 Includes $133,413 Code 711 funds, $183,732 Code 713 funds, and $40,001 contributed funds. 21 Includes $114,280 Special Recreation Use Fees and $214,675 under "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water." SIncludes $155,354 Code 713 funds and $193,903 contributed funds. Includes $155,354 Code 713 funds and $193,812 contributed funds. Includes $215,000 Code 711 funds, $174,392 Code 713 funds, $239,200 contributed funds and $174,392 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities. 25 Includes $215,000 Code 711 funds, $174,392 Code 713 funds, $237,871 contributed funds, and $174,392 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities. 26 Includes $1,185 Code 711 funds, $869,158 Code 713 funds, $7,797,604 contributed funds and $869,158 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities. 27 Includes $54,460 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 28 Includes $21,897 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds and $2,594,377 Code 711 funds. 29 Includes $21,897 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds and $2,592,438 Code 711 funds. 30 Includes $204,920 Special Recreation Use Fees, $52,000 Supplemental Funds, and $141,675 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water." 1 Includes $20,568,369 contributed funds. 32 Includes $20,221,129 contributed funds. SIncludes $196,306 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds, $867,396 Code 711 funds, $22,612 Code 713 funds, and $22,612 contributed funds. 4 Includes $236,640 Special Recreation Use Fees and $214,675 under "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water." * Includes $315,549 Code 713 funds, $170,697 contributed funds and $315,549 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities. 36 Includes $315,549 Code 713 funds, $163,867 contributed funds and $315,549 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities. 27 Includes $3,528,831 contributed funds. 8 Includes $2,928,803 contributed funds. 39 Includes $529,361 Code 713 funds, $50,000 contributed funds, $529,361 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities, and $520,800 non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam. 40 Includes $58,571 for preconstruction planning, engineering and design completed before FY 1953. 16-16 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT TABLE 16-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY (See Section 2 of Text) Purchase of original improvement Construction of Lock 2, Green River Construction of Lock 5, Green River Construction of Lock 6, Green River Appropriated $5,000 for continuing improvements of Green River above mouth of Big Barren River, with provision "That the Secretary of War may, in his discretion, expend such portion of said amount as may be necessary for removal of snags in Nolin River" Construct new Lock 1 and new Lock and Dam 2, Green River Construct new locks at Dam 5, Green River and Dam 1, Barren River; modification of Dam 5, Green River, widens bends in Bear Creek, KY Operation and care of locks and dams with War Department Appropriations for rivers and harbors Improvement of Nolin River Channel enlargement of lower 103 miles of Green River Recovation of authorities for improvement of Bear Creek and Nolin River OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville Dist.) (See Section 24 of Text) Aug 28, 1937 Construct levee, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin, projects to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War, at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction Jun 28, 1938 Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50.3 million for local protection works, individual projects to be selected and approved by Chief of Engineers subject to provision that authorization shall include diversion of Cache River above Cairo, Illinois, and protection of area north of Cairo drainage district by levees at an estimated cost of $2 million Aug 18, 1941 Additional $45 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Dec 22, 1944 Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including plan of improvement for flood control and other purposes in Kentucky River Basin Flood protection works at Taylorsville, Kentucky at an estimated cost of $129,350 Channel improvement of lower Rough River and Barnett Creek at an estimated cost of $360,000 Jul 24, 1946 Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan, including plan of improvement for flood control in Wabash River Basin, Illinois and Indiana, at an estimated cost of $9,629,000 Also, West Fork of Mill Creek at an estimated cost of $1,527,000. May 17, 1950 Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including necessary bank stabilization measures at New Harmony Bridge, Indiana, at an estimated cost of $500,000 Jul 3, 1958 Flood control Act of 1958 modified comprehensive plan to provide for Monroe Reservoir on Salt Creek, White River Basin, Indiana, at an estimated cost to the United States of $4,350,000; cost to local interests, $5,141,000 Oct 23, 1962 Flood Control Act of 1962 deleted Jessamine Creek Reservoir on Kentucky River, Kentucky, from comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Dec 30, 1963 Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Jun 18, 1965 Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin May 12, 1967 Additional $38 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Aug 13, 1968 Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Aug 11, 1888 Mar 3, 18931 Jul 13, 1892 Jul 13, 1902 Mar 3, 19052 Mar 3, 1909 Jul 3, 19302 Jun 26, 1934$ Aug 30, 19352 Sep 3, 1954 16-17 H. Ex. Doc 111, 49th Cong., 2d Sess., Annual Report 1887, p. 1903 Annual Report, 1891, p. 2 4 3 9 Annual Report, 1891, p. 2 4 7 8 S. Doc. 82, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 71st Cong., 1st Session, and H. Doc. 685, 69th Cong., 2d Session H.D. 480, 72d Congress, 2d Sess. S.D. 82, 83d Congress, 2d Sess. Flood Control Committee Document 1, 75th Congress., 1st Session Flood Control Committee Document 1, 75th Cong., 1st Session H. Doc. 504, 78th Congress, 2d Session S.D. 105, 78th Congress, 1st Session H. D. 535, 78th Congress, 2d Session H. D. 197, 80th Congress, 1st Session H.D.198, 80th Congress, 1st Sess H. D. 192, 85th Congress, 1st Session H. D. 423, 87th Congress, 2d Session Public Law 88-253, 88th Cong., 1st Session Public Law 8942, 89th Cong. 1st Session Public Law 90-17, 90th Cong., 1st Session Public Law 90-483, 90th Cong., 2d Session REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 16-B CONTINUED AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville Dist.) (Cont'd.) Jun 19, 1970 Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehen- Public Law 91-282, 91st Congress, sive plan for Ohio River Basin 2d Session Mar 7, 1974 Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehen- Public Law 93-251, 93rd Congress, sive plan for Ohio River Basin 2d Session Mar 7, 1974 Fifty-four local protection projects and one reservoir project in Public Law 93-251, 93rd Congress, comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin were deauthorized 2d Session August 5, 1977, under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 Two additional local protection projects in comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin were deauthorized November 6, 1977, under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 WABASH RIVER BASIN (See Section 29 of Text) Aug 13, 1968 Construction of five multiple purpose reservoirs and one S.D. 96, 90th Congress, 2d Session local protection project in Wabash River Basin, IL & IN, with proviso that construction of Big Walnut Lake, IN, project must be approved by the President. Authorization of $50 million for initiation and partial accomplishment of project. Dec 29, 1981 Two multiple purpose reservoirs in Wabash River Basin were Public Law 97-128, 97th Congress, deauthorized 2d Session MIAMI RIVER BASIN, PLEASANT RUN, VICINITY FAIRFIELD, OH. Nov 17, 1986 Three dry bed reservoirs and a Channel Improvement Public Law 97-128, 97th Congress, was authorized in Section 401 of The Water Resource 2nd Session Development Act of 1986. HAZARD; KENTUCKY Nov 17, 1988 Approximately 6 miles of Channel Improvement Public Law 100-676, 100th was authorized in Section 3 of the Water Resources Congress, 2nd Session Development Act of 1988. 1 Deficiency act. 2 Authorization for Nolin River and Bear Creek revoked by Act of Sep. 3, 1954. a Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. TABLE 16-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 5 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Name of Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Licking River Rough River, KY Tradewater River, KY White River, IN Completed Completed Completed Completed 1901 1951 1858 1909 $ 13,045 105,500 18,568 119,312 $ 101,196 33,331 16-18 TABLE 16-E LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Project and Status Report For Cost to Sep 30, 1989 Construction Operation and Maintenance Local Protection: Completed: Boone County, KY (Ohio River, Rabbit Hash) Brevoort Levee, IN (Wabash River) Brookport, IL Cannelton, IN Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY2 Chaplin River, Perryville, KY2 Cincinnati, OH Covington, KY Dayton, KY Delphi, IN (Wabash River) England Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) English, IN (Little Blue Rivera Frankfort, KY (North Frankfort) (Kentucky River 8 Gill Township Levee, IN (Wabash River) Golconda, IL Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IN (Muscatatuck River) Harrisburg, IL Hawesville, KY Indianapolis, IN (Fall Creek Section) (White River) Indian Creek, Corydon, IN2 Jackson, KY (Kentucky River) Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN Lawrenceburg, IN Lebanon Junction, KY (Salt River)a Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN Levee Unit 8, IN (White River) Louisville, KY4 Lyford Levee Unit, IN (Wabash River) Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN (Wabash Rivers Mill Creek, Jefferson County, KY2 Mount Carmel, IL (Wabash River) Muncie, IN (White River) Neon-Fleming, KY (Kentucky River) New Albany, IN New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) ' Newburgh, IN (Ohio River)6 Newport, KY Paducah, KY Panther Creek, KY (Green River)a Portland, IN (Salamonie River)a Reevesville, IL (Cache River) Rochester & McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL (Wabash River) Rosiclare, IL Saline River & Tribs, IL Shawneetown, IL7 Sturgis, KY Taylorsville, KY (Salt River) Tell City, IN Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN (Wabash River)7 Town Creek, Harrodsburg, KY2 Triplett Creek, Morehead, KY (Licking Rivers Uniontown, KY Vincennes, IN (Wabash River)7 West Terre Haute, IN (Wabash River) Active: Frankfort, KY (South Frankfort) (Kentucky River)3 * Grayville, IL Hazard, KY Holes Creek, West Carrollton, Ohio9 (Great Miami River) Louisville, KY Miami River Basin, Pleasant Run, Vicinity Fairfield, OH (Great Miami River) Russell & Allison Levee, IL (Wabash River) Salyersville, KY (Licking River) 1977 1954 1958 1959 1957 1965 1987 1953 1972 1965 1979 1948 1960 1953 1952 1955 1953 1964 1957 1959 1953 1967 1987 1952 1975 1944 1987 1973 1972 1956 1963 1957 1959 1974 1959 1959 1970 1962 1954 1972 1954 1981 1972 1952 1956 1965 1967 1972 1956 1964 1977 1979 1946 $ 392,443 1,240,299 597,493 2,068,391 1,206,852 832,700 10,150,935 7,862,937 13,177,345 144,563 734,498 372,353 2,960,970 561,200 565,333 70,304 870,015 969,318 1,788,840 300,143 130,952 4,226,361 2,473,414 130,417 7,440,987 700,534 26,721,438 267,391 5,892,329 292,710 1,980,675 887,835 86,532 5,375,471 297,624 52,061 7,512,987 4,761,551 254,031 237,657 600,300 1,079,236 622,544 7,826,219 91,000 1,826,778 378,050 932,229 14,913 56,505 893,094 1,070,926 3,308,941 1,095,704 52,088 272,750 16-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 16-E CONTINUED OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project and Status' Report For Construction Maintenance Inactive: Frankfort, KY (Benson Creek) (Kentucky River) 1979 - - Greenfield Bayou Levee, IN (Wabash River) 1979 157,935 - Indianapolis, IN (Warfleigh Section) (White River) 1976 153,410 - Island Levee, IN (Wabash River) 1979 355,963 - Lewisport, KY - - - New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River)' 1959 - - Newport-Wilder, KY - - - Owensboro, KY - - - Salyersville, KY (Licking River) 1946 12,000 - Smithland, KY - - - Vincennes, IL (Wabash River) 1964 - - West Point, KY - 4,490 - Reservoirs: Active: Camp Ground Lake, KY (Salt River) 1983 235,615- Inactive: Big Pine Lake, IN (Wabash River) 1977 1,270,590 - Big Walnut Lake, IN (Wabash River) 1980 1,009,188 - Booneville Lake, KY (Kentucky River) 1976 1,038,595 - Downeyville Lake, IN (Wabash River) - - - Eagle Creek Lake, KY 1975 702,471 - Falmouth Lake, KY (Licking River) 1981 944,386 - Lafayette Lake, IN (Wabash River) 1977 1,200,920 - Louisville Lake, IL (Wabash River) 1983 2,355,395 - Mining City Lake, KY (Green River) - 350,474 - Red River Lake, KY (Kentucky River) 1976 1,794,308 - 1 All projects are on Ohio River unless otherwise noted. 2 Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. g Cost includes $161,098 cash contribution consisting of $105,118 from the City of Frankfort, KY and $55,980 from the Commonwealth of Kentucky. ' Cost includes $1,716,301 cash contribution from City of Louisville, KY. a Cost shown are for Levee and pump plants. 6 The Water Resources Development Act of 1974 modified the Newburgh Locks & Dam project to include the bank protection works at Newburgh, IN. Partially completed to form a useful unit. Remaining portion of project deauthorized. 8 Partially completed to form a useful unit. Remaining portions of project are active and inactive. ' Advance Engineering and Design funded with General Investigations Appropriation. 16-20 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT TABLE 16-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Flood Control - Local Protection Adams Levee, IN (Wabash River) - 1978 $ -- Alton, IN - 1977-- Anderson, IN (White River) 1940 1986 5,724- Aurora, IN - 1977 35,420- Bellevue KY- 1977 19,023- Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River) - 1981 - - Bromley, KY - 1977-- California (Cincinnati) OH - 1977 16,465- Carrollton, KY - 1977 9,713- Caseyville, KY - 1986 - - Cave-in-Rock, IL - 1977 - - Cincinnati, OH (Unit 2) - 1977 - - Cincinnati, OH (Unit 4) - 1977 - - Cleves, OH - 1977 6,343- Clinton, IN - 1977 6,848- Cloverport, KY - 1986 - - Concordia, KY - 1986 - - Deer Creek, Prairie, Levee, IN - 1977 - - Derby, IN - 1977 - - Elizabethtown,, IL - 1977 - - Fletcher & Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN - 1977 3,361- Grandview, IN - 1977 8,497- Honey Creek Levee, IN - 1977 - - Leavenworth, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 2, East Fork White River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 3, East Fork White River, IN 1938 1977 275- Levee Unit 1, IL (Wabash River) 1973 1986 60,000- Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River, IL - 1977 - - Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL - 1977 - - Levee Unit 2, Wabash River, IL - 1977 - - Levee Units 3 and 4, Wabash River, IL 1938 1977 216- Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL - 1977 9,922- Levee Unit 17, Wabash River Basin, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 1, White River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 7, White River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 9, White River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 10, White River, IN - 1977 - - Louisville, KY (Partial) - 1986 - - Ludlow, KY - 1977 14,503- Madison, IN - 1977 - - Mauckport, IN - 1977 - - Marion, IN (Wabash River) 1979 1986 209,975- McGinnis Levee, IN 1950 1977 71,049- Metropolis, IL - 1986 10,575- Milton, KY -1977 - - Moscow, OH - 1977 New Amsterdam, IN - 1977 New Harmony, IN - 1977 New Richmond, OH - 1977 7,104 Orleans, IN 1972 1977 13,158 Patriot, IN - 1977 Prestonville , KY - 1977 Raccoon Creek Levee, IN - 1977 Rising Sun, IN - 1977 Rockport, IN - 1977 Rome, IN - 1977 Shawneetown, IL - 1986 25,367 Shoals, IN (East Fork White River) 1938 1977 Shufflebarger Levee, IN 1950 1977 64,487- Sugar Creek Levee, IN 1961 1977 28,061- Terre Haute, IN - 1977 - - Tolu, KY - 1986 - - Tri Pond Levee, IL 1972 1977 65,510- Troy, IN 1977 - - 16-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 16-G CONTINUED DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Flood Control- Local Protection Utica, IN Vevay, IN Vincennes, IN (Partial) Westport, KY Flood Control- Reservoirs Big Blue Lake, IN Clifty Creek Lake, IN Helm Lake, IL Lincoln Lake, IL Metamora Lake, IN 1964 1980 1979 1976 1979 1978 1977 1986 1977 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1,079,867 1,016,358 41,616 1,331,844 16-22 TABLE 16-H NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS PRINCIPAL FEATURES - GREEN & BARREN RIVERS AND KENTUCKY RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEMS Lock Dimensions Miles Greatest Length Lock above Available Upper Depth of Year and Mouth of Distance from Width of For Full Normal Pool Miter Sills Character of Percent Opened to Cost of Dam River Nearest Town Chamber Width Lift Elevation Upper Lower Foundation Complete Navigation Lock and Dam (feet) (feet) (feet msl) (feet) (feet) CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER - For report on this improvement see this heading under Ohio River. GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY (See Section 2 of Text) Green River New 1 9.1 Spottsville, KY 84.0 600.0 11.8' 349.1 12.1 11.3 Shale and Coal 100 1956' $5,101,978' New 2 63.1 0.3 miles below 84.0 600.0 14.3 363.4 15.0 11.7 Shale 100 1956' 4,799,271 Calhoun, KY 3 108.5 0.3 miles below 35.8 137.5 17.0 380.4 7.3 5.6 Rock 100 1836' 121,377 Rochester, KY 4 149.0 Woodbury, KY 35.8 138.0 16.4 396.8 7.1 6.5 Rock 100 1839' 125,718 5 168.1 0.3 miles below 56.0 360.0 15.2 412.0' 12.0 9.3 Piles and Rock 100 1905' 1,020,868" Glenmore, KY 6 181.7 2.8 miles above 36.0 145.0 9.2 421.1 8.0 8.8 Gravel 100 1905' 168,415 Brownsville, KY Barren Barren River River 1 15.0" 0.3 miles above 56.0 360.0 15.2 412.0 12.0 9.3 100 1934 871,565" Greencastle, KY KENTUCKY RIVER, KY (See Section 3 of Text) Kentucky River Kentucky River 1 4.0 3.8 miles above 38.0 145.0 8.2 430.0 8.2" 14.8 Rock and Clay 100 1839" Carrollton, KY 2 31.0 Lockport, KY 38.0 145.0 13.9 443.9 7.6 6.1 Rock 100 1839" . 3 42.0 Gest, KY 38.0 145.0 13.2 457.1 8.6 6.5 Rock 100 1844" 1,350,385" 4 65.0 1.0 mile below 38.0 145.0 13.2 470.3 6.4 7.4 Rock 100 1844" Frankfort, KY 5 82.2 2.8 miles below 38.0 145.0 15.0 485.3 10.0 6.5 Rock 100 1844" - Tyrone, KY 6 96.2 21.6 miles below 52.0 147.0 14.0 499.3 9.4 6.4 Rock and Piles 100 1894" 314,847 High Bridge, KY 7 117.0 0.8 mile below 52.0 147.0 15.3 514.6 9.1 6.9 Rock 100 1897" 290,788 High Bridge, KY 8 139.9 4.7 miles above 52.0 146.0 18.7 533.6 10.6 6.0 Rock 100 1900" 275,463 Camp Nelson, KY 9 157.5 Valley View, KY 52.0 148.0 17.3 550.6 10.0 6.6 Rock 100 1907" 237,646 10 176.4 1.0 mile below 52.0 148.0 17.0 567.6 9.0 6.0 Rock 100 1907" 221,500 Ford, KY 11 201.0 17.2 miles below 52.0 148.0 18.0 585.6 10.0 6.0 Rock 100 1906" 296,593 Irvine, KY 12 220.0 Ravenna, KY 52.0 148.0 17.0 602.6 9.6 6.0 Rock 100 1910" 425,693 13 239.9 2.2 miles below 52.0 148.0 18.0 620.6 9.6 6.0 Rock 100 1915" 461,476 Willow, KY 14 249.0 Heidelberg, KY 52.0 148.0 17.0 637.6 8.6 6.0 Rock 100 1917" 392,902 ' At normal pool Dam 48, Ohio River, Elev. 337.3, Green River datum (Elev. 338.0 Ohio River datum). ' New Lock 1 placed in operation May 25, 1956; old Dam 1, completed 1835-40, replaced with new cellular concrete masonry dam constructed 1970 71 with O&M General funds at cost of $822,000. SDoes not include $179,110 cost of old Lock and Dam 1. SNew Lock and Dam 2, placed in operation June 18, 1956. s Does not include $295,696 cost of old Lock and Dam 2. * Operation discontinued September 30, 1981. ' Breaching of dam on May 24, 1965, stopped through traf fic to Bowling Green, KY. SWith movable A frame crest 3 feet high. SOperation discontinued Aug. 1, 1951. O Does not include $179,434 cost of old Lock and Dam 5. n Distance from mouth of Green River is 164.5 miles. Lock closed to navigation as the result of loss of pool at Green River Lock and Dam 4 on May 24, 1965. 1 Includes $729,269 for new large lock completed in 1934. " At normal pool McAlpine Dam, Ohio River elev. 421.8 Kentucky River datum (Elev. 420 Ohio River datum). " Reconstruction completed by United States in 1882. ' Built by State of Kentucky. Cost given is for repairs by United States to Locks and Dams 1 through 5. Original construction costs to State were: L&D 1, $220,300; L&D 2, $151,983; L&D 3, $135,857; L&D 4, $131,607; and L&D 5, $137,436. * Lock was closed to traffic and placed in caretaker status in September 1982. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 16-I OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section 24 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Type of Estimated Cost" Project and Status1 Construction Federal Non-Federal Total Completed: Barnett Creek, KY (Rough River)8 " Brookport, IL5 6 Cannelton, IN5 7 Cincinnati, OH 5 8 Covington, KY 5 9 Dayton, KY Delphi, IN (Wabash River)5 1o England Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River)11 Frankfort, KY (Kentucky River)5 North Frankfort 5 Golconda, IL5 12 Harrisburg, IL5 10 Hawesville, KY 5 13 Jackson, KY (Kentucky River)5 8 Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN 7 Lawrenceburg, IN5 Louisville, KY5 14 Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN (Wabash River)4 5 New. Albany, IN 5 8 New Harmony Bridge, IL and IN (Wabash River)5 7 Newport, KY5 ' Paducah, KY5 7 Reevesville, IL (Cache River)" 15 Rochester and McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL (Wabash River)11 Rough River, KY3 4 Sturgis, KY (Tradewater River)11 Taylorsville, KY (Salt River)5 16 Tell City, IN5 14 Uniontown, KY5 17 Vincennes, IN (Wabash River)5 (completed portion) West Terre Haute, IN (Wabash River) 'Active: Evansville, IN 4 Frankfort, KY (Kentucky River)5 South Frankfort 5 Russell & Allison Levee, IL (Wabash River)9 Inactive: Frankfort, KY (Kentucky River)a Benson Creek5 Greenfield Bayou Levee, IN (Wabash River)5 Island Levee, IN (Wabash Rivera) Lewisport, KY 5 New Harmony Bridge, IL and IN (Wabash River) ' Owensboro, KY5 Smithland, KY5 Wilders, KY Channel improvement Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and barrier dam Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Cutoff channel Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee and pump plants Wall and levee Bank Protection Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Channel improvement Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Wall Levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Bank protection Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee 597,493 2,068,391 10,150,935 7,862,937 13,117,345 144,563 734,498 2,960,970 565,333 870,015 969,318 130,952 4,226,361 2,473,414 25,005,137 4,337,617 5,375,471 297,624 7,512,987 4,761,551 600,300 1,079,236 1,826,778 378,050 932,229 1,070,926 3,308,941 1,095,704 8,500 29,105 1,309,146 1,051,102 2,013,000 17,164 107,000 272,100 10,900 20,000 42,593 3,000 590,888 284,725 1,716,301 p 605,993 2,097,496 11,460,081 8,914,039 15,130,345 161,727 841,498 3,233,070 576,233 890,015 1,011,911 133,952 4,817,249 2,758,139 26,721,438 109,200 4,446,817 740,000 6,115,471 298,506 232,000 40,000 100,000 x93,000 63,309 32,707 72,153 285,000 297,624 7,811,493 4,993,551 640,300 1,179,236 1,919,778 441,359 964,936 1,143,079 3,593,941 150,000 1,245,704 51,100,000 5,500,000 56,600,00029 6,122,000 2,041,000 8,163,00018 19,400,000 2,340,000 21,740,00021 3,340,000 4,600,000 4,630,000 610,000 664,376 886,000 864,000 10,800,000 1,150,000 1,087,000 528,000 243,000 99,000 195,000 414,000 959,000 4,490,00022 5,687,00023 5,158,00023 853,00024 763,37625 1,081,000 1,278,000 11,759,00026 16-24 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT TABLE 16-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (FLOOD CONTROL) (See Section 24 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Type of Estimated Cost' Project and Status' Construction Federal Non-Federal Total Deauthorized August 5, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1971 (Public Law 93-251): Alton, IN Bellevue, KY Bromley, KY Carrollton, KY Cave-in-Rock, IL Cincinnati, OH (Unit 2) Cincinnati, OH (Unit 4) Cleves, OH Clinton, IN (Wabash River) Deer Creek Prairie Levee, IN (Wabash River) Derby, IN Elizabethtown, IL Fletcher and Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN (Wabash River) Grandview, IN Honey Creek Levee, IN Leavenworth, IN Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River, IL Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL Levee Unit 17, IN Levee Unit 1, White River, IN Levee Unit 2, White River, IN Levee Unit 7, White River, IN Ludlow, KY Madison, IN Mauckport, IN McGinnis Levee, IN (Wabash River) Milton, KY Moscow, OH New Amsterdam, IN New Harmony, IN (Wabash River) New Richmond, OH Patriot, IN Prestonville, KY Raccoon Levee, IN (Wabash River) Rising Sun, IN Rockport, IN Rome, IN Shufflebarger Levee, IN (Wabash River) Sugar Creek Levee, IN (Wabash River) Tri-Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) Troy, IN Vevay, IN Westport, KY Levee Wall and Levee Wall and Levee Wall and Levee Levee Wall and Levee Wall Levee Levee Levee Wall and Levee Wall and Levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and Levee Levee Levee Levee Wall Levee Levee Levee Wall and Levee Levee Wall and Levee Levee Wall and Levee Wall and Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and Levee Levee Wall $ 255,000 1,570,000 1,250,000 2,220,000 661,000 16,800,000 14,900,000 1,240,000 77,000 213,000 553,000 559,000 548,000 580,000 653,000 1,470,000 204,000 2,090,000 2,850,000 3,410,000 1,160,000 1,580,000 2,180,000 724,000 1,490,000 2,540,000 3,820,000 506,000 1,820,000 2,480,000 1,170,000 476,000 616,000 3,200,000 753,000 1,710,000 426,000 896,000 466,000 359,000 2,380,000 418,000 2,050,000 502,000 1,170,000 1,610,000 $ 40,000 400,000 925,000 97,000 125,000 2,900,000 621,000 67,000 9,000 10,000 67,000 153,000 26,000 133,000 32,000 266,000 40,000 715,000 164,000 136,000 56,000 118,000 116,000 73,000 88,000 745,000 360,000 105,000 104,000 41,000 372,000 13,000 25,000 720,000 372,000 55,000 37,000 280,000 133,000 67,000 90,000 29,000 191,000 133,000 146,000 41,000 $ 295,000 1,970,000 2,175,000 2,317,000 786,000 19,700,000 15,521,000 1,307,000 86,000 223,000"4 620,000 712,000 574,000" 713,000 685,000 1,736,000 244,000 2,805,000 3,014,000' 7 3,546,0002" 1,216,000 1,698,00028 2,296,00027 797,000' 1,578,00027 3,285,000 4,180,000 611,000 1,924,000 2,521,000 1,542,000 489,000 641,000 3,920,000 1,125,000 1,765,000 463,000"4 1,176,000 599,000 426,000 2,470,000 447,000" 2,241,0002" 635,000 1,316,000 1,651,000 16-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FY 1989 TABLE 16-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL !COST OF. BASIN PLAN (FLOOD CONTROL) (See Section 24 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Type of Estimated Cost' Project and Status Construction Federal Non-Federal Total Deauthorized November 6, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-251) Aurora, IN Wall and Levee $4,300,000 $1,190,000 $5,490,000 California (Cincinnati), OH Wall and Levee 1,750,000 720,000 2,470,000 Deauthorized October 3, 1978 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-251) Adams Levee, IN (Wabash River). Levee 292,000 14,000 306,00027 Utica, IN5 Levee 1,570,000 120,000 1,690,000 Deauthorized May 6, 1981 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-251) Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River : Channel 1,080,000 630,000 1,710,00028 improvement Deauthorized November 17, 1986 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-251) Caseyville, KY5 Levee 396,000 35,000 431,000 Cloverport, KY5 Wall and Levee 728,000 193,000 921,000 Concordia, KY5 Levee 590,000 55,000 645,000 Metropolis, IL5 Wall and Levee 3,070,000 431,000 3,501,000 Shawneetown, IL5 Wall and Levee 1,810,000 361,000 2,171,000 Tolu, KY5 Levee 303,000 35,000 338,000 Vincennes, IN (Wabash River)5 Wall and Levee 3,340,000 - 3,340,00028 (Uncompleted Portion) West Point, KY5 Wall and Levee 3,283,000 400,000 3,683,000" 1 All projects are on an Ohio River unless otherwise noted. 2 Latest cost estimate revision 1954 unless otherwise noted. * Part of Rough River Reservoir and.Channel Improvement Project, KY. 4 Details of this project are in individual report. 5 Also see "Other authorized flood control projects." 6 See Annual Report for 1958 for details. r See Annual Report for 1959 for details. 8 See Annual Report for 1957 for details. s See Annual Report for 1965 for details. 1o See Annual Report for 1953 for details. n See Annual Report for 1972 for details. 12 See Annual Report for 1960 for details. 13 See Annual Report for 1955 for details. 14 See Annual Report for 1962 for details. 15 Substitute project for Belknap, Karnak, and Ullin, IL, complete. See Annual Report for 1954 for details: 16 See Annual Report for 1952 for details. 17 See Annual Report for 1956 for details. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Latest cost estimate revision 1988. Latest cost estimate revision 1986. Latest cost estimate revision 1984. Latest cost estimate revision 1983. Latest cost estimate revision 1976. Latest cost estimate revision 1978. Latest cost estimate revision 1960. Latest cost estimate revision 1971. Latest cost estimate revision 1977. Latest cost estimate revision 1961. Latest cost estimate revision 1973. Latest cost estimate revision 1989. 16-26 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT TABLE 16-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (FLOOD CONTROL) (See Section 24 of Text) RESERVOIRS Tributary Basin Estimated Cost' Reservoirs Status Stream Federal Non-Federal Total Great Miami River: Brookville Lake, IN' Metamora Lake, IN Green River: Barren River Lake, KY1 Green River Lake, KY2 Mining City Lake, KY Nolin Lake, KY2 Rough River Kentucky2 Kentucky River Booneville Lake, KY Buckhorn Lake, KY2 Carr Fork Lake, KY2 Licking River Cave Run Lake, KY2 Falmouth Lake, KY Little Miami River: Caesar Creek Lake, OH2 William H. Harsha Lake, OH2 Mill Creek: West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH2 Wabash River: Cagles Mill Lake, IN 2 Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN 2 Monroe Lake, IN2 Patoka Lake, IN2 Complete Deauthorized Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete East Fork of Whitewater River West Fork of Whitewater River Barren River Green River Green River Nolin River Rough River South Fork of Kentucky River Middle Fork of Kentucky River North Fork of Kentucky River Licking River Licking River Caesar Creek East Fork of Little Miami River West Fork of Mill Creek Mill Creek Raccoon Creek Salt Creek Patoka River $37,918,888 35,300,000 27,371,299 33,238,597 69,100,000 17,193,381 10,620,389 60,700,000 11,766,206 50,854,826 114,826,300 125,000,000 $7,497,492$ 108,418' 223,7331$ 22,612' $ 45,416,380 35,300,0004 27,479,717 33,462,330 69,100,0004 17,193,381 10,643,001 60,700,000' 11,766,206 50,854,826 114,826,3007 125,000,000' 62,893,882 5,037,000' 67,930,882 55,230,000 3,485,840' 58,715,840 3,622,302 1,100,16110 4,722,463 4,263,184 6,633,812 7,902,827 113,094' 353,9955 8,666,76211 53,095,790 20,568,369 4,376,278 6,987,807 16,569,589 73,664,159 Latest cost estimate revision 1989 unless otherwise noted. Details of this project given in individual report. Cash contributions for water supply storage. Latest cost estimate revision 1954. For Code 713 recreation development. Latest cost estimate revision 1975. Includes $35,213,000 United States Forest Service cost. Latest cost estimate revision 1979. Reimbursement for water supply storage. 1o Includes $520,800 for non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam, $50,000 for contributed funds in fulfillment of project authorization, and $529,361 for Code 713 recreation development. 1 Includes $7,797,604 cash contribution for storage for low-flow regulation and $869,158 for Code 713 recreation development. 1i Includes $14,180,677 cash contribution for water supply storage, and $6,387,692 for initial recreation development. 13 For $183,732 Code 713 recreation development and $40,001 contributed funds. 16-27 Ti--~--~----.~1 l.-I----I-------. .-:i. r. --;T REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 16-J WABASH RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN: (FLOOD CONTROL) (See Section 29 of Text) Type of Construction Estimated Cost Project or Stream Status Federal Non-Federal Total LOCAL PROTECTION Marion, IN Wall and Levee Inactive $ 3,900,000 $ 854,000 $ 4,754,000' RESERVOIRS Big Blue Lake, IN Big Blue River Deauthorized 87,200,000 53,846,0008 141,046,0004 Big Walnut Lake, IN Big Walnut Creek Inactive 81,800,000 45,069,000' 126,869,0004 Downeyville Lake, IN Flatrock and Little Flatrock Rivers Inactive 74,200,000 64,448,000 138,648,000' Helm Lake, IN Skillet Fork Deauthorized 25,171,000 14,829,000' 40,000,0008 Louisville, Lake, IL Little Wabash River Inactive 113,000,000 14,435,000' 127,435,00010 i Latest cost revision 1984 unless otherwise noted. 9 Latest cost estimate revision 1977. 8 Includes $38,190,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $15,656,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities. ' Latest cost estimate revision 1979. a Includes $26,663,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $18,406,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities. * Includes $53,084,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply, $8,749,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities. ' Includes $12,696,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $2,133,000 for recreation facilities. 8 Latest cost estimate revision 1975. * Includes $8,402,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $6,033,000 reimbursable for initial recreation facilities. 10 Latest cost estimate revision 1982. 16-28 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT TABLE 16-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 32 of Text) Date of Local Protection Projects Inspection Brevoort Levee, IL May 1989 Brookport, IL Nov 1988 Cache River Levee, IL Nov 1988 Cannelton, IN Nov 1988 Cincinnati, OH May 1989 Covington, KY Nov 1988 Dayton, KY May 1989 Delphi, IN Mar 1989 England Pond Levee, IL May 1989 Evansville, IN Jul 1989 Frankfort, KY, North Frankfort Mar 1989 Gill Township Levee, IN Mar 1989 Golconda, IL Oct 1988 Harrisburg, IL Oct 1988 Hawesville, KY Nov 1988 Indianapolis, IN Mar 1989 Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN Mar 1989 Lawrenceburg, IN May 1989 Lebanon Junction, KY Mar 1989 Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN Sep 1989 Levee Unit No. 8, Wabash River, IN Mar 1989 Louisville, KY Aug 1989 Lyford Levee, IN Apr 1989 Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN May 1989 Mt. Carmel, IL Sep 1989 Muncie, IN Mar 1989 Perryville, KY Aug 1989 New Albany, IN Mar 1989 Newport, KY Nov 1988 Paducah, KY Nov 1988 Reevesville, IL Nov 1988 Rochester-McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL Sep 1989 Rosiclare, IL Oct 1988 Shawneetown, IL Oct 1988 Sturgis, KY May 1989 Taylorsville, KY Mar 1989 Tell City, IN Nov 1988 Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN Apr 1989 Uniontown, KY May 1989 Vincennes, IN May 1989 West Terre Haute, IN Apr 1989 16-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 16-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED CONTINUED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 32 of Text) Dates of Channel Improvements Inspection Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY May 1989 Cypress Creek, McLean County, KY Jul 1989 Eel River, Brazil Waterworks, IN Apr 1989 English, IN (Little Blue River) Jun 1989 Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IN Sep 1985 Harrodsburg, KY (Town Creek) Aug 1989 Indian Creek, Corydon, IN Jul 1989 Jackson, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Jun 1989 Lick Creek, Hartford City (Blackford County), IN Aug 1989 Mill Creek, Jefferson County, KY Jul 1988 Muscatatuck River, Crothersville, IN Sep 1986 Neon-Fleming, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Jun 1989 Nicholasville (Town Fork) Vicinity, KY Aug 1989 Panther Creek, Curdsville, KY Jul 1989 Plum Creek, Spencer County, KY Aug 1986 Portland, IN (Salamonie River) Mar 1989 Rough River, Hartford, Ohio County, KY Jul 1989 Salamonie River, Wells County, IN Mar 1989 Saline River and Tributaries, IL Oct 1988 Triplett Creek, Morehead, KY Jun 1989 Troublesome Creek, Hindman, KY Jun 1989 Wabash River, Adams County, IN Mar 1989 Whitesburg, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Jun 1989 Bank Revetments East Fork White River, Brownstown (Jackson County) IN Mar 1989 Eighteen Mile Island, Oldham Co., KY Jul 1988 Great Miami River, Sidney, OH Mar 1988 Green River, Calhoun, KY Jul 1989 Licking River, Butler, KY Nov 1988 Lusk Creek, Golconda, IL Oct 1988 Little Miami River, Indian Hill, OH May 1989 Little Miami River, Milford, OH May 1989 Ohio River, Brandenburg, KY Jun 1989 Ohio River, Cloverport, KY Jul 1989 Ohio River, Daviess Co., KY Jul 1989 Ohio River, Fort Massac State Park, IL Nov 1988 Ohio River, Hawesville, KY Jul 1989 Ohio River, Lewisport, KY Jul 1989 Ohio River, Madison, IN Aug 1989 Ohio River, Moscow, OH Nov 1988 Ohio River, Mount Vernon, IN May 1989 Ohio River, Newburgh, IN Jul 1989 Ohio River, Ohio Street, Evansville, IN Jul 1989 Ohio River, Otter Creek Park, KY Aug 1989 Ohio River, Rabbit Hash, Boone Co., KY May 1989 Ohio River, Rockport Landing, IN May 1989 Ohio River, Sellersburg, IN Sep 1986 Ohio River, SR 66, Cannelton, IN Nov 1988 Ohio River, Troy, IN May 1989 Ohio River, Upper River Rd., Jefferson Co., KY Jul 1988 Ohio River, Vanderburg Co., IN Jun 1989 Patoka River at Jasper, IN Mar 1989 Patoka River, Winslow, IN Apr 1988 Stoner Creek, North Middletown, KY Jun 1989 Wabash River near Merom, IN Mar 1989 Wabash River, New Harmony, IN Sep 1989 White River, Petersburg (Pike Co.), IN Mar 1989 Whitewater River, Levee Rd., near Brookville, IN May 1989 WTP, Great Miami River, Ross, OH May 1989 16-30 LOUISVILLE, KY. DISTRICT TABLE 16-L FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 34 of Text) Fiscal Year Cost Total Flood Control (Section 205): Canoe Creek at Henderson, KY5 $ 398 Duck Creek, Elwood, IN2 .11,607 Feather Creek, Clinton, IN2 73,016 Kentucky River, Hyden, KY' 7,461 Licking River, Salyersville, KY2 15,764 Little Beaver Creek, Kettering, OH2 549 Raccoon Creek, D & L Townships, IL1 15,661 Red River, Clay City, KY' 24,945 Sugar Creek, Bellbrook, OH2 38,459 Whitewater River, Hagerstown, IN3 9,987 Snagging and Clearing for Flood Control (Section 208): Salamonie River, Montpelier, IN3 8,607 Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14): Indian Creek, Burton Road, Morgan Co, IN3 23,009 Little Turtle Creek, Sullivan Co., IN3 18,980 Miami River, Lake Isabella Park, OH3 8,975 Ohio River, Brandenburg, KY' -656 Ohio River, Owensboro, KY5 42,839 Ohio River, Utica Pike, Clark Co., IN1 6,072 S.F. Wildcat Creek, Rd 7E, Tippecanoe Co., IN3 20,698 Wabash River, Little Road, Vigo Co., IN3 19,906 Wabash River, West Rd., Vigo Co., IN3 17,130 Whitewater River, Adar Grove, IN' 6,025 1 Reconnaissance Study 2 Detail Project Report 3 Plans and Specifications 4 Construction Funds Received 5 Construction Completed 16-31 HUNTINGTON, WV, DISTRICT * All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in the text and also appear at the end of this chapter. The Huntington District includes central and southeastern Ohio, all of West Virginia except the northern panhandle and northeastern portion, the eastern portion of Kentucky, a portion of midwestern Virginia, a very small portion of midwestern Virginia, a very small portion of northwestern North Carolina, embraced in the drainage basin of the Ohio River and its tributaries from approximate river mile 127 (below Pittsburgh, PA) to approximate river mile 438, immediately upstream from Foster, KY. The drainage area of the Huntington District is approximately 44,914 square miles. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River ..................................... 17-2 2. Kanawha River, WV ..................................... 17-2 3. Open Channel Work, Ohio River ................. 17-2 4. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .................................. 17-2 Flood Control 5. Alum Creek Lake, OH .................... .. 17-2 6. Beech Fork Lake, WV .................................. 17-3 7. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ..................................... 17-3 8. Burnsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ..................................... 17-3 9. Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH ................................... 17-3 10. Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH ..................................... 17-4 11. Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY .................................... 17-4 12. Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH ............................................... 17-4 13. East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ................................... 17-5 14. Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY ............ 17-5 15. Grayson Lake, KY ............................................ 17-5 16. John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin,VA ...................... 17-5 17. Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, KY, WV and VA ................................. 17-6 18. Massillon, OH ..................................... 17-6 19. Muskingum River Lakes, OH .......................... 17-6 20. Newark, OH ..................................... 17-7 21. North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH .................................... 17-7 22. North Fork of Pound River Lake, VA ........... 17-8 23. Ohio River Basin (Huntington District) ...... 17-8 24. Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio ............................................. 17-8 25. Paintsville Lake, KY ........................................ 17-8 26. R.D. Bailey Lake, WV ................................... 17-9 27. Roseville, OH .................................................... 17-9 28. Summersville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ..................................... 17-9 29. Sutton Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ............ 17-9 30. Tom Jenkins Dam, Ohio River Basin, OH ..................................... 17-10 31. Yatesville Lake, KY ....................................... 17-10 32. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................................. 17-10 33. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................................. 17-10 General Investigations 34. Surveys ..................................... 17-11 35. Collection and Study of Basic Data ............ 17-11 Tables Table Table Table 17-A 17-B 17-C Table 17-D Table 17-E Table Table Table 17-F 17-G 17-H Cost & Financial Statement ........ 17-12 Authorization Legislation ........... 17-17 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................... 17-20 Not Applicable Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............................ 17-21 Not Applicable -Deauthorized Projects .................. 17-22 Inspection of Flood Control Projects ............................ 17-23 17-1 Page Page REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1989 Navigation 1. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS ON THE OHIO RIVER See this heading under Chapter 19- Ohio River 2. KANAWHA RIVER, WV Location. The Kanawha River is approximately 97 miles in length and is formed by the junction of the New and Gauley Rivers, a short distance above Kanawha Falls, WV, and flows generally northwesterly to the confluence with the Ohio River at Point Pleasant, WV. Previous projects. For details of previous projects see the Annual Reports for 1875,1915 and 1938. Existing project. The existing project consists of three navigation structures on the Kanawha River. London Locks and Dam are located approximately 83 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River and approximately two miles downstream from Montgomery, WV. Marmet Locks and Dam are located approximately 68 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River at Marmet, WV. Winfield Locks and Dam are located approximately 31 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River at Winfield, WV. Each structure has twin locks with usable dimensions of 56 feet by 360 feet. Another structure is located on the Ohio River at approximate river mile 279 and approximately nine miles below Gallipolis, OH. This structure has two parallel locks, the main lock is 110 feet by 360 feet. This system of locks and dams provides a navigable depth of nine feet from the mouth of the Kanawha River to a point approximately 91 miles upstream. The existing project was completed at a cost of $23,403,201. Construction was initiated in 1931 and completed in 1937. For further cost details see Table 17-B, see also, Appendix C. Public Law 99-88 authorized the initiation of Engineering and Design and Real Estate Acquisition for Winfield Locks and Dam Replacement. Feasibility studies for modernization have been completed. The recommended plan includes construction of an additional lock chamber (800'x110') adjacent to the existing locks and continued use of the riverward lock chamber and the navigation dam. The full funding estimate for new work is $203,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are 79 terminals along the Kanawha River located from the mouth of the river to 30 miles east of Charleston, WV. These terminals are constructed principally of steel and wood mooring piles and steel pile mooring cells. Seventeen of these terminals have railroad connections. One terminal, a paved wharf, is owned by the City of Charleston, WV. The remaining terminals are privately owned. The principal commodities handled are coal, chemicals, acids, cement, gasoline and oil, and sand and gravel. For further details see the 1962 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. The Locks and Dams were operated as required and necessary repairs and improvements were made to the locks and dams as well as to the appurtenant structures and grounds. Channel inspections were conducted periodically. 3. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Chapter 19- Ohio River. 4. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 17-C. 5. ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH Location. The damsite is located in Delaware County, OH, on Alum Creek, a tributary of Big Walnut Creek, approximately 26 miles above the mouth of Alum Creek and 15 miles north of Columbus, OH, and approximately 157 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earthfill dam 93 feet in height and 10,000 feet in length with a gate controlled spillway located in the right abutment. The reservoir provides a total storage of 134,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 123 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1970 and completed in July 1974. The 405 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. The Federal cost of the project was $56,267,422. The Sponsor will reimburse the Government an estimated $27,880,000, exclusive of interest, for cost allocated to water supply. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations and Maintenance. The entire project is complete. The project was operated for the benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $984,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $45,071,000 in flood damages. 17-2 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT 6. BEECH FORK LAKE, WV Location. The damsite is located in Wayne County, WV., on Beech Fork Creek, a tributary of Twelvepole Creek, approximately four miles above the mouth of Beech Fork Creek and 20 miles above the confluence of Twelvepole Creek and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam 86 feet in height and 1,080 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway landward of the left abutment of the dam with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides a total storage of 37,540 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 78 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in December 1972 and completed in February 1977. See also Appendix A. A total of 485 tracts of land were acquired for the project. The total cost of the project was $41,987,500. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: Engineering activities for remaining work items continued. The project is essentially complete, except for remaining recreation facilities, landscaping and cleanup. Operations and maintenance. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $707,000. To date the project has prevented an estimated $3,666,000 in flood damages. 7. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. The damsite is located on the New River in Summers County, WV, approximately three miles above Hinton, WV and one mile from the confluence of the New and Greenbrier Rivers. The reservoir is located in Summers County, WV and Giles County, VA. Existing project. The existing project consists of a concrete gravity dam 180 feet in height and 2,048 feet in length. Appurtenant structures consist of a gated spillway 790 feet in length located in the channel section of the dam. The stilling pool is formed by a 23 foot highweir located 364 feet downstream of 16 gated sluices through the spillway section and discharging into the stilling pool. Penstocks were installed at the time of construction to permit the future installation of hydropower. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 631,000 acre-feet. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam was initiated in January 1942 and completed in April 1952. A total of 338 tracts of land was acquired for the project. The Federal cost of the project was $29,458,652, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. For further details see the 1939 and 1962 Annual Reports. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. The entire project is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $134,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $582,995,000 in flood damages. 8. BURNSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. The damsite is located in Braxton County WV, on the LIttle Kanawha River, approximately two miles above Burnsville, WV, and 124 miles above the confluence of the Little Kanawha River and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth embankment dam 80 feet in height and 1,000 feet in length with a gated spillway in the left abutment. The outlet works is an integral part of the spillway, consisting of five sluice gates and one low flow sluice. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 65,400 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 165 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in June 1973 and completed in February 1976. See also Appendix A. The 357 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. The Federal cost of the project was $56,195,839. Local cooperation. None Required. Operations during the fiscal year. The project is completed. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $4,161,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $26,860,000 in flood damage. 9. DEER CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. The damsite is located in Pickaway County, approximately seven miles south of Mount Sterling, OH on Deer Creek, a tributary of the Scioto River, approximately 21 miles above the mouth of Deer Creek and approximately 106 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River. 17-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1989 Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-filled dam 93 feet in height and 3,880 feet in length, a 741-foot concrete gravity channel section controlled by three tainter gates, an outlet works consisting of five gated sluices through a concrete spillway section discharging into a stilling basin and an earth dike 15 feet by 4,600 feet in a saddle located approximately four miles southwest of the damsite. The reservoir provides a total storage of 102,540 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 278 square miles. Construction of the dam was completed in May 1968. The 138 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. For further project details see the 1965 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost of the project is $20,406,545, including expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $376,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $18,059,000 in flood damages. 10. DELAWARE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. The damsite is located on the Olentangy River, approximately six miles above and north of Delaware, OH, and approximately 32 miles above the confluence of the Olentangy and Scioto Rivers at Columbus, OH. The reservoir is located in Delaware, Marion and Morrow Counties, OH. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam with a gate controlled ogee type spillway and five outlet conduits in the channel. The dam is 18,600 feet in length and 92 feet in height. The project provides for storage of 132,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 381 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in April 1946 and completed in July 1948. For further details see the 1962 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. Total real estate requirements of 7,703 acres of fee acquisition and 2,428 acres of flowage easements have been completed. The Federal cost for the project was $7,631,821. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $1,542,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $60,223,000 in flood damages. 11. DEWEY LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. The damsite is located on Johns Creek, approximately seven miles southeast of Paintsville, KY and approximately six miles above the confluence of Johns Creek and the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earthfill dam 118 feet in height and 913 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging through a channel excavated in the left abutment, and a rolled earth-fill dike blocking a low divide to Brandykeg Creek and the Levisa Fork. The reservoir provides a total storage of 93,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 207 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in March 1946 and completed in July 1949. For further project detail see the 1965 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. Total real estate requirements for the project were 12,458 acres in fee and 1,170 acres in flowage easements. The Federal cost of the project was $7,845,547, including expenditures for recreation under the completed project program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction activities are complete. The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $82,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $53,122,000 in flood damages. 12. DILLON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. The damsite is located on the Licking River, approximately six miles above the confluence of the Licking and Muskingum Rivers at Zanesville, Ohio. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam 118 feet in height and 1,400 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging through a 20-foot conduit in the right abutment, and an ungated 280-foot spillway adjacent to the left abutment of the dam, and two rolled earthfill dikes. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 261,110 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 748 square miles. Construction of the dam was completed in July 1959. For further project details see the 1962 Annual 17-4 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT Report. See also Appendix A. Total real estate required for the project consists of 8,232 acre in fee and 5,380 acres of flowage easements. See also Appendix A. Federal cost of the project was $30,218,135. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated as required for flood control, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $5,206,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $132,825,000 in flood damages. 13. EAST LYNN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. The damsite is located in Wayne County, WV approximately six miles southeast of Wayne, WV, 10 miles above the mouth of East Fork and 42 miles above the confluence of Twelvepole Creek and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth-fill dam 113 feet in height and 638 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway near the left abutment of the dam, and a 13-foot reinforced concrete tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 82,500 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 133 square miles. The required 552 tracts of land have been acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal costs of the project is $37,800,480. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $1,460,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $36,095,000 in flood damages. 14. FISHTRAP LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. The damsite is located in Pike County, KY, on the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River, approximately 15 miles upstream from Pikeville, KY, approximately three miles above the confluence of Levisa and Russell Forks and 103 miles above the mouth of the Levisa Fork. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock-fill dam 195 feet in height and 1,100 feet in length, a controlled spillway containing four tainter gates located in the valley wall adjacent to the left abutment of the dam, the outlet works consists of an intake structure with three conduits controlled by slide gates and discharging into a horseshoe shaped tunnel. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 164,360 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 395 square miles. The dam was completed in February 1969. The 1,301 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal costs for the project was $54,670,126, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $684,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $266,166,000 in flood damages. 15. GRAYSON LAKE, KY Location. The damsite is located in Carter County, Kentucky on the Little Sandy River approximately 49 miles above the confluence with the Ohio River, and 11 miles upstream from Grayson, KY. Existing project. The existing project consists of a random earthfill dam 120 feet in height and 1,460 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging through a 14-foot spillway beyond the left abutment. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 119,000 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 196 square miles. The dam was completed in January 1968. The 484 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. Federal costs for the project was $19,162,741, which includes expenditures for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $7,645,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $39,173,000 in flood damages. 17-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1989 16. JOHN W. FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, VA Location. The damsite is located in Dickenson County, VA, approximately four miles northwest of Haysi, VA, on the Pound River approximately two miles above the confluence of the Pound River and Russell Fork and approximately 150 miles above the mouth of the Big Sandy River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock-fill dam 252 feet in height and 970 feet in length, an outlet tunnel located near the left abutment of the dam with a control structure at the upstream end, a spillway controlled by six tainter gates located in a saddle just upstream from the damsite. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 145,700 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 222 square miles. The project was modified to include water quality control by adding control gates to the previously uncontrolled spillway, which increased the total storage capacity by 39,000 acre-feet. The dam was completed in December 1963. The 382 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost for the project was $20,444,383, which includes expenditures for recreation under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $260,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $138,453,000 in flood damages. 17. LEVISA AND TUG FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY AND CUMBERLAND RIVERS, WV, VA, AND KY Location. The Levisa and Tug Forks form the Big Sandy River at Louisa, KY. The Cumberland portion is the Upper Cumberland River Basin above Cumberland Falls, KY. The basin is approximately 100 miles in length and averages approximately 30 miles in width in the lower portion and approximately 10 miles in width above Harlan, KY. The Big Sandy Basin is within the Huntington District, and the Cumberland Basin is within the Nashville District. This report covers that portion of the project located in the Huntington District. Existing project. The authorization language directs the Corps of Engineers to design and construct, at full Federal expense, such flood control measures as are determined to be necesssary and advisable for the communities in the Tug and Levisa Forks and Upper Cumberland River basins. The authorization further states that such flood control measures would be located at or in the vicinity of Pikeville, KY; and Grundy, VA on the Levisa Fork; Pineville, KY, on the Cumberland River; and Williamson and Matewan on the Tug Fork, in order to afford the named communities and other flood damaged locations and their immediate environs a level of protection against flooding at least sufficient to prevent any future losses from the likelihood of flooding such as occurred in April 1977. The full funding estimate for the project is $763,300,000, which includes $41,600,000 non-Federal contributions. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Additional engineering studies are now underway to determine what is necessary and advisable to address the flooding problems in both the Levisa Fork Basin and in the Tug Fork tributary stream areas. The contract for construction of the Pump Station at West Williamson, WV was awarded in April 1983 and is complete. The contract for construction of the floodwall at West Williamson, WV, was awarded in July 1986 and is complete. The contract for the Williamson Area Clearing was awarded in September 1987 and is complete. The contract for the Williamson Housing Development, Valley View Site, was awarded in September 1987 and is 98% complete. The contract for the Floodwall and Pump Stations for the Williamson Central Business District was awarded in June 1988 and is 58% complete. 18. MASSILLON, OH Location. The project is located in Stark County, on the Tuscarawas River, approximately 200 miles above the mouth of the Muskingum River. Existing project. The existing project consists of channel improvement to the Tuscarawas River, combined with the construction of drainage facilities, levees and pump stations. For further details see the 1962 Annual Report. Construction was initiated in July 1940 and completed in October 1951. Local cooperation. None required. See the 1962 Annual Report for details of local contribution of work beyond the scope of the project. Operations during the fiscal year. Routine inspections were conducted to determine that the improved channel was maintained in satisfactory condition. 17-6 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT 19. MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH Location. The Muskingum River lies in Southeast Ohio and including tributaries, drains approximately 8,000 square miles. The headwaters rise about 25 miles south of Lake Erie and flow into the Ohio River at Marietta, OH, 172 miles below Pittsburgh, PA. Existing project. The existing project consists of the construction and operations and maintenance of 14 reservoirs and appurtenant works in the Muskingum River Basin. The existing project originally authorized by the Public Works Administration in February 1934. Construction of the system was initiated in January 1935 and completed in November 1938. The system was initially operated and maintained by the Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District of Ohio, the sponsoring agency, from July 1938 to August 1939 when operation and maintenance became the responsibility of the Corps of Engineers in accordance with the provisions of the 1939 Flood Control Act. For further project details, see the 1962 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. The cost of the project was $41,247,815, which includes expenditures for recreation facilities under the completed project program. A significant Major Rehabilitation program was approved in December 1977 in order to assure the integrity of the existing 14 structures under the originally designed maximum pool conditions. Underseepage and abutment seepage problems are being corrected through the installation of downstream blankets and/or relief wells and grouting. The estimated full funding cost of the rehabilitation program is $39,100,000 in total, with $25,500,000 from the Construction, General Appropriation and $13,600,000 from the Operations and Maintenance, General Appropriation. A related but separate program entitled Dam Safety Assurance has been initiated. Under current hydrologic design standards, deficiencies exist in the spillways at all the 14 projects in the system. Corrective measures include widening present spillways, constructing new spillways and installing parapet walls on top the dams. The full funding estimate for the Dam Safety Assurance Program is $60,870,000. Local cooperation. All requirements for local cooperation have been met. For further details see the 1942 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work. The Major Rehabilitation is continuing as scheduled. Thus far, twenty-one contracts have been awarded andthe program is 65% complete. The Dam Safety Assurance program was initiated during FY 1982. Thus far seven contracts have been awarded and the Dam Safety Assurance program is 39% complete. Operations and Maintenance. The reservoirs were operated for flood control as required, and the necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. The system prevented an estimated $43,836,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the system has prevented an estimated $1,153,332,000 in flood damages. 20. NEWARK, OHIO Location. The project is located in Licking County at the junction of the North and South Forks of the Licking River, approximately 29 miles above the confluence with the Muskingum River at Zanesville, OH. Existing project. For details of the existing project see the 1981 Annual Report. Construction of the existing project was initiated in July 1940 and completed in November 1941. As a result of the 1968 Flood Control Act the existing project was modified to include improvement of the interior drainage facilities, construction of Log Pond Run diversion channel and modification of the North Fork Channel. Construction of the Log Pond Run diversion channel was awarded in September 1980 and completed in December 1981. The full funding estimate for the project is $10,550,000 Federal cost and $4,215,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. For details of required and completed local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: North Fork Channel - As a result of withdrawal of State support for the Utica Lake project (now inactive) and the interdependency of the operation of Utica with the North Fork Channel, the North Fork Channel portion of the project required re-formulation. A reanalysis is complete. Engineering studies continued. The contract for construction of North Fork Channel (Phase I) was awarded in September 1986 and is complete. The contract for construction of the remaining portion of North Fork Channel was awarded in February 1988 and is 98% complete. Operations and Maintenance: Routine inspections were conducted to determine that the improved channel was maintained in satisfactory condition. 21. NORTH BRANCH OF KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH Location. The damsite is located in Knox County, OH, on the North Branch of Kokosing River, approximately nine miles above the confluence of the Kokosing and North Branch Rivers, and two miles northwest of Fredericktown, OH. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled-earth dam, 70 feet in height and 1,400 feet in 17-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1989 length with an uncontrolled spillway adjacent to the right abutment, and an uncontrolled, reinforced concrete outlet work located in the right abutment of the dam. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 14,885 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 45 square miles. the 56 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction of the dam was completed in May 1972. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost for the project was $6,665,985, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. 22. NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA Location. The damsite is located in Wise County, VA, on the North Fork of Pound River, approximately one mile upstream from the confluence of the North and South Forks which form the Pound River and approximately three miles upstream from Pound, VA. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam, 130 feet in height and 600 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway in a saddle upstream from the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides a total storage of 11,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 17 square miles. The 127 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction of the dam was completed in January 1966. See also Appendix A. The Federal costs for the project was $6,186,901, which includes expenditures for recreation under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction is complete. The project was operated as required for flood control and the necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $30,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $4,710,000 in flood damages. 23. OHIO RIVER BASIN (HUNTINGTON DISTRICT) Location. The work covered by this project consists of a series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements and dams and lakes in the Ohio River Basin within the Huntington District. Existing project. The existing project consists ofthe individual projects considered in the Ohio River Basin comprehensive plan within the Huntington District. Operations during the fiscal year. The completed local protection projects, which are operated and maintained by local interest, except for those local protection projects for which individual reports have been included. To date the project has prevented flood damages of an estimated cumulative total of $617,891,000. 24. PAINT CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. The damsite is located in Ross County, Ohio, on Paint Creek, a tributary of the Scioto River, approximately 37 miles above the mouth of Paint Creek and 100 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River and approximately four miles east of New Parkersburg, OH. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock and random earth fill dam, 118 feet in height and 700 feet in length, a gale controlled spillway located near the right abutment, an outlet tunnel located in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end, and a random rockfill dike located at the right abutment of the spillway. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 145,000 arcre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 576 square miles. Construction of the dam was completed in July 1973. The 257 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. Federal costs for the project was $26,969,962, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and the necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented an estimated $721,000 in flood damages. To date, the project has prevented flood damages estimated to be $38,794,000. 25. PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY Location. The damsite is located in Johnson County, KY, on Paint Creek, a tributary of the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River, approximately eight miles above the mouth of Paint Creek, and four miles west of Paintsville, KY. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam 153 feet in height and 1,560 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located southwest of the right abutment of the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. 17-8 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT The reservoir provides for a total storage of 76,642 acrefeet and controls a drainage area of approximately 93 square miles. The 635 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction of the dam was initiated in September 1976 and was completed in September 1980. See also Appendix A. The full funding estimate for new work is $66,478,000, which includes $3,028,000 non-Federal Costs. The local sponsor has reimbursed the Government $377,000 for the cost sharing portion of recreation development. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the project is well advanced. The remaining work items include minor highway relocations, landscaping and final cleanup. The contract for Construction of Mine Fork Road was awarded in February 1989 and is 3% complete. Operations and Maintenance: The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $3,000. To date, the project has prevented flood damages estimated to be $5,650,000. 26. R. D. BAILEY LAKE, WV Existing project. The damsite is located in Wyoming County, WV, on the Guyandotte River approximately 108 miles above the confluence with the Ohio River and one mile east of Justice, WV. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled rockfill dam with a concrete face, 305 feet in height and 1,330 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located in a saddle in the right abutment of the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the left abutment with a control structure located at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 203,700 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 540 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in November 1973 and completed in December 1979. See also Appendix A. A total of 2,109 tracts of land were acquired for the project. The total cost of the project was $261,211,700. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and Maintenance. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $94,000. To date, the project has prevented flood damages estimated to be $58,790,000. 27. ROSEVILLE, OH Location. The project is located in Muskingum and Perry Counties, on Moxahala Creek, approximately six miles the confluence with Jonathan Creek, a tributary of the Muskingum River. Existing project. The existing project consists of 7,291 feet of channel improvement; 6,400 feet of levee and railroad embankment enlargements; and the necessary appurtenances for interior drainage. Total Federal cost of the project was $910,785. Construction was initiated in August 1959 and completed in October 1960. Local cooperation. All requirements for local cooperation have been completed. See also the 1962 Annual Report. Total costs of local requirements were $62,000. Operations during the fiscal year. Routine inspections of the improved portion of the project were conducted to determine that the project was maintained in satisfactory condition. 28. SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. The damsite is located at Ruckers Bend in Nicholas County on the Gauley River approximately 35 miles above the confluence of the Gauley and New River at Gauley Bridge, WV. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam having a height of 357 feet and a length of 2,280 feet, an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure located at the upstream end, an uncontrolled spillway located west of the right abutment and two earthfill dikes. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 413,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 803 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam was initiated in March 1960 and completed in March 1966. A total of 9,346 acres of land were acquired for the project. The Federal costs of the project was $48,375,884, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necesssary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $286,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $256,167,000 in flood damages. 17-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1989 29. SUTTON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Location. The damsite is located on the Elk River in Braxton County approximately one mile above Sutton, WV and 101 miles above the mouth of the Elk River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a concrete gravity dam having a height of 220 feet and a length of 1,178 feet, a gated spillway in the channel section of the dam, comprised of six tainter gates supported by piers, an outlet works comprised of five gate sluices through the spillway section. The reservoir provides for a storage of 265,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 537 square miles. See also Local cooperation. None required. See the 1981 Annual Report for contributed funds. Operations during the fiscal year. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $1,059,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $173,123,000 in flood damages. 30. TOM JENKINS RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. The damsite is located in Athens County, on the East Branch of Sunday Creek, a tributary of the Hocking River, approximately three miles north of Glouster, Ohio and 57 miles above the mouth of the Hocking River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled-earth dam, 84 feet in height and 944 feet in length, a controlled works discharging through a tunnel in the left abutment, and an uncontrolled spillway in the ridge running south from the damsite. The reservoir, known as Burr Oak Lake, provides for a total storage of 26,900 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 33 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the project was initiated in March 1948 and completed in February 1950. A total of 100 acres of land were acquired for the project. The Federal costs of the project were $2,086,503, which includes expenditure for recreation at completed project. Local cooperation. All requirements of local cooperation have been met, see also the 1962 Annual Report. Contributed funds in the amount of $575,000 have been received from the State of Ohio. Operations during the fiscal year. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $342,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $9,983,000 in flood damages. 31. YATESVILLE LAKE, KY Location. The damsite is located in Lawrence County, on Blaine Creek, a tributary of the Big Sandy River, approximately five miles west of Louisa, KY and 18 miles above the mouth of Blaine Creek. Existing project. The existing project provides for the construction of an earthfill dam, 104 feet in height and 770 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located approximately one-half mile east of the right abutment of the dam, and an outlet tunnel through the left abutment of the dam with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir will provide a total storage of 86,951 acre-feet and control a drainage area of 208 square miles. The full funding estimate for new work is $106,000, which will be allocated and expended by the Federal Government. The sponsor will reimburse the Government an estimated $6,615,000 for the cost sharing portion of the recreation development. To date, 618 of the required 778 real estate tracts have been acquired. A contract for construction of the dam was awarded in January 1977 and was terminated for the convenience of the Government in August 1977. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: The contract for Construction of Dam and Appurtenant Works, Phase I, was awarded in March 1984 and is complete. Contracts with the Commonwealth and the County for relocation and/or abandonment of roads affected by the project are complete. The contract for construction of Dam and Appurtenances (Phase II) was awarded in April 1986 and is complete. The contract for Relocation of SR32-2 was awarded in February 1986 and is complete. The contract for Reservoir Clearing was awarded in June 1989 and is 49% complete. The contract for Relocating Remaining Highways was awarded in October 1988 and is 86% complete. The contract for Cemetery Relocation, Part III, was awarded in February 1989 and is 72% complete. 32. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS The flood control act of June 22, 1936 and subsequent acts require local interest to furnish assurances that they will operate and maintain certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for the administration of these regulations within their respective districts. Maintenance inspections were made 17-10 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT during the fiscal year of those completed units transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain the projects in accordance with the standards prescribed by regulations. Total costs for fiscal year 1989 were $83,890. Total cost to September 30, 1989, were $1,529,232. The flood control works inspected and the dates of inspection are tabulated in Table H. 33. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency bank protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress are tabulated as follows: Location FY 1989 Cost Apple Creek, Apple Creek, OH Jardin Manor, Lick Creek, OH Kenova, WV Nimishillen Creek, East Sparta, OH Ohio River, Gallipolis, OH Ohio River, Williamstown, WV Ohio River, Village Middleport, OH Point Pleasant, WV, State Park Prices Creek, at Smithfield, WV Sistersville, WV, City Park Sistersville, WV, Storm & Sanitary Services St. Albans, WV, Kanawha River State Route 62, Buffalo, WV $ 3,767 6,467 50,070 5,116 10,875 41,111 20,981 55,113 19 35,113 49,681 12,257 32 Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 853, 80th Congress are tabulated as follows: Location FY 1989 Cost Black Fork, Mohichan River, Shelby, OH Blacklick Creek, Franklin County, OH Elk River, at Addison, WV Hocking River, at Chauncey, OH Hughes Creek, Hugheston, WV Krouts Creek, Huntington, WV Muskingum River, Mansfield, OH Olentangy River, Galion, OH Spring Creek, Spencer, WV Wolf Creek, Barberton/Norton, OH $ 62 81,234 8,715 12,627 3,342 673 6 5,421 4,665 25,501 Snagging and clearing activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress are tabulated as follows: Location FY 1989 Cost Hocking River, Rockbridge, OH Krouts Creek, Huntington, WV Lilly Park, WV Shope Creek, Ashland, KY Whitestone Creek, Mt. Giland, OH $11,294 146 39 846 819 Work performed under special legislation pursuant to Water Resources Development Act of 1986 as follows: Location Bridges, Massillon, OH Kanawha River, Charleston, WV Kanawha River, St. Albans, WV FY 1989 Cost $ 5,778 4,683 13,112 Flood control and coastal emergency activities pursuant to Public Law 99, 84th Congress were conducted as required during FY 1989 at a cost of $416,239. National emergency management activities were accomplished by the district as required. The costs for these activities during FY 1989 were $131,890. 34. SURVEYS Fiscal year 1989 costs were $2,052,522 itemized as follows: Navigation Studies Flood Damage Prevention Studies Comprehensive Basin Studies Special Studies Miscellaneous Activities Coordination Studies Advance Engineering and Design 35. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $189,902. $678,360 583,231 539,690 9,519 92,088 149,634 961,345 17-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1989 TABLE 17-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sept. 30, 1989 2. Kanawha River, .WV (Existing Project) Winfield L&D 5. Alum Creek Lake, OH 6. Beech Fork Lake, WV 7. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 8. Burnsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 9. Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 10. Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - - 27,853,6991 - - - - 27,853,6991 6,765,000 5,326,600 6,348,500 5,045,900 89,777,5842 6,780,172 5,273,037 6,338,485 4,956,717 89,589,6872 - - - - 130,9848 - - - - 130,9848 - 1,185,000 2,905,000 5,860,000 - 788,585 3,049,510 5,257,766 -45,933 5,341 600,200 608,490 186,000 281,817 608,000 620,375 578,800 484,500 584,656 464,003 77,021 807,500 800,170 -40,000 34,897 754,000 705,229 730,200 831,300 966,500 725,974 818,116 959,377 -39,426 12,722 1,079,600 1,063,503 496,800 492,537 732,200 748,714 9,950,0004 9,095,8614 56,267,422 56,267,422 5,999,365 5,955,532 41,987,500 41,987,500 6,825,739 6,778,872 - 29,458,6526 - 29,458,6526 990,700 14,498,778 1,027,535 14,489,019 1,036,000 1,073,100 1,279,100 1,051,479 1,022,355 1,225,891 431,200 466,200 401,500 454,619 454,016 404,277 1,244,500 831,500 406,500 1,255,843 804,290 429,605 378,800 362,294 527,600 527,210 56,195,839 56,195,839 9,263,3056 9,138,2986 20,406,5457 20,406,5457 6,933,0258 6,900,4588 7,631,821 7,631,821 9,046,8199 9,030,0699 17-12 TABLE 17-A (cont'd) HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sept. 30, 1989 11. Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY 12. Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 13. East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 14. Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY 15. Grayson Lake, KY 16. John W. Flannagan Dam & Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, VA 17. Levisa & Tug Forks of the Big Sandy & Cumberland Rivers, KY, WV, & VA 18. Massillon, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - - 7,845,54710 - - - - 7,845,54710 935,400 1,102,600 1,218,000 1,028,200 14,820,17611 935,266 1,087,460 1,182,381 1,076,456 14,787,12111 - - - - 30,218,135 - - - - 30,218,135 823,300 809,990 1,169,000 1,201,498 757,500 777,145 410,900 405,026 327,000 299,855 426,300 6,092,34312 463,478 6,076,47712 - - 775,000 - - 774,512 960,300 1,213,501 995,100 945,656 1,106,056 1,123,898 806,000 803,962 37,800,968 37,806,480 12,506,80718 12,487,46818 54,670,12614 54,670,12614 909,500 1,039,300 8,842,49815 861,475 1,076,769 8,810,28216 19,162,74116 19,162,74116 572,000 598,334 639,000 631,346 649,500 617,469 628,800 9,823,370 639,720 9,784,232 20,444,38317 20,444,38317 666,500 674,436 857,300 1,119,000 844,377 1,058,688 935,600 12,092,26218 979,894 12,056,25718 14,526,000 30,865,000 30,102,000 41,100,000 139,993,0001' 15,005,640 20,547,722 36,253,188 43,081,654 136,831,11918 13,300 12,942 -100 9,000 8,575 10,000 9,587 8,139,4060" 8,139,406.' 312,708 311,611 17-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1989 TABLE 17-A (cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sept. 30, 1989 19. Muskingum River Dams & Lakes, OH 20. Newark, OH (Previous Project) (Existing Project) 21. North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH 22. North Fork of Pound River Lake, Ohio River Basin, VA 23. Ohio River Basin New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. (Rehab.) Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Dam Safety Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost - - - - 41,247,81521 - - - - 41,247,81521 4,041,000 4,110,000 3,570,500 4,222,500 68,878,05022 4,154,795 3,980,201 3,496,431 4,354,381 68,747,69022 993,000 1,139,211 60,000 308,507 196,800 595,500 200,000 992,300 195,560 577,093 209,502 982,155 2,052,000 572,000 50,000 22,209,945 1,915,129 349,014 375,383 22,077,845 6,000,000 9,065,000 2,410,000 24,415,000 4,473,692 7,914,562 3,921,597 23,137,625 845,916 845,916 13,800 13,737 297,785 198,296 23,200 20,500 -900 758,742 23,004 19,790 - 758,673 265,000 4,087,000 550,000 10,674,512 356,352 2,743,720 1,638,974 10,410,324 58,600 158,300 59,642 151,627 199,000 297,400 206,538 284,700 154,000 150,471 252,500 246,920 154,000 157,555 6,665,9852" 6,665,985" 1,809,917 1,800,586 - 6,186,90125 - 6,186,901" 265,700 5,655,959" 275,188 5,645,17726 355,86127 355,86127 24. Paint Creek Lake, New Work Ohio River Basin, Approp. OH Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 25. Paintsville Lake, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 464,000 706,700 455,093 669,305 548,500 590,421 84,359 620,000 322,000 435,106 856,936 317,444 844,500 685,600 596,500 816,543 672,878 582,529 - 26,969,962" - 26,969,962" 504,700 6,406,856 503,067 6,387,170 635,000 59,444,147 182,694 58,912,546 626,600 4,668,700 629,138 4,637,686 17-14 TABLE 17-A (cont'd) HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sept. 30, 1989 26. R. D. Bailey Lake, New Work WV Approp. - 45,250,000 -5,000 - 261,217,2335" Cost 271,600 45,222,538 36,623 - 261,217,23380 Maint. Approp. 2,551,000 1,335,800 1,723,000 1,178,000 12,328,61451 Cost 2,571,582 1,313,257 1,652,811 1,236,457 12,270,41881 27. Roseville, OH New Work Approp. - - - - 910,785 Cost - - - - 910,785 Maint. Approp. 20,000 12,000 9,000 22,700 192,668 Cost 19,961 12,004 8,665 - 169,596 28. Summersville Lake, New Work Ohio River Basin, Approp. - - - - 48,375,88482 WV Cost - - - - 48,375,88482 Maint. Approp. 1,649,000 2,784,500 963,500 1,040,100 18,843,014" Cost 1,656,311 2,794,884 902,053 1,086,289 18,799,009" 29. Sutton Lake, New Work Ohio River Basin, Approp. -5,376 - - - 37,029,585" WV Cost 12,805 - - - 37,029,585" Maint. Approp. 1,480,000 1,024,800 1,284,500 1,293,900 21,472,687" Cost 1,567,279 1,023,670 1,223,288 1,356,331 21,427,843" 30. Tom Jenkins Dam, New Work OH Approp. - - - - 2,086,503" Cost - - - - 2,086,503" Maint. Approp. 371,000 234,400 227,000 242,500 4,341,375 Cost 378,150 240,242 227,314 226,493 4,320,175 31. Yatesville Lake, New Work KY Approp. 9,642,000 5,410,000 8,287,000 17,627,000 86,010,500 Cost 10,201,760 15,907,584 16,007,404 18,798,052 84,011,836 See page 17-16 for footnotes. 17-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1989 1Includes $4,294,612 for new work for previous projects, $4,498,636 Emergency Relief funds, $9,004,800 Public Works funds and $686,317 Code 713 funds. 2Includes $3,883,513 for maintenance of previous projects and $546,090 Maintenance and Operation funds. 3 Public Works Acceleration funds. 4Includes $4,975,000 Inland Waterways Trust funds. sIncludes $543,960 Emergency Relief funds, $9,698 Public Works Acceleration funds, $211,850 Code 711 funds and $75,000 Code 713 funds. 6Includes $214,678 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 7Excludes $225,090 contributed funds. Includes $590,000 Code 711 funds. 8Includes $130,000 provided by the Productive Employment Act of 1983. 9Includes $240,000 provided by the Productive Employment Act of 1983. 10Includes $23,087 Public Works Acceleration funds, $1,089,94 Code 711 funds and $231,105 Code 713 funds. 11Includes $82,900 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds and $214,678 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 12Includes $100,000 provided from the Productive Employment Act of 1983. 1 lSncludes $209,918 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds and $214,678 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 14Includes $362,649 Code 711 funds and $10,000 Code 712 funds. 15Includes $38,000 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds and $214,678 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 16Includes $406,919 Code 711 funds and $2,317 Code 713 funds. 17Includes $422,983 Code 711 funds. lncludes $88,710 special recreation use fees. 19Includes Cost from Ohio River Division/District. m2Includes $477,813 contributed funds. 21Includes $27,190,000 National Industrial Recovery fundsand $528,288 Code 711 funds. 2Includes $198,578 Maintenance and Operations funds. 23Includes $61,945 Public Works Acceleration funds. 2Includes $45,177 Code 711 funds. 25Includes $64,233 Code 711 funds. 26Includes $68,200 special recreation use fees. 27Includes $10,920 Emergency Relief funds. 28Includes $14,153 Code 711 funds. 2Includes $31,496 special recreation use fee funds. 30Includes $5,534 Consolidated Army funds. S31 ncludes $60,000 provided from the Productive Employment Act of 1983, and $66,678 Maintenance and Operations Funds. S32 ncludes $300,062 Code 711 funds. "Includes $214,112 special recreation use fee funds, $300,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act of 1983, and $66,678 Maintenance and Operation Funds. 3"Includes $1,837,337 Code 711 funds and $287,843 Accelerated Public Works funds. Excludes $62,800 contributed funds. 36Includes $267,634 special recreation use fee funds, $215,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act of 1983, and $142,078 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 36Includes $8,064 Code 711 funds and $30,000 Public Works Acceleration funds. Excludes $575,000 contributed funds. 17-16 TABLE 17-B HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 15,1985 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Jun. 28,1938 Jun. 28,1938 Dec. 22,1944 Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Jun. 28,1938 Dec. 22,1944 KANAWHA RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV Construction of three locks and dams on the Kanawha River and one on the Ohio River. Engineering and Design and Land Acquisition for Winfield Locks and Dam. ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. BEECH FOfRK LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation Deleted Power BURNSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation DEER CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. DELAWARE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation DEWEY LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation DILLON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation 17-17 H. Doc. 31, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 88, 99th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 58'7, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 520, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 91, 74th Cong. 2nd Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534 78th Cong., 2nd. Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. 5. 6. 10. 11. 12. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1989 TABLE 17-B (cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 13. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 14. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 15. Jul. 14, 1960 16. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 17. Oct. 1, 1980 18. Jun. 28, 1938 19. Feb. 20, 1934 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 11, 1939 20. Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 13,1968 21. Oct. 23, 1962 22. Jul. 14, 1960 EAST LYNN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation FISHTRAP LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation GRAYSON LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. JOHN W. FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, VA Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation LEVISA AND TUG FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY RIVER, AND CUMBERLAND RIVER, KY, WV Construction of such Flood Control Measures as deemed Necessary and Advisable. MASSILLON, OHIO Construction of Channel Improvement Project. MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH Construction of 14 Flood Control Reservoirs. Reimbursement to the Muskingum Conservancy District a sum not to exceed actual expenditures for project construction. Operations and Maintenance assigned to the Corps of Engineers. NEWARK, OHIO Construction of Channel Improvement Project. Modification to Existing Project and Additional Channel Improvement and Drainage Facilities. NORTH BRANCH OF KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 440, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sect. 202, P.L. 367, 96th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Works Admin. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 396, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 337, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 220, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 645, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. 17-18 TABLE 17-B (cont'd) HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 24. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22,1944 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 28,1938 Jun. 28,1938 Dec. 22,1944 Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22,1944 Dec. 22, 1944 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 22, 1936 PAINT CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. R. D. BAILEY LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. ROSEVILLE, OH Construction of Channel Improvement Project. SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation SUTTON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation TOM JENKINS DAM, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. YATESVILLE LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. INSPECTIONS OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of Local Maintenance of Federally Constructed Local Protection Projects. 17-19 Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 246, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 569, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 762, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 246, 89th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 738, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1989 TABLE 17-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Big Sandy River WV and KY including Levisa and Tu Forks2 1952 1,586,236 1,569,8111 131,473 Elk River, WV 1903 30,259 Gauley River, WV4 1903 14,761 Guyandotte River, WV5 1915 27,500 Little Kanawha River, WVs 1960 470,536 1,023,854 Muskingum River, OH7 1955 301,912 6,171,897 6,041 New River, WA and VA5 1899 109,691 Scioto River at Portsmouth, OH8 1953 10,951 16,593 1In addition, $140,068 expended from funds transferred from Department of Commerce, under accelerated public works program, for repairs of eroded bank at lock 3 on Big Sandy River, at Louisa, KY. 2Operation and Maintenance suspended June 30, 1952. SWork closed September 1902. Property transferred to Kanawha River improvements. 4Work closed September 1902. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress. 5Work suspended. 6Operation and maintenance suspended June 30, 1951. 7Collections from license non-Federal hydroelectric utilities for use of dams on Muskingum River for fiscal years 1923-1953 were $79,154. 8Private Law 954, August 31, 1954, authorized Secretary of Treasury to pay Portsmouth sand and Gravel Co. $75,000 in full settlement of claims against Government for damages resulting from change in Scioto River Channel. 17-20 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT TABLE 17-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Completed Local Protection Projects Ashland, KY 1954 3,718,839 - - Athens, OH 1979 5,313,700 - - Cattletsburg, KY 1963 3,854,361 - - Ceredo-Kenova, WV 1955 2,753,551 - - Chillicothe, OH 1986 20,373,314 - - East Rainelle, WV 1962 614,598 - - Galax, VA 1953 480,536 - - Huntington, WV 1956 7,172,840 - - Ironton, OH 1952 2,604,646 - - Maysville, KY 1959 6,493,747 - - Parkersburg, WV 1955 6,652,827 - - Pt. Pleasant, WV 1955 2,919,578 - - Portsmouth-New Boston, OH 1956 9,806,424 - - Princeton, WV 1962 808,750 - - Russell, KY 1953 552,493 - - Williamson, WV 1964 1,056,166 - - Inactive Local Protection Projects Augusta, KY - 11,577 - - Burlington, OH - - - - Chesapeake, OH - - - - Coal Grove, OH - 3,389 - - Coal River, WV 1979 472,229 - - Dover, KY - - - - Fullerton, KY - - - - Greenup, KY - 4,962 - - Lower Guyandotte River Basin, WV - 17,721 - - Miller, OH - - - - Normal, KY - - - - Proctorville, OH - - - - Ravenswood, WV - - - - South Point, OH - - - - South Portsmouth, KY - - - - Vanceburg, KY - - - - Deferred Local Protection Projects Newark, OH (Interior Drainage) 1983 - - - Oceana, WV 1981 611,000 - - Inactive Reservoirs and Lakes Haysi, VA - 2,656 - - Leading Creek, WV 1974 272,880 - - Panther Creek, WV 1976 22,879 - - Salt Creek, OH 1975 1,089,943 - - Utica, OH 1975 757,550 - - West Fork, WV 1974 663,192 - - Deferred Reservoir and Lakes Birch, WV -.. Kehoe Lake, KY 1981 1,272,740 - - Logan, OH - Moores Ferry, WV - Active Authorized Projects with no current year expenditures. Martin, KY 1983 212,048 17-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY-1989 TABLE 17-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS All projects listed in this table have been deauthorized in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974, P.L. 251, 93rd Congress. For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Local Protection Projects Report For Date Expended Expended Aberdeen, OH - May 1981 1,334 - Athalia, OH - Aug 1977 - - Belpre, OH - Nov 1977 - - Brooklyn, WV - Nov 1979 - - Buena Vista, OH - Aug 1977 - - Chambersburg, OH - Aug 1977 - - Cheshire, OH Nov 1977 - - Chilo, OH - Aug 1977 - - Clifton, WV - Aug 1977 11,237 - Columbus, OH - Aug 1977 - - Friendly, WV - Aug 1977 - - Gallipoiis, OH - Aug 1977 - - Hanging Rock, OH - Aug 1977 - - Hartford, WV - Aug 1977 - - Henderson, WV - Aug 1977 - - Higginsport, OH - Oct 1978 - - Hockingport, OH - Aug 1977 - - Letart, WV - Aug 1977 - - Letart Falls, OH - Aug 1977 - - Manchester, OH - May 1981 - - Mapleshade, OH - Oct 1978 - - Marietta, OH - Nov 1981 - - Mason, WV - Aug 1977 - - Middleport, OH - May 1981 9,783 - Millwood, WV - Aug 1977 - - New Martinsville, WV - Nov 1979 - - New Matamoras, OH - Aug 1977 - - Newport, OH - Aug 1977 - - Pomeroy, OH - Aug 1977 - - Portland, OH - Aug 1977 - - Racine, OH - Aug 1977 - - Ripley, OH - Oct 1978 7,523 - Riverview, WV - Aug 1977 - - St. Mary's, WV - Aug 1977 - - Sardis, OH - Aug 1977 - - Sciotoville, OH - Aug 1977 - - Sistersville, OH - Aug 1977 - - Syracuse, OH - Aug 1977 - - Waverley, WV - Aug 1977 - - Williamstown, WV - Nov 1979 - - Zanesville, OH - May 1981 - - Reservoirs aid Lakes Big Bendc, WV - Aug 1977 - - Big Darby, OH 1969 Nov 1979 3,349,568 - Frazeysburg, OH - May 1981 5,000 - Millersburg, OH - May 1981 - - Mill Creek, OH 1981 Nov 1981 1,602,702 - Mud River, WV - Nov1979 - - Poca, WV - May 1981 - - Rocy Fork, OH 1950 Aug 1977 91,321 - White Oak Creek, OH - Nov 1981 - - 17-22 HUNTINGTON WEST VIRGINIA DISTRICT TABLE 17-H INSPECTION OF FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS - See Section 33 of Text Flood Control Works Inspected Dates of Inspection Ashland, KY May 89 Sep 89 Athens, OH May 89 Bramwell, WV Oct 89 Cairo, WV Oct 89 Canton (Nimishillen), OH Aug 89 Cattletsburg, KY Jun 89 Sep 89 Ceredo-Kenova, WV May 89 Sep 89 Chillicothe, OH Apr 89 Oct 89 East Rainelle, WV Oct 89 Fishing Creek, Pine Grove, WV Oct 89 Fourpole Creek, WV Feb 89 Galax, VA Nov 89 Grahn, KY Sep 89 Griffithsville-Yawkey, WV Dec 89 Hutchins, KY Huntington, WV Apr 89 Sep 89 Inez, KY Sep 89 Ironton, OH Apr 89 Sep 89 Jacksonsburg, Fishing Creek, WV Oct 89 Maysville, KY May 89 Oct 89 Montcalm, WV Nov 89 Newark, OH Jul 89 Oct 89 Olive Hill, KY Sep 89 Paint Creek at Chillicothe, OH Dec 89 Paint Creek at Washington Court House, OH Oct 89 Parkersburg, WV May 89 Oct 89 Pax, WV Nov 89 Point Pleasant, WV May 89 Oct 89 Portsmouth-New Boston, OH Jun 89 Oct 89 Prestonsburg, KY Jul 89 Princeton, WV Nov 89 Richwood and Fenwick, WV Nov 89 Right and Left Forks of Beaver Creek, KY Dec 89 Ripley, WV Oct 89 Roseville, OH Jul 89 Nov 89 Russel, KY Jun 89 Sep 89 Smithfield, WV Oct 89 South Williamson, KY May 89 Sep 89 Utica, OH Aug 89 West Union, Middle Island, WV Oct 89 Williamson, WV May 89 Sep 89 17-23 PITTSBURGH, PA DISTRICT * This District comprises part of eastern Ohio, western Pennsylvania, southwestern New York, northern West Virginia, and northwestern Maryland embraced in drainage basin of Ohio River and Tributaries above mile 127 (below Pittsburgh), immediately upstream from New Martinsville, W. Va. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation - Locks and Dams Page 1. Allegheny River, PA ........................... 18-2 2. Construction of locks and dams, Ohio River ...................................... 18-2 3. Monongahela River, PA and WV .................. 18-2 4. Open-channel work, Ohio River ................ 18-3 5. Tygart Lake, WV ................ ............. 18-3 6. Other authorized navigation projects .............. 18-3 Flood Control - Local Protection 7. Chartiers Creek, PA .................. ....... 18-3 8. Elkins, WV .................................... 18-3 9. Johnstown, PA......... ...... ............ ... . 18-4 10. Punxsutawney, Ohio River Basin, PA................. .. .. .............. 18-4 11. Turtle Creek, PA .............................. 18-4 Flood Control - Reservoirs 12. Berlin Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH...................................... 18-4 13. Conemaugh River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA ........................... 18-5 14. Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA ............................ 18-5 15. East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA ............................ 18-5 16. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, PA and NY .................. 18-5 17. Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA ............................... ..... 18-6 18. Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA ............................ 18-6 19. Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, OH .................. 18-6 20. Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH ............................... 18-7 21. Ohio River Basin (Pittsburgh District) ......................................... 18-7 22. Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and OH ......................... 18-7 23. Stonewall Jackson Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV..................................... 18-8 24. Tionesta Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA ................................. 18-8 25. Union City Dam, Ohio River Basin, PA ....................................... 18-8 26. Woodcock Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA ....................................... 18-9 27. Youghiogheny River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and MD ............................... 18-9 28. Inspection of completed flood control projects.......................................... 18-9 29. Other authorized flood control projects. .......... 18-10 30. Flood control work under special authorization ....................................... 18-10 General Investigations 31. Surveys....................................... 18-10 32. Collection and study of basic data ................ 18-10 33. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design......... 18-10 34. Research and development. ................ .. 18-10 Tables Table 18-A Table 18-B Table 18-C Table 18-D Table 18-E Table 18-F Table 18-G Table 18-H Table 18-I Table 184-J Table 18-K Table 18-L Table 18-M Cost & Financial Statement ............. 18-11 Authorizing Legislation ................. 18-15 Other Authorized Navigation Projects .... 18-20 Not Applicable ......................... Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................................ 18-21 Not Applicable......... ................ Deauthorized Projects .................. 18-23 Allegheny River Statistics ............ 18-24 Monongahela River Statistics ............ 18-25 Monongahela River Total Costs .......... 18-26 Ohio River Basin Reservoirs ............. 18-26 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................................ 18-27 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization.......................... 18-28 18-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA Location. The Allegheny River is 325 miles long. It rises in northern Pennsylvania, flows northwestward into New York, thence generally southwestward to Pittsburgh, PA, where it joins with Monongahela River to form the Ohio. (See Geological Survey Charts for western Pennsylvania and southwestern New York.) Existing project. The project consists of eight locks and dams to afford slack-water navigation for a length of 72 miles from Pittsburgh, PA to above East Brady, PA. Controlling depth through canalized portion is 9 feet at normal pool level. Channel width varies from a minimum of 200 feet to full width of river at mouth. Existing project is complete, the last lock, No. 9, was placed in service in 1938. All locks and dams are in fair condition. Navigation channel has been widened at certain points and, in general, maintained to project depth, thus affording adequate depth for passage of commercial tows. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Pittsburgh constructed a modern wharf for river freight. There are numerous privately maintained terminals and docks, consisting of tipples, various types of hoists, chutes, and pipelines for use in loading and unloading coal, stone, sand, gravel, petroleum products, steel products, and other commodities. Transshipment of freight between river and railroads is handled at privately owned riverto- rail terminals. Existing private terminals are adequate for shipments and receipt in Pittsburgh District of type of commerce now in existence. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance, General: Contract for tow haulage units at locks 2, 3, 4 and 6, awarded in September, 1988 for $330,337 was 67% complete. Contracts completed during the fiscal year include erosion protection at L/D 7 for an estimated $4,302,885 and installation of exterior insulation and doors - L/D 6 and 7 for an estimated $151,464. Locks were operated as required and necessary repairs were made to structures to maintain them in a serviceable condition. 2. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Ohio River portion. 3. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV Location. Formed by junction of Tygart and West Fork Rivers about 1 mile south of Fairmont, WV, and flows northerly for 128.7 miles to its junction with Allegheny River, forming Ohio River at Pittsburgh, PA (See Geological Survey Charts for southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1963, page 1070. Existing project. Provides for improvement of river by 9 locks and dams to afford slack-water navigation for its entire length from Pittsburgh to above Fairmont, WV. Original locks and dams 7, 8 and 9 were replaced by new locks and dams 7 and 8 in 1925. Increased traffic necessitated enlargement and improvement of locks and dams 1 to 6 between Pittsburgh and Rices Landing, PA, by building two parallel chambers and fixed concrete dams during 1905 and 1932. Locks and dam 1 were eliminated in 1938 by raising Emsworth Dam, Ohio River. Reconstruction of lock 2 was completed in 1953 to provide two modern navigation chambers. The existing locks and dam 2 were originally completed in 1907; major modifications were made in 1923 and 1924, and in 1926 the upper guard and guide walls were extended. Construction of Maxwell locks and dam and the reconstruction of dam 4 have allowed for removal of obsolete locks and dams 5 and 6. Small and antiquated original locks and dams 10 to 15, inclusive, have been replaced by three modern structures. Morgantown lock and dam, initial step in replacement program, was completed in 1950 replacing locks and dams 10 and 11. Hildebrand lock and dam, next upstream, was completed in 1959 replacing locks and dams 12 and 13. Raising crest of dam 8 was also completed in 1959 as part of upper river improvement and eliminates restricted depth in upper reach of pool. Opekiska lock and dam was completed in 1967 replacing locks and dams 14 and 15. Completion of this link in upper river replacement program provides for entire river length of minimum channel depth of 9 feet, varying in width from a minimum of 250 feet to practically full width at mouth. Locks and dam 3 showed advanced stages of deterioration and, because of its strategic location and its importance to industry throughout the Greater Pittsburgh area and the nation, emergency remedial work had to be done in 1977. Major rehabilitation of locks and dam 3 was completed on Oct. 27, 1980. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the replacement of Lock and Dam 7 with Grays Landing Lock and Dam and the construction of a new lock landward of the existing lock at Lock and Dam 8 (to be renamed Point Marion Lock and Dam). In accordance with the provisions of this act, 50% of the total cost of construction for the Grays Landing and Point Marion projects will be derived from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. City of Pittsburgh constructed a modern wharf for freight. Boat landings are maintained by some municipalities along the river. A large number of tipples at mines and various types of hoists at manufacturing plants and sand and gravel supply companies are maintained for private use in loading and unloading coal, coke, billets, steel products, sand, gravel, and other commodities. These terminals and docks are not available for general commerce. A number of docks and pipelines are also privately maintained for petroleum and acid products. Marine ways are maintained by some of the larger industries. These are also several terminals for rail-to-river and river-to-rail transfer. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: New Work: A contract for right bank excavation, Grays Landing L/D, was awarded on May 26, 1988 for $12,058,580 and was 93% complete. All land has been acquired for the lock site. Work continued on cultural resources and the acquisition of real estate for the remainder of the project. The estimated total cost of the project, which is scheduled to be complete in August, 1995 is $168,000,000. A total of 193 acres in fee and easements is expected to be acquired for the project by the end of FY 90. The estimated total cost of the Pt. Marion project, which is scheduled to be complete in September 1993, is $96,400. Operations and Maintenance, General: Contracts physically completed during the fiscal year include: Dam rehabilitation - Pt. Marion L/D for an estimated $2,491,843; replace concrete slabs - esplanade, Opekiska L/D for an estimated $101,489; and esplanade repairs - Maxwell L/D for an estimated $92,092. Contracts financially completed during the fiscal year include: Painting service bridge and emergency bulkheads - Morgantown L/D and Hildebrand L/D for $183,340; 18-2 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT emergency dredging - Hildebrand L/D for $260,103; removal of lower approach cells - L/D 3 for $137,170 and access road, parking lot and esplanade repaving for $53,475. Locks were operated as required and necessary repairs were made to structures to maintain them in a serviceable condition. 4. OPEN-CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Ohio River portion. 5. TYGART LAKE, WV Location. Tygart Lake is located on the Tygart River in Taylor and Barbour Counties, northcentral WV. The lake is approximately 26 road miles due east of Clarksburg, WV and 30 road miles south of Morgantown. The dam is situated 22.7 river miles above the mouth of the Tygart River at Fairmont, or 2.25 miles upstream from Grafton, WV, and about 78 miles south of Pittsburgh, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Fairmont, Thornton, and Belington, WV.) Existing project. A reservoir for low water regulation and flood control. Dam is concrete gravity type with an uncontrolled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides. Project was authorized by Public Works Administration January 11, 1934, and adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low water control in Monongahela River and for purpose of flood protection in Monongahela and Ohio Valleys. Construction of dam was started in 1935 and placed in operation in 1938. Land acquired for project consists of 2,662.9 acres in fee, flowage easements over 1,216.9 acres and 1,731.9 acres of other easements. Local cooperation. The State of West Virginia has assumed responsibility for the development and operation of hunting and fishing areas as well as the Tygart Lake State Park. Controlled releases for downstream navigation and recreation are also coordinated with others to the extend feasible. No local cooperation is required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. A cost-sharing agreement was executed with the West Virginia Department of Recreation in May 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low water regulation, as required, and project structures were operated and maintained in a serviceable condition throughout the year. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $17,140,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1989 are $545,845,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as State of West Virginia has jurisdiction over recreation in reservoir area. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 18-C on other authorized navigation projects. Flood Control - Local Protection 7. CHARTIERS CREEK, PA Location. Within Washington and Allegheny Counties, southwestern Pennsylvania, a tributary of Ohio River. (See Geological Survey Chart for Carnegie, PA) Existing project. Provides for channel widening, deepening and realignment, construction of a major channel cutoff, and relocations in two separate and independent reaches. James G. Fulton project in Allegheny County would be about 13.4 miles long and Canonsburg-Houston reach in Washington County about 4.7 miles long. Completed improvements would contain within banks, all floods up to the 1912 maximum of record, but with some residual damage, and would greatly reduce flood stages and damages resulting from higher floods. James G. Fulton Flood Control Project-Construction of Unit 1 was started in July 1968, completed in September 1970, and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance on June 25, 1971. Construction of Unit 2 was started in April 1970, completed in April 1973, and turned over to local interests on November 22, 1974. Construction of Unit 3 was started in July 1971 and was completed in December 1974. Construction of Unit 5 was started in June 1972 and was Completed in December 1973. Construction of Unit 4 channel improvement was started in July 1978, completed in June 1981 and turned over to local interests on 18 November 1981. A contract for Environmental Improvement, Unit 4, James G. Fulton, was awarded in Sep 1981 and completed in Dec 1981. Canonsburg- Houston Reach-Construction of Unit 1 was started in December of 1968, completed in March 1970, and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance on August 10, 1970. Construction of Unit 2A was started January 17, 1976, completed December 16, 1976, and turned over to local interests on June 9, 1977. Construction plans and specifications for Unit 2B, the remaining unit of the reach, are 99% complete. Remaining work on project has been delayed due to the inability of local cooperating agency to provide the necessary rights-ofway. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. Estimated cost for new work (1985) is $41,850,000 of which $32,750,000 is Federal cost and $9,100,000 non-Federal cost. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperating agency (Washington County) has been unable to provide the necessary rights-of-way for the remaining Unit 2B. Direct non-Federal contributions have been made in the amount of $4,225,188. Operations during fiscal year. Regular inspections were made at completed units. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by the Chartiers Creek project for this period were $3,000. Total benefits achieved through September 30, 1989 were estimated to be $16,051,000. 8. ELKINS, WV Location. On Tygart River in north-central Randolph County, WV, about 155 miles south of Pittsburgh, PA. It is at downstream end of a long, broad reach of upper Tygart Valley, about 75 miles above mouth of river. (See Geological Survey Chart for Elkins, WV) Existing project. Provides flood protection by diverting flood discharges from upstream arm of loop of natural river channel into an artificial cutoff channel, thereby bypassing City of Elkins. Improvement is designed to accommodate discharges equivalent to maximum flood of reasonable expectancy. Project construction was started in May 1946 and cornpleted in May 1949. Completed works, except that portion of 18-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 channel maintained by Federal Government, has been operated and maintained by City of Elkins since March 31, 1949. Land acquired for project consists of 32.04 acres in fee and 526.01 acres in easements. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1222. Federal cost of completed project was $1,772,627; estimated non-Federal cost for lands, easements, and rights-of-way was $40,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Routine investigations and inspections were made. Project was last inspected in June 1986. Cumulative total flood damages prevented to September 30, 1989, totaled $14,311,000. 9. JOHNSTOWN, PA Location. Project is located in southwestern Cambria County, PA, about 58 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. It is in a deep and comparatively narrow valley at junction of Stoney Creek and Little Conemaugh River, which unite to form Conemaugh River. (See Geological Survey Chart for Johnstown, PA.) Existing project. Provides for increased channel capacity by enlarging and realigning channels and protecting banks with concrete pavement. Improvement designed to accommodate discharges equivalent to those of March 1936 flood, maximum natural flow of record, minimum of overbank flow and to practically eliminate damages therefrom. Project construction began in August 1938 and was completed in November 1943. Footer protection for Unit 4 was completed in November 1949. Land acquired for project consists of easements over 192 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1937. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1215. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Operations & maintenance, general: Contract for flood wall repairs, awarded in August 1989 for $85,000 was 30% complete. Contract for removal of bar deposits and cleaning weep holes was completed in FY 89 for $427,731. Cumulative flood damages prevented by project were estimated to be $417,940,000 to end of September, 1989. 10. PUNXSUTAWNEY, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Borough of Punxsutawney is on Mahoning Creek in Jefferson County, PA, about 85 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. It is on a comparatively wide, alluvial flood plain about 52 miles above mouth of stream and 30 miles above Mahoning Creek flood control dam. (See Geological Survey Charts for Punxsutawney and Smicksburg, PA.) Existing project. Provides flood protection by channel enlargement, dikes, and walls. Improvement is designed to accommodate discharges 20% greater than that of maximum flood of record. Project was accomplished by construction of four units. Construction started May 1946 and was completed June 1950. Land acquired for project consists of perpetual easements over 72.6 acres. Completed works, except that portion of channel maintained by the Federal Government have been operated and maintained by Borough of Punxsutawney since July 31, 1950. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1209. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Operation activities continued and routine investigations and inspections were made. Cumulative flood damages prevented by project were. estimated to be $28,913,000 to end of September 1989. 11. TURTLE CREEK, PA Location. In Allegheny and Westmoreland Counties, adjacent to Pittsburgh, PA, along lower reaches of Turtle Creek and Thompson Run, a tributary of Turtle Creek. (See Geological Survey Chart for Pittsburgh, PA). Existing project. The existing channel improvement project was constructed during the period 1962-1967 and provided for flood protection by widening, deepening, and streamlining channel of lower Turtle Creek for about 6.3 miles and channel of Thompson Run for about 1 mile above its mouth. Appurtenant work consists of channel streambed and side slope protection where required, retaining walls, drop structures, floodgates, alteration, removal or reconstruction of restrictive structures and adjustments of affected utilities. Project was designed to accommodate a design flood corresponding to an estimated 100 year frequency. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Federal cost for completed project was $15,350,000; non-Federal cost was $1,840,000. The Fiscal Year 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act specified that the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, is authorized and directed to repair and restore the Turtle Creek, Pennsylvania, local protection project. Estimated Federal cost for repair and restoration work is $1,950,000; non-federal cost is $650,000. Local cooperation. The Turtle Creek Flood Control Authority was the local sponsor for the existing project. However, they are not financially able to sponsor the project restoration, nor to subsequently perform any required project maintenance. Consequently, the District has coordinated with other levels of Government, and in the process, has been advised by Allegheny County, Pennsylvania Board of Commissioners, that the County will sponsor the project. Preliminary confirmation by letter was received on 30 March 1988. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The proposed project consists of debris and sediment removal from the Turtle Creek and Thompson Run channels and debris basin; clearing trees and brush from channel side slopes, restoration of channel side slopes, repairs to concrete retaining walls, debris dams, trashracks, spalled concrete joints and drainage appurtenances; and removal of vegetative growth from weepholes. 12. BERLIN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. Dam is on Mahoning River about 73 miles above its confluence with Shenango River. It is about 10 miles above existing Milton Reservoir Dam and 35 miles upstream from Warren, Ohio. Reservoir is in Portage, Mahoning and Stark Counties, OH. (See Geological Survey charts for Warren, Ravenna, and Alliance, OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and water supply. Dam consists of a partially controlled, concrete gravity, center spillway flanked by rolled-earthfill abutment sections joining valley sides. Authorized project is complete and in operation for flood control and low water regulation purposes in industrialized Mahoning Valley below. Construction of dam was started January 1942 and completed in June 1943. Present project lands consists of 6,885.3 acres in fee and 1,098.7 acres 18-4 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT in easements. For further project description, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1233. Local cooperation. None required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Contract for construction of entrance road was completed for an estimated $97,904. Reservoir was operated as required and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $8,968,000; total benefits through September 30, 1989 are $232,059,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 13. CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Conemaugh River in Indiana and Westmoreland Counties, PA, 7.5 miles above junction of Conemaugh River and Loyalhanna Creek, which form the head of the Kiskiminetas River. It is about 2 miles northeast of Tunnelton, PA, and about 42 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Westmoreland and Indiana Counties, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Latrobe, New Florence, and Elders Ridge, PA.) Existing Project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides and an earth embankment ending in right abutment. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir system is designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Land acquired for dam, reservoir and railroad relocation consists of 7608.7 acres in fee and 522.8 acres in easements. Project authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1217. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Contract for drift and debris removal, awarded 10 December 1987 for $35,000, was completed during the fiscal year. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this fiscal year were $3,987,000; total flood control benefits through September 30, 1989 were $566,416,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public use facilities were continued. 14. CROOKED CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Crooked Creek 6.7 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River near Ford City, PA, and about 32 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Freeport and Elders Ridge, PA.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earth-fill type with separate uncontrolled saddle spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in March 1938 and completed in October 1940. Present project lands consist of 2,563.6 acres in fee and 99.98 acres in easements. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1213. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Contract for spillway repairs, awarded in September 1988, was completed for $242,364. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this fiscal year were $840,000; total benefits achieved through September 30, 1989 were $124,610,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 15. EAST BRANCH, CLARION RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is in Elk County, PA on East Branch of Clarion River above Middle Fork, 7.3 miles above junction of East and West branches of Clarion River at Johnsonburg, PA, and about 105 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Elk County, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Mount Jewett, PA.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and lowwater regulation. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with gatecontrolled concrete tunnel under right abutment and a paved uncontrolled spillway on left abutment slope. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low-water regulation purposes in Clarion River Valley below and for flood control as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for protection of Pittsburgh and upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in June 1947 and completed in July 1952. Present project lands consist of 287.2 acres in fee and 1,296.7 acres in easements. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in Flood Control Acts of 1938 and 1944. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1206. Local Cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: A contract for water supply systems revisions was completed for $30,750. Reservoir was operated for flood control and low-water regulation, as required; and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir during this fiscal year were $334,000; total benefits through September 30,1989 are $32,545,000. Some reservoir management activity was performed throughout the year comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation of public-use facilities. Work was limited in scope as bulk of reservoir lands are owned by Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 16. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN PA AND NY Location. Dam site is on Allegheny River 9 miles above Warren, PA, and 198 miles above mouth of river at Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Warren and McKean Counties, PA., and Cattaraugus County, NY. (See Geological Survey Charts for Warren and Kinzua, PA-NY, and Randolph and Salamanca, NY.) 18-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Existing project. Reservoir provides flood control, low water regulation, and recreation. Dam consists of a combination concrete gravity structure and rolled earth embankment with gate-controlled spillway and discharge conduits controlled by slide-gates in gravity section. Construction of project, initiated in February 1960, is complete. Construction of dam was started in September 1960 and completed in December 1965. Development of recreation area at Onoville under a cost-sharing agreement with Cattaragus County was completed in June 1978. Land acquired for project consists of 2,646.6 acres in fee and easements over 22,420.4 acres. For further details see Annual Report for 1962, page 1202. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936, 1938 and 1941. Local cooperation. None required by law. Licenses. The Federal Power Commission granted a license to Pennsylvania Electric Company and Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company on December 28, 1965, for the joint construction, operation and maintenance of a 325-megawatt pumped-storage installation (FPC Project No. 2280). The project is complete. Operation during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low water regulation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $2,309,000; total to end of this fiscal year, $335,385,000. Of 2,212 surface tracts authorized for acquisition, all have been acquired but are subject to a final audit. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 17. LOYALHANNA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Loyalhanna Creek, 4.5 miles above junction of creek with Conemaugh River at Saltsburg, PA, and about 29 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Westmoreland County PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Latrobe, PA). Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides, and an earth embankment section ending in left abutment. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in October 1939 and completed in June 1942. Land acquired for project consists of 3,333.7 acres in fee and easements over 86.7 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1219. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for ths fiscal year were $1,094,000; total benefits to September 30, 1989; $166,835,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 18. MAHONING CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Mahoning Creek in Armstrong County, PA, 21.6 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River. It is about 6.50 miles southeast of New Bethlehem, PA, and about 51 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Armstrong, Indiana, and Jefferson Counties, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Rural Valley and Smicksburg, PA). Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam started in February 1939 and was completed in June 1941. Land acquired for projects consists of 2,519.36 acres in fee and easements over 83.5 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1210. Local cooperation. None required at completed project. On November 4, 1977 a contract for Wildlife development at Mahoning Creek Lake was executed between the U.S. Government and the Pennsylvania Game Commission. Each party will pay or contribute in kind 50% of the first cost of initial wildlife development. Cost-sharing for construction of fishing access area awarded in September 1980 was completed in July 1981 for $335,405.75. On June 7, 1979, a contract for fishing and boating development at Mahoning Creek Lake was executed between the U.S. Government and Pennsylvania Fish Commission. Each party will pay or contribute in kind 50% of the first costs of initial fishing and boating development. Costsharing contract for construction of hunting access areas awarded July 30, 1980 was completed on Nov 25, 1981 at a final cost of $44,540. On September 9, 1980, a contract for camping and day-use recreational development was executed between the U.S. Government and the County of Armstrong. Each party will pay or contribute in kind 50% of the first costs of initial camping and day-use recreational development and 50% of the costs for future development. Cost-sharing contract for Construction of Milton Loop Recreation Area awarded July 19, 1981 was completed on September 17, 1982 for $467,842. Each cooperation authority is responsible for operation, maintenance and replacement without cost to the Government of all facilities developed with their support. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Contract for concrete repairs, parapet walls and roadway, awarded on August 19, 1986 was completed for $470,891. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood damages prevented by this project for this fiscal year were $896,000; total benefits through Sept 30, 1989 were $156,256,000. Activities under reservoir management and maintenance for public-use facilities continued. 19. MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH Location. Dam site is on West Branch of Mahoning River which joins Mahoning River at Newton Falls, OH. It is 11 miles above mouth of branch and about 15 miles upstream from Warren, OH. Reservoir is in Portage County, OH. (See Geological Survey Charts for Ravenna, Garrettsville, Chagrin Falls, and Kent, OH.) Existing project. Reservoir provides flood control, lowwater regulation and recreation. Dam consists of a rolled-earth 18-6 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT embankment structure with gate-controlled outlet works and an uncontrolled side-hill spillway through left abutment. Authorized project is completed and in operation for flood control and low water regulation purposes. Construction of dam and access road was started in May 1963 and completed in November 1966. Land acquired for project consists of 6,298.9 acres fee and easements over 27.9 acres. For further description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1231 (West Branch Reservoir, Mahoning River, Ohio). Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 191, 85th Cong. 1st sess.), with local contribution requirements modified by Flood Control Act of 1960. Federal costs of completed project as $17,370,000. Local interests contributed $3,230,000 during period of construction bringing initial project cost to $20,600,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute $5,200,000 for water pollution abatement and for municipal and industrial water supply purposes, of which $3,230,000 was paid in cash during construction. Unpaid balance at time project is placed in operation, $1,970,000, will be paid in cash at that time or on an annual basis. Of the unpaid balance of contributed funds due and payable, payment in full of Trumbull County's share in the amount of $663,040 has been received. Mahoning County elected to pay their share ($1,306,960) in 50 annual installments of $50,323.32, including interest, and has paid $589,465.70 toward principal to date. Local interests have now contributed $4,482,505.70 towards total of $5,200,000 non-Federal costs. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1989 are $84,127,000. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this project for this fiscal year are $4,947,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 20. MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Location. Dam is on Mosquito Creek, 9 miles above junction of creek with Mahoning River at Niles, OH, and about 18 miles northwest of Youngstown, OH. (See Geological Survey Charts for Bristolville and Kinsman, OH, and Pennsylvania.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control, low-water regulation and water supply storage. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with outlet facilities through dam, and an uncontrolled natural wasteway to discharge overflow from reservoir. Authorized project is complete and in operation for flood control and low-water regulation purposes in industrialized Mahoning and Beaver Valleys below. Construction of dam was started in July 1943 and was ready for beneficial use in January 1944. Land acquired for project consists of 11,180.6 acres in fees and easements over 276.0 acres. State of Ohio has a license from Secretary of the Army for development and operation of recreation facilities in reservoir area. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1228. Local cooperation. None required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow regulation as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this project for this fiscal year were $2,027,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1989 were $64,042,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of certain public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as State of Ohio has jurisdiction over recreation in reservoir area. 21. OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT) Location. A series of dikes, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs/lakes in Ohio River Basin within Pittsburgh District. Existing project. Individual projects considered in comprehensive plan within Pittsburgh District. (See Tables 18-B, 18- E and 18-K on Acts authorizing existing projects, local protection projects and reservoirs.) Operations during fiscal year. New work: None by the United States except as stated in individual projects. Completed local protection projects operated and maintained by local interests, including those projects for which individual reports have been included, prevented flood damages of an estimated $9,337,000 during this fiscal year. Total flood damages prevented through September 30, 1989 are $714,745,000. 22. SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND OH Location. Dam is on Shenango River about 0.8 mile above Sharpsville, PA, and about 33 miles above junction of river with Mahoning River, which unite near New Castle, PA, to form Beaver River. Reservoir is in Mercer County, PA and Trumbull County, Ohio. (See Geological Survey Chart for Kinsman, Ohio, and Shenango, PA.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control, low-flow augmentation and recreation. Dam consists of a concrete gravity structure with gate-controlled outlet works and an uncontrolled center spillway section. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low-water regulation purposes in Shenango River valley below and for flood control as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for protection of Shenango River valley and the Beaver and upper Ohio River Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in March 1963 and completed in May 1965. Land acquired for project consists of 14,482.8 acres in fee and easements over 197.7 acres. Future work consists of completion of project lands of any additional recreation facilities as required to serve the public needs. For further project description, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1230. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Contract for maintenance building renovation, awarded in FY 88 for $139,500 was 98% complete. Contract for rehabilitation of Milligan Bridge was completed for $99,919. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved for FY 1989 were $1,670,000. Total benefits achieved by this project through September 30, 1989 were $21,053,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance continued. 18-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 23. STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV Location. In Lewis County, North Central West Virginia, on the West Fork River, which joins the Tygart River at Fairmont, West Virginia to form the Monongahela River. Damsite is located at Brownsville, West Virginia, about 4 miles south of Weston and 72 miles above mouth of West Fork River at Fairmont, WV. (See Geological Survey Charts for Weston and Crawford, WV.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, area redevelopment and recreation. Dam is concrete gravity type, 95 feet high and 620 feet long. Outlet works consist of five multi-level sluices, spillway is uncontrolled. Storage capacity is 74,650 acre-feet controlling an area of 102 square miles. Project was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act. Estimated initial Federal cost for new work (1989) is $231,000,000 (includes $29,160,000 reimbursement by non-Federal interests.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to make arrangements for repayment, under the provisions of the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, of that part of the construction cost and annual operation, maintenance and replacement costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, an amount presently estimated at $4,350,000 for construction; and $15,000 annually for operations, maintenance and replacements. Also, in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act, local interests are required to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, pay, contribute in kind or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first costs of the reservoir project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, an amount presently estimated at $24,810,000, bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife land and facilities, the amount involved being currently estimated on an average annual basis to be $457,000, exercise to the full extent of their legal capability, control against removal of streamflow made available for water quality control; and contribute to the control of pollution of streams subject to low-flow augmentation by adequate treatment or other methods of controlling wastes at their source. The requirements of Section 221 were amended in 1971 to exempt assurances for future demands for water supply pursuant to the Water Supply Act of 1958 from the contractual requirements of the Act. Accordingly, the city of Weston, West Virginia, has provided assurances that it will enter into a water supply contract with the Department of the Army within a period of time which will permit paying out the costs allocated to the water supply storage within the life of the project. A recreation cost-sharing contract, in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act, P.L. 89-72, was executed by the State of West Virginia on March 27, 1977. Local cooperation assurances for recreation cost-sharing were executed by the Governor and Attorney General of West Virginia on May 29, 1973. In this connection, Section 8 ofP.L. 92-222 deleted the requirement that the State of West Virginia "hold and save the United States free from damages resulting from water rights claims due to construction and operation of the project." Legislation relieving Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV, project of the requirements of Section 221, P.L. 96-611 was contained in Water Resources Development Act of 1974 signed by the President on March 7, 1974. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Contract for Basic Park, Roanoke Bay recreation area, awarded in January, 1988 for $11,036,089 was 90% complete. Contract for dam area facilities, awarded in June, 1988 for $2,758,130 was 70% complete. Contract for access road road repairs, awarded in January, 1989 for $138,900 was 66% complete. Contracts awarded in September, 1989 included construction of Carrion Bay campground for $4,919,986 and design, furnish and install water temperature profile for $89,264. No physical work was accomplished on these contracts in FY 1989. Contracts completed during the fiscal year included: Carrion Bay recreation area for an estimated $1,370,435; Georgetown access area for $342,872; communication site, roads, trash boom and boat ramp for $497,844; Vandalia recreation area for $937,919; Jacksonville access area for $304,545; plugging oil and gas wells for $136,870; Glady Fork access area for $169,546; Carrion Bay - earthwork for $375,879 and plugging abandoned gas wells for $81,942. Surface land acquired for the project consists of 20,849 acres. Land acquisition, detailed engineering work and construction continued and all items of work were progressing on schedule. The overall completion date for the project is not scheduled pending agreement by the existing cost sharing partner to cost increases to the original agreed upon recreation program. Estimated flood control benefits achieved for this project for FY 89 were $9,454,000. Total flood control benefits for the reservoir through September 30, 1988 are $38,032,000. 24. TIONESTA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Location. Dam is on Tionesta Creek, 1.25 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River at Tionesta, PA, and about 78 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is entirely in Forest County, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Tionesta, Tidioute and Sheffield, PA.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earthfill type with separate uncontrolled saddle spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in May 1938 and completed in January 1941. Land acquired for project consists of 2,797.3 acres in fee and easements over 13.1 acres. Future work consists of provision on project lands of additional recreational facilities as required to serve public needs. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1203. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance general: Contract for boat launch ramp and access road repairs, awarded for $473,526, was 98% complete. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $1,270,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1989 were $173,273,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 25. UNION CITY DAM, PA Location. In Erie County, northwestern Pennsylvania, on French Creek, a tributary of Allegheny River. Damsite is 24 miles upstream from Cambridge Springs, PA, and 41 miles upstream from Meadville, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Union City, PA - NY.) 18-8 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earth embankment nongated type with uncontrolled side-channel spillway. Outlet works consist of a lower outlet located in valley floor constructed of reinforced concrete conduit 8 feet by 4.5 feet and an upper outlet consisting of an uncontrolled slot 9.5 feet wide through the north end of the ogee weir in the spillway. Dam is 1,420 feet long at top rising 88 feet above streambed and provides gross capacity of 47,640 acre-feet from a drainage area of 222 square miles. Project authorization was modified to provide for a conservation pool and addition of recreation facilities. On November 5, 1974, a referendum proposal was defeated by the constituents of Erie County in regard to the cost-sharing for construction of recreation facilities. In view of the foregoing, all action toward implementation of the authorized project modification was discontinued. Reservoir is operated as one of a two-reservoir system for reduction of flood stages in French Creek Basin between damsite and mouth, Allegheny River from Franklin, PA, to Pittsburgh, PA, inclusive, and upper Ohio River Valley. Initial highway relocations were completed in October 1968 and remaining highway relocations were completed in May 1972. Construction of the dam was started in July 1968 and completed in September 1971. Land acquired for project consists of 161.4 acres in fee and easements over 2,410.3 acres. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to inform affected interests in French Creek Basin at least annually, that the system of reservoirs of which Union City Dam is a part, will not provide protection against maximum floods. November 10, 1964 the Department of Forests and Waters of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania furnished formal assurances of local cooperation in respect to notifying local interests at least annually that the system of reservoirs will not provide protection against maximum floods. A referendum on the ballot during the November 1974 election regarding the approval to cost-share the maintenance of a summer pool was defeated by the local voters. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Contract to install sluice gate intake structure was completed during the fiscal year for $42,198. Maintenance of the structure and appurtenances was performed as required. This dam acted as an uncontrolled detention type dam during the fiscal year. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $385,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1989 were $14,875,000. 26. WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA Location. In Crawford County, northwestern Pennsylvania, on Woodcock Creek, a tributary of French Creek. Damsite is about 4.1 miles above mouth of Woodcock Creek and about 5 miles northeast of Meadville, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Meadville, PA.) Existing project. A flood-control reservoir dam of rolledearth embankment type, gate-controlled outlet works with a 6 foot-wide by 7.75 foot-high conduit and uncontrolled saddle spillway on the left abutment. Dam is 4,650 feet long at top rising 90 feet above streambed and provides for gross capacity of 20,000 acre-feet from a drainage area of 46 square miles. Reservoir is operated as one of a two-reservoir system for reduction of flood stages in French Creek Basin between damsite and mouth. Allegheny River from Franklin, PA, to Pittsburgh, PA, inclusive, and upper Ohio River Valley. Authorized project is complete. Construction of dam was started in July 1970 and completed in July 1973. Land acquired for project consists of 1,731.5 acres in fee and easements over .56 acres. Project was authorized for flood control and recreation by 1962 Flood Control Act. Storage for water quality control was added to the project during the preconstruction planning stage. Local cooperation. Local interests must inform affected interests in French Creek Basin at least annually, in a manner satisfactory to District Engineer, that a system of reservoirs of which Woodcock Creek is a part, will not provide protection against maximum floods. Pennsylvania Department of Forests and Waters assumed responsibility of local cooperation for project. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Maintenance of the structure and appurtenances was performed as required. Contract for access road and pump station repairs was completed for $44,270. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this project for FY 89 were $85,000. Total flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir through September 30, 1989 were $1,695.000. 27. YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND MD Location. Dam is on Youghiogheny River about 74.2 miles above its junction with Monongahela River at McKeesport, PA. It is 1.2 miles upstream from Confluence, PA, and about 57 miles southeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Fayette and Somerset Counties, PA, and Garrett County, MD. (See Geological Survey Charts for Confluence, PA, Accident, MD, West Virginia and Pennsylvania.) Existing project. Reservoir for flood control, low-flow augmentation, and pollution abatement purposes. Dam is rolledearthfill type with separate uncontrolled side channel spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. For flood control, reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in June 1940 and completed May 1944. Land acquired for project consists of 3,914.9 acres in fee and easements over 0.62 acre. A license was issued Commonwealth of Pennsylvania covering fish conservation and management in Pennsylvania portion of reservoir. Future work consists of provision on project lands of additional recreational and sanitary facilities as required to serve the public needs. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1223. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Contract for road/bridge improvements - Mill Run and Tub Run, awarded for $290,854 was 98% complete at the end of the fiscal year. Contracts completed during the fiscal year include concrete repairs to air shaft and control tower for $585,641 and revisions to water system for $55,515. Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for this period were $2,086,000. Total flood control benefits achieved by this project through September 30, 1989 were $153,897,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public use facilities continued. 28. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will 18-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within boundaries of their respective districts. Inspections were made of completed units transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation and local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain these projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. (See Table 18-L for dates of inspections.) Costs for this fiscal year, $69,018. Total cost to September 30, 1989 was $1,143,620. 29. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 18-E on other authorized flood control projects. 30. FLOOD CONTROL WORKS UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION - For flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) See Table 18-M. For emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) See Table 18-M. Flood control and coastal emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Corps Statutory Authorities $168,952 Activities in Support of Others 12,567 Facilities 5,478 Inspections 13,202 Total Cost for Fiscal Year: $200,199 General Investigations 31. SURVEYS Navigation studies Flood control studies Coordination with other agencies Review for Deauthorization Interagency Water Resource Development Special investigations Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Total cost for fiscal year $ 99,680 1,378,008 80,209 87 19,999 112,023 51,428 $1,741,434 32. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs this fiscal year were $233,947 for flood plain management services and $9,478 for related hydrologic studies. 33. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Saw Mill Run, Pittsburgh, PA $176,612 34. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT None. 18-10 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section Sep 30, In Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 1989 Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. Allegheny River PA 3. Monongahela River, PA and WV 5. Tygart Lake, WV Flood Control - Local Protection 7. Chartiers Creek, PA (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 8. Elkins, WV 9. Johnstown, PA 10. Punxsutawney, Ohio River Basin, PA 11. Turtle Creek, PA Flood Control - Reservoirs 12. Berlin Lake Ohio River Basin, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - - 18,157,8601 S- - - 18,157,8601 4,975,000 5,985,100 7,578,300 7,375,589 79,275,3512 4,986,772 5,905,479 7,649,246 7,318,418 79,185,5622 400,000 3,323,000 9,436,000 17,218,000 159,580,0853 209,436 3,080,973 7,334,873 17,718,346 157,546,7134 9,721,852 11,813,800 11,350,400 11,866,029 181,186,6355 10,063,705 11,727,436 11,441,627 11,873,521 181,086,6346 - - - 15,857,000 7 221 - - 15,857,000 - - - - 19,077,9327 - - - - 19,077,9327 726,400 873,300 711,000 699,244 11,046,7838 741,774 846,746 750,871 688,409 11,024,3198 5,134 3,500 2,838 7,000 7,098 8,000 8,346 15,000 14,951 - - - 26,586,186 - - - 26,560,187 - - - 4,225,188 - - -4,204,498 - - 1,772,627 - - - 1,772,627 21,000 5,000 5,000 262,987 10,372 16,083 3,704 260,958 - - - 8,865,3889 - - - 8,865,3889 84,000 452,500 236,533 4,583,238 50,417 483,915 211,155 4,555,492 - - - 3,586,10710 - - - 3,586,10710 7,000 2,679 78,000 22,239 5,000 9,254 174,000 34,901 4,000 1,247 130,000 254,486 1,038,88811 1,035,96011 15,747,352 15,676,92938 - - - - 8,739,98712 - - - - 8,739,98712 1,366,700 1,204,900 1,688,900 1,517,900 19,300,68313 1,397,114 1,238,771 1,668,230 1,498,246 19,227,53013 18-11 ---- - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 18-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section Sep 30, In Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 1989 13. Conemaugh River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 14. Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 15. East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 16. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, PA and NY 17. Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 18. Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 19. Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, OH 20. Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 21. Ohio River Basin Pittsburgh, PA District Consolidated New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 717,000 880,435 43,001 - - - 46,012,41114 - - - 46,012,41114 900,000 973,675 868,671 10,008,250 763,414 1,120,111 847,810 9,966,442 - - - 4,474,52416 - - - 4,431,523'15 2,619,000 3,003,400 1,595,200 1,383,449 18,362,97016 2,701,478 2,775,020 1,829,431 1,391,136 18,326,55516 - - - - 9,539,58617 - - - - 9,539,58617 539,482 728,300 817,300 804,600 9,588,05718 514,479 712,557 840,411 819,123 9,570,16918 - - - - 109,309,07619 - - - - 109,298,20519 1,083,000 1,115,419 -100,000 230,032 1,137,900 1,095,568 -200,000 8,928 1,178,200 1,133,200 17,944,578 1,235,576 1,111,672 17,915,762 - - 2,940,000 - 279 2,920,558 - - - - 5,727,53120 - - - - 5,727,53120 953,700 1,120,000 968,300 880,449 13,241,00521 999,266 1,047,093 1,054,219 872,417 13,215,16921 .=- - -=.. - - 6,104 650,200 909,000 715,100 656,660 829,775 813,086 0 7,144,97322 55 7,144,97323 720,708 9,723,324 733,871 9,714,660 - - - - 47,033 - - - - 47,033 - - - - 17,376,09724 - - - - 17,376,09724 655,500 596,100 577,700 735,300 8,894,39625 652,378 605,411 575,593 710,880 8,856,33425 - - - - 4,253,02926 S- - - 4,253,02926 683,000 795,900 758,900 824,400 8,824,064 672,132 815,130 766,515 815,786 8,802,547 - - - - 985,19727 - - - - 985,19727 18-12 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost to Section Sep 30, In Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 1989 22. Shenango River New Work Lake, Ohio River Approp. - - - - 40,227,20128 Basin, PA Cost - - - - 40,209,89428 Maint. Approp. 2,019,000 2,045,000 2,019,200 1,812,800 22,517,61729 Cost 2,068,686 1,890,645 2,148,985 1,872,160 22,488,51829 23. Stonewall Jackson New Work Lake, Ohio Approp. 24,106,000 16,913,000 23,259,000 2,428,000 202,316,200 River Basin, WV Cost 25,450,413 15,713,411 13,372,446 12,400,043 200,641,199 Maint. Approp. - 25,500 631,000 749,800 1,406,300 Cost - - 643,529 758,230 1,401,759 24. Tionesta Lake, New Work Ohio River Approp. -32,403 - 0 0 7,792,37830 Basin, PA Cost - - 3,770 230 7,792,37981 Maint. Approp. 1,060,000 1,010,500 1,263,800 1,308,979 14,847,23232 Cost 1,074,808 951,589 1,320,359 1,316,393 14,815,18032 25. Union City New Work Dam, Ohio Approp. - - - - 14,559,800 River Basin, PA Cost - - - - 14,559,800 Maint. Approp. 512,000 434,900 276,249 244,547 3,978,364 Cost 528,818 451,946 264,569 262,236 3,971,444 26. Woodcock Creek New Work Lake, Ohio Approp. 5,376 - - - 20,553,47433 River Basin, PA Cost 137,846 6,497 - - 20,545,06534 Maint. Approp. 749,000 621,800 626,298 775,600 7,201,96935 Cost 751,253 622,437 654,790 769,170 7,185,71435 27. Youghiogheny New Work River Lake Approp. -10,959 - - - 12,521,16736 Ohio River Cost 2,334 - - - 12,521,16736 Basin, PA and Maint. MD Approp. 2,602,000 1,722,600 1,426,978 2,271,800 21,953,76537 Cost 2,409,684 1,837,361 1,506,348 2,287,890 21,907,54737 1. Includes $2,453,737 from emergency relief funds and $1,250,049 from public works funds. 2. Includes $64,365 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963) and $191,400 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 3. Includes $5,420,541 for new work for previous projects, $4,657,000 appropriated to date for Pt. Marion, L/D 8, PA ($2,192,000 - CG funds, $2,465,000 from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund), and $25,720,000 appropriated to date for Grays Landing, L/D 7, PA ($12,397,000 - CG funds, $13,323,000 from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund). Also inclues AE & D costs from Gray's Landing ($803,000) and Pt. Marion ($618,758). 4. Includes $423,301 expended to date on Point Marion, L/D 8, PA ($2,098,973 - CG Funds, $2,324,328 from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund), and $23,920,327 expended to date for Grays Landing, L/D 7, PA ($12,100,406 - CG funds, $11,819,921 from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund). Also includes AE & D costs for Gray's Landing ($803,000) and Pt. Marion ($618,758). 5. Includes $22,549 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963), $742 for maintenance for previous project and $582,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 6. Includes $22,549 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963), $742 for maintenance for previous project and $464,508 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 7. Includes $1,999,995 emergency relief funds, $10,000,000 public work funds, $234,000 Code 711 funds and $412,088 Code 713 funds; excludes $409,622 contributed by local interest. 8. Includes $89,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations, Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 9. Includes $33,423 from emergency relief funds. 10. Excludes $180,485 for new work expended from contributed funds. 11. Includes $283,988 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 18-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 18A-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) 12. Includes $1,542,500 Code 711 funds, $809,700 Code 712 funds and $99,111 Code 713 funds; excludes $100,000 contributed by local interest. 13. Includes $40,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 14. Includes $5,351 from emergency relief funds and $328,000 Code 711 funds. 15. Includes $63,788 from emergency relief funds and $269,635 Code 711 funds. 16. Includes $45,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 17. Includes $156,812 Code 711 funds. 18. Includes $322,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 19. Includes $2,791 from emergency relief funds, $14,622 Code 711 funds and $568,265 Code 713 funds; excludes $389,370 contributed by local interest. 20. Includes $7,339 from emergency relief funds and $274,669 Code 711 funds. 21. Includes $256,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 22. Includes $25,671 emergency relief funds, $162,381 Code 711 funds and $561,247 Code 713 funds; excludes $500,086 contributed by local interests. 23. Includes $25,671 emergency relief funds, $162,381 Code 711 funds and $561,247 Code 713 funds; excludes $456,611 contributed by local interests. 24. Includes $74,900 Code 711 funds; excludes $4,482,505.70 for new work contributed by local interest. 25. Includes $315,500 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 26. Includes $122,729 Code 711 funds and $94,900 Code 713 funds. 27. Includes $8,914 from emergency relief funds. 28. Includes $1,730,100 Code 711 funds and $1,618,300 Code 713 funds. 29. Includes $152,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act. (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 30. Includes $2,303,076 Code 711 funds ($256,760 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act PL 98-8, 1983 funds), $275,900 Code 712 funds, and $24,201 emergency relief funds. 31. Includes $2,303,077 Code 711 funds, ($256,531 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act PL 98-8, 1983 funds), $275,900 Code 712 funds, and $24,201 emergency relief funds. 32. Includes $203,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 33. Includes $1,679,774 Code 711 funds. 34. Includes $1,671,366 Code 711 funds. 35. Includes $85,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds). 36. Includes $2,846,263 Code 711 funds ($293,000 provided from the productive Employment Appropriations Act. (PL 98-8) 1983 funds). 37. Includes $591,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 38. Includes $15,350,352 original construction cost. 18-14 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. Aug 5, 1886 June 3, 1896 July 25, 1912 July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 19351 Aug 30, 19351 June 26, 19342 Mar 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar 3, 1905 Mar 3, 1905 Mar 2, 1907 Mar 4, 1913 Sep 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 Jan 31, 19313 June 26, 19342 ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA. (See Section 1 of Text) For lock and dam 1. (Fixed dam contemplated. Sep 29, 1891 Secretary of War authorized change to a movable dam.) For locks and dams 2 and 3. For locks and dams 4 to 8 inclusive. For a depth of 9 feet in the lower 61 miles. Replace lock and dam 1 by a dredged channel, 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide up to lock 2, and construct new locks and dams 2 and 3, to replace existing locks and dams 2 and 3. Construct lock and dam 9, raising crest of dam 8, and dredging a navigable channel to head of pool 8. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriation for rivers and harbors. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV Enlarge and improve lock and dam 6; additional works at lock 3; new repair steamer and new dredge boat with equipment; all at an estimated cost of $185,556. Rebuild lock and dam 2 at estimated cost of $655,961. (Estimate increased in 1910 to $698,961.) Acquisition of land and additional improvements at 5 and 6 at a cost of $7,850. Rebuild lock and dam 3 at estimated cost of $589,196. Reconstruct lock and dam 5 at estimated cost of $756,042. Reconstruct lock and dam 6 at estimated cost of $356,400. (Estimate increased in 1916 to $418,860.) Additional improvements at estimated cost as follows: Guide walls and guard walls, 1 to 6, $1,255,130; Lengthen land chamber of lock 3 to 720 feet, $787,722; New chamber (360 feet long), lock 4, $699,786; Lock and dam 7, $1,161,241; Lock and dam 8, $1,165,758; Lock and dam 7 (second chamber), $419,126; Lock and dam 8 (second chamber), $504,465; Reconstruction dam 4, $397,211; Marine ways, repair plant, office and warehouse, $250,000, for a total of $6,640,439. Construct new locks and dam 2.5 miles below existing structure, at estimated cost of $2,175,000 in lieu of work authorized at old lock and dam 4. Chief of Engineers authorized to locate new locks and dam 4 above existing structure and on such site as they may deem most desirable. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. 18-15 Annual Report 1886, p. 1545, Annual Report 1891, p. 2366 H. Doc. 204, 54th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report 1896, p. 2212 H. Doc. 540, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 356, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 16, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 721, 71st Cong., 3d Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 27, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1897, p. 2423 Annual Report 1909, p. 1756 Annual Report 1904, p. 460 H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc., 1217, 62d Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 288, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 22, 70th Cong., 2d Sess. 3. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jan 11, 1934 Aug 30, 1935 Jun 28, 1938 Jun 28, 1938 Jun 28, 1938 3. May 17, 1950 S. Doc. 100, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. Modification of existing project as follows: Provide 2 new locks and dams similar to Morgantown lock and dam to replace existing locks and dams 12 to 15 inclusive. Provide a movable crest on existing dam 8 to raise existing pool-full elevation 4 feet. Provide a navigation channel of 300-foot minimum bottom width and a 9-foot project depth above lock and dam 8. Provide an extension of navigable channel of upper Monongahela River, into lower Tygart River for 2.1 miles at a maximum bottom width of 200 feet and a 9-foot project depth. Construct new lock and dam 7 (Grays Landing Lock and Dam) as follows: The Grays Landing Lock and Dam will be located 3.0 miles downriver from existing Lock and Dam 7. It will consist of a single lock chamber, 84 feet wide by 720 feet long, with a fixed crest dam 576 feet in length. The existing Maxwell Pool at elevation 763.0 will be shortened three miles and the existing Pool 7 at elevation 778.0 will be extended downriver to the new dam. There will be no change in pool elevation above existing Dam 7. Upon completion of the new replacement lock and dam, existing Lock and Dam 7 will be removed. Total authorized cost is $123,000,000. Replace existing 56' x 360' lock chamber at Point Marion Lock and Dam (Lock and Dam 8) with new 84' x 720' chamber. Existing movable crest dam to remain; no change in pool elevations. Total authorized cost is $82,900,000. TYGART RIVER LAKE, WV Construction of a dam and reservoir for low water regulation and flood control ELKINS, WV For construction of local flood protection projects. JOHNSTOWN, PA For construction of local flood protection projects. PUNXSUTAWNEY, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA For construction of local flood protection projects. 18-16 Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985 for Engineering and Design and Land Acquisition and Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 Sec. 301(a). Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985 for Engineering and Design and Land Acquisition and Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 Sec. 301(a). H. Doc. 1792, 64th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 106, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Nov 17, 1986 5. 8. 9. 10. PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-B (Continued) AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 12. Jun 28, 1938 13. Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 modified by Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended BERLIN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. CROOKED CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. EAST BRANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND NY Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation and recreation. Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, pollution abatement, low water regulation and recreation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. LOYALHANNA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. MAHONING CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. 18-17 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 300, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 18-B (Continued) AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 20. 19. Jul 3, 1958 Jul 14, 1960 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended, Aug 28, 1937 Jun 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Jul 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Dec 30, 1963 Jun 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 Jun 19, 1970 Mar 7, 1974 Oct 22, 1976 18-18 MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, low water, regulation and recreation. To define cost-sharing arrangement for municipal & industrial water supply & water for pollution abatement purposes. MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low water regulation and water supply storage. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. OHIO RIVER BASIN - Pittsburgh District Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Projects to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50,300,000 for local flood protection works. Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including additional projects in tributary basins. Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan including additional projects in tributary basins. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $38 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Authorized phase I design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design of the project for abatement of acid mine drainage in the Clarion River Basin, Pa. H. Doc. 191, 85th Cong. 1st Sess. Pub. Law 86-645 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 300, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong. 1st Sess. S. Doc. 20, 81st Cong. 1st Sess. Public Law 88-253, 88th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 6755, 89th Cong., 90th Cong. 1st Sess. Public Law 90-17. 90th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 90-483, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 15166, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 10203, 93rd Cong. River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974. Water Resources Development Act of 1976; Public Law 94-587, Sec. 101(a). 21. PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Seetlon Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 22. SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND OH Jun 28, 1938 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. water regulation and recreation. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facili- Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of as amended ties. 1944 23. STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV Nov 7, 1966 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, water S. Doc. 109, 89th Cong. supply, water quality control, area redevelopment and 2nd Sess. recreation. 24. TIONESTA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Jun 22, 1936 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. amended by water regulation. 1st Sess. Jun 28, 1938 FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facili- Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of as amended ties. 1944 25. UNION CITY DAM, PA Oct 23, 1962 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. S. Doc. 95, 87th Cong. 2nd Sess. 26. WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA Oct 23, 1962 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, recre- S. Doc. 95, 87th Cong. ation and storage for water quality control. 2nd Sess. 27. YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND MD Jun 28, 1938 Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low- H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. flow augmentation, and pollution abatement, purposes. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facili- Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of as amended ties. 1944 1. Included in the Emergency Relief program April 8, 1935. 2. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 3. Public Res. 117, 71st. Cong., 3d Sess. 18-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 18-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 6 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allegheny River, PA, open-channel work Completed 1934 197,000 133,940 Beaver and Mahoning Rivers, PA and OH1 4 Inactive 1938 - - Buckhannon River, WV2 3 Completed 1893 5,500 - Cheat River, WV2 3 Completed 1895 12,997 Pittsburgh Harbor, PA Completed 1922 110,663 81,613 1. January 23, 1939, Chief of Engineers recommended constructing a waterway from Ohio River through Beaver, Mahoning, and Grand River Valleys to Lake Erie (H. Doc. 178, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.) 2. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 3. No Commerce reported. 4. Eligible for deauthorization. 18-20 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-E Project and S Flood Protection Specifically Authorized Projects Completed: Bradford, PA Brookville, PA Buckhannon, WV Butler, PA DuBois, PA Elkins, WV6 Girty's Run, Millvale, PA4 Johnsonburg, PA Johnstown, PA6 Kittanning, PA, Part I Latrobe, PA Latrobe, PA Olean, NY Portage, PA Portville, NY Punxsutawney, PA6 Reynoldsville, PA Ridgeway, PA (Elk Creek) Root Creek, Bolivar, NY Salamanca, NY Turtle Creek, PA5 Washington, PA Wellsville, OH, Section I Wellsville, OH, Section II Youngstown, OH Active: Saw Mill Run, PA Inactive: Uniontown, PA 1 Deferred: Benwood, WV Authorized by Chief of Engineers Completed: Amsterdam, OH Big Run, PA Burgettstown, PA Friendsville, MD Granville, PA Leetonia, OH Oil City, PA Slovan, PA Sykesville, PA Tarentum, PA Tenmile Creek at Marianna, PA Wilmore, PA OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (All Projects Not Specifically Identified in Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Construction Non-Federal Opel tatus Report For (Federal Cost) Cost MaJ 1962 1963 1972 1970 1979 1986 1958 1949 1951 1970 1954 1965 1954 1959 1964 1986 1972 1972 1964 1956 1956 1976 1956 1954 1964 1965 - 1964 1981 7,601,763 964,976 1,568,661 1,556,181 4,465,200 1,772,627 2,659,263 674,664 8,865,388 130,317 207,659 2,556,652 3,217,531 150,386 2,070,484 3,586,107 385,494 628,888 1,591,436 2,880,535 15,676,979 789,093 483,910 157,633 3,621,134 - 40,000 130,000 2,000 49,400 597,000 353,000 180,485 72,000 113,000 81,028 183,072 364,208 83,129 41,529 75,908 89,299 43,595 57,811 184,246 136,591 1,554,428 96,853 18-21 ration and intenance REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 18-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Construction Non-Federal Operation and Project and Status Report For (Federal Cost) Cost Maintenance Active: Ridgeway & Vicinity (on Clarion River)3 1979 132,464 - - Inactive: Black Fork at Hendricks, WV 1972 6,800 - - Oakdale, PA - 14,127 - - Rouseville, PA -1,642 - - Wallace, WV2 - 11,035 - - Weston Mills, Olean, NY - 50,100 - - Weston Mills, Portville, NY - 52,100 - - Reservoirs Inactive: Eagle Creek Reservoir, OH - 100,000 - - Other: Rowlesburg Lake, WV 1977 2,857,575 - - Eligible for deauthorization. Lacks local support. No longer economically justified. Excludes $701,722 contributed by local interests. Includes $15,350,352 original construction cost. Reported in detail in an individual report. 18-22 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Adena, OH (Short Creek) Allegany, NY Unit I (Allegheny River)1 Allegany, NY Unit II (Five Mile Creek Area)1 Bellaire, OH Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, PA 1 Brilliant, OH Brockway, PA (Allegheny River Basin) Clarington, OH Coraopolis, PA Dillonvale, OH (Short Creek) Empire-Stratton, OH1 Follansbee, WV Freeport, PA (Allegheny River) Industry, PA Kittanning, PA, part II (Allegheny River) Lake Chautauqua and Chadakoin River, NY2 Lake Erie-Ohio Canal, OH and PA - 1935 Act Leetsdale, PA1 Martins Ferry, OH1 McKees Rocks, PA Mingo Junction, OH Moundsville, WV' Muddy Creek Dam, PA' Neville Island, PA' New Cumberland, WV New Kensington and Parnassus, PA' Pittsburgh, PA (Golden Triangle) Pittsburgh, PA (North Side) Pittsburgh, PA (The Strip) Powhaten Point, OH 1 Proctor, WV' Redbank Creek Lake, PA Rochester, PA' St. Marys, PA (Allegheny River Basin) Smith Ferry, PA Warwood, WV' Wellsburg, WV West Bridgewater, PA Wheeling, WV' Wheeling, WV (North Wheeling)' Wheeling, WV (Wheeling Island)' Wilcox, PA3 Woodlands, WV1 Youghiogheny River, PA and MD (Canalization)' 4 1975 "- 1965 1972 1941 1977 - - 1954 1971 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 May 6, 1981 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 6, 1977 Mar 2, 1970 May 6, 1981 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Oct 3, 1978 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Oct 3, 1978 Oct 3, 1978 Oct 3, 1978 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Mar 5, 1955 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 1. Deauthorized under Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). 2. Local Interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, authority for project expired Mar. 2, 1970. 3. Local interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, authority for project expired Mar. 5, 1955. 4. Includes $47,195 construction costs expended under previous project and $1,700 O&M costs expended under previous project. 18-23 13,452 4,100 64,851 76,487 194 16,884 33,031 190,722 1,342,000 25,164 402,459 156,377 13,529 6,387 189,067 21,700 16,761 232,863 -- -- II- "- TABLE 18-H ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Dimensions Upper Depths on Avail- Normal Miter Sills Character of Type of Width able Lift at Pool at Normal Foundation Construction Year of Length Normal Elevation Pool Level- Per- Opened Miles Cham- to Full Pool (feet, cent to Above ber Width Level mean sea Lower Upper Kind of Com- Navi- No. Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Dam Lock Dam plete gation Actu 2 6.7 Aspinwall, PA 56 360 11.0 721.0 12.0 10.9 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19342 $ 1, 3 14.5 Cheswick, PA 56 360 13.5 734.5 10.8 11.8 Rock Pile-Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19342 $ 1, 4 24.2 Natrona, PA 56 360 10.5 745.0 10.0 8.5 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1927 1, 5 30.4 Freeport, PA 56 360 11.8 756.8 10.5 10.3 Piling Crib-Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1927 1, 6 36.3 Clinton, PA 56 360 12.2 769.0 10.6 10.8 Rock Crib-Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1928 1, 7 45.7 Kittanning, PA 56 360 13.1 782.1 9.8 10.9 Piling Steel Sheet Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1930 1, Piling 8 52.6 Templeton, PA 56 360 17.9 800.0 10.4 13.8 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1931 2, 9 62.2 Rimer, PA 56 360 22.0 822.0 10.5 11.3 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1938 2, Total $15, Abandoned lock and dam 1 Abandoned lock and dam 2 Abandoned lock and dam 3 Demolishing old dam 1 Dredging channel 1, Total $18, 1. All depths as shown are on guard sills and are controlling depth. 2. Dates shown represent replacement structures. 0 q al Cost y 763,485 875,665 707,690 940,537 523,959 460,008 848,920 510,373 630,637 591,187 544,929 310,103 26,001 055,003 157,860 4 Z 0 C TABLE 18-I MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W. VA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 3 of Text) Dimensions Upper Depths on Avail- Normal Miter Sills Character of Type of Width able Lift at Pool at Normal Foundation Construction Year of Length Normal Elevation Pool Level- Per- Opened Miles Cham- to Full Pool (feet, cent to Above ber Width Level mean sea Lower Upper Kind of Com- Navi- No. Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Dam Lock Dam plete gation Actual Cost 2 11.2 Braddock, PA 56 360 8.7 718.7 16.0 15.95 Rock Crib Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19532 $ 17,872,21257 110 720 3 23.8 Elizabeth, PA 563 360 8.2 726.9 16.0 15.95 Rock Crib Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19533 17,538,5365 8 720 4 41.5 Monessen, PA 563 360 16.6 743.5 10.7 20.0 Piles Piles Movable Concrete Concrete 100 19322 17,254,0715 6 720 - 61.2 Maxwell locks 843 720 19.5 763.0 15.0 20.5 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 1964 30,110,8895 and dam, Maxwell, PA - 82.2 Grays Landing 84 720 15.0 778.0 15.0 26.0 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete - - 24,723,3279 Lock and dam, Grays Landing, PA 7 85.0 Greensboro, PA 56 360 15.0 778.0 10.0 10.5 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19252 2,639,8045 8 90.8 Point Marion, PA 56 360 19.0 797.0 10.0 14.5 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 19252 10,450,5544 5 - 102.0 Morgantown lock 84 600 17.0 814.0 14.5 17.8 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 1950 8,778,0005 and dam, Morgantown, WV - 108.0 Hildebrand lock 84 600 21.0 835.0 15.0 14.0 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 1959 12,506,8295 and dam, 6 miles above Morgantown, WV - 115.4 Opekiska lock 84 600 22.0 857.0 14.0 17.75 Rock Rock Movable Concrete Concrete 100 1964 25,179,6225 and dam, 13.4 miles above Morgantown, WV Marine ways, etc 250,0005 Abandoned lock and dam 1 1,019,9075 Abandoned lock and dam 4 780,8165 Abandoned lock and dam 5 1,074,8125 Abandoned lock and dam 6 770,4495 Abandoned lock and dam 7 213,7765 Abandoned lock and dam 8 245,9005 Abandoned lock and dam 9 191,0005 Abandoned lock and dam 10 210,4455 Abandoned lock and dam 11 227,6685 Abandoned lock and dam 12 200,5505 Abandoned lock and dam 13 190,6915 Abandoned lock and dam 14 210,1275 Abandoned lock and dam 15 175,8295 Dredging 587,8995 Total $173,403,7135 1-r 1. All depths as shown are on guard sills and are controlling depths. 2. Dates shown for locks and dams No. 2 to 8 inclusive, represent reconstruction. 3. 2 Chambers 4. Includes $3,322,057 for raising crest of dam, (1958-9), $2,086,438 for original reconstruction (1923-1926) and $618,758 AE&D costs for replacement of lock, and $2,324,328 expended from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 5. Actual cost: may include estimated costs which have been footnoted as necessary. 6. Includes $2,173,767 for original reconstruction (1931-2), and $15,080,304 for reconstruction of dam (1963-1967). 7. Includes $16,967,114 for reconstruction of locks. 8. Includes $15,857,000 for major rehabilitation. 9. Includes AE&D costs for proposed lock ($803,000) and $11,819,921 expended from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY Off THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 18-J MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV: TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT TO END OF FISCAL YEAR (See Section 3 of Text) Operation and Maintenance, Funds New Work General Total Regular $167,983,17213 $160,164,1332 $328,147,3051 23 Maintenance and operation . .. 452,623 452,623 Public Works acceleration, executive (1963) - 22,549 22,549 Total $167,983,17213 $160,639,3052 $328,622,477123 1. Excludes $5,420,541 for new work for previous projects. 3. Includes $15,857,000 for major rehabilitation of LID 3, $23,920,327 for replacement of L/D 7 ($11,819,921 provided by 2. Excludes $20,446,587 expended between July 7, 1897 and the Inland Waterways Trust Fund), and $4,423,301 for re- June 30, 1937, on operation and care of works of improvement placement of lock at Pt. Marion Lock and Dam ($2,324,328 under provisions of permanent appropriation for such purposes provided by the Inland Waterways Trust Fund.) and excludes $742 for maintenance of previous projects. TABLE 18-K OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT): RESERVOIRS (See Section 21 of Text) Total Estimated Tributary Basin and Reservoir Stream Cost Allegheny: Conemaugh River, PA' Conemaugh River $ 46,012,41113 Crooked Creek, PA' Crooked Creek 4,431,52313 East Branch Clarion River, PA' Clarion River 9,539,5861' Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, PA and NY' Allegheny River 112,218,763136 Loyalhanna, PA' Loyalhanna Creek 5,727,53113 Mahoning Creek, PA' Mahoning Creek 7,144,97313 Tionesta, PA' Tionesta Creek 7,792,3791 3 Union City, PA' French Creek 14,559,80013 Woodcock Creek, PA' Woodcock Creek 20,545,0651 3 Beaver: Berlin, OH' Mahoning River 8,739,98713 Eagle Creek, OH2 Eagle Creek 12,700,0002 4 7 Michael J. Kirwan, OH' Mahoning River 17,376,09713 Mosquito Creek, OH 1 Mosquito Creek 4,253,02913 Shenango River, PA and OH' Shenango River 40,209,8941 3 Monongahela: Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV' West Fork River $231,000,00015 Youghiogheny River, PA and MD' Youghiogheny River 12,521,16713 1. Reported in detail in an individual report. 2. Eligible for deauthorization. 3. Actual Cost. 4. Latest cost estimate revision 1954. 5. 6. 7. Latest cost estimate revision in 1989. Includes $2,920,558 actual cost for Dam Rehabilitation. Inactive. 18-26 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-L INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 28 of Text) Project Dates of Inspection Project Dates of Inspection Amsterdam, OH October 1988 Marianna, PA April 1988 Big Run, PA May 1989 Millvale, PA June 1986 Bolivar, NY September 1989 Oil City Ice Control Bradford, PA June 1989 Structure, Allegheny Brookville, PA May 1989 River, PA September 1989 Buckhannon, WV September 1989 Oil City LPP-(Dike), PA September 1989 Burgettstown-Slovan, PA September 1986 Olean, NY September 1989 Butler, PA June y 19 Portage, PA September 1989 Chartiers Creek, PA Portville, NY September 1989 Cannonsburg-Houston Reach September 1989 Reynoldsville, PA May 1989 James G. Fulton Reach September 1989 Ridgway, PA June 1988 Colliers, WV September 1988 Salamanca, NY September 1989 DuBois, PA May 1989 Stonewood-Nutter Fort, WV July 1983 Eldred, PA April 1987 Sykesville, PA May 1989 Etna, PA September 1989 Tarentum, PA November 1976 Friendsville, MD April 1988 Turtle Creek, PA September 1987 Granville, PA April 1988 Washington, PA September 1986 Johnsonburg, PA April 1989 Wellsville, OH September 1988 Kittaning, PA August 1983 Weston, WV September 1989 Latrobe, PA September 1988 Wilmore, PA September 1988 Leetonia, OH June 1989 Yonmgstown, PA July 1989 18-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 18-M FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 30 of Text) Flood Control Activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Project/Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Allegheny River, Oil City, PA (Complete) 909,940 Girty's Run, Allegheny County, PA (Complete) 2,737 Lick Run Creek, Baldwin, PA (Reconnaissance Report) 18,583 Parsons, Hambleton, Hendricks, WV (Reconnaissance Report) 45,932 Robinson Run, Oakdale, PA (Inactive) 29 Sullivan Run, Butler, PA (Reconnaissance Report) 158,399 Tygart River, Phillipi, WV (Reconnaissance Report) 11,609 W. Little Pine Creek, Etna, PA (Complete) 4,523 Total cost for current fiscal year: 1,151,752 Emergency Bank Protection - Section 14 of the 1846 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress Project/Study Identification Airport, Glendale, WV (Detailed Project Report complete) Beaver River, Bridgewater, PA (complete) Brook County, Hooverson Heights, WV (complete) Brush Creek, Jeannette, PA (Detailed Project Report complete) Chadakoin River, Jamestown, NY (Detailed Project Report complete) Cox Run, Wellsburg, WV (Detailed Project Report underway) Crows Run, Conway, PA (To be terminated) Dry Brook Creek, Poland, NY (Detailed Project Report underway) Dutch Hollow, Ellery, NY (To be terminated) Elks Creek, Clarksburg, WV (complete) Green County, Route 88, PA (to be terminated) Kennedy Twp., McKees Rocks, PA (complete) Mahoning River, Warren Twp., OH (complete) Mahoning River, Warren, OH (Detailed Project Report underway) Main Street, Wellsburg, WV (Detailed Project Report underway) Middle School, Wellsburg, WV (Detailed Project Report underway) Mill Run, Sinclairville, NY (Detailed Project Report complete) Monongahela River, Granville, WV. (complete) N. Scenic Road, Buffalo Twp., PA (to be terminated) Neshannock Creek, New Castle, PA (Detailed Project Report underway) Ohio River, McMechen, WV (to be terminated) Ohio River, River Ave., Chester, WV (to be terminated) Orange Road, Mercer County, PA (Detailed Project Report underway) Plum Creek, Oakmont, PA (Detailed Project Report underway) S. Scenic Road, Buffalo Twp., PA (to be terminated) Salamanca (Power Trans. Tower), NY (Detailed Project Report underway) Saw Mill Run Rd., Salamanca, NY (Detailed Project Report underway) Sewer Outfall, Glendale, WV (Plans & Specs underway) Shupe Run, Mt. Pleasant, PA (Detailed Project Report complete) Turkey Run, Shenango Twp., PA (to be terminated) Unnamed Tributary to Pymatuning (to be terminated) Walnut Bottom Run, Beaver Falls, PA (Detailed Project Report underway) Water Works, Park & Pool, Wellsburg, WV (Detailed Project Report underway) West Run, Munhall, PA (Plans & Specs complete) Total cost for current fiscal year Fiscal Year Costs 7,362 60 254 13,623 8,885 17,052 4 9,424 36 82 62 55 28 18,982 15,447 17,025 6,404 104 2,246 7,260 72 872 6,417 19,487 15 10,052 6,299 4,418 321 2 1,148 7,665 12,677 21,539 215,379 18-28 OHIO RIVER For actual construction of locks and dams, and operation and care of completed stuctures, river is divided into three sections under immediate supervision and direction of District Engineers at Pittsburgh, Huntington and Louisville. Pittsburgh section extends 127 miles from head of river at Pittsburgh, Pa., to a point immediately upstream from New Martinsville, W. Va., and includes Emsworth, Dashields, Montgomery, New Cumberland, Pike Island and Hannibal locks and dam. Huntington section extends 311 miles from mile 127 to 438 immediately upstream from Foster, Ky., and includes Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Gallipolis, Greenup and Captain Anthony Meldahl locks and dams. Louisville section extends 543 miles from mile 438 to mouth of river, and includes Markland and McAlpine locks and dams (with Louisville and Portland Canal) Cannelton, Newburgh, Uniontown, and Smithland locks and dams and Locks and Dams 52 and 53. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Construction of locks and dams on Ohio River ............................... 19-1 2. Open channel work, Ohio River............ 19-3 Tables Table 19-A Cost and Financial Statement...... 19-5 Table 19-B Authorizing Legislation............19-6 Table 19-C Not Applicable Table 19-D Not Applicable Table 19-E Not Applicable Navigation 1. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS ON OHIO RIVER Location. Ohio River is formed by junction of Allegheny and Monongahela rivers at Pittsburgh, Pa., and flows generally southwesterly for 981 miles to join Mississippi River near Cairo, Ill. For description of river see page 1227, 1932 Annual Report. Previous projects. For details see page 1907 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for improvement of entire river by construction of locks and dams to provide a channel depth of 9 feet and for widening Louisville and Portland Canal at Louisville, Ky. Project provides for a lock with usable dimensions of 110 by 600 feet at each of the dams and, in addition, an auxiliary lock 56 by 360 feet is available at Emsworth, Dashields, Montgomery, and McAlpine locks and dams with an auxiliary lock at Gallipolis being 110 by 360 feet. Dashields is a fixed dam, while Emsworth, Montgomery, and Gallipolis are fixed dams with movable crests. Remaining dams are movable Table 19-F Not Applicable Table 19-G Not Applicable Table 19-H Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River, Total Cost of Existing Project .......................... 19-6 Table 19-I Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Licenses of Locks and Dams, Ohio River............. 19-6 Table 19-J Ohio River Locks and Dams Statistics ............... ....... 19-7 type, with navigable pass varying in width from 600 to 1,248 feet. In addition to navigable pass, movable-type dams are also provided with one or more regulating weirs. At McAlpine Locks and Dam, a canal (Louisville and Portland) extends along left bank for 2 miles, with locks at lower end. Modifications to existing project under purview of Section 6, March 3, 1909 Act, provide for fixed dams with movable crests with two locks (110 by 1200 feet and 110 by 600 feet) at New Cumberland, Pike Island, Hannibal, Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Greenup, Captain Anthony Meldahl, Markland, Cannelton, Newburgh, and Uniontown; two locks 110 by 1200 feet at Smithland; 110 by 1,200 foot temporary locks in addition to the existing locks at Locks and Dams 52 and 53, and reconstruction to provide a 110 by 1200-foot lock in addition to existing locks and a fixed dam with two sections of movable crest at McAlpine Locks and Dam; widening Louisville and Portland Canal to 500 feet. Auxiliary lock 56 by 360 feet at McAlpine Locks and Dam has been inoperative since failure of downstream lock gates in December 1972. Rehabilitation of existing Locks and Dams 52 and 53 was started in September 1979 under the purview of Section 6, March 1909 Act. Mound City 19-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 was also considered authorized under purview of 1909 Act, and preconstruction planning was performed in the period 1965 to 1972. The ruling of the U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, on September 6, 1974, with reference to Lock and Dam 26, Mississippi River, would also apply to this project. Consequently, it is no longer considered authorized. Operation and care of locks and dams were included in project July 1, 1935, under provisions of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. Estimated Federal cost of new work (existing project, 1983), exclusive of Gallipolis Locks and Dam reported under Kanawha River project is $1,778,840,999, estimated non-Federal cost is $14,999,000. Foregoing estimate does not include expenditures on previous projects. Various items previously included in this project are considered inactive or unnecessary and are excluded from foregoing cost estimate. See page 693, Annual Report, 1968 for items and estimated'cost. Under authority of 1910 River and Harbor Act, Louisville and Portland Canal was widened to 200 feet; Locks and Dams 40 and 42 eliminated; Locks and Dams 1 and 2 replaced by Emsworth Locks and Dam; Lock and Dam 3 replaced by Dashields Locks and Dam; and Locks and Dams 4, 5, and 6 replaced by Montgomery Locks and Dam. Locks and Dams 24, 25, and 26 were replaced by Gallipolis Locks and Dam authorized by August 30, 1935 Act, and constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River. Locks and Dams 7, 8, and 9 were replaced by New Cumberland Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 10 and 11 were replaced by Pike Island Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 12, 13, and 14 were replaced by Hannibal Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 15, 16, and 17 were replaced by Willow Island Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 18, 19, and 20 were replaced by Belleville Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 21, 22, and 23 were replaced by Racine Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 27, 28, 29, and 30 were replaced by Greenup Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 31, 32, 33, and 34 were replaced by Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 35, 36, 37, 38, and 39 were replaced by Markland Locks and Dam; the Louisville and Portland Canal at McAlpine Locks and Dam was widened to 500 feet. Locks and Dams 43, 44, and 45 were replaced by Cannelton Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 46 and 47 were replaced by Newburgh Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 48 and 49 were replaced by Uniontown Locks and Dam, presently under construction; and Locks and Dams 50 and 51 were replaced by Smithland Locks and Dam, presently under construction, as modifications to existing project under purview of Section 6, March 3, 1909 Act, reducing total number of structures to 20. The Water Resources Development Act of 1974 combined the Newburgh Bank Protection Works project with the Newburgh Locks and Dam project. A December 1981 Act established the Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area near McAlpine Locks and Dam to protect and preserve existing fossilized coral and a diversity of wildlife. Table 19-J contains data relative to various features of locks and dams included in existing projects. For list of principal towns and cities along Ohio River with their mileage below Pittsburgh, PA, see page 1060, 1962 Annual Report. See Table 19-I for licenses. Navigation system of 21 locks and dams is in operation and 9-foot navigation throughout length of river is generally available at all times. At certain unstable bars project depth is maintained by dredging, supplemented by contraction works. (See "Open Channel Work, Ohio River.") Table 19-J shows cost and year completion of locks and dams now in operation. Existing project does not provide adequate facilities for present day navigation due to obsolescence of structures. Since repair and modernization of these facilities would be extremely costly, replacement and reconstruction is being accomplished as rapidly as funds are made available for the purpose. Construction of lock and dam replacement program was initiated in fiscal year 1955. New Cumberland, Pike Island, Hannibal, Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Greenup, Captain Anthony Meldahl, Markland, McAlpine, Cannelton, Newburgh, Uniontown, and Smithland replacement locks and dams are in operation, replacing 39 old low-lift locks and dams. For total cost of existing project, see Table 19-H. Terminal facilities. Modern public terminals, with warehouses, equipped with operating machinery for transferring materials, have been constructed by private interests at some of the larger cities and towns. A list of terminals on Ohio River is revised annually and can be obtained from Division Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer Division, Ohio River, Cincinnati, Ohio. Operations during fiscal year. New work by contract and hired labor: Emsworth Locks and Dam (Rehabilitation): Major rehabilitation work was completed on November 9, 1984 and included placing stone erosion protection downstream of both the back channel and the main channel, structurally rehabilitating all 14 dam gates, painting of the service bridge on the main channel dam and painting dam gates on the back channel. Lock work included rehabilitation of the river chamber and land chamber including all lock machinery. Expenditures during FY 1989 for construction completion of the remaining rehabilitation project was $1,768. Montgomery Locks and Dam (Rehabilitation): Contracts completed include: Fabrication of lock miter gates, 110-foot chamber for $1,049,132; upper guard wall cells for $856,468; emergency dam bulkheads for $329,631; fabrication of 56-foot lock miter gates for $344,519. Contract for installation of 56-foot lock miter gates and major rehabilitation of locks and dam, awarded on July 29, 1985 for $22,193,960 was completed for estimated amount of $24,004,667. Installation of 110-foot lock miter gates was completed by hired labor. Expenditures during FY 1989 for real estate coordination, construction, engineering and design of rehabilitation project was $446,971. Willow Island Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in January 1967. All work is complete. Belleville Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in May 1962. All work is complete. Racine Locks and Dam: Construction initiated in June 1964 is complete. 19-2 OHIO RIVER Gallipolis Lock and Dam: The existing project, constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River, was placed in operation in August 1937. The dimensions of the existing locks chambers and poor approach conditions, particularly to downstream traffic, have created a higher than normal accident rate to the structure with corresponding hazards and delays to traffic. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 authorized Phase I studies for a single 1200-foot lock in a bypass canal. These studies are complete. Initial Construction, General funds for the continuation of Engineering activities were received in September 1985. During the fiscal year real estate acquisition continued. Plans and Specifications were completed. The project was advertised and bids were opened in September 1987. The contract was awarded in October 1987 and is 38% complete. The total estimated cost of the project is $345,000,000, which is 50 percent federal cost and 50 percent inland waterways trust fund cost. Greenup Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in October 1954. All work is complete. Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam: Construction work complete. Markland Locks and Dam: Project is complete including a public highway bridge across the navigation structure, as authorized by the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-606). For details of bridge see page 22-3 of Annual Report for 1978. Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area was authorized by Public Law 97-137 on December 29, 1981. The Conservation Area will protect 1,000 acres which consists of birdlife and other wildlife. Planning, consisted in efforts to locate a Non-Federal sponsor to help cost share project accomplishments. Real Estates activities consisted of acquisition proceedings against 48 triacts needed for the projects. $903,140. McAlpine Locks and Dam: Project is complete except for alteration of lift section of railroad bridge that spans the upper end of the Louisville and Portland Canal which work is presently deferred. Cannelton Locks and Dam: Project is complete except for financially closing out the project. $20,371. Newburgh Locks and Dam: Construction initiated in October 1962 is complete except for financially closing out the project. $3,210. Uniontown Locks and Dam: Project is complete except for continuing action on Declarations of Taking on one tract. $6,446. Smithland Locks and Dam: All major construction features are complete and the project was advanced to 99 percent completion. Land acquisition is complete except for outstanding condemnation actions and acquisition of one recreation site. One relocation contract for electric lines is being delayed for rights-of-way problems. Contracts to construct a recreational site at Lusk Creek, IL and to provide electric service to same were completed. Engineering and Design on remaining project features was continued. $75,778. Locks and Dam No. 52 (New Lock): Construction initiated in December 1967 is complete. Locks and Dam No. 53 (Temporary Lock): Construction initiated in December 1972 is complete. Locks and Dam No. 52 (Rehabilitation): Construction initiated in June 1979 is complete. Locks and Dam No. 53 (Rehabilitation): Construction initiated in June 1979 is complete. Operation and maintenance, general. Locks and dams operated as required and necessary repairs and improvements made thereto and to operator's quarters, grounds and esplanades. Costs were $9,000,963 for Pittsburgh District, $11,464,341 for Huntington District and $13,638,220 for Louisville District. Dashields Locks and Dam (Rehabilitation): Major Rehabilitation work includes new mechanical and electrical systems, structural repairs, lock wall stabilization, new land and middle wall buildings, repairs to existing land wall, service and river wall buildings and new access road. Contract for Rehabilitation of Locks and Dam was awarded on September 17, 1987 for $25,918,504 and is 94 percent complete. Overall scheduled completion date is December 1990. Expenditures during FY 1989 for construction and engineering and design for rehabilitation project was $14,103,507. 2. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER Location. Under jurisdiction of district engineer in whose district the work is located. Portion of river included in project extends 974.7 miles from head of river at Pittsburgh, PA, to mouth of Cache River (Mound City, IL). Open channel improvement from mouth of Cache River to mouth of Ohio River is under jurisdiction of Mississippi River Commission. Existing projects. Before completion of canalization project, no project depth had been fixed by Congress under project for open channel work, but in order to properly aid packet and barge navigation it was necessary to secure a low-water channel with a minimum depth of 4 to 6 feet, and a width, depending upon difficulty of running channel, of 400-600 feet; also to permit movemment of large coal tows, which movement occurred at stages of water exceeding 10 feet, it was necessary to remove points of projecting bars which formed at various locations along river. Accomplishment of this purpose involved concentration of current by closing back channels at islands with low dams, contraction and straightening wide open channels by low dikes, dredging bars and shoals, and removal of snags and wrecks. Incidental to direct improvement of Ohio River is construction and maintenance of ice piers as required for protection of river craft. Stage of extreme high water on Ohio River varies from 46 feet at Pittsburgh, Pa., to 80 feet at Cincinnati, Ohio, with 57.2 feet at Louisville, Ky. (head of falls), 53.8 feet at Evansville, Ind., and 59.5 feet at Cairo, Ill. (mouth of river). Estimated cost of new work (1960) is $16,160,000, exclusive of following items which are considered inactive: Ice piers authorized by 1927 River and Harbor Act; reforestation of sloughs on Kentucky 19-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Peninsula near Evansville, Ind., authorized by 1930 River and Harbor Act; dredging to widen channel at certain points; and placing revetment at various points. Estimated cost of these items (1954) is $6,565,000. Operation of snag boats on Ohio River below Pennsylvania State line was included in project July 1, 1935, under provisions of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. See Table 19-B for authorizing legislation. New work under this project is substantially complete, since it is not anticipated that work on inactive portion of project will be accomplished. In addition to dredging, local stabilization of channel has been effected at various points by construction of dikes and revetment. Work which remains consists of dredging to widen channels at certain points to project depth. Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of January 21, 1927 authorizing construction of ice piers for general open channel work, imposes condition that before work is begun on any pier, local interests convey to the United States free of cost such riparian rights as may be deemed necessary in connection with the improvements at locality (HI. Doc. 187, 67th Congr., 2nd sess.). Existing ice piers are adequate for present purposes and local cooperation is not needed since no additional construction is under consideration. River and Harbor Act of July 3, 1930, provides for reforestation of sloughs of Kentucky Peninsula and bank protection and that no expense shall be incurred by the United States for acquiring lands required for purpose of this improvement (H. Doc. 409, 69th Cong. 1st sess.). However, since no serious overbank erosion has occurred since bank revetment in 1933-34, reforestation is not considered justifiable at this time and no local cooperation is required. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Dredging was done where required to provide an adequate and dependable channel of project depth at minimum pool conditions. Dikes and revetments were maintained and routine work of maintaining navigation aids, removing snags, making channel studies, hydrographic surveys and mapping was performed as required. Channel soundings, hydrographic surveys, stream gaging operations, channel inspections and aids to navigation, and miscellaneous inspections and reports cost $978,308. There was no dredging by hired labor on the Ohio River in FY 89. Dredging by contract: Huntington District 645,881 cubic yards at $1,475,964 and Louisville District 1,033,966 cubic yards at $2,092,935. 19-4 OHIO RIVER TABLE 19-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep 30, 1989 1. Construction of New Work Locks and Dams Approp. $7,065,000 $5,479,000 $52,787,000 $43,833,000 $1,492,818,7721 3 5 10 17 21 on Ohio River Cost 6,639,783 4,974,653 45,381,646 48,444,774 1,488,152,8151 3 6 11 12 15 16 18 22 Maint. Approp. 32,293,874 33,309,500 34,400,000 34,279,987 691,632,3212 4 19 Cost 32,804,809 32,780,076 34,640,914 34,103,524 690,611,1482 13 14 1920 Rehab. Approp. 10,151,000 12,486,000 2,720,000 275,000 82,996,572 Cost 12,571,165 9,965,508 5,845,792 448,866 82,898,626 Rehab.(O&M) Approp. 1,267,100 1,784,400 12,890,200 14,129,500 30,071,200 Cost 1,166,100 1,578,959 13,155,802 14,103,501 30,004,362 2. Open Channel New Work Work, Ohio River Approp. - - - - 15,962,2608 Cost - - - - 15,962,2608 Maint. Approp. 4,508,800 3,860,500 4,429,600 4,394,700 121,302,0267 9 Cost 4,555,393 3,854,324 4,250,322 4,547,207 121,246,6857 9 Rehab. Approp. - - - - 944,649 Cost - - - - 944,649 1 Includes $17,003,761 for previous 6-foot canalization project. 2 Includes $36,943,217 expended from 1885 to 1937 on operation and care of work of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriations for such purposes. 3 Includes $215,812 public works acceleration, executive 1963. 4 Includes $38,766 public works acceleration, executive 1963. 5 Excludes $251,769 contributed funds for new work. 6 Excludes $250,102 contributed funds for new work. 7 Excludes $1,621,349 expended in operation of snag boats under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes, and $267 transferred to project without reimbursement. 8 Includes $1,040,236 Public Works funds. 9 Includes $1,000 for removal of obstructions in Licking River under authority of Section 3, R&H Act of 1930. 10 Includes $100,000 placed in FY 1971 Budget Reserve. 1 Excludes $3,899 transferred from project without reimbursement. 12 Surplus property valued at $3,553 transferred to project without reimbursement. 13 Excludes $2,140 transferred to project without reimbursement. 14 Excludes surplus property valued at $73,832 transferred to project without reimbursement. 15 Includes $87,724,158 prior construction cost. 16 Excludes surplus property valued at $297,385 transferred to project without reimbursement. 17 Includes $549,392 Code 710 Funds, $572,162 Code 711 Funds, $532,677 Code 712 Funds and $1,759,812 Code 713 Funds. 18 Includes $549,392 Code 710 Funds, $342,162 Code 711 Funds, $532,677 Code 712 Funds and $1,989,812 Code 713 Funds. 19 Includes $2,158,073 Funds provided from The Productive Employment Appropriations Act of 1983 (PL 98-8). 20 Includes $920,945 cost for operations and care of previous projects. 21 Includes $52,249,000 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. 22 Includes $49,629,000 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. 19-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 19-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. Open Channel Work, Ohio River March 3, 1827 Project adopted by this act originally covered entire length of Ohio River from its mouth near Cairo to Pittsburgh, a distance of 981 miles. It provided for removal of all obstructions which tend to endanger steamboat navigation. January 21, 1927 Construct ice piers as a part of project, with funds H. Doc. 187, 67th Cong., 2nd sess. allotted from appropriations for general open channel work. July 3, 1930 Reforestation of sloughs on Kentucky Peninsula near H. Doc., 409, 69th Cong., 1st sess. Evansville, Ind., and a 200-foot strip along bank and for bank protection, at an estimated cost of $200,000. July 3, 1958 Act of March 3, 1827 modified to include maintenance H. Doc., 434, 84th Cong., 2nd sess. of existing Licking River Channel within lower 3-mile limit of River slack water, at an estimated increase of $1,000 in cost of average annual maintenance. Locks and Dams, Ohio River December 29, 1981 Act of December 29, 1981 established the 1,000 H.R. 2241, PL 97-137, Title II, acre Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conser- 95 Stat. 1710 vation Area, at a cost not to exceed $300,000. November 17, 1988 Olmsted Locks and Dam PL 100-676, 100th Cong., 2nd Sess. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS ON OHIO RIVER TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 TABLE 19-H (See Section 1 of Text) Operations and Maintenance Funds New Work General Rehabilitation Total Regular $1,395,755,640 $649,649,431 $112,902,988 $2,158,308,059 Public Works 3,258,368 0 0 3,258,368 Emergency Relief 1,198,837 19,000 - 1,217,837 Maintenance & Operation - 3,039,789 3,039,789 Public Works Acceleration 215,812 38,766 254,578 Executive 1963 $0 Total $1,400,428,6573 $652,746,9861 2 $112,902,9884 $2,166,078,631 1 Excludes $36,943,217 expended from 1885 to 1937 under 4 Includes $30,004,362 cost for O&M permanent indefinite appropriation. Rehabilitation. 2 Excludes $920,945 cost for operation and care of previous projects. Note: All other cost variations are listed in the Footnotes 3 Excludes $87,724,158 prior construction cost. of Table 19-A. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSES TABLE 19-I AT LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER Markland Dam McAlpine Dam Racine Dam Greenup Dam Hannibal Dam F.E.R.C. License 2,211 289:1,000 2,570 2,614 3,206 License Public Service Co. Louisville Gas and Ohio Power Co. City of Vanceburg, City of New of Indiana Electric Co. Kentucky Martinsville,WV Annual Charge $ 45,950.00 $ 95,000.00 $ 64,232.00 $ 261,103.00 Collections to end of Fiscal Year 1988 $1,054,961.64 $8,340,353.84 $478,369.00 $1,774,678.00 19-6 TABLE 19-J4 OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual Cost Lock Miles of For Full mean Year to Date of and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Character of Foundation Percent Opened to Each Lock Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Dam Replaced Emsworth Locks and Dam, Emsworth, PA Replaced Replaced Dashields Locks and Dam 1.6 miles below Sewickley, PA Replaced Replaced Replaced Montgomery Locks and Dam, 1.4 miles above Industry, PA Replaced Replaced New Cumberland Locks and Dam, Stratton, OH Replaced Replaced Replaced Pike Island Locks and Dam, 2 miles upstream from Warwood, WV Replaced Replaced Replaced Hannibal Locks and Dam, 1.6 miles upstream from New Martinsville, WV Replaced Replaced Willow Island Locks and Dam, 2.7 miles above Waverly, WV 110 56 600 360 110 600 56 360 110 56 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 600 360 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 18.0 710.0 17.0' " 12.9' Rock 15.5' s 12.93 10.0 692.0 13.41 17.53 Rock Rock and piles 100 Rock and piles 100 - $ 870,034 1921 43,347,634" - 976,767 - - 1,144,588 Rock 100 1929 33,537,438"** - - 1,071,472 - - 1,080,132 - - 1,123,442 17.5 682.0 16.0' 14.6s Rock and piles Rock and piles 100 20.5 664.5 7.0' 14.8s Rock 21.0 644.0 17.0' 18.0' Rock Rock 1936 37,680,796"* - - 1,075,000 - - 1,167,456 100 1959 39,099,688 - - 1,177,100 - - 1,138,000 - - 1,162,165 Rock 100 1968 56,623,946 - - 1,166,104 - - 1,222,389 - - 1,133,371 21.0 623.0 38.0 17.0 Rock Rock 99 1972 87,649,818 - - 1,180,478 - - 1,275,532 20.0 602.0 35.0 15.0 Rock and piles Rock 100 1972 76,520,876 1 - 6.2 13.3 31.7 7 - 8 - 54.4 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 84.3 126.4 161.7 TABLE 19-J4 (Continued) OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual Cost Lock Miles of For Full mean Year to Date of and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Character of Foundation Percent Opened to Each Lock Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Dam - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 103.9 Belleville Locks and Dam, 0.3 mile below Reedsville, OH - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 237.5 Racine Locks and Dam, 1.5 miles below Letart Falls, OH - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 279.2 Gallipolis Locks and Dam, 0.7 mile below Hogsett, WV Gallipolis Modernization - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 341.0 Greenup Locks and Dam, 4.9 miles below Greenup, KY - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 436.2 Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam, 2.2 miles above Foster, KY 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 1,200 600 1,200 600 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 - - $ 1,362,591 - - 927,091 - - 1,213,848 - - 936,696 22.0 582.0 37.0 15.0 Rock and piles Rock 100 1968 - - 1,484,562 - - 1,218,798 - - 1,851,488 22.0 560.0 18.0 15.0 Rock and piles 23.0 538.0 18.0 15.0 Rock 23.0 538.0 18.0 15.0 - 30.0 515.0 18.0' 13.0 Rock 30.0 485.0 18.0' 15.0 Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock 100 1971 100 1937 100 1959 - - 1,359,231 - - 2,951,216 - - 1,937,166 - - 3,437,057 100 1962 74,188,216 600 360 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 62,591,255 ri 0 0 Li 0 ITi r-3' 0 0 ITJ d 0 O 'TI C0 r 0 C Cl 0 d co 64,922,680 1,187,542 1,925,205 1,307,241 3,452,066 100,505,8021" 1,063,133 1,088,802 1,579,618 57,464,191 TABLE 19-J (Continued) OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual Cast Lock Miles of For Full mean Year to Date of and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Character of Foundation Percent Opened to Each Lock Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Dam 35 - Replaced 36 - Replaced 37 - Replaced 38 - Replaced 531.5 Markland Locks and Dam, 1 mile above Markland, IN 39 - Replaced 40 - Eliminated 41 - - Falls of the Ohio, 1 mile above McAlpine 604.0 McAlpine Locks and Dam (Reconstruction of Locks and Dam 41) 42 - Eliminated 43 - Replaced 44 - Replaced 45 - Replaced 720.7 Cannelton Locks and Dam 3 miles above Cannelton, IN 46 - Replaced 776.1 Newburgh Locks and Dam, 16 miles above Evansville, IN 47 - Replaced 48 - Replaced 49 - Replaced 846.0 Uniontown Locks and Dam, 3.5 miles below Uniontown, KY 50 - Replaced 51 - Replaced 918.5 Smithland Locks and Dam, 2 miles above Smithland, KY 110 110 N/A 110 110 56 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 1,200 600 35.0 455.0 50.0 15.0 Rock N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1,200 49.0 12.0 600 37.0 420.0 19.0 11.0 Rock 360 19.0 11.0 1,200 25.0 383.0 38.0 13.0 Rock 600 1,200 600 16.0 358.0 32.0 16.0 Rock 1,200 600 22.0 342.0 34.0 12.0 Rock 1,200 1,200 22.0 324.0 34.0 12.0 Rock Piles N/A Rock Rock 100 0 1963 N/A $ 1,894,942 3,704,535 1,297,924 2,857,040 63,019,403 2,222,448 7,658,134' 1,470,959 100$ 1961 45,726,189' 99 1972 2,592,242 2,819,930 3,202,890 99,028,570'� - - - 3,129,028 Pile 99 1975 104,484,465 - - - 4,415,526 - - - 3,062,710 - - - 3,325,964 Rock 99 1975 100,307,642 - - - 3,751,762 - - - 4,370,566 Rock 99 1980 273,689,085 0 ('") N CD TABLE 19-J (Continued) OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual Cost Lock Miles of For Full mean Year to Date of and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Character of Foundation Percent Opened to Each Lock Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Dam 52 938.9 1.4 miles below Brookport, IL 110 000 12.0 302.0 15.4 11.0 Pile Pile 100 1928 13,337,747" 938.9 1.4 miles below Brookport, Il 110 1,200 12.0 302.0 15.4 11.0 Pile Pile 100 1969 10,197,516 (New lock) 53 962.6 10.8 miles above 110 600 13.4 290.0 15.4 9.6' Pile Pile 100 1929 10,004,240" Mound City, IL 962.6 10.8 miles above 110 1,200 13.4 290.0 15.4 9.6 Pile -100 1982 38,570,920 -Mound City, IL (New lock) 974.2 Mound City Lock and Dam - - - - - - - - 1,539,470 I mile below Mound City, IL TOTAL $1,594,061,568" ' Depths are on emergency dan foundation and are controlling depths. : Change from fixed dam to lift-gate dam completed in 1938. ' Depths are on poiree dam foundation and are controlling depths. * Land chamber. s River chamber. s Roller-gate dam. Cost not included in total. Constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River. Lock and Dam 41 completed with 110- by 600-foot lock in 1921. Completed with new dam and raised canal and lock wall in 1928. Auxiliary 56- by 360-foot lock constructed in 1929-30. Reconstr-uction and modernization began 1956, renamed McAlpine Locks and Dam in 1960. Operation of auxiliary lock suspended in 1971. * Completed except for deferred alteration of railroad bridge. 9 Dam below not yet constructed. Depth on lower miter sill at lower water. 1o Excludes $2,219,975 payment for settlement of damage to dam caused by barge accident in April 1978. " Includes $8,876,000 for major rehabilitation project initiated in FY 1979. " Includes $4,593,572 for major rehabilitation project initiated in FY 1979. 13 For preconstruction planning 1965 to 1972. No longer considered authorized. See Section 1 of text. " Includes $37,485,869 for major rehabilitation initiated in FY 1980. 14* Includes $31,943,185 for major rehabilitation initiated in FY 1983. " 4 **Includes $30,004,362 for major rehabilitation initiated in FY 1986 (O&M funds). s Includes $46,629,000 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. " Exclusive of $6,994,235 details below. Additional Features Entering into Cost of Project Louisville and Portland Canal and Indiana chute $ (under previous project) Examinations, survey contingencies, plants and miscellaneous Recreation facilities, pool area, Gallipolis Locks and Dam TOTAL 5,359,203 966,232 668,800 6,994,235 GRAND TOTAL $1,601,055,803 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT * The district comprises Ohio, northwestern Pennsylvania and western and northern New York, embracing U.S. waters of Lake Erie exclusive of small portion of western end, Lake Ontario, and St. Lawrence River, with their tributary drainage basins from boundary between the states of Ohio and Michigan to international boundary line east of Frontier, New York. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio ...................... 2. Barcelona Harbor, N Y .... ,.................... 3. Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, N Y ...................... 4. Buffalo Harbor, N Y .......................... 5. Cattaraugus Harbor, N Y .................... 6. Cleveland Harbor, Ohio ............. ....... 7. Conneaut Harbor, Ohio ........................ 8. Dunkirk Harbor, N Y ........................ 9. Erie Harbor, Pa. .............................. 10. Fairport Harbor, Ohio ....................... 11. Huron Harbor, N Y ........................... 12. Irondequoit Bay, N Y ..................... 13. Lorain Harbor, Ohio .......................... 14. New York State Barge Canal ................... 15. Oak Orchard Harbor, N Y ..................... 16. Olcott Harbor, N Y ........................... 17. Port Ontario Harbor, N Y ..................... 18. Rochester Harbor, N Y ......................... 19. Rocky River, Ohio ........................... 20. Sandusky Harbor, Ohio ...................... 21. Toledo Harbor, Ohio ......................... 22. Vermilion Harbor, Ohio ................... 23. West Harbor, Ohio .......................... 24. Wilson Harbor, N Y .......................... 25. Reconnaissance and condition surveys ......... 26. Other authorized navigation projects ........... 27. Navigation work under special authorization .. . Page 20-1 20-2 20-2 20-2 20-3 20-3 20-4 20-4 20-4 20-5 20-5 20-5 20-6 20-6 20-6 20-6 20-7 20-7 20-7 20-8 20-8 20-8 20-8 20-9 20-9 20-9 20-9 Navigation 1. ASHTABULA HARBOR, OHIO Location. On the south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Ashtabula River, 59 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14836.) Previous projects. For details see page 1963 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1593 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1297-99 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost of completed project is $12,240,147. Non-Federal costs of $5,743,000, including contribution of $47,000, were for construction of access roads, docks, storage and handling facilities and dockside dredging. Beach Erosion Control Page 28. Maumee Bay State Park, Ohio ................. 20-9 29. Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, Pa .............. 20-10 30. Other authorized beach erosion control projects ........................... 20-11 31. Beach erosion work under special authorization .......................... 20-11 Flood Control 32. Ellicott Creek, N Y ....................... 20-11 33. Mount Morris Lake, N Y Genesee River ..................................... 20-11 34. Ottawa, Ohio .............................. 20-12 35. Point Place, Toledo, Ohio .................... 20-12 36. Reno Beach-Howard Farms Area, Ohio ........ 20-12 37. Inspection of completed flood control projects .............................. 20-12 38. National Emergency Preparedness ............. 20-12 39. Other authorized flood control projects ........ 20-13 40. Flood control work under special authorization ........................ 20-13 Deauthorized projects 41. Deauthorized Projects ....................... 20-13 General Investigations 42. Surveys ...................................... 43. Collection and study of basic data .............. 44. Advance Engineering & Design ................. 45. Continuation of Planning and Engineering .... 20-13 20-13 20-13 20-13 See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $47,000 for work authorized by 1936 and 1970 acts. Terminal facilities. There are 16 piers and wharves. One facility is owned by Coast Guard. Ten facilities are along banks of Ashtabula River and six are on southside of outer harbor. Eleven terminals have railroad connections and six have mechanical handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) 20-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Operations and results during fiscal year, Maintenance: Real estate activities, condition sediment surveys and reformulation and economic analysis regarding dredging of toxic materials from upper River by Government plant and hired labor cost $81,705. Environmental testing, by contract, and supervision and review of that contract cost $32,431. Repairs to 25 l.f. of the east and west breakwater by U.S. derrickboat McCauley cost $107,777. Removal of 87,000 cubic yards shoaled material from outer harbor, by contract, cost $447,912. Engineering and design cost $148,530. Supervision and administration cost $82,327. 2. BARCELONA HARBOR, N Y Location. On south shore of Lake Erie about 17 miles southwesterly of Dunkirk, N Y, and 29 miles northeasterly of Erie, Pa. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Previous projects. Adopted by July 4, 1936, River and Harbor Act. Only information available is in index to report of Chief of Engineers under title "Portland Harbor, N.Y." Existing Project. For description of existing project see page 1506 of Annual Report for 1961. Actual costs for new work for completed project were $1,124,286. Non-Federal costs of $60,000 were incurred by local interests. Of this amount, $7,500 was a cash contribution and remainder was for providing necessary lands and construction of public wharf. Existing project was authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2nd sess.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interest contributed $7500 for existing project. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, condition sediment surveys and real estate activities by Government plant and hired labor cost $2,718. 3. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, NY Location. Improvement is essentially that of upper 13.5 miles of Niagara River from its head at Lake Erie, Buffalo, N Y, to and including Tonawanda Harbor, N.Y. It comprises improvements formerly designated by three titles; viz, Lake Erie entrance to Black Rock Harbor and Erie Basin, N Y, Black Rock Harbor and Channel, N Y and Tonawanda Harbor and Niagara River, N Y (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14832.) Previous projects. For details see item 5 and 7, page 19700f Annual Report for 1915, and page 1612 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project and Federally owned Black Rock ship lock, see page 1548 of Annual Report for 1962. Improvement of guide pier at Black Rock Lock, as authorized by 1935 act was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Cost for completed portion of new work is $10,457,093. Enlarging of existing 21-foot turning basin and deepening lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda inner harbor from 16 to 21 feet, authorized by the 1954 act, was deauthorized by Congress in May 1981, and is excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost, (1961) of this portion is $339,000. Non-Federal costs are estimated at $1,540,000 for costs incurred by New York State for construction of Erie Basin and protecting breakwater, and construction and extension of Bird Island Pier, and by other local interest for relocation of utilities. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for existing project. Contract for cost-shared recreation development at completed projects (Code 713 program) was executed by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, N.Y. on April 16, 1985, and was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army and Chief of Engineers on May 3, 1985. Terminal facilities. Two facilities are along upstream end of channel. Below Black Rock Lock and at Tonawanda Harbor there are 13 privately owned terminals. There are two State-owned barge canal terminals at Tonawanda, N Y, and several marine service and supply docks for recreational and other small craft. The Corps owns a wharf adjacent to Black Rock Lock which is private. Ten terminals have railroad connections and six mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (Port Series No. 41, revised 1971, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and care (Black Rock Lock): Lock was in operation 274 days and closed for underwater cleaning and repairs from January 6, 1989 through April 9, 1989. Ordinary maintenance and repair of structures and grounds was accomplished throughout the year by Government plant and hired labor. Total costs of $734,621 were distributed as follows: Operation and care: operation of lock, ordinary maintenance and repair $551,530; maintenance of grounds $108,811; periodic inspection, real estate activities, condition sediment surveys, Commercial Activities study and support of Water Control Center $162,862. A/E contract for stability analyses of lockwall continued at cost of $74,470. Lockwall maintenance by hired labor cost $9,868. Rehab/widening of west lockwall, by contract, was completed at cost of $136,837. Testing of cable for potential voltage, by contract, cost $7,732. Payment from Canada for a portion of costs to remove sunken vessel from abutment of Peace Bridge within Black Rock Channel resulted in credit for snagging and clearing in amount of $499,821. Finalization of FY85 contract for repairs at Bird Island Pier by settlement of outstanding claim cost $25,437 Federal and $150 non-Federal. Engineering and design cost $108,781. Supervision and administration cost $48,114. 4. BUFFALO HARBOR, N Y Location. At eastern end of Lake Erie, at head of Niagara River, 176 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14820 and 14833.) Previous projects. For details see page 1967 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1606 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1368 of Annual Report for 1963. In addition, on December 15, 1980, OCE authorized the removal of bridge abutments of South Michigan Avenue Bridge. New work for completed project cost $18,837,601. Estimated non-Federal costs were $9,188,000 for deepening, widening, and improving Buffalo River and ship canal, constructing piers, retaining walls, and dikes and performing dockside dredging. See Table 20-B for authorizing 20-2 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 45 wharves and piers of which 4 piers, owned by Niagara Frontier Port Authority, and 9 privately owned and operated facilities are on outer harbor and along sides of Lackawanna and Union ship canal, 4 along banks of Buffalo ship canal, and 26 along Buffalo River. Coast Guard facilities are at mouth of Buffalo River along left bank. City of Buffalo owns a slip on right bank of Buffalo River just north of Michigan Avenue Bridge for mooring city fireboat. Thirty-four terminals have railroad connections and 29 mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 41, revised 1971, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor, water control management, and real estate activities cost $149,193. Fish and plant life study at Times Beach, by contract, cost $58,267. Engineering study regarding design deficiency at Times Beach dike cost $45,645. Repairs to about 175 l.f. of South and Old breakwaters by U.S. derrickboat McCauley cost $159,763. Finalization of FY88 dredging contract and settlement of claim from FY87 dredging contract cost $60,546. Snagging and clearing by Government plant and hired labor cost $46,571. Maintenance at Dike 4 and emergency repairs at Times Beach disposal area cost $27,102. Engineering and design effort cost $19,852. Supervision and administration cost $204,984. 5. CATTARAUGUS HARBOR, N Y Location. At mouth of Cattaraugus Creek on south shore of Lake Erie about 12 miles northeasterly from Dunkirk Harbor, N Y and 24 miles southwesterly from Buffalo Harbor, N Y (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Existing project. For details of the existing project, see page 32-4 of Annual Report for 1983. Construction was completed in January 1983. Total Federal cost for new work was $4,804,060. Total non-Federal cost for new work was $2,566,529, excluding $20,000 for lands. Existing project was authorized by 1968 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 97, 90th Cong., 1st sess.) Local cooperation. See page 32-5 of Annual Report for 1976 for details of requirements of local cooperation. The cash contribution paid was $2,566,529. The State of New York executed local cooperation agreement in July 1981. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project condition sediment surveys and real estate activities cost $37,698. Biological testing, by contract, and supervision and review of contract cost $4,184. 6. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Cuyahoga River, 176 miles westerly from Buffalo, N.Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14839). Previous projects. For details see page 1962. Annual Report for 1915, and page 1585, Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description of existing project, as authorized through the 1967. Further improvements through the 1966 modification, see page 1269 of Annual Report for 1967. Further improvements in the interest of commercial navigation and recreational navigation were authorized in the 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (PL 99-88), at a cost not to exceed $36,000,000. The commercial navigation portion of the overall project consists of: (a) enlarging and deepening to 31 feet LWD the east entrance channel; (b) deepening the east basin channel to 27 feet LWD; and (c) expanding the capacity of Dike Site 14 to contain the polluted dredged material resulting from the project. This portion of the project is currently on hold as the local sponsor has assigned this aspect a lower priority. The recreational navigation portion of the overall project consists of: an entrance channel 100 feet by 540 feet in length dredged to 8 feet below Low Water Datum (LWD) and the associated 375 feet of bulkheading along the west side of Pier 34; a 386 foot west breakwater with a 20 foot top width, shore arm connection to Pier 32 and associated 406 feet of bulkheading; a 485 foot north breakwater including 635 feet of bulkheading along the north end of Pier 34 extending to and along the west end of Pier 36 and 1.8 acres of fill between Pier 34 and Pier 36; and, a combined 6.4 acre turning basin, anchorage area, and harbor-of-refuge with a dredged depth varying between 7 and 8 feet below LWD and the 1,223 feet of bulkheading around the combined area; 2,093 feet of walkway 4 feet wide along the north breakwater bulkheading and the anchorage area; and 2,593 linear feet of suitable handrail for safety along the north and west breakwaters and the anchorage area. The basis for these recreational features is a report titled "North Coast Harbor/Pier 34, Cleveland Harbor, Ohio" prepared by CENCB in December 1988. A portion of the recreational navigation project has been completed by the Ohio Department of Natural Resources. The recreational navigation project was also authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) and the FY88 Energy and Water Appropriations Act (PL 100-202). These acts also authorized additional undefined improvements to Cleveland Harbor. Estimated total Federal cost of the existing project is $40,084,100 (Oct. 1988) exclusive of undefined, inactive and deferred portions of the project. The amount of $29,315,100 is for completed work and the balance of $10,769,000 is for new work. Estimated non- Federal cost is $15,157,000 (Oct. 1988) of which $9,203,000 is actual cost for completed work and the balance of $5,954,000 is required for work authorized by PL 99-88, PL 99-662, and PL 100-202. Remaining work authorized by 1946 River and Harbor Act, consisting of widening and deepening the right bank of Cuyahoga River at the downstream end of Cut 4, is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated Federal cost (1966) of this portion is $85,600 and non-Federal cost (1966) $5,000,000. Remaining work authorized by 1958 R&H Act, consisting of planning and replacement of bridges number 19 (E.L.R.R.) and 32 (B.&O.R.R.) and widening Cuyahoga and Old River channels, and remaining work authorized by the 1960 RScH Act, consisting of deepening the remainder of Cuyahoga River from bridge number 1 to and including the Old River to a depth of 27 feet, has been classified as deferred and is also excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1976) of this portion is $18,033,300 and estimated non-Federal cost (Oct. 1976) is $21,251,000. See Table 20-B for 20-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation, see page 32-4 of FY 87 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. There are 65 piers and wharves. Fourteen are located in the outer harbor, 11 on banks of Old River, 40 along the deep-draft section of Cuyahoga River. Forty-one terminals have both railroad connections and mechanical-handling facilities. The Corps owns a wharf at the foot of East 9th Street. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 43, revised 1981, Corps of Engineers). Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Coordination with local interests, completion of the report entitled "North Cost Harbor/Pier 34, Cleveland Harbor, OH," a draft PL 100-202 Agreement and draft Local Cooperation Agreement for the recreational navigation portion of the authorized project were provided at a cost of $127,579. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, condition sediment surveys, letter report on new confined disposal facility and associated testing, and real estate activities cost. $296,926. Environmental testing, by contract, and supervision and review of that contract cost $82,602. Repairs to 225 l.f. of east and west arrowhead breakwaters and east breakwater by U.S. derrickboat Simonsen cost $791,739. Removal of approximately 21,636 cubic yards of shoaled material from Cuyahoga River, by contract, cost $308,119. Repairs to east breakwater, by contract, were continued at cost of $1,123,948. Botulism control for confined disposal facility cost $4,716. Engineering and design costs were $310,449. Supervision and administration cost $522,155. 7. CONNEAUT HARBOR, OHIO Location. On the south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Conneaut River, 73 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14824.) Previous projects. For details see page 1964, Annual Report for 1915. Existing projects. For description see page 1274 of Annual Report for 1967. Actual costs for new work for completed portion of the project were $7,541,369. See page 1274, Annual Report for 1967, for complete description of project modification authorized by 1966 R&H Act. Estimated cost (1970) of this modification is $717,000. For completed work non- Federal costs were $200,000 for dockside dredging and removal of existing dolphins. Estimated non-Federal cost of $2,877,000 (1970) includes cash contribution of $717,000 and the remainder is for the construction of service facilities for the 1966 project modification. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. See page 32-6 of Annual Report for 1971 for requirements of local cooperation for project modification as authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1966. Terminal facilities. There are seven piers and wharves. Six are privately owned and operated and located in inner harbor. Remaining facility is city owned on the south side of outer harbor. Six terminals have railroad connections and four mechanical-handling facilities. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition sediment surveys were done by Government plant and hired labor and cost $26,322. Finalization of FY88 dredging contract resulted in cost of $68,885. Engineering and design effort cost $1,329. Supervision and administration cost $41,334. 8. DUNKIRK HARBOR, N Y Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, 37 miles southwesterly from Buffalo, N Y (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Previous projects. For details see page 1966 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1604 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of completed portion of existing project see page 32-8 of Annual Report for 1976. For description of small boat harbor project as authorized under Section 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965, see page 32-8 of Annual Report for 1978. Actual costs for completed work are $3,010,024. Actual non-Federal costs are $1,961,000. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project condition sediment surveys and deficiency study by Government plant and hired labor cost $14,693. U.S. derrickboat McCauley repaired 1001.f. of the U.S. breakwater at cost of $148,751. Supervision and administration cost $3,217. 9. ERIE HARBOR, PA Location. On southerly side of bay formed by Presque Isle Peninsula, on south shore of Lake Erie, 78 Miles westerly from Buffalo, N Y (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14835.) Previous projects. For details see page 1965 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1600 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing projects. For description see pages 1363-64 of Annual Report for 1963. Entire project modification authorized by 1945 River and Harbor Act, providing for deepening channel and basin, both 23 feet deep, to Penn Central Company coal docks at westerly end of harbor, was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. Actual costs for new work for completed portion of project were $2,860,906. Extension of north pier portion, authorized by 1899 act was deauthorized in November 1981. Estimated cost (1955) of this portion is $1,071,000. A portion of work authorized by 1960 act, deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers, was deauthorized in August 1982. Estimated cost (July 1962) of this portion is $78,000. Non-Federal costs for completed work were $51,000 for providing ore dock and dredging slip adjacent thereto. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, of which 12 are privately owned and operated. Erie International Marine Terminal No. 1 owned by Port Commission, city of Erie, is along main waterfront on south side of Presque Isle Bay and Coast Guard facilities are on north side. Two offshore oil docks are on Lake Erie. Eight terminals have railroad connections and six mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities. 20-4 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and result during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, condition sediment surveys, and real estate activities by Government plant and hired labor cost $28,295. Contract for repair of north pier by placing stone along the toe, cost $266,500. Realignment and strapping of steel sheetpiling at north pier by Government plant and hired labor cost $35,462. Engineering and design efforts cost $50,795. Supervision and administration cost $23,301. 10. FAIRPORT HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Grand River, 33 miles easterly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14837.) Previous projects. For details see page 1963 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1590 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project as authorized through the 1960 modifications, see page 1526 of Annual Report for 1962; for description of small boat harbor as authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act, see page 32-10 of Annual Report for 1977. Estimated total Federal cost of new work is $4,931,000 (Oct. 1980) of which $2,591,000 is actual cost for completed portion of project and the balance of $2,340,000 is for proposed work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 FC Act which is deferred. Entire project modification authorized by 1960 River and Harbor Act, providing for deepening lake approach channel, 800-foot wide channel through outer harbor and channel in Grand River, and enlargement of turning basin, is classified inactive and is excluded from foregoing cost. Estimated cost of this modification is $3,170,000 (1963). Estimated non-Federal cost is $4,991,000 of which $101,000 were for bulkheads and dockside dredging for completed portion of project and $2,560, 000 which includes cash contribution of $2,330,000, is for work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 FC Act. For the inactive 1960 project modification, estimated non-Federal cost of $3,821,000 (1963) is for lands, relocations, utility changes, dock dredging and dock and bulkhead modifications. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. See page 32-11 of 1976 Annual Report regarding assurances of local cooperation for work authorized by R&H Acts of 1927 and 1960 and page 32-11 of 1977 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation for work authorized by Sec. 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act. Terminal facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, all along banks of Grand River. One facility is owned by Coast Guard. Nine terminals have railroad connections and ten mechanical- handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, real estate activities, and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor, cost $28,315. U.S. derrickboat McCauley repaired 130 1.f. of outer breakwaters at cost of $115,350. Dredging, by contract, removed 131,845 cubic yards of shoaled material, and cost $654,019. Engineering and design effort cost $18,869. Supervision and administration cost $78,853. 11. HURON HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Huron River, 47 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chapit 14843.) Previous project. For details, see page 1961 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1576 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description, see page 1347 of Annual Report for 1963 and page 32-12 of Annual Report for 1978. Cost of completed portion of existing project was $4,834,006. Construction of detached breakwater as authorized by 1962 R&H Act is deferred. Estimated cost of construction of breakwater is $12,970,000 (July 1972). Non-Federal costs of $163,000 were incurred by local interests in 1963 for dockside dredging of areas between Federal improvement and terminal facilities. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Six privately owned wharves and docks, one along left bank of Huron River and remainder along right bank. Four terminals have railroad connections and four mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are regarded as adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $22,146. Finalization of FY87 dredging contract resulted in credit of $31,714. Engineering and design costs were $8,499. Supervision and administration cost $31,693. 12. IRONDEQUOIT BAY, N Y Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, 4 miles east of Rochester, N Y at mouth of Irondequoit Creek, Monroe County, N Y (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14804 and 14815). Existing project. For details of existing project, see page 32-7 of Annual Report for FY 87. Total estimated project cost is $15,363,000 (Oct. 1984) including $3,582,000 Federal (which includes the CoE $3,536,000 and the USCG $46,000) and $11,781,000 non-Federal, including a cash contribution of $2,661,000, lands and damages $290,000 and the cost of a movable highway bridge $8,830,000. Existing project was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc 332, 84th Cong., 2d sess.) Local cooperation. The Buffalo District has a properly executed Local Cooperation Agreement with New York State, executed April 20, 1983. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Project is physically complete, including upland recreation features. FY89 Non-Federal contract cost including supervision and administration was $62,683. Federal cost were $96. Construction of the recreational facilities was completed in August 1987. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, real estate activities and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $3,901. Finalization of FY88 dredging contract cost $7,006. Engineering and design effort cost $4,323. Supervision and administration cost $9,529. 20-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 13. LORAIN HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Black River, 25 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14841.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1961 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1580 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1319-22 of Annual Report for 1966. Estimated Federal cost of new work is $26,246,000 (Oct. 1976). Deepening and widening remainder of Black River Channel at Cut 1 and construction of bank stabilization as authorized by 1960 act and modified by 1965 act is classified deferred. The estimated cost of $5,317,000 for this work is included in the above estimate. A portion of work authorized by 1960 act, dredging of 15-to-25 foot wide strips adjacent to the U.S. East and West piers is also deferred and estimated cost of $60,200 (July 1966) is excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Total non-Federal cost estimate is $8,853,000 (Oct. 1976) including $3,000 contributed by local interests toward construction of west shorearm. For work authorized by 1960 act, including deferred portion, non- Federal costs are estimated to be $8,805,000 for lands, relocations of utilities, modifications of existing docks and bulkheads, construction of new bulkheads and dockside dredging. For work authorized by 1965 act, classified as deferred, local interests must make a cash contribution presently estimated to be $45,000. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. The Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 (PL 99-662) authorized construction of commercial navigation improvements consisting of two bend cuts on the Black River to widen and straighten the channel between the Norfolk and Western Railroad Bridge and the 21st Street Bridge. These cuts are to be excavated to the existing channel depth of 27 feet. The authorized plan also includes widening the Upper Turning Basin at the existing depth of 21 feet. Estimated costs for this work are $3,750,000 Federal and $2,110,000 non-Federal (Oct. 1988). On March 12, 1986 the Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbors Act, as amended authorized construction of a small boat harbor which was completed in July 1987. The project consists of a 225-foot detached rubblemound breakwater and an 800-foot long rubblemound breakwater attached to the east breakwater shorearm in the east basin of the outer harbor. Construction costs for this project, including supervision and administration, were $775,025 Federal and $775,025 non-Federal. Local cooperation. For completed work, local interests contributed $3,000. Work authorized by 1960 act (and modified by 1965 act) is deferred. All other conditions fully complied with. On March 25, 1986, the city of Lorain, Ohio signed the local cooperation agreement, for the Section 107 project. For details see page 32-7 of Annual Report for 1986. For details of local cooperation agreement for project authorized by the 1986 WRDA, see page 32-9 of Annual Report for FY87. Terminal facilities. There are 23 piers and wharves, of which three are on outer harbor and remainder are along banks of Black River. Two are owned by the city. Eight terminals have railroad connections and 15 mechanicalhandling facilities. Facilities are considerd adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Federal advance engineering and design (Preconstruction Engineering and Design) funds in the amount of $281,336 were expended on in-house engineering effort for project authorized by the 1986 WRDA. This includes $104,917 for a vessel simulation model study (Phase II) conducted at the Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, real estate activities, and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $42,788. Repairs to 150 l.f. of east breakwater and diked disposal area by the U.S. derrickboat Simonsen cost $394,868. Engineering and design effort cost $21,514. Supervision and administration cost $80,182. 14. NEW YORK STATE BARGE CANAL Location. Erie, Niagara, Orleans, Monroe, Wayne, Seneca, Cayuga, Onondaga, Oswego, Oneida and Herkimer Counties, N Y (within the Buffalo District). Existing project. The NY State Barge Canal system has 57 locks, 524 miles of canals, over 100 dams and numerous roads, bridges, buildings and other structures. The Barge Canal was built and is owned by New York State. Existing project was authorized by PL 99-662, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local cooperation. There is no cooperative agreement as yet on this project. Operations and results during fiscal year: Maintenance: Coordination between NY State and Department of Army cost $9,493. 15. OAK ORCHARD HARBOR, N Y Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario at mouth of Oak Orchard Creek, 33 miles westerly of Rochester, N Y (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14805.) Previous project. For details see page 628 of Annual Report for 1905. Existing project. For description of completed existing project see page 32-14 of 1975 Annual Report. Actual Federal cost for completed project was $1,613,500. Estimated non- Federal cost is $270,000 (July 1971) including cash contribution of $170,700 and $54,002 for recreational facilities and remainder for lands and construction of wharf. Existing project was authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $224,702. Terminal facilities. There is no commercial navigation at Oak Orchard Harbor. Terminal facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project condition sediment surveys, real estate activities and economic evaluation cost $10,440. 16, OLCOTT HARBOR, N Y Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario at mouth of Eighteen Mile Creek about 18 miles east of mouth of Niagara River and 63 miles by water west of Rochester, N Y (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14806.) 20-6 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT Previous project. For details see page 1971 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1621 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description, see page 1555 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of new work for completed project was $1,500 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects, all of which was contributed by local interests. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. The authorized modification to the existing project consists of breakwaters to provide optimum harbor protection, channel dredging, a stone jetty and recreational fishing facilities including a foot bridge, walkways and guardrails, access facilities, sanitary facilities and parking areas. The estimated cost of the authorized modifications is $13,280,000 (October 1988) of which $6,680,000 is Federal (80,000 USCG) and $6,600,000 is non- Federal. Modification of the existing project was authorized by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) (PL 99-662). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed project. Local interests contributed $1,500. Modifications authorized by the 1986 WRDA will require local interests to pay 50% of project cost including lands, easements, rights-ofway and dredge disposal areas. They are also responsible for construction of necessary docks and berthing spaces, construction of launching ramp, parking areas, sanitary facilities, and necessary access roads. After construction, non-Federal responsibilities would include fishing facility maintenance, except for the aids to navigation. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Inhouse engineering effort for Advance Engineering and Design Preconstruction Engineering and Design for FY89 was $494,360. Maintenance: Project condition sediment surveys, real estate activities and update of Environmental Impact Statement cost $16,374. 17. PORT ONTARIO HARBOR, N Y Location. On southeasterly end of Lake Ontario, 19 miles northeasterly of Oswego, N Y and 32 miles southerly of Sackets Harbor, N Y (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14803.) Previous projects. Adopted by the River and Harbor Act July 4, 1836. Only information available is the index to the report of the Chief of Engineers. Existing project. As modified by Phase I and II General Design Memorandum, provides for: (a) two shore connected rubblemound breakwaters in Lake Ontario at mouth of Salmon River, south breakwater about 1,350 feet and north breakwater about 350 feet long; (b) entrance channel between breakwaters, 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep, from deep water in lake to a limit about 1,200 feet from 8-foot depth contour in lake; (c) river channel 85 feet wide and 6 feet deep from inner limit of entrance channel for a distance upstream of about 450 feet. Estimated Federal cost for project is $2,350,000 (Oct. 1987). Estimated non-Federal cost for new work is $1,670,000 (Oct. 1987) including cash contribution of $1,350,000. Existing project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945 (H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. See page 32-16 of Annual Report for 1976 for details of requirements of local cooperation. Assurances have been received from the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. The LCA was executed on June 24, 1986. Terminal facilities. The only commercial navigation at Port Ontario is charter boat fishing. Terminal facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Actual construction of the project was completed in October 1987. Federal in-house engineering effort cost $14,818. Contract supervision and administration cost $1,332. Non- Federal costs for in-house engineering effort were $556. Maintenance: Condition sediment surveys and real estate activities cost $4,893. 18. ROCHESTER HARBOR, N Y Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Genesee River, 59 miles westerly from Oswego, N,Y. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14815.) Previous project. For details see page 1471 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1623 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see page 1556 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual cost for new work for completed project is $2,191,514. Non-Federal costs are estimated at $2,260,000, all for 1960 Act, for lands, relocation of submarine cable crossing, relocations of small docks and boathouses, dockside dredging, structure modifications, and replacement of Baltimore & Ohio coal loader. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Complied with except provision for replacement of coal loading facility as required by River and Harbor Act of July 14, 1960. Terminal facilities. One terminal facility at mouth of Genesee River has been leased to the Great Lakes Division of Pittston Stevedoring Corp. Facilities also consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, real estate activities, and condition and sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $29,317. Finalization of FY88 structure repair contract resulted in credit of $9,265. Finalization of FY88 dredging contract resulted in credit of $20,666. Engineering and design effort cost $27,215. Supervision and administration cost $50,535. 19. ROCKY RIVER HARBOR, OHIO Location. At mouth of Rocky River which empties into Lake Erie 7 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing project. For description see page 1329 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost for completed project was $343,494 and non-Federal cost was a cash contribution of $249,346. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $249,346 for new work. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately-owned servicing and storage 20-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and project condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $18,301. 20. SANDUSKY HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, in southeasterly portion of Sandusky Bay, 50 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14845.) Previous projects. For details see page 1960 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1574 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description see pages 1511-12 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual costs for new work for completed project were $6,250,121, excluding $325,000 contributed by local interests. Non-Federal costs for completed project are estimated at $675,000, including $325,000 cash contribution and the remaining $350,000 is for dockside dredging adjacent to deepened channels authorized by 1960 Act. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $325,000 for new work. Terminal facilites. Fourteen piers and wharves, three at west end of harbor and remainder along dock channel. One is a base for State-owned fish research and patrol boats. One publicly owned and six privately owned are used for mooring fishing boats and recreational craft and for ferry service. Five terminals have railroad connections and five mechanicalhandling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services and condition sediment surveys by Government plant and hired labor cost $67,062. Removal of 46,976 cubic yards shoaled material, by contract, cost $240,158. Supervision and administration cost $103,889. Engineering and design effort cost $25,976. Finalization of dredging contract resulted in a net credit of $4,554 to the non-Federal account. 21. TOLEDO HARBOR, OHIO Location. Comprises lower 7 miles of Maumee River and channel through Maumee Bay to Lake Erie. Maumee River has its source in northern Indiana and empties into Lake Erie. Harbor is at westerly end of Lake Erie, 99 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847.) Previous projects. For details see page 1959 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1565 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project see pages 32-18 and -19 of Annual Report for 1978. Cost of completed existing project was $15,567,147. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Maumee River through city of Toledo has been developed extensively for deep-draft navigation. Detailed information on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series No. 44 (revised 1972) prepared and published as Part 2, by board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors. Information on port administration and Federal services, port and terminal services and charges, and steamship services is prepared and published as Part 1 by the Port Development Staff, U.S. Department of Commerce. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition sediment surveys, economic and environmental studies, and real estate activities cost $257,620. Environmental testing, by contract, cost $12,000; supervision and review of that contract cost $5,632. In-house study to develop additional uses for dredged material cost $48,430. A/E contract to study alternative methods of moving dredged material from site cost $40,715. A/E contract for Maumee Bay Bottom Sedimentation/Characterization Study to determine more and better areas for dumping dredged material was completed at a cost of $49,915; supervision and review of that contract cost $20,096. Contract for obstruction removal from FY88 was finalized at cost of $15,384. Removal of estimated 480,000 cubic yards of shoaled material from Bay Channel and Maumee River Channel, by contract, cost $1,820,032. Repairs to confined disposal facility by hired labor cost $48,030. Engineering and design cost $226,594. Supervision and administration cost $234,600. 22. VERMILION HARBOR, OHIO Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Vermilion River, 37 miles westerly from Cleveland, Ohio, (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing project. For description of existing project see pages 32-17 and 32-18 of Annual Report for 1975. Actual Federal cost for the completed existing project was $1,156,118. Estimated non-Federal cost for new work is $754,679 including cash contribution of $740,679 and remainder for relocation of submarine cable and construction of public wharf. See Table 20. B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $740,679. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous studies, condition sediment surveys and real estate activities by Government plant and hired labor cost $25,951. Supervision and administration cost $5,990. 23. WEST HARBOR, OHIO Location. On southwest shore of Lake Erie, 13 miles northeast of Port Clinton, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847.) Existing project. For description of existing project, see page 32-10 of Annual Report for 1983. Total Federal cost for new work was $3,303,898. Total non-Federal cost for new work was $3,922,000 including cash contribution of $3,795,000. Existing project was authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 245, 88th Cong., 2d sess.) Local cooperation. See page 32-20of 1978 Annual Report for requirement of local cooperation. By letter dated January 31, 1978, State of Ohio stated its intent to furnish assurances of local cooperation, and executed LCA was received on March 9, 1981. 20-8 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT Terminal facilities. Commerce at the harbor presently consists of recreational boating and affiliated activities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous reports and condition sediment surveys cost $35,696. Maintenance dredging, by contract, cost $407,420, and removed approximately 70,389 cubic yards of shoaled material. Engineering and design costs were $221. Supervision and administration costs were $44,091. 24. WILSON HARBOR, N Y Location. At mouth of east branch of Twelve Mile Creek, which enters Lake Ontario 12 miles easterly of mouth of Niagara River, and 67 miles westerly of Rochester Harbor, N Y (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14806). Previous project. For details see page 2395 of Annual Report for 1889, and page 628 of Annual Report for 1905. Existing project. For description see page 32-18 of Annual Report for 1975. Actual Federal cost for the completed existing project was $477,904. Estimated non-Federal costs are $774,000 which includes cost of $16,000 for previously completed work. Remainder of non-Federal costs are for work required for 1968 R&cH Act including cash contribution of $166,988. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous studies, condition sediment surveys and real estate activities cost $16,176. Supervision and administration cost $6,415. 25. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition surveys were performed by the Buffalo District at a cost of $20,808. Environmental Impact Statement update cost $18,977. Real estate activities, to include utilization inspections, cost $8,748. Supervision and administration, to include program management for activities, cost $6,220. Project Date of Survey Niagara River, NY Sept 1989 Little Sodus, NY Aug 1989 Great Sodus, NY Aug 1989 Pt. Clinton, OH July 1989 26. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 20-C. 27. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION See Table 20-G. STURGEON POINT, EVANS, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, 17 miles southwest of Buffalo, NY and 22 miles northeast of Dunkirk, NY. (See Geological Survey map for Angola, NY). Existing project. Project was authorized for construction by the Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbors Act, as amended, on October 21, 1987. The project provides for rehabilitation of the existing breakwater with a rubblemound facing and raised concrete walkway, construction of a rubblemound west breakwater extension, construction of a rubblemound east breakwater, a shore revetment, and dredging. The project will provide needed access to Lake Erie between Buffalo and Dunkirk, NY. The marina will provide mooring for 210-230 boats, provide protection and access to the lake for the trailered boat launch ramp and provide fishing access for non-boaters. The non- Federal sponsor (Town of Evans, NY) is required to provide approximately 50% of the cost of the general navigation features, provide the lands, easements and rights of way, relocations, dredging into the mooring area, docking facilities, and upland improvements. Estimated Federal project cost is $1,460,000 (October 1987). Estimated non- Federal project cost is $1,475,000 (October 1987). In addition, the local sponsor is required to provide associated costs estimated at $1,000,000. Local cooperation. The Buffalo District has a properly executed Local Cooperation Agreement with the Town of Evans, NY, signed October 26, 1987. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Project construction was 100% complete in December 1988. Balancing of Federal and non-Federal shares resulted in a net Federal credit to the contract of $183,172, including supervision and administration, and a net credit of $85,786 for in-house engineering effort. Additional Federal in-house engineering effort cost $125,041. Non-Federal contract cost, including supervision and administration was $866,941. Inhouse engineering effort cost $81,743. Investigation and removal of sunken vessels and other obstructions to navigation under authority of Section 19 of the River and Harbor Act of 1899. Billing from NAVSEACOM for removal of sunken Barge No. 45, pinned against the upstream face of Peace Bridge pier 4, on the Niagara River was continued at a cost of $378,921. Navigation work pursuant to Section 111, Public Law 90-483. Fairport Harbor, OH - Costs of $40 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Lorain Harbor, OH - Costs of $9,298 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Sandusky Harbor, OH - Costs of $4,315 were incurred for preauthorization studies. West Harbor, Ottawa, OH - Costs of $3,995 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Navigation work pursuant to Section 208, Public Law 83-780. Unnamed Tributary of Lake Erie, Blasdell - Costs of $3,149 for preauthorization studies. Beach Erosion Control 28. MAUMEE BAY STATE PARK, OHIO Location. Maumee Bay State Park is located in Lucas County, OH approximately 5 miles east of Toledo. The 1,855 20-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 acre park has 11,000 feet of shoreline along the southerly end of Maumee Bay (Lake Erie). (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, Oregon, OH). Existing project. The study for Maumee Bay was conducted under the Western Lake Erie Shore Study authorized by the Committee on Public Works of the House of Representatives on April 11I, 1974. The project was authorized for construction by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act (PL 99-662), November 17, 1986. The recommended plan as described in the General Design Memorandum (May 1988) consists of a 2500 ft. long protective sand beach stabilized by rubblemound breakwaters and jetties, in addition to a 2700 ft. long rubblemound revetment along the west half (5,200 ft.) of park shoreline. The authorized plan also included a rubblemound revetment along the easterly half of the park shoreline. However, in July 1986, the Ohio Department of Natural Resources initiated advance construction of the rubblemound revetment and work was completed in February 1987. This has reduced the estimated cost of the project to $10,290,000 (Oct. 1988) of which $2,870,000 is Federal cost and $7,420,000 is non-Federal cost including lands, utilities and other recreation facilities. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation, see page 32-14 of FY 87 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Plans and Specifications for the project were completed in September 1989. In-house engineering effort cost $27,250 under Advance Engineering and Design, Preconstruction Engineering and Design and $109,566 under the Construction General Appropriation. 29. PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA Location. At Erie, Pa., on south shore of Lake Erie, 78 miles southwest of Buffalo, N Y and 102 miles eastnortheast of Cleveland, Ohio. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14824 and 14835). Existing project. For description of completed portion of existing project see page 1393 of Annual Report for 1963. For details of project authorized by the 1974 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA), 1976 WRDA and 1986 WRDA, see page 32-14 of Annual Report for FY 87. Estimated Federal cost for the authorized project modifications (Oct. 1988) is $16,379,000 which includes $5,646,000 for completed work authorized by the 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRD Act and $10,773,000 for completed work authorized by the 1976 WRD Act. Estimated non-Federal cost for the authorized project and modifications (Oct. 1988) is $8,579,000 which includes $3,983,000 for completed work authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRD Act and $4,596,000 for completed work authorized by the 1976 WRD Act. The estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1988) for the 58 breakwater project is $16,700,000. The estimated non-Federal cost (Oct 1988) for the breakwater project is also $16,700,000. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed project as authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&8cH Acts and 1974 WRD Act. An agreement between the United States of America and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, acting through the Department of Environmental Resources was entered into on February 21, 1979 for the annual nourishment which was extended by the 1976 WRD Act. A Local Cooperation Agreement between the United States of America and the local sponsor for construction of the 58 breakwater project was executed by the Secretary of the Army on June 22, 1989. The local sponsor, namely the Department of Environmental Resources of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, agreed to provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredge disposal areas for excavated material as determined by the Chief of Engineers and necessary for implementation and for annual nourishment of the project; provide a cash contribution based on the appropriate percentage of final construction cost, exclusive of lands, easements, and rights-of-way, the percentage to be in accordance with existing law based on shore ownership and use existing at time of construction, which contribution is presently estimated at $13,800,000 or 50% based on this being a recreational project. Pay 50% of the cost for annual beach redistribution and nourishment work for the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction works, except for damages due to fault or negligence of Government or its Contractors; maintain and operate all the works, including breakwaters and annual sand nourishment and redistribution as needed, after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; and assure continued public ownership and continued public use without cost to the United States of appropriate access and facilities including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of public benefits upon which Federal participation is based, and administer and maintain beach for continued public use during life of project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Beach nourishment as authorized by the 1976 WRD Act was continued. One contract for providing beach nourishment in 1989 and 1990 was awarded. A total off 268,718 tons of sand were placed on the beaches. The 1989 nourishment program included placement of approximately 234,004 tons of upland sand at a unit price of $4.72 per ton on beaches 4, 5, 6, 8, and Duck Pond Crossover. In addition, approximately 34,714 tons of fine off-shore sand at a unit price of $8.27 per ton was used in the top dressing layer on beaches 6, 8 and 10 and on Duck Pond Crossover. During the year a total of $1,599,864 ($1,115,058 Federal and $484,806 non-Federal) was expended for beach nourishment operations. Of this total, contract costs were $1,014,669 Federal, including supervision and administration and chemical testing and aerial photography architect/engineering contracts and $461,042 non-Federal. In-house engineering effort cost $100,389 Federal and $23,764 non-Federal. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania contributed $456,429 for their share of the FY 89 nourishment operations. The cumulative non-Federal total project share through FY 89 is $8,364,529. The Final Phase I General Design Memorandum was submitted to the Secretary of the Army in October 1981 for his review and transmittal to Congress. In FY 89 a total of $8,952 was expended for real estate activities and $29 for in-house engineering effort for the permanent project under Continuation of Planning and Engineering Preconstruction Engineering and Design. The Phase II General Design Memorandum which presents the detailed final design of the project recommended in the Phase I General Design Memorandum was approved on July 27, 1988. The contract plans and specifications for construction of the 58-breakwater project, under the Construction 20-10 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT General appropriation were approved on August 3, 1988. A Local Cooperation Agrement between the United States of America and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania was executed by the Secretary of the Army on June 22, 1989. One contract for construction of the breakwater project was awarded. During the year, a total of $258,339 ($149,223 Federal and $109,116 non-Federal) was expended to initiate construction of the breakwater project. Of this total, contract costs were $30,000 Federal and $25,120 non-Federal, including construction management. In-house engineering effort cost $119,223 Federal and $81,996 non-Federal. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania contributed $2,500,000 in FY 89 toward this project. 30. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 20-D. 31. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION LAKESHORE PARK ASHTABULA, OHIO Location. Lakeshore Park is located in Ashtabula, Ashtabula County, Ohio about 40 miles southwest of Erie, Pennsylvania, and about 50 miles northeast of Cleveland, Ohio. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, Ashtabula North, OH). Existing project. For description of existing project, see page 32-12 of Annual Report for 1983. Construction was completed in July 1983. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation requirements, see page 32-12 of Annual Report for 1983. Operation and results during fiscal year. New Work: FY 89 Federal cost was $25,289 for beach nourishment contract. In-house engineering effort cost $4,258. Beach erosion activity pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization studies). Century Park, Lorain, OH - Costs of $12,106 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Geneva State Park, OH - Costs of $2,844 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Simms Park, Euclid, OH - Costs of $3,915 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Flood Control 32. ELLICOTT CREEK, N Y Location. The channel improvement is located on the downstream portion of Ellicott Creek in the towns of Amherst and Tonawanda, Erie County. (See Geological Survey maps of Tonawanda East and Buffalo Northeast, N Y) Existing project. For detailed description of the original project as authorized by Section 201 of the 1970 Flood Control Act, see page 32-24 of Annual Report for 1973. The basic authorization, as modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1974, provides authority to undertake flood control measures to alleviate flooding that is compatible with authorized project and any alternatives currently under restudy pursuant to Flood Control Act of 1970. As a result of restudy of alternatives, the project provides for: (a) widening, straightening and deepening about 2.5 miles of existing creek channel including the existing bypass channel in Ellicott Creek Park; (b) construction of a diversion channel about 5,850 feet long between Maple Road and Millersport Highway; (c) construction of a diversion channel about 1,950 feet long through Pfohl Park; (d) construction of a diversion channel about 9,150 feet long from Niagara Falls Boulevard upstream to about Pfohl Park; (e) construction of 3 highway bridges; (f) modification of culverts at Tonawanda Creek Road; (g) modification of utilities and drainage outlets; and (h) recreation facilities consisting of a bike and hike path about 5.4 miles long, with open space park areas. The estimated Federal cost of existing project is $11,312,000 (Oct. 1988). The estimated non-Federal cost is $9,235,000 (Oct. 1988). Completion of preconstruction planning and construction was authorized Dec. 29, 1981, under Section 5, PL 97-128. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation see page 32-22 of Annual Report for 1976. On October 25, 1976, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation furnished a letter of intent to cooperate toward construction of project. On June 22, 1983, a formal Local Cooperation Agreement was requested from N Y State. On January 20, 1984, this agreement was fully executed. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: In August 1987 a contract was awarded and construction initiated on Stage 2. A third and final contract, Stage 2A, which will complete the project, was awarded in May 1988. Construction on Stages 2 and 2A was completed in Spring 1989 and the project was accepted by the sponsor in July 1989. Minor site restoration remains to be completed in spring 1990. Federal costs for FY 89 were $830,246 for the contract, including supervision and administration and $157,000 for in-house engineering effort. Non-Federal costs were $238,554 for construction contract, including supervision and administration. 33. MT. MORRIS LAKE, N Y GENESEE RIVER Location. Dam is on Genesee River 66.9 miles above river mouth and about 32 miles southwesterly of Rochester, N. Y. Reservoir is in Livingston and Wyoming Counties, N Y (See Geological Survey maps of Nunda and Portage, N Y). Existing project. For description of existing project as authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act see page 1575 of Annual Report for 1962. New work for completed project cost $23,365,559. In addition $5,000 contributed funds were expended for new work. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests contributed $5,000 for new work. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and ordinary maintenance of dam, reservoir and service facilities, condition and operation studies, real estate activities and miscellaneous reports, to include stability analysis, periodic inspection and dam failure emergency planning, were accomplished by hired labor at a cost of $568,831. Co-Operative Stream Gaging Program accomplished by U.S. Geological Survey and National Weather Service reporting and hydroclimatic network cost $81,228. Operation of the Water Control Center cost $162,602. Finali- 20-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 zation of FY88 debris removal contract cost $4,922. Installation of emergency lighting system within confines of dam, by hired labor, cost $4,636. Installation of intercommunication system throughout dam by hired labor cost $8,669. Rehab of existing elevator, to include replacement of guide rails, door tracks, hangers, ladders and cables, by contract, cost $74,985. Engineering and design costs for maintenance were $127,996. Supervision and administration cost $58,512. 34. OTTAWA, OHIO Location. Ottawa is located on the Blanchard River, about 22 miles upstream from its confluence with the Auglaize River. The Blanchard River drains about 765 square miles of the extreme sourtheastern corner of the Maumee River Basin which covers about 6,586 square miles in northwestern Ohio, northeastern Indiana and southeastern Michigan (See U.S. Geological Survey map for Ottawa, OH.) Existing project. The local protection project, authorized by Section 203 of the 1966 Flood Control Act (Public Law 89-789), provides for construction of levees, floodwalls combined with channel improvement, bridge change, and construction of new bridges. The reformulated project consists of improving the floodway by clearing and snagging the Blanchard River, removing abandoned railroad and highway embankments, relocating a power line, clearing a floodway and doing some selected filling on the riverbanks. The non-structural component of the selected plan consists of automating one gage at Ottawa, OH, to provide an early warning system to residents. Estimated Federal cost of the project (Oct., 87) is $990,000. Estimated non-Federal cost is $440,000 (Oct., 87) including a cash contribution of $73,000. The project was reclassified from active to deferred for restudy in March 1988. Local cooperation. The local sponsor, Maumee Watershed Conservancy District, will, prior to construction, enter into a bindipg written agreement which addresses project construction and satisfies the requirements of Section 221 of Public Law 91-611. For details of local cooperation, see page 32-15 of Annual Report for FY85. By letter dated September 10, 1987, the Conservancy District informed the Buffalo District that it cannot provide a Letter of Intent because the Village of Ottawa is unable to provide any funds to meet the non-Federal funding requirements for this project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Inhouse engineering effort for Advance Engineering and Design Preconstruction Engineering and Design cost $1,153. 35. POINT PLACE, TOLEDO, OHIO Location. Point Place is located on a peninsula in northeast portion of city of Toledo, Ohio. Its shores are bounded on the east by Maumee Bay of Lake Erie and on the west by Ottawa River. The peninsula extends in a northeasterly direction immediately north of mouth of Maumee River. Existing project. The project provides for: (a) combination of protective structures consisting of 5,700 linear feet of steel sheet pile wall and 18,700 feet of levee; (b) three new pumping stations; and (c) 5,500 linear feet of new storm sewer facilities, including 2,400 linear feet of gravity outfalls. The estimated project costs are $9,916,000 Federal and $4,220,897 non- Federal including a cash contribution of $1,865,800. Existing project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act (H.D. 363, 92nd Cong., 2d sess). Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation see pages 32-24 and -25 of Annual Report for 1978. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed by city of Toledo on January 27, 1982. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The entire project was completed in June 1986. Balancing of Federal and non-federal shares resulted in a Federal net credit of $30,000 for in-house engineering effort. Non-Federal inhouse engineering effort cost $32,978. 36. RENO BEACHHOWARD FARMS AREA, OHIO Location. Area is located in Lucas Country, on the south shore of Lake Erie about 15 miles east of Toledo, Ohio. (See U.S. Geological Survey map for Reno Beach and Metzger Marsh, OH). Existing project. The local protection project, as authorized, provides for construction of 8,200 feet of roadway seawall, consisting of an earth dike, faced on the lakeward side with a quarry-run stone fill; and a steel sheet pile floodwall connecting the easterly end of this seawall at Wards Canal to the existing inland dike paralleling the canal. Estimated Federal cost of new work consisting of reconstructing to a permanent project the "Operation Foresight" work which was completed in 1973, is $5,560,000 (Oct. 1988). Non-Federal cost estimate of $1,850,000 (Oct. 1988) includes cash contribution of $520,000 toward first cost of construction plus all lands, easements, and rights-of-ways. Project was authorized under Section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (H.D. 554, 80th Cong. 2d sess.) Local cooperation. See pages 32-16 of 1982 Annual Report for full requirements of local cooperation. A local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was executed with the local Sponsor on July 22, 1988 and by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works on September 30, 1988. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: FY 89 continued coordination with local sponsors, the State of Ohio and Congressional Representatives, in an effort to resolve problems in acquiring the necessary lands, easements and Rights-of-way (LER). Availability of LER is uncertain. In-house engineering effort cost $123 under Advance Engineering and Design Preconstruction Engineering and Design, and $163,230 under the Construction General Appropriation. 37. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed flood control works for compliance with Federal requirements were made during the period at a cost of $242,177. This includes updating the hydraulics and hydrology of various local flood control projects. Total cost to Sept. 30, 1989 was $1,322,426. 38. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FY 89 costs were $139,664. 20-12 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT 39. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 20-E. 40. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION See Table 20-H. CONESUS LAKE, LIVONIA, N Y Location. Conesus Lake is situated in western New York State about 25 miles south of the city of Rochester. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, Livonia, N Y). Existing project. Project was authorized for construction by the Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended, on July 22, 1985. For description of existing project, see page 32-19 of the Annual Report for FY87. Total Federal cost of the project is $1,445,000 (June 1988). Total non-Federal cost is $300,000 (June 1988). Local cooperation. On September 25, 1985, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation signed the Local Cooperation Agreement. For details see page 32-16 of Annual Report for FY 86. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Project construction is 100% complete as of June 1988. Balancing of Federal and non-Federal shares resulted in a Federal net credit to the construction contract of $14,638. Supervision and administration of the contract cost $4,547. In-house engineering effort for flow tests, and to modify the operating plan for the outlet control structure cost $57,601. Non-Federal contract costs wer $1,000. EUCLID CREEK, CLEVELAND, OH Location. Euclid Creek has a drainage area of approximately 25 square miles and is located east of Cleveland in Cuyahoga County and a small portion in Lake County, Ohio. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map, East Cleveland, OH). Existing project. For details of existing project, see page 32-14 of the Annual Report for 1983. Initial construction of project was completed in 1986. Repairs to failed bank were completed in May 1988. Local cooperation. For details of local cooperation requirements, see page 32-13 of Annual Report for 1984. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Federal contract costs, including supervision and administration were $1,000. In-house engineering effort cost $11,462. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, as amended by Sec. 206 of Flood Control Act of 1962). FY 89 costs for Disaster Preparedness were $859,706. Federal costs for Advance Measures were $54,470 and non- Federal costs were $18,606. The Advance Measures project at Wightman's Grove, Sandusky County, Ohio provides for construction of 5,600 feet of clay and rubblemound dikes and was completed in late FY88. Balancing of Federal and non- Federal shares resulted in a Federal net credit for the contract, including supervision and administration of $1,374 and a credit to in-house engineering effort of $7,607. Non-Federal contract costs, including supervision and administration were $10,999. In-house engineering effort cost $7,607. The Advance Measures Self-Help Program initiated in FY87 was terminated in June 1988. FY89 in-house costs were $63,451. Government furnished materials which remained unused at the end of the program are being redistributed to six Corps Districts for use during future flood events. 41. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS See Table 20-I. General Investigations 42. SURVEYS During FY 1989 costs of $925,793 were incurred as shown below: Navigation Studies ............................. Flood Damage Prevention Studies .............. Shoreline Protection Studies ................. Special Studies ............................... Miscellaneous Investigations ................... Coordination Studies ........................... Phase I GDM Studies ..................... Comprehensive Studies .......................... Review of Authorized Projects ................ $ 49,827 611,810 107,323 0 69,844 82,242 0 4,747 0 43. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the period, costs of $247,467 were incurred in connection with International Water Studies under the General Investigations appropriation and $520,367 incurred under the Operations and Maintenance appropriation for a total cost of $767,834. Flood plain management services were performed during the year at a cost of $291,708. During the year, flood hazard evaluation studies were essentially completed for the towns of Grove, NY and Pioneer, OH. The results of these studies will enable local officials to encourage and enforce prudent use of the identified flood plains. Also hundreds of technical assistance requests regarding flood plain matters were completed during the year responding to individuals, corporations, real estate companies, insurance agents, engineering firms and local agencies. Costs for General Hydrologic Studies were $1,932. 44. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Costs during the period were $804,222 for Preconstruction Engineering and Design Advance Engineering and Design projects. For details of individual projects, see sections 13, 16, 28, 34 and 36 in text. 45. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Costs during the period were $8,981 for Preconstruction Engineering and Design Continuation of Planning and Engineering. For details of individual project, see section 29 in text. 20-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project 1. Ashtabula Harbor, OH 2. Barcelona Harbor, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 3. Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 4. Buffalo Harbor, NY 5. Cattaraugus Harbor, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 6. Cleveland Harbor, OH 7. Conneaut Harbor, OH 8. Dunkirk Harbor, NY (Federal Funds) Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 1989 - - - - 12,805,339' - - - - 12,805,339' 304,500 781,500 577,000 898,500 12,112,446 325,492 750,105 608,844 900,683 12,095,103 - - - - 6,077,000 - - - - 6,077,000 554 554 1,110 1,110 1,861,755 2,122,000 57 1,985,726 2,007,904 73 2,718 2,718 1,185,853 2 1,185,853 2 1,930,177 1,930,177 174,000 174,000 - 11,135,120 3 - 11,135,120 3 4,896 38,293,861 4 4,621 38,270,1494 - 620,000 150 620,000 - 23,115,187 5 - 23,115,187 s 8,000 55,381,515 6 1,923 55,311,6076 - 295,457 - 295,457 33,864 41,882 12 2,98 3,44 4,804,060 4,804,060 144,169 119,959 2,566,529 2,566,529 - 32,146, 299 7,579 32,126, 663 7 6,000 151,648,485 8 0,654 151,240,164 8 - 16,404,903 - 16, 404,903 - 8,346,6419 - 8,346,641 9 6,000 9,705,602 to 7,871 9,704,527 to - 651,850 - 651,850 - 3,010,024 " - 3,010,024 " 9,460 2,105,334 6,661 2,105,065 4,608 4,608 310,000 310,000 2,869,826 2,718,745 15,998 209,852 1,610,000 1,806,000 1,708,000 76 1,764,633 1,536,751 2,000,059 77 .- 157 93,141 49,039 178,000 193,000 3,050,000 3,088,149 2,895,000 3,646,340 651,000 633,847 35,095 34,406 5,547 17,397 50,000 49,794 3,509,000 3,450,536 300,000 136,368 9,236 9,260 250,000 102,991 5,807,000 5,071,289 218,182 14,000 441,500 12 31,314 428,606 13 33,000 240,004 11 30,914 195,346 16 20-14 BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 20-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project (Contrib. Funds) 9. Erie Harbor, PA 10. Fairport Harbor, NY 11. Huron Harbor, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 12. Irondequoit Bay, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 13. Lorain Harbor, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 14. New York State Barge Canal 15. Oak Orchard Harbor, NY 16. Olcott Harbor, NY Funding New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 1989 - - - - 1,950,000 12 - - - - 1,950,000 12 353,185 185,006 1,162,001 400,512 296,835 111,071 1,287,977 404,352 267,000 111,000 725,000 843,000 263,177 116,277 663,810 895,406 600,000 792,000 615,000 -22,000 598,849 754,196 617,197 30,624 3,597,873 13 3,597,873 13 16,594,274 14 16,593,842 '4 1,154 1,154 2,959,611 1 2,959,611 15 14,716,672 14,707,333 5,103,795 16 5,103,795 16 16,211,926 16,210,842 247,030 247,030 63,079 63,079 3,535,800 3,535,710 390,704 390,704 2,720,186 2,720,039 22,217,073 17 22,196, 467 17 25,503,429 25,493,738 845,551 845,551 12,500 12,500 1,586,996 18 1,586,996 18 248,541 248,541 890,210 19 812,703 19 578,052 20 578,052 20 14,477 2' 14,47721 25,000 - -166,925 198,565 - 105,000 - 1,850 1,389,500 71,340 1,589,224 262,725 575,000 577,000 263,456 788,111 1,124,000 1,087,000 1,093,955 1,059,216 660,000 203,000 14,198 696,038 38 267,500 364,095 9,402 36,515 70,607 635,000 703,157 -17,449 135,315 - 12,500 - 3,007 44 -25,717 85,297 ..- -12,464 -4,679 22 5,005 1,578 4,757 1,826 - 350,000 - 178,133 3,336 12,094 3,269 12,161 96 18,204 24,760 59,346 62,683 208,000 281,336 545,000 539,352 9,493 10,440 10,440 400,000 494,360 16,374 16,374 20-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 20-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 1989 17. Port Ontario Harbor, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 18. Rochester Harbor, NY 19. Rocky River Harbor, NY 20. Sandusky Harbor, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 21. Toledo Harbor, OH 22. Vermilion Harbor, OH 23. West Harbor, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 24. Wilson Harbor, NY 27. Lake Erie, Sturgeon Pt., NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 160,000 920,000 500,000 59,808 1,028,304 460,136 - - 359 - - 359 270,000 560,000 520,000 - 824,358 510,677 1,828,000 627,000 1,285,000 1,734,843 721,364 1,266,283 3,951 245,580 - 3,270 59 3,270 - 2,400,00022 16,150 2,374,39822 4,893 5,252 4,893 5,252 - 1,350,000 556 1,335,591 - 2,439,308 23 - 2,439,308 23 38,000 18,592,816 24 77,136 18,592,79924 18,301 18,301 343,494 343,494 2,252,607 2,252,607 - - - - 6,727,270 25 - - - - 6,727,27025 813,000 639,000 165,000 446,000 14,935,439 813,049 624,082 157,030 437,085 14,903,530 - - - - 675,606 - - - - 675,606 - 20,000 - - 20,000 - 19,999 - -4,554 15,445 - - - - 17,191,842 26 - - - - 17,191,842 26 3,320,000 3,741,500 2,958,000 2,894,800 83,401,353 27 3,367,229 2,001,213 4,710,343 2,779,048 83,262,543 27 -23,903 17,639 48,744 48,744 3,695 4,994 92,000 96,898 52,597 52,597 14,083 14,083 31,941 31,941 45,472 688,700 210,275 26,296 430,722 487,428 3,377 38,786 3,377 38,786 173,000 1,460,000 167,117 1,451,120 - 1,464,858 - 404,395 22,591 22,591 -15,000 -143,915 -108,000 948,684 1,156,118 28 1, 156, 118 28 2,026,840 2,026,840 139,775 139,775 3,303,898 3,303,898 1,028,294 1,028,294 3,795,000 3,795,000 535,246 29 535,246 29 554,005 30 554,005 30 1,786,90031 1,635,854 31 1,356,858 1,353,079 20-16 TABLE 20-A (Continued) BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 1989 28. Maumee Bay State Park, OH 29. Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, PA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 31. Lakeshore Park, Ashtabula, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 32. Ellicott Creek, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 33. Mt. Morris Lake, NY Genesee River 34. Ottawa, OH 35. Point Place, Toledo, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 36. Reno Beach-Howard Farms Area, OH 40. Conesus Lake, Livonia, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 40. Euclid Creek, OH New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost - 250,000 113,000 - - 229,777 15,000 136,816 378,000 366,593 1,085,000 1,163,000 1,297,000 3,608,000 18,738,562 1,101,511 1,163,404 1,277,795 1,264,281 16,382,393 - - - - 4,978 - - - - 4,978 497,143 486,429 464,143 2,956,429 9,712,713 529,863 508,126 440,157 593,922 7,321,733 85,000 13,739 73,045 20,000 30,000 16,108 29,547 865,000 2,474,000 4,878,000 505,283 2,819,385 4,906,278 - - 400,000 - - 399,900 990,000 931,000 1,004,820 951,801 - 135,000 142,821 98,091 117,000 109,421 45,320 57,021 3,000 17,702 448,000 134,255 35,000 90,000 108,791 10,501 90,480 58,164 880,000 857,780 -11,000 26,822 8,74 1,081,000 987,246 253,000 238,554 1,23 1,09 9 -3 [4 921,844 916,475 249,707 249,707 11,193,000 11,097,039 653,000 638,454 - 23,365,559 32 - 23,365,559 32 $3,500 13,935,809 )2,381 13,756,431 - 374,000 1,153 374,000 - 9,916,000 30,000 9,866,000 5,831 1,871,631 32,978 1,871,203 25,000 200,000 335,000 12,159 210,486 163,353 953,000 1,084,884 14,964 85,000 36,532 88,000 235,462 19,000 119,000 184,825 38,400 47,510 1,000 12,462 1,170,467 996,230 2,069,400 2,031,849 35,000 34,964 3,456,000 3,455,904 1. Includes $565,192 for previous projects. Excludes $47,000 contributed funds. 2. Includes $56,616 for previous projects. Excludes $7,500 contributed funds. 3. Includes $58,027 for previous projects. 4. Includes $4,922 emergency relief authority administrative costs transferred for new work to maintenance upon conversion to programming and budgeting system July 1, 1953, by direction of Office, Chief of Engineers. Also includes appropriations and costs under appropriation titles 96x3123 Operation and Maintenance and 96x5125 Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 5. Includes $4,277,586 for previous projects. Excludes expenditures of $239,305 for work authorized by Section 107. 6. Includes 1,883,647 for previous projects. Excludes $446,805 contributed funds. 7. Includes $1,564,154 for previous project and appropriations and costs of $16,596 for modification authorized for construction under authority of Sec. 107,1960 RcH Act. 8. Includes appropriations and costs under appropriation titles 96x3123 Operations and Maintenance and 96x5125 Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. Excludes $201,960 contributed funds. 9. Includes $805,272 for previous projects. 10. Includes $39,784 for previous projects. 11. Includes $811,250 for previous projects. Excludes $11,000 contributed funds. 12. Includes $176,520 for previous projects. 13. Includes $736,967 for previous projects. 14. Includes $104,900 for previous projects. Excludes $154,500 contributed funds. 15. Includes $368,940 for previous projects. 16. Includes $269,789 for previous projects. 17. Includes $292,203 for new work for previous projects. Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. Also excludes appropriation and cost of $29,570 under authority of Section 107, 1960 R8cH Act. 18. Excludes $224,702 contributed funds. 20-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 19. Includes $140,210 for previous projects. Excludes $1,500 contributed funds. 20. Includes $38,959 for previous projects. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 21. Excludes $186,000 Public Works Acceleration Act. 22. Includes $50,000 for previous projects. 23. Includes $247,794 for previous projects. 24. Includes $617,529 for previous projects and $478 emergency relief authority administration costs transferred from new work to maintenance upon conversion to programming and budgeting system, July 1, 1953, by direction of Office, Chief of Engineers. 25. Includes $477,149 for previous projects. Excludes $325,000 contributed funds. 26. Includes $1,624,695 for previous projects. 27. Includes $16,914 for previous projects. 28. Excludes $740,679 contributed funds. 29. Includes $57,342 for previous projects. Excludes $166,998 contributed funds. 30. Includes $16,914 for previous projects. 31. Includes $341,900 study funds under authority Section 107, 1960 R8cH Act. 32. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. TABLE 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents ASHTABULA HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 1 of Text) Construction of breakwater. Enlarge outer harbor by extending west breakwater and constructing new east breakwater pierheads on lakeward ends of breakwaters; and remove part of old east breakwater. Extend west breakwater to shore; dredge outer harbor to a depth of 20 feet. Remove portion of east breakwater, extend breakwaters to present project dimensions and dredging restrictions in portion of west basin. Dredge channel through outer harbor, channel of approach to Penn Central Co. slip, channel Ashtabula River, to and in turning basin all to present project dimensions; remove portion of old east inner breakwater and maintenance to 24-foot depth of portion of outer harbor. Extend river channel to present project limit. Dredging approach channel and turning basin in east outer harbor to 25-foot depth. A depth of 29 feet in soft and 30 feet in hard material in entrance Channel to just inside outer ends of breakwaters, thence 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in a channel to inner breakwater, thence 27 feet in soft and 28 feet in hard materials in a channel extending to Penn Central Co. slip and extending 2000 feet up Ashtabula River, 22 feet in hard material in turning area; and 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in areas adjacent to 250-foot section of inner breakwater when that section is removed as now authorized. Dredging approach, channel and turning basin in east outer harbor to 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material. BARCELONA HARBOR, NY (See Section 2 of Text) Harbor of refuge. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, N Y (See Section 3 of Text). Dredging channel through horseshoe reef at outlet of Lake Erie and Tonawanda Inner Harbor to 16 feet. Deepening Tonawanda Creek to 16 feet. Dredging channel from Buffalo outer harbor to foot of Maryland St., Buffalo, to 21 feet. Dredging channel from foot of Maryland St., Buffalo, to natural deepwater pool upstream from Tonawanda Harbor to 21 feet; construction of ship lock and bridge; and repair of Bird Island pier and towpath wall. Annual Report, 1895, p. 2132 H. Doc. 654, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 997, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 43, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 78, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 321, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. sess. H. Doc. sess. 486, 83rd Cong., 2d 148, 86th Cong., 1st H. Doc. 269, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 4 H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Ex. Doc. 83, 50th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1888, p. 2066, and Annual Report, 1897, pp. 3116-3120. H. Doc. 143, 56th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1900 p. 4152. H. Doc. 125, 56th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1901, p. 3343. H. Doc. 428, 58th Cong., 2d sess. 20-18 TABLE 20-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 11, 1888 June 3, 1896 June 13, 1902 June 13, 1902 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1905 BUFFALO N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 20-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 27, 1916 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 June 26, 1934s Aug. 30, 19356 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 May 20, 1826 June 23, 1866 June 23, 1874 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 3, 1909 June 6, 1900 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907:o June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 194511 July 14, 1960 Dredging channel along Tonawanda Island, with turning basin at its downstream end at the foot of the Island, to 21 feet. Dredging triangular area at junction with Buffalo north entrance channel. Widening channel at foot of Maryland St., Buffalo. Widening canal south of International Bridge and removal of westerly end of Rattlesnake Island shoal. Operation and care of improvements provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Removal of rock shoals in Lake Erie entrance to canal, and in canal south of Ferry Street Bridge, to 22 feet; enlargement of North Tonawanda turning basin; extension of Bird Island pier, improvement of guide pier at the lock; and elimination of upper 150 feet of Tonawanda Creek channel from the project.7 Widening Lake Erie entrance to canal. Deepen lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda inner harbor and enlarge turning basin. BUFFALO HARBOR, N Y (See Section 4 of Text). Construction of south pier (extended in 1868)9. Construction of old breakwater.9 Extension of old breakwater. 9 Stony Point and south breakwater.9 North breakwater. 9 Deepening entrance channel to inner harbor and removing rock shoal therein. Dredging at entrance to canals at South Buffalo in outer harbor.' South entrance breakwater. 9 Extension of Federal project to Commercial St. and removal of Watson elevator site. 9 Deepening areas A, B, and D in outer harbor to 21 feet, and area C in north entrance to 23 feet. Deepening areas F and G in outer harbor to 21 feet. Removal of shoal between entrance channel to Buffalo River and Erie Basin to 21 feet. Deepening areas H, I, and K in outer harbor to 21 feet. Extension of south entrance and south breakwaters, deepening outer harbor to present project dimensions, and removal of shoals on approach to south entrance. Maintenance of channels in Buffalo River and Buffalo ship canal to 21 feet in cooperation with city of Buffalo. Deepening North and Buffalo River entrance channels, and deepening and maintaining Buffalo River and Buffalo ship canal to present project dimensions. Deepening approach to south entrance channel to 30 feet; deepen to 30 feet in outer area and 29 feet in inner area of south entrance channel; and deepen to 28 feet southerly part of outer harbor. H. Doc. 658, 63d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1004, 65th Cong., 2d sess. and H. Doc. 92, 79th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 981, 66th Cong. 2d sess. H. Doc. 289, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 28, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 92, 79th Cong., 1st sess. 4 H. Doc. 423, 83d Cong., 2d sess. 4, 8 Annual Report 1868, pp. 222 and 232. Annual Report, 1868, pp. 232 and 236. Annual Report, 1876, pt. 2, pp. 569 and 573. Annual Report, 1895, p. 3153. H. Doc. 72. 55th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1897, p. 3245. Specified in acts. Specified in act. H. Doc. 240, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 298, Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 550, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1139, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 481, 68th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 71st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 46, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 54, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 352, 78th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 151, 86th Cong., 1st sess. 20-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 20-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 3, 1875 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 11, 1888 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 27, 1916 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 29, 1937 Aug. 30, 193512 Aug. 30, 1935" Mar. 2, 194514 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 as amended Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 13, 1968 Deepening portion of outer harbor to 27 feet over a width of 500 feet for 2,500 feet northward from 28-foot project area, widening within 1,700 feet to limits within 150 feet of breakwater axis and 75 feet from harbor line and continuing within these limits for 7,000 feet. Elimination of 25-foot wide strip between presently authorized and proposed easterly dredging limits. Elimination of easterly 50-foot wide undredged strip in existing 23-foot depth project area, extending northerly from 27-foot depth to Buffalo River entrance channel. Previously authorized but uncompleted portions of work authorized by 1935 act, combined with this act as a single improvement. Removal of abandoned abutments of South Michigan bridge. Replace dike at the Small Boat Harbor. CATTARAUGUS HARBOR, N Y (See Section 5 of Text). Construction of arrowhead breakwaters at mouth of Creek; entrance channel 200 feet wide at lakeward end, 100 feet wide and eight feet deep from that depth in lake to point 1,575 feet upstream; channel 100 feet wide, six feet deep an additional 3,425 feet upstream; and recreational fishing facilities at mouth. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 6 of Text). West breakwater. Part of east breakwater. 9. Extension of east breakwater. Reconstruction of piers.9 Dredging channel between piers and outer harbor to depth of 19 feet; dredging to depth of 23 feet in any portion of harbor in discretion of Secretary of War. Arrowhead breakwater and extension of east breakwater. Removal of deflecting arm of old east breakwater and closure of gap between old and new east breakwaters. Pierhead at easterly end of east breakwater. Maintenance and improvement of channels in Cuyahoga and Old Rivers to a depth of 21 feet to a point 2,000 feet upstream from Clark Ave. viaduct and 18-foot turning basin. Deepening outer harbor and channel between piers to present project dimensions, construction of 400-foot spur breakwater at gap in shore arm of west breakwater, removal of easterly 150 feet of west main breakwater, elimination from project of a 298-foot southerly extension of west pier, and abandonment of inner 932 feet of shore arm of west breakwater. Maintenance dredging in Cuyahoga and Old Rivers for 1 year as an emergency measure. Maintenance of extension of Cuyahoga River channel. Extension, maintenance, and improvement to a depth of 21 feet of Cuyahoga River channel to present project limit. 15,'6 Improvement of Cuyahoga and Old Rivers to a depth of 23 feet and replacement or pier construction of 7 railroad bridges. 2 Deepening channel 25 feet through east basin of outer harbor; replacement of Erie-Lackawanna Railroad bridge over Cuyahoga River at mile 4.1 and widening of channel at that point, with elimination of reconstruction of east pier of bridge as previously authorized; and replacement of Baltimore SOc hio Railroad Bridge over Old River near its mouth and Willow Avenue Highway Bridge about 800 feet above mouth and widening channel at four locations along lower, 2,000 feet of river. 3 20-20 H. Doc. 451, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Dec. 15, 1980. Sec. 601, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 97, 90th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1876, p. 558. H. Ex. Doc. 116, 48th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1886, p. 1865. H. Ex. Doc. 189, 50th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1888, p. 2005. H. Doc. 326, 54th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1896, p. 2949. H. Doc. 156, 55th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report, 1899, pp. 3075 and 3078. H. Doc. 118, 56th Cong. 2d sess. No printed report. H. Doc. 891, 63th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 707, 63d Cong., 2d sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 84, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 477, 72d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 39, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 95, 79th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 629, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 107, 85th Cong., 1st sess. TABLE 20-B (Continued) BUFFALO N.Y., DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 14, 1960 Mar. 2, 1827 Mar. 2, 1867 June 3, 1896 June 25, 1910 June 30, 1948 Oct. 23, 1962 Depth of 29 feet in lake approach to main entrance; 28 feet in entrance channel to lakeward ends of piers at mouth of Cuyahoga River; 27 feet in river to a point just above its junction with Old River, and in Old River to upstream limit of present 23-foot project; 28 feet in west basin within existing project limits as modified to eliminate a triangular area at west end and to extend limits to a line parallel to and 75 feet from harbor line; and 28 feet in westerly 800 feet of east basin. 24 An area in east basin 27 feet deep extending about 3,800 feet easterly of 28-foot area with project limits 380 feet from east breakwater and on landward side generally by a line 75 feet lakeward of and parallel to harbor line. A dock channel to Nicholson Cleveland Terminal Co. pier, at easterly end of east basin, from 25-foot contour to a limit 75 feet north of pierhead line, 400 feet wide at shoreward end and flared toward the lake. Deepening upper end of Old River channel from 21 to 27 feet. Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for improvements consisting of removal of portions of entrance breakwater; construction of breakwater extension of east entrance; deepening approach and entrance channels; construction of diked disposal area; and, installation of recreational fishing facilities on west breakwater. Bulkheading and other necessary repairs at pier 34 and approach channels and necessary protective structures for mooring basins for transient vessels in the area south of pier 34. CONNEAUT HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 7 of Text). Extension of east breakwater, construction of new west breakwater, removal of portion of old west breakwater, and dredging of outer harbor to 19 feet. Realinement of west breakwater, removal of remainder of old west breakwater, and deepening outer harbor to 20 feet. Removal of Bessemer & Lake Erie R.R. Co. of inner 635 feet of west pair. Removal of a portion of west breakwater, extension of breakwaters to present project dimensions, construction of pierheads on outer ends of breakwaters, deepening outer harbor to present project dimensions; removal of portions of river pier, and elimination from project of a 255-foot shoreward extension of west breakwater. Deepening easterly part of outer harbor to 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material; deepening remaining triangular area of outer harbor to 22 feet in soft material and 23 feet in hard material; deepening inner harbor for 2,450 feet upstream of outer end of west pier to 27 feet in soft material and 28 feet in hard material; removal of east pier, extension of east break water to shore; and an access channel 8 feet deep in outer harbor to city dock. Previously authorized but uncompleted portion of work authorized by 1917 and 1935 acts combined with this act for accomplishment as a single improvement. Recreational small-boat harbor provided by: a stone dike about 2,200 feet long: access channels 6 feet deep, 2,800 feet long and 100 feet wide; closing of 100-foot gap in existing west breakwater; and personnel guard rail on west breakwater. DUNKIRK HARBOR, N Y (See Section 8 of Text) Construction of west pier. 9,1 8 Breakwater and excavation of entrance channel to 13 feet 9 Deepening of entrance channel and harbor basin to a depth suitable for vessels of 16-foot draft. Removal of rock reef bordering the inner entrance channel. Deepening outer entrance channel to present project depths; removal of rock shoal on the west side of the entrance channel to a depth of 17 feet, and changed limits of the inner entrance channel and basin to present project dimensions. H. Doc. sess. 983, 64th Cong., 1st H. Doc. 48, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. sess. 415, 87th Cong., 2d H. Doc. 484, 89th Cong., 2d sess. 4 S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report 1866 pt. IV, p. 155. Annual Report, 1871, p. 214 H. Doc. 63, 54th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 720, 61st Cong., 2d sess. 4 H. Doc. 632, 80th Cong., 2d sess. 20-21 H. Doc. 152, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 527, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 4 Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized by chief of Engineers Dec. 6, 1966. Sec. 202, PL 99-662. H. Doc. 653, 61th Cong., 2d sess. July 14, 1960 as amended Oct. 22, 1976 (Sec. 175) Nov. 17, 1986 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 17 Aug. 30, 193511 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 19668 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 20-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Dec. 15, 1970 (House Public Works Comm.) June 22, 1971 (Senate Public Works Comm.) Sec. 201 of F.C. Act of 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 May 26, 1824 Mar. 3, 1899 June 15, 1910 Nov. 28, 192020 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Sept. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 3, 182521 June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193522 Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 July 14, 196027 Construction of small-boat harbor. Dredging and maintenance of eastern inner harbor. ERIE HARBOR, PA (See Section 9 of Text). Breakwaters and piers; dredging entrance channel; and brushwood protection of beach of Presque Isle Peninsula.9 Deepening channel and harbor basin to 18 feet; repair and extension of piers; and plant growth and emergency protection work on peninsula. Deepening channel and part of harbor to 20 feet. Reconveyed Presque Isle Peninsula to the State of Pennsylvania for park purposes. Deepening, widening, and straightening entrance channel, dredging channel at easterly end of harbor basin, deepening a portion of harbor basin, all to present project dimensions; elimination of north breakwater from project; and limitation of south breakwater to a length of 1,200 feet. Protection of the peninsula south of the waterworks settling basin. Widen 25-foot deep approach channel to ore dock. Depth of 29 feet in the entrance channel to a point opposite the inner end of the north pier, thence 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in the remainder of the entrance channel, within the general limits of the 25-foot basin and inner channel opposite the ore dock except as modified to eliminate from the project a triangular area along the easterly side;and a depth of 28 feet over a 300-foot westward extension of the 25-foot basin. 26 Depth of 27 feet in soft material and 28 feet in hard material in approach area to Duquesne Marine Terminal. Previously authorized but uncompleted portion of work authorized by 1935 act is combined with this act as a single improvement. FAIRPORT HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 10 of Text) Construction of piers. Breakwaters and dredging outer harbor to a depth of 18 feet. 1,400-foot extension of east breakwater, present project dimension of east pier, and deepening of harbor to 19 feet. 4,000-foot extension of east breakwater at limit of cost to the United States of $715,000. Deepening of outer harbor and entrance channel to present project dimensions; extending the west breakwater to present project dimensions with pierhead at its outer end; removal of west pier, and construction of bulkhead on west side of river channel. Dredging of 21- and 24-foot river channels and turning basin in Grand River to present project dimensions. Dredging of 8-foot river channel. Depth of 29 feet in the approach channel from the lake; a depth of 28 feet over a width of 800 feet in outer harbor; a depth of 27 feet in soft and 28 feet in hard material in Grand River, over a width of 200 feet to the upstream limit of the turning basin, with suitable widening at the bends, thence over widths reducing from 200 to 100 feet to the upstream limit of the existing Federal project, except in the 8-foot channel; enlargement of the turning basin, including deepening of the entire basin to 21 feet; and minor modification of the existing project limits in the outer harbor. H. Doc. 91-423, 91st Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 848, PL 99- 662. Annual Report, 1915, p. 1965. H. Doc. 70, 55th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report, 1896, p. 3237.19 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 52, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 345, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 199, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 340, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 4 Annual Report, 1889, pp. 2147-2153. H. Doc. 347, 54th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Reports, 1896, p. 2956; 1903, p. 2084; 1905, p. 2349. H. Doc. 206, 63d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 592, 69th Cong., 2d sess., Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 472, 72d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 79, 74th Cong., 2d sess. 4 H. Doc 706, 79th Cong., 2d seSS. 4 H. Doc. 347, 86th Cong., 2d sess. 4 20-22 BUFFALO N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 20-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 10, 1977 (House Public Works Comm.) Oct. 1, 1976 (Senate Public Works Comm.) Sec. 201 of F.C. Act of 1965 Mar. 2, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 193522 Oct. 23, 1962 July 3, 1958 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Construction of small boat harbor. HURON HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 11 of Text) Extension of west pier, construction of east breakwater, removal of part of old east pier; deepening of channel to 19 feet; and dredging of sheltered area. Widening river to 200 feet; removal of remainder of old east pier, construction of new spur pier, enlargement of sheltered area; and closure of breach at shore end of west pier. Extension of west pier with pierhead at its outer end; removal of outer end of east breakwater and constructing pierhead on new outer end; widening and deepening channel to present project dimensions; enlargement of turning basin at head of channel; shore protection west of west pier, and elimination from project construction of spur pier and dredging sheltered area outside channel limits. Depths of 29 feet in approach channel, 28 feet in entrance channel, 27 feet in river channel, 21 feet in turning basin a detached breakwater, 1,575 feet long 2,000 feet lakeward of outer end of existing west pier; and abandonment of lakeward end of existing approach channel.2 8 IRONDEQUOIT BAY, NY (See Section 12 of Text). Construction of entrance channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide, extending from 9-foot depth in Lake Ontario to junction with inner bay channels, a distance of about 1,300 feet; inner channel, 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from entrance channel to deep water in bay, a distance of about 3,035 feet; access channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 500 feet in length from the inner bay channel to the west; two stone rubblemound structures 1,350 feet and 750 feet in length at the natural entrance; and recreational facilities. LORAIN HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 13 of Text). Breakwaters and extensions of piers to present dimensions. Extend 18-foot channel from inner end of piers to Erie Avenue Bridge. Extend breakwaters and dredge to depth of 19 feet in outer harbor. Extend breakwaters to present project dimensions. Deepen outer harbor and river channel to Erie Avenue Bridge to 20 feet. Extend 20-foot channel to American Shipbuilding Co. drydock. Widen 2 bends in river and enlarge turning basin opposite National Tube Co. dock. 12 Approach channel to municipal pier. Deepen outer harbor and river channel to American Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2 to present project dimensions and extension of river channel to upper end of National Tube Co. dock with turning basin opposite that dock. Maintenance dredging in Black River from American Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2. Upper end of National Tube Co. dock was authorized Apr. 7, 1934, by Public Works Administration. Enlarging turning basin opposite National Tube Co. dock to present project dimensions. Turning basin in bend of Black River immediately upstream from Baltimore & Ohio RR coal dock. H. Doc. 627, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 122, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 5, 63d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 478, 72d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 165, 87th Cong., 1st sess. 4 H. Doc. 332, 84th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 131, 55th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report 1898, p. 2718. H. Doc. 560, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 644, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 980, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 985, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 587, 69th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 469, 72d Cong., 2d sess. Senate Committee print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 161, 77th Cong., 1st sess. 20-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 20-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 14, 1960 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 4, 1913 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1829 Aug. 2, 1882 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 19356 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 H. Doc. 166, 86th Cong., 1st sess. 4 PL 89-298. Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Mar. 12, 1986. Sec. 202, PL 99-662. Oct. 2, 1965 July 14, 1960 as amended Nov. 17, 1986 Replace Norfolk and Western Railway swing bridge with a vertical lift bridge; construct two detached arrowhead breakwaters lakeward of existing breakwaters; construct extension of east breakwater, to shore; remove 300 feet of lakeward end of west breakwater; remove outer 1,100 feet of east pier; deepen lake approach to 29 feet, 800-foot wide outer harbor channel to 27 feet; widen river channel at bends; and construct a new turning basin 21 feet deep near upstream limit of existing project. 29 Construct bank of stabilization works at cut numbered 1 along left bank of river channel above Erie Avenue Bridge.8 Construction of a 225 foot detached rubblemound breakwater and an 800 foot long rubblemound breakwater attached to the east breakwater shorearm in the east basin of the outer harbor. Two bend cuts on Black River between the Norfolk and Western Railroad Bridge and 21st Street Bridge, excavated to existing channel depth of 27 feet. Widening Upper Turning Basin at existing authorized depth of 21 feet. NEW YORK STATE BARGE CANAL (See Section 14 of Text) Reimbursement to State of New York for 50 percent of the cost of operating, maintaining and rehabilitating the New York Barge Canal. The Federal contribution to rehabilitation costs shall be limited in any fiscal year to $5,000,000, or 5 percent of the expenditures in that fiscal year whichever is the lesser. OAK ORCHARD HARBOR, NY (See Section 15 of Text) Harbor of refuge. OLCOTT HARBOR, NY (See Section 16 of Text) Dredging a channel 11 feet deep between parallel piers. 9 Deepening channel to 12 feet and maintenance of west pier. Construct the project for Navigation, Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 11, 1980. PORT ONTARIO, NY (See Section 17 of Text) Construct harbor of refuge. Maintain harbor of refuge. ROCHESTER, HARBOR, N Y (See Section 18 of Text) Construction of piers.9 Extension of piers to 15 foot contour in the lake. Concrete superstructure on piers.9 Deepening channel to 20 feet. Dredging of the entrance channel and turning basin, and the elimination of the inner ends of the east and west piers, all to present project dimensions. Maintenance of existing channel upstream of the Penn Central Co. bridge. Depth of 24 feet in the channel from the lake to the west pier, a depth of 23 feet between the piers and in the lower river to the Penn Central Co. bridge, including the existing turning basin; a depth of 21 feet from the bridge to the upstream project limit, with suitable widening at the bends; and, upstream turning basin 21 feet deep and 650 feet wide adjacent to the improved channel, with two mooring dolphins. ROCKY RIVER HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 19 of Text) East pier and dredging of channel. Extension of east pier and deepening channel to present project dimensions. Realign and extend channel and construct an anchorage basin. Annual Report, 1871, p. 211. H. Doc. 70, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 352, 88th Cong., 2d sess. 4 20-24 Sec. 1105, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report, 1866 pt. III, p. 15 and pt. IV, p. 158. H. Doc. 780, 62d Cong., 2d sess. 4 Sec. 601, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 615, PL 99-662. Annual Report, 1874, p. 247. Annual Report, 1881, p. 2437. Annual Report, 1905, p. 2383. H. Doc. 342, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 484, 72d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 139, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 409, 86th Cong., 2d sess. 4 Nov. 17, 1986 June 10, 1872 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 27, 1965 BUFFALO N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 20-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 193525 Mar. 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 SANDUSKY HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 20 of Text) Construction of channel protection works. Widening of Straight and Dock channels and deepening to 19 feet. Extension of east jetty to total length of 6,000 feet, with pierhead on outer end; deepening of the outer, straight, and easterly portion of Dock channels to 21 feet, and westerly portion of Dock channel to 20 feet. Deepening of Dock Channel to 22 feet. Enlargement of turning basin and construction of rock dike. Maintenance of Bay Channel to 22 feet; and elimination from project of portion of turning basin and rock dike. Extending Moseley Channel and deepening that channel and the outer end of Straight channel to 26 feet, from deep water in the lake to the vicinity of Cedar Point dock; widening the bend at the junction of the Moseley and Straight channels and deepening to 26 feet; deepening the Straight channel to 25 feet from the vicinity of Cedar Point dock to junction with Bay channel; deepening the Bay channel from the junction with the Straight channel to the outer end of the Pennsylvania Coal dock No. 3 to 25 feet, thence from outer end of the coal dock to the turning basin to 24 feet in soft material and 25 in hard, with no Federal dredging within 50 feet of the dock; and enlarging the turning basin, including removal of approximately 300 feet of the rock dike, and deepening to 24 feet in soft material and 25 feet in hard. H. Doc. 362, 55th Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report 1898, p. 2708 H. Doc. 120, 56th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 982, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 584, 69th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 328, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 144, 86th Cong., 1st sess. 4 TOLEDO HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 21 of Text). Mar. 3, 1899 A channel 400 feet wide and 21 feet deep from 25-foot contour in Maumee Bay to Fassett Street Bridge, 200 feet wide and 19 feet deep above that point and a 500-foot turning basin at Upper End. A stone revetted earth dike in Maumee Bay Channel. June 25, 1910 Act 1899 modified to insure a navigable channel to 21 feet from Fassett Street Bridge to Lake. Aug. 30, 1935 Channel 25 feet deep and 500 feet wide from 25-foot contour to mouth of Maumee River (300 feet wide on each side of center dike in Bay Channel), thence 400 feet wide to Fassett Street Bridge, 200 feet wide above that point and a turning basin at Upper end 18 feet deep. May 17, 1950 Widening at bend of mouth of River opposite Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Dock. Sept. 3, 1954 Removal of center dike in Maumee Bay Channel. July 3, 1958 Enlarge widening at bend opposite Chesapeake and Ohio dock and turning basin opposite American Shipbuilding Co. dock. July 14, 1960 Deepen Bay Channel including widenings to 28 feet, deepen River channels to New York Central Railroad Bridge to 27 feet and construct new turning basin below Anthony Wayne Brige.30. VERMILION HARBOR OHIO (See Section 22 of Text). Parallel piers and dredging channel to 8 feet deep. Deepening of channel to 12 feet. Reconstruction of piers. New entrance formed by two overlapping arrowhead breakwaters and extension of existing river channel upstream to Liberty St. Bridge. WEST HARBOR, OHIO (See Section 23 of Text). Construction of arrowhead breakwaters, entrance channel, and access channel. WILSON HARBOR, N Y (See Section 24 of Text). Entrance channel 80 feet wide and 8 feet deep; and restore east and west piers. Extend existing channel 300 feet; and construct new channel 3,800 feet long through Tuscarora Bay. H. Doc. 198, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1898, p. 2693. H. Doc. 865, 60th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 72d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 189, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 620, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 436, 84th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 153, 86th Cong., 1st sess. 4 Annual Report, 1880 Annual Report, 1874, p. 219. H. Doc. 252, 58th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 231, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 245, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 679, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 112, 90th Cong., 1st sess. 20-25 July 4, 1836 Mar. 3, 1875 Mar. 3, 1905 July 3, 1958 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 13, 1968 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 20-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents STURGEON POINT, EVANS, N Y (See Section 27 of Text). Rehabilitate existing breakwater, construct rubblemound west breakwater extension, construct rubblemound east breakwater, a shore revetment, and dredging. MAUMEE BAY STATE PARK, OHIO (See Section 28 of Text). Protective sand beach stabilized by rubblemound offshore breakwaters and jetties along the west half of park shoreline and rubblemound revetment at the east end of the park. PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA (See Section 29 of Text). Sept. 3, 1954 Construction of groin system, seawall, bulkhead, placement of beach material at waterworks reservation and along remainder of peninsula; removal of portions of existing structures. July 14, 1960 Periodic nourishment of shores for a 10-year period. Mar. 7, 1974 Periodic nourishment of shore for a 5-year period. Oct. 22, 1976 Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for improvements (Sec. 101) consisting of construction of five sections of spaced offshore breakwaters and replenishment of beach area with sandfill. Nov. 17, 1986 Construct offshore breakwaters and restore beaches. LAKESHORE PARK, ASHTABULA, OHIO (See Section 31 of Text). Construction of offshore breakwaters, restoration of an 800-foot long beach, and subsequent periodic nourishment as necessary. ELLICOTT CREEK, NY (See Section 32 of Text). Widening, straightening and deepening channel in Ellicott Creek Park; construct diversion channels; construct 3 highway bridges; modify culverts; modify utilities and drainage outlets; and construct recreation facilities. MT. MORRIS LAKE, GENESEE RIVER, N Y, (See Section 33 of Text). Construction of a concrete gravity dam and reservoir. OTTAWA, OHIO (See Section 34 of Text). Construction of leeves, floodwalls, combined with channel improvement, bridge change, and construction of new bridges. POINT PLACE, TOLEDO, OHIO (See Section 35 of Text). Construction of steel sheet pile wall, levees, pumping stations, storm sewer facilities, and gravity outfalls. RENO BEACH - HOWARD FARMS AREA OHIO (See Section 36 of Text). Construction of dike and levees. CONESUS LAKE, LIVONIA, NY (See Section 40 of Text). Construction of sheetpiling, concrete control structure, outlet channel, and creek channelization. EUCLID CREEK, CLEVELAND, OHIO (See Section 40 of Text). Construction of diversion channel, levees, and creek channelization. Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Oct. 21, 1987. Sec. 501, PL 99-662. H. Doc. 231, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 397, 86th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 796, 93d Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 501, PL 99-662. Sec. 103, PL 87-874. Authorized by Chief of Engineers April 26, 1982. Sec. 201, PL 91-611 Sec. 14, PL 93-251 H. Doc. 615, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 485, 89th Cong. H. Doc. 363, 92d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 554, 8th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 205, PL 858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers July 22, 1985. Sec. 205, PL 858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Oct. 9, 1981 1. Authorized by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. 2. Widening Cuyahoga River downstream at end of Cut 4 classified inactive. 3. Replacement of bridges 19 and 32, widening Cuyahoga and Old River Channels, classified deferred. 4. Contains latest published map. 5. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 6. Authorized May 28, 1935 by Emergency Relief Administration Act of 1935. 7. Improvement of guide pier at Black Rock Lock was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. 8. Classified deferred. 9. Completed under previous projects. 10. Also Sundry Civil Act of Mar. 3, 1905. 11. Authorized in part by Public Works Administration, Sept.6, 1933. 12. Authorized by Public Works Administration Sept. 6, 1933. 13. Previously authorized by Public Works Administration. 14. First Deficiency Appropriations Act approved April 1, 1944. 15. Authorized by Defense Plant Corp., May 19, 1942. 20-26 July 14, 1960 Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 23, 1962 as amended Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 7, 1974 Dec. 22, 1944 Nov. 7, 1966 Oct. 27, 1965 June 30, 1948 June 30, 1948, as amended June 30, 1948, as amended. BUFFALO N.Y., DISTRICT TABLE 20-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents 16. Deepening left half of channel extension was eliminated 24. Deepening remainder of Cuyahoga River from bridge 1 to from project by 1962 R&H Act. and including Old River, classified deferred. 17. Permit of Secretary of War, Aug. 5, 1927. 25. Included in Public Works Administration program, Nov. 18. Modified 1828 and 1852. 15, 1933. 19. Extension of north pier portion of this modification was 26. Deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers was deauthorized Nov. 1981. deauthorized Aug. 1982. 20. Public Law 366. 27. Modification classified inactive. 21. Modified 1830, 1881, and 1890. New work completed under 28. Construction of breakwater classified deferred. previous projects. 29. Deepening and widening remainder of Black River channel 22. Partly included in Public Works Administration program, at Cut 1 classified deferred. Nov. 15, 1933. 30. The 27-foot project extended 2,800 feet and turning basin 23. First Supplemental National Defense Appropriation Act, relocated under authority of Chief of Engineers. 1944 approved Dec. 23, 1943. TABLE 20-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 26 of Text) Cost to September 30, 1989 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Big (Cunningham) Creek, Ohio' Completed _2 $ 19,763 3 Black River Harbor, N Y4 - - 2 42,401 Cape Vincent Harbor, N Y Completed 1962 275,082 $1,563,727 Cattaraugus Creek, N Y5 -_ _2 57,410 - Elk Creek Harbor, Pa. Active 1978 101,500 Geneva-on-the-Lake, Ohio Completed 1988 3,681,563 16 60 Grasse River (Massena), N Y4,6 - 1891 9,000 3 - Great Sodus Bay Harbor, N Y Completed 1988 610,959 7 2,470,590 18 Hamlin Beach Harbor, N Y Deferred 1973 72,052 Kelleys Island, Ohio Active 1974 12 129,874 Little River at Cayuga Island, N Y Completed 1969 46,804 7 42,393 Little Sodus Bay Harbor, N Y Completed 1988 301,394 19 3,101,290 20 Morristown Harbor, N Y Completed 1949 6,221 9,694 Niagara Remedial Works, N Y8 Completed 1966 6,069,395 510,819 Niagara River, N Y13 Completed 1964 559,457 9 144,569 Ogdensburg Harbor, N Y Completed 1987 1,720,466 14 1,357,007 15 Oswego Harbor, N Y Completed 1988 8,430,016 21 6,637,325 22 Ottawa River Harbor, Michigan and Ohio Inactive 1977 12 99,000 - Port Bay, N Y Active - - - Port Clinton Harbor, Ohio Completed 1985 71,950 928,608 Pultneyville Harbor, N Y" - 1934 68,219 20,087 Put in Bay, Ohio Completed 1951 12 51,609 13,046 Sackets Harbor, Ohio Completed 1982 25,010 25,298 Sandusky River, Ohio 4 - 1894 58,0003 557 1. No commerce reported. 2. Only information available is in index to reports of Chief of Engineers. 3. Amount includes maintenance; not separable. 4. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 5. Abandonment recommended inEx. Doc. 16, 35th Cong., 1st sess. 6. Channel improved by local interests. 7. Includes local interests contribution of $25,742. 8. Costs of operation and maintenance of this project will be settled directly by concerned power agencies. No further appropriations will be made to this project. 9. Includes local interests contribution of $27,563. 10. Includes local interests contribution of $5,000. 11. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 375, 64th Cong., 1st sess. 12. Annual Report for Detroit District. 13. Construction of compensating works as authorized by 1930 R&H Act was deauthorized by Congress in August 1977. 14. Includes $271,380 for previous projects. Excludes $57,000 contributed funds. 15. Includes $130,512 for previous projects. 16. Excludes $3,236,062 for previous projects. 17. Includes $361,772 for previous projects. 18. Excludes $713,544 for Rehab. 19. Includes $232,328 for previous projects. 20. Excludes $742,822 for Rehab. 21. Includes $1,187,977 for previous projects. 22. Includes $945,684 for previous projects. Excludes $307,590 Rehab. 20-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 20-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 30 of Text) Cost to September 30, 1989 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Cleveland and Lakewood, Ohio: Edgewater Park' Deferred - - - White City Park' Deferred - - - Fair Haven Beach State Park, Lake Ontario2 Deferred - - - Fort Niagara State Park, N Y3 Active - - - Hamlin Beach State Park, N Y Completed 1976 $1,769,600 - Lakeview Park, Lorain, OH Completed 1987 1,741,125 S Selkirk Shore State Park, Lake Ontario, N Y4 Deferred 1963 58,978 $2,946 1. Project authorized by River and Harbor Act of September 3, 4. Federal participation was limited to one-third of first cost 1954 is classified as deferred. when project was authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act. Federal 2. Project authorized by River and Harbor Act of July 3, 1958 participation was changed from one-third to 70 percent of remaining is classified as deferred. work under Public Law 87-874. Uncompleted portion of project is 3. Project authorized under provision of Section 201, 1965 classified as deferred. Flood Control Act as been reclassified as active. 5. Does not include $739,700 contributed funds. TABLE 20-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 39 of Text) Cost to September 30, 1989 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Auburn, N Y Owasco Outlet' Completed 1962 $ 371,9856 - Batavia and vicinity, Tonawanda Creek, N Y' Completed 1957 335,385 - Caledonia, Genesee River, N Y Deferred 1950 - - Camp Perry, Ohio' Completed 1967 " 275,000 '0 Cayuga Creek, Cheektowaga, N Y',5 Completed 1984 1,404,500 - Chittenango Creek and tributaries, N y2,3 Inactive 1948 12,464 - Cuyahoga River Basin, Ohio Active 1985 1,117,000 - Dansville and vicinity, Canaseraga Creek, N Y Active 1985 490,300 - East Lake, Ohio, Chagrin River 3 Inactive 1976 506,344 - Fremont, Ohio, Sandusky River' Completed 1976 8,589,824 9 - Ithaca, N Y, Cayuga Inlet, N Y' Completed 1978 3,929,330 2 - Lackawanna, N Y Smokes Creek' Completed 1971 3,542,068 7 Lancaster, Cayuga Creek, N Y' Completed 1954 797,300 - Marsh Creek, Geneva, N Y5 Completed - 226,429 - Montour Falls, Oswego River Basin, N Y' Completed 1954 1,681,785 - Onondaga Creek, Nedrow, N Y ',5 Completed 1964 330,231 - Owasco Inlet and Outlet, Montville and Dry Creek, State Ditch and Crane Brook, N Y4 Inactive/Deferred 1950 281,559 - Scajaquada Creek, N Y' Completed 1985 4,944,852 - Syracuse, Oswego River Basin, N Y' Completed 1954 3,349,248 - Warsaw, N Y Oatka Creek', 5 Completed 1969 558,317 8 Wellsville, N Y Genesee River' Completed 1978 3,145,303 '3 1. Completed. 2. Local interest required to contribute $25,000. 3. Project is not considered economically justified and is inactive. 4. Inactive portion of work for State Ditch has been done by local interest and work on Crane Brook has been deferred at the request of local interests. 5. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers. 6. Excludes costs of $188,732 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. 7. Includes local interest contribution of $50,000. 8. Excludes costs of $26,807 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, 20-28 BUFFALO N.Y., DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 39 of Text) June 1972. 9. Includes local interests contribution of $6,944. Excludes cost of $383,786 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, for emergency restoration of levees damaged during 1973. 10. Includes local interest contribution of $125,000. 11. Annual Report for Detroit District. 12. Includes local interests contribution of $99,000. Excludes TABLE 20-G costs of $104,005 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, June 1972. 13. Includes local interests contribution of $50,000. Excludes costs of $374,042 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storms. Study Identification Fiscal Year Cost East Harbor State Park, OH $30,758 Lake Erie, Sheffield, OH 877 North Sandy Pond, Oswego Co., NY 40,032 Seneca Lake, Geneva, NY 43,581 Toussaint River, Carrol Twsp., OH 36,302 TABLE 20-H FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 40 of Text) Flood Control Activities pursuant to Sec. 205 Public Law 858, 80th Congress as amended (preauthorization) Study Identification Andover, Dyke Creek, NY Buffalo River, West Seneca, NY Butternut Creek, DeWitt, NY Canadaway Creek, Fredonia, NY Canandiagua Lake, NY Cattaraugus Creek, Arcade, NY Cazenovia Creek, Buffalo, NY Chagrin River, Eastlake, OH Cross Lake, NY Honeoye Lake, NY Keuka Lake Outlet, NY Limestone Creek, Fayetteville, NY Maumee River, Grand Rapids, OH Oneida Lake, NY Owasco Inlet, Groton, NY Scajaquada Creek, Depew, NY Silver Creek, Silver Creek, NY Swan Creek, Toledo, OH Temple Creek, Elk Creek, PA Village of Malone, NY W. Br. Limestone Creek, Manlius, NY Fiscal Year Cost $34,614 3,337 217 11,210 7,372 1,746 13,863 13,552 15,691 38,430 31,260 31,957 195 4,444 17,259 39,882 3,483 11,783 4,569 308 38,585 20-29 TABLE 20-E (Continued) NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 27 of Text) Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 20-H (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 40 of Text) Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Study Identification Butternut Creek, E. Syracuse, NY Canadaway Creek, Fredonia, NY Chagrin River, Solon Rd., OH Chagrin River, East Branch, Sperry Rd., OH Chagrin River, East Branch, Wisner Rd., OH Clear Creek, Bray Rd., Freedom, NY Clear Creek, Rt. 98, Freedom, NY Cuyahoga River, Akron Peninsula Rd., OH Cuyahoga River, Brecksville Rd., OH Cuyahoga River, North Portage Path, Akron, OH Cuyahoga River, Riverview Rd., Northampton, OH Keshequa Creek, Nunda, NY Lake Erie, Lakeshore Blvd, Willowick, OH Lake Erie, Eastlake, OH Lake Erie, Fredonia, NY Lake Erie, Linwood Park, Vermilion, OH Lake Erie, Mentor-on-the-Lake, OH Lake Erie, Middle Bass Island, Deist Rd., OH Lake Erie, North Point Dr., Avon Lake, OH Lake Erie, St. Joseph Christian Life Center, OH Lake Erie State Park, Brocton, NY Maumee River, Providence Metropark, OH Mill Creek, Warrenville Twsp, OH Sandusky River Ream Rd., Sandusky, OH Sandusky River, Twsp. Rd. 234, Sandusky Twsp., OH Fiscal Year Cost $ 9,964 1,225 14,957 4,126 1,424 2,266 4,011 5,811 10,425 296,649 115,574 2 4,146 2,951 50 8,737 3,742 500 665 4 2,003 14,929 6,513 5 1,638 7,787 3,751 6,354 1. Does not include $94,411 in contributed funds. 4. Does not include $131 in contributed funds. 2. Does not include $26,281 in contributed funds. 5. Does not include $3,648 in contributed funds. 3. Does not include $10,395 in contributed funds. TABLE 20-I DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Section 41 of Text) For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY 1935 R&H Act' Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY 1954 R&cH Act Cape Vincent Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act Crane Creek State Park, OH 1962 R&H Act Erie Harbor, PA 1945 R&H Act Erie Harbor, PA 1899 R&H Act Erie Harbor, PA 1960 R&H Act Grandview Bay Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 1962 R&H Hammondsport, Oswego River Basin, NY 1941 FC Act Ithaca, NY-Cascadilla Creek 1941 FC Act Ithaca, NY-Fall Creek 1941 FC Act Maumee River, above Toledo, OH 1872 Act 1962 1962 1962 1968 3 1963 1963 1963 1948 1963 1951 1950 1950 1971 3 Aug 1977 May 1981 Nov 1986 Nov 1979 Aug 1977 Nov 1981 Aug 1982 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Nov 1983 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Nov 1977 - - - - - $1,524 29,000 8,159 12,300 12,000 20-30 TABLE 20-I (Continued) BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (See Section 41 of Text) For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Niagara River, Compensating Works, NY 1930 R&H Act 1964 Aug 1977 - - Ogdensburg Harbor, NY 1935 R&H Act 1986 Nov 1986 - - Oswego Harbor, NY 1940 R&H Act2 1963 May 1981 -- Red Creek, NY 1966 FC Act 1975 Nov 1986 361,241 - Sackets Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act 1948 May 1981 19,010 - Sheffield Lake Community Park, OH 1962 R&H Act - Aug 1977 - - Watkins Glen, NY 1941 FC Act 1958 Aug 1977 43,182 - 1. Extension of guide pier only; other improvements completed. 2. Deepening of west outer harbor, other improvements completed. 3. Annual Report for Detroit District. 20-31 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT * The district is composed of the upper and lower peninsulas of Michigan and portions of Indiana, Wisconsin and Minnesota, which border the lakes. It includes U.S. waters of Lakes Superior, Michigan, Huron, St. Clair and western Lake Erie. Unless otherwise indicated, all depths stated in this report are referred to low water datum as follows: Lake Superior, 600 feet; Lake Michigan-Huron, 576.8 feet; Lake Erie, 568.6 feet; and Lake St. Clair, 571.7 feet. Elevations in feet are above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec (International Great Lakes Datum - 1955). IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Algoma Harbor, WI ........................ 21-2 2. Arcadia Harbor, MI .......................... 21-2 3. Ashland Harbor, WI ......................... 21-2 4. Au Sable Harbor, MI ....................... 21-2 5. Bayport Harbor, MI ......................... 21-3 6. Big Suamico River, WI ....................... 21-3 7. Black River, (P.H.) MI ....................... 21-3 8. Black River Harbor, (U.P.) MI ................ 21-4 9. Bolles Harbor, MI .. ........................ 21-4 10. Charlevoix Harbor, MI ........................ 21-4 11. Clinton River, MI ..... ..................... 21-5 12. Detour Harbor, MI .................. ...... 21-5 13. Detroit River, M I ............. ............... 21-5 14. Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN and WI ........... 21-6 15. Eagle Harbor, MI ... ....................... 21-7 16. Fox River, WI ............................ 21-7 17. Frankfort Harbor, MI ......................... 21-7 18. Grand Haven Harbor and Grand River, MI ....... 21-8 19. Grand Marais Harbor, MI ..................... 21-8 20. Grand Marais Harbor, MN .................. 21-9 21. Grand Traverse Bay Harbor, MI .............. 21-9 22. Green Bay Harbor, WI ........................ 21-9 23. Harbor Beach Harbor, MI ................... .21-10 24. Hearding Island Inlet, Duluth Harbor, MN ...... 21-10 25. Holland Harbor, MI ......................... 21-10 26. The Inland Route, MI :.......................21-10 27. Kenosha Harbor, WI ........................ 21-11 28. Kewaunee Harbor, WI ....................... 21-11 29. Keweenaw Waterway, MI .................... 21-12 30. Lac LaBelle Harbor, MI ..................... 21-12 31. Lake St. Clair, MI Channels ................... 21-12 32. Leland Harbor, MI ......................... 21-13 33. Lexington Harbor, MI ........................ 21-13 34. Little Lake Harbor, MI ................... .. .21-13 35. Ludington Harbor, MI ....................... 21-13 36. Mackinac Island Harbor, MI .................. 21-14 Navigation (cont.) Page 37. Manistee Harbor, MI ........................ 21-14 38. Manistique Harbor, MI ....................... 21-14 39. Manitowoc Harbor, WI ..................... 21-15 40. Marquette Harbor, MI ...................... 21-15 41. Menominee Harbor and River, MI and WI ...... 21-15 42. Milwaukee Harbor, WI ....................... 21-16 43. Monroe Harbor, MI ........................ 21-16 44. Muskegon Harbor, MI ....................... 21-17 45. New Buffalo Harbor, MI .................... 21-17 46. Ontonagon Harbor, MI .................... 21-18 47. Pentwater Harbor, MI ........................ 21-18 48. Pointe Lookout Harbor, (Au Gres River) MI . .21-18 49. Portage Lake Harbor, MI ..................... 21-19 50. Port Austin Harbor, MI ...................... 21-19 51. Port Sanilac Harbor, MI .................... 21-19 52. Port Washington Harbor, WI ................. 21-19 53. Port Wing Harbor, WI ..................... 21-20 54. Rouge River, MI .......................... .21-20 55. Saginaw River, MI ............ ............. 21-20 56. St. Clair River, MI .......................... 21-21 57. St. Joseph Harbor, MI ....................... 21-21 58. St. Marys River, MI ......................... 21-22 59. Saugatuck Harbor and Kalamazoo River, MI . .21-23 60. Saxon Harbor, WI ......................... 21-23 61. Sebewaing River, MI ........................ 21-24 62. Sheboygan Harbor, WI ..................... 21-24 63. South Haven Harbor, MI ................... 21-24 64. Sturgeon Bay & Lake Michigan Ship Canal, WI . .21-24 65. Two Harbors, MN .......................... 21-25 66. Two Rivers Harbor, WI ...................... 21-25 67. Whitefish Point Harbor, MI .................. 21-25 68. White Lake Harbor, MI ..................... 21-26 69. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ......... 21-26 70. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......... 21-26 71. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ... 21-26 21-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Beach Erosion Control Page 72. Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ... .21-26 73. Emergency Shore Protection ................. .21-26 74. Beach Erosion Work Under Special Authorization .............................. 21-27 75. Mitigation of Shore Damages ............... .21-27 Flood Control 76. Paw Paw Lake, MI ........................ 2. 1-27 77. Saginaw River, MI .......................... 21-27 78. Sebewaing, Sebewaing River, MI .............. 21-28 79. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 21-28 80. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...... 21-28 81. Flood Control Under Special Authorization ... .21-28 82. Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters ..... 21-29 83. Surveys .................. .............. . 21-31 General Investigations Page 84. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ........ 21-31 85. Collection and Study of Basic Data ............ 21-31 Tables Table 21-A Cost & Financial Statement ............ 21-33 Table 21-B Authorizing Legislation ............... .21-46 Table 21-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ... 21-58 Table 21-D Not Applicable ............................ Table 21-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 21-59 Table 21-F Multiple Purpose Projects, including Power St. Marys River, MI: Existing Project ... .21-59 Table 21-G Deauthorized Projects ................ .21-60 Table 21-H Features of Existing Project ............ 21-61 Table 21-I Fox River, WI: Locks & Dams .......... 21-62 Table 21-J Reconnaissance & Condition Surveys ..... 21-63 Navigation 1. ALGOMA HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan, about 68 miles from Green Bay via Sturgeon Bay Canal and about 115 miles northerly from Milwaukee (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 14910). Previous project. For details see page 1199 of Annual Report for 1958. Existing project. Provides for (a) a north pier 1102 feet long; (b) a south breakwater 1530 feet long; (c) an entrance channel 14 feet deep and 200 feet wide from that depth in Lake Michigan and extending 800 feet landward; (d) a channel 14 feet deep in the Ahnapee River 80 to 175 feet wide for 1200 feet up to the Second Street Bridge; (e) an outer basin 14 feet, 600 feet long and 100 to 500 feet wide. For a more detailed description see page 1200 of Annual Report for 1958. Section 52 (c) of the Water Resources Development Act (W.R.D.A.) of 1988 deauthorized the outer harbor basin feature of the navigation project. (See Table 21-B for legislation.) 2. ARCADIA HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 193 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 15 miles northerly from Manistee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 14907). Existing project. Provided for maintenance dredging of the existing harbor built by private interests for a period of five years. The five years covered by this project were the calendar years 1905 to 1909, inclusive. Funds were also appropriated and maintenance was performed in calendar years 1911, 1912, 1913 and 1915, inclusive. There is at present no approved project for the improvement of this harbor. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Dock facilities are considered adequate for existing recreational traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $60,384. A contract was awarded and completed for repairs to the North and South Pier and Revetment at a cost of $1,956,296. Engineering and design during construction cost $2,198. A contract was also awarded and completed for maintenance dredging at a cost of $32,552 removing approximately 5,224 cubic yards of shoal material by hydraulic dredge. Engineering, design, surveys, real estate, supervision and administration cost $106,777. Existing project was completed in 1909. Varying depths of 5- 12 feet exist in the channel at present. Future maintenance of the harbor will be based on providing a 9-foot depth. Piers and revetments are in good condition with some sections in need of major repair. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $4,083,366. 3. ASHLAND HARBOR, WI Location. At head of Chequamegon Bay, on south shore of Lake Superior, about 65 miles east of Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14974.) Existing project. A west channel 20 and 21 feet deep and an east basin 25 and 27 feet deep, both all protected by an 8,000- foot breakwater. For additional details see page 1008 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Ashland owns 4,150 feet of waterfront for future public needs. Wharves for handling coal, ore, limestone, logs and pulpwood are served by railroads. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Handling of ore and logs has been discontinued for the present. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $24,006. Breakwater repairs were performed by the derrickbarge COLEMAN at a cost of $57,357. Supervision and administration cost $1,589. Work authorized prior to 1960 Act was completed in 1950. Work authorized by 1960 Act was completed in November 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $4,763,421, of which $1,695,645 was for new work and $3,067,776 for maintenance. 4. AU SABLE HARBOR AT AU SABLE RIVER (OSCODA), MI Location. The Au Sable River and Village of Oscoda, MI are on west shore of Lake Huron, 8 miles north of Au Sable 21-2 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Point, northeast limit of Saginaw Bay. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Previous project. For details see pages 336 and 2453 of Annual Report for 1892. Existing project. Riprapping outer 200 feet of north pier at mouth of Au Sable River, dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep and dredging between piers and upstream to State highway bridge 10 feet deep. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several small timber pile wharfs used primarily by commercial fishermen and pleasure craft operators; also a private marina basin east of U.S. Highway 23 Bridge. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $10,437. The contract awarded last FY for repair of Breakwater Cell Caps was completed at a cost of $41,481. Engineering and design during construction, surveys, supervision and administration cost $9,415. Existing project was completed in 1962. Total cost for existing project to the end of FY was $2,781,341, of which $209,776 was for new work (includes $16,400 contributed funds) and $2,571,565 for maintenance. 5. BAY PORT HARBOR, MI Location. On Wild Fowl Bay on east shore of Saginaw Bay about 10 miles south of Caseville, Mich. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 14863.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide extending 5,750 feet from 6-foot contour in Saginaw Bay to intersection of private service channels to be dredged by local interests. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several small wharves used primarily by commercial fishermen. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and environmental studies were performed by Government forces at a cost of $24,609. Engineering and design for a maintenance dredging contract to be awarded next FY cost $24,737. Existing project was completed in 1967. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $215,672, of which $93,597 was for new work and $122,075 for maintenance. 6. BIG SUAMICO RIVER, WI Location. A small stream which flows easterly into Green Bay, an arm of Lake Michigan. Mouth of the river is about 8 miles north of Green Bay Harbor, and about 44 miles southwesterly from Menominee Harbor, MI and WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 14910.) Existing project. An entrance channel 8 feet deep which extends from that depth in Green Bay to 1,800 feet above the river mouth, with widths of 100 feet in bay and 60 feet in river; total length of channel is about 3,700 feet. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Small private wharves along lower 1.5 miles of river, used by local fishing interests. Ample space is available for additional fishing wharves when required. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $13,040. The contract for maintenance dredging awarded last FY was completed at a cost of $379,601. Cost incurred included Confined Disposal Site Construction and Preparation and removing 32,635 cubic yards of material. Surveys, supervision and administration cost $57,344. Existing project was completed in 1938. Dredging channel was started in September 1938 and completed in November 1938. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $790,429 of which $20,243 was for new work and $770,186 for maintenance. 7. BLACK RIVER (PORT HURON), MI Location. This river has its source in the northern part of Sanilac County, MI, is about 60 miles long, and flows in a southeasterly direction into the St. Clair River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14852.) Previous project. For details see page 1441 of Annual Report for 1916, and page 1554 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel 20 feet deep from deep water in St. Clair River to the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge, 160 feet wide at the mouth, decreasing to 100 feet, about 800 feet from the mouth, thence 100 feet wide for 2,600 feet, decreasing to 75 feet for a distance of 4,800 feet; widening two bends to 100 feet, one at the foot of 12th Street, and the other below the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge; for a settling basin 75 feet wide and 20 feet deep, beginning at the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge in Port Huron and extending upstream a distance of about 2,300 feet; and then for a distance of 2.6 miles as a 100-foot wide river channel, 8 feet deep to the I-94 bridge where it decreases to 6 feet deep and continues to the vicinity of the Black River Drainage Canal with suitable widening where required at bends in the channel. The project modification authorized by the Act of August 30, 1935, is considered to be inactive and is excluded from the foregoing cost for new work. The cost of this modification was last revised in 1954 and was estimated to be $194,000 exclusive of $194,000 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are docks on both sides of Black River, near its mouth, and between these docks and the upper limit of improvement there are 5 other docks varying in length from 100 to 500 feet. All docks are privately owned and are restricted to the use of the owners. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Public recreational boating facilities constructed by the State and local agencies are available, as are privately owned and operated marinas. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $27,980. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging to be performed by contract next FY cost $38,891. Supervision and administration and real estate cost $2,235. 21-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 All work, except that authorized by Act of August 30, 1935, and the latest modification, has been completed. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $1,430,125, of which $830,165 was for new work (includes $349,921 contributed funds) and $599,960 for maintenance. 8. BLACK RIVER HARBOR (UPPER PENINSULA), MI Location. At mouth of Black River on south shore of Lake Superior 39 miles westerly from Ontonagon, MI, and 47 miles easterly from Ashland, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Existing project. Two converging breakwaters, an entrance channel between breakwaters, an inner channel, and an irregular harbor basin. For additional details see page 1092 of Annual Report for 1966. Project depths are 12 feet in the approach channel and 8 feet in the river channel and basin. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests furnished easements on 0.85 acre of land. Terminal facilities. Wharves constructed on both sides of river. Wharf on east bank has frontage of 400 feet; on west bank, a frontage of 750 feet. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and environmental studies were performed by Government forces at a cost of $5,318. An adjustment of -$17,055 and -5,046 cubic yards was made to the maintenance dredging contract completed last FY. Supervision and administration cost $9,257. Project was completed in June 1958. A triangular-shaped rock shoal 50 feet wide at easterly end extends along southerly side of channel. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $1,094,743, of which $383,350 was for new work and $711,393 for maintenance. 9. BOLLES HARBOR, MI Location. On west shore of Lake Erie at mouth of La Plaisance Creek, 7 miles southwest of Monroe, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14846.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel in Lake Erie, 8 feet deep and 80 feet wide from deep water to a point opposite the outer end of existing jetty, thence widening to 100 feet at creek mouth; an access channel in La Plaisance Creek, 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide at the mouth widening to 120 feet and extending to the first bend, thence narrowing to 50 feet wide and continuing at that width to the La Plaisance Road bridge; a steel sheet pile revetment, about 200 feet long, located along Michigan State Conservation Department property on west side of channel at creek mouth. Project also provides for inclusion of existing 400-foot long steel sheet pile jetty constructed by Michigan State Waterways Commission at the mouth of La Plaisance Creek. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Monroe Boat Club and three marinas provide facilities adequate for existing recreational boat traffic. There is also a public launching ramp and parking area at Conservation Department fishing site at creek mouth. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $24,673. An adjustment of -$16,383 was made to the FY 87 maintenance dredging contract terminated for default in FY 88. The contract for maintenance dredging awarded last FY was completed removing 13,837 cubic yards of material at a cost of $119,941. Surveys, supervision and administration cost $13,401. The existing project was completed in 1970 (Adequate depths exist over the project length except for the upstream 800 feet). Total cost for existing project to the end of FY was $3,286,723, of which $426,413 was for new work (includes $255,000 contributed funds) and $2,860,310 for maintenance. 10. CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 276 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 75 miles northerly from Frankfort, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14942.) Existing project. A channel 24 feet deep in Lake Michigan and a river channel 23 feet deep in the lower and upper channels connecting Lake Michigan with Lake Charlevoix via Round Lake. The channels are protected where needed by piers and revetments. For additional details see page 1476 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Section 25 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 provides authorization pertaining to the South Pier to Charlevoix Harbor. It states, "The Secretary shall take such action as may be necessary to restore recreational uses established prior to May 1, 1988, or provide comparable recreational uses at the South Pier to Charlevoix Harbor project, Charlevoix, Michigan, in order to mitigate any adverse impact on recreational uses resulting from reconstruction of the South Pier.. ." Local cooperation. None required except the latest project modification is subject to the following: Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the modified project upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of excavated materials and any necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments, therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and maintenance of the modified project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide and maintain without cost to the United States depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with the depths provided in the related project areas; accomplish, without cost to the United States, such alterations of submarine utility crossing as are required by the modified project; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the harbor by users thereof which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; if acquiring lands, easements and rights-of-way for construction of the project, local interests will comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970; Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971; contribute all costs in excess of $1,000,000 should the total cost of construction of the general navigation facilities exceed that amount, in accordance with provisions of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. The total first cost of construction (1975) is estimated at $652,000. 21-4 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Terminal facilities. Several small landing places in Round Lake at Charlevoix for handling fish and miscellaneous commodities, a wharf for petroleum products at west end of Lake Charlevoix, and coal wharves at Advance and Boyne City. Charlevoix, Boyne City, and East Jordan provide public docks for small craft. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $95,833. The U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC performed removal of obstructions along channel limits at a cost of $53,891. Repairs to safety features were performed by hired labor at a cost of $2,647. The contract awarded last FY for repair of the South Pier and Revetment, Sections A & F, was completed at a cost of $1,265,491. Engineering and design during construction, surveys, real estate, supervision and administration cost $110,199. Existing project was completed in 1939 except for the latest modification. A controlling depth of 18 feet is available throughout the entire project, except for minor shoaling along the channel limits. Total cost for existing project to the end of FY was $9,218,882, of which $180,623 was for new work, $7,908,863 for maintenance (Bank Stabilization $46,352) and $1,129,396 for rehabilitation. 11. CLINTON RIVER, MI Location. Has its source in Oakland County, MI, flows easterly about 60 miles and empties into Anchor Bay in northwestern part of Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14850). Previous project. For details see page 1958 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1556 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel in Anchor Bay 8 feet deep, 300 feet wide at 8-foot depth contour in the bay, gradually decreasing to 50 feet wide at about 1,000 feet upstream from mouth of Clinton River, a length of about 4,600 feet; a channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide in the river about 38,700 feet long from entrance channel upstream to Mt. Clemens at Cass Avenue; closing old channel and making a cutoff at Shoemakers Bend; closing Catfish Channel; construction of revetments as needed in the river; and a harbor basin, 5 feet deep and 11 acres in area at entrance along bay channel, protected by breakwaters on north and south sides. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. River is used exclusively by recreational craft. There are numerous public and private piers and wharves along the river below the city. They are considered adequate. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $57,968. Maintenance of disposal area was performed by hired labor at a cost of $277. Engineering and design for a maintenance dredging contract deferred to perform more critical work cost $44,651. Engineering and design for construction of off-loading platform to be performed by contract next FY cost $23,232. Supervision and administration cost $431. The contract for construction of a confined disposal facility was completed at a cost this FY of $852,698. Surveys and layouts, engineering and design during construction cost $18,488. Supervision and administration for Dike Disposal cost $238,191. Existing project was completed in 1966. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $5,703,081, of which $549,798 was for new work (includes $289,752 contributed funds) and $5,153,283 for maintenance. 12. DETOUR HARBOR, MI Location. On the west side of DeTour Passage, about 2 miles upstream from Lake Huron. The passage forms the mouth of the St. Marys River which connects Lakes Huron and Superior. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14882.) Existing project. Provides for small boat harbor and harbor of refuge by dredging a 10-foot deep entrance channel and providing an 8-foot deep access channel protected by a 1,305-foot breakwater. The total estimated (October 1981) project cost is $2,650,000; the Federal cost is $1,400,000 and the non-Federal cost is $1,250,000, which is a cash contribution. (See Table 21- B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Public docking, landing, parking and sanitary facilities are being provided by the State of Michigan. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $9,245. An adjustment of $381 was made to the contract completed last FY for repair of the Breakwater. Supervision and administration cost $90. Existing project is complete. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $2,695,606, of which $2,559,346 was for new work and $136,260 for maintenance. 13. DETROIT RIVER, MI Location. One of the Great Lakes connecting channels, 31 miles long, flows south from Lake St. Clair to Lake Erie. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14848.) Previous project. For details see page 1958 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1541 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Improving Detroit River main channels to provide 25.5-foot draft navigation; improving certain auxiliary and side channels; and construction of various water level and crosscurrent control structures. Details are in accompanying Table 21-H. Project depths are referred to local low water datum planes which correspond to low water datums for Lakes St. Clair and Erie, 571.7 and 568.6 feet above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec (International Great Lakes Datum - 1955.) (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Estimated 1978 Federal cost of new work, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects, is $159,300,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. No local cooperation is required for modifications authorized by Acts of July 1946 and March 1956. The Trenton Channel modification approved August 13, 1968, is considered inactive. Terminal facilities. Numerous commercial installations used for handling coal, iron ore, limestone, steel products, petroleum products, and other items such as overseas general cargo. Detail on actual port and harbor facilities is in Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 21-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, Hi-Fix surveys, real estate, environmental studies, support of water control center, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $1,244,961. Maintenance of disposal area was performed by hired labor at a cost of $90,170. Location and removal of obstructions cost $1,647,907. An adjustment of -$5,167 was made to the contract for repair of the diked disposal facility at Pte. Mouillee completed last FY. A maintenance dredging contract at Pte. Mouillee Access Channel was awarded and completed this FY removing approximately 49,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $645,399. Engineering, design and surveys cost $41,691. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging East Outer and Lower Livingstone channels to be performed by contract next FY cost $23,161. Supervision and administration cost $20,926. Under the Dike Disposal Program an adjustment of $764,999 was made to the FY 78 Pointe Mouillee Disposal Site Phase II contract. Supervision and administration for dike disposal was $571. Latest modification of connecting channels project in the Detroit River is complete except for compensating works. Pertinent data concerning channels covered by project at end of FY are set forth in Table 21-H. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $202,336,328, of which $76,877,357 was for new work ($75,346,669 regular funds and $1,530,688 Public Works Funds) and $125,458,971 (includes $361,235 Section 150 contributed funds) for maintenance. 14. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN AND WI Location. At extreme western end of Lake Superior. Cities of Duluth, MN, and Superior, WI, are on north and south sides, respectively. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14975.) Previous projects. See page 1246 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Provides for rebuilding canal piers at Duluth entry, replacement or construction of piers and breakwater at Superior entry and dredging approaches and channels within harbor, St. Louis Bay, and St. Louis River. Channels vary in depth from 32 to 28 feet in entrances, are 27 feet deep in iron-ore route channels, and are from 20 to 23 feet in inner channels. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) For details of authorized channel dimensions and dimensions of structures, see pages 1246 and 1247 of Annual Report for 1962 and page 1011 of Annual Report for 1965. Portion of project for deepening Twenty-first Avenue West channel is inactive. Estimated cost (1967) of this portion was $577,000. The Water Resources Development Act (W.R.D.A.) of 1986 authorized modifications to the project to deepen the western portions of North and South Channels, the entire Upper Channel, and the Minnesota Channel to 27 feet LWD; widen the Cross Channel to provide a minimum turning basin of 1,500 feet; widen the bend at the Arrowhead Bascule Bridge to 600 feet; and construct an upland confined disposal facility. Estimated cost (Oct. 88) is $13,180,000; which includes $7,068,000 Federal and $6,112,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the W.R.D.A. of 1986 (P.L. 99-662), are as described in House Document 150, 86th Congress, 1st Session, and also includes, as a result of P.L. 99-662, construction cost sharing as follows: a. Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $2,350,000. The estimated cash contribution of $2,350,000 to be paid in lump sum prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; and b. Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $940,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution for lands, easements, rights-of-way, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost. Terminal facilities. There are 113 docks or terminals including some 54 major ones; all but one are privately owned. Facilities for handling iron ore, coal, limestone, petroleum, steel and scrap iron, cement, general cargo, and grain are believed adequate for most existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Rehabilitation: Miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $6,053. Engineering and design, supervision and inspection for the rehabilitation of North and South Piers Sections 0, N-1, N and M contract completed last FY cost $12,277. Maintenance: Condition surveys, master plan, environmental studies, support of water control center, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $630,709. Operation and maintenance of the museum was performed by Government forces at a cost of $348,231. Operation and maintenance of service facilities and pier was performed at a cost of $93,981. A Commercial Activities Program study for the Visitor's Center cost $23,954. Repairs to Superior entry breakwater and seawalls were performed by the Derrickbarge COLEMAN at a cost of $170,728. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $13,446. An adjustment of $55,584 and 9,373 cubic yards was made to a maintenance dredging contract awarded in FY 87 and completed last FY. The contract for maintenance dredging awarded last FY was completed with approximately 126,499 cubic yards removed this FY at a cost of $925,491. A contract for maintenance dredging of contaminated materials was awarded this FY in the amount of $1,395,200. The contract is approximately 13% complete at a cost of $181,999. Cost incurred this FY was for mobilization, site preparation at Erie Pier and removing approximately 17,927 cubic yards of material. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $240,827. Work authorized prior to 1960 Act was completed in June 1956. Under the 1960 Act, work on the outer harbor, included in House Document 150, was completed in June 1965. Work in the inner harbor, included in House Document 196, started in May 1963, was completed in November 1968 except for 21st Avenue West channel portion which is inactive. The United States owns 34.90 acres of land in fee in Minnesota and Wisconsin of which 2.15 acres are used for a vessel yard. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $72,550,767, of which $16,109,258 was for new work, $45,490,636 for maintenance, and $10,950,873 for rehabilitation. 21-6 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 15. EAGLE HARBOR, MI Location. On the south shore of Lake Superior on the North Face of Keweenaw Point, 31 miles northeasterly from the Upper Entrance to Keweenaw Waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14964.) Existing project. Provides for a short entrance channel, a guide pier marking the entrance on the west side, and a harbor basin. Project depths are 14 feet in the entrance channel and 12 feet in the harbor basin. For additional details see page 1182 of Annual Report for 1959. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. An old Lshaped timber wharf is available but is in poor condition. A dock and launching ramp constructed by the State is located on the north side of the Harbor Basin. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $1,711. Minor repairs to navigation structures were performed by hired labor at a cost of $237. The original project was completed in 1879. The modification for a small boat harbor was completed in 1959. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $293,058, of which $205,164 was for new work and $87,894 for maintenance. 16. FOX RIVER, WI Location. Rises in Columbia County, WI, and flows about 176 miles northerly into Green Bay. Wolf River, physically a main river but by designation a tributary of Fox River, rises in central part of Fort County, WI, and flows southerly. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14916 for Lake Winnebago and lower Fox River.) Previous projects. See page 1368 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Deepening and widening channel of Fox River from De Pere 7 miles above mouth to confluence of Wolf River, a total length of 59 miles, to 6 feet, with 9.6 feet in rock cut below De Pere lock and 7 feet in other rock cuts on lower river below Menasha lock; construction and reconstruction of 19 locks and 9 dams; a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna; construction and maintenance of harbors having depths of 6 feet on Lake Winnebago; widening Neenah Channel to 100 feet, with a 6-foot depth for about 1 mile; and dredging, snagging, and otherwise improving Wolf River 47 miles from its mouth to New London, depth to be 4 feet. Cost of completed portion of project is $513,424 for the lower river exclusive of previous projects. River and Harbor Act of 1925 portion of project is considered inactive and excluded from cost estimate. Estimated cost (1924) of this portion is $2,886,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Wharf and landing facilities are, in general, adequate for existing needs. (See Table 21-I on locks and dams, Fox River, WI.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports, safety training and plans for flood emergencies were performed at a cost of $44,956. Federal canal banks at various locations were repaired at a cost of $33,215. Pier repairs were performed at De Pere Dam at a cost of $70,324. Scour protection stone was placed below Menasha Dam at a cost of $42,200. Sediment sampling was performed at random sites at a cost of $30,104. An archaeological study for disposal was undertaken, totaling $36,913. The operation and maintenance of nine (9) dams and ten (10) overflow weirs and caretaker status maintenance of seventeen (17) locks and two (2) guard locks totaled $567,857. Retroactive pay in the amount of $53,950 was paid to cover lock and dam employees who were, from FY 1980 - FY 1988, paid at a lower pay scale than laws required. Fox River O.S.H.A. Program and major miscellaneous items of supply totaled $4,580. Water control studies, monitoring and regulation of water levels were performed at a cost of $228,280. Engineering and design costs were $28,073. Supervision and administration costs were $215,102. Existing project is complete except for the inactive portion. Nineteen original locks and nine original dams have been rebuilt. (See Table 21-I for year of completion of each). Structures and dredging in pools have increased original depths generally about 2 feet. Work remaining to complete project consists of dredging in upper portion of Wolf River, and rock removal and deepening of Neenah Channel on lower Fox River, which are no longer considered necessary. Existing locks and dams are generally in fair to good condition. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $44,780,449, of which $3,753,334 was for new work and $41,027,115 for operation and maintenance. Funds in the amount of $3,706,187 were expended between July 5, 1884, and June 30, 1935, on operation and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 17. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 204 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 28 miles northerly from Manistee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907). Existing project. Provides for constructing an exterior basin in Lake Michigan formed by two breakwaters, 450 feet apart at the outer ends, diverging at an angle of about 90 degrees, the main arm and shore connection on north breakwater are 972 and 1,000 feet long, respectively, and the main arm and shore connection of south breakwater 1,188 and 1,400 feet long, respectively; for removing 801 feet of north and 1,172 feet of south pier; dredging basin 20 feet deep and 800 feet wide at entrance, decreasing toward new pier heads to 600 feet wide, dredging approach and entrance channel through outer basin to a depth of 24 feet from deep water in Lake Michigan to a point 500 feet landward of opening between breakwaters, over the entire width outside the breakwaters and to a maximum width of 500 feet inside the breakwaters; thence to 23 feet deep through inner portion of outer basin to outer end of north pier, over widths decreasing from 500 to 160 feet; and thence to 22 feet deep between the piers to the inner basin in Lake Betsie; dredging an 18-foot deep interior basin in Lake Betsie from within 50 feet of existing structures on the west and extending eastward about 1,550 feet to easterly boundary and from within 50 feet of existing structures on the north and extending southward 800 feet to the southerly boundary; dredging a recreational craft anchorage area 10 feet deep and 300 feet wide, extending 600 feet eastward of the east limit of the interior basin, with its north side in line with the north limit of the basin. Breakwaters and shore connections are built of concrete caissons and piling capped with concrete. Inner piers and revetments are built of stonefilled timber cribs and piling, all capped with concrete, except for 476 feet of south revetment which consists of steel sheet piling. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 21-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two car ferry slips on south shore and several docks along north shore of Lake Betsie. The City and State provide a recreational docking facility on north side of Lake Betsie which is open to all on equal terms. There is also a marine railway capable of handling small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $26,889. Repairs to North and South Breakwater, Sections A, B, C and D, and South Revetment, Sections O and P were performed using the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $48,699. Supervision and administration cost $4,772. Existing project was completed in 1939, with exception of the latest modification which was completed in 1969. Navigation structures are in good condition and programmed for major repair on an as needed basis. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1474 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $9,962,726, of which $1,955,159 (includes $31,709 contributed funds) was for new work, $7,732,791 for maintenance, and $274,776 for rehabilitation. 18. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR AND GRAND RIVER, MI Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan. 108 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 23 miles northerly from Holland, MI. River rises in Jackson County, MI, and flows 260 miles westerly into Lake Michigan. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14933, and Geological Survey Grand Rapids quadrangle). Previous project. For details see page 1949 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1481 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel protected by parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Grand River, a deep draft channel in river extending to Spring Lake, a turning basin, and a shallow draft channel in river extending 14.5 miles upstream to Bass River. Project depths are 23 feet in entrance channel, 21 feet in river to turning basin, 18 feet in turning basin and channel to Spring Lake, and 8 feet in upper Grand River channel. For additional details see page 1461 of Annual Report for 1962. Dredging on northerly side of inner channel is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $38,600. The Water Resources Development Act (W.R.D.A.) of 1986 authorized modifications to deepen the harbor entrance and river channels to 29 and 27 feet, respectively; and provides for a new and larger turning basin. Estimated cost (Oct. 88) is $18,700,000, which includes $10,950,000 Federal and $7,750,000 non-Federal. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portions of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the W.R.D.A. of 1986 (P.L. 99-662), are as described in House Document 661, 76th Congress, 3d Session, and also includes, as a result of P.L. 99-662, construction cost sharing requirements as follows: a. Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $3,650,000. The estimated cash contribution of $3,650,000 to be paid in lump sum, prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; and b. Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $1,460,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution of lands, easements, rights-of way, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost. Terminal facilities. Several wharves exist for handling coal, limestone, sand and gravel, petroleum products, fish and miscellaneous commodities. There is also a car ferry slip which is inactive. The State and local agencies provide recreational boating facilities which are open to all on equal terms. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $240,918. The U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC performed repairs to the South Pier, Sections K, J, J-1, and I at a cost of $101,481. Minor repairs to navigation structures by hired labor cost $4,221. The contract awarded last FY for maintenance dredging of the inner harbor was completed at a cost of $393,297, removing approximately 104,909 cubic yards of dredged material. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging at a cost of $107,136. Approximately 15,359 cubic yards of shoal material was removed from the outer harbor. This contract was also for beach nourishment. Engineering, design, surveys, real estate, supervision and administration cost $146,849. Environmental studies in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 were performed at a cost of $18,947. Beach nourishment in conjunction with above maintenance dredging contract cost $39,626. Supervision and administration cost for Section 111 was $1,806. Existing project was substantially completed in 1949. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1463 of Annual Report for 1982. Structures are generally in good condition; repairs are made on an as needed basis. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $27,703,415, of which $1,458,469 was for new work, $25,431,333 for maintenance, and $813,613 for rehabilitation. 19. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior, 93 miles west of Sault Ste. Marie, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14962.) Existing project. Provides for a channel protected by parallel piers and for closing natural entrance channel with a pile dike. Project depths are 18 feet between piers and 20 feet in lake approach. For additional details see page 1449 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Several small piers, a Coast Guard Station, and a small boat pier and launching ramp built by the State of Michigan provide facilities adequate for present traffic. 21-8 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $5,643. Existing project is complete except for widening a portion of channel from 250 to 300 feet. Project now being maintained to 19 and 15 feet below I.G.L.D. in lieu of 20 and 18 feet which is adequate for current usage. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $2,774,534, of which $1,055,871 was for new work and $1,718,663 for maintenance. 20. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MN Location. On north shore of Lake Superior, 106 miles northeasterly from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14967.) Existing project. Provides breakwater piers to narrow the entrance; concrete seawalls across ledge at southeast corner of harbor; an anchorage area and a small-boat basin protected by a rubblemound breakwater. Project depths are 16 feet in anchorage area increasing to 20 feet near entrance and 8 feet in small-boat basin. For additional details see page 1014 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two inactive pulpwood wharves and several fish wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $10,909. Existing project is complete. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $3,672,924, of which $450,972 was for new work, $1,991,952 for maintenance, and $1,230,000 for rehabilitation. 21. GRAND TRAVERSE BAY HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Traverse River on eastern shore of Keweenaw Peninsula about 20 miles northeasterly from Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14964.) Existing project. Provides two parallel piers, an entrance channel between piers and a harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet between piers and 10 feet in basin. Project area extended 200 feet upstream in 1966. For additional details see page 1015 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests furnished easements on 5.1 acres of land. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned fishing wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $7,688. Repairs to N. Breakwater Section A were performed by the Cranebarge MARKUS at a cost of $22,068. Existing project was completed in 1950 except for extension of north pier completed in 1964. Steel cells and piers are in good condition. Total cost of existing project to end of FY was $1,995,690, of which $266,037 was for new work and $1,729,653 for maintenance. 22. GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI Location. At mouth of Fox River, at head of Green Bay, about 180 miles from Milwaukee, WI, via Sturgeon Bay Canal, and about 49 miles southwest of Menominee Harbor, MI, and WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14918.) Previous projects. See page 1366 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual Report, Table 30-C, p. 30-30. For more detailed description of project see page 1216 of Annual Report for 1963. Cost of completed portion of project is $9,335,000 Federal, and non-Federal cost is $490,000 including $100,000 contributed funds. Local interests requested that the inactive portion of the 1962 River and Harbor Act, consisting of dredging the reach from 150 feet downstream of the C.&N.W. Railway Bridge to 1,700 feet upstream of this bridge, be reactivated and the authorization modified to include deepening the adjacent turning basin and modifying the C.&N.W. Railway Bridge to provide increased horizontal clearance. Estimated cost of this portion (1988) is $5,560,000; $3,614,000 Federal and $1,946,000 non-Federal which includes $1,390,000 local contribution. Section 601c of the Water Resources Development Act (W.R.D.A.) of 1986 authorized deepening the Fox River Channel, Green Bay, WI, to 27 feet. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for existing project. Terminal facilities. There are 16 wharves for handling coal, petroleum products, cement, limestone, general overseas cargo and miscellaneous commodities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $458,885. Minor maintenance of the disposal area was performed by hired labor at a cost of $910. The contract for maintenance dredging the Outer Bay Portion awarded in FY 87 was completed removing 44,865 cubic yards of material at a cost this FY of $1,026,225. The contract for maintenance dredging the Fox River and Outer Channel awarded last FY was completed at a cost of $959,319. Cost incurred this FY included clearing of trees at Bayport Disposal Area and removing 105,544 cubic yards of material. A contract was awarded this FY for maintenance dredging Inner Channel with Disposal in Bayport in the amount of $597,690. No work was performed this FY. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $358,596. Engineering and design for construction of a confined disposal facility cost $402. Existing project is complete. The 1962 modification was started in November 1966 and completed in September 1973, except for dredging the reach from 150 feet downstream of the C.&N.W. Railway Bridge to 1,700 feet upstream of this bridge. Dredging of the turning basin above Chicago & Northwestern Railway Bridge was commenced in August 1938. The turning basin was enlarged under authority of Section 5 of the River and Harbor Act of March 4, 1915, in order to provide sufficient area for the large ships that use it. The work was performed as part of a maintenance dredging contract in September and October 1973. East revetment at Grassy Island was entirely removed in July 1935. Dredging Fox River and 21-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 entrance channel to Tail Point Light was completed in September 1967. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $39,349,237, of which $38,408,437 were regular funds and $940,800 Public Works funds; $9,946,395 for new work and $29,402,842 for maintenance. The new work cost does not include $100,000 contributed funds. 23. HARBOR BEACH HARBOR, MI Location. On west shore of Lake Huron about 60 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Harbor of refuge protected by three breakwaters; a main entrance 23 feet deep; and an anchorage area 21 feet deep. For additional details see page 1485 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Coal and limestone are received at a private wharf. In addition, there is a public recreational craft pier, a Coast Guard pier, and several small installations engaged in docking and servicing light-draft commercial and recreational vessels. These facilities satisfy current commerce and traffic requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $19,714. The contract awarded in FY87 for repair of the Main Breakwater, Phase I, was completed at a cost of $252,995. Engineering and design for the second phase of repairing the Main Breakwater continued at a cost of $62,993. Real estate and supervision and administration cost $27,358. Existing project was completed in 1928. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1485 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $10,952,873, of which $1,200,598 was for new work, $9,557,771 for maintenance, and $194,504 for rehabilitation. 24. HEARDING ISLAND INLET, DULUTH, MN Location. In Duluth Harbor, which is at the extreme western end of Lake Superior. The city of Duluth, MN is on the north side. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14975.) Existing Project. Hearding Island was formed by placement of dredged material in 1934 while deepening the Duluth-Superior Harbor. The Hearding Island Inlet is within the existing harbor line; however, it is outside of the Congressionally authorized Federal project at Duluth. Hearding Island Inlet is a 750-foot channel, 75 feet wide and 5 feet deep below Low Water Datum. Section 22 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 authorized dredging the Inlet to increase water circulation and reduce stagnant water conditions, at a total cost of $500,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 25. HOLLAND HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan 95 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 23 miles southerly from Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14932.) Previous project. For details see page 1948 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1478 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An outer breakwater protected approach channel in Lake Michigan, an entrance channel to Lake Macatawa protected by piers and revetments, a channel through Lake Macatawa into Black River, and a turning basin. Project depths are 23 feet in outer portion of approach channel decreasing to 21 feet at outer end of inner piers, 21 feet to upper end of project, and 18 feet in turning basin. For additional details see page 1458 of Annual Report for 1962. Widening bend of entrance channel into Lake Macatawa is in an active category as a result of a reclassification recommendation approved by the Office of the Chief of Engineers on August 20, 1981. Estimated cost of this portion (1988) is $2,517,000, Federal and $1,355,000 non-Federal which includes $1,248,000 local contribution. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portions of project. Work authorized by Act of 1954 is subject to condition that work on either or both proposed modifications may be undertaken by the United States provided local interests furnish all lands except 1.5 acres of Federal lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable spoil disposal areas for initial work and future maintenance; remove buildings and other structures, except existing revetments, from lands to be furnished; and hold the United States free from damages. Terminal facilities. Wharves are at inner end of Lake Macatawa, and used for handling coal, building materials, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. Two shipbuilding yards are on south shore of the lake. Holland provides a public wharf for small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $191,559. Minor repairs to navigation structures by hired labor cost $14,634. The contract awarded last FY for repair of South Revetment, Sections J thru P, was completed at a cost of $2,870,137. Engineering and design during construction cost $24,565. A contract for maintenance dredging the inner harbor was awarded in the amount of $890,765. The contract is approximately 46.6% complete at a cost of $414,633, removing approximately 34,625 cubic yards of shoal material from the inner harbor. Another contract was awarded for maintenance dredging of the outer harbor and was completed at a cost of $86,970 removing approximately 16,100 cubic yards of dredge material. Engineering and design for major repairs to the remaining portion of South Revetment, Section P, was performed at a cost of $29,557. Engineering and design for major repairs to North and South Connector, Section Q, cost $48,157. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, supervision and administration cost $281,313. Condition surveys, environmental studies and real estate in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 were performed at a cost of $19,829. Existing project, with exception of widening bend in revetted entrance channel authorized by Act of September 3, 1954, was completed in 1957. For additional details on completion of existing project, see page 1460 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost of existing project to end of FY was $23,077,390, of which $1,392,827 was for new work ($1,180,502 regular funds, $176,620 for previous project and $35,705 contributed funds), $21,182,111 for maintenance, and $502,452 for rehabilitation. 26. THE INLAND ROUTE, MI Location. A series of interconnected lakes and streams stretching across northern tip of Lower Peninsula of Michigan, and extends from Conway near Lake Michigan to Cheboygan on Lake Huron; a distance of 35 miles. Crooked and Indian Rivers are connecting channels in the waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14886.) 21-10 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Existing project. Provides for a channel 30 feet wide and 5 feet deep, with necessary widening at bends, through Crooked and Indian Rivers, and Crooked, Burt, and Mullett Lakes, and from Conway (west end of Crooked Lake) to navigation lock at Cheboygan; in Pickerel Channel from Pickerel Lake to Crooked Lake. It also provides for suitable jetties at head of Indian River. The addition of a lock and dam was approved by the Chief of Engineers on September 2, 1964, to correct a design deficiency. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None exist for commercial cargo-handling along the Crooked and Indian Rivers. Numerous small privately owned timber piers and wharves, some equipped with covered boat wells for serving and storing recreational craft, have been constructed. Landings maintained by hotel and resort operators are open to the public for transfer of passengers. Public docks are at Conway and Oden on Crooked Lake; the Village of Indian River, Topinabee, and Mullett Lake Village on Mullett Lake; and at Cheboygan. About 30 highways dead end at the water's edge, permitting public access for various marine activities. Dock facilities are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The navigation lock was operated and maintained by the Village of Alanson at a cost of $46,721. In 1989, the lock was operated from April 17 through April 28 from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.; from April 29 through May 12 from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.; and, from May 13 through September 30 it was open from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Adjustments of $8,677 were made in cost to FY87 and FY88 navigation lock operations for repair services performed by the Village of Alanson. Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $8,463. The existing project was completed in 1958. The lock and dam was completed in FY 1968. For additional details see page 1382 of Annual Report for 1960. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $3,733,794, of which $918,222 was for new work (includes $148,000 contributed funds) and $2,815,572 for maintenance. 27. KENOSHA HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 35 miles south of Milwaukee and about 54 miles north of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous project. See page 1390 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. For detailed description see page 1237, Annual Report for 1963. Estimated (1986) Federal cost is $455,000 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects and $195,000 non-Federal which includes $155,000 local contribution. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three wharves used for miscellaneous foreign overseas commodities and autos, and also several fishing wharves. While these facilities are considered generally adequate for existing commerce, more efficient use of existing terminals and utilization of available frontage for development of additional terminals should be made. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $47,197. Repairs to S. Revetment, Section E and Confined Disposal Facility, Sections 2 and 3 were performed by the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $67,739. Engineering and design for repairs to Detached Breakwater - Section H to be performed by contract next FY continued at a cost of $96,699. Engineering and design for repair to confined disposal facility cost $4,231. Supervision and administration cost $16,968. Existing project is complete except for dredging 25-foot strips adjacent to the north and south piers which will be completed after rehabilitation of the piers. The north and south piers were completed in 1900 and the breakwater in 1909. The north pier is in excellent condition. The south pier and breakwater are in generally good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $11,348,891, of which $11,321,233 were regular funds and $27,658 Emergency Relief funds; $988,969 being for new work, $9,089,647 for maintenance, and $1,270,275 for rehabilitation. The new cost does not include $3,000 contributed funds. 28. KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan, about 105 miles north of Milwaukee, WI, and about 78 miles from Green Bay, via Sturgeon Bay Canal. Harbor is at mouth of Kewaunee River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14908.) Previous projects. See page 1375 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual Report, Table 30-C, p. 30-31. Costs of completed project are $603,021, Federal, and $9,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. Uncompleted portion (estimated $200,000-July 1965) of 1935 River and Harbor Act is considered inactive, and excluded from present cost estimate. The portion authorized by the 1960 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two car-ferry slips, a petroleum tank farm, a Corps of Engineers project office, and several fishing wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $134,456. Repairs to navigation structures were performed by hired labor at a cost of $1,625. Repair to diked disposal area was performed by hired labor at a cost of $1,751. An adjustment of $199 was made to the FY 87 contract completed last FY for repair of the N. Stub Pier, Section A. A contract for Emergency Maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY at a cost of $136,624. Cost incurred this FY included revising the disposal area and removing 6,819 cubic yards of material. A contract for Maintenance dredging the entire channel was awarded and completed this FY at a cost of $180,977 removing 53,679 cubic yards of material. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration were performed at a cost of $106,446. Active portion of existing project is complete. The north pier was completed in 1897 and the remaining portion is in generally good condition. Rehabilitation of the south pier was completed in June 1967. Construction of north breakwater and shore connection, except for a gap of 150 feet about 830 21-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 feet from shoreward end, and removal of outer 706.5 linear feet of north pier was commenced in September 1935 and completed in June 1937. Removed 500 linear feet of north pier in April/May 1963 and widened and deepened the adjacent channel in 1965. Outer end of the north pier was struck and severely damaged by car ferry vessel in October 1973 and a 24-foot section at outlet end was subsequently removed, thus reducing the structure to a length of 626 feet. Dredging entrance channel in interior basin to existing project depth was commenced in April and completed in October 1938. Kewaunee River is navigable to about 6.5 miles above mouth for craft drawing not more than 4 feet. Total cost of existing project to end of FY was $9,556,321, of which $758,333 was for new work ($338,333 regular and $420,000 Emergency Relief funds) $8,180,688 regular funds for maintenance and $617,300 regular funds for rehabilitation. 29. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI Location. In Lake Superior across Keweenaw Peninsula in upper peninsula of Michigan. The west entrance is 169 miles east of Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14972.) Existing project. A navigable channel, minimum width 300 feet, 25 miles long, partially natural and partially artificial, across Keweenaw Peninsula via Portage Lake. For details see page 1121 of Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) The uncompleted portion of the project for navigation at Keweenaw Waterway, Houghton County, MI, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of Aug. 30, 1935, Public Law 409, 73rd Congress, which consists of extending the lower entrance breakwater by 2,000 feet, including the necessary alteration or replacement of structures due to channel deepening, was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662-Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Six coal docks, a petroleum dock, and several general merchandise and miscellaneous wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Also present is a government constructed recreational area with facilities to include a picnic area and small boat landing range. Operations during the fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $85,353. The Derrickbarge COLEMAN performed breakwater repair at a cost of $216,729. The contract for major repair of Section F, North Revetment is approximately 77%7 complete at a cost this FY of $4,022,000. A contract was awarded for maintenance dredging in the amount of $653,300. No work was performed this FY. Engineering and design during construction for major repair of Section F, North Revetment cost $17,893. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging cost $35,824. Supervision and administration cost $186,939. An adjustment of $21,382 was made to the contract for construction of a confined disposal facility completed last FY. Preparation of O&M Manual, supervision and administration for Dike Disposal cost $8,767. Active portion of the project is complete. The flared revetment at the upper entry should be modified to restrict wave action from the stilling basin entrance. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $26,992,296, of which $5,974,141 was for new work, and $21,018,155 for maintenance. 30. LAC LA BELLE HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior on eastern shore of Keweenaw Peninsula, 41 miles northeasterly from Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway. Lac La Belle, Bete Grise Bay, and Mendota Ship Canal combine to form the harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14964.) Existing project. Provides for construction of two parallel piers at the entrance having lengths of 584 and 682 feet for north and south piers, respectively; for an entrance channel between the piers 50 feet wide and 12 feet deep, about 820 feet long with a flared approach; and for an inner canal 50 feet wide and 10 feet deep, about 730 feet long. For additional details see page 1039, Annual Report for 1964. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several small, privately owned wharves are available in the harbor for use of small craft engaged in fishing and recreational activities. A state owned dock for small craft is located at northwest corner of Lac La Belle Bay. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $22,797. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging cost $6,273. Removal of obstructions was performed by the Cranebarge MARKUS at a cost of $43,930. The existing project was completed in 1960. Controlling depths are about 11 feet in the approach channel and 10 feet in the inner channel. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $824,264, of which $269,270 was for new work and $554,994 for maintenance. 31. LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI CHANNELS Location. Lake St. Clair, a section of Great Lakes connecting channels, is an expansive shallow basin having a vessel track length of about 15 miles from mouth of St. Clair River to head of Detroit River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14850.) Previous project. For details see page 2882, Annual Report for 1896; pages 1957-58, Annual Report for 1915; and page 1539, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An improved channel through Lake St. Clair 800 feet wide, 27.5 feet deep, and about 14.5 miles long; extending from mouth of Southeast Bend cutoff channel at lower end of St. Clair River to head of Detroit River Channel. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. None Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, Hi-Fix surveys, support of Water Control Center, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $99,126. Maintenance of disposal area was performed by hired labor at a cost of $1,118. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $20,361,921, of which $7,675,357 was for new work ($6,666,762 regular funds and $1,008,595 Public Works Funds) and $12,686,564 for maintenance. 21-12 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 32. LELAND HARBOR, MI Location. A light-draft harbor on eastern shore of Lake Michigan at mouth of Carp River, about 40 miles north of Frankfort, MI, and 40 miles southwest of Charlevoix, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14912.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge consisting of a breakwater about 1,200 feet long, a protected anchorage and maneuver area about 3 acres in extent and 10 feet deep, a 12-foot deep flared approach channel decreasing in width to 90 feet, an existing south pier 440 feet long, a 35-foot long cellular extension to south pier, an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide extending to mouth of Carp River, and for elimination of existing north pier. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves on each side of river below the dam which is 400 feet above the river mouth. These wharves serve the local fishing interests and recreational craft. Public facilities are operated by the State and local agencies. All available dockage space is utilized. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $21,344. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging removing approximately 16,417 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $86,268. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $20,867. The existing project was completed in 1932 except for the 1962 authorization which was completed in 1967. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $2,977,575, of which $1,027,089 was for new work, $1,879,808 for maintenance and $70,678 for rehabilitation. 33. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI Location. On southwest shore of Lake Huron, 20 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Provides for two offshore breakwaters opening to the southeast and totaling about 2,400 feet long with provisions for recreational fishing on the main breakwater; an anchorage and maneuver area of about 5 acres, 8 feet deep; and a flared approach channel 10 feet deep, decreasing to 160 feet in width through the breakwaters. Project also provides for recreational fishing facilities. Estimated (1979) Federal cost for new work is $1,647,306 excluding $1,088,888 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation were furnished by Michigan Department of Natural Resources to the Secretary of the Army. The cash contribution was $1,088,888. Terminal facilities. An existing public fishing pier of open pile construction is not adequate for existing and prospective commerce. Complete boating facilities are planned by State and local agencies in connection with the harbor construction. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $18,783. Safety maintenance cost $1,172. Monitoring and environmental studies under Section 111 mitigation were performed at a cost of $20,450. The Beach nourishment contract awarded last FY was completed at a cost this FY of $347,174. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration under Section 11l cost $8,193. The existing project was completed during FY 1977. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $4,694,020, of which $3,107,192 (includes $1,088,888 contributed funds) was for new work and $1,586,828 for maintenance. 34. LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior 21 miles west of Whitefish Point and 30 miles east of Grand Marais, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14962.) Existing project. Provides for a small-craft harbor of refuge by dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep from Lake Superior into Little Lake, suitably protected by breakwaters and revetments. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Only terminal facility at project site consists of a public dock built by State of Michigan for light-draft craft. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $38,706. Design deficiency study continued at a cost of $16,929. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded and completed at a cost of $88,210, removing approximately 19,812 cubic yards of shoal material. Engineering, design, and supervision and administration cost $19,257. This project is considered complete; however, because of shifting sand, the harbor entrance shoals rapidly with the result that full project depth is not usually available. An analysis for the Deficiency Report was submitted to North Central Division in March 1978 and approved. The design deficiency letter report and Environmental Assessment, drafted in FY 87, were reviewed by NCD. A biological assessment on the Piping Plover was prepared, and we are presently awaiting comments from the Fish and Wildlife Service. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $3,911,768, of which $600,478 was for new work and $3,311,290 for maintenance. 35. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 156 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 67 miles northerly from Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14937.) Previous project. For details see page 1951 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1491 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 1307 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides for an exterior basin in Lake Michigan protected by north and south breakwaters, north breakwater is 1,800 feet long and south breakwater 1,700 feet long, 550 feet apart at outer ends, diverging at an angle of 90 degrees, with shore connections, 1,103 and 2,004 feet long, respectively; for dredging exterior basin to 18 feet deep with a maximum width of 1,500 feet; for a channel with a depth of 29 feet from deep water in Lake Michigan decreasing to 27 feet at the west end of the north pier, over a maximum width of 600 feet; thence a channel with a depth of 27 feet, over a minimum width of 230 feet with necessary widening at Pere Marquette 21-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Lake; and for inner piers and revetments, 1,649 feet long on north and sufficiently long on the south for turn at Pere Marquette Lake. The estimated (1977) Federal cost for new work is $8,250,000. Estimated total costs for local interests is $147,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Has been complied with. Terminal facilities. In addition to main terminal of Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., consisting of three car ferry slips, a wharf, and warehouses, there are several wharves which handle coal, limestone, and miscellaneous commodities. Facilities adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $62,606. An adjustment of $40,426 was made in cost to the repair of the North Breakwater, Sections A, B, and C, and South Breakwater performed last FY using the Cranebarge MANITOWOC. Maintenance of safety features was performed at a cost of $2,426. A contract was awarded in the amount of $388,800, for maintenance dredging. No work was performed this FY. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $26,725. Under the Section 111 program, surveys and monitoring, cost $2,769. Existing project was completed in 1918. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1469 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $20,446,484, of which $8,532,202 was for new work, $11,556,369 for maintenance, and $357,913 for rehabilitation. 36. MACKINAC ISLAND HARBOR, MI Location. On the southeast side of Mackinac Island which lies just east of the Straits of Mackinac, the connecting waterway between Lakes Michigan and Huron. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14881.) Existing project. Provides for the construction of two breakwaters 910 and 950 feet long from Mission and Biddle Points, respectively. The breakwaters are of rubblemound construction. Estimated (1969) Federal cost for new work is $230,000, excluding $105,000 to be contributed by local interest. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Consists of private piers used by small commercial vessels and light-draft passenger ferry boats. Facilities for recreational craft are provided by the State dock which is open to all on equal terms. These facilities satisfy current traffic requirements, however, they are usually hard pressed during the annual Chicago to Mackinac-Port Huron to Mackinac sailboat races. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $1,652. Close-out of the contract completed last FY for repair of Rubblemound, East Breakwater cost $622. The existing project was completed in 1967. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $2,146,133, of which $334,089 (includes $105,004 contributed funds) was for new work and $1,812,044 for maintenance. 37. MANISTEE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 179 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 26 miles northerly from Ludington, MI (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14938.) Previous project. For details see page 1952 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1493 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel in Lake Michigan protected by a breakwater, piers, and revetment; a channel in Manistee River to Manistee Lake; and Federal participation in cost of replacing Maple Street Bridge. Project depths are 25 feet in entrance channel and 23 feet in river channel. For additional details see page 1470 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Installations are on both sides of river and on Manistee Lake. Commerce handled includes coal, sand, salt, and general cargo. In addition, there is a Government wharf and a State and City owned recreational craft pier which is open to the public. These facilities satisfy current commerce requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $38,491. Repairs to the North Breakwater, Sections A and S and the South Breakwater, Sections B and B-1, were performed by the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $91,893. Repairs to safety features cost $40. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging at a cost of $262,919 removing approximately 72,292 cubic yards of material. Engineering and design for repair of the South Breakwater Sections M, N, O, 0-1 was completed at a cost of $3,509. Engineering, design, surveys, real estate and supervision and administration cost $61,350. Existing project was completed in August 1967. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1470 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $10,753,744, of which $2,696,522 was for new work, $6,683,058 for maintenance, and $1,374,164 for rehabilitation. 38. MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MI Location. On the north shore of Lake Michigan, 135 miles northeasterly from Green Bay Harbor, WI, and 220 miles northerly from Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14908.) Previous project. For details see page 1933 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1422 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A breakwater protected entrance channel in Lake Michigan, a channel in Manistique River, and a pier at river mouth. Project depths are 19 feet in outer portion of entrance channel, 18 feet in inner portion of entrance channel, and 18 feet in river channel. For additional details see page 1451 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A car ferry slip, two coal and building material wharves, two fishing wharves, and numerous lumberyard slips. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $18,197. Repairs to East Breakwater, Sections A and B and West Breakwater, Sections A, B, C, and D were performed by the U.S. Cranebarge MARKUS at a cost of $145,960. Repairs to safety features cost $1,006. Supervision and administration cost $3,803. 21-14 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $3,694,883, of which $1,299,355 was for new work, $2,079,195 for maintenance and $316,333 for rehabilitation. 39. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 79 miles north of Milwaukee and about 106 miles from Green Bay via Sturgeon Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) Previous projects. See page 1379 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The total estimated (Oct. 1981) project cost is $3,080,000; the Federal Cost is $1,085,000 and non-Federal cost is $1,995,000, which is a cash contribution. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C. For detailed description see page 1228 of Annual Report for 1963. Estimated costs (1970) of new work for 1968 modification are $81,000 Federal and $30,000 non-Federal which includes a cash contribution of $18,000. Work on the 1968 modification was postponed until 1982. The portion authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act is inactive and estimated (1970) at $1,150,000 Federal, and $105,000 non-Federal. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, June 26, 1979, and 720-foot channel extension reaffirmed in July 1982, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modifications. For 1968 modification local interests must make an annual cash contribution equivalent to 50�%/ of the annual costs associated with construction and maintenance of the channel extension until such time that a second user utilizes the channel extension. Such a contribution is presently estimated at $14,200; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of dredged materials, and the necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor or the costs of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent use, operation, and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide and maintain without cost to the United States adequate berthing areas at the docks adjacent to the improvement; accomplish at no cost to the United States all relocations and alterations of utilities necessary for the project; assume full responsibility for all project first costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $2,000,000; and comply with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970. Terminal facilities. Three car-ferry slips, a grain elevator, one shipbuilding yard, and three other wharves used for handling coal, building materials, cement, and miscellaneous commodities. While these facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce, it is believed the city should provide a suitable wharf with warehouse and railway connection open to the general public. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $40,546. Repairs to confined disposal facility - Sections J and K and N. Breakwater Section C were performed by the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $76,624. Supervision and administration were performed at a cost of $17,328. Existing project is completed except for the 1962 and 1968 modifications. The 1962 modification is inactive. Work on the 1968 modification was essentially completed in FY 83. The Federal modification, adopted July 15, 1985, included the expansion of the new entrance channel to the Section 107 project and extension of the rubblemound breakwater. The breakwater, completed in 1910, is in generally fair condition. Dredging a channel through the outer basin to existing project depth and removal of a portion of old north stub pier at the river entrance were completed in December 1937. Dredging river channel was completed in July 1942. Cost for existing project to end of FY was $12,595,054, of which $3,960,044 was for new work (includes $1,911,130 contributed funds) and $8,635,010 for maintenance. 40. MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI Location. In Marquette Bay on south shore of Lake Superior, 160 miles west of Sault Ste. Marie, MI, and 265 miles east from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14970.) Existing project. Provides for a breakwater, and a harbor basin 26.5 feet deep, giving a protected area of 350 acres. Project was modified in 1960 to provide a 27-foot depth in harbor area. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required for earlier authorizations. Fully complied with for the 1960 Act. Terminal facilities. One ore dock, unused at present; two coal docks; one petroleum dock; and three other unused docks. There are also several small fish wharves without railroad connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $7,810. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $3,756,506, of which $1,282,893 was for new work, $2,007,856 for maintenance and $465,757 for rehabilitation. 41. MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MI AND WI Location. On Lake Michigan at the mouth of the Menominee River on the western shore of Green Bay, 16 miles northwest of the mouth of Sturgeon Bay, and 49 miles northeast of Green Bay Harbor, about 155 miles from Milwaukee via Sturgeon Bay Canal. The river forms the boundary between the commercial harbors at Marinette, WI, and Menominee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14917.) Previous projects. See page 1361 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-26. For detailed description see page 1214, Annual Report for 1963. The portion authorized by 1960 River and Harbor Act is inactive and estimated (1964) at $442,000 Federal, and $105,000 non-Federal. Costs of completed new work exclusive of inactive work and amount expended on previous projects are $221,053 Federal and $50,762 non-Federal, which includes a cash contribution of $36,762. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. 21-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Terminal facilities. There are 9 wharves for handling coal, limestone, pulp and miscellaneous commodities. City of Marinette, WI, provided a public wharf. Facilities are considered fairly adequate for existing commerce, except that there is need for a public wharf owned by City of Menominee, with warehouse and railway connection. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $33,027. Repairs to S. Pier Sections A, B, C, D, E, F were performed by the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $60,018. Supervision and inspection cost $11,831. Engineering and design for site selection of a confined disposal facility cost $10,245. The project is effect prior to the modification of March 2, 1945, was completed in 1938. No additional work was necessary under the modification of March 2, 1945, to provide a depth of 12 feet in the extension of the channel to the vicinity of the Marinette Yacht Club, as project depth or more was available. The entrance piers were completed in 1884, were rehabilitated (1954-1964) and are in excellent condition. Dredging of the channel below the Marinette municipal wharf, together with enlarging the turning basin to existing project depth, was commenced in May 1938. Modification of the project authorized by the 1960 River and Harbor Act is inactive. Construction for the 1967 modifications was started August 17, 1968, and completed in October 1968. The cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,584,840, of which $570,238 was for new work (includes $36,762 contributed funds), $2,662,750 for maintenance and $1,351,852 for rehabilitation. 42. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 85 miles north of Chicago, IL, and about 83 miles west of Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14924.) Previous projects. See page 1385 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-26. For detailed description see page 1232 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed new work costs are $6,937,804 Federal and $478,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. The uncompleted portion authorized by the 1935 River and Harbor Act was placed in the inactive category in June 1973. Estimated costs are $119,000 (July 1972) Federal and $1,170,000 (July 1972) non-Federal for this portion. Uncompleted portion 1945 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with for Acts of March 2, 1945, October 23, 1962, and July 14, 1960, except inactive portion of 1945 Act. Act of August 30, 1935, provided that original dredging of outer harbor area be done by city of Milwaukee and city of Milwaukee be reimbursed at actual cost but not to exceed 10 cents per cubic yard, place measurement, for original dredging done subsequent to authorization of work by Congress. Agreement covering dredging was executed by Secretary of War, February 23, 1934, after this work was originally authorized as part of public works program. City was reimbursed for 10 percent of dredging. Terminal facilities. Four car-ferry slips, and 57 other wharves, private and municipal, used for handling coal, grain, building materials, cement, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. As facilities in inner harbor were inadequate for existing commerce, Milwaukee Harbor Commission has constructed nine docks in the outer harbor for handling general cargo. Operations during fiscal year. Rehabilitation: An adjustment of $10,002 was made to the FY 85 contract for major rehabilitation of the North Pier and North Breakwater completed last FY. An adjustment of -$6,398 was made to the FY 87 contract for major rehabilitation Phase II of the North Breakwater completed last FY. The contract awarded last FY for major rehabilitation Phase III of the North Breakwater was completed this FY at a cost of $781,987. Engineering, design, supervision, and administration was performed at a cost of $101,759. Engineering and design for construction of a walkway on the outer end of the N. Breakwater to be performed by contract next FY cost $14,516. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $189,773. Repairs to diked disposal facility Sections B, D, G, and F were performed by the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $153,079. Engineering and design for CDF expansion cost $32,296. Engineering and design for emergency maintenance dredging of the Kinnickinnic River to be performed by contract next FY cost $20,011. Supervision and administration cost $31,640. Existing project is complete except for inactive portions. The 1962 modification was completed in July 1967. North breakwater and shore connection, 9,954 feet long, was completed in August 1925. North pier was completed in 1905 and construction of south pier was completed in November 1910. Construction of south breakwater and shore connection was completed in October 1929. Before modification of August 30, 1935, City of Milwaukee also dredged most of the area in the outer harbor south of inner entrance piers and lakeward of pierhead line to more than 21 feet below datum without cost to the United States. City of Milwaukee also dredged a portion of the area of the outer harbor north of inner entrance piers to provide an approach channel to the passenger and auto pier opposite East Claybourn Street. Work on the 1945 modification was completed in August 1957, except for inactive portion which consists of dredging the Milwaukee River from Buffalo Street to upper limit of the project at Humboldt Avenue. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $55,643,135, of which $8,231,024 was for new work, $34,721,465 for maintenance, and $12,690,646 for rehabilitation. 43. MONROE HARBOR, MI Location. On lower reach of River Raisin, which empties into Lake Erie and is 36 miles south of Detroit, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14830.) Existing project. Provides for a channel in Lake Erie and River Raisin to City of Monroe, for a turning basin, and for riprapping protecting dikes at river mouth. Project depths are 21 feet to turning basin, 18 feet in turning basin, and 9 feet to upstream end of project. For additional details see page 1490 of Annual Report for 1962. Project feature for riprapping protecting dikes is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this feature (1954) is $90,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) 21-16 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT The Water Resources Development Act (W.R.D.A.) of 1986 authorized modifications to deepen the River Raisin portion of the existing 200 foot navigation channel from 21 to 27 feet between the existing turning basin and the river's mouth; deepen the lake channel from 21 to 28 feet, and widen the channel from 200 to 500 feet, for a distance of approximately 47,000 feet from the river's mouth to the Maumee Bay Entrance Channel; dredge a new turning basin 24 feet deep, with a diameter of at least 1,600 feet, at the river's mouth; and construct a 190 acre confined disposal area in Plum Creek Bay behind which would enable the creation of a 700 acre marsh. Estimated total cost (Oct. 88) is $150,200,000; $59,000,000 Federal and $91,200,000 non-Federal, which includes a cash contribution of $19,650,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the W.R.D.A. for 1986 (P.L. 99-662), are as described in the Rivers and Harbors Committee Document 22, 71st Congress, 1st Session; R & H Comm. Doc. 12, 72d Congress, 1st Session, and 45, 75th Congress, 1st Session, and also includes, as a result of P.L. 99-662, construction cost sharing as follows: a. Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $19,650,000. The estimated cash contribution of $19,650,000 to be paid in lump sum prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; and b. Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $7,860,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution for lands, easements, rights-of-way, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost. c. The confined dike area construction is a non-Federal responsibility and is estimated to cost $70,156,000. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned docks and a municipal terminal. Port of Monroe Authority built a steel and concrete wharf on southeast side of turning basin for commercial use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $90,146. Maintenance of the disposal facility was performed by hired labor at a cost of $12,153. The maintenance dredging contract awarded last FY was completed with 126,671 cubic yards removed this FY at a cost of $598,419. An adjustment of -$39,714 was made to the contract for repair of confined disposal facility Cell #1 completed last FY. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $38,858. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $55,839,721, of which $987,340 was for new work (includes $300,000 contributed by the Port Commission of Monroe) and $54,852,381 for maintenance (includes $166,667 contributed funds, $125,000 by Consolidated Paper Company and $41,667 by River Raisin Company). 44. MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 114 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 80 miles easterly from Milwaukee, WI (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14934.) Previous project. For details see page 1950 of Annual Report for 1915; page 1399, Annual Report for 1924; and page 1484, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A breakwater protected outer basin in Lake Michigan and an entrance channel from Lake Michigan to Muskegon Lake protected by piers and revetments. Project depths vary from 29 feet in the lakeward portion of the outer basin to 27 feet in the channel between the inner piers to Muskegon Lake. For additional details see page 1303 of Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned wharves primarily for commercial use. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series, No. 48 (revised 1981) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Rehabilitation: An adjustment of $804 was made to the cost of engineering and design for major rehabilitation of the North and South Revetment. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $86,940. Repair to safety features by hired labor cost $13,621. Repairs to South Pier, Sections N, O, P and North Breakwater, Sections A & B were performed by the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $128,236. An adjustment of -$10,517 and 25,785 cubic yards was made to the maintenance dredging contract completed last FY. Engineering, design, surveys, real estate, and supervision and administration cost $23,916. Environmental monitoring was performed in conjunction with the authorized Section 111 project at a cost of $25,747. The contract awarded last FY for Beach Nourishment was completed at a cost of $293,755. Real estate, supervision and administration cost $18,470. Existing project, including latest project modification, was completed in 1965. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1465 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $25,453,749, of which $3,017,110 was for new work, $8,612,339 for maintenance, and $13,824,300 for rehabilitation. 45. NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Galien River on southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Berrien County, about 45 miles easterly from Chicago, IL. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14905.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 10 feet deep by 80 feet wide and 850 feet long, to mouth of Galien River; new north and south breakwaters 1,305 and 740 feet long, respectively, and deepening inner channel to Galien River to 8 feet and 80 feet wide and 1,250 feet long. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 21-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Terminal facilities. One village owned boat ramp and three privately operated marinas, and a private boat club facility. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $59,488. The U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC performed repairs to North Breakwater, Section A and South Breakwater, Section B at a cost of $48,868. Repairs to safety features cost $38. An adjustment of $71 was made to the contract completed last FY for beach nourishment. Supervision and administration cost $12,710. Existing project is complete. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $5,961,802, of which $2,472,183 was for new work (includes $1,186,467 contributed funds) and $3,489,619 for maintenance. 46. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior. It consists of improvement of mouth of Ontonagon River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Previous project. For details see page 1931 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1406 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for approach channel 16 feet deep, a channel between piers with 17 and 15-foot depths, an inner basin 12 feet deep, and maintenance of channels, basin, and entrance piers. Completed project cost $19,619. See page 1100 of Annual Report for 1966 for details. A modification authorized by 1962 River and Harbor Act provides for increasing depths of channels, construction of an inner basin and a sedimentation basin. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) The turning basin feature of the project for navigation at Ontonagon Harbor, Ontonagon County, MI, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1962, was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are no publicly owned wharves. There are three coal wharves, an oil receiving facility, and a few small fish wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The Definite Project Report for Ontonagon, terminated due to lack of local sponsorship, cost $18,525 in FY 89. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $21,568. Repairs to the East and West Breakwaters were performed by the Derrickbarge COLEMAN at a cost of $294,389. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY at a cost of $261,164 removing 39,005 cubic yards of material. Engineering and design for Repair to the West Revetment Section E to be performed by contract next FY cost $68,019. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging to be performed by contract next FY cost $13,044. Other engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $43,805. All work authorized under previous Acts was completed in 1938. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $10,327,657, of which $952,170 was for new work and $9,375,487 for maintenance. 47. PENTWATER HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 146 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 14 miles southerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907.) Existing project. Provides for widening old entrance channel to 150 feet between parallel piers and revetments, channel to extend from Lake Michigan to Pentwater Lake, with a depth of 16 feet. Piers and revetments are built of stonefilled timber cribs and piling and capped with concrete. The 200-foot extension to south pier portion of project is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion is $65,100. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Several small privately owned wharves on west end of Pentwater Lake. The City and Michigan Waterways Commission jointly constructed a dock on northwest side of Pentwater Lake for public use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $31,673. Repairs to North Pier Sections B, B-1, C, C-1, G and H, and South Revetment Sections F and J were performed by hired labor using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $77,649. Repairs to safety features cost $29. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded and completed removing approximately 19,100 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $106,700. Engineering and design for repairs to South Revetment and South Pier Sections, A, M, M-1 and N was performed at a cost of $27,790. Engineering, design, surveys, real estate, and supervision and administration cost $24,920. Existing project was completed in 1959 except for a 200-foot extension to the south pier which is not considered necessary under present conditions. For additional details see page 1468 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $3,974,263, of which $179,899 was for new work, and $3,794,364 for maintenance. 48. POINTE LOOKOUT HARBOR (AU GRES RIVER), MI Location. At Au Gres River on westerly shore of Lake Huron at entrance to Saginaw Bay, about 17 miles northeast of mouth of Saginaw River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a small boat harbor having a 12-foot deep, 100-foot wide, 2,800-foot long outer entrance channel; a 5,600-foot long, 100-foot wide inner entrance channel having a 10-foot depth; an 8,270-foot long, 6-foot deep river channel ending just downstream from U.S. 23 highway bridge and having a width of 60 feet; a 4,000-foot long north breakwater and a 3,800-foot long south breakwater. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Small boat marina facilities are under construction by the State of Michigan. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $26,855. Minor structure repairs were performed by hired labor at a cost of $8,414. An adjustment of -$3,688 and -546 cubic yards was made to the maintenance dredging contract completed last FY. Engineering, design, and supervision and administration cost $8,661. 21-18 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Existing project was completed in 1974. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $6,042,602, of which $2,642,584 was for new work and $3,400,018 for maintenance. 49. PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan about 186 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and about 37 miles northerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14939.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge with an entrance channel from Lake Michigan to Portage Lake protected by piers and revetments. Project depth is 18 feet. For additional details see page 1297 of Annual Report for 1958. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are landing places and marinas at inner end of Portage Lake. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $19,113. Repairs to North and South Revetment, Sections D, F, G, H, and J, North and South Pier, Sections A, B, and F were performed by the U.S. MANITOWOC at a cost of $163,940. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded in the amount of $82,500. No work was performed this FY. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $43,233. Existing project was substantially completed in 1912. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1298 of Annual Report for 1958. The structures are generally in fair condition. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $2,053,892, of which $256,129 was for new work and $1,797,763 for maintenance. 50. PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI Location. On west shore of Lake Huron at extreme southeastern limit of Saginaw Bay, and 29 miles south of Au Sable River (Oscoda). (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. A harbor of refuge at the mouth of Bird Creek, consisting of a harbor basin dredged to a depth of 10 feet protected by a breakwater structure, and for dredging an entrance channel to the harbor basin to a depth of 12 feet. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of docks near mouth of Bird Creek and a State-owned dock inside breakwater. Facilities accommodate recreational craft and are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A contract was awarded this FY in the amount of $1,673,300 for additional breakwater. The contract is approximately 65% complete at a cost of $1,078,603. Engineering and design, supervision and administration cost $193,583. Maintenance: Condition surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $14,682. The contract awarded last FY for repair of the Breakwater Cell Cap was completed at a cost of $96,573. Engineering and design during construction cost $323. Supervision and administration cost $28,823. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $4,439,025, of which $2,538,469 was for new work (includes $172,100 contributed funds) and $1,900,556 for maintenance. 51. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI Location. On southwest shore of Lake Huron, 30 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge protected by breakwater structures extending to 12-foot depth contour in lake; for dredging a harbor basin 10 feet deep; for dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep; a 70-foot extension of the south breakwater; a 300-foot arm added to the north breakwater; and riprap placed at the lakeward side of the breakwater additions. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one privately owned dock used principally as a fishing terminal by owner and a municipally owned pier for recreational craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $4,616. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $7,575. An adjustment of $67,808 was made in cost to the Breakwater Cell Cap Repairs contract completed last FY. An adjustment of $1,972 was made to the dredging contract completed last FY. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $10,746. Environmental studies under Section 111 Mitigation were performed at a cost of $8,931. An adjustment of $2,614 was made in cost to beach nourishment work in conjunction with the above maintenance dredging contract. The project was completed in 1951 except for latest modification which was completed in FY 76. The breakwaters are in good condition. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $4,832,797, of which $1,733,071 was for new work (includes $487,108 contributed funds) and $3,099,726 for maintenance (includes $115,000 contributed funds). 52. PORT WASHINGTON HARBOR, WI Location. On the west shore of Lake Michigan, about 53 miles south of Manitowoc and about 29 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous project. For details, see page 1938 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1459 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 30-14 of Chicago District Annual Report for 1975. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, June 12, 1975, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one coal wharf, a petroleum tank farm and several fishing wharves. City provided a wharf which is open to public use. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $11,134. Repair to N. Stub Pier Section G was performed by 21-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $86,357. Supervision and administration cost $9,015. The existing project was completed in 1936. The 1958 modification was deauthorized in 1977. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $6,780,946, of which $4,206,204 was for new work (includes $1,624,000 contributed funds) and $2,574,742 for maintenance. 53. PORT WING HARBOR, WI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior, 34 miles easterly from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing project. Provides for two parallel piers at entrance, 835 and 1,017 feet long, respectively, 200 feet apart; an entrance channel between piers 150 feet wide with 15-foot depth; an irregular-shaped turning basin 15 feet deep at inner end of piers from which two inner channels with 8-foot depth extend. One of these is 60 feet wide extending southerly for 340 feet and one 70 feet wide extending easterly 1,170 feet. Portion of dredging of entrance channel to complete project width and depth is considered unnecessary to meet present navigation requirements. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are four privately owned fishing wharves which are considered adequate for existing conditions. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $3,905. Minor repairs to navigation structures cost $235. Existing project is complete, except channel between piers, and has been dredged to only a 100-foot width. Widening the channel an additional 50 feet was considered unnecessary to meet present navigation requirements. That work was classified inactive and deauthorized on August 5, 1977, under Section 12 of Public Law 93-251. Piers are in good condition. At the end of FY controlling depth was 12 feet in lake approach, 10 feet between piers in northerly portion of turning basin, and 8 feet in easterly inner channel. Land owned by the United States totals 7.80 acres. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $940,334, of which $63,393 was for new work and $876,941 for maintenance. 54. ROUGE RIVER, MI Location. Rises in Oakland and Washtenaw Counties, MI, 30 miles long, flows southeasterly through Wayne County, and joins Detroit River at westerly limit of City of Detroit. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14854.) Previous project. For details see page 1530 of Annual Report for 1932, and page 1558 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for: (a) Main channel from Detroit River through Short Cut Canal extending to upstream limit of the project, a distance of 3.5 miles. Project depths are 25 and 21 feet in navigation channel, 21 feet in turning basin, and 13 feet in upper reach of project. (b) Old Channel from Detroit River extending to junction of Old Channel with Short Cut Canal. Project depths are 25, 18, 17, and 21 feet. For additional details see page 1324 of Annual Report for 1963. In 1973, work authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was reclassified from the active to inactive category. Estimated cost (1972) of this work is $880,000. Except for dredging 25-foot channel 1,150 feet upstream from mouth of Old Channel, work authorized in Act of August 30, 1935, is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1958) of inactive portion is $255,000. Work authorized by Act of July 3, 1958, is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1960) of this work is $210,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Act of October 23, 1962, requires local interests to provide lands and rights-of-way for construction upon request of the Chief of Engineers; hold the United States free from damages; provide terminal facilities to accommodate prospective commerce considered in report of District Engineer; dredge and maintain areas between the Federal improvement and terminal facilities to depths commensurate with improved Federal channel; make alterations in docks, bulkheads and other structures, and take such other measures as may be necessary to assure stability of banks adjacent to channel; and provide bridge protection. The assurances of local cooperation for the River and Harbor Act of 1962 were furnished by the Michigan State Waterways Commission and accepted on January 7, 1965. Fulfillment of all items of local cooperation has not been accomplished. Terminal facilities. Numerous large commercial docks for handling various type cargo. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are contained in the Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and environmental studies were performed by Government forces at a cost of $154,369. An adjustment of -$6,542 was made to the FY 86 contract for repairs to the confined disposal facility at Grassy Island. An adjustment of -$1,631 was made to the contract for repair of the diked disposal facility at Pte. Mouillee completed last FY. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded and completed this FY at a cost of $604,499 removing approximately 63,000 cubic yards of material. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration cost $76,381. Under the Dike Disposal Program an adjustment of $234,999 was made to the FY 78 Pointe Mouillee Disposal Site Phase II Contract. Supervision and administration for Dike Disposal cost $11,609. Work authorized before 1962 modification is complete or deauthorized. For additional details on completion of existing project see Annual Report for 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $34,605,353, of which $675,251 was for new work and $33,930,102 for maintenance. In addition, $29,563 was expended for new work from Emergency Relief Act Funds. 55. SAGINAW RIVER, MI Location. Formed by union of Tittabawassee and Shiawassee Rivers, 22 miles long, and flows northerly into extreme inner end of Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron. Cities of Saginaw and Bay City are on the river. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14867.) Previous project. For details, see page 1957 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1550 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 27 feet deep and 350 feet wide from 27-foot contour in Saginaw Bay to river mouth; thence a channel 26 feet deep and 200 feet wide to New York Central Railroad Bridge at Bay City; thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide to C&O Railroad Bridge in Saginaw; thence 16.5 feet deep and 200 feet wide to upstream limit at Green Point. Project also provides for five turning basins; one 25 feet deep at Essexville, 600 feet wide with a maximum length of 1,850 feet; one 22 feet deep on east side of channel about 1 21-20 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT mile upstream from Cass Avenue in Bay City, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; one 20 feet deep at Carrollton, 100 to 300 feet wide and 900 feet long; one 20 feet deep just downstream from C&O Bridge in Saginaw, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; and one 15 feet deep between Bristol Street Bridge and New York Central Railroad Bridge in Saginaw. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Numerous large commercial docks for handling a great variety of cargo. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, Hi-Fix surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $410,418. The contract awarded last FY for maintenance dredging was completed at a cost of $1,107,392, removing approximately 183,925 cubic yards of shoal material. A contract was awarded this FY in the amount of $1,447,280 for maintenance dredging. No work was performed this FY. An adjustment of $9,010 was made to the cost of the FY 87 Diked Disposal Facility repair contract completed last FY. Maintenance of disposal area cost $7,015. Engineering, design, real estate, supervision and administration cost $100,709. Engineering, design, and real estate for construction of a diked disposal area for upper Saginaw was continued at a cost of $198,388. Existing project is complete except for small part of the work authorized by the Act of October 23, 1962. Section D (Sixth Street Turning Basin) of the 1962 Act is complete except for the channel portion, which is pending modification. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $73,358,585, of which $14,930,727 was for new work and $58,427,858 for maintenance. 56. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI Location. A 40 mile long section of Great Lakes connecting channels which flows southerly from Lake Huron and discharges into Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14852.) Existing project. Provides for channels through St. Clair River, which, at lower water datum, are suitable for vessels drawing 25.5 feet. Project also provides for improvement of North Channel outlet, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep, for recreational craft. Project depths are referred to low water datums for Lakes Huron and St. Clair, 576.8 and 571.7 feet above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec; International Great Lakes Datum 1955. (See Tables 21-B and 21-H for authorizing legislation and features of existing project.) Act of July 24, 1946, provides for widening and deepening of southeast bend and improvement of outlet of north channel at an estimated cost (1986) of $870,000; $435,000 Federal and $435,000 non- Federal. On June 16, 1969, the Director of Civil Works approved substitution of the Middle Channel of the St. Clair River for the authorized north channel. Subsequently, however, the work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946, was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. This improvement serves through commerce, between upper and lower Great Lakes, and has not materially influenced terminal facilities along its route. A number of privately owned piers and wharves are at Port Huron, Marysville, St. Clair, and Marine City, MI, which handle coal, limestone, petroleum products, woodpulp, salt and general cargo. These installations satisfy present commerce requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, support of water control center, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $198,952. Location and removal of obstructions cost $369,339. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging Pte. Edwards, Blue Water and Lower River to be performed by contract next FY cost $36,752. Supervision and administration cost $694. Existing project is complete. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $38,018,618, of which $19,213,246 was for new work and $18,805,372 for maintenance. 57. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 60 miles easterly from Chicago, IL, and 24 miles southerly from South Haven, MI (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14930.) Previous project. For details see page 1945 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1470 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for protecting mouth of St. Joseph River by two piers, 250 to 325 feet apart at their inner and outer ends, respectively, having lengths of 2,758 feet on north side and 2,603 feet on south side; for a channel 21 feet deep from Lake Michigan to mouth of Benton Harbor Canal, a length of about 6,900 feet with widths of 265 feet at outer end of piers, 190 feet at inner end of piers and revetments, thence generally 215 feet to lower end of turning basin, increasing to 250 feet above the turning basin to mouth of Paw Paw River, thence generally 110 feet in Paw Paw River to mouth of Benton Harbor Canal; for dredging channel in Benton Harbor Canal up to west line of Riverview Drive extended northerly, to 18 feet deep and 80 feet wide; and a turning basin 18 feet deep on north side of channel above mouth of Morrison Channel and a turning basin 18 feet deep near mouth of Paw Paw River. Public Law 88-88th Congress declared a portion of Benton Harbor Canal a non-navigable stream. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several commercial wharves for handling coal, building materials, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. A package freight terminal and a public docking facility is also available. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $169,405. Repairs to North Revetment, Sections C, D, and E, and Obstruction Removal were performed using the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $62,762. Hired labor cost for maintenance of disposal area and safety features was $5,304. The structure repair contract awarded last FY for repair of North Pier, Section A, South Pier, Sections H and N, and North Revetment, Section B was completed at a cost of $94,209. Engineering and design during construction cost $473. An adjustment of -$17,966 was made in cost to the contract for maintenance dredging of the Outer Channel com- 21-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 pleted last FY. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging the Outer Channel. Approximately 18,745 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $106,362. This contract was also for beach nourishment. Engineering and design for a Wave Deflection Wall in Section E of the North Revetment cost $1,545. Engineering, design, surveys, real estate, and supervision and administration cost $106,850. Engineering and design for disposal area for polluted dredged material was continued at a cost of $104,921. Under the Section 111 Program, $255,150 was expended to complete a contract awarded last FY to place dredged material on the beach. Beach nourishment in conjunction with above maintenance dredging contract cost $41,363. Monitoring, surveys, engineering, and supervision and administration cost $35,475. Existing project was completed in 1956. The structures are in generally good condition. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1454 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $20,435,643, of which $1,804,485 was for new work, $17,668,942 for maintenance and $962,216 for rehabilitation. 58. ST. MARYS RIVER, MI Location. A Great Lakes connecting channel about 63 miles long, flows southeasterly between State of Michigan and Province of Ontario, Canada, from eastern end of Lake Superior into northern end of Lake Huron. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14882, 14883, and 14884.) At Sault Ste. Marie, MI, about 14 miles downstream from Lake Superior, there are four parallel locks and a hydroelectric powerplant. Previous project. For details see page 1955, Annual Report for 1915; and page 1529, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Channels permitting 25.5-foot draft navigation in St. Marys River and Lake Superior and Lake Huron approaches thereto; constructing and operating four locks and two canals; constructing an electric plant of 14,000 kilowatt capacity (45,000 kilowatt ultimate capacity) constructing anchorage areas in river above and below locks; and constructing various other works in conjunction with project. Subsequently, in 1932, the Unit 10 powerhouse was installed raising the capacity to 18,400 kilowatts (45,000 ultimate capacity). Original State locks were operated and maintained under permanent indefinite appropriation from June 9, 1881, to November 2, 1886, after which they were destroyed by excavation for the Poe Lock in 1896. Weitzel Lock destroyed in 1942 by excavation for MacArthur Lock, was operated and maintained under the same appropriation from September 1, 1881, to June 30, 1935. Poe Lock was operated and maintained under the same appropriation from August 3, 1896, Davis Lock from October 21, 1914, and Sabin Lock from September 18, 1919, to end of FY 1935. The 1,200 foot by 110 foot new Poe Lock was authorized in 1962 and put into operation in 1968. Details of existing project are set forth in Table 21-F. Project depths are referred to low water datum corresponding to sloping surface of river as follows: Above locks: When water surface of Lake Superior is at elevation 600 feet and at upstream side of locks is 599.5 feet above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec (International Great Lakes Datum 1955). Below locks: When water surface at downstream side of locks is at elevation 577.8 feet and Lake Huron is 576.8 feet above mean water level at Father Point, Quebec (International Great Lakes Datum 1955). Estimated (1974) cost for new work is $163,087,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) The Water Resources Development Act (W.R.D.A.) of 1986 authorized construction of a second lock 1,294 feet in length, 115 feet in width, and 32 feet in depth, adjacent to the existing lock. The replacement lock is to be located in the North Canal of the St. Marys Falls Canal at Sault Ste. Marie, MI, on the site of the existing Davis and Sabin Locks. Material removed during construction of the replacement lock will be placed on the Northwest Pier to serve as a windbreak for downbound vessels approaching the lock. Estimated cost (Oct. 88) is $159,900,000 Federal and $86,100,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the W.R.D.A. of 1986 (P.L. 99-662), are as follows: a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for implementation and later maintenance of the proposed project, and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and later disposal of dredged/demolition material and including necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the costs of such retaining works; b) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the implementation and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; c) Accomplish without cost to the United States such alterations and relocations of pipelines, powerlines, cables, sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utilities, structures, and improvements made necessary by the project (Any such costs of the items on Federal property at the locks, would be part of the total construction cost and not separable local sponsor cost.); d) Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $61,500,000. The estimated cash contribution of $61,500,000 to be paid in lump sum prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; and e) Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $24,600,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution for lands, easements, rightsof- way, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost. f) Any construction needed to prevent/mitigate for erosion or shoaling attributed to the lock would be cost shared in the same proportion as the project. Terminal facilities. This improvement serves through commerce between Lake Superior and lower lakes and has not materially influenced terminal facilities at localities along its route. Three piers at Sault Ste. Marie receive coal and petro- 21-22 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT leum products. Limestone is shipped from a pier at Drummond Island. Vessel refueling stations are at Lime Island and Village of Detour; they receive coal and petroleum products. Present terminals satisfy current traffic requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Operations, maintenance, and care of locks: Two canals and three locks were operated (the third lock, Davis, was out of service) as required. Necessary repairs and improvements were made thereto and to appurtenant structures and equipment. Canals were open to navigation 300 days (from 1 October 1988 through 30 September 1989). During that period, a total of 13,660 vessels, aggregating 89,517,470 short tons of freight and 319,291 passengers passed through the MacArthur, Poe, and Sabin Locks. Cost for operation, maintenance, and care of the locks for this FY was $5,756,085, which included $282,858 for extended season operation and maintenance, $50,257 for operation and maintenance of the Gatelifter PAUL BUNYAN and $21,573 retroactive backpay (FY 1980 - FY 1988) for lock and dam operators who had been paid at the wrong pay scale. Powerhouse and equipment: Two hydroelectric powerhouses were operated and maintained at a cost of $879,150 during the FY which includes a deduction of $39,008 for interdepartmental electricity sold but not paid for. The contract awarded in FY 87 for emergency repair to hydro generator Unit 10 accrued expenditures in the amount of $27,500. Other operation and care items: Building and grounds were operated and maintained, condition surveys, operations studies, real estate, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $1,388,574 which includes a custodial, snow removal, and grounds upkeep contract for $275,644. Security measures were performed at a cost of $349,747 which included a service contract for $341,760. The survey and mapping contract awarded last FY accrued cost in the amount of $5,223. A study on winter and extended navigation season, ice measurements, and weather monitoring was performed at a cost of $264,473. Hired labor repairs to the Soo Harbor ice boom cost $38,114. Work was done on the Compensating Gates at a cost of $53,414. Channels and canals: St. Marys River channels and canal approach depths were surveyed by sweeping. Removal of shoals in the St. Marys River channels and canal approaches was accomplished by hired labor with U.S. Derrickboats NICOLET and HARVEY at a cost of $1,357,614. Other miscellaneous items: The FY 87 repair contract for the Davis Lock Dewatering Gates was completed this FY at a cost of $51,081. Supervision and Administration of the Dewatering Gates Contract cost $14,206. Engineering and design for the master plan for the facility was performed at a cost of $20,319. Other miscellaneous engineering and design, supervision and administration cost $65,050. Recreational facilities: Information center, comfort stations, park fountain, observation and overlook platforms were maintained at a cost of $123,557 which included a janitorial contract for the Information Center at a cost of $21,717. A commercial activity study was performed for the Visitor Center at a cost of $19,191. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for the expansion of the Visitor Center parking lot at a cost of $86,477. Visitors entering the Soo Locks Information Center numbered 614,156. Visitors to the observation platforms overlooking the locks numbered 540,411. Total number of visitors to the Soo Locks park was 734,915. A grand total of 1,054,206 people visited the Soo Locks. Total project costs in FY 89 amounted to $10,499,775. Project in effect prior to modification of March 21, 1956, is complete and work authorized by 1956 modification to provide a safe draft of 25.5 feet for both upbound and downbound traffic is also complete. Public Works Acceleration Funds used for maintenance were $118,000. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $371,462,047, of which $160,657,070 was for new work and $210,804,977 for maintenance. 59. SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MI Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan, 90 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 22 miles northerly from South Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14906.) Previous project. For details see page 1947 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1475 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Entrance channel protected by parallel piers at mouth of Kalamazoo River and a river channel to Village of Saugatuck, MI. Project depths: 16 feet in entrance channel, 14 feet in river channel. Additional details on page 1456, 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At Village of Saugatuck, MI, there are several landing places for recreational craft and one for small commercial vessels. At Village of Douglas, MI, there is a landing pier. Facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $50,412. Repairs to safety features by hired labor cost $3,721. A contract in the amount of $49,320 was awarded for maintenance dredging. No work was performed this FY. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision, and administration cost $34,399. Existing project was completed in 1903. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $3,634,047, of which $364,527 was for new work and $3,269,520 for maintenance. 60. SAXON HARBOR, WI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior in Wisconsin at mouth of Oronto Creek, 27 miles southeast of harbor at Bayfield, WI, and 21 miles westerly of harbor at Black River, MI; 99 miles east of Duluth-Superior Harbor and 60 miles west of Ontonagon Harbor, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Previous project. For details see page 1254 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Provides for east and west breakwaters, an outer channel 10 feet deep, an inner basin and side channel 8 feet deep, and diversion of Oronto Creek to Parkers Creek by three short reaches of channel excavation and a levee. For detailed dimensions of features see page 1025 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One wharf 300 feet long on east side of present harbor basin constructed by local interests. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $30,034. Repairs to E. Breakwater Outer Cell Cap were per- 21-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 formed by the Cranebarge MARKUS at a cost of $43,983. Engineering and design for repairs to the East and West Breakwater cost $24,136. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging cost $34,665. A contract was awarded this FY for maintenance dredging in the amount of $91,760. No work was performed this FY. Supervision and administration cost $2,673. The project was completed in March 1968. A reconnaissance report was completed in August 1971 concerning erosion of the shoreline west of the harbor. Plans and specifications for mitigation of shoreline damages were completed and a construction contract was awarded in August 1989. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $1,707,670, of which $1,094,377 was for new work (includes $50,193 contributed funds) and $613,293 for maintenance. 61. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI Location. At mouth of Sebewaing River on south shore of Saginaw Bay about 10 miles south of Bay Port, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Previous project. For details see page 1007 of Annual Report for 1912. Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 15,000 feet long in Saginaw Bay. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Terminal facilities. A number of small wharves used by fishing vessels and other light-draft craft are along the river. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $28,329. The maintenance dredging contract awarded last FY was completed at a cost of $586,031, removing approximately 82,898 cubic yards of dredged material. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $56,300. Existing project was completed in 1903. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $3,473,295, of which $35,573 was for new work and $3,437,722 for maintenance. 62. SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 26 miles south of Manitowoc and about 55 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) Previous project. See page 1381 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. For detailed description see page 1230, Annual Report for 1963. New Work for project as completed cost $648,271, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 21- B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three wharves for handling coal, petroleum products and miscellaneous commodities. City provided a public wharf. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $30,426. Minor repairs to navigation structures were performed by hired labor at a cost of $815. Engineering, design, surveys, supervision and administration for a maintenance dredging contract cancelled due to lack of shoaling cost $23,003. Engineering and design for dike disposal site selection continued at a cost of $6,868. Existing project was completed in 1904. Construction of north breakwater was commenced in October 1913 and completed in October 1915. Dredging entrance channel to existing project depth was commenced in June and completed in July 1938. Work on 1954 modification was completed in December 1956. Piers and breakwaters are in generally good condition. Inner 260 feet of south pier was replaced with a revetment by private interests under permit granted July 16., 1931, by the Secretary of War. Piers, therefore, are maintained only for a length of about 2,490 feet. Sheboygan River is navigable about 2.4 miles above its mouth for craft drawing not more than 2 feet. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $8,043,208, of which $1,136,088 was for new work, $6,298,092 for maintenance and $609,028 for rehabilitation. 63. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 77 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 24 miles northerly from St. Joseph, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14906.) Previous project. For details see page 1947 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1473 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel protected by parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Black River, a river channel and a turning basin. Project depths are 21 feet in entrance channel and 19 feet in river channel and turning basin. For additional details see page 1455 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several wharves for handling coal, building materials, woodpulp, fish, and miscellaneous commodities will have warehouses. Facilities satisfy current commerce requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $20,485. The U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC performed repairs to North Revetment, Section G and South Pier, Sections H, J, and K at a cost of $41,340. Hired labor cost for maintenance of safety features was $5,697. Engineering and design for major repairs to the South Pier and Revetment Sections A, M, M-1, and N continued at a cost of $38,692. Real estate and supervision and administration cost $10,587. Environmental studies and monitoring in connection with Section 111 was performed at a cost of $13,725. Existing project was completed in 1960. Project now being maintained to 14-foot and 12-foot depths, respectively (in lieu of the 21 feet and 19 feet authorized), which is adequate for current usage. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1456 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $7,676,048, of which $984,426 was for new work, $5,059,546 for maintenance and $1,632,076 for rehabilitation. 64. STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 52 miles northeast of Green Bay and about 128 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14919.) Previous projects. See page 1373 of Annual Report for 1962. 21-24 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 31-C, page 30-27. For detailed description, see page 1223, Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. As the canal and connecting channel is a through waterway, only terminal facilities are in City of Sturgeon Bay, 4 miles from west end of revetted portion of canal. These facilities consist of two wharves for handling coal, petroleum products and miscellaneous commodities and four shipbuilding yards. City of Sturgeon Bay provided a public wharf about 5 miles northwesterly from City of Sturgeon Bay. Two major shipyards are located in Sturgeon Bay where repair facilities are available including dry docks, marine railways and hoists. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $77,453. Repairs to N. Revetment Sections M, J, L, and S. Revetment Sections K and N were performed by the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $96,692. Engineering, design, miscellaneous inspections and reports for construction of offloading disposal facility to be performed by contract next FY cost $75,853. Other engineering and design, supervision and administration cost $21,431. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $10,008,501, of which $1,059,722 was for new work, $8,063,880 for maintenance and $884,899 for rehabilitation. In addition, $235,940 was expended between April 25, 1893, and June 30, 1917, on operating and care of works of improvements under provision of permanent indefinite appropriations for such purposes. 65. TWO HARBORS, MN Location. Harbor is on north shore of Lake Superior, 27 miles northeasterly from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14966.) Existing project. Narrowing natural entrance by construction of two breakwaters, 1,628 and 900 feet long, from eastern and western points of bay, respectively; and dredging a maneuvering area on north side of harbor to 28 and 30 feet deep. A walkway on east breakwater is provided for public recreational use. For details see page 1026 of Annual Report for 1965. Dredging to deepen areas along easterly and northerly edges of channel was completed in 1980. This portion of project was reclassified from the "inactive" to "active" category in 1973. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. A section 221 local cooperation agreement was entered into with the city of Two Harbors on August 14, 1978. Terminal facilities. No publicly owned wharves. Three ore docks, tug wharf, an unused coal dock, and merchandise wharf are privately owned. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $26,289. Engineering and design for repair to W. Pier - Section C to be performed by contract next FY cost $175,554. Supervision and administration cost $2,117. The existing project is complete. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $6,413,694, of which $4,170,710 was for new work and $2,242,984 for maintenance. 66. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 82 miles north of Milwaukee and about 101 miles from Green Bay, WI, via Sturgeon Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14903.) Previous projects. See page 1377, Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-28. For detailed description see page 1226 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed project cost $147,463, exclusive of the amount expended on previous projects. The 1935 River and Harbor Act portion of project is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $14,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A coal wharf and several fishing wharves. City provided a wharf for receipt of petroleum products and public use. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $30,445. Repairs to South Breakwater Sections C and D were performed by the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $45,434. A contract was awarded for maintenance dredging in the amount of $207,840. No work was performed. Engineering, design, supervision and administration cost $58,702. Existing project is complete except for inactive portion of project which consists of dredging a 10-foot width along east side of lakeward portion entrance channel between the piers. This dredging was omitted to avoid removal of necessary riprap along entrance piers. Present width of channel is considered adequate for present and reasonably prospective commerce. South pier was completed in 1883 and is in generally good condition. North pier was completed in 1908. North revetment, completed in 1917, was rebuilt in May to August 1962. Dredging entrance channel and inner basin to existing project depth was commenced in March and substantially completed in May 1937. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $7,156,497, of which $360,320 was for new work, $6,738,120 for maintenance, and $58,057 for minor rehabilitation. 67. WHITEFISH POINT HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior 40 miles northwesterly from Sault Ste. Marie, MI, and 53 miles easterly from Grand Marais, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 14962.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor or refuge protected by two breakwater structures and for dredging a harbor basin and entrance channel, 12 feet deep. The addition of a 270-foot wave absorbing breakwater inside the harbor was approved by the Chief of Engineers on August 17, 1967, to correct a design deficiency. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one privately owned fishing wharf and a small-boat pier and launching ramp built by the State of Michigan. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 21-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and environmental studies were performed by Government forces at a cost of $10,833. Engineering and design for a maintenance dredging contract to be awarded next FY cost $3,939. Existing project was completed in 1960. The interior breakwater and repairs to the shoal connection were accomplished by contract during FY 1969. Remaining structures are in generally good condition. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $1,023,747, of which $771,639 was for new work and $252,108 for maintenance. 68. WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan 120 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 45 miles southerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14935.) Existing project. Parallel piers, revetments, and a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, 1,950 feet long, extending from Lake Michigan to White Lake. For additional details see page 1465 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. A privately owned chemical shipping dock on north side of lake about 3 miles from inner end of revetted entrance channel. Across lake, at Village of Whitehall, there are several installations serving light draft vessels. These terminals satisfy present recreational and commercial traffic requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $27,188. Repairs to the North Revetment Sections A, G, and H and Scuth Pier, Sections A, B, C, D, and E were performed by hired labor using the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $62,330. Minor safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $2,474. Engineering and design for repairs to North and South Piers Sections A and B continued at a cost of $69,331. Real estate and supervision and administration cost $9,470. Condition surveys, monitoring, real estate, and engineering and design in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 were performed at a cost of $23,587. Existing project was completed in 1908. Stone was placed on the north and south revetments in FY 1972. The structures are in generally good condition. Project now being maintained to 14-foot depth authorized, which is adequate for current usage. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $3,745,781, of which $457,562 was for new work and $3,288,219 for maintenance. 69. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS See Table 21-3. 70. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 21-C. 71. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107. Public Law 86-645 (pre-authorization.) None. Beach Erosion Control 72. AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS A beach erosion control project is authorized at the Shore of Manitowoc County, WI. For last full report see Annual Report for 1963 (Berrien County). The project is in the inactive category. The project for beach erosion control, Berrien County, MI (St. Joseph Shore), authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. (See Table 21-G for list of deauthorized projects.) 73. EMERGENCY SHORE PROTECTION Authority for emergency streambank and shoreline protection of public works and non-profit public services. (Section 14 Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended.) Bar Lake, MI - A contract for construction of a stone revetment to protect 600 feet of Lake Michigan shoreline adjacent to Lakeshore Road was awarded on August 3, 1989, and work commenced on September 22, 1989, at a cost of $18,844. Baraga County, MI - Plans and specifications for protection of 400 feet of Lake Superior shoreline adjacent to U.S. Highway 41 were continued at a cost of $3,862. Charlevoix County, East Jordan River, MI - The plans and specifications for protection of 800 feet of shoreline adjacent to the M-32 bridge abutment embankments were completed at a cost of $4,343. The Local Cooperation Agreement for construction of the project was executed on July 13, 1989, and the required cash contribution and rights-of-entry were provided on September 7, and August 19, 1989, respectively. City of South Haven, MI - Termination and financial closeout of the unfavorable reconnaissance report study was completed at a cost of $4,000. Fair Haven, MI- Plans and specifications for protection of 850 feet of the Anchor Bay shoreline adjacent to State Highway M-29 were continued at a cost of $8,851. Harbor Springs, MI - Subsequent to approval of the project for construction, by the Assistant Secretary of the Army, in FY 1988, the project sponsor withdrew its support of the project due to real estate problems and the project was therefore terminated on February 9, 1989. FY 1989 costs were $5,910. Lake Michigan Shoreline, Muskegon, MI - A contract for construction of a stone revetment to protect 600 feet of Lake Michigan shoreline adjacent to the city's water filtration plant was awarded on March 30, 1989, and all work was substantially completed on July 26, 1989, at a cost of $205,306. Lake Michigan Shoreline, South Milwaukee, WI - A reconnaissance study, to determine if there is a Federal interest in providing shoreline erosion protection to the outfall pipe of the city's Wastewater Treatment Plant, was completed, and is currently under review by higher authority. No funds were expended in FY 1989. Ludington, MI - Termination and financial closeout of the unfavorable reconnaissance report study was completed at a cost of $2,390. Manistee River, Manistee, MI - Termination and financial closeout of the unfavorable reconnaissance report study was completed at a cost of $4,000. 21-26 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Marysville, St. Clair River, MI - A contract for shoreline erosion protection of 2,000 feet of the St. Clair River shoreline adjacent to River Road was awarded on June 30, 1989, and work commenced on August 8, 1989, at a cost of $113,544. Memorial Drive, McKinley Park, WI - Review and approval of the completed Detailed Pr oject Report, which recommended the construction of the stone revetment to protect 500 feet of the Lake Michigan shoreline adjacent to Lincoln Memorial Drive, was continued at a cost of $850. Memorial Drive, Muskegon, MI - A reconnaissance study, to determine if there is a Federal interest in providing shoreline erosion protection to 800 feet of Scenic Drive at Memorial Drive, was continued at a cost of $2,936. Milwaukee South Shore Park, WI - Review and approval of the completed Detailed Project Report, which recommended the construction of a stone revetment to protect the pavilion/bathhouse and its parking lot, was continued. There were no costs incurred during FY 89. Scenic Drive, Duck Lake, MI - A contract for construction of a stone revetment to protect 1,500 feet of Lake Michigan shoreline adjacent to Scenic Drive was awarded on August 9, 1989. However subsequent to contract award, a significant error in estimated bedding stone quantities was detected and the contract was terminated on September 8, 1989, for convenience of the Government. Design alternatives were developed and will be coordinated with the project sponsor prior to readvertisement of the work in FY 90. FY 89 costs were $15,856. Sheboygan, WI - Completed the preparation of an unfavorable Detailed Project Report for the city's sanitary pump station, and a favorable Detailed Project Report to provide shoreline erosion protection to the city's 60-inch sanitary sewer line. FY 89 costs were $2,592. 74. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion activities pursuant to Section 103 of the 1962 River and Harbor Act. None. 75. MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES Mitigation of Shore Damages pursuant to Section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968. Plans and specifications for mitigation of shoreline damages adjacent to County Highway A west of Saxon Harbor, WI, were completed and a construction contract was awarded to Saginaw Construction, Inc., on August 3, 1989. Construction initiation scheduled for October 1989. FY 89 costs were $30,526. Flood Control 76. PAW PAW LAKE, MI Location. Approximately 10 miles north of St. Joseph/Benton Harbor on the Paw Paw River, in Berrien County. Existing Project. Accomplished under the authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, the project provides for: a gated control structure at the Paw Paw Lake outlet to the Paw Paw River; a 1,722 foot long, 72-inch reinforced concrete drainage from the southeast corner of the lake to the Paw Paw River; entrance and exit structures to improve hydraulic efficiency and provide protection to the pipe from floating debris; and two small levees to alleviate induced downstream damages. The project was completed in February 1987. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Financial closeout of the project authority cost $1,358. Total costs to end of FY were $3,589,000. 77. SAGINAW RIVER, MI Location. Saginaw River Basin including its tributaries, Tittabawasee, Shiawassee, Flint and Cass Rivers, drains an area of 6,260 square miles in the east central part of Michigan and empties into Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron. Bay City, near mouth of river, and Saginaw, 22 miles upstream from mouth, are on Federally improved deep-draft Saginaw River navigation channel (See Saginaw and Flint Geological quadrangles and NOAA Nautical Chart 14867). Existing project. Provides for improvements in Saginaw River Basin for flood control and other purposes: (a) at Sanilac Flats, MI, Middle Branch and South Branch, Cass River, to provide for major drainage improvements by channel improvements on Middle and South Branches, including a short reach of East Branch. This feature of the project for flood control, Saginaw River, MI, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X; (b) at Vassar on Cass River, to provide for flood protection of areas on north and south sides of river by channel improvement, levee construction floodwalls, modifications of Moore Drain, and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of $8,620,000 and non-Federal cost of $579,000 for construction; (c) at Frankenmuth on Cass River, to provide for flood protection of areas on north side of river by channel improvement, levee construction, and related work, at an estimated U.S. cost (July 1974) of $410,900 for construction; (d) at Flint on Flint River, to provide for flood protection of areas on both sides of main stem of Flint River and its tributaries, Swartz and Thread Creeks by channel improvement, bridge alterations, floodwall and levee construction, and related work, at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of $18,251,600 and non-Federal cost of $2,580,000 for construction; provided local interests contribute in cash 1 percent of first cost of project, exclusive of costs of rights-ofways; (e) at Corunna on Shiawassee River, to provide for flood protection by channel improvement, levee construction, and related work. This feature of the project for flood control, Saginaw River, MI, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X; (f) at Owosso on Shiawassee River, to provide for flood protection by channel improvement. This feature of the project for flood control, Saginaw River, MI, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X; (g) at Midland on Tittabawassee River, to provide for flood protection through non-structural (permanent evacuation) measures at an estimated U.S. cost (Apr. 1982) of $5,125,000 and non-Federal cost of $1,611,500 for implementation; however, project was reclassified to the "inactive" category on December 15, 1982; (h) at Shiawassee Flats along lower reaches of the four principal tributaries of Saginaw River, to provide for flood protection, including fish and wildlife areas; by channel improvement, levees, lateral reservoirs with control structures and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of 21-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 $23,417,500 Federal, and a non-Federal cost of $2,705,000 which includes a cash contribution of $1,237,000; provided local interests contribute in cash 5 percent of cost of rights-ofway for flood control and other work required as local cooperation, and furnish one-half of land required for fish and wildlife areas; provided that the Federal allocation for conservation does not exceed amount obtained by taking 28 percent of project cost for Shiawassee Flats unit and subtracting therefrom one-half cost of lands for conservation; and provided further that before starting works for flood control to Shiawassee Flats, Chief of Engineers and Director, Fish and Wildlife Service, prepare a plan mutually acceptable to Secretary of the Army and Secretary of the Interior for operation of fish and wildlife areas to required degree of controlled storage of flood-waters while preserving the maximum fish and wildlife benefits. Total estimated cost for new work, for active portion (1984) is $50,700,000 Federal and $1,421,000 to be contributed by local interests. Total estimated cost (1984) to local interests is $5,870,000. Local cooperation. Responsible local interests must make cash contributions as called for above; furnish lands, and rights-of-way, including removal of buildings, for construction; hold the United States free from damage; maintain and operate all works after completion; establish and enforce regulations designed to prevent encroachments in improved channels; and bear expense of constructing highway relocations and highway bridges, alter bridge approaches and existing highway bridge approaches and existing highway bridges (except underpinning and bridge raising), and alter utilities. Required assurances for Flint River at Flint were furnished by city of Flint and accepted by the United States on November 23, 1962. Estimated required cash contribution for Flint ($56,000) was furnished February 20, 1963. An additional $117,000 was furnished by the City to cover increased construction costs. Required assurances for Cass River at Frankenmuth were accepted on September 8, 1964. All necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way have been provided. The Midland City Council adopted a resolution on June 7, 1982, declaring its intent not to sponsor the Flood Control project on the Tittabawassee River at Midland. The Vassar City Council, in a letter dated January 26, 1982, indicated a willingness and capability to provide the assurances of local cooperation for the Vassar Flood Control Project. Saginaw County, in a resolution dated August 11, 1982, indicated a willingness and capability to provide the assurances of local cooperation for the Shiawassee Flats Flood Control Project. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Flint: Investigations of claims for contract completed in FY 80 were continued in FY 89 at a cost of $148,628. The Frankenmuth and Flint portions of the project are complete. 78. SEBEWAING, SEBEWAING RIVER, MI Location. Sebewaing River drains an area of 105 square miles in Huron and Tuscola Counties on the westerly side of Thumb area of Lower Peninsula of Michigan and discharges into Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron, 20 miles northeast from mouth of Saginaw River. Village of Sebewaing is near mouth of River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. Enlarging present channel of Sebewaing River through Village of Sebewaing, MI, to a capacity of 7,500 cubic feet per second from junction of Columbia and State drains to a point 4,500 feet lakeward from railroad bridge near mouth; altering railroad bridge and three highway bridges to permit free passage of ice; and removal of present dike on south side of channel lakeward from railroad bridge. Project is designed to provide protection for Village of Sebewaing from floods with a frequency of once in 15 years and with a magnitude greater than the maximum flood of record. (See Table 21- B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except for furnishing easements and rights-of-way for removal of remaining portion of dike on south side of channel lakeward from railroad bridge. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $7,243. Total costs to the end of the FY were $773,529. 79. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Name of Project Date of Inspection Battle Creek, Kalamazoo River, MI September 1989 Burr Oak, Prairie River, MI September 1989 Frankenmuth, Cass River, MI August 1989 Mount Clemens Spillway and Cutoff Canal, Clinton River, MI May 1989 Red Run, Clinton River, MI May 1989 FY 89 costs were $115,223. Total costs to end of FY were $1,612,392. 80. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 21-E. 81. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Flood Control Activities, Flood Fighting (Public Law 84-99 and P.L. 93-288 and Antecedent Legislation). Fiscal Year Costs Project and Location to September 30, 1989 Disaster Preparedness $ 330,015 Emergency Operations $ 19,724 Rehabilitation $ -0- Advance Measures $ 165,799 Advance Measures (Contributed Funds) $ 100,918 Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. The Draft Definite Project Report for the Ontonagon, MI project was terminated due to lack of local sponsorship ($18,525). The preparation of Reconnaissance Reports continued for Cedar Creek, Auburn, IN ($22,061); Grand Pointe, Eaton County, MI ($4,749); LaPorte, Pine Lake, IN ($27,873); Lincoln Creek, Milwaukee, WI ($38,928); Menominee River, Milwaukee, WI ($14,103); and Root River, Milwaukee, WI ($34,548). Financial physical closeout of study authorities were completed on the terminated Wilson Park, Milwaukee, WI project ($2,182) and the Judy Creek, IN project ($43). New Reconnaissance Report efforts were initiated for the city of Monroe, MI ($297) and Oconto River, WI ($1,291). A Reconnaissance Report addressing alternatives for reducing the O&M cost of the completed Kawkawlin River project was initiated and completed at a cost of $18,050. Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Physical and financial closeout of the 21-28 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT study authority was accomplished on the terminated study for North Fond du Lac, WI ($368). Aquatic Plant Control activities pursuant to Section 302 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (PL 89-298). None. 82. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS Field Operations. The following field operations, which were complemented by office activities, were conducted during the report period. In support of District modeling activities, flow distribution measurements were conducted in the St. Clair River delta. In support of the International Niagara Board of Control, the District conducted discharge measurements on the Niagara River. These measurements are part of programs to verify the stage-discharge relationships for the Ashland Avenue, American Falls, Buffalo and Fort Erie gages, and to support mathematical modeling activities. These programs are essential to maintaining an accurate estimate of flow over Niagara Falls, to satisfy the Niagara Treaty, and to verify stage-discharge relationships developed for the International Joint Commission Reference Study. In support of the International Lake Superior Board of Control, discharge measurements were conducted in the lower St. Marys Rapids for the calibration of the Sault Ste. Marie Compensating Works. Additional field measurements are scheduled on the St. Marys, St. Clair, Niagara, and St. Lawrence Rivers during FY 90. During the winter months, the District monitors the presence and intensity of ice in the St. Marys, St. Clair, and Detroit Rivers as an ongoing mission. Water levels are monitored continuously at key gages in these rivers for automated updating of hydrographs used for detecting possible ice jams and the associated potential for flooding. This information can be used to provide advance warning to area residents and to trigger emergency actions by the Corps and other governmental agencies (in support of respective Flood Alert Plans). Currently, data can be obtained from water level gages via direct communication with the gages or from a satellite downlink station using portable lap-top personal computers. This provides water level data from critical sites to the District office within minutes of data collection. International Activities. The following activities were conducted specifically for the International Joint Commission (IJC) Boards and Committees: Members of the Detroit District staff attended the spring semi-annual appearances of the International Great Lakes Boards before the Commission in Washington, D.C. As a result of the record high Great Lakes levels in 1985-86, and the prospects of even higher levels in 1987, the governments of the United States and Canada issued the IJC a Reference, on August 1, 1986, requesting a new water level study. Under this study, the IJC was asked to examine and report upon methods of alleviating the adverse consequences of fluctuating water levels in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River basin. As previously indicated, the water levels of the lakes were at or near recorded highs for this century. This led to an initial emphasis on high water levels and interim emergency actions which could be taken to aid interests harmed or threatened. This led to the creation of an interim task force, which was charged with completing a study within one year. Personnel from the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch of the Detroit District headed several of these tasks and were involved in preparing many of the group findings and recommendations. Although water levels descended dramatically in 1987, the main study commenced. In addressing potential measures for alleviating the adverse effects of water level fluctuations, the study groups will identify and provide advice on crisis intervention, intermediate measures and long-term considerations, building on, as appropriate, the work of the Commission's task groups. Once the study is completed the governments should be in a better position to make a determination regarding management of the Great Lakes. Because of the complexity of the issues being addressed during the Reference Study, the bulk of the work, which is expected to require several years of effort, has been assigned to functional study groups, each with a responsibility to play a lead role with respect to a group of related tasks. The work activities of each group, in turn, frequently requires integration and close collaboration with work activities of the other groups. The magnitude of this study requires that it be addressed in two phases. Phase I, which was completed in May 1989, identified the major types of measures, which address the problems brought on by lake level fluctuations, and developed a comprehensive framework for the systematic evaluation of these measures. The IJC reviewed the work of the functional groups and issued their Phase I progress report in July 1989. This report was titled, "Living With the Lakes: Challenges and Opportunities" In FY 89, the Detroit District continued to be heavily involved in providing support to several of the study groups under Phase I, in particular, Functional Group 1 - Hydraulics, Hydrology and Climate. Phase II, with a final report to the IJC due in September 1991, will apply the evaluation procedure in detail to specific selected measures identified in Phase I. Although this effort has not yet started, it is expected that it will be formulated and staffed before the end of FY 90. a. International Lake Superior Board of Control. The Detroit District Engineer is the United States Regulation Representative of the Board of Control. In support of the U.S. Section of the Board, the District provided monthly Lake Superior outflow recommendations based upon a review of the hydrologic factors which influence the future regulation of Lake Superior. These recommendations were based on the use of probability forecasts of water supplies routed through the lakes, rendering outflows under Plan 1977, the currently approved operating rule. The Board has sought to update the current regulation plan to include such things as: an additional decade of water level data; an increase in outflow capacity following construction of a new powerhouse by Great Lakes Power Limited, Canada; and the additional knowledge gained since Plan 1977 has been in effect. The Board submitted to the IJC for approval an updated and revised edition of Plan 1977 in October 1989. It is expected that further Plan modification will be explored by the Detroit District under its association with the IJC's Reference Study. During FY 89, a series of discharge measurements were made at the St. Marys River Compensating Works as part of a program to verify the existing gate rating equations or to establish new ones. A second series of measurements at the Compensating Works is scheduled for FY 90. Further measurements may be required in order to obtain adequate data. 21-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 b. International Niagara Board of Control and International Niagara Working Committee. The Chief of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch is on the U.S. Section of the Working Committee. Under the auspices of the International Niagara Committee, the Detroit District computes, coordinates and publishes, with Canada, the monthly flows in the Niagara River. The District also provides direct technical support and consulting engineering services to the Board and Committee. During FY 89, a series of discharge measurements were made at the International Bridge Section for verification of Lake Erie outflow equations. Additional measurements are planned at this section in FY 90 and 91. Due to the dynamic nature of the Niagara River, the District is involved with the periodic verification of the rating curves for the Ashland Avenue and American Falls gages. The Ashland Avenue relationship measures the flow over the falls to ensure that the Board operates within the terms of the Niagara Treaty. The American Channel relationship provides a measure of the flow over only the American Falls. As part of the ongoing programs to periodically verify the stage-discharge relationships for these gages, discharge measurements were made in FY 89. c. International St. Lawrence River Board of Control. When requested, the Detroit District supported the Buffalo District in its activities. In FY 87 and 88, the Detroit District conducted an intensive flow measurement program in the Copeland Cut reach of the St. Lawrence River to collect data to be used for development of a mathematical model of critical sections in the river, and also for proposed physical models. In FY 90, the Detroit District will perform an additional drogue study in the river. In FY 92 and FY 93, further flow distribution measurements will be made to calibrate the existing mathematical model of the river. During FY 89, personnel from the Detroit District were requested to review specific aspects of Plan 1958-D, the present outflow regulation plan for Lake Ontario, and look at ways of optimizing the outlet conditions employed in the Plan. d. International Great Lakes Diversions and Consumptive Uses Study Board. The IJC submitted its recommendations, based on the Board's report and subsequent public hearings, to the governments of the United States and Canada, in a report dated January 1985. A former Detroit District Engineer was Chairman of the U.S. Section of the Working Committee. Until such time as the Board is either dissolved or continued, certain personnel within the District continue to hold membership on the Diversions and Environmental Evaluation Subcommittees and on the Public Involvement Ad Hoc Group. In an action related to the efforts of this Board, a cooperative study, by the Council of Great Lakes Governors Water Resources Management Committee and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), was conducted to investigate, evaluate and compare water-use data in the Great Lakes basin. Personnel from the Detroit District were contacted for consultation services with respect to Great Lakes computer models. A report was produced by the USGS in 1986. In matters related to the IJC Reference Study, in FY 89, the USGS provided District personnel with updated Great Lakes consumptive uses data. Throughout the Reference Study the District is expected to continue with its support relating to the evaluation of consumptive uses. e. International Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board. Although the Board is inactive at this time, the Chief of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch remains the Secretary to the U.S. Section, as well as a member of the Hydraulics and Hydrology Committees. The Board completed its study and provided a report of its findings and recommendations to the Commission in December 1984. In January 1985, the IJC informed the governments of the United States and Canada of the findings of the Board. One of the recommendations of this Board, to create a modeling group, has been adopted by the Coordinating Committee and is described below. Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data. The Chief of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch is the U.S. Secretary to this Committee, as well as a member of its several subcommittees. A new subcommittee was created in FY 89, the Hydrometeorology and Modeling Subcommittee. The first efforts of this subcommittee are to update the Great Lakes Hydrometeorological Station Directory and to prepare a models inventory. The directory update is expected to be completed in FY 90. Committee operations continued pertaining to the coordination of basic hydraulic and hydrologic data with Canada. In FY 89, efforts were begun to more closely coordinate the format of the U.S. and Canadian water level bulletins, in order to avoid confusion and to better inform the public. Suggested changes are being considered and reviewed by this Committee. Work continues on a report which will document all the discharge measurements (U.S. and Canadian) made on the Great Lakes Connecting Channels and St. Lawrence River during the period 1860 to present. Through the auspices of the Coordinating Committee, the Corps of Engineers, by 1983, had provided funds to Canada, in the amount of $215,000, to aid in completion of precise leveling in the International Section of the St. Lawrence River. This survey, as well as similar surveys conducted in the U.S. by NOAA, are part of a program to update the International Great Lakes Datum (IGLD). The new IGLD will evolve around the epoch year 1985 and is expected to be published in early FY 91. NCD Master Plan for the Water Control Data System. During FY 89, the District continued to implement the Great Lakes Water Control Data System, using a Harris-800 minicomputer and an extensive system of automated gaging stations. The computer collects data from the District's data collection platforms (DCP's), from dedicated lines to the National Weather Service's telecommunication network, and from NOAA/NOS and Canadian water level computer systems. The District has 29 active DCP's and plans to install as many as three additional DCP's in the near future. Great Lakes Information Management. The District, in FY 89, continued development of computer mapping capabilities centered around dedicated computer hardware and software for processing satellite and aerial photography and encoded mapped information into a Geographic Information System (GIS) for the U.S. portion of the Great Lakes. The GIS is being generated to contain multiple information layers on the physiographic, economic, sociologic, environmental, and hydrologic characteristics of the Great Lakes region. The GIS is designed to create a "corporate data base" to support various District operations and studies, including improved monitoring of hydrometeorologic conditions over the basin. Hydraulics and Hydrology of the Great Lakes. Studies to improve the existing Great Lakes water level forecasting system, including investigation into the factors affecting the Great Lakes water balance relationship (i.e., runoff, over water precipitation, evaporation, ice retardation, etc.) and use of real-time hydrologic data, were continued by Great Lakes 21-30 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch staff members. Hydrologically based computer models are being calibrated and tested for each of the Great Lakes for possible use in simulating water supply conditions, forecasting water levels and regulating the outflows from Lakes Superior and Ontario. District personnel, in cooperation with National Weather Service personnel, are continuing to assess water supply conditions over both Lakes Superior and Ontario, through use of airborne snow and soil moisture surveys, and processed satellite imagery. Levels of the Great Lakes. The Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch provided technical information and expertise regarding recorded lake levels and still water lake level forecasts to many interested parties, such as Congressmen, state and local officials, news media, navigation and power interests, concerned property owners and recreational boaters. Upon request, water level information was supplied to the public in the form of direct answers to numerous inquiries, addresses to various civic groups, and interviews with the news media. Currently, daily reports on present water levels, precipitation and significant events on the Great Lakes basin, are being made available on the District's Harris-800. Historical water level data is also available on this system. Those agencies and individuals interested can retrieve this information at any time via a telecommunication device. The publication of an internationally coordinated (U.S. and Canada) forecast of Great Lakes water levels, under the auspices of the Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data, was continued during the period. The circulation in the U.S. alone is about 13,000 copies. Total costs under Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters for FY 89 were $1,458,207. General Investigations 83. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $12,377 for the navigation study on the Great Lakes Connecting Channels and Harbors (GLCC&H). Pre-construction Engineering and Design work activities were outlined and are scheduled to be initiated in FY 90, and completed in FY 92. Preparation of the Chief of Engineers report continued. The city of Superior, WI, elected to not provide a willingness to sponsor the Superior Harbor portion of the project. Flood Damage Prevention studies cost $834,370. Funds in the amount of $13,083 were expended on coordinating the Ecorse Creek Basin, Wayne County, Flood Protection Study. In addition, $2,461 were spent in coordinating work efforts on a Summary Report dealing with the overall study authority for the Great Lakes, particularly Lake Ontario and Lake Erie, of which Ecorse Creek is an Interim study. Funds in the amount of $120,361 were used to prepare a Reconnaissance Report for Southern Wayne County, MI. Continuation of the Saginaw River, MI, Basin Study was accomplished at a cost of $531,142. The St. Joseph River, MI, Basin Study continued at a cost this FY of $167,323. Coordination Studies with Other Agencies includes: Special Investigations, $88,347 (includes $74,347 for engineering and technical assistance given to local citizens because of fluctuating lake levels of the Great Lakes; F.E.R.C., $2,000; Interagency Water Resources Development, $12,000). Soil Conservation Service, $2,000; and Planning Assistance to States (Section 22), $136,700 (includes $75,000- MN, $59,700- MI). Funds in the amount of $91,701 for Fox River, WI, and $41,317 for the Inland Route, MI, were expended to continue the restudy of Federal interest under Section 216. 84. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN MONROE HARBOR, MI: A Final Survey Report recommending structural modifications was completed in February 1980. The report recommendations are: to deepen the River Raisin portion of the project to 27 feet; to widen to 500 feet and deepen to 28 feet the entrance channel from Lake Erie; to provide a new turning basin able to accommodate 1,000 foot vessels; and to construct a confined disposal facility that would create a 700 acre marsh and provide shoreline protection behind the disposal facility. The Monroe Harbor Study was included in the FY 1984, 1985, and 1986 budgets under the category "Continuation of Planning and Engineering" for the purpose of collecting updated and detailed project data, reevaluating project channel dimensions and dredged material disposal requirements, reaffirming project economic and environmental feasibility, and preparing preliminary project design. A reevaluation report was completed in FY 89, and is under review at North Central Division. The report proposes a reduction in the recommended channel width and depth, and proposes open water disposal of the dredged materials. FY 89 costs for continuing preconstruction engineering and design for Monroe Harbor, MI, were $122,458. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN-WI: A Final Survey Report recommending a commercial navigation project at Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN-WI, was completed in November 1982. The report recommends deepening approximately 4.0 miles of navigation channels (North, South, Upper, and Minnesota Channels) in the St. Louis River to a 27 foot project depth, widening the Cross Channel turning basin to 1,500 feet, widening the bend at the site where the Arrowhead Bridge was removed to 600 feet and disposing the dredged material in an upland confined disposal site located on a 120- acre tract of land in the Superior Forest. FY 1989 costs for continuing the General Design Memorandum for Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN-WI, were $280,662. FORT WAYNE, IN The Final Feasibility Report (FFR) and Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) were completed by the District in August 1987 and revised in April 1988. The Recommended Plan provides for upgrading, to a 100-year level of protection, approximately 35,000 feet of existing levees and floodwalls. On September 14, 1988, the FFR/FEIS, BERH Report was forwarded to the Chiefs office. The Chief of Engineers Report was forwarded to the Secretary of the Army on May 1, 1989. The FY 89 cost for Fort Wayne, IN, was $575,691. 85. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA FY 89 costs for International Water Studies were $25,000, and $233,938 for Flood Plain Management Services. Flood Insurance Studies. Six Flood Insurance Studies were completed in FY 89 for Sheboygan County, WI; and the Michigan communities of Ann Arbor City, Washtenaw County; Hersey Village, Osceola County; Lincoln Township, Newaygo County; Kalamazoo City, Kalamazoo County; and Wyoming City, Kent County. The studies were completed at a total cost of $190.313. The FY 89 costs for the six studies were $129, $1, 21-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 $15,036, $14,801, $34,616, and $33,232, respectively. Michigan Flood Insurance Studies for Georgetown Township, Ottawa County; Lapeer City, Lapeer County; and Thomas Township, Saginaw County will be completed in FY 90. The FY 89 costs associated with these studies were $30,205, $8,613, and $6,234, respectively. FY 89 coordination costs for the Michigan communities of Adrian Township, Lenawee County; City of Three Rivers, St. Joseph County; Manistee Township, Manistee County, and Northfield Township, Washtenaw County, were $923, $195, $283, and $340, respectively. Final coordination meetings were held on completed Flood Insurance Studies for Allen County, IN; and the Michigan communities of Armada City, Macomb County; Clare City, Clare County; Holland City, Ottawa County; Lapeer Township, Lapeer County; and Mayfield Township, Lapeer County. The FY 89 costs for these activities were $975, $2,180, $73, $28, $465, $214, and $387, respectively. Costs in FY 89 in support of the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Community Assistance Program, limited map maintenance program, and a special study on Great Lakes wave runup methodology were $29,088, $34,721, and $73,993, respectively. A Dam Break Analysis for Bloomer Dam, WI, was completed for the St. Paul District at a cost of $12,233. 21-32 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 2. Arcadia Harbor, New Work MI Approp. 0 - - - 0 Cost 0 - - - 0 Maint. Approp. 117,000 433,000 272,000 2,134,000 4,094,362 Cost 144,618 387,088 283,253 2,158,207 4,083,366 3. Ashland Harbor, New Work WI Approp. - - - - 1,695,645 Cost - - - - 1,695,645 Maint. Approp. 115,000 364,948 9,528 87,254 3,072,078 Cost 129,603 360,246 14,231 82,952 3,067,776 4. Au Sable Harbor, New Work MI Approp. - - - - 209,776' Cost - - - - 209,776' Maint. Approp. - - 89,697 7,000 2,571,565 Cost - - 35,364 61,333 2,571,565 5. Bayport Harbor, New Work MI Approp. - - - - 93,597 Cost - - - - 93,597 Maint. Approp. - - - 49,346 121,283 Cost - - - 49,346 121,283 Diked Disposal Approp. - - - - 792 Cost - - - - 792 6. Big Suamico River, New Work WI Approp. - - - - 20,243 Cost - - - - 20,243 Maint. Approp. 8,757 16,557 128,974 449,293 770,186 Cost 8,757 16,557 128,282 449,985 770,186 7. Black River (P.H.) New Work MI Approp. - - - - 830,1652 Cost - - - - 830,1652 Maint. Approp. - - 22,071 66,435 600,9473 Cost - - 18,414 69,106 599,961P 8. Black River Harbor, New Work MI (U.P.) Approp. - - - - 383,350 Cost - - - - 383,350 Maint. Approp. (6,000) - 147,000 (14,000) 711,423 Cost 8,645 1,410 135,450 (2,480) 711,393 9. Bolles Harbor, New Work MI Approp. - - - - 426,413^ Cost - - - - 426,413' Maint. Approp. 167,964 222,422 377,499 (1,000) 1,669,762 Cost 153,415 143,902 335,703 141,632 1,669,760 Diked Disposal Approp. - - - - 1,190,550 Cost - - - - 1,190,550 21-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 10. Charlevoix Harbor, New Work MI Approp. - - - - 180,623 Cost - - - - 180,623 Maint. Approp. 182,000 253,000 1,080,000 1,523,000 7,909,900 Cost 154,568 251,394 1,115,167 1,528,061 7,908,863 Rehab. Approp. 0 - - - 1,129,396 Cost 0 - - - 1,129,396 11. Clinton River, New Work MI Approp. - - - - 549,798' Cost - - - - 549,798' Maint. Approp. 8,662 89,661 19,248 122,935 1,255,303 Cost 8,662 89,661 14,342 126,559 1,254,021 Diked Disposal Approp. 71,000 261,000 2,219,000 966,100 3,907,300 Cost 72,663 237,122 2,098,062 1,109,377 3,899,262 12. Detour Harbor, New Work MI Approp. - - - - 1,354,910 Cost - - - - 1,354,910 Contributed Funds New Work Approp. - - - - 1,204,436 Cost - - - - 1,204,436 Maint. Approp. 3,752 22,320 99,664 4,500 136,260 Cost 4,118 12,331 104,437 9,716 136,260 13. Detroit River, New Work MI Approp. - - - - 76,877,3576 Cost - - - - 76,877,357' Maint. Approp. 3,446,800 4,017,500 2,714,000 3,680,100 83,005,424 Cost 4,109,489 4,030,841 2,673,764 3,709,048 82,934,502 Diked Disposal Approp. 0 - - 768,600 42,169,294 Cost 1,383 54 - 765,570 42,163,234 Contributed Funds Maint. Approp. 242,280 72,612 46,343 - 361,235 Cost 203,000 89,344 68,891 - 361,235 14. Duluth-Superior Harbor, New Work MI and WI Approp. - - - - 16,109,258' Cost - - - - 16,109,258' Maint. Approp. 1,973,700 2,219,700 3,694,400 2,665,000 43,961,370 Cost 1,945,302 2,304,284 3,699,515 2,684,950 43,934,387 Diked Disposal Approp. - - - - 1,556,249 Cost - - - - 1,556,249 Rehab. Approp. 4,830,000 3,773,000 (55,000) - 10,958,000 Cost 4,773,781 3,930,167 (63,083) 18,330 10,950,873 15. Eagle Harbor, New Work MI Approp. - - - - 205,164 Cost - - - - 205,164 Maint. Approp. - - - 2,000 87,946 Cost - - - 1,948 87,894 21-34 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 16. Fox River, WI 17. Frankfort Harbor, MI 18. Grand Haven Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 Contributed Funds 19. Grand Marais Harbor, MI 20. Grand Marias Harbor, MN 21. Grand Traverse Bay Harbor, MI New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,063,000 1,246,100 1,545,000 1,383,000 1,064,843 1,251,433 1,565,066 1,355,554 45,000 150,999 25,000 74,449 49,296 150,723 21,193 80,360 615,700 673,200 672,100 979,000 615,944 670,055 654,999 993,902 1,181,500 91,000 69,000 65,000 1,204,587 92,608 67,261 60,379 - - - 27,936 - - -5,643 1,079,000 (16,000) (17,336) 1,071,033 (3,820) 18,064 0 89,000 43,000 0 87,584 37,660 10,409 10,909 23,000 29,756 21-35 3,753,3343 3,753,3343 41,069,773' 41,027,115' 1,955,1590 1,955,15910 6,529,345 6,528,291 274,776 274,776 1,204,500 1,204,500 1,283,469" 1,283,469" 175,000 175,000 22,708,455" 22,699,614 '2 813,613 813,613 780,400 780,400 1,958,684 1,951,319 27,200 15,585 1,055,871 1,055,871 1,740,956 1,718,663 450,972 450,972 1,991,952 1,991,952 1,230,000 1,230,000 266,037 266,037 1,729,653 1,729,653 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 22. Green Bay Harbor, WI 23. Harbor Beach Harbor, MI 25. Holland Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 26. Inland Route, MI 27. Kenosha Harbor, WI Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Total Cost to FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 - - - - 9,946,395' "' - - - - 9,946,395'"' 1,761,000 1,299,000 2,562,000 2,796,200 1,604,864 1,384,841 2,630,676 2,803,935 290,000 205,000 25,000 310,913 205,760 23,982 0 402 313,949 295,641 2,651,100 330,900 310,694 252,600 2,671,991 363,060 507,000 484,876 694,000 828.919 86,000 60,666 454,000 472,285 80,000 74.093 1,137,600 1,096,765 49,500 58.655 3,915,000 3,961,525 22,000 19,829 64,000 74,000 46,000 85,167 60,411 63,861 22,620,435" 22,593,934'" 6,813,807 6,808,908 1,200,598 1,200,598 9,316,980 9,314,671 194,504 194,504 243,100 243,100 771,827 " ' 7 771,827'"67 621,000 621,000 17,913,312 17,910,881 1,611,700 1,607,930 502,452 502,452 1,663,300 1,663,300 918,222'" 918,222'1 2,415,888 2,411,272 404,300 404,300 8,077 208,000 168,916 1,072 1,182,600 1,206,019 352,000 216,200 351,863 232,834 988,969 ' 19.2 988,96919.20 4,711,6682' 4,711,0472' 1,270,275 1,270,275 4,378,600 4,378,600 21-36 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 28. Kewaunee Harbor, WI 29. Keweenaw Waterway, MI 30. Lac Labelle Harbor, MI 31. Lake St. Clair, MI, Channels 32. Leland Harbor, MI 33. Lexington Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Section 111 Section 111 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 243,000 172,000 954,200 559,500 225,007 159,073 962,764 562,078 681,000 2,822,000 584,000 4,588,700 668,439 2,777,736 631,023 4,564,738 241,000 855,000 162,500 220,193 875,855 150,762 15,000 30,149 - - - 73,000 - - - 73,000 262,600 103,000 256,000 54,100 260,663 105,926 225,803 100,244 100,000 105,000 135,000 129,500 104,735 100,159 138,200 128,479 - 49,000 - 22,997 260,000 88,000 407,397 92,307 194,000 210,048 115,000 32,489 10,000 19,955 294,000 375,817 21-37 758,33322 758,33322 5,239,291" 5,219,22723 617,300 617,300 2,961,461 2,961,461 5,974,141 5,974,141 19,546,38324 19,494,65524 1,523,500 1,523,500 269,270 269,270 554,994 554,994 7,675,35725 7,675,35725 7,568,18426 7,566,76426 5,119,800 5,119,800 1,027,08927 1,027,08927 1,883,011 1,879,808 70,678 70,678 1,646,304 1,646,304 1,088,888 1,088,888 372,000 372,000 377,044 377,044 1,211,000 1,209,784 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 34. Little Lake Harbor, MI 35. Ludington Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 36. Mackinac Island Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 37. Manistee Harbor, MI 38. Manistique Harbor, MI 39. Manitowoc Harbor, WI Contributed Funds New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 263,000 165,600 216,000 162,500 279,129 166,243 221,928 163,102 329,000 1,743,000 566,000 150,500 337,698 1,764,395 565,357 132,183 (64,000) 41,800 11,000 (46,931) 40,390 13,086 22,274 136,000 1,580,300 22,023 59,616 1,656,661 10,000 2,769 2,000 2,274 816,000 777,000 299,000 454,000 791,534 784,446 313,522 458,202 - - 39,436 172,400 - - 39,435 168,966 296,000 283,000 213,000 134,000 300,389 297,160 220,309 134,498 21-38 600,4782" 600,4782" 3,312,615 3,311,290 7,912,2022"9 7,912,20229 620,000 620,000 10,866,066"' 10,839,260' 357,913 357,913 724,340 717,109 229,085 229,085 105,004 105,004 1,812,044 1,812,044 2,696,522"' 2,696,522"' 6,684,73332 6,683,0582 1,374,164 1,374,164 1,299,355" 1,299,355" 2,082,630 2,079,195 316,333 316,333 2,048,91434 2,048,9143" 1,911,130 1,911,130 5,557,515" 5,553,254" 3,081,756 3,081,756 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 40. Marquette Harbor, MI 41. Menominee Harbor & River, MI & WI Contributed Funds 42. Milwaukee Harbor, WI 43. Monroe Harbor, MI Contributed Funds New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Diked- Disposal Approp. Cost 204,384 184,646 9,188 204,324 185,349 8,369 6,741 7,810 104,000 149,886 26,000 114,500 109,403 149,204 29,387 115,121 1,282,893 1,282,893 2,007,856 2,007,856 465,757 465,757 533,476" 533,4763 2,074,840 s: 2,071,73637 1,351,852 1,351,852 (10,000) 2,288 440,000 399,452 3,205,000 3,189,537 593,660 591,014 36,762 36,762 2,783,000 2,753,156 1,235,000 1,229,552 540,300 608,059 3,592,400 3,537,129 442,400 426,799 784,000 901,866 1,640,900 1,576,000 1,289,500 514,800 1,700,939 1,577,775 1,133,479 699,862 (17,000) (23,493) (1,000) (6,500) 34,881 (1,077) 8,231,02438 8,231,02438 28,361,9753' 28,340,54039 12,718,210 12,690,646 6,380,925 6,380,925 987,340" 987,340� 16,158,420" 16,154,808� - (1,818) - 5,442 0 38,614,400 0 38,614,391 83,182 83,182 21-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 44. Muskegon Harbor MI Section 111 Section 111 45. New Buffalo Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 46. Ontonagon Harbor, MI 47. Pentwater Harbor, MI 48. Point Lookout Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 49. Portage Lake Harbor, MI New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 86,000 89,926 1,593,000 1,602,842 1,337,300 1,468,604 526,000 664,118 83,000 77,669 916,000 919,158 80,000 532,000 245,000 77,241 533,537 242,196 45,000 70,000 305,700 58,390 29,843 337,972 60,000 84,085 7,832 0 804 5,000 398,371 109,800 10,057 386,063 121,175 56,000 48,354 443,600 420,997 3,000 10,824 573,700 563,053 8,000 18,525 691,000 701,989 194,666 221,000 288,000 261,500 194,467 222,504 283,769 268,761 1,701,100 33,991 266,980 1,882,296 35,484 259,915 (2,743) 606 120,385 125,487 21-40 30,000 40,242 13,854 9,292 249,400 14,664 6,406 226,286 2,912,110"' 2,912,110 ' 105,000 105,000 6,301,11542 6,295,52412 2,324,700 2,316,815 13,824,300 13,824,300 1,285,716 1,285,716 1,186,467 1,186,467 3,311,324 3,308,119 953,90343 952,170^5 9,388,853" 9,354,487" 181,500 181,500 21,000 21,000 179,899 179,899 3,795,755 3,794,364 2,642,584 2,642,584 3,269,161 3,269,161 121,600 121,600 9,257 9,257 256,129 256,129 1,823,763 1,797,763 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 50. Port Austin Harbor, MI 51. Port Sanilac Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Section 111 Contributed Funds Section 111 52. Port Washington Harbor, WI Contributed Funds 53. Port Wing Harbor, WI 54. Rouge River, MI New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost 52,000 50,000 100,000 1,245,000 50,753 5 87,191 1,272,186 60,613 (62,502) 106,867 79,824 544,368 (55,855) 38,044 140,401 1,772 177,000 128,101 8,676 51,263 242,404 87,000 92,717 - 207,000 6,000 (1,000) 185,852 45,478 157,407 11,545 - - - 106,506 - - - 106,506 - 78,935 - 78,216 3,598 4,140 711,700 2,685,000 ,(82,000) 817,500 694,589 2,673,425 (50,114) 827,076 329 - - 247,000 12 174 246,608 21-41 2,575,334" 2,538,469'5 1,749,822 1,741,556 159,000 159,000 909,963 909,963 487,108 487,108 336,000 336,000 1,967,286 1,961,568 115,000 115,000 9,158 9,158 1,014,000 1,014,000 2,582,204" 2,582,204" 2,564,12147 2,564,121" 10,621 10,621 1,624,000 1,624,000 63,393 63,393 877,118 876,941 675,251" 675,251" 19,168,103" 19,166,277" 14,770,823 14,763,825 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 55. Saginaw River, MI (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 56. St. Clair River, MI 57. St. Joseph Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 58. St. Marys River, MI 59. Saugatuck Harbor, MI and Kalamazoo River, MI 60. Saxon Harbor, WI Section 111 New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 626,200 2,548,000 1,937,000 680,370 2,422,846 2,052,297 1,642,100 1,634,544 182,500 126,000 80,000 188,000 207,953 149,558 71,832 198,388 816,100 1,527,000 1,927,100 573,500 863,958 1,519,667 1,874,080 605,737 611,000 647,000 3,406,700 527,100 591,221 670,265 3,301,795 633,865 - - (5,700) 14,595 868 (5,700) 730,000 387,000 465,000 632,995 520,434 244,935 00 74,800 331,988 - 160,657,071l" - 160,657,070"' 9,704,800 9,934,400 14,288,300 9,761,729 9,497,511 14,783,035 10,527,500 10,499,775 78,559 29,270 156,161 134,973 95,146 26,250 152,608 88,532 (1,130) - - - 477 - - - 2,237 25,098 21-42 15,191 50,000 158,500 2,434 59,766 135,491 14,917,1275 14,917,127" 13,600 13,600 38,876,394 38,848,145 19,579,900" 19,579,713"5 19,213,24652 19,213,24652 18,848,513 18,805,372 976,485 976,485 828,000 828,000 12,765,264 12,758,766 962,216 962,216 638,076 638,076 4,272,100 4,272,100 211,317,308 210,791,877 13,100 13,100 364,5275" 364,527" 3,322,690" 3,269,520" 426,507" 426,507" 667,870 667,870 639,293 613,293 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 61. Sebewaing River, MI 62. Sheboygan Harbor, WI 63. South Haven Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 64. Sturgeon Bay, WI & Lake Michigan Ship Canal, WI 65. Two Harbors, MN New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 230,400 396,176 522,051 - 111,517 366,111 670,660 327,000 301,000 217,000 61,500 363,502 251,568 267,383 61,112 (15,000) 9,231 64 87,000 197,335 65,000 116,500 84,580 194,378 85,519 116,801 312,000 669,316 3,198 3,584 13,000 13,725 176,000 141,300 269,500 246,000 346,931 121,157 266,195 271,429 11,953 1 - - 24,521 157,000 160,722 - 13,315 120,516 203,960 21-43 35,573 35,573 3,438,060 3,437,722 1,136,08857 1,136,0885' 5,390,892" 5,390,300" 609,028 609,028 907,792 907,792 452,42659 452,426" 532,000 532,000 3,863,301" 3,863,001 1,632,076 1,632,076 42,381 42,381 1,157,000 1,154,164 1,059,722" 1,059,7226' 7,755,41562 7,752,76162 311,119 311,119 884,899 884,899 4,170,710'3 4,170,71063 2,247,436 2,242,984 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 66. Two Rivers Harbor, WI 67. Whitefish Point Harbor, MI 68. White Lake Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 76. Paw Paw Lake, MI 77. Saginaw River, MI (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 78. Sebewaing River, MI 82. Surveillance Of North Boundary Waters New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Diked Disposal Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 21,978 21,017 23,416 7,174 159,992 15,445 26,713 134,581 - - - 14,772 - - - 14,772 98,000 95,000 139,000 166,900 98,248 91,872 141,570 170,793 389,000 429,111 49,000 11,000 23,000 53,483 8,936 23,587 2,900,000 125,000 (3,000) 2,777,125 263,233 10,599 57,336 9,000 16,224 - 260,000 44,928 19,298 5,000 4,000 8,000 4,000 0 1,358 0 148,628 7,500 7,243 1,330,000 1,230,000 1,435,000 1,440,000 1,308,778 1,278,991 1,372,820 1,458,207 360,320" 360,320" 5,576,648"' 5,550,648"' 1,187,472 1,187,472 58,057 58,057 771,639 771,639 251,027 251,027 1,081 1,081 207,862 207,862 249,700 249,700 2,559,363 2,559,063 734,000 729,156 3,589,000 3,589,000 24,813,359 24,715,090 173,000 172,997 365,642" 365,642" 408,144 407,887 0 0 44,329,3346" 44,252,216"7 21-44 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 'Includes $114,786 for previous projects. 2 Includes $85,849 for previous projects. Includes $12,008 for maintenance of previous projects. 'Includes $255,000 contributed funds. SIncludes $25,500 for previous projects and $289,752 contributed funds for existing projects. ' Includes $2,097,254 for previous projects. ' Includes $1,547,195 for new work for previous projects. " Includes $3,239,910 for previous projects. Includes $89,309 for previous projects. 'O Includes $31,709 contributed funds. " Includes $311,329 for previous projects. '2 Includes $13,437 for previous projects. '-In cludes $396,974 for previous projects. " Includes $109,463 for previous projects. "sIn cludes $8,918 for previous projects. '"In cludes $176,620 for new work, $127,598 for maintenance. " Includes $35,705 contributed funds. " Includes $148,000 contributed funds for existing project. " Includes $453,839 for previous projects. 20 Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. 21 Includes $21,818 for previous projects. 2 Includes $149,312 for previous projects. 2 Includes $88,364 for previous projects. 24 Includes $402,242 for previous projects. 2" Includes $656,000 for previous projects. 26 Includes $235,346 for previous projects. 2" Includes $354,139 contributed funds. '" Includes $57,670 contributed funds. 29 Includes $491,416 for previous projects. 3� Excludes $136,286 contributed funds. 3' Includes $354,999 for previous projects. 32 Includes $150,910 for previous projects. "3 Includes $3,955 for previous projects. 3' Includes $400,126 for previous projects. 3' Includes $54,288 for previous projects. Includes $312,423 for previous projects. "' Includes $36,194 for previous projects. " Includes $1,293,220 for previous projects. 3' Includes $459,305 for previous projects. 4' Includes contributed funds of $300,000 for new work and $166,667 for maintenance contributed by: Port Commission of Monroe, $300,000; Consolidated Paper Co., $125,000 and River Raisin Co., $41,667. " Includes $613,408 for previous projects. " Includes $446,183 for previous projects. '' Includes $284,802 for previous projects. " Includes $113,326 for previous projects. ' Includes $172,100 contributed funds. 3' Includes $188,495 for previous projects. " Includes $15,123 for previous projects. ' Includes $50,084 for previous projects. ' Includes $56,608 for previous projects. " Includes $962,556 for previous projects. " Includes $1,671,660 Public Works Funds and $49,419 emergency relief funds. ' Includes $503,113 for previous projects. '" Includes $2,904,807 for previous projects. " Includes $90,232 for previous projects. " Includes $117,554 for previous projects. " Excludes $50,193 contributed funds. " Includes $487,817 for previous projects. " Includes $87,131 for previous projects. " Includes $187,233 for previous projects. 60 Includes $131,239 for previous projects. "' Includes $323,419 for previous projects. 02 Includes $219,730 for previous projects. �' Includes $48,404 national recovery act for new work funds. " Includes $212,857 for previous projects. " Includes $33,113 for previous projects. " Includes $15,000 for previous projects. " Includes $3,973,897 for previous projects. 21-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 21-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1871 Nov. 17, 1988 Mar. 3, 1905 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 11, 1888 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 6, 1900 Aug. 8, 1917 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 2, 1945 May 20, 1965 Aug. 26, 1937 Sep. 19, 1890 Jul. 13, 1892 Sep. 22, 1922 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Apr. 23, 1970 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 6, 1965 Aug. 14, 1876 Aug. 2, 1882 Jun. 13, 1902 Jun. 20, 1938 ALGOMA HARBOR, WI (See Section 1 of Text) Outer basin enclosed by a north pier 1,102 feet long and a south breakwater 1,530 feet long, a 2,100 foot entrance channel and outer basin. Deauthorization of the outer harbor basin feature of the navigation project. ARCADIA HARBOR, MI (See Section 2 of Text) Maintenance of existing 12-foot channel. ASHLAND HARBOR, WI. (See Section 3 of Text) Breakwater 7,900 feet long and dredging to remove a shoal. Appropriation of $60,000 for 'Continuing improvements on enlarged project: (On completion of Poe Lock in 1896, with available depth of 20 feet, dredging at Ashland Harbor was carried to a similar depth.) Detached breakwater extending 4,700 feet out from shore at a point 2,600 feet east of main breakwater (prolonged) and parallel thereto. Project modified by omitting detached breakwater and defining depth and extent of channel to be dredged. Widening part of present channel for entrance channel and for basin in eastern part of harbor. Deepening east basin to 25 feet and west channel, as far as 8th Ave. West extended to 21 feet. Widening west channel to 750 feet at its westerly end. Deepening portions of East Basin and West Channel to 27 and 21 feet, respectively. AU SABLE HARBOR AT AU SABLE RIVER (OSCODA), MI (See Section 4 of Text) Dredging channels 12 and 10 feet deep and riprapping North Pier. BAY PORT HARBOR, MICHIGAN (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide. BIG SUAMICO RIVER, WI (See Section 6 of Text) Channel from Green Bay to 1,800 feet above the river mouth. BLACK RIVER (PORT HURON), MI (See Section 7 of Text) Channel from mouth of Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge. Channel from Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge to Washington Ave. Consolidation of projects for Black River at Port Huron and Mouth of Black River. Settling Basin. Deepening channel and settling basin to 20 feet, and widening to 100 feet 2 bends; 1 at the foot of 12th St., the other below the Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge. Extension of existing channel. BLACK RIVER HARBOR, MI (UPPER PENINSULA) (See Section 8 of Text) Two converging breakwaters, an entrance channel between breakwaters, an inner channel, and an irregular harbor basin. Project depths 12 feet in approach channel and 8 feet in the river channel and basin. BOLLES HARBOR, MI (See Section 9 of Text) Entrance channel in Lake Erie, Access channel in LaPlaisance Creek, Steel sheet pile revetment. CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI (See Section 10 of Text) Channel from Lake Michigan to Round Lake protected where needed by piers and revetments. Channel from Round Lake to Lake Charlevoix. Project depth increased to 15 feet. Project depth increased to 18 feet. River and Harbor Act H. Doc. 1098, 100th Cong. 2d Sess., Sec. 52(c) of the Water Resources Development Act (W.R.D.A.) of 1988 H. Doc. 194, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. H.Ex. Doc. 89, 48th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Reports, 1886, p. 1674; and 1887, p. 1966. H. Doc. 1698, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 133, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 82d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 337, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 165, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. H. Doc 498, 74th, Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report 1889, p. 2291 No Printed Report H. Doc. 436, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 162, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 54, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. S. Ex. Doc. 16, 44th Cong., Ist Sess., and Annual Report 1876, p. 523 No Prior Survey of Estimates. No Prior Survey of Estimates. S. Doc. 163, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.' 21-46 TABLE 21-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1988 Mar. 29, 1977 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 19, 1963 Jun. 3, 1969 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1910 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19353 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 19504 Mar. 21, 1956 Jul. 14, 1960 Aug. 13, 1968 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 May 28, 1908s Jul. 27, 1916 Mar. 2, 1919 Restore recreational uses or provide comparable recreational uses at the South Pier. Project depth increased to 24 and 23 feet, and construction of revetment upstream of Highway Bridge. CLINTON RIVER, MI (See Section 11 of Text) Channel in River and Lake St. Clair, Pile Dike, Closing channels and making Cutoff, and revetments as needed. Widening entrance channel and constructing protected harbor basin. DETOUR HARBOR, MI (See Section 12 of Text) Small boat harbor and harbor of refuge, 10-foot channel, 8-foot deep access channel protected by 1,000-foot breakwater. DETROIT RIVER, MI (See Section 13 of Text) Amherstburg Channel and removal of Grosse Ile shoal. Fighting Island Channel. Livingstone Channel. Channel Depths of 26 and 25 feet. Channel to Wyandotte 21 feet deep and 300 feet wide through Middle Ground opposite Head of Fighting Island. Trenton Channel and Turning Basin (West of Grosse Ile). American Channel North of Belle Isle between Windmill Point and Fairway Slip, Detroit. Deepen Westerly 300 feet of Amherstburg Channel and Ballards Reef Channel below Livingstone Channel to 27 feet to provide depths adequate for 24-foot draft navigation when governing Lakes are at Datum, with necessary widening at approaches and bends and construction of necessary compensating works, Detroit River. Extend Turning Basin in Trenton Channel 600 feet. Dredge through East Draw of lower Grosse Ile Bridge and extend 300-foot width of Channel North of lower Grosse Ile Bridge. Channel Depth of 28.5 feet throughout downbound and Two-Way Channels, except in upper (27.7-foot depth) and lower, (29-foot depth) Livingstone Channel, and in upbound Channel; 27-foot depth in Ballards Reef Channel below junction with Livingstone Channel. 27.5-foot depth in westerly 300-foot width of Limekiln Crossing and Amherstburg Reaches, and 28.5-foot depth in westerly 300-foot width of Hackett Beach, with necessary compensation works. Also 28.5-foot depth in Lake Erie from Detroit River to Pelee Passage Shoal. Inclusive. Trenton Channel; Deepen to 27 feet, where necessary, Wyandotte Reach from Detroit River to Upper Grosse Ile Bridge, about 5.5 miles, deepen to 28 feet and widen to 300 feet below Upper Grosse Ile Bridge to and including a Turning Basin 28 feet deep and 15 across in area outside project limits. Trenton Channel: Deepen to 28 feet and widen to 300 feet from the Upper Turning Basin at Trenton to Gibraltar, about 20,500 feet downstream: Construct a Turning Basin at Gibraltar at a depth of 28 feet, width of 830 feet, and length of 1,500 feet: Build compensating works to maintain water levels. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN AND WI (See Section 14 of Text) Dredging. Rebuilding piers at Superior Entry. Enlarge plan for Superior Entry and additional dredging near draw span of Burlington Northern railway bridge. Dredging additional area for basin inside Duluth entrance to 22-foot depth. Enlarging Superior Harbor Basin. Removal of shoal point at southerly end of East Gate Basin. H. Doc. 1098, 100th Cong. 2d Sess., Sec. 25 of the W.R.D.A. of 1988 Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. S. Doc. 199, 46th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1880, p. 2062 and H. Doc. 210, 44th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1886, p. 219 Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. H. Doc. 712, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. and 40, 58th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 17, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 266, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. 676, 61st Cong., 2d Sess., and 32, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 205, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 734, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 30, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 319, 86th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 338, 90th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Ex. Doc. 59, 53rd Cong., 3d Sess. and Annual Report, 1895, p. 2538. H. Doc. 82, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 221, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 651, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 1018, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 21-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 30, 19303 Aug. 30, 19303 Jul. 16, 19526 Jul. 14, 1960' Oct. 4, 1961 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 5, 1886 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1925' Jun. 26, 1934' Jul. 3, 1958 ' Jun. 23, 1866" Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 23, 1866 Jun. 14, 1880 Sep. 19, 1890 Jul. 13, 1892 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 17, 1986 Howards Bay Channel, 20 feet deep. Deepening and widening channels and basins. Deepen Superior Front Channel and a portion of East Gate Basin to 25 feet. Present project dimensions of channels and basin. Abandons northerly portion of 21st Avenue West Channel. Deepen portions of the North and South Channels, the entire Upper Channel and Minnesota Channel to 27 feet; widen the Cross Channel turning basin to 1,500 feet; widen the bend at the Arrowhead Bascule Bridge to 600 feet, and construct an upland CDE EAGLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 15 of Text) Breakwater and dredging of entrance channel 130 feet wide to depth of 14 feet. Project modified by reduction of channel width from 130 feet to 80 feet. Project modified by increasing width of breakwater from 20 feet to 30 feet and increasing the channel from 80 to 130 feet. Project modified by omitting breakwater and constructing guide piers. Inner harbor basin and breakwaters and removal of east guide pier. FOX RIVER, WI (See Section 16 of Text) Improvement of Fox River. Dredging Fond du Lac Harbor on Lake Winnebago. Improvement of Wolf River Improvement of Stockbridge, of Calumet and Miller Bay, and of Brothertown Harbor, on Lake Winnebago. Increased depth in rock cuts on lower river, widen Neenah Channel, and a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Sec. 108, that Federal project structure, appurtenances, and real property of Upper Fox River, WI, be disposed of to State of Wisconsin. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI (See Section 17 of Text) A New Outlet 12 feet deep protected by Piers and Revetments. Exterior Breakwaters, removal of portions of Piers, Project Dimensions of Outer Basin. Dredge the area in Lake Betsie. Deepen approach and entrance Channels. Extend Inner Basin and Dredge recreational anchorage area. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI (See Section 18 of Text) Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Present Project dimensions of Harbor channel to Grand Trunk Car Ferry Slip and River Channel. Eliminating all of that portion of Grand River above Bass River, Consolidation of Projects for Harbor and River. Channel to Spring Lake Present Project Dimensions of Harbor Channel from Car Ferry Slip to Grand Trunk Railway Bridge and Turning Basin. Deepen the harbor entrance channel and harbor river channel to 29 and 27 feet, respectively; provide a new and larger turning basin, trapezoidal in shape, 1,200 feet long at the channel, 300 feet long at the shore, 800 feet at a right angle to the channel and 18 feet deep. H. Doc. 145, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 32, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 482, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 374, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 150, 86th Cong., 1st Sess., H. Doc. 196, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 204, 99th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 202a of Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Annual Report for 1868, p. 89. Annual Report for 1874, pp. 36, 135 and 136. Annual Report for 1877, p. 98. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report, 1885, pp. 2041-2045 (plan of a board approach Dec. 10, 1884, as modified by Corps of Engineers, May 14, 1886). H. Ex. Doc. 24, 51st Cong. 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1890, p. 2390. No prior survey or estimates. No prior survey or estimates. No prior survey or estimates. H. Doc. 294, 68th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Bill 3910, 85th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 482, 5th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 208, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 511, 74th Cong., 2d Sess., S. Doc. 16, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 88, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 3d Sess.' H. Doc. 661, 76th Cong., 3d Sess.' H. Doc. 227, 98th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 202a of W.R.D.A. of 1986 21-48 TABLE 21-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 14, 1880 Jun. 14, 1880 May 17, 1950 Mar. 3, 1879 Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 23, 1866 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 26, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 19352 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 3, 1871 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 16, 1984 Nov. 17, 1988 Aug. 30, 1852 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 3, 1905 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 2, 1964 GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MI (See Section 19 of Text) Existing Project, except for pile dike. For Pile Dike. 800-Foot Extension of West Pier. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MN (See Section 20 of Text) Breakwaters and dredging of anchorage area of 26 acres to 16 feet. Seawalls across ledge in southeast corner of harbor, enlarging anchorage basin and deepening of entrance. Small-boat basin with breakwater. GRAND TRAVERSE BAY HARBOR, MI (See Section 21 of Text) Two Parallel piers, and entrance channel between piers and a harbor basin. Project depths are 12 feet between piers and 10 feet in basin. Project area extended 200 feet upstream in 1966. GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI (See Section 22 of Text) Outer Channel and revetment at Grassy Islands.' 2 Inner channel."2 Turning basin at De Pere. Maintenance of turning basin at De Pere. Increasing depth of inner channel and turning basin to 18 feet. Deepen outer channel to 22 feet with widening and straightening inside of Tail Point Bend, widen channel in Fox River through city of Green Bay to 22 feet. Turning basin above Chicago & North Western Ry. Bridge. Turning basin at mouth of East River. Deepen and widen 9 miles of entrance channel to 26 by 500 feet; 3.6 miles of entrance channel to 24 by 300 feet; and 3.2 miles of existing Fox River to 24 feet deep. Deepen the Fox River channel at Green Bay, WI, to 27 feet. HARBOR BEACH, LAKE HURON, MI (See Section 23 of Text) Adopted Site and made provision for harbor. Closing North Entrance and dredging Main Entrance and Anchorage Area. Removal of portion of Breakwater in interest of sanitation. Deepen the waterway within the Marina facility. HEARDING ISLAND INLET, DULUTH, MN (See Section 24 of Text) Dredging of the Inlet to increase water circulation and reduce stagnant water conditions. HOLLAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 25 of Text) Artificial channel between Lakes Macatawa and Michigan.' 2 Piers and Revetments.' 2 Extending Inner Piers. Converging Breakwater. Channel to Holland and Turning Basin at Holland Present Project Dimensions of Channels at Turning Basin. Widen Bend in Reveted Entrance Channel into Lake Macatawa, Dredge Channel in Black River, and Widen and Extend Turning Basin. THE INLAND ROUTE, MI (See Section 26 of Text) Channel 30 feet wide and 5 feet deep through Lakes and Rivers with suitable jetties. Lock and Dam. Specified in Act. Annual Report 1881, p. 2050. Annual Report 1895, p. 351. H. Doc. 751, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc., 75, 43d Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1875, p. 184. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 22, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 187, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1867, p. 70. Unpublished report approved Aug. 3, 1892. H. Doc. 222, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1017, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 294, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 40, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 73, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 95, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 470, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' H.R.6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (W.R.D.A. of 1986, Sec. 601c) Annual Report 1873, p. 292, H. Doc. 1700, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. H.R. 5653, 98th Cong., 2d Sess., P.L. 98-360 (98 Stat. 405) Sec. 105. H. Doc. 1098, 100th Cong., 2d Sess., Sec. 22 of the W.R.D.A. of 1988 S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report 1866, p. 106. H. Doc. 272, 51st Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report 1887, p. 2950 Annual Report 1905, p. 2176. H. Doc. 588, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 48, 74th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 282, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 142, 82nd Cong., 1st Sess.' Chief of Engineers. 21-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 19352 May 17, 1950 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 3, 1881 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935214 Jul. 14, 1960 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935's Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19333 Mar. 21, 1956 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 KENOSHA HARBOR, WI (See Section 27 of Text) Parallel piers and 600 feet of breakwater.'2 Extending Breakwater 200 feet. Present project dimensions of entrance channel and basin. Channel northwesterly from basin. Deepen lake approach channel to 27 feet and 800 feet wide; deepen approach channel to 26 feet, entrance channel and inner basin to 25 feet. KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI (See Section 28 of Text) Entrance piers. Turning basin. North breakwater, remove old north pier, widen and deepen entrance channel and turning basin to 20 feet and remove outer south shoal. Enlarge existing turning basin, extend existing project into north basin, and increase depth of north basin to 20 feet at a maximum width of 500 feet and eliminate removal of outer shoal. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI (See Section 29 of Text) Acquisition of waterway; for a 16-foot channel of 70-foot bottom width, renew canal revetments, reconstruct and extend piers at upper entrance to 30-foot depth of water, and at proper time for increase of channel depth to 20 feet with bottom width of not less than 120 feet (increase in width and depth of channel approved Mar. 15, 1898). Anchorage basin just within lower entrance about one-half mile long, 800 feet wide; a mooring pier on its westerly side 2,000 feet in length, and for purchase of necessary land. Princess Point Cutoff channel. General deepening, widening and straightening of channels and basins to provide 25-foot depth with additional overdepth at entrances, extend lower entrance breakwater, and necessary alteration or replacement of structures due to deepening channels. Deauthorization of the uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1935 River and Harbor Act. LAC LA BELLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 30 of Text) Two parallel piers at the entrance, 584 and 682 feet; an entrance channel between the piers 50 feet wide and 12 feet deep, 820 feet long with a flared approach and inner canal 50 feet wide and 10 feet deep and 730 feet long. LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI, CHANNELS (See Section 31 of Text) Two Dikes. Deepening Canal and dredging Channel at Grosse Pointe. Second Canal for downbound vessels. 21-foot depth in Grosse Pointe Channel for about 5.25 miles. 25-foot depth through Canals and Channel through Lake St. Clair. Removal of Center Dike and widening Channel to 700 feet. Deepening Channel to 27.5 feet and abandonment of Channel above mouth of Southeast bend cutoff Channel. LELAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 32 of Text) Entrance Channel protected by Piers. Outer Breakwater, Anchorage Area. Approach Channel and removal of North Pier. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI (See Section 33 of Text) Approach Channel and Maneuver Area Protected by Breakwaters.' LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 34 of Text) 12-Foot Deep Channel from Lake Superior into Little Lake Breakwaters and Revetments. H. Doc. 328, 54th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1897, p. 2772, H. Doc. 164, 55th Cong., 3d Sess. Annual Report, 1899, p. 1817. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 750, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 496, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report, 1881, p. 2082 H. Doc. 324, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 19, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Ex. Doc. 105 49th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1887, p. 1977. H. Doc. 325, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 835, 63rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 55, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess.' H.R.6 (formerly S. 1567) 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (W.R.D.A. of 1986) H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1961, p. 1039. Annual Report 1885, p. 2150. H. Doc. 297, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 234, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 188, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 23, 74th Con., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 413, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 301, 88th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' 21-50 TABLE 21-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Dec. 31, 1970 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 17, 1966 Mar. 2, 1867 Sep. 19, 1890 Jul. 25, 1912 Jul. 3, 1920 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul, 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 1935" Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 31, 1968 (Sec. 107 of 1960 R & H) Jun. 26, 1979 Mar. 2, 1867 Aug. 11, 1888 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935' Jul. 11, 1960 LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI (See Section 35 of Text) Entrance Piers. Pier Extension. Reconstruction and Repairs to Existing Structures and Present Project Dimensions of Channel. Breakwaters, Shore Connections, and Removal of Outer Ends of the Two Inner Piers. Deepen Channels and Widen Opening between Breakwaters. MACKINAC ISLAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 36 of Text) Original Breakwater.' 500-foot extension to East Breakwater. MANISTEE HARBOR, MI (See Section 37 of Text) Entrance Piers. Extending Channel 8,000 feet to connect with Manistee Lake, and further Pier extension. Depth of 20 feet in Outer Harbor 570 feet wide to Outer end of South Pier 18 feet deep in river, South Breakwater with shore connection, and extend North Pier if required. 23-foot depths in entrance channel and 21-foot depths in River Channel. Remove old South Revetment, Construct new South Pier and Revetment, and widen river entrance Channel. Present Project dimensions of Channel through Outer Basin and River, and Federal participation in cost of replacing Maple Street Bridge. MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MI (See Section 38 of Text) Breakwaters and Outer Harbor. Present Location of West Breakwater and Pier at River Mouth. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI (See Section 39 of Text) Breakwaters. Present project dimensions of channel through outer basin, removal of old north stub pier, and approach channel to a proposed city terminal south of shore end of south breakwater. Channel in river. Deepen Lake approach to 25 feet by 800 feet wide, deepen outer harbor to 25 feet, river channel to 23 feet to 8th St., and Upper River Channel to 22 feet to Soo Line R.R. Dredge River Channel to 12 feet from Soo Line R.R. 720 feet upstream. Construct 765-foot long stone Breakwater, and rubblemound bulkhead; construct 360-foot long entrance Breakwater; dredge 16,500 cubic yards for entrance channel. MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI (See Section 40 of Text) Breakwaters, 2,000 feet long. Extending the breakwater 1,000 feet. Additional 1,500-foot extension to breakwater and removing a shoal in northerly part of harbor. Deepening harbor to 25 feet. Deepening harbor to 27 feet. Annual Report 1867, p. 114 '6 H. Doc. 273, 54th Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1897, p. 2951 H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess.'" H. Doc. 342, 91st Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 646, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. Annual Report 1867, p. 115 Annual Report 1891, p. 2678 H. Doc. 599, 62nd Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 131, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 380, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 358, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 429, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1908, p. 648, and Unpublished Report of Mar. 13, 1908. Approved by Secretary of War, Apr. 3, 1908. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess., as modified by Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 39, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 80, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 479, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Jun. 1967 Detailed Project Report; Apr. 1982 Supplement.' Sec. 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. H. Ex. Doc. 56, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. pts. 1 and 2, and Annual Report, 1866, pp. 8 and 77. Annual Report 1889, pp. 272 and 2021. H. Doc. 573, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 154, 86th Cong., Ist Sess.' 21-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1871 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 4, 1913 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 27, 1967 Sec. 107 Aug. 30, 1852 Mar. 3, 1883 Mar. 2, 1907 Sep. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 's Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Feb. 24, 1835 '9 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 14, 193221 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MI AND WI (See Section 41 of Text) Entrance piers. Consolidation of project for harbor and river, and a channel 18 feet deep. Partial restoration of work above bridge which had been eliminated by Act of May 3, 1905. 20-foot depth in channel and 18-foot depth in turning basin. 21-foot depth in channel and turning basin and enlarge turning basin. Extend channel 12 feet deep to vicinity of Marinette Yacht Club. Deepen existing approach channel to 26 feet, entrance and river channels to 24 feet and enlarge turning basin. Deepen 1,100 feet of river channel generally north of Marinette Corp. facilities to 19 feet. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI (See Section 42 of Text) North Pier." Inner 7,600 feet of breakwater.'" South pier. Extending north breakwater 1,000 feet. Extend north breakwater; a south breakwater; present project dimensions of inner entrance channel. Dredging a portion of outer harbor to 21-foot depth. Dredging river channels to 21-foot depth. Deepen South Menominee and Burnham Canals to 21 feet. Deepen an approach channel to 30 feet by 800 feet wide and 300 feet wide through breakwater; deepen entrance channel 28 feet through piers, outer harbor to 28 feet south of entrance channel, and a channel to 27 feet in Milwaukee River to Buffalo St., and in Kinnickinnic River to Chicago & North Western Ry. bridges. MONROE HARBOR, MI (See Section 43 of Text) 9-foot channel, protecting Revetments and Piers. 21-foot channel, dikes and Turning Basin.2' Modified Conditions of Local Cooperation imposed by Act of Jul. 3, 1930. Deepen portion of existing navigation channel to 27 feet; deepen lake channel to 28 feet; widen the channel from 200 to 500 feet; dredge a new turning basin 24 feet deep, 1,600 feet wide at river's mouth; and construct a 190 acre CDF in Plum Creek Bay to enable creation of a 700 acre marsh behind the CDF. MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI (See Section 44 of Text) Piers and Revetments. Breakwaters. Repairing Revetments around Car Ferry Slip. Channel deepening and present project dimensions of channel. Piers and Revetments. NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MI (See Section 45 of Text) Entrance channel 10 feet deep by 80 to 180 feet wide and 850 feet long to mouth of Galien River, new no. and so. breakwaters 1,305 and 740 feet, respectively, deepening inner channel to Galien River to 8 feet and 80 feet wide and 1,250 feet long. Annual Report, 1867, p. 132. H. Doc. 419, 56th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 171, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 228, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 112, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Detailed Project Report Dec. 1960.' S. Doc. 175, 25th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1881, p. 2122 Annual Report 1906, p. 1752. (No prior survey or estimate affecting breakwater extensions.) H. Doc. 804, 66th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 289, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 29, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 285, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 134, 87th Cong., 1st Sess.' Annual Report 1872, p. 237 Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 22, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 12, 72d Cong., 1st Sess., 45, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' H.R.6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (W.R.D.A. of 1986) H. Doc. 104, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 494, 67th Cong., 4th Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 64, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 474, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 474, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 21-52 TABLE 21-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 5, 1881 Jul. 13, 1892 Mar. 25, 1907 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 3, 1879 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 16, 1984 Jul. 11, 1987 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 11, 1870 Aug. 14, 1876 Aug. 30, 193529 Jul. 3, 195830 Jun. 13, 1902 Jun. 30, 1948 Aug. 5, 1977 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 30, 19352' 25 Jul. 3, 19582 Oct. 23, 19622 Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI (See Section 46 of Text) Channel 17 feet deep and 150 wide through bar and 15 feet deep and 100 feet wide between piers, and pier maintenance. Modified project widths and provide inner basin. Enlarging and deepening the existing harbor basin. Deauthorization of the turning basin feature of the project authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act. PENTWATER HARBOR, MI (See Section 47 of Text) Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Present project depth of channel. POINTE LOOKOUT HARBOR (AU GRES RIVER), MI (See Section 48 of Text) Breakwater, Anchorage Area, Channel Dredging. PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 49 of Text) Entrance Channel 18 feet deep protected by Piers and Revetments. PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI (See Section 50 of Text) Breakwater, Anchorage Basin, Channel Dredging. Construct a breakwater access for recreation purposes. Breakwater PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI (See Section 51 of Text) Entrance Channel 12 feet deep, Anchorage Basin, Breakwater. PORT WASHINGTON HARBOR, WI (See Section 52 of Text) North pier and south basin.' 2 North basin. North breakwater, removal of 650 feet of north pier, outer turning basin, present project dimensions of channel and basin and extension of south breakwater. Extending and raising of north breakwater and placing rubble along sides; removing 456 feet of south breakwater and dredging in outer basin. PORT WING HARBOR, WI (See Section 53 of Text) Construction of parallel piers and dredging. Dredging inner channels and abandonment of certain revetments and channels. Deauthorization of 50 feet of entrance channel widening. ROUGE RIVER, MI (See Section 54 of Text) 21-foot channel via the Shortcut Canal. 25-foot channel at mouth of Old Channel, 1,425 feet long and adjacent to latter, and 21-foot channel extending from junction of Old Channel and Shortcut Canal into Old Channel to Detroit, Toledo & Ironton R.R. Bridge. Old Channel; 100 feet wide from Peerless Cement Corp. to Junction with Shortcut Canal widened to 150 feet at 2 bends. 25-foot channel over modified limits from Detroit River to Jefferson Ave. (via Shortcut Canal). SAGINAW RIVER, MI (See Section 55 of Text) Channel 200 feet wide, with depth of 18.5 feet in Bay and 16.5 feet in River. Project Depth of 18.5 feet extended up River to Saginaw. Turning Basin. H. Doc. 602, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Committee print, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 287, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H.R.6 (formerly S. 1567) 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (W.R.D.A. of 1986) H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 181, 39th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1879, p. 163422 H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H.R. 5653, 98th Cong., 2d Sess., P.L. 98-360 (98 Stat. 405) Sec. 106. P.L. 100-71 H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 28, 41st Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report, 1879, p. 119. Annual Report, 1876, pt. 2, p. 379 H. Doc. 168, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 446, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 114, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 668, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1063, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 125, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 509, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 740, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 30, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 21, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 21-53 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Jun. 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 13, 1892 Jul. 8, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Mar. 21, 1956 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 3, 1875 Jun. 14, 1880 Mar. 3, 1899 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 2, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 11, 1870 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1907 Mar. 3, 1909 Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 4, 1915 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 Work Authorized Present Project Channel Dimensions from Bay to Sixth Street Bridge in Saginaw. New Channel in Bay, 350 feet wide and 24 feet deep from 24-foot contour to River Mouth, Project Depth of 24 feet in River Channel up to Detroit & Mackinac Railway Bridge, Project Depth of 22 feet in River Channel up to Sixth Street Bridge, Turning Basins at Essexville and Carrollton, and elimination of present Channel in Bay. Deepen Bay Channel, Deepen River Channel to Detroit & Mackinac Bridge, Extend 22-foot Project above 6th St. Bridge, Deepen Essexville Turning Basin, and Construct 2 new Turning Basins.' Deepen River Channel to 25 feet, from Detroit & Mackinac Bridge to New York Central Railroad Bridge. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI (See Section 56 of Text) 20-foot Channel in the River Deepen Channel to 25 and 26 feet, and Compensating Works. Widening Channel at Southeast Bend to 700 feet. Widen and deepen Southeast Bend and improve Outlet of North Channel, St. Clair River. Deepen and further improve Channels in St. Clair River between limits of 27.1 to 30 feet to provide safe navigation by vessels with drafts of 25.5 feet. A cutoff Channel in Canada at Southeast Bend and abandon old Southeast Bend Channels. Deauthorization of the work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of Jul. 24, 1946. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI (See Section 57 of Text) Interior Revetments. 26 Benton Harbor Canal. 26 Present Project dimensions of Piers and a Turning Basin. Present project dimensions of Paw Paw River. Abandon easterly 1,000 feet of Channel above West Line of 9th St. Thrning Basin above mouth of Morrison Channel and eliminate Turning Basin near mouth of Paw Paw River. Maintenance of Turning Basin near mouth of Paw Paw River. ST. MARYS RIVER, MI (See Section 58 of Text) Weitzel Lock (Replaced in 1943 by MacArthur Lock), widen and deepen existing State Channel.26 Poe Lock.' Dredging through shoals above falls and shoals below falls between lower end of Canal and upper entrance Channel into Lake Nicolet (formerly Hay Lake). Enlarging the Old Channel. Lake Nicolet and Neebish Channels work in that section of River below Locks. Davis Lock Second Canal, and Emergency Dam. Lease of Waterpower at Falls. Lease entered into with Michigan Northern Power Co. provided for construction of remedial and compensating works. Fourth Lock (Renamed 'Sabin' Lock in 1943). Deepen Tailrace of Power Plant. Widen upper approach to Canals through Vidal Shoals, extend anchorage and maneuver area below Locks. Remove Round Island, middle ground extension of Northwest Canal Pier, and widen Channels Middle Neebish Route. Documents H. Doc. 576, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 500, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 554, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 240, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 207, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 309, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H.R.6 (Formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (W.R.D.A. of 1986) H. Ex. Doc. 160, 43rd Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report 1875, pt. 1, p. 162 Annual Report 1880, pp. 2030, 2031 and 2049, 2055. H. Doc. 307, 55th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report 1898, p. 2496. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 52, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 129, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 95, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' Report by Maj. O. M. Poe, Corps of Engineers, not published. H. Ex. Doc. 72, 49th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 207, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report 1891, p. 2810 H. Doc. 138, 56th Cong., 2d Sess., and 215, 58th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 128, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 333, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. (Plan 3) H. Doc. 65, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. District Engineer Report, Oct. 29, 1920. H. Doc. 270, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 21-54 TABLE 21-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 3, 1930 Jun. 26, 1934' Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 7, 1942 Jun. 15, 1943 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Mar. 21, 1956 Jul. 9, 1956 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 3, 1958 Jun. 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 11, 1888 Mar. 3, 1905 Aug. 30, 1935 Deepen Channels throughout downbound Route. Operation and Care of Canal and Locks provided from War Department Appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Widen Brush Point Turn and Channel from Brush Point to Point Louise. Construct new (MacArthur) Lock on site of former Weitzel Lock, deepen approach Channels to 27 feet, and reconstruct approach Piers. Name 'MacArthur' Lock and changed name of 'Fourth' Lock to 'Sabin' Lock. Remove Bridge Island and construct new Hydroelectric Power Plant. Replace Poe Lock at St. Marys Falls Canal with a new structure 800 feet long, 100 feet wide and 32 feet deep with necessary construction of Nose and Center Piers, and widen and deepen Channel across Point Iroquois Shoals and in Lake Nicolet to provide wider anchorage and maneuver areas in St. Marys River. Deepen to provide a Project Safe Draft of 25.5 feet over full width to downbound and 2-way Channels (including anchorage areas) and over Westerly 300-foot width of upbound Middle Neebish Channel, when levels of Lakes Superior and Huron are at their respective low-water datums. Repeal Authorization of Bridge as a part of Project, authorize alteration with cost to be apportioned by Sec. 6, Truman Hobbs Act, June 21, 1940. Construct a second large lock 1,294 feet in length, 115 feet in width, and 32 feet in depth, adjacent to the existing lock. The replacement lock is to be located in the North Canal of the St. Marys Falls Canal at Sault Ste. Marie, MI, on the site of the existing Davis and Sabin Locks. SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MI (See Section 59 of Text) Entrance Channel, Piers and Revetments. Deepening entrance to 16 feet. Deepening Channel in River to 14 feet. SAXON HARBOR, WI (See Section 60 of Text) Provides for east and west breakwaters, an outer channel 10 feet deep, an inner basin and side channel 8 feet deep, and diversion of Oronto Creek to Parkers Creek by three short reaches of channel excavation and a levee. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI (See Section 61 of Text) Entrance Channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 15,000 feet long in Saginaw Bay. SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WI (See Section 62 of Text) North breakwater. Preserving south pier as part of project, providing turning basin, and elimination of proposed south breakwaters. Present project dimensions of channel. Widen and deepen outer harbor entrance channel to 450 feet, widen and deepen river channel from present project limit to north side of Jefferson Ave. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI (See Section 63 of Text) Channel from Inner End of Piers to Highway Bridge.' 2 Present dimensions of Piers and for a Thrning Basin. Present Project dimensions of Channel and Thrning Basin. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 53, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 218, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 679, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. and H. Doc. 339, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' None H.R.6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (W.R.D.A. of 1986) H. Doc. 912, 54th Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report 1896, Vol. 2. Pt. 5, p. 2739 Annual Report 1907, p. 6416 H. Doc. 635, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. River and Harbor Act, H. Doc. 169, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.,' Annual Report for 1965, p. 1025. H. Doc. 71, 54th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 475, 68th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 47, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 554, 82d Cong., 2d Sess.' No Prior Survey or Estimate. H. Doc. 119, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 9, 73d Cong., 1st Sess.' and unpublished review Report of Chief of Engineers, Dated Dec. 21, 1934. 21-55 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 30, 1935 Nov. 7, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1871 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 3, 1958 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 17, 1967 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 5, 1884 Jul. 13, 1892 Mar. 2, 1907 Jul. 23, 1985 Jul. 3, 1958 Aug. 18, 1941 STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI (See Section 64 of Text) Breakwaters. '2 Acquisition of the canal. Canal revetments and consolidation of canal and harbor works. Present project dimensions of channels and elimination of turning basin immediately west of revetted canal. Turning basin between city and Bushman wharves. TWO HARBORS, MN (See Section 65 of Text) Breakwater and dredging. Construction of two breakwater piers. Shore connection to east breakwater and dredging maneuvering area. Construct new east breakwater and enlargement of maneuvering basin. Deepen harbor project depths from 26 and 28 feet to 28 and 30 feet, respectively. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI (See Section 66 of Text) South pier, 750 feet of north pier, and about 44 feet of north revetment.' 2 Remainder of north pier and stilling basin. Deepening entrance channel and inner basin to 18 feet. Extend existing project in West Twin River to 18 feet deep and in East Twin River to 10 feet deep to 22d Street Bridge. WHITEFISH POINT HARBOR, MICH. (See Section 67 of Text) Breakwaters, Entrance Channel, Anchorage Basin. Breakwater Inside Harbor. WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 68 of Text) New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. Present Project Depth of Channel. PAW PAW LAKE, MI (See Section 76 of Text) Construct a gated control structure at the Paw Paw Lake outlet; a 1,722 foot long, 72-inch reinforced concrete drainage from the Lake to Paw Paw River; entrance and exit structures to improve efficiency and provide protection; and two small levees. SAGINAW RIVER, MI FLOOD CONTROL (See Section 77 of Text) Flood Control improvements to Saginaw River and its tributaries including Tittabawassee, Shiawassee, Flint, and Cass Rivers. SEBEWAING, SEBEWAING RIVER, MI (See Section 78 of Text) Enlarging present Channel of Sebewaing River, altering Railroad and Highway Bridges, removal of Dike. H. Ex. Doc. 34, 42d Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1872, p. 171. H. Ex. Doc. 106, 49th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 117, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 421, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 94, 48th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report for 1887, p. 1952 Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 17. 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 805, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 146, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' Annual Report, 1871, p. 123 (as modified by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 27, 1897). H. Doc. 730, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. Modification of Plan A. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 362, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Chief of Engineers. Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. No Prior Survey or Estimate. 2" Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act H. Doc. 346, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 286, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.' 21-56 TABLE 21-B (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 'Contains latest published map. 'Including Emergency Relief Administration Work authorized May 28, 1935. 3Included in Public Works Administration Program September 6, 1933. 'This modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. SAdministrative Act, Section 4. 'Public Law 568, 82d Congress. 'Public Law 388, 87th Congress. 'This portion inactive. 'Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. "Transfer completed June 1962. "Amended 1868, 1879, 1892. "Completed under previous project. "'Included in Public Works Administration Program January 3, 1934. "Inactive portion; removal of 200 linear feet of north pier, widening inner 200 feet of channel through outer basin, and closing gap in north shore connection of breakwater. 'SLatest published map is in Annual Report 1914, p. 2974. "Latest published map in Annual Report 1914, p. 2914. "Superceded by Act of October 23, 1962. "Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (dredging Milwaukee River from Buffalo St. Bridge to North Humboldt Ave. Bridge). "Modified by Act of June 10, 1872. '"Riprapping of protecting dikes portion of project is inactive. 2"War Department Appropriations Act. 22Latest published map is in House Document 588, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. "Contains latest published maps. See also map with Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. UExcept for dredging 25-foot channel to 1,150 feet upstream of mouth in old channel, work authorized in this Act is considered inactive. "This modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. 26Completed under previous projects. Public Law 130, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. "Latest published map is in H. Doc. 2053, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. "Project complete except for Work Authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1950. "Work recommended in H. Doc. 588, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 3"Deauthorized in 1977. 21-57 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 21-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Alpena Harbor, MI Completed 1985 337,394' 943,697 Algoma Harbor, MI Completed 1981 205,0102 937,883 Bayfield Harbor, WI Completed 1979 183,855 89,585 Belle River, MI Completed 1980 24,301 78,516 Beaver Bay, MN Active 1982 293,000 2,818 Big Bay Harbor, MI Completed 1988 390,433' 1,208,384 Black River (Alcona Co), MI Inactive 1907 0 0 Caseville Harbor, MI Completed 1988 587,314 361,007 Cedar River Harbor, MI Active 1982 215,000 0 Chnls. in the Straits of Mackinac, MI Completed 1984 2,832,629 223,354 Cheboygan Harbor, MI Completed 1988 504,236 895,263 Chippewa Harbor, Isle Royale, MI Completed 1959 125,629 13,528 Cornucopia Harbor, WI Completed 1988 462,653 865,151 Cross Village, MI Active 1983 364,000 0 Grays Reef Passage, MI Completed 1970 190,521 709,571 Greilickville Harbor, MI Completed 1976 366,579 139,513 (Formerly Traverse City Harbor, MI) Hammond Bay Harbor, MI Completed 1988 1,092,366 494,587 Harrisville Harbor, MI Completed 1988 2,639,392 1,061,193 Kawkawlin River, MI Completed 1986 0 241,700 Knife River Harbor, MN Active 1986 412,945 288,478 La Pointe Harbor, WI Completed 1986 139,874 94,966 Les Cheneaux Islands Channels, MI Completed 1980 399,478 324,036 Little Bay DeNoc, Gladstone Harbor, MI Completed 1966 332,832 98,455 Lutsen Harbor, MN Active 1982 357,000 0 Mackinaw City Harbor, MI Completed 1986 136,286' 85,684 Northport Harbor, MI Inactive - 0 0 Oconto Harbor, WI Completed 1985 130,7545 1,152,5516 Pensaukee Harbor WI Completed 1986 0 28,182 Petoskey Harbor, MI Completed 1986 123,839 551,052 Pine River, MI Completed 1980 13,649 40,646 Presque Isle Harbor, MI Completed 1988 1,252,192 998,665 St. James, Beaver Island, MI Completed 1957 49,1717 65,842 St. Joseph River, MI ' Completed 1975 54,555 19,185 Tawas Bay Harbor, MI Completed 1986 1,955,745" 25,288 Washington Island, WI Completed 1950 62,838 71,708 'Includes $18,899 for previous projects. I2ncludes $92,774 for previous projects. 3Excludes $56,500 Contributed Funds. 'Excludes $136,286 for Contributed Funds. Slncludes $84,569 for previous projects. 'Includes $8,161 for previous projects. 'Excludes contributed funds of $7,500. 8Includes $834,677 Contributed Funds. 21-58 TABLE 21-E DETROIT, MI DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Kalamazoo River (Battle Creek) MI'.' Deferred 1975 4,471,235 - Kalamazoo River (Kalamazoo) MI2 Active 1975 421,466 - Mount Clemens, Clinton River, MI Completed 1953 1,136,0083 - Upper River Rouge, MI4 Inactive 1968 7,935 River Rouge, MI Completed 1981 31,960,332 'Includes $108,335 Contributed Funds. 3Includes $202,996 Contributed Funds. 2Scheduled for deauthorization on Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance 4Planning indefinitely suspended due to lack of local cooperawith Section 1001 of the W.R.D.A. of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). tion. TABLE 21-F MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER ST. MARYS RIVER, MI: EXISTING PROJECT (SEE SECTION 58 OF TEXT) Lock Davis Sabin MacArthur New Poe Miles Above Mouth 47 47 47 47 Clear Width of Chamber Feet 80 80 80 110 Length Between Gate Quoins Feet 1,350 1,350 800 1,200 Lifts Feet 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 Depth Over Upper Breast Walls' Feet 24.3 24.3 31 32 Depth Over Lower Breast Walls' Feet 23.1 23.1 31 32 Foundation Rock Rock Rock Rock Type of Construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Estimated Cost $6,200,0002 $3,275,000 $12,909,440 $39,000,000 Actual Cost $2,200,000' $1,750,0006 $12,718,8064., $34,813,066 Completed (Open to Commerce) Oct. 21, 1914 Sep. 18, 1919 Jul. 11, 1943 Jun. 26, 1969 Emergency Dam for South Canal North Canal Miles Above Mouth 47 47 Estimated Cost 9- $300,000 Type Steel Stoplogs Recessed Steel Stoplogs Recessed Into Lock Masonry Into Lock Masonry Cost Completed _' $169,224' Year Completed 1943 1922 (Modified 1963) 'At low water datum 599.5 above and 577.8 below. 'Includes Cost of North Canal. 3Includes cost of canal excavations to provide necessary approaches to lock, canal walls, piers and emergency dam, $662,919. 4Excludes cost of deepening and enlarging South Canal, $1,653,378. 'Excludes cost of North Canal, $2,572,611. Note: Limiting draft to locks is determined by depth over breast walls. 6Excludes cost of canal excavations to provide necessary approaches to lock, canal walls, piers, and emergency dam, $662,919. 'Excluding cost of lower guard gates which were never installed. 'Including engineering office, and inspection. 9Not separate from cost of locks. 21-59 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 21-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Berrien County, MI 1963 Nov. 1986 0 0 (St. Joseph Shore) beach erosion control (1958 Flood Control Act) Black River Harbor, MI 1976 Nov. 1977 0 0 (Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act) Detroit River, Trenton Chnl., MI 1976 Aug. 1977 0 0 (May 17, 1950 R&H Act) Forestville Harbor, MI 1969 Nov. 1986 0 0 (1968 R&H Act) Grand Haven Harbor, MI 1976 Nov. 1977 0 0 (Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act) Grand River at Grandville, MI 1966 Nov. 1977 0 0 (Oct. 27, 1965 Flood Control Act) Kewaunee River, WI 1976 Aug. 1977 0 0 (1960 R&H Act) Lansing (Grand River), MI 1971 Jun. 1981 7,000 0 (Jul. 3, 1958 Flood Control Act) Pentwater Harbor, MI 1976 Nov. 1977 0 0 (Jul. 13, 1892 R&H Act) Racine Harbor, WI 1963 May 1986 9,441,554 0 (Mar. 2, 1907; Aug. 26, 1937; Mar. 2, 1945, R&H Acts and Section 107 of the 1960 R&H Act) Red Run Drain, Lower Clinton River, MI 1983 Nov. 1986 3,823,000 0 (1970 Flood Control Act) Rogers City Harbor, MI 1926 Aug. 1977 5,892 0 (Jun. 25, 1910 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI 1976 Aug. 1977 22,000 0 (Oct. 23, 1962 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI 1976 Aug. 1977 12,000 0 (Jul. 3, 1958 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI 1976 Aug. 1977 0 0 (Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act) St. Clair River Compensating Works, MI 1976 Aug. 1977 0 0 (Jul. 3, 1930 R&H Act) South Milwaukee Harbor, WI 1906 Aug. 1977 0 0 (1836 Flood Control Act) St. Marys River (MacArthur Lock Guard Gates), MI 1977 Oct. 1978 0 0 (Mar. 7, 1942 R&H Act) 21-60 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT FEATURES OF EXISTING PROJECT Project Datum Planes Length Miles Used by Above Mean of from Upbound Water Level Channel Mouth or Down- Project Project at Father of bound Width Depth Point, Quebec Year Name of Channel (Feet) River Vessels (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) Complete DETROIT RIVER, MI (SEE SECTION 13 OF TEXT) Channel North of Belle Isle' 2 Channel at Head of Detroit River Miscellaneous Shoals and Obstructions Belle Isle to Fighting Island Channel Fighting Island Channel Ballards Reef Channel North of Junction with Livingstone Channel Livingstone Channel Upper Livingstone Channel Lower: CS 260 + 00 to 368 + 87 CS 368 + 87 to 492 + 00 East Outer Channel Misc., Shoals and Obstructions, Detroit River to Pelee Passage Pelee Passage Shoal Amherstberg Channel: Upper Section, Ballards Reef Channel Middle Section Lower Section, Hackett Range West Outer Channel Trenton Channel: Wyandotte Reach Trenton Reach (Upper) Trenton Reach (Lower) Grosse Ile Shoal 30 38,800 32 44,500 25 Both Both Both 24,800 17 Both 12,200 12 Both 26,000 10 Down 10,887 12,313 42,000 5 Down Both Both - - Both - - Both 6,500 12,000 24,000 21,000 31,500 5,100 600 600 10 17 14 14 Up Up Up Down Local Local Local Local 200 800 800 600 450 450,800 800-1,200 1,200 21.0 571.3 28.5 571.5-570.9 28.5 570.9-570.3 28.5 28.5 569.8 569.8 27.7 569.8-568.6 1964 29.0 29.0 28.5 568.6 568.6 568.6 - 28.5-29.53 568.6 - 29.5 568.6 600 600 6,000 800 300 300 250-300 27.5 21.27.5� 21.28.5" 22.0 27.0 28.0 28.0 20.0 569.8-569.5 569.5-568.9 568.9-568.6 568.6 569.7-569.6 569.6-568.8 569.8 ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI (SEE SECTION 56 OF TEXT) Channel at Foot of Lake Huron Channel North of Blue Water Bridge Port Huron to Stag Island Widening at Upper and Lower Ends of Stag Island St. Clair to Russell Island Russell Island to Southeast Bend Southeast Bend CS 324 + 00 to 250 + 00 Cutoff Channel North Channel 26,500 44 4,100 39 38,000 37,600 77,000 20,600 7,400 30,300 8,000 39 31 24 11 5 Both Both Both Both Both Both Both Both Small Craft 800 800 800 900-1,000 1,000 700-1,000 700 700 100 30.0 576.8-576.5 1961 30.0 576.4-576.1 1962 30.0 27.4 27.3 17.2 27.1 27.1 10.0 576.4-576.1 574.9-573.8 573.8-572.4 572.4-572.1 573.1-572.0 572.1-571.7 571.7 1961 1962 1962 1962 1962 1962 1962 'This is a Side Channel 2Extends from Deep Water Near Windmill Point to a Point Opposite Fairview Slip, about 3,000 Feet. 3Project Depth 29.5 feet over Rock Shoals and 28.5 feet over other than Rock Shoals. 4Project Depth 21 feet in Easterly 300-foot width of Channel and 27.5 feet in Westerly 300-foot width. "Project Depth 21 feet in Easterly 300-foot width of Channel and 28.5 feet in Westerly 300-foot width. 6Project Complete Except for Work Authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1950. 21-61 TABLE 21-H 1964 1964 1964 1962 1963 1961 1961 1964 1962 1964 1960 1960 1960 1929 19646 1964 1941 1904 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 21-I FOX RIVER, WI: LOCKS AND DAMS (SEE SECTION 16 OF TEXT) Depth At Normal Pool Miles Avail-' Lower from Dis- Clear able Breast Miter Character Kind Year Green Nearest tance Width Length Lift Wall' Sill of of Type of Com- Name of Lock and Dam Bay Town (miles) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation Dam Construction plete De Pere lock] 7.1 De Pere - 36.0 146.0 8.9 10.3 12.0 Rock - Concrete 1936 De Pere dam 7.2 De Pere - - - - - - Rock Fixed. Concrete 1929 Little Kaukauna lock2 13.0 De Pere 6 36.0 146.0 7.2 8.0 9.5 Clay - Concrete 1938 Little Kaukauna dam 2 13.1 De Pere 6 . - . -..- - - Clay and gravel Fixed Piers and concrete 1926 Rapide Croche lock 19.2 Wrightstown 2 36.0 146.0 8.3 8.8 9.3 Rock - Concrete 1934 Rapide Croche Dam 19.3 Wrightstown 2 - - - - - Rock Fixed" Concrete 1930 Kaukauna fifth lock 22.8 Kaukauna - 35.6 144.0 9.1 6.7 9.3 Rock - Composite 1898 Kaukauna fourth lock 23.1 Kaukauna - 36.6 144.1 10.2 6.9 6.0 Rock - Stone masonry 1879 Kaukauna third lock 23.3 Kaukauna - 30.6 144.0 10.2 6.9 6.3 Rock - Stone masonry 1879 Kaukauna second lock2 23.4 Kaukauna - 35.0 144.0 9.6 6.0 6.0 Rock - Stone masonry 1903 Kaukauna first lock 23.6 Kaukauna - 35.1 144.4 11.0 6.9 6.0 Rock - Stone masonry 1883 Kaukauna Dam2 24.0 Kaukauna - - - - - - Rock Fixed. Concrete 1931 Kaukauna guard lock 24.0 Kaukauna - 40.0 - - 9.4 - Rock - Stone masonry 1891 Little Chute combined lock: Lower 24.4 Little Chute 1 35.4 146.5 10.9 6.0 8.6 Rock - Stone masonry 1879 Upper 25.4 Little Chute 1 36.3 144.1 10.6 7.6 6.0 Hardpan - Stone masonry 1879 Little Chute second lock 26.4 Little Chute - 35.0 144.2 13.8 8.0 6.1 Rock - Stone masonry 1881 Little Chute first (guard) lock' 26.5 Little Chute - 35.4 - - 6.6 - Rock - Stone masonry 1904 Little Chute Dam 26.6 Little Chute - - - - - - Rock Fixed3' Concrete 1932 Cedars lock 27.3 Little Chute 1 35.0 144.0 9.8 6.8 7.3 Rock - Stone masonry 1888 Cedars Dam 27.4 Little Chute 1 - - - - - Rock Fixed. Concrete 1933 Appleton fourth lock 30.7 Appleton 1 35.0 144.0 7.6 8.1 7.9 Rock - Stone masonry 1907 Appleton lower dam 30.9 Appleton 1 - - - - - Rock Fixed3' Concrete 1934 Appleton third lock 31.3 Appleton - 35.0 144.0 8.7 6.0 8.6 Rock - Stone masonry 1900 Appleton second lock 31.6 Appleton - 35.1 144.6 9.6 6.9 6.0 Clay - Stone masonry 1901 Appleton first lock 31.9 Appleton - 35.0 144.7 10.0 6.6 6.0 Rock - Stone masonry 1884 Appleton upper dam 32.2 Appleton - - - - - - Rock. Fixed3 Concrete 1940 Menasha lock 37.0 Menasha - 35.4 144.0 8.5 7.2 8.0 Clay - Composite 1899 Menasha Dam 37.8 Menasha - - - - - - Hardpan Fixed Concrete 1937 'Depth shown is on breast wall, which is controlling depth for upper pool. 2Original structure built prior to assumption of control by United States on Sep. 18, 1872. 'Provided with sluices. 'Flash boards used. sPartially rebuilt. 21-62 Actual Cost $229,308 209,536 362,427 179,398 228,738 118,975 13,310' 37,536 39,948 24,313 38,704 123,763 12,630 102.304 48,555 7,817 s 82,554 34,972 84,973 40.893 73,903 32.238 22,940 36,004 151,558 19,326 s 84,686 TABLE 21-J DETROIT, MI DISTRICT RECONNAISSANCE & CONDITION SURVEYS Name of Project Date Survey Conducted ALGOMA HARBOR, WI ALPENA HARBOR, MI BAYFIELD HARBOR, WI BELLE RIVER HARBOR, MI BIG BAY HARBOR, MI CASEVILLE HARBOR, MI CHANNELS IN STRAITS OF MACKINAC, MI CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, MI CORNUCOPIA HARBOR, WI GRAYS REEF PASSAGE, MI GREILICKVILLE HARBOR, MI HAMMOND BAY HARBOR, MI HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MI KNIFE RIVER, MN LAPOINTE HARBOR, WI LES CHENEAUX ISLAND CHANNELS, MI LITTLE BAY DENOC, MI MACKINAW CITY HARBOR, MI OCONTO HARBOR, WI PENSAUKEE HARBOR, WI PETOSKEY HARBOR, MI PINE RIVER HARBOR, MI PORT WING HARBOR, WI PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI ST. JAMES HARBOR, MI TAWAS BAY HARBOR, MI NOVEMBER 1988 SEPTEMBER 1989 JULY 1989 JUNE 1989 AUGUST 1989 APRIL 1989 JUNE 1989 MAY 1989 JULY 1989 AUGUST 1989 APRIL 1989 MAY 1989 JUNE 1989 JULY 1989 JULY 1989 SEPTEMBER 1989 JULY 1989 MAY 1989 OCTOBER 1988 FEBRUARY 1989 OCTOBER 1988 JUNE 1989 JULY 1989 AUGUST 1989 JUNE 1989 JUNE 1989 21-63 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT * This district comprises Cook, McHenry, Lake, Kane, DuPage Indiana, including a portion of LaPorte County along Lake Michiand Will Counties in Illinois, and Lake and Porter Counties in gan. IMPROVEMENTS Page 22-2 22-2 22-2-3 22-3 22-3 22-4 22-4 22-4 22-4-5 22-5 Navigation 1. Burns Waterway Harbor, IN 2. Burns Waterway SBH, IN 3. Calumet Harbor and Rv. IL and IN 4. Chicago Harbor, IL 5. Chicago River, IL 6. Indiana Harbor, IN 7. Michigan City Harbor, IN 8. Waukegan Harbor, IL 9. Reconnaissance and Cond. Surveys 10. National Emergency Preparedness Alteration of Bridges 11. Other Authorized Bridge Alteration Beach Erosion Control 12. Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore (Beverly Shores, IN) 13. Indiana Shoreline, IN 14. Other Authorized Beach Erosion 15. Beach Erosion Control Under Special Authorization Flood Control 16. Chicago River, IL (North Branch) 17. Lake Michigan, Edgewater/Rogers Park Communities, Chicago, IL 18. Little Calumet River, IN 19. McCook and Thornton Reservoirs, IL 20. North Branch Chicago River, IL 21. O'Hare Reservoir, IL 22. Other Auth. Flood Control Projects 23. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization General Investigation 22-5 24. Surveys 25. Collection and Study of Basic Data 26. Continuation of Planning and 22-5 22-5 22-5 22-5 27. 28. TITLE Cost and Financial Statement ............... ................. Authorizing Legislation....................................... Existing Projects .......................................... Other Authorized Bridge Alteration .............................. Other Authorized Beach Eros. Projects ........................... Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................... Deauthorized Projects ................. .................... Engineering Advance Engineering and Design Miscellaneous TABLES 22-A 22-B 22-C 22-D 22-E 22-F 22-G Page 22-5 22-6 22-6 22-6-7 22-7 22-7 22-7 22-7-8 22-8 22-8 22-8 22-8 22-8 PAGES 22-9-11 22-12-14 22-15 22-16 22-16 22-16 22-16 22-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Navigation 1. BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana on the southern shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, 28 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (see NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14905 and 14926). Existing Projects. Provides for (a) rubble mound north breakwater 5,830 feet long; (b) a rubble mound west bulkhead 1,200 feet long; (c) a stone filled steel sheet pile cell, west bulkhead shore connection 2,400 feet long; (d) an approach channel 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide; (e) an outer harbor 28 feet deep; (f) an east harbor arm 27 feet deep and 620 feet wide; (g) a west harbor arm 27 feet deep and 620 feet wide. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 27 October 1965 (Public Law 89-298; House Document Number 160, 88th Congress, 1st Session). The authorizing act also provided the Secretary of the Army to reimburse The State of Indiana for expenditure of funds used to construct such portions of the project as approved by the Chief of Engineers and constructed under supervision of the Chief of Engineers. See Table 22-C. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Seven berths and docks are available, three on the west harbor arm, one on the harbor basin, and three on the east harbor arm. One dock on the west harbor arm is used for shipment and receipt of steel products. One dock on the east harbor arm is used for receipt of iron ore pellets and limestone and shipment of steel products. Five facilities are administered by the Indiana Port Commission and are used for handling general cargo. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Operations studies, surveys and reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $39,499, by other COE at a cost of $12,041, and by contract cost of $27,867. E&D for the placement along the north breakwater was performed by hired labor at a cost of $2,746. Placement of the stone was performed by contract at a cost of $937,490. Project management and real estate costs were $43,512 and $7,255, respectively. Supervision and administration was performed by hired labor at a cost of $102,414. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1989 were $18,975,953 of which $13,599,900, was for New Work ($13,584,000 federal and $15,900 non-federal), and $5,376,053 for maintenance. 2. BURNS WATERWAY SBH, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, at the mouth of the Burns Ditch, approx. 35 miles southeast of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14905 and 14926). Previous Projects. None Existing Projects. Provides for (a) a rubble mound west breakwater 1,003 feet long; (b) a rubble mound north breakwater 678 feet long; (c) channel improvement 5,200 linear feet, 145,000 cubic yard dredged and used for beach nourishment. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facility. There are several marinas located at Burns Ditch. The commodities handled at this harbor are fresh fish. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Beach monitoring analysis and surveys were performed by hired labor at a cost of $51,768, and by contract at a cost of $46,840. Equipment and labor costs to remove and restack stones on the north breakwater by Detroit District were $35,097. Field sampling and lab analysis of wave data were performed by CERL at a cost of $15,000. Project management and program management costs were $21,606 and $2,971, respectively. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1989 was $3,972,676 of which $3,766,593 was for New Work, ($1,999,921 federal and $1,766,672 non-federal), and $206,083 for maintenance. 3. CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL and IN Location. Northeastern Illinois, on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, 15 miles south of Chicago Harbor, within corporate limits of the city of Chicago, except for breakwaters, an approach channel and an anchorage area which are in Illinois and Indiana (see NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14926 and 14929). Previous Projects. For details see page 1400 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Projects. Provides for (a) stone filled timber crib breakwater 6,714 feet long; (b) a stone filled double row steel sheet pile detached breakwater 5,007 feet long; (c) a north pier 2,450 feet long; (d) an approach channel 29 feet deep and 3,200 feet wide; (e) an outer harbor anchorage area 28 feet deep and 3,000 feet wide; (f) an entrance channel 27 feet deep and 230 to 290 to feet wide; (g) a channel in the Calumet River 27 feet deep and at least 200 feet wide to the north side of 130th Street; (h) three turning basins designated as numbers 1, 3, and 5; (i) a channel extending into Lake Calumet at a width of about 1,000 feet. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 3 March 1899, 13 June 1902, 30 August 1935, 14 July 1960, 23 October 1962, and 27 October 1965. See Table 22-C. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Thirty six docks, wharves, and terminals are available. The Chicago Regional Port District owns four wharves, two grain elevators, one dock, and one terminal. The United States Government owns one stone dock. The most important cargoes handled are iron ores and concentrates, coal, and lignite. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Water quality activities were continued by contract at a cost of $99,400, and by hired labor at a cost of $62,749. Operation studies and reports were performed by hired labor at a cost of $10,460. Installation and retrieval of wave gauges were performed by WES at a cost of $12,853, by contract at a cost of $14,243 and by hired labor at a cost of $40,838. Field sampling and lab analysis of the wave data was performed by CERL at a cost of $75,664. Plans and specifications for the Coast Guard light and foundation were continued by hired labor at a cost of $33,822. Maintenance Dredging of 100,000 cubic yds of the outer harbor was performed by contract at a cost of $858,028. Conract administration was performed by hired labor at a cost of $8,595. E&D was performed by hired labor at a cost of $102,023. Project management and real estate management were performed by hired labor at a cost of $132,925 and $6,942, respectively. 22-2 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT Under the major rehabilitation project, placement of stone on Reach A of the breakwater was performed by contract at a cost of $3,262,269. Engineering and design during construction was performed by hired labor at a cost of $91,762. Supervision and administration costs were $226,371. Project and real estate management were performed by hired labor at a cost of $30,192 and $2,383, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is 79 % complete. Work remaining to be accomplished consists of widening and straightening the Calumet River in the vicinity of 106th Street and the inactive portion which consists of closing the gap between the breakwaters, and dredging minor shoals in the outer harbor. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1989 were $54,570,793 of which $22,578,567 was for new work ($19,541,964 regular funds and $3,036,603 public work funds), $25,867,531 regular funds for maintenance, $836,667 non-federal funds for maintenance, and $5,288,028 regular funds for rehabilitation. 4. CHICAGO HARBOR, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago, (see NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14926, 14927, and 14928). Previous Projects. See page 1396 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone filled timber crib shore arm extension breakwater 2,250 feet long; (b) a stone filled timber crib exterior breakwater 5,421 feet long; (c) a rubble mound and stone filled concrete caisson southerly extension to the exterior breakwater 4,944 feet long, exclusive of 582 foot entrance gap enclosing an outer basin of about 970 acres; (d) a stone filled timber crib north pier 960 feet long; (e) a stone filled timber crib north inner breakwater 4,034 feet long with a 304 foot shore return, and a 754 foot gap; (f) a stone filled timber crib south inner breakwater 2,544 feet long enclosing an inner basin of approximately 224 acres; (g) a lake approach channel 29 feet deep and 800 feet wide; (h) a channel and maneuver area inside the exterior breakwater and exterior breakwater southerly extension 28 feet deep with a maximum width of 1,300 feet; (i) an inner basin 21 feet deep; (j) an entrance channel of 21 feet deep. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of 11 July 1870, 14 June 1880, 3 March 1899, 25 July 1912, 2 March 1919 and 23 October 1962. See table 22-C. The Chicago Lock was constructed in 1938 by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. The deep draft lock is 600 feet long, 80 feet wide, and 23 feet deep and uses a steel cellular design. Operation and maintenance responsibilities in the interests of navigation were transferred to the Federal Government pursuant to Public Law 90-63 approved 30 July 1983, Section 107 of the Public Law 97-88, and Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of Army and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are three docks, two for passenger excursion boats and one for cargo. The most important cargoes handled are sugar and non-metallic minerals. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: The lock operations contract was continued with International Research and Development, Inc. at a cost of $514,562. Other support for operations of the lock amount to $31,579. Surveys and soundings were performed by contract at a cost of $83,654 and by hired labor at a cost of $42,407. A wave gauge retrieval system was installed by other COE at a cost of $22,464. E&D for the rehabilitation of the lock was performed at a cost of $73,673. Rehabilitation of the lock was performed by contract at a cost of $365,856. Real estate costs were $19,959. Project management and contract administration cost were $137,079 and $42,711, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1989 were $19,199,086 of which $4,342,822 was for new work, $13,529,664 for maintenance, and $1,326,600 for rehabilitation. 5. CHICAGO RIVER, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois, in Cook County within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14926, 14927 and 14928.) Previous Projects. See page 1394 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a channel 21 feet deep in the main river from its mouth at Rush Street to the junction of the North and South Branches (0.7 miles); (b) a channel 21 feet deep in the North Branch from the junction to North Avenue (2.22 miles); (c) a channel 21 feet deep in the North Branch Canal (1.04 miles); (d) a 21 foot deep North Branch Turning Basin just south of North Avenue; (e) a channel 9 feet deep in the North Branch from North Avenue to Addison Street. All dredging to within 20 feet of existing docks. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of 3 March 1899, 13 June 1902, 2 March 1907, and 24 July 1946. Portion of project authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1946 is in deferred-for-restudy category. See table 22-C. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modifications. River and Harbor Act of 24 July 1946 which provided improvement of channel is subject to condition that local interests furnish assurances they will hold the United States free from damages which may result from construction and maintenance of improvement. Requirement has not been complied with. Terminal Facilities. Six docks are available. The most important cargoes handled are sand, gravel and crushed rock. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: An environmental impact statement associated with the Confined Disposal Facility was continued by hired labor at a cost of $138,498. Data collection for water control and water quality activities was performed by hired labor at a cost of $494,166, by other federal agency at a cost of $430,576, by contract at a cost of $75,236 and by other COE at at cost of $22,784. Real estate and project management were performed by hired labor at a cost of $11,968 and $73,869, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for dredging the channel between North Avenue and Addison Street as authorized by 1946 River and Harbor Act. Head of navigation for deep draft vessels are North Avenue, 5.97 miles from deauthorized Michigan Avenue Bridge. Under Section 1142, PL 99-662, the Corps assumes responsibility for monitoring of the Diversion of Lake Michigan water into the Illinois waterway. The Corps assumes full diversion accounting responsibility in FY88. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1989 were $12,780,125 of which $1,500,565 was for new work and $11.279.560 was for maintenance. 22-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 6. INDIANA HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Lake County, 19 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14926 and 14929). Previous Projects. For details see page 1943 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1520 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Projects. Provides for (a) northerly rubble-mound breakwater 1,120 feet long; (b) an easterly concrete capped concrete caisson breakwater 201 feet long with a rubble mound extension 2,324 feet long; (c) a lake approach channel 29 feet deep and 800 feet wide; (d) an anchorage and maneuver basin 28 feet deep; (e) a canal entrance channel 27 feet deep and 280 feet wide; (f) a main canal 22 feet deep; (g) a turning basin 22 feet deep; (h) the Forks Turning Basin 22 feet deep; (i) the Lake George Branch 22 feet deep; (j) the Calumet River Branch 22 feet deep. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of 4 March 1913, 2 March 1919, 20 March 1922, 3 July 1930, 30 August 1935, 26 August 1937, and 4 July 1960. See table 22-C. Local Cooperation. Substantially complied with. See the FY 1986 Annual Report for full requirements. Terminal Facilities. Fifteen docks and wharves are available. Six docks for handling iron ore and limestone. Six docks for handling petroleum products. Three docks for handling gypsum, scrap metal and steel, and bulk products. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Environmental studies and surveys were conducted by hired labor at a cost of $572,794, by contract at a cost of $151,477 and by other COE at a cost of $6,419. Project management and real estate costs were $8,842 and $5,923, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1989 was $14,535,098, of which $4,909,648 was for new work and $9,625,450 was for maintenance. 7. MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in LaPorte County, 38 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14905 and 14926.) Previous Projects. See page 1407 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone filled timber crib detached breakwater 1,304 feet long; (b) a pile and steel sheeting west pier 835 feet long; (c) a stone filled timber crib, pile and steel sheeting east pier 2,276 feet long; (d) a stone filled timber crib east breakwater 1,000 feet long; (e) an entrance channel 18 feet deep and 425 feet wide; (f) a turning basin 18 feet deep; (g) a channel in Trail Creek 18 feet deep; (h) a turning basin 18 feet deep; (i) an outer basin 12 feet deep; (j) an outer basin 8 feet deep; (k) a channel in Trail Creek 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of 3 March 1889, 3 March 1905, 21 January 1927, 30 August 1935, and Section 107 of 14 July 1960 approved on 30 September 1966. See table 22-C. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are several marinas in the lower mile of Trail Creek. The commodity handled at this harbor is fresh fish. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Sediment surveys and studies of the east and west pier were conducted by hired labor at a cost of $65,945 and by contract at a cost of $23,450. Plans and specifications for the capping of the Confined Disposal Facility and for resurfacing the concrete cap on the east pier were performed by hired labor at a cost of $87,322 and $82,180, respectively. Core sampling of the east pier was performed by contract at a cost of $2,803. Real Estate costs were $5,315. Program management for these activities was performed by hired labor at a cost of $8,920. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1989 were $9,239,264 of which $1,287,057 was for new work ($1,256,257 federal and $30,800 non-federal funds), $6,333,537 for maintenance, and $1,618,670 for rehabilitation. 8. WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois, on the Southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Lake County, 38 miles north of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14904 and 14905). Previous Projects. See page 1392 of Annual Reprot for 1962. Existing Projects. Provides for (a) northerly stone filled timber crib breakwater 588 feet long; (b) a stone filled reinforced concrete caisson shore connection 270 feet long; (c) a stone filled double row steel sheeting shore connection 640 feet long; (d) a single row steel sheeting shore connection 398 feet long; (e) a stone filled timber crib north pier 998 feet long; (f) a single row steel sheet piling north pier 444 feet long; (g) a steel piling revetment 632 feet long; (h) a stone fille timber crib pier 1,399 feet long; (i) a stone filled double row pile and sheeting south pier 1,712 feet long; (j) an entrance channel 22 feet deep and 390 feet wide; (k) a channel between the piers 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide; (1) an inner basin 13 feet deep; (m) an anchorage area in the southwest corner of the inner basin 8 feet deep. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of 13 June 1902, 3 July 1930, and 2 March 1945. See table 22-C. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Four docks are available. The commodities handled at this harbor are gypsum and building cement. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Enviromental studies and monitoring activites were performed by hired labor at a cost of $72,116, by other COE at a cost of $3,200, by contract at a cost of $17,930, and by other Federal Agency at a cost of $9,549. A wave guage retrieval system was installed by other COE at a cost of $25,000. FY 1988 dredging contract was completed at a cost of $3,884. Engineering and design costs were $6,273. E&D costs associated with the construction of the Confined Disposal Facility were $3,865. Real estate costs were $7,310. Project management and contract administration for the above project were $16,972 and $7,741, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is complete except for the 1970 modification which is inactive. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1989 were $7,979,627, of which $823,026 was for new work and $7,156,601 was for maintenance. 9. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition surveys and aerial photos were performed at a cost 22-4 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT of $9,168. Water quality studies were performed by hired labor at a cost of $1,202. Project management was performed by hired labor at a cost of $114,193. 10. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Fiscal Year costs of $141,486 were for: Training and Exercises $ 7,157 Management and Mobilization Planning $134,329 Alteration of Bridges 11. OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION See table 22-D. Beach Erosion 12. INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKE SHORE BANK PROTECTION, BEVERLY SHORES, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, approximately 35 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Charts Numbers 14095 and 14926.) Existing Projects. Provides for 13,000 feet of stone revetment and periodic repair of rip rap to maintain the full length of beach front at Beverly Shores, Indiana. The current project was authorized by Public Law 97-88 and Public law 98-63. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during period. Project management cost associated with closing FY 1988 contract for emergency repairs of the existing revetment was $1,679. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1989 were $1,086,585 of which $660,000 is for new work and $426,585 is for maintenance. 13. INDIANA SHORELINE, IN Location. On the south end of Lake Michigan along a twomile reach of shore west of Michigan City Harbor, Indiana. Existing Project. The project consists of beach nourishment of approximately two miles of beach between Michigan City Harbor and Beverly Shores, Indiana, requiring placement of 400,000 cubic yards of sand. Periodic replenishment averaging about 70,000 cubic yards of sand at five year intervals would be required throughout the life of the project. The project was authorized for construction by Section 501 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Estimated Federal Cost (1987) for new work is $8,340,000. Local Cooperation. Sections 101 and 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. In letter dated March 27, 1984, the City of Michigan City stated its willingness to act as local sponsor in the event that a local sponsor may be required at a future date. Operations and results during period. New work: Advance Engineering and Design was continued at a cost of $49,092. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Preconstruction planning and engineering was initiated in fiscal year 1984. Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1989 is $222,000 for new work. 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS See table 22-E. 15. BEACH EROSION CONTROL UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962, as amended. Project and Location North Chicago, IL Sunrise Park, Lake Bluff, IL Fiscal Year Costs to September 30, 1989 $1,395 $-7,184 Flood Control 16. CHICAGO RIVER, IL (NORTH BRANCH) Location. Northern Illinois, in Cook and Lake Counties. Existing Project. Provides for clearing the channel of the North Branch of the Chicago River, Illinois, of fallen trees, roots, and other debris and objects which contribute to the flooding, unsightliness, and pollution of the river. The project extends from Wolf Point in Chicago, Illinois, to its source just south of Rockland Road east of Libertyville, Illinois. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 31 December 1970 (Section 116) and amended by the River and Harbor Act of 7 March 1974. Local Cooperation. The 1970 Act provided that local interests furnish without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and disposal areas necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction; maintain and operate all works after completion without cost to the United States; and agree to bear all costs in excess of $200,000 for completing construction. Assurance of local cooperation for this act was approved on 31 July 1972. The 1974 Act provided that the United States will maintain the channel free of trees, roots, debris and objects at a cost not to exceed $150,000 per year with non-Federal interests paying 25 percent of the cost of maintenance. Operations and results during period. Maintenance: Engineering and design for FY 87 Debris Removal project was continued by hired labor at a cost of $12,420 and by contract at a cost of $26,865. Contract administration costs were $1,042. Condtion at end of fical year. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1989 was $2,331,075 of which $231,884 was for new work ($191,884 regular funds and $40,000 contributed funds), and $2,099,191 was for maintenance ($1,617,702 Federal funds and $481,489 contributed funds). 22-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 17. LAKE MICHIGAN, EDGEWATER/ROGERS PARK COMMUNITIES, CHICAGO, IL Location. On the Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan in City of Chicago (Cook County) from Hollywood-Ardmore Beach to Chicago-Evanston border. Existing Project. The project includes construction of a series of rubble mound revetments at the following street ends: Granville, Rosemont, and North Shore Avenues (approximate total of 340 linear feet); offshore breakwaters, 100 feet long each, at Thorndale, Jarvis and Fargo Avenues; a 40 foot seawall extension at Glenlake Avenue; and placement of 450 linear feet of rubble mound revetment at Berger Park. Planned construction activities at Devon Avenue and Hartigan Park and Beach were deleted at the local sponsor's request and at Sherwin Avenue due to lack of economic justification as determined by the value engineering study. Beach nourishment placement at Rogers Park and Beach was deleted due to the local sponsor's disagreement with the Local Cooperation Agreement requirement which holds the local sponsor responsible for future project maintenance. The project was authorized by PL-99-190 Section 123 and amended by PL99-591. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights of way, provide all required relocations, hold and save the United States from any damages due to construction or operation of the project, and contribute a minimum of twenty-five percent of the total project costs. The local sponsorship for Phase I (the completed activities) was shared by the City of Chicago and the Chicago Park District. Operations and results during period. New Work: Construction contract for the first phase; which included breakwaters at Thorndale, Jarvis and Fargo Avenues, rubble mound revetments at Granville, Rosemont, and North Shore Avenues and the seawall extension at Glenlake Avenue was fiscally completed. During the year a total of $348 was expended for Phase I for project management. Administrative close-out of the construction contract for the rubble mound revetment at Berger Park was completed. Construction contract costs were $16,502 ($15,716 Federal and $786 Non-Federal). Operation and maintenance manual was completed for $8,658 ($7,114 Federal and $1,544 Non-Federal). Plans and specifications were completed for Phase II which includes beach nourishment at Rogers Park and Beach at a cost of $2,001 for hired labor and $2,069 for real estate management services. A summary of total Federal costs by locations is as follows: Fiscal Year Cost Project and Location September 30, 1989 Phase I - Completed Construction Lake Michigan-Granville Ave., Chicago, IL $ 59 Lake Michigan-Thorndale Ave., Chicago, IL 97 Lake Michigan-Rosemont Ave., Chicago, IL 39 Lake Michigan-North Shore Ave., Chicago, IL 94 Lake Michigan-Fargo Ave., Chicago, IL 20 Lake Michigan-Jarvis Ave., Chicago, IL 39 Lake Michigan-Berger Park, Chicago, IL 22,830 Phase II Lake Michigan, Edgewater/Rogers Park $ 4,071 (Hartigan Park), Chicago, IL Condition at the end of the fiscal year. The existing project is 100 percent complete. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1989 were $2,062,347 for new work ($1,685,700 Federal and $376,647 contributed funds). 18. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN Location. Little Calumet River is located in northwest Indiana between the Illinois-Indiana state line and the Conrail Railroad in east Gary, Indiana. Existing Project. The project consists of replacing 22 miles of levees between the Illinois-Indiana state line and Cline Avenue; construction of 12 miles of levees in Gary; a diversion structure at Hart Ditch; permanent evacuation of 29 structures in the Black Oak area of Gary; flood proofing 38 residential structures in Gary; modifying 7 miles of channel; modifying 4 highway bridges; construction of 17 miles of hiking trails and accompanying recreation support facilities, and preservation of 788 acres of wetlands with wildlife mitigation measures. Estimated Federal cost (1988) for new work is $50,700,000 and $17,300,000 to be contributed by local intests. Project was authorized by Section 401 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local Cooperation. Section 103 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. By letter dated June 22, 1981, the Little Calumet River Basin Development Commission forwarded a resolution passed by the Commission affirming its understanding of the general items of local cooperation and indicating tentative willingness to act as local sponsor. By letter dated May 2, 1986, the Commission expressed its willingness to meet the non-Federal project sponsor requirements. The Commission is aware of the PL99-662 cost-sharing requirements. The District Engineer believes that the Commission would have the ability to provide the local cooperation requirements for this project. Operations and results during period. New work: Advance engineering and design was continued at a cost of $329,053. Conditions at the end of the fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is in progress. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1989 were $2,004,000 for new work. 19. McCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVIORS, IL Location. The McCook Reservoir will be located in within the communities of McCook and Hodgkins, Illinois, at the existing McCook Quarry. The Thornton Reservoir will be located in the community of Thornton, Illinois at the existing Thornton Quarry. Existing Project. The project consists of converting two quarries into flood storage reservoirs. The McCook reservoir will have a storage volume of 32,100 acre-feet (9.8 billion gallons), the Thornton reservoir will have a volume of 14,600 acre-feet (4.8 billion gallons). The reservoirs will store floodwater from tunnels constructed or under construction by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago as part of the Tunnel and Reservoir Project (TARP). Estimated project cost (1986) is $436,000,000 including Federal cost for new work of $327,000,000 and $109,000,000 to be contributed by non-Federal interests. Project was authorized by Section 3 of the Water Resrouces Development Act of 1988. Local Cooperation. By letter dated 13 November 1986, the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago indicated that it would be the local sponsor and provide the re- 22-6 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT quired local cooperation. Operations and results during period. New work: Continuation of planning and engineering was continued at a cost of $599,850. Condition at end of the fiscal year. Pre-construction planning is in progress. Total costs to the existing project to September 30, 1989 were $654,615 for new work. 20. NORTH BRANCH, CHICAGO RIVER, IL Location. The North Branch Chicago River Basin is located north of the City of Chicago in suburban Cook and Lake Counties. Existing Project. The project consists fo constructing two excavated floodwater storage reservoirs on the West Fork and one excavated reservoir on the Middle Fork. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Section 401, also includes authorization to reimburse non-Federal interests 50 percent of the costs of planning and construction for three existing reservoirs on the West Fork, known as Techny reservoirs, and the existing Mid Fork reservoir on the Middle Fork. Reservoir 27 in the Village of Brannockburn, the first reservoir to be constructed, will be built on the West Fork 12.7 miles above its confluence with the North Branch Chicago River. It will have a floodwater storage capacity of 525 acre-feet. Excavation for the reservoir will be approximately 48 feet deep. Approximately 700 feet of the West Fork channel will be improved and relocated for construction of the diversion structure. The second reservoir to be constructed, Reservoir 29A, will be built 9.6 miles above the mouth of the West Fork and 3.1 miles south of Reservoir 27. The reservoir flood water storage capacity is 575 acre-feet. Site 29A is located near the Village of Deerfield in unincorporated Cook County. Two project features, the channel relocation and construction of two bridges, will be accomplished by private or local governmental interests prior to construction of the reservoir at 29A. The last reservoir to be constructed, Reservoir 15, will be located near the City of Green Oaks on the Middle Fork, 22.1 miles above its confluence with the North Branch Chicago River. The design floodwater storage capacity is 500 acre-feet. The excavated reservoir will be approximately 42 feet deep except in the sedimentation pool area which will be about 15 feet deeper. Channel improvements and relocation of about 800 feet of the channel will be required for construction of the diversion structure at the north end of the reservoir. Estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1988) for new work is $18,400,000. An additional $9,600,000 will be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (H. Doc. 100-72 100th Congress, 1st session). Local Cooperation. By letter dated August 2, 1983, the Director of the Illinois Division of Water Resources has indicated that the State of Illinois will provide the lands required for the project. The Director also stated that the Lake County Forest Preserve District and the Village of Deerfield will operate and maintain the reservoirs. The Director has stated in conversations with the Chicago District that the State will be willing to participate in the cost sharing plan required by Section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The local cooperation agreement for Reservoir 27 was executed on 27 April, 1988. Operations and results during period. New work: Construction of Reservoir 27 was continued at a cost of $3,093,121 ($2,922,869 Federal and $170,252 non-Federal). Engineering and design costs associated with Reservoir 27 were $113,810 ($104,490 Federal and $9,320 non-Federal) and construction managment costs were $233,948 hired labor ($228,403 Federal and $5,546 non-Federal), and $1,304 Federal costs for soil testing. Plans and specifications for Reservoir 29A were completed at cost of $615,264. Plans and specifications for Reservoir 15 were initiated at a cost of $168,828. Audit of the costs for Techny and Mid Fork Reservoirs and pumping stations were completed. Audit costs by other COE were $21,028 and project management costs were $31,851. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. The existing project is 56 percent complete. Construction of Reservoir 27 was initiated in August 1988. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1989 were $6,362,462 for new work of which $6,177,344 was Federal funds and $185,118 non-Federal Funds. 21. O'HARE RESERVOIR, IL Location. The reservoir will be located in an unincorporated portion of Elk Grove Township in northwestern Cook County, Illinois about 1 mile northwest of Chicago O'Hare International Airport. Existing Project. The project consists of a 1,050 acre-foot capacity reservoir, excavated to a depth of 80 feet. The reservoir would be constructed at the terminus of the existing system of 6.6 miles of deep tunnels, recently constructed under the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago Tunnel and Reservoir Project (TARP). Estimated project cost (Oct. 1988) is $18,500,000 including Federal cost for new work of $13,500,000 and $5,000,000 to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by Section 401 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local Cooperation. Sec. 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. By letter dated 12 April 1984, the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago stated it would be the local project sponsor and provide the required local cooperation. Operations and results during period. New work: Advance Engineering and Design was continued at a cost of $545,928. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is in progress. Total costs to the existing project to September 30, 1989 were $1,078,000 for new work. 22. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See table 22-F. 23. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong. and antecedent legislation). Program Disaster Preparedness Emergency Operations Advance Measures Fiscal Year Costs to September 30, 1989 $136,675 34,413 565,474 22-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Emergency Water Supplies/Drought 46,191 Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act Public Law 526. 79th Congress). Fiscal Year Costs Project and Location to September 30, 1989 Batavia, IL $ 16,247 Dune Acres, IN 98,311 Duneland Beach, LaPorte Co., IN 215,735 Lake Michigan, Temple Emanuel, IL 216,740 Meigs Field, IL 2,500 Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of Flood Control Act of 1845, as amended. Project and Location Fox River, McHenry County, IL Northfield, IL Libertyville Estates, IL Wilmington, IL McCook Levee, IL Monticello Ave., IL Fiscal Year Costs to September 30, 1989 $ 6,000 17,385 6,563 10,050 7,716 4,887 General Investigations 24. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $731,967 itemized as follows: Navigation Studies $ 0 Flood Damage Prevention Studies 375,960 Shoreline Protection Studies 268,223 Special Studies 12,784 Special Investigations 45,000 Coordination Studies 19,000 Supplemental Pre-authorization 0 25. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs of $157,000 were for: Flood Plain Management Services Hydrologic Studies 26. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Costs during the period were $599,850. Costs were incurred on the McCook and Thornton Reservoir projects. See section 19 for details. 27. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Costs during the period were $924,073. For details see sections 13, 18, and 21. Miscellaneous 28. LAKE GEORGE, HOBART, IN Location. Lake George in Hobart, Indiana and the Deep River watershed upstream of the lake through Lake Station, Indiana. Existing Project. The project consists of the removal of approximately 900,000 cubic yards of silt, aquatic growth and other material and the construction of silt traps or other devices to prevent and abate the deposition of sediment. Estimated cost (1988) for new work is $3,750,000 Federal and $1,250,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by Section 602 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local Cooperation. Section 602(b), Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Operations and results during period. None. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. No work has been initiated. $157,000 $ 0 22-8 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 22-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total To Section September in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 30, 1989 1. Burns Waterway New Work: Harbor, IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Burns Waterway Small Boat Harbor, IN (Federal Funds) Contributed Funds) 3. Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Chicago Harbor, IL (Federal Funds) 5. Chicago River, IL Indiana Harbor, 6. IN (Contributed Funds) 7. Michigan City Harbor, IN Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib.. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost 150,000 169,592 80,000 58,181 13,584,000 13,584,000 350,000 1,041,000 5,425,793 190,357 1,172,824 5,376,053 15,900 15,900 270,000 107,727 135,000 603,227 985,000 1,399,456 1,507,000 1,488,154 970,000 941,516 -0- 239,573 30,000 2,101 89,172 251,805 368,500 337,350 350,000 237,488 13,000 18,633 20,000 30,700 3,886 -0- 1,305,000 244,567 2,204,000 748,562 185,000 173.282 446,500 1,458,542 2,185,000 3,612,977 2,000,000 1,999,921 235,000 206,083 1,770,558 1,766,672 22,578,5671 22,578,5671 25,985,7742 25,867,5312 5,428,0013 5,288,0283 836,667 836,667 4,788,8274 4,788,8274 905,000 1,260,000 1,327,000 13,772,286 957,037 1,053,456 1,333,944 13,529,664 1,326,600 1,326,600 1,500,5655 1,500,5655 738,000 694,096 946,000 1,076,000 11,395,7376 694,064 1,347,097 11,279,5606 4,897,1487 4,897,1487 12,500 12,500 981,000 1,224,393 395,000 293,094 380,000 372,199 611,000 9,655,7788 745,455 9,625,4508 43,6469 1,543,6469 25,000 1,292,000 22,484 1,115,432 124,000 279,174 270,000 6,351,512 275,935 6,333,537 1,618,670 1,618,670 22-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 22-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total To Section September in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 30, 1989 (Contributed Funds) 8. Waukegan Harbor, IL 12. Indiana Dunes Nat'l. Lakeshore Beverly Shores, IN 13. Indiana Shore- Line, IN 16. Chicago River, IL (North Branch) (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 17. Lake Michigan- Edgewater/ Rogers Park Communities, Chicago, IL (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 18. Little Calumet River, IN 19. McCook and Thornton Reservoirs, (CUP) IL 20. North Branch Chicago River, IL (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 30,800 30,800 823,02610 823,02610 380,000 753,002 -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- 9,999 66,000 137,171 96,898 26,458 121,000 113,972 360,000 466,267 -0- -0- -0- 379,000 390,216 300,000 158,224 -0- -0- 467,500 395,208 -0- -1,016 20,000 31,687 -0- -0- 1,621,200 1,506,101 380,000 364,739 288,000 243,404 -0- -0- 315,000 309,626 956,000 1,066,704 -0- -0- -30,000 29,698 108,000 74,925 285,000 239,476 8,400 80,925 -0- 38,379 -0- 9,578 350,000 396,662 201,000 7,224,980" 173,840 7,156,601" -0- -0- -10,000 1,679 15,000 49,092 660,000 660,000 427,500 426,585 230,000 230,000 33,000 1,681,000 40,327 1,617,702 -0- 11,575 40,000 40,000 -56,500 1,685,700 27,248 1,685,700 -0- 2,330 380,000 376,647 337,000 2,012,000 329,053 2,004,000 150,000 1,107,000 1,257,000 54,765 599,850 654,615 3,800,000 907,753 255,000 -0- 1,476,500 4,094,037 183,000 185,118 6,460,000 6,177,344 438,000 185,188 22-10 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 22-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total To Section September in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 30, 1989 21. O'Hare Reservoir, New Work: Chicago, IL Approp. 85,000 500,000 493,000 1,078,000 Cost 39,587 492,485 545,928 1,078,000 1. Includes $855,973 for previous projects. 2. Exludes contributed funds in settlement pursuant to decree (No. 54-C-1608) regarding removal of flue dust and includes $45,230 for previous projects. 3. Includes $689,001 in settlement pursuant to decree regarding removal of flue-dust. 4. Includes $446,005 for previous projects. 5. Includes $955,886 for previous projects. 6. Includes $109,463 for previous projects. 7. Includes $60,668 for previous projects. 8. Includes $2,509 for previous projects. 9. Excludes $287,389 for previous projects. 10. Excludes $218,233 on previous projects. 11. Includes $15,711 on previous projects. 22-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 22-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 Sept. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 19351 2 Aug. 30, 1935' 2 Mar. 2, 19453 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 July 11, 1870 June 14, 1880 Mar. 3, 1899 July 25, 1912 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1931 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 4, 1981 July 30, 1983 Mar. 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1919 July 24, 1946 Work Authorized BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN (See Section 1 of Text) Provides for breakwater and channel to present dimensions and depths; North Breakwater, West Bulkhead, Approach Channel and Outer Harbor, East and West Harbor Arms. CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL AND IN (See Section 3 of Text) Outer Harbor protected by breakwaters. Five turning basins. Provided for shape and dimensions of turning basins. Consolidated the 2 projects for Calumet Harbor and Calumet River. Detached breakwater, dredging outer harbor to existing project depth and dimensions; deepen river-entrance channel and river to existing project depths; widen and straighten river channel; 5 turning basins to same depth as adjacent channel. Dredging area A and B in south end of Lake Calumet and an entrance channel 300 feet wide and 21 feet deep. An approach channel to harbor 3,200 feet wide and 28 feet deep through shoals outside breakwater and closing existing gap between breakwaters. Depth of 29 feet in lake approach to 28 feet in outer harbor, and 27 feet in river entrance up to E.J. & E. Ry. Bridge. Deepen, widen, and straighten channel in Calumet River from E.J. and E. Ry. Bridge, to and including turning basin 5, to a depth of 27 feet in earth and 28 feet in rock; deepen turning basins 1, 3 and 5 to 27 feet; enlarge turning basins 3 and 5; a channel into Lake Calumet to 27 feet deep for 3,000 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; and eliminate turning basins 2 and 4 from project. Modification of Act of Oct. 23, 1962. Protection for Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Bridge over the Calumet River, to permit dredging to full width of the south draw to depth of 27 feet, and temporary protection for center pier and south abutment of the New York, Chicago, and St. Louis Railroad Bridge (Nickle Plate) to permit dredging of full width of south bridge draw to depth of 27 feet prior to its replacement. CHICAGO HARBOR, IL (See Section 4 of Text) Inner breakwaters and inner basin. Exterior Breakwater. Present project depth in basin, and entrance to Chicago River. Shore-arm and southerly extension of exterior breakwater. Modification of area to be dredged in inner basin. Shore-arm extension of exterior breakwater transferred to Lincoln Park Commissioners. Resumption of jurisdiction over shore-arm extension breakwater and over certain navigable waters in Lake Michigan which lie in northwestern part of outer harbor. Deepen a lake approach channel to 29 by 800 feet wide for 6,600 feet; and deepen a channel and maneuver area inside harbor entrance to 28 by 1,300 feet wide. Provides for lock operations and maintenance responsibilities in the interests of navigation. CHICAGO RIVER, IL (See Section 5 of Text) For project depth of 21 feet in lieu of that fixed by act of June 3, 1896. Turning basins. Interpreted by Chief of Engineers, April 11, 1908 as adopting new work of the then existing project for 21-foot depth. Eliminated all work except maintenance of main river. Dredging channel 9 feet deep to within 30 feet of existing bulkheads and river banks from North Ave. to Belmont Ave., thence 9 feet deep and 50 feet wide to Addison St. Documents Public Law, 89-298, H. Doc. 160, 88th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1896, pp. 2584 et Seq. and H. Doc. 277, H. 54th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 172, 54th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 349, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 494, 72d Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 180, 73rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 233, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 149, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 581, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Report No. 973, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Ex. Doc. 114, 41st Cong., 2d sess., and Annual Report 1879, pp. 1562-1567 Annual Report, 1870, pp. 1562-1567 Annual Report 1897, pp. 2790-2791 H. Doec. 710, Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 1303, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 797, 71st Cong. Public Law 14, 79th Cong. H. Doc. 485, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Section 107 of Public Law 97-88 Public Law 98-63 Specified in act. Specified in act. H. Doe. 95, 56th Cong., 1st sess. (Annual Report, 1900, p. 3863 and Annual Report, 1909, p. 709). H. Doe. 1294, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 767, 78th Cong., 2d sess.6 7 22-12 CHICAGO, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 22-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Nov. 17, 1986 June 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 20, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 2, 1929 July 3, 193010 July 30, 1932 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 28, 1937 July 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 196512 Mar. 3, 1889 Mar. 3, 1905 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Sept. 30, 1966 Sec. 107 June 14, 1880 Aug. 3, 1882 June 13, 1902 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 22-13 Work Authorized Responsible for monitoring of Lake Michigan Diversion INDIANA HARBOR, IN (See Section 6 of Text) Maintenance of outer harbor. Maintenance of inner harbor channel when deeded free of cost to and accepted by the United States. Breakwaters. Lighthouse crib, present length and alignment easterly and northerly breakwaters. Reduce length of channel to be maintained in extension to Lake George. Authorized Secretary of War to modify project so far as relates to length and alignment of breakwaters and to sell Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. about 1,180 linear feet of shoreward end of existing north breakwater. Accept 2.3 acres of land for construction of the Forks Turning Basin. Existing project channel width and depth in Lake George Branch and turning basin at the Forks. Authorized Secretary of War to sell Inland Steel Co., about 1,903 linear feet of southerly end of existing east breakwater. Extended easterly breakwater, dredge entrance channel and outer harbor, deepen channel between bulkhead fills, widen main stem of canal and portion of Calumet River Branch to 141st St. Modified conditions of local cooperation required before enlargement of Indiana Harbor Canal is undertaken by United States. Increase authorized depths of 29 feet in outer harbor entrance channel; 28 feet in outer harbor, and 27 feet in canal entrance channel to first E.J. & E. Ry. Bridge. Deepen main canal from landward end of canal entrance channel to a point lakeward of Dickey Place Bridge over a modified channel width of 190 feet, except through bridge openings. MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IN (See Section 7 of Text) East breakwater and old east pier inclosing the outer basin. Extension of east pier. Extend east pier and construct detached breakwater. Lower turning basin. Rebuild west pier as at present located. Present project dimensions of entrance channel. Existing project depth in channel, and in lower and middle turning basins, eliminated improvement of Trail Creek above middle turning basin and uncompleted portion of detached breakwater, abandonment of old east breakwater and old east pier inclosing outer basin. Restore and repair westerly 1,000 feet of east breakwater, dredging outer basin, and enlarging entrance to basin through east pier. Dredge river channel 50 feet wide and 6 feet deep from upper turning basin to E Street bridge. WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL (See Section 8 of Text) Parallel piers and basins. 9 Modified location of harbor entrance. Detached breakwater, extend piers, increase width of harbor at inner end of north pier, and dredge channel and basin to depth of 20 feet. Extension of breakwater to shore, dredging near outer end of north piers and enlarging inner basin. Dredge an entrance channel to existing project dimensions from outer end of north pier to project depth in lake, and dredge an anchorage area in southwest corner of inner basin to existing project depth. Abandonment of dredging triangular area in southwest corner of inner basin to 18 feet deep. Documents Section 1142, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 H. Doc. 1113, 60th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 690, 62d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 65th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 176, 67th Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 219, 72d Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 195, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 227, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Recommendations of a Board of Engineers, Annual Report 1870, p. 123 Reports of Boards of Engineers, Annual Report 1851, pp. 2187-2189; Annual Report 1882, p. 2264-2266. Annual Report 1897, pp. 2903-2904. Joint Resolution of Congress approved May 13, 1908. Public Law 23. H. Doc. 279, 69th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 34, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Detailed Project Report June 19658 Annual Report, 1880, p. 142 Annual Report, 1882, pp. 277, 2162 H. Doc. 343, 56th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 27, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 116, 77th Cong., 1st sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 22-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Dec. 17, 1970 Sec. 201 Oct. 27, 1965 Dec. 4, 1981 July 30, 1983 Nov. 17, 1986 Dec. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Dec. 31, 1970 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Work Authorized Provides for deepening the existing entrance channel in the outer harbor to 25 feet and extending it to the depth in Lake Michigan, at widths varying from 380 feet to 500 feet; deepening the channel between piers to a depth of 23 feet at a width of 180 feet, and deepening the inner basin to 23 feet and extending its limits approximately 275 feet northward. INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE, IN BEVERLY SHORES, IN (See Section 12 of Text) Provides for emergency shore protection repairs to stone revetment initially constructed in 1973. Provides for operations and maintenance of the shore protection measures. INDIANA SHORELINE, IN (See Section 13 of Text) Provides for beach nourishment along a two-mile reach of shore west of Michigan City Harbor, Indiana. LAKE MICHIGAN-EDGEWATER/ROGERS PARK COMMUNITIES, CHICAGO, IL (See Section 17 of Text) Provides for emergency bank stabilization, shore protection and flood control work. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN (See Section 18 of Text) Provides for levee construction, a diversion control structure at the mouth of Hart Ditch, permanent evacuation of a portion of the Black Oak area of Gary and non-structural flood proofing measures in Gary. NORTH BRANCH CHICAGO RIVER, IL (See Sections 16 and 20 of Text) Construction of three reservoirs and reimbursement to locals for 50 percent of the costs for Techny and Mid-Fork reservoirs. Clearing fallen trees, roots and other debris and objects which contribute to flooding. O'HARE RESERVOIR, CHICAGO, IL (See Section 21 of Text) Provides for a 1,050 acre-foot excavated reservior. LAKE GEORGE, HOBART, IN (See Section 28 of Text) Provides for removal of silt, aquatic growth and construction of silt traps. McCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVOIR (See Section 19 of Text) Provides for construction of two floodwater storage reservoirs in the quarries of the same name. Documents H. Doc. 368, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 97-88 Public Law 98-63 Sec. 501, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Public Law 99-190 amended Sec. 401, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. H. Doc. 100-72, 100th Cong. 1st sess., Sec. 401, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 River and Harbor Act. (Sec. 116) Sec. 401, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Sec. 602, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Sec. 3, Water Resources Development Act of 1988. 1. Included in Public Works Administrative Program September 6, 1943, and Dec. 16, 1933. 2. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (dredging in front of U.S. Steel Corp.). 3. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (breakwater closure). 4. Contains latest map of harbor. Uncompleted portion is inactive. 5. Contains latest map of river. 6. Latest published map is an Annual Report for 1914, opposite p. 2928. 7. Contains latest published map of North Branch above North Ave. 8. Contains latest published map. 9. Completed under previous project. 10. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (widen and deepen Lake George Branch). 11. Included in Public Works Administration Program Sept. 6, 1933, and July 25, 1934. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (widen and deepen main canal and Calumet River Branch). 12. Project deauthorized in 1977. 22-14 CHICAGO, II, DISTRICT TABLE 22-C EXISTING PROJECTS See Section Length Width Depth in Text Project Item (feet) (feet) (feet) i. Burns Waterway Harbor, IN 2. Burns Waterway SBH, IN 3. Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN 4. Chicago Harbor, IL 5. Chicago River, IL 6. Indiana Harbor, IN 7. Michigan City Harbor, IN 8. Waukegan Harbor, IL North Breakwater Outer West Bulkhead Approach Channel Outer Harbor East Harbor Arm West Harbor Arm North Breakwater West Breakwater Approach Channel Burns Ditch Northerly Crib Breakwater Southerly Steel Breakwater North Pier Chicago Confined Disposal Facility Approach Channel Outer Harbor River Entrance Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Bridge to turning basin No. 3 Turning Basin No. 3 to Turning Basin No. 5 Approach into Lake Calumet Extension in Lake Calumet Turning Basins 1,3,and 5 Shore arm extension Exterior breakwater Exterior breakwater southerly ext. North inner breakwater South inner breakwater North Pier Approach Channel Channel and maneuver Lock Inner Basin Entrance Channel Main branch of Chicago River North Branch of Chicago River North Branch Canal North Branch Turning Basin Northerly Breakwater Easterly Breakwater Approach Channel Outer Harbor Entrance Channel Main Channel Turning Basin Lake George Branch Calumet River Branch Detached Breakwater West Pier East Pier East Breakwater Entrance Channel Main Channel Outer Basin Trail Creek Trail Creek North Breakwater and Shore Connection North Pier and North Revetment South Pier Entrance Channel Channel to Inner Basin Inner Basin Anchorage Area 'Area of about 6 acres. 22-15 5 Ran 3,600 2,200 3,700 2,100 3,800 678 1,043 1,200 5,593 6,714 5,007 2,450 2,979 9,700 10,500 3,000 21,100 8,000 4,000 3,000 2,250 5,421 4,944 4,034 2,544 960 6,600 2,200 600 1,270 7,300 3,800 11,100 5,500 1,120 2,525 7,200 4,200 3,600 7,400 3,700 2,500 1,304 835 2,276 1,000 1,900 2,400 900 3,000 2,300 1,896 2,074 3,111 3,250 1,700 1,650 _1 400 Varies 620 620 200 100 3,200 2,000 290 200 and variable Variable 400 1,000 800 1,300 80 740 190-470 190-390 91-390 56-210 800 Varies 65-280 61-210 64-160 160-260 150-425 120-150 900 50-100 50 390 200 375-500 801 30 28 27 27 11 9 29 28 27 27 earth 28 rock 27 27 27 27 29 28 23 21 21 21 21 21 21 29 28 27 22 22 22 22 18 18 8-12 8 6 22 18 18 8 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 22-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION (See Section 11 of Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Calumet River Bridges 1967 1,625,068 - 1Transferred to Department of Transportation in accordance with Section 6(g) of the Act of October 16, 1966, P.L. 89-670. TABLE 22-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Casino Beach, Chicago, IL 1987 - Mt. Baldy, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, IN 1984 $1,500,000 Hollywood-Ardmore Beach, Chicago, IL 1982 237,271 Evanston, IL 1979 766,052 - Lake Michigan-Lake Bluff, IL 1976 244,889 - Lake Michigan-Lake Forest, IL' 1975 65,611 1Authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1954. TABLE 22-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Little Calumet River, IL 1984 583,000 Little Calumet River Basin (Cady Marsh Ditch), IN 1987 - TABLE 22-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended KANKAKEE RIVER, IL AND IN Levee between Shelby Bridge and Baum's Bridge in IN 1938 Nov. 17, 1986 - LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IL AND IN Little Calumet River and Tributaries, IL and IN 1968 Nov. 17. 1986 53,136 - 22-16 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT* This district comprises most of the northern half of Illinois, portions of southern Wisconsin, southern and southwestern Minnesota, eastern and central Iowa, and northeastern Missouri, embraced in drainage basin of Mississippi River and its eastern and western tributaries between mile 330 (above mouth of Ohio River) and 614, and of its eastern tributaries only, between Hamburg Bay, at mile 261 and 300. This district also includes the Illinois Waterway above mile 80 with its tributaries and drainage basins. The section of the Mississippi River between river miles 300 and 614 is included in the report on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Illinois and Mississippi Canal, IL............... 23-2 2. Illinois Waterway, IL and IN.................. 23-2 3. Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN........................ 23-3 4. Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program, IL, IA, MN, Mo, WI.....23-3 5. Other Authorized Navigation Projects.......... 23-3 Flood Control 6. Coralville Lake, IA.......................... 23-4 7. Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA ............................... 23-4 8. Farm Creek, IL ........................... 23-4 9. Hannibal, M O .............................. 23-4 10. Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, IA......... 23-5 11. Rockford, IL. ............................. 23-5 12. Saylorville Lake, IA.......................... 23-5 13. South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL .... 23-6 14. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ...... ...................... 23-6 15. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects. ....... 23-6 16. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............................... 23-6 General Investigations 17. Surveys .................................... 23-6 18. Collection and Study of Basic Data............. 23-6 19. Advance Engineering and Design ............... 23-6 Tables Page Table 23-A Cost and Financial Statement.......... 23-7 Table 23-B Authorizing Legislation.............. 23-9 Table 23-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......................... 23-12 Table 23-D Not Applicable Table 23-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects................... 23-12 Table 23-F Not Applicable Table 23-G Deauthorized Projects. .............. 23-14 Table 23-H Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects................... 23-15 Table 23-I Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ...................... 23-16 Table 23-J Illinois Waterway: Existing Locks and Dams................... 23-18 Table 23-K Illinois Waterway: Lock and Dam Construction, Foundations, Cost ..... 23-18 Table 23-L Illinois Waterway: Additional Features Entering into Cost .......... 23-19 Table 23-M Illinois Waterway: Existing Project.... 23-20 Table 23-N Illinois Waterway: Total Cost of Existing Project.................... 23-21 23-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Navigation 1. ILLINOIS AND MISSISSIPPI CANAL, IL Location. This canal extends for 75 miles from the Illinois River near LaSalle, IL, to the Mississippi River at Rock Island, IL. A feeder canal, 29 miles in length, extends from the summit level of the canal to the Rock River at Rock Falls, IL. Existing project. See pages 1306-1308 of Annual Report for 1962 for details regarding project. The canal was constructed in the period 1892-1918. The canal has not been operated for navigation since June 1951 in accordance with Corps policy to discontinue operation of waterways affording little or no benefit to navigation. The River and Harbor Act of 1958 authorized the appropriation of $2,000,000 for the purpose of placing the canal in proper condition for public recreational use and to convey and transfer the canal to the State of Illinois as part of the State park system. The repair and modification program was initiated in 1961, and a number of canal features have been repaired or modified. In connection with this program, fee title to 1,062 acres and recreational flowage easements over 309 acres of land in Rock River at Rock Falls, formerly under navigation flowage easement, have been acquired. The State of Illinois accepted title to the canal as of August 1, 1970. The River and Harbor Act of 1970 authorized the additional appropriation of $6,528,000 to be expended for the repair, modification, and maintenance of bridges, title transfer, modification or rehabilitation of hydraulic structures, fencing, clearing auxiliary ditches, and for the repair and modification of other canal property appurtenances. The repair and modification work was underway until a suit was filed by three Illinois counties and their Commissioners of Highway against the Federal Government and the State in 1974 over maintenance of highway bridges crossing the canal. After the lawsuit was filed, further rehabilitation work by the Federal Government on the canal was suspended. On 4 November 1981, the Corp of Engineers deposited $3,722,572 with the Clerk of the U.S. District Court in Chicago in full satisfaction of the Court's judgment. These funds are currently being used by the counties to complete bridge rehabilitation work as directed in the court order. Rehabilitation work by the Federal Government in coordination with the state was resumed in 1984 with the remaining authorization expended in 1987. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized an additional appropriation of $8,472,000 to accomplish the work described in the 1970 River and Harbor Act. The State of Illinois filed a lawsuit against the United States on July 6, 1987 in the U.S. Claims Court in the amount of $8,472,572. The suit consisted of two parts: (1) a claim for reimbursement of previously expended State funds for bridge repair and (2) that the federal funds ($3,722,572) used by the Government to satisfy the judgment in the Commission of Highway vs. United States be restored to the remaining authorization. Litigation of this suit will continue in FY90. Local cooperation. A revised agreement listing Federal remaining work items and the State desired priority of remaining work items is being developed in FY90. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and Design work: (1) Performed hydraulic assessment of east end of canal, (2) Developed list of remaining federal work items; (3) Developed draft of revised agreement; and Initiated environmental coordination for remaining federal work at a cost of $105,286 during FY 1989. 2. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN Location. Illinois River (entirely within State of Illinois), formed by confluence of Kankakee and Des Plaines River, flows southwesterly and enters Mississippi at Grafton, IL, about 38 miles above St. Louis. Illinois Waterway comprises Illinois River from its mouth to confluence of Kankakee and Des Plaines Rivers (273 miles), Des Plaines River to Lockport (18.1 miles) and Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and South Branch of Chicago River to Lake Street, Chicago (34.5 miles). Also from a point 12.4 miles above Lockport, IL, waterway comprises Calumet-Sag Channel and Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers to turning basin 5, near entrance to Lake Calumet (23.8 miles); and Grand Calumet River from junction to 141st Street, deep (lake) draft navigation (9 miles) and to Clark Street, Gary, IN (4.2 miles). Previous projects. For details, see page 1945 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1172 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. See table 23-K and page 1255 of Annual Report for 1963. Cost of new work was $124,041,436 and includes $445,000 for Recreation Facilities under Code 711. Calument-Sag Modification, Part III, placed in the deferred-for-restudy category in March 1972, cost of $33,000,000 (July 1971) Federal and $20,700,000 (July 1971) non-Federal; and widen Marseilles Canal to 300 feet, a protion of work authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1935, placed in the deferred category, cost of $1,859,300 (July 1971) Federal, are all exluded from present cost estimate. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. (See tables 23-J through 23-N on existing locks and dams; lock and dam construction, foundations, cost; additional features entering into cost of project; existing project and total cost of existing project.) Local cooperation. Complied with for completed modifications and Part I of Calument-Sag Modification. All pools above Alton Pool: Maintenance: Channel dredging by the Government cutterhead pipeline Dredge WILLIAM A. THOMPSON was performed in the LaGrange pool at a cost of $529,700 with a total of 263,063 cubic yards of material being remov- 23-2 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT ed. Dredging inspection and reports were completed at a cost of $55,400. Strike removal and snagging and clearing was accomplished in various locations by hired labor at a cost of $121,600. Maintenance of the Lucas-Berg Disposal Facility cost $10,000 and contractor completed construction mitigation at a cost of $8,700. Structural repairs to locks and dams were performed by hired labor at a cost of $1,679,200. Contractor substantially completed repairs to the upstream lock gates at Lockport Lock at a cost of $6,700. Repairs to upstream guard cell at Lockport Lock were completed by contract at a cost of $24,200. Contractor initiated construction of lock chamber bulkhead slots and repairs to the riverwall at Lockport Lock at a cost of $742,900. Contract for replacement of lock lighting at Peoria and LaGrange Locks and Dams was performed at a cost of $228,200. Contract repairs to the Visitor's Center at Starved Rock Lock and Dam cost $23,700. Dredged material disposal activities and other environmental concerns in connection with dredging cost $29,400. Real estate support of maintenance activities cost $41,200. Buildings, grounds, and utility maintenance at locks and dams and Illinois Waterway Project Office at Peoria totaled $36,900. Permanent operating equipment costs were $173,700. Engineering and design work, including preparation of design memorandums cost $214,500, and supervision, administration and inspection for the maintenance features totaled $231,500. Total maintenance costs were $4,157,500 Net credits to the project were $3,700. Operation and Care: Operation of the locks and dams and routine maintenance and minor repairs thereto were made at a cost of $6,369,400. Illinois Waterway Project Office at Peoria was continued at a cost of $822,900. Real estate management services were provided at a cost of $27,700 Visitor's Center at Starved Rock Lock and Dam was operated at a cost of $208,200. OSHA inspections and medical examinations were accomplished at a cost of $9,600. Contract law enforcement was provided at a cost of $900. Surveys, studies, and other inspections were performed at a cost of $850,400; natural and cultural resource activities cost $33,100; and water control management costs were $555,900. Supervision and administration for the operation features totaled $207,000. Total operation costs were $9,085,100. Total operation and maintenance costs were $13,242,600 for all pools above Alton Pool. Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation work at LaGrange, Peoria, Marseilles, Brandon Road, and Lockport Lock Locks and Dams was in progress. Costs at LaGrange were $4,841,517; at Brandon Road, $86,147; at Lockport, -$1,516; at Marseilles, $996,654; and at Peoria, $5,534,868; for a total of $11,457,670. Alton Pool Operation: Costs by hired labor for condition and operation studies were $120,042; water control management $73,004; and supervision and administration $12,197. Alton Pool Maintenance: Costs for the year were $168,122 for dredging and $5,801 for supervision and administration. Total cost for work in Alton Pool was $379,166. Total operation and maintenance costs for all pools above Alton Pool were $13,242,600. Alton Pool operation and maintenance costs were $379,166; for a total operation and maintenance cost of $13,621,766. 3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN For report on this improvement, see chapter on "Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN." 4. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, IL, IA, MN, MO, WI Location. The project is located in the Mississippi River Basin encompassing a 5-state area including IL, IA, MN, MO, and WI. Existing project. The project represents the initial implementation of the master plan prepared by the Upper Mississippi River Basin Association (report dated January 1982). Project features include long-term resources monitoring, habitat rehabilitation and enhancement, a study of economic impacts of recreation, traffic monitoring, and recreation improvements (currently unfunded). The project was initiated in FY 1986 utilizing funds provided by FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriation Act. The execution of the project will be closely coordinated with the Upper Mississippi River Basin Association, other Federal agencies, affected States, and local communities. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Local cooperation agreements will be sought as required. Operations during fiscal year. Costs during the year totaled $6,300,372. The majority of funds were expended on two program elements: habitat projects and continuation of long term resource monitoring. Design was initiated on 13 projects, continued on 14: construction was initiated on four and continued on one. Funds were also used for the economic impacts of recreation study, the traffic monitoring program, and the general plan. 5. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 23-C 23-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Flood Control 6. CORALVILLE LAKE, IA Location. Coralville Lake is formed by the Coralville Dam on the Iowa River, several miles upstream from Iowa City, Johnson County, IA, about 83 miles above the confluence of the Iowa River with the Mississippi River. Existing project. See page 28-4, Annual Report for 1981, for project details. Construction began in July 1949 and the project has been in operation since February 1958. About 24,406 acres of land were acquired in fee, and flowage easements obtained for 9,494 acres. The project was modified to provide for construction of a highway bridge crossing the lake at the Mehaffey site, which was begun in June 1964 and completed in October 1966. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required, except in connection with the Mehaffey Bridge which has been fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Additional land acquisition to provide for the present plan of reservoir operation performed at a cost of $180,546. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities continued at a cost of $2,990,552. Reservoir maintenance and operation funds FY cost of $68,000. Expenditures from return of recreation use fees were $125,192. 7. DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER AND GREENBELT, IA Location. The greenbelt area is located along both banks of the Des Moines River in central IA and extends from a point at which relocated U.S. Highway 92 crosses the Des Moines River near Harvey, upstream approximately 169 river miles to U.S. Highway 20 at Fort Dodge, IA. It includes the Corps' operated Lake Red Rock and Saylorville Lake projects. Existing project. The project will include, but not be limited to: (1) the construction, operation, and maintenance of recreational facilities and streambank stabilization structures; (2) the operation and maintenance of all structures constructed before the date of authorization of this project (other than any such structure operated and maintained by any person under a permit or agreement with the Secretary); (3) such tree plantings, trails, vegetation, and wildlife protection and development and other activities as will enhance the natural environment for recreational purposes; and (4) the prohibition or limitation by the Secretary of the killing, wounding, or capturing at any time of any wild bird or animal in such areas as may be directed by the Secretary. In carrying out the project, the Secretary may acquire by purchase, donation, exchange, or otherwise, land and interests therein, as the Secretary determines are necessary to carry out such project. The authorization requires that an Advisory Committee will be established for consultation with the Department of the Army consisting of three Corps of Engineers appointees, one person from the city of Des Moines, and one from each other incorporated municipality within the greenbelt, two from each of eight counties in the greenbelt, and five from the State of Iowa. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Letters of Assurance for the overall project have been furnished by Polk County, (28 Oct. 85) City of Johnson (11 Nov. 85), Iowa Department of Natural Resources (6 Dec. 85), City of Ft. Dodge (5 Dec. 85), City of Swan (7 Dec. 85), Marion County (16 Dec. 85), Jasper County (16 Dec. 85), Boone County (18 Dec. 85), Webster County (14 Jan. 86), City of Des Moines (7 Apr. 86), City of West Des Moines (28 May 87), City of Dayton (20 May 87), Hamilton County (1 Sep. 87), City of Stratford (12 Jan. 88), Polk City (12 Mar. 87), and the Town of Lehigh (13 Mar. 86). Operations during fiscal year. Coordination was maintained with the Advisory Committee in accordance with Public Law 99-88. Feature Design Memoranda were completed for Jester Park Campground improvements (February 1989) and Multi-Purpose Trail, Red Rock, Segment I,( May 1989). The construction contract was awarded for the Jester Park Campground Improvements project. Costs incurred were $371,106. 8. FARM CREEK, IL Location. Farm Creek watershed in Tazewell County, IL, is 60 square miles in extent. Stream empties into Illinois Waterway at mile 162 above mouth. Existing project. See page 28-5, Annual Report for 1983 for description of project. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $148,814. 9. HANNIBAL, MO Location. Hannibal is located on the right bank of the Mississippi River between river miles 309 and 310 in Marion County. The area to be protected contains about 50 acres, which have been extensively developed for light industrial, commercial, public, and residential purposes. Existing project. The project provides a 500-year level of protection for Hannibal by construction of levees and floodwalls along Front and Collier Street. The proposed project is approximately 0.7 of a mile long, with an average levee height of 12.5 feet. Concrete floodwalls would be used in confined areas. There are four street closure structures and six gatewells. Provisions for interior drainage includes a new 3,000 foot interceptor sewer, together with a 1.0 acre 23-4 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT ponding area and a 40,000 GPM station. The area to be protected includes 19 blocks of the city's downtown area, including the historic Mark Twain District. The estimated cost is $6,770,000 which includes $1,690,000, non-federal costs. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Local cooperation agreement for the project was executed on 27 December 1988. Operations during fiscal year. Continued planning, engineering and design effort at a cost of $303,889. 10. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA Location. The site of this project is on the Des Moines River, chiefly in Marion County, but extending into Jasper, Warren, and Folk Counties. The dam is 142.9 miles above the mouth of the Des Moines River, which empties into the Mississippi River at mile 361.4 above the mouth of the Ohio River. The city of Des Moines lies northwesterly from the site, about 60 miles upstream. Existing project. See page 28-6, Annual Report for 1981 for description of the project. Construction began in May 1960, and the dam was placed in beneficial use for storage of flood water in January 1969. Land acquired for the project consisted of 47,615 acres in fee and 29,057 acres in flowage easement. Landowner complaints, that lake operations have flooded their lands more frequently than what they were told to expect when flowage easements were initially acquired, led Congress to modify the project authorization. Language in PL 99-190 authorizes acquisition from willing sellers fee simple title in real property, which is subject to periodic flooding inconnection with the operation of the project. Potentially, there are approximately 1,000 tracts consisting of about 30,000 acres involved. Estimated Federal cost is $33,600,000. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year: New Work: Land Acquisition costs were $227,006. The REDM (#5W) was approved February 1988. Preparation of second REDM (#5X) was initiated. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $2,475,492. Flood control reservoir maintenance and operation funds FY cost $68,000. Expenditures from the return of recreation use fees were $143,003. 11. ROCKFORD, IL Location. The city of Rockford is located along both banks of the Rock River, in Winnebago County, IL. Kent Creek is a small stream, tributary to the Rock River, which flows through the right-bank portion of the city. Existing project. The project provides flood protection for the right-bank portion of the city from floods on Kent Creek. It consists of a rolled earth dam with outlet works and spillway on North Branch Kent Creek in Page Park; 12,000 feet of channel cleanout and straightening on North Branch Kent Creek; raise of Levings Lake Dam on South Branch Kent Creek and construction of spillway and diversion channel; 10,800 feet of channel cleanout and straightening on South Branch Kent Creek; and relocations. Construction was initiated in October 1978. The estimated project cost is $17,001,736, including $6,430,000 for land and relocations. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the project was continued at a cost of $47,007. The project is now complete. 12. SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA Location. The project site is chiefly in Polk County, IA, but portions extend into Dallas and Boone Counties. The dam is about 213.7 miles above the mouth of the Des Moines River and about 5 miles upstream from the city of Des Moines, IA. Existing project. The dam is an earth embankment 6,750 feet long at crest with a height of 120 feet. Outlet works are a single circular concrete conduit, 22 feet in diameter, located at the toe of the west bluff. Control structure is at upstream end of conduit and houses three gates. A stilling basin is provided to dissipate energy of discharge from outlet conduit. Spillway is in west bluff, weir 430 feet long. Water flowing over the spillway weir discharges into a paved chute and thence into an excavated earth channel to the Des Moines River. Top of spillway is about 31 feet below top of earth embankment section, and flow over weir is uncontrolled when water in reservoir reaches its crest. Watershed area above dam site is 5,823 square miles. With pool at spillway crest elevation, lake area is 16,700 acres and contains about 676,000 acre-feet of water at that height (602,000 for flood control and 74,000 for a conservation pool to maintain minimum flows at downstream points). Lake supplements capacity of downstream Lake Red Rock at river mile 142.9. The two lakes provide a high degree of flood protection to the lower Des Moines River Valley. Reaches along the Mississippi River downstream from the mouth of the Des Moines River are also benefited. A project modification plan to minimize the adverse environmental effects at Ledges State Park, located upstream from the dam, was authorized in 1976. The project modification includes relocation of affected park facilities, acquisition of additional park land, and the development of a floodway corridor, with recreational facilities, from the dam downstream to Sixth Avenue in Des Moines. Improvements to Highway 415 the main access road to existing facilities on the east side of the reservoir, were added to the project by Congress in 1984. Construction began in June 1965, and the dam ws placed in operation for the storage of flood water in April 1977. 23-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Remedial work in Big Creek Valley, consisting of a diversion dam and channel and a barrier dam, for the protection of the town of Polk City was completed in December 1974. The land acquisition program involved 26,526 acres acquired in fee, flowage easements for 1,925 acres. The estimated project cost is $16,580,000 including $2,820,000 non-Federal costs from the State of Iowa and the City of Des Moines, Iowa toward recreational development. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The principal work item was the construction of recreational facilities and spillway modifications. New work costs were $1,448,816. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $4,594,994. Reservoir maintenance and operation funds FY costs of $68,000. Expenditures from return of recreation use fees were $200,116. The project is about 96 percent completed, excluding deferred work. 13. SOUTH QUINCY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, in Adams County, is located on the left bank of the Mississippi River between river miles 318.5 and 325.5 just south of Quincy, Illinois. It is bounded by the Mississippi River on the west, the river bluffs on the east, Curtis Creek on north, and Mill Creek on the south. Existing project. About 8.8 miles of earth levee and a pumping station constructed by local interests and imporved by the Federal Government in 1967 was designed and built to provide protection against a flood having a 2 percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any one year. Increasing the level of protection to a 500-year change of occurrence includes raising the existing levee approximately 3.5 feet in height and adding .4 mile of levees and floodwall. Associated features of the proposed plan include raising and resurfacing existing road ramps, and a railroad closure structure. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Completed construction of Stage I, Levees and Floodwalls. Initiated construction of Stage II, Levees, and Stage III, Levees. Costs for FY 89 were $2,623,855 14. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Federal flood control regulations (part 208 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations) provide that the structures and facilities constructed by the United States for local flood protection shall be continuously maintained in such a manner and operated at such times and for such periods as may be necessary to obtain the maximum benefits. Costs during the period for inspections of projects turned over to local interests to ascertain compliance with Federal requirements were $97,428. (See Table 23-H for list of completed flood control projects inspected.) 15. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 23-E. 16. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities, Section 205, Public Law 84-685. See Table 23-I. Snagging and Clearing of Navigable Streams and Tributaries in Interest of Flood Control, Section 208, Public Law 83-780. See Table 23-I. Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526.) See Table 23-I. Emergency Flood Control Activities, Public Law 99, 84th Congress. See Table 23-I. General Investigations 17. SURVEYS The flood control study in progress during FY 89 was the South Fork, Sangamon River, Illinois at a cost of $129,523. Special investigations, FERC review, Dam Safety Criteria Studies. Inventory of Dams, SCS Coordination, and Planning Assistance to States efforts totaled $166,166. Total cost of surveys was $295,689. 18. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services cost $195,449. Hydrologic studies, including general studies, sedimentation studies, streamflow studies, and rainfall studies cost $195,508. Total cost for collection and study of basic data was $390,957. 19. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN The Loves Park, IL, project, authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, lies in Winnebago County, IL, on the northeast boundary of the city of Rockford, 17 miles south of the IL-WI State line. The project would provide local flood protection (100-year level) for the city of Loves Park, IL, against flooding of Loves Park Creek (formerly called the Large Unnamed Creek). Protection measures would consist of 17,350 feet of channel improvements, a 75,000 GPM pump plant, and ponding. Completed the General Design Memorandum and initiated plans and specifications for Stage I in FY 89. Total cost of advance engineering and design was $227,046. See Table 23-B for authorizing Legislation. 23-6 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT Located in Muscatine and Louisa Counties, Muscatine Island Levee District and Muscatine-Louisa County Drainage District No. 13, together with the city of Muscatine, Iowa form a joint drainage and flood protection area for 30,700 acres of bottom land. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 subject to a favorable Chief's Report and approved by the Secretary of the Army. The project will provide flood protection by increasing the height of the existing main stem levee and flank levee. Work continued on the General Design Memorandum in FY 89 at a cost of $68,127. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. TABLE 23-A COST AND FINAN The West Des Moines - Des Moines, Iowa project is located in Polk County in central Iowa. The recommended project of levees and flood walls will provide flood protection from the Raccoon River, Walnut Creek, and Jordan Creek for approximately 927 urban acres. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. FY 89 funds were used to complete work on the General Reevaluation Report (GRR) and initiate work on the General Design Memorandum (GDM). Preconstruction planning for FY 89 was $273,269. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. Total cost for advance engineering and design was $532,442. CIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 1. Illinois and Mississippi Canal, IL 2. Illinois Waterway, IL and IN 4. Upper Mississippi River System Enviornmental Management Program, IL, IA, MN, MO, WI 6. Coralville Lake, IA 7. Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA 8. Farm Creek, IL 9. Hannibal, MO Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Contibuted Funds Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Total Cost to FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 September 1989 - - - - 7,605,143' - - - - 7,605,143' 695,000 359,615 42,558 377,489 5,639 115,000 105,286 18,048,3682 18,032,6022 - 126,707,751' - 126,706,419' 10,847,351 10,797,875 13,841,000 16,528,634 12,491,000 15,938,200 12,730,200 12,748,599 15,775,768 13,238,903 29,671,000 18,153,200 10,865,000 30,572,350 18,003,459 11,457,670 814,000 1,683,000 5,911,000 7,364,000 442,750 1,571,225 4,601,786 6,300,372 507,889 2,290,600 2,045,866 238,000 163,997 31,900 132,327 72,339 100,000 180,546 2,048,522 2,599,400 2,774,000 2,225,575 2,566,631 2,990,552 371,000 240,000 480,000 404,519 199,368 371,106 4,150 25,986 8,632 145,984 4,916 266,908,147' 264,076,151' 134,239,825 132,889,368 15,802,000 12,916,133 30,069,488' 29,963,521' 30,833,027 28,780,075 1,344,000 1,138,990 182,034 39,534 - 9,859,0206 - 9,859,0206 60,000 79,811 124,000 117,693 89,000 93,074 184,000 119,421 138,500 100,069 84,000 154,746 115,600 148,814 395,000 303,889 3,028,332 2,920,082 1,307,993 1,216,682 23-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 23-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 September 1989 10. Red Rock Dam and New Work: Lake Red Rock, IA Approp. - - 500,000 1,057,000 96,860,484 Cost - - 90,566 227,006 95,621,056 Maint: Approp. 3,004,600 2,638,322 2,647,700 2,531,000 32,664,345 Cost 2,638,830 2,801,950 2,914,375 2,475,492 30,210,627 11. Rockford, IL New Work: Approp. 309,000 1,086,000 773,000 - 10,827,273 Cost 564,537 159,867 1,654,337 47,007 10,006,497 Contributed Funds Approp. - - 259,750 5,079 514,190 Cost 48 - 237,736 - 481,944 12. Saylorville Lake New Work: IA Approp. 7,107,000 961,000 1,500,000 1,522,000 113,809,887 Cost 3,631,688 4,740,366 1,511,897 1,448,816 112,393,145' Maint: Approp. 3,116,600 3,823,422 3,542,400 4,568,800 34,296,665 Cost 3,032,005 3,362,400 3,870,708 4,594,994 30,990,912 Contributed Funds: Approp. 141,989 143,489 136,454 168,033 2,752,806 Cost 141,745 245,111 166,102 44,640 2,407,254 13. South Quincy, IL New Work: Approp. 209,000 230,000 2,574,000 2,570,000 5,733,000 Cost 218,160 231,040 2,363,592 2,623,855 5,575,113 Contributed Funds: Approp. - - 480,000 1,180,000 1,660,000 Cost - - 401,083 966,423 1,367,506 19. Loves Park, IL New Work: Approp. 311,000 430,000 275,000 193,000 1,409,000 Cost 303,507 297,233 339,749 227,046 1,355,179 Muscatine Island, IA New Work: Approp. - 100,000 225,000 150,000 475,000 Cost - 25,843 238,497 68,127 332,467 West Des Moines, IA New Work: Approp. - 75,000 250,000 250,000 575,000 Cost - - 247,658 273,269 520,927 1. Includes $25,000 Emergency Relief Funds. 2. Includes $4,143,282 for Operating and Care under the "Permanent Indefinite Appropriation." 3. Includes $2,569,102 for previous projects. 4. Includes $1,028,468 for previous projects. 5. Includes cost of Mehaffey Bridge, $1,365,074 (excluding $100,000 contributed funds). 6. Excludes $161,813 contributed funds. 7. Excludes $950,000 non-Federal cost. 23-8 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 23-B See Section in Text AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized 2. January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 June 26, 1934' August 30, 1935 August 30, 1935" June 14, 1937 June 20, 1938 October 23, 1943 March 2, 1945 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 69th Cong., 1st sess., and S. Doc. 130, 69th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 126, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN Channel 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth of Illinois River to Utica, 231 miles, modification of 2 U.S. locks and dams, removal of 2 State dams. (Act authorized appropriation of not to exceed $3,500,000 for carrying on work.) Channel 9 feet deep from Utica, IL, to heads of present Federal projects on Chicago and Calumet Rivers 94.6 miles to Lake Street, and 96.3 miles to turning basin 5, respectively, to be secured by means of completed dams, locks, lateral canals, and dredging begun by State of Illinois in general accordance with present plans of State for that work. Act adopting project authorized appropriation of not to exceed $7,500,000 for carrying on work. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriation for rivers and harbors. Construct modern locks and dams at LaGrange and Peoria and a channel 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide below Lockport, exact location and details of design of all structures to be left to discretion of Chief of Engineers, and, for time being, that no change be made in water authorized for navigation of Illinois River by act of July 3, 1930. Also provides for 3 passing places along Sag Channel and authorized channel in Calumet-Sag route to turning basin 5, and dredging at entrance of Lake Calumet. Realign portion of Calumet River and abandonment of bypassed section of Calumet River. Modifies local cooperation requirements in 1935 act. Pay damages to levee and drainage districts due to seepage and other factors, not to exceed $503,500. Enlarge Calumet-Sag Channel to 160 feet wide and a usable depth of 9 feet. Dredge a barge channel 160 feet wide with a usable depth of 9 feet in Grand Calumet and Little Calumet River Branch of Indiana Harbor Canal to deep (lake) draft through 141st St., East Chicago, IN. Construct in Little Calumet River a lock of suitable dimensions for large navigation. Rebuild or otherwise alter at Federal expense all obstructive railroad bridges across Calumet-Sag Channel, Little Calumet River, Calumet River, Grand Calumet River, and Indiana Harbor Canal, so as to provide suitable clearance, except that no Federal Iunl(s shall he expended lfor removal or alteration of Illinois Central RR. bridge at mile 11.20 of Little Calumet River. H. Doc. 711, 77th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 145, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 23-9 H. Doc. 184, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. 2 H. Doc. 180, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Ilarbors Couniit tee Doc. 19, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Documents _ _ _ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 23-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See D)ate Section Authorizing in 'T'ext Act Project and Work Authorized Documents July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 17, 1953 July 3, 1958 August 18, 1968 November 17, 1986 Substitute following work for that authorized by act of March 2, 1945; replace emergency dam in Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal: enlargement of that canal thence to Sag ,Junction and of Caltimet -Sag Channel to afford channels 225 feet wide and usable depth of 9 feet; construct along general route depth of 9 feet to 225 feet wide between Little Calumet River and junction with Indiana Harbor Canal and 160 feet wide thence to Clark St., Gary, IN, with a turning basin at Clark St.., enlarge Indiana Harbor Canal to 225 feet wide and usable depth of 9 feet between Grand Calumet River and vicinity of 141st St., inclusive; remove Blue Island lock and construct a lock and control works in Calumet River near its head, and similar structures in proposed Grand Calumet Channel west of Indiana Iharbor Canal; alter or eliminate railroad bridges across three channels lakeward of Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, or construct new railroad bridges to provide suitable clearance. A small-boat harbor in vicinity of Peoria, IL,b,y construction of a basin 510 by 250 feet, dredged to 7 feet deep. $48,933 to reimburse Nutwood Drainage and Levee District for additional pumping operation; supplementing $58,750 authorized in October 1943 act. Federal participation in alteration of highway bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part I, which constitute unreasonable obstructions to navigation, in accordance with Public Law 647, 76th Cong., as amended. Federal participation in alteration of highway bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part II, which constitute unreasonable obstructions to navigation, in accordance with Public Law 647, 76th Cong., as amended. Illinois River at Peoria, IL modification of navigation project to include an adjacent downstream water area. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, IL, IA, MN, MO, WI Provide for a 10-year environmental program to include habitat rehabilitation and enhancement; longterm resource monitoring with computerized( inventory and analysis; recreational development; assessment of economic benefits from recreational activities; and navigation system traffic monitoring. 23-10 II. Doc. 677, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 698, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. II. I)oc. 144, 81st Cong., 1st sess. II. Doc. 45, 85th Cong., 1st sess.4 Specified in Act. Also II. I)oc. 45, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 857, II.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. 11. Doc. 2577, 99th Cong., 1st sess. August 15, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 23-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION l)nte Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents November 17, 1986 June 28, 1938 July 14, 1960 August 15, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) November 17, 1986 8. 1944 Flood Control Act 9. October 23, 1962 10. June 28, 1938 December 19, 1985 11. October 23, 1962 12. July 3, 1958 October 22, 1976 13. Novembcer 17, 1986 19. November 17, 1986 Approves 1982 Upper Mississippi River Master Plan, authorizes interstate agreements between Upper Mississippi River states, directs Secretary to implement GREAT II recommendations for disposal of dredged material and facilitate the productive use of dredge material, directs and interagency agreement with the Department of Interior for its participation in the plan, authorizes second lock at Lock and Dam No. 6. CORALVILLE LAKE, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Highway bridge across Coralville Lake at or near the Mehaffey site. DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER AND GREENBELT, IA Recreational development; environmental enhancement; and related streambank stabilization. Defines area of work. FARM CREEK, IL Two flood detention dams and channel improvements. HANNIBAL, MO Levee, floodwall, closure structures, and pumping plant for flood control. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Land Acquisition ROCKFORD, IL Channel enlargement and realignment, levees, and appurtenant works for flood control. SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Modification to minimize adverse project impact on Ledges State Park. SOUTH QUINCY I)RAINAGE ANI) LEVEE I)ISTRIICT, IL Raise existing levee, construct levees and Iloodwalls raise road ramps and construct railroad closure. LOVES PARK, IL Improved channel, pumping plant and pond storage. Sec. 1103, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. None IH. i)oc. 2577, 99th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 604, 1H.R.6, Water Resources I)evelopment Act of 1986. H. Doc. 802, 78th Cong., 2nd sess. II. Doc. 564, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. PL 99-190 S. Doc. 142, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 9, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 487, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. Sec. 401, II.l1.6, Water Resources I)evelopment Act of 1986. Sec. 401, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. 23-11 See in 'l'cxt 6. 7. __ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 23-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents MUSCATINE ISLAND LEVEE DISTRICT AND MUSCATINE-LOUISA COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT, NO. 13, IA 19. November 17, 1986 Raise existing levees. Sec. 401, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. WEST DES MOINES, IA 19. November 17, 1986 Construct levees and floodwall. Sec. 401, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. 1. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 3. Included, in part, in Public Works Administration Program 2. Contains latest published map of Illinois and Des Plaines October 31, 1934, and February 28, 1935. Rivers. 4. Contains latest published maps of Calumet-Sag portion. TABLE 23-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 5 of Text) For Last Cost To September 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Hannibal SBH, MO Completed 1958 108,7004 58,000 Squaw Chute at Quincy, IL Completed 1967 70,979' 9,345 Muscooten Bay, Illinois River, IL Completed 1985 265,499 ' 167,504 Quincy, IL, Harbor Access Channel Completed 1970 35,4772 37,700 Muscatine Harbor, IA Completed 1964 353,000 85,999 1. Excludes $25,851 contributed funds. 3. Excludes $137,869 contributed funds. 2. Excludes $35,350 contributed funds. 4. Excludes $20,300 contributed funds. TABLE 23-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 15 of Text) Cost To September 30, 1989 For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Completed Projects Banner Special Drainage and Levee Districts, IL Bear Creek Dam (City of Hannibal, MO) Bettendorf, IA Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL Canton, MO' Clinton, IA Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, MO Des Moines, IA Drury Drainage District, IL Dubuque, IA East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL 1943 1962 1987 1943 1964 1981 1954 1941 1969 1972 1964 1974 1941 247,822 1,679,056 14,827,293 144,910 1,496,555 26,001,996 1,923,145 68,898 1,492,016 4,993,224 1,144,875 10,861,170 207,826 - - 228,073 761,050 23,323 145,415 23-12 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 23-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) (See Section 15 of Text) Cost To September 30, 1989 For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Completed Projects East Moline, IL 1984 9,692,097 - - East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, IL 1946 279,963 - - Elkport, IA 1951 34,200 - - Evansdale, IA 1983 4,409,088 - - Fabius River Drainage District, MO 1941 60,500 - - Fabius River Drainage District, MO 1963 1,621,841 - - Farmers Levee and Drainage District, IL 1942 155,562 - - Fulton, IL 1984 18,017,200 - - Galena, IL 1952 844,100 - 118,000 Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA 1949 299,000 - - Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA 1967 1,727,711 - - Gregory Drainage District, MO 1940 77,100 - - Gregory Drainage District, MO 1972 1,538,963 - 20,626 Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, IL 1968 1,453,217 - - Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, IL 1968 1,043,902 - - Henderson County Drainage District No. 3, IL 1949 42,700 - - Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, IL 1940 109,593 - - Hunt Drainage District and Lima Lake Drainage District, IL 1972 4,772,498 - - Indian Grave Drainage District, IL 1972 3,551,961 - - Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA 1972 6,044,693 - - Kishwaukee River at DeKalb, IL' 1957 123,300 - - Lacey Langellier, West Mantanzas and Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL 1954 1,290,000 - - Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL 1943 117,731 - - Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1938 152,000 - - Marengo, IA' 1981 2,447,001 - - Marion County Drainage District, MO 1967 873,748 - - Marshalltown, IA 1978 8,437,511 - 252,136 Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL 1940 93,808 - - Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL' 1977 1,995,322 - 269,739 Milan, IL 1988 13,430,596 - 213,554 Muscatine, Mad Creek, IA' 1983 1,129,800 - - Muscatine Island Levee District and Muscatine- Lousia County Drainage District No. 13, IA 1970 3,293,276 - 220,000 Near Springfield on Sangamon River, IL 1941 - - - Oakford Special Drainage District, IL 1940 38,417 - - Okabena Creek at Worthington, MN' 1957 72,432 - - Ottumwa, IA 1977 233,145 - - Pekin and La Marsh Drainage and Levee District, IL 1955 158,383 - - Penny Slough, Rock River, IL 1940 85,800 - - Rock Island, IL 1979 7,582,373 - - Rocky Ford Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 108,797 - - Sabula, IA 1958 411,915 - - Sagamon River (Mouth), IL 1980 1,048,990 272,848 15,122 Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL 1945 32,281 - - Sid Simpson Project, IL 1968 5,789,800 - - Sny Basin, IL 1972 14,003,560 - - Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL 1942 61,400 - - Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL 1968 4,956,749 - - 23-13 TABLE 23-E (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 15 of Text) Cost To September 30, 1989 For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended South Beardstown and Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL 1942 220,729 -- South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL 1942 171,839 - - South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1940 61,200 -- South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1968 1,231,243 - - South River Drainage District, MO 1941 55,300 -- South River Drainage District, MO 1966 1,106,056 - - Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 185,980 -- Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1 and Bay Island Drainage and Levee District No. 1,IL 1967 3,306,695 - - Union Township Drainage District, MO 1947 116,576 - - Van Meter, IA' 1965 113,842 -- Authorized Projects Not Constructed Ames Dam and Reservoir, Skunk River, IA 1987 1,400,800 - - Davenport, IA 1987 - - Moline, IL2 1987 - - - Peoria, IL 1973 534,580 - - Rock River Agricultural Levees, IL 1984 858,000 -- Waterloo, IA (Bridges) 1987 - - 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act). 2. FY 89 funds of $5,639 were expended to close out project. TABLE 23-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For i)cauthorized Expended Expended Cal.-Sag Channel, Part II Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Campbells Island Mississippi River, IL Carroll County Levee and Drainage District, IL Central City Lake, Wapsipinicon River, IA Farmers Drainage and Levee District (Sangamon River), IL Freeport, IL Green Island Levee and Drainage District, IA 1-Henderson River, ILI Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Duplicate Locks Illinois Waterway Navigation Project (Pekin, IL) Janesville and Indian Ford Dams, WI 1986 1969 1938 1970 1942 1979 1938 1964 1982 1986 1938 1986 1979 1977 1977 1986 1986 1977 1977 1981 1986 1977 $ 76,664 55,664 286,000 102,310 23-14 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT 'TABLE 23-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Keithsburg Drainage District, IL 1938 1977 Pecatonica River at Darlington, WI - 1977 Rochester Lake, Cedar River, IA - 1977 - South Beloit, IL 1979 1986 270,000 William L. Springer Lake Decatur, IL 1979 1986 - - TABLE 23-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 14 of Text) Date Project Inspected Alpine Dam and Page Park Dam, Rockford, IL Banner Special Drainage and Levee District, IL Bear Creek Reservoir, Hannibal, MO Bettendorf, IA Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL Burlington, IA Canton, MO Clinton, IA Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL DeKalb, IL Des Moines, IA Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, MO Drury Drainage District, IL Dubuque, IA East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL East Moline, IL East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, IL East Peoria Sanitary District, IL Elkport, IA Evansdale, IA Fabius River Drainage District, MO Farmers Drainage and Levee District, IL Fulton, IL Galena, IL Green Bay Levee and Drainage District, No. 2, IA Gregory Drainage District, MO Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, IL Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, IL Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, IL Hergot Drainage and Levee District, IL Hunt Drainage District & Lima Lake Drainage District, IL Indian Grave Drainage District, IL September 1988 December 1988 January 1989 October 1988 December 1988 December 1988 March 1989 September 1988 April 1989 February 1989 September 1988 October 1988 April 1989 December 1988 September 1988 January 1989 October 1988 December 1988 March 1989 September 1988 November 1988 April 1989 February 1989 September 1988 September 1988 November 1988 January 1989 November 1988 November 1988 January 1989 January 1989 January 1989 January 1989 23-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 23-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) (See Section 14 of Text) Date Project Inspected Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL Lacey Drainage and Levee District, IL Langellier Darinage and Levee District, IL Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Mad Creek, Muscatine, IA Marengo, IA Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL Marion County Drainage District, MO Marshalltown, IA Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL Milan, IL Muscatine Island, L&DD, &Louisa DD No. 13, IA Oakford Special Drainage and Levee District, IL Pekin-LaMarsh Drainage and Levee District, IL Penny Slough Drainage and Levee District, IL Rock Island, IL Sabula, IA Sanitary District of Beardstown, IL Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL South River Drainage District, MO Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. I and Bay Island Levee and Drainage District No. 1, IL The Sny Basin, IL Valley Drainage and Levee District IL Van Meter, IA Volga, IA Waterloo, IA West Matanzas Drainage and Levee District, IL Worthington, MN December 1988 March 1989 March 1989 March 1989 February 1989 December 1988 December 1988 November 1988 January 1989 May 1989 November 1988 October 1988 October1988 December 1988 January 1989 March 1989 September 1988 October 1988 September 1988 March 1989 December 1988 March 1989 March 1989 May 1989 March 1989 December 1988 March 1989 March 1989 October 1988 September 1988 November 1988 March 1989 December 1988 TABLE 23-I FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended (Preauthorization) (See Section 16 of Text) Study Identification Cedar Falls, Cedar River, IA DeKalb, Kishwaukee River, IL Des Moines River, IA East Peoria, IL Gale Creek, Oregon, IL Village of Hull, IL Illinois, and Michigan Canal, IL Fiscal Year Costs $ 3,473 241 18,654 28,297 54,716 8,275 21,264 23-16 a ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 23-I (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended (Preauthorization) (See Section 16 of Text) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Illinois River, Liverpool, IL Iroquois River, Sugar Creek, Watseka, IL North River, Marion County, MO No Name Creek, Waterloo, IA Oelwein, Fayette County, IA Ottawa, IL Panther Creek, Sangamon River, Chandlerville, IL Raccoon River, Des Moines, IA Sabula, IA Sink Creek, Waterloo, IA Tama, IA Vermilion River, Pontiac, IL Walnut Creek, Clive, IA Willow Creek, Mason City, IA $15,398 7,035 34,060 14,000 17,610 9,683 5,968 43,625 3,242 9,917 4,575 2,029 8,813 37,426 TABLE 23-I Snagging and Clearing Navigable Streams and Tributaries in the Interest of Flood Control (Preauthorization) (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress) (See Section 16 of Text) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Carbon Cliff, Sec 3 & 4, RIE, IL $12,909 Kickapoo Creek, DeWitt Co., IL 15,000 TABLE 23-I Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress) (See Section 16 of Text) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Buena Vista, IA $25,633 Des Moines River, Bridge 32527, MN 14,300 Eldon, IA 10,534 Farmington, Des Moines River, IA 8,685 Iowa River, Louisa Co., IA 9,611 Iowa River, Wapello, IA 12,092 Monroe County, IA 6,656 North River, Klien Bridge, MO 9,565 Oquawka, Mississippi River, IL 3,054 Oxford Junction, Wapsi River, IA 30 Sangamon River, Riverton, IL 24,626 Stuart, IL 14,485 Van Buren Co., IA 8,605 Wapello County, IA 4,490 Whitetie River, Grundy County, IL 8,235 23-17 TABLE 23-I (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting, and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and Antecedent Legislation) (See Section 16 of Text) Project and Location Federal Cost Advance Preparation $376,975 Rehabilitation: Sny Island D.D., IL 280,860 Emer Water Supply & Drought Assistance: Blandinsville, IL 66,801 Packard, IA 3,600 Papineau, IL 68,129 TABLE 23-J ILLINOIS WATERWAY: EXISTING LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 2 of Text) Depth on D)imensions Miter Sills at Low Water Available Lift at Miles Width of length for Low Above Chamber Full Width Water' Lower Upper Lock Mouth Miles to Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) LaGrange Lock 80.2 7.8 below leardstown, IL 110 600 10.0 13.0 15.5 Peoria Lock 157.7 4.1 below Peoria, IL 110 600 11.0 12.0 15.5 Starved Rock Lock 231.0 Utica, IL 110 600 18.5 14.0 16.8 Marseilles Lock 244.6 Marseilles, IL 110 600 24.45 14.0 18.6 Dresden Island Lock 271.5 8 above Morris, IL 110 600 21.75 12.25 16.85 Brandon Road Lock 286.0 Joliet, IL 110 600 34.0 13.8 17.85 Lockport Lock 291.1 Lockport, IL 110 600 30.5-39.52 15.0 11.0-20.0' T.J. O'Brien Lock 326.5 Chicago, IL 110 1,000 - 14.0 14.0 1. Lifts and depth on miter sills are those obtained with 2. Variation in lift and depth on upper miter sill at flat pools. Loclkport is (Itde to Iluctuation of water surface in the sanitary district canal. TABLE 23-K ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN LOCK AND DAM CONSTRUCTION, FOUNDATIONS, COST (See Section 2 of Text) Lock Dam Estimated Federal Cost Under Type of Character of Type of Character of Year Existing Name Construction Foundation Kind Construction Foundation Complete Project Illinois River, $ 2,733,499' mouth to Utica; channel improvement by dredging in Illinois River below Starved Rock modification of two U.S. locks and dams, and removal of two State dams. 23-18 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 23-K (Continued) ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN LOCK AND DAM CONSTRUCTION, FOUNDATIONS, COST (See Section 2 of Text) Lock Dam Estimated Federal Cost Under Type of Character of Type of Character of Year Existing Name Construction Foundation Kind Construction Foundation Complete Project Concrete Piles in sand Concrete Piles in sand Starved Rock Marseilles Dresden Island Brandon Road I ockport T.J. O'Brien Lock and damn equipment 'l'ota I locks and dams 1. Actual cost. TABLE 23-L Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete and sheet piling Piles in clay Fixed ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST (See Section 2 of Text) Dredging: Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers Calumet-Sag, 3 passing places Starved Rock to Lockport Starved Rock to Grafton Calumet-Sag Channel Peoria small boat harbor $ 2,135,358' 813,418' 3,650,635 2,917,607 19,238,200 24,937' 23-19 LaGrange Peoria Movable (wicket with Aframe- crest) Movable (wicket type) Movable (tainter gates) Movable (tainter gates) Movable (tainter gates) Movable (tainter gates) Movable (Bear trap) (Bear trap) Concrete and timber Concrete and timber Concrete and structural steel Concrete and structural steel Concrete and structural steel Concrete anI structural steel Concrete a nd structural steel Concrete an(l sheet piling Piles in sand Piles in sand Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Piles in clay 1939 1939 1933 1933 1933 1.933 1933 1960 2,744,592' 3,381,030' 885,315' 1,853,725' $ 2,503,376' 2,031,683' 133,608' 6,954,700' 1,250,304' $ 24,471,832 TABLE 23-L (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST (See Section 2 of Text) Protection piers at all locks Calumet-Sag modification engineering and design Calumet-Sag modification, supervision and administration Rebuild highway bridges Rebuild railway bridges: Calumet-Sag Channel Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers Recreation Facilities, Code 711 Removal of Blue Island lock Grand Calumet River controlling works2 St. Louis District Total additional features Total existing project 1. Actual cost. TABLE 23-M 77,613' 5,141,474 5,466,804 19,327,850 20,828,435' 18,362,041' 445,000 288,600' 3,375,704' $100,442,142 $124,913,974 2. Placed in inactive status November 19, 1974. EXISTING PROJECT See Section in Text Project Item Length (feet) Width (feet) Depth (feet) 2. Illinois Waterway, Nine locks and six dams - - IL and IN Grafton to Lockport, IL 291.1 miles 300 9 Lockport to controlling works 2.0 miles 200-300 9 Controlling works to junction with 10.0 miles 225 9 Calumet-Sag Channel Calumet-Sag Channel to lock in Blue 16.0 miles 225 9 Island Calumet and l,ittle Calumet Channel, 7.7 miles 300 9 from Blue Island to turning basin 5 Grand Calumet River Channel from 9.0 miles 9 junction with Little Calumet River to and in Indiana Harbor Canal to 141st, East Chicago, IN Also, Grand Calumet River Channel 4.2 miles 160 9 from junction of Indiana Harbor Canal and Grand Calumet River to Clark St. in Gary, IN, with a turning basin at Clark St. A channel in Chicago Sanitary and 22.1 miles 175-300 9 Ship Canal and South Branch Chicago River from Sag-Junction to Lake St. in Chicago, IL 23-20 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 23-N ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 (See Section 2 of Text) New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Total Regular Funds $120,886,748 $264,076,151 $132,889,368 $517,852,267 Public Works Funds 3,960,735 - - 3,960,735 Emergency Relief Funds 1,858,936 - - 1,858,936 Total $126,706,419 $264,076,151 $132,889,368 $523,671,938' 1. Includes $1,735,890 expended between 1927 and 1936 on the visions of the permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. operation and care of the works of improvement under the pro- 23-21 ST. PAUL, MN DISTRICT * District comprises western Wisconsin, major portion of Minnesota, northern and eastern North Dakota, and small portions of northeastern South Dakota and northern and northeastern Iowa embracing drainage basins of Mississippi River and tributaries from its source to mile 614 above mouth of Ohio River; Red River of the North and tributaries; those streams north of Missouri River Basin in North Dakota; and U.S. waters of Lake of the Woods and its tributaries. That section of Mississippi River above mile 614 is included in report on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Minnesota River, MN .......................................... 24-2 2. Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN ..................................... 24-2 3. Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN. 24-2 4. St. Croix River, MN & WI .................................. 24-3 5. Warroad Harbor and River, MN ........................... 24-3 6. Zippel Bay, Lake of the Woods County, MN .......... 24-3 Flood Control 7. Bassett Creek, MN .................................. 24-4 8. Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN and SD. 24-4 9. Cannon River at Faribault, MN ............................ 24-4 10. Chaska, MN ..................................... 24-5 11. Devils Lake, ND ..................................... 24-5 12. Eau Galle River, WI ..................................... 24-5 13. Emerson, Manitoba-Noyes, MN ........................ 24-6 14. Enderlin, Maple River, ND .................................. 24-6 15. Grafton Pumping Station, ND .............................. 24-6 16. Homme Lake and Dam, ND ................................ 24-6 17. Houston, MN ...................................... 24-7 18. Lac qui Parle Lakes, Minnesota River, MN ............ 24-7 19. La Farge Lake and Channel Improvement, WI ....... 24-7 20. Lake Andrusia, Mississippi River, MN ................ 24-8 21. Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, ND ..................................... 24-8 22. Lake Pulaski, Wright County, MN ....................... 24-8 23. Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River, SD and MN ..................................... 24-9 24. Mankato and North Mankato, MN .......................... 24-9 25. Marshall, MN ..................................... 24-9 26. Middle River at Argyle, MN ............................... 24-10 27. Minnesota River at Henderson, MN ....................... 24-10 28. Pettibone Park, La Crosse, WI ................................ 24-10 29. Portage, WI ....................................... 24-10 30. Prairie du Chien, WI .................................... 24-11 31. Red Lake River, MN including Clearwater River, MN ..................................... 24-11 32. Red Lake River, Gentilly, MN ............................ 24-11 33. Red River of the North at Argusville, ND ........... 24-12 34. Red River of the North at Breckenridge, MN ......... 24-12 35. Red River of the North drainage basin, MN, SD and N D ................................................................ 24-12 Page 36. Rochester, M N .................................................... 24-13 37. Roseau River, MN ..................................... 24-13 38. Sheyenne River, ND ..................................... 24-14 39. Souris River Basin, ND ........................................ 24-14 40. State Road and Ebner Coulees, WI ...................... 24-15 41. St. Paul, M N ........................................................ 24-15 42. Wild Rice River, South Branch and Felton Ditch, M N .......................................................... 24-15 43. W inona, M N ...................................................... 24-16 44. Zumbro River at Jarrett and Millville, MN ............. 24-16 45. Inspection of completed flood control projects ....... 24-16 Miscellaneous 46. Other work under special authority ..................... 24-17 General Investigations 47. Surveys ..................................... 24-17 48. Collection and study of basic data ....................... 24-17 49. Advance engineering and design ......................... 24-17 Tables Table 24-A Cost & Financial Statement .................. 24-18 Table 24-B Authorizing Legislation ......................... 24-22 Table 24-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ....... 24-23 Table 24-D Not Applicable Table 24-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .. 24-24 Table 24-F Not Applicable Table 24-G Deauthorized Projects ............................ 24-26 Table 24-H Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River ...................................... 24-27 Table 24-I Red River of the North Drainage Basin: Active Units in Comprehensive Basin Plan .................................. 24-28 Table 24-J Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ..................................... 24-29 Table 24-K Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ..................................... 24-30 Table 24-L General Investigations ........................... 24-31 24-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Navigation 1. MINNESOTA RIVER, MN Location. Rises in Big Stone Lake, MN and SD, and flows southeasterly about 224 miles to Mankato, MN, thence northeasterly about 106 miles to join the Mississippi River opposite St. Paul, MN. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Previous projects. For details see page 1890 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1105 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides 9-foot depth below flat pool level of Mississippi River lock and dam 2 from mouth to mile 14.7, one-half mile above the railway bridge at Savage, MN, and 4-foot depth from mile 14.7 to 25.6 at Shakopee, MN. For details see page 1018 of Annual Report for 1965. (See table 24- B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See also page 1074 of Annual Report for 1967. Terminal facilities. There are privately-owned terminals at miles 9, 13.1, 14.5, and two at mile 14.7. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging by hired labor cost $77,736. Snagging and clearing cost $24,409 by hired labor. Engineering and administrative costs amounted to $9,554. Condition at end of fiscal year: Work on project for 4-foot depth was completed in 1931. The United States owns 10 acres of land in fee 2 miles east of Savage, MN, and easements on 123.08 acres of land. 46.20 acres have been transferred from the Department of the Army and Department of the Air Force to the project. Navigation from mouth to Shakopee was practicable for drafts not in excess of 3 feet. A contract for work under 1958 authorization for a 9-foot channel started in May 1966 and was terminated in January 1967 when 56 percent complete. A channel dredging contract awarded in June 1967 was completed in August 1968. Total costs for existing project to September 30, 1989, were $4,648,311, of which $1,940,180 was for new work and $2,708,131 for maintenance. In addition, cost from contributed funds was $139,671 for dredging to 9-foot depth under provisions of section 4, River and Harbor Act of 1915, and $219,531 for work done for the State of Minnesota relative to modification of the project. 2. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN For report on this improvement see chapter on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota. 3. RESERVOIRS AT HEAD WATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN Location. Reservoirs are on the Mississippi River and several of its tributaries in Itasca, Beltrami, Hubbard, Aitkin, Cass and Crow Wing Counties, MN. (See table 24-H on reservoirs.) Previous projects. For details see page 1888 of Annual Report for 1915,and page 1098 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for reconstruction from timber to concrete at Winnibigoshish, Leech Lake, Pokegama, Sandy Lake and Pine River Dams, and construction of a concrete dam at Gull Lake. Pokegama was built on bedrock and the others on pile foundations. A portion of Leech Lake Dam from piers 26 to 39 was replaced with an earth fill. Constructed three dikes at Winnibigoshish, four at Pokegama, two at Sandy Lake, and 16 at Pine River. Sandy Lake Dam includes a lock 160 feet long, 30 feet wide, with a maximum lift of 9.5 feet and a depth of 2.5 feet on lower sill at low water which was converted to use as a spillway. (See table 24-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Reservoirs were operated as required, recreation facilities and equipment maintained, and surveys, repairs, and reports were made by hired labor at a cost of $1,243,462. Reservoirs were operated by contract at a cost of $126,191 and by U.S. Geological Survey for $30,265. Physical security cost $3,195 by hired labor. Periodic inspection and dam safety costs were $89,728 by hired labor, $14,815 by contract and $30,477 by other Corps. Cultural resource investigation cost $9,293 by contract, $37,832 by hired labor and $-3,800 by other Corps. Land acquisition analysis and survey cost $14,234 by hired labor. Environmental review and drought planning cost $13,485 by hired labor and $5,999 by other Corps. Data collection, water analysis, structural inventory for drought planning and maintenance of stream gauging cost $209,442 by hired labor, $5,283 by contract, $4,470 by other Corps, and $38,480 by U.S. Geological Survey. Miscellaneous engineering and design cost $212,257 by hired labor, and $78,841 by contract. Real estate was managed at a cost of $23,740. Lands and damages cost $31,358. Supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs were $319,313. Condition at end of fiscal year: Existing project was completed in 1937. Flowage rights were acquired on all lands affected by construction, maintenance, and operation of reservoirs. A total of 1,672.26 acres in fee are owned by the United States. The United States has easements, flowage rights, and 24-2 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT other rights of use on another 296,334.44 acres. Structures are in fair condition. Recreation facilities for public use are being constructed intermittently at all reservoir areas. (See table 24- H for capacities and costs by reservoir.) 4. ST. CROIX RIVER, MN & WI Location. From source in northwestern Wisconsin, flows southwesterly and then southerly about 164 miles to Mississippi River at Prescott, WI, about 41.7 miles below lower Burlington Northern railway bridge, Minneapolis, MN. For its greater part, forms boundary between Minnesota and Wisconsin. (See Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for maintenance of a channel, 9 feet in depth and of suitable width from mouth to Stillwater, MN, 24.5 miles, created by improvement of upper Mississippi River; a channel 3 feet deep at mean low water between Stillwater and Taylors Falls (27.3 miles); improvement of harbor and waterfront at Stillwater; and a small-boat harbor at Hudson, WI, which was deauthorized on November 17, 1986 under Section 1002 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. (See table 27-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. At Stillwater there is a concrete paved levee and a piling-and-timber trestle wharf on right bank. At other points along river, landing may be made on banks. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Channel dredging by Government pipeline dredge WILLIAM A. THOMPSON cost $65,500. Condition at end of fiscal year: All new work was completed in 1930. The United States owns 2.75 acres of land in fee at Taylors Falls and has easements over 7.57 acres of land at Bayport, MN. Extension to provide a 9-foot channel from mouth to Stillwater was completed August 12, 1938, when full pool at dam 3 of Mississippi River canalization project was reached. Minimum draft from Stillwater to Taylors Falls is about 1 foot at extreme low water, and from mouth to Stillwater, 9 feet. Maintenance of the 3-foot channel is limited to requests by the National Park Service which manages this reach under the Wild and Scenic Waterways classification. 5. WARROAD HARBOR AND RIVER, MN Location. At southwestern extremity of Lake of the Woods, 36 miles west of mouth of Rainy River. (See NOAA Nautical chart 14999.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 8 feet deep from landing at Warroad to deep water in lake, channel being 9,200 feet long, 200 feet wide within harbor, and 300 feet wide out in lake; for a turning basin 500 by 900 feet to a depth of 8 feet; and for a pile-brush stone jetty on north side of channel extending from shore 700 feet into the lake. For additional details see page 1027 of Annual Report of 1965. Portion of dredging of entrance channel and turning basin to complete project width and depth was considered unnecessary to meet present navigation requirements, and classified inactive was deauthorized on August 5, 1977, under Section 12 of Public Law 93-251. (See table 27-B for authorization legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There is one publicly owned wharf. There are two commercial fish wharves, one of which is served by a spur track, and a number of minor wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design cost $10,614. Administrative costs were $1,496. Condition at end of fiscal year: Project is complete. Prospective jetty completed in 1910 and reconstructed as a rubble mound in 1929 is in good condition. Turning basin at Warroad wharves was completed in 1911, and a channel 200 feet wide and 8 feet deep in 1915. Controlling depth in river channel and lake approach channel was 6 feet below low-water datum for a minimum width of 100 feet. A walkway on the jetty is provided for public use. A revetment wall, constructed under Section 2 of Public Law 269, 69th Congress, in accordance with Article VIII of the Lake of the Woods Treaty, has deteriorated and will require future maintenance. 6. ZIPPEL BAY, LAKE OF THE WOODS COUNTY, MN Location. Zippel Bay is a natural harbor located in northwestern Minnesota on the south shore of Lake of the Woods near Williams, Minnesota. The navigation project is located in Zippel Bay State Park. Existing project. Boats based at a state park, resort, marina, and a number of private residences use Zippel Bay to provide access to the lake. However, the natural channel between the bay and Lake of the Woods varied in depth and width and restricted navigation. The plan of improvement provides a small-boat access channel 50-70 feet wide and approximately 1,800 feet long between Zippel Bay and Lake of the Woods. Jetties have been constructed on both sides of the channel to minimize the amount of maintenance dredging. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction in October 1985 under the authority contained in Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: An adjustment of $59,030 was made based on an audit of final project costs. 24-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of the small boat navigation project is completed. Responsibility for the project was transferred to the local sponsor, the State of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, in July 1988. Flood Control 7. BASSETT CREEK, MN Location. In Hennepin County and Minneapolis, Minnesota, on Bassett Creek, a tributary of the Mississippi River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The proposed project consists of nonstructural and structural flood control measures. Nonstructural measures include continuation of existing floodplain regulations, flood insurance and forecasting, and flood warning. Principal structural measures consist of six small control structures in the upper watershed to temporarily impound floodwaters and a new tunnel (part of which is being constructed on a cooperative basis with the Minnesota Department of Transportation) in a highly urbanized area of Minneapolis to replace the existing tunnel outletting Bassett Creek to the Mississippi River. Also included in the plan are a limited reach of channel widening, bridge removals, culvert replacements, a weir structure, a flood storage area, and a railroad bridge replacement. Estimated Federal cost (1989) for new work is $28,100,000 and $4,494,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. Under current cost sharing policies, when the costs of lands, easements, and rights-of-way are less than 20 percent of total project costs, local interests are required to furnish the standard local cooperation requirements plus a cash contribution, the total of the two to amount to a minimum of 25 percent of the total project costs. On June 27, 1986, the City of Minneapolis entered into a local cooperation agreement with the Department of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Miscellaneous lands and damages cost $20,922. A Stage 3 construction contract cost $1,732,721. Engineering and design cost $299,116 by contract, and $591,893 by hired labor. Supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs were $238,558. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of the first control structures is complete. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has completed construction of the downstream portion of the tunnel including the last 4,800 feet and outlet to the Mississippi River. The amount of $3,642,888 was reimbursed to MnDOT for the Federal share of the work. Construction work is currently underway on the tunnel segment located in sandstone (Stage 3). 8. BIG STONE LAKE AND WHETSTONE RIVER, MN AND SD Location. On Minnesota River near Ortonville and Odessa, MN, and Big Stone City, SD, at the outlet of Big Stone Lake and in Big Stone and Lac qui Parle Counties, MN, and Grant County, SD. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for a dam and reservoir on Minnesota River above U.S. Highway 75, modification of Big Stone Lake outlet dam and silt barrier, bank stabilization along lower reach of Whetstone River, channel improvement on Minnesota River for 3 miles below outlet control dam at Big Stone Lake along with necessary relocations and acquisition of lands. These improvements would be made for wildlife conservation and development, flood control, and recreation. For additional details see Annual Report for 1970. Project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 579, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest map; and H. Dec. 193, 88th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structure was operated and maintained and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $77,466 by hired labor and $8,000 by other Corps. Data collection and water control analysis cost $25,166 and $18,134, respectively. Data collection by other government agencies cost $22,400. Real estate management by the North Central Division cost $513. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $3,549 and $40,687, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of the project is complete. A general plan between the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Interior for administrating the use of waters, land, or interests therein has been consummated, and a cooperative agreement between the Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service was approved. On March 31, 1975, the Secretary of the Army transferred lands in the project not required for Corps of Engineers operation and maintenance to the Department of Interior. The transfer of property was accepted by the Department of the Interior on May 21, 1975. The project was transferred to the Upper Minnesota River Watershed District for operation and maintenance. 9. CANNON RIVER AT FARIBAULT, MN Location. The project site is located along the left bank of the Cannon River, about 5 miles north of Faribault, Minnesota, in southeastern Minnesota. Existing project. The plan consists of protecting approximately 440 feet of shoreline with riprap and clearing fallen trees from the channel at the erosion site. A minimum of 8 feet would be maintained between the edge of the road surface and the edge of the riverbank. The bank would be shaped and filled with pervious fill to a 1 vertical on 2.5 horizontal slope. The bank would be protected with 12 inches of riprap and 6 inches of bedding above the water level. A guardrail would be installed as an additional measure to protect the public safety. The project was approved for construction by the Chief of Engineers on August 19, 1988. The project is being constructed 24-4 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT under the authority of Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was signed by Rice County, Minnesota in August 1988. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: A construction contract cost $42,959. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $624 and $2,561, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction was completed in the summer of 1989. 10. CHASKA, MN Location. In Carver County in south-central Minnesota on the Minnesota River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of a levee and interior drainage works along the Minnesota River, flood diversion channels on Chaska Creek and East Creek, and appropriate floodplain regulation measures. Principal project features include: approximately 1.1 miles of upgraded levee, 1.5 miles of new levee, and one pumping station on the Minnesota River; 1.1 miles of diversion channel on Chaska Creek; and 0.6 mile of diversion channel and 0.3 mile of channel improvement on East Creek. Approximately 2.9 miles of paved recreation trails on top of the levee and around Courthouse Lake are also included in the proposed plan. Estimated Federal cost (1989) for new work is $21,400,000 and $2,637,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. (H. Doc. 644, 94th Congress, 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was executed on September 12, 1988. The agreement included cost sharing provisions in accordance with the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Real Estate cost $14,096. Stage 1 construction contract cost $3,500. Engineering and design cost $2,565 by contract and $762,688 by hired labor. Supervision and administration cost $108,663. Condition at end of fiscal year: A contract for Stage 2 of the flood control project was awarded in September, 1989. Stage 1 construction is complete. 11. DEVILS LAKE, ND Location. In Ramsey County in north central North Dakota about 80 miles west of Grand Forks, North Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. Involves a system of levees and interior flood control facilities at the head of Creel Bay. The main embankment across Creel Bay is 1,810 feet long and varies from 0 to 27 feet high. The south Creel Bay tieback embankment is 1,030 feet long and varies from 0 to 3 feet high. The north Creel Bay tieback embankment is 2,400 feet long and varies from 0 to 8.5 feet high. The south embankment is 3,100 feet long and varies from 0 to 9.5 feet high. The interior flood control system consists of temporary stormwater retention ponds immediately north and south of the city's sewage lagoons, a 16,000 gallon per minute pumping station and a system of ditches and culverts linking the ponds to the pumping station. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction August 15, 1983, under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1983 for requirements. A local assurance agreement required by Public Law 91- 611 was adopted by the city of Devils Lake in August 1983. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction contracts cost $954. Engineering and design cost $30,821 by hired labor. Supervision and administration costs were $7,128. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction work on the project is substantially complete. 12. EAU GALLE RIVER, WI Location. At and in vicinity of Spring Valley, WI, on Eau Galle River 30 miles above its mouth at Chippewa River, and its tributary, Mines Creek, which flows through the village. Spring Valley is about 45 miles east of St. Paul, MN, and 36 miles west of Eau Claire, WI. (See Geological Survey map for Wisconsin for general location.) Existing project. Authorized plan of improvement as modified by further studies includes a retarding dam and reservoir on Eau Galle River immediately upstream from Spring Valley, and remedial works on Mines Creek including channel enlargement, a low levee, and a drop structure. Project provides for earth and rock-fill dam, an uncontrolled outlet and an uncontrolled spillway emerging above Mines Creek. See page 1030 of Annual Report for 1965 for further details. Proposed improvements on Burghardt Creek were eliminated. Improvements provide complete protection near Spring Valley for standard project flood, and below that point in decreasing value in proportion to distance from reservoir. Permanent conservation pool will serve a local need for a recreational area. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 52, 84th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. See page 1083 of Annual Report for 1967. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structure and recreation facilities were operated and maintained, and inspections, investigations and evaluations were performed at a cost of $267,848 by hired labor and $65,347 by contract. Real estate management cost $2,121. Data collection cost $3,456 by hired labor and $8,500 by other government 24-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 agencies. Water control analysis and water quality by other Corps of Engineer districts cost $7,985 and $138,249, respectively. Administrative and other miscellaneous costs were $98,138. Condition at end of fiscal year: Mines Creek improvements were substantially completed in 1964; minor work was accomplished in 1966. A contract for dam, spillway, and discharge channel, started July 1, 1965, was completed in October 1968. Recreational facilities have been provided. Remedial work to repair eroded gutters and road ditches was completed in September 1973. Repair of failing discharge conduit by installing a steel liner was completed in April 1982. 13. EMERSON, MANITOBA-NOYES, MN Location. The unincorporated village of Noyes is located in Kittson County in extreme northwestern Minnesota about 80 miles north of Grand Forks, North Dakota. Noyes is situated on the right overbank of the Red River of the North, approximately one-half mile from the channel. Existing project. The project will consist of a "ring" levee which will protect both Noyes and the city of Emerson, Manitoba, Canada. The project will have three basic components: upgrading the existing Emerson, Manitoba, emergency levee to provide 100-year flood protection; constructing a 3,800-footlong levee at Noyes, Minnesota, to provide 100-year flood protection; and constructing a 2,000-foot-long International levee in Minnesota which will run parallel to the International boundary. The levees will provide a complete and continuous levee system around the two communities. The levees will have a 10-foot top width, side slopes of 1 vertical on 3 horizontal, and vary in height from 7 to 12 feet. The interior flood control facilities consist of one ponding area and two gravity outlets. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction on July 26, 1988, under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was signed by St. Vincent Township, Minnesota, the local sponsor, in August 1988. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract cost $313,001. Engineering and design cost $7,050. Supervision and administration cost $16,020. Condition at end of fiscal year: The contract for construction of the flood control project at Noyes was 95 percent complete in September 1989. 14. ENDERLIN, MAPLE RIVER, ND Location. In Ransom County in southeastern North Dakota on the Maple River about 45 miles southwest of Fargo, North Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The project at Enderlin involves a system of levees along the right bank of the main stem and the left bank of the South Branch of the Maple River. The total levee system would be about 1.2 miles long and would have an average height of about 8 feet. Other features of the project include channel improvements on the south branch, replacement of the Soo Line railroad bridge, and interior drainage facilities consisting of three ponding areas with gated outlet conduits. To prevent failure of the channel and levee by erosion, rip-rapping is provided in selected reaches. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction August 11, 1982, under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1982 for requirements. Alocal assurance agreement required by Public Law 91- 611 was adopted by the city of Enderlin in July 1982. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design by hired labor cost $9,208. Supervision, administration and other miscellaneous costs were $751. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of the project is substantially complete. 15. GRAFTON PUMPING STATION, ND Location. The project site is located in an unincorporated area of Walsh County, North Dakota. The erosion site is on the left bank of the Red River of the North immediately downstream of the County Highway 17 bridge which is 10 miles east of Grafton. Existing project. The project to protect the streambank from erosion that is threatening the City of Grafton's water supply intake facility was authorized under Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. The initial appraisal report was dated January 1988. The recommended plan consists of reshaping the existing bank and placing 1,200 cubic yards of riprap along approximately 250 feet of the riverbank to protect the city's pumping station from further erosion. The project was approved for construction by the Chief of Engineers on August 18, 1988. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was signed by the City of Grafton, North Dakota in August 1988. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract cost $56,729. Engineering and design cost $1,003. Supervision and administration costs were $2,473. Condition at end of fiscal year: A construction contract for slope protection was awarded on September 29, 1988. 16. HOMME LAKE AND DAM, ND Location. Dam is on South Branch of Park River about 4 miles upstream from Park River, ND, and 62.1 miles above mouth of Park River. South, Middle, and North Branches, headwater streams of Park River, rise in Cavalier County in northeastern North Dakota and flow easterly to an almost common confluence near Grafton, ND, forming main stream which flows easterly 35 miles to join Red River of the North 24-6 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT about 35 miles south of the international boundary. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. See Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized as Park River Reservoir by 1944 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 194, 78th Cong., 2d sess.), and redesignated Homme Reservoir and Dam by Public Law 435, 80th Congress, 2d session. Latest published map is in project document. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Total costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization, including required non-Federal contributions, were $62,800. In addition, local interests contributed $16,220 for construction of a water supply outlet through dam and incurred other costs of $19,600. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structure was operated and maintained, and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $82,812. Condition at end of fiscal year: Project completed in June 1956 except for additional recreational facilities which have been done intermittently since that time. Construction began in April 1948 and major structures completed in May 1951. Structures are in good condition. Government has acquired 395 acres of land in fee and easements over 7.8 acres of land for project. An additional 6.3 acres of land have been donated for recreational development and 3.75 acres have been acquired due to bank erosion bordering the project. 17. HOUSTON, MN Location. In Houston County in southeastern Minnesota on the Root River in the city of Houston, Minnesota. Existing project. The plan of protection provides levee flood protection together with appropriate floodplain regulation measures. Main features of the project include 3.1 miles of levee, 0.2 miles of road raise, an interior drainage pumping station, and road and rail closures. Estimated Federal cost (1989) for new work is $5,620,000 and $1,772,000 is to be contributed by local interests. The project was approved for construction by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act (Public Law 99-662) and is being reevaluated based on changes since the 1975 Feasibility Report. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. During reevaluation of the project, the items of local cooperation will be modified to reflect current cost sharing requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning continued at a cost of $222,100. Condition at end of fiscal year: General Reevaluation study was initiated in January 1987 to reevaluate the feasibility of the authorized project based on changes in existing conditions, public views, and design criteria since completion of the feasibility report in 1975. In coordination with the city of Houston, the state of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and the Department of Transportation, a flood control plan has been identified and a report is being prepared recommending the plan for design studies. 18. LAC QUI PARLE LAKES, MINNESOTA RIVER, MN Location. Works covered by this project lie along Marsh Lake and Lac qui Parle and the Minnesota River between head of Marsh Lake and Granite Falls, MN. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated and maintained, and inspections and evaluations were performed at a cost of $178,371 by hired labor, $30,607 by contract, and $-549 by other Corps districts. Dam failure planning cost $2,227 by hired labor. Reservoir operations planning evaluation cost $25,116 by hired labor. Data collection cost $8,605 by hired labor and $47,340 by U.S. Geological Survey. Water control analysis cost $42,002. Real estate cost $7,491. Water control operating equipment cost $49,860 and for the U.S. Geological Survey $17,420. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $33,361 and $78,862, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year: Project has been operated by the Government since transfer from State of Minnesota to the United States in September 1950. The United States owns fee title to 517.62 acres of land and easements on 19,859.47 acres of land. In 1957, 60.1 acres were withdrawn from public lands for use by the Department of the Army. Land acquisition is complete. Construction under present plan of improvement was started in September 1941 and completed in December 1951 except for recreational facilities. All structures are in good condition. 19. LA FARGE LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, WI Location. On the Kickapoo River which rises in Monroe County in southwestern Wisconsin and flows south and southwest through Vernon, Richland, and Crawford Counties emptying into Wisconsin River about 16 miles above junction of latter stream with Mississippi River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. Provides for a dam and impoundment of the Kickapoo River about 1 mile upstream from village of La Farge, operated for flood control, fish and wildlife conservation, general recreation, and a reduction ofaggradation downstream from the dam, and supplemental protection at Soldiers Grove and at Gays Mills by means of levees, supplementary channel improvement, and interior drainage facilities. See Annual Report for 1975 for details. Estimated Federal cost (1976) for new work is $55,400,000. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 557, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. None required for construction of La Farge Lake. See Annual Report for 1967 for requirements for 24-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 local protection works. Local interests have not been requested to furnish assurances. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated and maintained at a cost of $16,300. Condition at end of fiscal year: General and Real Estate design memorandums and detailed plans for the La Farge Dam and spillway and for relocations have been completed. Land acquisition negotiations began in December 1968. The first land payment was made on January 15,1969, and the land acquisition program is 80 percent complete. Contracts for excavation of the left abutment, for test wells, and for construction of the outlet works and right abutment have been completed. A study of alternatives has been completed. All further construction has been indefinitely suspended. Work has been accomplished to provide for completion of relocation work left partially completed when construction was suspended. Soldiers Grove has relocated out of the floodplain area after receiving funds from other agencies. A study of a modified dry dam was completed in early FY 1985. On the basis of the study results, it was recommended that no further work be done to establish the economic feasibility of a dry or wet dam at La Farge and that the La Farge Lake and channel improvement project be deauthorized. 20. LAKE ANDRUSIA, MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN Location. On the left bank of the Mississippi River, between Andrusia Lake and Allen's Bay of Cass Lake, about 5 miles north of the city of Cass Lake, in the southeastern corner of Beltrami County, which is in north-central Minnesota. Existing project. The project to protect the streambank from erosion that is destroying a prehistoric cemetery and a historic and prehistoric habitation site was authorized under Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. The initial appraisal report, dated June 1986, recommended placing a 2-foot-thick blanket of random fill to protect the burial site from construction activities, placing granular fill and shaping 520 feet of the riverbank to a 1 vertical on 2.5 horizontal slope, and protecting the area with 9 inches of bedding and 18 inches of graded riprap. The project was approved for construction by the Chief of Engineers on October 26, 1987. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was signed by the Beltrami Soil and Water Conservation District in November 1987. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: An adjustment of $-1,668 was made based on an audit of final project costs. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction was complete and final contract payment made in July 1988. Project was transferred to Beltrami Soil and Water Conservation District by letter dated February 15, 1989. 21. LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, SHEYENNE RIVER, ND Location. Baldhill Dam is on the Sheyenne River, 16 miles upstream from Valley City, ND, and about 271 miles above mouth. Sheyenne River rises in central North Dakota and flows 500 miles generally southeast to enter Red River of the North about 10 miles north of Fargo, ND. (For general location see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. See Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1944 (S. Doc. 193, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Reservoir above Baldhill Dam was designated as Lake Ashtabula by Public Law 772, 81st Congress, 2d session. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1962. Complied with except for construction of Fargo diversion dam and ditch for which assurances furnished by city of Fargo were approved by the Secretary of War on June 26, 1947. Necessity for this feature will be reviewed. Operations and results during fiscal year. Dam Safety: Cultural resources costs by hired labor were $1,640. Engineering and design cost $121,270 by contract, $352,070 by hired labor, and $54,974 for a Waterways Experiment Station model study. Administrative costs were $24,717. Maintenance: Project was operated and maintained, and inspections, investigations, monitoring and evaluations were performed at a cost of $429,366 by hired labor and $8,863 by contract. Real estate management cost $22,594. Data collection cost $6,513 by hired labor and $73,541 by other government agencies. Water control analysis by hired labor cost $16,566. Dam safety engineering and design cost $14,037 by hired labor, and $475 by Fish and Wildlife Service. A privy and shower cost $44,357 by hired labor and $29,918 by contract. Administrative and engineering and design costs were $112,605 and $3,163, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year: Project completed in March 1956 except construction of recreational facilities which is being accomplished intermittently. United States owns 7,816.5 acres of land in fee and easements on 666.2 acres. Construction initiated in July 1947 and major features completed in November 1950. Dam was placed in permanent operation in spring of 1951. Structures are in good condition. Baldhill Dam has been classified as a large, high hazard dam under the National Program for the inspection of dams. A risk assessment report prepared in June 1986 indicated a serious spillway discharge capacity deficiency. A General Design Memorandum which recommended increasing the spillway capacity was approved by OCE in July 1987. 22. LAKE PULASKI, WRIGHT COUNTY, MN Location. Lake Pulaski is approximately 45 miles northwest of the Twin Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota. 24-8 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT It lies within three local political jurisdictions (City of Buffalo, Wright County and Buffalo Township). Existing project. Lake Pulaski has no natural outlet. Prior to construction of this project, the lake had been rising, inundating a number of houses or summer residences. A combination of a pumped pipeline and gravity-flow storm sewers to convey excess water through the city of Buffalo from Lake Pulaski to Buffalo Lake was constructed to stabilize the lake. Included in this project was a storm sewer upgrade which was constructed by the city of Buffalo. The lake will be maintained at elevation 966.0 feet mean sea level. This is the lowest level permitted for an artificial outlet under State of Minnesota rules governing landlocked lakes. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction in March 1985 under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1986 for requirements. A local assurance agreement was adopted by the Lake Pulaski Improvement District, the local sponsor, in August 1986. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract cost $15,753. Supervision and administration costs were $9. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction is essentially complete. 23. LAKE TRAVERSE AND BOIS DE SIOUX RIVER, SD AND MN Location. Works covered by this project lie along Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River between upper end of Lake Traverse at Browns Valley, MN, and the mouth of Bois de Sioux River at Breckenridge, MN. Lake drains through river to Red River of the North, and two waters form a portion of boundary between State of Minnesota and States of North and South Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See Annual Report for 1962. Existing project was authorized by Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project and related facilities were operated and maintained, and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $348,094. Condition at end of fiscal year: Existing project was completed in June 1948, except for minor recreational facilities. Fee title to 1,144.13 acres and easements on 6,172.25 acres of land have been acquired. White Rock Dam and Reservation control structures are in operation, and structures and appurtenances are in good condition. Remedial work for repair of apron at White Rock Dam was completed in November 1968. Roadways across structure are open to public travel. 24. MANKATO AND NORTH MANKATO, MN Location. Along Minnesota River between miles 103.5 and 109.5 near Mankato, North Mankato, and Le Hillier, in southcentral Minnesota. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. As modified as a result of severe 1965 flood, provides for protection of communities of Mankato, North Mankato, and Le Hillier by means of levees and floodwalls with pumping plants and interior drainage facilities. See page 1090 of Annual Report for 1967 for further details. Additional channel improvement, levees, pumping, and interior drainage features have been included in the Mankato unit of the project for protection from the high flows of Indian Creek. Expansion of Indian Creek improvements were made during detailed studies as a result of updated hydrologic data. Highway bridge relocations made necessary by the project have been authorized at Federal expense. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 437, 84th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Project was modified by 1965 Flood Control Act, and by the Water Resources Development Acts of 1974 and 1976. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction of the T.H. 169 Bridge relocations was completed. Construction costs for improvements at Mankato were $1,133,524, at North Mankato were $12,590 and at Le Hillier were $958,108. Engineering and design by contract cost $95,356 and by hired labor cost $19,689. Real Estate cost $-218,455. Supervision and administration cost $70,215 by hired labor and $65,690 by contract. Other miscellaneous costs were $2,858. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of the project is complete. 25. MARSHALL, MN Location. In Lyon County in southwestern Minnesota along the Redwood River about 68 miles above its confluence with the Minnesota River at the city of Marshall, Minnesota. (For general location see Geological Survey map for Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 1059 of Annual Report for 1964 for completed channel improvement project authorized by 1960 Flood Control Act. Federal costs amounted to $1,802,866. The existing flood control project was completed in 1963. In response to a need for additional flood control, a feasibility study was completed in 1979. The project recommended in the feasibility report was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, Section 401(a). Improvements include 4.7 miles of additional levees, 3.8 miles of bank protection, 0.3 mile of new high-flow diversion channel, an interbasin overflow structure, modifications to the existing diversion and drop structures, and a recreation plan. The recrea- 24-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 tion plan consists of 2.5 miles of biking/walking trail, five miles of cross-country skiing/hiking trail, and related picnic and rest area facilities. The project would provide protection against a flood having an occurrence interval of about once in 115 years. Estimated Federal cost (1989) for new work is $5,150,000 and $1,065,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Project was transferred to local interests on December 23, 1963. For new work, see Annual Report for 1985 for requirements. By letter dated November 19, 1986, the city of Marshall indicated its willingness to participate financially in construction of a project consistent with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $33,569. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of completed work was initiated August 1962 and completed December 1963. Preconstruction planning for the new work is in progress. 26. MIDDLE RIVER AT ARGYLE, MN Location. In Marshall County in northwestern Minnesota on the Middle River within the city limits of Argyle, Minnesota. Existing project. The plan of protection includes a system of levees, road raises along with interior drainage facilities to provide main developed parts of the city of Argyle with one percent chance flood protection. Also included is the evacuation of 12 residences which are located outside of the line of flood barrier protection. The project was approved for construction on August 1, 1985 by the Chief of Engineers. The project is being constructed under the authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1985 for requirements. A local assurance agreement required by Public Law 91- 611 was adopted by the city of Argyle in August 1985. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Real estate costs were $1,489 by hired labor. Engineering and design cost $60,836 by hired labor. Supervision and administration costs were $15,425. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction contract for Stage I is complete. A Stage II construction contract was awarded in September 1989. The evacuation of the 12 residences is complete. 27. MINNESOTA RIVER AT HENDERSON, MN Location. In Sibley County in southeastern Minnesota about 50 miles southwest of Minneapolis, Minnesota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The project at Henderson involves a system of levees to protect the flood prone areas of the city from floods on the Minnesota River. The proposed levee is about 1.6 miles long and has an average height of 15 feet. Appurtenant interior flood control facilities include a system of interceptor stormsewers and ditches, and two ponding areas each with a gravity outlet and a pumping station designed to discharge impounded storm water during flood periods when exterior flood levels would require the gravity outlets to be closed. Provisions for the temporary closure of two state highways and a county highway are also included as project features. Total Federal cost (1989) of the project is estimated at about $1,500,000. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction June 26, 1987, under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. A local assurance agreement was adopted by the City of Henderson, the local sponsor, in May 1988. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction by contract cost $626,057. Engineering and design, supervision and administration and other associated costs were $85,959. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of the project was about 80 percent complete at the end of the fiscal year. 28. PETTIBONE PARK, LA CROSSE, WI Location. The project site is located along Pettibone Park which is on Barron Island, a large island in the Mississippi River which forms the right bank of the main channel, directly across the river from La Crosse, which is located in La Crosse County, in southwestern Wisconsin. Existing project. The project to protect the streambank from erosion that threatened the access road to Pettibone Park was authorized under Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. The initial appraisal report was dated June 1988. The recommended plan consisted of placing 4,500 tons of rockfill along 1250 feet of the riverbank to protect the park access road from further erosion. The project was approved for construction by the Chief of Engineers on August 19, 1988. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was signed by the City of La Crosse, Wisconsin, in August 1988. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract cost $44,680. Engineering, design and supervision and administration cost $2,251 and $450, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year: A construction contract for slope protection was awarded on September 27, 1988. Construction was completed in November 1988 and the project was formally transferred to the City of La Crosse on June 22, 1989. 29. PORTAGE, WI Location. In Columbia County in central Wisconsin along the Wisconsin River about 35 miles north of Madison, Wiscon- 24-10 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT sin. (For general location see Geological Survey map for Wisconsin.) Existing project. The recommended plan provides for improvement to the existing levee system along the left bank of the Wisconsin River at Portage. The plan includes 2.9 miles of existing levee improvement; 550 feet of flood wall; rehabilitation of the Portage lock gate as a flood barrier while retaining its intrinsic historic value; interior flood control facilities; and recreational and aesthetic facilities. The project would protect against a flood having an occurrence interval of about once in 500 years. Estimated Federal cost (1989) for new work is $5,330,000 and $1,222,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide the entire cost of lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of the project and make a cash contribution to increase their share to 25 percent of total project costs for flood control. In addition, local interests are to provide the necessary lands for recreation development, subject to the condition that, where the appraised value of those lands is less than 50 percent of the total first cost of recreation development, a cash contribution will be made to bring the non-Federal share to at least 50 percent of the total first cost of recreation development. By letter dated July 14, 1988, the city of Portage indicated a willingness and intention to meet the requirements of local cooperation for flood control and recreation. Formal assurances will be requested prior to initiation of construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $280,668. Condition at end of fiscal year: Preconstruction planning is in progress. 30. PRAIRIE DU CHIEN, WI Location. In Crawford County in southwestern Wisconsin on the left bank of the Mississippi River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. Combines total evacuation with flood proofing and land use control measures to provide the reduction of potential flood damages within design limits. Evacuation was accomplished by purchase and relocation of structures in lowest portions of the floodplain. Project was authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1974. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1974 for requirements. A local assurance agreement in accordance with Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 was entered into with the city of Prairie du Chien on May 2, 1978, and signed by the Chief of Engineers on September 11, 1978. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Adjustment in project costs was made for $-69,891. Condition at end of fiscal year: Project was completed in September 1984. 31. RED LAKE RIVER, MN, INCLUDING CLEARWATER RIVER, MN Location. Works covered by this project lie along upper reach of Red Lake River and also along Clearwater River, a tributary of Red Lake River, between a point near Plummer, MN, and a point just above the mouth of Ruffy Brook. Red Lake River, principal tributary of the Red River of the North, has its source at the outlet of Lower Red Lake in northwestern portion of Minnesota and flows westerly about 196 miles to its junction with Red River of the North at East Grand Forks, MN. Clearwater River has a general westerly course from its source near Ebro, MN, about 205 miles to its junction with Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, MN. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 345, 78th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structures were operated and maintained and inspections and evaluations performed at a cost of $154,746. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of major improvements on Red Lake River and the Clearwater River were completed in June 1956. Replacement of rock and brush dam on Red Lake River at Indian boundary with a concrete structure and appurtenant work was completed in June 1959 to restore marshes in the area to better wildlife conditions. Construction of a bridge on Clearwater Road was completed by the Indian Service in July 1965. A contract for improvements on Red Lake River was completed in November 1966, and a contract for restoration of water levels in Red Lake River marshes was completed in November 1968. Operation of Red Lake Dam was assumed by the Corps on April 1, 1951. Channels are in good condition and indicate effectiveness of project as a flood control measure. 32. RED LAKE RIVER AT GENTILLY, MN Location. The project site is located on the left bank of the Red Lake River in northwestern Minnesota about 1.5 miles west of Gentilly and 6 miles east of Crookston, the county seat of Polk County. Existing project. The project to protect the streambank from erosion that is threatening Polk County State Aid Highway 11 and bridge was authorized under Section 603 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662). The plan of improvement recommended in the project report dated May 1989 consists of stabilizing approximately 1200 feet of riverbank by slope reshaping and the placement of riprap. Based on the recommendation contained in the report, the project was approved for construction by the Chief of Engineers on August 22, 1989. 24-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement between the Department of the Army and the Red Lake Watershed District, the local sponsor of the project was fully executed on September 5, 1989. In accordance with the agreement, the local sponsor is required to provide during the period of construction, a cash contribution of at least 5 percent of total project costs and any additional funds needed to make its total contribution, including the value of all required local responsibilities, equal to 25 percent of the total project costs; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas necessary for construction, operation and maintenance of the project; perform all relocations and alterations of buildings, utilities (other than those portions which pass under or through the project structures), highways, railroads, bridges (other than railroad bridges and approaches thereto), sewers and related and special facilities determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project; pay all costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $500,000; hold and save the United States free from all damages arising from construction, operation and maintenance of the completed project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the Government or its contractors; comply with the provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971, in acquiring lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent operation of maintenance of the project, and inform all affected persons of applicable benefits, policies, and procedures in connection with said Act; operate, maintain, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion in accordance with regulations or directions prescribed by the Government; give the Government a right to enter, at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner, upon land which it owns or controls for access to the project for the purpose of inspection, and, if necessary, for the purpose of completing, operating, maintaining, repairing, rehabilitating, or replacing the project; and comply with all applicable Federal and state laws and regulations, including section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public law 88-352) and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, as well as Army Regulation 600-7, entitled "Nondiscrimination of the Basis of Handicap in Programs and Activities Assisted or conducted by the Department of the Army." Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design costs were $84,216. Condition at end of fiscal year: A construction contract for the project was awarded on September 28, 1989. 33. RED RIVER OF THE NORTH AT ARGUSVILLE, ND Location. In Cass County in eastern North Dakota near the confluence of the Red River of the North and the Sheyenne River about 15 miles northwest of Fargo, North Dakota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The project involves a levee encircling the city of Argusville with associated interior flood control facilities. The total levee system is about 1.9 miles long and has an average height of about 8 feet. Interior flood control facilities consist of interceptor ditches and pipes, two temporary ponding areas and a pumping station to periodically discharge impounded water. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction July 5, 1985, under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1985 for requirements. A local assurance agreement was adopted by the city of Argusville, the local sponsor, in July 1985. Operations at end of fiscal year. New Work: Construction contract cost $2,236. Engineering and design cost $12,192 by hired labor. Supervision and administration costs were $2,810. Condition at end of fiscal year: A construction contract for Stage 1 involving the west levee was completed in July 1986. A construction contract for Stage 2 involving the remainder of the project was awarded in August 1986 and was substantially complete at the end of the fiscal year. 34. RED RIVER OF THE NORTH AT BRECKENRIDGE, MN Location. In Wilkin County in west central Minnesota on the Red River of the North, approximately 200 miles northwest of Minneapolis-St. Paul. Existing project. Provide for erosion control along the east bank of the Red River of the North adjacent to the St. Francis Nursing Home, a city owned facility. The project involves excavation and the placement of granular fill, bedding material and riprap along an approximate 300-foot reach of eroding riverbank. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction in September 1988 under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. A local assurance agreement was adopted by the city of Breckenridge, the local sponsor, in September, 1988. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract cost $56,171. Engineering and design costs were $1,917. Supervision and administration costs were $1,118. Condition at end of fiscal year: A contract for the erosion control project at Breckenridge was awarded in September 1988. Construction of the project was substantially complete at the end of the fiscal year. 35. RED RIVER OF THE NORTH DRAINAGE BASIN, MN, SD & ND Location. Red River of the North Basin, within the United States, includes northeastern corner of South Dakota and much 24-12 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT of eastern North Dakota and northwestern Minnesota. Red River of the North, formed by confluence of Otter Tail and Bois de Sioux Rivers, flows northward through this region, forming boundary between North Dakota and Minnesota. (For general location of basin, see Geological Survey maps of Minnesota and South Dakota.) Previous project. See Annual Report for 1962 for navigation and flood control projects in the basin, not part of this project. Existing project. Project includes improvements for local protection in interests of flood control and major drainage accomplished by channel improvement, levees, etc., in addition to construction of a multiple purpose reservoir on Otter Tail River to control floods and, in conjunction with previously authorized Federal reservoir project at Baldhill site of Sheyenne River and at Red Lake, to increase low flows for water supply and pollution abatement. (See table 24-I for active units in comprehensive basin plan.) Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1948 and 1950. Public Works Authorization Act, 1957, authorized Chief of Engineers to acquire such lands as were beyond legal authority of the city of Grand Forks to acquire. Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 provided for extension of the expiration date for the East Grand Forks project. Authorization of the Sheyenne River (Kindred Lake) project by the 1970 Flood Control Act provided for the deletion of channel improvement on the lower 48.8 miles of the Sheyenne River authorized under the Flood Control Acts of 1948 and 1950. Latest published map is in House Document 185, 81st Congress, 1st session. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1965. Following the flood of 1965, the city of East Grand Forks requested reactivation of the project and furnished a resolution adopted May 11, 1965, indicating its willingness to meet the requirements of local cooperation. Expiration date for the East Grand Forks project was extended to April 17, 1975, permitting local interests additional time to furnish assurances of local cooperation. A local assurance agreement was passed by the city on March 27, 1975, and accepted by the acting Director of Real Estate, OCE for the Secretary of the Army on April 9, 1975. In a July 9, 1986 letter, the city of East Grand Forks withdrew support for the project presented in the General Design Memorandum. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Orwell Lake and Dam were operated as required and miscellaneous inspections, reports, and repairs were made at a cost of $106,396 by hired labor and $21,693 by contract. Real estate management cost $4,459. Miscellaneous lands and damages costs were $2,735. Data collection cost $7,230 by hired labor and $16,610 by U.S. Geological Survey. Water control and water quality cost $15,932 and $7,718, respectively. Engineering and design cost $173,968 by hired labor and $46,601 by contract. Supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs were $60,089 and $-2,311, respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year: Major construction for all active units except for East Grand Forks, MN, is complete. The East Grand Forks project was reclassified from active to inactive status on August 19, 1988. A total of 1,985 acres of land for Orwell Lake and Dam is owned in fee by the United States. See page 1281 of Annual Report for 1962 for periods of completion at active units of project other than Fargo. Work at Fargo, ND, started in May 1959, was completed in July 1963. (See table 24- I at end of chapter for total costs of new work to date.) 36. ROCHESTER, MN Location. In Olmsted County in southeastern Minnesota on the South Fork of the Zumbro River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for stream channel modifications and levees functioning in combination with a system of seven headwaters reservoirs. Principal features, in addition to the reservoirs, include 0.5 mile of grass-sloped channels, 6.1 miles of riprapped or gabion-lined channels, 0.9 mile of architecturally- treated concrete channels, 0.5 mile of dredged channel, six drop structures, 2.4 miles of levee, and hiking and biking trails. Estimated cost (1989) to the United States for new work is $60,700,000 and $7,418,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (H. Doc. 156, 93rd Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1974 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was signed August 27, 1987 by the city of Rochester. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction contracts for Stage 1A2B, 1A1, and 1B1 were $1,390,521, $1,207,034 and $400,392, respectively. Engineering and design cost $1,746,062 by contract, $1,268,835 by hired labor, and $19,932 by other Corps. Real estate activities cost $48,008. Supervision and administration cost $380,364. Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction continued on Stages 1A2B and 1A1. A construction contract was awarded for Stage 1B1 in May 1989. 37. ROSEAU RIVER, MN Location. In Roseau County on the Roseau River in northwestern Minnesota near the city of Duxby. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See Annual Report for 1988 for description of project as authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1965. The project, as modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1988, provided for construction of about 6 miles of flood control levee approximately 3 feet high in the vicinity of Duxby, Minnesota. Estimated cost (1989) to the United States for new work on the modified project is $270,000 and $90,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1968 for requirements of project as authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1965. For the modified project, local interests are required to provide the entire cost of lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of the project and make a cash contribution to 24-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 increase their share to 25 percent of total project costs for flood control. Local interests have formed the Roseau River Watershed District to provide local cooperation requirements and acquire rights-of-way. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $9,193. Condition at end of fiscal year: Preconstruction planning is underway for the Duxby levee project. 38. SHEYENNE RIVER, ND Location. The Sheyenne River Basin is included in 16 counties in the southeastern portion of North Dakota and drains an area of 7,140 square miles into the Red River of the North near Fargo, North Dakota. The principal area of flood damages in the basin is located at the lower end within Cass County and the city of West Fargo. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The project as authorized by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act consists of three major components for Federal implementation: 1) 11.9 miles of levee and a 6.7 mile flood diversion channel at West Fargo; 2) 7.5 miles of flood diversion channel from Horace to West Fargo; and 3) a five-foot raise of the Baldhill Dam flood control pool. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 stipulated that the project shall also include a dam and reservoir of approximately 35,000 acre-feet of storage for the purpose of flood protection on the Maple River. There are several items of local cooperation required to implement the plan, and several components identified for non-Federal implementation which would supplement the recommended plan. Estimated cost (1989) to the United States for new work is $40,500,000 and $3,045,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. Project consists of four separable components requiring four Local Cooperation Agreements. The Southeast Cass Water Resource District will serve as the local sponsor for the West Fargo Unit and the Horace to West Fargo Unit. The Local Cooperation Agreement for the West Fargo Unit was executed on July 25, 1988. By letter dated April 4, 1989, the Southeast Cass Water Resources District indicated that it fully agrees with the Horace to West Fargo Unit of the project and that it has the financial capability to cover the local share. The State Water Commission will serve as the quasi-sponsor for the other components until a formal sponsorship is determined by benefiting entities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning was continued at a cost of $759,579. Condition at end of fiscal year: Plans and specifications for the West Fargo and Horace to West Fargo Units are under way. An economic evaluation study for the Maple River Unit is in progress. 39. SOURIS RIVER BASIN, ND Location. On the Souris River in Ward, Renville, McHenry, and Bottineau Counties in northwestern North Dakota. The existing Lake Darling Dam is located about 20 miles northwest of Minot, North Dakota. The project also includes features at the communities of Sawyer and Velva and at various locations along the 358-mile U.S. portion of the Souris River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The current plan of improvement authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 is the one-time purchase of 400,000 acre-feet of flood storage in Rafferty and Alameda Dams in Saskatchewan, Canada and the operation and maintenance of Rafferty Dam, Alameda Dam and the existing Boundary Dam in conjunction with the existing Lake Darling Dam to provide 100-year flood protection at Minot, North Dakota. The Act also authorizes those flood control measures upstream and downstream of the dam which are necessary for effective operation of the project. The 4-foot raise of the Lake Darling design pool (authorized by Section III of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1982, PL 97-88) and the the construction of Burlington Dam (authorized by PL 91-611) will no longer be authorized upon completion of the structure(s) in Canada. An International Agreement between Canada and the United States was signed in October 1989. The work under the current plan authorized by PL 99-662, consists of either one or two reservoirs in Saskatchewan, Canada (known as the Rafferty and Alameda projects); a modified outflow structure at Lake Darling Dam; a downstream flood warning system from the Canadian border; levee improvements at Sawyer, Renville County Park, and six subdivisions from Burlington to Minot, flood proofing of about 90 rural homes in the basin and the purchase of flowage easements; modifications to dams 87 and 96 in the Upper Souris National Wildlife Refuge; and modifications to dams 320, 326, 332, 341 and 357 in the J. Clark Salyer National Wildlife Refuge. Estimated Federal cost (1989) for new work is $80,900,000 and $5,042,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1983 for requirements. Representatives of the water resource districts from Ward, Renville, McHenry, and Bottineau Counties area agreed to become members of a Souris River Joint Board for flood control, which would serve as local sponsor for the project. A local cooperation agreement for construction at Velva was signed in November 1984. A local cooperation agreement for the remainder of the project as authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 was signed in October 1989. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning for the Souris River basin reservoir continued at a cost of $1,891,625. An adjustment of construction contract costs for improvements at Velva was made for $- 60,173. Engineering and design and supervision and administration costs for Velva were $48,049. 24-14 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year: Construction of the channel and levee improvement work at Velva is complete. Preconstruction engineering and design are in progress for the remainder of the project. 40. STATE ROAD AND EBNER COULEES, WI Location. In La Crosse County in west-central Wisconsin, on the south side of the City of La Crosse. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. The plan of improvement for local protection (flood control) consists of channel deepening and enlarging downstream from Hagen Bridge to the mouth of Pammel Creek and includes 13,600 feet of concrete-lined rectangular channel, a drop chute inlet structure, a side channel inlet structure, a stilling basin, a terminus structure, and three new street bridges. The upper 4,000 feet of rectangular channel is designed for supercritical flow and the remaining 9,600 feet of channel is designed for subcritical flow. When completed, the project will provide Standard Project Flood (SPF) protection. The city replaced a fourth bridge in 1980 that was previously included in the authorized plan. The city also replaced a railroad bridge in 1985 that was also included in the authorized plan. In 1986, the city constructed 450 feet of rectangular channel in the downstream reach to SPF protection. Estimated cost (1989) to the United States for new work, exclusive of the Ebner Coulee portion of the project which was deleted due to lack of economic feasibility, is $25,000,000 and $8,300,000 is to be contributed by local interests including a credit of $1,000,000 for advance construction work. Project was authorized by 1968 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 360, 90th Cong., 2d sess., contains published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1969 for requirements. The local sponsor withdrew support for the project in 1976 citing increased non-Federal costs and lack of agreement on local cost sharing between three local units of government located within the project area. The project was reclassified as inactive on April 7, 1977, but was reactivated on November 8, 1978, after the La Crosse County Board of Supervisors, the La Crosse City Council, and the Town of Shelby passed separate resolutions on September 17, 1978, July 13, 1978, and July 10, 1978, respectively, which requested continuance of the project. A Local Cooperation Agreement between the Department of the Army and the City of La Crosse, Wisconsin, for the construction of the State Road flood control project was entered into August 11, 1988. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A Stage 1 construction contract cost $4,924,577. Real estate costs were $10,636. Cultural resources cost $19,774 by hired labor and $21,000 by contract. Engineering and design cost $225,164 by contract and $172,909 by hired labor. Supervision and administration costs were $159,355. Other miscellaneous costs were $10,332. Condition at end of fiscal year: A construction contract for Stage 1 (outlet structure to Broadview Place) was awarded in September 1988. Plans and specifications for Stage 2 have been initiated. Ebner Coulee was classified to "inactive" in 1981 due to lack of economic feasibility. Construction is continuing. 41. ST. PAUL, MN Location. In Ramsey County at St. Paul, Minnesota, on the Mississippi River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Previous project. For details see page 27-20 of Annual Report for 1974. Existing project. Since completion of the St. Pauland South St. Paul flood control project in 1964, the protected area has experienced two floods greater than the previous flood of record. The plan of protection provides for a 4-foot barrier raise along the existing project alignment. Estimated cost (1988) to the United States for new work is $7,160,000 and $2,390,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99- 662). Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. During the preparation of the General Design Memorandum, the items of local cooperation will be modified to reflect cost sharing requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Meetings on December 10, 1987 and January 14, 1988 with local officials from the city of St. Paul reaffirmed the local sponsor's support of the project and its willingness to assume non-Federal cost sharing responsibilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Preconstruction planning continued at a cost of $479,221. Condition at end of fiscal year: Preconstruction planning is continuing. 42. WILD RICE RIVER--SOUTH BRANCH AND FELTON DITCH, MN Location. In Clay and Norman Counties in west-central Minnesota northeast of the city of Moorhead, MN. The South Branch of the Wild Rice River and Felton Ditch drain areas of 253 and 122 square miles and enter the Wild Rice River at points 29.5 and 20.5 miles, respectively, above its confluence with the Red River of the North. (For general locations, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provided for increasing the capacities of the South Branch and Felton Ditch channels by widening the existing channels through the floodplain. Debris removal was accomplished in the lower reaches of both streams. In addition, short reaches of low dikes were constructed on both banks of Felton Ditch near the upper limit of improvement. The plan also included bridge and culvert structure alterations, new bridges, multi-plate pipe arches, side ditch inlet and lateral ditch entry modifications; and a drop inlet structure. The project provides flood protection in both watersheds for a 6-percent chance flood and outlets necessary for removal of crop-damaging surface 24-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 waters from lateral and on-farm drainage systems. Project was authorized by 1968 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 98, 90th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1969 for requirements. A local assurance agreement in accordance with Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 was executed by the Wild Rice Watershed District on October 18, 1978. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract cost $7,849. Engineering and design cost $9,408 by hired labor and supervision and administration cost $11,921. Condition at end of fiscal year. The original flood control project was completed in 1983. After assuming responsibility for its operation and maintenance, the local sponsor reported a problem associated with certain types of inlets that had been installed. It was determined that the problems resulted from a design deficiency. A contract was awarded in September 1987 to correct this deficiency by realigning/relocating the outlets of 102 culvert inlets. The work is complete. 43. WINONA, MN Location. At Winona County in southeastern Minnesota on the right bank of the Mississippi River about 725 miles above mouth of the Ohio River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. See Annual Report for 1968 for completed upstream improvements authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958 providing for a continuous flood barrier about 6.1 miles long with related pumping and interior drainage facilities. Federal costs amounted to $2,147,131 of which $111,500 was expended for the portion then deferred for restudy and $17,316 was contributed by local interests. Improvement authorized in 1971 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 152, 92d Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map) provides for levee and floodwall protection with necessary interior drainage works for the riverfront and the Lake Winona closure reaches, as well as a sound floodplain management program to prevent unwise development of the bordered by U.S. Highway 61 and Burns Valley and Pleasant Valley Creeks. The plan would also provide the downstream flood barrier needed to prevent Mississippi River backup flows from entering Lake Winona and inundating the area now only partially protected by the completed segment of the project authorized by the 1958 Flood Control Act. The plan would also provide control of Burns Valley Creek by means of channel improvement, raising and extending the existing levee system, a drop structure, an erosion control structure, alteration of two highway bridges, and a sewer line modification. Earth levees averaging 10 feet in height total approximately 3.1 miles in length. Concrete floodwalls, also averaging about 10 feet in height, total about 2,025 feet in length. Resolutions authorizing the project were adopted by the Public Works Committees of the House on July 29, 1971, and the Senate on November 18, 1971. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. See Annual Report for 1968 for requirements. For improvements authorized in 1971 see Annual Report of 1972 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement required under Section 221 of the 1970 Flood Control Act was executed by the City of Winona on October 6, 1978. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract for dredge fill cost $55,513. Engineering and design cost $3,043 by hired labor. Supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs were $175. Condition at end of fiscal year: The upstream improvement except for a portion of the project raising and extending the existing levee downstream from the Lake Winona outlet was completed in August 1967. Work authorized in 1971 is complete. Project was formally dedicated by the city on October 13, 1985. By letter dated September 7, 1988, responsibility for the completed project was transferred to the city of Winona. 44. ZUMBRO RIVER AT JARRETT AND MILLVILLE, MN Location. The project sites are located on the left bank of the Zumbro River. The first site is about 1/2 mile downstream from Jarrett, Minnesota, and the second is about 1 1/4 miles downstream from Millville, Minnesota. The sites are about 16 miles northeast of Rochester, Minnesota, in south-central Wabasha County, in southeastern Minnesota. Existing project. The project to protect the streambank from erosion that is threatening County State Aid Highway 11 was authorized under Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. The initial appraisal reports were dated June 1986 and March 1987 for Millville and for Jarrett, respectively. The recommended plan consists of placing 2,200 tons of rockfill along 700 feet of the riverbank to protect the road from further erosion at the Millville site, and minor excavation and placing 11,450 tons of rockfill along 1130 feet of the riverbank to protect the road from further erosion at the Jarrett site. The project was approved for construction by the Chief of Engineers on July 22, 1988. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. Local cooperation agreements for the projects were signed by Wabasha County, Minnesota in July 1988. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract cost $88,983. Engineering and design cost $2,226. Real estate studies cost $157. Supervision and administration cost $1,819. Condition at end of fiscal year: A construction contract for slope protection was awarded on September 19, 1988. Construction is complete. Project was turned over to local interests by letter dated October 2, 1989. 45. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood control projects turned over to local interests were inspected to determine that project channels are kept clean and 24-16 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT unobstructed, dikes and revetments are in good condition, and structures are in good repair and operable. Deficiencies, if any, were minor unless noted. (See table 24-J on inspection of completed flood control projects.) Cost for the period was $56,816. Total cost to September 30, 1989, is $1,006,346. Miscellaneous 46. OTHER WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITY In the Aquatic Plant Control program (Section 302, Public Law 298, 89th Congress) coordination with the state of Minnesota cost $46,183 and coordination with the state of Wisconsin, cost $12,166. A contract for aquatic plant control operations at Buffalo Lake, Wisconsin cost $27,000. Work in Minnesota by other Corps offices cost $19,790. Condition/operation studies for removal of silt and aquatic growth in Sauk Lake, Minnesota (Section 602, Water Resources Development Act of 1986) cost $404 by contract with the Fish and Wildlife Service, $80,300 by agreement with the United States Geological Survey, $12,500 by agreement with the Department of Agriculture, $4,001 by agreement with the Waterways Experiment Station, and $81,809 by hired labor. General Investigations 47. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $1,076,853 which included five flood damage prevention studies, one restudy of deferred projects study, miscellaneous activities, and coordination with both Federal and non-Federal agencies. Table 24-L provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 48. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year cost was $314,633 which included the items concerning international water studies, flood plain management services and hydrologic studies. Table 24-L provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 49. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Fiscal year cost was $1,775,138 which included six local protection projects. Table 24-L provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. For details of the individual projects see sections 17, 25, 29, 38 and 41. 24-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 24-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30 In Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 1989 1. Minnesota River, MN 3. Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN 4. St. Croix River, MN and WI 5. Warroad Harbor and River, MN 6. Zippel Bay, Lake of the Woods County, MN 7. Bassett Creek, MN 8. Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN and SD 9. Cannon River at Faribault, MN 10. Chaska, MN 11. Devils Lake, ND New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maj. Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 2,057,7221 2,057,7221 - 48,300 7,585 283,000 282,907 35,546 35,639 115,700 2 2,712,132 114,4992 2,710,931 - - - - 4,398,6283 - - - - 4,398,628 3 2,263,000 1,643,200 2,305,600 2,413,600 30,184,0464 2,040,208 1,964,106 2,153,201 2,538,360 30,094,5644 - - - - 425,000 - - - - 425,000 - - - - 150,410 - - - - 150,410 100 100 69,700 5 1,178,055 69,700 s 1,178,055 86,105 86,105 34,600 38,947 331,000 87,146 24,000 24,569 215,046 415,000 5,522,000 323,387 5,159,893 130,000 221,445 107,000 173,867 1.5,000 52,066 90,124 - 104,960 181,300 177,527 14,500 7,500 1,347 100,000 75,701 68,187 63,332 6,600 12,111 - - 115,000 11,035 - 59,318 1,219,787 1,219,787 515,000 515,0006 3,131,000 1,051,000 11,834,000 1,598,739 2,883,210 11,662,8117 - - 12,175,000 - - 12,174,9148 133,800 150,131 57,750 6,988 217,000 209,888 107,000 152,113 197,300 195,915 46,144 901,000 891,512 25,000 38,903 2,623,600 2,621,683 72,250 60,632' 2,961,000 2,943,89610 2,702,000 2,690,864 24-18 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 24-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30 In Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 1989 12. Eau Galle River, WI 13. Emerson, Manitoba- Noyes, MN 14. Enderlin, Maple River, ND 15. Grafton Pumping Station, ND 16. Homme Lake and Dam, ND 17. Houston, MN 18. Lac qui Parle Lakes, MN 19. La Farge Lake and Channel Imp., WI 20. Lake Andrusia, Mississippi River, MN 21. Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, ND 22. Lake Pulaski, Wright County, MN New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Dam Safety: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 606,000 472,034 25,000 6,351 361,669 68,000 83,257 384,500 931,793 78,000 68,208 934,000 1,082,717 325,000 106,728 488,500 663,301 15,000 35,793 20,057 10,000 10,000 64,600 65,211 250,000 152,000 476,600 478,975 45,600 68,774 17,500 8,057 420,500 512,070 350,000 68 27,584 139,000 38,592 84,600 79,641 229,000 190,852 478,200 495,181 34,200 36,774 54,000 54,437 836,000 1,165,900 1,084,350 1,121,528 - 1,080,000 - 456,218 760,000 981,973 20,000 2,997 24-19 9,039,250 9,039,250 597,200 591,644 336,071 9,959 60,205 77,500 82,812 180,000 222,100 - 462,200 520,713 16,300 16,300 - 1,168 724,600 761,998 401,000 554,671 15,762 6,467,305 6,449,839 425,000 390,96011 4,000,000 3,999,82412 149,000 108,797 13 1,396,097 1,396,097 2,430,121 2,429,113 659,000 564,952 964,873 964,873 6,411,663 6,404,237 18,642,000 18,642,000 277,100 276,499 71,500 61,326 15 3,325,638 3,325,63816 15,634,652 15,622,007 1,481,000 1,010,889 1,187,500 1,183,72417 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 24-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (cont) See Total Cost to Section September 30 In Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 1989 23. Lake T raverse and Bois de Sioux River, SD and MN 24. Mankato and North Mankato, MN 25. Marshall, MN 26. Middle River at Argyle, MN 27. Minnesota River at Henderson, MN 28. Pettibone Park, LaCrosse, WI 29. Portage, WI 30. Prairie du Chien, WI 31. Red Lake River,MN, including Clearwater River, MN 32. Red Lake River, Gentilly, MN 33. Red River of the North at Argusviiie, ND 34. Red River of the North at Breckenridge, MN 35. Red River of the North Drainage Basin, MN, SD and ND 36. Rochester, MN New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 1,339,727 1,339,727 265,000 277,289 400,900 399,078 516,900 504,140 331,900 348,094 10,875,000 10,035,000 9,200,000 1,298,000 10,276,105 10,550,414 9,008,612 2,139,575 75,000 133,624 345,000 448,055 40,000 4,568 - - - 70,000 - 87,787 100,500 142,367 190,000 94,958 200,000 196,334 18,000 161,205 100,000 94,983 215,000 1,020,000 234,728 475,312 - 77,000 - 19,883 12,374 65,200 68,424 535,000 570,000 233,838 803,174 - 7,500 - 7,500 331,000 214,000 365,679 185,313 42,051 84,700 78,031 100,000 24,445 - 50,000 145,050 67,500 6,971 - 35,000 1,250 385,000 358,400 324,700 367,879 413,858 294,219 244,000 229,894 25,000 33,569 990,000 77,750 350,000 712,016 42,879 300,000 280,668 - 69,891 - 69,891 140,400 154,746 140,000 84,216 17,238 59,206 428,900 461,120 673,000 3,489,000 5,514,000 563,018 1,510,876 6,461,148 4,362,319 4,347,272 97,378,500 96,940,538 18 2,495,866 2,495,024 19 2,015,000 1,077,118 1,747,500 1,544,549 20 77,000 62,762 21 300,000 280,668 3,685,000 3,528,347 3,120,079 3,120,079 22 1,231,602 1,231,512 247,500 116,161 1,534,000 1,522,688 75,000 73,677 23 8,138,984 8,138,984 24 4,496,534 4,476,966 12,800,000 25 11,617,880 24-20 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 24-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (cont) See Total Cost to Section September 30 In Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 1989 37. Roseau River, MN New Work: Approp. - - - 2,128,000 Cost 9,748 23,548 14,775 9,193 1,957,854 38. Sheyenne River, New Work: ND Approp. 711,000 845,000 522,000 780,000 4,413,000 Cost 733,305 688,070 687,427 759.579 4,389,928 26 39. Souris River New Work: Basin, ND Approp. 3,257,000 2,057,000 2.450,000 1,500,000 10,572,000 Cost 2,359,516 2,388,438 2,404,279 1,879,501 10,339y734 27 40. State Road & New Work: Ebner Coulees, Approp. 15,000 - 1,265,000 4,582,000 7,409.000 WI Cost 20,953 14,134 231,633 5,543,747 7,337,380 "8 41. St. Paul, MN New Work: Approp. - - 400,000 475,000 875,000 Cost - - 389.808 479,221 869,029 42. Wild Rice River, New Work: South Branch and Approp. - 946.000 200,000 - 60.000 5,620.700 Felton Ditch, MN Cost - 120,973 935,849 29.178 5,620,700 43. Winona, MN New Work: Approp. - 165,000 - - 32,741,131 Cost 186,137 86,877 98,537 58.731 32,741,131 "9 44. Zumbro River New Work: at Jarrett and Approp. - 44,500 141,000 - 10,000 175.500 Millville, MN Cost - 17,345 39,043 93,185 149,573 0o 1 Includes $117,542 for new work for previous project. Excludes $359,202 contributed funds. 2 Includes $2,800 for condition surveys. 3 Includes $681,805 for new work for previous projects. 4 Includes $100,857 for maintenance for previous projects. s Includes $4,200 for condition surveys. 6 Excludes $307,556 contributed funds. ' Excludes $218,940 contributed funds. 8 Excludes $152,223 contributed funds. In addition, $486,313 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by the Ottertail Power Company. 9 Excludes $14,841 contributed funds. 10 Excludes $229,327 contributed funds. ix Excludes $46,439 contributed funds. 12 Excludes $131,459 contributed funds. 13 Excludes $18,014 contributed funds. 14 Excludes $56,220 contributed funds. 15 Excludes $20,441 contributed funds. 16 Excludes $208,000 contributed funds. 17 Excludes $33,902 contributed funds. 18 Excludes $79,537 contributed funds. 19 Includes $1,802,866 for new work for previous project. 20 Excludes $144,160 contributed funds. 21 Excludes $20,920 contributed funds. 22 Excludes $30,020 contributed funds. 23 Excludes $20,327 contributed funds. 24 Includes cost of the Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit,$11,239, which is classed as "deferred" and the units on which authorization has expired: Maple River, $1,241; Moorhead, $27,700; Sheyenne, $37,956. In addition, $203,874 special deposit funds and $146,160 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by local interests. 25 Excludes $554,350 contributed funds. 26 Excludes $1,150,000 sunk costs for deauthorized Kindred Lake unit (see Table 24-G). 27 Excludes $4,919,000 sunk costs for deferred Lake Darling Dam unit (see Table 24-E). 28 Excludes $225,000 sunk costs for inactive Ebner Coulee unit (see Table 24-E) and $209,083 contributed funds. 29 Excludes $589,316 contributed funds. In addition, $717,809 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by local interests. 30 Excludes $29,845 contributed funds. 24-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 24-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Sec. Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents MINNESOTA RIVER, MN 1. July 13, 1892 Open-channel improvement from mouth to Shakopee to obtain a channel of 4-foot depth to accommodate vessels with 3-foot draft. July 3, 1958 Dredging to provide channel of 9-foot depth from mouth to mile 14.7 RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN 3. Mar. 3, 1899 Reconstruct 4 of the 5 original dams and surveys to determine extent of lands overflowed by reservoirs. Mar. 2, 1907 Reconstruct Sandy Lake Dam and construct Gull Lake Reservoir. June 25, 1910 Construct an equalizing canal between Winnibigoshish and Leech Lake Reservoirs (no work was done and this part of the project abandoned in Act of Mar. 4, 1915.) July 27, 1916 Abandonment of ditches connecting Long Lake, Round Lake, and Gull Lake. June 26, 1934 2 Operation and maintenance provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Annual Report 1891. p. 2209 S. Doc. 144. 84th Cong., 2d sess. 1 H. Doc. 363, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 413, 64th Cong., 1st sess. 1 4. June 18, 1878 June 3, 1896 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 ST. CROIX RIVER, MN AND WI Dredging, etc., for a 3-foot channel between mouth and Taylors Falls. Harbor and waterfront at Stillwater. A 6-foot channel to Stillwater. The 9-foot channel from mouth to Stillwater. Small-boat harbor at Hudson. 6 WARROAD HARBOR AND RIVER, MN 5. Mar. 3, 1899 Dredging bar at mouth of Warroad River. June 6, 1900 Entrance channel 300 feet wide and 7 feet deep. June 13, 1902 3 Mar. 3, 1905 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Aug. 5, 1977 Enlarging turning basin. Deepening to 8 feet. Deauthorized portion of entrance channel and turning basin to complete project width and depth. H. Ex. Doc. 75, pt. 6, 43rd Cong., 2d Sess;4 Annual Report 1875, p. 372. H. Doc. 378, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 4 H. Doc. 183, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. 4 H. Doc. 184, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 4 Specified in Act. H. Doc. 92, 56th Cong., 2d sess. s H. Doc. 703, 61st Cong., 2d sess. 5 Public Law 93-251 1Contains latest published map. 2 Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 3 Appropriation 4 See H. Doc. 462, 71st Congress, 2d sess., for latest published map. 5 Latest published map is oppositep. 1984 in Annual Report for 1911. 6 Deauthorized by 1986 WRDA (see Table 24-G). 24-22 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 24-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30. 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Baudette Harbor, MN Completed 1961 $36,415 $57,768 Black River, WI 1 1950 67,585 - Lake Traverse, MN and SD 3, 4 1921 92 - Mississippi and Leech Rivers, MN Completed 3 1929 277,615 40,251 Mississippi River between Brainerd and Grand 5 1925 47,794 3,891 Rapids, MN Pine Creek, Angle Inlet, MN Completed 1978 38,700 102,196 Red Lake and Red Lake River, MN Completed 3 1923 9,070 - Red River of the North, MN and ND 3, 6 1921 293,344 76,209 Wisconsin River, WI 2, 3 1888 - - Zippel Bay Harbor, MN Inactive 5 1928 27,941 11,139 1 Existing channel adequate for commerce (see table 24-G for deauthorized portion of project). 2 Originally included in project 'Fox and Wisconsin Rivers, WI' Abandonment of improvement of Wisconsin River by channel contraction works recommended in 1886 and 1887 (H.Doc.65,49th Cong., 2d sess.). Expenditures included under Fox and Wisconsin Rivers, WI'. No breakdown available. 3 No commerce reported. 4 Abandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 439, 64th Cong., 1st sess.) and June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong.,lst sess.). s Abandonment recommended June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. 467,69th Cong. 1st sess.). 6 Abandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 1666, 63d Cong., 3d sess.). 24-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 24-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30. 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Black Bear and Miller Lakes, Crow Wing County, MN Bonnes Coulee, Velva, ND s 5 Burlington Dam, Souris River, ND Dry Run, IA Elk River, MN Grafton, ND Guttenberg, IA Hanover, Hennepin County, MN 5 Irving Township, Jackson County, WI5 Irving Township at Nicols Road, Jackson County, WI s Kickapoo River, Gays Mills, WI s Lake Darling Dam, ND Lost River, MN Lower Branch Rush River, ND 8 Minnesota River at LeSueur, MN s Minneota, MN s Minot, ND Mississippi River near Aitkin, MN Pembina River, ND Pembina River Lake, ND Red Lake River at Huot, MN 5 Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, MN s Red River of the North at Breckenridge, MN s Red River of the North at Halstad, MN 8 Red River of the North at Oslo, MN 8 Red River of the North at Pembina, ND 8 Redwood River below Marshall, MN a Rushford, MN Shepard Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN Sheyenne River, Valley City, ND S Souris River, Velva, ND S St. Paul and South St. Paul, MN State Road & Ebner Coulees, WI (Ebner Coulee Unit) Tongue River Lake, ND Twin Valley, MN Upper Iowa River, IA Velva, ND 8 Vermillion River, Hastings, MN 8 Veteran's Memorial Levee, Mississippi River, Hastings, MN s Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN s Zumbro River, MN 1 Advance engineering and design costs only. Project deferred with authorization of Lake Darling project. Additional authorization required for implementation of recommended plan. The Senate Report 97-256 states that the Corps is to take no further action to construct Burlington Dam until directed to do so by Congress. 2 Excludes $42,766 contributed funds. 3 In addition $87,878 was expended from Public Law 99 funds in the spring of 1969 for emergency protection and incorporation into the permanent project. 4 Preconstruction planning has not started. Phase I completed under General Investigations. 24-24 Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Active 4 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Active 4 Inactive 12 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Inactive 12 Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1988 1985 1983 1966 1970 1983 1974 1988 1984 1986 1987 1987 1967 1974 1986 1963 1983 1957 1983 1950 1984 1984 1986 1984 1979 1960 1980 1985 1988 1988 1974 1987 1950 1988 1964 1970 1980 1985 1987 1975 $471,000 58,500 5,568,6001 1,790,759 2 259,700 3 2,361,915 259,500 189,600 158,500 33,000 4,919,0006 517,519 7 1,000,000 9 250,00010 161,545 21,479,50011 1,675,835 50,000 64,500 131,000 27,500 2,012,000 1,960,200 2,000,000 202,400 3,192,333 250,00013 111,000 137,500 8,476,01214 225,000 23,695 2,115,700 888,445 334,628 999,900 182,000 250,000 1,284,100 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT 5 Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. 6Advance engineering and design costs only. Project deferred with authorization of Souris River Basin Project (see Section 39 and Table 24-A for costs for active project). 7 Excludes $46,034 for the Ruffy Brook unit for which authorization expired in April 1966 (see Table 24-G). Excludes $246,911 contributed funds. 8 Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. 9 Excludes $35,000 contributed funds. 1o Excludes $130,300 contributed funds. 11 Excludes $4,167 contributed funds. 12 Further work deferred pending review of project document (inactive). 13 Excludes $62,620 contributed funds. 14 Excludes $545,637 contributed funds for new work and $38,000 expended by South St. Paul for work in lieu of required cash contribution. Excludes an additional, $206,629 expended for work done at request of local interests. 24-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 24-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Black River, WI 1 1950 Aug. 5, 1977 - - Black River Lake, WI 1950 Aug. 5, 1977 - - Hudson Harbor, WI 2 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 - - Kindred Lake, ND 3 1987 Nov. 17, 1986 $1,150,000 - La Crosse, WI 1983 Nov. 17, 1986 - - Maple River, ND 4 1981 Oct. 6, 1961 1,241 - Moorhead, MN 4 1981 Oct. 30, 1961 27,700 - Ruffy Brook, MN 1967 Apr. 1966 46,034 - Sheyenne River, ND 4 1981 Dec. 31, 1970 37,956 - Warroad River and Bulldog Creek, MN 1974 Nov. 17, 1986 182,000 Warroad Harbor and River, MN s 1981 Aug. 5, 1977 - - 1Portion of project for removal of obstructions at various points outside the dredged area to clear channel to full project width (see Table 24-C for costs for completed portion of project). 2 Part of the St. Croix River, Minnesota and Wisconsin project (see Section 4 in text). 3 Previously part of Sheyenne River, ND project (see Section 38 and Table 24-A for costs for active project). 4 Part of Red River of the North Drainage Basin (see Section 35 in text and Table 24-I for costs for active units of the project). S Portion of dredging of entrance channel and turning basin to complete project width and depth (see Table 24-A for costs for completed portion of project). 24-26 TABLE 24-H RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER (See Section 3 of Text) Outlet Watershed Area (square miles) Capacity Previous Projects Existing Proiects at Minimum Above Watershed Maximum Stages St. Paul (square Original Stage Total Reservoir (feet) 1 River (miles) miles) Lake Reservoir (acre-feet) Completed Cost Completed Cost Cost Winnibigoshish 6 Mississippi 408 1,442 117 179.4 967,930 1884 $214,000 1900 $173,470 $387,470 Leech Lake 0 Leech 410 1,163 173 205.9 743,320 1884 171,805 1902 84,380 256,185 Pokegama 6 Mississippi 344 6602 24 35.0 120,750 1884 85,000 1904 126,030 211,030 Sandy Lake 7 Sandy 267 421 8 16.6 72,500 1895 114,000 1909 117,020 231,020 Pine River 9 Pine 199 562 18 23.7 177,520 1886 97,000 1907 133,320 230,320 Gull Lake 5 Gull 168 287 20 20.5 70,820 - - 1913 86,826 86,826 Surveys and flowage rights - - - - 160,939 160,939 Recreational facilities - - - - 2,834,838 2,834,838 Total new work - - 681,805 - 3,716,823 4,398,628 Total operating and care - - 100,857 - 29,026,508 29,127,365 Permanent indefinite - - - - 967,197 967,197 appropriation for operation and care, Feb. 1, 1895 to end of fiscal year 1936 Rehabilitation - - - - 425,000 425,000 Total 2,152,840 - $782,662 - $34,135,528 $34,918,190 'Lower operating limits by regulations approved February 4, 1936, as modified December 29, 1944. 2 Exclusive of area controlled by Winnibigoshish and Leech Lake Dams. i ) 3 3 ) ) ycJ r zz 0 dd y REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 24-I RED RIVER OF THE NORTH DRAINAGE BASIN: ACTIVE UNITS IN COMPREHENSIVE BASIN PLAN (See Section 35 of Text) Total Cost to Estimated Name of Unit State Type September 30, 1989 Federal Cost Orwell Reservoir (Otter Tail River) Minnesota Reservoir $1,916,753 $1,916,7001 Wild Rice and Marsh Rivers Minnesota Channel improvement 405,056 405,100 Rush River North Dakota Channel improvement 287,686 287,700 Sand Hill River Minnesota Channel improvement 548,778 548,800 Mustinka River Minnesota Channel improvement 440,788 440,800 Otter Tail River Minnesota Channel improvement 174,768 174,800 Red River at Grand Forks North Dakota Levees and floodwall 948,895 948,900 Red River at East Grand Forks Minnesota Levees, floodwall, 1,698,200 17,500,000 2 pumping plants Red River at Fargo North Dakota Channel improvement, 1,639,924 1,639,9003 levees Total cost to date 8,060,8484 Total estimated cost 23,862,000 5 1 Includes $181,713 for lands and $25,045 for recreation facilities. 2 The East Grand Forks unit was reclassified from active to inactive on August 19, 1988. The cost of this unit was last revised in 1987. 3 Includes $67,900 for lands. 4 Costs of $11,239 for the Wahpeton-Breckenridge deferred unit not included. Authorization of the Sheyenne River, Moorhead, and Maple River units has expired. Cost of these units also not included total $66,897. 5 The Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit of the project is classed as 'deferred' and is excluded from the estimate. The cost of this unit, last revised in 1955, was estimated to be $666,000. The Flood Control Act approved December 31, 1970 (H. Doc. 330-91-2) provided for deletion of the Sheyenne River unit, an authorization of the Maple River and Moorhead units expired at the end of the 5-year period within which local interests were required to furnish assurances of local cooperation. Authorization of these units, not included, expired on the dates indicated in Table 24-G. In FY 89, the Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit was included as part of the General Investigation program under Restudy of Deferred projects. 24-28 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 24-J INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 45 of Text) Project Date Inspected Breckenridge, MIN ................................................. August 1989 Eau Galle River, W I (M ines Creek Improvements) .......................................................................................................... September 1989 Elk R iver, M N ...................................................................................................................... .. ... ...... ...................... A ugust 1989 Enderlin, M aple River, ND ....................................... .. ....... .. ..... ..... .......... .............. August 1989 Hanover, MN....................... .. . .......... ...... ...... . ................... ................ August 1989 Maple River, ND........................... .................................... ............................................... August 1989 Sheyenne River, ND......................................... .... . .......................... August 1989 24-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 24-K FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Anoka, M N ............................................. .............. .............. $18,489 Avoca, WI ........................................................................... .............. 10,554 Beaver Lake, Stearns County, MN ......................................... ............................... 13,789 Beebe Lake, Frankfort, MN ...................................... . ....... ........................... 18,211 Cochrane, M ississippi River, W I ........................................................................... 138,253 Gilmore Creek, M N ........................................................................... 12,586 Granite Falls, M N ........................................................... ............... 10,778 Kickapoo River, Viola, W I .................................................. ... ............... 429 Lac qui Parle, MN ...................................................... 445 Lake Charlotte, MN .............. .......... ............................................................. 17,835 Lisbon, ND ........................................................................................................................... 21,274 O w en, W I ............................................................................................................................................... ............ 18,433 Pelican Lake, Frankfort, MN ........................................ ..................... 20,330 Red River, Perley, MN ..................................... ................. 3,000 Sanders Creek, Boscobel, W I ...................................................................................................... .................. 79,600 Shell Lake, W I ......................................... .................... 2,703 Sheyenne River, Harwood, ND......................................................... 360 Snake River, A lvarado, M N ............................................... ....................................................... ....................... 52,722 Trempealeau River, Arcadia, WI ....................................................................... 4,253 Vermillion River, Farmington, MN ........................... . 423 Emergency bank protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs County Hwy. 41 No.-MN R.-Mankato, MN ......................................................................................................... $5,766 Grand Mound-St. Historical Site, MN ............................................................... 9,999 H okah, M N ................................................................................................................................. .. .................... 20,727 Wabasha, Mississippi River, MN ................................................................................................................... 6,850 Warner Road at Sibley-St. Paul, MN ................................................................................................................ 19,179 Zumbro River at Genoa, MN ............................................................ 3,371 24-30 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 24-L GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 47, 48 and 49 of Text) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs SURVEYS Flood Damage Prevention Studies Crookston, M N .............................................................. $14,955 La C rosse, W I ........................................................................................................ . ................ 210,063 M innesota River Basin, M N ................................................................................. ...................... 142,158 Rainy River Basin, M N ......................... ........................................... 188,399 Red River of the North, M N and ND ........................................................................... ............... 18,000 Review of Authorized Projects Wahpeton-Breckenridge, MN ............................................ 92,168 Miscellaneous Activities Special Investigations ....................................................................................................................... 47,914 FERC Licensing Activities ......................................................................................... 1,610 Intra Agency Water Resources Development ........................................................ 11,601 Coordination with Other Agencies Soil Conservation Services .......................................................... 2,191 B ureau of R eclam ation ............................................................................................................... 4,445 Planning Assistance to States-M N .............................................................................. ................ 135,779 Planning Assistance to States-ND .............................................................. 159,770 Planning Assistance to States-W I.................................................................................. .................... 47,801 TOTAL SURVEYS ....................................................... ...................... $1,076,853 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA International W ater Studies ......................................................................................... ................... 54,5841 Flood Plain Management Services Flood Plain Management Services Unit .................................................... 116,215 Technical Services, General ................................................................. 44,092 Special Studies ............................................ ............... 50,152 Hydrologic Studies Sedimentation Studies .................. ................................ ... ................... 46,000 Stream Flow Data ...................... .................................................. 3,589 TOTAL COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA ......................... ........................ $314,632 ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Houston, M N ........................................ .............. ........ .............. 222,100 M arshall, MN ................................................ ..... ........ ..................... 33,569 Portage, W I ......................... ... ...... ........................................... ......................... ....................... 280,668 Sheyenne River, N D ............................................................................................. ....................... 759,579 St. Paul, MN ............................................. 479,221 TOTAL ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN ........................ ............................. $1,775,137 Includes $45,804 for International Water Studies under O&M Appropriation. 24-31 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN * Section of river covered in this report is divided into three reaches, under supervision and direction of District Engineers at St. Louis, Rock Island, and St. Paul. Section in St. Louis District extends 105 miles from Mouth of Missouri River to Location. Mississippi River rises in northern part of Minnesota, flows about 2,360 miles southerly and empties into Gulf of Mexico. Portion included in this report extends about 663 miles from mouth of Missouri River to Soo Line Railroad bridge, Minneapolis. Latest map and profile showing this section of river is in House Document 669, 76th Congress, 3d session. A map showing Lake Pepin is in House Document 511, 79th Congress, 2d session. A map of section Minneapolis to Dubuque is in House Document 515, 79th Congress, 2d session. A map showing location of drainage districts (Bellevue, Iowa, to Missouri River ) is in River and Harbors Committee Document 34, 75th Congress, 1st session. Previous projects. See page 1199 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides for a channel of 9-foot depth and adequate width between mouth of Missouri river (1,179 miles from the gulf) and Soo Line Railroad at Minneapolis, by construction of a system of locks and dams, supplemented by dredging. Project also provides for further improvements at St. Paul to provide a basin extending downstream from Robert Street Bridge of 2.7 miles, and at Minneapolis to provide adequate terminal facilities, and for other harbor improvements and miscellaneous work. Pertinent data on locks and dams, harbor improvements, additional features entering into cost of project, and authorizing legislation are given in Tables 25-C, 25-D, 25-E and 25-G. All dams are concrete. Three dams (Upper St. Anthony Falls, 1 and 19) are fixed, remainder are movable. See House Document 669, 76th Congress, 3d session, for a report of Chief of Engineers Dated February 27, 1940, containing a general plan for improvement of Mississippi River between Coon Rapids Dam and mouth of Ohio River for purposes of navigation, power development, flood control, and irrigation needs. Local cooperation. Small-boat harbors authorized in the River and Harbor Act of 1962 are subject to conditions that local interests make a cash contribution toward cost of construction (except in case of Quincy Harbor which involves maintenance only of an existing harbor); furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance; hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain mooring facilities and utilities; reserve accommodations for transient small boats; accomplish all Upper Mississippi River mile 300 above Ohio River; Rock Island District extends about 314 miles from mile 300 to 614; and St. Paul District extends about 244 miles from mile 614 to Soo Line Railroad bridge, Minneapolis (mile 857.6). necessary relocations and alterations; and establish public bodies empowered to regulate use, growth and development of the harbors. Rectification of seepage damages to privately owned lands in the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL, is subject to the conditions that local interests acquire all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and maintenance of the project; comply with applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970; accept, operate, and maintain the project upon its completion; and hold and save the United States free from damages arising from the construction and operation of the completed project; provided further that the local public entity shall be reimbursed by the Government in the amounts actually expended by it in the acquisition of real estate and for payments required under Public Law 91-646 if said amounts have been previously submitted to and approved by the Government. Local cooperation requirements have been complied with for improvement of commercial harbor at Dubuque, IA; for improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA, for navigation; and for general navigation facilities at small-boat harbors at Rock Island, IL; Hannibal, MO; Fort Madison, IA; Davenport (Lindsay Park), IA; Muscatine, IA (including freight terminal approach channel); Andalusia, IL; Warsaw, IL; Moline, IL; Clinton, IA; and Savanna, IL. Licenses. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission collects from non-Federal licensees annually to recompensate the United States for use of government dams for generation of hydroelectric power. Amounts collected are returned to U.S. Treasury. (See table at end of chapter for license fees collected through the end of the fiscal year.) St. Paul District. New Work: Studies were continued under Section 107, small navigation project authority, for establishment of a small boat harbor at Guttenberg, Iowa at a cost of $224. Maintenance: Channel dredging to remove shoal areas was performed. Government pipeline dredge WILLIAM A. THOMPSON removed 2,796,406 cubic yards of material at 38 locations at a cost of $888,663. Government derrick barge HAUSER/WADE removed 10,000 cubic yards of material at 1 location for $30,148. Government pipeline 25-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 dredge DUBUQUE removed 30,337 cubic yards of material at 2 locations at a cost of $210,320. Mechanical dredging contractors removed 195,197 cubic yards of material at 16 locations at a cost of $2,029,944. Dredging surveys cost $377,711. Other dredging and snagging cost $285,033. Water quality testing for dredging cost $77,365. Painting at locks and dams cost $504,899. Contracts for boundary surveys, general dam maintenance and general lock maintenance cost $32,162, $12,505 and $15,722, respectively. A contract to raise the service bridge at Lock and Dam 2 cost $2,617,442. Contracts for asbestos removal at all locks and dams for installation of lock machinery at Lock and Dam 2, and for scour repair at Lock and Dam 10 cost $24,206, $139,100 and $1,822, respectively. A contract for rehabilitation of Blackhawk Park cost $386,349. Supply and equipment contracts for chains at Locks and Dams 2,4,and 5 for gear reducers, for roller gate chains, for hoist machinery, for major maintenance supplies, and for lock operating machinery cost $206,661, $32,985, $262,838, $49,900, $520,962, and $78,690, respectively. Contracts for modification of tainter valves at Lock and Dam 1 for purchase of spare parts for locks, for a service bridge crane at Lock and Dam 2, for equipment replacement, for installation of septic and drain field at Locks and Dams 5 and 5A, for installation of a well at Lock and Dam 10 cost $17,427, $35,000, $90,893, $115,815, $36,611, and $30,351, respectively. Engineering work and miscellaneous surveys, reports, and other work were carried on by hired labor for $2,195,102 and by contract for $950,699. Other miscellaneous hired labor, supplies, and equipment cost $2,836,721. The total cost of maintenance was $15,094,046. Rehabilitation: A lock supply contract for Locks and Dams 3 and 5A-9, an electrical supply contract for Lock and Dam 6, and a supply contract for roller gate chains cost $37,845, $16,630, and $360,780 respectively. A contract to install lock machinery at Lock and Dam 3 cost $1,056,965. Engineering, administration, and other work were carried on by hired labor for $499,599 and by contract for $129,813. Total rehabilitation costs were $2,101,632. Operating and care: Locks and dams were operated as required, and necessary repairs were made to those and appurtenant structures. Other studies, reports, and miscellaneous engineering work were also accomplished. Total cost of operating and care was $9,765,674. Cost to St. Paul District were $224 for new work; $24,859,720 for operation and maintenance; and $2,101,632 for rehabilitation, for a total of $26,961,576. Rock Island District. New Work: Work continued on Stage II, Rock Excavation, in Pool 15 with 78,685 cubic yards of rock and overburden being removed by contract at a cost of $611,700. Maintenance: Channel dredging by Government cutterhead pipeline dredge WILLIAM A. THOMPSON was performed at various locations in Pools 11, 16, 20 and 21 at a cost of $1,215,000 with 508,996 cubic yards of material being removed. Dredging inspection and reports were completed at a cost of $63,500. Snagging, clearing, and excavation was performed by hired labor at various locations at a cost of $284,700. Dredged material disposal activities and other environmental concerns in connection with dredging and channel maintenance activities cost $71,500. Repair of channel regulating works structures was performed at a cost of $1,955,500. Structural repairs, including sandblasting and painting, were performed by hired labor at locks and dams at a cost of $536,400. A strong-back to lift roller gate bulkheads for Locks and Dam 15 was constructed at a cost of $381,800. Repairs to spillways and dikes cost $91,400. Riprap repairs to the nonoverflow dike at Lock and Dam 12 were completed at a cost of $464,800. Construction was completed on a new mooring cell upstream of Lock and Dam 12 at a cost of $5,800. Construction of bulkheads at Lock 13 was initiated at a cost of $283,800. The LeClaire Base Storage Yard was raised above the 50-year flood level and security improved at a cost of $154,700. Resurfacing of the access road to Lock and Dam 13 and Thompson Causeway cost $19,100 and $37,800 respectively.The Stage I contract for major maintenance to the dams at Locks and Dams 17 and 18 was continued at a cost of $3,110,600. The work includes repairs to the structural components of the dams, placement of additional rock fill upstream and downstream of the gated sections of the dam, repairs to the spillways, and removal of silt from the auxiliary lock bays. The Stage II major maintenance contract for electrical / mechanical system replacement at Lock 17 was initiated at $852,600. Shady Creek Public Use Area improvements included resurfacing of roads and relocating a sanitary dump station at a cost of $87,000. Repairs to boat ramps at Big Slough and Kilpeck Landing Public Use Areas were accomplished at a cost of $40,100. Camp pads were rehabilitated to Class A standards in Thompson Causeway Recreation Area at a cost of $38,500. Maintenance of roads and bridges, and of buildings, grounds and utilities cost $64,700. Maintenance of public use areas was performed at a cost of $671,500, and maintenance and purchase of permanent operating equipment cost $329,800. Maintenance of levees cost $74,400. Real estate activities relating to maintenance cost $123,600. Engineering and design work was performed at a cost of $1,137,900. Supervision administration and inspection for maintenance features cost $823,700. Total maintenance costs were $12,920,200. Net credits to the project were $1,311,000, primarily as a result of collection of damages from towboat companies to lock and dam structures. Operating and care: Operation of locks and dams and routine maintenance and minor repairs thereto were performed at a cost of $9,623,000. Real estate management services were performed at a cost of $191,400. Natural and cultural resource activities cost $248,200. Public use areas and Mississippi River Visitors Center were operated at a cost of $1,334,600 with contract law enforcement provided at a 25-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN cost of $77,800. OSHA inspections and medical examinations were accomplished at a cost of $26,900. Surveys, various condition and operation studies, and structural inspections cost $1,778,000. Water control management costs were $707,000 and the amount of $600 was expended on Master Plans. Supervision and administration for operations features cost $295,000. Total operation costs were $14,282,500. Total operation and maintenance costs were $27,202,700. Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation continued at Locks and Dams 20, 21, and 22 at a cost of $7,110,567, $6,871,189, and $8,835,269, respectively. Total rehabilitation costs were $22,817,025. Costs to Rock Island District were $611,700 for new work; $27,202,700; for operations and maintenance; and $22,817,025 for major rehabilitation for a total of $50,631,425. St. Louis District. New work: Costs incurred for Melvin Price Locks and Dam, formerly Lock and Dam 26 replacement were $974,631 for real estate acquisition, $14,240,204 for relocations, $310,930 for reservoir, $6,382,139 for the dam, $11,289,629 for the lock, $259,999 for channels, $694,035 for levees and floodwalls, $460,640 for buildings and utilities, $2,060,754 for permanent operating equipment, $2,910,552 for engineering, and $5,085,578 for supervision and administration. Costs incurred for 2nd lock were $41,295 for the lock, $2,068,513 for engineering and $207,831 for supervision and administration. Total cost of new work was $46,986,730. Operating and care: The locks and dams were operated as required, and necessary repairs were made thereto and to appurtenant structures at a cost of $3,586,031. Costs to St. Louis District were $46,986,730 for new work and $9,337,090 for operation and maintenance for a total of $56,323,820. Condition at end of fiscal year: For information pertaining to locks, dams, and harbors, see tables at end of chapter. St. Paul District. Work completed: Locks and Dams at St. Anthony Falls and 1 to 10, inclusive, except for relatively minor appurtenant work; major improvements of channels and harbors at St. Paul and Minneapolis; commercial harbors at Lake City, Red Wing, and Winona, MN; and Prairie du Chien, WI; small-boat harbors at St. Paul, Hastings, Red Wing, Wabasha, Lake City and Winona, MN; Lansing, IA; and Bay City, Pepin, and Prairie du Chien, WI; a remedial drainage ditch at Cochrane, WI; miscellaneous channel dredging and realignment; channel markers; pool clearing; and construction of various facilities for recreation use. Seepage damages totaling $90,027 were paid to 210 claimants. Status of land and flowage acquisition; Approximately 50,293.54 acres of land in fee, including 47,305 acres used by the Department of the Interior in accordance with a cooperative agreement and general plans, and easements of 15,549.63 acres of land are owned or controlled in pools 1 to 10, inclusive, at end of fiscal year. In addition, fee title to 12.46 acres and perpetual easements on 2.98 acres of land for St. Anthony Falls and perpetual easements over 244.39 acres of land for harbors have been obtained and Department of the Army holds special rights over 62,954.74 acres owned by Department of the Interior in pool Nos. 3 to 10, inclusive. Land acquisition is complete. Work remaining to complete portion of project in St. Paul District: Construction of small boat harbor at St. Paul (Harriet Island), MN and construction of additional recreational facilities. Condition of channel at end of fiscal year was such that controlling depths of nine feet at low water and minimum widths for long-haul common carrier service were available in all pools. Structures are in good condition. Rock Island District. Work completed: Major construction items including all locks and dams, are completed and in operation. The following related work has also been completed: Construction of small-boat harbors at Rock Island, IL; Moline, IL; Andalusia, IL; Warsaw, IL; Fort Madison, IA; Davenport (Lindsay Park), IA; Muscatine, IA; Clinton, IA; and Hanibal, MO; improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton,IA, for navigation; improvement of commercial harbor at Dubuque, IA; rehabilitation of old auxiliary lock at Lock and Dam 14; permanent closure of old Lock 19 and drydock; rock and conglomerate excavation in Pool 16; rectification of seepage damage in the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL; recreational facilities; and construction of visitor center at Lock 15. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Acquisition of land in Pools 11 to 22, inclusive consisting of 93,601 acres in fee and 10,541 acres in flowage easement, has been completed. Condition of the channel at end of fiscal year, was such that controlling depths of nine feet at low water and widths suitable for long-haul common carrier service were being maintained in all pools. Work remaining to complete portion of project in Rock Island District: Construction of guidewall extension at 16, 18, and 21; mooring facilities at 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18; upper approach improvement at 19 and 20; rock and/or congolmerate excacation in Pools 14, 15, 18, and 21. Smallboat harbors at New Boston, IL, Bellevue, IA, Cassville, WI, Davenport (Credit Island), IA and Keokuk, IA are inactive, deferred or have been deauthorized. St. Louis District. Work completed: Locks and Dams 24, 25, and Melvin Price Locks and Dam, except for guidewall extensions at Locks 24 and 25, have been completed as have recreation facilities at the three pools. Payments for rectification of damages have been completed. Other work remaining consists of construction guidewall ex- 25-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 tensions at Locks 24 and 25. Melvin Price Locks and Darn are under construction. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Acquisitions of lands in Pools 24, 25, and 26, involving 4,448 acres of land in fee and flowage easements over 6,600 acres, is complete. A total of 3,561 acres has been acquired for the Melvin Price Locks and Dam project. Condition of channel at end of fiscal year was such that controlling depth of nine feet at low water and generally suitable widths for long-haul common carrier services were maintained in all pools and between Melvin Price Locks and Dam and Missouri River. Work remaining to complete portion of project in St. Louis District: Work remaining on the Melvin Price Locks TABLE 25-A COST AND FINANCI and Dam project includes completion of the second stage, (the 1200 foot lock and two half gatebays of the dam), and the third stage, (the 600 foot lock and 1 1/2 gatebays of the dam). Other work includes removal of the existing lock and dam, rerouting a railroad, and construction of the administration/ maintenance building and Visitor Center. Approximately 286 acres remains to be acquired, of which 1,391 acreas are for mitigation purposes for terrestrial wildlife loses. Total Federal costs of existing project to end of fiscal year for the three Districts was $133,916,821 of which $47,598,654 was for new work, $61,399,510 regular funds for operation and maintenance and $24,918,657 regular funds for rehabilitation. AL STATEMENT Total Cost to Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 Mississippi River New Work' between Missouri River Approp. 2 $84,345,770 $102,998,100 $72,364,918 $36,641,700 $863,211,621 and Minneapolis, Cost' 86,217,056 83,924,837 72,366,650 47,598,654 855,576,703 Minnesota (Federal Maint. 4 Funds) Approp. 56,548,589 59,089,429 59,310,934 57,726,400 899,878,388 Cost 52,049,293 50,351,678 56,948,760 61,399,510 879,216,649 Rehab. Approp. 1,240,000 12,950,000 15,902,500 24,729,200 112,354,887 Cost. 1,185,900 12,283,403 16,248,598 24,918,657 112,169,755 (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. 0 0 0 0 2,041,140 Cost 0 0 0 0 2,041,140 1. Includes $56,945,518 for new work on previous projects. 2. Includes Melvin Price Locks and Dam funds $643,182,000. 3. Includes Melvin Price Locks and Dam funds $621,038,461. 4. Includes $8,504,026 for maintenance on previous project. TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT TABLE 25-B TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 Regular Public Work Emergency District Cost Funds Funds Relief Funds Total St. Paul New Work' $ 60,145,9912 24,210,071 $ 9,071,214 $93,427,276 Maintenance3 371,516,443 - - 371,516,443 Rehabilitation 51,105,616 - - 51,105,616 Total 482,768,050 24,210,071 9,071,214 516,049,335 Rock New Work4 70,947,945' 17,403,322 11,338,865 99,690,132 Island Maintenance6 321,743,133 - - 321,743,133 Rehabilitation 61,064,139 - 61,064,139 Total 453,755,217 17,403,322 11,338,865 482,497,404 St. Louis New Work' 650,142,679' 10,282,566 2,440,266 662,865,511 Maintenance 195,189,902 - - 195,189,902 Total 845,332,581 10,282,566 2,440,266 858,055,413 1. Excludes $2,041,140 contributed funds. Includes $7,673 expended in pool No. 11. 2. Includes $159,359 transferred from Rock Island District covering pro rata share of cost of derrick boat Hercules. 3. Includes $762,196 expended between 1930 and 1936 on operating and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. Excludes $797,670 contributed funds. 4. Excludes $58,999 contributed funds. 5. $687,709 was transferred to St. Louis District in fiscal year 1958. Excludes $201,167 transferred to St. Paul and St. Louis Districts covering their pro rata share of cost of derrick boat Hercules. 6. Costs subsequent to FY 1953 included with operating and care. Includes the sum of $395,442, expended between 1930 and 1934 on the operating and care of the works of improvement under the provisions of the permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 7. Includes $47,800 transferred from Rock Island District covering pro rata cost of derrick boat Hercules and $687,709 transferred from Rock Island District. 8. Includes $621,038,461 for Melvin Price Locks and Dam. 25-4 TABLE 25-C LOCKS AND DAMS Lock Dimensions Greatest Depth on Character of Foundation Percent Width Length Upper Miter Sill Complete Miles of Available Normal Locks, Year Estimated Cost of Above Chain- for Full Pool Dams, and Opened Each Lock and Ohio Miles from ber Width Lift Eleva- Upper Lower Work in to Navi- Dam Including Lock and Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion' (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Pool gation Work in Pool St. Anthony 853.9 In city of 56 400 49.2 799.2 15.7 13.7 Some lime- Limestone. 100 - $ 18,203,000 Falls, upper Lock St. Anthony Falls, lower Lock and dam Lock and dam 1 Lock and dam 2 Lock and dam 3 Lock and dam 4 Lock and dam 5 Lock and dam 0 5A S Lock and dam 6 Lock and dam 7 Lock and dam 8 Lock and dam 9 Lock and dam 10 Lock and dam 11 Lock and dam 12 Lock and dam 13 Lock and dam 14 Le Claire Lock (Canal) Lock and dam 15 Lock and dam 16 Minneapolis, MN 853.3 In city of Minneapolis, MN 847.6 Minneapolis- St. Paul 815.2 1.3 above Hastings, MN 796.9 6.1 above Red Wing, MN 752.8 Alma, WI 738.1 Minneiska, MN 728.5 3 above Winona, MN 714.3 Trempealeau, WI 702.5 Dresbach, MN 679.2 Genoa, WI 647.9 3.3 below Lynxville, WI 615.1 Guttenberg, IA 583.0 3.7 above Dubuque, IA 556.7 Bellevue, IA 522.5 4.3 above Clinton, IA 493.3 3.7 below Le Claire, IA 493.1 3.9 below Le Claire, IA 482.9 Foot of Arsenal Island Rock Island. IL 457.2 1.8 above Muscatine, IA stone, mainly sandstone. No piles. 56 400 26.9' 750.0 13.7 10.3 Sandstone. No piles. 56 400 35.9' 725.1 13.5' 10.1 Rock and piles 56 400 35.9 - 12.5' 7.6 in gravel. 110 500 12.2 - 16.0 15.1 Piles in sand, 1108 6008 12.2 687.2 22.2 13.0 silt and clay. 110 600 8.0 675.0 17.0 14.0 Piles in sand, silt and clay. 110 600 7.0 667.0 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand and gravel. 110 600 9.0 660.0 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand and gravel. 110 600 5.5 651.0 18.0 12.5 Piles in sand. 110 600 6.5 645.5 17.0 12.5 Piles in sand, gravel and silt. 110 600 8.0 639.0 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand and gravel. 110 600 11.0 631.0 22.0 14.0 Piles in sand, gravel and broken rock. 110 600 9.0 620.0 16.0 13.0 Piles in sand. 110 600 8.0 611.0 15.0 12.0 Piles in sand. 110 600 11.0 603.0 18.5 12.5 Piles in sand, gravel and silt. 110 600 9.0 592.0 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand and gravel. 110 600 11.0 583.0 19.0 13.0 Piles in sand, clay and gravel. 110 600 11.0 527.0 20.5 13.5 Rock. 80 320 11.0 - 17.6 10.9 Rock. 110 600 16.0 561.0 24.011 11.0 Rock. 110 360 16.0 - 17.011 11.0 110 600 9.0 545.0 17.0 12.0 Piles in sand Sandstone. Piles in gravel. Piles in sand, silt and clay. Piles in sand. Piles in sand and gravel. Piles in sand. Piles in sand. Piles in sand and clay. Piles in sand. Piles in sand and gravel. Piles in sand. Piles in sand. Piles in sand. Piles in sand and gravel. Piles in sand and gravel. Rock. Rock. Rock. Piles in sand and gravel, and gravel. 100 1959 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 100 92 100 96 1917 1930 1948 1938 1935 1935 1936 1936 1937 1937 1938 1936 1937 1938 1938 1939 1922 1934 98 1937 Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) 0l 0 12,382,000' 2,358,000' 6,492,000' 5,596,000 4,865,000 5,081,000 4,549,000 4,874,000 5,574,000 6,061,000 6,539,000 4,750,000 7,428,000 5,580,000 7,502,000 6,284,000 10 13,589,000 9,788,000 TABLE 25-C (Cont'd) LOCKS AND DAMS Lock Dimensions Greatest Depth on Character of Foundation Percent Width Length Upper Miter Sill Complete Miles of Available Normal Locks, Year Estimated Cost o Above Cham- for Full Pool Dams, and Opened Each Lock and Ohio Miles from ber Width Lift Eleva. Upper Lower Work in to Navi Dam Including Lock and Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Pool gation Work in Pool Lock and dam 437.1 4.2 above New 110 600 8.0 536.0 16.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand. 99 1939 $ 5,843.000 17 Boston. IL Lock and dam 410.5 6.5 above 18 Burlington, IA Lock and dam 364.2 Keokuk, IA 19 343.2 0.9 above Canton, MO 324.9 2.1 below Quincy, IL 301.2 1.5 below Saverton. MO 273.4 Clarksville. MO 241.4 Cap Au Gris. MO 202.9 Alton, IL 200.8 Alton, IL 200.8 Alton, IL Lock and dam 20 Lock and dam 21 Lock and dam 22 Lock and dam 24 Lock and dam N 25 Lock and dam 26 (Henry T. Rainey Dam) Melvin Price Locks and Dam Melvin Price Locks and Dam (2nd Lock) Total, Locks and dams 110 600 110 358 110 1,200 9.8 and gravel. 528.0 16.5 13.7 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 38.2 518.2 4.5 9.2 Rock. 5.0 13.0 Rock. 110 600 10.0 480.0 15.0 12.0 Rock. Rock and piles in sand and gravel. 110 600 10.5 470.0 16.5 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel, and gravel. 110 600 10.2 459.5 18.0 13.8 Rock. Rock. 110 600 15.0 449.0 19.0 12.0 Rock and piles. Piles in sand. 110 600 15.0 434.0 19.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel, and gravel. 110 600 24.0 419.0 19.0 10.0 Piles in sand. Piles and 110 360 24.0 - 16.0 10.0 sand. 110 1,200 24.0 419.0 23.0 18.0 Piles to bedrock. 110 600 24.0 419.0 42.0 18.0 Piles to bedrock. Piles to bedrock. Piles to bedrock. 90 100 99 97 95 99 1937 1913 1957 1936 1938 1938 9914 1940 9914 1939 100 1938 81 - 7 - f 10,308.000 bb 0 y 0 14,813,00012 6,281.000 v I- 8,065.000 ; 5,275.000 O 10,337.000 x 13,694.000 ' 12,824.000 0 z 746,010,000 230,000,000 $ 1,200,945,000 1. Elevation of pools 1 to 22 and at St. Anthony Falls are mean sea level 9. In addition, $1,965,300 expended from previous projects. 1912 adjustment: pools 24, 26 are mean sea level 1929 adjustment. 10. Existing Le Claire Canal lock is used as auxiliary to lock 14; previous 2. Includes existing dam, owned by Northern States Power Co. project cost $540,000. 3. Includes dredging above upper lock. (Federal cost only.) 11. Depth over upper poiree sill. Depth over upper miter sill is 27 feet, at 4. Based on pool elevation 723.1 in pool 1 which is crest of dam. Pool is nor- lock 15. mally maintained at elevation 725.1 by flashboards. 12. $640,868 for first lock was reported by Mississippi River Power Company, 5. Includes lower approach dredging and dredging between upper and lower transferred to Government free in lieu of improvements destroyed. (Annual rock. (Federal cost only.) Report, 1928, pp. 1118-1119.) Present estimate includes $13,132,600 for main 6. In addition 81.948,000 expended from previous projects and 81,349,600 lock and appurtenant work. from O & C appropriation for first of twin locks. Excludes lock and dam 13. Includes cash contribution of $3,950,000. rehabilitation program. 14. Complete except for guidewall extensions. 7. Old upper guard sill. 8. Landward lock. 0 r O cr yC12 O 7d 0 pt o TABLE 25-D HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS Miles above Project Approximate size (feet) Actual or Name Ohio River Location Type depth Percent Estimated (feet) Width Length Complete Cost Harriet Island Harbor, St. Paul, MN St. Paul Harbor, MN Hastings Harbor, MN Red Wing Harbor, MN Red Wing Harbor, MN Bay City Harbor, WI Lake City Harbor, MN Pepin Harbor, WI Wabasha Harbor, MN Alma Harbor, WI Winona Harbors, MN 0J Lansing Harbor, IA Prairie du Chien Harbor, WI Cassville Harbor, WI Dubuque Harbor, IA Savanna Harbor, IL Clinton Harbor, IA Moline Harbor, IL Davenport Harbor, IA (Lindsay Park) Rock Island Harbor, IL Andalusia Harbor, IL Muscatine Harbor, IA New Boston Harbor, IL Fort Madison Harbor, IA 840.2 In city of St. Paul, MN 836.5-839.2 In city of St. Paul, MN 839.7 Channel improvement, Small-boat harbor and channel enlargement. 813.2 Lower end of city of Hastings, MN 791.4 In city of Red Wing, MN 791.1 In city of Red Wing, MN 785.9 Upper end of Bay City, WI 773.0 In city of Lake City, MN 767.1 In city of Pepin, WI 760.0 Upper end of city of Wabasha, MN 751.3 Upper end of Alma, WI 726.0 In city of Winona, MN Latsch Island 726.2 Crooked Slough 663.3 Upper end of city of Lansing, IA 635.5 Upper end of city of Prairie du Chien, WI 635.0 In Marais de St. Friol East Channel below Hwy bridges. 606.6 At Cassville, WI 579.4 At Dubuque, IA 537.3 At Savanna, IL 519.0 At Clinton, IA 488.0 At Moline, IL 484.2 At Lindsay Park 479.8 473.0 455.5 455.6 433.1 383.7 At Rock Island, IL Andalusia Slough At Muscatine, IA In Boston Bay At Fort Madison, IA Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Commercial' Small-boat' Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Entrance channel small-boat harbor Small-boat Small-boat Freight terminal approach channel Small-boat Small-boat 70 9 400-1,000 5 300 200 300 450 50-100 400 500 500 50 175-400 300 200 200 170 400 925 0 $ 306,000' 2.7(mile) 400 100 100 500 100 1,200 800 5,990 600 1,000 850 600 800 500 1,000 6,000 500 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 800 100 1,000 frontage 5 12 5555 120 340 280 400 230 200 100 40 150 200 90-135 250 565 1,500 910 1,400 660 1,150 1,100 435 950 1,890 600 900 100 0 100 0 78 100 100 100 100 100 0 100 217,100 230,200 74,300 146,800' 8,700 39,400 , 93,500 9 1,077,000' a 205,500' 41,700 pa 56,300 - 89,800 84,700 z 95,300 rJ) 85,500 0 93,100 z 178,000 55,200 z 310,000 Z 101,912 110,328 's 262,100 31,000 g z 21,000 353,000 23,000 184,200 TABLE 25-D (Cont,d) HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS Project Approximate size (feet) Actual or Name Mies aboRive Location Type depth Percent Estimated (feet) Width Length Complete Cost Keokuk Harbor, IA 363.5 At Keokuk, IA Small-boat 5 100-600 1,015 0 394,00 Warsaw Harbor, IL 359.1 At Warsaw, IL Small-boat 5 100 600 100 73,0C Quincy Harbor, IL 327.3 In Quincy Bay, IL Small-boat 5 200-300 9,000 0 Hannibal Harbor, MO 308.8 At Hannibal, MO Small-boat 5 180-260 600 100 129.0( Total $5,170,64 I. In addition, local interests will contribute $306,000. 2. In addition, local interests contributed $3,455. 3. In addition, local interests contributed $9,533. 4. Commercial harbor converted to small-boat harbor under authority of Section 107 of 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Primary use is small-boat, although some commercial activity exists. 5. In addition, local interests contributed $812,599. 6. In addition, local interests contributed $32,344. 7. Maintenance only, estimated at $5,000 annually. 3O )0 I0 1,, 00 00 5a b O -l O 0 r y 31 m $1, C, 0 y m O z r O C) H r' O o TABLE 25-E MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST OF PROJECT Facilities for public use, convenience and safety Rectification of damages caused by seepage and backwater Regulating works between Melvin Price Locks and Dam and Missouri River Improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, Iowa, for navigation Miscellaneous Total additional features Total existing project (new work) $ 9,172,700 8,366,400' 545,000 193,600 3,624,9002 18,705,900' 516,183,512 1. Includes a lump-sum payment of $2,146,800 (O&M appropriation) paid to the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL, for rectification of seepage damages. Also includes $140,000 Construction General funds for project studies, evaluation, and report preparation. 2. Includes $686,500 for repairs to Stone Arch Bridge, Minneapolis, MN. (FY 1969) 3. Excludes $227,000 (1965) for inactive remedial measures at Sandy Slough, MO. LICENSE FEES COLLECTED TABLE 25-F THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1989 Annual Collections to Dam Licensee Charge Sept. 30, 1989 St. Anthony Falls Lower Northern States Power $ 3,300 $ 89,977 Lock and Dam Co. (No. 2056) Lock and Dam No. 1 Ford Motor Co. 95,400 6,107,640 Total project (No. 362) 6,197,617 25-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 25-G AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sep. 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 as amended by P.R. No. 10, Feb. 24, 1932 June 26, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 2(, 1937 l)cc. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1915 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 None Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 M ay 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN Dredging channels to landing places. Project adopted from Illinois River to Minneapolis; Chief of Engineers granted discretionary authority to make such modification in plan as may be deemed advisable.4 Operation of snag boats and operation and care of locks and dams to be provided for with funds from Department of the Army appropriations for rivers and harbors. Missouri River established as lower limit of project. Extension of 9-foot channel above St. Anthony Falls, MN, including adequate terminal facilities for Minneapolis, MN St. Paul, MN harbor. I)etermine damages to drainage and levee districts caused by seepage and backwater, and cost of making rectification thereof. Public park and recreational facilities. Red Wing, MN harbor. Remedial works to correct damages caused by seepage and backwater at Cochrane, WI Such changes or additions to payments, remedial works, or land acquisitions authorized by River and Harbor Act of Aug. 26, 1937 (River and Harbor Committee Doc. 34, 75th Cong., 1st sess.), as Chief of Engineers deems advisable. St. Paul, MN channel enlargements, small boat harbor, and roadway. Vertical bridge clearance at Minneapolis to 26 feet above estimated stage for discharge of 40,000 c.fs. Winona, MN basin. Future mnodifiication of lock and dam No. 2 for power development. Provides for cash contribution by local interests in lieu of alteration of privately owned bridges and utilities for St. Anthony Falls prject. Lake City, MN harbor. Wabasha, MN harbor. Payment of damages caused by backwater and seepage, pools 3 to 11. Hastings, MN harbor. Lansing, IA harbor. Fort Madison, IA harbor. Payment of damages caused by pool No. 14 at Clinton, IA. Davenport, IA harbor. Muscatine, IA harbor. Alma, WI harbor. Hannibal, MO harbor. Prairie du Chien, WI harbors. Opposite llnmburg, IL harbor.' Permits such change in location of Winona, MN small boat basin authorized by River and Harbor Act of Mar. 2, 1945 (1I. Doc. 263, 77th Cong., 1st sess.), as Chief of Engineers deems advisable. Construction of Crooked Slough Harbor at Winona, MN, in lieu of previously authorized commercial harbor. Payment of damages caused by pool No. 24 at Louisiana, MO. Permits modification of vertical bridge clearances and authorizes completion of St. Anthony Falls project. Small boat and commercial harbors at Alton, IL.' None H. Doc. 290, 71st Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 137, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 137, 72nd Cong. let sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 44, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and larbors Commnittee Doc. 34, 75th Cong., 1st sess. None II. I)oc. 103, 7(ith (ong., lt sess. H. Doc. 137, 76th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 547, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. S. Doc. 54, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 263, 77th Cong., 1st Bess. II. I)oc. 4:12, 77th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 449, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 511, 79th Cong., 2d1 seas. H. Doec. 514, 79th Cong., 2d1s ess. H. Doc. 515, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 559, 79th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 192, 79th Cong., 2d seas. H. Doc. 661, 80th Cong. 2d seas. S. Doc. 197, 80th Cong., 2(1 sess. H. Doc. 642, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 733, 80th Cong., 2d seas. H. Doc. 66, 81st Cong., 1st seas. H. Doc. 67, 81st Cong., 1st seas. HI. Doc. 71, 81st Cong., 1 st sess. II. D)oc. 254, 81st Cong., Ist sess. None H. Doc. 347, 83rd Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 251, 82nd Cong., 1st seas. H. Doc. 33, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 136, 84th Cong., Ist sess. 25-10 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN T ABLE 25-G (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 Mar. 3, 1959 .July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966 Oct. 21, 1978 Dec. 29, 1981 Work Authorized Payment of lump sum amounts for damages to drainage and levee districts caused by operation of navigation pools. Improvement and maintenance of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA. Reconstruction of structures as may be necessary to provide adequate facilities for existing navigation. Construction of Industrial Harbor at Red Wing, MN. Construction of small-boat harbors at Savanna, Moline, Andalusia, New Boston,' Warsaw, Quincy, and Grafton, IL; Bellevue,' Clinton, Davenport, and Keokuk, IA; St. Paul (Harriet Island), MN; and Bay City, Pepin, and Cassville,' WI. Payment of damages caused by pool 24 at Clarksville, MO. Remedial works at Sandy Slough, MO. Repair of Stone Arch Bridge at Minneapolis, MN. Replacement of Lock and Dam 26 Change name of Lock and Dam 26 to Melvin Price Locks and Dam effective on the date of Melvin Price's death. (Apr. 22, 1988 - date of death) Documents H. Doc. 135, 84th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 345, 84th Cong., 2d sess. None H. Doc. 32, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 513, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 552, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 419, 87th Cong., 2(1 scss. None Public Law 95-502 Public Law 97-118 1. Deferred. 2. Inactive. 3. Deauthorized FY 87 (WRDA of 1986). 4. Guidewalls at Locks 3, 4, 5, 5A, 7, 8, 9, and 10 deauthorized FY 87 (WRDA of 1986). 25-11 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT * This district comprises portions of Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Colorado, Nebraska, Iowa, and Missouri, all embraced in drainage basin of Missouri River along main stem and tributraries to Rulo, NE. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE ................................. 26-2 2. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .............................. 26-2 Flood Control 3. Bear Creek Lake, CO .................... 26-2 4. Bowman-Haley Lake, ND .................... 26-2 5. Chatfield Lake, CO ........................ 26-2 6. Cherry Creek Lake, CO ..................... 26-3 7. Fall River Basin, SD ....................... 26-3 8. Great Falls, MT ................ ..... 2.....6-3 9. Little Sioux River, IA ....................... 26-3 10. Lost Creek at Columbus, NE ................. 26-4 11. Lower Heart River, Mandan, ND .......... 26-4 12. Missouri National Recreational River, NE and SD ........................... 26-4 13. Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, NE to Sioux City, IA ........................ 26-4 14. Missouri River Levee System, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE .................. 26-4 15. Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, NE .................................. 26-5 16. Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE ................. 26-5 17. Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program (Omaha Dist) ....................... 26-5 18. Pipestem Lake, ND .......................... 26-5 19. Salt Creek & Tributaries, NE ................ 26-5 20. South Platte River Basin, CO................. 26-6 21. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Works ......................... 26-6 22. Scheduling Flood Control Resrvoir Operations ......................... 26-6 23. Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization ........................ 26-6 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power Page 24. Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD ................ 26-6 25. Fort Peck Lake, MT .................... 26-6 26. Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, SD ................ 26-7 27. Garrison Dam-Lake Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin, ND ................... 26-7 28. Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, Missouri River Basin, NE and SD............26-7 29. Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin, SD and ND ................... 26-7 Miscellaneous 30. National Emergency Preparedness ............ 26-8 General Investigations 31. See Table 26-K ............................ 26-8 Tables 26-A Cost and Financial Statement ............. 26-9 26-B Authorizing Legislation ................ 26-12 26-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...... 26-15 26-D Not Applicable 26-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects...26-15 26-F Other Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power ......................... 26-17 26-G Deauthorized Projects .................... 26-17 26-H Missouri River Levee System, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE .............. 26-18 26-I Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program.......26-18 26-J Inspection of Completed Local Protection Projects ....................... 26-18 26-K Active General Investigations ........... 26-21 26-L Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization .............. 26-22 26-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Navigation 1. MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO MOUTH (SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE) Location. Channel of the Missouri River extending from Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE. Previous projects. For details see page 1893, Annual Report for 1915, and page 1175, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a navigation channel of 9-foot depth and width not less than 300 feet, obtained by revetment of banks, rock dikes to contract and stabilize waterway, cutoffs to eliminate long bends, closing minor channels, and removal of snags and dredging as required. Construction was initiated on this section of the project (Sioux City to Rulo) in fiscal year 1928, the bank stabilization work was completed in April 1979, and the navigation feature was completed in September 1980. A reliable channel suitable for navigation is available through this section. Controlling depth at ordinary stages of the river is 9 feet, with additional depths available during high stages. Commercial navigation was inaugurated on this section in May 1939, and common carrier transportation service was inaugurated in October 1946. Seven riverside recreation sites are complete and in operation. Total cost of new work Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE is $189,226,000 (1989), of which $187,639,000 is the Federal cost of construction and $1,587,000 is the non-Federal cost, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-2 of fiscal year 1988 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities for loading and unloading grain, liquids and dry bulk products are maintained by private interests at various locations on this section of the river. A complete list of terminal facilities are included in the Missouri River. Navigation Maps and can be obtained from the Omaha District for a small fee. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. Local interests operate and maintain the recreation sites. 2. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Small Navigation Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended, Public Law 645, 86th Congress). No work during the period. Flood Control 3. BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO Location. Damsite is on Bear Creek in Jefferson County, CO about 8 miles above the confluence of Bear Creek with the South Platte River at Denver. Existing project. Earthfill dam 180 feet high, with a crest length of about 5,300 feet, and a supplementary earthfill dike with a height of 65 feet and a crest length of 2,100 feet, to the south of the main dam, and an uncontrolled earth and rock-cut emergency spillway. The lake provides storage capacity of 28,831 acre-feet for flood control and 1,979 acre-feet for sediment and recreation. Construction of the project was initiated in October 1973 and was completed in September 1982, exclusive of recreation facilities. The total cost of construction was $61,503,600. Recreation facilities were developed utilizing cost sharing funds at an additional cost of $500,000. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 21-3 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Initiated investigation of contractor claim. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 460,300. 4. BOWMAN-HALEY LAKE, ND Location. Damsite is on North Fork of Grand River in southwestern North Dakota, about 6 miles above Haley, ND. Existing project. A dam 79 feet high, with a crest length of 5,730 feet, and reservoir with a storage capacity of about 19,780 acre-feet for sediment storage, fish and wildlife conservation, recreation, and future water supply for communities of Bowman, Reeder, Scranton, and Gascoyne, ND. Construction was initiated in July 1964, and the project was completed in 1970. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-2 of fiscal year 1988 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 126,600. 5. CHATFIELD LAKE, CO Location. On the South Platte River, just below the mouth of Plum Creek, about eight miles upstream from Denver, CO. Existing project. Consists of rolled earth-fill dam with a maximum height of 148 feet, a crest length of 12,500 feet, and a reservoir with flood control capacity of 204,737 acre-feet and sediment capacity of 26,692 acre-feet, which will be used for recreation, and an enlarged channel from the dam downstream to Denver to accommodate reservoir flood releases. The Corps is participating with local interests in acquisition of lands and development of recreation facilities immediately downstream of the Chatfield Dam in lieu of a portion of the channel improvement. Construction of the project was initiated in August 1967 and is 99 percent complete, with a scheduled completion date in FY 1990. Construction is essentially complete at the project with the exception of the downstream channel improvement, associated recreation facilities and fish and wildlife mitigation measures. Estimated cost through construction of the project is $104,700,000 (1989) of which $95,400,000 is the Federal cost for construction, $6,400,000 local cost in connection with the downstream channel improvement, and $2,900,000 is the local cost for acquisition of water for the recreation pool. 26-2 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies to the downstream channel improvement. The Colorado Water Conservation Board provided assurances of local cooperation for the downstream improvement on December 13, 1967. Local interests must provide water for filling the sediment reserve pool for recreation use which the state agreed to on April _25, 1967. Operations during fiscal year. Continued design by hired labor. Continued work on O&M manuals. Continue downstream channel recreation facilities. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 3,801,700. 6. CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO Location. Damsite is on Cherry Creek in Arapahoe County, CO, approximately 6 miles southeast of Denver, CO just outside of city limits. Cherry Creek joins South Platte River within city limits of Denver. Existing project. A rolled earth-fill dam with maximum height of 141 feet above streambed and 14,300 feet long. Project includes a reinforced concrete outlet works and an uncontrolled side channel spillway canal discharging into adjacent Toll Gate Creek. Cherry Creek project provides reservoir storage capacity of 93,920 acre-feet below spillway canal invert and, in addition, a surcharge storage of 134,470 acre-feet. Plan of operation in ultimate development for multiple-purpose uses includes 13,960 acre-feet for sediment storage and 79,960 acre-feet for conservation purposes. Construction began in fiscal year 1946 and was completed in June 1961, exclusive of recreation facilities. Federal cost of the project was $15,220,000. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 6,060,300. 7. FALL RIVER BASIN, SD Location. In Custer and Fall River Counties, in and near the town of Hot Springs, SD. Hot Springs unit is in the town of Hot Springs, immediately south of the junction of Cold Brook and Hot Brook which combine to form the Fall River. Cold Brook Lake unit is approximately 1.25 miles north of the town of Hot Springs on Cold Brook; and Cottonwood Springs Lake unit is approximately 4.5 miles west of the town of Hot Springs on Cottonwood Springs Creek, one-half mile upstream from its confluence with Hot Brook. Existing project. The general plan of improvement provides flood protection for Hot Springs, SD. The Hot Springs channel improvement unit consisted of widening, deepening and straightening 6,000 feet of channel of Fall River. The Cold Brook Lake unit, an earth-fill dam with appurtenant structures, controls an area of 70.5 square miles. The Cottonwood Springs Lake unit consists of an earth-fill dam with appurtenant structures and controls an area of 26 square miles. Construction of Hot Springs unit was completed during fiscal year 1951. Construction of Cold Brook unit dam and appurtenances was completed in fiscal year 1953 with exception of a road and parking area which were completed in fiscal year 1955. Construction of the Cottonwood Springs unit dam was completed in fiscal year 1970, with the exception of the recreation facilities which were completed in fiscal year 1972. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) For last funding see FY 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Local cooperation requirements have been fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance activities were continued on the Cottonwood Springs and Cold Brook Dams and structures. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 449,100. 8. GREAT FALLS, MT Location. In Great Falls, Cascade County, MT at confluence of the Sun and Missouri Rivers. Existing project. Provides for levees along the left bank of the Sun River and an interceptor ditch and closed conduit to collect and convey side-hill runoff to the Sun River. Estimated cost through construction of the project is $13,962,000 of which $11,912,000 is the Federal cost of construction and $2,050,000 is the local cost for lands, relocations and a cash contribution for replacement of a storm sewer conduit desired by local interests. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. In addition, local interests must zone the unleveed portion of the flood channel through the damage area to preserve its capacity and to prevent further encroachments and contribute in cash $179,000 representing the estimated cost of replaced storm drainage facilities which will be incorporated into the closed conduit of the Watson Coulee Interceptor. West Great Falls Flood Control and Drainage District provided assurances on January 17, 1968, State Supreme Court decision on assessments required a change in state law, which was enacted in 1973. The final court ruling on compliance was made April 1, 1981, and the local sponsor was instructed to proceed toward project construction. Operations during fiscal year. Work continued on the O&M manuals. 9. LITTLE SIOUX RIVER, IA Location. The project is located in the lower portion of the Little Sioux River Basin in Harrison and Monona Counties, IA, near the confluence of the Little Sioux and Missouri River. Previous project. For details see page 646, Annual Report for 1970. Existing project. Construction of the original project was completed in June 1966. Sill No. 4 was identified as a design deficiency in a June 17, 1981 report by the Omaha District, approved by OCE. Based on that report, design studies for a permanent solution to the problem were completed. Estimated cost through construction of the project is $23,630,000 (1989) of which $20,630,000 is the 26-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Federal cost of construction, and $3,000,000 is the local cost for lands, relocations, and associated E&D. Local cooperation. The Little Sioux Inter-County Drainage District was sponsor of that portion of the original project where the remedial work is being accomplished. Remedial work was 100 percent Federally funded. Operations during fiscal year. Work continued on O&M manuals. 10. LOST CREEK AT COLUMBUS, NE Location. On Lost Creek just north of the City of Columbus in Platte County, NE. Existing project. This project provides levee and channel improvements on the north side of Columbus and provides protection to commercial and residential areas. The estimated cost of the construction is $4,480,000 (1989) of which $3,620,000 is the Federal cost, and $860,000 is non-Federal contributed funds - other, that provides for all necessary right of way, utility, and bridge relocations. Local cooperation. A contract with the City of Columbus to sponsor the project was approved on February 18, 1982. Operations during fiscal year. Requested funds for use in analyzing contractor claim and to prepare O&M manuals for the project. 11. LOWER HEART RIVER, MANDAN, ND Location. Mandan, North Dakota, is located just upstream from the confluence of the Missouri and Heart Rivers in Morton County, adjacent to Bismarck, North Dakota. The Heart River is a right-bank tributary to the Missouri River. Existing project. The plan includes raising a 7,150-foot reach of the Mandan Unit of the existing levee an additional 1-1/2 to 2 feet to provide a full three feet of freeboard above the 100-year ice-affected event; raising a 12,300-foot reach of the Lower Unit four to five feet to provide three feet of freeboard above the SPF ice-affected event; and continued zoning and flood insurance for the unprotected portions of the Lower Unit. Local cooperation. The Lower Heart River Water Resources District (LHRWRD) is the non-Federal sponsor of the project. The LHRWRD has obtained cost-sharing assistance from the North Dakota State Water Commission. Operations during fiscal year. Construction was completed in September 1989. The total estimated cost of the project is $1,568,100. The non-Federal portion of this cost is $333,000 which includes $69,300 for lands, easements and rights-of-way. 12. MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, NE AND SD Location. NE and SD. The Missouri River between Gavins Point Dam and Ponca State Park, NE. This includes Cedar and Dixon Counties in Nebraska, and Yankton, Clay, and Union Counties in South Dakota. Existing project. The designation as a National Recreational River will preserve outstanding and important scenic values and will provide additional opportunities for river access and recreation use. Erosion control, consisting of bank stabilization and river management techniques designed to preserve the existing environment, will at the same time preserve high bank flood plain lands. Estimated total cost of construction is $21,633,000 (1989) of which $21,000,000 is the Federal cost of construction and $633,000 is the non-Federal contributed funds - other costs. Local cooperation. All construction on this project will be done in accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. A cost-sharing contract with the State of South Dakota for the Myron Grove access site was signed on June 24, 1986 and the Yankton-Riverside Park Section 215 Agreement was signed on April 24, 1989. Operations during fiscal year. Efforts to protect Federally listed threatened and endangered species continued. 13. MISSOURI RIVER, KENSLERS BEND, NE, TO SIOUX CITY, IA Location. Project is along Missouri River between Ponca Bend, NE, and combination bridge at Sioux City, IA. Existing project. Construction of dikes, revetments and channel improvement along Missouri River from Miners Bend and vicinity, SD and NE, to Sioux City, IA. Project was started in June 1946 and completed in June 1961. (See Table 26-A for total costs.) 14. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IOWA, NEBRASKA, KANSAS AND MISSOURI (SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE) Location. On both banks of the Missouri River from Sioux City, IA to St. Louis, MO. Active portion of the project in Omaha District extends from Council Bluffs, IA to Rulo, NE. Existing project. A series of levee units and appurtenant works along both sides of Missouri River from Sioux City, IA, to mouth, for protection of agricultural lands and small communities against floods. Construction was initiated June 1948. (See Table 26-H for status of active units). Cost estimate for active portion of project from Council Bluffs, IA to Rulo, NE is $42,549,000 (1988) of which $37,931,000 is Federal cost for construction and $4,618,000 local costs for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. Fully complied with for all completed units. Local interests have furnished assurances of their willingness and ability to fulfill local cooperation requirements for the remaining active units. Operations during fiscal year. Completed construction on Levee Unit L-611-614. Continued work on O&M manuals for Levee Unit L-611-614. 26-4 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT 15. PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES LAKES, NE Location. The Papillion Creek basin is located in Washington, Douglas, and Sarpy Counties, NE. Big Papillion Creek rises west of Blair, flows southeasterly through metropolitan Omaha area where it is joined by the Little Papillion Creek just above Offutt AFB, forming Papillion Creek. The combined creek flows along the side of Offutt AFB to its confluence with the Missouri River. Existing project. The active project consists of a series of four dams and reservoirs, channel improvement and a flood warning system on tributaries of Papillion Creek. Construction was initiated in FY 1972. Completed projects include Standing Bear Lake (Site 16) December 1978 and Glenn Cunningham Lake (Site 11) December 1979. Construction of the dam portions of Ed Zorinsky Lake (Site 18) and Wehrspann Lake (Site 20) are complete. Remaining work includes construction of recreational facilities at both sites, effluent storage facility at Site 18, and channel improvement on the Big Papio Channel. Estimated total costs for the project are $59,500,000 Federal funds with $3,879,000 non-Federal reimbursement, and $2,711,000 other and cash contributions. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 21-6 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Revise GDM and complete plans and specifications for Big Papio Channel. Start construction Recreation Facilities Stage I and Effluent Storage Facility; complete Stage IV Recreation Facilities, initiate and complete landscaping and handicapped fishing pier, Site 20. Maintenance: Routine operations and maintenance activities continued at all four dam sites. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 8,897,395. 16. PEBBLE CREEK, SCRIBNER, NE Location. Scribner, Nebraska, is located in Dodge County about 47 miles northwest of Omaha, Nebraska. Pebble Creek is a right-bank tributary to the Elkhorn River. Existing project. The plan includes a 3.6-mile-long levee with an average height of about eight feet providing 100-year flood protection plus 3 feet of freeboard from Pebble Creek, a closure structure at U.S. Highway 275 at the northern edge of Scribner, four road ramps over the levee, an automated flood warning system, and appropriate land use zoning and continued flood insurance for unprotected areas. In the process of providing FEMA the necessary date to revise the flood insurance rate maps to reflect the Pebble Creek levee, it was determined that Scribner is subject to greater residual flooding from the Elkhorn River than was previously determined. An additional segment needs to be added to the project which will essentially result in a ring levee that would provide complete flood protection for the city. Local cooperation. The city of Scribner is the non- Federal sponsor of the project. The city has obtained costsharing assistance from the Nebraska Natural Resources Commission and the Lower Elkhorn Natural Resources District. Operations during fiscal year. Construction on the Pebble Creek levee continued during the year and is scheduled for completion in October 1989. Work began on the plans and specifications for the additional segment of the project along the Elkhorn River. The total estimated cost of the project is $2,604,997. The non-Federal portion of this estimate is $533,000 which includes $225,000 for lands, easements and rights-of-way. 17. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (OMAHA DISTRICT) Location. Flood control improvements in this project are along Missouri River and several of its principal tributaries and in states comprising Missouri River Basin. Existing project. A general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin provides for levees along Missouri River between Sioux City, IA, and mouth and reservoirs on main stem of Missouri River and tributaries. See individual reports and Table 26-I for projects in the Omaha District included in the program. 18. PIPESTEM LAKE, ND Location. On Pipestem Creek in Stutsman County, ND, 3 miles upstream from where Pipestem Creek joins the James River at Jamestown, ND. Existing project. The project consists of a rolled earthfill dam approximately 108 feet high with a crest length of 4,000 feet and outlet works of a gated reinforced concrete conduit. The reservoir provides 146,880 acre-feet of storage. The miltipurpose pool provides space for silt storage and 885 acres of water surface for fish, wildlife and recreation needs. Construction of the project was initiated in FY 1970 and completed in FY 1977. (See Table 26-A for total construction costs.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-6 of fiscal year 1988 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance activities continued. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 307,045. 19. SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE Location. Salt Creek Basin comprises an area of about 1,627 square miles in and around Lincoln in southeastern Nebraska. Existing project. The authorized project consists of a system of 10 dams and reservoirs, channel clearing, enlarging and realignment, levees and necessary bridge alterations. Pursuant to Senate Resolution adopted August 7, 1964, which authorized a review of Salt Creek survey report, remaining units were placed in "inactive" classification. Construction of the project began in the spring of 1962. All work under the active portion of the project, consisting of the 10 dams and reservoirs and the channel improvements and levees through Lincoln, was completed in 1969. Funds were transferred to the project in FY 1980 with concurrence of Congressional Committees. These funds were used to determine an effective method of correction for the dispersive clay problem in the completed 26-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 downstream levees through Lincoln. (See Table 26-A for total construction costs.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-6 of fiscal year 1988 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance activities continued. Annual visitation hours to the system of dams were estimated at 16,057,962. 20. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, CO Location. Flood control improvements in this project are along the South Platte River and its tributaries in Colorado. Existing project. General plan for flood control and other purposes provides for construction of Chatfield Lake on the South Platte River, Bear Creek Lake on Bear Creek, and levee and channel improvements on the South Platte River. (See individual reports and Table 26-B for authorizing legislation). 21. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL WORKS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion, in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within the boundaries of their respective districts. Inspections of completed local protection projects which have beer turned over to local interests for maintenance and operation during the fiscal year are set forth in Table 26-J, Inspections of Completed Local Protection Projects. Fiscal year costs were $183,728. 22. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Under sections 7 and 9, Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, Corps of Engineers is responsible for detailed scheduling of operations involving storage capacity reserved for or assigned to flood control in reservoirs constructed by Bureau of Reclamation as well as those constructed by Corps of Engineers. Costs for FY 1989 were $274,342 and total costs to September 30, 1989 were $5,655,864. 23. FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Federal costs for FY 1989 were $449,963 for disaster preparedness and emergency operations, $293 for repair and restoration and $20,575 for emergency water supply and drought assistance. Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act as amended, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., June 30, 1948). Initiated preparation of O&M manuals and analysis of contractor claim on Lost Creek at Columbus, NE. Plans and specifications are currently being done on Sidney, NE. The following studies were initiated in FY 1989. Beaver Creek, Brush, CO; Big Dry Creek, Littleton, CO; Dutch Creek, Columbine Valley, CO; Elkhorn River, West Point, NE; and Wet Spottedtail Creek, Mitchell, NE. Three negative Initial Appraisal Studies were submitted during FY 89 at a cost of $10,686. Emergency Bank Protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., July 24, 1946.) Operations under this heading were as follows: Construction was completed on four projects: Keg Creek, Minden, IA, completed 8 May 1989; Soldier River, Ute, IA, completed 20 June 1989; Milk River, Malta, MT, completed 11 September 1989; James River, Yankton, SD, completed 18 May 1989. Plans and specifications are currently being prepared on the following projects: South Platte River, Ft. Lupton, CO; West Nishnabotna River, Malvern, IA; East Bow Creek, Cedar County, NE; Powder River, Sheridan, WY; White River, Trip County, SD; Elkhorn River, Cuming County, NE; South Table Creek, Nebraska City, NE; Elkhorn River, Norfolk, NE; South Fork Elkhorn River, Holt County, NE; and Knife River, Mercer County, ND. The following studies were initiated in FY 1989: South Platte River, Commerce City, CO; Little Sioux River, Spencer, IA; Gallatin River, Gallatin County, MT; Shields River, Livingston, MT; Plum Creek, Brown County, NE; and Sand Draw Creek, Brown County, NE. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 24. BIG BEND DAM-LAKE SHARPE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD Location. On Missouri River, 987.4 miles above mouth, near Fort Thompson, SD, and approximately 20 miles upstream from Chamberlain, SD. Dam is located in the upstream reach of Fort Randall Reservoir. Big Bend Reservoir extends upstream to Pierre, SD. Existing project. A rolled earth-fill dam 95 feet high, with a crest length of 10,570 feet, a hydroelectric generating plant consisting of eight 58,500 kilowatt units, and a chute-type gated spillway. Reservoir provides gross storage of 1,883,000 acre-feet. Federal cost of the project was $107,498,000. Construction began in September 1959 and was completed in September 1977, except for Code 710 recreation facilities. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, power production and other multiple uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the fiscal year. During the period, 885,287,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity were produced. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 4,119,900. 25. FORT PECK LAKE, MT Location. Reservoir is in Missouri River Valley in Mc- 26-6 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT Cone, Valley, Garfield, Phillips, Petroleum, and Fergus Counties, MT. Dam is approximately 1,771.6 miles above mouth of Missouri River. Nearest towns are Glasgow, 17 miles northwest, and Nashua, 9 miles north. Existing project. A hydraulic earthfill dam with a maximum height of 251 feet, with a crest length of 21,026 feet, and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 18,909,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. Work started on original project in October 1933 and on second power plant in August 1956. The project was completed in 1965. The power installations at the project were uprated in FY 1979. The 5 generators have a total output of 185,250 KW, 2 generators at 40,000 KW each, 2 generators at 43,500 KW each and 1 generator at 18,250 KW. See page 818 of 1965 Annual Report and page 905 of 1958 Annual Report for project details. Federal cost of the project was $158,428,000. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with the other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multi-purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the fiscal year. Generating facilities produced 978,105,000 net kilowatt hours of electricity. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 1,783,000. 26. FORT RANDALL DAM-LAKE FRANCIS CASE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD Location. On Missouri River in Charles Mix and Gregory Counties, SD, about 82 miles above Yankton, SD. Site is 880 miles above mouth of Missouri River and 148 miles above Sioux City, IA. Existing project. A rolled earth-fill dam with a maximun height of 165 feet, a crest length of 10,700 feet, and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 5,574,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. The power installation consists of eight units rated at 40,000 kilowatts each. Construction began in May 1946 and was completed in 1969, except for Code 710 recreation facilities. Federal cost of the project was $199,066,000. Non-Federal contribution for constructing approaches to the Platte-Winner Bridge was $720,000. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the fiscal year. Generating facilities produced 1,648,711,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 7,383,400. 27. GARRISON DAM-LAKE SAKAKAWEA, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, ND Location. On Missouri River in McLean and Mercer Counties, ND, about 11 miles south of Garrison, ND, and 9 miles west of Coleharbor, ND. 1,389.9 miles above mouth of river and 75 miles above Bismarck, ND. Existing project. A rolled earth-fill dam 11,300 feet long with a maximum height of 210 feet and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 24,137,000 acre-feet. It provides five power units, three units rated at 80,000 kilowatts each, and two units rated at 95,000 kilowatts each, three flood control tunnels and a gated spillway. Federal cost of the project was $299,938,000 including $4,208,000 for major rehabilitation. Non-Federal contribution in connection with widening Snake Creek Embankment was $687,000. Construction of the project was initiated in April 1946 and completed in 1966, except for recreational development using Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. None required except cost-sharing with the State of North Dakota for widening the Snake Creek Embankment and recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the fiscal year. Generating facilities produced 1,818,415,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 10,801,800. 28. GAVINS POINT DAM-LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, NE AND SD Location. On Missouri River in Yankton County, SD, and Knox County, NE, about 4 miles upstream from Yankton, SD, and 811.1 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. A concrete and rolled earth-fill dam with a maximum height of 74 feet and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes with a gross storage capacity of 504,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. The power installation consists of three units rated at 33,333 kilowatts each. Federal cost of the project was $49,617,000. Construction of original project was initiated in March 1952 and was completed in 1964. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the fiscal year. Generating facilities produced 696,248,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity during fiscal year. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 9,336,400. 29. OAHE DAM-LAKE OAHE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD AND ND Location. Dam is on Missouri River in hughes and Stanley Counties, SD, about 6 miles northwest of Pierre, 26-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 SD, and 1,072.3 miles above mouith of river. Existing project. A rolled earth-fill dam with maximum height of 245 feet, a crest length of 9,300 feet, and reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 23,337,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. It contains seven power units rated at 85,000 kilowatts each. Federal cost of the project was $346,521,000. Construction was initiated August 1948 and project placed in operation June 1963. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the fiscal year. Generating facilities produced 2,227,673,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity. Annual project visitation hours were estimated at 16,124,979. Miscellaneous 30. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS The total fiscal year cost for this category amounted to $190,895. 31. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS Fiscal Year 1989 costs totaled $2,208,558 for all General Investigation activities. See Table 26-K which covers Surveys, Collection and Study of Basic Data, Research and Development, Preconstruction Engineering and Design (projects not fully authorized), Planning and Engineering under Proposed Program Legislation, and Preconstruction Engineering and Design (fully authorized projects). 26-8 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT TABLE 26-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Thru in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep 30, 1989 I. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE 2. Sioux City Marina 3. Bear Creek Lake, CO 4. Bowman-Haley Lake, ND 5. Chatfield Lake, CO (Required Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 6. Cherry Creek Lake, CO 7. Fall River Basin, SD 8. Great Falls, MT (Required Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 9. Little Sioux River and Tributaries, IA (Required Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 1,792,000 1,814,990 100,000 100,000 17 227,000 225,407 127,000 126,115 2,584,000 1,892,138 561,000 154,129 3,145,000 2,046,267 748,000 752,420 -53,000 55,464 404,000 402,689 287,000 288,506 825,000 563,139 825,000 563,139 176,247 176,247 2,475,000 2,464,261 -20,000 --21,364 268,000 275,403 175,000 174,940 600,000 1,369,780 3,941 96,498 603,941 1,466,278 474,000 471,710 -65,000 567,000 566,993 266,000 254,829 -80,000 118,213 -80,000 118,213 100,000 26,511 6,329 106,329 26,511 2,406,000 2,412,217 9,000 10,080 243,000 243,329 276,000 275,668 361,000 449,983 444,539 361,000 894,522 503,000 497,720 4,115 833,000 756,453 312,000 317,400 -25,000 31,283 -25,000 31,283 30,000 93,556 2,051 8,380 32,051 101,936 - 189,225,9911 189,225,9911 1,926,284 110,730,702 1,927,227 110,722,466 284 40,000 11,538 244,000 244,269 177,000 176,890 360,000 341,698 360,000 341,698 502,000 500,802 425,000 501,292 288,000 291,312 8.930 8,930 16,782 16,782 88,716 88,716 62,043,600 62,015,138 2,347,000 2,346,197 4,372,174 4,372,174 2,298,043 2,296,202 94,503,700 94,455,891 1,246,171 1,187,914 95,749,871 95,643,805 4,528,800 4,515,061 15,220,364 15,220,364 7,251,511 7,247,785 5,538,432 5,538,432 3,931,141 3,927,822 11,912,1124 11,904,6104 308,600 308,600 12,220,7124 12,213,2104 20,629,920 20,621,900 8,380 8,380 20,638,300 20,630,280 26-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 26-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Thru in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep 30, 1989 10. Lost Creek, New Work: Columbus, NE Approp. 294,000 -15,000 150,000 3,619,518 Cost 547,369 -50,000 20,542 67,625 3,467,187 (Required New Work: Contributed Approp. 147,300 Funds) Cost 125,069 - - 147,300 (Consolidated New Work: Summary) Approp. 294,000 -15,000 - 150,000 3,766,818 Cost 547,369 74,232 20,542 67,625 3,614,487 11. Lower Heart River New Work: Mandan, ND Approp. 88,000 73,000 211,000 703,000 1,235,100 Cost 70,283 24,575 223,950 613,121 1,087,208 (Required New Work: Contributed Approp. - - 263,700 263,700 Funds) Cost - - 224,689 224,689 (Consolidated New Work: Summary) Approp. 88,000 73,000 474,700 703,000 1,498,800 Cost 70,283 24,575 223,950 837,810 1,311,897 12. Missouri National New Work: Recreational River Approp. 136,000 25,000 70,000 68,000 919,800 NE & SD Cost 95,984 57,516 88,586 71,561 914,446 Maint. Approp. 352,000 200,000 200,000 952,000 Cost 511,978 5,533 45,780 345,793 941,158 13. Missouri River New Work: Kenslers Bend, Approp. - - - - 11,294,414 NE, to Sioux Cost - - 11,294,414 City, IA Maint. Approp. 39,000 52,000 45,000 41,000 4,528,069 Cost 38,585 51,304 45,828 41,318 4,527,469 14. Missouri River New Work: Levees, IA Approp. 287,000 120,000 250,000 37,931,1776 NE, KS & MO Cost 218,155 166,202 99,087 178,349 37,882,1436 (Required New Work: Contributed Approp. - - - - 38,810 Funds) Cost - - - 38,810 (Consolidated New Work: Summary) Approp. 287,000 120,000 250,000 - 40,198,198 Cost 218,155 166,202 99,087 178,349 40,149,164 15. Papillion Creek New Work: and Tributaries Approp. 1,627,000 2,270,000 2,868,000 1,671,000 50,426,7625 Lakes, NE Cost 1,610,484 2,129,384 3,008,487 1,511,524 50,221,5305 Maint. Approp. 473,000 514,000 594,000 710,000 3,767,000 Cost 469,039 513,416 585,395 721,885 3,757,369 16. Pebble Creek New Work: Scribner, NE Approp. 71,000 109,000 140,000 1,067,000 1,763,997 Cost 85,307 114,703 45,607 1,071,987 1,674,441 (Required New Work: Contributed Approp. - - 205,000 - 205,000 Funds) Cost - - - 179,559 179,559 (Consolidated New Work: Summary) Approp. 71,000 109,000 345,000 1,067,000 1,968,997 Cost 85,307 114,703 45,607 1,251,546 1,854,000 18. Pipestem Lake, New Work: ND Approp. - - - - 9,277,545 Cost - - - - 9,277,545 Maint. Approp. 271,000 351,000 534,000 267,000 3,795,000 Cost 269,506 352,918 532,078 268,752 3,794,350 26-10 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT TABLE 26-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Thru in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep 30, 1989 19. Salt Creek and Tributaries, NE 21. Inspections of Completed Local Protection Projects 22. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 24. Big Bend Dam- Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD 25. Fort Peck Lake MT 26. Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, SD 27. Garrison Dam- Lake Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin, ND (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 28. Gavins Point Dam-Lewis & Clark Lake, Missouri River Basin, SD and NE 29. Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin, SD & ND New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost Major Rehab Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 213 390,000 387,776 278,000 277,285 274,000 273,069 -25,000 -24,979 3,667,000 3,642,938 4,200 3,399,000 3,461,784 946,000 946,653 209,000 209,511 279,000 278,567 4,861,200 4,868,068 2,555,400 2,535,237 820,000 821,892 140,000 140,060 292,000 293,188 4,322,000 4,319,764 2,862,000 2,852,583 311 6,957,000 6,925,109 7,148,000 7,144,937 78,000 78,000 4,246,000 4,311,714 -2,892 7,149,000 7,283,549 1. Includes $18,325,581 National Industrial Recovery Act funds, $8,625,718 Emergency Relief Funds, and $1,181,125 for previous project. 2. Includes $123,000 of government cost applicable to that portion of the project which is currently being carried in a deferred status. 6,418,100 6,525,664 8,332,700 8,366,465 5,307,300 5,306,454 7,452,300 7,395,467 7,088,000 7,040,950 7,492,000 7,500,354 4,819,000 4,685,741 8,322,300 8,295,810 749,000 690,683 184,000 183,728 274,000 274,342 4,770,000 4,729,117 12,197,6212 12,197,6212 9,221,475 9,161,496 3,112,348 3,111,929 5,655,976 5,655,864 107,497,597 107,497,597 56,531,1743 56,441,1733 158,428,080 158,428,080 4,087,000 62,323,9543 3,936,406 62,113,8213 199,065,883 199,065,883 7,032,000 101,015,9523 6,786,599 100,678,8683 295,729,613 295,729,613 6,620,000 114,366,4003 6,465,668 114,161,2213 4,208,310 - 4,208,310 -- 686,961 686,961 - 49,617,239 - 49,617,239 4,753,000 74,159,4503 4,791,142 74,035,6623 - 346,520,603 - 346,517,696 7,945,000 106,759,7453 7,929,133 106,596,5293 3. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees. 4. Includes $110,000 transferred to inactive portion for planning cost. 5. Does not include $1,854,338 cost of inactive sites. 6. Does not include $2,228,211.50 cost of inactive sites. 26-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 26-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents Jan 12, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 2, 1945 Aug 13, 1968 Flood Control Act of 1962 Flood control Act of 1950 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Dec 22, 1944 Aug 18, 1941 Flood Control Acts of 1955, 1965 Flood Control Act of 1954 June 30, 1948 June 30, 1948 National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 1. LOST CREEK AT COLUMBUS, NE Levee and channel improvement for local protection - Section 205. LOWER HEART RIVER, MANDAN, ND Levee and channel improvement for local protection - Section 205. MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE Appropriation of $12 million authorized for securing a 6 foot depth from Quindaro Bend (Kansas City, MO to Sioux City, IA). Appropriation of $15 million additional allotments totaling $29,153,108 made by Public Works Administration under provisions of National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933, and $9,669,791 alloted under provisions of Emergency Relief Appropriations Act of 1935. For completion of project from mouth to Sioux City, IA. For a channel of 9-foot depth and 300-foot width. BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO A flood control reservoir for protection of metropolitan Denver, CO. BOWMAN-HALEY LAKE, ND Flood control reservoir and water supply. CHATFIELD LAKE, CO Flood control reservoir and channel improvements to provide downstream protection for Denver, CO. Modified 1950 Flood Control Act to operate dam and other Federal improvements to achieve authorized level of protection, beginning at dam and ending 82 miles downstream. Reassigns a portion of the storage space in the lake project to joint flood control-conservation purposes. Modified 1974 WRDA to exemp prohibition of encroachments for Mineral Ave/ Ken Caryl Rd. ext & transmission line. CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO Initiation and partial accomplishment of project. Completion of plan approved in Act of Aug 18, 1941. General comprehensive plan, Missouri River Basin. FALL RIVER BASIN, SD Provide flood control to the town of Hot Springs, SD. GREAT FALLS, MT Levees and channel improvement for local protection. PL 858, 80th Cong. PL 858, 80th Cong. MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, NE AND SD Preservation and enhancement of the Missouri PL 95-625 River between the reaches from Gavins Point Dam, NE & SD to Ponca State Park, NE. 26-12 H. Doc. 1120, 60th Cong. PL 70-560 PL 71-520 PL 73-67 H. Doc 238, 73rd Cong. PL 74-409 H. Doc. 214, 76th Cong. PL 79-14 S. Doc. 87, 90th Cong. PL 90-483 H. Doc. 574, 87th Cong. PL 87-874 H. Doc. 669, 80th Cong. PL 81-516 H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong. PL 99-662 H. Doc. 426, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 H. Doc. 426, 76th Cong. PL 78-534 H. Doc. 475, and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 H. Doc. 655, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 H. Doc. 343, 85th Cong. PL 85-500 PL 89-298 5. 6. 7. 9. 10. 11. 12. LITTLE SIOUX RIVER, IA Correction of design deficiency. PL 341, 80th Cong. PL 83-780 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents 13. 14. June 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sep 3, 1954 Sep 3, 1954 May 2, 1956 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Dec 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 MISSOURI RIVER, KENSLERS BEND, NE TO SIOUX CITY, IA Construction of dike, revetments. H. Doc. 821, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 PL 80-858 MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IA, NE, KS, AND MO. Levees along both sides of river from Sioux City, IA to H. Doc. 821, 76th Cong. Kansas City, MO. PL 77-228 Extended project from Kansas City, MO to mouth H. Doc. 475, 78th Cong. and provided for increased protection. PL 78-534 S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES LAKES, NE Series of flood control reservoirs, providing protection H. Doc. 349, 90th Cong. for the metropolitan areas of Omaha, NE. PL 90-485 Authorized additional $4.8 million for channel H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong. improvement on Big Papillion Creek, and to PL 99-662 Union Pacific RR bridge, rec trail and flood warning system. PEBBLE CREEK, SCRIBNER, NE Levee and channel improvement for local PL 858, 80th Cong. protection - Section 205. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (OMAHA DIST.) Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE and authorized additional $7 million. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional $200 million. Authorized additional $150 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $250 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional $217,710,000 Authorized $5,384,014 to compensate Sioux Indians for reservation lands required for Oahe, South Dakota project. Modified general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin by deletion of construction of Red Willow Dam and Reservoir, NE, and addition of construction of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, KS. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional $200 million. Authorized additional $207 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $80 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and modified the plan to include work protection and rectification works below Garrison Dam. Authorized additional $116 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $20 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong. PL 75-761 H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 H. Doc. 475, and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 PL 79-526 PL 81-516 H. Does. 549 and 642, 81st Cong. PL 83-780 PL 83-776 PL 84-505 H. Doc. 409, 84th Cong. PL 85-500 PL 86-645 PL 88-253 PL 89-042 PL 90-17 26-13 Aug 18, 1941 June 30, 1948 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Flood Control Act of 1968 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 June 30, 1948 15. 16. 17. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents Aug 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec 24, 1970 Dec 31, 1970 Dec 23, 1971 Mar 7, 1974 July 8, 1976 Nov 16, 1977 Flood Control Act of 27 Oct 1965 July 3, 1958 May 17, 1950 May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec 23, 1971 Mar 7, 1974 July 8, 1976 Nov 16, 1977 Dec 22, 1944 June 16, 1933 Aug 30, 1935 May 18, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 June 3, 1948 Authorized additional $38 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $109 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Changed comprehensive plan name to Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Oahe Dam and Reservoir, ND. Authorized additional $101 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $72 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $85 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $59 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. PIPESTEM LAKE, ND Provide flood control for Jamestown, ND and downstream areas. SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE Series of dams and channel improvements for flood control around Lincoln, NE. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, CO Adopted plan of improvement for South Platte River Basin and authorized $26.3 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Authorized additional $2 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $12 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $21 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $37 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $15 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $22 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $3 million for prosecution of plan. BIG BEND DAM - LAKE SHARPE, SD Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin FORT PECK LAKE, MT Construction of earth dam, as recommended by Chief of Engineers Sep 30, 1933, was approved by Executive Order by the President and included in Public Works Administration program, Oct 14, 1933 as authorized by the National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933 and adopted by the River and Harbor Act of 1935 (PL 74-409). Completion, maintenance, and operation of a hydroelectric power plant, subject to certain provisions in act respecting transmission and sale of electric energy. Also authorizes installation of additional power-generating facilities by Secretary of War when deemed necessary in judgment of Bureau of Reclamation. Modified authorization to provide for full multiple purpose operation. Payments to be made to school districts serving project as reimbursement for educational facilities (including transportation to and from school) for pupils who are dependents of persons engaged in construction, operation, and maintenance of projects. PL 90-483 H. Doc. 91-748 and S. Doc. 91-895 PL 91-282 S. Doc. 91-1100, 91st Cong. PL 91-576 H. Doc. 91-23 and PL 91-611 PL 92-222 PL 93-251 PL 94-347 PL 95-189 H. Doc. 266, 89th Cong. PL 89-298 H. Doc. 396, 84th Cong. PL 85-500 H. Doc. 669, 80th Cong. PL 81-516 PL 90-17 PL 90-843 PL 91-282 PL 92-222 PL 93-251 PL 94-347 PL 95-189 H. Doc. 475, S. Doc. 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 H. Doc. 238, 73rd Cong. PL 74-409 PL 75-529 H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 PL 80-586 26-14 18. 19. 20. 24. 25. OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents Water Resources Modified authorization to include recreation as a H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong. Development Act project purpose. PL 99-662 of 1986 26. FORT RANDALL DAM - LAKE FRANCIS CASE, SD Dec 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 27. GARRISON DAM - LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND Dec 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control H. Doc. 475, S. Doc. 247, PWA 1968 and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. 78th Cong. PL 78-534 28. GAVINS POINT DAM - LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, NE & SD Dec 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control H. Doc. 475, S. Doc. 247, and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. 78th Cong. PL 78-534 29. OAHE DAM - LAKE OAHE, SD & ND Dec 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 TABLE 26-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1989 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Fort Benton, MT Complete 1948 3,123,141 644,863 Small Navigation Project at Sioux City, IA Complete 1970 43,582 88,716 TABLE 26-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1989 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Belle Fourche, Cheyenne River, SDI Complete 1940 37,410 Big Sioux River at Sioux City, IA Complete 1982 7,458,934 - Blackbird Creek Near Macy, NE2 Complete 1970 262,479 - Buffalo Creek, Meadow Grove, NE2 Complete 1974 293,016 - Buffalo Creek, Scranton, ND2 Complete 1960 102,980 - Cedar Canyon Dam, Rapid City, SD Complete 1960 120,482 - City of Aurora, Westerly Creek, CO Complete 1955 150,000 Clarkson, NE, Maple Creek Complete 1967 191,282 Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1936) Complete 1939 - Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1944) Complete 1954 2,557,680 26-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 26-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1989 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Deadman's Gulch, Sturgis, SD2 Complete 1981 3,000,000 - Dry Creek, Hawarden, IA Complete 1964 400,000 Eagle Bay and Fort Yates Highway Bridges, ND Active 1978 616,639 Floyd River, Sioux City, IA Complete 1970 11,556,667 Forsyth, MT Complete 1950 255,177 - Frazer-Wolf Point, MT Complete 1982 435,000 Gering Valley, NE Complete 1971 5,989,663 Glasgow, MT Complete 1939 16,832 Greybull, WY Complete 1960 248,507 Havre, MT Complete 1958 1,825,881 Herreid, Spring Creek, SD Complete 1954 50,216 Hooper, NE2 Complete 1968 326,667 Ida Grove, IA 2 Complete 1972 522,344 Jamestown Reservoir, ND Complete 1950 - - Linton, ND2 Inactive 1973 Little Papillion Creek, NE Complete 1976 3,643,111 Loup River, Columbus, NE2 Complete 1973 1,000,000 Lower Big Sioux River, IA and SD Inactive 1966 Lower Heart River, ND Complete 1964 1,961,173 Madison, NE, ,nion and Taylor Creeks" Complete 1967 234,839 Mandan, Heart River, ND Complete 1960 676,916 Marmarth, ND Complete 1960 169,498 - McCook Lake, SD Complete 1958 147,627 Miles City, MT Inactive 1956 Missouri River, Aten, NE Complete 1951 578,791 Missouri River, Niobrara, NE Complete 1945 99,370 5,633 Mott, ND Deferred - Mud Creek, Broken Bow, NE2 Complete 1976 1,000,000 - Nishnabotna River at Hamburg, IA Complete 1948 236,000 Norfolk, NE Complete 1971 3,400,504 Omaha, NE Complete 1954 5,903,640 Pierce, NE Complete 1967 296,597 Platte River Near Schuyler, NE2 Complete 1948 74,940 Platte River and Lost Creek, Schuyler, NE Complete 1971 257,398 Platte River and Tributaries, NE Inactive - 1,538,269 Rapid Creek, Rapid City, SD Complete 1980 1,004,000 - Saco, MT Complete 1958 67,793 Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton, SD Complete 1978 184,380 Sheridan, WY3 Complete 1976 2,618,809 Shields River, Near Clyde Park, MT2 Complete 1951 25,747 Sioux Falls, SD Complete 1966 5,288,707 South Platte River Levees and Channel Improvements, Chatfield Lake to Ft. Morgan, CO Inactive 1957 Vaughn, MT, Sun River2 Complete 1971 457,582 Waterloo, NE Complete 1970 237,883 - West Point, NE Complete 1966 149,596 Yellowstone River, W. Glendive, MT Complete 1960 230,294 1. Completed as a Public Works Administration project. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 3. Includes inactive segment. 26-16 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT TABLE 26-F OTHER MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1989 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, Relocation of Niobrara, NE Complete 1980 13,516,459 Springfield, SD Water Intake Active Williston, ND Water Intake Complete 1981 988,583 TABLE 26-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Authority Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Date Expended Expended Billings, MT Boulder, CO Buffalo, Johnson County Diversion Channel, WY Castlewood Lake, Douglas County, CO Davids Creek Lake, IA Dayton, WY Giles Creek, Elkhorn, NE Indian Creek Lake, IA Little Nemaha River, Nemaha County, NE Morrison, Bear Creek, CO Redwater River and Hay Creek, Bell Fourche, SD Shell Creek, NE 1976 1976 1961 1943 1972 1956 1952 1969 1973 1950 1966 1962 Vermillion River and Tribs, SD 1968 Sec. 201, FC Act 1950 23 Mar 81 FC Act 1950 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 FC Act 1950 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 PL 77-228 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 203, PL 90-483 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 5 Aug 77 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 6 Nov 77 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 Sec. 204, PL 89-298 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 5 Aug 77 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 3 Oct 78 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 The following investigations for flood control called for by Flood Control Acts and committee resolutions were deauthorized by WRDA of 1986, 17 Oct 86: Aowa & South Creek, NE; Bow Creek, NE; Cannonball River, ND; James River, ND & SD; Judith River Basin, MT; Niobrara River Basin, NE, SD & WY; Omaha Creek, NE; South Dakota Lakes, SD; Weeping Water Creek, NE; Windpower at Ft. Peck Lake, MT; Yellowstone River below Billings, MT. 26-17 75,000 142,666 135,000 30,000 1,000 71,000 208,000 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE TABLE 26-H (See Section 14 of Text) Miles of Unit Levee Status L627-624 Mosquito Creek Levee 14.2 Complete 1950 L601 Watkins-Waubonsie Ditch Levees 15.0 Complete 1966 L594 Pleasant Valley Levee 11.4 Complete 1964 R580 Nebraska City Levee 0.2 Complete 1950 L575 Thurman-Hamburg Levee 45.8 Complete 1950 R573 Otto County Drainage District No. 2 5.9 Complete 1950 R562 Peru Dike 7.6 Complete 1950 L561-550 Atchison County Levee District No. 1 41.3 Complete 1952 R548 Brownville-Nemaha Levee 19.5 Complete 1952 L536 Mill Creek Levee 13.6 Complete 1952 R520 Richardson County Drainage Dist. No. 8 6.3 Complete 1960 R613 Papillion Creek-Platte River Levee 14.0 Complete 1971 R616 Bellevue-Papillion Creek Levees 4.5 Complete 1987 L611-614 Mosquito-Keg Creek Levees 22.0 Complete 1988 LL566217-, 5LL5660222447,,, Remedial Studies on Completed Units Studies Complete Comprehensive Restudy of Levee System Started Mar 1988 PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM TABLE 26-I (See Section 17 of Text) Estimated Estimated Project Federal Cost Non-Federal Cost Fort Peck Lake, MT1,2 158,428,000 1,103,000 Garrison Dam, Lake Sakakawea, ND1 ,2 299,938,000 1,516,000 Missouri River Levee System, 14, NE, KS and MO (Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE) , 37,931,000 4,618,000 Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, SD and ND 1,2 346,521,000 2,320,000 Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, SD1,2 107,498,000 302,000 Fort Randall Dam, Lake Francis Case, SD1,2 199,066,000 1,609,000 Gavins Point Dam, Lewis & Clark Lake, SD & NE1, 2 49,617,000 137,000 Gavins Point Dam, Lewis & Clark bake, SD & NE-Relocation of Niobrara, NEz 13,516,000 Omaha, NE2 5,904,000 362,000 Council Bluffs, IA2 2,558,000 146,000 Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, ND2 9,413,000 270,000 Cherry Creek Lake, CO1 ,2 15,220,000 285,000 1Details presented on individual report. 2Completed. 3 Active portion of project. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 26-J (See Section 21 of Text) Location Month Inspected Montana Glasgow, Milk River Nov 87 Saco, Beaver Creek Aug 87 Havre, Milk River Aug 87 Havre, Scott Coulee-Bull Hook Dam Aug 87 Clyde Park, Shields River Nov 86 Three Forks, Lower Madison River Sep 88 Forsythe, Yellowstone River May 89 West Glendive, Yellowstone River Nov 86 Vaughn, Sun River Sep 88 *Yellowsatone River, Water Plant, Livingston May 89 Sun River, Great Falls Sep 88 26-18 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 26-J (Continued) (See Section 21 of Text) Location Month Inspected *Yellowstone River, Reedpoint Bridge May 89 *Yellowstone River, Greycliff Bridge May 89 *Yellowstone River, Springdale Bridge Inactive *Yellowstone River, Near Miles City Water Intake & Sewage Lagoon Inactive *Yellowstone River, Bank Protection, Billings Inactive *Yellowstone River, Yellowstone County Bridge, Near Billings Feb 88 *Yellowstone River, Voges Bridge, Near Big Timber May 89 *Jefferson River, Willow Creek Bridge, Near Three Forks Apr 88 *Jefferson River, Bank Protection, Near Waterloo Apr 88 *Big Hole River, Pennington Bridge, Near Twin Bridges Aug 89 *Ruby River, Wheatly Bridge, Near Twin Bridges Aug 89 *Big Horn River, Two Leggin Bridge, Near Hardin Inactive *Missouri River, Bank Stabilization, Fort Benton Sep 88 *Yellowstone River, Glendive Nov 87 Wyoming Greybull, Big Horn River May 89 Sheridan, Big and Little Goose Creeks May 89 *Shoshone River, Bank Protection, Lovell May 89 *Shoshone River, Byron May 89 North Dakota Mandan, Lower Heart River Aug 89 Marmarth, Little Missouri River Aug 89 Scranton, Buffalo Aug 89 South Dakota Big Sioux River, Union County Jul 89 Big Sioux River, North Sioux City Jul 89 Sioux Falls, Big Sioux River May 89 Belle Fourche, Belle Fourche River Sep 89 Rapid City, Cedar Canyon Dam Sep 89 Hot Springs, Fall River Channel Jul 89 Herreid, Spring Creek Sep 85 *Missouri River, Bank Protection, Greenwood Jun 88 *Bad River, Bank Protection, Fort Pierre Jun 85 *Big Sioux River, Schofield Bridge, Near Flandreau Jun 89 *Big Sioux River, Fink Bridge, Near Flandreau Jun 89 Rapid Creek, Rapid City Sep 89 Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton Jun 89 *Vermillion River, Vermillion Jun 89 *Big Sioux River, Harrisburgh Jun 89 *Big Sioux River, Jefferson Jun 89 Deadman Gulch, Sturgis Sep 88 *Big Sioux River, Plymouth County Jun 89 *Marne Creek, Yankton Jun 89 Colorado Aurora, Westerly Creek-Kelley Road Dam Aug 88 *Plum Creek, Bank Stabilization, Aurora Jul 86 *Cache La Poudre River, Windsor Jul 86 *South Platte River, Kersey Jul 86 *South Platte River, Merino Jul 86 *South Platte River, Iliff Jul 86 *South Platte River, Platteville Jul 86 *Big Thompson River, Johnstown Jul 86 Cache La Poudre River, Ft. Collins (Water Treatment Plant) Jul 86 South Platte River, Adams County, No. Washington St. Water and Sanitary District Jul 86 26-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 26-J (Continued) (See Section 21 of Text) Location Month Inspected Nebraska Blackbird Creek, Decatur Jul 89 Omaha, Missouri River Aug 89 Waterloo, Elkhorn River Sep 89 West Point, Elkhorn River May 89 Pierce, Elkhorn River Aug 89 Clarkson, Middle Fork, Maple Creek Jul 89 Hooper, Elkhorn River Jul 89 Norfolk, North Fork, Elkhorn River Jun 89 Madison, Union & Taylor Creeks Aug 89 *Platte River, M.U.D. Protection, Cedar Island Feb 89 *Platte River, Bank Protection, Louisville Feb 89 *Elkhorn River, Q Street Bridge, Near Gretna Sep 89 *Elkhorn River, Ray Bridge, Near Norfolk Jul 89 *North Platte River, Bank Stabilization, Minatare Sep 89 *Logan Creek, Bank Protection, Near Bancroft May 89 *Battle Creek, Bank Protection, Battle Creek Jun 89 Schuyler, Lost Creek & Platte River Sep 89 Little Papillion, Little Papillion Creek Jul 89 Gering Valley, Gering Drain & Tributaries Sep 89 Macy, Blackbird Creek Jul 89 Lincoln, Salt Creek & Tributaries Mar 89 Meadow Grove, Buffalo Creek May 89 Columbus, Loup River Aug 89 Broken Bow, Mud Creek Sep 89 *Tangeman, Little Nemaha River Feb 89 *Julian, Rock Creek Inactive *Muddy Creek Near Syracuse Feb 89 *Platte River, Hansen-Chris Lakes, Bellevue Feb 89 *Platte River, Brady Sep 89 *Elm Creek, Decatur Apr 89 *Wiggle Creek, Homer Jun 89 *Elk Creek, Jackson Jun 89 *South Creek, Martinburg Jun 89 *Elk Creek, Willis Jun 89 Columbus Flood Control Project, Lost Creek, Columbus Aug 89 *Shell Creek, County Road Near Columbus Jun 89 *Middle Pebble Creek, Snyder Jun 89 *Elm Creek, Burt County Apr 89 *Redbird Creek, O'Neill Sep 89 *Salt Creek Sewage Treatment Plant, Lincoln Mar 89 *Platte River, Ashland Jul 89 *West Branch Papillion Creek, Omaha, NE Sep 89 Iowa Council Bluffs, Missouri River Sep 89 Ida Grove, Maple River-Odebolt Creek Aug 89 Sioux City, Floyd River Sep 89 Hawarden, Dry Creek Aug 89 Hamburg L575, Nishnabotna River May 89 Intercounty D.D., Little Sioux River Sep 89 Nagel D.D., Little Sioux River Sep 89 Bennett-McDonald-Smithland D.D., Little Sioux River Sep 89 *West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, Near Malvern Feb 89 *West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, Near Hastings Feb 89 *East Nishnabotna River, Page County Bridge, Near Essex Feb 89 *Missouri River, Marina, Sioux City Sep 89 *West Nishnabotna River, Near Hancock Feb 89 *East Nishnabotna River, Near Griswold Feb 89 East Nishnabotna River, Red Oak Mar 89 Big Sioux River, Sioux City Jul 89 *Mucky Creek, Mapleton, IA Jun 89 26-20 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT INSPECTION TABLE 26-J (Continued) Location Emerson, Indian Creek, Mills County *East Fork of Boyer River, Near Vail Monona-Harrison Ditch Control, Monona County *Little Sioux River, Anthon *Big Sioux River, Plymouth County Missouri River Levees L624 & L627, Mosquito Creek & Sieck Levees L601, Watkins Levee District L601, Miller-Sturgeon Levee District L601, Missouri River Levee District #1 L594, Waubansie Drainage District L594, Pleasant Valley Levee District L575, Benton-Washington Levee District L575, Northwest Atchison Levee District L575, McKissock Island Levee District L575, Buchannan Levee District L561, L550, L536, Atchison County Levee District L611-614, M & P Missouri River Levee District R613, Papio Natural Resources District R562, Peru Levee District R548, Brownville-Nemaha Levee District R548, Little Nemaha Levee District R520, Richardosn Co. Levee Dist. #8 R573, Otoe County Drainage Dist. #2 R616, Sarpy County Papio Natural Resources District OF COMPLETED LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 21 of Text) Month Inspected Mar 89 Mar 89 Sep 89 Jun 89 Jun 89 Sep 89 Jun 89 Jun 89 Jun 89 Jun 89 Jun 89 Mar 89 May 89 May 89 May 89 Mar 89 May 89 Aug 89 Apr 89 Apr 89 Apr 89 Apr 89 Apr 89 Aug 89 *Denotes Section 14 Projects ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS TABLE 26-K (See Section 21 of Text) Federal Cost Totals By Item FY 89 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Antelope Creek, Lincoln, NE 49,962 Big Sioux River, Sioux Falls, SD 22,997 Box Elder Creek Basin, CO 94,996 Thurman to Hamburg, IA 31,708 Platte River Basin, CO 6,950 Eastern SD and Upper Big Sioux River, SD, IA 18,361 James River Basin, SD 127,198 Watertown and Vicinity, SD 138,219 Missouri River, SD, NE, ND, MT 32,596 Wood River, Grand Island, NE 65,593 Subtotal 588,580 Special Studies (140) Elm Creek, Decatur, NE 37,006 Platte River Bank Stabilization Project, NE 245,278 Subtotal 282,284 Review of Authorized Projects (160) Deauthorization Review Program 1,898 Subtotal 1,898 26-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 26-K (Continued) ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Section 31 of Text) Federal Cost Totals By Item FY 89 Categories Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations 128,051 FERC Licensing 1,916 Interagency Water Resources Development 3,526 Subtotal 133,493 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Soil Conservation Service, Dept. Agric. (181) 226 Bureau of Reclamation, Dept. Interior (182) 5,121 Planning Assistance to States (186) 633,599 Subtotal 638,946 TOTAL (Category 100) 1,645,201 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) 248,326 Hydrologic Studies (260) 35,780 TOTAL (Category 200) 284,106 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (Category 300) None PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN - PROJECTS NOT FULLY AUTHORIZED (Category 400) None PLANNING AND ENGINEERING UNDER PROPOSED LEGISLATION (Category 500) None PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN - FULLY AUTHORIZED PROJECTS (Category 600) Peity Creek, IA (650) 279,251 TOTAL (Category 600) 279,251 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 2,208,558 FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 26-L (See Section 23 of Text) Fiscal Year Project Name Stage Cost Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Disaster Preparedness - 449,963 Flood Flight and Rescue Operations - - Rehabilitation - 293 Emergency Water Supply & Drought Assistance 20,575 Advance Measures Section 205: Beaver Creek, Brush, CO R 23,935 Carter Lake, NE R 85 Knife River, Hazen, ND R 24 Boyer River, Missouri Valley, IA R 27,071 Cache La Poudre River, Greeley, CO R 1,985 Elkhorn River, West Point, NE F 5,990 Dutch Creek, Columbine Valley, CO R 14,606 Elkhorn River, Crowell, NE R 24,049 26-22 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 26-L (Continued) (See Section 23 of Text) Fiscal Year Project Name Stage Cost Little Sioux River, Spencer, IA R 2,379 Lodge Creek, Chinook, MT R 25,210 Logan Creek, Wakefield, NE R 2,180 Lost Creek at Columbus, NE C 67,625 Lower Heart River, Mandan, ND C 613,121 Milk River, Malta, MT R 24,331 Nowood River, Manderson, WY R 24,308 Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE C 1,071,987 Platte River, Cedar Creek, NE R 8,717 Sidney, NE P 207,134 Thirty Mile Creek, Harlem, MT R 24,956 Van Bibber Creek, Arvada, CO F 15,067 West Nishnabotna River, Atlantic, IA 68 Wet Spottedtail Creek, Mitchell, NE R 46,085 Yellowstone River, Glendive, MT R 28,086 3 Negative Appraisals 10,688 Total (Sectin 205's) 2,269,686 Section 14: Battle Creek, Blaine, CO (Unruh Bridge) - 105 Beaver Creek, Platte County, NE R 5,156 Big Sioux River, 4-Plymouth, IA - 20 Cannonball River, Shields, ND R 5,361 Cedar River, Spaulding, NE R 5,093 Clearwater, NE - 38 East Bow Creek, Cedar County, NE P 6,799 Elk Creek, Willis, NE - 34 Elkhorn River, Beemer, NE P 2,428 Elkhorn River, Norfolk, NE P 1,464 Fort Lupton, CO (Lagoon) P 11,928 Gallatin River, Gallatin County, MT R 4,136 Hauser Lake, MT 65 Heart River, Ft. Abe Lincoln Park, ND 79 James River, Yankton, SD C 21,389 Keg Creek, Minden, IA (WW Lagoon) C 54,737 Knife River, Stanton, ND P 1,230 Logan Creek, Bancroft, NE C 480 Lovell, WY (Sewage Lagoon) P 6,550 Madison River, Madison County, MT (State hwy 287) C 7,263 Medicine Bow River, Elk Mountain, WY - 18 Medora, ND (Sewage Lagoon) C 6,719 Milk River, Blaine County, MT (Finley Bridge) C 5,064 Milk River, Malta, MT (Sewerline) C 81,860 Milk River, Nashua (Sewage Lagoon), MT 83 Muckey Creek, Mapleton, IA - 3,111 Muddy Creek, Syracuse, NE - 95 Nine Mile Drain, Scottsbluff, NE R 3,966 Niobrara River, NE (Carnes Bridge) - 1,747 Oakland, IA P 609 Platte River, Cass County, (YMCA), NE - 36 Platte River, Camp Ashland, NE - 59 Platte River, Douglas County, NE (Ginger Cove Sewage Lagoon) C 5,614 Platte River, North Band, NE C 38,463 Plum Creek, Norden Dam Access Road, NE R 5,419 Powder River, Arvada, WY P 5,797 Sand Creek, Rosebud, MT 66 Shields River, Park County, MT (US 89) R 1304 Snyder, NE (WW Treatment Plant) - 69 Soldier River, Ute, IA C 18,578 South Creek, Martinsburg, NE - 57 South Fork, Ewing, NE P 6,045 26-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 26-L (Continued) (See Section 23 of Text) Fiscal Year Project Name Stage Cost South Platte River, Commerce City, CO South Platte River, Commerce City, CO (1-270) South Platte River, Commerce City, CO (1-76) South Platte River, Commerce City, CO (State Hwy 244) South Platte River, Ft. Lupton, CO South Table Creek, Nebraska City, NE Spring Creek, Zap (Water & Sewer) Vermillion River, SD Waterman Creek, O'Brien County, IA West Nishnabotna, River, Malvern, IA West Papillion Creek, Douglas County, NE White River, Tripp County, SD Yellowstone River, Livingston, MT 5 Negative Appraisals Total (Section 14's) Total Flood Control Activities R = Recon P = Plans & Specs C = Construction F = Feasibility - Does Not Apply 26-24 RRRPP CP P C 594 5,316 711 249 307 3,997 37 126 27,787 5,258 1,885 7,418 4,562 6,879 384,260 2,653,946 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT * The district comprises a portion of southwestern Iowa; northwestern, central, and western Missouri; northern Kansas; southern Nebraska; and a portion of northeastern Colorado embraced in drainage basin of the Missouri River and tributaries from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth. Report on navigation project for section of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to Rulo, Nebraska, is in report of Omaha District. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Mouth (Rulo, NE, to Mouth).................27-2 Flood Control 2. Blue River Channel, Kansas City, MO ........ 27-2 3. Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO............... 27-2 4. Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, KS ........... 27-2 5. Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE .............................. 27-3 6. Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS ........... 27-3 7. Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS ........ 27-3 8. Little Blue River Channel Improvement, Little Blue River, MO ...................... 27-3 9. Little Blue River Lakes, MO .............. 27-4 10. Long Branch Lake, Little Chariton River, MO ............................ 27-4 11. Melvern Lake, Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, KS ......................... 27-4 12. Milford Lake, Republican River, KS .......... 27-5 13. Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS, and MO (Rulo, NE to Mouth)............27-5 14. Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS ............. 27-5 15. Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Kansas City Dist.) ........................ 27-5 16. Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO ................................ 27-6 17. Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, KS ................................ 27-6 18. Rathbun Lake, Chariton River, IA ............ 27-6 19. Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, MO ...... 27-6 20. ITttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, KS ........ 27-6 21. Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS ............. 27-7 Flood Control (cont.) Page 22. Scheduling of Flood Control Reservoir Operations ....................... 27-7 23. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........................... 27-7 24. Disaster Preparedness Program-Inspections . .27-7 25. Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization ......................... 27-7 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 26. Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO ........................ 27-8 27. Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO .............. 27-8 General Investigations 28. General Investigations ...................... 27-9 Tables Table 27-A Cost & Financial Statement .......... 27-10 Table 27-B Authorizing Legislation ............. 27-13 Table 27-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......................... 27-16 Table 27-D Not Applicable Table 27-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .......................... 27-17 Table 27-F Not Applicable Table 27-G Deauthorized Projects ............... 27-18 Table 27-H Missouri River Levee System ........ 27-19 Table 27-I Kansas City District Projects Included in Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program ..................... 27-20 Table 27-J Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................... 27-20 Table 27-K Active General Investigations ........ 27-21 Table 27-L Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization ............... 27-22 27-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Navigation 1. MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA, TO MOUTH (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) Location. Jefferson, Madison, and Gallatin Rivers conjoin at Three Forks, Montana, to form the Missouri River, which flows southeasterly 2,315 miles (1960 mileage) across or along seven states to the Mississippi River, 17 miles above St. Louis. For description see page 1149, Annual Report for 1932. The river is commercially navigable from Sioux City, Iowa, to the mouth, a distance of 732 miles. The portion of project in Kansas City District extends from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth, a distance of 498 miles. Previous Projects. For details see page 1891 of Annual Report for 1915, and pages 1153 and 1175 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. A channel of 9-foot depth and width not less than 300 feet, obtained by revetment of banks, construction of permeable dikes to contract and stabilize the channel, cutoffs to eliminate long bends, closing minor channels, removal of snags, and dredging as required. The improved reach within the Kansas City District extends from the mouth to Rulo, Nebraska, a distance of 498.4 miles. The Bank Stabilization and Navigation features of the project were completed in September 1980. For the reach from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth, the total construction cost was $237,942,190 including $8,665,594 for previous project. River access sites have been completed at 11 locations. Ordinary and extreme stage fluctuations are 16 and 38 feet, respectively. Local cooperation. Cooperation from benefited localities may be required where any improvement may confer special benefit. The receipt of contributions from private parties are to be expended along with Government funds upon authorized work where such work would be in the interest of navigation, as authorized by 1915 Rivers and Harbors Act. Secretary of the Army approved general principle of cooperative construction on Missouri River below Kansas City on basis that 25 percent of cost of any special installation shall be paid by the United States and 75 percent by local interests. Total contributed by local interests in cooperation with the United States from 1918 to June 30, 1964, was $675,663, of which $8,647 was returned to contributors. Local interests must share in cost of recreation facilities in accordance with provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Local interests have contributed $171,816 for cost sharing on construction of recreation in addition to constructing portions of the facilities. 'lerminfaalc ilities. A listing of terminal facilities are included in Missouri River Navigation Charts and can be obtained from Kansas City District Engineer for a small fee. Operations during fiscal year. The 1974 Base Line Study of the reach of the Missouri River in the Kansas City District estimated recreation use on the river at 1,250,000 recreation days annually. The projected tonnage on the river for FY 1989 was approximately 2.3 million, excluding sand, gravel, and waterway improvement materials. Maintenance: Repair of dikes and revetments by contract. In addition, following work was accomplished by hired labor: Construction of environmental gaps, dike and revetment repair, channel maintenance dredging, real estate management, channel reconnaissance, condition studies, surveys and mapping, stream gauging, engineering and design, surveys and layout of construction, and supervision and administration. Flood Control 2. BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO Location. Along the Blue River and tributaries in Jackson County, Missouri. Existing project. Preliminary plans consist of 12.5 miles of improved channel along the Blue River within Kansas City, Missouri. Estimated Federal cost through construction of the project (1989) is $175,000,000, and estimated non-Federal cost of lands, damages and relocations is $22,800,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. The city of Kansas City, Missouri, passed a resolution of intent on December 9, 1975 to provide the required assurances of local cooperation when requested. The Section 221 agreement was signed by the Kansas City District Engineer on September 8, 1983. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is complete and final designs are underway. The first and second channel contracts are complete. A contract for pile stabilization is complete. Relocation contracts with four railroad companies are nearing completion. A contract for removal of contaminated sediments is underway. 3. BRUSH CREEK, KANSAS CITY, MO Location. A major tributary of the Blue River in westcentral Kansas City and extending into Johnson County, Kansas, draining a highly urbanized 29-square-mile area in the two states. Existing project. Preliminary plans consist of improving about 7,500 feet of the channel from near Roanoke Parkway downstream to near Troost Avenue in Kansas City. Estimated Federal cost of the project (1989) is $16,090,000, and estimated non-Federal cost of lands, damages, and relocations is $10,110,000. Local cooperation. The city of Kansas City provided a letter of assurance, dated June 20, 1986, officially stating its intent and ability to cost share the project. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction engineering and design continues with activity in the Kansas City District and at the Waterways Experiment Station where model studies undertaken to confirm design calculations were completed. A Post Authorization Change Report was prepared which documented changes in the design and cost of the project. That report was submitted as the basis for further authorization by Congress to raise the maximum cost of the project, in accordance with Section 902 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The report is undergoing Washington-level review. 4. CLINTON LAKE, WAKARUSA RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Wakarusa River about 4 miles southwest of Lawrence, Kansas, in Douglas County. Lake extends into Shawnee and Osage Counties, Kansas. 27-2 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT Existing project. An earthfill dam about 9,250 feet long constructed to a height of about 114 feet with an uncontrolled spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity 397,200 acre-feet (258,300 for flood control, 28,500 for sediment reserve, and 110,400 of multipurpose storage for municipal and industrial waste supply and recreation). Cost of constructing the completed project was $57,415,433. Construction was initiated in January 1972, and the project was placed in operation in November 1977. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Reimbursement in the estimated amount of $6,768,000 is required for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. A contract was signed by the State on September 6, 1978 and was approved by the Secretary of the Army on October 30, 1978. Utilization of storage was initiated in December 1979. Repayment also began at that time. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1989 was 4,002,819 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 5. HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, NE Location. Dam is on main stem of Republican River about 235 miles above confluence of stream with Smoky Hill River. Site is in Harlan County, 1/2 miles south of Republican City and 13 miles west of Franklin, Nebraska. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 107 feet above streambed with a total length of 11,827 feet, including a gate-controlled, concrete, gravity-type spillway section near center of dam. Reservoir provides storage capacity of 850,000 acre-feet (500,000 for flood control and 350,000 for irrigation and sedimentation allowance). Initial cost of constructing the project was $45,279,532. Total Federal cost of project, including $1,017,623 for major rehabilitation work and $1,832,394 supplemental recreation development (Code 710), is $48,129,549. Construction of the project was initiated in August 1946. Project was placed in operation in December 1952. Major rehabilitation work was completed in FY 1968. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1989 was 2,550,920 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included sediment resurvey and ordinary operation and maintenance. 6. HILLSDALE LAKE, BIG BULL CREEK, KS Location. The project is located approximately 12 miles above the mouth of Big Bull Creek, a tributary of the Marais des Cygnes River and about 15 miles southwest of the Kansas City metropolitan area in Miami County, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill embankment about 11,600 fe'et long (including approximately 3,300 feet of dike section) about 75 feet above rising valley flood plain. The spillway is gravity type uncontrolled and the outlet works are controlled. The total reservoir storage capacity is 160,000 acre-feet (81,000 for flood control, 11,000 for sediment reserve, and 68,000 for multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Construction was initiated in December 1974 and project was placed in operation in October 1981. Federal cost of construction is $64,161,400. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act 1938, applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $23,342,756 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. The Kansas Water Resources Board signed a contract in January 1974, approved by the Secretary of the Army in April 1974, for the entire 53,000 acre-feet of water supply storage. Local interests have shown no interest in sponsoring recreational development at this time. Therefore, only minimum recreational facilities have been built. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1989 was 409,683 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of upstream riprap repair and ordinary operation and maintenance. 7. KANOPOLIS LAKE, SMOKY HILL RIVER, KS Location. Dam is on Smoky Hill River about 19 miles west and 16 miles south of Salina, Kansas, and about 205 river miles above mouth of stream. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 131 feet above streambed, having a total length of 15,360 feet, including 4,070 feet of dike section on the left abutment and 2,550 feet of dike section on right abutment. The reservoir provides storage capacity of 450,000 acre-feet, (400,000 for flood control and 50,000 for recreation and streamflow regulation). Outlet works and spillway are in right abutment. Initial cost of constructing the project was $12,327,735. Total Federal cost of project, including $249,492, supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $12,577,227. Construction was initiated in June 1940 and project was placed in operation in May 1948. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1989 was 1,835,804 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included completion of upstream riprap repair, drain installation, replacing collector system, and ordinary operation and maintenance. 8. LITTLE BLUE RIVER CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, LITTLE BLUE RIVER, MO Location. The project is located along the Little Blue River and extends 22 miles upstream from the head of Missouri River Levee Unit R 351 to the vicinity of Wildwood Creek in Jackson County, Missouri. Existing project. The improvements consist of straightening and enlarging the Little Blue River channel from the head of Missouri River Levee Unit R 351, near Blue Mills Road, upstream to the vicinity of Wildwood Creek, reducing the length of this section from 20.4 to about 15 miles. Alteration of six highway bridges and construction of five new highway bridges and one railroad bridge 27-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 were required. Improvements in the vicinity of Lake City Army Ammunition Plant consist of diversion of West Fire Prairie Creek into the Little Blue River and construction of a levee. Federal cost through construction of the project (1989) is $25,530,083 and non-Federal cost is $3,390,000. Construction was initiated in December 1974, and project was placed in operation in September 1986. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies to the Little Blue River channel improvement works. Jackson County, Missouri, passed a bond issue for sponsorship of the project. Assurances of local cooperation were furnished July 31, 1973. Operations during fiscal year. Project is complete. 9. LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO Location. This project consists of two lakes in Jackson County, Missouri, located in Kansas City, Missouri, and suburban communities. The Blue Springs Lake site is on the East Fork of the Little Blue River about one-half mile south of U.S. Highway 40 and the Longview Lake site is on the main stem at approximately 109th Street. Existing project. The Blue Springs dam is an earthfill embankment about 2,500 feet long and rising about 78 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled service spillway and uncontrolled outlet conduit. The total reservoir storage capacity is 26,600 acre-feet (15,700 for flood control, 10,600 for multipurpose storage for water quality and recreation, and 300 for sedimentation). The Longview dam is an earthfill embankment about 1,900 feet long and rising about 120 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled service spillway and an uncontrolled outlet conduit. The total reservoir storage capacity is 46,900 acre-feet (24,300 for flood control and 20,600 for multipurpose storage for water quality and recreation, and 2,000 for sedimentation). Estimated Federal cost (1989) for both lakes through construction of the project is $140,750,000. Construction was initiated in September 1977. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Local interests must share in separable cost allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. The Jackson County Legislature approved a recreation cost-sharing contract on July 5, 1974 which was approved by the Secretary of the Army on June 24, 1976. A supplemental agreement, signed by Jackson County officials on June 5, 1978, and approved by the Secretary of the Army January 10, 1979, revised the existing contract to include additional costs involved in raising the multipurpose pool elevation at the Blue Springs Lake. Estimated reimbursement for recreation is $14,564,000 of which $450,000 will be accomplished during construction by local interests. Operations during fiscal year. Longview Lake is essentially complete except for emergency rock stockpiles. Blue Springs Lake is complete except for road across dam, emergency rock stockpiles, recreation facilities, and interpretive exhibits. Project is 99 percent complete. Land acquisition is complete. Visitation for FY 1989 was 3,813,569 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 10. LONG BRANCH LAKE, LITTLE CHARITON RIVER, MO Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Little Chariton River in north-central Missouri about 1 mile west of Macon in Macon County. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 3,800 feet long and about 71 feet high with an uncontrolled outlet conduit and an uncontrolled service spillway in right abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 65,000 acre-feet (29,000 for flood control, 4,000 for sediment reserve, and 32,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, fish and wildlife, and recreation). Estimated Federal cost (1989) is $19,454,000, and estimated non-Federal cost is $2,801,000. Construction was initiated in March 1973. Project was placed in useful operation for flood control on September 1, 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $5,567,000 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958 and share in separable cost of $2,801,000 allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. On September 15, 1972 the Secretary of the Army approved a contract signed by the City of Macon, Missouri, for water supply and recreation development. Missouri state agencies indicated their intent to sponsor future water supply and signed a contract on June 17, 1977 to sponsor recreational development in lieu of City of Macon. After review by the Office of the Secretary of the Army, the state signed the contract in December 1979, and it was approved by the Secretary of the Army on April 18, 1980. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1989 was 1,229,265 visitor hours. Project is 99 percent complete on scheduled work. The remaining work is construction of recreation facilities. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 11. MELVERN LAKE, MARAIS DES CYGNES (OSAGE) RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River in Osage County, Kansas, about 2 miles west of Melvern, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 9,700 feet long and about 98 feet high with an uncontrolled chute-type spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 363,000 acre-feet (200,000 for flood control, 26,000 for sediment reserve, and 137,000 of multipurpose storage for water quality control, and recreation). Cost of constructing the completed project was $37,436,530. Construction was initiated in July 1967, and the project was placed in operation in August 1972. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1989 was 5,494,562 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 27-4 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT 12. MILFORD LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Republican River near village of Alida and about 8 miles downstream from Milford, Geary County, Kansas, and about 10 miles above confluence of Republican and Smoky Hill Rivers which form Kansas River near Junction City, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 6,300 feet long and 126 feet high with an uncontrolled service-chute spillway in a saddle on right abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 1,160,000 acre-feet (700,000 for flood control, 160,000 for sediment reserve and 300,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Water supply storage is included in project at request of Governor of Kansas under provisions of Federal Water Supply Act of 1958. Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $48,268,843. Total Federal cost of project, including $1,297,649 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $49,566,492. Construction was initiated in July 1961. Project was placed in operation in June 1965. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $13,045,576 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. Utilization of storage has not been initiated. Reimbursement was initiated, at the option of the State, in September 1976. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1989 was 5,529,347 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included replacing relief wells and ordinary operation and maintenance. 13. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IA, NE, KS, AND MO (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) Location. On both banks of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, about 760 miles to mouth near St. Louis, Missouri. Portion of project in Kansas City District extends from Rulo, Nebraska, 498 miles to mouth. Existing project. A series of levee units and appurtenant works along both sides of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to the mouth, for protection of agricultural lands and small communities against floods. Estimated cost (1989) for the active portion of the project from Rulo, Nebraska, to mouth is $81,696,000, including $76,485,000 Federal and $5,211,000 non-Federal contributions. Costs of $7,949,000 for lands and damages are to be borne by local interests. Remaining portion of project consists of units on which planning and construction are being delayed pending completion of restudy to assure that additional levee construction is economically justified. Cost estimate for deferred, inactive, and deauthorized portion of project Rulo, Nebraska, to mouth is $432,354,000 (1964, 1986, and 1987 price levels), of which $393,956,000 is Federal cost for construction and $38,398,000 for lands and damages to be borne by local interests. Construction of the project was initiated in June 1948. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 applies. Fully complied with for all completed units and units under construction. Local sponsors provide all operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Status of individual units of active portion of project at end of fiscal year is shown in Table 27-H on Missouri River Levee System. Planning on remaining active unit continued. 14. PERRY LAKE, DELAWARE RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Delaware River about 5 miles above mouth in Jefferson County, Kansas, about 3 miles north of Perry, Kansas Existing project. An earthfill dam about 7,750 feet long constructed to an elevation about 95 feet above valley floor with gated-outlet works and an uncontrolled spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 770,000 acrefeet (480,000 for flood control, including 140,000 for sediment reserve and 150,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Water supply storage is included in project plan at request of State of Kansas under provisions of Federal Water Supply Act of 1958. Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $48,371,706. Total Federal cost of project, including $724,212 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $49,095,918. Construction was initiated in March 1964, and the project was placed in operation in January 1969. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $9,208,342 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. Utilization of storage has not been initiated. Reimbursement was initiated at the option of the State in September 1978. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1989 was 4,681,905 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included painting gates and frames, renovating and stabilizing relief wells, and ordinary operation and maintenance. 15. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (KANSAS CITY DIST.) Location. Flood control improvements included in this project are on and along the Missouri River and several of its principle tributaries, in states comprising the Missouri River Basin. Existing project. The Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin provides for levees along Missouri River between Sioux City, Iowa, and the mouth, flood-protection works at certain municipalities, and reservoirs on main stem of Missouri River and on tributaries for control of flooding. (See Table 27-B for authorizing legislation and Table 27-I on Kansas City District projects included in Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program.) See individual project reports. 27-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 16. POMME DE TERRE LAKE POMME DE TERRE RIVER, MO Location. Dam is on main stem of Pomme de Terre River, about 44 miles above mouth of stream in Hickory County, Missouri. The lake extending upstream into Polk County, Missouri. Site is about 3 miles south of Hermitage, Missouri, and 20 miles north of Bolivar, Missouri. Existing project. An earth and rockfill dam about 4,630 feet long constructed to about 155 feet above riverbed and a dike section on left abutment about 2,790 feet long, providing storage capacity of 650,000 acre-feet (407,000 for flood control and 243,000 for sedimentation and multipurpose). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $14,946,784. Total Federal cost of project, including $329,140 area redevelopment and $2,089,529 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $17,365,453. Construction was initiated in January 1957, and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1961. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1989 was 7,645,745 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 17. POMONA LAKE, ONE HUNDRED TEN MILE CREEK, KS Location. Dam is on One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, a tributary of Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, 7 miles above mouth of stream in Osage County, Kansas, about 7 miles northwest of Pomona, Kansas, and 34 miles upstream from Ottawa, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam 7,750 feet long constructed to an average height of about 85 feet above streambed, with gated-outlet workes and an ungated chutetype spillway near left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 230,000 acre-feet (160,000 for flood control, 14,000 for sediment reserve, and 56,000 of multipurpose storage for water quality control, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $13,272,108. Total Federal cost of project, including supplemental recreational development $731,130 (Code 710), is $14,003,238. Construction began in July 1959, and the project was placed in operation in October 1963. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Pomona has water supply reimbursement under Water Supply Act of 1958 totaling $71,018. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1989 was 5,038,082 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 18. RATHBUN LAKE, CHARITON RIVER, IA Location. Damsite is on Chariton River about 7 miles north of Centerville and 1 mile north of Rathbun, Appanoose County, Iowa. Existing project. An earthfill dam 10,600 feet long constructed to an elevation about 86 feet above valley floor, with gated-outlet works and an uncontrolled service chute with paved sill spillway about a mile upstream from left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 552,000 acre-feet (339,000 for flood control, 24,000 for sediment reserve and 189,000 of multipurpose storage for navigation, water quality control, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the project was $27,033,210. Total Federal cost of project, including $588,948 supplemental recreation development (Code 710), is $27,622,158. Construction of the project was initiated in September 1964 and completed in November 1969. The operating plan for this project was revised to reduce flood control releases during critical times of the year to allow local farmers better access during planting and harvesting and to facilitate field drainage and drying out. The revised plan has resulted in more frequent high pool elevations than anticipated, which has inundated roads and recreation facilities. A shoreline erosion study was accomplished; and a supplement to the master plan was approved, which resulted in relocation of recreation facilities and bank stabilization work to compensate for the higher lake levels. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1989 was 3,233,589 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included ordinary operation and maintenance. 19. SMITHVILLE LAKE, LITTLE PLATTE RIVER, MO Location. Damsite is on Little Platte River about 1 mile northeast of Smithville and about 5 miles north of Kansas City, in Clay and Clinton Counties, Missouri. Existing project. Earthfill dam about 4,200 feet long and 95 feet high with an uncontrolled service spillway. A dike about 2,400 feet long crosses a saddle in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 246,500 acre-feet (92,000 for flood control, 52,300 for sediment reserve, and 102,200 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Cost of constructing the project was $87,685,314. Construction was initiated in November 1973, and the project was placed in operation in March 1982. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Reimbursement of $24,000,000 will be required for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958, and reimbursement of $7,500,000 will be required for recreation development in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Additional non-Federal contribution for recreation amounts to $737,000. All contracts for local cooperation were approved by the Secretary of the Army on November 27, 1972. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1989 was 5,023,366 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of sediment resurvey, resurfacing road across dam and to Litton Visitor Center, and ordinary operation and maintenance. 20. TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, BIG BLUE RIVER, KS Location. Dam is on main stem of Big Blue River, about 12 miles above the mouth of stream in Riley and Pottawatomie Counties, Kansas. Site is about 12 miles northwest of Manhattan, Kansas. 27-6 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT Existing project. An earth and rock dam 7,500 feet long and 157 feet high. Total reservoir storage capacity is 2,346,000 acre-feet (1,933,000 for flood control, 228,000 for sediment reserve and 185,000 for multipurpose storage, for low-flow regulation, navigation, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $80,051,031. bTotal Federal cost of project, including $533,048 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $80,584,079. Construction began in October 1952. Project was placed in operation in July 1962. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1989 was 3,585,458 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included seismic reevaluation, modification and enlargement of administration building, and ordinary operation and maintenance. 21. WILSON LAKE, SALINE RIVER, KS Location. Dam is on Saline River about 130 miles above its mouth, near eastern edge of Russell County, Kansas, about 50 miles west of Salina, 10 miles north of Wilson, and 20 miles east of Russell, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 5,600 feet long and 160 feet high with a gated-outlet works, chute spillway, storage capacity is 776,000 acre-feet (511,000 for flood control, 40,000 for sediment reserve and 225,000 multipurpose storage for irrigation, navigation, and low flow regulation). Initial cost of constructing the project was $20,015,023. Tobtal Federal cost of project, including $448,344 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $20,463,367. Construction began in April 1961 and the project was placed in operation in December 1964. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1989 was 4,647,773 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activity consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 22. SCHEDULING OF FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Under sections 7 and 9, 1944 Flood Control Act, the Corps is responsible for detailed scheduling of operations concerning storage capacity reserved for or assigned to flood control in reservoirs constructed by Bureau of Reclamation as well as those constructed by the Corps. 23. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, P.L. 738, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within boundaries of their respective district. (See Table 27-J on inspection of completed flood control projects.) 24. DISASTER PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM-INSPECTIONS Non-Federal flood protection works constructed or rehabilitated under P.L. 84-99 must be inspected by the Corps of Engineers to assure compliance with local cooperation agreements. 25. FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and Antecedent Legislation). Operations for period October 1, 1988 thru September 30, 1989 were as follows: Disaster Preparedness Program includes planning, training, inspection, supplies and equipment and personnel. Inspections of both non-Federal farm levees and Federal authorized levees to assure compliance with eligibility and maintenance requirements were performed during FY 1990. Drought Assistance emergency hauling of potable water to eight drought-distressed communities in Iowa was undertaken during the fourth quarter of FY 1989. This assistance will continue in FY 1991. (See Table 27-L for costs.) Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., June 30, 1948, as amended). Each project selected must be complete in itself, economically and environmentally justified, and limited to a Federal cost of not more than $5 million. The local sponsoring agency must agree to provide without cost to the Department of the Army, all lands, easements, and rightsof- way, including highway, highway bridge, and utility relocations and alterations; hold and save the Department of the Army free from damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; assume all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limit; and prevent future encroachments on improved channels. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 requires the non-Federal sponsors of Section 205 projects to pay 50 percent of the cost of the feasibility study. For structural flood control projects, the sponsor must pay in cash during the construction at least 5 percent of the construction cost. The sponsor's cash and other contributions must equal 25 percent of the total construction cost, but will not be required to exceed 50 percent. There were no Section 205 projects under construction in Fiscal Year 1989. See Table L for expenditures under Section 205 during Fiscal Year 1989. Emergency Streambank Protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., July 24, 1946) as amended. Each project selected must be complete in itself, engineeringly feasible, economically justifiable, environmentally acceptable, and limited to a Federal statutory cost of 27-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 not more than $500,000. The local sponsoring entity must agree to provide without cost to the Department of the Army, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including highway, highway bridge, and utility relocations and alterations required for project construction; provide over the period of construction, an amount equal to not less than 25 percent or more than 50 percent of total project cost, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; operate, maintain, repair, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion; hold and save the Department of the Army free from damages arising from the construction, operation, and maintenance of the completed project; and assume all project costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limit. Projects that were physically complete in FY 89, but will be financially completed in FY 90 are as follows: Little Blue River, Clay County, NE, Weyenberg Bridge - Construction was completed in February 1989 on this project to protect the county road and bridge from floodcaused erosion. The project consists of a concrete rubble fill revetment along both the right and left streambanks to protect the bridge abutments. Little Blue River, Nuckolls County, NE, Bridge 4525 - Construction was completed in March 1989 on this project to protect the county road and bridge. The project consists of concrete rubble streambank paving with a reinforced toe along the left streambank and a concrete rubble fill revetment along the right streambank to protect the bridge abutments. Chariton River, Schuyler County, MO, Eason Bridge - Construction was completed in July 1989 on this project to protect the county road and bridge. The project consists of a stone fill revetment with baffle dikes along the left streambank. West Fork Grand River, Ringgold County, IA, Parker Bridge - Construction was completed in September 1989 on this project to protect the county road and bridge. The project consists of stone streambank paving with a reinforced toe along the left streambank. West Fork Grand River, Ringgold County, IA, Redding Bridge - Construction was completed in September 1989 on this project to protect the county road and bridge. The project consists of stone streambank paving with a reinforced toe along both the right and left streambanks. See Table L for Emergency Streambank Protection expenditures during Fiscal Year 1989. Multiple Pupose Projects Including Power 26. HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OSAGE RIVER, MO Location. Damsite is on main stem of Osage River about 1.5 miles northwest of Warsaw, Benton County, Missouri. Reservoir extends into Bates, Henry, Hickory, St. Clair, and Vernon Counties, Missouri. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 5,000 feet long constructed to an average height of about 96 feet above streambed, including a gate-controlled overfall spillway section and a power installation consisting of six inclined pumpgenerating units with total capacity of 160,000 kilowatts. Total reservoir storage capacity is 5,202,000 acre-feet (3,918,000 for flood control, 244,000 for sediment reserve, and 1,040,000 multipurpose storage for power, low-flow regulation, and recreation). Public Law 91-267, approved May 26, 1970, authorized a change in project name from Kaysinger Bluff Dam and Reservoir, Osage River Basin, Missouri, to the Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir. Estimated cost (1989) through construction of the project is $549 million. Construction of relocation of Missouri Highway M-13 was initiated September 1964 and completed May 1966. Construction of the dam and reservoir was initiated in October 1964. The embankment has been completed including paving the top of the dam roadway. The spillway was completed in October 1979. The Southwestern Power Administration powerline needed for final testing and commercial operation of the generators was completed in December 1979. The first power unit was placed on line on December 22, 1979. Subsequent problems with the turbine bearing required remedial design on the bearing. Restricted commercial power production began in April 1982. Through September 1989, power generation totaled 2,631,813,800 kilowatt hours. Of the gross income from the sale of power by Southwestern Power Administration, $43,642,662 was allocated to the Corps of Engineers for project power operating costs, interest, and investment recovery. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operation during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1989 was 11,269,544 visitor hours. Work was continued on acquisition of land and rights-of-way and construction of the powerplant. Project is 97 percent complete. During FY 1989, 148,237,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated. Maintenance: Activities consisted of continuation of contract for repair of turbine blade, painting gates, road repair, and ordinary operation and maintenance. 27. STOCKTON LAKE, SAC RIVER, MO Location. Damsite is on Sac River about 49.5 miles above its confluence with Osage River, and about 2 miles east of Stockton, Cedar County, Missouri, lake extending into Dade and Polk Counties. Existing project. A rock-shell dam with impervious core about 5,100 feet long constructed to an average height of about 128 feet, with a gated overfall spillway and a 45,200-kilowatt power installation. Ibtal reservoir storage capacity is 1,674,000 acre-feet (774,000 for flood control, 25,000 for sediment reserve and 875,000 multipurpose storage for power and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $75,715,300. Estimated cost of the project, including $3,758,000 for downstream channel work and $502,057 for supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $79,975,357 (1988). Construction was initiated in October 1963, and the project was placed in operation in December 1969. Power operation problems were encountered with the initial operation in March 1973 because the downstream channel did not have the capacity which earlier observations and computations indicated. As a result, it has been necessary to restrict the power operation to about the 30,000 kilowatt level. Rightof- way for construction of a channel cutoff and bridge at Horseshoe Bend has been acquired, and construction has been completed. Sloughing easements downstream to Caplinger Mills have been acquired. Completion assured 27-8 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT downstream channel capacity to Caplinger Mills of 8,000 c.f.s. for powerplant operation. Discharge in this range will accommodate power operations at a 39,500-kilowatt level. Through September 1989, power generation totaled 991,699,800 kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from the sale of power by Southwestern Power Administration, $19,379,635 was allocated to the Corps of Engineers for project operating costs, interest, and investment recovery. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1989 was 6,933,586 visitor hours. The project is complete and in operational status. The net amount of power marketed with Southwestern Power Administration was 46,619,000 kilowatt-hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of installation of microwave communication system and ordinary operation and maintenance. General Investigations 28. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS Fiscal year 1989 costs totaled $1,041,744 for all General Investigations activities. See Table 27-K which covers Surveys, Collection and Study of Basic Data, and Preconstruction Engineering and Design. 27-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 27-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Mouth (Rulo, Nebr., to Mouth) (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 2. Blue River Channel Kansas City, MO 3. Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO 4. Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, KS 5. Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE 6. Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS 7. Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS 8. Little Blue River Channel Improvement, Little Blue River, MO 9. Little Blue River Lakes, Little Blue River, MO 1. FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 I Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 6,452,000 6,489,931 6,452,000 6,489,931 6,052,000 6,123,287 325,000 301,712 1,237,000 1,237,034 5,312,600 5,312,600 5,312,600 5,312,600 5,750,000 3,029,536 488,000 510,235 1,193,100 1,188,950 4,731,500 4,731,500 4,731,500 4,731,500 4,370,000 4,108,250 752,000 748,429 1,554,100 1,556,750 1,249,000 1,024,500 1,113,800 1,203,000 1,230,196 1,039,936 1,115,994 1,202,000 140,000 140,000 611,000 611,096 1,696,000 1,723,084 55,000 128,044 589,300 587,500 1,663,400 1,658,450 52,007 6,371,000 4,152,000 7,060,777 4,165,726 - 271,600 - 271,600 652,900 807,000 644,700 817,000 1,541,200 1,546,150 25,000 25,801 3,997,000 3,476,930 646,100 646,099 2,222,000 2,222,000 9,026 1,742,000 642,178 838,000 837,970 27-10 5,424,000 5,274,000 5,424,000 5,274,000 7,031,000 9,982,519 255,000 259,530 1,300,000 1,301,490 237,942,1901 237,942,1901 285,414,3142 285,264,3142 816,190 816,190 22,642 22,642 238,758,3801 238,758,3801 285,436,9562 285,286,956 34,951,171 34,915,2903 1,820,000 1,819,906 57,415,433 57,415,4334 11,530,500 11,530,490 47,111,926 47,111,9266 20,552,761 20,550,511 1,017,623 1,017,623 64,161,400 64,161,400 4,709,700 4,709,700 12,577,227 12,577,2276 19,404,610 19,404,610 25,530,083 25,530,083 140,750,200 139,090,5277 1,755,700 1,755,669 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 27-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 10. Long Branch Lake Little Chariton River, MO (Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) 11. Melvern Lake Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS 12. Milford Lake, Republican River, KS 13. Missouri River Levee System IA, NE, KS and MO 14. Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS 16. Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO 17. Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, KS 18. Rathbun Lake, Chariton River, IA 19. Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, MO Total Cost to Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sept. 30, 1989 New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 480,000 374,529 685,100 680,100 -5,803 224,016 474,197 598,545 1,046,000 1,213,200 1,046,062 1,213,200 1,273,000 1,557,400 1,273,091 1,555,900 583,000 2,129,000 583,031 742,202 1,533,000 1,576,795 1,453,000 1,454,098 1,058,000 1,058,022 1,609,500 1,627,595 -33,000 370,426 987,000 990,924 1,503,200 1,502,000 1,277,400 1,277,400 1,165,900 1,163,088 1,321,300 1,331,082 67,000 35,559 801,100 801,050 20,675 562,100 567,100 146,717 167,392 15,371 627,000 627,000 15,371 1,400,400 1,292,000 1,400,400 1,292,000 1,939,600 1,942,100 904,000 2,137,188 1,427,300 1,426,000 1,453,700 1,452,200 1,177,900 1,168,483 1,565,900 1,575,400 37,136 862,500 862,550 1,631,000 1,630,995 655,000 809,164 48,721 503,000 503,029 484,612 59,520 484,612 108,241 - 49,095,918 - 49,095,918 1,651,000 22,224,984 1,630,496 22,201,980 - 17,365,452 - 17,365,452 1,346,000 20,665,612 1,347,500 20,665,612 - 14,003,238 - 14,003,238 1,262,000 17,582,133 1,274,229 17,582,133 - 27,622,159 - 27,622,159 1,535,000 20,589,918 1,535,500 20,589,918 - 87,685,315 - 87,685,315 1,246,000 8,006,600 1,246,000 8,006,600 27-11 18,286,177 18,215,319 4,827,700 4,827,700 1,119,3318 1,004,324 19,405,5089 19,219,643 37,436,530 37,436,530 15,262,360 15,262,360 49,566,492 49,566,492 20,669,524 20,669,519 60,573,851 60,573,802 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 27-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sept. 30, 1989 20. Tuttle Creek Lake New Work: Big Blue Approp. - - - - 80,584,079 River, KS Cost- - - 80,584,079 Maint. Approp. 1,375,000 2,036,400 2,860,100 1,666,000 22,301,279 Cost 1,376,718 2,022,437 2,867,463 1,672,600 22,304,279 21. Wilson Lake, New Work: Saline River, Approp. - - - - 20,463,367 KS Cost - - - 20,463,367 Maint. Approp. 1,458,000 1,671,900 974,900 1,234,000 15,705,846 Cost 1,239,997 1,889,950 974,900 1,209,540 15,681,386 22. Scheduling Flood Maint. Control Reservoir Approp. 195,160 164,000 177,000 180,000 54,535,483 Operations Cost 195,160 164,000 177,000 180,000 54,535,483 23. Inspection of Maint. Completed Flood Approp. 350,340 287,400 366,000 338,000 4,984,815 Control Projects Cost 350,490 287,400 366,000 338,000 4,984,815 24. Disaster Prepared- Maint. ness Program- Approp. 138,000 39,000 132,000 200,2501� 830,250 Inspections Cost 138,546 39,000 132,000 200,241 830,241 26. Harry S. Truman New Work: Dam & Reservoir Approp. 3,093,000 3,507,000 4,868,000 2,660,000 535,617,900 Osage River, MO Cost 3,563,417 3,412,650 4,244,971 2,359,661 534,555,484 Maint. Approp. 5,136,000 6,444,100 6,997,600 6,012,500 45,307,400 Cost 5,133,990 6,438,198 6,993,112 6,026,000 45,307,400 27. Stockton Lake, New Work: Sac River, MO Approp. 73,000 201,000 43,000 - 79,975,357 Cost 451,361 220,675 37,772 9,756 79,968,442 Maint. Approp. 1,830,000 2,217,200 2,394,500 2,777,500 28,557,500 Cost 1,839,804 2,220,270 2,394,560 2,775,794 28,555,794 1. Includes $8,665,594 costs of new work for previous _ 6. Excludes cost of materials furnished without charge project. 2. Includes $738,109 for maintenance of previous project. 3. Excludes $35,296 non-Federal contribution not required for authorized project (Blue River Channel Mobay Chemical 1984-1987). 4. Excludes $118,805 non-Federal contribution not required for authorized project (1973-1979). 5. Excludes cost of materials furnished without charge in the amount of $24,198. in the amount of $7,885. 7. Excludes $2,727,401 thru FY 1989 non-Federal contributions not required for authorized project. 8. Correct total is $1,095,596, which includes $43,074 interest during construction. Correction pending. 9. Correct amount is $19,381,773. 10. After FY 1988 inspections of non-Federal levees previously funded under O&M are funded under FC&CE, 96X3125 (910-140) Disaster Preparedness Program- Inspections which had a carryover into FY 1989 of $250. 27-12 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 27-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 12, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 31, 1970 Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Sep. 3, 1954 Jun. 28, 1938 MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA, TO MOUTH (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) Project adopted for securing a permanent navigable channel of 6-foot depth from Kansas City, MO to mouth. Fixed upstream limit of improvement at upper end of Quindaro Bend (374.8 miles from mouth) and provided for dredging. For a mimimum width of 200 feet and depth of 6 feet, with a reasonable additional width around bends, mouth to upper end of Quindaro Bend, Kansas City, MO. Appropriation of $12 million authorized for securing a 6-foot channel depth between Kansas City, MO, Quindaro bend, and Sioux City, IA. Appropriation of $15 million additional authorized; additional allotments totaling $29,153,108 were made by Public Works Administration under provisions of National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933, and $9,669,791 allotted under provisions of Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935. Completion of improvement from mouth to Sioux City, IA.. Securing a navigable channel of 9-foot depth and a minimum width of 300 feet. BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO Adopted plan for Blue River Basin and authorized $40,000,000 for initiation and partial accomplishment. BRUSH CREEK, KANSAS CITY, MO Project for flood control on Brush Creek, a tributary of the Blue River, Kansas City, MO, authorized at estimated total cost of $16,100,000. CLINTON LAKE, WAKARUSA RIVER, KS The project for the Kansas River, KS, NE, and CO is authorized at an estimated cost of $88,070,000. HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, NE Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure HILLSDALE LAKE, BIG BULL CREEK, KS The comprehensive plan for the Missouri River Basin, approved by the Act of June 28, 1938, and as amended and supplemented is further modified to include the project for flood protection on the Kansas River and tributaries. It is further modified to include the project for flood protection on the Osage River and tributaries. KANOPOLIS LAKE, SMOKY HILL RIVER, KS Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. H. Doc. 1287, 61st Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 241-62. H. Doc. 463, 64th Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 585-68. H. Doc. 1120, 60th Cong., P.L. 560-70. P.L. 67-73 H.R.11781 P.L. 520-71 H. Doc. 238, 73d Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 409-73 H. Doc. 214, 76th Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 14-79. H. Doc. 91-332, 91st Cong. Sec. 401, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662 1962 Flood Control Act S Doc 122, H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., P.L. 87-874. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., P.L. 761. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; P.L. 77-228. H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. P.L. 780, 83rd Cong., H. Doc. 549, 81st Cong. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., P.L. 761. 27-13 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 27-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 8. 9. Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 27, 1965 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Sep. 3, 1954 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. LITTLE BLUE RIVER CHANNEL Additional $38,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO Additional $38,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. LONG BRANCH LAKE, LITTLE CHARITON RIVER, MO The project for flood protection on the Chariton and Little Chariton Rivers and tributaries, IA and MO, is authorized at an estimated cost of $9,167,000. MELVERN LAKE, MARAIS DES CYGNES (OSAGE) RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. MILFORD LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IA, NE, KS, AND MO Levees along both sides of river from Sioux City to Kansas City. Extended project from Kansas City to the mouth and provided for increased protection. PERRY LAKE, DELAWARE RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (KANSAS CITY DIST.) Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure Additional expenditure of $150 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional expenditure of $250 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. 27-14 H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; P.L. 77-228. H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. P.L. 90-483 (H. Doc. 169, 90th Cong. P.L. 90-483 (H. Doc. 169, 90th Cong. 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298, (H. Doc. 238, 89th Cong. H. Docs. 642, 5491, and 561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 H. Doc. 5491 83rd Cong., P.L. 780 H. Doc. 821, 76th Cong. H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. H. Docs. 642, 5491 and 561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; P.L. 77-228 H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 27-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Sep. 3, 1954 May 2, 1956 Jul 3, 1958 Jul 14, 1960 Dec 30, 1963 Jun. 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug. 13, 1968 Dec 24, 1970 Dec. 23, 1971 Mar. 7, 1974 Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure Modified general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin by deletion of construction of Red Willow Dam and Reservoir, NE, and addition of construction of Wilson Dam and Reservoir KS. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Additional expenditure of $207 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional expenditure of $80 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and modified plan to include bank protection or rectification works below Garrison Dam. Additional $116 million for prosecution on general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional $20 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional $38,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Change comprehensive plan name to Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin program. Additional $101,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Additional $72,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. POMME DE TERRE LAKE, POMME DE TERRE RIVER, MO Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,000,000 additional expenditure. POMONA LAKE, ONE HUNDRED TEN MILE CREEK, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. RATHBUN LAKE, CHARITON RIVER, IA Expanded general comprehenssive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. SMITHVILLE LAKE, LITTLE PLATTE RIVER, MO The project for flood protection on the Platte River and tributaries, MO and IA, is authorized at an estimated cost of $26,889,000. H. Docs. 642 and 5491, 83rd Cong. H. Doc. 409, 84th Cong. S. Doc. 91-1100, 91st Cong. S. Doc. 92-222, 92nd Cong. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., P.L. 761. H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. H. Docs. 642, 5491 and 561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. H. Doc. 5491', 561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. H. Doc. 561, 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 262, 89th Cong.) 27-15 16. 17. 18. 19. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 27-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, BIG BLUE RIVER, KS 20. Jun. 28, 1938 Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri Flood Control Committee River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiatiion Doc. 1, 75th Cong., and partial accomplishment. P.L. 761. Aug. 18, 1941 Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, P.L. 77-228. NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Dec. 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. River Basin and authorized $200 million additional 191 & 247, 78th Cong., expenditure. P.L. 534. WILSON LAKE, SALINE RIVER, KS 21. Dec. 22, 1944 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. River Basin and authorized $200 million additional 191 & 247, 78th Cong., expenditure P.L. 534. Jul. 14, 19602 Additional expenditure of $207 million for prosecution S. Doc. 96, 86th Cong., of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River P.L. 645. Basin. HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OSAGE RIVER, MO 26. Sep. 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri H. Doc. 5491, 83rd Cong., River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional P.L. 780. expenditure. Oct. 23, 1962 The Kaysinger Bluff Reservoir is hereby modified in 1962 Flood Control Act, accordance with recommendations of the Chief of H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., Engineers in H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., at an P.L. 87-874. estimated additional cost of $43,245,000; provided, that nothing in this Act shall be construed as authorizing the acquisition of additional lands for the establishment of a national wildlife refuge at the reservoir. STOCKTON LAKE, SAC RIVER, MO 27. Sep. 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri H. Doc. 5491, 83rd Cong., River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional P.L. 780. expenditure 1. Contains latest published maps of Missouri River. 2. Report of Chief of Engineers on justification of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, submitted in compliance with Public Law 505, 84th Congress, published as Senate Document 96, 86th Congress, was approved July 14, 1960 (Public Law 645). TABLE 27-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Fort Leavenworth Bridge removal Complete 1965 270,393 - Gasconade River, MO 1, 2 Complete 1931 139,003 85,077 Osage River, MO, lock and dam3 Complete 1952 658,076 850,495 1. Improvement adequate for existing needs. Project for maintenance only. 2. Curtailment of project in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 3. Operation of lock and dam placed in standby status. 27-16 KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT TABLE 27-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Abilene, KS Completed 1965 1,099,350 - Atchison, KS Completed 1973 4,099,590 - Barnard, KS' Completed - 127,860 - Bartley, NE Completed 1953 118,269 - Bedford, East Fork, 102 River, IA' Completed 1974 652,414 - Big Blue River, Seward, NE' Completed - 126,887 - Big Stranger Creek, KS' Completed - 337,131 - Braymer Lake, Shoal Creek, MO Inactive 1966 - - Brookfield Lake, Yellow Creek, MO Inactive 1976 451,400 - Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO (1965 Act)2 1977 692,706 - Chariton River, MO (1944 Act) Completed 1973 8,052,990 - Dry Fork and East Fork Lakes, Fishing River, MO Deferred 1974 51,989 - East Muddy Creek, MO Inactive 1966 - - Elk Creek, Clyde, KS' Completed 1984 989,015 - Fairbury, Little Blue River, NE Completed 1973 726,966 - Fort Scott Lake, Marmaton River, KS Active 1976 757,500 - Frankfort, Black Vermillion River, KS Completed 1966 1,271,025 - Gypsum, Gypsum Creek, KS' Completed 1984 2,782,793 - Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, MO (Downstream Fish and Wildlife Mitigation) Inactive - - - Indianola, NE Completed 1950 67,275 - Kansas City, Kansas River, KS (62 Mod) Completed 1984 25,010,500 - Kansas Citys on MO and KS Rivers, MO and KS3 1980 42,434,197 - Lawrence, Kansas River, KS4 Completed 1985 8,773,488 - Lower Grand River, MO Inactive 1966 - - Manhattan, Kansas River, KS Completed 1967 2,488,585 - Melvern Lake and Pomona Lake (Road Improvements) KS (1974 Act) Inactive - - - Mercer Lake, Weldon River, MO Inactive 1976 432,245 - Missouri River at New Haven, MO (Sec 212, 1950 Act) Completed - 139,883 - Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Mitigation Active - - - Osawatomie, Pottawatomie Creek, KS Completed 1973 2,036,624 - Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS Completed 1966 4,462,661 - Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO Inactive 1976 - - Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO (Advance Highway Relocation) Inactive 1976 393,623 Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO (Advance Town Relocation) Inactive 1976 91,929 - Perry Lake Area (Road Improvements), KS Completed 1982 5,315,168 - Platte River, MO, Channel Improvement Deferred 1973 222,193 - Rathbun Lake Fish Hatchery Completed 1975 700,000 - Salina, Smoky Hill River, KS Completed 1967 3,878,668 - Seward, NE' Completed - 126,887 - Smithville Channel, Little Platte River, MO Deferred 1973 6,896 - Smithville Lake, Trimble Wildlife Area Active - - - Stonehouse Creek, Jefferson Co., KS' Completed 1972 246,995 - Topeka, Kansas River, KS Completed 1974 21,174,593 - Trenton Lake, Thompson River, MO Inactive 1966 - - Tuttle Creek Lake, KS Road and Bridge (1976 Act) Inactive - - - Upper Grand River, MO Inactive 1966 - - 1. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers under Section 205, 3. Includes $619,787 non-Federal contributions for work Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended, desired by local interests, but not required under the project. 2. Little Chariton River (East and Middle Fork) and The project as a whole is complete except for Turkey Creek Mussell Fork classified inactive. Construction cost includes facilities in Central Industrial District Unit. $481,106 cost of completed Shoal Creek Unit and $211,600 cost 4. Includes $153,377 non-Federal contributions. for inactive units, Little Chariton River and Mussell Fork. 27-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 27-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Project Arlington Lake, MO For Last Full Report See Annual Re] Beatrice, Big Blue River, NE Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, KS Grove Lake, Soldier Creek, KS Hackleman Corners Lake, Cedar Creek, MO Hays, Big Creek, KS 1 Indian Lake, Blue River, KS Kansas River Navigation Marysville, KS Merriam, Turkey Creek, KS Mill Lake, Blue River, MO Missouri River Levee System, KS, Units R402; R393-395; and R414 Onaga Lake, Vermillion Creek, Pioneer Lake, KS Richland Lake, MO Tomahawk Lake, Blue River, KS Tuttle Creek Lake, KS (Road Improvement- 1974 Mod.) Wolf-Coffee Lake, Blue River, KS Contributed Funds Expended -T Date Deauthorized Aug. 5, 1977 port For Date and Authority 1948 Flood Control Act approved June 28, 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act approved August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 22, 1944 1965 Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 1973 Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 1977 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 122, 87th Cong. 2d sess.) - Authorized by Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 1974 Flood Control Act of 1965 approved October 27, 1965 1976 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 91st Cong., 2d sess.) 1980 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298, Sec. 201 - Flood Control Act of September 3, 1954 1970 Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 1971 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 91st Cong., 2d sess.) - Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, P.L. 228, 77th Cong. 1982 Flood Control Act of 1962, October 23, 1962 (P.L. 87-874) 1952 Flood Control Act approved June 28, 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 22, 1944 1948 Flood Control Act approved June 28, 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act approved August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Conotrol Act approved December 2, 1944 1976 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 91st Cong., 2d sess.) 1977 Sec. 18 of Water Resources Development Act of 1974 1976 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 91st Cong., 2d sess.) 1. A study of water supply and flood problems at Hays, KS, is being studied under Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. 27-18 I Federal Funds Expended $8,651 16,317 71,466 1,754,019 499,200 127,297 259,900 133,682 39,708 57,500 2,178,261 95,692 8,548 77,189 3,000 1,095,020 - May 6, 1981 - Nov. 17, 1986 - Nov. 17, 1986 - Aug. 5, 1977 - Jan. 18, 1978 - Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 - Jan. 1967 - Nov. 27, 1973 Nov. 17, 1986 - Nov. 17, 1986 - Nov. 17, 1986 - Aug. 5, 1977 Aug. 5, 1977 - Nov. 17, 1986 - Nov. 17, 1986 - Nov. 17, 1986 TABLE 27-H KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM (See Section 13 of Text) Unit R 512-513 Richardson Co. D. D. #7 R 500 Iowa Point D. D. #4 Kimsey Holly Creek L 497 Forest City L. D. L488 Holt Co. D. D. #7 R 482 Burr Oak D. D. #3 L 476 Amazonia L. D. R 460-471 Elwood-Gladden L. D. L 455 S. St. Joseph L. D. L 443-448 Halls L. D. R 440 Atchison & Doniphan Co. D. D. L 408 Farley-Beverly D. D. L 400 Waldron L. D. L 385 Riverside-Quindaro D. D. R 351 Atherton L. D. L 330-345 Orrick L. D. L 319-325 Henrietta-Crooked River D. D. L 246 Brunswick-Dalton D. D. L 15 North County L. D. Remaining units Miles of Levee 19.1 4.1 4.4 16.0 11.5 8.2 10.8 13.8 15.6 17.3 10.7 12.2 7.6 6.5 15.9 43.4 35.0 20.0 40.0 Status Complete- 1958 Complete-1954 Complete-1970 Complete- 1962 Complete-1955 Complete- 1954 Complete- 1956 Complete- 1968 Complete- 1967 Complete-1957 Complete-1959 Complete (Levee raise modification)-1972 Complete-1957 Planning underway Complete- 1966 Inactive Inactive Complete- 1983 Inactive Detailed planning not initiated 27-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 27-I KANSAS CITY DISTRICT PROJECTS INCLUDED IN PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (See Section 15 of Text) Estimated Estimated Project Federal Non-Federal Cost Cost Abilene, Smoky Hill River, KS $ 1,099,350 $ 287,000 Bartley, Republican River, NE 118,269 9,500 Fort Scott Lake, Marmaton River, KS 90,500,000 44,800,000 Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, KS1 71,4662 Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE 48,129,549 - Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO 549,000,000 138,688,000 Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS 64,161,400 23,342,756 Indianola, Republican River, NE 67,275 7,592 Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS 12,577,227 - Lawrence, Kansas River, KS 8,620,111 2,130,000 Manhattan, Kansas River, KS 2,488,585 265,000 Melvern Lake, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS 37,436,530 Melvern Lake and Pomona Lake (Road Improvement), KS (1974 Authorization)8 500,000 214,300 Milford Lake, Republican River, KS 49,566,492 - Missouri River Levee System, Rulo to the Mouth4 76,485,000 13,160,000 Osawatomie, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS 2,036,624 348,300 Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS 4,462,661 876,000 Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS 49,095,918 - Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO 17,365,453 - Pomona Lake, Osage River Basin, KS 14,003,238 - Salina, Smoky Hill River, KS 3,878,668 1,960,000 Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO 79,975,357 17,458,000 Topeka, Kansas River, KS 21,174,593 10,383,492 Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, KS 80,584,079 - Tuttle Creek Lake, KS-Road and Bridge (1976 Act)8 630,000 610,000 Tuttle Creek Lake (Road Improvement), KS (1974 Modification) 1 500,000 214,300 Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS 20,463,367 - 1. Deauthorized by Water Resources Development Act of 4. Active portion of project. Deferred portion of project is 1986, P.L. 99-662. currently estimated to cost (1989) $46,753,000 Federal and 2. Total Federal funds expended. $4,336,000 non-Federal. Inactive portion of project is current- 3. Inactive. ly estimated to cost (1989) $347,146,000 Federal and $34,062,000 non-Federal. Actual cost of deauthorized units was $57,000 Federal. TABLE 27-J INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 23 of Text) Location Month Inspected Missouri River Main Stem Missouri River Levees: R 512-513, R 500, Kimsey Holly Creek, L 497, L 488, R 482, L 476, R 460-471, L 455, L 443-448, R 440, L 408, L 400 and R 351, L 246 Kansas Citys, Missouri and Kansas: Argentine, Armourdale, Birmingham, CID (Mo & Kans), East Bottoms, Fairfax-Jersey Creek, North Kansas City Units, and GSA Federal Complex Osage River, Kansas and Missouri Ottawa, Kansas Osawatomie, Kansas Kansas River and Minor Tributaries Topeka, Kansas; Auburndale, North Topeka, Oakland, Soldier Creek, South Topeka, and Waterworks Units Republican River. Nebraska and Kansas Bartley, Nebraska Smoky Hill. Saline, and Solomon Rivers Abilene, Kansas Mar/Sep 89 Mar/Sep 89 Apr 89/Oct 89 Apr 89/Oct 89 Apr 89/Oct 89 May/Oct 89 May 89/Oct 89 27-20 TABLE 27-K KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Section 28 of Text) Item and CWIS Number SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Blue River Basin, Overland Park, KS - 12562 Blue River Basin, Kansas City, MO - 12563 Grand River Basin, MO & IA - 12432 Kansas and Osage Rivers, KS - 12204 Osage River above Harry S. Truman Dam - 14063 Turkey Creek Basin, KS & MO - 12381 Subtotal Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations -17250 Interagency Water Res Dev - 14713 Subtotal Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Soil Conservation Service, Dept. Agric. (181) - 51840 Bureau of Reclamation, Dept. Interior (182) - 51820 Regional Planning (183) - 53847 Planning Assistance to States (186) - 14820 Subtotal TOTAL (Category 100) COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) - 82030/40 Hydrologic Studies (260) - 53820 TOTAL (Category 200) PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 600) Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO (650) - 12319 TOTAL (Category 600) GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS Federal Cost FY 89 27-21 Totals By Categories $21,727 149,036 166,929 6,500 986 90,633 $435,811 $90,000 4,998 $94,998 $ 9,000 17,000 5,000 35,416 $66,416 $597,225 $173,886 11,103 $184,989 $259,530 $259,530 $1,041,744 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 27-L FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 25 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Status' Cost Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended Hays, Lincoln Draw, KS F $35,129 Rossville, Cross Creek, KS F 52,077 Bedford, East Fork 102 River, IA F 13,637 DeWitt, Big Blue River & Turkey Creek, NE R 42,361 TOTAL FOR 4 ACTIVE PROJECTS: $143,204 4 Section 205 studies were terminated in FY 1989, total $61,121 TOTAL ALL PROJECTS $204,325 Emergency Streambank Protection - Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress July 24, 1946, as Amended Little Blue River, Clay County, NE, Weyenberg Bridge O $16,076 Little Blue River, Nuckolls County, NE, Bridge #4525 O 12,521 Chariton River, Schuyler County, MO, Eason Bridge O 12,700 West Fork Grand River, Ringgold County, IA, Parker Bridge O 29,846 West Fork Grand River, Ringgold County, IA, Redding Bridge O 43,967 Little Blue River, Washington County, KS, Spence Bridge P 16,285 Little Blue River, Washington County, KS, County Road P 18,942 Gregg Creek, Brown County, KS, Granada Bridge P 14,805 Middle Fork Wolf River, Brown County, KS, Avenue Road Bridge P 3,713 Tributary of Kill Creek, DeSoto, KS, Sewage Treatment Plant P 13,839 Little Blue River, Thayer County, NE, Gilead North Bridge P 5,781 Big Blue River, Blue Springs, NE, Sewerline and Road P 9,254 Thompson River, Union County, IA, H17 Bridge P 10,773 Middle Nodaway River, Adair County, IA, Bridge #56240 P 11,037 Marais des Cygnes River, Osawatomie, KS, Water Supply Facilities P 1,646 102 River, Nodaway County, MO, South Pickering Bridge P 7,885 Republican River, Clifton, KS, Sewage Lagoons P 11,479 TOTAL FOR 17 ACTIVE PROJECTS IN FY 89: $240,549 13 studies were terminated in FY 89, total $51,999 TOTAL ALL PROJECTS $292,548 Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting, and Rescue Work - Public Law 99 84th Congress and Antecedent Legislation Disaster Preparedness Program Corps Statutory Activities $161,548 Activities in Support of Others 33,999 Facilities 79,049 Inspections 200,241 Total Disaster Preparedness Program $474,837 Emergency Water Supply and Drought Assistance 46,314 TOTAL ALL ACTIVITIES $521,151 1. Status: R = Recon; F = Feasibility; P = P&S; C = Construction; O = Operational 27-22 LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS DISTRICT * The civil works portion of this District covers an area of approximately 36,414 square miles in northern, western, and southwestern Arkansas and a portion of Missouri within the Arkansas, Little, and White River Basins. The District's responsibilities include those areas embraced in the drainage basin of the Arkansas River and its tributaries above and exclusive of Pine Bluff, AR, and below the mouth of the Poteau River, near Fort Smith, AR. The District has responsibility for planning, design, construction and operation and maintenance of the navigation portion of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System in the State of Arkansas (including that portion below Pine Bluff). The District's responsibilities in the Little River Basin covers those portions of the drainage basin of the Arkansas portion of Little River and its tributaries above its mouth near Fulton, AR. The District's responsibilities in the White River Basin cover those portions in southern Missouri and northern and eastern Arkansas embraced in the White River drainage basin and its tributaries above Peach Orchard Bluff, AR. The Memphis District is responsible for navigation maintenance on the White River below Newport, AR, to the mouth of Wild Goose Bayou, in Arkansas County, AR. The White River downstream from the mouth of Wild Goose Bayou is part of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Eag 1. AR River Basin, AR, OK, & KS ....................... 28-2 2. Arthur V. Ormond Lock & Dam (No.9), AR ................ 28-2 3. Bank Stabilization & Channel Rectification, AR........... 28-2 4. David D. Terry Lock & Dam (No.6), AR ................... 28-3 5. James W. Trimble Lock & Dam (No.13) ................... ; 28-3 6. Lock No.2 & Wilbur D. Mills Dam (No.2), AR ............ 28-3 7. Lock & Dam No.3, AR ............................... 28-3 8. Lock & Dam No.4, AR ................................ 28-3 9. Lock & Dam No.5, AR ................................ 28-3 10. Maintenance & Repair Fleet & Marine Terminals, AR .................................. 28-3 11. Murray Lock & Dam (No.7), AR ...................... 28-4 12. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ............. 28-4 13. Norrell Lock & Dam (No.l) & Entrance Channel, AR ................................... 28-4 14. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................. 28-4 15. Toad Suck Lock & Dam (No.8), AR .................... 28-4 Flood Control 16. Black River, Wayne County, MO ...................... 28-4 17. Blue Mountain Lake, AR ............................. 28-4 18. Clearwater Lake, MO ................................. 28-5 19. DeQueen Lake, AR ................................... 28-5 20. Dierks Lake, AR .....................................- 28-5 21. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ................................. 28-5 22. Fourche Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR .................... 28-6 23. Gillham Lake, AR ..................................... 28-6 24. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................................. 28-6 25. Little Red River & Tributaries, Clinton, AR .................................... 28-6 26. Little River Basin, AR .................................. 28-6 27. Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR ............................. 28-7 28. Millwood Lake, AR .................................. 28-7 29. Nimrod Lake, AR .................................... 28-7 30. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................. 28-7 31. White River Basin (Little Rock District), AR & MO ........................... 28-7 32. White River, Batesville, AR ........................ . 28-8 33. White River, Newport, AR ........................... 28-8 34. White River, St. Paul, AR ............................. 28-8 Multiple Purpose Proects Including Power 35. Beaver Lake, AR ................................. 28-8 36. Bull Shoals Lake, AR .............................. 28-9 37. Dardanelle Lock & Dam (No.10), AR .................. 28-9 38. Greers Ferry Lake, AR .............................. 28-9 39. Norfork Lake, AR ............................ ..... 28-10 40. Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock & Dam (No.132), AR ........................................ 28-10 41. Table Rock Lake, MO ................................... 28-10 General Investigations 42. Surveys .......................................... 28-10 43. Collection and Study of Basic Data .................... 28-11 44. Continuation of Planning and Engineering ............. 28-11 45. Advance Engineering and Design ..................... 28-11 Iables Table 28-A Cost & Financial Statement .................... 28-12 Table 28-B Authorizing Legislation ....................... 28-16 Table 28-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...................................... 28-19 Table 28-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................................... 28-20 Table 28-G Deauthorized Projects ......................... 28-21 Table 28-H AR, OK,& KS: Navigation .................... 28-22 Table 28-I AR, OK, & KS: Lakes ......................... 28-26 Table 28-J Little River Basin, AR: Lakes.................. 28-27 Table 28-K White River Basin, AR & MO: Lakes ............ 28-28 28-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Navigation 1. ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, AR, OK, AND KS Location. Arkansas River rises in Rocky Mountains near Leadville, CO, and flows southeastward 1,396 miles through Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas to join Mississippi River 599 Miles above Head of Passes, LA. (See Geological Survey state maps, 1:24,000, and flood control and navigation maps of Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Gulf of Mexico, 1970 edition scale 1:62,500.) Previous projects. For details see page 1066, Annual Report for 1932, and pages 744, 864, and 881, Annual Report for 1943. Existing project. Provides for improvement of Arkansas River Basin by construction of coordinated developments for navigation, hydroelectric power, flood control, water supply, sediment control, recreation, and fish and wildlife propagation. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System provides a channel 9 feet deep and 444.8 miles long, beginning at mouth of White River, which enters Mississippi River 599 miles above Head of Passes, LA, thence 9.8 miles upstream to mouth of Wild Goose Bayou; thence 9.2 miles by a land cut, designated as Arkansas Post Canal to mile 42 (1943 survey) on Arkansas River; thence 376.0 miles along channel of latter stream to mouth of Verdigris River at navigation mile 395.0; thence 49.8 miles up Verdigris River to head of navigation at Catoosa, OK. The waterway is canalized throughout its length by 17 locks and dams with total lift of 420 feet. Dardanelle, Ozark-Jeta Taylor, Robert S. Kerr, and Webbers Falls are multiple-purpose projects including power. Lock chambers are 110 by 600 feet. A minimum channel width of 150 feet is provided for Verdigris River, 225 feet for San Bois Creek, 250 feet for Arkansas River, and 300 feet for Arkansas Post Canal and White River. Other coordinated developments consist of 15 lakes, of which 13 are in Tulsa District, Kansas and Oklahoma, and two in Little Rock District. Pertinent data and estimated Federal costs are summarized in Tables 28-H and 28-I, and Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Navigation Lakes. For authorization see Table 28-B, Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. For McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, local interests must provide adequate terminal and transfer facilities and bear increased cost of maintenance and operation of all altered rail and highway routes, including bridges and appurtenances, utilities, and other existing improvements, other than federally owned. For lakes see requirements for each individual lake. Terminal facilities. Public port facilities are in operation at Pine Bluff (Jefferson County), Little Rock, and Fort Smith, AR, and Muskogee and Catoosa (Tulsa-Rogers County), OK. Port authorities have been organized to develop public facilities at North Little Rock, Dardanelle-Russellville, Morrilton, Clarksville, Ozark and Van Buren, AR, and Sallisaw, OK. Terminal facilities are in operation or being built at 35 locations in Arkansas and at 25 locations in Oklahoma along the improved waterways. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. (See Tables 28-H and 28-I for navigation and lake listings.) For details of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System and lakes in Oklahoma and Kansas, see the Tulsa District report. Details of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System and lakes in Arkansas are shown on the following pages. Condition at end of fiscal year. See Tables 28-H and 28-I, Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Navigation/Lakes for status for individual items, navigation project, lakes, and basin plan. The overall project is 96 percent complete. Construction of the Holla Bend Closure (Arthur V. Ormond Lock and Dam) was completed in September 1987. Work continues on the Arkansas River project in this District including construction of meander cutoff levee between the Arkansas and White Rivers, land acquisition studies, continue detailed engineering studies to modify Wilbur D. Mills Dam No.2 to improve navigation at the Entrance Channel, and raise the existing North Little Rock floodwall and levee. Planning and engineering studies continue on the low-stage problem on the White River at Montgomery Point. 2. ARTHUR V. ORMOND LOCK & DAM (NO. 9), AR Location, existing project, local coopertion, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Non-Federal hydropower is being developed at the project under the authority provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in July 1969. Construction of Holla Bend closure structure (fish and wildlife mitigation) began in July 1986. Holla Bend Closure was completed in September 1987. 3. BANK STABILIZATION & CHANNEL RECTIFICATION, AR Location. Several bank stabilization and channel rectification projects are laid out in various reaches extending from fixed point to fixed point on Arkansas River from 33.7 to 362 miles above mouth and across the Arkansas-White cutoff, a 4- to 5-mile natural channel joining Arkansas and White Rivers about 18 and 12 miles above their respective mouths. 28-2 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT Existing project. Bank stabilization and channel rectification is a part of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. For a complete description of reach and location of each bank stabilization and channel rectification project, see the Annual Report FY 81. Total Federal cost to date is $119,300,184 for existing project in Little Rock District. For authorization see Table 28-B, Authorizing Legislation. 4. DAVID D. TERRY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 6), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in January 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in August 1968. 5. JAMES W. TRIMBLE LOCK AND DAM (NO. 13), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Construction of a non-Federal hydropower facility has been completed at the project under the authority provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in October 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in April 1969. Bridge across dam was completed in July 1968. 6. LOCK NO.2 AND WILBUR D. MILLS DAM (NO.2), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963. Lock was placed in operation in March 1968. Emergency repairs to the scour protection features and tainter gates at the dam that resulted from the barge accident in December 1982 were completed in FY 85. The barges that clogged the dam gates during the December 1982 flood revealed that, with a certain set of circumstances (higher than normal head combined with the clogged gates resulted in high, current velocity that caused both upstream and downstream scouring), the structure could fail. This condition exists primarily because the structure was constructed on piling and designed for all of the gates to operate in unison. A model study by the Waterways Experiment Station determined the most feasible solution to this problem is to extend the stilling basin downstream. Plans and specifications for extending the stilling basin are currently being prepared, with a construction start planned for the summer of 1990 contingent upon approval and funding. 7. LOCK AND DAM NO. 3, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963 and lock and dam were placed in operation in December 1968. 8. LOCK AND DAM NO. 4, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1964 and lock and dam was placed in operation in December 1968. The Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department (ASHTD) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) have jointly requested that the Corps of Engineers design and construct a highway bridge crossing Lock and Dam No. 4 on the Arkansas River near Pine Bluff, AR with 100 percent funding by ASHTD and FHWA. Design will be by A-E contract. Negotiations for an A-E design contract were initiated in 15 June 1989. 9. LOCK AND DAM NO. 5, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operation and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1964 and lock and dam was placed in operation in December 1968. 10. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FLEET AND MARINE TERMINALS, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of Pine Bluff Marine Terminal began March 1968 and it was placed in operation in April 1969. Construction of Dardanelle Marine 28-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Terminal began June 1968 and it was placed in operation in November 1969. Location, existing project, local cooperation and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1964 and lock and dam was placed in operation in December 1968. 11. MURRAY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 7), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Excavation of the high rock in Pool 7 was completed 19 January 1989. Recreation facilities are complete except for cost sharing items under the 710 program. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1964 and lock and dam was placed in operation in October 1969. Construction of a non-Federal hydropower facility was completed at the project under the authority provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 12. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Preauthorization studies under the small project continuing authorities program, navigation activities, Section 107, Public Law 86-6456, as amended. No activity during this fiscal year. 13. NORRELL LOCK AND DAM (NO.1) AND ENTRANCE CHANNEL, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Recommended modification. The Waterways Experiment Station (WES), Vicksburg, MS, is conducting a test model of an additional lock and dam in the White River Entrance Channel. This alternative is being tested to relieve restrictions on the navigation system during low flows. WES has determined that the other alternatives tested would not solve the low-flow problem. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963 and lock and dam was placed in operation in June 1967. 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 28-C, Other Authorized Navigation Projects. 15. TOAD SUCK FERRY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 8), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in July 1965 and lock and dam was placed in operation in November 1969. Conway water supply project was completed and transferred to that city for operation and maintenance in July 1983. Flood Control 16. BLACK RIVER, WAYNE COUNTY, MO Location. On Black River at Missouri Highway HH Wayne Couty, Missouri. Highway HH is a major access route to Clearwater project and to Piedmont, located approximately 4 miles to the northeast. Existing project. The Definite Project Report, recommending a plan of improvement under Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended, was approved in February 1988. The plan of improvement recommended construction of approximately 750 feet of quarry-run revetment. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Construction was completed. 17. BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR Location. See Table 28-1, Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS: Lakes. Existing project. Estimated cost is $5,069,974. For further information see pages 906 and 907 of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 28-B. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Estimated monetary benefits at end of fiscal year attributed to Blue Mountain Lake for prevention of flood damages were $1,011,000 for a total of $20,481,000 through September 30, 1989. 28-4 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for additional recreation sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in May 1940, and was placed in operation in March 1947. In FY 89, the Corps carried out a fall-andwinter drawdown, recommended by the AR Game and Fish Commission (AGFC), on Blue Mountain Lake. The purpose was fishery management, with water quality improvement a secondary purpose. As the water level decresed, the AGFC seeded the exposed bottom with a sorghum-sudan combination which effectively cleared up the water column. 18. CLEARWATER LAKE, MO Location. See Table 28-K. White River Basin, AR & MO. Existing project. Estimated cost is $11,395,000. For further information see pages 897 and 898 of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 28-B, Authorizing Legislation. Project modification. A contract was awarded in July 1987 to construct a seepage berm on the upstream face of the dam, a grout curtain on the right abutment, and a parapet wall along the dam. An additional 9 acres of land has been acquired to widen the spillway from 190 feet to 370 feet. The parapet wall and the widened spillway will pass about 90 percent of the probable maximum flood. The estimated project cost is $11,000,000. Construction was essentially completed in September 1989. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Flood damages prevented during FY 89 are estimated at $1,780,000; total cumulative damages prevented through September 1989 are estimated at $77,793,000. Releases made from lake during low-water periods were sufficient to supply municipal water for Poplar Bluff and other usages. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement existing sanitary recreational facilities. Construction of project began in June 1940 and was ready for beneficial use in March 1948. 19. DEQUEEN LAKE, AR Location. On Rolling Fork River, river mile 22.8, a tributary of Little River, in Sevier County, about 4 miles northwest of DeQueen, AR. (See Geological Survey map for Chapel Hill, AR, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. An earthfill dam, 2,360 feet long, constructed to 160 feet above streambed. An uncontrolled spillway, 200 feet wide, is about 1,400 feet east of main embankment. Outlet works consist of a gated conduit, 12 feet in diameter. The lake controls 169 square miles of drainage area and provides a total storage of 136,100 acre-feet (101,200 for flood control storage and 34,900 for conservation and sedimentation reserve). Federal cost of project is $19,623,752. (See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to DeQueen Lake for prevention of flood damages were $212,000 for a total of $4,952,000 through September 30, 1989. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began April 1966 and project placed in useful operation in August, 1977. 20. DIERKS LAKE, AR Location. On Saline River, river mile 56.6, a tributary of Little River, about 5 miles northwest of Dierks, Howard County, AR. (See Geological Survey map for Dierks Dam, AR, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. An earthfill dam, 2,760 feet long, about 153 feet above streambed. An uncontrolled spillway 800 feet wide is in a saddle at west end of dam. Outlet works consisting of a gated 6- by 9-foot oblong conduit, one 24-inch low-flow pipe, and one 30-inch water supply pipe are provided. The lake controls a drainage area of 114 square miles and provides for storage of 67,100 acre-feet for flood control and 29,700 acre-feet for water supply, conservation, and sedimentation reserve, a total of 96,800 acre-feet. Federal cost of project is $16,002,781. (See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 89 are estimated at $405,000; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $3,252,000. During the year, 254 acre-feet of water supply storage were withdrawn by Tri-Lakes Water District. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1968. The embankment closure was made on May 8, 1975 and the project placed in useful operation. 21. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (1) Emergency bank protection, Section 14, Public Law 79-526. Fiscal year costs were: Black River Highway HH, Wayne County, MO, $38,079; White River, Newport, AR, $93,930. 28-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 (2) Flood control activities, Section 205, Public Law 80-858. Fiscal year costs were $258,044 (for more information, see Table 28-L). (3) Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control, Section 208, Public Law 73-780. Fiscal year costs were $1,106, White River, St. Paul, AR, project. 22. FOURCHE BAYOU BASIN, LITTLE ROCK, AR Location. On Fourche, Rock and Grassy Flat Creeks in vicinity of Little Rock, Pulaski County, AR. Existing project. The flood damage reduction channel project consists of widening, clearing and snagging with alteration of highway and railroad bridges. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). The estimated project cost is $29,000,000; $19,100,000 Federal, $9,900,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. The city of Little Rock, the project sponsor, signed the local cooperation agreement on August 20, 1987. Operations during the fiscal year. Funds were provided to prepare plans and specifications for future contracts and continue construction. The first channel construction contract was completed. The second channel construction contract was awarded April 16, 1989. Sponsor has continued relocations and acquisition of real estate. 23. GILLHAM LAKE, AR Location. Damsite is on Cossatot River, river mile 49.0, in Howard County, about 5 miles northeast of Gillham, Sevier County, AR. (See Geological Survey quadrangle map for Gillham Dam, AR, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement see Page 19-12 of Annual Report for 1977 (Tulsa District). Federal cost of project is $17,826,703. (See Table 28-H for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Tri-Lakes Water District furnished a resolution of intent to repay costs allocated to water supply storage. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 89 are estimated at $838,000; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $5,908,000. During the year, 627 acre-feet of water supply storage were withdrawn by Tri-Lakes Water District. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1968. The embankment closure was made on May 8, 1975 and the project placed in useful operation. 24. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Approved regulations for operation and maintenance of flood control works, Part 208 of Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, provide for periodic inspection of completed projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Inspections of local flood protection projects were made to determine extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation of these projects. Responsible officials of improvement districts concerned were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation of local flood protection works under their jurisdiction where appropriate. Costs for fiscal year were $81,247. Total cost through September 30, 1989, are $1,258,398. 25. LITTLE RED RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CLINTON, AR Location. In Clinton, Van Buren County, AR, along the tributaries of the Little Red River. The city lies between the tributaries of Archey Fork and South Fork and is bisected by Town Branch. Existing project. The flood damage reduction project consists of 100-foot bottom-width channel for 1.35 miles on Archey Fork Creek and a 300-foot bottom-width channel for 1.99 miles on South Fork, Little Red River. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during the fiscal year. Mitigation measures to compensate for damages to the walleye pike fishery are being coordinated with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project began in 1985 and was transferred to the city of Clinton in August 1986 for operation and maintenance. An O&M manual was furnished the city of Clinton. 26. LITTLE RIVER BASIN, AR Location. Improvements are on Little River and tributaries, Arkansas. More definite location of individual items is shown in Table 28-J, Little River Basin. Existing project. Part of a six-lake system for flood control and other purposes in the Little River Basin. The system consists of four lakes in Arkansas: Millwood on the main stem, Dierks on the Saline River, DeQueen on the Rolling Fork River, and Gillham on the Cossatot River, and two lakes in Oklahoma: Broken Bow on the Mountain Fork River and Pine Creek on the Little River. Under a District boundary change, effective in October 1980, the four projects in this system in Arkansas were reassigned from the Tulsa District to the Little Rock District. 28-6 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Tri-Lakes Water District (DeQueen, Gillham, and Dierks) furnished a resolution of intent to repay costs allocated to water supply storage. The Southwwest Arkansas Water District is currently repaying costs allocated to water supply storage at Millwood Lake. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of projects continued. See individual projects for details. Condition at end of fiscal year. Millwood, DeQueen, Gillham, and Dierks Lakes are complete and in operation. 27. MILL CREEK, FORT SMITH, AR Location. In southwest Fort Smith, Sebastian County, AR. Existing project. The detailed project report was approved December 5, 1975. The plan involves improvements on 3.9 miles of the Mill Creek channel and modifications on three bridges. The estimated project cost is $6,177,000: $3,617,000, Federal; $2,560,000, non-Federal. The study, which began under the General Investigations Program, was changed to the Continuing Authority Program due to the size of the project. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations during the fiscal year. Plans and specifications are complete except for the utilities under and through the project's structure. 28. MILLWOOD LAKE, AR Location. On Little River, river mile 16.0, approximately 7 miles east of Ashdown, Little River County, AR, and about 2 miles northeast of Millwood, Little River County, AR. (See Geological Survey quadrangle map for Red Bluff, AR, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1969 (Tulsa District). Federal cost of project is $46,100,082. (See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A total of 54,187 acre-feet of water was released from the lake for water supply to Southwest Arkansas Water District. Estimated monetary benefits attributed to Millwood Lake for prevention of flood damages for the fiscal year were $574,000, for a total of $7,270,000 through September 30, 1989. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in September 1961 and the project was placed in full-flood control operation in August 1966. Work required to complete project consists of additional recreational facilities under the cost sharing program. 29. NIMROD LAKE, AR Location. See Table 28-I, Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS: Lakes. Existing project. Estimated cost is $4,005,627. For further information see pages 908 and 909 of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 28-B. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities continued. Flooding was prevented on an average of 1,978 acres of improved land during fiscal year. Estimated monetary benefits at end of fiscal year attributed to Nimrod Lake for prevention of flood damages were $701,000, for a total of $12,726,000 through September 1989. Eighty-seven acre-feet of water were withdrawn by the city of Plainview, AR. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing sanitary recreation facilities. Construction of project began in January 1940 and was ready for beneficial use in January 1942. 30. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 28-E, Other Authorized Flood Control Projects. 31. WHITE RIVER BASIN (LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT), AR&MO Location. Improvements are on White River and tributaries, Arkansas and Missouri. More definite location of individual items is shown in Table 28-K, White River Basin. Existing project. A general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in White River Basin. Plan includes seven lakes, of which two are flood-control only projects and five are multiple-purpose projects. Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, Clearwater, Greers Ferry and Bell Foley lakes were selected and approved for construction by Chief of Engineers, and individual reports on six of these seven lakes are presented on subsequent pages. Bell Foley lake project was reclassified to inactive in June 1977; reviewed for the purpose of deauthorization and placed in a 28-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 deferred status in May 1985; funded for update of economic data in FY 89. Lakes in plan are listed in Table 28-K, White River Basin. For authorization see Table 28-B. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies to Beaver, Greers Ferry, and Norfork. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of projects continued. Estimated monetary flood control benefits attributed to Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, Greers Ferry, and Clearwater lakes for FY 89 totaled $8,258,000. A cumulative total of flood damages prevented by the lakes through September 30, 1989, is estimated at $297,418,000. Electric energy delivered to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing during the fiscal year totaled 1,802,532,500 kilowatt-hours. Water releases for fish hatcheries were: 28,960 acre-feet from Norfork Lake for Fish and Wildlife Service trout hatchery, 14,480 acre-feet from Table Rock Lake for Missouri Conservation Commission trout hatchery, and 14,480 acre-feet from Greers Ferry Lake for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service trout hatchery. Withdrawals for water supply purposes were: Beaver Water District, 34,084 acre-feet from Beaver Lake; Water and Sewer Improvement District No. 3 of Mountain Home, AR, 2,624 acre-feet from Norfork Lake; the Community Water System, Cleburne County, AR, and the city of Clinton, AR, 6,870 acre-feet from Greers Ferry Lake. Condition at end of fiscal year. Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, Clearwater, and Greers Ferry lakes are complete and in operation. Progress on these lakes is in individual reports. Bell Foley lake project has been placed in a deferred status. Water Valley and Lone Rock lakes have been deauthorized. 32. WHITE RIVER, BATESVILLE, AR Location. On White River, within the city of Batesville, Independence County, AR. Existing project. The Definite Project Report, recommending construction of a levee and floodwall to protect the industrial area, under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended, was approved June 30, 1988. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations during the fiscal year. Funds were used for plans and specifications, coordination with the local sponsor on real estate acquisition and the local cooperation agreement. 33. WHITE RIVER, NEWPORT, AR Location. On White River, approximately 200 feet downstream of the Highway 367 bridge. Newport, Jackson County, AR. Existing project. Approximately 362 feet of emergency bank protection work along the White River bank was constructed to protect a Federally constructed concrete floodwall. Total project cost was $140,200: Federal, $105,100; non-Federal, $35,100. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 30, 1988. The local cooperation agreement was signed by the local sponsor and the city of Newport on October 1, 1988. Operations during the fiscal year. Initial construction began in November 1988; however, work was delayed due to high water. A slope failure occurred in December 1988 which required a revised plan. The contractor resumed work in January 1989. Construction of the project was considered complete and acceptable by the local sponsor in May 1989. 34. WHITE RIVER, ST. PAUL, AR Location. Along the right bank of the White River, St. Paul, Madison County, AR. Existing project. A plan of improvement, under Sec 208 of the 1954 Flood control Act, as amended, was approved in February 1988, to snag and clear 2,800 feet by 30 feet along the White River bank. Construction of the project, approved in August 1988, was delayed until the city could acquire the necessary land. Total cost of the project is estimated at $31,800: $22,700, Federal; $7,600, non-Federal. Location cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. The local cooperation agreement was signed by the local sponsor, the city of St. Paul, AR, on August 24, 1989. Operations during the fiscal year. The local cooperation agreement was negotiated and the city acquired the necessary lands. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 35. BEAVER LAKE, AR Location. See Table 28-K. White River Basin. Existing project. Estimated cost is $50,797,000. For further information see pages 788 and 789 of 1966 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 28-B. Local Cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. 28-8 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 89 are estimated at $498,000; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $21,401,000. During the year, 159,942,500 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Water supply storage withdrawn during the year was 34,084 acre-feet. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for modifications to existing recreation and sanitary facilities. Alterations to existing parks to enhance fee collections, improve efficiency, reduce maintenance effort or rehabilitate 20-year old park operation funded by O&M and SRUF, as appropriate. Construction of project began in October 1959 and was placed in operation for flood control in December 1963, hydroelectric power generation with both units in May 1965, and water supply in January 1966. Since the dam was constructed there has been a seepage problem below Dike No. 1. Based on detailed investigation, it was determined that the limestone foundation under Dike No. 1 and 200 feet of the north end of the main dam embankment is the main problem. The plan of improvement is a concrete seepage cutoff in Dike No. 1 and the north end of the main dam. A request for proposals to construct a concrete cutoff wall was issued in September 1988. After evaluation a contract was awarded in June 1989, but a protest (which was denied) delayed the notice to proceed, which was issued in October 1989. The contract period is estimated to be 760 days. 36. BULL SHOALS LAKE, AR Location. See Table 28-K, White River Basin, AR & MO. Existing project. Estimated cost with eight generating units is $96,356,000. For further information see pages 725 and 726 of 1965 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 28-B. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 89 are estimated at $2,959,000; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $91,646,000. During the year, 706,294,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for modifications to existing recreation and sanitary facilities. Alterations to existing parks to enhance fee collections, improve efficiency, reduce maintenance effort or rehabilitate 35-year-old park facilities funded by O&M or SRUF, as appropriate. Planning Division and Construction Operation Division, (LRD) and Arkansas Game & Fish Commission and Arkansas Department of Parks and Tourism worked together to provide environmentally sensitive bank stabilization along the White River at Bull Shoals State Park. Gravel excavation was conducted so as to avoid brown trout spawning sites. Environmental damages were offset with the placement of large boulders which serve as habitat for juvenile and adult trout. The boulders also provide excellent angling opportunities for this world class fishery. Construction of project began in April 1946 and was ready for beneficial use for flood control in June 1951 and generation of electrical energy in September 1952. Units 1 through 8 were placed in operation September 1952, December 1952, June 1953, January 1962, February 1962, August 1963, and September 1963, respectively. 37. DARDANELLE LOCK AND DAM (NO. 10), AR Location. See Table 28-H, Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Navigation. Existing project. Project is a unit of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Dam is 2,683 feet long and 68 feet high. It has a spillway with 20 tainter gates 50 feet long and 39 feet high. Navigation lock is 110 by 600 feet with a lift of 54 feet. Powerhouse contains four 31,000 kilowatt generators. Lake has a storage capacity of 486,200 acre-feet. Estimated cost is $86,507,000. (See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Pool fluctuated within 2-foot power pondage, elevation 336.0 to 338.0. Power generation continued. During FY 89, 703,762,900 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction began June 1957. Power units were placed on line April, May, and September 1965, and January 1966. Lock was placed in operation in December 1969. The visitor center and resident office were completed in May 1985. 38. GREERS FERRY LAKE, AR Location. See Table 28-K, White River, AR & MO. Existing project. Estimated cost is $55,125,000. For further information see page 740 of 1964 Annual Report. (See Table 28-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 and Water Supply Act of 1988, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 89 are estimated at $1,588,000; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $19,394,000. During the year, 216,618,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were 28-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Water supply storage withdrawn during the year was 1,870 acre-feet. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in June 1957, was ready for beneficial use for flood control in January 1962, and power units 1 and 2 were placed in operation in March and May 1964, and water supply was placed in operation in April 1971. The visitors center was completed in June 1983 at a cost of $813,000. 39. NORFORK LAKE, AR Location. See Table 28-K, White River Basin, AR & MO. Existing project. Total estimated cost is $111,624,000, including $38,700,000 for addition of power units 3 and 4, and $40,000,000 for highway bridge construction. For further information see page 896 of 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 28-H for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 89 are estimated at $264,000; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $31,796,000. During the year, 240,547,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Water supply withdrawn by city at Mountain Home, AR, totaled 2,624 acre-feet. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities, and addition of power units 3 and 4. Construction of project began in October 1940, ready for beneficial use for flood control in June 1943, and for generation of electrical energy with one unit in June 1944. Second unit was added in February 1950. Water supply was added as a purpose in December 1969. Construction of two highway bridges over Norfork Lake to replace ferries was completed in November 1982. The bridges were transferred to the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department for operation and maintenance in July 1984. 40. OZARK-JETA TAYLOR LOCK AND DAM (NO. 12), AR Location. See Table 28-H, Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS: Navigation. Existing project. Project is a unit of McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Dam is 2,480 feet long and 58 feet above streambed. It has a spillway with 15 tainter gates 50 feet long and 46 feet high. Navigation lock is 110 by 600 feet with a lift of 34 feet. Powerhouse contains five 20,000 kilowatt generators. Lake has a storage capacity of 148,400 acre-feet. In addition, 1 foot of power pondage is provided in Pool No.13 between elevations 391.0 and 392.0. Estimated cost is $86,167,000. For authorization see Table 28-B. Local cooperation. See Section 1. Operations and results during fiscal year. Delivered 407,841,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Continued operation and maintenance. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in December 1964. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Lock and dam was placed in operation in November 1969. Power units were placed on line as follows: unit 1, November 1972; unit 2, August 1973; unit 3, October 1973; unit 4, December 1973, and unit 5, May 1974. Work remaining consists principally of modifications to powerplant. 41. TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO Location. See Table 28-K, White River Basin, AR & MO. Existing project. Estimated cost is $71,233,000. For further information see page 893 of 1962 Annual Report. For authorization see Table 28-B. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 89 are estimated at $1,169,000; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $55,388,000. During the year, 497,131,000 kilowatt hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. The District and the Waterways Experiment station are investigating the possibilities of improving the quality of Table Rock releases with a hypolimnetic oxygenation system. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in October 1954, was ready for beneficial use for flood control in November 1958, and for generation of electrical energy with units i and 2 in May 1959. Units 3 and 4 were added in April and June 1961. General Investigations 42. SURVEYS Total fiscal year expenditures were $970,854: navigation studies, $409,422; flood damage prevention studies, $464,470; review of authorized projects, $4,232; special investigations, $35,000; review of FERC licenses, $2,000; interagency water 28-10 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT resource development, $16,978; and, coordination studies with other agencies, $38,752. 43. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services (FPMS). The authority for the FPMS program is Section 206 of the 1960 Flood Control Act, PL 86-645, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program encourages comprehensive flood plain management planning at all levels to reduce the potential for losses to life and property from floods. Federal and non-Federal agencies and the private sector are assisted with planning and development information for flood hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, Federal Insurance Program requirements, and Executive Order 11988 guidelines. Such assistance may include factual flood information (available or determined) and interpretation on flood frequencies, extent of flooding, flood-water velocity, duration of flooding and floodway limits. Services accomplished during fiscal year: Technical services and planning guidance responses furnished during FY 89 totaled 15,900. This total included services to Federal and non-Federal agencies, individuals, realtors, corporations, lending institutions, engineers, architects, and others. Costs for providing these services during FY 89 totaled $290,277. Hydrologic studies. During the fiscal year, 141 stations were operated; 73 cooperatively with USGS and 41 by the Corps. The total cost for streamflow and some sediment data from all sources of funding for FY 89 was $562,050, of which $398,340 was transferred to USGS. The District also participated in a cooperative program with National Weather Service for rainfall and/or river reporting stations for use in forecasting streamflow for flood warning and operation of lake projects. Records were also collected at certain hydroclimate rainfall stations under a cooperative program between the two agencies. For these services, $41,490 was transferred to the National Weather Service. 44. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING During this fiscal year, a total of $124,683 was expended on North Little Rock (Dark Hollow), AR. 45. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN During the fiscal year, a total of $734,777 was expended on Little River, Horatio, AR ($10,000); Beaver Lake Water Quality, AR ($596,790); Dardanelle Lock and Dam, Cane Creek Bridge, AR, $94,482; Village Creek, Jackson and Lawrence Counties, AR, ($8,506); Bell Foley Lake, AR, ($25,000). 28-11 TABLE 28-A LITLE ROCK, AR. DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT2 See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Se.30,'89 2 1. Arkansas River Basin, Ark., Okla. & Kans. 3. Bank Stabilization & Channel Rectification, AR 2,4-5, Navigation 6,9,11, Locks & Dams, 13,15 AR 16. Black River Wayne Co., MO 17. Blue Mountain Lake, AR New Work Approp. Dams Navigation Cost Dams Navigation Maint. Approp. Dams Navigation Cost Dams Navigation Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Special Funds Cost Other Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Other Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost $ 971,000 $ 3,346,000 $4,852,926 $7,481,000 $1,476,886,053 150,318,533 971,000 3,346,000 4,852,926 7,481,000 1,326,567,520 1,072,738 4,400,979 4,352,714 4,256,220 1,472,472,641 150,279,504 1,072,038 4,400,979 4,352,714 4,256,220 1,322,198,137 51,802,900 11,478,700 40,324,200 56,383,991 12,196,588 44,187,403 53,820,069 11,386,703 42,433,366 54,463,823 11,676,676 42,792,147 73,193,568 12,883,200 60,310,368 69,730,438 12,211,917 57,518,521 68,731,146 13,230,308 51,500,838 20,319,918 13,699,711 56,620,207 791,729,5622 170,356,501 621,373,061 796,104,0712 170,094,241 626,209,830 291,106 291,106 1,609,842 1,609,842 19,926,755 19,926,755 531,336 531,336 119,300,184 119,300,184 4,561,666 4,561,666 493,000 785,392 12,237,000 15,261,530 3,154,000 4,852,926 3,614,165 4,288,918 18,739,150 18,913,983 7,481,000 437,510,399 4,256,220 433,576,551 25,388,560 19,445,670 250,777,1822 24,612,255 20,251,719 253,346,1342 161,481 21,256 1,134,866 984,823 531,336 531,336 39,400 38,079 13,650 11,913 39,4003 38,0793 13,650 11,913 5,069,974 5,069,974 28-12 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 28-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT' See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sept..30,'89 1,2 Blue Mountain Lake, AR (cont.) 18. Clearwater Lake, MO 19. DeQueen Lake, Little River Basin, AR 20. Dierks Lake, Little River Basin, AR 22. Fourche Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR 23. Gillham Lake, Little River Basin, AR 25. Little Red River & Tributaries, Clinton, AR 26. Little River Basin, (Little Rock Dist.) 27. Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 624,000 636,896 701,722 693,553 1762,003022 769,708 620,000 620,000 1,419,000 1,391,455 1,540,922 1,546,000 1,555,704 1,482,319 _ 348,000 6,119,000 _ 347,823 6,096,046 747,000 12,061,0162 750,782 12,027,2202 _ 11,073,403 11,060,204 1,590,000 25,214,4441 1,654,115 25,210,2811 3,660,000 10,127,000 3,674,652 10,118,519 19,629,753 19,623,752 809,000 805,368 691,400 713,943 823,000 813,849 834,000 7,456,4302 823,816 7,431,5982 _ 16,002,904 16,002,781 624,000 649,813 300,000 297,042 697,300 707,478 798,000 746,097 360,000 2,225,000 343,750 2,200,119 _ 108,000 __ 64,750 816,000 841,872 2,550,000 2,815,619 766,722 814,460 88,000 62,864 328,578 371,828 819,000 816,034 12,131 881,000 7,857,0032 919,005 7,842,8222 2,252,000 6,508,0003 1,313,562 5,472,1043 166,900 61,900 603,478 498,478 _ 17,827,111 17,826,703 847,360 7,053,5672 847,710 7,046,9282 3,999,5003 3,761,2933 _ 99,959,850 1,127 99,544,384 3,336,000 3,632,464 162,000 99,493 3,865,144 3,902,000 3,945,354 3,749,058 90,000 122,848 20,000 37,177 4,129,360 46,232,7842 4,210,494 46,076,9432 119,000 391,0003 60,955 320,4733 68,400 30,254 68,400 30,254 28-13 TABLE 28-A (Continued) LI TLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1, See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sept30,'89 1,2 28. Millwood Lake, Little River Basin, AR 29. Nimrod Lake, AR 31. White River Basin (Little Rock District) 32. White River Batesville, AR 33. White River Newport, AR 34. White River St. Paul, AR 35 Beaver Lake, AR 36. Bull Shoals Lake, Ar 37. Dardanelle Lock & Dam (No. 10) AR New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 46,087,3822 1,127 46,091,2482 1,323,600 1,709,722 1,335,411 1,712,473 922,000 914,350 160,297 916,722 909,774 9,005 1,462,000 1,373,078 1,567,000 23,602,3842 1,619,963 23,758,5952 4,092,826 4,005,627 1,103,000 1,076,793 620,000 620,000 1,085,000 14,573,4602 1,122,310 14,559,5912 335,651,873 335,378,666 15,961,000 20,126,632 26,134,860 23,919,340 305,447,3112 18,584,487 20,196,826 25,588,775 24,188,550 307,517,8572 41,467 5,0004 6,5004 3,2004 104,200 150,6671 101,698 101,6981 98,600 105,1004 93,929 93,9294 29,500 27,900 1,000 1,105 1,500 29,500 27,900 4,2004 1,1054 1,500 0 46,183,033 46,112,072 3,043,600 3,082,886 3,416,922 3,382,140 3,626,100 3,000,640 41,218,0912 3,544,464 3,070,175 41,131,4192 88,858,711 88,858,707 4,754,600 4,435,922 4,754,193 4,430,634 7,146,900 6,227,200 67,719,3752 6,970,679 6,219,379 72,040,2302 84,270,124 84,261,240 28-14 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 28-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1 2 See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sept30,'891 , Dardanelle Maint. 3,751,000 4,284,300 4,558,000 4,736,000 57,082,1692 (cont.) Approp. 3,633,834 4,425,056 4,338,146 4,862,558 56,886,8882 Cost 38. Greers Ferry New Work Lake, AR Approp. - - 48,865,512 Cost - - 48,865,512 Maint. Approp. 3,745,600 3,832,922 4,461,340 4,743,000 55,695,4002 Cost 3,716,466 3,886,414 4,318,096 4,789,616 55,529,3952 39. Norfork Lake, New Work AR Approp. 378 70,997,929 Cost 159,899 378 70,716,087 Maint. Approp. 2,423,600 2,537,022 3,250,860 3,229,000 48,355,073 Cost 2,442,185 2,547,120 3,211,880 3,268,163 48,218,064 40. Ozark-Jeta Taylor New Work Lock & Dam Approp. - 85,629,412 (No.12), AR Cost 85,629,412 Maint. Approp. 2,295,000 3,526,400 3,376,000 4,675,000 47,168,878 Cost 2,322,962 3,525,398 3,344,691 4,688,530 47,125,441 41. Table Rock New Work Lake, MO Approp. - - 67,224,000 Cost - 67,224,000 Maint. Approp. 3,229,600 4,362,922 4,446,000 5,129,500 63,751,788 Cost 3,197,302 4,394,814 4,283,388 5,187,102 63,597,640 1. For more details on project funds see text for individual projects. 2. Beginning data shown in Table 28-A includes special recreation use fees. 3. Includes funds for plans and specifications. 4. Unexpended study funds used to initiate plans and specifications. 28-15 LIT'LE ROCK, AR. DISTRICT TABLE 28-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, AR, OK, & KS (See Section 1 of text) Approved General comprehensive plan: Mannford Reservoir, OK Oologah Lake, OK Canton Lake, OK Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK Wister Lake, OK Blue Mountain Lake, AR Nimrod Lake, AR Modified comprehensive plan to include reservoirs in Grand (Neosho) River Basin, OK, and Mo, and in Verdigris River Basin: Markham Ferry Reservoir, OK Fort Gibson Lake, OK Pensacola Reservoir Lake O' The Cherokees, OK Fall River Lake, KS Elk City Lake, KS Toronto Lake, KS Neodosha Lake, KS Authorized Chief of Engineers to provide in the Canton Lake 69,000 acre-feet of irrigation storage, subject to certain conditions. Approved multiple-purpose plan: Oologah Lake, OK Markham Ferry Reservoir, OK Fort Gibson Lake, OK Blackburn Reservoir, OK Mannford Reservoir, OK Taft Reservoir, OK Bank stabilization Dardanelle Lock and Dam, AR Eufaula Lake, OK Navigation locks and dams Ozark Lock and Dam, AR Short Mountain Lock and Dam, OK Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, OK Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK Flood Control Com. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 107 and 440, 76th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc 758, 79th Cong., 2d sess. June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Modified Arkansas River navigation comprehensive plan to include bank protection works at Bradens Bend, OK. Modified comprehensive plan authorized in 1938 Flood Control Act and multiple-purpose plan authorized in River and Harbor Act of 1946 to provide for substituting Keystone Lake for Mannford, Blackburn and Taft Reservoirs. S. Doc 107, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 28-16 June 28, 1938 August 18, 1941 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 28-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents July 14, 1960 Authorized incorporation of River and Harbor and Flood Control plans into a single plan of development and made all pervious authorizations applicable to combined plan of development. November 17, 1986 June 10, 1948 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 Fourche Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR (See Section 22 of text.) Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR (See Section 27 of text.) RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM INCLUDING LITLE RIVER BASIN, OK AND AR (See Section 26 of text) Construct Boswell, Hugo, and Millwood Lakes, and Bank Stabilization. Modified Millwood: Construct Pine Creek, Lukfata, Broken Bow, DeQueen, Gillham, Dierks Lakes Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662, Sec. 401 Section 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 170, 85th Cong., 1st sess. WHITE RIVER BASIN (L'TLE ROCK DISTRICT) (See Section 31 of text) June 28, 1938 August 18, 1941 September 3, 1954 October 23, 1962 March 1, 1974 June 30, 1948 Approved comprehensive plan for White River Basin: Lone Rock Lake, AR, Norfork Lake, AR, Clearwater Lake, MO, Water Valley Lake, AR, Bell Foley Lake, AR, Greers Ferry Lake, AR, and White River emergency. Modified comprehensive plan to include Bull Shoals Lake, AR, and MO, Table Rock Lake, MO, and AR, and Norfork Lake, AR, and MO (power). Authorized power in Greers Ferry Reservoir and added Beaver Lake to the plan. Authorizing clearing and straightening of channel for Village Creek, Jackson and Lawrence Counties. Authorizing highway bridge construction across Norfork Lake. Little Red River and Tributaries, Clinton, AR (See Section 25 of text.) Flood Control Comn. Doc 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 917, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 290, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 499, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 352, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Flood Control Comn. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Section 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 28-17 LITTLE ROCK, AR. DISTRICT TABLE 28-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date of Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents October 22, 1976 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 July 24, 1946 August 28, 1937 White River Fish Hatchery, Arkansas provides for trout production facilities downstream from Beaver Dam. Black River, Wayne County, Mo. (See Section 16 of text.) White River, Batesville, AR. (See Section 32 of text.) White River, Newport, AR. (See Section 33 of text.) White River, St. Paul, AR. (See Section 34 of text.) Water Resources Development Act of 1976, P.L. 94-587, Sec. 105 Section 14 P.L. 79-526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Section 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Section 14 P.L. 79-526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Section 208, P.L. 75-406. Authorized by Chief of Engineers 28-18 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 28-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Federal Cost to Sept. 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Arkansas River, Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, AR 1 1988 $736,869 Black River, AR and MO 3 1950 80,000 $ 930,324 Current River, AR and MO 3 1964 17,0004 132,178 Upper White River, AR 2 5 1952 813,197 1,788,374 White River, AR (above Peach Orchard Bluff) 3 6 1950 _ 785,666 White River, Jacksonport, AR 2 1984 43,110 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Sec. 107, P.L. 86-6456. 2. Completed. 3. Channel adequate for existing commerce. completion not contemplated. 4. Includes $7,000 for previous project. 5. Federal operation and maintenance terminated June 30, 1952, due to lack of commerce. Facilitates at Locks and Dams Nos. 1,2, and 3 disposed of in accordance with authority in Public Law 996, 84th Cong. 6. Responsibility for maintenance of project downstreamdownbstream downstream from Newport, AR transferred to Memphis District in FY 62. 28-19 LrITLE ROCK, AR. DISTRICT TABLE 28-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Bell Foley Lake, White River, AR Black River, Butler County Road 607, MO Black River, Poplar Bluff, MO, to Knobel, AR Butler County Drainage District 3, MO Carden's Bottom Drainage District No. 2, Arkansas River, AR Clarksville, AR Conway County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, Ar Conway County Levee Districts Nos. 1, 2, and 8, Arkansas River, AR Conway County Levee District No. 6, Arkansas River, AR Crawford County Levee District, AR Crawford County Levee District, Arkansas River, AR Curia Creek Drainage District, Independence County, AR East Poplar Bluff and Poplar Bluff, MO Faulkner County Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, AR Fort Smith, Arkansas River, AR From North Little Rock to Gillett, AR (above Plum Bayou) Fourche Creek, Little Rock, AR Jackson Couinty Levee District 2, White River, AR Little Massard Creek, Fort Smith, AR Little Red River District 1, AR Little Red River, White County Road Bridge, Judsonia, AR Little Rock Levee, AR, East End Fourche Bayou McLean Bottom Levee District No. 3, Arkansas River, AR Near Dardanelle, Arkansas River, AR Newport, White River, AR North Little Rock, Arkansas River, AR Otter Creek and Tributaries, Shannon Hills, AR Petit Jean River, AR Pine Mountain Lake, AR Point Remove Levee and Drainage District, Conway County, AR Roland Drainage District, Arkansas River, AR Rolling Fork River, Sevier Coiunty, AR Skaggs Ferry, Black River, AR South Bank Arkansas River (Head Fourche Island to Pennington Bayou), AR Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Cancelled Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1975 1985 1958 1983 1951 1962 1959 1952 1952 1983 1954 1983 1958 1941 1951 1954 1973 1983 1988 1983 1983 1975 1950 1953 1941 1958 1987 1966 1985 1983 1950 1983 1941 1964 $1,407,116 44,500 84,315 42,172 919,955 271,717 187,440 1,018,840 390,952 53,506 2,001,820 117,898 304,699 99,511 1,077,546 845,300 22,890 131,699 198,096 28,968 63,355 1,901,899 422,549 198,069 314,276 512,001 162,204 84,350 1,432,331 86,943 269,907 64,500 81,023 1,404,852 28-20 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 28-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance South Bank, Arkansas River, Little Rock to Pine Bluff, AR, Tucker Lakes Completed 1961 409,115 - Swan Creek Bank Stab., Taney County, MO Completed 1986 76,800 - Van Buren, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1952 438,222 - Village Creek, White River, and Mayberry Levee Districts, AR Completed 1972 1,567,156 Village Creek, Jackson and Lawrence Counties, AR Inactive 1977 510,217 West of Morrilton, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1962 1,269,959 White River, at Hwy 14, 1/4 mile east of Oil Trough, AR Completed 1981 214,308 White River Bank Stab., Batesville, AR Completed 1986 101,100 White River, Jacksonport, AR Completed 1987 277,600 _ 1. Reclassified as inactive in Jun '77; reviewed & deferred in 5. RecLassified as inactive in Jul '85. May '85. 6. See H Doc 577, 87th Cong., 2d sess., for description of 2. Recommended for deauthorization in Sep '86. project. 3. Construction of project cancelled because Local interests 7. Reclassified in Jun '77; inabi ity of Local interests to meet fai led to provide right-of-way for construction and maintenance. Local cooperation requirements. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. TABLE 28-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Funds Expended Full Report See Annual Date Federal Contributed Project Report For Authority Deauthorized Funds Funds Arkansas River, Russellville, Morrilton, AR HRI1 May 77 1988 - Black River Basin, MO & AR _ HR10 QOct 74 1988 - Crooked Creek Lake & Levee, AR 1969 1968 FCA 1988 - Lone Rock, Buffalo River, AR 1959 1938 FCA 1977 $130,653 Ozark Natl Rec Area, Bell Foley & Greers Ferry SR14 May 73 1988 70,000 Prosperity Lake, MO PL93-251 1988 864,000 Water Valley, Eleven Point River, AR & MO 1959 1963 FCA 1977 414,011 White River Basin above Beaver Lake, AR SR26, Oct 72 1988 - 28-21 TABLE 28-H ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Elevation Depth on Char- Year Up- Upper Miter Sill actcr Opened stream Lock Pool of to Total from Miles to Dimension Lift (feet, Upper Lower Foun- Kind of Type of Naviga- Estimat Feature Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) MSL) (feet) (feet) dation Dam Construction tion Cost LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT Norrell L&D No. 1 Lock No. 2 Wilbur D. Mills Dam (No. 2) L&D No. 3 10.3 8 east of Arkansas Post, AR 13.3 6 east of Arkansas Post, AR 40.5 3 southeast Arkansas Post, AR 50.2 5 north of Grady, AR 110 by 600 30 max 110 by 600 20nom 28 max 142 162 16 15 Piles in Fixed sand overflow 18 14 Piles in sand Concrete 1967 $34,265,000 1967 43,869,000 Piles in Movable Gated concrete 1968 sand spillway with embankment ends 110 by 600 20 182 18 14 Piles in sand Movable Gated concrete 1968 spillway with embankment ends 33,791,000 L&D No. 4 L&D No. 5 David D. Terry L&D (No. 6) 66.0 7 east of Pine Bluff, AR 86.3 4 southeast of Redfield, AR 108.1 12 southeast of Little Rock, AR 110 by 600 14 196 110 by 600 17 213 110 by 600 18 231 18 14 Piles in Movable Gated concrete 1968 sand spillway with embankment ends 18 14 Clay Movable Gated concrete 1968 spillway with embankment ends 18 14 Piles in Movable Gated concrete 1968 sand spillway with embankment ends 40,831,000 29,568,000 62,585,000 dl TABLE 28-H (Continued) ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Elevation Depth on Char- Year Up- Upper Miter Sill acter Opened stream Lock Pool of to Total form Miles to Dimension Lift (feet, Upper Lower Foun- Kind of Type of Naviga- Estimate Feature Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) MSL) (feet) (feet) dation Dam Construction tion Cost d1 Murray L&D (No.7) Toad Suck Ferry L&D (No. 8) Arthur V. Ormond L&D (No. 9) Dardanelle L&D (No. 10) L&D No. 11 Ozark-Jeta Taylor L&D (No. 12) James W. Trimble L&D (No. 13) TULSA DISTRICT3 James W. Trimble L&D (No. 13)(part) 125.4 6 northwest of Little Rock, AR 155.9 6 west of Conway, AR 176.9 3 southwest of Morrilton, AR 205.5 2 northwest of Dardanelle, AR 110 by 600 110 by 600 18 249 16 265 110 by 600 19 284 110 by 600 54 338 18 14 Shale Movable Gated concrete 1969 spillway with embankment ends 18 14 Shale Movable Gated concrete 1969 spillway with embankment ends 18 14 Shale Movable Gated concrete 1969 spillway with embankment ends 18 14 Sand- Movable Gated concrete 1969 stone spillway with embankment ends Deleted 256.8 1 east of Ozark, AR 292.8 7 east of Fort Smith, AR 110 by 600 110 by 600 34 372 20 392 18 15 Sandstone and shale 18 14 Sandstone and shale Movable Gated concrete 1969 spillway with embankment ends Movable Gated concrete 1969 spillway with embankment ends 1970 6,858,(00) $37,492,000 56,912,000 34,357,000 84,270,124 85,629,412 46,187,000 TABLE 28-H (Continued) ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Elevation Depth on Char- Year Up- Upper Miter Sill acler Opened stream Lock Pool of to Total form Miles to Dimension Lift (feet, Upper Lower Foun- Kind of Type of Naviga- Eslimat Feature Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) MSL) (feet) (feet) dation Dam Construction tion Cost W.D. Mayo L&D (No. 14) Robert S. Kerr L&D (No. 15) Webbers Falls L&D (No. 16) Chouteau L&D (No. 17) Newt Graham L&D (No. 18) 319.6 4 east of Redland, OK 336.2 1 north of Cowlington, OK 366.6 1 northwest of Gore, OK 401.4 4 northwest of Okay, OK 421.6 8 southwest of Inola, OK 110 by 600 20 412 110 by 600 48 460 110 by 600 30 490 110 by 600 21 110 by 600 21 532 14 15 Rock Movable Gated concrete 1970 spillway with embankment ends 18 14 Rock Movable Gated concrete 1970 spillway with embankment ends 19 16 Rock Movable Gated concrete 1970 spillway with embankment ends 511 15 14 Rock Movable Gated concrete 1970 spillway with embankment ends 15 14 Rock Movable Gated concrete 1970 spillway with embankment ends $32,655,000 94,578,237 83,738,277 31,619,000 44,355,000 eci TABLE 28-H (Continued) ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Additional features entering into cost of project Little Rock District: Bank stabilization and channel rectification, mile 33.7 to 362 and Arkansas-White Cutoff, 100 per cent complete ........... $119,300,184 Maintenance and repair fleet and marine terminals, 99 percent complete ..................................... 7,500,000 Total, Little Rock District ....................... 716,556,720 Navigation aids (U.S. Coast Guard) ........................... 2,268,000 Tulsa District: Bank stabilization and channel rectification, Short Mountain to Fort Smith, complete ................................. 12,700,038 Maintenance and repair fleet and marine terminals, complete ............................................... 2,750,000 Subtotal ....................................... $309,253,552 Upstream Lakes:3 Oologah, 90.2 miles upstream from mouth, Verdigris River complete ................. .......................... $ 46,772,329 Keystone, 638.8 miles upstream from mouth, Arkansas River, complete....................... .............. 123,171,17 Eufaula, 27 miles upstream from mouth, Canadian River, complete ........................................... 123,350,74 Subtotal......................................... 293,294,24 Total, Tulsa District .............................. 602,547,80 Total Project Cost 96 percent complete .......... $1,319,104,52 1. Navigation miLeage from mouth of White River except Dam No. 2 is 40.5 mites above mouth of Arkansas River. 2. Includes cost of entrance channel. 3. Details in TuLsa District report. O 0 O cn C'1 ~t1 0 z rr 0 C2 x C. O 00 0 00 ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: LAKES (See Section 1 of Text) Lake and State Miles Above River Mouth Nearest Town Drainage Area (sq mi) Height of Dam (feet) 1pe Reservoir Capacity (acre-feet) Power Development (kilowatts) Blue Mountain, AR Canton, OK Elk City, KS (Table Mound) Eufaula, OK 1 2 Fall River, KS Fort Gibson, OK 1 Keystone, OK 1 2 3 Markham Ferry, OK1 Neodesha, KS5 Nimrod, AR Oologah, OK2 Pensacola, OK 1 6 Tenkiller Ferry, OK 1 Toronto, KS Wister, OK Petit Jean North Canadian Elk Canadian Fall Grand (Neosho) Arkansas 4 Grand (Neosho) Verdigris Fourche La Fave Verdigris Grand (Neosho) 3 Illinois Verdigris Poteau 74.4 384.3 8.7 27.0 54.2 7.7 538.8 47.4 222.8 62.6 90.2 77.0 12.8 271.5 60.9 Paris, AR Canton, OK Independence, KS Eufaula, OK Fall River, KS Fort Gibson, OK Sand Springs, OK Pryor, OK Neodesha, KS Plainview, AR Claremore, OK Disney, OK Gore, OK Toronto, KS Wister, OK 488 12,483 634 47,522 585 12,492 74,506 11,533 1,152 680 4,339 10,298 1,610 730 993 115 Earthfill 68 Earthfill 107 Earthfill 114 94 110 121 90 74 103 137 147 197 90 99 Earthfill Earthfill Concrete-gravity Earthfill Earthfill Earthfill Concrete-gravity Earthfill Concrete arch Earthfill Earthfill Earthfill 257,900 383,300 284,300 3,798,000 256,40() 1,284,400 1,836,500 444,500 90,000 336,010 1,519,0(X) 2,197,000 1.230,800 199,700 427,900 90,000 45,000 70,000 100,000 86,400 34,000 1947 1948 1966 1964 1949 1953 1964 1968 0 1942 1974 1940 1953 1960 1949 $ 5,069,974 11,209,834 19,052,990 123,350,791 10,550,873 42,591,298 123,171,173 6,908,756 97,910 4,092,826 46,722,329 52,126 24,017,724 13,896,324 10,501,226 Subtotal, exclusive of Eufaula, Keystone, and Oologah, 93 percent complete. Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK and KS: Navigation (Table 28-H) Total, Arkansas River Basin, 98 percent complete 1. Project includes facilities for production of hydroelectric power. 2. Cost included in navigation project. 3. Details in Tulsa District report. 4. Constructed by State of Oklahoma under the name of Robert S. Kerr Dam (Lake Hudson). Estimate shown is for Federal participation. 5. Inactive. Estimate is based on 1954 price levels. 6. Constructed by State of Oklahoma under the name Grand River Dam (Lake O'The Cherokees). Estimate shown is for Federal participation. Table 28-I Year or Percent Complete Total Estimated Cost 148,041,86 1,319,104,52 1,467,146,38 _ ~_ ~ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 28-J LIT'LE RIVER BASIN, AR: LAKES (See Section 26 of Text) Project River Site1 Nearest Town DeQueen Lake1 Rolling Fork River 22.8 DeQueen, AR Gillham Lake1 Cossatot River 49.0 Gillham, AR Dierks Lake1 Saline River 56.6 Dierks, AR Millwood Lake1 Little River 16.0 Millwood, AR 1. Project is reported separately herein. 28-27 WHIT'E RIVER BASIN; AR, AND MO: LAKES TABLE 28-K (See Section 33 of text) Miles Drainage Reservoir Power Total Above Area Hleight of Dam Above Streambed Capacity Development Estimate Lake River Mouth Nearest Town (sq mi) and Type (acre-feet) (kilowatts) Cost1 Beaver2 White 609.0 Eureka Springs, AR 1,186 228 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 1,952,000 112,000 $ 50,797, Bell Foley3 Strawberry 27.2 Poughkeepsie, AR 519 136 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 518,000 93,700, Bull Shoals2 White 418.6 Mountain Home, AR 6,036 258 feet concrete-gravity 5,408,000 340,000 96,356, Clearwater2 Black 257.4 Piedmont, MO 898 154 feet earthfill 413,000 11,395,( Greers Ferry2 Little Red 79.0 Heber Springs, AR 1,146 243 feet concrete-gravity 1,844,000 96,000 55,125,( Norfork2 North Fork 4.8 Norfork, AR 1,806 216 feet concrete-gravity 1,983,000 80,550 111,624,( Table Rock2 While 523.8 Branson, MO 4,020 252 feet concrete-gravity and earthfill 3,462,000 200,000 71,233,( Total 15,580,000 828,550 490,230,( 1. Current FY price levels unless otherwise noted. 3. Inactive--placed in a deferred status in May 1985. 2. For details see individual reports. Estimate based on 1983 price Levels. 000 000 000 000 00 000 000 )00 00 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT * The civil works portion of this District covers an area of approximately 160,000 square miles which includes Oklahoma and parts of Kansas and Texas within the Arkansas and Red River Basins. The District's responsibilities within the Arkansas River Basin cover southern Kansas, northern Oklahoma, and the Texas Panhandle. These areas are embraced in the drainage basin of the Arkansas River and its tributaries above the mouth of the Poteau River, extending to the Kansas-Colorado State line, exclusive of that portion of the South Canadian River Basin and its tributaries west of the Texas-New Mexico State line. The District's responsibilities within the Red River Basin cover the northern portion of Texas, and the southern portion of Oklahoma. These areas are embraced in the drainage basin of the Red River and its tributaries above Fulton, AR. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, OK ................ 29-2 2. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .... 29-2 Flood Control Arcadia Lake, OK .................... 29-2 Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control Projects, KS, OK, and TX ............. 29-2 Area V, Estelline Springs .............. 29-3 Area VIII ............................ 29-3 Birch Lake, OK ....................... 29-3 Candy Lake, OK ......... ........ 29-3 Canton Lake, OK ..................... 29-4 Copan Lake, OK ...................... 29-4 Council Grove Lake, KS .............. 29-4 El Dorado Lake, KS .................. 29-4 Elk City Lake, KS .................... 29-4 Fall River Lake, KS ................... 29-4 Fort Supply Lake, OK ................. 29-4 Great Bend, KS ...................... 29-4 Great Salt Plains Lake, OK ............ 29-5 Halstead, KS ......................... 29-5 Heyburn Lake and Polecat Creek, OK .. 29-5 Hugo Lake, OK ................... 29-5 Hulah Lake, OK ...................... 29-5 John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS . 29-5 Kaw Lake, OK ....................... 29-5 Lake Kemp, TX ...................... 29-6 Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX ...... 29-6 Marion Lake, KS ..................... 29-6 Mingo Creek, OK ..................... 29-6 Oologah Lake, OK .................... 29-6 Optima Lake, OK ..................... 29-6 Parker Lake, OK ...................... 29-7 Page 29. Pat Mayse Lake, TX .................. 29-7 30. Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, KS ..... 29-7 31. Pine Creek Lake, OK ................. 29-7 32. Sardis Lake, OK ...................... 29-7 33. Skiatook Lake, OK . ................. 29-7 34. Toronto Lake, KS .................... 29-7 35. Waurika Lake, OK . ................. 29-8 36. Wister Lake, OK ..................... 29-8 37. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ....................... 29-8 38. Inspection of Completed Local Flood Protection Projects .................... 29-8 39. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ............................. 29-8 40. Emergency Flood Control Activities ..... 29-8 41. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ......................... 29-8 Multiple -Purpose Projects Including Power 42. Broken Bow Lake, OK ................ 29-8 43. Eufaula Lake, OK .................... 29-8 44. Fort Gibson Lake, OK ................ 29-8 45. Keystone Lake, OK ................... 29-9 46. Lake Texoma (Denison Dam), OK and TX .............................. 29-9 47. Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, OK .................... 29-9 48. Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK ............. 29-9 49. Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, OK ..... 29-9 29-1 3. 4. 4a. 4b. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Genera 50. 51. 52. Tables 29-A 29-B 29-C 29-D d Investigations Page Surveys .......... ...... .......... 29-10 Collection and Study of Basic Data ... 29-10 Preconstruction Engineering and Design .............. 29-10 Cost and Financial Statement ......... Authorizing Legislation ............... Other Authorized Navigation Projects .. Not Applicable 29-11 29-16 29-18 Navigation 1. McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM (Tulsa District Portion), OK. Location. The Tulsa District portion of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System provides a navigation route up the Arkansas River from the Oklahoma-Arkansas State line to the head of navigation at Catoosa, OK, near Tulsa, OK. The total length of the Tulsa District portion of the system is 137 navigation miles. Descriptions and costs for the entire navigation system can be found in Little Rock District's entry in this Annual Report. Existing projects. The McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River navigation project is a component of the multiple-purpose plan for the Arkansas River Basin which provides for the improvement of the basin through the construction of coordinated developments for navigation, hydroelectric power, flood control, water supply, water quality control, sediment control, recreation, and fish and wildlife propagation. The McClellan-Kerr project consists of bank stabilization, channel straightening, and cutoffs as required. The navigation channel has a minimum depth of 9 feet and minimum widths of 250 feet on the Arkansas River and 150 feet on the Verdigris River. The Tulsa District portion of the navigation system consists of Arkansas River Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification, Chouteau Lock and Dam, Newt Graham Lock and Dam, Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, Sans Bois Navigation Channel, W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam, Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, and the pool in Oklahoma which was created by Lock and Dam 13 in Arkansas. The other parts of the multiple-purpose plan for the Arkansas River Basin are listed in Table 29-H. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Public port facilities are in operation at Muskogee and Catoosa, OK, and at Fort Smith, AR. At Sallisaw, OK, a port authority has been active in seeking development of public facilities at that location. Other private commercial port facilities are complete and in operation at eight Oklahoma locations. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Page 29-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................... 29-19 29-F Not Applicable 29-G Deauthorized Projects ................ 29-19 29-H Arkansas River Basin Multiple- Purpose Plan ....................... 29-20 29-I Inspection of Completed Local Flood Protection Projects ................... 29-20 29-J Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ........................ 29-21 29-K General Investigations ................ 29-22 2. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS. See Table 29-C. Flood Control 3. ARCADIA LAKE, OK. Location. On the Deep Fork River at river mile 218.3 in the metropolitan area of Oklahoma City and Edmond, OK, about 1.5 miles west of Arcadia, in Oklahoma County, OK. (See Arcadia, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for flood control, water supply, and recreation by construction of an earthfill dam approximately 102 feet high and 5,250 feet long with a high-level uncontrolled spillway. Outlet works consist of a gated tower and conduit. The lake has a total capacity of 92,000 acre-feet (27,380 for conservation, 64,430 for flood control, and 190 for sedimentation reserve) and controls a 105-square-mile drainage area. Construction began in October 1980 and the project became operational for flood control in November 1986. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of 1938, the Water Supply Act of 1958, the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965, and Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project is 99 percent complete. Estimated cost is $90,400,000 (October 1989 price level base). Funds of $768,000 were transferred from the project in FY 89. Remaining work in recreation is unscheduled pending settlement of lawsuit filed against the city of Edmond for payment of completed recreation work. Litigation is now in Western District Court, OK. Court date is tentatively scheduled for November 1990. The city of Edmond has signed an interim lease to assure parks will remain open. 4. ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL PROJECTS, KS, OK, AND TX. Location. On certain tributary streams of the Arkansas and Red Rivers in the western half of the Tulsa District. Existing project. Provided for studies involving the control of water pollution caused by 15 natural salt sources identified 29-2 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT in 1957 by the U.S. Public Health Service. The Arkansas and the Red Rivers represent major national and regional water resources severely limited due to poor water quality primarily caused by the natural pollutant, sodium chloride. The Arkansas River is polluted by five naturally occurring salt sources located in northwestern Oklahoma and southwestern Kansas. The Red River Basin is polluted by ten naturally occurring salt sources located in northwestern Texas and southwestern Oklahoma. These studies included the construction and subsequent maintenance of an ifection well and a ring dike used for data collection. Preauthorization studies completed in 1966 and 1970 recommended construction of project features at 13 of the 15 sites. For a detailed discussion of the chloride control projects, see the page 19-4 of the Annual Report for 1983. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) authorized the Red River Basin and the Arkansas River Basin as separate projects with separate authority under Section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1966. The Arkansas River portion of the project was deferred in 1982 (not economically justified). Preconstruction engineering and design is compl te on the Red River portion of the project. It is available for initiation of construction. 4a. AREA V, ESTELLINE SPRINGS. Location. Chloride Control Area V is located about 0.5 mile east of Estelline, TX, on the Prairie Dog Town Fork of the Red River. Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see the Annual Report for 1987. Construction started in 1963 and the structure was completed in 1964. Local cooperation. Descriptive text concerning local cooperation requirements is given on page 19-5 of the Annual Report for 1983. 4b. AREA VIII. Location. Chloride Control Area VIII is located at river mile 74.9 of the South Fork of the Wichita River in King County, TX, about 5 miles east of Guthrie, TX. Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of two low-flow collection dams with attendant pumping stations and pipeline facilities. These two dams (the Bateman Low Flow Dam and the Ross Ranch Low Flow Dam) would be equipped with an inflatable fabric-type weir located in the spillway section which would be deflated to pass relatively good quality high flows. The collected brines would be pumped to the storage reservoir behind the Truscott Brine Dam. This brine dam, located at river mile 3.6 on Bluff Creek (a tributary of the North Fork of the Wichita River) about 3 miles northwest of Trusctt, TX, would contain the collected brines from this area as well as ftuture collections from Area X. Construction was initiated at Area VIII and Truscdt Brine Dam in 1976. The first of the two low-flow dams was completed and put into full operation in May 1987. The second was to be constructed after initial operation of the first to determine the effectiveness of the operation. Local cooperation. Descriptive text concerning local cooperation requirements is given on page 19-5 of the Annual Report for 1983. Operations and results during fiscal year. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized construction of the remaining areas of the Red River Chloride Control project pending transmittal of a report of a favorable finding of the effectiveness of the operation of Area VIII. Public Law 99-662 established a panel to assess the improvement in water quality downstream of Area VIII as a measure of its effectiveness. A favorable report was submitted by the panel to the Secretary of the Army (CW) and to the Public Works Committees of the House and Senate in August 1988. 5. BIRCH LAKE, OK. Location. On Birch Creek at river mile 0.8, about 1.5 miles south of Barnsdall in Osage County, OK. (See Barnsdall, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see the Annual Report for 1979. Construction began in November 1973 and the project was placed in useful operation in March 1977. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 6. CANDY LAKE, OK. Location. On Candy Creek, a tributary of Bird Creek in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 1.9. The damsite is about 1.5 miles northeast of Avant in Osage County, OK. (See Avant, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for an earthfill dam about 4,200 feet long, including an uncontrolled concrete spillway, with a maximum height of 103 feet above streambed. Outlet works will consist of a gated intake structure, a 10- by 11.25-foot conduit, and a stilling basin. An 18- by 24-inch low-flow pipe and an 18-inch water supply pipe will be provided. The lake will have a total capacity of 75,420 acre-feet (44,160 for conservation and sediment reserve and 31,260 for flood control). The drainage area above the damsite is 43 square miles. Candy Lake will be operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Construction began in September 1976. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of 1938, the Water Supply Act of 1958, and Section 221 of the Food Control Act of 1970 apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was about 13 percent complete when construction was delayed because the U.S. Justice Department decided to withdraw condemnation proceedings to acquire mineral rights. Estimated cost of the project was $38,300,000 (October 1984 price level). The project was deferred in January 1984. Project land has been made available for low intensity recreation use. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 29-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 7. CANTON LAKE, OK. Location. On the North Canadian River at river mile 394, about 2 miles north of Canton in Blaine County, OK. (See Canton, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 590 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in December 1940 and the project was placed in useful operation in April 1948. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 8. COPAN LAKE, OK. Location. On the Little Caney River, a tributary of the Caney River in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 7.4, about 2 miles west of Copan in Washington County, OK. (See Copan, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-7 of the Annual Report for 1983. Copan Lake is operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Construction began in November 1972 and the project was placed in useful operation in April 1983. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work on the recreation contract was completed and the lake is physically complete. 9. COUNCIL GROVE LAKE, KS. Location. On the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 450, about 1.5 miles northwest of Council Grove in Morris County, KS. (See Council Grove Lake, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 519 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1959 and the project was placed in useful operation in July 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 10. EL DORADO LAKE, KS. Location. On the Walnut River, a tributary dof the Arkansas River, at river mile 100.2, about 4 miles northeast of El Dorado in Butler County, KS. (See El Dorado, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a descripion of the completed improvement, see page 19-7 at the Annual Report for 1983. El Dorado Lake was authorized as a unit of a three-lake system for flood control in the Walnut River Basin. Construction began in October 1973, and impoundment began in June 1981. Project completion is scheduled for July 1989. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The 12th Street bridge and road resurfacing were completed. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 11. ELK CITY LAKE, KS. Location. On the Elk River at river mile 8.7, about 7 miles northwest of Independence in Montgomery County, KS. (See Table Mound, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 593 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in February 1962 and the project was placed in useful operation in March 1966. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 12. FALL RIVER LAKE, KS. Location. On the Fall River at river mile 54.2, about 4 miles northwest of Fall River in Greenwood County, KS. (See Severy, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a descririon of the completed improvement, see page 953 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in May 1946 and the project was placed in full operation in April 1949. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 13. FORT SUPPLY LAKE, OK. Location. On Wolf Creek, a tributary of the North Canadian River, at river mile 5.5, about 12 miles northwest of Woodward in Woodward County, OK. (See Fort Supply, OK, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 594 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in October 1938 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in May 1942. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 14. GREAT BEND, KS. Location. In Barton County, KS, on the north bank of the Arkansas River about 4.5 miles above its confluence with Walnut Creek. (See Great Bend, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The plan, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1965, provides for 6.2 miles of leveed channel to divert Walnut Creek flood flow around Great Bend into the Arkansas River upstream from the city; a 1.5-mile leveed channel to divert Little Walnut Creek flood flow into the Walnut Creek diversion levees along the Arkansas; a tie-back levee 4.3 miles long on the Arkansas left bank upstream from the junction of the Walnut diversion channel; and appurtenant facilities. 29-4 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Local cooperation. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the city of Great Bend, KS, agreed to participate in project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Estimated cost of the project is $39,500,000 (October 1988 price level). The contract for Phase II-A was awarded 14 July 1989. Funds of $1,000,000 were reprogrammed from the project in FY 89. 15. GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, OK. Location. On the Salt Fork of the Arkansas River at river mile 103.3, about 12 miles east of Cherokee in Alfalfa County, OK. (See Jet, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 594 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction of the project began in September 1938 and was completed in July 1941. The project was placed in full flood control operation in May 1941. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 16. HALSTEAD, KS. Location. In the city of Halstead in Harvey County, KS, along the Arkansas River. (See Halstead, KS, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Provides for channel modification and construction of about 4 miles of levee in combination with clearing and snagging and straightening and widening approximately 3.6 miles of the Little Arkansas River channel to a 60- foot-bottom width in the vicinity of Halstead. Channel modification will be restricted to one side of the channel except in transition areas. Tree planting and revegetation will be done and ten pool riffle areas will be established to minimize environmental impacts. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Funds provided in FY 89 were used to complete the Design Memorandum and to coordinate the Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA). The LCA was signed in October 1989. Estimated project cost is $8,800,000 (October 1989 price level base). 17. HEYBURN LAKE AND POLECAT CREEK, OK. Location. On Polecat Creek, a minor tributary of the Arkansas River, at river mile 48.6, about 11 miles west of Sapulpa in Creek County, OK. (See Lake Heyburn, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 599 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction started in March 1948 and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1950. Channel improvements below the lake were completed in September 1952. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The dam and reservoir, which is federally maintained and operated, is in good condition and performs as intended. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 18. HUGO LAKE, OK. Location. On the Kiamichi River at river mile 17.6, about 7 miles east of Hugo in Choctaw County, OK. (See Hugo Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-12 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in October 1967 and the project was placed in useful operation in January 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 19. HULAH LAKE, OK. Location. On the Caney River at river mile 96.2, about 15 miles northwest of Bartlesville, near Hulah, in Osage County, OK. (See Bowring, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 595 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in May 1946 and was completed in June 1950. The project was placed in full flood control operation in September 1951. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 20. JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, KS. Location. The dam is located on the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 343.7, about 2 miles northwest of Burlington in Coffey County, KS. (See John Redmond Dam, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 581 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction was initiated in July 1959 and was completed in December 1965. The project was placed in flood control operation in July 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 21. KAW LAKE, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at river mile 653.7, about 8 miles east of Ponca City in Kay County, OK. (See Charley Creek West, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-13 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in June 1966 and the project was placed in operation in May 1976. 29-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 22. LAKE KEMP, TX. Location. On the Wichita River at river mile 126.7, about 40 miles southwest of Wichita Falls, TX. (See Northeast Lake Kemp, TX, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-14 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in May 1970 and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1972. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 23. LAKE WICHITA, HOLLIDAY CREEK, TX. Location. The project is located in Wichita and Archer Counties, TX. The Lake Wichita dam and the Holliday Creek channel are located in the city of Wichita Falls, TX. (See Wichita Falls, TX, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The proposed plan includes the replacement of the existing Lake Wichita dam with an earthen dam approximately 16,000 feet long, a concrete spillway, an auxiliary spillway, and low-flow outlet works. The plan also includes channel improvements along Holliday Creek from the new spillway to the Wichita River, a distance of 9.3 miles. Local cooperation. The city has removed one bridge, initiated construction of a portion of the channelization, initiated acquisition of real estate necessary for construction of the project, and initiated engineering and design for the relocation of utilities, streets, and highway bridges. Operations and results during fiscal year. The construction of Phase II channels is approximately 27 percent complete and will continue in FY 90 along with engineering and design and supervision and admenistration. Estimated project cost is $45,200,000 (October 1989 price level base). 24. MARION LAKE, KS. Location. On the Cottonwood River at river mile 126.7, about 3 miles northwest of Marion in Marion County, KS. (See Pilson, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 597 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1964 and the project was placed in flood control operation in February 1968. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 25. MINGO CREEK, OK. Location. On the right-bank tributary of Bird Creek in Tulsa County, OK. (See Tulsa, OK, Geological Survey Map, Scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The recommended plan will consist of 23 detention sites which would capture peak flows and hold them temporarily until downstream flows subside. There would be about 9.4 miles of channelization in selected locations on the tributaries and main stem of Mingo Creek. This plan will provide a minimum of 65-year protection in the major damage area. Local cooperation. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the non-Federal sponsor must provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project; pay five percent of the costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. The non-Federal sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. The local sponsor is the city of Tulsa, OK. On August 26, 1983, the city of Tulsa adopted a Resolution of Assurance to provide a minimum share equal to 35 percent or the traditional lands, easements, and rights-of-way, whichever is greater, and will be required to assist in the actual financing of construction. The city has constructed 4.75 miles of channel and placed two excavated detention facilities into flood control operation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Two contracts were awarded during FY 89 - main stem Phase I-A in September 1989 for $2,000,000, and Audubon in May 1989 for $3,079,000. Estimated project cost is $167,800,000 (October 1989 price level base). 26. OOLOGAH LAKE, OK. Location. On the Verdigris River at river mile 90.2, about 2 miles southeast of Oologah in Rogers County, OK. (See Oologah, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-15 of the Annual Report for 1972. Construction began in July 1950 but the project was placed in standby status in October 1951. Construction resumed in December 1955 and was completed in May 1963 for initial development. Construction for ultimate (second stage) development was initiated in July 1967 and was completed in 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 27. OPTIMA LAKE, OK. Location. On the North Canadian River at river mile 623.2, about 4.5 miles northeast of Hardesty in Texas County, OK. (See Optima Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the existing improvement, see page 19-16 of the Annual Report for 1979. 29-6 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Construction began in March 1966 and impoundment began in October 1978. Construction was completed in 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 28. PARKER LAKE, OK. Location. On Muddy Boggy Creek, a tributary of the Red River, about 23 miles east of Ada in Coal County, OK. (See Parker, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Parker Lake is a multipurpose element in a plan of improvement for the Upper Muddy Boggy Creek Basin, OK. The project consists of an earthfill dam about 2,100 feet long, a gated outlet works for flood control and water supply, and a 600-foot-wide spillway. The lake created would have a total storage capacity of 237,000 acre-feet and would yield 42 million gallons per day for municipal and industrial water supply. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local cooperation. The Oklahoma Water Resources Board, the local sponsor, has agreed to provide 5 percent of the costs allocated to flood control upfront and to reimburse the costs allocated to water supply over a 30-year period. Operation and results during fiscal year. Work in FY 89 included a design memorandum for an access road and project building. Plans and specifications for the access road and project building were approved by Southwestern Division in January 1989. Estimated project cost is $62,500,000 (October 1989 price level base). 29. PAT MAYSE LAKE, TX. Location. On Sanders Creek, a tributary of the Red River, at river mile 4.6, about 12 miles north of Paris in Lamar County, TX. (See Grant, TX, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the complded improvement, see page 584 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in March 1965 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in September 1967. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 30. PEARSON- SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE, KS. Location. On Big Hill Creek at river mile 33.3, about 4.5 miles east of Cherryvale, KS. (See Dennis, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-11 of the Annual Report for 1983. Construction began in April 1974 and impoundment began in March 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 31. PINE CREEK LAKE, OK. Location. On the Little River at river mile 145.3, about 5 miles northwest of Wright City in McCurtain County, OK. (See Wright City, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 584 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in February 1963 and the project was placed in useful operation in June 1969. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 32. SARDIS LAKE, OK. Location. On Jackfork Creek, a tributary of the Kiamichi River, at river mile 2.8, about 2.5 miles north of Clayton in Pushmataha County, OK. (See Yanush, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-11 of the Annual Report for 1983. Sardis Lake will be operated as a unit of a three-lake system for flood control in the Kiamichi River Basin. (The three-lake system includes Hugo and Tuskahoma Lakes.) Construction began in August 1975 and the project became operational in January 1983. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project is about 99 percent complete. Remaining work is on the Daisy Road Stage II-B. Stage II-B is about 86 percent complete; repair of Stage I is complete. Funds of $1,350,000 were transferred into the project in FY 89. Estimated cost of the project is $67,893,000 (October 1989 price level). 33. SKIATOOK LAKE, OK. Location. On Hominy Creek, a tributary of Bird Creek in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 14.3, about 5 miles west of Skiatook in Osage County, OK. (See Avant S.E., OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1;24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see Page 19-8 of the Annual Report for 1987. Construction began in January 1974, impoundment began in October 1984, and the project became operational in November 1984. Local cooperation: Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project is 97 percent complete. Estimated cost of the project is $121,500,000 (October 1989 price level base). 34. TORONTO LAKE, KS. Location. On the Verdigris River at river mile 271.5, about 4 miles southeast of Toronto in Woodson County, KS. (See Fredonia, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 600 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in November 1954 and the project was 29-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 placed in full operation in March 1960. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 35. WAURIKA LAKE, OK. Location. On Beaver Creek, a tributary of the Red River, at river mile 27.0, about 6 miles northwest of Waurika in Jefferson County, OK. (See Hastings, OK- TX, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-12 of the Annual Report for 1983. Waurika Lake is operated as a unit of a coordinated lake system for flood control in the Red River Basin. Construction began in July 1971 and impoundment began in August 1977. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance continued. 36. WISTER LAKE, OK. Location. On the Poteau River at river mile 60.9, about 2 miles south of Wister in LeFlore County, OK. (See Wister, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 601 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in April 1946 and was completed in May 1949. The project was placed in full flood control operation in October 1949. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. A contract for Phase I of major rehabilitation was awarded June 5, 1989, in the amount of $3,919,000. The contract for Phase II will be awarded upon resolution of a protest. Estimated major rehabilitation cost is $11,300,000 (October 1989 price level base) 37. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS. See Table 29-E. 38. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS. Inspections of completed, Federally constructed local flood protection projects which are owned, operated, and maintained by local interests are made to determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for operations and maintenance. The inspections assist the Corps of Engineers in determining if the project provides the flood protection for which it was constructed. See Table 29-I for a list of projects inspected in FY 89. Fiscal year cost was $103,025. 39. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS. The Tulsa District, Corps of Engineers is responsible for flood control operations at 12 non-Corps projects. These include nine Bureau of Reclamation lakes, two Grand River Dam Authority lakes, and one city-county owned lake. All of these projects were constructed wholly or in part with Federal funds. No unusual problems were experienced at any of these projects during FY 89. Fiscal year cost for scheduling flood control reservoir operations toaled $677,029. 40. EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES. Fiscal year cost for national emergency preparedness was $75,790 and for advance measures was $77,097. 41. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION. See Table 29-J for FY 89 expenditures for Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Section 205); Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Projects (Section 14); Snagging and Clearing; and Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies, Rehabilitation Projects. Multiple -Purpose Projects Including Power 42. BROKEN BOW LAKE, OK. Location. On the Mountain Fork River at river mile 20.3, about 9 miles northeast of Broken Bow in McCurtain County, OK. (See Broken Bow, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements, see page 29-17 of the Annual Report for 1971. Construction began in November 1961 and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1969. Power units 1 and 2 were placed in operation in January and June 1970, respectively. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 43. EUFAULA LAKE, OK. Location. On the Canadian River at river mile 27.0, about 12 miles east of Eufaula in McIntosh County, OK. (See Porum, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 588 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in December 1956 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in February 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 44. FORT GIBSON LAKE, OK. Location. On the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 7.7, about 5 miles north of Fort Gibson in Muskogee County, OK. (See Fort Gibson Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) 29-8 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Existing project. For a description of the complted improvement, see page 604 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in March 1942 but was held in abeyance during World War II. Construction resumed in May 1946 and was completed in June 1950. The fourth generator was installed and the project placed in full operation in September 1953. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the construction of hydropower units 5 and 6. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 45. KEYSTONE LAKE, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at river mile 538.8, near Sand Springs, OK, and about 15 miles west of Tulsa, OK. (See Keystone Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 589 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in January 1957 and the project was placed in flood control operation in September 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 46. LAKE TEXOMA (DENISON DAM), OK AND TX. Location. On the Red River at river mile 725.9, about 5 miles northwest of Denison, TX. (See Denison Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 603 of the Annual Report for 1969. Lake Texoma is operated as a unit of a coordinated lake system for flood control in the Red River Basin. Construction started in August 1939 and was completed in February 1944. Commercial power generation was started in March 1945. Authorized work is complete except for installation of the third, fourth, and fifth power units. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 47. ROBERT S. KERR LOCK AND DAM AND RESERVOIR, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at navigation mile 336.2, about 8 miles south of Sallisaw in eFlore County, OK. (See Robert S. Kerr, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-21 of the Annual Report for 1972. The Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Construction began in April 1964 and closure was completed in October 1970. The lock and dam became operational for navigation in December 1970. Generating units 1, 2, 3, and 4 were placed in operation in October, July, September, and November 1971, respectively. Local cooperation. See section 1 of this report. Terminal facilities. Five sites have been developed for handling coal, grain, construction aggregrates, and miscellaneous cargo. The facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 48. TENKILLER FERRY LAKE, OK. Location. On the Illinois River at river mile 12.8, 7 miles northeast of Gore in Sequoyah County, OK. (See Gore, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a descriiion of the completed improvement, see page 606 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1947 and was completed in July 1953. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 49. WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at navigation mile 366.6, about 5 miles northwest of Webbers Falls in Muskogee County, OK. (See Webbers Falls, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-23 of the Annual Report for 1977. The Webbers Falls Lock and Dam is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Construction began in January 1965, and the project was placed in useful operation in November 1970. The lock and dam became operational for navigation in December 1970. Generating units 1, 2, and 3 were placed in operation in August, September, and November 1973, respectively. Local cooperation. See section 1 of this report. Terminal facilities. Facilities at the Port of Muskogee include: A cargo pier, mooring dolphins, warehouse, terminal building, and fuel facility built by the Muskogee City-County Port Authority; a liquid cargo loading facility and a steel unloading facility built by Frontier Steel Company; grain holding facilities built by Conagra, Inc.; and a general-purpose private dock built by the Fort Howard Paper Company. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 29-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 General Investigations 50. SURVEYS. Fiscal year cost was $2,429,186 which included 11 flood damage prevention studies; 2 comprehensive studies; 2 restudies of deferred projects; inventory of dams - special investigations and review of FERC licenses, and coordination with her Federal agencies, States and intragency water resources development; and non-Federal interests. Table 29-K provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 51. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA. Fiscal year cost was $311,399 which includes flood plain management services and hydrologic studies. Table 29-K provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 52. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. Fiscal year cost was $1,003,858 which includes two flood control reservoirs and four local protection projects. Table 29-K provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 29-10 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Table 29-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep 30, 19891 1. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, OK, (Tulsa District Portion) 3. Arcadia Lake, OK 4. Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control, KS, OK, and TX 4a. Area V, Estelline Springs, TX 4b. Area VIII, TX 5. Birch Lake, OK 6. Candy Lake, OK 7. Canton Lake, OK - - - - 130,936,6382 S- - - 130,936,6382 8,635,900 7,778,050 10,166,800 4,207,100 132,507,061 9,120,610 7,895,973 9,367,272 4,224,784 127,376,720 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 3,146 4,410 6,000 5,882 943,000 601,912 127,300 127,232 595,000 611,520 8,285 -222 -222 435 1,660 330,844 459,500 457,269 615,400 611,826 47,590 1,500,000 815,940 294,600 304,715 768,000 1,323,780 417,500 392,488 376 5,700 5,048 28,300 26,232 341,291 693,500 654,204 709,800 687,249 -22,000 8,272 24,100 14,338 3,635 4,288 3,300 5,288 115,936 770,300 802,076 759,972 771,336 19,000 19,242 1,188,500 1,146,922 1,585,400 1,403,400 1,297,427 1,142,413 1,481,886 1,508,298 29-11 82,108,289 81,657,964 880,900 839,724 25,705,208 25,705,068 3,533,506 3,646,832 300,028 300,028 169,111 183,699 46,493,000 46,418,486 2,050,600 2,040,781 13,549,170 13,549,296 6,968,573 10,253,240 4,927,922 4,927,714 43,100 33,580 11,209,834 10,918,727 19,899,594 19,971,579 1t T 7 6,646,000 6,300,000 11,417,121 6,092,367 100 168,700 -315 142,836 182 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Table 29-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep 30, 19891 8. Copan Lake, OK 9. Council Grove Lake, KS 10. El Dorado Lake, KS 11. Elk City Lake, KS 12. Fall River Lake, KS 13. Fort Supply Lake, OK 14. Great Bend, KS 15. Great Salt Plains Lake, OK 16. Halstead, KS New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 3,092,000 1,050,879 491,000 501,204 450,000 725,909 587,100 609,896 2,127,911 729,800 674,358 353,133 903,200 875,777 88,676,999 91,987,703 3,751,000 3,653,202 - 11,810,509 - 11,810,509 856,000 1,420,122 876,525 1,444,285 1,412,317 319,800 338,798 870,500 917,213 453,181 329,100 328,807 654,300 686,243 818,300 803,059 1,930,000 2,064,749 416,500 391,983 843,900 864,027 131,000 318,066 536,208 539,477 777,400 1,005,708 745,711 1,026,682 11,821,944 11,793,246 92,432,468 92,265,049 2,927,908 2,901,292 19,052,990 19,052,990 10,770,814 10,723,259 - 10,550,873 - 10,550,873 835,800 1,091,136 671,000 687,903 696,600 703,723 622,800 619,807 888,200 1,054,600 801,319 1,132,283 942,600 1,024,500 889,571 970,456 220,000 1,140,000 1,500,000 126,531 1,031,858 1,247,994 485,200 636,153 370,600 366,615 250,000 156,920 507,200 1,033,200 427,519 1,119,370 375,000 454,756 200,000 203,551 11,185,995 11,339,542 7,724,134 7,723,127 10,753,973 10,616,384 2,860,000 2,406,383 4,626,270 4,626,270 7,082,307 7,072,602 825,000 815,227 29-12 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Table 29-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep 30, 19891 17. Heyburn Lake and Polecat Creek, OK 18. Hugo Lake, OK 19. Hulah Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Minor Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 20. John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS 21. Kaw Lake, OK 22. Lake Kemp, TX 23. Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX 24. Marion Lake, KS 25. Mingo Creek, OK 495,200 531,820 610,400 564,381 693,200 681,398 826,000 787,096 - 1,868 974 4,023 1,217,600 2,712,122 2,398,900 1,328,700 1,264,286 2,597,490 2,462,384 1,343,855 291,600 497,400 642,100 648,068 721,000 681,541 595,300 597,517 1,380,600 1,009,622 1,212,200 1,546,200 1,563,663 892,125 1,284,003 1,562,032 143,616 5,264 3,102 -390 1,714,200 2,118,422 2,430,300 1,772,700 2,080,047 2,139,648 2,202,005 1,884,007 138,000 172,196 118,300 120,895 169,700 160,954 150,680 158,216 805,000 1,704,000 6,755,000 677,910 1,275,692 6,826,669 719,300 789,868 831,500 830,572 906,600 797,669 889,800 910,507 - 2,087,000 4,884,000 446,418 2,268,007 29-13 2,560,572 2,560,572 8,796,923 8,794,842 37,759,742 37,432,108 16,746,850 16,568,047 11,388,150 11,182,433 11,095,279 11,008,195 135,718 135,718 28,151,515 28,151,515 18,801,677 18,847,092 109,430,750 109,429,274 19,323,090 19,153,295 7,637,702 7,637,702 1,986,914 1,984,348 9,264,000 8,780,271 13,420,817 13,420,817 12,010,346 11,889,997 6,971,000 2,714,425 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Table 29-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep 30, 19891 26. Oologah Lake, OK 27. Optima Lake, OK 28. Parker Lake, OK 29. Pat Mayse Lake, TX 30. Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, KS 31. Pine Creek Lake, OK 32. Sardis Lake, OK 33. Skiatook Lake, OK 34. Toronto Lake, KS New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 1,179,000 1,252,522 1,295,700 1,135,100 1,306,646 1,246,801 1,309,601 1,143,974 485,500 490,736 451,500 448,801 961,000 55,496 542,900 525,318 200,000 288,951 561,000 578,602 -654,000 119,194 46,722,3293 46,721,5563 19,351,426 19,331,602 47,173,438 47,273,438 4,758,422 4,788,614 522,000 463,641 - 9,310,661 - 9,310,661 930,000 1,018,712 692,800 689,368 927,400 870,590 805,100 869,122 40 797,600 825,038 45,998 924,900 1,065,137 7,453,000 1,055,291 673,700 671,787 - 230,000 1,041,357 578,600 524,973 301,000 292,120 767,300 1,007,300 1,025,700 786,870 961,795 1,066,793 22,313 780,800 768,370 572,000 3,607,419 665,350 690,076 509,874 609,700 639,033 400,500 410,820 849,500 883,439 -202 1,008,600 999,405 5,215,000 1,350,000 4,138,635 4,273,156 823,900 812,244 2,000,000 279,972 795,900 712,124 313,200 291,831 888,800 887,629 433,000 2,189,460 987,700 1,002,919 211,900 233,835 11,158,609 11,144,569 16,879,166 16,879,165 5,701,200 5,697,978 20,628,049 20,627,847 11,056,658 11,000,442 67,893,479 65,760,353 4,202,850 4,177,311 106,181,282 106,138,089 3,190,300 3,081,202 13,896,324 13,896,324 5,286,103 5,283,938 29-14 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Table 29-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep 30, 19891 35. Waurika Lake, OK 36. Wister Lake, OK 42. Broken Bow Lake, OK 43. Eufaula Lake, OK 44. Fort Gibson Lake, OK 45. Keystone Lake, OK 46. Lake Texoma (Denison Dam), OK and TX 47. Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, OK New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Major Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Minor Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 24,340 938,200 958,274 29,910 73,000 192,927 -8,034 901,922 1,121,600 1,209,100 899,739 1,083,398 1,212,261 67,153,050 67,142,501 8,833,966 7,784,634 - 10,501,226 - 10,501,226 718,400 777,134 774,500 758,208 852,100 836,200 802,800 805,894 940,000 922,683 1,274,100 1,334,022 1,677,900 1,626,200 1,393,509 1,342,585 1,501,749 1,779,734 478,000 287,346 3,137,400 3,319,004 192,000 786,814 3,771,922 3,751,284 63,796 4,725,100 4,488,574 17,617 3,666,000 3,403,633 2,898,800 3,239,622 3,300,400 3,230,500 3,187,330 3,144,482 3,138,033 3,354,424 2,681,300 3,081,022 3,666,600 2,902,200 2,844,576 3,033,653 3,491,838 3,024,825 5,070,800 4,593,222 5,668,500 5,350,600 5,433,240 4,534,606 5,592,446 5,473,749 10,863,860 10,828,281 940,000 922,683 41,222,692 41,222,692 18,516,541 18,473,541 123,350,7474 123,012,7624 50,880,366 47,373,436 42,591,298 s 43,497,791 s 45,569,188 46,778,635 123,171,1736 123,170,6756 39,777,652 39,743,799 68,168,9607 68,019,1097 81,801,170 81,705,441 46,237 46,237 - - - 94,578,237 - - 94,578,237 2,452,000 2,413,300 4,273,100 4,592,584 42,578,820 2,510,997 2,531,516 4,037,108 4,781,357 42,126,223 29-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Table 29-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep 30, 19891 48. Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK New Work Approp - - 24,017,7208 Cost - - 24,057,7188 Maint Approp 2,927,600 3,115,037 3,291,800 2,739,000 39,201,614 Cost 3,081,392 3,178,124 3,061,753 2,831,687 39,043,115 49. Webbers Falls Lock New Work & Dam, OK Approp - - - - 83,738,277 Cost - - - - 83,738,701 Maint Approp 3,561,800 2,341,900 2,860,500 2,433,300 39,754,764 Cost 3,867,890 2,368,464 2,529,036 2,728,735 39,821,131 1. Includes $2,077,900 expended by the Jobs Act (P.L. 98-8, 6. Excludes $5,366,231 special funds. dated March 24, 1983) for projects listed in Table 29-M of the 7. Includes $433,539 Emergency Relief funds. Exchange FY 85 Annual Report. $1,256,068 from special contributed funds. 2. Includes $12,700,038 for Bank Stabilization and Channel 8. Excludes $946 contributed funds. Includes $39,999 Public Rectification. Works acceleration funds. 3. Excludes $81,460 contributed funds and $1,348,816 special 9. The cost for Grand Lake 0' the Cherokees has been added funds. to amount reported in paragraph 40, Scheduling Reservoir 4. Excludes $299,803 contributed funds and $13,211,728 Operations. special funds. 5. Excludes $134,919 contributed funds. Includes $49,581 Public Works acceleration funds. Table 29-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Project Section Authorizing and Work In Text Act Authorized Documents July 24, 1946 October 22, 1976 November 17, 1986 December 31, 1970 October 22, 1976 4. 4a. October 23, 1962 4b. November 7, 1966 December 31, 1970 November 17, 1986 McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM Big and Little Sallisaw Creeks Navigation Project W.D. Mayo Hydropwer ARCADIA LAKE Changed water quality to water supply ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL Authorized Area V (Estelline Springs) Authorized Areas VII, VIII, and X Authorized Areas I, II-III, VI, IX, XIII, XIV, and XV Authorized the Red River Basin and the Arkansas River Basin as separate projects with separate authority. HD 79-758, PL 79-525 PL 94-587 PL 99-662 HD 91-299 PL 94-587 SD 87-107 PL 89-789, SD 110 PL 91-611 PL 99-662 29-16 1. TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT Table 29-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Project Section Authorizing and Work In Text Act Authorized Documents 5. October 23, 1962 6. October 23, 1962 7. June 28, 1938 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 8. October 23, 1962 9. May 17, 1950 10. October 27, 1965 11. August 18, 1941 12. August 18, 1941 13. June 22, 1936 14. November 17, 1986 15. June 22, 1936 16. November 17, 1986 17. July 24, 1946 18. July 24, 1946 19. June 22, 1936 20. May 17, 1950 February 15, 1958 21. October 23, 1962 22. October 23, 1962 23. November 17, 1986 24. May 17, 1950 25. November 17, 1986 26. June 28, 1938 27. June 22, 1936 28. November 17, 1986 29. October 23, 1962 30. October 23, 1962 November 10, 1978 31. July 3, 1958 32. October 23, 1962 December 4, 1981 33. October 23, 1962 34. August 18, 1941 35. December 30, 1963 HD HD HD BIRCH LAKE CANDY LAKE CANTON LAKE Approved Irrigation Storage Approved Water Supply Storage COPAN LAKE COUNCIL GROVE LAKE EL DORADO LAKE ELK CITY LAKE FALL RIVER LAKE FORT SUPPLY LAKE GREAT BEND GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE HALSTEAD HEYBURN LAKE AND POLECAT CREEK HUGO LAKE HULAH LAKE JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR Authorized name change KAW LAKE LAKE KEMP LAKE WICHITA, HOLLIDAY CREEK MARION LAKE MINGO CREEK OOLOGAH LAKE OPTIMA LAKE PARKER LAKE PAT MAYSE LAKE PEARSON-SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE Authorized name change PINE CREEK LAKE SARDIS LAKE Authorized name change SKIATOOK LAKE TORONTO LAKE WAURIKA LAKE 87-563 87-563 75-569 HD 87-563 HD 80-442 HD 89-232 HD 76-440 HD 76-440 HD 74-308 PL 99-662 HD 74-308 PL 99-662 HD 80-290 HD 79-602 HD 74-308 HD 80-442 PL 85-327 HD 87-143 HD 87-144 PL 99-662 HD 80-442 PL 99-662 Committee Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Session HD 74-308 PL 99-662 HD 88-71 HD 87-472 PL 95-265 HD 85-170 SD 87-145 PL 97-88 HD 87-563 HD 76-440 PL 77-228 SD 88-33 PL 88-253 29-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Table 29-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Project Section Authorizing and Work In Text Act Authorized Documents 36. June 28, 1938 WISTER LAKE Committee Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Session July 30, 1983 Changed conservation pool PL 98-63 elevation 42. July 3, 1958 BROKEN BOW LAKE HD 85-170 October 23, 1962 SD 87-137 43. July 24, 1946 EUFAULA LAKE HD 79-758 44. August 18, 1941 FORT GIBSON LAKE HD 76-107 July 24, 1946 Incorporated into the PL 76-228 multiple-purpose plan for the Arkansas River Basin November 17, 1986 Added hydropower units 5 & 6 PL 99-662 45. May 17, 1950 KEYSTONE LAKE SD 81-07 46. LAKE TEXOMA (Denison Dam) June 28, 1938 Flood control and power HD 75-541 October 17, 1940 Navigation and regulating flows PL 76-868 Sepember 30, 1944 Authorized name PL 78-454 August 14, 1953 Water supply PL 83-273 November 17, 1986 Recreation PL 99-662 47. July 24, 1946 ROBERT S. KERR LOCK AND HD 79-758 DAM AND RESERVOIR July 8, 1963 Authorized name change PL 88-62 48. June 28, 1938 TENKILLER FERRY LAKE Committee Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Session June 24, 1946 Power HD 79-758 49. July 24, 1946 WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM HD 79-758 Table 29-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Big and Little Sallisaw Navigation Project Inactive - Poteau River Navigation Project, OK and AR Complete 1983 536,952 Red River from Fulton, AR, to Mouth of Washita River Complete 1924 378,574 182,157 29-18 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT TABLE 29-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Augusta LPP, KS"' 2 1938 84,217 Big Pine Lake, TX3 1984 1,701,670 Boswell Lake, OK3 1952 Cherry and Red Fork Creeks LPP, OK2 1970 261,448 Crutcho Creek LPP, OK3 1972 213,016 Dodge City LPP, KS2 Enid LPP, OK2 1963 743,612 14,599 Flat Rock and Valley View Creeks LPP, Tulsa, OK2' 4 1975 1,741,000 Florence LPP, KS2 1965 369,782 Hutchinson LPP, KS2 1956 3,497,718 Iola LPP, KS2 1939 22,290 Jenks LPP, OK2 1950 344,797 Joe Creek LPP, OK2 308,041 Lamed LPP, KS2 Lukfata Lake, OK3 1983 1,424,685 Marion, KS2 1988 5,488,190 McGrath Creek, Wichita Falls, TX5 Oklahoma City LPP, OK2 1960 8,047,512 Red River Bank Stabilization Below Denison, OK and TX2 1953 222,105 Sand Creek LPP, KS2 1968 545,996 Sand Lake, OK' 1963 Shidler Lake, OK3 1983 568,191 Tulsa and West Tulsa LPP, OK2 1954 2,785,070 Turtle Creek LPP, Yukon, OK3 1975 144,853 Tuskahoma Lake, OK' 1963 West Branch Chisholm Creek LPP, KS2 1965 364,200 Wichita and Valley Center LPP, KS2 1960 12,247,379 Winfield LPP, KS1' 2 1937 LPP - Local Protection Project. 1. Completed by Kansas Works Progress Administration. 2. Complete. 3. Deferred. 4. Federal cost limited to $1,000,000. 5. Active with no current year expenditures. TABLE 29-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Cedar Point Lake, KS 1980 November 17, 1986 0 0 Public Law 99-662 Cow Creek, Hutchinson, KS 1971 November 17, 1986 363,720 0 Public Law 99-662 El Dorado, West Branch, 1977 November 17, 1986 92,319 0 Walnut River, KS Public Law 99-662 Neodesha Lake, KS 1952 November 17, 1986 97,910 0 Public Law 99-662 Towanda Lake, KS 1981 November 17, 1986 392,361 0 Public Law 99-662 29-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 29-H ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PLAN (See Section 1 of Text) Feature River River Mile 1 Nearest Town LAKES Canton North Canadian 394.3 Canton, OK Elk City Elk River 8.7 Elk City, KS Eufaula Canadian 27.0 Eufaula, OK Fall River Fall River 54.2 Fall River, KS Fort Gibson Grand (Neosho) 7.7 Fort Gibson, OK Grand Lake 0' the Cherokees Grand (Neosho) 77.0 Disney, OK Keystone Arkansas 538.8 Sand Springs, OK Lake Hudson (Markham Ferry) Grand (Neosho) 47.4 Locust Grove, OK Neodesha Verdigris 222.8 Neodesha, KS Oologah Verdigris 90.2 Oologah, OK Tenkiller Ferry Illinois 12.8 Gore, OK Toronto Verdigris 271.5 Toronto, KS Wister Poteau 60.9 Wister, OK McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, OK (Tulsa District Portion) Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification Verdigris and Arkansas N/A2 Fort Smith, AR, to Catoosa, OK Chouteau Lock and Dam (17), OK Verdigris 401.5 Okay, OK Lock and Dam 13, AR Arkansas 292.8 Fort Smith, AR Newt Graham Lock and Dam (18), OK Verdigris 421.6 Inola, OK Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam (15), OK Arkansas 339.0 Sallisaw, OK Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, OK Arkansas 336.2 Cowlington, OK Sans Bois Navigation Channel, OK Sans Bois Creek 341.0 Keota, OK W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam (14), OK Arkansas 319.6 Redland, OK Webbers Falls Lock and Dam (16), OK Arkansas 366.6 Gore, OK 1. On the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, these are navigation miles. 2. As required for a channel 9 feet deep. TABLE 29-I INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 38 of Text) Projects Inspected in Fiscal Year Inspection Date Hutchinson, KS May 1989 Park City, KS June 1989 Wichita and Valley Center, KS May 1989 29-20 TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT TABLE 29-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 41 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Identification/Name Cost SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED BY CONGRESS (Section 205) Blackboy Creek, Tulsa County, OK Caney River (Kennilworth Addition), Bartlesville, OK Coal Creek, Henryetta, OK Coweta Creek, Coweta, OK Dog Creek, Waynoka, OK East Plum Creek, Wichita Falls, TX Haikey Creek, Tulsa County, OK Joe Creek, Tulsa, OK Merkle Creek, Norman, OK Muskogee, OK North Canadian River Wastewater Plant, Oklahoma City, OK Pauls Valley, OK Rock Creek, Burlington, KS Tahlequah Creek Walnut Creek, Purcell, OK Washita River, OK Whiskey and Rock Creeks, Independence, KS Whitewater and Walnut River, Augusta, KS Wichita Falls, TX TOTAL SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION (Section 14) Chikaskia River, Blackwell, OK City Dam, Little Caney River, KS County Road (Sec. 2), Deer Creek, KS County Road (Sec. 6), Deer Creek, KS County Road, Verdigris River, KS County Road, Tner Creek, Adair County County Road, Washita River, Carter County Dam and Bridge, Neosho River, KS Fort Cobb Sewage Lagoon, OK Lee Creek, Adair County, OK Levee, Arkansas River, Tulsa Murray County Bridge, OK North Canadian River (11th Street Bridge), Yukon, OK North Canadian River, Okfuskee County, OK Sewage Lagoons, North Canadian River State Highway 156, Kay County, OK Verdigris River City Dam, Independence, KS Walnut River, Cowley County, KS Washita River, Anadarko, OK TOTAL EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION SNAGGING AND CLEARING Elk River, Elk County, KS Minnehaha Creek, Canton, OK South Deer Creek, Shawnee, OK Unnamed Trib., Tecumseh, OK Walnut Creek, Purcell, OK TOTAL SNAGGING AND CLEARING FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES, REHABILITATION Tulsa/West Tulsa Levee TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES, REHABILITATION 29-21 67,005 2,664 6,417 4,142 37,435 19,827 6,459 16,312 36,878 46,453 819,387 600 34,637 52,458 26,636 47,366 4,800 377 46,406 1,266,258 33,859 8,200 3,515 3,625 7,696 2,855 5,012 1,952 4,455 543 8,369 521 94 -338 3,359 2,164 229,333 3,304 95 318,614 3,031 10,000 7,868 11,096 4,154 36,149 -702 -702 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 29-K GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 50, 51, and 52 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Identification/Name Cost SURVEYS Flood Damage Prevention Studies Arkansas River, Great Bend, KS, to Tulsa, OK 309,864 Arkansas River Basin, AR and OK 331,239 Canadian River Basin, OK, TX, and NM 10,576 Crutcho Creek, OK 124,708 Grand (Neosho) River, KS and OK 2,226 Keystone Dam to Tulsa, Ark River 210,065 Lake Texoma, OK and TX 362,481 Miami and Vicinity, OK 243,283 North Canadian River Above Lake Overholser 62,732 Verdigris River Basin 243 Verdigris River Basin, KS and OK, Caney 9,873 Comprehensive Studies Arkansas River and Tributaries, South Central-Southeast Areas, OK 206,079 Red River Basin, AR, TX, LA, and OK CM 223,687 Review of Authorized Projects Restudy of Deferred Projects Lukfata Lake, OK 43,929 Winfield, KS 1,427 Inventory of Dams Special Investigations 40,981 Review of FERC Licenses 2,411 Intragency Water Resources Development 16,434 Coordination with Other Federal Agencies, States, and Non-Federal Interests Soil Conservation Service 3,992 Bureau of Reclamation 6,050 Planning Assistance to States - Texas 0 Planning Assistance to States - Kansas 65,195 Planning Assistance to States - Oklahoma 151,719 TOTAL SURVEYS 2,429,186 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood Plain Management Services Flood Plain Management Services 120,396 Ponca City, OK, Flood Forecast Map 2,792 Technical Services General 174,418 Tulsa Forecast Maps 13,495 Hydrologic Studies Storm Studies 298 TOTAL COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA 311,399 PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Flood Control Reservoirs Douglass Lake, KS 1,645 Parker Lake, OK 4,110 Local Protection Arkansas City, KS 136,771 Fry Creeks, Bixby, OK 519,614 Mingo Creek, OK 315 Upper Little Arkansas River Watershed, KS 341,402 TOTAL PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 1,003,858 29-22 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT * District includes that portion of Texas south of Red River drainage basin exclusive of drainage basin of Rio Grande and its tributaries above and including Pecos River; exclusive of drainage basins to all short streams arising in coastal plain of Texas and flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, including entire basins of Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, San Bernard, Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Arkansas Rivers; exclusive of lower basins of major streams flowing into the gulf as follows: Sabine River, Texas and Louisiana, downstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas; Neches River downstream from Town Bluff gaging station; Trinity River downstream from Texas State Highway 45 crossing at Riverside, Texas; Brazos River downstream from confluence with Navasota River; Colorado River downstream from gaging station at Austin; Guadalupe River downstream from confluence with San Marcos River; San Antonio River downstream from confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River downstream from confluence with Frio and Atascosa Rivers; and exclusive of Agua Dulce, San Fernando, and Olmos Creek basins draining into Baffin Bay; coastal area south thereof to Rio Grande and south to the northern boundaries of Newton, Jasper, Tyler, Polk, Trinity, Walker, Waller, Austin, Fayette, Gonzales, Karnes, Live Oak, Jim Hogg, Zapata; the northern and western boundaries of McMullan; and the western boundaries of Montgomery and Duval Counties, Texas. District also includes those portions of the Sulphur River and Cypress Creek Watershed located in the State of Texas; that portion of western Louisiana in Sabine River drainage basin upstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas. 30-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 IMPROVEMENTS Navigation l 1. Trinity River Project, TX ............... Flood Control 2. Aquilla Lake, TX ..................... 3. Bardwell Lake, TX .................... 4. Belton Lake, TX ...................... 5. Benbrook Lake, TX .................... 6. Boggy Creek, TX ...................... 7. Canyon Lake, TX .................... .. 8. Cooper Lake and Channels, TX .......... 9. Ferrells Bridge Dam- Lake O' The Pines, TX ................. 10. Grand Prairie, TX (Meyers Road) ......... 11. Grapevine Lake, TX ................... 12. Hords Creek Lake, TX ................. 13. Joe Pool Lake, TX .................... 14. Lavon Lake, TX ...................... 15. Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement, TX .............. 16. Lewisville Dam, TX ................... 17. Navarro Mills Lake, TX ................ 18. O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake, TX .......... 19. Proctor Lake, TX ..................... 20. Ray Roberts Lake, TX ................. 21. San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX ... 22. San Gabriel River, TX ................ 23. Somerville Lake, TX .................. 24. Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX ............ 25. Waco Lake, TX ...................... Page Flood Control (Cont) Page 30-2 26. Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX ...... 30-11 27. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............................ 30-11 30-3 28. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir 30-3 Operations ......................... 30-12 30-4 29. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .. 30-12 30-4 30. Flood Control Work Under Special 3n_A Authorization ....................... 30-12 30-5 30-5 30-6 30-6 30-6 30-7 30-7 30-7 30-8 30-8 30-8 30-9 30-9 30-9 30-9 30-10 30-10 30-11 30-11 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 31. Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower, TX ... 32. Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX .... 33. Town Bluff Dam- B.A. Steinhagen Lake, TX ............. 34. Whitney Lake, TX ................... General Investigations 35. Surveys ............................ 36. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... 30-12 30-12 30-13 30-13 30-13 30-13 Tables Table 30-A Cost and Financial Statement .. 30-15 Table 30-B Authorizing Legislation ........ 30-19 Table 30-C Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................... 30-22 Table 30-D Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .............. 30-22 Table 30-E Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .......... 30-23 Navigation 1. TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX The project authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (H. Doc 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.) consists of five major components: Multiple-Purpose Channel, Tennessee Colony Lake, Dallas Floodway Extension, West Fork Floodway, and Water Conveyance Facilities. For the last full report on the project as authorized, see Annual Report of 1978. The project information present herein is based on the tentatively selected project plan presented in the Draft General Design Memorandum. The plan consists of three structural components: Dallas Floodway Extension, Tennessee Colony Lake, and Channel to Liberty in the lower basin. The estimated cost of the improvements is $1,235,000 including $107,000,000 non-Federal cost for land acquisition and relocation required for the local protection features (Oct. 1, 1987, base price). Operations during fiscal year. The authorized projects have been dormant for several years due to lack of local support. CHANNEL TO LIBERTY: Location. The Channel to Liberty begins at the Houston Ship Channel, crosses the bay area in an easterly direction to intersect the existing Double Bayou Channel turns northward along the coastline to Wallisville Lake and then continues northward through the lake area along the course of the Trinity River to River Mile 45 above Liberty, Texas. Existing project. The navigation portion of the channel will have a width of 200 feet with a depth of 12 feet and will extend from the Houston Ship Channel in Galveston Bay to the port of Liberty, Texas. The flood control portion of the channel will have a bottom width of 200 feet with a depth of 30 feet, and will extend from Wallisville Lake to River Mile 45 above Liberty, Texas. Estimated Federal cost of the improvements is $147,000,000 and estimated non-Federal cost is $44,000,000 for a total estimated cost of $191,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1987, base price). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to: (a) provide, without cost to the Federal Government, all lands, easements and rights-of-way required for construction, operation and maintenance of the project, 30-2 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT (b) accomplish, without cost to the Federal Government, all relocations and alterations to existing improvements, other than highway bridges over new land cuts and railroad bridges required for the construction of the project, (c) maintain and operate the flood control portion of the channel upstream of Liberty, Texas, and (d) reimburse the Federal Government for one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $34,000, exclusive of interest. TENNESSEE COLONY LAKE: Location. The Tennessee Colony dam site is located at River Mile 341.7 on the Trinity River about 22 miles west of Palestine, Texas. The lake would extend into Freestone, Anderson, Henderson, and Navarro Counties, and would control a drainage area of 12,302 square miles. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for the construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum height of 123 feet above the streambed and a total embankment length of 42,350 feet with a gated concrete spillway. The lake will have a total controlled storage of 3,455,000 acre-feet and a water surface area of 114,400 acres at the top of the flood control pool and 68,100 acres at the top of the conservation pool. The total storage includes 2,269,500 acre-feet for flood control, 1,040,000 acre-feet for conservation, and 145,500 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated Federal cost of the improvement is $913,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1983, base price). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage and one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $461,754,000 for water supply and $9,533,000 for recreation (excluding future recreation facilities), for a total cost of $471,287,000, exclusive of interest. DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION: Location. Dallas Floodway Extension is located on the Trinity River in the City of Dallas, Dallas County, Texas. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for extending the existing Floodway downstream about 9 miles to the confluence of the Trinity River and Five Mile Creek. The plan consists of a leveed floodway and flood conveyance improvement (channel) along the main stem, Five Mile Creek and White Rock Creek. Maintained free of encroachments, the levees and channels would provide Standard Project Flood protection for approximately 7,300 acres of urban lands currently subject to flooding. The estimated Federal cost is $68,000,000 and estimated non-Federal cost is $63,000,000 for a total estimated cost of $131,000,000 for the improvement (Oct. 1, 1983, base price). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to: (a) provide, without cost to the Federal Government, all lands, easements and rights-of-way necessary for construction, maintenance and operation of the project, (b) accomplish, without cost to the Federal Government, all alterations to existing improvements, other than railroad bridges required for the construction of the project, (c) maintain and operate the project after completion, and (d) reimburse the Federal Government for one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $1,878,000 (excluding future recreation) exclusive of interest. Flood Control 2. AQUILLA LAKE, TX Location. On Aquilla Creek in Hill County, Texas, with the dam at River Mile 23.3, about 6.8 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas, and about 24.0 miles north of Waco, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing Acts see Annual Report for 1984. Construction was started March 1977, and project was ready for beneficial use April 29, 1983. Estimated cost is $46,100,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. A contract with the Brazos River Authority for water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army, June 29, 1976. To date, the Authority has paid $141,283 toward principal and $17,008 to operation and maintenance. Benefits accrued to Aquilla project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1989 were $1,919,000. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continue. 3. BARDWELL LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Waxahachie Creek, 5 river miles upstream from its confluence with Chambers Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, and about 5 miles south of Ennis, Ellis County, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction of project was started August 1963 and completed for beneficial use in November 1965. Estimated cost of project is $12,941,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased water supply storage under the terms of the Water Supply Act of 1958. A Contract was approved by the Secretary of the Army on June 24, 1963, and the Trinity River Authority, a State agency, agreed to fulfill all requirements of local cooperation. To date the authority his paid $588,565 toward principal and $747,951 toward annual cost of operation and maintenance of project, including cost of operating 10-foot conduit. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 30-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Benefits accrued to Bardwell project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1989 were $9,137,800. 4. BELTON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Leon River about 16.7 miles above confluence of Leon and Lampasas Rivers and about 3 miles north of Belton, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report of 1962. Construction started June 1949 and project was ready for beneficial use in March 1954. Raising water supply pool: Construction started in July 1970 and the pool raise is complete. Estimated cost of project is $18,410,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for remaining water supply storage in reservoir was approved by Secretary of the Army on January 15, 1958, at an estimated cost of $1,602,822. To date $1,186,817 has been paid. Under the contract Brazos River Authority must also pay annually 11.2 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date $1,323,854 has been paid. An interim contract with Brazos River Authority for emergency use of water supply storage in project was approved by Secretary of the Army on January 2, 1957. Amount of $331,410 paid by authority on March 21, 1957 for use of these facilities was credited to interest and principal payable under formal water supply contract. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Belton project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1989 were $118,806,600. 5. BENBROOK LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Tarrant County, Texas, on Clear Fork of Trinity River 15 river miles upstream from its confluence with West Fork of Trinity River about 10 miles southwest of downtown Fort Worth, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for beneficial use in September 1952. Estimated cost of project is $14,544,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. No water supply storage is included in project. In 1956, Congress passed legislation enabling the city of Fort Worth to purchase conservation storage space in Benbrook lake. Contracts have been negotiated with the city of Fort Worth and the Benbrook Water and Sewer Authority for the use of portions of the navigation storage for water supply purposes until such storage is required for Trinity River Navigation. To date $166,851 has been paid by the city of Fort Worth and $123,522 by Benbrook Water and Sewer Authority. A cost sharing contract with the city of Benbrook for Recreation Development was approved by the Secretary of the Army May 20, 1977. To date, $18,321 has been paid. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to system consisting of Benbrook Lake, Clear Fork and West Fork Floodways: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1989 are estimated at $60,658,800. 6. BOGGY CREEK, AUSTIN, TX Location. The project is located on Boggy Creek in southeast portion of the city of Austin, Texas. Existing project. The Boggy Creek Channel Improvement Project will consist of approximately 2 miles of concrete and gabion lined channel beginning just upstream of Webberville Road and extending downstream almost to Jain Lane. From there the Channel is about 1.0 mile of grasslined trapezoidal channel to Ed Bluestein (Highway 183) where it transitions back into the natural channel. The project will include a 54 acre tract near the lower end of the project which will serve as a mitigation and environmental quality enhancement area. Approximately 1.0 mile of nature trail will be included in the mitigation/enhancement area. The project will require the replacement or modification of four bridges. It will also include the replacement of two railroad bridges with one bridge. Estimated Federal cost is $16,700,000 and $8,500,000 non-Federal cost (Oct. 1, 1989, base price). The proposed flood control channel will provide capacities for the 100 year flood. Design will provide for containment of flows within the banks of the improved channels. Bottom widths for the concrete channel will vary from 60 feet to 90 feet, and top widths from 80 feet to 120 feet. Local cooperation. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the City of Austin is required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and material disposal areas, presently estimated at $2,129,000; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads and other facilities except railroad bridges, where necessary in the construction of the project presently estimated at $4,719,000; pay one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $231,000; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities, presently estimated at $32,000 annually; pay five percent of cost allocated to flood control, presently estimated at $1,227,000 and bear all cost of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities presently estimated at $43,000 annually; pay 33 percent of the first costs allocated to environmental quality enhancement, presently estimated at $64,000; pay 37 percent of the separable first cost allocated to fish and wildlife mitigation, presently estimated at $130,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of fish and wildlife facilities presently estimated at $5,000. The city will also be required to hold and save 30-4 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT the United States free from damages due to the construction work, operate and maintain all works after completion, prevent any obstruction or encroachment that would reduce the flow capacity of the project, provide and maintain adequate lateral drains and channels, publicize flood plain information for all streams in the watershed and adopt and enforce regulations to minimize damages to future developments within the 100-year flood plain, and administer and assure access to the recreational facilities and lands to all on an equal basis. Operations during fiscal year. Specific authorization for construction of Boggy Creek is found in FY 1985 Supplemental Act. In FY 1989 work continued on the Channel Improvement Part I; contracts were awarded on Relocation of the Railroad Bridge and the Channel Improvement Part II. Project completion is scheduled for FY 1991. 7. CANYON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Guadalupe River, 303 miles above its mouth, and about 12 miles northwest of New Braunfels, Comal County, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction started April 1958 and project completed for beneficial use June 1964. Estimated cost of project is $21,732,000, including $1,400,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Local interests (Guadalupe- Blanco River Authority) will utilize water impounded for water supply and streamflow regulation for development of electric power. In a formal contract approved by Chief of Engineers on October 24, 1957, Guadalupe- Blanco River Authority agreed to fulfill all requirements of local cooperation. Required contribution of $1,400,000 was made in full by Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority. The estimated cost of the water storage contract is about $9,000,000. To date $1,770,654 has been paid. In addition, $22,848 was contributed for installation and operation of reservoir leakage gages. Under the contract the authority must pay 34.8 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date $1,069,561 has been paid. Operations during fiscal year. Regular funds: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Canyon project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1989 were $58,878,300. 8. COOPER LAKE AND CHANNELS, TX Location. Cooper Dam is located in northeast Texas about 4 miles southeast of Cooper, 13.0 miles north of Sulphur Springs, and is at river mile 23.2 on the South Sulphur River. The South Sulphur River rises in Fannin County, Texas, and flows generally east for about 80 miles to its confluence with the North Sulphur River to form the Sulphur River. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of a multipurpose reservoir with levee and channel improvements on the Sulphur River. The reservoir consists of a rolled earthfill dam with a maximum height of about 73 feet, 28,070 feet long at its crest, a single conduit 10.5 feet in diameter, 530 feet long, two 10.5 foot by 4.75 foot sluices, and a 700 foot wide uncontrolled concrete spillway. The reservoir surface area will be 22,740 acres at the top of the flood control pool, 19,305 acres at the top of the water supply pool, and 5,084 acres at the top of the sediment pool. The reservoir will contain 131,400 acre-feet of flood control storage, 273,000 acre-feet of municipal and industrial water supply storage, and 37,000 acre-feet of sediment storage. Construction of the project began in July 1958 and, to date, approximately 66 percent of the lands required for project construction have been acquired and 98 percent of the levees and 100 percent of the channel work have been completed. Approximately 14.8 miles of the South Sulphur River and 6.3 miles of the Middle Sulphur River channels have been excavated. Approximately 3.4 miles of levee embankment on the South Sulphur River and 7.3 miles on the Middle Sulphur River have been constructed upstream of the Cooper Lake. About 10.5 miles of levee on the North Sulphur River, 8.2 miles of levee on the Sulphur River, 14 miles of levee on Cuthand Creek, and 4.2 miles of levee on Brushy Creek were strengthened; 0.5 mile of levee on Kickapoo Creek was enlarged; and 15.3 miles of new channel in Cuthand Creek, 0.8 mile of new channel in Brushy Creek, and 0.2 mile of cutoff channel in Kickapoo Creek were excavated; all downstream from Cooper Lake. Lack of funds and spending limitations prevented construction of the levees and channel work between April 1964 and February 1971. Construction was started again, however, in May 1971. The Texas Committee on Natural Resources, et. al., secured an injunction to halt construction on the project pending preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), required by the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. A statement was prepared and filed on June 24, 1977. The plan recommended, in the Final EIS, minimized further construction of the authorized channels and provided for construction of the lake and downstream levees. The sufficiency of the Final EIS was challenged in the court and in December 1978 the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas ruled the statement inadequate, citing five deficiencies and halting all further construction. A Supplemental EIS to comply with the court's decision was prepared and filed with the Environmental Protection Agency in March 1981. The recommended plan of improvement consists of the multipurpose lake, 0.9 mile of levee, and the acquisition of 25,500 acres of wildlife mitigation lands. All remaining channel and levee work was deleted from the recommended plan. The Supplemental EIS was filed with the court in July 1981 and numerous motions, documents, affidavits, and briefs were subsequently filed. After the Supplemental EIS was filed in July 1981, numerous motions, documents, affidavits, 30-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 and briefs were filed through October 1982. On December 30, 1982, the U.S. District Court issued a 95-page order continuing the permanent injunction. On March 22, 1983, the order was revised and Judge William Wayne Justice issued an Amended Memorandum Opinion and a Permanent Injunction against the construction of Cooper Lake. The Government filed a Notice of Appeal with the court in May 1983. On July 16, 1984, litigation was resolved and the injunction was released. The project was transferred to the Fort Worth District at the end of FY 1979. Public Law 101-101, H.R. 101-235, approved September 29, 1989, authorized $5 million for additional recreation. Estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1, 1989 base price) is $134,400,000, non- Federal cost for land for the levees is $227,000 and in addition $51,200,000 is to be reimbursed by water supply users over a 50-year period. Local cooperation. Except for Cooper Lake, local interest must furnish lands and rights-of-way and alter and relocate highways and related facilities and utilities, except railroads, for construction; hold and save the United States free from damages; maintain and operate all works after completion, and preserve channel capacities by preventing encroachment. Local agencies furnished rights-of-way for the first two phases of work on the levees and channel downstream from Cooper Dam. Rights-of-way acquisition for the second phase was also essentially complete when construction was halted. Assuring agencies are the following counties in Texas: Franklin, Hopkins, Titus, and Red River. Basic assurances have been received. Operations during fiscal year. Contract awarded during FY 1989 include the following: Fencing Part III, awarded 25 April 1989. Through FY 1989 the following is approximately complete: Levees and Channels, 98 percent; Real Estate, 66 percent; Embankments, Spillway and Outlets, 30 percent. Land Acquisition and Engineering and Design continues. Deliberate Impoundment is scheduled for September 1991 and project completion is scheduled June 1994. 9. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAMLAKE O' THE PINES, TX Location. Dam is on Cypress Creek in Marion, Harrison, Upshur, Morris, Camp, and Titus Counties, Texas, 8 miles west of Jefferson, Texas. Existing project. An earth-fill dam 10,600 feet long and 77 feet high includes a 200-foot spillway with a capacity of 68,200 cubic feet per second. Reservoir controls runoff from 850 square miles of drainage area, and has a gross storage capacity of 842,100 acre-feet, including 587,200 acre-feet flood control storage, 3,800 acre-feet conservation storage, and 251,000 acre-feet for municipal and industrial water supply. Reservoir extends 28 miles upstream. Project affords substantial flood protection of Cypress Creek Valley from damsite to confluence with Red River and, together with operation of other reservoirs proposed in Red River Basin, will provide flood protection along main stem of Red River below Denison Dam. Construction commenced in January 1955 and was completed June 1960. Estimated Federal cost of project is $17,231,700 (Oct. 1, 1983, base price), including $4,349,200 for Code 711 and $399,739 accelerated Public Works fund. This project transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of FY 1979. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O' The Pines project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1989 were $6,636,600. 10. GRAND PRAIRIE, TX, STREAMBANK EROSION AT MEYERS ROAD Location. The project is located at a bend of the West Fork of the Trinity River approximately 6.1 miles upstream of the confluence of the West Fork and Elm Fork of the Trinity River. This bend in the river is adjacent to Meyers Road which lies within Dallas County and is located in northeast Grand Prairie. More specifically, Meyers Road is north of Interstate Highway 30 and west of the city's sanitary landfill. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1985. Construction was started in January 1984 and completed in 1985. The total Federal and non-Federal estimated cost of the project is $300,000. Local cooperation. In accordance with Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 as amended, the city of Grand Prairie is required to assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $250,000. In addition, the city is required to provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and maintenance; bear the cost of all alteration and relocations of utilities, storm drains, roads, highway bridges, and community services; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction work; operate and maintain all works after completion and prevent any obstruction or encroachment that would reduce the flow capacity of the project; publicize and notify all interested parties that the project will not provide protection from the occurrence of storms greater than the project design flood; comply with Public Law 91-646, approved January 2, 1971, and with the requirements of Section 221, Public Law 91-611, approved December 31, 1970, as amended. 11. GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Tarrant County, Texas, on Denton Creek, 11.7 river miles upstream from its confluence with Elm Fork of Trinity River and about 20 miles northwest of City of Dallas, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started December 1947 and ready for beneficial use in July 1952. 30-6 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT Estimated cost of project is $18,896,000, including $2,040,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. A contract with Dallas County Park Cities Water Control and Improvement District No. 2 for 50,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on March 21, 1955. Park Cities paid the required $607,000. A contract with City of Dallas for 85,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on March 17, 1954. Dallas paid the required $1,433,026. A contract with City of Grapevine, Texas, for 1,250 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on September 14, 1953, at an estimated cost of $22,654. A contract for Interim Use of Navigation Storage with city of Grapevine was approved by Secretary of the Army on February 27, 1981, at an estimated cost of $684,000. To date, $117,411 has been paid. Above contracts include payment of operation and maintenance costs as follows: Dallas County Park Cities Water Control and Improvement District No. 2, a pro rata part of the actual annual cost, which part is to be not less than $2,000 nor more than $3,000; Dallas, 9.2 percent of actual annual cost; and Grapevine, its pro rata part of actual annual cost (estimated at $79.55 annually and included in total annual payment). Following operation and maintenance payments have been made: Park Cities $109,231, Dallas $535,002, and Grapevine $145,434. Operations during fiscal year. A contract for modification of Embankment and Spillway was awarded September 30, 1983 and continues. The proposed plan of improvement provides for spillway modification by construction of spillway chute and stilling basin and a berm on the downstream side of the main embankment and completion in FY 1987. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to system comprised of Lewisville Lake, Grapevine Lake and Dallas Floodway: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1989 were $964,580,100. 12. HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX Location. On Hords Creek, a tributary of Pecan Bayou, about 13.5 miles west of Coleman, Texas, and about 27.8 miles upstream from mouth of Hords Creek. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started January 1947 and completed for beneficial use in April 1948. Estimated cost of project is $4,337,000 including $105,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Hords Creek project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1989 were $937,200. 13. JOE POOL LAKE, TX Location. Dam site is located at River Mile 11.2 on Mountain Creek, a right bank tributary of the West Fork of the Trinity River, and is adjacent to the city limits of Grand Prairie, Dallas County, Texas, which is one of the rapid growing cities in the Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan area. Existing project. The project provides for construction of an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 108.5 feet above the streambed and a total length of 22,360 feet, including 50-foot type spillway, which will control 232 square miles of drainage area. The reservoir will have a total controlled storage of 304,000 acre-feet and a water surface area of 10,940 acres at the top of the flood control pool and 7,470 acres at the top of the conservation pool. The total storage includes 123,100 acre-feet for flood control, 142,900 acre-feet for conservation and 38,000 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of the project is $198,900,000 (Oct. 1, 1989, base price) including $10,600,000 non-Federal first cost. Project is a unit in the general comprehensive plan for development and control of the water resources of the Trinity River Basin. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 apply. Contracts for water supply storage and recreation with the Trinity River Authority were approved by the Acting Secretary of the Army, June 15, 1977. The recreation contract with Trinity Valley Authority was modified March 28, 1979, to allow the Corps to participate with the State of Texas and approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army March 21, 1980. Recreation development contract with the State of Texas was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army March 21, 1980. Reimbursement is currently estimated at $48,600,000 for water supply and $19,400,000 for recreation (excluding future recreation facilities) for a total of $68,000,000 exclusive of interest. To date $35,503 has been paid. Of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance, $464 has been paid. Operations during fiscal year. The project has been under construction since FY 1975 and through FY 1989 is approximately ,99 percent complete overall. Contracts awarded during FY 1989 included the following: Embankment Skinslide Repair, awarded February 15, 1989; Stabilization and Restoration of Penn Site, awarded May 25, 1989. Deliberate Impoundment was January 1986. Project completion is scheduled for May 1993. Land Acquisition and Engineering and Design continue. Public Law 97-400, H.R. 7377, 97th Congress, effective December 31, 1982, changed the name of Lakeview Lake to Joe Pool Lake. Benefits accrued to Joe Pool Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1989 were $3,086,100. 14. LAVON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Collin County, Texas, on East Fork of Trinity River 55.9 miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. 30-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started January 1948 and ready for beneficial use in September 1953. Project is complete. See following section for Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement authorized by Flood Control Act of 1962. Estimated cost of project is $15,470,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with North Texas Municipal Water District for water supply storage, including cost of intake structure, was approved by Secretary of the Army July 8, 1954, at an estimated cost of $1,405,753. Contract was revised in 1973 and final revised contract amount is $1,445,261.67. To date North Texas Municipal Water District has paid $2,654,348. Under the contract North Texas Municipal Water District must pay annually 13.6 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance, and to date has paid $640,785. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Lavon project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1989 were $96,677,100. 15. LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Location. Existing dam is in Collin County, Texas, on East Fork of Trinity River, 55.9 miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22.0 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. Channel improvement of East Fork extends from its mouth to River Mile 31.8. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1988. Construction of project was initiated in May 1970 and ready for beneficial use in December 1975. Estimated Federal cost of the modification and improvement is $69,750,000 and $220,000 local interests, a total of $69,970,000. Project is complete. Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased water supply storage under the terms of the Water Supply Act of 1958. The North Texas Municipal Water District has contracted for 43 percent of the water supply (approved September 22, 1967, by the Secretary of the Army) and to date $2,997,006 has been paid. North Texas Municipal Water Supply District has submitted assurance to contract for 57 percent of future water supply. Reimbursement is currently estimated at $37,787,324. Levee Districts 4 and 5, which comprise the lower 10 miles of the East Fork Channel, entered into agreements as required by Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 on January 28, 1972 and have furnished all necessary construction easements. Levee Districts 6, 8, 10, 13, and 15, which comprise the upper 15 miles of the East Fork Channel, have declined to provide the necessary assurances. On December 8, 1972, this portion of the project was reclassified from "active" to "inactive" category. Operations during fiscal year. Improvement of the lower ten miles of the East Fork Channel and Levees and total project are 100 percent complete. 16. LEWISVILLE DAM, TX Location. Dam is in Denton County, Texas, on Elm Fork of Trinity River 30 river miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northwest of City of Dallas, Texas at a site downstream from old Garza Dam. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started November 1948 and ready for beneficial use in November 1954. Estimated cost of project is $25,902,000, including $3,677,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. A contract with City of Dallas for 415,000 acre-feet of water supply storage land rights and interests to Garza Dam and Reservoir was approved by the Secretary of the Army on July 16, 1953. Local contributions have been made in full. A contract with city of Denton, Texas, for remaining 21,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 20, 1954, with an estimated cost of $250,064. Local contributions have been paid in full. Under above contracts, cities of Dallas and Denison must pay annually 21.9 and 1 percent, respectively, of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date Dallas has paid $3,121,543 and Denison $135,178. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to system comprised of Lewisville Lake, Grapevine Lake, and Dallas Floodway: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1989 were $964,580,100. 17. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Navarro County, Texas, at River Mile 63.9 on Richland Creek, a tributary of Trinity River, about 16.0 miles southwest of Corsicana, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorization acts see Annual Report for 1965. Construction started December 1959 and project completed for beneficial use March 1963. Estimated cost of project is $13,154,000, including $300,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended applies. A formal contract with the Trinity River Authority was approved March 3, 1966, by the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $2,260,800. To date the Authority has paid $855,612 for water supply and $882,568 for operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 30-8 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT Benefits accrued to Navarro Mills project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1989 were $27,837,900. 18. O.C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on North Concho River, a tributary of Concho River, about 6.6 miles above mouth of North Concho River near city of San Angelo, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Name was changed from San Angelo Dam and Reservoir to O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake January 3, 1975 by Public Law 93-634. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for beneficial use February 1952. Estimated cost of project is $17,111,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A water-supply contract with Upper Colorado River Authority for water-supply storage in reservoir was approved by Secretary of the Army on October 11, 1948. The Authority has contributed $860,444 toward cost of project and $64,336 toward operation and maintenance for a 50-year period. The Authority must pay additional contributions of $1 a year for useful life of project, beginning January 1, 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1989 were $2,375,600. 19. PROCTOR LAKE, TX Location. Dam is at River Mile 238.9 on Leon River, a tributary of Brazos River, about 8.0 miles northeast of Comanche in Comanche County, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorization act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction of project was started July 1960 and completed for beneficial use 1963. Estimated cost of project is $16,249,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 applies. A formal contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, was approved by Secretary of the Army, July 1, 1960, and was modified and approved May 9, 1966, at an estimated cost of $1,707,900. To date the Authority has paid $390,024 for water supply and $344,000 for operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance were continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Proctor project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1989 were $9,300,800. 20. RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX Location. Damsite is located at River Mile 60.0 on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River, Denton County, between Sanger and Aubrey, Texas and 30 miles upstream from Lewisville Dam. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum height of 141 feet above the streambed, a length of 15,250 feet including an uncontrolled broadcrested spillway 100 feet long, controlling 682 square miles of drainage area. The lake will have a total controlled storage of 1,064,600 acre-feet, with a water surface area of 36,900 acres. The total storage includes 260,800 acre-feet for flood control, 749,200 acre-feet for water supply, and 54,600 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $291,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1989, base price). Public Law 96-384, 96th Congress, H.R. 8094, effective January 4, 1981, changed the name of Aubrey Lake to Ray Roberts Lake. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Contracts with the cities of Dallas and Denton, Texas, for water supply storage and recreation were approved by the Secretary of the Army September 16, 1980. To date the city of Dallas has paid $3,878,934 and the city of Denton has paid $1,362,867 toward principal. Dallas has paid $35,441 and Denton has paid $12,452 toward annual cost of operation and maintenance of project. Operations during fiscal year. The project is about 89 percent complete overall. Acquisition of real estate continues. FY 1989 funds were used to award the following contracts: Alternative Recreation Facilities, Part III, awarded May 12, 1989; Boundary Delineation Part VII, awarded April 14, 1989; Recreation Facilities Part II and Part III, awarded July 17, 1989. Engineering and Design continues. Deliberate Impoundment was June 30, 1987. Project completion is scheduled for June 1992. At the request of the City of Denton and the approval of the Secretary of the Army, the penstock was added to the embankment as a minimum facility for future hydropower. 21. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Location. Floodway is in city of San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas, on San Antonio River and San Pedro, Apache, Alazan, Martinez Creeks, and Espada Aqueduct located in vicinity of Six Mile Creek. Existing project. The project consists of 34.9 miles of channel and associated improvements on six separate streams of which about 84 percent has been completed. Completion of detailed engineering and design studies revealed that the least costly alternative for the remaining channel improvements would consist of two tunnels. The San Pedro Creek tunnel would be 6,040 feet in length and the San Antonio River tunnel would be 16,360 feet in length, and construction and alteration of railroad bridges. Estimated Federal cost of these modifications is $114,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1989, base price), and estimated cost to local interests is $93,000,000 which includes $3,000,000 cash contributions and $90,000,000 for lands, damages, and construction, a total of $207,000,000. Existing project was 30-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act. The Water Resources Act of 1976 added authorization to the existing project for construction of flood control measures needed to preserve and protect the Espada Aqueduct located in the vicinity of Six Mile Creek. Construction was started in October 1957 and the project is about 84 percent complete. Project completion is scheduled for July 1992. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction, including purchase and removal of buildings, relocation or reconstruction of bridges (exclusive of railway bridges), channel dams where applicable, and utility lines; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate all works after completion; and provide a cash contribution for enhancement benefits of 2.65 percent of actual Federal construction cost. San Antonio River Authority furnished assurances that it will comply with all requirements of local cooperation. These assurances were accepted by the District Engineer on April 15, 1957. To date $1,764,210 has been contributed by San Antonio River Authority. In addition, $30,000 has been contributed and accepted, under the authority of Civil Functions Appropriations Act of 1958, for vehicular crossings over the San Antonio Channel. Operations during fiscal year. FY 1989 funds were used to continue construction and engineering and design studies. Benefits accrued to San Antonio project: Accumulated damages prevented through FY 1989 were $117,514,900. 22. SAN GABRIEL RIVER, TX Location. Project is a system of three reservoirs in Williamson County in the central portion of Brazos River Basin, which consists of Granger Dam at River Mile 31.9 on San Gabriel River, about 7.0 miles east of Granger, Texas; North San Gabriel Dam at River Mile 4.3 on North Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3.5 miles northwest of Georgetown, Texas; and South Fork Dam at River Mile 4.7 on South Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3.0 miles southwest of Georgetown, Texas. Existing project. Granger Lake was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, and North (North San Gabriel Dam and Lake Georgetown) and South Fork Lakes were authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Estimated total Federal cost of project is $181,400,000 (Oct 1, 1986, base price) and estimated non-Federal cost of $90,600,000 for a project total of $272,000,000. Plan of improvement provides for the following: Granger: An earthfilled dam 16,320 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 115 feet above streambed, which controls 709 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 244,200 acre-feet, of which 162,200 acre-feet are for flood control, 37,900 acre-feet for water supply storage, and 44,100 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of project is $62,062,000. North San Gabriel Dam: A rockfill dam 6,700 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 164 feet above streambed, which controls 246 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 130,800 acre-feet of which 87,600 acre-feet are for flood control, 29,200 acre-feet for water supply storage, and 14,000 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of project is $38,765,000. South Fork: A rockfill dam 5,620 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 152 feet above streambed, which controls 123 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 82,600 acre-feet (45,700 for flood control, 28,900 for water supply storage, and 8,000 for sediment reserve). Estimated cost of project is $171,173,000. Public Law 96-575, 96th Congress, H.R. 4941 effective January 4, 1981, changed the name of North Fork Lake to North San Gabriel Dam and Lake Georgetown. Local cooperation. Construction is subject to condition that local interests reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply at Granger, Lake Georgetown, and South Fork Lakes. Reimbursement currently estimated at $13,315,000 for Granger, $6,295,000 for Lake Georgetown, and $50,563,000 for South Fork, for a total of $70,172,000 exclusive of interest. Brazos River Authority, a State agency, is the local interests' sponsor of project, and by letter dated April 18, 1966, indicated its acceptance of the proposed plan of development and its willingness to pay for the costs allocated to water supply in each reservoir in the ultimate plan. Such water supply assurances for Granger and Lake Georgetown Lakes were approved May 24, 1968 as satisfactory in accordance with requirements of the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended. Contract negotiations for South Fork Lake will be deferred until the need for water supply develops and the reservoir is scheduled for construction. Operations during fiscal year. Through 1983 all work has been completed. Deliberate impoundment of water commenced at Granger and Lake Georgetown Lakes on January 21, 1980 and March 3, 1980, respectively. In FY 1982, studies on South Fork Lake were resumed in preparation of General Design Memorandum to provide reaffirmation prior to construction. A Draft Reevaluation Report on South Fork Lake was submitted to headquarters in October 1986. The report recommended no Federal action and defer further studies indefinitely. Future water supply needs of the area would be addressed by reallocating storage at Granger Lake. The South Fork Lake project was placed on inactive status and would be eligible for deauthorization in FY 1997 if no funds are obligated by then. Benefits accrued to project consisting of Granger and Lake Georgetown: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1989 were $19,094,400. 23. SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Yegua Creek 20 miles upstream from its confluence with Brazos River and about 2 miles south of Somerville, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction started in June 1962 and project 30-10 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT was ready for beneficial use in January 1967. Estimated cost of project is $30,227,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage approved May 10, 1962, by the Secretary of the Army, has paid $1,348,117 to date. Also under the contract, the authority must pay annually 28.655 percent of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Somerville project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1989 were $32,976,900. 24. STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX Location. Dam is on Lampasas River 16 miles upstream from its confluence with Little River, a tributary of the Brazos River, and about 5 miles southwest of Belton, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction was initiated in July 1962 and the project was ready for beneficial use in February 1968. Estimated cost of project is $23,670,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage was approved April 13, 1962, by the Secretary of the Army, at an estimated cost of $6,912,430. To date the Authority has paid $1,664,692. Also under the contract the Authority must pay annually 27.748 percent of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the Authority has paid $718,917. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Stillhouse Hollow Project: Accumulated estimate of flood damages prevented through FY 1989 is $28,027,300. 25. WACO LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Bosque River, 4.6 river miles above its confluence with Brazos River, at City of Waco, McLennan County, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $50,853,000 including $250,000 contributed by local interests and $2,500,000 other non-Federal cost. Construction was started in July 1958, and project was ready for beneficial use in February 1965. Local cooperation. Section G of the Flood Control Act of December 1944 applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage and the contract with the City of Waco transferring the existing Lake Waco to the Government for their water storage, was approved by the Secretary of the Army on April 15, 1958. To date, the Authority for their portion of the water supply storage has paid $1,904,735. Also under the contract the Authority and the City must pay 14.706 and 2.087 percent respectively of the actual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the Authority has paid $902,247 and the City has paid $140,818. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, for additional storage for municipal and industrial water supply, was approved by the Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army, September 28, 1984. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Waco project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1989 were $66,633,100. 26. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Sulphur River in Cass and Bowie Counties, Texas. Dam is 45 miles above mouth of Sulphur River, and about 8 miles southwest of Texarkana, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1984. Estimated cost of project is $51,945,000 which includes $5,449,100 Code 711, $399,939 accelerated public works funds, and $13,138,004 to be reimbursed by local interests, over a period not to exceed 50 years, for water supply storage, and including $2,092,040 for pro rata share of original reservoir cost. Construction was initiated in August 1948 and completed in March 1962, except real estate activities, construction under Code 711, and conversion of 120,000 acre-feet to water supply storage after completion of Cooper Reservoir. This project transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of FY 1979. Local cooperation. A contract with the city of Texarkana, Texas, for reserving water supply storage space was approved by the Secretary of the Army December 17, 1968. To date, the City has paid $488,614. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Wright Patman project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1989 were $13,859,400. 27. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed local flood protection projects is made periodically in compliance with Section 208.10, of Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, which contains regulations for operation and maintenance of local flood-protection works approved by Secretary of the Army in accordance with authority in Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936. See Table 30-D for inspections made this fiscal year. Inspection costs for FY from regular funds for maintenance were $42,053. Total costs to September 30, 1989 were $815,945. 30-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 28. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with Flood Control Act of 1944, expenditures were made for scheduling flood control reservoir operations and preparation of reservoir regulation manual for Marshall Ford Dam, on the Colorado River, near City of Austin, Texas, and for preparation of reservoir regulation manual for Twin Buttes Dam, on Middle and South Concho Rivers near City of San Angelo, Texas. Marshall Ford Dam was authorized by 1937 River and Harbor Act. Project was constructed jointly by Bureau of Reclamation and Lower Colorado River Authority and was completed during FY 1942. Twin Buttes Reservoir was authorized for construction by Department of Interior by Public Law 152, 85th Congress. Construction was initiated in June 1960; closure of dam started in June 1962; deliberate impoundment was started January 23, 1963. Accumulated damages prevented by Marshall Ford Reservoir through FY 1989 were $191,937,800 and by Twin Buttes through FY 1989 were $418,000. Twin Buttes Reservoir consists of two separate pools, one on South Concho River and the other on Middle Concho River and Spring Creek. Equalizing channel between these two pools is at elevation 1925.0. Costs for fiscal year from regular funds for operation of both reservoirs were $109,395. 29. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 30-C.) 30. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Table 30-E.) Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 585, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization); emergency streambank protection under Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended. Emergency flood control, hurricane-flood, and shore protection activities (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs were $206,257 for disaster preparedness; no levee repair. Multi-Purpose Projects Including Power 31. ROBERT DOUGLAS WILLIS HYDROPOWER, TX Location. For location of completed dam see Town Bluff Dam-B.A. Steinhagen Lake, Texas in this chapter. Existing project. Installation of hydroelectric power generating facilities at Town Bluff Dam was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1945 (Public Law 79-14), March 2, 1945, but deferred in the original construction. Town Bluff Dam was completed and placed in operation in 1951. A Design Analysis Report completed in April 1982 and a Feasibility Report was approved September 9, 1983 indicated that installing hydropower at this project is now economically feasible. The hydropower facilities will include a 6,000 kilowatt power plan (two units at 3,000 kilowatts each), intake and outlet facilities, and necessary switchgear equipment to be located in the main embankment at the old diversion channel and will be operated remotely from the Sam Rayburn project. The installation and operation of hydropower facilities will not result in the altering of the existing operation at Town Bluff. The project will produce an estimated 35,900 megawatt hours of energy per year. There is no Federal cost on this project. It is completely funded by non-Federal funds. The estimated non-Federal cost is $18,900,000. 101st Congress House Report 923, effective February 7, 1989, changed the name of Town Bluff Hydropower to Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower. Local cooperation. A contract with the Sam Rayburn Municipal Power Authority was approved by Secretary of the Army, June 28, 1985, relative to financing, escrow agreement, and power sales agreement. Operation during fiscal year. Plans and specifications were completed and construction on the turbine-generator was initiated in FY 1986. Construction on the powerhouse was initiated in FY 1987. Project completion date is scheduled for 1990. 32. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX Location. Dam is on Angelina River 25.2 miles upstream from its confluence with Neches River and about 10.0 miles northwest of Jasper, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report 1969. Construction was started August 1956 and project was ready for beneficial use in March 1965. Estimated cost of project is $68,683,000 including $3,000,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. A contract with the Lower Neches Valley Authority, a State agency, to contribute $3,000,000 toward the first cost and an additional $200,000 annually for 50 years after completion of the project was approved by the Secretary of the Army on January 22, 1957: Contribution of $3,000,000 was made in full and annual payments to date of $4,000,000 have been made by the Authority. A contract with the City of Lufkin for water supply storage was approved May 27, 1969 by the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $525,600. To date the City has paid $143,830. Also under the contract the City of Lufkin must pay annually 0.692 percent of the annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the City has paid $131,217. Operations during fiscal year. Continued routine operation and maintenance. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Sam Rayburn project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1989 were $208,792,200. 30-12 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT 33. TOWN BLUFF DAMB. A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Neches River about 12.4 miles below mouth of Angelina River, one-half mile north of Town Bluff, Texas, and 93.0 river miles north of Beaumont, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction started March 1947 and project was ready for beneficial use in April 1951. Estimated cost of project is $9,888,000, including $2,000,000 contribution by local interests. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. 34. WHITNEY LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Brazos River, about 442 miles above mouth of river, 5.5 miles southwest of Whitney, Texas, and about 38 miles upstream from City of Waco, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started June 1946 and ready for flood control use in December 1951. First power was placed on-the-line in June 1953. Raise power pool is complete. Estimated cost of project is $46,306,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 3, 1982. To date, the authority has paid $235,251. Operations during fiscal year. Continued routine operation and maintenance. Recreation facilities under Code 710 remain. Benefits accrued to Whitney project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1989 were $160,030,900. General Investigations 35. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,062,950 for flood damage prevention studies; $84,192 for coordination with other agencies; $78,777 for review of authorized projects; $77,832 for miscellaneous activities; and $0 for preauthorization studies Phase I for a total of $1,225,919. 36. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Work was continued under the Flood Plain Management Services on the compilation of information on floods and potential flood damages, including identification of those areas subject to inundation. Fiscal year expenditures for these activities totaled $320,519. Fiscal year costs were $18,468 for hydrologic studies. 30-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 This page intentionally left blank. 30-14 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 30-A See Section in Text Project 1. Trinity River Project, TX Includes Channel to Liberty, Tennessee Colony Lake, and Dallas Floodway Extension 2. Aquilla Lake, TX 3. Bardwell Lake, TX 4. Belton Lake, TX 5. Benbrook Lake, TX 6. Boggy Creek, TX (Federal Costs) (Contributed Funds) 7. Canyon Lake, TX 8. Cooper Lake and Channels, TX (Contributed Funds) 9. Ferrells Bridge Dam Lake O' The Pines, TX 10. Grand Prairie, TX Meyers Road (Contributed Funds) 11. Grapevine Lake, TX COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost To Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 1989'7 New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost (-)81,000 275,000 161,064 235,826 7,683 412,000 400,259 1,124,800 1,116,537 (-)9,000 (-)2,557 1,622,600 1,640,448 1,112,000 1,140,186 295,000 215,950 1,087,000 1,068,610 3,301,000 3,181,603 1,660,200 1,697,636 39,227 - 22,574,865 - 22,574,865 - - - 45,506,300 13,509 1,324 - 45,506,300 506,300 436,800 532,500 2,601,600 519,866 441,685 529,579 2,581,648 - - - 10,934,505 - - - 10,934,505 954,122 1,148,400 1,194,800 14,662,20918 963,614 1,174,518 1,183,423 13,475,18818 - - - 16,960,549 - - - 16,960,5491 1,488,622 1,993,300 1,716,300 20,518,76418 1,481,234 2,010,129 1,761,276 20,395,28918 - - - 13,130,463 - - - 13,069,9912 1,100,522 1,398,100 1,245,400 20,076,43818 1,105,422 1,261,787 1,376,992 19,913,58118 1,045,000 3,100,000 4,205,000 9,370,000 1,102,585 2,158,645 2,769,539 6,959,521 16,500 922,968 35,132 974,400 - 357,601 281,160 638,661 - - - 19,088,5243 - - - 19,088,524 1,094,522 1,266,600 1,186,900 15,245,02618 1,095,387 1,248,993 1,169,578 14,939,47918 6,055,000 17,200,000 20,534,000 71,710,000 6,082,525 8,082,802 24,757,172 66,463,742 - - - 227 - - - 227 - - - 14,175,1974 - - - 14,175,1975 6 1,860,122 2,096,400 1,680,700 25,452,05318 1,854,337 2,077,743 1,721,149 25,434,01118 - -1,729 - 248,271 - 223 - 248,271 - - -40,000 1,511 (-)9,551 - 250,000 462,395 2,801 7,030 6,050 21,317,790 21,317,278 30-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project 12. Hords Creek Lake, TX 13. Joe Pool Lake, TX 14. Lavon Lake, TX 15. Lavon Lake Modification & East Fork Channel Improvement, TX 16. Lewisville Dam, TX 17. Navarro Mills Lake, TX 18. O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake, TX 19. Proctor Lake, TX 20. Ray Roberts Lake, TX 31. Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower, TX (Contributed Funds) 32. Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX Funding Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 1989" 1,450,600 1,571,122 2,001,400 1,912,100 23,857,39018 1,504,755 1,572,836 1,975,327 1,903,328 23,783,14918 -- - - 2,731,0898 1,924 - - - 2,731,089 928,181 658,300 713,900 769,600 11,374,469 980,194 650,938 709,692 772,873 11,289,82118 1,951,000 11,100,000 9,100,000 5,182,000 185,171,000 7,404,030 5,739,280 8,404,244 10,379,003 183,800,503 108,000 355,800 448,300 529,900 1,442,000 105,918 354,030 428,177 532,438 1,420,563 - - - - 12,864,796 - - - - 12,864,796 1,904,600 2,148,322 2,352,400 1,841,300 24,957,64018 1,945,384 2,152,944 2,327,877 1,850,509 24,885,90018 - - - - 69,796,862 - 184 - - 69,796,862 (-)184,000 - - - 25,333,988 3,529 - - - 25,333,9889 2,054,600 3,899,822 2,230,600 2,108,300 33,590,22510 1,876,603 3,929,412 2,140,815 2,133,211 is 31,044,63010 18 - - - - 9,846,759 - - - - 9,846,75911 843,000 1,095,422 1,257,900 1,311,800 14,621,80018 888,742 1,080,767 1,244,267 1,286,746 14,541,94918 - - - - 16,027,467 - - - - 16,027,467 601,000 685,900 1,026,660 867,400 13,034,89018 603,677 646,518 1,052,790 851,790 12,966,80518 - - - - 14,469,585 14,409 - - - 14,469,585 1,081,000 938,022 1,228,100 1,401,800 14,522,65418 1,085,535 942,557 1,193,209 1,413,347 14,284,32118 44,118,000 39,000,000 10,534,000 15,583,000 262,829,700 46,428,681 33,801,189 13,117,540 13,682,191 256,336,826 - 36,300 319,500 449,600 805,400 - 25,754 309,453 456,846 792,053 1,761,000 4,541,000 8,758,000 3,458,000 18,518,000 1,313,111 4,417,320 9,229,935 3,385,422 18,345,788 - - - - 60,670,957 - - - - 60,670,95612 30-16 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 1989 ' 7 21. San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 22. San Gabriel River, TX Granger Lake Georgetown 23. Somerville Lake, TX 24. Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX 33. Town Bluff Dam- B.A. Steinhagen Lake, TX 25. Waco Lake, TX 34. Whitney Lake, TX 26. Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2,441,6( 2,455,3E 2,114,0( 2,119,8 191,0( 181,7E 1,208,0( 1,202,6 964,0( 980,6 3,5( 1,563,6( 1,586,6( )0 2,455,322 88 2,451,539 )0 10,859,000 55 5,985,903 - 353,935 00 23,000 84 36,593 00 834,722 57 839,763 )0 1,044,822 79 1,004,730 2,724,400 2,734,448 17,800,000 11,285,198 602,750 956,685 2,305,100 2,288,354 19,891,000 17,605,602 39,603,03618 39,220,51618 88,765,048 74,803,714 - 1,956,210 - 1,956,210 - 101,796,100 - 101,796,100 1,220,600 1,116,200 1,179,792 1,130,161 1,465,000 1,485,058 1,181,000 1,180,248 9,298,27818 9,243,90618 8,750,55418 8,717,83018 - 27,790,438 - 27,790,436 2,190,122 2,071,900 1,590,400 2,183,967 2,030,709 1,637,136 23,766,35818 21,232,10718 - 19,594,97113 - 20,522,084 841,000 921,122 1,529,700 1,405,000 900,650 886,513 1,495,401 1,452,494 14,105,04818 14,040,46618 - - - - 6,602,737 - - - - 6,602,73714 859,000 747,400 750,500 1,158,000 14,135,46818 848,855 757,622 734,887 1,191,374 14,048,84918 - - - - 49,521,12115 - - - - 49,521,121 1,838,800 1,772,722 2,040,625 1,694,700 22,294,10518 1,891,769 1,800,333 2,019,545 1,681,788 22,141,99818 - - - - 42,952,938 - - - - 42,952,93816 2,484,600 2,428,122 2,686,800 2,717,800 37,280,60218 2,471,637 2,490,316 2,653,768 2,713,466 36,859,92518 - - - - 35,731,626 - - - - 35,731,626 1,541,600 2,023,322 1,658,402 1,743,100 26,129,51418 1,534,545 1,945,964 1,731,222 1,751,522 26,070,06418 1 Excludes $47,309 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts. 2 Excludes $322,346 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts. * Excludes $1,422,848 expended for new work from contributed funds, including $22,848 "Contributed Funds Other" for installation and operation of gages for leakage study. 4 Includes $1,378,486 for Code 711, $52,808 for Code 713, and $399,739 accelerated Public Works Act funds. Excludes $1,711,200 contributed funds. 6 Includes $1,376,322 for Code 711, $52,808 for Code 713, and $399,739 accelerated Public Works Act funds. Excludes $4,137 reimbursed in Fiscal Year 1973. 6 Claim Northeast Texas Municipal Water District $16,546. Three payments of $12,410 less real estate charges of $1,325, making a total of $2,811 reimbursed in Fiscal Year 1972, Fiscal Year 1973, and Fiscal Year 1974. 7 Excludes $146,795 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts, and $2,040,026 for new work expended from contributed funds. 30-17 68 3O 33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT s Excludes $105,079 expended from contributed funds. 9 Excludes receipts from reconveyance Q A ,,",mC of land of n,, L... L - -,,-.,, - - -1-� , - , - -- -�- �1 1 - �--, --= �-- funds. 14 Excludes $2,000,000 contributed funds expended. 15 Excludes $2,750,000 expended for contributed 426,Ub whicn were aeposited to miscellaneous receipts, and 16 Excludes $188,282 receipts from reconveyance of $3,676,661 for new work expended from contributed funds. 10 Includes $130,000 under appropriation 96X5125. lands deposited to miscellaneous receipts. 11 Excludes $300,000 expended from contributed 17 Includes funds provided by the Jobs Act (PL 98-8, funds. dated March 24, 1983). 12 Excludes $3,000,000 expended from contributed 18 Beginning Fiscal Year 1985 data shown on Table funds. A includes Special Recreation Use Fees. Data for previous 13 Includes receipts from disposals and revocation of fiscal years have been changed to conform to the new funds related thereto. procedure. 30-18 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 13, 1968 Mar. 31, 1960 Jul. 24, 1946 Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 22, 1936 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 8. Aug. 3, 1955 9. Jul. 24, 1946 10. Jul. 24, 1946 11. Mar. 2, 1945 12. Aug. 18, 1941 2. S. Doc. 52, 90th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 424, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 88, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 535. 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Act of 1936 (PL 738) AQUILLA LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Aquilla Creek, about 6.8 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas and about 24 miles north of Waco, Texas. BARDWELL LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Waxahachie Creek about 5 miles south of Ennis, Texas. BELTON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Leon River about 3 miles north of Belton, Texas. Modification of the dam to provide for generation of hydroelectric power. BENBROOK LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Clear Fork of the Trinity River about 10 miles southwest of Fort Worth, Texas. BOGGY CREEK, TX Construction of a concrete trapezoidal channel on Boggy Creek beginning just above Webberville Road and extending downstream about 2.2 miles to just below Bolm Road. From there, a grass lined channel would extend further downstream and transition with the natural channel at Ed Bluestein Boulevard, a distance of about 1.7 miles. CANYON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Guadalupe River about 12 miles northwest of New Braunfels, Texas. COOPER LAKE AND CHANNELS, TX Construction of earth-fill dam and reservoir area; channel clearing, realignment, and enlargement; enlargement and extension of existing levees; construction of appurtenant drainage works along main stem of Sulphur River above mile 126; channel clearing, realignment, and enlargement and levee enlargement and modification of appurtenant drainage works on Cuthand Creek below mile 24, on Sulphur River below mile 70, except in proposed Cooper Reservoir, miles 29 to 42, and on Middle Sulphur River below mile 8; channel clearing and realignment of Brushy Creek below mile 5; and levee enlargement on North Sulphur River between miles 1 and 5. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM-LAKE O' THE PINES, TX Provides for construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir area. GRAND PRAIRIE, MEYERS RD, TX Slope Restoration with riprap side slopes along streambank of West Fork Trinity River, adjacent to Meyers Road. GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Denton Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, about 20 miles northwest of Dallas, Texas. HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Hords Creek, a tributary of Pecan Bayou, near the city of Coleman, Texas. 76th Cong., 1st H. Doc. 488, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Act of 1946 H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 370, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. 30-19 TABLE 30-B H. Doc. 247, Sess. 5. 7. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 30-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 13. Oct. 27, 1965 14. Mar. 2, 1945 15. Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 16. Mar. 2, 1945 17. Sep. 3, 1954 Dec. 31, 1970 18. Aug. 18, 1941 19. Sep. 3, 1954 20. Oct. 27, 1965 32. Mar. 2, 1945 21. Sep. 3, 1954 22. Sep. 3, 1954 Jan. 3, 1975 23. Sep. 3, 1954 24. Sep. 3, 1954 33. Mar. 2, 1945 JOE POOL LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Mountain Creek, adjacent to the city limits of Grand Prairie, Texas, about 3 miles above the existing Mountain Creek Dam. LAVON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the East Fork of the Trinity River about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Enlarge Lavon Dam and enlargement and realignment of the lower 25 miles of the East Fork of the Trinity River, including rehabilitation of existing levees. Improvement of Collin County Road 115. LEWISVILLE DAM, TX Construction of a dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River near the city of Lewisville, Texas. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Richland Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, about 16 miles southwest of Corsicana, Texas. Alteration of FM Highway 3164 in Wolf Creek Park. O.C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the North Concho River just above San Angelo, Texas. PROCTOR LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Leon River about 8 miles northeast of Comanche, Texas. RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River between Sanger and Aubrey, Texas, about 30 miles upstream from the existing Lewisville Dam. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX Construction of a dam on the Angelina River about 10 miles northwest of Jasper, Texas. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Channel improvement of the San Antonio River and tributaries in and near the city of San Antonio, Texas. SAN GABRIEL RIVER PROJECT, TX Construction of: (1) a dam (Granger Dam and Lake) on the San Gabriel River about 7 miles east of Granger, Texas, (2) a dam (North Fork Lake) on the north Fork of the San Gabriel River about 3.5 miles northwest of Georgetown, Texas and (3) a dam (South Fork Lake) on the South Fork of the San Gabriel River about 3 miles southwest of Georgetown, Texas. SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Yegua Creek about 2 miles south of Somerville, Texas. STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX Construction of a dam on the Lampasas River about 5 miles southwest of Belton, Texas. TOWN BLUFF DAM-B. A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Neches River near Jasper, Texas. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 533, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 554, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 498, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 315, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 344, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess., and H. Doc. 591, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. 30-20 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 30-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents ROBERT DOUGLAS WILLIS HYDROPOWER, TX 31. Mar. 2, 1945 Construction of two units at 3,000 kilowatts each of S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., hydroelectric power generating facilities connected with 1st Sess. Town Bluff Dam-B.A. Steinhagen Lake, Texas. TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX 1. Oct. 27, 1965 Construction of Tennessee Colony Dam located at river H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., mile 339.2 on the Trinity River about 16 miles west of 1st Sess., and Palestine, Texas; a multiple purpose channel from the H. Doc. 364, 90th Cong., Houston, Texas ship channel to Fort Worth, Texas; a 2nd Sess. distance of approximately 363 miles, an extension of the existing Dallas, Texas, Floodway downstream approximately 9.0 miles; a realignment and enlargement of the West Fork of the Trinity River from the mouth of the West Fork to the existing Fort Worth, Texas, Floodway, a distance of approximately 31 miles; and water conveyance facilities involving construction of about 98 miles of pipeline from Tennessee Colony Lake to the existing Benbrook Lake. WACO LAKE, TX 25. Sep. 3, 1954 Construction of a dam on the northwest edge of Waco, H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., Texas, below the confluence of the North, South, and 2nd Sess. Middle Bosque Rivers. WHITNEY LAKE, TX 34. Aug. 18, 1941 Construction of a dam on the Brazos River, about 19 miles H. Doc. 390, 76th Cong., southwest of Hillsboro, Texas. 1st Sess. Raise the power pool 13.0 feet. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX 26. Jul. 24, 1946 Construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. 30-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 30-C OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL (See Section 29 of Text) PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to September 30, 1989 Report See Annual Report Operation and Project For Construction Maintenance Belton Lake Modification, TX7 1988 - - Big Fossil Creek, TX3 1969 - - Big Sandy Lake, TX2 1986 - Big Spring, TX2 1979 - Brownwood Channel Improvement, TX5 - - Carl L. Estes Dam and Lake, TX2 1979 - - Dam "A" Lake, TX6 1987 - Duck Creek Channel Improvement, TX4 1983 - Elm Fork Floodway, TX 1987 - Fort Worth Floodway (Clear Fork), TX3 1971 - - Fort Worth Floodway (West Fork), TX3 1971 - Grand Prairie, TX (Landfill)3 1987 - Greenville, TX3 1983 - Lake Brownwood Modification, TX4 1983 - Lake Fork Lake, Sabine River, TX5 - - Millican, TX2 1988 - Navasota Lake, Navasota River, TX4 Plainview Local Flood Protection Project, TX4 1979 - - Roanoak Lake, TX2 1979 - - Rockland Lake, TX6 1988 - Rutledge Hollow Creek Channel Improvement, Poteet, TX3 1969 - - Zacate Creek Channel, TX3 1983 - Calloway Branch, Hurst, TX3 1986 - - 1Deauthorized 1 Nov 81. 5 Deauthorized Nov 86. 2Inactive. 6Deauthorized Oct 88. "Completed. 7Deferred. 4Recommended for deauthorization, H.R. 3678, August 23, 1983, 98th Congress, 1st Session. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 30-D (See Section 27 of Text) Location Dates of Inspection Big Fossil Creek .................................. ..... ............. ... ....... Dec.15,1988 Calloway Branch, Hurst .................................................. .......... Jul. 12, 1989 Dallas Floodway .................................................... ........ Nov. 17,1988 East Fork ................ ................................................. Nov.7, 1989 Fort Worth Floodway ......... .................................................... Sep. 21, 1989 Grand Prairie Landfill ................................................................ Jul. 19, 1989 Grand Prairie Meyers Road ............................................... .......... Jul. 19, 1989 Greenville...................................... ................................ Oct.19,1989 Irving Floodway .................. .................. .................. Jul. 28, 1986 Munday ............................................................. ................. Nov. 9, 1988 Pleasanton ............................................................ ......... May 22, 1989 Poteet ....................................................... ........... M ay 22, 1989 San Antonio Floodway ................... ........................................ May 23, 1989 Sulphur River Levees ............................. ............................... Aug. 23, 1985 Wheeler Creek ......... ............................................. ........... Apr. 4, 1989 Zacate Creek .................. May 24, 1989 30-22 FORT WORTH, TEXAS DISTRICT TABLE 30-E FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Project Blockhouse Creek, Cedar Park, TX ..... Bunker Hills Creek, Watauga, TX ...... Burton Creek, Bryan, TX ........... California Creek, Hamlin, TX ......... Calloway Branch, Hurst, TX .......... Carrizo Creek, Carrizo Spring, TX ...... Chacon Creek, Laredo, TX ........... Chambers Creek, Everman, TX ........ Delaware Creek, Dallas, TX .......... Dry Branch Creek, Grand Prairie, TX .. . Elm Fork, Gainesville, TX............ Farmers Branch, White Settlement, TX. . Grassy Branch, Millsap, TX .......... Johnson Creek, Grand Prairie, TX ...... Little Walnut Creek, Austin, TX ....... Lorean Branch, Hurst, TX ........... Lower Walnut Creek, Austin, TX....... Pecan Creek, Gainesville, TX ......... Rush Creek, Arlington, TX ........... Singing Hills Creek, Watauga, TX ...... South Mesquite, Mesquite, TX ......... Spanish Oak Creek, Cedar Park, TX .. . Sulphur Branch, Euless, TX .......... Ten Mile Creek, De Soto, TX.......... Ten Mile Creek, Duncanville, TX ....... Ten Mile Creek, Lancaster, TX ........ Timber Creek, Double Oak, TX ........ Town Branch Creek, Lockhart, TX...... Upper Zacate Creek, Laredo, TX ....... Valley View Branch, Hurst, TX........ Walnut Creek, Hood County, TX ....... Walnut Creek, Sequin, TX ........... Walnut Creek Tribs, Austin, TX ....... Whitney Creek, Whitney, TX ......... Zacate Creek, Laredo, TX ............ Zarzamdra Creek, San Antonio, TX ..... (See Section 30 of Text) Cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30-23 . . . . . . . . . . $ 00 193 00 51,472 1,580 923 22,303 61,333 0 75,892 0 94,404 5,065 1,462,740 00 29,765 24,657 77 0 47,080 51,589 22,871 00 14,190 27,840 22,476 51,795 35,923 12 1,722 0 14,929 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT * Galveston District comprises drainage basins of all short streams arising in coastal plain of Texas and flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, including the entire basin of Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, San Bernard, Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Aransas Rivers. It embraces Agua Dulce, San Fernando, and Olmos Creek Basins draining into Baffin Bay, and coastal area south thereof to the Rio Grande and east of western Boundary of Starr County, Texas. It includes lower basins of major streams flowing into the Gulf of Mexico: Sabine River, Texas and Louisiana, downstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas; Neches River downstream from Town Bluff gaging station; Trinity River downstream from Texas State Highway 19 crossing at Riverside, Texas; Brazos River downstream from confluence with Navasota River; Colorado River downstream from northern boundary of Fayette County; Guadalupe River downstream from confluence with San Marcos River; San Antonio River downstream from confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River downstream from confluence with Frio and Atascosa River. 31-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page Flood Control (cont.) 1. Aquatic Plant Control (Southwestern Division) ........................... 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX ............. 3. Cedar Bayou, TX .................... 4. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX ....... 5. Freeport Harbor, TX ................. 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX ..... 7. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL, and the Mexican Border ............................ 8. Houston Ship Channel, TX ............ 9. Matagorda Ship Channel, TX ......... 10. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX .......... 11. Texas City Channel, TX ............... 12. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX ....... 12A. Anahuac Channel, TX ................ 12B. Channel to Liberty, TX ............... 12C. Wallisville Lake, TX ................. 13. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .. 14. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ...................... 31-2 31-2 31-3 31-3 31-4 31-5 31-5 31-7 31-7 31-7 31-8 31-9 31-9 31-9 31-9 31-10 31. Surveys .......................... 32. Planning and Engineering ............ 31-10 33. Collection and Study of Basic Data ..... Tables 31-A Cost and Financial Statement. 31-17 thru 31-B Authorizing Legislation ..... 31-20 thru 31-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .. 31-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects. 31-E Total Cost of Existing Projects ........ 31-F Channel Dimensions ........ 31-36 thru 31-G Channel Dimensions, GIWW Tributary Channels ........ 31-39 thru 31-H Dredging Operations ........ 31-41 thru 31-11 31-11 31-12 31-12 31-12 31-12 22. Port Arthur and Vicinity, TX Hurricane-Flood Protection ........... 23. Sims Bayou, TX .................... 24. Taylors Bayou, TX .................. 25. Texas City and Vicinity, TX Hurricane-Flood Protection ........... 26. Upper White Oak Bayou, TX ......... 27. Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX ..... 28. Inspection of Completed Flood Control W orks ........................... 29. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ...................... 30. Emergency Stream Bank and Shoreline Erosion Work and Snagging and Clearing Under Special Authorization .......... General Investigations Beach Erosion Control 15. Corpus Christi Beach, TX ............ 31-10 Flood Control 16. Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX ..... 17. Clear Creek, TX .................... 18. Cypress Creek, TX .................. 19. Falfurrias, TX ..................... 20. Kirbyville, TX ..................... 21. Lower Rio Grande Basin, TX .......... Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION) 1965 ACT Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Texas and the Sabine River Watershed of Louisiana. Previous project. For details see page 699 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. A comprehensive project to provide for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, hydrilla, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths, from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Texas in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures. Control of hydrilla, water hyacinth and alligator weed continues in the Nueces River Basin, North Coastal Area, Guadalupe River Basin, Sabine River Basin, Trinity River Basin, Cypress Creek Basin, Neches River Basin, South Coastal Area, San Jacinto River Basin, Rio Grande Basin, Colorado River Basin and Brazos River Basin. Local cooperation. Sec. 302, 1965 River and Harbor Act, amended by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Control work by the State of Texas continued. Coordination of a Cooperative Agreement with the State for operations was continued. Monitoring of the biological control nursery areas was continued during the year. Expansion of the program to additional sites was approved. 2. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX Location. At extreme south end of coast of Texas, about 7 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande and about 5 miles east of Brownsville, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11301.) 31-2 Page 31-13 31-13 31-13 31-14 31-14 31-14 31-15 31-15 31-15 31-15 31-15 31-16 31-19 31-33 31-34 31-34 31-35 31-38 31-40 31-42 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT Previous project. For details see page 1017 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in various sections of the waterway as shown in Table 15F. Project also provides for dual jetties at the gulf entrance, a north jetty 6,330 feet long, a south jetty 5,092 feet long, and 1,000-foot extension to existing north jetty and for maintenance of 3rd fishing harbor constructed by local interests. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet, and extreme range is about 2 feet. All depths refer to mean low tide. To some extent, height of tides is dependent on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season, water surface in southern end of Laguna Madre may be raised 4 feet or more above mean low tide in the gulf. Estimated cost for new work is: Federal (Corps) $32,581,647, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects, and non-Federal $16,056,258, including $8,697,258 contributed funds, $438,000 lands, $2,064,000 relocations, and $4,857,000 other costs, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. (October 1, 1989 base price). Widening Brownsville Channel from Goose Island to Brownsville turning basin and deepening southeast corner of Brownsville turning basin to 36 feet was completed in April 1980. The 1,000-foot extension to existing north jetty was deauthorized under Section 1001 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Work remaining consists of enlarging 14.8 miles of the existing Brownsville Channel from 36 feet by 200 feet to 42 feet by 300 feet and by enlarging 2.5 miles of the entrance channel from 38 feet by 300 feet to 44 feet by 400 feet. The turning basin would be enlarged to 1,200 feet at a depth of 36 feet. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1989.) Local cooperation. Complied with for the completed work. For the 42 foot project authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and material disposal areas; levees and spillways for disposal areas; modify or relocate utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation, during construction, and pay an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to navigation within a period of 30 years following completion if not offset by credit allowed for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and dredged material disposal areas. Terminal facilities. Numerous terminal facilities for bulk and liquid cargo are available. (See Port Series No. 26, revised 1980.) Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 32, Planning and Engineering. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 3. CEDAR BAYOU, TX Location. The bayou is about 30 miles long. It flows to the south and empties into northwest corner of upper Galveston Bay, about 1.5 miles below mouth of San Jacinto River and about 28.5 miles north of Galveston, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11326.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Project provides for a channel 10 feet by 100 feet from Houston Ship Channel to Bayou Mile 11.0. Channel was completed from Houston Ship Channel to first bend in Cedar Bayou above the mouth in 1931. Channel from Mile -0.1 to Mile 3.0 was completed in March 1975. Channel from Mile 3.0 to Mile 11.0 was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of Public Law 93-251. Project also includes jetties at mouth of bayou provided for under previous project. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range is about 0.6 feet and extreme range 1.2 feet. Height of tides is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in the winter season water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. (See Table 15-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1989.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. U.S. Steel Company has a barge dock at bayou mile 2.8, and there are a few small wharves, privately owned, for local use at various places along Cedar Bayou. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 4. CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. This project, formerly known as the Port Aransas-Corpus Christi Waterway, Texas, was changed to Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Texas, by 1968 River and Harbor Act. This is a consolidation of old improvements of Port Aransas, Texas, and channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi, Texas. Aransas Pass is on southern portion of Texas Coast, 180 miles southwest of Galveston and 132 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande. Aransas Pass connects Corpus Christi Bay with the gulf. Waterway extends from deep water in the gulf through Aransas Pass jettied entrance, thence westerly 20.75 miles to and including a turning basin at Corpus Christi, thence westerly 1.75 miles through Industrial Canal to and including turning basin at Avery Point, thence westerly 4.25 miles to and including a turning basin near Tule Lake, thence northwesterly 1.8 miles to and including a turning basin at Viola, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11308, 11309, 11311, and 11314.) Previous project. For details see page 1861 of Annual Report for 1915. 31-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Existing project. (See Table 31-F for existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins comprising this waterway.) Project also provides for two rubblestone jetties at Aransas Pass entrance, extending into the gulf from St. Joseph and Mustang Islands, project lengths of which are 11,190 and 8,610 feet, respectively. Project further provides for a stone dike on St. Joseph Island about 20,991 feet long, connecting with north jetty and extending up this island to prevent a channel being cut around jetty. Project also provides for a breakwater at the entrance to the harbor area at Port Aransas, and for the realignment of the existing 12-foot by 100-foot project channel to Port Aransas. The breakwater consists of two overlapping sections. The one on the east side of the realigned entrance channel has a length of 830 feet and the second, located on the west side of the entrance channel, has a length of 1,290 feet. The channel to Port Aransas was relocated in the 300-foot clear distance between the overlapping sections. The portion of the channel remaining inside the breakwaters was widened to 150 feet. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range at Aransas Pass is about 1.1 feet and extreme range about 2 feet, and at Corpus Christi mean range about 1 foot and extreme about 1.5 feet. Heights of tides are dependent largely on strength and directions of winds, and during strong "northers" in the winter season water surface may be depressed as much as 3 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: Federal (Corps) $74,938,515, including $456,515 for Port Aransas Breakwaters and exclusive of amount expended on previous projects: and non- Federal $18,977,431 (includes $768 for Port Aransas Breakwaters) including $7,644,435 contributed funds and value of useful work performed, $3,320,228 lands, $6,027,000 relocations and $1,985,000 other cost. (October 1, 1989 base price.) The Port Aransas-Corpus Christi 40-foot project was completed in 1966. The Jewel Fulton Canal was completed in 1963. The Port Aransas Breakwaters were completed in July 1973. Work remaining consists of deepening deep-draft channels to 45 feet from Tule Lake Turning Basin through Viola Turning Basin, and constructing a mooring area at Port Ingleside with dolphins. Entrance and jetty channels have been dredged to project depth and width, and dredging of channel from Harbor Island to and through the Chemical Turning Basin at 45-foot depth has been completed. Initial mooring dolphins were completed in May 1979. Disposal area levees, Area 1 and Rincon were completed in August 1984. First stage disposal area levees, South Shore, were completed in September 1984. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1989.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities on Harbor Island at head of Aransas Pass, Ingleside, Corpus Christi, La Quinta, Avery Point, and Viola, are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series, No. 25, revised 1979, Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of retaining works at Suntide was completed at a fiscal year cost of $130,961. Contract for dredging Tule Lake to and including Viola Turning Basin was completed at a fiscal year cost of $7,116,237. Contracts for the alteration of a 6" oil pipeline, an 8" pipeline and a 4" fiber optic cable in the Suntide area are completed at a fiscal year cost of $44,535, $39,913 and $33,003 respectively. Construction of the effluent ditch for the Suntide Disposal Area was awarded in July 1989. Fiscal year cost was $250,031. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 5. FREEPORT HARBOR, TX Location. Formed by improvement of Brazos River, Texas, from mouth to about 6 miles upstream to Freeport, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11321 and 11322.) Previous projects. For details see page 1860 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 872 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Existing project dimensions for various channels and basins are shown in Table 31-F on channel dimensions at end of chapter. Existing project also provides for: Dual jetties and a diversion canal for the Brazos River, including a dam, a lock in the dam and necessary auxiliary equipment. Also provides for rehabilitation of southwest jetty and the relocation of the northeast jetty (about 640 feet to the northeast); realignment of the channel between the Jetty Channel and Brazosport Turning Basin; realignment of the channel between Brazosport Turning Basin and Upper Turning Basin; relocation of Upper Turning Basin; and public use facilities adjacent to the Freeport Jetties. The 30-foot channel from Upper Turning Basin to Stauffer Chemical Plant, including the turning basin, was deauthorized by Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Construction of lock in diversion dam at local expense is considered inactive. The 38-36 foot project was completed in 1962. Work remaining consists of realigning, deepening and widening the Outer Bar and Jetty Channels; relocating the northeast jetty; rehabilitating the southwest jetty; realigning and deepening the harbor channel between the jetty channel and the Upper Turning Basin; relocating and enlarging the Upper Turning Basin; constructing a turning point near the northwesterly end of the jetty channel; enlarging Brazosport Turning Basin; deepening Brazos Harbor Channel; and enlarging and deepening Brazos Harbor Turning Basin, as authorized by the R&H Act of 1970. The initial contract for the 45 foot project, construction of 3,700 feet of the North Jetty, was awarded in May 1987. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1989.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet and extreme range is about 2.5 feet. Except under extreme conditions, rises on river and in diversion channel do not cause greater variations in water surface than those caused by tidal action. 31-4 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT Estimated cost of new work is: $63,627,000 Federal (Corps); and $31,666,000 non-Federal, including $21,158,303 contributed funds, $360,249 contributed work, $6,587,448 lands, $2,990,000 levees and spillways, and $570,000 relocations. (October 1, 1989 base price.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for Section 101 of River and Harbor Act of 1970, modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The Local Cooperation Agreement, executed 26 June 1986, requires that local interest provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, including land for recreation, and dredged material disposal areas, presently estimated at $9,260,000, modify or relocate utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary for construction of the project, presently estimated at $570,000, contribute in cash one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $390,000; and, during construction, pay 25 percent of the construction costs allocated to deep-draft navigation, presently estimated at $20,010,000. Terminal facilities. Small privately owned wharves, two oil docks, one acid dock, two shell unloading docks and one caustic dock. Brazos River Navigation District has one large dock with four transit sheds over rail facilities permitting all-weather work. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 26, revised 1980, for additional facilities.) Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of 3,700 feet of the North Jetty continued at a fiscal year cost of $3,565,080. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 6. GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX Location. A consolidation of authorized improvements at Galveston, Texas, which includes projects formerly identified as Galveston Harbor, Texas; Galveston Channel, Texas; and Galveston seawall extension. Entrance to Galveston Harbor is on Gulf of Mexico on the northern portion of the Texas Coast. Galveston Channel extends from a point in Galveston Harbor between Bolivar Peninsula and Fort Point to and along wharf front Galveston, Texas, and is about 5 miles long and 1,200 feet wide. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11324/5.) Previous projects. For details see page 1854 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in sections of the waterway shown in Table 31-F. Also provided are: two rubble-mound jetties, the south one extending from Galveston Island and the north one extending from Bolivar Peninsula, for distances of 35,900 feet and 25,907 feet, respectively, into the Gulf of Mexico; a concrete seawall from the angle at Sixth Street and Broadway, in the city of Galveston, to the south jetty, and a 16,300-foot extension of the concrete seawall in a southwesterly direction from 61st Street; for 11 groins along the gulf shore between 12th Street and 61st Street; and for maintenance of seawall from the angle at 6th Street and Broadway to the south jetty. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range in Galveston Harbor is 1.6 feet on outer bar and 1.4 feet on inner bar with extreme ranges of 2.3 and 2.1 feet, respectively. Mean range in Galveston channel is about 1.3 feet and extreme range about 2 feet under ordinary conditions. Height of tides in both Galveston harbor and channel is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Existing project is complete. Dredging of Galveston channel to 36 foot depth was completed in November 1966. Dredging of the realigned entrance and Outer Bar Channel was completed in October 1967. Rehabilitation of the Beach Front Groins was completed June 1970. Dredging of Galveston channel to 40 feet was completed in March 1976. See Section 12. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX regarding work authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1989.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. None on Galveston Harbor, which is entrance channel leading to terminal facilities on Galveston, Texas City, and Houston Ship Channels. Galveston Channel terminal facilities are mostly on south side of channel. Principal wharves, owned by the city of Galveston, extend from 10th to 41st Street (see Port Series No. 23, revised 1979). A containership terminal equipped with a crane capable of stacking containers three units high on the deck of any normal containership has been completed and placed into operation by the city of Galveston at Piers 10 and 11, on the south side of Galveston Channel. The city of Galveston has also placed into operation a barge terminal equipped with two 35-ton and one 5-ton cranes for loading and unloading barges on Lash and Seabee ships at Pier 35 and a docking and holding area for Lash and Seabee barges on Pelican Island, directly across the channel from Piers 35 and 36. Present facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance including mosquito control spraying. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 7. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL, AND MEXICAN BORDER Location. Extends from a point on Sabine River about 3 miles below Orange, Texas, to Brownsville, Texas, about 421 miles; a navigation channel, about 7 miles long, in Colorado River, extending from Matagorda, Texas, to Gulf of Mexico; a tributary channel in San Bernard River, extending from Intracoastal Waterway crossing to State highway bridge some 30 miles above crossing; a tributary channel in Colorado River extending from Intracoastal Waterway upstream 15.5 miles; a tributary channel extending about 14 miles from Intracoastal Waterway 31-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 to Palacios, Texas; a tributary channel extending about 2 miles from Intracoastal Waterway to Rockport, Texas; a tributary channel extending about 6 miles from Intracoastal Waterway near Port Aransas, Texas, to town of Aransas Pass, Texas; a tributary channel about one-fourth mile long extending from Intracoastal Waterway near Port O'Connor, Texas, into Barroom Bay; a tributary channel extending about 38.8 miles from Intracoastal Waterway via Seadrift to a point in Guadalupe River 5.5 miles below Victoria, Texas; a harbor of refuge for small craft at Seadrift; a channel extending from gulf to Port Mansfield, Texas, about 11 miles; and a tributary channel in Arroyo, Colorado extending from Intracoastal Waterway to a point near Harlingen, Texas, about 31 miles; side channels in vicinity of Port Isabel, Texas, and a small boat basin at Port Isabel, Texas, and a tributary channel extending from Intracoastal Waterway main channel at a point in West Galveston Bay into Offatts Bayou about 2.2 miles with a west turnout (wye connection) 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide between Offatts Bayou Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11302, 11303, 11305, 11306, 11308, 11309, 11314, 11315, 11317, 11319, 11322, 11326, and 11331.) Previous project. For details see page 1859 of Annual Report for 1915. (West Galveston Bay and Brazos River Canal, Texas.) Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in main channel of waterway: A channel 12 feet deep (below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide from the Sabine River to Brownsville, Texas. Relocation of channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide in Matagorda Bay, miles 454.3 to 471.3, relocation of channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide in Corpus Christi Bay, miles 539.4 to 549.7 (mileage is west of Harvey Lock, Louisiana); and alternate channel, 12 feet deep (below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide via Galveston Channel and Galveston Bay to the Galveston causeway; maintenance of existing channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide through Lydia Ann Channel, between Aransas Bay and Aransas Pass; provisions of such passing places, widening of bends, locks and guard locks, railway bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary, and the tributary channels shown in tabulation. The authorized channel 16 feet deep and 125 feet wide from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel is inactive. (See Table 31-G on existing project dimensions provided for in tributary channels.) Removal of the railroad bridge across the canal at Mud Bayou was completed and operation and care of the facility was discontinued on April 14, 1969. Deepening the existing 6 foot by 60 foot side channels at Port Isabel to 12 feet was completed February 22, 1972, Offatts Bayou channel was completed January 1974. Relocation of main channel across Corpus Christi Bay was completed in September 1976. The 14 foot by 175 foot Channel to Aransas Pass was completed in April 1979. Dredging Chocolate Bayou Channel was completed in January 1981. Construction of a saltwater barrier in Chocolate Bayou was completed in February 1981. The 12 foot by 125 foot channel relocation route in Matagorda Bay has been deauthorized. The Harbor of Refuge at Seadrift, Texas, has been placed in the inactive category. Construction of jetties at mouth of Colorado River was completed in 1986. Active authorized work remaining consists of the following: (1) Mouth of Colorado River, dredging a navigation channel from gulf to the GIWW; construction of an impoundment basin; constructing a turning basin at Matagorda, Texas; construction of a diversion dam and channel; construction of a dam at Tiger Island Cut; construction of an oyster cultch; and recreation facilities; (2) Work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 for enlarging the existing Channel to Victoria from a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet to a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1989.) Mean tidal variation is 0.5 foot at Orange, 1 foot at Port Arthur, 1.3 feet in Galveston Bay, 1.5 feet at Freeport, 1 foot in Matagorda Bay, 1 foot in San Antonio Bay, 1 foot at Corpus Christi, 1.5 feet at Port Isabel, and 1.5 feet at Brownsville. Extreme ranges of tide under ordinary conditions are 1 foot at Orange, 1.5 feet at Port Arthur, 2 feet in Galveston Bay, 2 feet at Freeport, 1.5 feet in Matagorda and San Antonio Bays, 1.5 feet at Corpus Christi, 2 feet at Port Isabel, and 1.5 feet at Brownsville. Height of tides is dependent largely on wind. Strong north winds have depressed water surface as much as 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: $91,764,000 (excluding $164,000 Department of Transportation cost for Channel to Victoria) Federal (Corps), including $8,414 for Port Isabel Side Channel, $46,559 for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin, $356,466 for Offatts Bayou, and $658,573 for Channel to Aransas Pass and excluding expenditures on previous projects; non-Federal $25,025,174 ($395,000 voluntarily expended on Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $46,559 contributed funds for Port Isabel, $49,665 contributed funds for Offatts Bayou, $347,950 contributed funds for channel to Aransas Pass, $3,530,000 contributed funds for Mouth of Colorado River, $1,680,000 contributed funds for Channel to Victoria, $7,155,000 lands for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $11,000 lands for Port Isabel, $4,242,000 relocations for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, and $7,568,000 other costs for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway). (October 1, 1989 base prices.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for provisions of Section 101, 1968 River and Harbor Act and Water Resources Development Act of 1988. Non-Federal contributions are $395,000 for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, $46,559 for Port Isabel, Texas, $49,665 for Offatts Bayou, Texas, $347,950 for Channel to Aransas Pass, Texas, and $3,530,000 for Mouth of Colorado River, Texas, and $1,680,000 for Channel to Victoria. Terminal facilities. There are terminal facilities at Aransas Pass, Port Arthur, Galveston, Port Isabel, and Brownsville. See Port Series No. 22 (revised 1981), Port Series No. 23 (revised 1979), Port Series No. 25 (revised 1979) and Port Series No. 26 (revised 1980), 31-6 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT Corps of Engineers. Local interests constructed terminal facilities at Port Mansfield and Port Harlingen. There are numerous privately owned piers and wharves along the waterway. A 330-foot navigation district owned general cargo dock, a 770-foot private dock and a 760-foot private timber trestle have recently been completed at the upper end of the Channel to Victoria. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contract for dredging the harbor and turning basin was completed at a fiscal year cost of $727,110. Contract for the diversion channel and levees continued at a fiscal year cost of $2,866,010. Channel to Victoria New Work: See Section 32, Planning and Engineering. Maintenance: The Brazos River Floodgates were operated and maintained at a cost of $917,042 including engineering and design, supervision and administration, and real estate activities. The Colorado River Locks were operated and maintained at a cost of $2,481,125 including engineering and design and supervision and administration. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 8. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. Connects Galveston Harbor, at a point opposite Port Bolivar, with city of Houston, Texas, extending 50 miles northwesterly across Galveston Bay through San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou to a turning basin at head of Long Reach with light-draft channel 5 miles long from turning basin to Jenson Drive, Houston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/5, 11327, 11328, and 11329.) Previous project. For details see page 1856 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in sections of the waterway shown in Table 31-F. Also provides for certain cut-offs, for easing sharp bends, an earthen dam across the upper end of Turkey Bend, and for off-channel silting basins as deemed necessary by the Chief of Engineers. Construction of 26,000 linear feet of pile dike to protect the channel in upper Galveston Bay was deauthorized by Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. The 40-foot project was completed in March 1966. Dredging a channel in Greens Bayou to Mile 1.57 was completed in 1970. Dredging Greens Bayou, Mile 1.57 to Mile 2.73, has been deauthorized. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1989.) Mean tidal range under ordinary conditions is 0.6 foot to 1.3 feet in lower part of Galveston Bay; 0.6 foot to 1.3 feet in upper bay; and 0.5 to 1 foot in San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou. Extreme ranges under ordinary conditions are about 2 feet, 1.2 feet and 1 foot, respectively. Freshets caused rises of over 12 feet in Buffalo Bayou; however, this condition has not occurred since completion of Addicks and Barker Dams for flood control on upper watershed of Buffalo Bayou. Height of tides is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "'northers" in winter season the water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Houston and Port of Houston Authority operate modern terminals which supplement privately owned wharves, piers, and docks, as described in Port Series No. 24 (revised 1980), Corps of Engineers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Rehabilitation of House and Stimson Tracts disposal areas fiscal year cost was $3,054,999. Rehabilitation of Peggy Lake disposal area fiscal year cost was $197,946. Routine maintenance, including mosquito control spraying. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 9. MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. This is a consolidation of shallow draft channel improvements of "Channel from Pass Cavallo to Port Lavaca, Texas," and deep draft channel improvements authorized under "Matagorda Ship Channel, Texas." Bar at Pass Cavallo is 125 miles southwest of Galveston entrance and 54 miles north of Aransas Pass. It connects Matagorda Bay with the gulf. Project extends across Matagorda Bay and Lavaca Bay to towns of Port Lavaca and Point Comfort. These two towns are on opposite sides of Lavaca Bay and both are about 26 miles northwest from Pass Cavallo. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11316.) Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are listed in Table 31-F on channel dimensions. Project also provides for dual jetties at entrance, south jetty extending 6,000 feet to 24-foot depth in the gulf and north jetty extending 5,900 feet to 24-foot depth. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1 foot and extreme range about 2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season the water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: $18,058,777 Federal (Corps), and $12,859,000 non-Federal, including $12,259,619 contributed funds, $182,000 for lands, $220,000 for relocations, and $196,581 other costs. The project was completed in March 1967. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Privately owned facilities at Port Lavaca, municipally owned facilities at mouth of Lynn bayou, privately owned and publicly owned facilities at Point Comfort, Texas. These facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Facilities at Point Comfort consist of a channel, turning basin with wharfs, oil dock and loading equipment, all owned by Aluminum Company of America; and a wharf built by local interest at Point Comfort turning basin. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 10. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX Location. This is a consolidation of old improvements of "Harbor at Sabine Pass and Port Arthur Canal" and "Sabine-Neches Canal, including Sabine River to Orange and Neches River to Beaumont, 31-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Texas." Sabine Pass is on Gulf of Mexico about 58 miles east of Galveston and 280 miles west of Southwest Pass, Mississippi River. It connects Sabine Lake with gulf. Port Arthur canal extends 7 miles from near upper end of Sabine Pass to Port Arthur docks at mouth of Taylors Bayou. Near its upper end, Sabine-Neches canal joins and extends to mouths of Neches and Sabine Rivers. Waterway next extends up Neches River to Beaumont and up Sabine River to Orange. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11341, 11342, and 11343.) Previous projects. For details see page 1863 of Annual Report for 1915, page 985 of Annual Report for 1916, and page 873 of Annual Report for 1926. Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are set forth in Table 31-F on channel dimensions. Project also provides for two stone jetties at Sabine Pass entrance from the gulf, western jetty to be 21,905 feet long and eastern jetty 25,310 feet long. Project further provides for removal of guard lock in Sabine-Neches Canal, construction of suitable permanent protective works along Sabine Lake frontage owned by city of Port Arthur to prevent dredged material from entering Sabine Lake and to prevent erosion of material deposited, reconstruction of Port Arthur Bridge, and relocation of Port Arthur field office. Mean tidal variation at entrance is about 1.5 feet, at Port Arthur about 1 foot, and at Orange and Beaumont about 0.5 foot. Prolonged north winds during winter season have depressed water surface as much as 3.4 feet below mean low tide while tropical disturbances have caused heights as much as 8 feet above mean low tide. Existing project is complete. Removal of obstructive bridge at Port Arthur was completed May 1969. The high level fixed bridge across Sabine-Neches Canal was completed October 1970. Deepening project to 40 feet was completed April 1972. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1989.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. See volume 2, Port Series No. 22 (revised 1981), Corps of Engineers. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance including mosquito control spraying. A contract for dredging Lower Reach-Neches River Channel was initiated in August 1989 and incurred $19,000 for mobilization costs this fiscal year. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 11. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX Location. Texas City is on the mainland of Texas on west side of Galveston Bay, about 10 miles northwest of city of Galveston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/5.) Previous projects. For details see page 1856 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel 40 feet deep, 400 feet wide and about 6.75 miles long, from Bolivar Roads to a turning basin at Texas City, 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet to 1,200 feet wide and 4,253 feet long; and an Industrial Canal, 40 feet deep and 300-400 feet wide extending a distance of 1.7 miles southwestward from the south end of Texas City Turning Basin, and a turning basin, 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 1,150 feet long. Project also provides for easing the approach to the turning basin; a pile dike 28,200 feet long, parallel to and north of the channel; and a rubble-mound dike, 27,600 feet long, along the southerly side of the pile dike. The 40-foot channel was completed in June 1967. Widening the Texas City Turning Basin; realigning the Texas City Turning Basin to a location 85 feet easterly from its present position; and enlargement through widening and deepening of the Industrial Canal and basins was initiated in July 1980 and completed in June 1982. The only work remaining is deferred construction consisting of widening the Industrial Canal from 250 feet to 300 feet at 40 foot depth. Work authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986 would modify the project by providing for deepening the Texas City Turning Basin to 50 feet, enlarging the 6.7-mile long Texas City Channel to 50 feet by 600 feet, deepening the existing 800-foot wide Bolivar Roads Channel and Inner Bar Channel to 50 feet, deepening the existing 800-foot wide Outer Bar and Galveston Entrance Channel to a 52-foot depth for 4.1 miles at a width of 800 feet and an additional reach at a width of 600 feet to the 52 foot contour in the Gulf of Mexico. Establishment of 600 acres of wetland and development of water-oriented recreational facilities on a 90-acre enlargement of the Texas City Dike are also proposed. At the request of local sponsor, City of Texas City, the project has been placed in the "deferred" category. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1989.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.3 feet and extreme range is about 2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on the wind and during strong "northers" water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is $123,300,000 Federal (Corps), excluding expenditures on previous projects, and $74,393,700 non-Federal, including $62,027,741 contributed funds, $248,000 work contribution, $427,959 lands, $10,737,000 levees and spillways, $6,000 for removal of barge mooring facilities from Snake Island, $561,000 for berthing areas, and $386,000 relocations. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. For work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide levees for disposal areas and wetlands; relocate utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges; provide berthing areas; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities, and, during construction, pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation to a depth of 45 feet plus 50 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation deeper than 45 feet; pay an additional 10 percent of the 31-8 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT costs allocated to deep-draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion if not offset by credit allowed for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and disposal areas; and pay 50 percent of the costs incurred for operation and maintenance below the 45-foot depth. Terminal facilities. Privately owned terminal facilities are on the mainland at inner end of this channel and are considered adequate for existing commerce. A deep-draft channel and turning basin extend about 1.9 miles southwestward from south end of Texas City Turning Basin have been constructed by local interests. See Port Series No. 23 (revised 1979), Corps of Engineers. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 32, Planning and Engineering. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 12. TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Location. The main stem of the Trinity River is formed at Dallas by the confluence of the West Fork and the Elm Fork at river mile 505.5. The mouth of the Trinity is about one-half mile west of Anahuac, Texas. (See Geological Survey base map, Texas, scale 1:500,000.) Previous project. For details of abandoned locks and dam construction see page 986 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. See individual detailed reports on Anahuac Channel, Channel to Liberty and Wallisville Lake. Project includes the existing Federal project designated as "Mouth of Trinity River, Texas," which was completed in 1907 at a cost of $80,000 (no cost to local interest). Project is not being maintained. (See Table 31-E for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1989.) Local cooperation. See individual detailed reports on Channel to Liberty and Wallisville Lake. There is no local cooperation required for Anahuac Channel. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and piers at Anahuac, Moss Bluff, Wallisville, and Liberty, Texas, are adequate for existing commerce. 12A. ANAHUAC CHANNEL, TX Location: Extends from 6-foot depth in Galveston Bay to Anahuac, Texas, opposite mouth of Trinity River 38 miles north of Galveston, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11323.) Existing project. No project dimensions authorized by 1905 River and Harbor Act. A 6- by 80-foot channel, 16,000 feet long was dredged in 1905. At present a 6- by 100-foot channel is maintained. Under ordinary conditions tidal range is 0.6 to 1.2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on wind. Strong north winds depress water surface 1.5 feet below mean sea level. Latest published map is in House Document 440, 56th Congress, 1st Session. Project was completed in 1911. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and piers are the only terminal facilities at Anahuac. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance. 12B. CHANNEL TO LIBERTY, TX Location. Improvement is located in Galveston Bay and tidal reach of lower Trinity River. (See Geological Survey Maps for Anahuac, Cove, Moss Bluff, and Liberty, Texas.) Previous projects. For details see page 986 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for a 6-foot channel from Anahuac to Liberty which was completed in 1925. A navigable channel from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay to Liberty, Texas, with depth of 9 feet and width of 150 feet, extending along the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth of the Trinity River at Anahuac, thence in the river channel to a turning basin at Liberty, Texas, and a protective embankment along the west side of the channel in Trinity Bay. The 6-foot Channel to Liberty was completed in 1925. The 9-foot Channel to Liberty has been dredged from junction with Houston Ship Channel to a point one mile below Anahuac, Texas. Work remaining consists of dredging a 9- by 150-foot channel from one mile below Anahuac, Texas to Liberty, Texas. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for portion of "Channel to Liberty" between Houston Ship Channel and 1 mile below Anahuac, Texas, as required by 1946 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess.), but not complied with for remaining portion of "Channel to Liberty" as required by River and Harbor Act of 1945 (H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.) at an estimated total cost of $550,000, of which $460,000 is for lands and rights-of-way and $90,000 for pipeline relocations for 9- by 150-foot channel. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and docks at Anahuac, Wallisville, Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.'s slip, Moss Bluff and Liberty, Texas, are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance including mosquito control spraying. (See Table 31-H for dredging operations.) 12C. WALLISVILLE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is at river mile 3.9, about 4 miles northwest of Anahuac, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11323.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a dam and overflow spillway approximately 8 miles long to prevent salinity intrusion and create a 5,600-acre reservoir. The maximum pool elevation will be 4 feet above National Geodetic Vertical Datum. Project provides for an 84 foot by 600-foot navigation lock to facilitate navigation on Channel to Liberty. The sill has a depth of minus 16 feet below National Geodetic 31-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Vertical Datum. Project also provides for two recreational areas. Dam controls a drainage area of 1,262 square miles below Livingston Dam (non-Federal project at channel mile 99.2) and has a storage capacity of 58,000 acre-feet. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range in bay is from 0.6 foot to 1.2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on wind. Strong northerly winds depress water surface 1.5 feet below mean sea level. Total estimated cost of authorized project is $71,100,000 Federal (Corps). (October 1, 1989 base price.) A contract for construction of access road, Big Hog intake structure, intake canal and access bridge was completed in October 1968. Work started in July 1970 on construction of the lock and dam, roads, diversion channel, and navigation channel. Work was suspended in February 1973 because of an injunction halting construction. Protective work on the lock and dam was permitted and was completed in April 1973. An exception to the injunction was granted for plugging oil wells which was completed in August 1973. Notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit was filed in April 1973. In August 1974, the Court of Appeals reversed the judgment and remanded the case with directions that a revised or supplemental statement be prepared and judged anew. Final supplement to the Environmental Impact Statement for the modified project authorized in the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1983 (PL 98-63) was submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency on September 21, 1983. In March 1986, the Court rendered it Memorandum of order continuing the injunction and directing the Corps to re-commence the administrative process at the time when the first departure from standard NEPA procedures occurred prior to the 1983 legislative action. The Corps and local sponsors perfected an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals and on May 11, 1987, the Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the Corps and dismissed the suit in its entirety. Local cooperation. Local interest must contribute an amount equal to cost allocated to water supply, one-half of cost allocated to salinity control and cost allocated to recreation less cost of basic facilities and less 15 percent of total project cost. Local interest reimbursement is estimated at $9,818,000. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Plans and specifications for the non-overflow dam, Interstate 10 to the Lock site, were approved in May 1986. Further work has been deferred pending receipt of construction funds. Maintenance: Ranger surveillance, administration of project, and administration of duck blind permit program was conducted. 13. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys were conducted on the following projects: Project Channel to Port Bolivar Houston Ship Channel Cedar Bayou Freeport Harbor Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Texas City Channel Brazos Island Harbor Date of Survey Oct 1988 Jan-Mar 1989 Jan 1989 May-Aug 1989 Jul-Aug 1989 Jul-Sep 1989 Aug-Sep 1989 Fiscal Year Cost $ 18 2,358 302 13,497 1,135 7,760 54,223 $79,293 14. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). 107, Reconnaissance studies of navigation channel improvements on the Sabine River Channel at Orange, Texas were completed at a fiscal year cost of $553. Studies have been terminated. Reconnaissance studies of navigation channel improvements on Cedar Bayou at Baytown, Texas were continued at a fiscal year cost of $54,674. Beach Erosion Control 15. CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TX (RESTORATION PROJECT) Location. Corpus Christi Beach, a shore area having a length of about 2 miles, is located on the west side of Corpus Christi Bay in Nueces County at Corpus Christi, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11309 and 11311.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provided for initial restoration of eroded areas of Corpus Christi Beach, over a shore length of 1.4 miles, located on the easterly side of Rincon Peninsula, with periodic nourishment as required. Construction was completed in March 1978. Periodic nourishment and construction of sand retention groin was completed in November 1985. Estimated cost of new work is $2,150,000 Federal (Corps) and $2,265,000 non-Federal consisting of $2,150,000 Contributed funds, $43,000 relocations, and $72,000 lands. (October 1, 1987 base price.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Section 934 of Water Resources Development Act of 1986 provides for extension of nourishment period to 50 years for beach nourishment projects. A study is underway to determine the appropriateness of such an extended nourishment period for the Federal beach nourishment project. 31-10 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT Flood Control 16. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Location. Improvements are on Buffalo Bayou watershed, a part of San Jacinto River watershed, in Harris County, west and northwest of city of Houston, Texas. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheets for Harris County.) Existing project. Provides for improvement of Buffalo Bayou and its tributaries above turning basin of Houston Ship Channel to control floods for protection of city of Houston, and prevent deposition of silt in turning basin of ship channel by construction of detention reservoirs, enlargement and rectification of channels and construction of control works. Estimated cost of new work is $150,114,000 Federal (Corps) including $11,900,000 for recreational facilities at completed projects (Code 713 funds) and $11,214,000 for Dam Safety Assurance, and $98,791,000 non-Federal, consisting of $86,891,000 for lands and relocations, and $11,900,000 contributions for recreational facilities. (October 1, 1989 base price.) Construction of Barker Dam was completed in February 1945. Construction of Addicks Dam and 7.4 miles of channel rectification downstream from Addicks and Barker Dams was completed in October 1948. Modification of Barker and Addicks Dams consisting of gating of two uncontrolled conduits in each dam, was completed in 1969. Channel rectification on Brays Bayou with an improved channel length of 25.4 miles was completed in March 1971. Channel rectification on White Oak Bayou was completed in 1976. Major rehabilitation of Addicks and Barker Dams to prevent seepage through the embankment was completed in 1982. Work remaining consists of rectification of approximately 22 miles of main stem of Buffalo Bayou. Work under the Dam Safety Assurance program was initiated in Fiscal Year 1986. Work to be accomplished includes raising approximately 32,400 feet of Addicks Dam 1 to 3 feet and raising approximately 57,600 feet of Barker Dam 3 to 5 feet and armor-plating low ends of both dams. A contract with the city of Houston for cost-sharing in the construction of recreation facilities at Cullen Park was entered into in November 1981. The lease for approximately 10,534 acres of land and- water areas was approved in February 1983. Local cooperation. Section 203, 1954 Flood Control Act applies. Local interests have accomplished all required local cooperation on Brays Bayou and White Oak Bayou. On Buffalo Bayou, local interests purchased interests that the United States had in 7 miles of rectified channel below Barker and Addicks Dams for $256,651. Of the remaining required rights-of-way on Buffalo Bayou, local interests have acquired about 40 percent. About 53 percent of required bridge relocations and 3 percent of the required utility relocations have been accomplished. Advance of $4,400,000 by the Harris County Flood Control District was refunded in September 1956. Public Law 86-53 authorized reimbursement of $38,726 to Galveston, Houston and Henderson Railroad Company for bridge alterations at Brays Bayou. Non-Federal contributions totaled $63,661 for project betterments. Recreation development is subject to conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Recreation: Community Park West (Phase IB) and the velodrome were completed in November 1986. Grading and clearing for an archery range was performed by the City of Houston in March and April 1987. Work has been initiated on a construction contract, awarded for Community Park West (Phase 2) in 1988. Harris County Precinct 3, Cullen Barker Park, completed Community Park 2 which includes soccer fields and parking lots. Dam Safety Assurance: Raising Main Dam, Barker Dam, awarded in June 1986, was financially completed with a decrease in cost of $69,361. Contract for armor plating the ends of the dams, awarded in May 1987, continued at a fiscal year cost of $335,270. Contract for construction of concrete T-wall at Outlet, Addicks Dam was awarded in December 1988 and continued at a cost of $151,820. The contract for raising the Main Dam, Barker Dam, awarded in July 1986, was physically completed in August 1987, but remains financially incomplete due to a pending claim. No cost was incurred for this fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operations and maintenance at Addicks and Barker Dams. 17. CLEAR CREEK, TX Location. The project is located about midway between the two metropolitan centers of Houston, Texas, on the north and Galveston-Texas City on the south in Harris and Galveston Counties above and below existing Clear Lake. Existing Project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of an improved channel from Mile 3.8 to Mile 34.8 to contain within its banks all flood flows up to and including that of a 100-year flood. The selected plan provides channel enlargement and easing of bends within the existing stream from Mile 3.8 to Mile 26.05 to contain at least the 10-year frequency storm, and additional outlet with gated structure from Clear Lake to Galveston Bay, restriction of development in the residual 100-year flood plain and measures to mitigate environmental effects. In 1986, at the request of Brazoria County Drainage District No. 4, that portion of the project upstream of the Brazoria/Galveston County line, approximate improved Mile 18.5, was placed in the "inactive" category. Estimated cost for new work, excluding "inactive" portion, is $49,900,000 Federal (Corps) and $41,780,000 non-Federal consisting of $4,580,000 cash contributions, $17,100,000 for lands, and $20,100,000 for relocations (October 1, 1989 base price). Local Cooperation. Local sponsors for the project are Galveston and Harris counties. The Local Cooperation Agreement, executed 30 June 1986, requires local interests to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, 31-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 and material disposal areas; modify or relocate building, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary in the construction of the project; make a cash contribution for mitigation measures consistent with the non-Federal share of total project costs without mitigation measures; pay five percent of the total costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation and maintenance of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and Design is underway. A contract for relocation of the Galveston, Houston and Henderson Railroad bridge at mile 6.79 was awarded in March 1988. Fiscal year cost was $1,222,322. Construction of a second outlet-gated structure was initiated in May 1989. Fiscal year cost was $287,231. 18. CYPRESS CREEK, TX Location. The project is located north of Houston, Texas in Harris County. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of enlargement of the lower 29.4 miles of the Cypress Creek Channel, incorporating grassed side slopes and channel bottom and appropriate erosion control measures; application of floodplain management techniques in the residual floodplain; construction of project-oriented recreation features, including 11.5 miles of hike-and-bike trails and related facilities for health, safety, and public access; and habitat management measures on 844 acres of Harris County Parkway land, creation of wooded and brush habitat along 70 acres of the project right-of-way, acquisition of 329 acres of wildlife habitat along the creek, and creation of 64 acres of ponds and marshes. Estimated cost for new work is $89,300,000 Federal (Corps) and $30,800,000 non-Federal consisting of $10,600,000 cash contribution, $14,500,000 for lands, and $5,700,000 for relocations (October 1, 1989 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County. Local sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $10,600,000; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Project is awaiting Planning and Engineering funds. 19. FALFURRIAS, TX Location. The city of Falfurrias is located near the confluence of Palo Blanco and Cibolo Creeks, intermittent streams that drain a 600-square-mile area in south Texas. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of a 5.6 mile long diversion levee; a 1.8 mile long pilot channel; a flowage easement of 11,000 acres of land subject to overflows from the pilot channel; and a 0.8 mile long ring levee around the sewage treatment plant. Estimated cost for new work is $16,600,000 Federal (Corps) and $16,600,000 non- Federal consisting of $1,660,000 cash contribution, $14,200,000 for lands, and $740,000 for relocations (October 1, 1989 base price). Local cooperation. The local sponsor would be required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipeline, utilities, roads and other facilities, except railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $1,660,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Project is awaiting Planning and Engineering funds. 20. KIRBYVILLE, TX Location. The project is located in Southeast Texas in the Sabine River basin on Trout Creek and Pin Oak Creek in the vicinity of Kirbyville, Texas, about 45 miles north of Beaumont, Texas. Existing project. The plan of improvement is a combination channelization and floodplain management plan for Trout and Pin Oak Creeks. The structural element consists of a slightly enlarged channel and clearing and straightening of Trout Creek. The non-structural part consists of controls on future development in the residual 100-year floodplains along Trout and Pin Oak Creeks. Channel improvements in Trout Creek begin about 0.8 mile downstream from the Jasper-Newton County line and end about 0.4 mile upstream from the U.S. Highway 96 bridge. The improved, grass-lined channel will be 2.7 miles long, and generally follow the existing alignment of Trout Creek. A steel sheet pile and riprap drop structure will be constructed on Pin Oak Creek near its confluence with Trout Creek. Drainage culverts will be constructed along the improved channel on Trout Creek to facilitate lateral drainage and control erosion. Work includes some alterations to a Santa Fe Railroad bridge to accommodate the project and a new roadway bridge providing approximately 2,000 square feet of opening for passage of floodwaters. Estimated cost for new work is $1,458,000 Federal (Corps) and $785,000 non-Federal consisting of $90,000 cash contribution, $695,000 for lands and relocations. (1 October 1989 base prices) Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is the City of Kirbyville, Texas. A Local Cooperation Agreement was signed by the sponsor in August 1987. Operations during fiscal year. A contract for channelization, awarded in August 1989, cost $106,195. 21. LOWER RIO GRANDE BASIN, TX Location. The project is located in Willacy, Hidalgo and Cameron Counties. The basin is bounded on the east by the Gulf of Mexico, on the south by the Rio Grande which forms the international boundary between the United States and Mexico, on the west by Starr County, and on the north by Brooks and Kenedy Counties. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of channel improvements to: (1) provide drainage protection for the area in Hidalgo and Willacy 31-12 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT Counties north of U.S. Highway 83, and for the area between U.S. Highway 83 and the Rio Grande in Hidalgo County; and (2) provide flood protection for the cities of McAllen, Edinburg, Raymondville, Edcouch, La Villa, and Lyford. Estimated cost for new work is $136,200,000 Federal (Corps) and $76,700,000 non- Federal consisting of $14,900,000 cash contribution, $32,300,000 for lands, and $29,500,000 for relocations (October 1, 1989 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsors for the project are Hidalgo County Drainage District No. 1 and Willacy County Drainage District No. 1. In accordance with the cost-sharing and financing concepts of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $14,900,000, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Phase I General Design Memorandum was approved by the Board of Rivers and Harbors in April 1983. Project is awaiting Planning and Engineering funds. 22. PORT ARTHUR AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Location. Port Arthur is on west shore of Sabine Lake in extreme southeast part of Texas, about 14 miles from the gulf. Area under consideration is comprised of about 38,500 acres, and includes cities of Port Arthur and Groves, towns of Griffin Park, Pearl Ridge, and Lakeview, and adjacent industrial areas. Existing project. Authorized plan provides for raising and reconstructing 6.3 miles of existing concrete and steel sheet-pile seawall; constructing 0.3 mile of new concrete and sheet-pile seawall; raising and improving 3.0 miles of existing earth levees; constructing 20.3 miles of new earth levees and constructing five interior drainage pumping plants. Raising and strengthening of levees surrounding Gulf Oil Company's fresh water reservoir was placed in the "inactive" category in December 1980. The project was initiated in March 1966 and the active portion of the project was completed in 1984. Estimated cost for new work, excluding "'inactive" portion, is $59,703,000 Federal (Corps) and $26,036,000 non-Federal consisting of $16,016,000 cash contributions, $3,403,000 for lands, $6,168,000 for relocations, and $449,000 for pumping station betterments and levee realignment betterments. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation during fiscal year. A severe settlement problem exists in the Chevron Sabine Road Tank Farm area. The Galveston District continued to conduct investigations and monitoring of the settlement to help determine appropriate corrective actions of Federal interest. 23. SIMS BAYOU, TX Location. The project is located in Harris County, in the southern portion of Houston, Texas. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement provides for enlargement and rectification, with appropriate erosion control measures, of 19.31 miles of Sims Bayou to provide 25-year flood protection; environmental measures and riparian habitat improvement along the entire alignment; and recreational development to include 27 miles of hike and bike trails connecting to existing public parks, together with picnic, playground, and other leisure facilities. Estimated cost for new work is $163,700,000 Federal (Corps) and $79,600,000 non-Federal consisting of $14,120,000 cash contributions, $32,995,000 for lands, $30,214,000 for relocations and $2,271,000 other cost (October 1, 1989 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. In accordance with the cost-sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary for the construction of the project; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities; and pay 12 percent of the costs allocated to flood control to bring the total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. See Section 32, Planning and Engineering. 24. TAYLORS BAYOU, TX Location. Watershed of Taylors Bayou is in extreme southeast corner of Texas adjoining basins of Neches River and Sabine Lake on the east. City of Port Arthur is about 8 miles from the main stream of Taylors Bayou. Existing project. Improvement consists of enlarging and rectifying approximately 53 miles of natural and artificial channels on Taylors Bayou and tributary water courses. Phase I consists of constructing a gated structure to prevent saltwater intrusion and 2.9 miles of new diversion channel and enlarging 1.8 miles of Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and a 1.9 mile section of the Outfall Canal. Phase II consists of enlarging 6.0 miles of Taylors Bayou, 14.3 miles of Hillebrandt Bayou, 1.5 miles of Pivotot Bayou, 2.3 miles of Bayou Din, and 3.5 miles of Willow Marsh Bayou. Phase III consists of enlarging 7.0 miles of North Fork Taylors Bayou, 7.8 miles of South Fork Taylors Bayou and 4.4 miles of Mayhaw Bayou. The Phase III portion of the project was placed in the "inactive" category in November 1980. Initial contract on the "active" portion 31-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 of the project was awarded in August 1982. Estimated cost for new work, excluding inactive portion, is $40,800,000 Federal (Corps) and $22,300,000 non- Federal, including $14,000,000 cash contribution, $4,400,000 lands, and $3,900,000 for relocations. (October 1, 1989 base price.) Local cooperation. Section 204, 1965 Flood Control Act, applies. Operation during fiscal year. Contract for channel rectification, Hillebrandt Bayou Sta. 4+07.12 to Sta. 86+30, awarded in September 1988, had a fiscal year cost of $1,086,363. Installation of a cathodic protection system for the salt water barrier was completed at a fiscal year cost of $82,200. Construction of the water control structure at Star Lake was initiated in December 1988 and continued at a cost of $201,033. Channel rectification of Hillebrandt Bayou Sta. 97 + 90 to Sta. 224+00 was initiated in June 1989 and continued at a cost of $870,480. In July 1989 a contract for channel rectification of Hillebrandt Bayou Sta. 224 + 00 to Sta. 350 + 00 was awarded and continued for a fiscal year cost of $236,000. 25. TEXAS CITY AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Location. On the west and southwest shore of Galveston Bay, about 9 miles northwest of Galveston, Texas. Project fronts on the west side of Galveston Bay and protects a land area of about 36 square miles. Existing project. Plan provides for construction of improvements for control of storm tides. Improvements consist of 15.9 miles of new levees, 1.3 miles of concrete floodwall, related drainage and stoplog structures, one tide control structure, and two pumping plants. The project was initiated in 1962, and physically completed in 1987; however, remedial measures are required to approximately 1.7 miles of levee toe to avoid further erosion. Estimated cost for new work is $40,300,000 Federal (Corps) and $17,600,000 non-Federal, including $15,180,000 cash contribution, $1,071,000 work contribution, and $1,349,000 for lands, and $256,000 for ramps in lieu of closure structures and increased low flow pumping capacity for La Marque Pumping Plant. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. No work was performed. 26. UPPER WHITE OAK BAYOU, TX Location. The project is located in Harris County, in the northwest portion of Houston, Texas. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement provides for channel improvements in White Oak Bayou from Mile 10.7 to Mile 19.9; on Cole Creek from its mouth to Mile 4.9; and on Vogel Creek from its mouth to Mile 4.5. In addition, the project includes regulation of the residual 100-year flood plains along these streams and recreational development on project lands along White Oak Bayou, between Mile 14.6 and Mile 18.3. Estimated cost for new work is $70,200,000 Federal (Corps) and $23,900,000 non-Federal consisting of $13,100,000 cash contribution, $6,920,000 for lands, and $3,880,000 for relocations (October 1, 1987 base price). Local cooperation. Local sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. In accordance with the cost-sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges; make a cash contribution, which when combined with lands required for recreation equals one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and during construction, pay 13 percent of the costs allocated to flood control to bring the total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent. Operation during fiscal year. See Section 32, Planning and Engineering. 27. VINCE AND LITTLE VINCE BAYOUS, TX Location. Watershed of Vince Bayou and tributary, Little Vince Bayou, has an area of about 17 square miles and lies entirely within Harris County. Vince Bayou is a minor tributary of Buffalo Bayou in San Jacinto River Basin on upper gulf coast of Texas. Existing project. Project provides for enlarging and rectifying channel of Vince Bayou from mouth to a point about 7.3 miles upstream and Little Vince Bayou from mouth to a point about 4.2 miles upstream, a total distance in both streams of about 11.5 miles. The project was initiated in 1968. All work on Vince Bayou is complete. Estimated cost for new work is $19,347,000 Federal (Corps) and $17,300,000 non-Federal, consisting of $5,100,000 for lands and $12,200,000 for relocations. (October 1, 1989 base price.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Contract for channel rectification on Little Vince Bayou was awarded in October 1988. Fiscal year cost was $216,270. 31-14 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT 28. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL WORKS Inspections of completed projects operated and maintained by local interests were made on the following projects. Fiscal year cost was $152,603. Date of Project Lavaca River Flood Protection, Halletsville, TX Oc Port Arthur Hurricane Flood Protection Project, TX NovE Vince Bayou - Flood Control Project, TX DecE GIWW - Chocolate Bayou Salt Water Barrier, TX Jai Freeport Hurricane-Flood Protection Project, TX Three Rivers Local Flood Protection, TX Corpus Christi Beach-Beach Protection, TX Mooring Dolphins Vicinity of Port Ingleside, TX Texas City Hurricane Flood Protection Project, TX Galveston Seawall, TX Brays Bayou Channel Rectification Project, TX Taylors Bayou Salt Water Barrier, TX A Big Hog Bayou, Wallisville, TX Sept( White Oak Bayou Channel Rectification Project, TX Sept( Inspection ctober 1988 ember 1988 ember 1988 Emergency flood control - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation): Cost was $280,222 for disaster preparedness and $29,541 for emergency operations. Rehabilitation work for Brays and White Oak Floodways cost was reduced by $7,780. 30. EMERGENCY STREAM BANK AND SHORELINE EROSION WORK AND SNAGGING AND CLEARING ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Stream bank and shoreline erosion activities pursunuary 1989 ant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 525, as amended: April 1989 Feasibility studies of shoreline erosion control for May 1989 State Highway 111 at Lake Texana, Texas continued at May 1989 a fiscal year cost of $8,744. May 1989 Feasibility studies of streambank protection at U.S. Highway 190 Bridge near Merryville, Louisiana were M laa Q initiated at a fiscal year cost of $19,776. July 1989 July august ember 1989 1989 1989 ember 1989 29. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205 of 1970 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended: Construction of a flood control project at Kirbyville, Texas was initiated at a fiscal year cost of $123,921. Feasibility studies of a flood control project on West Gum Bayou at Dickinson, Texas were completed at a fiscal year cost of $13,790. Reconnaissance studies of flood control projects on the Lower Guadalupe River at Victoria, Texas, and on Tranquitas Creek at Kingsville, Texas were completed at fiscal year costs of $3,930 and $34,447 respectively. Both studies have been terminated. Reconnaissance studies of flood control projects on the Lower Guadalupe River at Victoria, Texas and on Petronila Creek at Discoll, Texas were continued at fiscal year costs of $18,566 and $48,160 respectively. Initial reconnaissance studies of flood control projects on the Arroyo Colorado at Rio Hondo, Texas, on Oso Creek, Texas, and on the Guadalupe River, Texas (Railroad Bridges) were completed at fiscal year costs of $7,218, $9,164, and $10,000 respectively. All studies have been terminated. Initial reconnaissance studies at Crystal Beach, Texas, were initiated at a fiscal year cost of $11,777. Snagging and clearing activities for flood control pursuant to Section 208 of the Flood Control Act of 1954, Public Law 780, as amended: No studies of clearing and snagging for flood control purposes were conducted this fiscal year. General Investigations 31. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,742,573 of which $491,154 was for navigation studies, $860,490 was for flood damage prevention studies, $249,083 was for Review of Completed Projects, $5,843 was for coordination with other agencies, $50,839 was for Special Investigations, $17,000 for Interagency Water Resources, and $68,165 was for Planning Assistance to States, also, $234,633 was expended from contributed funds for the Cameron County flood damage prevention study. Local sponsor's in-kind services for Cameron County study were $263,950 for fiscal year 1988 and $233,680 for fiscal year 1989. 32. PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Brazos Island Harbor, Texas (42-Foot Project) - The project will provide for enlargement of the entrance channel from deep water in the Gulf of Mexico to the Laguna Madre to a depth of 44 feet and a width of 400 feet; enlargement of the Turning Basin Extension to a point 800 feet beyond the grain elevator to a depth of 42 feet at widths varying from 325 to 400 feet; removal of Brownsville Navigation District Wharves 5, 6, and 9 to permit widening of the adjacent portion of the Turning Basin to 1,200 feet at a depth of 36 feet. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $2,050,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1987. Fiscal year costs were $376,918. 31-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Channel to Victoria, Texas - The project will provide for enlarging the existing Channel to Victoria from a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet to a depth of 12 feet and a width of 125 feet, the same dimensions as the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, with disposal of the dredged materials in upland areas. In addition, the project includes a 60-acre confined disposal area in San Antonio Bay which would be developed as a bird rookery, and creation of additional marsh along the landlocked reach of the channel. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $650,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1989. Fiscal year costs were $184,380. Sims Bayou at Houston, Texas - The project will provide for enlargement and rectification, with appropriate erosion control measures, of 19.31 miles of Sims Bayou to provide flood protection, environmental measures and riparian habitat improvement along the entire alignment; and recreational development consisting of hike-and-bike trails connecting public parks, as well as picnic and other day-use facilities. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $2,300,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1986. Fiscal year costs were $728,079. Texas City Channel, Texas (50-foot Project) - The project will provide for enlargement of Texas City Channel to 50 feet deep and 600 feet wide over its 6.7 mile length and enlargement of Galveston Harbor Channel to 50-52 feet deep and 800 feet wide over the 10.5 mile length. The Galveston Entrance Channel would be extended 12.5 miles to the 52-foot bottom in the Gulf of Mexico. A 50-year dredged material disposal plan will be provided by a combination of containment of dredged material on Snake Island, establishment of 600 acres of wetland, enlargement of Texas City Dike, and deposition of dredged material in the Gulf. Ninety acres of water-oriented recreational facilities on the Texas City Dike are included as a part of the proposed project. At the request of local sponsor, City of Texas City, the project has been placed in the "deferred" category. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $2,000,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1986. Fiscal year costs were $193,258. Upper White Oak Bayou and Tributaries, vicinity of Houston, Texas - The project will provide for channel improvements on White Oak Bayou from Mile 10.7 to Mile 19.9; on Cole Creek from Mile 0 to Mile 4.9; and on Vogel Creek from Mile 0 to Mile 4.5, for a total of 18.6 miles. Project also provides for flood plain zoning and regulation on the residual 100-year flood plains on White Oak Bayou from Mile 19.9 to near Mile 25.5; on Cole Creek from Mile 4.9 to near Mile 6.9; and on Vogel Creek from Mile 4.5 to near Mile 6.5; and includes recreational development along White Oak Bayou from near Mile 14.6 to near Mile 18.3. Harris County Flood Control District, sponsor, is proceeding with a schedule for construction of the project that is far in advance of the schedule for the Federal project. As a result of their schedule, the Federal project would be about 75 percent complete before scheduled construction by the Government could commence. Therefore, the project has been placed in the "inactive" category. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $3,900,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in 1982. Fiscal year costs were $10,757. 33. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management and technical services were performed at a cost of $37,601 and $106,154, respectively. Hydrologic studies cost $19,555. 31-16 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 31-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 1. Aquatic Plant Control (Southwestern Division) 1965 Act 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX 3. Cedar Bayou, TX 4. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Freeport Harbor, TX 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX 7. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and the Mexican Border (Galveston District) 8. Houston Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) Total Cost To FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 198927 350,000 410,000 423,289 218,283 - 263,000 - 201,963 862,876 4,324,300 807,209 4,384,707 Funding New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Minor Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost Minor Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 280,000 362,827 330,000 337,341 489,000 376,459 - 50,000 - 43,758 5,186,000 6,370,000 5,820,870 5,197,915 1,500,800 1,045,780 1,501,507 1,025,178 900,000 789,000 966,167 737,743 1,400,000 6,664,000 1,312,905 5,822,023 1,774,100 2,725,000 1,752,328 2,744,490 280,00 377,07 500,00 376,91 1,598,70 1,711,33 670,50 676,44 6,441,00 7,018,98 2,692,30 2,704,98 948,00 858,21 9,758,0C 3,556,54 3,400,40 3,403,67 2,151,100 256,800 4,520,000 2,515,0( 2,168,744 252,486 4,494,522 2,540,95 1,445,000 1,407,010 14,157,400 13,885,258 600,000 601,461 11,807,893 12,291,328 2,531,000 2,299,493 13,404,000 13,179,818 5,339,0( 4,953,4 15,842,6( 15,954,3E )0 2,918,1001 '5 2,836,9031 )0 12,950,5022 .8 12,773,7252 )0 42,126,3613 16 42,126,3553 - 2,170,080 - 2,170,080 - 681,2634 - 681,2634 )0 2,809,8165 14 2,809,5185 )0 76,635,3596 34 75,624,3736 )0 88,473,6587 34 88,463,999' - 3,576,684 - 3,576,684 )0 6,279,088 L5 5,892,972 )0 20,834,1528 [1 13,694,5278 )0 50,138,7159 77 50,136,9539 - 8,935 - 8,935 - 29,096,39210 - 29,096,39210 )0 83,103,72311 i3 83,090,80511 - 7,969,329 - 7,969,329 )0 69,723,30312 38 68,994,90812 )0 236,458,64813 54 236,229,83814 - 434,638 - 434,638 - 835,873 - 835,873 - 35,760,38215 - 35,760,38215 31-17 5,186,000 4,433,754 3,958,900 4,158,250 200,000 63,401 55,000 143,688 790,100 801,255 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 31-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 8. (Continued) 9. Matagorda, Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) 10. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX (Regular Funds) 11. Texas City Channel, TX 12. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX (Includes Wallisville) 15. Corpus Christi Beach, TX (Restoration Project) (Contributed Funds) 16. Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX 17. Clear Creek, TX (Contributed Funds) 22. Port Arthur and Vicinity, TX Hurricane- Flood Protection (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) Funding Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Recreation: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost Dam Safety: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Total Cost To FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 198927 1,517 31-18 - 4,787 22,256 16,291,97525 16,264,68725 3,303,100 4,573,100 5,370,000 5,807,400 113,926,12316 3,269,155 4,625,738 4,839,291 6,258,038 113,833,16516 - - - - 18,058,77717 - - - - 18,058,77717 3,110,545 1,898,700 1,315,000 2,668,600 42,351,888 3,056,503 1,954,301 1,280,648 2,691,027 42,334,010 - - - - 56,136,81518 - - - - 56,136,81518 4,859,500 8,801,900 5,766,000 2,191,200 146,659,62019 4,930,766 8,830,303 5,736,919 2,215,722 146,652,69019 287,000 800,000 550,000 169,500 15,131,97220 266,519 789,006 552,610 193,258 15,126,86520 1,955,900 756,300 1,624,000 25,900 23,614,46121 1,963,470 755,245 1,611,594 38,062 23,613,09321 - - - - 726,158 - - - - 726,158 196,000 96,000 - 78,000 29,279,67622 182,708 49,190 43,479 26,757 29,160,70622 1,930,800 856,800 626,500 426,400 11,686,30323 2,001,202 811,757 666,001 395,234 11,629,66823 (-)120,000 - 90,000 - 2,120,641 264,506 9,337 14,621 79,360 2,099,727 (-)60,000 - - - 2,038,345 280,045 9,444 309 - 2,009,710 - - - - 57,206,32424 - - - - 57,206,32424 - - - - 377,804 98,400 86,703 (-)200 (-)12,151 358,185 1,452,700 1,166,600 1,250,000 1,291,000 20,946,413 1,442,566 1,196,542 1,201,080 1,288,343 20,858,885 - - - - 12,475,000 - - - - 12,475,000 1,471,000 5,210,000 2,696,000 1,587,000 10,964,000 623,544 2,902,172 5,477,640 725,846 9,729,202 350,000 579,000 2,740,000 1,700,000 8,220,361 331,139 572,718 1,031,961 2,394,973 7,158,453 - 300,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 - 200,000 110,000 28,723 338,723 - - 50,000 150,000 59,902,509 (-)2,599 26 13,514 67,473 59,763,053 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 31-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 198927 23. Sims Bayou, TX New Work: Approp. 383,000 552,000 850,000 605,000 2,390,000 Cost 300,776 508,887 809,881 728,079 2,347,623 24. Taylors Bayou, TX New Work: (Regular Funds) Approp. 3,594,000 4,700,000 2,730,000 2,763,000 24,730,198 Cost 3,749,224 4,767,108 1,794,939 2,712,071 23,534,298 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. 1,200,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 735,000 7,034,000 Cost 1,138,507 1,745,394 294,303 870,703 6,429,646 25. Texas City and Vicin- New Work: ity, TX Hurricane-Flood Approp. 300,000 - - 70,000 38,052,400 Protection Cost 639,007 138,296 4,693 65,512 38,018,805 (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. 175,000 15,000 - 26,000 14,251,10026 Cost 354,683 137,455 1,851 21,455 14,242,58026 26. Upper White Oak New Work: Bayou, TX Approp. 253,000 539,000 625,000 (-)444,700 972,300 Cost 237,984 441,756 281,803 10,757 972,300 27. Vince and Little Vince New Work: Bayous, TX Approp. 3,145,000 2,800,000 1,333,000 61,000 19,347,100 Cost 3,203,495 2,464,974 1,744,821 288,880 19,263,328 1 Excludes $810,144 credit for contributed work. 2 Includes $675,855 for previous projects. In addition, $1,806,619 expended from contributed funds, of which $123,361 was for previous projects. 3 In addition, $14,692 expended from contributed funds. 4 Includes $39,087 for previous projects. In addition $25,000 expended from contributed funds. 5 Includes $69,784 for previous projects. 6 Includes $1,372,534 for previous projects. Includes $456,515 for Sec. 107 project for Port Aransas Breakwaters. In addition $768 expended from contributed funds for Port Aransas Breakwaters. v Includes $62,452 for previous projects. In addition, $445,269 expended from contributed funds. 8Includes $147,098 for previous projects. In addition, $4,271,003 expended from contributed funds. ($389,825 on 45' project.) 9In addition, $229,311 expended from contributed funds. 1�Includes $8,421,996 for previous projects. In addition, $3,648,932 expended from contributed funds. 11Includes $86,126 for previous projects. In addition, $2,116,719 expended from contributed funds. 12Includes $706,709 for previous projects. Includes Sec. 107 projects for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin ($46,559); Port Isabel Side Channel ($8,414); Offatts Bayou ($356,466); and Channel to Aransas Pass ($658,573). In addition contributed funds expended for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin ($46,559); Offatts Bayou ($49,665); Channel to Aransas Pass ($347,950); Chocolate Bayou ($658,310); and Mouth of Colorado River ($2,719,106). 13Includes $1,526,564 for previous projects. In addition $22,672 expended from contributed funds. Includes following amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1987: Channel to Victoria $3,565,100. Channel to Aransas Pass $2,600. Chocolate Bayou Channel $1,091,500. Includes following amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1989: Channel to Harlingen $743,200. Channel to Port Mansfield $513,300. 14Includes $1,526,564 for previous projects. In addition $22,672 expended from contributed funds. Includes following amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1987: Channel to Victoria $3,525,887, Channel to Aransas Pass $2,600, Chocolate Bayou Channel $1,091,500. In addition $566,875 was expended from contributed funds for Chocolate Bayou Channel. Also includes amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1989: Channel to Harlingen $733,847. Channel to Port Mansfield $507,955. 'sIncludes $4,105,157 for previous projects. In addition, $2,591,939 expended from contributed funds, of which $1,209,179 was for previous projects. '6Includes $1,213,142 for previous projects. In addition, $534,641 expended from contributed funds, of which $200,000 was for previous projects. 1In addition, $12,259,619 expended from contributed funds and $182,800 for contributed lands. iSIncludes $5,180,832 for previous projects. In addition, $2,680,942 expended from contributed funds, of which $577,507 was for previous projects. 'Includes $2,379,677 for previous projects. In addition, $2,910,974 expended from contributed funds. 20Includes $366,823 for previous projects. In addition, $1,023,819 expended from contributed funds, of which $99,000 was for mitigation measures. 21Includes $195,083 for previous projects. 22Includes $1,966,306 for previous projects. In addition, $66 000 expended from contributed funds. 3Includes $543,662 for previous projects. 24Includes $4,400,000 of advanced funds repaid to Harris County Flood Control District. In addition, $63,661 contributed funds expended for Brays Bayou and $12,900 Federal funds and $19,104 contributed funds expended for enlargement of Clodine Ditch. 25Excludes $3,402,588 estimated value of contributed lands, $6,168,360 for relocations, and $217,000 credit given local sponsor for work-in-kind. 26Excludes $1,349,069 estimated value of contributed lands and $1,070,959 credit given local sponsor for workin- kind. 27Includes funds ($12,544,400) provided by the Jobs Act (P.L. 98-8, dated March 24, 1983) for projects listed in Table 15-I of Annual Report for 1985. 31-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 3, 1930 May 24, 1934 (PWA) Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Nov. 17, 1986 2. 31-20 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Provides for control of progressive eradication of aquatic plant growth from the navigable waters and streams in the U.S. Amended cost sharing requirements to provide for 50 percent Federal and 50 percent non-Federal participation in control operations. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX Jetties and jetty channel, inside channels and basins. Local cooperation requirement modified to provide contribution of funds to cover cost of original dredging of all inside channels and basins. Deepen jetty channel to 31 feet and inner channels and Brownsville and Port Isabel turning basins to 28 feet. Enlarge Port Isabel turning basin. Deepen entrance channel to 35 feet; deepen to 33 feet channel across Laguna Madre; deepen to 32 feet channels from Laguna Madre to turning basins at Brownsville and Port Isabel; widen turning basins; and dredging present shallow-draft channel south of Port Isabel from railroad bridge to Laguna Madre and connecting channel to Port Isabel turning basin. Additional connecting channel between Port Isabel and Brownsville channels; and transfer shallow-draft channels at Port Isabel to GIWW. Deepen to 38 feet in outer bar channels and 36 feet in all other authorized channels and basins; extend existing turning basins at Brownsville and Port Isabel; and construct small-boat basin with a connecting channel next to Brownsville ship channel. Widen Brownsville Channel to 300 feet at a depth of 36 feet from former Goose Island passing basin to turning basin extension, thence at a width of 500 feet and same depth to turning basin proper, deepen to 36 feet in area in southeast corner of turning basin, maintain two existing basins of fishing harbor, and a connecting channel, and construct a third basin, with necessary connecting channel and extend Brazos Island Harbor north jetty seaward 1,000 feet.27 Enlargement of the entrance channel from deep water in the Gulf of Mexico to the Laguna Madre to a depth of 44 feet and a width of 400 feet; enlargement of the Turning Basin Extension to a point 800 feet beyond the grain elevator to a depth of 42 feet at widths varying from 325 to 400 feet; removal of Brownsville Navigation District Wharves 5, 6, and 9 to permit widening of the adjacent portion of the Turning Basin to 1,200 feet at a depth of 36 feet; construction of asphalt walkways with handrails on the crown of the North and South Jetties, and construction of park-type public use facilities at the inner end of the North Jetty. H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 103(c), PL 99-662 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 71st Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 347, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 627, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 192, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc., 428 86th Cong., 2nd Sess.i Sec. 201, PL 99-662 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 3. Jul. 3, 1930 4. Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 4, 19132 Sep. 23, 1922 Jul. 3, 19303 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19354 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 CEDAR BAYOU, TX Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Houston Ship Channel to a point on bayou 11 miles above mouth.9 CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX Acquisition of old curvey portion of north jetty previously constructed by private parties. Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. Connect old curve to St. Joseph Island, and construct south jetty. Dredge roadstead in Harbor Island Basin to 20 feet deep and construct 10,000 linear feet of stone dike on St. Joseph Island. Channel between jetties and Harbor Island Basin to 25 feet deep, extend jetties seaward, extend dike on St. Joseph Island 9,100 feet, and dredge approach channel 12 feet deep to town of Port Aransas. Dredging channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi, 25 feet deep, 200 feet bottom width. Deepen entrance channel from gulf to Harbor Island and provide an inner basin at Harbor Island of reduced area but greater depth. Channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi Channel with depth 30 feet. Enlarge all channels from gulf to western end of basin dredge by Humble Oil and Refining Co., at its docks on Harbor Island. Maintain channel and maneuvering basin between breakwater and western shoreline of Corpus Christi Bay. Maintain 30-foot depth of approach channel, turning basin at Corpus Christi, Industrial Canal and turning basin at Avery Point. Maintain and deepen to 32 feet channel from deep water at Port Aransas to and including turning basin at Corpus Christi. Extend main turning basin at Corpus Christi westward 2,500 feet at its present width and depth, deepen existing Industrial Canal and turning basin to 32 feet and extend this canal at a depth of 32 feet and general width of 150 feet, westward along Nueces Bay shore to a turning basin 32 feet by 900 feet, and 1,000 feet long near Tule Lake. Provide depth of 34 feet in all project channels and basins from Port Aransas to and including Tule Lake turning basin, for a width of 250 feet from Port Aransas to breakwater at Corpus Christi, for a width of 200 feet in Industrial Canal and in channel between Avery Point and Tule Lake turning basins, and widen Avery Point turning basin to 1,000 feet. 31-21 TABLE 31-B S. Doc 107, 71st Cong., 2nd Sess.x Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1094, 61st Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 1125, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 321, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 214, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Committee Does. 35, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess., and 40, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 130, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 63, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 574, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 544, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun. 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 19545 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended by Dec. 31, 1970) Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 22, 1976 Deepen entrance channel to 38 feet from gulf to outer end of jetty; 38 feet decreasing to 36 feet thence to station 90 north jetty; and 36 feet in all other deep water channels and basins except 2,000-foot undredged part of inner basin at Harbor Island, and a width of 400 feet in channel from Port Aransas to Maneuvering basin at Corpus Christi. An anchorage basin 12 feet deep, from 300 to 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long in Turtle Cove at Port Aransas, Texas. Branch channel 32 feet by 150 feet, extending northerly from main channel in vicinity of Port Ingleside, along north shore of Corpus Christi Bay to Reynolds Metals Co. plant and turning basin 32 feet deep and 800 feet square near plant in general vicinity of LaQuinta, Texas. An entrance channel 36 by 400 feet on a tangent alignment from 400-foot channel in Corpus Christi Bay, near Corpus Christi breakwater to flared approach channel to Corpus Christi turning basin. Deepen and widen LaQuinta Channel to 36 by 200 feet; enlarge LaQuinta turning basin to 36 by 800 by 1,000 feet; a flared entrance to channel; and widening at curves. Deepen entrance channel to 42 feet from gulf to outer end of jetty; 40 feet in all other deep-water channels and basins except undredged northward extension to inner basin at Harbor Island and branch channel to LaQuinta; and widen Industrial Channel to 400 feet with flared entrances to Corpus Christi and Avery Point turning basins. Channel 40 by 200 feet extending 2.2 miles from Tule Lake turning basin to a turning basin 40 feet deep, 700 to 900 feet wide, 1,000 feet long at Viola, Texas. Depth of 12 feet and a width of 100 feet in locally dredged Jewel Fulton Canal from LaQuinta Channel to a turning basin 12 by 200 by 400 feet, and assumption of maintenance by United States. Construction of a breakwater at entrance to harbor area at Port Aransas, and realignment of existing 12-foot by 100-foot project channel. Provides for a project depth of 45 feet in the existing deep-draft channels and basins, for construction of a new deep-draft turning point, for construction of a deep draft mooring area and mooring facilities and for widening of the channels and basins at certain locations. The Act also deauthorized the undredged northward extension of Inner Basin at Harbor Island and the undredged west turnout (Wye connection) between the LaQuinta Channel and the main channel of the waterway. Modified local cooperation requirements for 1968 Act. Shifted responsibility for cost of disposal areas and confinement works from sponsor to joint 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal responsibility. H. Doc. 560, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 654, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 89, 83rd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 487, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 33, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 S. Doc. 99, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Sec. 124, PL 94-587 31-22 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 5. Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 4, 1913 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 19256 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19357 Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 Jul. 3, 1958 Oct. 5, 1961 Dec. 31, 1970 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 5, 1886 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 FREEPORT HARBOR, TX Dredging and other work necessary in judgment of Secretary of War for improving harbor; for taking over jetties and privately built works at mouth of river. Examination authorized. Work later confined to maintenance of jetties. Repairs to jetties and dredging. Construct seagoing hopper dredge. Purchase of one 15-inch pipeline dredge and equipment, its operation of 3 years, operation of seagoing dredge one-half time for 3 years, and repairs to jetties. Diversion dam, diversion channel, and necessary auxiliary works. Maintenance of diversion channel at expense of local interest. Deepening channels and basins. Maintenance of present project dimensions of channels and basins at Federal expense. Deepen outer bar channel to 38 feet from gulf to a point within jetties, thence 36 feet in authorized channels to and including upper turning basin. Relocate outer bar channel on straight alignment with jetty channel and maintain Brazos Harbor entrance channel and turning basin (constructed by local interests). Modification of HD 1469. Revoking certain provisions of local cooperation. Relocation of entrance channel and deepen to 47 feet; enlargement to a depth of 45 feet and relocation of jetty channel and inside main channel; deepening to 45 feet of channel to Brazosport; enlargement of the widened area of Quintana Point to provide a depth of 45 feet with a 750-foot diameter turning area; Brazosport turning basin to 45 feet deep with a 1,000 foot turning area; a new turning basin with a 1,200 foot diameter turning area and 45 feet deep; deepening Brazosport channel to 36 by 750 feet diameter; flared approaches from Brazos Harbor Channel; relocation of north jetty and rehabilitation of south jetty. Modified local cooperation requirements for the 1970 Act. GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX Construct 2 rubblestone jetties at entrance to Galveston Harbor. A channel 1,200 by 30 feet from Bolivar Roads (outer end of old inner bar near Fort Point) at 51st Street.s Purchase or construct hydraulic pipeline dredge. 31-23 TABLE 31-B Specified in Act. H. Doc. 1087, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 68th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Docs. 15, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess., and 29, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 195, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 433, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. PL 394, 87th Cong. H. Doc. 289, 93rd Cong., 2nd Sess.2 Sec. 101, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 85, 49th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report, 1886, p. 1311. H. Doc. 264, 56th Cong., 2nd Sess. Specified in Act. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 19109 Jul. 27, 1916 Jul. 18, 1918 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Apr. 4, 1938 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Jul. 3, 1958 Jun. 23, 1971 (House Res.) Nov. 18, 1971 (Senate Res.) Mar. 2, 1907 Extension of jetties to present project length and construction and operation of a dredge. Extension of Galveston Channel from 51st to 57th Sts., with depth of 30 feet and width of 700 feet. Conditional extension of Galveston Channel between 51st and 57th Sts., 30 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide. Extend seawall at Galveston from angle at 6th St., and Broadway to vicinity of Fort San Jacinto. Deepen harbor channel to 35 feet and widen to 800 feet. Further extension of seawall at Galveston to a junction with south jetty; and repairing seawall in front of Fort Crockett reservation. Deepen Galveston Channel to 32 feet; and maintain Galveston Harbor channels to dimensions of 800 feet wide, 35 feet deep on outer bar and 34 feet deep in inner bar.' � Maintain State Highway Ferry Landing Channels to dimensions of 12 by 100 feet. Construct 13 groins along gulf shore from 12th to 61st Sts. in city of Galveston at a limited cost of $234,000 (10 groins constructed). Deepen Galveston Channel to 34 feet (Bolivar Roads to 43rd St.). Deepen Galveston entrance channel to 36 feet. Completion of project for construction of 13 groins. Deepen Galveston Harbor to 38 feet from gulf to a point 2 miles west of seaward end of north jetty; thence 36 feet to Bolivar Roads; revoking authority for maintenance of ferry channels; and Galveston channel to 36 feet deep from Bolivar Roads to 43rd Street. Deepen outer bar channel to 38 feet from gulf to a point within jetties, thence 36 feet in authorized channels to and including upper turning basin. Relocate outer bar channel on straight alignment with jetty channel and maintain Brazos Harbor entrance channel and turning basin (constructed by local interests). Deepen Galveston Channel to 40 feet from Bolivar to 43rd Street. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL AND MEXICAN BORDER12 Channel 4 by 100 feet from West Galveston Bay across Chocolate Bay to 4 feet of water in Chocolate Bay. H. Doc. 340, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 768, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 328, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1390, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc 758, 65th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 693, 66th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 307, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. River and Harbors Committee Doc. 31, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 400, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 61, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 57, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. PL 463, 75th Cong. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 195, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 433, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 121, 92nd Cong. H. Doc. 445, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. 31-24 TABLE See Section in Text Mar. 2, Mar. 2, Mar. 2, Mar. 2, Mar. 2, 1945 19459 1945 1945 194514 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 31-25 31-B Date Authorizing Act Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 193813 Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 20, 1938 June 20, 1938 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 23, 1939 Jul. 23, 1942 Project and Work Authorized -- Channel 9 by 100 feet, Sabine River to Galveston Bay, and a 20-inch pipeline dredge. Such passing places, widening at bends, locks or guard locks and railway bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary. Channel 9 by 100 feet, Galveston Bay to Corpus Christi. Maintenance of a flood-discharge channel in Colorado River. Channel 9 by 100 feet in San Bernard River, Texas. Channel in Colorado River, 9 by 100 feet, with basin. Channel 9 by 100 feet from Palacios through Trepalacios and Matagorda Bays. Channel 9 by 200 feet from main channel to harbor at Rockport and improve harbor to 9-foot depth. Channel 6 by 100 feet from main channel to Aransas Pass, Texas. Enlarge waterway to depth of 12 feet and a width of 125 feet from Sabine River to Corpus Christi. Enlarge waterway from Corpus Christi to vicinity of Mexican border to provide a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet throughout. Channel 6 by 60 feet from GIWW to a point in Chocolate Bayou near Liverpool. Channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from main channel near Port O'Connor, Texas, in Barroom Bay. Enlarge channel from main channel to Aransas Pass, Texas, providing a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet. Channel 12 by 125 feet from main channel to Red Fish Landing, Texas, with basin. Channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide from main channel to vicinity of Ilarlingen, Texas, via Arroyo Colorado with basin. Fill a portion of shallow-draft channel adjacent to Port Isabel Turning Basin, construct a channel to connect shallow-draft channel with main channel near shoreline of Laguna Madre, and enlarge shallow-draft channel west of this connection, all to 12-foot depth and bottom width of 125 feet. Reroute main channel to north shore of Red Fish Bay between Aransas Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; deepen tributary channel from Port Aransas to Aransas Pass, Texas, 12 feet and extended basin at same depth. Deauthorized 6 by 60 foot channel in Chocolate Bayou and reauthorized the 4 by 100-foot channel. Alternate channel across South Galveston Bay between Port Bolivar and Galveston causeway. "Red Fish Landing" changed to "Port Mansfield, Texas." Documents H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee print, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 640, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 642, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 564, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 641, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 643, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 230, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. PL 675, 77th Cong. H. Doc. 337, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 428, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 383, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc 248, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 402, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. (See PL 14, 79th Cong.) H. Doc. 627, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 700, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 768, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 196, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. PL 516, 81st Cong. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 12, 1952 Sep. 3, 195415 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 9, 1959 Jul. 14, 1960 Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Oct. 23, 196216 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Incorporate as part of Intracoastal Waterway a channel 9 by 100 feet from main channel via Seadrift to point on Guadalupe River 3 miles above Victoria, Texas, authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1945. Small craft harbor 9 by 200 by 1,000 feet at Seadrift with an entrance channel 9 by 100 feet. Widen tributary channel between Port Aransas and Aransas Pass, Texas, to 125 feet; straighten and widen to 125 feet connecting channel to Conn Brown Harbor, and maintain Conn Brown Harbor at Federal expense, all to 12 feet deep. Improve channels and basins comprising channel to Port Mansfield constructed in part by Federal Government and in part by local interest; constructing turnout curves at Gulf Intracoastal Waterway intersection and bend easing at entrance to turning basin; construct parallel jetties at gulf entrance; maintenance of locally dredged jetty channel 16 by 250 feet; and maintenance of small craft basin. Entrance channel 7 feet deep by 75 feet wide from main channel to Gulf of Mexico to inside shoreline at Port Isabel, Texas, an inner channel 6 feet deep by 50 feet wide from entrance channel to East Harbor Basin, and an irregular-shaped harbor basin 6 feet deep having a surface area of about 7 acres. Deepen the existing 6-foot channel at Port Isabel to 12 feet and removing the submerged bars at each end of the island to a depth of -12 feet MLT. Deepening the existing channel to 12 by 125 feet, and extend southeasterly from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway main channel in West Galveston Bay, into Offatts Bayou, a distance of 2.2 miles, and a west turnout 12 by 125 feet between the proposed Offatts Bayou Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Deepening Aransas Pass tributary channel to 14 feet from mile 0 at Harbor Island to mile 6.1 at the city of Aransas Pass; widening to 175 feet between miles 3.5 and 4.6; and deepening Conn Brown Harbor, turning basin and connecting channel between Conn Brown Harbor and turning basin. Improve main channel 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel; with two relocations; relocate main channel in Matagorda Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; and maintaining existing Lydia Ann Channel. Deepen and widen channel to Palacios; construct two protective breakwaters; maintain and deepen existing basins; and deepen, enlarge and maintain existing approach channel to basin No. 2. Eliminates requirement of local interest to construct bridge at mile 29.2 turning basin at Victoria, and maintain turning basins at Victoria and Seadrift; provide: Federal construction of vertical-lift railroad bridge at Missouri-Pacific Railroad mainline crossing, mile 29.2; construction and future maintenance of basin near Victoria, Texas, and maintenance of basin constructed by local interests at Seadrift, Texas. PL 527, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 478, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 376, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 11, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 107, PL 645, 86th Cong. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 Sec. 107, PL 86-645 Sec. 107, PL 86-645 H. Doc. 556, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 504, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 288, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. 31-26 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 196517 Aug. 13, 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Mar. 5, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 3, 195820 Modify existing Federal navigation project to provide a channel extending from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Chocolate Bay and Chocolate Bayou to project channel mile 8.2, thence to a turning basin near channel mile 13.2 and for salt water barrier in Chocolate Bayou about 3.7 miles upstream from basin (channel mile 16.9). Entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide at the mouth of Colorado River Channel protected by an east jetty 3,500 feet long extending to 12-foot depth and a west jetty 2,900 feet long extending to 5-foot contour; make channel 12 feet by 100 feet from gulf shore to Matagorda, including recreation facility, a turning basin 12 feet by 300 feet wide and 1,450 feet long, and a new diversion channel 250 feet wide and varying in depth from 20 to 23 feet including a closure dam across the present river channel. Modified 1968 authorization to provide that diversion features be constructed at Federal expense and operation and maintenance be shared 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal. Enlarge existing Channel to Victoria from a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet to a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX Easing or cutting off sharp bends and construction of a pile dike.' s A channel 30 feet deep, widen bend at Manchester and enlarge turning basin. A light-draft extension of channel to mouth of White Oak Bayou.' 9 Widen channel through Morgan Point and to a point 4,000 feet above Baytown and widen certain bends. Deepen to 32 feet in main channel and turning basin, and a 400-foot width through Galveston Bay. Deepen to 34 feet in main channel and widen from Morgan Point to turning basin. Branch channel 10 by 60 feet behind Brady Island. Widen channel from Morgan Point to lower end of Fidelity Island with turning points at mouth of Hunting Bayou and lower end of Brady Island. Widen channel from lower end of Fidelity Island to Houston turning basin and dredge off-channel silting basins. Dieepen to 36 feet from Bolivar Roads to and including main turning basin at Houston, Texas, including turning points at Hunting Bayou and Brady Island. Deepen to 40 feet from Bolivar Roads to Brady Island, construct Clinton Island turning basin, a channel 8 by 125 feet at Five Mile Cut, and improve shallow-draft channel at Turkey Bend. H. Doc. 217, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 102, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 812, PL 99-662 Sec. 3, PL 100-676 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 35, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1632, 65th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 93, 67th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 13, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 58, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 226, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 226, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 737, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 350, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess.' 31-27 TABLE 31-B 8. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 9. Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 10. Jul. 25, 1912 Sep. 22, 1922 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 21, 1927 Barbour Terminal at Morgan Point. Restoring existing locally dredged channel from mile 0 to 0.34 to 36 feet deep and dredging a 15-12 ft. channel from mile 0.34 to 2.81, in Greens Bayou.2 1 Maintenance of Greens Bayou, Barbour Terminal Channel, and Bayport Ship Channel to forty-foot depths at Federal expense. MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX Channel to Port Lavaca, Texas 7 feet deep and 89 feet bottom width. Extend 7-foot channel to shoreline of Lavaca Bay at mouth of Lynns Bayou. Deepen and widen channel to present project dimensions. Extend channel 6 by 100 feet from Port Lavaca via Lavaca Bay, Lavaca and Navidad Rivers to Red Bluff, a distance of 20 miles. A harbor of refuge 9 feet deep near Port Lavaca and an approach channel 100 feet wide and equal depth. Deepen to 12 feet and widen to 125 feet Port Lavaca Channel and approach channel to harbor of refuge; deepen to 12 feet Port Lavaca turning basin and basins at harbor of refuge. An entrance channel 38 by 300 feet, a channel 36 by 200 feet, 22 miles long across Matagorda and Lavaca Bays to Point Comfort, Texas, a turning basin 36 feet deep and 1,000 feet square at Point Comfort, and dual jetties at entrance from gulf. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX Existing project dimensions of jetties, a 26-foot channel through Sabine Pass, Port Arthur Canal and Port Arthur turning basin; and a 26-foot turning basin at Port Arthur. A depth of 25-feet in Sabine-Neches Canal, Neches River to Beaumont and Sabine River to Orange, including cutoffs and widening channels. Deepen channels to 30 feet from gulf to Beaumont, with increased widths and an anchorage basin in Sabine Pass. Deepen Port Arthur east and west turning basins and approach channel to 30 feet. Take over and deepen to 30 feet channel connecting west turning basin with Taylors Bayou turning basin. For a 30-foot depth in channel from mouth of Neches River to cutoff in Sabine River near Orange. Removal of guard lock in Sabine-Neches Canal. Widen Sabine Pass and jetty channel, Port Arthur Canal, and Sabine-Neches Canal. For dredging 2 passing places in Sabine-Neches Canal, easing of bends, removal and reconstructing Port Arthur field office, extending Beaumont turning basin upstream 200 feet above new city wharves, and an anchorage basin in Sabine Pass. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 R. Doc. 257, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 819, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 1082, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 37, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 314, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 731, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 131, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 388, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 773, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 975, 66th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc. 152, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 234, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 287, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 31-28 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 193822 Oct. 17, 1940 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 194623 Jul. 24, 194624 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 A depth of 32 feet in channels from gulf to Beaumont turning basin, including all turning basins at Port Arthur. Deepen channels to 34 feet with increased widths from gulf to Beaumont turning basin. Construct suitable permanent protective works along Sabine Lake. Maintain Taylors Bayou turning basin. Maintain channel from Sabine River to Orange Municipal wharf. Dredging 500 feet from eastern end of Harbor Island and abandonment of channel south and west of Harbor Island. Increased widths of channels from gulf to Beaumont turning basin and channel connecting Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin, deepen Beaumont turning basin and Beaumont turning extension to 34 feet; and dredge a new cutoff from Smith's Bluff cutoff to McFadden Bend. Abandon Orange turning basin; dredge a channel 25 by 150 feet, suitably widened on bends to highway bridge, and dredge a cutoff channel opposite Orange. Extend Beaumont turning basin upstream 300 feet. Widen Port Arthur west turning basin to 600 feet. Dredge a channel from Beaumont turning basin to vicinity of Pennsylvania Shipyard. Deepen Sabine Pass outer bar channel to 37 feet, Sabine Pass jetty channel to 36 feet at inner end, deepen to 36 feet Sabine Pass Channel, Port Arthur Canal, Port Arthur east and west turning basins, Taylors Bayou turning basin and channel from Port Arthur west turning basin to Taylors Bayou turning basin, deepen to 36 feet and widen toA00 feet Sabine-Neches Canal from Port Arthur Canal to mouth of Neches River except through Port Arthur Bridge; deepen Neches River channel from mouth to Beaumont turning basin to 36 feet widening to 350 feet from Smith's Bluff to Beaumont turning basin; deepen junction area on Neches River at Beaumont turning basin to 36 feet; and widen Sabine-Neches Canal between Neches and Sabine Rivers to 150 feet. Improve Cow Bayou, Texas, by construction of a channel 100 feet wide and 13 feet deep extending from navigation channel in Sabine River to a point 0.5 mile above county bridge at Orangefield, Texas, with a turning basin. Improve Adams Bayou, Texas, to provide a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from 12-foot depth in Sabine River to first county highway bridge across bayou. Deepen to 36 feet and widen to 400 feet the Sabine-Neches Canal near Port Arthur bridge; reconstruct Port Arthur Bridge and relocate Port Arthur field office. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 27, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 581, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc 14, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 685, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc 60, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc 158, 77th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 571, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 702, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 626, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 174, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. 31-29 TABLE 31-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Sep. 3, 195425 Oct. 23, 196226 11. Mar. 4, 1913 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 12, 1972 (Senate Res.) Oct. 12, 1972 (House Res.) Rectification of certain reaches of existing Sabine Pass Channel, Sabine-Neches Canal, and Neches River and Sabine River Channel; widen to 350 feet entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basins; widen curve at junction of Port Arthur and Sabine-Neches Canals; relocate and enlarge Sabine Pass anchorage basin to 34 by 1,500 by 3,000 feet; widen to 200 feet Sabine-Neches Canal from mouth of Neches River to mouth of Sabine River and Sabine River Channel to upper end of existing project at Orange, except for channel around Harbor Island at Orange; deepen to 30 feet Sabine River Channel from cutoff near Orange municipal slip to upper end of project, except around Harbor Island; and enlarge area at entrance to Orange municipal slip to provide a maneuvering basin. Improve outer bar channel to 42 and 40 feet for all inland channels to Port Arthur and Beaumont; width of 500 feet in Port Arthur Canal and 400 feet in Neches River Channel to Beaumont with three turning points in Neches River; a channel, 12 by 125 feet, extending in Sabine River to Echo; and replace an obstructive bridge at Port Arthur, Texas. Deauthorization of uncompleted portion of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin and enlargement of entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basins. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX A channel 300 by 30 feet and construct a pile dike 28,200 feet long north to channel. A harbor 800 by 30 feet at Texas City, and construct a rubblemound dike. Extension of rubblemound dike to shoreline. Deepen channel and harbor to 32 feet. Deepen channel and harbor to 34 feet. Extend harbor 1,000 feet southward, 800 by 34 feet. Deepen channel and harbor to 36 feet, widen channel to 400 feet and harbor to 1,000 feet and changing name of project to "TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TEXAS." Deepen channel and turning basin to 40 feet and construct 16-foot Industrial Barge Canal. Widen the existing main turning basin to 1,200 feet including relocation of the basin 85 feet to the east; providing a 40-foot deep channel in the Industrial Canal at widths of 300-400 feet, with a turning basin at the head of the canal 40 feet deep, 1,150 feet long, and 1,000 Sfeet wide, and easing of the bend at the entrance to the canal, and deauthorization of shallow-draft Industrial Barge Canal not incorporated in the plan of improvement above. S. Doc. 80, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 553, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. 1 H. Doc. 1390, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 107, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 62, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 47, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess.1 H. Doc. 427, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 199, 92nd Cong., 2nd Sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) 31-30 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1986 12. Mar. 3, 1905 Jul. 25, 1912 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 30, 1983 15. Dec. 15, 1970 (House Res.) Dec. 17, 1970 (Senate Res.) 16. Jun. 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Deepening the Texas City Turning Basin to 50 feet, enlarging the 6.7 mile long Texas City Channel to 50 feet by 600 feet; deepening the existing 800-foot wide Bolivar Roads Channel and Inner Bar Channel to 50 feet; deepening the existing 800-foot wide Outer Bar and Galveston Entrance Channels to 52 feet; extending the Galveston Entrance Channel to a 52 foot depth for 4.1 miles at a width of 800 feet and an additional reach at a width of 600 feet to the 52 foot contour in the Gulf of Mexico; and establishment of 600 acres of wetland and development of water-oriented recreational facilities on a 90-acre enlargement of the Texas City Dike. TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Anahuac Channel. Six-foot channel to Liberty. Abandon improvements above Liberty and terminate all improvements by lock and dam, leaving a 6-foot channel from Liberty to mouth. Provides for a navigable channel from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston and Trinity Bays to the mouth of Trinity River and 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide in the river section, with a turning basin at Liberty. Modification of the project to provide for a channel 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay extending along the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth of the Trinity River at Anahuac, including protective spoil embankment on the bay side of the channel in lieu of the 9 by 200-foot channel in Galveston and Trinity Bays. Provides for the multiple-purpose Wallisville Reservoir, including a navigation lock in the Wallisville Dam at Channel Mile 28.30 and advancement of the Channel to Liberty from one mile below Anahuac (Mile 23.2) to the Texas Gulf Sulphur Company's slip at Channel Mile 35.8, and incorporation into existing project Anahuac Channel and mouth of Trinity River projects. Reevaluation of navigation benefits. Modified Wallisville Reservoir by reducing the size to 5,600 acres and confining the reservoir to east side of Trinity River. CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TX (RESTORATION PROJECT) Restoration and periodic nourishment of 1.4 miles of beach. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Barker and Addicks Reservoirs, Texas. Clearing, straightening, enlarging and lining of Buffalo, Brays, and White Oak Bayous. Extend upper limits of White Oak Bayou upstream about 2.1 miles from BRI RR bridge to mouth of Cole Creek. Sec. 201, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 989, 66th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 215, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. PL 98-63 H. Doc. 415, 91st Cong., 2nd Sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) H. Doc. 456, 75th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 250, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess.1 H. Doc. 169, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. 31-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 17. Aug. 13, 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 18. Nov. 17, 1988 19. Nov. 17, 1988 21. Nov. 17, 1986 22. Oct. 23, 1962 23. Nov. 17, 1986 24. Oct. 27, 1965 25. Jul. 3, 1958 26. Nov. 17, 1986 27. Oct. 23, 1962 CLEAR CREEK, TX Channel enlargement and rectification from upper end of Clear Lake at Mile 3.8 to improved channel Mile 34.8.30 Modified local cooperation requirements of the 1968 authorization. CYPRESS CREEK, TX Enlargement and rectification of lower 29.4 miles of Cypress Creek channel and recreational development. FALFURRIAS, TX Construction of a 5.6-mile long diversion levee west of Falfurrias; a 1.8-mile long pilot channel west of Falfurrias; a flowage easement; and a 0.8-mile long ring levee around the sewage treatment plant. LOWER RIO GRANDE BASIN, TX Channel improvements to provide drainage protection for the area in Hidalgo and Willacy Counties north of U.S. Highway 83, and for the area between U.S. Highway 83 and the Rio Grande in Hidalgo County; and to provide flood protection for the cities of McAllen, Edinburg, Raymondville, Edcouch, La Villa, and Lyford. PORT ARTHUR AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANEFLOOD PROTECTION) Raising and reconstructing 6.3 miles of existing seawall; constructing 0.3 mile of new seawall, 20.3 miles new levees and five pumping plants; and raising and improving 7.5 miles of existing levees. 28 SIMS BAYOU, TX Enlargement and rectification, with appropriate erosion control measures of 19.31 miles of Sims Bayou; environmental measures and riparian habitat along entire alignment, and recreational development. TAYLORS BAYOU, TX Enlarging and rectifying channels; construction of diversion channel; a salt water gate; enlargement of GIWW 1.3 miles and alteration of State Highway 87 bridge. 29 TEXAS CITY AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANEFLOOD PROTECTION) Construction of improvements for control of storm tides, consisting of new and enlarged levees and floodwalls approximately 14.1 and 2.1 miles in length; related drainage and stoplog structures; a navigation opening and pumping plants. UPPER WHITE OAK BAYOU, TX Channel improvements in White Oak Bayou from Mile 10.7 to Mile 19.9; on Cole Creek from its mouth to Mile 4.9; and on Vogel Creek from its mouth to Mile 4.5; and recreational development on project lands along White Oak Bayou, between Mile 14.6 and Mile 18.3. VINCE AND LITTLE VINCE BAYOUS, TX Enlarging and rectifying channel of Vince Bayou and Little Vince Bayou upstream for a total of 11.5 miles for both streams. H. Doc. 351, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 1001, PL 99-662 Sec. 3, PL 100-676 Sec. 3, PL 100-676 Sec. 401, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 505, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.1 Sec. 401, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 206 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 347, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess.1 Sec. 401, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 441, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.' 1 Contains latest published maps. 4 Included in Public Works Administration program 2 Extension of north jetty 1,950 feet and south jetty September 6, 1933 and February 16, 1935. 1,265 feet considered inactive. 5 West leg of Wye junction with main channel ddreeadugtihnogcri2z,0e0d0. 3 Dredging 2,000 by 650-foot northerly extension of 6 Construction of lock in diversion dam at local inner basin deauthorized. expense considered inactive. 31-32 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 7 Dredging upper .5 mile of channel to vicinity of Stauffer Chemical plant was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Included in Public Works Administration program September 6, 1933. 8 Dredging 43rd to 51st Streets was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 9 Deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 10 Deepening 43rd to 57th Streets was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 11 Previously authorized September 6, 1933 by Public Works Administration. 12 H. Doc. 230, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. and project documents contain latest published maps. 13 Dredging upper 3.5 miles was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 14 Dredging upper 5 miles was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 15 Inactive. 16 Portion of 16-foot by 150-foot channel from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel is inactive. Relocation of channel in Matagorda Bay deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 17 The 9 feet by 100 feet channel from Mile 8.2 to Mile 13.2 in Chocolate Bayou was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 18 Construction of pile dike was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 19 Hill Street Bridge to mouth of White Oak Bayou was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 20 Deepening channel to 40 feet from Southern Pacific Slip to Brady Island was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 21 The 12-foot channel from mile 1.65 to mile 2.81 deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 22 Complete widening of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 23 Complete deepening of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 24 Channel extension above Cow Bayou turning basin near Orangefield was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 25 Widening to 350 feet entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 26 The 12-foot channel in Sabine River from Orange to Echo, Texas deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 27 Jetty extension was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 28 Raising and strengthening of levees surrounding Gulf Oil Company's fresh water reservoir is inactive. 29 Enlarging 7.0 miles of North Fork Taylors Bayou, 7.8 miles of South Fork Taylors Bayou and 4.4 miles of Mayhaw Bayou are inactive. 30 Portion of project upstream of Brazoria/Galveston County line, approximately mile 18.5, in inactive category. 31 Turning basin was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 31-33 TABLE 31-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 31-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to September 30, 1989 Report See Annual Report Operation and Project For Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control (1958 and 1962 River and Harbor Acts)6 1967 38,2521 - Bastrop Bayou, TX2 1931 9,920 27,129 Brazos River, TX, Velasco to Old Washington3 1924 216,9894 223,010 Channel to Port Bolivar, TX 1987 133,9248 1,173,8929 Clear Creek and Clear Lake, TX 1982 66,934 537,139 Corpus Christi, TX, Channel to Navy Seaplane Base Encinal Peninsula 1968 1,194,344 26,467 Dickinson Bayou, TX 1954 33,942 57,553 Double Bayou, TX 1987 226,558 1,412,07810 East Bay (Hanna Reef), TX5 1922 2,476 847 Johnson Bayou LA6 1933 2,261 54,042 Little Bay, TX 1979 - 252,728 Neches River and Trib., Salt Water Barrier at Beaumont, TX (Advance Engineering & Design) 1984 1,503,843 - Oyster Creek, TX 1922 6,942 7,556 Sabine River and Tributaries, TX (Echo to Morgan Bluff)3 1971 - 1 Excludes $1,672 work contribution. 7 Aransas County Navigation District, Rockport, TX, 2 Widening from 60 feet to 100 feet at 4-foot depth constructed project as authorized by 1950 River and Harbor was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Act (H. Doc. 114, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.) in 1955 under 3 Deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. Department of Army permit. 4 Includes $123,676 for previous projects. Includes $46,101 for previous projects. In inactive category for maintenance. 'o n addition, $102,325 expended from contributed 6 Channel adequate for existing commerce. funds. TABLE 31-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to September 30, 1989 Report See Annual Report Operation and Project For Construction Maintenance Arroyo Colorado, Rio Hondo, Texas 1986 201,300 - Baytown, Texas 1980 245,400 - Colorado River, Matagorda, Texas2 1963 273,757 - Freeport and Vicinity, Texas, Hurricane-Flood Protection2 1984 29,285,0423 - Guadalupe River (Remove Log Jams), Texas2 1978 505,749 - Highland Bayou, Texas2 1984 12,254,390 - Lavaca-Navidad River, Texas: Hallettsville Project 1961 256,043 - General channel project 1952 21,086 - Liberty Local Protection Project, Texas6 1971 98,517 - Mill Creek, Texas' 1952 24,753 - Peyton Creek, Texas4 1975 66,377 - San Diego Creek, Alice, Texas2 1963 135,175 - Tranquitas Creek, Kingsville, Texas2 1956 130,239 - Three Rivers, Texas5 5,835,927 - 1 Inactive. 4 Deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 2 Completed. 5 See Annual Report for 1983, Fort Worth District, " In addition, $8,695,438 expended from contributed page 16-12 funds, $1,126,905 estimated value of contributed lands, and pag $2,726,446 for relocations by local interests. 6 Deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 31-34 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 31-E TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS See Section in Text Project Funds New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX 3. Cedar Bayou, TX 4. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX 5. Freeport Harbor, TX 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX 7. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and the Mexican Border 8. Houston Ship Channel, TX 10. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX 11. Texas City Channel, TX 12. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Total cost of project Regular Channel Seawall Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Contributed Total cost of project 9,249,310 2,848,560 1,683,258 13,781,128 642,176 25,000 667,176 73,927,552 324,287 5,893,740 80,145,579 1,716,695 276,720 82,138,994 13,430,854 116,575 4,271,003 17,818,432 360,249 18,178,681 11,920,187 8,754,209 3,648,932 24,323,328 67,821,722 466,477 3,821,590 72,109,789 395,000 139,776 72,644,565 29,042,293 2,612,932 1,382,760 33,037,985 49,592,331 1,363,652 2,103,435 53,059,418 32,000 116,760 53,208,178 14,623,746 136,296 1,023,819 15,783,861 27,194,400 66,000 27,260,400 42,126,355 14,692 42,141,047 2,739,734 2,739,734 88,401,547 445,269 88,846,816 88,846,816 50,136,953 229,311 50,366,264 50,366,264 82,479,395 512,163 13,121 2,116,719 85,121,398 234,703,274 22,672 234,725,946 234,725,946 112,620,023 334,641 112,954,664 144,273,013 2,910,974 147,183,987 147,183,987 23,418,010 23,418,010 11,086,006 11,086,006 2,170,080 2,170,080 3,576,684 3,576,684 3,576,684 8,935 8,935 8,935 7,373,356 595,973 7,969,329 1,270,511 1,270,511 1,270,511 726,158 726,158 8,35 Total 53,545,745 2,848,560 1,697,950 58,092,255 3,381,910 25,000 3,406,910 165,905,783 324,287 6,339,009 172,569,079 1,716,695 276,720 174,562,494 63,576,742 116,575 4,500,314 68,193,631 360,249 68,553,880 101,772,938 9,862,345 13,121 5,765,651 117,414,055 303,795,507 466,477 3,844,262 308,106,246 395,000 139,776 308,641,022 141,662,316 2,612,932 1,717,401 145,992,649 193,865,344 1,363,652 5,014,409 200,243,405 32,000 116,760 200,392,165 38,767,914 136,296 1,023,819 39,928,029 38,280,406 66,000 38,346,406 31-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 31-F CHANNEL DIMENSIONS See Section in Text 2. Project Brazos Island Harbor, TX 4. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX 5. Freeport Harbor, TX Adopted Project Dimensions Depth in Feet (Below Mean Low Bottom Tide) Width (Feet) 44-42 400 42 300 42 300 42 300 42 500 36 1,000 36 200 36 200 36 1,000 15 370-305 15 370-305 15 370 15 270 15 100 Section of Waterway Outer Bar and Jetty Channel Padre Island to Long Island Long Island to Goose Island Goose Island to Turning Basin Extension Turning Basin Extension Brownsville Turning Basin Port Isabel Channel via East Turnout West Wye, from Brownsville Channel Port Isabel Turning Basin Fishing Boat Harbor: West Basin Middle Basin East Basin Connecting Channel Entrance Channel Aransas Pass Outer Bar Channel Aransas Pass Jetty Channel Inner Basin at Harbor Island Channel to Port Aransas Port Aransas Turning Basin Anchorage Basin at Port Aransas Inner Basin to Mile 8.5 Mile 8.5 to LaQuinta Junction LaQuinta Junction to Corpus Christi Turning Basin Corpus Christi Turning Basir Industrial Canal Avery Point Turning Basin Channel to Chemical Turning Basin Chemical Turning Basin Tule Lake Channel Tule Lake Turning Basin Viola Channel Viola Turning Basin Channel to LaQuinta LaQuinta Turning Basin Turning Point at LaQuinta Channel Junction Jewel Fulton Canal Jewel Fulton Turning Basin Mooring Area at Ingleside: Mooring Area (a) Mooring Area (b) Outer Bar Channel Jetty Channel Quintana Turning Basin Channel to Brazosport Turning Basin Brazosport Turning Basin Channel to Upper Turning Basin Upper Turning Basin Channel to Stauffer Chemica Plant Stauffer Turning Basin Brazos Harbor Channel 700 600-730 730-1,720 100-150 200-4002 300-400 600-500 500 400 800 400 975 400 1,200' 300 1,200 300-350 1,200 300-400 1,200 1,250 s 100 200 150 150 400 400 7504 400 1,0004 375 1,2004 200 500 200 Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Feet (Below Bottom Mean Low ,Width Length Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 38-36 300 2.5 36 200 2.1 36 200 9.6 36 200 3.2 36 500 1.3 36 1,000 2,670 0.5 36 200 1.4 36 200 0.8 36 1,000 1,300 0.2 15 370-305 1,470 0.3 15 370-305 1,200 0.2 15 370 1,470 0.3 15 265 1,230 0.2 15 100 770 0.1 47 45 45 12 12 12 45 45 40-45 45 45 45 45 45 40 40 40 40 45 45 45 12 45 38 36 36 36 36 36 30 25 30 700 600 Irregular 100 2002 300-400 600-500 500 400 1,000 400 1,000 350 1,050' 200 900 200-250 700-900 300-400 1,200 1,250* 100 200 150 300 200 200-350 744-800 350-375 600 200 500 200 1,550 200 900 5,423 1,150 1,690 1,000 1,000 800 1,250 400 1.8 1.0 0.1 0.2 8.5 3.6 8.6 1.0 1.1 0.2 0.6 0.3 3.1 0.2 1.8 0.2 5.6 0.1 0.2 0.8 0.1 0.8 - 3.0 0.8 47 45 45 12 12 12 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 12 45 45 47 45 45 45 45 45 45 30 30 36 31-36 - 1.2 667 0.1 - 1.4 600 0.1 - 1.1 500 0.1 - 0.5 1 ' 3 3 3 L TABLE 31-F Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Uepth in Depth in Feet Feet See (Below (Below Bottom Section Mean Low Bottom Mean Low Width Length in Text Project 5. (Continued) 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX 8. Houston Ship Channel, TX 9. Matagorda Ship Channel, TX 10. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX Tide) Width (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet iles 7504 800 800 800 2,8751 800 1,125 Section of Waterway Brazos Harbor Turning Basin Entrance Channel Outer Bar Channel Inner Bar Channel Anchorage Basin Bolivar Roads Channel Bolivar Roads Channel to 43rd St. Bolivar Roads to Morgan Point Morgan Point to Boggy Bayou Boggy Bayou to Greens Bayou Greens Bayou to Sims Bayou Hunting Bayou Turning Point Clinton Island Turning Basin Sims Bayou to Southern Pacific Slip Southern Pacific Slip to Houston Turning Basin Houston Turning Basin Upper Turning Basin Brady Island Channel Barbour Terminal Channel Turning Basin Bayport Ship Channel Turning Basin Anchorage Area Five-Mile Cut Channel Light-Draft Channel: Upper Turning Basin to Jensen Drive Turkey Bend Channel Greens Bayou Channel: Mile 0 to Mile 0.36 Mile 0.36 to Mile 1.57 Outer Bar and Jetty Channel Channel to Point Comfort Approach Channel to Turning Basin Turning Basin Channel to Port Lavaca Lynn Bayou Turning Basin Channel to Harbor of Refuge North-South Basin East-West Basin Channel to Red Bluff Sabine Bank Channel Sabine Pass Outer Bar Channel Sabine Pass Jetty Channel Sabine Pass Anchorage Basin Sabine Pass Channel Port Arthur Canal Entrance to Port Arthur Turning Basins Port Arthur East Turning Basin 36 52 52 50 36 50 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 36 36 10 40 40 40 40 40 8 10 10 40 15 38 36 36 36 12 12 12 12 12 6 42 42 40 40 40 40 40 40 525-675 800 800 800 2,875 800 1,125 400 400 300 300 900-1,0009 8009 300 300 400-1,000 150 60 300 2,000 300 1,600 150 125 60 60 175 100 300 300-2008 200-300 1,000 125 27-340 125 300 250 100 800 800 800-500 1,500 500 500 275-678 420 6;75 0.1 - 4.7 - 1.7 - 3.2 - 1.81 - 1.0 - 3.9 - 26.2 - 12.8 OA 30 42 42 40 36 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 36 36 10 40 40 40 40 40 8 10 10 40 15 38 36 36 36 12 12 12 12 12 6 42 42 40 40 40 40 40 40 400 400 300 300 948-1,0009 965-1,0709 300 300 400-1,000 150 60 300 2,000 300 1,600 150 125 60 60 175 100 300 300-2006 200-300 1,000 125 27-340 125 300 250 100 800 800 800-500 1,500 500 500 275-678 370-547 - 4.1 - , 0.8 - 0.3 - 1.3 - 3.2 - 20.9 - 1.1 00 0.2 - 4.1 32 0.1 - 1.9 82 0.3 '50 0.3 - 20.2 - 14.7 - 3.4 - 4.1 )00 65 - 5.6 6.2 0.3 0.3 1,0 5 1,6 1,7 3,0 1,7 31-37 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT CHANNEL DIMENSIONS - 5.3 1,375 - 1,592 - - 0.6 - 2.9 3,100 0.6 1,000 0.2 - 0.9 - 3.1 2,000 0.4 - 3.8 1,000 0.3 - 1.9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 31-F CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet Feet See (Below (Below Bottom Section Mean Low Bottom Mean Low Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Tide) Width (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 10. (Continued) Port Arthur West Turning Basin 40 600 40 350-550 1,610 0.3 Channel connecting Port Arthur West and Taylors Bayou Turning Basins 40 200-250 40 200-250 - 0.6 Taylors Bayou Turning Basin 40 150-1,000 40 90-1,233 3,470 0.7 Sabine-Neches Canal, Port Arthur Canal to Neches River 40 400 40 400 - 11.2 Turning Point at Mile 19.5 40 9004 40 9004 - 8 Neches River, Mouth to Maneuvering Area Beaumont Turning Basin 40 400 40 400 - 18.3 Turning Point, Mile 31.1 40 1,0004 40 1,000 700 8 Turning Point, Mile 36.6 40 1,0004 40 1,000 930 8 Turning Point, Mile 40.3 40 1,0004 40 1,300 1,530 8 Channel Extension, Mile 40.3 36 350 36 350 1,265 0.2 Maneuvering Area at Beaumont Turning Basin 40 Irregular 40 Irregular 1,300 0.2 Beaumont Turning Basin 34 500 34 160-535 1,500 0.3 Beaumont Turning Basin Extension 34 350 34 300 - 0.4 Beaumont Turning Basin Extension to End of Project Channel Vicinity Bethlehem Steel Company 30 200 30 200 - 0.7 Sabine-Neches Canal, Neches River to Sabine River 30 200 30 200 - 4.4 Sabine River Channel, Mouth to Foot of Green Ave. 30 200 30 200 - 9.5 Orange Turning Basin 30 Irregular 30 Irregular 1,550 0.3 Orange Municipal Slip 30 200 30 150-200 2,435 0.5 Old Channel Around Harbor Island 25 150-200 25 150-200 - 2.4 Channel to Echo7 12 125 - - - - Adams Bayou 12 100 12 100 - 1.7 Cow Bayou 13 100 13 100 - 7.0 Orangefield Turning Basin 13 300 13 300 500 0.1 1 Average. 2 Includes 100-foot channel width. 4 Includes 450-foot channel to Corpus Christi. 4 Diameter. 6 Includes 350-foot channel width. 6 300-foot width through Matagorda Peninsula. 7 Deauthorized. 8 Included in channel length. * Includes 300-foot channel width. 31-38 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 31-G GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY APALACHEE BAY, FLORIDA TO MEXICAN BORDER EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS, PROVIDED FOR IN TRIBUTARY CHANNELS Tributary Channel Offats Bayou Main Channel West Wye Chocolate Bayou Channel 1 12-Foot Channel via East Turnout 2 West Turnout 3 9-Foot Channel 4 Turning Basin San Bernard River Channel 5 Colorado River Channel 6 Turning Basin Silting Basin Mouth of Colorado River Navigation Channel, GIWW to Gulf Turning Basin at Matagorda Channel to Palacios Turning Basin No. 1 Turning Basin No. 2 Connecting Channel Channel to Barroom Bay Channel to Victoria Main Channel via East Turnout Turning Basin West Turnout Channel Channel to Seadrift via South Turnout Turning Basin North Turnout Channel Harbor of Refuge at Seadrift Channel Basin Channel to Rockport Turning Basin Channel to Aransas Pass Turning Basin Channel to Conn Brown Harbor Conn Brown Harbor Channel to Port Mansfield to Entrance Channel Approach Channel to Hopper Dredge Turning Basin Hopper Dredge Turning Basin Channel Across Padre Island and Laguna Madre Turnout Channels, East Side of Main Channel, GIWW North Turnout South Turnout Channel West Side of Main Channel, GIWW, to P.T. of Turnout Channels Turnout Channels, West Side of Main Channel, GIWW North Turnout South Turnout Channel from P.T. of Turnout Channels to Approach Channel to Main Turning Basin Approach Channel to Main Turning Basin Main Turning Basin Turning Basin Extension Small Craft Basin Shrimp Basin Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Uepth in Feet (Below Bottom Feet (Below Mean Low Width Mean Low Bottom Length Tide) (Feet) Tide) Width (Feet) Feet Miles 12 12 12 12 999999 15-12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 9999 9999 14 14 14 14 16 16 16 14 12 12 14 12 12 14 14 14 14 8 12 125 125 125 125 100 600 100 100 400 150 200-100 350 125 200 300 150-480 60 100 600(AVG) 100 100 250 100 100 200 200 475 175 300 125 300 250 100 300 100 100 100 100 200 200 125 200 400 1,000 160 350 12 12 12 12 9999 12 12 12 12 999999 99 14 14 14 14 16 16 16 14 12 12 14 12 12 14 14 14 14 8 12 125 125 125 125 100 100 400 150 125 200 300 130-400 100 500(AVG) 100 100 200 100 200 342(AVG) 125-175 300 0.2 300 250 100 300 100 100 100 100 200 200 125 200 400 1,000 160 350 2,200 500 635 1,130 80 23 1,22 2,21 12 1,80 3C 2.3 0.4 8.2 0.8 26.0 15.5 0.1 1.0 16.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 - 34.8 )0(AVG) 0.1 - 0.8 - 2.0 30 - - 0.5 - 2.1 5 0.2 - 6.1 .2 0.4 5 - )0 0.3 - 0.8 - 0.4 )0 0.1 - 7.7 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.3 1,250 0.2 580 0.1 860 0.2 1,450 0.3 31-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 31-G GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY APALACHEE BAY, FLORIDA TO MEXICAN BORDER EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS, PROVIDED FOR IN TRIBUTARY CHANNELS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet (Below Bottom Feet (Below Mean Low Width Mean Low Bottom Length Tributary Channel Tide) (Feet) Tide) Width (Feet) Feet Miles Channel to Harlingen via South Turnout from Main Channel, GIWW 12 125 12 12511 - 25.812 Turning Basin near Rio Hondo 12 400 12 400 500 0.1 North Turnout from Main Channel 12 200 12 200 - 0.7 Port Isabel Side Channels Main Channel 12 125 12 125-90 - 0.6 Main Channel 12 233-60 12 233-60 - 0.4 South Leg 12 125 12 125 - 0.2 Port Isabel Small Boat Harbor Entrance Channel 7 75 7 75 - 1.4 Harbor Channel 6 50 6 50 - 0.3 Boat Basin 6 Variable 6 72-501 1,308 0.2 1 Includes the construction of a salt water barrier at Mile 16.9. 2 Constructed 10 feet deep by 100 feet wide by local interests. East turnout channel constructed 150 feet wide. 3 Constructed by local interests. 4 Authorized to mile 13.2. Mile 8.2 to Mile 13.2 was deauthorized. 5 Authorized to Mile 31 above mouth (channel mile 29.41). Upper 3.4 miles was deauthorized under Section 12 of PL 93-251. 6 Includes a discharge channel from Matagorda, Texas, to the gulf which was dredged by local interests in 1939. (Maintenance will be discontinued upon completion of improvements authorized by R&H Act of 1968.) 7 Authorized by R&H Act of 1968. Also provides for a dam across the present discharge channel, a new 250-foot wide by 20 to 23-feet deep discharge channel into Matagorda Bay, and a 15-foot by 200-foot wide entrance channel with parallel jetties from the gulf shoreline into the Gulf of Mexico. East jetty to be 3,500 feet long and west jetty 2,900 feet long. 8 Includes two protective breakwaters at entrance to turning basins. 9 In the inactive category for maintenance. 1o Also provides for two stone jetties at the gulf entrance about 1,000 feet apart. (North jetty constructed 2,300 feet long and south jetty constructed 2,270 feet long.) 11 South turnout is 200 feet wide. 12 Authorized to mile 31. Mile 25.8 to Mile 31 was deauthorized. 31-40 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 31-H DREDGING OPERATIONS Brazos Island Harbor, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Brazos Island Harbor Entrance Channel November 30, 1988 to January 16, 1989 731,545 $1,404,354 Cedar Bayou, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Cedar Bayou Channel January 16, 1989 to April 10, 1989 633,636 $642,328 Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Light Beacon 82 thru Main Turning Basin September 7, 1988 to December 12, 1988 606,141 $469,147 Dredging Corpus Christi Entrance Channel (Hopper Dredge WHEELER) October 5, 1988 to October 29, 1988 261,343 $1,440,000 Dredging Corpus Christi Jetty Channel (Hopper Dredge WHEELER) September 6, 1989 to September 7, 1989 4,972 $97,500 Dredging Inner Basin April 3, 1989 to April 12, 1989 201,671 $271,420 Freeport Harbor, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Outer Bar and Jetty Channels August 1, 1988 to September 4, 1988 61,480 $79,925 Dredging Outer Bar and Jetty Channels (Hopper Dredge WHEELER) August 5, 1989 to September 24, 1989 999,961 $3,217,500 Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Bolivar Roads to Pier "B" April 12, 1989 to September 30, 1989 2,528,948 $1,756,162 Dredging Entrance, Outer and Inner Bar Channels (Hopper Dredge WHEELER) September 2, 1989 to September 30, 1989 58,938 $336,200 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Between Apalachee Bay, FL and Mexican Border - Galveston District (Maintenance) Dredging Channel to Victoria and Removal of Broken Concrete Chutes October 1, 1988 to January 27, 1989 692,862 $611,940 Dredging Galveston Causeway to Cow Bayou October 1, 1988 to January 1, 1989 1,381,845 $403,748 Dredging Main Channel in Matagorda Bay October 2, 1988 to October 25, 1988 197,056 $250,233 Emergency Dredging Vicinity FM 457 October 7, 1988 to October 10, 1988 22,360 $168,322 Dredging Chocolate Bayou Channel October 12, 1988 to February 4, 1989 1,460,058 $913,752 Dredging Channel to Palacios October 26, 1988 to December 13, 1988 1,284,247 $497,329 Emergency Dredging Channel to Port Mansfield November 13, 1988 to December 7, 1988 169,585 $345,000 Dredging South Bird Island to Mud Flats January 5, 1989 to September 30, 1989 1,821,099 $1,913,790 Dredging Port Isabel to Mud Flats and Port Isabel Small Boat Harbor January 22, 1989 to September 30, 1989 1,238,601 $1,470,220 Dredging Main Channel GIWW, Channel to Victoria and Channel to Seadrift July 8, 1989 to September 11, 1989 1,724,800 $1,086,400 Dredging Turnstake Island to Live Oak Point July 6, 1989 to August 10, 1989 1,327,691 $690,000 Dredging Vicinity Rollover Pass and Port Bolivar August 7, 1989 to September 30, 1989 587,522 $500,000 31-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Between Apalachee Bay, FL and Mexican Border - Galveston District (Maintenance) Dredging Freeport Harbor to Vicinity FM 457 September 10, 1989 to September 30, 1989 263,798 $385,970 Dredging Main Channel in Matagorda Bay September 13, 1989 to September 30, 1989 227,279 $282,520 Houston Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Light Draft Channel October 1, 1988 to October 8, 1988 12,811 $166,258 Dredging Morgan Point to Carpenter Bayou October 1, 1988 to January 16, 1989 2,112,775 $1,554,086 Matagorda Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Matagorda Peninsula to Point Comfort January 10, 1989 to March 24, 1989 3,787,107 $1,264,003 Dredging Entrance Channel January 30, 1989 to February 20, 1989 498,040 $877,256 Dredging Channel to Port Lavaca and Channel to Harbor of Refuge March 29, 1989 to April 16, 1989 1,069,665 $245,466 Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Sabine Pass Outer Bar Channel September 4, 1988 to October 16, 1988 1,045,159 $937,203 Dredging Port Arthur Turning Basins and Junction Area August 31, 1989 to September 30, 1989 434,829 $500,000 31-42 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT* The district comprises the watershed of the Canadian River and its tributaries and the watershed of Arkansas River and its tributaries in Colorado including Colorado and New Mexico; the watershed of Rio Grande and its tributaries including the Pecos River and its tributaries upstream of Amistad Lake; and the watershed of the Mimbres River and its tributaries in New Mexico. Note: The district watershed boundaries were revised in June 1986 to include the portion of New Mexico west of the Continental Divide. IMPROVEMENTS Flood Control 1. Acequias Irrigation System, NM ...... 2. Albuquerque Diversion Channels, NM ... 3. Conchas Lake, NM ................ 4. El Paso, TX ..................... 5. Fountain Creek, Pueblo, CO ......... 6. John Martin Reservoir, CO .......... 7. Puerco River, Gallup, NM ........... 8. Rio Grande Basin, NM ............. 8A. Abiquiu Dam, NM ................ 8B. Cochiti Lake, NM ................. 8C. Galisteo Dam, NM ................ 8D. Jemez Canyon Dam, NM ........... 8E. Rio Grande Floodway, NM .......... 8F. Truth or Consequences Unit, NM ...... 9. Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, NM ....... Page 32-1 32-2 32-2 32-3 32-3 32-4 32-4 32-4 32-5 32-5 32-6 32-6 32-6 32-7 32-7 Flood Control (Continued) 10. Trinidad Lake, CO ................. 11. Two Rivers Dam, NM ............... 12. Inspection of completed flood control projects .................. 13. Scheduling flood control reservoir operations ................ 14. Other authorized flood control projects .................. 15. Flood Control work under special authorizations .............. General Investigations 16. Surveys ........................ 17. Collection and study of basic data ...... 18. Continuation of Planning and Engineering 19. Advance Engineering and Design ....... Flood Control 1. ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM, NM Location. There are about one thousand acequias throughout the state of New Mexico, most of which are located in north-central New Mexico. Proposed project. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Section 1113, the project consists of about one thousand acequias throughout the state of New Mexico. These community ditch systems provide irrigation water to about 160,000 acres on an estimated 12,000 farms. Acequias have been in existence since the early Spanish Colonization period of the 17th and 18th Centuries and represent one of the oldest forms of cooperative institutions in the United States. They are an integral part of the culture and heritage of New Mexico. Diversion structures, many of which are constructed of available materials such as rock and brush, are frequently destroyed by flows greater than normal resulting from spring runoff or summer thunderstorms. Usually disruption of the ditches occurs during peak irrigation season and severely impacts crop production. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 directs the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to undertake measures, without regard to economic analysis, as are necessary to protect and restore the river diversion structures and associated canals. *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 32-1 Page 32-8 32-8 32-9 32-9 32-10 32-10 32-10 32-10 32-10 32-10 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Local Cooperation. The local sponsor, the State of New Mexico, has a law whereby the State of New Mexico provides 17.5% of the project costs and low interest loans to the local Acequias for the remaining 7.5%. The State of New Mexico has appropriated, and will appropriate on an annual basis, the funds necessary to meet the requirements of local sponsorship. Operation and results during fiscal year. Funds to initiate construction were received in Fiscal Year 1988. Construction contracts were awarded in FY 1988 and FY 1989. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed on structures for seven projects in FY 1989: Farmers Mutual Ditch, Heading Structure and Sluice; Upper Clyde Ditch, Diversion Structure; Tecolotito (upper Anton Chico) Ditch, Flume; Cinco Acequias, Diversion Structure; Ortiz Ditch, Heading Structure; Acequia Madre del Sur, Diversion Structure and Eledge Mill Ditch, Heading Structure. 2. ALBUQUERQUE DIVERSION CHANNELS, NM Location. The project is located in an area which comprises watersheds of ephemeral streams entering a 15-mile reach of the Rio Grande from the east at Albuquerque, NM, and vicinity. Combined drainage area of the tributaries is about 276 square miles. The Sandia range of the Rocky Mountains, which is about 12 miles east of the Rio Grande, forms the eastern border of the watersheds. The crest of this mountain range rises more than a mile over the river to an elevation of 10,692 feet above mean sea level. (See Geological Survey Map, Albuquerque, NM, quadrangle, scale 1:62,500.). Existing project. Improvements consist of north and south diversion channels on high ground east of and parallel to the valley. Channels are designed to carry floods equal in magnitude to standard project flood from all tributaries. For a description of the complete improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17-15 of Annual Report for FY 1973. Local cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. For details of local cooperation requirements see page 17-2 of Annual Report for FY 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. The North Diversion Channels prevented $2,505,600 in flood damages during FY 1989. The estimated total accumulated flood damages prevented were $80,279,500. Peak flood flows recorded during FY 1989 were: North Diversion Channel near Alameda 3,510 c.f.s.; South Diversion Channel 712 c.f.s.. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the North and South Diversion Channels began in March 1965, and was completed in March 1972. The South Diversion Channel is in good condition and well maintained by the local interests. The North Diversion Channel has experienced severe arching and cracking of the concrete lined portion. Construction to correct this problem was initiated and completed in FY 1987. 3. CONCHAS LAKE, NM Location. The dam is in San Miguel County, NM, on the Canadian River, about one-fourth mile downstream from the confluence of the Canadian and Conchas Rivers. (See Geological Survey State map of New Mexico, scale 1:500,000, and Geological Survey topographic map. Tucumcari quadrangle, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. A concrete gravity main dam section 1,250 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet above streambed located in the Canadian River Canyon together with earth dikes on each side have an overall length of about 3.7 miles. The main section contains conduits in its base for the release of water to maintain low flows and for drainage of the reservoir, and an overflow, ungated spillway 300 feet long. The earth dikes vary in height up to 100 feet and the north dike contains a concrete ogeetype emergency spillway 3,000 feet long. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 529,000 acre-feet (198,900 for flood control, 259,600 for water conservation and irrigation, and 70,500 dead storage). The dam controls 7,409 square miles of drainage area. (See page 17-16 of Annual Report of 1973 for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None Required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the reservoir continued. The reservoir was operated for storage of floodwater and releases for irrigation purposes. $78,400 in sediment damages were prevented during FY 1989 while no flood damages were prevented. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project through FY 1989 were $3,142,500. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 1989 were $165,000. Estimated total accumulated irrigation benefits through FY 1989 were $9,457,400. The pool elevation at the start of FY 1989 was 4,190.11 feet with corresponding storage of 224,154 acre-feet. Total releases for this reporting period were 75,194 acre-feet. Releases of 71,708 acre-feet were made to Arch Hurley Conservancy District and 3,415 acre-feet to Bell Ranch. The pool elevation on September 30, 1989 was 4,190.11 32-2 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT feet with corresponding storage of 224,154 acre-feet. Sediment deposition during the fiscal year was 700 acrefeet. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was essentially complete in 1940. Reservoir and appurtenances are in good condition and in operation. Irrigation of some lands downstream from the project was begun in November 1945. A cost sharing agreement between the Government and the State of New Mexico for additional Recreation Development at Conchas Lake was completed in August 1977. Costs of the facilities are 50 percent State of New Mexico and 50 percent Federal. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in FY 1978 and completed in FY 1983. 4. EL PASO, TX Location. The project is located at El Paso, El Paso County, TX, which is on the left bank of the Rio Grande in the reach that forms part of international boundary between United States and the Republic of Mexico. (Geological Survey map for El Paso, TX; New Mexico quadrangle, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. This project consists of a singlepurpose flood control system of detention dams, diversion dikes, conduits and channels to collect, regulate and discharge arroyo runoff into the Rio Grande. Runoff from the tributary arroyos on the eastern, southern, and western slopes of the adjacent Franklin Mountains often inundates sections of the city and its outlying suburban developments. The project is divided into three independent elements: Northwest area, Central area, and Southeast area. The project plan satisfies the 1933 U.S. and Mexico agreement on limited tributary discharge into the Rio Grande in El Paso, Texas. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applied for the Northwest and Central areas. The Local Cooperation Agreement for the Southeast area reflects the cost sharing requirements contained in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Operations and results during fiscal year. Flood control dams in operation during FY 1989 and dates of completion of construction are as follows: Northgate and Range Dams (February 1973); Sunrise and Mountain Park Dams (October 1974); and Pershing Dam (March 1977); Fort Bliss Diversion Channel (November 1978); Oxidation Pond and Buena Vista Diversion and Oxidation Pond Outlet Conduit (November 1980); Mulberry and Thorn Drive Dams (June 1982); Mesa Dam (September 1982); McKelligon Canyon Dam (October 1982); Keystone Dam (September 1983); Keystone Outlet Conduit (March 1984); Highway Diversion Channel (May 1985); Dam Safety Assurance Program to the existing Range and Northgate Dams (May 1986); and Borderland Diversion Channel (September 1986). During FY 1989 flood flows and flood control storage were minimal, however, damages which would have resulted from these flows were prevented. The estimated total flood damages prevented since completion of Northgate and Range Dams in 1973 through FY 1989 were $22,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has temporarily ended in the Central Area. The only remaining work is the Pershing Dam, Dam Safety Assurance. The Northwest Area of the project for all practical purposes is 100 percent complete. The General Design Memorandum for the Southeast Area was completed in September 1987 and construction was initiated in October 1988 on the Phelps Dodge Basin. 5. FOUNTAIN CREEK, PUEBLO, CO Location. The project is located on Fountain Creek approximately 1 mile above the confluence of the Arkansas River and Fountain Creek in the city of Pueblo in southeastern Colorado. Pueblo is approximately 30 miles east of the Wet Mountains of the Rocky Mountains. (See Geological Survey Map, Northeast Pueblo, CO quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Proposed project. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, the project comprises 11,500 feet of channel modification and 9,700 feet of levee which will provide a 200-year level of protection at an estimated first cost of $8,880,000 ($6,410,000 Federal and $2,470,000 non-Federal). (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Funds for initiation of construction were initially received in fiscal year 1987. A construction contract for recreation was awarded in September 1987. The remaining construction contract for levees and channel work was awarded 21 June 1988. Condition at end of year. Construction on the levees and channel began in July 1988 and the entire project is scheduled for completion in March 1990. 32-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 6. JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR, CO Location. The project is located on the Arkansas River, 1,159 miles upstream from its mouth, 300 miles downstream from its source, in Bent County, about 18 miles upstream from the city of Lamar, CO. (See Geological Survey maps for Lamar and Las Animas, CO quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. The project consists of a concrete and earthfill structure about 2.6 miles long with a maximum height of 106 feet above streambed and an overflow, gated spillway 1,174 feet long. Total capacity of the reservoir at the spillway crest is 615,500 acre-feet (270,200 for flood control and 345,300 for conservation and recreation storage). This reservoir controls a contributing drainage area of 18,130 square miles and is operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for flood control in the Arkansas River Basin. Public Law 89-298 modified the act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1570) to authorize 10,000 acre-feet of reservoir flood control storage space for fish and wildlife and recreation purposes. For details of the completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17-16 of Annual Report for FY 1973. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine maintenance and operation continued. Regulation of conservation storage continued under rules and regulations of the Arkansas River Compact. $136,200 in sediment damages were prevented during FY 1989. Estimated total flood and sediment damages prevented by this project through FY 1989 were $91,822,100. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 1989 were $351,700. Estimated total accumulative irrigation benefits were $24,463,200. Maximum pool elevation of 3,826.58 feet with corresponding storage of 125,286 acre-feet occurred on March 24, 1989. Total releases for FY 1989 were 162,845 acre-feet. Releases attributed to irrigation benefits amounted to 89,501 acre-feet. Sediment deposition was 1,216 acre-feet in FY 1989. Condition at end of fiscal year. Storage and operation of the reservoir for irrigation began in March 1943. The reservoir and appurtenances are in good condition and in operation. 7. PUERCO RIVER, GALLUP, NM Location. The project is located on the Puerco River in the city of Gallup in northwestern New Mexico in McKinley County. Proposed project. This project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662 and the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1988. The project consists of improvement of existing levees, construction of new levees and limited channel rectification. The project will provide the 100-year level of protection at an estimated first cost of $6,670,000 ($5,000,000 Federal and $1,670,000 non-Federal) 1 October 1989 price levels. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Operation and results during fiscal year. Funds to initiate construction were received in Fiscal Year 1988. A construction contract for the I-40 Auxiliary Levee was awarded in September 1988. The remaining construction contracts for the construction of the levees and channel improvement were awarded in June 1989. The entire project is scheduled for completion in May 1991. Condition at end of year. Finalized Construction Cost-Sharing Agreement, prepared Plans and Specifications and awarded construction contracts. 8. RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM Location. Improvements are on the Rio Grande and tributaries in New Mexico. More definite locations and descriptions of individual projects are in following paragraphs and individual reports by projects. Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1948 authorized the flood control phase of the comprehensive plan of development of water resources of the Rio Grande basin in New Mexico (H. Doc 243, 81st Cong., 1st sess.) with the exception of Chiflo Dam and Reservoir and spillway gate structure at Chamita Dam. Although recommended, Chiflo Dam and Reservoir was deleted from the authorized plan. It was excluded without prejudice to future consideration by Congress. It was requested at that time, by the States of Colorado and Texas, that the project be deferred for restudy regarding required storage and methods of operation. By the same act, Congress also authorized for the construction irrigation phase of the comprehensive plan as recommended by Bureau of Reclamation (H. Doc. 653, 81st Cong., 2nd sess.). The act also stipulated that work should be prosecuted in accordance with a joint agreement approved by the Secretary of the Army and Acting Secretary of the Interior on November 21, 1957. In addition, under that agreement the Bureau of Reclamation was given responsibility for construction, operation, and maintenance of channel rectification, and drainage rehabilitation and extension 32-4 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT phases of the unified plan of improvement. Authority for the Chamita Dam and Reservoir was abrogated when Cochiti Dam and Reservoir was authorized. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation and Table 32-C for existing projects.) All operations and costs for projects contained in the authorized plan are reflected in individual reports on the following pages. 8A. ABIQUIU DAM, NM Location. The project is one unit of the flood control phase of the comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande and tributaries, New Mexico. Abiquiu Dam is on the Rio Chama near the town of Abiquiu, NM, about 32 miles upstream from the confluence of Rio Chama and Rio Grande. (See Geological Survey Map for plan and profile of Rio Chama, NM, from mouth to mile 103, sheet 1, and Army Map Service, Aztec, NM; Colorado NJ 13-1, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam 1,540 feet long, 325 feet high, with a 12-foot diameter controlled outlet, and an uncontrolled spillway in a natural saddle about one mile north of the left abutment. The reservoir provides 565,000 acre-feet of flood control and sediment storage. Total capacity at the spillway crest is 1,212,000 acre-feet. For a detail description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see Annual Report of 1973. A major rehabilitation project was completed in September, 1980 and the recreation facilities were completed in FY 1981. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine maintenance and operation continued. Storage and flows were regulated in accordance with Section 203, Flood Control Act of 1960. On October 1, 1988, the pool elevation was 6,218.74 feet. The maximum pool (6,221.69 feet) and storage (198,338 acre-feet) occurred on March 13, 1989. On September 30, 1989, the pool elevation was 6,211.20 feet with a corresponding storage of 156,589 acre-feet. There was 1,205 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1989. There were $28,100 in flood damages prevented during FY 1989. Sediment damages prevented were $135,000. Accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project since completion were $232,743,600 through FY 1989. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was placed in operation in February 1963. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. On 22 February 1989 a contract was awarded for construction of two drainage adits to alleviate seepage problems in the north and south abutments. Construction of the adits is scheduled to be completed in February 1990. Emergency gates were not installed in the outlet conduit of Abiquiu Dam during its construction. A plan for the Abiquiu Dam emergency gates has been prepared in accordance with Section 1112 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Construction of the emergency gates is necessary to increase safety and enhance flood and sediment control. 8B. COCHITI LAKE, NM Location. The dam is at river mile 340 on the Rio Grande (river mile 0 being at intersection of New Mexico- Texas State line with international boundary at El Paso, TX), near Pueblo de Cochiti, which is about 50 miles upstream from Albuquerque, NM. (See Geological Survey Maps, Cochiti Dam, NM, quadrangle and Santo Domingo Pueblo, NM, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam about 5.4 miles long with a maximum height of 251 feet above streambed. The project extends generally in an east-west line across the Rio Grande to a point about 2 miles east of the Rio Grande and then southward across the Santa Fe River. An uncontrolled spillway with a 460- foot-long ogee-weir and a 160-foot notch 10.5 feet deep in the center is at the embankment on the south side of the Santa Fe River. Operational releases for flood control and irrigation are made through a 3-barrel gated conduit in the left abutment on the Rio Grande. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 492,500 acre-feet for flood control, 103,800 acre-feet for sediment and 50,130 acre-feet for recreation within the sediment space, for a total of 596,300 acre-feet. The project controls flood waters from a 11,695 square mile drainage area. For more improvement details see page 17-7 of Annual Report for 1980. See page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was completed in June 1975. On October 1, 1988, the pool elevation was 5,332.41 feet with a corresponding storage of 50,312 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 5,340.40 feet with a storage of 60,939 acre-feet on March 20, 1989. On September 30, 1989 the pool 32-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 elevation was 5,332.72 feet with a corresponding storage of 50,692 acre-feet. There was 738 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1989. There were no flood damages prevented during FY 1989. Sediment damages prevented were $82,700. Accumulated total damages prevented are $252,005,600. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The dam and appurtenances were placed in operation in 1975. The Cochiti Recreation area was completed in 1976, with the Visitors Center completed in 1977. The Tetilla Peak recreation area was completed in 1981. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 8C. GALISTEO DAM, NM Location. The dam is at river mile 12 on Galisteo Creek, a tributary of Rio Grande. The reservoir will extend upstream from the dam for about 4 miles, near the village of Waldo, NM (See Geological Survey Map,. San Pedro 1, NM quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam 2,820 feet long with a maximum height of 158 feet above the streambed. The outlet works consist of a 10- foot diameter uncontrolled outlet with a discharge capacity of 4,980 cubic feet per second with a pool at the spillway crest elevation. The spillway is a broad crested weir 250 feet long in the right abutment. The flood control storage is 89,000 acre-feet. For more details of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see page 17-17 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Operation of the project began on October 11, 1970. The reservoir was empty on October 1, 1988. No storage occurred during FY 1989. Peak inflow was 625 c.f.s. and maximum outflow was 625 c.f.s. There was 37 acre-feet of sediment deposition during the year and the reservoir was empty on September 30, 1989. Sediment damages prevented during the FY were $4,100 totaling $123,000 through FY 1989. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in October 1970. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 8D. JEMEZ CANYON DAM, NM Location. The project is located in Sandoval County, NM, on the Jemez River about 2 miles upstream from the confluence of the Jemez River and the Rio Grande, about 5 miles northwest of Bernalillo, NM (See Geological Survey map for Bernalillo quadrangle, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam 780 feet long with maximum height of 135 feet above streambed, and off-channel uncontrolled saddle spillway 400 feet wide, and a 13-foot diameter gated outlet in the left abutment with discharge capacity of 8,340 cubic feet per second with a pool at spillway crest elevation. The dam was raised 14.1 feet and the spillway widened 28 feet in 1986 and 1987 to provide adequate discharge capability and freeboard allowance to accommodate the revised probable maximum flood. The reservoir has a capacity of 106,100 acre-feet (73,000 acre-feet for flood control and 33,100 acre-feet for sediment control). For more detailed description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see page 17-17 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. On October 1, 1988, the pool elevation was 5,194.77 feet with a corresponding storage of 26,753 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 5,198.88 feet with a storage of 32,465 acre-feet on May 10, 1989. On September 30 1989 the pool elevation was 5,191.88 feet with a corresponding storage of 23,086 acre-feet. The reservoir was regulated for sediment control during FY 1989. Sediment deposition during FY 1989 was 428 acre-feet. There were no flood damages prevented during FY 1989. Sediment benefits during FY 1989 were $47,900. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project through FY 1989 were $11,931,300. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in October 1953. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 8E. RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, NM Location. This project is one unit of the flood control phase of the comprehensive plan of improvement for the Rio Grande Basin in New Mexico. It is on the Rio Grande and covers a section of the river commencing near Truth or Consequences (formerly Hot Springs) at about river mile 123 and extends upstream to Espanola, NM, about river mile 394. (See table 32-D on Rio Grande Floodway.) Existing project. This project consists of flood protection and major drainage improvements by channel rectification, levee enlargement and construction, and bank stabilization work where needed to protect the levees. Construction of the project is a joint undertaking by the 32-6 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT Bureau of Reclamation and the Corps. Portions to be done by the Corps will consist of levee enlargement, construction, and bank protection work, with channelrectification and drainage-rehabilitation work being the responsibility of Bureau of Reclamation. Levees constructed by local interests exist throughout the reach of the river involved, but are not uniform as to grade, section, or standard of construction, and in many places are threatened by the meandering river. (See Table 32- D on existing project and Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. In addition to the usual requirements, local interests are responsible for all highway, bridge, and public utility relocations or replacements required in construction of the project. Local interests will also be required to comply with requirements of Section 221, 1970 Flood Control Act and PL 91-646 Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1970. Total costs for all requirements for the completed Albuquerque unit under terms of project authorization were $75,000. There were no non-Federal costs in connection with the construction of the Cochiti to Rio Puerco unit of floodway. The Espanola Valley unit is in the deferred category. Neither the city of Espanola nor Santa Clara Pueblo have given any indication that they plan any positive action to solve the flooding problem. For more details see page 17-8 of Annual Report for 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. There were no flood damages prevented by the completed floodway project during FY 1989. Estimated total accumulated flood damages prevented by the floodway project through FY 1989 amounted to $44,011,400. The peak flow of the Rio Grande through the middle valley was 3,770 c.f.s. at Albuquerque on April 22, 1989. The peak at San Acacia was 3,500 c.f.s. on April 29, 1989. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the Albuquerque unit of the Rio Grande Floodway project is complete. The General Design Memorandum for the Bernalillo to Belen unit was completed in June 1986. The San Acacia to Bosque del Apache unit was reclassified to the active category in July 1985. Construction was initiated on the Truth or Consequences Unit in fiscal year 1989. The Espanola Valley unit was reclassified to deferred category on 17 October 1973. 8F. TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES UNIT, NM Location. This project is located on Cuchillo Negro Creek in the vicinity of the city of Truth or Consequences, New Mexico. Proposed project. The project is authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1948 and 1950, modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, to provide that the Secretary is authorized to construct a flood control dam on Cuchillo Negro Creek, a tributary of the Rio Grande in lieu of the authorized floodway. The project will be constructed at an estimated total cost of $13,600,000 ($10,200,000 Federal and $3,400,000 Non- Federal) 1 October 1989 price levels. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. A contract for the construction of the dam was awarded on 22 September 1989. 9. SANTA ROSA DAM AND LAKE, NM Location. The project is located on a lake in Guadalupe County, on Pecos River, at river mile 766.4 approximately 7 miles north of Santa Rosa, NM (See U.S. Geological Survey map, Corazon, NM, sheet, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. Operation of the project began in November 1979. It consists of an earth and rock fill dam 1,950 feet long and 212 feet maximum height above the streambed. The purposes of the project are flood control, irrigation and sediment retention. An unlined, open rock cut about 1,000 feet back from the left abutment serves as an uncontrolled spillway. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consists of a control tower, intake structure with gates, and a 10-foot diameter concrete lined tunnel with a terminal flip bucket energy dissipator. Storage capacity at the spillway crest is 447,100 acre-feet which includes 80,100 acre-feet sediment reserve, 200,000 acrefeet irrigation and 167,000 acre-feet flood control storage. The surface area of the reservoir at the spillway crest is 10,685 acres. The contributing drainage area at the dam site is 2,434 square miles. For a more detailed report of the authorized project including the modification to existing Summer Lake see page 17-8 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. For authorizing legislation see page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperation. In addition to first costs, operation and maintenance of both reservoirs is the responsibility of the Federal Government; however, the Carlsbad Irrigation District is required to contribute to operation and maintenance costs an equal amount to what they now pay toward Sumner Lake. The Carlsbad 32-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Irrigation District also agreed to use Sumner Lake for flood control. Because they realize equivalent benefits from storage capacity in Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, they will continue to fulfill their repayment obligation. The New Mexico Division of Parks manages the recreation facilities. Activities include camping, picnicking, boating and hiking. For more requirements and details on final approval in 1974 for transfer of irrigation storage from Sumner Lake to Santa Rosa Dam and Lake (formerly Los Esteros Lake) see page 17-5 of Annual Report for 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was completed in late 1979 and reservoir operation for irrigation was started in March 1980. Pool elevation at the start of the fiscal year was 4,738.25 feet with storage of 78,884 acre-feet. Total releases for the fiscal year were 85,823 acre-feet. Pool elevation on September 30, 1989 was 4,711.99 acre-feet with a storage of 22,920 acre-feet. The maximum elevation was 4,740.87 feet with a storage of 87,396 acre-feet on April 8, 1989. There was 270 acre-feet of sediment deposition during the fiscal year. $6,500 in flood damages were presented in FY 1989. Sediment damages prevented during the fiscal year were $30,200. Releases attributed to irrigation benefits were 78,515 acre-feet. Irrigation benefits for the fiscal year were $274,800 with an accumulative total of $1,594,900 through FY 1989. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract for the recreation area was awarded in September 1979 and completed in October 1980. Design studies for spillway modification were initiated in FY 1979 and construction was completed in FY 1982. 10. TRINIDAD LAKE, CO Location. This project is located on the Purgatoire River about 161 miles above its junction with the Arkansas River. The Project is about 4 miles upstream from the city of Trinidad, CO. (See Geological Survey map, Trinidad, CO, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The project consists of an earthfill dam 6,610 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled spillway 1,000 feet wide in the left abutment, and a 10-foot diameter, gatecontrolled conduit in the right abutment with discharge capacity of 5,870 c.f.s. with a water surface at top of the flood control pool. In 1985, a 3-foot high parapet wall on top of the upstream face of the dam and a supplemental 700-foot wide rock cut emergency spillway located on the right abutment were constructed to provide adequate discharge capability and freeboard allowance to accommodate the revised probable maximum flood. The reservoir provides for storage of 60,000 acrefeet for flood control, 39,000 acre-feet for sediment, 20,000 acre-feet irrigation, and 4,500 acre-feet for recreation, a total of 123,500 acre-feet. The reservoir controls a drainage area of 671 square miles and is operated for flood and sediment control, irrigation, and recreation purposes. For authorizing legislation see page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation received from City of Trinidad and Purgatoire River Water Conservancy District were formally accepted May 11, 1967, after execution of irrigation repayment contract. For complete details of requirements and costs pertaining to the execution of the irrigation repayment contract and the addition of permanent storage for recreation facilities see page 17-9 of fiscal year 1980 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. The reservoir was operated for flood control and irrigation releases during the fiscal year. On October 1, 1988 the pool elevation was 6,173.73 feet with a corresponding storage of 17,751 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 6,185.91 feet with a corresponding storage of 26,041 acre-feet on April 17, 1989. On September 30, 1989 the pool elevation was 6,147.35 feet with a corresponding storage of 5,753 acre-feet. Sediment deposition during FY 1989 was 194 acre-feet. Sediment damages prevented during FY 1989 was $46,200. Accrued sediment benefits are $2,109,900. Irrigation benefits for FY 1989 were $90,100. Accrued irrigation benefits through FY 1989 were $1,316,800. Irrigation releases for the year were 22,933 acre-feet. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in 1977. The recreation facilities were completed in 1980. The Dam Safety Assurance Contract was awarded in September 1982 and was completed in 1Vay rrujc ILeatures are in guuuoo couiiiu iLuIu a in operation. 11. TWO RIVERS DAM, NM Location. The project is located about 14 miles southwest of Roswell, NM on the Rio Hondo and the Rocky Arroyo. The Rio Hondo is formed at the confluence of the Rio Ruidoso and the Rio Bonito, near the village of Hondo, NM, in the foothills region of Sierra Blanca in the southeastern part of Lincoln County, NM, and flows generally easterly to its confluence with the Pecos River near Roswell, NM (See Geological Survey map, Hondo Reservoir quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) 32-8 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT Existing project. The Diamond "A" Dam is an earthfill structure, 4,885 feet long and 98 feet high, with a gated outlet. The Rocky Dam is an earthfill structure 2,940 feet long and 118 feet high with an uncontrolled outlet. No provision is made for water storage except for flood control. Flood releases will be controlled so that flows through Roswell will not exceed the Rio Hondo channel capacity which is about 1,000 c.f.s. The capacity of the Two Rivers Reservoir at its spillway crest is 168,000 acre-feet, of which 18,000 acre-feet are provided for sediment reserve. Together these dams regulate runoff from 1,027 square miles of drainage area. For details of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17-18 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of 1938 applies and compliance is satisfactory. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine maintenance and operation continued. The reservoir was empty on October 1, 1988. There were $215,000 flood damages prevented during 1989. Sediment damages prevented were $28,200. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented through FY 1989 were $7,997,800. There were 252 acrefeet of sediment deposition during FY 1989. The accrued sediment benefits through FY 1989 are $920,900. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete and was placed in operation July 1963. The project features are in good condition and in operation. 12. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Included under this heading is inspection of completed flood control projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. The projects in Texas, Colorado, and New Mexico were inspected. Federal costs for fiscal year 1989 were $92,321. 13. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Pursuant to Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, five projects are operated by others for flood control. These projects are Platoro, Pueblo, Sumner, Navajo, and Brantley Dams. Platoro Dam on the Conejos River above the town of Platoro, Conejos County, CO controls runoff from 40 square miles of high mountain area. The authorized purposes are irrigation storage and flood control. Total storage is 60,000 acre-feet with the top 6,000 acre-feet for flood control. The 54,000 acre-feet is joint use storage with flood control on a forecast basis during spring runoff. Platoro Dam was authorized by the Interior Appropriation Act of 1941. (see H Doc 693, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess.) Construction of this project was completed by the Bureau of Reclamation in 1952. On October 1, 1988 storage in Platoro Reservoir was 29,182 acre-feet at elevation 9,997.4 feet. Maximum storage of 33,913 acre-feet at elevation 10,004.05 feet occurred on May 9, 1989. On September 30, 1989, storage was 19,430 acre-feet at elevation 9,991.94 feet. Peak flow at Mogote gage was 1,470 c.f.s. on May 30, 1989. There were no flood damages prevented by the project during FY 1989. Total flood damages prevented to date are at $4,507,500. Total cost for activity, by the Corps of Engineers during FY 1989 was $13,549. Pueblo Dam is part of the Fryingpan-Arkansas project which was authorized under Public Law 87-590, 87th Congress, HR 2206 on August 16, 1962. The project was completed in August 1975. Pueblo is operated by the Bureau of Reclamation and is located at river mile 1,293.7 on the Arkansas River in Pueblo County, Colorado. Pueblo Reservoir has 27,000 acre-feet exclusive flood space and 66,000 acre-feet joint use space. Operation of Pueblo Reservoir began on February 10, 1974. Storage on October 1, 1988 was 150,685 acre-feet, elevation 4,851.21 feet. Maximum storage during the year was 203,429 acre-feet at elevation 4,866.14 feet on April 5, 1989. Storage on September 30, 1989 was 113,489 acrefeet at elevation 4,838.55 feet. There were no flood damages prevented in FY 1989. Total cost for FY 1989 activity, by the Corps of Engineers, was $13,281. Total flood damages prevented to date are $2,852,100. Sumner Dam is located on the Pecos River at river mile 710.8 in DeBaca County, New Mexico. Sumner Dam was authorized as Alamogordo Dam by the Secretary of the Interior under a Finding of Feasibility approved by the President of the USA on 6 November 1935, under the Federal Reclamation laws. The original project was completed in 1937. Modification work of raising the dam 16 feet, adding a spillway and limiting the service spillway floor to 56,000 c.f.s. was completed in 1957. A twentyfour inch bypass line was installed in 1977 to pass flows less than 100 c.f.s. Storage on October 1, 1988 was 19,168 acre-feet at elevation 4,248.7 feet. Maximum storage for FY 1989 was 34,600 acre-feet at elevation 4,255.0 feet on March 14, 1989. Storage on September 30, 1989 was 15,981 acre-feet at elevation 4,243.3 feet. Total cost for FY 1989 activity, by the Corps of Engineers, was $12,124. 32-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Navajo Dam and Reservoir is located on the San Juan River at river mile 298.6 in San Juan County, New Mexico. Navajo Dam was authorized as part of a Colorado River Storage Project by an act of 84th Congress, 11 April 1956 (PL 485). The Bureau of Reclamation constructed and is responsible for operation of the project. Construction was initiated in June 1958 and the project was completed and placed in operation in March 1963. Storage on October 1, 1988 was 1,214,973 acre-feet, elevation 6,049.40 feet. Maximum storage for FY 1989 was 1,406,160 acre-feet, elevation 6,064.81 feet on June 20, 1988. Storage on 30 September 1989 was 1,309,989 acre-feet, elevation 6,057.30 feet. Total Corps of Engineers cost for FY 1989 activity was $13,646. Brantley Dam on the Pecos River above the town of Carlsbad in Eddy County, NM controls runoff from 13,208 square miles of uncontrolled area. The authorized purposes are irrigation, flood control, Fish and Wildlife and Recreation and for the elimination of the hazards of failure of the McMillan and the Avalon Dams. The total storage is 348,544 acre-feet with 189,000 acre-feet for flood control. The Brantley Dam was authorized for construction on 20 October 1972 by Public Law 92-514 with the cost ceiling raised for the project in October 1980 by Public Law 96-375. On September 6, 1988 the conduits were closed and Brantley Dam started its initial filling. On September 30, 1989, the storage was 10,086 acre-feet at elevation 3,238.9 feet. 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 32-E. 15. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Costs during FY 1989 were: Tellbrook Arroyo, Dona Ana County, NM $7,950; Willow Creek Floodway, Creede, CO $38,291; Zuni River at Zuni, NM $41,257 and Templeton Gap Floodway, Colorado Springs, CO $4,850. Emergency flood control activities; repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Federal costs for fiscal year 1989 were $169,599 for advance preparation, none for flood emergency operations, and there were no repair and restoration costs. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flodd Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Federal costs during FY 1989 were: San Vicente Arroyo, Silver City, NM $12,929; Pinon Bridge, Fountain Creek, CO $162,235; Stratmoor Hills, CO $94,718; Alameda Street, Santa Fe, NM $18,356; Willow Creek (Sewage Lagoons) Creede, CO $5,865; Pueblo State Rec Area, Pueblo, CO $2,250; Hampton Arroyo at SH550, Aztec, NM $9,607 and Dona Ana Drain, Dona Ana County, NM $9,668. Snagging and Clearing for Flood Control (Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, 83rd Cong.) Costs during FY 1989 were: Gallinas River, City of Las Vegas, NM $6,489. General Investigations 16. SURVEYS Costs for the fiscal year were $839,234 for flood damage prevention studies, $67,733 for special studies (coordination studies with other agencies), and $576 for preauthorization studies. 17. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $154,546 for flood plain management and technical services. Hydrologic studies involving collection and study of basic dtLG, such as stream flow ata coLllecV#tion of suspndeLJ d sediment samples, recording rain gage data, special study for Pikes Peak flood warning systems, hydrometeorological studies, and sedimentation studies continued. Costs during the fiscal year were $31,873. 18. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING There was no cost associated with the Continuation of Planning and Engineering in FY 1989. 19. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 32-10 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT Advance Engineering and Design Costs for FY 1989 were $412,292 for the following flood Control Projects: Alamogordo, NM ($2,521); Rio Grande Bernalillo to Belen, NM ($49,099); Puerco River and Tribs, Gallup, TABLE 32-A COST AND FINA NM ($111); Rio Grande Floodway, San Acacia to Bosque del Apache, NM ($361,274) and Rio Grande Floodway TorC Unit, NM (-$713). N CIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sept. 30, 1989 1. Aceauias Irrigation New Work System, NM 2. Albuquerque Diversion Channels Project, NM (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) (Other Contributed Funds) 3. Conchas Lake, NM 4. El Paso, TX 5. Fountain Creek Pueblo, CO 6. John Martin Reservoir 7. Puerco River, Gallup, NM Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 301,000 277,737 1,678,000 479,263 23,263 2,000,000 1,142,950 3,678,0005 1,622,2135 17,569,450 17,569,450 518,356 518,356 854,644 854,644 13,821,4991 13,821,4991 941,000 905,216 3,538,000 3,743,565 679,322 725,985 910,800 886,032 598,000 1,729,000 715,687 792,511 300,000 2,878,000 256,135 1,072,391 955,000 1,085,222 1,501,300 976,245 1,081,879 1,346,719 249,000 249,000 25,000 25,000 275,000 268,826 903,300 15,059,794 942,571 15,034,744 3,206,000 63,550,294 3,056,377 62,354,482 3,032,000 4,673,143 6,210,000 5,998,669 15,555,3582 15,555,3582 2,010,500 19,134,522 2,176,195 19,119,472 2,792,000 396,592 3,042,0005" 640,5305.8 32-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sept. 30, 1989 8. Rio Grande Basin, NM 8A. Abiquiu Dam, NM I 8B. Cochiti Lake, NM I r New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 26,745,028 14,318 26,745,028 1,958,000 3,925,122 1,564,400 2,032,253 3,682,277 1,788,361 3,864,200 22,628,528 3,974,747 22,623,301 97,084,559 97,084,559 1,010,000 1,217,022 1,192,200 996,402 1,208,537 1,049,950 1,266,200 13,399,122 1,454,062 13,397,164 8C. Galisteo Dam, NM 8D. Jemez Canyon Dam, NM 8E. Rio Grande Floodway 8F. Rio Grande Floodway T or C Unit, NM 9. Santa Rosa Dam & Lake, NM 10. Trinidad Lake, CO New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 88,000 97,215 1,457,000 1,457,797 198,000 201,545 367,000 276,605 20,833 491,000 489,720 20,746 459,000 425,597 141,000 135,193 610,000 601,864 233,000 195,877 254,000 366,766 5,621 621,000 627,678 23,344 441,000 485,188 136,900 140,391 9,339 267,500 310,108 393,000 386,718 23,277 601,400 615,688 175 476,100 475,952 211,600 215,037 371,800 370,477 3,422,000 772,829 -660 731,600 750,828 363,500 374,903 14,275,053 14,275,053 1,977,977 1,976,333 6,293,972 6,293,972 6,195,351 6,193,729 4,794,8683 4,794,8683 5,183,0004 2,512,6354' 41,041,562 41,039,056 5,106,200 5,106,020 55,774,758 55,774,758 5,144,100 5,141,942 32-12 ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sept. 30, 1989 11. Two Rivers Dam, NM New Work Approp. - - - - 4,847,244 Cost - - - - 4,847,244 Maint. Approp. 209,000 242,000 294,300 280,300 2,984,312 Cost 214,225 240,312 291,180 290,782 2,983,217 Includes $3,492,696 maintenance and improvement costs and of Reclamation under memorandum of agreement between that agency $869,978 for emergency relief, excludes $2,279,326, cost of initiating and the Corps. project under the authority of Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935 and $222,669, the cost for work performed with funds 4Starting in FY 1982, AE&D programs are funded through GI transferred to the Corps under Public Works acceleration Act of 1962. appropriations. 2Excludes $59,977 emergency relief funds for new work. Includes 5 Reflects PED funding appropriations beginning in FY 1986. $30,000 for Code 710. 6FY 1986 PED funds were appropriated to and expended by Los 3Includes funds for preconstruction planning of Espanola Valley Angeles District. unit. Excludes $1,000,011 appropriated funds transferred to Bureau TABLE 32-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act 1. Nov. 17, 1986 4. Oct. 27, 1965 5. Nov. 17, 1986 7. Nov. 17, 1986 Project and Work Authorized ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM An Irrigation System dating back to the eighteenth century with significant engineering works in the settlement and development of the western portion of the United States. Restoration and preservation of this system has cultural and historic values to the region. Measures are necessary to restore and protect the river division structures and associated canales. EL PASO, TX A single-purpose flood control system of detention dams, diversion dikes and channels to collect, regulate and discharge arroyo runoff in the Rio Grande. Consists of four independent units (NW Area, Central Area, and two units, Copper System and Bluff Channel of the SE Area.) FOUNTAIN CREEK, PUEBLO, CO Channel improvements and levee construction on both sides of Fountain Creek approximately 1 mile above the confluence of the Arkansas River and Fountain Creek. PUERCO RIVER, GALLUP, NM Channel rectifications, improvement of existing levees and construction of new levees on both sides of Rio Puerco in the city of Gallup, NM. Documents Public Law 662, 99th Cong. 2nd sess. (Sec. 1113) H. Doc. 207, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 662, 99th Cong. 2nd sess. Public Law 662, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. 32-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 32-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act 8. June 30, 1948 May 17,1950 July 14, 1960 November 17, 1986 8E. June 30, 1948 and May 17, 1950 8F. June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 November 17, 1986 IContains latest published maps. 32-14 -- Project and Work Authorized RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM Authorized to be appropriated $3,500,000 to be expended by the Dept. of the Army for partial accomplishment of approved general comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin in NM and Colorado. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $39,000,000 for Department of the Army for prosecution of comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin. Authorized Cochiti Dam on Rio Grande and Galisteo Dam on Galisteo Creek as additions to authorized comprehensive plan for Rio Grande Basin (Cochiti Dam was authorized in lieu of Low Chamita Dam of Chamita Reservoir Project on Rio Chama under "substitute plan"). Also authorized to be appropriated an additional $58,300,000 for Dept. of the Army for this addition to comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin. Authorized installation of the Abiquiu Dam Emergency Gates by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, NM Channel rectification, levee enlargement and construction, and bank stabilization on Rio Grande between river mile 123 and 394 (San Acacia to Bosque Del Apache Unit.) TRUTH OR CONSEQUENCES UNIT, NM Approved comprehensive plan for Rio Grande Basin is set forth in the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated April 15, 1948, for flood control of Rio Grande Basin. In addition to previous authorizations, the completion of the plan approved in the Flood Control Act of 1948, for the Rio Grande Basin, at an estimated cost of $39,000,000. Modify previous authorizations to provide that the Secretary is authorized to construct a flood control dam on Cuchillo Negro Creek in lieu of the authorized floodway. Documents H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong.,lst sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 94, 86th Cong. Public Law 662 99th Cong., 2nd sess. Cong., 1st sess.' and Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 662, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. (Sec 871) ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT TABLE 32-C RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 8 of Text) Miles Drainage Total Above Nearest Area (square Estimated Project River Mouth Town mile) Description Cost Abiquiu Dam Rio Chama 32 Espanola, 2,147 Earthfill 325 feet high, 30,397,096 NM 1,212,000 acre feet capacity Jemez Canyon Jemez 2 Bernalillo, 1,034 Earthfill 136 feet high, 106,100 4,217,206 Dam NM acre-feet capacity Rio Grande Rio Grande 123 - - Channel rectification, levee 25,744,000 Floodway to 3941 enlargement and construction Cochiti Lake Rio Grande 3401 Cochiti, NM 11,695 Earthfill 251 feet high, 596,300 96,900,000 acre-feet capacity Galisteo Dam Galisteo Creek 8 Waldo, NM 596 Earthfill 158 feet high, 89,000 14,340,280 acre-feet capacity River mile 0 is at intersection of New Mexico-Texas State Line with international boundary at El Paso, Texas. 2Does not include non-Federal costs. 3Includes $5,383,000 major rehabilitation, $138,900 for recreation facilities and $3,600,000 for emergency gates. TABLE 32-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Report For Construction Maintenance Alamogordo Diversion Channel, Tularosa (closed) Basin, New Mexico 1966 189,356 Alpine, Texas3 1977 130,488 Cibolo Creek, Texas1 1983 829,500 Colorado Springs, Fountain cue Bouille River, Colorado (Templeton Gap Floodway) 1959 881,262 Creede, Willow Creek, Colorado (floodway)1 1952 219,789 Highway 12, Colorado1 1985 120,500 Holly, Colorado' 1985 2,021,400 Las Animas, Colorado2 1980 4,956,000 Las Cruces, New Mexico2 1980 4,815,236 Pecos, Texas3 1977 480,273 Pinon Canyon Dam, Trinidad, Colorado (Sec.212)1 130,678 Pueblo, Arkansas River, Colorado (floodway levee extension)' 1954 201,958 Santa Fe River and Arroyo Mascaras, New Mexico3 1983 1,123,900 Smith Creek, Colorado' 1985 219,000 Socorro Diversion Channel, Tributaries of Rio Grande, New Mexico1 1965 2,259,328 ICompleted. hResponsibility of local interests. Inactive. 'Deferred. 32-15 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT * This district (total area, about 230,000 square miles) comprises those drainage basins tributary to the Pacific Ocean that are in California between the Mexican boundary and Cape San Martin (about 265 miles north of entrance to Los Angeles Harbor); lower Colorado River drainage (below Lee Ferry, AZ), which is in southeastern California, southeastern Nevada, southwestern Utah, and all of Arizona, except the northeastern corner; that part of the Great Basin that is in southern Nevada and southeastern California; and the United States parts of those small drainage basins in southern Arizona that drain southward into Mexico. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Channel Islands Harbor, CA ........... 33-2 2. Oceanside Harbor, CA ................ 33-2 3. Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), CA .................. 33-2 4. San Diego Harbor, CA ............... 33-2 5. Santa Barbara Harbor, CA ............. 33-3 6. Ventura Harbor, CA ................. 33-3 7. Reconnaissance and condition surveys ..... 33-3 Flood Control 8. Alamo Lake, Bill Williams River, AZ ..... 33-3 9. Gila River Basin, AZ: ................ . 33-3 9A. Painted Rock Dam (Gila River), AZ . . .. 33-3 9B. Phoenix, AZ, and vicinity (including New River) ............. 33-3 9C. Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek, AZ ...................... 33-4 10. Los Angeles County drainage area, CA ......................... 33-4 11. Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, CA ........................ 33-5 12. Pine and Mathews Canyons Dams, Colorado River Basin, NV ............ 33-5 13. San Luis Rey River, San Luis Rey River Basin, CA .................... 33-5 14. Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA........................ 33-5 15. Sweetwater River, Sweetwater River Basin, CA ........................ 33-5 16. Telegraph Canyon Creek, Chula Vista, CA........................ 33-6 17. Whitewater River, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, CA ............... 33-6 18. Inspection of completed flood control projects .......................... 33-6 19. Scheduling flood control reservoir operations ....... .................... 33-6 Flood Control (Cont'd) Page 20. Flood control work under special authorization ...................... 33-6 General Investigations 21. Surveys ......................... 33-7 22. Collection and study of basic data ..... 33-7 23. Research and development ........... 33-7 24. Preconstruction engineering and design: .. 33-7 24A. Little Colorado River at Holbrook, CA... 33-7 24B. Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), CA .................... 33-7 24C. Rillito River in the vicinity of Tucson, Gila River and tributaries, AZ ......... 33-7 24D. Santa Ana River mainstem, including Santiago Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, CA Tables Table 33-A Table 33-B Table 33-C Table 33-D Table 33-E Table Table Table 33-F 33-G 33-H Table 33-I Table 33-J ...................... 33-7 Page Cost and financial statement .............. 33-9 Authorizing legislation .............. . 33-13 Other authorized navigation projects ........ 33-17 Other authorized beach erosion control projects ..... .33-19 Other authorized flood control projects .......... 33-20 Not applicable Deauthorized projects ...... 33-22 Reconnaissance and condition surveys .......... 33-23 Inspection of completed flood control projects........... 33-23 Flood control work under special authorization ....... 33-24 33-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 89 Navigation 1. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA Location. On coast of southern California about a mile northwest of existing harbor of Port Hueneme, 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor, and 345 miles south of San Francisco. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 5007 and 5202.) Existing project. For details, see page 33-2 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two thousand and six hundred boat slips in 9 marinas, with restroom and shower facilities; dry storage area for 300 boats with 3-ton and 1-ton hoist facilities; 2 marine construction and repair yards with 5-ton travel lift and 35-ton hoist to 70-ton boatway haulout capacities; a fuel dock facility; a sport-fishing complex; 6 restaurants; 2 coffee shops; 800 waterfront apartments-many with adjoining slips; 300 motel units; 4 yacht club buildings; 3 public convenience docks; a 66-slip guest boat complex; a harbor administration building/harbor patrol office and dock complex; a marine emporium complex, housing a chandlery store, a sail loft, a delicatessen, a fishing tackel shop, yacht sales, an underwater repair service, and an adjacent dock complex; a 7-lane free access public launch ramp, with paved pay parking for cars and trailers; a boaters' convenience center; a commercial fishing pier and hoist; 2 large public parks; a fire station; and a U.S. Coast Guard station. Waterway-connected and north of the harbor is Mandalay Bay, a private keys-type waterfront homes development with an area for about 500 homes and connected dockage for boats. Transition from harbor to Mandalay Bay is restricted by a 4-lane high-rise bridge with a clearance height of 29 feet at high tide. Operations during fiscal year. Completed contract payment for maintenance dredging of sand trap and entrance channel at a cost of $2,789,640 regular funds and $713,405 Navy funds. 2. OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA Location. On coast of southern California at Oceanside, about 30 miles north of City of San Diego. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5101.) Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for maintenance to date. Terminal facilities. Berthing for 957 boats (783 single-tie slips, 38 double-tie slips, and 136 side-ties, of which 54 are visitors slips); 12 dry storage spaces at Oceanside Marine Center; a fuel dock; a boat hoist; a launching ramp, which can accommodate 4 launchings at the same time; parking for 1,732 cars, with temporary parking for about 141 boat trailers; a boat-repair facility; a pump-out facility; a Coast Guard cutter; restaurants; retail stores; yacht brokers; a boatel/motel; condominiums; and a sport-fishing facility. Operations during fiscal year. Completed contract payment for maintenance dredging at a cost of $40,575 regular funds. Completed second construction contract for experimental sand bypass system, pump facilities and power system, in June 1989 at a cost of $307,077 regular funds. 3. REDONDO BEACH HARBOR (KING HARBOR), CA Location. On coast of southern California in southern (downcoast) part of Santa Monica Bay about 18 miles northwest of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors and about 417 miles southeast of San Francisco Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 5101 and 5144). Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Consist of 3 boat basins containing 1,500 small boat slips; outer harbor containing 120 moorings; fuel docks; sewage pump-out station; 2 boat hoists; launching ramp for hand carried boats; boat repair facilities; marine hardware stores; sport-fishing pier, with facilities for the on- and off-loading of passengers from vessels for hire; and a commercial/recreational/fishing pier adjacent to the harbor facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Completed contract payment for maintenance repair of north breakwater at a cost of $200,435 regular funds. 4. SAN DIEGO HARBOR, CA Location. On coast of southern California just north of United States-Mexico boundary line, about 109 miles southeast of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5107.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1976 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1642 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1980. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on Page 33-5 of Annual Report for 1980. Terminal facilities. Consist of 45,070 feet of wharves, exclusive of Government-owned wharves, of which 21,070 feet are Port District owned and 24,000 feet are privately owned. Government-owned wharves at North Island are restricted to military use only. Operations during fiscal year. Initiated and completed maintenance dredging in February 1989 at a cost of $598,528 regular funds. 33-2 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT 5. SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA Location. On coast of southern California 90 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor and 320 miles southeast of San Francisco Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5261.) Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1983. Local cooperation. See page 1015 of Annual Report for 1969 for items of local cooperation under 1962 authorized modification of existing project. Terminal facilities. A wharf 2,000 feet long; a pier 325 feet long in harbor for tie-up mooring for Coast Guard cutter; a landing float; an open mooring and slip anchorage for small craft; and a launching ramp for small craft. Operations during fiscal year. Completed maintenance dredging in September 1989 at a cost of $372,010 regular funds. 6. VENTURA HARBOR, CA Location. On coast of southern California about 65 miles northwest of the City of Los Angeles, about 70 miles northwest of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, and about 6 miles northwest of Channel Islands Harbor. Existing project. For details, see page 33-5 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two fuel docks; guest berthing docks; 3 boat-repair facilities, 1 full service with a 60-ton travelift, 1 full service with a 150-ton marine elevator, and 1 do-it-yourself boatyard with a 20-ton travelift; Fisherman's Pier, with 3 50-ton jib cranes for off-loading commercial fishing vessels; flake ice manufacturing and distribution system; 3 wholesale fish buying stations; a retail fish market and seafood restaurant; 1,800 boat slips; a mast up dry storage area for 112 trailerable boats; a 6-lane deluxe launch ramp; 2 yacht clubs; restaurants; cocktail lounges; sport-fishing facilities; harbor and offshore islands excursion boats; 3 yacht sales; marine communications sales and services; 3 marine chandleries; 2 public restroom buildings; a harbor administration building/harbor master's office; a headquarters/visitors center for Channel Islands National Park; marine related ancillary businesses, including a convenience grocery store, a marine bookstore, a dive shop, gift shops, and a jewelry store; and a 230-room resort and time-share hotel. Operations during fiscal year. Completed contract payment for maintenance dredging of entrance channel and sand trap at a cost of $544,486 regular funds. 7. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS See table 33-H. Flood Control 8. ALAMO LAKE, BILL WILLIAMS RIVER, AZ Location. About 70 miles southeast of Kingman, AZ, in a narrow gorge at river mile 39 on Bill Williams River, AZ, a tributary of Colorado River. Existing project. For details, see page 33-7 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Initiated preparation of water control manual. 9. GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ 9A. PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIVER), AZ Location. On Gila River (mile 126) about 20 miles downstream from Gila Bend, AZ, in Gila River Basin, which is a part of Colorado River Basin. Existing project. For details, see page 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. 9B. PHOENIX, AZ, AND VICINITY (INCLUDING NEW RIVER) Location. On Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, Dreamy Draw, New River, and Agua Fria River in and adjacent to metropolitan Phoenix, AZ. Existing project. Plan as modified by Division Engineer, South Pacific Division, in July 1977, provides for four dams and detention basins, one each on Dreamy Draw, Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, and New River; Arizona Canal diversion channel; channel improvements on Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, and New River; flowage easements along Skunk Creek and New and Agua Fria Rivers; flood plain management along Dreamy Draw, Cave Creek, Skunk Creek, and New River; and recreational facilities. Approved estimated (1989) first cost for modified project is $446,512,000 (full funding estimate and includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $254,009,000 Federal and $192,503,000 non-Federal. Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No. 3, General Design Memorandum- Phase I, Plan Formulation for New River and Phoenix City Streams, Arizona," prepared by Los Angeles District in March 1976. 33-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 89 Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Completed construction of Agua Fria River levees in April 1989. Continued construction of Arizona Canal diversion channel, reach 2B, 47th Drive to 29th Avenue, which is about 99 percent complete. Initiated construction of Arizona Canal diversion channel, reach 2C, 29th Avenue to Cave Creek, Cave Creek channel and sediment basin, and recreation, which is about 82 percent complete. Initiated construction of New River bank stabilization and channelization, which is about 77 percent complete. Completed preparation of plans and specifications for recreational facilities, Arizona Canal diversion channel, reach 1, Cactus Road to Skunk Creek. Completed preparation of plans and specifications for Arizona Canal diversion channel, reach 3, Cave Creek to Dreamy Draw; and awarded contract in July 1989. Continued preparation of plans and specifications for Arizona Canal division channel, reach 4, Dreamy Draw to Cudia City Wash. Administered rights-of-way acquisition continued by local interests. Costs for construction of channels were $20,583,596 regular funds, $476,155 required contributed funds, and $1,751,340 other contributed funds. Costs for construction of levees were $664,230 regular funds, $15,636 required contributed funds, and $33,858 other contributed funds. Costs for construction of bank stabilization were $3,438,502 regular funds and $80,947 required contributed funds. Costs for relocations were $135,354 regular funds and 450,000 other contributed funds. Cost for recreational facilities was $257,614 required contributed funds. 9C. WHITLOW RANCH DAM, QUEEN CREEK, AZ Location. On Queen Creek, AZ, a tributary of Gila River, about 10 miles west of Superior, AZ. Existing project. For details, see page 33-10 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintained dam in good operating condition; and administered real estate. 10. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA Location. Along Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers, Rio Hondo, and Ballona Creek, and tributaries thereof in Los Angeles County, CA. Previous project. For details, see pages 1768 to 1772 of Annual Report for 1941; page 1602 of Annual Report for 1942; and page 1535 of Annual Report for 1943. Existing project. Flood control improvements in four stream basins in Los Angeles County, CA, as follows: Los Angeles River Basin, San Gabriel River Basin, Rio Hondo Basin, and Ballona Creek Basin. Protection of about 325,000 acres in densely populated Los Angeles County, including areas in Los Angeles, Pasadena, Glendale, Burbank, and other cities. Five flood control dams (Hansen, Lopez, Santa Fe, Sepulveda, and Whittier Narrows); debris basins at mouths of 22 canyons; channel improvements along 101.3 miles of Los Angeles River, San Gabriel River, Rio Hondo, and Ballona Creek; and channel improvements along 192.89 miles of tributary channels. For details on units, see Annual Report for 1962. For other pertinent information, see table 33-G, "Deauthorized Projects." A rehabilitation plan was approved in May 1984. Deteriorated portions of the Los Angeles River channel along a 23.5-mile reach from Lankershim Boulevard to Stewart and Gray Road were restored; and the Los Angeles River channel along a 1-mile reach upstream from Sepulveda Dam in the vicinity of Balboa Boulevard was repaired and improved. Federal first cost for rehabilitation was $33,780,311. A map of the rehabilitation plan is in "General Design Memorandum, Los Angeles River Rehabilitation under the Major Rehabilitation Program," dated January 1984 and revised in March 1984. Removal and sale of dredged material from Hansen flood control basin for purposes of facilitating flood control, recreation, and water conservation were authorized as a modification of existing project in 1986. Maintenance dreding at mouth of the Los Angeles River for the purpose of maintaining the flood control basin and navigation safety was authorized as a further modification of existing project in 1988. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-11 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Operations for units in Los Angeles River Basin: (a) Compton Creek: Maintained channel in good operating condition from Alameda Street to Hooper Avenue storm drain. (b) Haines Canyon: Maintained debris basin and channel upstream from Plainview Avenue in good operating condition and administered real estate. (c) Hansen Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Continued preparation of water control manual. (d) Lopez Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (e) Los Angeles River channel, Lankershim Boulevard to Stewart and Gray Road: Administered real estate. Completed construction of twelfth rehabilitation contract, main channel invert overlay (Dayton Ave. to Soto St.), in December 1988. Initiated and completed construction of thirteenth rehabilitation contract, expansion joints (Los Feliz to Soto St.), in March 1989. Cost for construction of channels was $3,040,646 regular funds. (f) Sepulveda Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Operations for units in San Gabriel River Basin: (a) Santa Fe Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administr'ed real estate. Continued preparation of water control manual. (b) San Gabriel River channel, San Gabriel Canyon to Santa Fe Dam, Approach channel to Santa Fe Dam (remedial work): Maintained channel in good operating condition. (c) Whittier Narrows Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. 33-4 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT Operations for unit in Rio Hondo Basin: Alhambra Wash: Maintained channel upstream from Valley Boulevard in good operating condition. Operations for unit in Ballona Creek Basin: Ballona Creek channel and jetties: Maintained channel downstream from Washington Boulevard to La Salle Avenue and downstream from Los Angeles city boundary to ocean; jetties; and Pacific Avenue bridge in good operating condition. 11. MOJAVE RIVER DAM, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CA Location. On Mojave River at the Forks site, just downstream from mouth of Deep Creek and about 14 miles upstream from Victorville, in Mojave River Basin, CA. Existing project. For details, see page 33-8 of Annual Report for 1983. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-13 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. 12. PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS DAMS, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, NV Location. In Lincoln County, NV, about 100 miles north of Hoover Dam and about 17 and 20 miles, respectively, east of Caliente, NV. Existing project. For details, see page 33-13 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintained dams in good operating condition and administered real estate. 13. SAN LUIS REY RIVER, SAN LUIS REY RIVER BASIN, CA Location. Lower San Luis Rey River Valley along San Luis Rey River from Murray Road (river mile 7.2) to Pacific Ocean, San Diego County, CA. Existing project. Plan as modified provides for about 5.4 miles of double levee; stone-protected channel with soft bottom invert; 1,300 feet of parapet walls; and 6 interior drainage ponds. Plan also provides for recreation features. Approved estimated (1989) first cost for project is $44,100,000 (includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $33,000,000 Federal and $11,100,000 non-Federal. Map of modified plan is in "Supplement to the Phase II General Design Memorandum for the San Luis Rey River Flood Control Project (Murray Road to Pacific Ocean), Encompassing Pilgrim Creek to Pacific Ocean, San Diego County, California," prepared by the Los Angeles District in December 1987 and approved in March 1988. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-7 of Annual Report for 1987. Operations during fiscal year. Completed first construction contract, Pacific Ocean to Priory Road, in May 1989. Costs for levees were $4,577,108 regular funds, $128,762 required contributed funds, and -$7,090 other contributed funds. Cost for relocations was $84,286 other contributed funds. 14. SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CA Location. On Santa Ana River and tributaries and on other streams in Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, CA. General plan of improvement. For details, see page 33-14 of Annual Report for 1981. Existing project. For details on units, see Annual Report for 1968. For other pertinent information, see table 33-G, "Deauthorized Projects." Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. (a) Brea Dam: Continued preparation of water control manual. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (b) Carbon Canyon Dam and channel: Initiated preparation of water control manual. Maintained project in good operating condition and administered real estate. (c) Fullerton Dam: Completed preparation of water control manual. Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. (d) Prado Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Continued preparation of water control manual. (e) San Antonio Dam: Maintained dam in good operating condition and administered real estate. Continued preparation of water control manual. (f) San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel: Maintained project in good operating condition and administered real estate. 15. SWEETWATER RIVER, SWEETWATER RIVER BASIN, CA Location. Lower Sweetwater River Valley, along Sweetwater River from Interstate Freeway 805 to San Diego Bay, San Diego County, CA. Existing project. Plan as modified provides for about 3.2 miles of improved trapezoidal channel along Sweetwater River from Interstate Freeway 805 to San Diego Bay as part of a combined flood control and highway project; recreation features; and mitigation measures. Approved estimated (1989) first cost for project is $53,440,000 (includes allowance for estimated inflation through construction period), comprising $29,800,000 Federal and $23,640,000 non-Federal. Map of modified plan is in "General Design Memorandum No. 1 for Sweetwater River Flood Control Channel, San Diego County, California," 33-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 89 prepared by Los Angeles District in March 1982 and revised in May 1984. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-16 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Completed stage 3 construction in June 1989. California State Department of Transportation awarded contract for and initiated creation of marshland, which is about 15 percent complete. Initiated preparation of plans and specifications for channel excavation west of Interstate 5. 16. TELEGRAPH CANYON CREEK, CHULA VISTA, CA Location. In and near the City of Chula Vista, San Diego County, CA. Existing project. A 0.5-mile-long rectangular concrete channel from about 550 feet upstream from 4th Avenue to 450 feet upstream from Broadway Boulevard; two boxes varying from 10 to 12 feet wide and 10 to 13 feet high, totaling 0.4 mile in length, that would connect the rectangular concrete channel to existing 0.2-mile-long culvert, which is incorporated into project; a 0.3-mile-long trapezoidal concrete channel downstream from Interstate 5; a 0.1-mile-long trapezoidal earth-bottom channel leading into San Diego Bay; and beautification. Approved estimated (1989) first cost for project is $9,618,000 ($5,000,000 Federal and $4,618,000 non-Federal). Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-9 of Annual Report for 1985. Operations during fiscal year. Completed construction in July 1989 at a cost of $816,090 regular funds and $2,624,155 required contributed funds. 17. WHITEWATER RIVER, SAN BERNARDINO AND RIVERSIDE COUNTIES, CA Location. In San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, CA, from the City of Banning to the Salton Sea, and about 100 miles from the City of Los Angeles, CA. Existing project. Plan provides for an eventreporting network of remote precipitation and stream gauges in the upstream watersheds, consisting of 19 rain gauges,; 3 combination rain and snow gauges; 3 rain, snow, and temperature gauges; 13 stream and rain gauges; 4 repeaters; and 1 weather station. Latest approved estimated (1986) first cost for project is $300,000 ($225,000 Federal and $75,000 non-Federal). Local cooperation. Provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; maintain and operate works after completion; and develop, maintain, and implement emergency evacuation plans. Operations during fiscal year. Continued preparation of project plan, which is about 99 percent complete. 18. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection costs for fiscal year from regular funds for maintenance were $623,697. (See table 33-I on inspection of completed flood control projects.) 19. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, studies of reservoir operations for flood control were conducted; and preparation of regulations for the use of storage allocated for flood control was continued for the following Bureau of Reclamation projects: Hoover Dam and Twitchell Dam. Costs for fiscal year from regular funds for maintenance were $56,429. 20. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended (preauthorization) See table 33-J on flood control work under special authorization. Emergency bank protection (sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Federal cost for fiscal year was $225,309 for Gila River, Pima Bridge, Safford, Graham County, AZ; $39,428 for Walnut Canyon, Anaheim, Orange County, CA; $16,196 for Arroyo Conejo Creek, Camarillo, Ventura County, CA; and $7,661 for Chino Canyon, Palm Springs, and $1,161 for Heacock Channel, Sunnymead, both in Riverside County, CA. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation) Federal cost for fiscal year was $520,591, of which $455,429 were for advance preparation and $65,162 were for rehabilitation. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (sec. 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Cong.) Federal cost for fiscal year was $4,351 for McDonald Canyon, Ventura County, CA. Flood insurance activities (sections 1301-1377, 1968 Housing and Urban Development Act, Public Law 90-448, as amended) 33-6 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT In coordination with flood control activities, flood insurance studies were continued in accordance with Inter-Agency Agreements at fiscal year cost of $6,118 under Housing and Urban Development reimbursable order. General Investigations 21. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $5,743,404 regular funds, of which $1,154,673 were for navigation studies; $23,313 were for beach erosion control studies; $2,790,977 were for flood control studies; $1,218,537 were for surveys; $131,493 were for special studies involving coordination with other agencies; $250,638 were for review of authorized projects; $173,409 were for miscellaneous activities; and $364 were for supplemental preauthorization studies, phase I. 22. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year costs were $250,064 for technical services, including $13,792 for Sierra Vista, Coches County, AZ; $5,295 for Las Vegas Wash, Clark County, NV; and $213 for Kershaw Ryan State Park, Lincoln County, NV; and $45,320 for flood plain management. 23. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Fiscal year costs were $2,816 for hydrologic studies; and $3,995 for coastal data collection. 24. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 24A. LITTLE COLORADO RIVER AT HOLBROOK, AZ Holbrook, Navajo County, AZ, is along the Little Colorado River about 150 miles northeast of Phoenix, AZ. Project was authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, dated November 17, 1986. Plan of improvement provides for raising and extending existing levee along the north bank of the Little Colorado River at Holbrook; and adding a south bank levee, a low flow channel, recreational facilities, and mitigation features. Continued preparation of project plan during fiscal year. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is 1,967,000. Total costs during fiscal year were $645,259. 24B. REDONDO BEACH HARBOR (KING HARBOR), CA Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor) is a small-craft harbor at the southern end of Santa Monica Bay in the City of Redondo Beach, Los Angeles County, CA, which is about 17 miles southwest of the business center of the City of Los Angeles, CA. Project modification was authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, dated Nobember 17, 1986; and further modification was authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1988, Public Law 100-676, dated November 17, 1988. Plan of improvement to modify existing project provides for raising 1,300 feet at the south end of the north breakwater to 20 feet, raising 150 feet at the shoreward end of the south breakwater to 16 feet, and extending the seaward end of the south breakwater 150 feet. Continued preparation of project plan during fiscal year. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $785,000. Total costs during fiscal year were $576,083. 24C. RILLITO RIVER IN THE VICINITY OF TUCSON, GILA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AZ Rillito River and associated streams are in the north and east parts of the Tucson metropolitan area, Pima County, AZ. Project was authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, dated November 17, 1986. Plan of improvement provides for bank stabilization and grade control structures to prevent degradation; landscaping; and recreational features. Continued preparation of project plan during fiscal year. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $1,900,000. Total costs during fiscal year were $340,880. 24D. SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, INCLUDING SANTIAGO CREEK, SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA Santa Ana River mainstem, including Santiago Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, CA, is on Santa Ana River and tributaries and on other streams in Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, CA. Project was authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, dated November 17, 1986; and Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1988, Public Law 100-202, dated December 22, 1987. Plan of improvement provides for construction of Seven Oaks Dam in the San Bernardino Mountains north of Redlands, San Bernardino County; management of flood plain between Seven Oaks Dam and Prado Reservoir; raising Mill Creek levee near Redlands; improvement of Oak Street Drain in Corona, Riverside County; enlargement of existing Prado Dam 33-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 89 and reservoir, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties; improvement of lower Santa Ana River channel from Prado Dam to Pacific Ocean; improvement of lower reach of Santiago Creek channel in Orange County; and improvement of San Timoteo Creek channel from mouth of San Timoteo Canyon to Santa Ana River; recreational development along project length; purchase of 8 acres of salt marsh for mitigation of project effects; and purchase of 84 acres of wetlands at mouth of Santa Ana River for preservation of endangered least tern habitat. Completed preparation of project plan, phase II, during fiscal year. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $28,643,000. Total costs during fiscal year were $7,655,186. 33-8 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 1989 1. Channel Islands Harbor, CA 2. Oceanside Harbor, CA (Regular Funds) Other Contrib. Funds) 3. Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), CA 4. San Diego Harbor, CA (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 5. Santa Barbara Harbor, CA (Regular Funds) 6. Ventura Harbor, CA 8. Alamo Lake, Bill Williams River, AZ New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost - $5,123,345 1 - 5,123,345 1 $261,415 $3,203,174 273,870 3,198,140 $103,427 $3,053,480 79,131 3,085,944 27,850,802 2 27,847,504 2 5,019,575 2,518,915 1,940,549 1,137,731 19,844,809 3 5,192,340 2,301,884 1,619,552 1,392,867 19,406,954 3 - - - - 491,286 4 - - - - 491,286 4 - - - - 1,200,000 - - - - 1,187,500 - - - - 4,766,898 5 - - - - 4,766,898 5 326,000 184,273 143,000 2,535,000 -18,890 4,281,506 6 293,167 2,289,955 226,299 4,281,506 6 - 40 112,300 1,248,243 113,854 1,224,701 720,700 686,790 1,238 324,859 340,156 - 28,094,095 7 1 28,093,478 7 873,000 880,854 4,838,867 8 4,832,237 8 717,910 715,215 1,926,563 9 1,900,063 9 - - - 172,000 10 - - - 172,000 10 787,000 905,000 158,806 11,159,625 11 823,733 522,705 541,898 11,158,896 11 - - - - 1,711,539 12 - - - - 1,711,539 12 1,823,920 1,659,500 1,586,000 921,364 19,919,221 13 1,836,388 1,644,746 1,587,940 936,799 19,918,641 13 -56 697,000 684,246 581 777,000 741,897 - - 16,934,060 14 - - 16,934,060 14 664,000 750,312 7,317,111 679,831 754,272 7,262,192 33-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 89 TABLE 33-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 1989 9A. Gila River Basin, AZ, Painted Rock Dam (Gila River) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost - 19,980,564 15 - 19,980,564 15 651,000 616,553 805,000 725,000 681,019 10,396,167 803,109 732,669 717,117 10,362,754 9B. Gila River Basin, New Work: AZ, Phoenix, Approp. AZ, and vicinity Cost (including New River) (Regular Funds) (Required New Work: Contrib. Funds) Contrib. Cost (Other Contrib. New Work: Funds) Contrib. Cost 16,539,000 15,556,495 34,500,000 18,000,000 25,200,000 8,925,957 29,663,604 30,548,322 333,500 745,000 275,076 251,052 - 1,730,000 740,297 282,212 1,659,600 564,923 6,366,620 2,288,661 2,551,000 1,130,390 1,144,000 2,351,602 162,594,297 152,278,649 7,624,314 3,749,050 11,475,320 6,069,503 9C. Gila River Basin, AZ, Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek 10. Los Angeles County drainage area, CA (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 11. Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, CA (Regular Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Rehab.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 42,000 39,914 - -1,199 3,444,000 4,423,901 6,869,000 3,929,743 659 352,572 - - 161,187 241,091 -, 116,000 180,500 - - - 1,867,963 18 - - - 1,867,963 18 58,000 74,000 54,000 1,129,413 52,423 79,631 50,702 1,123,061 - 4,647 3,649,400 2,911,406 11,121,000 4,566,377 366 107,413 4,611,040 5,162,625 5,124,000 10,469,266 200,000 171,198 6,880,590 6,702,794 -78,000 3,539,763 320 - 377,226,885 17 18 20 377,194,526 17 19 21 70,765,050 17 22 70,120,822 17 23 34,556,000 33,780,311 13,933,341 24 13,891,552 25 - 516,000 28 - 459,985 27 - 36,644,865 28 - 36,639,888 28 - 300,000 179,800 1,148,994 29 116,365 224,700 255,376 1,117,851 30 - - - 17,838,198 - - - 17,838,198 134,000 151,000 183,000 3,612,548 115,710 113,743 206,282 3,579,629 - - - 286,300 - - - 284,501 33-10 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 1989 12. Pine and Mathews Canyons Dams, Colorado River Basin, NV 13. San Luis Rey River, San Luis Rey River Basin, CA (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 14. Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA (Regular Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) 15. Sweetwater River, Sweetwater River Basin, CA 16. Telegraph Canyon Creek, Chula Vista, CA (Regular Funds) Required Contrib. Funds) (Other Contrib. Funds) 17. Whitewater River, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, CA New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 105,000 108,416 301 436 1,886,600 1,982,194 4,132 - - - 1,401,248 - - - 1,401,248 107,000 56,000 105,000 1,372,356 106,915 57,637 98,228 1,364,705 250,000 2,800,000 4,653,000 9,142,000 223,717 609,990 6,284,196 8,556,178 2,211 1,728,000 1,670,993 -38,322 -38,322 67,555 130,000 78,000 1,589,000 1,506,188 100 6,242,000 6,919,000 600,000 6,295,436 4,164,487 2,215,062 68,000 64,073 128,762 77,196 130,000 128,762 78,000 77,196 - 47,994,738 31 32 33 47,994,738 31 32 33 1,940,061 29,414,471 31 34 35 2,034,762 29,287,446 31 34 35 - 3,065,000 38 - 3,065,000 38 - 75,000 37 - 67,655 38 - 20,885,503 -364,149 19,358,679 - 3,400,000 750,000 5,000,000 3,846 3,134,380 1,018,273 4,997,385 500,000 2,000,000 1,823,000 4,323,000 - 1,482,038 2,739,776 4,221,814 105,000 - - 105,000 104,941 10 3 104,954 150,000 250,000 90,893 50,038 400,000 140,931 1. Excludes $1,361,668 Navy funds; Coast Guard costs; and $210,748 other contributed funds. 2. Includes $55,194 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. Excludes $6,337,536 for maintenance accomplished with Navy funds. 3. Includes $76,268 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. Excludes $5,807,410 for maintenance accomplished with Navy funds. 33-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 89 TABLE 33-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 4. For jetty and groin extensions desired by local interests. 5. Excludes Coast Guard costs. 6. Includes $20,517 for reconnaissance and condition survey costs since FY 1958. 7. Includes $154,704 for new work for previous project; $86,352 public works funds; and $1,226,793 emergency relief funds. Excludes $254,795 Navy funds for dredging entrance channel in FY 1961 to depth of -42 feet mean lower low water (or 2 feet below project depth); and Coast Guard costs. 8. Includes $59,904 for maintenance for previous project and $221,831 for reconnaissance and condition surveys since FY 1958. In addition, includes $144 for retroactive pay increase shown in "cost" figure only, as reported in 1958 Annual Report, page 1430. Excludes $270,696 for maintenance accomplished with Navy funds. 9. Includes $4,441 for betterments desired by local interests prior to modification by 1986 River and Harbor Act. 10. Excludes Coast Guard costs. 11. Includes $29,198 public works funds; $11,000 working funds for work performed in addition to existing project; and $19,741 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. Excludes $462,986 other contributed funds spent by the Corps for maintenance-dredging betterments desired by local interests. 12. Excludes $1,708,836 required contributed funds and Coast Guard costs. 13. Includes $89,819 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. Excludes $10,000 other contributed funds. 14. Includes $57,000 Code 710 funds since FY 1975. 15. Includes $357,469 Code 710 funds since FY 1962. 16. Includes $3,758 Code 710 funds since FY 1962. 17. Includes $11,008,935 emergency relief funds for new work. Excludes $16,726,888 emergency relief funds spent by Corps in connection with emergency relief (previous) project and $107,939 for minor rehabilitation. 18. Includes $23,763,900 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($1,226,100 for Sepulveda Dam; $6,290,000 for Whittier Narrows Dam; $22,000 for LACDA prototype; $535,000 for Hansen Dam; $10,422,100 for Santa Fe Dam; $215,000 for Tujunga Wash channel; $8,500 for Lopez Dam; $3,562,200 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels; and $1,483,000 for Ballona Creek channel). 19. Includes $23,760,342 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($1,223,226 for Sepulveda Dam; $6,289,734 for Whittier Narrows Dam; $22,000 for LACDA prototype; $535,000 for Hansen Dam; $10,421,682 for Santa Fe Dam; $215,000 for Tujunga Wash channel; $8,500 for Lopez Dam; $3,562,200 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels; and $1,483,000 for Ballona Creek channel). 20. Includes $200,000 for Hansen Dam modification since FY 1989. 21. Includes $171,198 for Hansen Dam modification since FY 1989. 22. Includes $8,679,940 for recreational facilities since FY 1985 ($8,154,940 for Sepulveda Dam and $525,000 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels). 23. Includes $8,363,741 for recreational facilities since FY 1985 ($7,838,741 for Sepulveda Dam and $525,000 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels). 24. Includes $13,933,341 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($992,650 for Sepulveda Dam; $6,797,556 for Whittier Narrows Dam; $199,541 for Tujunga Wash channel; $460,500 for Hansen Dam; $2,824,056 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels; $1,467,538 for Santa Fe Dam; and $1,191,500 for Ballona Creek channel). 25. Includes $13,891,552 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($992,650 for Sepulveda Dam; $6,755,767 for Whittier Narrows Dam; $199,541 for Tujunga Wash channel; $460,500 for Hansen Dam; $2,824,056 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels; $1,467,538 for Santa Fe Dam; and $1,191,500 for Ballona Creek channel). 26. Includes $516,000 for recreational facilities since FY 1985 ($516,000 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels). 27. Includes $459,985 for recreational facilities since FY 1986 ($459,985 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels). 28. Non-Federal funds spent by the Federal Government to September 30, 1989, for replacements required as part of local cooperation and betterments desired by local interests. Excludes $4,238,000 other contributed funds spent by the Corps in connection with emergency relief (previous) project. 29. Includes $1,148,994 for recreational facilities since FY 1984 ($299,194 for Santa Fe Dam; $370,000 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels; and $479,800 for Sepulveda Dam). 30. Includes $1,117,851 for recreational facilities since FY 1984 ($299,194 for Santa Fe Dam; $338,857 for Los Angeles River and Rio Hondo channels; and $479,800 for Sepulveda Dam). 31. Comprises funds for Brea, Fullerton, Prado, and San Antontio Dams, Carbon Canyon Dam and channel, Lytle and Cajon Creek channel improvements, and San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel. 32. Includes $5,000 working funds for San Antonio Dam; $67,361 for San Juan Dam (deauthorized unit) (also reported under "Deauthorized Projects"); and $85,310 undistributed funds. Excludes other contributed funds spent by the Corps, as follows: $124,105 for water conservation betterments desired by local interests at Prado Dam; $8,500 for betterments desired by local interests at San Antonio Dam; $234,709 for betterments desired by local interests on San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel; and $601,762 for required items of local cooperation on Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements. Excludes $290,000 spent direct by local interests on San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel for local cooperation items not required. 33-12 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 33. Includes $5,920,831 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($1,058,731 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel; $1,264,300 for Fullerton Dam; and $3,597,800 for Prado Dam). 34. Includes $114,000 for recreational facilities since FY 1985 ($114,000 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel). 35. Excludes maintenance for Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements, which are operated and maintained by local interests. TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING 36. Includes $3,065,000 Code 710 funds since FY 1974 ($1,388,651 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel; $1,250,349 for Fullerton Dam; and $426,000 for Prado Dam). 37. Includes $75,000 for recreational facilities since FY 1985 ($75,000 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel). 38. Includes $67,655 for recreational facilities since FY 1986 ($67,555 for Carbon Canyon Dam and channel). LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. Sep. 3, 1954 2. Oct. 27, 1965 3. May 17, 1950 4. Mar. 3, 1875 Sep. 19, 1890 June 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 July 27, 1916 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA Harbor for light-draft vessels and shore protection works. OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA Maintenance of general navigation features of Del Mar Boat Basin and of Oceanside Harbor. REDONDO BEACH HARBOR (KING HARBOR), CA Reconstruction of part of original breakwater and construction of extension; construction of south breakwater; and maintenance of breakwaters. SAN DIEGO HARBOR, CA Diversion dike. Jetty on Zuniga Shoal. Dredge channel through outer bar 30 feet deep and 600 feet wide, and a channel through middle ground to 30 feet deep. Dredge channel through outer bar 570 feet wide and 35 feet deep, and a channel through middle ground 32 feet deep. Widen approach (area B) to San Diego municipal pier by dredging area C (north of area B). Dredging area A (south of area B). Dredge 35-foot channel through middle ground. Dredging areas D and E. Widen approach (area C) to San Diego municipal pier 1 by dredging a portion of area F (north of area C). H. Doc. 362, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 76, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 303, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1873; p. 1142 H. Ex. Doc. 177, 50th Cong., 1st sess. (Annual Report, 1888; p. 2114) H. Doc. 961, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1309, 62d Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 648, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 64th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1000, 66th Cong., 3d sess. River and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 68th 33-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 89 TABLE 33-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 1 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 17, 1940 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 13, 1968 5. Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 31, 1970 6. Aug. 13, 1968 8. Dec. 22, 1944 9A. May 17, 1950 Deepen to 40 feet channel through outer bar; along south and north banks, main channel; dredge turning basin, widen area H, and dredge a channel to National City and Chula Vista. Widen bay channel to 2,200 feet with depth of 35 feet from the vicinity of Whalers Bight in lower bay to navel air station opposite turning basin. Dredging areas Q, Q-1, M, N, and O. Dredge a seaplane basin (area S) of about 3,000 acres, 10 feet deep, and fill an area of about 110 acres adjacent to southern end of basin. Dredge triangular approaches to 26- and 35- foot anchorages, area M. Deepen and extend existing navigation channels, delete uncompleted parts, and extend maintenance. SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA Maintenance dredging present depths into harbor formed by breakwater constructed by local interests. Permits maintenance by means of a fixed sandintercepting plant to be provided and operated by and at expense of local interests. United States to contribute to operating expense an amount not to exceed $30,000 annually, whenever funds are allotted therefor; funds thus contributed to be reduced by actual cost of harbor maintenance if and when intercepting plant has been installed. Modification of existing project. Dredging and maintenance by United States. VENTURA HARBOR, CA Adoption and maintenance of existing general navigation features of harbor, excluding interior basins; construction of an offshore breakwater; dredging a sand trap in lee of breakwater; repairing existing north and middle jetties; and construction of recreational fishing facilities on jetty crests. ALAMO LAKE, BILL WILLIAMS RIVER, AZ Multiple-purpose dam and reservoir. PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIVER), GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ Dam and flood control basin. S. Doc. 81, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 223, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 89, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 844, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 390, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 365, 90th Cong., 2d sess. 2 S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 348, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 518, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 2 None H. Doc. 356, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 625, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 331, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 33-14 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 9B. Oct. 27, 1965 9C. July 24, 1946 10. June 22, 1936 May 15, 1937 June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 30, 1963 PHOENIX, AZ, AND VICINITY (INCLUDING NEW RIVER), GILA RIVER BASIN Detention basins, diversion channels, and channel improvements. WHITLOW RANCH DAM, QUEEN CREEK, GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ Dam and flood control basin. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control and related purposes at an estimated construction cost not to exceed $70 million. Added flood channels on Ballona Creek and tributaries to project. Provision of lands, easements, and rights-of-way and relocations by Federal Government instead of by local interests. (Resultant additional cost to the United States, $12,541,000.) Project extended to include additional flood control reservoirs, flood control channels, and debris basins for flood control and related purposes. Also authorized to be appropriated $25 million for further accomplishment of plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $25 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan approved in Flood Control Act of Aug. 18, 1941. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $25 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Rio Hondo channel improvement, Whittier Narrows Reservoir to Los Angeles River (in lieu of enlarging channel and bridges on San Gabriel River downstream from reservoir). Also authorized to be appropriated an additional $40 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $12,500,000 for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $44 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $32 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $3,700,000 for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $30 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. H. Doc. 216, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 220, 80th Cong., 1st sess. None None None H. Doc. 838, 76th Cong., 3d sess. None None None None None None None None 33-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 89 TABLE 33-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 18, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 11. July 14, 1960 12. May 17, 1950 13. Dec. 17, 1970 3 Nov. 17, 1986 14. June 22, 1936 June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 July 3, 1958 In addition to all previous authorizations, completion of improvements under the comprehensive plan for flood control in the Los Angeles River Basin at a presently estimated cost of $31 million for completion. Authorized modification of Hansen Dam by removing and selling dredged material to facilitate flood control, recreation, and water conservation. Authorized modification of Los Angeles River by dredging at mouth of river to maintain flood control basin and navigation safety. MOJAVE RIVER DAM, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CA Dam and reservoir, and an earthfill dike. PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS DAMS, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, NV Dams and flood control basins. SAN LUIS REY RIVER, SAN LUIS REY RIVER BASIN, CA Channel and levee, and beautification features. Authorized non-Federal project cost sharing at a minimum of 25 percent and a maximum of 50 percent. SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CA Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control and related purposes for protection of metropolitan area of Orange County, at an estimated construction cost not to exceed $13 million. San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel portion of improvement. Authorized to be appropriated $6,500,000 for initiation and partial accomplishment of plans for those creeks. Rescinded provisions of Flood Control Act of 1936, providing that local interests pay for relocations, lands, easements, and rights-of-way. (Estimated resultant additional cost to United States, $3,500,000). Authorized to be appropriated an additional $2,500,000 for prosecution of projects approved in above flood control acts. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $10 million for prosecution of projects adopted in above-mentioned flood control acts, including projects on Lytle and Cajon Creeks for local flood protection at San Bernardino and Colton, CA. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $8 million for prosecution of projects approved in above-mentioned flood control acts. None None None H. Doc. 164, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 530, 81st Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 91-106, 91st Cong., 2d sess. None None H. Doc. 688, 75th Cong., 3d sess. None H. Doc. 534, 78th Cong., 2d sess. 2 None 33-16 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 15. Aug. 13, 1968 16. Feb. 7, 1985 4 17. Nov. 17, 1986 5 SWEETWATER RIVER, SWEETWATER RIVER BASIN, CA Channel improvement, as part of a combined flood control and highway project. TELEGRAPH CANYON CREEK, CHULA VISTA, CA Channel improvements and beautification. WHITEWATER RIVER, SAN BERNARDINO AND RIVERSIDE COUNTIES, CA Flood warning system. H. Doc. 148, 90th Cong., 1st sess. None None 1. Included in the emergency relief program, May 28, 1935. 2. Contains latest published map. 3. Final date of approval by House and Senate Public Works Committees resolution under provisions of section 201, Public Law 89-298. TABLE 33-C OTHER AUTHORIZE 4. Date approved by Chief of Engineers under provisions of section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. 5. Date approved by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, under provisions of section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. D NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Dana Point Harbor, CA Harbor office at Morro Bay, CA Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, CA Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, San Pedro Bay, CA Marina del Rey, Los Angeles County, CA Morro Bay Harbor, CA Newport Bay Harbor, CA Port Hueneme, CA Port San Luis, CA Completed 3 Completed Completed Completed Inactive & Active (mod)3 Completed Completed & Active (mod) 1984 1988 1988 1988 1982 1988 1984 $4,737,550 1 64,710,518 4 4,238,752 6 2,612,093 8 796,897 10 2,051,422 12 1,457,929 14 $555,147 2 17,462,276 s 2,440,268 7 12,523,928 9 622,252 11 1,293,606 13 1,062,173 16 33-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 89 TABLE 33-C (Cont'd) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA Completed 1988 11,972,422 18 5,497,316 17 Sunset Harbor (Bolsa Chica Bay), CA 3- -- 1. Excludes $4,777,000 required contributed funds and Coast Guard costs. 2. Includes $59,187 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. 3. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986, subject to favorable report. 4. Includes $2,187,047 for new work for previous project; $1,593,667 public works funds; a credit of $33,050 for transfer land at Reservation Point; and $996,792 of emergency relief funds. Excludes Federal funds spent by the Navy for new work on middle breakwater; $1,219,655 required contributed funds; $37,104,234 other contributed funds, including $1,672,575 for new work betterments desired by local interests prior to 1976 modification; and Coast Guard costs. 5. Includes $139,347 for maintenance for previous project, and $205,479 for reconnaissance and condition survey costs since FY 1958. Excludes $87,120 for maintenance betterments desired by local interests prior to 1976 modification. 6. Excludes $4,238,752 required contributed funds; $1,843,146 other contributed funds; and Coast Guard costs. 7. Includes $105,526 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. Excludes $114,000 required contributed funds; and $75,109 other contributed funds. 8. Navy funds. Excludes $2,128,411 for rehabilitation. 9. Includes $431,926 for reconnaissance and condition surveys since FY 1958 and $307,945 Navy funds. Excludes $124,578 other contributed funds. 10. Public Works administration funds. Excludes $796,897 required contributed funds and $1,100 preauthorization costs. 11. Includes $168,329 for reconnaissance and condition survey costs since FY 1958. Excludes $7,000 other contributed funds. 12. Excludes $813,878 other contributed funds. 13. Includes $93,606 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. 14. Includes $568,417 for new work prior to modification by 1965 River and Harbor Act. Excludes Coast Guard costs. Includes $344 expended in FY 1989. 15. Includes $54,715 for maintenance for project prior to modification by 1965 River and Harbor Act and $18,958 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. 16. Excludes $557,832 other contributed funds. Includes $2,610,000 regular funds and excludes $2,910,000 required contributed funds, both for new work on flood control project, "San Diego River Basin, Calif." 17. Includes $103,116 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. 33-18 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS *For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Anaheim Bay Harbor, Orange County, CA 1 Completed 1967 $89,119 Bird Rock area, La Jolla, San Diego County, CA 2 Completed 1967 25,881 3 Coast of California, Point Mugu to San Pedro breakwater, CA Completed 1972 1,253,594 4 Doheny Beach State Park (Doheny State Beach), CA Completed 1968 587,717 s Imperial Beach, CA Active 1986 2,283,932 8 Las Tunas Beach Park, San Diego County, CA Active 1976 107,484 Ocean Beach, San Diego County, CA 7 Completed 1960 7,912 - Oceanside, San Diego County, CA Completed 1982 4,367,442 8 - San Diego (Sunset Cliffs), CA Active 1979 365,000 s - San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, CA Active 1985 10,257,465 10 Ventura-Pierpoint area, CA Completed (part) 1969 715,819 11 & Deferred (part) 1. The project authorized by the Act of Congress of October 23, 1962, H. Doc. 602, 87th Cong., 2d sess., in lieu of part of the original Anaheim Bay Harbor project is covered under San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, CA. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of section 103, Public Law 87-874. 3. Excludes $75,614 required contributed funds. 4. Excludes $1,238,418 required contributed funds. 5. Excludes $431,260 required contributed funds. 6. Excludes $1,464,677 required contributed funds; $66,124 other contributed funds; and Coast Guard costs. Includes $227,433 expended in FY 1989. 7. Plant in service. 8. Excludes $604,817 other contributed funds. 9. Excludes $184,336 required contributed funds. 10. Excludes $4,627,903 required contributed funds. Includes $535,365 expended in FY 1989. 11. Excludes $117,406 other contributed funds for beach-nourishment betterments and $618,949 required contributed funds. 33-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 89 TABLE 33-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allenville, AZ 1 City Creek levee, San Bernardino County, CA 1 Cucamonga Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, CA Gila River Basin, AZ: Camelsback Dam (Gila River) Gila and Salt Rivers levee and channel improvements Indian Bend Wash Lower Gila River levee and channel improvements (Gila River and tributaries downstream from Painted Rock Dam) Middle Gila River channel improvements, upper end of Safford Valley to Buttes damsite (Camelsback damsite to Salt River) Pinal Creek channel improvements (Globe) Santa Rosa Wash (Tat Momolikot Dam and Lake St. Clair) Tucson diversion channel Goleta, CA, and vicinity Holbrook levee, Little Colorado River, Colorado River Basin, AZ Los Coches Creek, San Diego County, CA 1 Lytle and Warm Creeks, Santa Ana River Basin, CA Mission Zanja Creek, Redlands, CA 11 Needles, San Bernardino County, CA I Oro Grande Wash channel improvements, Mojave River Basin, CA I Quail Wash levee, Joshua Tree, San Bernardino County, CA ' Ridgecrest, Kern County, CA ' Rose Creek channel improvements, San Diego, CA 1 San Diego River (Mission Valley), San Diego River Basin, CA Santa Ana River Basin, CA: Devil, East Twin, and Warm Creeks channel improvements and Lytle Creek levee Mill Creek levees Riverside levees San Jacinto River levee and Bautista Creek channel Santa Clara River levee improvement, Santa Clara River Basin, CA Completed Completed Completed Deferred Active (part) & Deferred (part) Completed Inactive Active Deferred Completed Completed Active Completed Completed Completed Active Completed Completed Completed Terminated Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1984 1987 1963 1966 1985 1975 1970 1968 1982 1986 1982 1950 1988 1987 1988 1973 I A 1973 1972 1978 1962 1961 1959 1985 1961 $3,000,000 2 400,000 3 93,339,911 4 73,201 5 32,459,294 6 2,413,051 402,867 121,509 5 17,009,754 7 6,922,631 8 500,000 335,000 3,973,741 s 37,973,202 10 1,352,294 1,000,000 12 1,000,000 13 212,745 195,194 982,432 14 1,708,437 7,753,937 15 617,890 18 2,104,478 9,258,207 17 2,126,672 33-20 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-E (Cont'd) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Santa Maria Valley levees, Santa Maria River Basin, CA Completed 1984 10,079,976 18 - Santa Paula Creek channel and debris basins (including Mud Creek), Santa Clara River Basin, CA Active 1983 4,790,960 19 - Sespe Creek at Fillmore, Ventura County, CA 1 Completed 1984 4,000,000 20 South Fork of the Santa Clara River, Santa Clarita Valley, CA 1 Active 1985 632,158 - Tijuana River Basin, CA Completed 1979 1,703,031 21 - Ventura River Basin, CA: Stewart Canyon debris basin and channel Completed 1964 939,908 22 _ Ventura River levee Completed 1950 1,349,638 23 - Whitewater River Basin, CA: Banning levee-San Gorgonio River, Riverside County 1 Completed 1966 97,868 Chino Canyon improvements, Palm Springs 1 Completed 1973 819,878 25 Tahchevah Creek detention basin and channel improvements Completed 1967 1,420,552 26 - Tahquitz Creek Inactive 1974 1,063,600 - Winslow (tributaries of Little Colorado River), Little Colorado River Basin, AZ Completed (part) 1973 1,831,300 - & Deferred (part) West Magnesia Canyon channel, Rancho Mirage, CA Completed 1988 4,000,000 24 - 1. Authorized by Chief of authority of section 205, Public amended. Engineers under Law 80-858, as 2. Excludes $187,965 required contributed funds. 3. Excludes $371,058 other contributed funds. 4. Excludes $584,068 required contributed funds and $9,332,327 other contributed funds. Includes $6,435 expended in FY 1989. 5. Advance planning only. 6. Excludes $304,720 required contributed funds and $3,130,762 other contributed funds. Includes $650,000 expended in FY 1989. 7. Includes $6,790,854 expended since FY 1988 to comply with Tohono O'odham Tat Momolikot Dam Settlement Act of October 14, 1986, Public Law 99-469. Includes $63,048 expended in FY 1989. 8. Includes $1,158,006 Code 710 funds since FY 1977. Excludes $749,072 required contributed funds and $394,364 other contributed funds. 9. Excludes $6,319,349 required contributed funds. 10. Excludes $5,499,193 other contributed funds. Includes $14,689 expended in FY 1989. 11. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. 12. Excludes $619,912 required contributed funds and $91,160 other contributed funds. 13. Excludes $514,806 required contributed funds and $176,295 other contributed funds. 14. Excludes $251,000 required contributed funds and $154,733 other contributed funds. 15. Excludes $200,000 required contributed funds and $1,641,668 other contributed funds. 16. Excludes $35,830 other contributed funds. 17. Excludes $712,000 other contributed funds. 18. Excludes $106,364 other contributed funds. Includes $49 expended in FY 1989. 19. Excludes non-Federal costs of $295,000 for local cooperation items not required and $49,458 other contributed funds. Includes $787 expended in FY 1989. 20. Excludes $559,525 required contributed funds. 21. International Boundary and Water Commission funds. 22. Excludes $179,148 other contributed funds. 33-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 89 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 23. Includes $6,000 Code 710 funds since FY 1977. Excludes $17,006 other contributed funds. 24. Excludes $2,324,206 required contributed funds. TABLE 33-G DEAUTHORI 25. Excludes $8,718 required contributed funds and $53,470 other contributed funds. 26. Excludes $74,718 required contributed funds. [ZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Hodges Dam, San Dieguito River Basin, CA Las Vegas Wash tributaries, Colorado River Basin, NV Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA: Aliso Creek Dam San Juan Dam 1958 1964 1950 Trabuco Dam Villa Park Dam Sierra Madre Wash channel, Los Angeles County drainage area, CA University Wash and Spring Brook, Riverside, CA 1986 1975 1978 Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251 1977 Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 1978 Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 33-22 TABLE 33-E (Cont'd) $295,191 67,361 213,313 - LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-H RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 7 of Text) Project Date Dana Point Harbor, CA October 1988 Morro Bay Harbor, CA September 1989 Newport Bay Harbor, CA October 1988 Port Hueneme, CA June 1989 TABLE 33-I INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 18 of Text) Project Date Alamo Lake, Bill Williams River, AZ Banning levee-San Gorgonio River, Whitewater River Basin, CA Brea Dam, Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA Carbon Canyon Dam and channel, Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA Chino Canyon improvements, Palm Springs, Whitewater River Basin, CA City Creek levee, San Bernardino County, CA Devil, East Twin, and Warm Creeks channel improvements and Lytle Creek levee, Santa Ana River Basin, CA Fullerton Dam, Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA Hansen Dam, Los Angeles County drainage area, CA Holbrook levee, Little Colorado River, AZ Indian Bend Wash, Gila River Basin, AZ Lopez Dam, Los Angeles County drainage area, CA Los Angeles County drainage area channels, CA Lytle and Cajon Creeks channel improvements, Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA Lytle and Warm Creeks, Santa Ana River Basin, CA Mathews Canyon Dam, Colorado River Basin, NV Mill Creek levees, Santa Ana River Basin, CA Needles, San Bernardino County, CA Oro Grande Wash channel improvements, Mojave River Basin, CA Painted Rock Dam (Gila River), Gila River Basin, AZ Pine Canyon Dam, Colorado River Basin, NV Prado Dam, Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA Quail Wash levee, Joshua Tree, San Bernardino County, CA Riverside levees, Santa Ana River Basin, CA January May April April May May 1989 1989 1989 1989 1989 1989 May 1989 April 1989 June 1989 January 1989 January 1989 November 1988 November 1988, June and July 1989 May May June May January May January June May May May 1989 1989 1989 1989 1989 1989 1989 1989 1989 1989 1989 33-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 89 TABLE 33-I (Cont'd) INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 18 of Text) Project Rose Creek channel improvements, San Diego, CA San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel, Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA San Antonio Dam, Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA San Diego River channel and levees, San Diego River Basin, CA San Jacinto River levee and Bautista Creek channel, Santa Ana River Basin, CA Santa Fe Dam, Los Angeles County drainage area, CA Santa Rosa Wash (Tat Momolikot Dam and Lake St. Clair), AZ Sepulveda Dam, Los Angeles County drainage area, CA Tahchevah Creek detention basin and channel improvements, Whitewater River Basin, CA Tucson diversion channel, Gila River Basin, AZ Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek, Gila River Basin, AZ Winslow (tributaries of Little Colorado River), Little Colorado River Basin, AZ (part) June 1989 May May June May June February June May February January 1989 1989 1989 1989 1989 1989 1989 1989 1989 1989 January 1989 TABLE 33-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858, As Amended (Preauthorization) (See Section 20 of Text) Project Fiscal Year Costs Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, CA $280,412 Rialto Channel, Rialto, CA 26,750 Santa Clara River, Fillmore, CA 2,112 Tanque Verde Creek, Tucson, AZ 80,468 33-24 Date SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT * This district comprises the Klamath River Basin in southern Oregon and portions of northern and western California consisting of drainage basins tributary to the Pacific Ocean from the Oregon-California State line on the north to Cape San Martin, CA, on the south, except for basins tributary to the San Francisco Bay system which lie east of the Benicia-Martinez Bridge. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Oakland Harbor, CA ................ 34-1 2. Richmond Harbor (Deepening), CA ...... 34-2 3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) ..................... 34-2 4. San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, CA. . . 34-3 5. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .... 34-3 6. Navigation Work under Special Authorization ....................... 34-3 7. Beach Erosion Control Work under Special Authorization ...................... 34-3 Flood Control 8. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................... 34-4 9. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ................. ... . 34-4 10. Surveys .......................... 34-4 Navigation 1. OAKLAND HARBOR, CA Location. Oakland Harbor is located in the City of Oakland, California, on the eastern shore of central San Francisco Bay immediately south of San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. Existing project. Adopted by Acts of June 23, 1874, June 25, 1910, September 22, 1922, January 21, 1927, April 28, 1928, July 3, 1930, March 2, 1945 and October 23, 1962. The project was completed February 1975, except for deepening the tidal canal to 35 feet from Fortman Basin to Park Street, and to 25 feet above Park Street which was deauthorized November 1977. Reconstruction of the Fruitvale Avenue Highway Bridge was completed in December 1973 and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance. Project consists of entrance channel to Oakland Outer Harbor, 35 feet deep from deep water in San Francisco Bay and 800 feet wide across the shoal southeast of Yerba Buena Island, narrowing to 600 feet at Oakland Mole; thence, a channel and turning basin 35 feet deep and from 600 to 950 feet wide in outer harbor to the Army Base. Project also provides entrance channel to Oakland Inner Harbor, 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide to west end of Government Island, with additional widening to General Investigations 11. Collection and Study of Basic Data .... 12. Preconstruction Engineering and Design . Tables Table 34-A Table 34-B Table 34-C Table 34-D Table Table Table Table 34-E 34-F 34-G 34-H Page . 34-4 . . 34-4 Cost and Financial Statement ................ 34-5 Authorizing Legislation ................ 34-9 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........ 34-11 Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ..... 34-11 Not Applicable Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects ...... 34-12 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects........... 34-12 within 75 feet of the pierhead line in front of Grove and Market Street (formerly municipal) piers and along the south side of the channel from Harrison Street eastward to harbor line point 119 in Brooklyn Basin; a channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide through Brooklyn Basin; for a triangular area 35 feet deep about 2,700 feet long and maximum width of 300 feet at western end of Brooklyn Basin; a channel along north side of Brooklyn Basin which is 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide for 1,300 feet, thence 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide for 3,700 feet to a turning basin at east end of Brooklyn Basin which is 35 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 1,200 feet long; a channel in the tidal canal 35 feet deep and 275 feet wide from Brooklyn Basin to Park Street, thence 18 feet deep to San Leandro Bay; a total channel length of 8-1/2 miles from San Francisco Bay to San Leandro Bay. Project also includes parallel rubblemound jetties at entrance to inner harbor, north jetty 9,500 feet long and south jetty 12,000 feet long; three highway bridges across the tidal canal, two of which (at Park Street and High Street) have been replaced by local interests and the Fruitvale Avenue Bridge constructed by Federal Government has been transferred to Alameda County. The railroad bridge has been transferred to the County for operation and maintenance. The Federal Government will reimburse the County for the cost of operating and maintaining the railroad bridges. 34-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 WRDA of 1986 authorized deepening the 4 mile Inner and 3.4 mile Outer Harbors channels to 42 feet deep and widening the entrance channel to 1,000 feet; relocation of the Outer Harbor turning basin 3,000 feet westward; and widening the turning basin to 1,800 feet and constructing a 1,200 foot turning basin in the Inner Harbor, 42 feet deep, at mile 3.7. Present estimated total cost for the authorized improvements is $72,580,000. The non-Federal cost is $25,500,000. Local cooperation. By letter dated June 2, 1987, the Port of Oakland has indicated its intent to sign the Local Cooperation Agreement satisfying the requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. The local sponsor must comply with the following requirements: (1) provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; (2) pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction; and (3) pay additional 10 percent plus interests of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction. Terminal facilities. The port occupies 19 miles on the mainland shore of San Francisco Bay. There are 550 acres of marine terminal facilities, 28 deepwater berths and 25 container cranes, including 5 of the post Panamax type. On-dock covered storage space exceeds 600,000 square feet. Three major railroads, Santa Fe, Southern Pacific and Union Pacific serve the port. Operations during fiscal year. New Work. Sediment testing, ocean site baseline and intitial monitoring studies, preparation of SEIS draft and GDM draft. 2. RICHMOND HARBOR (DEEPENING), CA Location. Richmond Harbor is located in central San Francisco Bay, in Contra Costa County in the City of Richmond. Existing project. The existing navigation channel extends from deep water in San Francisco Bay to the Port of Richmond. The channel is maintained at a depth of -45 feet MLLW (Southhampton Shoal Channel and Long Wharf Maneuvering Area), -35 feet MLLW (Entrance Channel, Potrero Reach Channel, Potrero Sharp Turn, Inner Harbor and about half of the Santa Fe Channel), and -30 feet MLLW (remainder of the Santa Fe Channel). The width of the navigation channel is 600 feet for most of its length to Point Richmond with two maneuvering areas: one in front of the Long Wharf and the other at Point Richmond. At Potrero Reach, the channel 500 foot width flares to about 600 feet at Point Potrero with a turn at the point, 1,150 feet wide and 35 feet deep except for a depth of 30 feet at the southerly apex of the bend. Thence, the channel continues into the inner harbor at a width of 850 feet in a northerly direction to the entrance of the Santa Fe Channel. The Santa Fe Channel extends northwesterly at a width of 200 feet into the upper basin terminus. A turning basin is provided at Point Richmond, and a rubble-mound training wall extending 10,000 feet westerly from Brooks Island is also provided in the Potrero Reach. For details, see page 1977 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1646 of Annual Report for 1938. Proposed improvements consists of a two-phased construction plan extending four and a half miles through the Santa Fe Channel. Phase I would deepen the existing 35-foot channel to -38 feet for bulk carriers, and provide a turning basin of 1,200 feet diameter near Point Potrero. Approximately 1,500,000 cubic yards of sediment are to be dredged and transported to an upland and/or aquatic disposal site. In addition, 2,600 cubic yards of rock are to be excavated and disposed of at the Port-owned land disposal site. The estimated cost of Phase I is $16,050,000 of which $12,550,000 is Federal cost (includes $50,000 Coast Guard costs) and $3,500,000 is non-Federal cost. Phase II has been deferred and is reclassified to the inactive category. The existing project was authorized on October 27, 1965. Previous projects were authorized by Acts adopted in 1917, 1930, 1935, 1938, 1945 and 1954. The proposed improvements are authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. Local cooperation. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the local sponsor must comply with the following requirements: (1) pay 10 percent of the costs to 20 feet below mean lower low water and 25 percent of costs between 20 and 45 feet below mean lower low water and (2) reimburse an additional 10 percent of the costs of the general navigation feature of the project within a period of 30 years following completion of construction; and (3) provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocation and dredged material disposal (LERRD) areas necessary for the projects. The value of LERRD can be credited toward the payment required under item (2) above. The agreement is scheduled to be executed in September 1994. Terminal activities. The Port of Richmond encompasses nine privately-owned terminals and seven terminals owned by the Port. Operations during fiscal year. New Work. Continued preconstruction planning and engineering. 3. SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) Location. John F. Baldwin Ship Channel. Navigation channels extending from entrance to San Francisco Bay to Suisun Bay near Martinez through San Francisco, Marin, Contra Costa, and Solano Counties. (See National Ocean Service Charts 18649, 18654 and 18656 for respective areas.) 34-2 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT Existing project. Project provides for modification of the existing San Francisco Harbor, Richmond Harbor, San Pablo Bay and Suisun Bay Channels to the vicinity of Martinez to provide depths of 55 feet for San Francisco Bar Channel, 45 feet (currently 35 feet) for main internal bay channels upstream to the vicinity of Martinez; enlargement and deepening to 45 feet (currently 35 feet) of maneuvering areas adjacent to major petroleum refinery terminals along the channel route. San Francisco Harbor Main Channel was completed in February 1974. The South Hampton Shoal Channel and the Richmond Long Wharf manevering area was completed in December 1986. For the approved cost estimate (1989) of Federal cost (Corps), see Sacramento District Annual Report. Existing project was adopted by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 208, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. See Sacramento District Annual Report. The local sponsor, Contra Costa County, supports the project. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 30, revised 1983, No. 31, revised 1982, and No. 32, revised 1986, titled respectively: "The Ports of San Francisco, Redwood City, and Humboldt Bay, Calif."; "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, and the Ports on Carquinez Strait, Calif."; and "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg, and Antioch, Calif." Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and will be adequate for future commerce upon completion of new terminal facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Continued planning engineering and design activities. 4. SAN FRANCISCO BAY AND DELTA MODEL, CA Location. The model, including a regional visitor center, is located in Sausalito, CA, adjacent to San Francisco Bay about two miles north of the Golden Gate Bridge. Existing project. The San Francisco Bay/Delta Model, which covers 17 miles of the Pacific Ocean beyond the Golden Gate, all of San Francisco Bay proper, San Pablo Bay, Suisun Bay, and all of the Sacramento- San Joaquin Delta east of Suisun Bay to the cities of Sacramento on the northeast and Stockton and Tracy on the south, was constructed in a rehabilitated warehouse at Sausalito, CA, as a part of the San Francisco Bay and Tributaries, CA, Study authorized by the River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950 (PL 81- 516, Section 110). The model was authorized as an operation and maintenance project in the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (PL 93-251, Section 8). The model successfully reproduces to the proper scale the rise and fall of the tide, flow and currents of water, salinity intrusion, and trends in disposition of sediments. It is a useful tool to examine forces existing in the bay and estuarine system and to predict results of proposed changes. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the model continues. Extensive exhibit upgrade for the Visitor Center and development of Cooperative Association completed September 30, 1989. Historical summary. Original model construction was initiated 1956 and completed 1957. The addition of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to the original model was initiated 1966 and completed 1969. The central exhibits were completed in December 1981. Continued testing of proposals affecting the environmental quality of the region including, but not limited to: salinity intrusion, dispersion of pollutants, water quality, improvements for navigation, dredging, bay fill, physical structures, other shoreline changes. Total cost of regional visitor exhibits and model as of September 30, 1989, was $16,643,770, of which $6,410,630 was for the regional visitor center, $1,288,219 for exhibits, and $8,944,921 for maintenance. 5. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance and condition surveys of channels to be dredged in years other than FY 89 and jetty structures were conducted on the following projects: Bodega Bay; Crescent City Harbor; Fisherman's Wharf; Moss Landing; Noyo River and Harbor; Petaluma River; Redwood City Harbor; Richardson Bay Channel; San Bruno Shoal; San Francisco Harbor; San Leandro Marina; San Pablo-Mare Island Straits; San Rafael Creek; Suisun Bay Channel; and Suisun Channel, all in California. Fiscal year costs were $341,479 of which $70,786 was for jetty condition surveys and $270,693 for project condition surveys. 6. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year total costs for preauthorization studies were $75,305 of which $59,044 was for Crescent City Harbor, Del Norte County, CA; and $16,261 for Larkspur Ferry, Marin County, CA. 7. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization). Fiscal year cost for preauthorization studies was $61,622 for Emeryville, Alameda County, CA. Mitigation of shore damages activities pursuant to Section 111, Public Law 90-483 (preauthorization). Fiscal year cost for preauthorization studies was $14,312 for Moss Landing Harbor, CA. 34-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 8. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, as amended and supplemented, included a requirement that local interests maintain and operate completed flood control works in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of War. Inspections made throughout the year to determine effectiveness of operation and maintenance by local interests of completed local protection projects and works constructed under emergency and special authorities of Sections 205 and 208 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, and Public Law 99, 84th Congress. Fiscal year cost was $82,371. Total cost to September 30, 1989 was $2,120,090. See Table 34-H for inspections made this fiscal year. 9. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $306,595 for preauthorization studies of which $15,367 for Felton Grove, Santa Cruz County, CA; $62,604 for Gold Gulch, Santa Cruz County, CA; $67,327 for Haciena Carmel, Carmel River, CA; $8,682 for Las Gallianas Creek, Marin County, CA; $10,946 for Pescadero and Butano Creeks, CA; $50,311 for Petaluma River, Sonoma County, CA; $14,030 for Rohner Creek, Fortuna, CA; $1,779 for San Felipe Lake, San Benito County, CA; $2,298 for Salt and Eel River, Humboldt County, CA; $70,537 for San Pedro Creek, Pacifica, CA; and $2,714 for Soquel Creek, Santa Cruz County, CA. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year costs of $642,401 were incurred for disaster preparedness of emergency flood control activities. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Fiscal year cost was $62,151 for San Pablo Creek, CA. General Investigations 10. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs for surveys were $1,683,151, of which $312,337 was for navigation studies; $1,288,787 for flood damage prevention; and $82,027 for inventory of dams. 11. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year total costs of $76,354 were incurred, of which $74,354 was for flood plain management service program and $2,000 for hydrologic studies. 12. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN NOYO RIVER AND HARBOR, CA Noyo River rises in the Coast Range, flows westerly, and empties into Noyo Harbor. Noyo Harbor is a cove on the California Coast about 87 miles south of Humboldt Bay and 135 miles northwest of San Francisco. The 1962 Rivers and Harbors Act, modified by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act, authorized up to two breakwaters as necessary to provide protection. The 1976 WRDA authorized construction of additional channel improvements. Recommended plans of improvement for the breakwater and channel improvement were previously considered as a single project. Due to significant differences in the time required for planning and construction, each part is now reported separately. The plan of improvement for Noyo River and Harbor (Breakwater), CA provides for one breakwater west of the entrance channel in Noyo Harbor. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $1,560,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $427,507 with General Investigation funds. Planning is about 65 percent complete. Model studies, using a physical model to test alternative plan, were run intermittently from FY 84-FY 86, with additional tests conducted in FY 88 and FY 89. The plan of improvement for Noyo River and Harbor (Channel Extension), CA provides for a 60-foot wide channel, 7 feet deep, for a distance of about 3,000 feet upstream from the end of the existing Federal project to the Dolphin Isle Marina. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $580,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $46,940 with General Investigation funds. 34-4 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 1989 Bodega Bay, CA New Work Approp. - - - - $1,226,765 1 2 40 Cost - - - - 1,226,765 1 3 40 Maint. Approp. $67,210 $39,374 $34,257 $34,358 1,190,514 4 40 Cost 82,427 42,542 40,520 34,362 1,190,514 4 40 Major rehab. Approp. - - - - 397,779 5 Cost - - - - 397,779 5 Crescent City New Work Harbor, CA Approp. - - - - 9,454,972 6 36 Cost 1,993 - - - 9,454,972 6 36 Maint. Approp 5,110,486 777,000 1,606,614 1,213,875 22,085,227 7 36 Cost 5,004,776 850,714 1,633,938 1,210,973 22,057,628 7 36 Major rehab. Approp. - - - - 525,000 8 Cost - - - - 525,000 8 Fisherman's Wharf New Work Areas, San Francisco Approp. 5,265,000 -116,000 - - 9,199,000 41 48 50 Harbor, CA Cost 7,151,353 28,014 -763 2,057 9,199,000 41 49 50 Maint. Approp. - - - 7,894 7,894 51 Cost - - - 7,894 7,894 51 Halfmoon Bay, CA New Work Approp. - - - - 6,697,396 43 44 Cost - - - - 6,697,396 43 44 Maint. Approp. 10,000 -3,700 12,827 - 2,097,194 44 45 Cost 36,818 -1,244 12,827 - 2,097,194 44 45 Humboldt Harbor New Work and Bay, CA Approp. - - - - 9,847,299 9 40 Cost - - - - 9,847,299 9 40 Maint. Approp. 4,236,000 2,369,000 2,628,700 853,000 59,784,641 10 40 Cost 4,414,387 2,342,236 2,680,296 814,563 59,746,321 10 40 Moss Landing New Work Harbor, CA Approp. - - 15,000 - 353,215 11 40 Cost - - - 14,312 352,527 11 40 Maint. Approp. 36,570 465,000 15,000 59,018 4,505,802 12 40 Cost 52,051 467,211 21,258 65,968 4,505,802 12 40 Napa River, CA New Work Approp. - - - - 1,021,274 13 40 Cost - - - - 1,021,274 13 40 Maint. Approp. 26,583 6,412 724,000 1,321,300 3,891,932 13 14 40 Cost 26,583 6,412 722,384 1,291,094 3,860,110 13 14 40 Noyo River and New Work Harbor, CA Approp. - - 580,000 141,000 2,242,482 15 16 40 Cost 12,423 829 232,814 474,448 2,228,744 15 17 40 Maint. Approp. 598,000 422,000 363,000 53,875 7,092,529 18 19 40 Cost 534,352 445,886 387,248 65,482 7,082,210 18 19 40 Minor rehab. Approp. - - - - 222,810 20 40 Cost - - - - 222,810 20 40 34-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 1989 1. Oakland Harbor, CA Petaluma River, CA l Redwood City l Harbor, CA 2. Richmond Harbor, CA 3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) 4. San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, CA San Francisco Harbor, CA San Francisco Harbor and Bay, CA (Removal of Drift) San Leandro Marina, CA San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 535,700 915,000 315,449 984,397 1,075,000 2,620,200 1,060,589 2,582,782 3,400,000 2,573,759 1,917,900 1,913,913 1,976,000 2,836,782 2,009,000 2,053,312 16,778,684 21 40 16,649,384 21 40 35,264,346 22 40 35,239,117 22 40 297,146 23 40 297,146 23 40 -168,185 755,000 1,129,000 736,454 10,434,107 24 40 -115,226 729,877 1,032,148 857,991 10,431,970 24 40 S- - - 1,672,722 25 40 S- - - 1,672,722 25 40 14,674 59,010 77,260 448,576 7,925,474 26 40 14,674 59,010 77,260 444,208 7,921,106 26 40 848,300 561,000 779,532 437,000 5,627,527 27 28 760,681 662,879 237,782 975,507 5,618,521 27 28 1,074,000 1,811,300 610,300 2,589,440 21,583,382 29 40 1,097,818 1,803,232 593,290 2,596,465 21,554,678 29 40 - - - - 164,689 - - - - 164,689 5,166,000 1,937,000 1,600,000 1,186,000 29,011,200 5,877,031 2,216,315 1,157,869 1,759,997 28,928,467 1,100,000 1,067,138 980,000 1,050,000 1,880,000 16,792,700 1,077,118 1,043,711 1,820,403 16,643,772 - - - 2,689,356 28 30 40 - - - 2,689,356 28 30 40 1,566,340 1,593,036 2,615,833 1,282,785 27,977,515 31 40 1,726,548 1,595,213 2,432,154 1,438,119 27,930,774 31 40 930,000 1,305,000 1,570,000 1,317,000 25,168,182 40 1,047,460 1,109,605 1,698,448 1,426,004 25,069,771 40 44,171 66,284 38,337 34,105 815,663 2,134,008 32 38,337 34,105 815,127 2,133,472 32 - - - 1,369,372 28 33 40 - - - 1,369,372 28 33 40 34-6 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 1989 Maint. Approp. 1,939,000 1,898,935 891,543 994,034 36,092,213 34 40 Cost 1,978,259 1,848,904 806,132 1,120,892 36,085,640 34 40 San Rafael, CA New Work Approp. - - - - 32,359 40 47 Cost - - - - 32,359 40 47 Maint. Approp. 970,994 626,591 202,007 - 3,816,962 40 46 Cost 932,781 629,727 231,575 4,026 3,815,479 40 46 Santa Cruz New Work Harbor, CA Approp. 2,134,000 - 20,468 - 4,126,808 51 (Federal Funds) Cost 1,960,377 198,922 19,715 755 4,126,808 52 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. - - - - 160,000 35 Cost - - - - 160,000 35 Maint. Approp. 994,500 64,000 62,000 - 9,600,660 40 Cost 1,035,571 59,497 67,328 8,808 9,600,660 40 Suisun Bay New Work Channel, CA Approp. - - - - - 36 Cost - - - - - 36 Maint. Approp. 1,797 174,000 296,700 250,717 3,483,277 37 40 Cost 8,568 160,402 309,816 253,884 3,483,076 37 40 Suisun Channel, CA New Work Approp. - - - - 217,677 38 Cost - - - - 217,677 38 Maint. Approp. 51,594 92,312 95,498 88,765 1,679,907 39 Cost 51,594 92,312 95,498 88,765 1,679,907 39 1. Include $641,800 for jetties, bulkheads, main Bodega Bay Channel and turning basin completed in 1943. 2. Includes $585,000 for Preconstruction Planning ($456,000 Construction, General funds and $129,000 General Investigation funds). 3. Includes $584,563 Preconstruction Planning costs ($455,563 Construction General costs and $129,000 General Investigation costs). 4. Includes $255,964 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1989. 5. Excludes contribution funds of $2,000. 6. Excludes contributed funds of $271,116 and $2,138 surplus material from Corps military activities. 7. Excludes contributed funds of $44,340. Includes $80,284 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1989. 8. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds in lieu of royalty-free rock. 9. Includes $2,261,371 for previous project. Excludes $95,000 contributed funds for existing project. 10. Includes $98,206 for previous project and $1,710 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1989. 11. Excludes $5,337 previous project costs. 12. Excludes $8,539 surplus material from Corps' military activities. Includes $126,283 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1989. Excludes contributed funds of $180,200. 13. Excludes previous project costs. Excludes $492,788 contributed funds. 14. Includes $274,508 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1989. 15. Includes $11,985 for previous project. Excludes $7,180 contributed funds for previous project. 16. Includes $1,944,000 for Preconstruction Planning ($1,364,000 for Breakwater of which $500,000 allocated under Construction, General and $864,000 under General Investigations); ($580,000 for Channel Extension of which $165,000 allocated under Construction, General and $415,000 under General Investigations). 17. Includes $1,930,262 Preconstruction cost ($1,350,262 for Breakwater of which $500,000 was under Construction, General and $850,262 under General Investigations); ($580,000 for Channel Extension of which $165,000 was under Construction, General and $415,000 under General Investigations). 18. Includes $32,097 for previous project and $19,311 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1989. Excludes contributed funds of $820 for previous project. 19. Excludes contributed funds of $4,000 in lieu of providing dike disposal areas on existing project. 20. Excludes contributed funds of $1,700. 34-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 21. Includes $2,899,232 for previous projects. Excludes $397,266 contributed funds on existing project. 22. Includes $684,028 for previous projects and $774 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1989. 23. Includes $212,083 for previous project. Excludes contributed funds of $15,559 for previous project. Excludes $30,000 contributed funds. 24. Includes $314,692 for previous project and $151,586 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1989. Excludes contributed funds of $192,424. 25. Includes previous project costs $31,443. Excludes $119,572 contributed funds for existing project. 26. Includes $277,214 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1989. 27. Excludes contributed funds of $524,778. Includes $105,000 Public Works Administration funds. 28. Excludes modification authorized October 27, 1965, under project "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)." 29. Excludes $34,800 contributed funds. Includes $3,364 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1989. 30. Includes $1,030,399 for previous projects. Excludes $134,591 contributed funds for existing project. Includes $193,000 Public Works Administration funds. 31. Includes $475,321 for previous projects and $107,313 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1989. 32. Authorized by FC Act of 1965 (Sec. 201); Maintenance R&H Act of 1970 (Sec. 103). Includes $179,208 for reconnaissance and condition surveys FY 1979-1989. See FY 1977 Annual Report for last full report. Excludes contributed funds of $859,947. 33. Includes $1,086,703 for previous projects. 34. Includes $1,359,380 for previous projects and $32,894 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1989. 35. Excludes $810,046 contributed funds. 36. See FY 1984 Annual Report for last full report. 37. Project maintenance responsibility to Point Edith was transferred to San Francisco District January 1, 1974. Excludes Sacramento District's portion. Includes $17,327 for reconnaissance and project condition surveys, FY 1976-1989. 38. Project maintenance assigned to San Francisco District from Sacramento District January 1, 1974. See Sacramento District 1972 Annual Report for full report. 39. Includes $372,398 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1978-1989. 40. See FY 1981 Annual Report for last full report. 41. Excludes Contributed Funds of $709,624. 42. See Sacramento District FY 1985 Annual Report for full report. 43. Excludes $100,000 contributed funds and $105,000 contributed in lieu of royalty-free rock. 44. See FY 1979 Annual Report for last full report. 45. Includes $30,394 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1970-1989. 46. Includes $162,015 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1970-1989. 47. Excludes $41,094 contributed funds. 48. Includes $9,199,000 funds of which $8,499,000 was under Construction, General and $700,000 under General Investigations. Excludes Contributed Funds of $742,360. 49. Includes $9,199,000 costs of which $8,499,000 was under Construction, General and $700,000 under General Investigations. Excludes Contributed Funds of $709,624. 50. See FY 1987 Annual Report for last full report. 51. Includes $7,894 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1989. 52. See FY 1988 Annual Report for last full report. 34-8 TABLE 34-B SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 23, 1874 June 25, 1910 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 2 Apr. 28, 1928 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 3 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 4 1. OAKLAND HARBOR, CA Jetties. North channel in Brooklyn Basin, 25 feet deep, and tidal canal to 18 feet. Channel across shoal southeast of Yerba Buena Island and thence to Webster St.; South channel in Brooklyn Basin; Turning Basin at east end of Brooklyn Basin; and channel in Tidal Canal from Brooklyn Basin to Park St., 30 feet deep. Channel from Webster St. to Brooklyn Basin, maintain area to within 75 feet of pierhead line south of channel from Harrison St. to Harbor Line Point 119 in Brooklyn Basin; dredge a triangular strip about 2,700 feet long and maximum width of 300 feet at western end of Brooklyn Basin, 30 feet deep. Local cooperation requirements modified to provide alteration or replacement of bridges by local interests shall apply only to that feature of project covering deepening tidal canal to 25 feet. Drawbridges across Tidal Canal were required by 1882 Decree of Court in condemnation proceedings whereby title was obtained to rightof- way for tidal canal. Entrance channel to outer harbor, 800 to 600 feet wide. Eliminated requirement that local interests contribute 10 cents per cubic yard toward deepening tidal canal. Maintenance of 35-foot depth in channel to outer harbor and in outer harbor channel and turning basin. Deepen inner harbor 35-foot channels and lower 1,300 feet of north channel in Brooklyn Basin to 35 feet. Deepen Inner and Outer Harbor channels to 42 feet. Widen entrance channel to 1,000 feet; relocate Outer Harbor turning basin 3,000 feet westward and widen turning basin to 1800 feet. Construct 1,200 feet turning basin in Inner Harbor. RICHMOND HARBOR, CA Channel 24 feet deep and 600 feet wide from San Francisco Bay to Ellis Slough (Santa Fe Channel); a turning basin at Point Potrero; a training wall. A 30-foot channel with lessened widths; a turning basin at head of navigation. Increase project widths in inner harbor, maintenance of Santa Fe channel to 30 feet; approach areas in outer harbor to 32 feet. 34-9 Annual Report, Part II, 1874, p. 378. H. Doc. 647, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 144, 67th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 407, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 1 Public Res. 28, 70th Cong. Rivers and Habors Committee Doc. 43, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 466, 77d Cong., 1st sess. Report on File in Office, Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 353, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 1 1986 WRDA, Public Law 99-662 H. Doc. 515, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 7, 73d Cong., 1st sess., and 10, 74th Cong., 1st sess. 2. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 34-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 20, 1938 Widen channel at Point Potrero and north thereof; H. Doc 598, 75th Cong., enlarge and maintain to 30-foot depth turning 3d sess. basin at Terminal No. 1. Mar. 2, 1945 Channel 20 feet deep, 150 feet wide, in San Pablo H. Doc. 715, 76th Cong., Bay north of Point San Pablo. 3d sess. Sep. 3, 1954 Channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide adjacent H. Doc. 395, 83rd Cong., to Southampton Shoal; enlarge and deepen to 35 2d sess. 1 feet approach area to Richmond Long Wharf; widen and deepen inner harbor and entrance channels; deepen turning basin at Point Richmond and southerly 2,000 feet of Santa Fe Channel. Eliminate restriction that widening north of Point Potrero will not be undertaken until local interests furnish assurances industries will avail themselves of improved navigation facilities. and reclamation of Reservation Point. Oct. 27, 1965 West Richmond channel 45 feet deep, 600 feet H. Doc. 208, 89th Cong., wide; enlarge and deepen to 45 feet maneuvering 1st sess. 1 area at Richmond Long Wharf (Sacramento Dist. "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockon Ship Channels)"). Nov. 17, 1986 Deepen channel to 38 feet between Richmond 1986 WRDA, Public Law Long Wharf and Santa Fe Channel. Construct 99-662 1,200 feet turning basin. 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Included deepening of tidal canal above Park Street Bridge to 25 feet, which was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 3. Reconstruction of Fruitvale Avenue Highway Bridge (S. Doc. 75, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) which was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 4. Included in part in Public Works Administration Program, September 6, 1933. 34-10 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Berkeley Harbor, CA 1 Completed 1966 $155,550 2 $6,120 s Berkeley Marina, CA 1 Completed 1979 505,201 3 Lower San Francisco Bay, CA Inactive 1935 - - Monterey Harbor, CA Completed 1971 1,108,182 4 85,880 5 San Francisco Harbor (Islais Creek), CA 1 Completed 1976 848,227 7 San Francisco Marina (Gas House Cove), CA Completed 1974 180,472 - San Leandro Marina (Breakwater), CA 1 Completed 1976 210,390 8 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107, 5. Includes $8,041 for reconnaissance and Public Law 86-645). condition survey for FY 1956-1989. 2. Excludes $155,551 contributed funds. 6. Includes preauthorization costs $26,855 and 3. Excludes $378,989 contributed funds. excludes contributed funds $153,618. 4. Includes $207,800 Public Works Administra- 7. Includes $94,550 preauthorization costs. tion funds and breakwater modifications (1960 Act) 8. Includes $72,000 preauthorization costs and placed inactive 1974. The barrier groin and sandtrap excludes contributed funds $138,189. feature of the project was deauthorized November 17, 9. Includes $6,120 for jetty condition surveys for 1986, by WRDA of 1986. FY 1987-1989. TABLE 34-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Humboldt Bay, CA Inactive 1958 $2,000 Santa Cruz County, CA Inactive 1966 245,639 34-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 34-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Knights Valley Lake, R.R. Basin, CA 1974 Aug. 5, 1977 - Oakland Harbor, CA (Deepen Tidal Canal) 1981 Nov. 6, 1977 - Oakland Harbor, CA (Fruitvale Avenue Bridge) 1981 Nov. 6, 1977 - San Lorenzo Creek, CA (Upper Portion) 1962 Nov. 6, 1977 - San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, CA (Approaches to Vallejo and South Vallejo) 1982 Nov. 6, 1977 - TABLE 34-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 8 of Text) Location Dates of Inspection Alameda Creek Butte Creek Canyon Creek Corte Madera Creek Coffee Creek Coyote Creek Denny Rock Creek Dry Creek East Weaver Creek lri iRiver Eel River at Sandy Prairie Fishhole Creek Klamath River Mad River Mad River at Blue Lake Mad River Slough Meiss Lake Pajaro River Pinole Creek Redwood Creek Rheem Creek Rodeo Creek Russian River San Leandro Creek San Lorenzo Creek San Lorenzo River Mar 1989 Aug 1989 Sep 1989 Apr 1989 Sep 1989 Apr 1989 Sep 1989 Nov 1988 and Mar 1989 July 1989 Sep 1989 July 1989 Sep 1989 July 1989 and Sep 1989 Sep 1989 July 1989 Sep 1989 Aug 1989 Nov 1988 and Jun 1989 May 1989 July 1989 and Sep 1989 May 1989 May 1989 July 1989 Mar 1989 Mar 1989 May 1989 34-12 TABLE 34-H (Cont'd) SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 8 of Text) Location Dates of Inspection San Pablo Creek Oct 1988 Scott River Aug 1989 Sprague River Sep 1989 Upper Klamath Lake Sep 1989 Uvas Creek May 1989 Wildcat Creek May 1989 34-13 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT * This district comprises basins of Suisun Bay and San Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers in California; Goose Lake in Oregon; basins of the Great Salt Lake and Sevier Lake in Utah; an intervening portion of Great Basin in northern Nevada, northern California, and southeastern Idaho; and the upper Colorado River basin, which is in southwestern Wyoming, eastern Utah, northeastern Arizona, and western Colorado, west of the Continental Divide. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Sacramento River, CA ............... 35-2 2. Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA ................... 35-3 3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) .................... 35-3 4. San Joaquin River, CA ................ 35-4 Flood Control 5. Buchanan Dam-H.V. Eastman Lake, Chowchilla River, CA ................ 35-5 6. Cache Creek Settling Basin, CA ......... 35-5 7. Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and tributaries, including New Hogan Lake and Farmington Dam, CA ................ 35-6 8. Corte Madera Creek, CA .............. 35-7 9. Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA .......... 35-7 10. Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake, Fresno River, CA ......................... 35-8 11. Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA .......... 35-9 12. Kaweah and Tule Rivers, including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, CA . . . . 35-10 13. Little Dell Lake, UT................. 35-11 14. Lower San Joaquin River, CA .......... 35-11 15. Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, NV and CA ....................... 35-12 16. Merced County Streams ............. 35-12 17. Merced County Stream Group, CA ...... 35-13 18. Pajaro River, CA .................... 35-13 19. Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, CA ..... 35-14 20. Redbank and Fancher Creeks, CA ...... 35-15 21. Russian River Basin, including Dry Creek (Warm Springs Lake) and Lake Mendocino (Coyote Valley Dam), CA... 35-16 22. Sacramento River and tributaries, CA from Collinsville to Shasta Dam ......... 35-17 23. Walnut Creek, CA ................. 35-18 24. Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA ...... 35-19 25. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................... 35-20 Flood Control (Cont'd) Page 26. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ..................... 35-20 27. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ................ 35-20 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 28. New Melones Lake, CA.............. 35-21 General Investigations 29. Surveys ......................... 35-22 30. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... 35-22 31. Research and Development ........... 35-22 32. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ... 35-22 Tables Table 35-A Table 35-B Table 35-C Table 35-D Table 35-E Table 35-F Table 35-G Table 35-H Table 35-I Table 35-J Table 35-K Table 35-L Page Cost and Financial Statement ............... 35-24 Authorizing Legislation .............. 35-32 Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........ 35-34 Not Applicable Other Authorized Flood Control Projects........... 35-35 Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects ...... 35-37 Sacramento River, CA: Tidal and Flood Conditions Prevailing ............... 35-37 San Joaquin River, CA: Total Cost of New Work for Project ............... 35-38 San Joaquin River, CA: Project Units (1950 Modification) Reclassified and Excluded from Project Cost .............. 35-38 Merced County Stream Group, CA, Maximum Inflow, Storage, and Outflow for Projects ...... 35-39 Russian River Basin, CA: Estimated Cost for New Work . .35-39 35-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 IMPROVEMENTS (Cont'd) Page Tables Russian River Basin, CA: Project Features and Estimated Costs ............ 35-40 Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA, Collinsville to Shasta Dam: Project Units Units Reclassified and Excluded from Cost Estimate . . 35-40 Table 35-0 Table 35-P Page Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA, from Collinsville to Shasta Dam: Construction Accomplished and Contract Costs .................... 35-41 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858, as Amended (Preauthorization) ......... 35-42 Navigation 1. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Location. Rises in Trinity Mountains in north-central California, flows generally southerly about 374 miles and empties into Suisun Bay, an arm of San Francisco Bay, at Collinsville, CA. (See Geological Survey topographic map of Sacramento Valley, CA.) Previous projects. For details see page 1985 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1708 of Annual Report fcr 1938. Existing project. For description of Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, see Annual Report for 1969. Total first cost for completed portion was $43,932,558 ($39,560,558 Federal (Corps), $300,000 (Coast Guard), and $4,072,000 non-Federal for lands and damages, including relocations) and excludes local interests cost $10,741,000 (June 1963) for 30-foot deep water ship channel and 13-foot deep connecting canal basic terminal facilities required under terms of project authorization. Project also provided for a shallow-draft channel 10 feet deep at mean lower low water 150 to 200 feet bottom width, from Suisun Bay to Sacramento, CA, 60 miles; a depth of 6 feet at low water between Sacramento and Colusa, 85 miles; a depth of 5 feet at low water between Colusa and Chico Landing, 50 miles; and such depths as practicable between Chico Landing and Red Bluff, 53 miles, a total distance of 248 miles. However, shallow-draft channel feature Colusa to Red Bluff (including Colusa to Chico Landing, 50 miles and Chico Landing to Red Bluff, 53 miles) was deauthorized by 1986 Water Resources Development Act on November 17, 1986 (Public Law 99-662). (See table 35-H on tidal and flood conditions prevailing.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for deep water ship channel project. None required on shallowdraft feature. Terminal facilities. Piers, wharves, and docks at Port of Sacramento for shallow-draft navigation are open-pile structures with timber decks, some of which are designed to meet extreme high waters of flood stages. All main wharves at Sacramento have rail connections. Three of above facilities are owned by city of Sacramento and remainder by private interests; all are privately operated. For full description see "Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif., 1986." Deep water terminal facilities comprise wharves and piers, administration and storage buildings, and belt railroad facilities. Majority of these facilities are owned and operated by Sacramento-Yolo Port District; remainder are privately owned and operated. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work, Deep Water Ship Channel: None. Maintenance: Shallow Draft Channel: Maintenance and operation activities continued in Sacramento River, Sacramento upstream to Colusa. Deep Water Ship Channel: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Historical summary. Construction of 7-foot shallow-draft channel below Sacramento was initiated in September 1899 and completed in 1904. Modified 10-foot shallow-draft channel up to Sacramento was initiated in FY 1928 and completed in 1931. Shallow-draft channel above Sacramento was begun in April 1946 but new work was discontinued when about 48 percent complete. In February 1974, remaining work for shallow-draft portion of project, provision of a 5-foot depth between Colusa and Chico Landing (50 miles), was reclassified as "deferred." Channel is navigable all year; however, there is no regular navigation above Colusa, 145 miles above river mouth. On November 17, 1986, remaining shallow-draft feature, Colusa to Red Bluff (including Colusa to Chico Landing, 50 miles and Chico Landing to Red Bluff, 53 miles) was deauthorized by 1986 Water Resources Development Act (Public Law 99-662). Construction of 30-foot deep water ship channel was initiated in July 35-2 Tables Table 35-M Table 35-N SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 1949; improvement dredging by continuing contracts resulted in provision of an operational facility for oceangoing vessels during June 1963. Bascule bridge was completed in April 1960, barge lock in August 1961, barge canal in November 1961, and entire deep water ship channel in June 1970. 2. SACRAMENTO RIVER DEEP WATER SHIP CHANNEL, CA Location. On the Sacramento River between Collinsville and the Port of Sacramento, a distance of about 43 miles, in the counties of Sacramento, Contra Costa, Solano, and Yolo, CA. Existing project. Project provides for deepening to 35 feet the Suisun Bay and Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channels from New York Slough to the Port of Sacramento, and the Avon to New York Slough reach to 35 feet which will be accomplished under the San Francisco Bay to Stockton (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) project, and widening the channel as necessary. Current selected plan also provides for a water quality monitoring program, and establishment of wetland habitat and upland habitat to mitigate for losses of such habitat. Project estimate (October 1989) is $43,400,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) comprising Federal cost (Corps) of $21,400,000; Federal cost (Coast Guard) for navigation aids $300,000; and non-Federal cost of $21,700,000 for lands and damages, relocations, and spoil retention dikes, including the cash contribution ($7, 130,000) that local interests must pay. Existing project was adopted by Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985, August 15, 1985 (Public Law 99-88), 99th Cong., 1st sess. and modified by 1986 Water Resources Development Act, November 17, 1986 (Public Law 99-662) 99th Cong., 2d sess. Local cooperation. Local interests, through a public body legally authorized and financially capable, must give assurances they will furnish lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project; and provide retention dikes for dredged material disposal area; and pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction, presently estimated at $7,240,000. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) (sec. 221) was executed June 27, 1986. An LCA modification necessitated by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 was executed December 6, 1988. Terminal facilities. All main wharves at Sacramento have rail connections. Three of above facilities are owned by city of Sacramento and remainder by private interests; all are privately operated. For full description see "Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif., 1986." Deep water terminal facilities comprise wharves and piers, administration and storage buildings, and belt railroad facilities. Majority of these facilities are owned and operated by Sacramento-Yolo Port District; remainder are privately owned and operated. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering was continued. First construction contract was awarded in February 1989. Work was initiated at contract fiscal year cost of $1,090,000. Historical summary. General Design Memorandum was approved and Record of Decision was signed in May 1987. Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) modification was approved and was signed by Port of Sacramento on August 19, 1987. LCA modification was executed December 6, 1988. First construction contract was awarded February 2, 1989 and work was initiated. 3. SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA, (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) Location. On navigation channels extending from entrance to San Francisco Bay to Port of Stockton through San Francisco, Marin, Contra Costa, Solano, Sacramento, and San Joaquin Counties. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 5527 and 5532-5534 for respective areas.) Existing project. Project provides for modification of existing San Francisco Harbor, Richmond Harbor, San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, Suisun Bay Channel, and San Joaquin River navigation projects to provide depths of 55 feet for San Francisco Bar Channel, 45 feet for main internal bay channels upstream to vicinity of Avon, and 35 feet from Avon to Stockton; enlargement and deepening to 45 feet of maneuvering areas adjacent to major petroleum refinery terminals along channel route; widening Suisun Bay Channel; reclaiming shoreline marshes and inundated or low-lying areas by spoil deposit for public recreation and for industrial use; providing basic recreation facilities on some of the reclaimed areas for public use; and placing additional rock revetment on waterside of levees bordering channels. Project estimate (October 1989) is $124,900,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) comprising Federal cost (Corps) of $123,800,000, including basic recreation facilities; Federal cost (Coast Guard) for navigation aids $1,100,000; and non-Federal cost of $29,200,000 for lands and damages, relocations, berthing areas, and spoil retention dikes, including the cash contribution ($20,000) that local interests must make for land enhancement at time of construction. Local interests must also pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest one-half of separable cost of project allocated to recreation. Existing project was adopted by 1965 River and 35-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Harbor Act (H. Doc. 208, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Local interests, through a public body legally authorized and financially capable, must give assurances they will furnish lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation, including spoil-disposal areas designated by the Chief of Engineers; provide necessary spoil retention dikes, bulkheads, and embankments except as applicable to spoildisposal areas designated as public recreation areas; make utility modifications and relocations required for construction, including new bridges or bridge alterations (except for railroad bridges), and absorb any increased annual maintenance and operation costs resulting there from; provide and maintain all necessary berthing areas, at a depth commensurate with project depth, at all terminals and wharves to be served by the deepened channels; and in recognition of the local land enhancement benefits to result from landfill during dredging, contribute to the United States 4 cents per cubic yard of all spoil material placed during initial construction for modification of Suisun Bay Channel project on areas not developed for public use. Local interests must also give satisfactory assurances, before starting construction of the affected units, that they will maintain and operate the Federally provided recreation areas and facilities, continue to maintain to adequate standards the levees altered, set back or provided revetment protection, and hold the U.S. Government free from damages due to deposition of spoil and construction of new levees or reconstruction of existing levees. Local interests, represented by Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County and Stockton Port District, must, at time of construction, contribute $20,000 in cash for land enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest one-half of separable cost of project allocated to recreation; and maintain and operate basic recreation facilities after construction and install additional basic facilities required as demands on area expand. No work shall be undertaken on a modification of Suisun Bay Channel project unit to deepen the channel to more than 35 feet between Avon and a proposed refinery or manufacturing plant, until local interests furnish formal assurances and definite plans for such installation within the Avon- Chipps Island reach of channel. Also, no work shall be undertaken on modification of San Joaquin River navigation project unit, regarding access channels in vicinity of Antioch, until local interests furnish formal assurances and definite plans for Port of Antioch. Formal assurances for deepening and otherwise improving the Stockton Deep Water Ship Channel from Pittsburg to Stockton were furnished by Stockton Port District April 9, 1970. The Stockton Port District, in August 1980, formally provided their intent to sponsor the Avon to Pittsburg reach (Suisun Bay Channel) and recreational development on Roberts Island. The Port of Stockton, by letter of October 20, 1981, stated that they would furnish the necessary assurances for fish and wildlife mitigation and enhancement, and on April 13, 1982, provided formal updated assurances for the Avon to Stockton portion. A sec. 221 agreement satisfying all requirements of local cooperation for Southampton Shoal and Richmond Long Wharf maneuvering area was obtained from Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and signed by District Engineer July 31, 1984. On May 3, 1988, Board passed a resolution of continued support for construction in West Richmond, Pinole Shoal, Carquinez Strait, and Suisun Bay Channels. A Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of the Army, San Francisco District and Contra Costa County to sample berthing areas of project was executed September 12, 1989. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 30, revised 1983, and 31, revised 1982, titled respectively: "The Ports of San Francisco, Redwood City, and Humboldt Bay, Calif." and "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, and Ports on Carquinez Strait, Calif."; and Port Series No. 32, revised 1986, "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif." Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and will be adequate for future commerce upon completion of new terminal facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Sacramento District: Engineering continued. Channel improvement-dredging of various reaches between McDonald Tract and Avon was continued by Contract No. 4 at fiscal year contract cost of $647,055. San Francisco District: planning activities continued including completion of an overwater sediment sampling contract and initiation of a vessel simulation navigation study. Historical summary. Construction of project was initiated in June 1971 and is about 37 percent complete. 4. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA Location. Rises in east central California and flows westerly and northwesterly about 340 miles to its confluence with Sacramento River at head of Suisun Bay, 48 miles northeast of San Francisco. Deep water channel in San Joaquin River extends 41 miles from its mouth in Suisun Bay at Pittsburg to city of Stockton. Waterborne access to city provided by Stockton Channel, an artificial cut extending from river about 2 miles into city. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Sheet 5527.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement, modifications, and authorizing acts, see Annual Report for 1967. (See table 35-I for total cost of new work for project completed in May 1960.) Projects units (1950 modification) reclassifed and excluded from project cost are set forth in table 35-J. Modification of existing project is included as one unit of San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA, (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) project, authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Dec. 209, 89th Cong., 1st sess.); this modification is reported in detail under Sacramento District, Improvement No. 3. 35-4 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project; for details of required cash contributions on completed, inactive and deferred portions of project, see Existing project paragraph, Annual Report for 1967. Terminal facilities. For description of harbor facilities at Port of Stockton, CA, see Port Series 32, "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif.," revised 1986. Downstream from Stockton, traffic is accommodated by bank landings and sheds except at Antioch and near Pittsburg, where there are wharves for shallow- and deep-draft vessels. Terminal transfer facilities at public ocean terminal of Port of Stockton are adequate for present and immediate future. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition studies and miscellaneous inspections and reports were accomplished by hired labor. (Repair or restoration of wavewash protection is required by legislation authorized by Improvement No. 3.) Historical Summary. Active portion of existing project was completed in May 1960. Construction of project was initiated in December 1877. Flood Control 5. BUCHANAN DAM-H.V. EASTMAN LAKE, CHOWCHILLA RIVER, CA Location. On Chowchilla River about 36 miles above its mouth and about 16 miles northeast of city of Chowchilla, CA. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a 205-foot high rockfill dam to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 150,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, recreation, and fish and wildlife. In conjunction with dam, project plan provides for about 12 miles of downstream levee and channel construction on Ash Slough to accommodate a project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second within slough and 7 miles of levee and channel improvement on Berenda Slough. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Total first cost for existing project is $28,919,597, of which $27,369,597 is Federal cost, including $4,580,000 for basic recreation facilities, and $1,550,000 non-Federal costs for lands and damages, including relocations for downstream levee and channel improvements. Local interests have contracted with the Bureau of Reclamation for irrigation service. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Local interests have also, over a period of years, expended about $500,000 for construction of low levees and clearing downstream channels to provide some local flood protection in project area. This work is inadequate during major floods. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 98, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Lake formed by Buchanan Dam on Chowchilla River was designated "H.V. Eastman Lake" by Public Law 93-217. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities were continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $8,842. Runoff of Chowchilla River above Buchanan Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 19,400 acrefeet occurred May 16, 1989. Maximum bihourly inflow to reservoir was 970 cubic feet per second on March 26,1989. Maximum release of 220 cubic feet per second on June 27, 1989, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, a total of 7,700 acre-feet of water was released for irrigation and other purposes. Historical summary. Construction began in July 1971 and was completed in May 1979. Construction of Buchanan and Hidden dam and appurtenances were combined under one contract. Project was completed in September 1983, except for installation of piezometers (now deferred indefinitely). Dam closure was in March 1975; dam was completed in January 1976. Reservoir clearing and boundary marking were completed May 1975. Bifurcation structure was completed in February 1976. Channel improvement, Ash and Berenda Sloughs, was completed in March 1976. Recreation areas: Phase I was completed in January 1976; Phase II was completed in February 1978. Residences, administration building, and visitors center contract was completed in May 1978. Landscaping was completed in May 1979 and erosion control was completed in April 1979. A resources interpretive display and road relocation were completed in FY 1982. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1981. Solar heating was installed at Chowchilla recreation area in FY 1984. Final land audit was approved on December 3, 1985. 6. CACHE CREEK BASIN, CA (CACHE CREEK SETTLING BASIN) Location. At the mouth of Cache Creek in Yolo County where it enters the Yolo Bypass about 2 miles east of city of Woodland and about 15 miles northwest of city of Sacramento, CA. Existing project. Provides for raising the perimeter levees of the existing settling basin an average of 12 feet, extending the levees upstream to County Road 102 to provide 50-year sediment storage capacity, enlarging and reconstructing the cobble weir, and degrading existing training levees and rebuilding them adjacent to western perimeter levee to provide 50 years of sediment storage capacity (340 acre-feet annually.). Estimated cost (October 1989) for existing project is $21,400,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $14,700,000 is Federal and $6,700,000 is non-Federal (which includes $1,070,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 35-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 17, 1986 (HD 98-134, 98th Cong., 1st sess., contains published map.) Project as authorized included development of a national wildlife refuge within the settling basin; however, the Department of the Army determined that such refuge would be more appropriately funded and developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Refuge feature was reclassified to deferred category on April 11, 1988. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges) and other facilities where necessary in construction of the project; pay 5 percent of cost allocated to flood control to bring total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent of which $1,050,000 is cash contribution, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities were continued. 7. CALAVERAS RIVER AND LITTLEJOHN CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, INCLUDING NEW HOGAN LAKE AND FARMINGTON DAM, CA Location. Streams comprising Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek groups rise in Sierra Nevada and its foothills, flow easterly across flatlands of San Joaquin Valley and empty into San Joaquin River directly, or through various sloughs, in vicinity of Stockton, CA. Littlejohn Creek is in Calaveras, Stanislaus, and San Joaquin Counties. The three principal stream systems of the group are, from south to north, Lone Tree Creek, Littlejohn Creek, and Duck Creek. Calaveras River group is in Calaveras and San Joaquin Counties. The two principal streams of the groups are, from south to north, Calaveras River and Bear Creek. (See Geological Survey Valley Springs quadrangle for New Hogan reservoir area and Trigo and Bachelor Valley quadrangles for Farmington reservoir area.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements consisting of Farmington Dam, New Hogan Lake, and Bear Creek levee and channel improvement, and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1967. (a) Farmington: Total first cost (July 1955) for project was $3,995,684, of which $3,676,384 was Federal and $319,300 non-Federal for lands and damages including relocations. (b) New Hogan: Federal cost for project is $15,906,150, including $543,514 for basic recreation facilities. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost for recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $897,742. (c) Bear Creek: Project cost is $6,485,734, of which $3,242,867 is Federal, including reimbursement ($488,096) to local interests of one-half of excess local interest cost of lands, rights-of-way, and relocations over estimated Federal construction cost in accordance with section 3, Public Law 738, 74th Congress. Non-Federal cost included in above amount is $3,242,867 for relocations and lands and damages, exclusive of above Federal reimbursement. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. New Hogan: Local interests must pay portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to conservation functions of project. These costs are estimated at 36.2 percent of first cost and 38 percent of annual costs. In addition, local interests contributed land, the (July 1964) market value of which was. $556,000. For years 1961 through 1970, an interim contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users provided for storage and payment of irrigation water; local interests paid $3,238,092 through December 31, 1988. A long-term contract between that agency and local water users was executed August 25, 1970. A concessionaire at New Hogan Marina provided public use facilities in accordance with lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost to date of $234,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: New Hogan Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Bear Creek, San Joaquin County: None. Maintenance: Farmington Dam-Maintenance and operation activities continued; structures were maintained in serviceable condition. During rainflood season, Duck Creek Diversion and Littlejohn Creek at Farmington had no active storage. New Hogan Lake--Maintenance and operation activities continued. Dam safety assurance studies at New Hogan Dam were continued at a fiscal year cost of $14,317. Renovation of recreational area was continued at a fiscal year contract cost of $672,036. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Calaveras River above New Hogan was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 41,400 acre-feet occurred April 30, 1989. Maximum bihourly inflow to reservoir was 1,500 cubic feet per second on March 25, 1989. Maximum release of 310 cubic feet per second on June 1, 1989, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 19,700 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Historical summary. Farmington Dam: Construction of Farmington project was initiated in July 1949 and completed for beneficial flood control operation in 1952. Duck Creek channel improvement was completed in November 1951; and channel improvement on south Littlejohn Creek was completed in May 1955. There are no recreation facilities or public-use areas. All work completed. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1982. New Hogan Lake: Construction was initiated May 1960, main dam closure November 1963, project completed for operational use in June 1964, and all work completed October 1973. Recreation facilities have been provided from Code 710 appropriations. Seepage measurement weir constructed in June 1980. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980. Bear Creek, San Joaquin County: Construction began in June 1963 and was completed in June 1967. Final cash contribution was made to local interests December 23, 35-6 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT 1970. Solar heating was installed at recreation facilities in FY 1984. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 8. CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA Location. Creek and tributaries drain an area of 28 square miles in Marin County, CA, and flow into west side of San Francisco Bay about 9 miles north of Golden Gate. (See Geological Survey quadrangle San Rafael.) Existing project. Provides for about 11 miles of channel improvements, including realignment, enlargement, levees, riprapping, rectangular concrete sections, interior drainage facilities, bridge relocations, and debris removal on Corte Madera Creek and lower reaches of its tributaries, and a continuous channel rights-ofway to deep water in San Francisco Bay reserved to assure channel outlet in the event of future tideland reclamation. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 modified existing project to direct construction of Unit 4 from Lagunitas Road Bridge to Sir Francis Drake Boulevard, and to include construction of floodproofing measures as necessary to individual properties and other necessary structural measures in vicinity of Lagunitas Road Bridge to insure proper functioning of completed portions of authorized project. Portion of project upstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard previously classified inactive was modified on November 17, 1986 to eliminate any channel modification. Current project has 3 miles of channel enlargement and levees, about 1.8 miles of rectangular concrete channel improvements, and 450,000 cubic yards of redredging on lower Corte Madera Creek. Approved estimated cost for new work (October 1989) is $29,500,000, of which $17,700,000 is Federal cost and $11,800,000 is non- Federal cost (includes $730,000 to be contributed by local interests.) (See table 34-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way, including suitable areas for disposal of waste material, modify or relocate all bridges and utilities necessary for construction and maintenance; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate the project after completion in accordance with the regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, and prevent encroachment on flood channels that would result in decreasing the effectiveness of project for flood control; adjust all claims regarding water rights that might be affected by the project; and contribute in cash 1.5 percent of Federal construction cost of Ross Valley unit and tidal areas, an estimated $730,000. Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District previously furnished resolution of local assurances dated March 29, 1966, March 28, 1967, August 15, 1967, and July 8, 1969, and Marin County Board of Supervisors reaffirmed by letter dated September 28, 1978. Project was authorized by the State of California by 1965 Statute, Chapter 1388. Board of Supervisors of Marin Connty Flood Control and Water Conservation District furnished assurances of willingness and ability to meet requirements for portion of project below Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. On December 13, 1983, Marin County Board of Supervisors reconfirmed assurances of local cooperation because a Superior Court Judgment ordered that county to take all steps required by law to complete channel downstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard (Unit 4) and maintain entire project as agreed. A Local Cooperation Agreement for redredging the lower reach of Corte Madera Creek was executed on June 29, 1985. Marin County also provided support for Ross Valley Unit 4 by resolution on March 24, 1987 and by the resolution on September 13, 1988. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering continued. Landscaping restoration contract for Units 2 and 3 was continued at fiscal year cost of $152,697. Waterways Experiment Station published a sedimentation study in April 1989. Study concluded that existing concrete channel will not contain 100-year flows. Historical summary. Project responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. Project is about 77 percent complete considering the portion being held in abeyance upstream of Sir Frances Drake Boulevard. Work remaining: Design construction of the remaining 3,000 feet of channel downstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard and Ross Creek. In lieu of the authorized concrete channel, an alternative plan consisting of wing walls and individual house floodproofing is being recommended in the Significant Post-Authorization Change Report. The portion of Corte Madera Creek upstream of intersection of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard and Corte Madera Creek in Ross, near the city of San Anselmo, was classified as "inactive" on July 11, 1984, due to lack of local support. A Local Cooperation Agreement for redredging lower reach of Corte Madera Creek was executed June 29, 1985. Construction on Lower Corte Madera Creek Channel was completed and transferred to Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by letter of May 28, 1987. San Francisco District will monitor maintenance and operation of the project. 9. FAIRFIELD VICINITY STREAMS, CA Location. On five streams in vicinity of cities of Fairfield and Suisun, Solano County, CA. Existing project. Provides for channel improvement on Ledgewood, Laurel, and McCoy Creeks and diversion of three creeks upstream from Fairfield (Pennsylvania Avenue Creek into Ledgewood Creek, Union Avenue Creek into Laurel Creek, and Laurel Creek into McCoy Creek). Project related recreation facilities such as access roads, parking areas, a boat-launching ramp and hiking, bicycle, and horseback trails would also be constructed. Estimated cost (October 1989) for existing project is $36,300,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $13,800,000 is Federal and $22,500,000 is non- 35-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Federal (includes $290,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by sec. 201, 1965 Flood Control Act (1970 Senate and House Public Works Committee resolutions) and Further Continuing Appropriations Act for FY 1986 (Public Law 99-190), December 19, 1985. (HD 91-159, 91st Cong., 1st sess., contains published map). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary in the construction of the project, pay one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $475,000, of which $80,000 is for lands, $105,000 is credit for recreation facilities built by local interests per Public Law 100-71, July 11, 1987, which directs that project proceed under provisions of sec. 117, Public Law 99-190, and $290,000 is cash contribution; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities and flood control facilities. Ultimate non-Federal cost for flood control will be reduced by a Federal reimbursement of one-half of the non-Federal costs in excess of the Federal construction costs. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Project had been in "deferred" status since September 15, 1977, due to lack of local assurances. In April 1982, the cities of Fairfield and Suisun affirmed their support and intent to provide necessary assurances of local cooperation for a modified version of the authorized project from 200-year to 100-year flood protection. On June 23, 1982, project was reclassified from "deferred" to "active" status. The State of California Reclamation Board has provided a letter of intent to the Assistant Secretary of the Army, November 8, 1982, to cooperate with the Federal Government to begin construction of the project. In accordance with FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (Public Law 99-88) and sec. 117 of the Further Continuing Appropriations Act for FY 1986 (Public Law 99-190), a Local Cooperation Agreement for flood control and recreation (sec. 221) was executed June 3, 1986. Sec. 117 of Further Continuing Appropriations Act for FY 1986 contained the following authorization language which will be reflected in any future modified agreements: "The Secretary shall include as part of the non-Federal contribution of the project for flood control, Fairfield Vicinity Streams, California, authorized in accordance with sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965, the cost of any work carried out by non-Federal interests on the project after December 31, 1973, and before the date of the enactment of this joint resolution if the Secretary determines such work is reasonably compatible with the project. Costs and benefits resulting from such work shall continue to be included for purposes of determining economic feasibility of the project." Prior local expenditures of $6,800,000 have been reported by the sponsor. The Corps is evaluating costs and benefits of all completed works by non-Federal interests after December 31, 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction contract for Laurel Creek Diversion Channel, Phase II, was physically completed at a fiscal year cost of $462,209. Construction contract for Laurel Creek and Union Avenue Diversion, Phase III, was initiated at a fiscal year cost of $3,204,904. Historical summary. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on June 3, 1986. Construction was initiated in October 1986. Construction contract for enlarging McCoy Creek and constructing Laurel Creek Diversion Channel, Phase I, was completed and was transferred to local interests in July 1987 for maintenance. Construction contract for Laurel Creek Diversion Channel, Phase II, was physically completed. Construction contract for Laurel Creek and Union Avenue Diversion, Phase III, was initiated. 10. HIDDEN DAM-HENSLEY LAKE, FRESNO RIVER, CA Location. On Fresno River about 50 miles above its mouth and about 15 miles northeast of Madera, CA (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a 163-foot high earthfill dam to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 90,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, recreation and other purposes. In conjunction with the dam, the project provides for about 13 miles of downstream levee and channel improvements on Fresno River immediately upstream of Chowchilla Canal crossing to accommodate project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Total first cost for existing project is $31,785,426, of which $30,555,426 is Federal cost, including $3,564,168 for basic recreation facilities, and estimated $1,230,000 non-Federal cost for lands and damages including relocations for downstream levee and channel improvements. Local interests have contracted with the Bureau of Reclamation for irrigation service. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Local interests have also, over a period of years, expended about $300,000 for construction of low levees and clearing downstream channels to provide some local flood protection in the project area. This work is inadequate during major floods. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 37, 87th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Lake created by Hidden Reservoir project on Fresno River was designated "Hensley Lake" by Public Law 93-603. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work. None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation 35-8 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT activities were continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $8,851. Runoff of Fresno River below Hidden Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 23,000 acre-feet occurred June 9, 1989. Maximum bihourly inflow to the reservoir was 490 cubic feet per second on March 3, 1989. Maximum release of 230 cubic feet per second on July 7, 1989, was below maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 16,300 acre-feet of water was released for irrigation and other purposes. Historical summary. Construction began in July 1971 and was completed in January 1979. Dam closure was in March 1975; dam was completed November 1975. Instrumentation was completed in January 1976. Downstream channel improvement, Fresno River, was completed April 1976. Recreation areas: Phase I was completed in March 1976; Phase II was completed in June 1978. Residences, administration building, grounds, and utilities contract was completed in February 1978. Landscaping was completed in December 1978 and erosion control was completed in January 1979. Project was completed in September 1980. Final land audit was approved February 5, 1980. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980. Piezometer installation was completed in September 1982. Solar heating was installed at recreation areas in FY 1984. 11. ISABELLA LAKE, KERN RIVER, CA Location. About 35 miles northeast of city of Bakersfield, CA, near confluence of north and south forks of Kern River; auxiliary dam is about one-half mile east of main dam. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1967. Federal cost for new work is $22,027,452. For future non-Federal reimbursement see Local cooperation and Licenses paragraphs. Federal cost funded from Code 710 appropriations is $2,199,085. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. California officially adopted project by chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945, State of California. Local interests, represented by North Kern, Buena Vista, and Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage Districts and La Hacienda Water District, were required to reimburse the Federal Government the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation functions of project. These costs, based on a cost allocation study completed in December 1955, are $4,573,000 of first cost and 21.7 percent of annual operation and maintenance cost. For the years 1956 through 1964, an interim contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users provided for storage and payment of irrigation water. Under provisions of this interim contract, local interests paid $1,936,229 through December 31, 1964. A long-term contract between the Bureau and local water users was executed October 23, 1964. Balance due on allocated first cost of $4,573,000 was paid by the water users on March 31, 1965. Kern County assumed administration of recreation and development and maintenance of public use areas at project in accordance with a 25-year license February 15, 1955. The agreement with Kern County provided for joint operation and development by the Corps and Kern County including permits granted to concessionaires by the county to provide certain services. As of September 30, 1971, Kern County relinquished all administration of recreation and development and maintenance of public use areas at the project. A State law permitting the Department of Boating and Waterways (known as the Department of Navigation and Ocean Development prior to January 1979) to participate in inland water development with Federal agencies was signed by the Governor on August 11, 1972. All concessionaires will operate under permits granted by the Corps. Total cost to date of present recreation facilities developed by the county and the marina concessionaires is about $965,000; $235,000 of this was a grant from the California Wildlife Conservation Board and about $534,000 is investment by marina concessionaires. Licenses. In accordance with Federal Power Commission Docket No. E-6578, issued April 1, 1963, payment of $377,426 was made to the Federal Government by Pacific Gas and Electric Co. ($108,352) and Southern California Edison Co. ($269,074) for headwater benefits to downstream existing plants from Isabella Dam to cover benefits from April 15, 1954, to December 31, 1962. Between 1962 and 1982, the power companies have in the aggregate made annual payments of $44,650 for headwater benefits. That amount was to be paid each year until changes in operation, development, or costs indicated some modification to be advisable. Federal Power Commission Docket No. E-6578 was revised by Docket No. HB07-75-4-000 (order issued July 11, 1983 under 24 FERC, paragraph 62052) which modified cumulative use charges after 1974, effective retroactively. Such charges will now vary each year. An adjustment (years 1974 through 1984) was included in 1984 payment of $244,790. The 1985 payment was $52,747; 1986 payment was $51,905. No payment was received in 1987. The 1988 payment was $58,187. No payment was received in 1989. Cumulative use charges collected by the Federal Power Commission (known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission since January 9, 1978) and returned to the U. S. Treasury through period ending September 30, 1989, amounted to $1,767,355. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation continued. Structures were maintained in good condition. Runoff of Kern River above Isabella Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 184,800 acre-feet occurred June 1, 1989. Maximum bihourly inflow to the reservoir was 2,600 cubic feet per second on March 3, 1989, and maximum outflow of 1,900 cubic feet per second occurred July 13, 1989. During the year, 35-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 335,600 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Historical summary. Construction began in March 1948 and was completed in June 1968. Main dam, Borel Canal outlet works and appurtenances, and auxiliary dam were completed in April 1953. Storage impoundment began December 1952. Piezometer was installed in August 1982. Project is operating to provide flood protection and irrigation benefits for which it was designed. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 12. KAWEAH AND TULE RIVERS, INCLUDING TERMINUS DAM AND SUCCESS LAKE, CA Location. Terminus Dam is on Kaweah River about 20 miles east of Visalia, CA. Success Lake is on Tule River about 5 miles east of Porterville, CA. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Existing project. Terminus Dam: For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost of new work is $19,302,957, including $242,605 for basic recreation facilities and excluding spreading works constructed by local interests at an estimated (July 1957) cost of about $750,000. Spreading works portion of project has been deauthorized. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of that portion of project. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $700,004. Success Lake: For description of completion improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost of new work for Success Lake is $14,247,221, including $253,697 for basic recreation facilities. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $747,048. For future non-Federal reimbursements, see Local cooperation paragraph. Operation and maintenance of reservoirs is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. California officially adopted projects by chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945, State of California. Local interests for Terminus Dam are represented by Kaweah Delta Water Conservation District. Local interests for Success Lake are considered to be represented by the Vandalia, Porterville, and Lower Tule River Irrigation Districts, the Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District, and Pioneer Water Co., which represent over 90 percent of irrigated land and water-right holders along Tule River below damsite. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation functions of projects. These costs are estimated at 14.1 percent of first and annual costs for Terminus and 9.5 percent of first and annual costs for Success. Local interests for Terminus stated they will continue to operate and maintain spreading works and downstream channel systems to provide required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. Local interests for Success stated they will continue to maintain downstream channel systems to provide required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. Repayment contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users for irrigation supply from Terminus and Success reservoirs were executed January 11, 1965, and April 30, 1965, respectively. Reservoirs are being operated for irrigation storage as well as flood control and incidental recreation use. Tulare County acquired water for recreation pools at the projects. Local interests paid the following total amounts for irrigation services from the reservoirs through December 31, 1988: Terminus, $1,801,206 and Success, $847,903. Tulare County was granted a 25-year license for planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Success, July 10, 1960, and at Terminus, June 5, 1961. Basic public-use facilities constructed by Corps at the Success reservoir were transferred to jurisdiction of Tulare County on January 18, 1962; facilities at Terminus were transferred June 20, 1962. In March 1967, an amendment to the license agreements was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army. Under these amended licenses, Tulare County retained administration of only specified land areas and operation and maintenance of recreation facilities in these areas. In addition, they continued their program of water safety, boat inspection, and law enforcement at both reservoirs. The Corps took over the administration of the remainder of the project land areas and the operation and maintenance of recreation facilities in these areas. Calif. Department of Fish and Game expended funds to improve fishery resources of the Terminus reservoir. As of April 1, 1972, Tulare County relinquished all planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Terminus Dam. Tulare County by expenditure of county funds and by a lease to a marina concessionaire has aided in the development of recreation facilities at an estimated cost of $199,000. Calif. Department of Fish and Game expended funds in conjunction with Tulare Sportsman's Council and developed a habitat for upland game birds at Success Lake. As of April 1, 1972, Tulare County relinquished all planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Success Lake, except for the Bartlett Park recreation area. Tulare County has aided in development of recreation facilities. Total cost to date of present recreation facilities developed by the county ($360,000) and the marina concessionaires ($373,000) is about $733,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Terminus Dam, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Success Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Terminus Dam: Maintenance and operation continued. Dam safety assurance studies were completed at a fiscal year cost of $138. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Kaweah River above Terminus Dam was below normal for the 35-10 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT year. Maximum storage of 129,000 acre-feet occurred on May 31, 1989. Maximum bihourly inflow to the reservoir on April 11, 1989, was about 1,600 cubic feet per second. Maximum outflow of 2,000 cubic feet per second occurred June 9, 1989. Water released for irrigation and spreading releases totaled 207,000 acre-feet. Success Lake: Maintenance and operation continued. Dam safety assurance studies were completed at a fiscal year cost of $2,294. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Tule River above Success Dam was below normal during the year. Maximum bihourly inflow to the reservoir was 1,900 cubic feet per second on March 3, 1989, and maximum outflow of 470 cubic feet per second occurred on August 2, 1989. Maximum storage of 42,100 acre-feet occurred on June 2, 1989. Water released for irrigation and spreading releases amounted to 49,700 acre-feet. Historical summary. Terminus Dam: Construction of project began in July 1957 and was completed in June 1968. Final land audit was approved on April 20, 1987. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, initiated in February 1959, was completed in June 1962. Dam has been operating since November 1961 to provide flood protection for which it was designed; conservation impoundment was commenced May 1962. Appurtenances are in good condition. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979 and completed in FY 1989. Piezometer installation and a cultural resources survey were completed in FY 1984. Success Lake: Construction of project began in November 1956, was completed in June 1968, and final audit of historical land record was approved December 17, 1979. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, initiated in October 1958, was completed in May 1961. Dam has been operating since October 1960 to provide flood protection for which it was designed; conservation impoundment was commenced March 1962. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979 and completed in FY 1989. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 13. LITTLE DELL LAKE, UT Location. On Dell Creek, a tributary of Parleys Creek, about 8 miles east of Salt Lake City upstream of Mountain Dell Reservoir in Salt Lake County, UT. Existing Project. Project providing for construction of a dam about 253 feet high to create a reservoir with a gross capacity of 30,000 acre-feet for flood control, municipal and industrial water supply, recreation and fish and wildlife was authorized by the 1968 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 53, 90th Cong., 1st sess., contains published map) as modified by sec. 170, Water Resources Development Act of 1976, Public Law 94-587, October 22, 1976. Facility would be operated in conjunction with existing downstream 3,200 acre-foot Mountain Dell Reservoir on Parleys Creek for flood control and water supply. Authorized project has been reexamined and scaled down to reflect local interests' ability to pay. Current plan of improvement includes only flood control and water supply purposes. Recreation was deferred as of May 30, 1986, and Emigration Creek Diversion was deleted and placed in an inactive status. Project will include an earthfill dam 224 feet high, a 20,500 acre-foot reservoir, and 10,035 feet of pipeline to divert water from Parleys Creek. Estimated project cost (October 1989) is $56,800,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) of which $32,700,000 is Federal and $24,100,000 is non-Federal for lands and damages and includes a cash contribution of $17,500,000. Project is included in FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (Public Law 99-88) August 15, 1985. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project; pay all costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply; pay 13 percent of costs allocated to flood control to bring total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent, bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities; and pay a cash contribution presently estimated at $17,500,000. By letters of January 22, 1986, and January 24, 1986, the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County indicated their support and willingness to proceed with a reduced scale project based on their "ability to pay." A Local Cooperation Agreement (sec. 221) was executed on June 10, 1986. Water Revenue Bonds were issued August 27, 1986, and proceeds from the sale in the amount of $14,300,000 have been deposited in the Little Dell Construction Fund Account. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities continued. Construction of core trench and test fill was completed at a fiscal year contract cost of $198,950. Main dam and appurtenances contract was awarded in May 1989; construction was initiated at contract fiscal year cost of $1,920,367. Relocations were essentially completed by the State of Utah and several utility companies. Main dam and appurtenances contract was awarded in May 1989; construction was initiated at contract fiscal year cost of $1,920,367. Historical summary. A Local Cooperation Agreement (sec. 221) was executed June 10, 1986. Construction was initiated in April 1988. Construction of core trench and test fill was completed in February 1989. Main dam and appurtenances contract was awarded May 12, 1989. 14. LOWER SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA Location. On Lower San Joaquin River, CA, from city of Stockton, CA, extending about 225 miles upstream to Friant Dam (about 19 miles northeast of 35-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Fresno) and along Kings River North for approximately 25 miles upstream from Mendota Dam. Existing project. This project is a modification and extension of the previous Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries project (see Annual Report for 1976) to provide clearing and snagging on San Joaquin River from Stockton, CA, upstream to Friant Dam. Estimated first cost (October 1989) is $29,776,000, of which $22,876,000 is Federal and $6,900,000 is non-Federal for lands and damages (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period as well as $12,976,000, Federal, and $5,000,000, non-Federal, for work completed by 1974). Existing project was included in the 1983 Supplemental Appropriations Act, Public Law 98-63, July 29, 1983, which states that project for flood protection on Lower San Joaquin River, CA, authorized by the Flood Control Act approved December 22, 1944, as amended, is modified to authorize the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, to perform clearing and snagging on San Joaquin River from Stockton, CA, to Friant Dam, at an estimated cost of $5,000,000. The Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1988, Public Law 100-202, December 22, 1987 (H.J. Res. 395) modifies Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1983 to include: clearing and snagging in area of North Fork of Kings River in Mendota Pool from southerly boundary of James Reclamation District Number 1606 to Mendota Dam; fish and wildlife mitigation; and such riprapping in area of clearing and snagging on such rivers as may be necessary to prevent erosion from such clearing snagging; and increase estimated cost of clearing and snagging on Lower San Joaquin River, including activities above, from $5,000,000 to $8,000,000. Local cooperation. Prior to initiation of construction, a non-Federal entity shall furnish adequate assurance for providing all lands, easements, rights-ofway and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in construction of project at no expense to the Federal Government, execute a local cooperation agreement pursuant to sec. 221 Public Law 96-611; agree to operate and maintain the project works upon completion of construction in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by the Department of the Army; and hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. Non-Federal sponsor, the California State Reclamation Board, has agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Coordination with local interests and pertinent agencies was continued. Lack of concensus of support by Federal, State and local entities led to recommendation to terminate project. Historical summary. A Plan of Action, February 1984, has been prepared. Design Memorandum No. 5 for Eastside Bypass at San Joaquin River was prepared in September 1984. First construction contract, dredging Eastside Bypass, was awarded October 12, 1984 and completed in May 1985. 15. MARTIS CREEK LAKE, MARTIS CREEK, NV AND CA Location. Reservoir is on Martis Creek a tributary of Truckee River, near Truckee, CA; intermittent channel improvements are on Truckee River in Reno, NV. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for areas.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost for project was $8,503,789 including $289,506 for basic recreation facilities. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations was $1,200. Construction of recreation facilities under Code 710 was determined to be infeasible. Operation and maintenance of reservoir is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation of project, including recreation facilities, was continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff above Martis Creek Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 900 acre-feet occurred on March 11, 1989. Maximum bihourly inflow to the reservoir was 350 cubic feet per second on March 11, 1989, and maximum outflow of 250 cubic feet per second occurred March 11, 1989. Historical summary. Project construction began in August 1967; dam closure was in October 1971; dam completed in August 1972; basic recreation facilities were completed in December 1972; and project was completed in June 1974. Recreation facilities under Code 710 funding were considered infeasible. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1981. 16. MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA Location. In vicinity of city of Merced, CA, on streams draining from Mariposa County foothills of the Sierra Nevada into Merced County. Streams lie easterly of and drain into the San Joaquin River between Chowchilla River on the south and Merced River on the north. Drainage area represents about 1,000 square miles; nearly 700 square miles of foothills and mountains in Mariposa County and about 300 square miles of flood plain in Merced County. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Project is a modification of Merced County Stream Group, Calif., Improvement No. 17, authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 473, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and completed in FY 1957. Existing project provides for construction of three new 35-12 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT reservoirs-Castle, Haystack Mountain, and Marguerite on Canal, Black Rascal, and Deadman-Dutchman Creeks, respectively, and enlargement of four existing reservoirs-Burns, Bear, Owens, and Mariposa, providing a total capacity of 126,700 acre-feet for multipurpose storage; and about 52 miles of levee and channel improvements in lower reaches of Bear, Black Rascal, Mariposa, and Deadman Creeks, thereby tying the existing project channels into Eastside Bypass of San Joaquin River flood control system. Haystack Mountain, Bear, and Owens projects would provide flood control only; Castle and Burns projects, flood control and recreation; Marguerite project, flood control and irrigation; and Mariposa project, all three purposes. Existing project was adopted by 1970 Flood Control Act (Document not yet printed.) Current plan of improvement would defer enlargement of existing Burns reservoir, Mariposa reservoir, construction of Marguerite Dam, and the irrigation function associated with the latter two facilities, enlargement of existing Owens reservoir and about 32 miles of levee and channel improvement on Owens, Mariposa, and Deadman-Dutchman Creeks. Estimated project cost (October 1989) is $100,900,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $70,500,000 is Federal and $30,400,000 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $230,000, of which $190,000 is a cash contribution and $40,000 is for lands; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Total non-Federal share of Castle Dam first cost is $3,000,000 and includes cash contribution of $470,000. The California Reclamation Board and the City of Merced are the local sponsors of the authorized project. The Reclamation Board will serve as sole sponsor for the Castle Dam Unit. Merced County Board of Supervisors reaffirmed their support for the project by letter of April 4, 1986. City of Merced by letter of March 13, 1986, reaffirmed its support for and intent to furnish assurances for recreation aspects of the project. California Reclamation Board reaffirmed its support for total project by letter of April 9, 1986. A Local Cooperation Agreement (sec. 221) was executed for Castle Dam Unit on June 27, 1986. State of California legislation (AB3369) was enacted on September 14, 1986 which enabled the Reclamation Board to financially participate in the project. A new Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army November 30, 1988, in accordance with the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities continued with completion of plans and specifications for Castle Dam. 17. MERCED COUNTY STREAM GROUP, CA Location. Reservoirs and channel improvements are on Bear, Burns, Mariposa, and Owens Creeks, in foothills of Sierra Nevada about 15 to 20 miles east of city of Merced, CA. (See Geological Survey Haystack Mountain quadrangle for Burns and Indian Gulch quadrangle for Bear, Owens, and Mariposa areas.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1962. Improvements consist of reservoirs at Mariposa, Owens, Burns and Bear Creeks and diversions from Black Rascal Creek to Bear Creek and from Creek to Mariposa Creek. Total first cost for project was $3,899,259, of which $2,751,259 was Federal and $1,148,000 non-Federal for lands including relocations and channel improvement. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary maintenance and operation of the four completed reservoirs continued. Structures were maintained in a serviceable condition. Runoff from drainage areas above Merced County stream group reservoirs was below normal for the year. See Table 35-K for maximum inflow storage and outflow for the projects. Outflows were less than channel capacity rates in the project streams. Historical summary. Construction was initiated March 1948, with construction of Mariposa project, which was completed in November 1948. Construction of Owens project, initiated in March, was completed in October 1949; Burns project, initiated in July 1949, was completed in January 1950; and Bear project initiated in April, was completed in December 1954. Black Rascal and Owens Creek diversion channels and stream-gaging stations were completed in April 1956. Local interests completed channel enlargement and restoration of channel capacities of Miles, Burns, Owens, and Mariposa Creeks in 1956 at their expense. Improvement of Bear Creek and Black Rascal Slough, below their confluence, was deferred pending possible improvements downstream, outside limits of project. 18. PAJARO RIVER, CA Location. In the Uvas-Carnadero and Llagas Creeks watersheds of the upper Pajaro River Basin in south Santa Clara County in vicinity of the city of Gilroy about 75 miles south of San Francisco, CA. Existing project. Provides for construction of a 2-mile levee along the north side of Uvas Creek from a point about 2,000 feet downstream of Thomas Road to about 3,500 feet upstream of Miller Avenue. Project will also include a bikeway and hiking trail. Estimated 35-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 cost (October 1989) for existing project is $14,790,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $5,395,000 is Federal and $7,395,000 is non-Federal (which includes $795,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by Flood Control Act of 1944, December 21, 1944 (HD 505-78, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains published map.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, right-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges) and other facilities where necessary in construction of project; pay one-half of separable costs allocated to recreation and bear all cost of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities; and pay 5 percent of cost allocated to flood control and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests will receive an estimated Federal reimbursement of $6,228,000 for one half of non-Federal costs allocated to flood control in excess of Federal costs. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operations and result during fiscal year. First construction contract (levee work and bike path upstream of Thomas Road Bridge) was completed at fiscal year cost of $2,320; second construction contract (levee work and hiking trails), continued at fiscal year cost of $69,227; and the third and final construction contract (landscaping) was initiated at fiscal year cost of $106,504. Historical summary. Responsibility for remaining portions of advance engineering and design, plans and specifications, and construction was transferred to Sacramento District in April 1982. Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) for flood control was executed with the Santa Clara Valley Water District on June 25, 1987, and LCA for recreation was executed with the City of Gilroy on July 27, 1987. Construction began in October 1987. 19. PINE FLAT LAKE AND KINGS RIVER, CA Location. Reservoir is on Kings River, about 25 miles east of Fresno, CA, and channel improvements are on Kings River downstream from Lemoore weir, about 25 miles south of Fresno. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Existing project. Improvement is a unit in comprehensive plan for flood control and other related purposes for Sacramento-San Joaquin Basins. Project consists of a 429-foot high concrete gravity dam, including a gated overflow section with a maximum discharge capacity of 391,000 cubic feet per second, creating a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 1 million acre-feet, for flood control, irrigation, and related purposes. Outlet provisions for future power development are included in dam, but Federal construction of power-generating facilities is not authorized. Improvement also includes levee and channel work on Kings River and its distributaries on valley floor about 25 miles south of Fresno. Channel improvement work will enlarge channel capacities and regulate flows in lower branches of the Kings River. There are nine public-use and recreation areas: One maintained by the Corps, four by the Forest Service, three jointly by the Corps and concession, and one by Fresno County. Also, five boat access-only areas are maintained by the Corps on the south side of the reservoir. Project cost is $42,072,330, of which $41,502,330 is Federal (including $13,700 for basic recreation facilities) and $570,000 non-Federal for rights-of-way for downstream channel improvements. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost of recreation facilities for Pine Flat Lake, funded from Code 710 appropriations is $1,595,100 exclusive of recreation facilities previously provided at a cost of $13,700. In addition, Federal cost of recreation facilities for Pine Flat Lake, funded from Public Works Acceleration Executive Act of 1962 appropriations, was $239,235 (July 1963). Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is Federal responsibility. Existing project was adopted by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 630, 76th Cong., 3d sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for first costs allocated to irrigation functions of reservoir portion of project in accordance with reclamation law. Under provision of War Department Civil Appropriations Act of 1947, the Secretary of War, with concurrence of the Secretary of the Interior, determined allocation of cost to irrigation should be set at an amount not to exceed $14,250,000. In addition, local interests must pay 37.4 percent of annual maintenance, operation, and replacement costs of dam and reservoir allocated to irrigation function. Repayment contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation and the local water users for the irrigation use of the reservoir were executed December 23, 1963. The Bureau is administering the contracts in accordance with reclamation law as amended by the Reclamation Reform Act of October 12, 1982. That act generally exempts the limitations under the early reclamation laws as being applicable to projects constructed by the Corps with two exceptions; however, all existing contracts to share construction and maintenance costs remain in effect. Prior to execution of the final contracts, the Bureau provided conservation water to local interests under an interim contract. Irrigation interests paid $13,062,723 for irrigation services through December 31, 1988. With respect to the downstream channel improvements, sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. King River Conservation District represents local interests; assurances were acceptcd November 20, 1959. Local interests have furnished all requirements for construction rights-of-way for construction of channel improvements required to date, Three concessionaires each at Lakeridge Marina (Deer 35-14 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Creek), Pine Flat Marina and Trimmer Marina provided public-use facilities in accordance with lease agreements with the Secretary of the Army. Estimated cost to date of facilities installed by these concessionaires is $1,727,000. Fresno County developed publicuse facilities on an 85-acre tract immediately downstream from dam for picnicking, camping, swimming, and playground activities, at an estimated cost to date of $476,000 under provisions of a license agreement. The U.S. Forest Service developed and operates a picnic area at the upper end of reservoir. Cost of site development is about $37,500. Installation of a hydroelectric powerplant, located at the downstream toe of the Corps Pine Flat Dam, was completed in January 1984 by Kings River Conservation District. Project consists of an outdoor-type powerhouse containing three generating units with capacities of 55 megawatts each for a total of 165 megawatts. Conservation District would make use of the three existing 13.5-foot diameter penstocks that were installed in Pine Flat Dam when constructed in 1954. Licenses. License No. 1988, effective April 1, 1955, was issued by Federal Power Commission to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. for hydroelectric power development of North Fork Kings River by the company upstream from the Pine Flat reservoir. Under interim Contract No. DA-04-167-eng-1182 with the Department of the Army, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. paid for storage of power water in the Pine Flat reservoir May 15, 1954, through March 31, 1955. Current Contract No. DA-04-167-eng-1328 with the Department of the Army provides for storage of power water at the rate of 0.1375 per acre-foot; the contract covers April 1, 1955, through March 31, 2005. By an agreement of January 1972, supplementing the December 1954 contract, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. transferred ownership of most of its Kings River system water to the Kings River Water Association. Accordingly, no further significant storage service to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. by the reservoir at Pine Flat is anticipated. Total payment under these contracts through June 30, 1972, (last year of payment), amounts to $2,478,798; these funds were paid to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Kings River above Pine Flat Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 386,200 acre-feet occurred on May 29, 1989. Maximum bihourly inflow to the reservoir was 5,080 cubic feet per second on May 8, 1989, and maximum outflow of 6,700 cubic feet per second occurred on June 12, 1989. During the year, 924,000 acre-feet was released for irrigation and spreading. Historical summary. Construction began in April 1947 and project, including channel improvement, was completed in September 1977. Main dam was initiated in January 1950, completed in June 1954, and has been operating since February 1954 to provide flood protection for which it was designed. Total of 35.2 miles of new and reconstructed levees and 13.2 miles of channel clearing have been transferred to the Kings River Conservation District for maintenance. Recreation facilities for various recreation areas under Code 710 appropriation are complete. Completed preliminary design and cost estimates for Pine Flat fish barrier were reviewed by the State, but the State was unable to provide necessary assurances of local cooperation. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1982. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 20. REDBANK AND FANCHER CREEKS, CA Location. Northeast and adjacent to the Fresno- Clovis Metropolitan Area in Fresno County about 170 miles southeast of Sacramento, CA. Existing project. Provides for flood control detention basins on Redbank Creek, Pup Creek, and Alluvial Drain; construction of a dam 45.5 feet high to create a reservoir with gross capacity of 10,300 acre-feet for flood control on Fancher Creek; and enlargement of Big Dry Creek project to provide increased flood protection and recreational development. Since the local sponsor does not support recreational development at this time, the recreation feature of the project is considered to be inactive. The authorization Act states "measures determined appropriate by the Secretary of the Army to minimize benefits to groundwater recharge" shall be included in the project. Estimated cost (October 1989) for existing project is $67,200,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $50,400,000 is Federal and $16,800,000 is non-Federal (which includes $5,138,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by sec. 401, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. (HD 98-147, 98th Cong., 2d sess., contains published map.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges) and other facilities where necessary in construction of the project; pay 5 percent of cost allocated to flood control to bring total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent, of which $5,138,000 is cash contribution, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities were continued. Construction contract was completed for Dry Creek Crossing at a fiscal year cost of $87,333 and was transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance on January 10, 1989. Cultural Resources Preservation contract was essentially 35-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 completed. Construction contract for Redbank Creek Detention Basin was awarded September 14, 1989. Historical summary. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on August 1, 1987. Project construction was begun in September 1987 with initiation of archaeological work on Cultural Resources Preservation. Construction contract for Dry Creek Crossing was completed and transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance on January 10, 1989. 21. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA Location. Russian River rises in Coast Range in northwestern California, flows southerly for 87 miles, and then turns westerly to flow for 23 miles to Pacific Ocean at Jenner, 60 miles northwest of San Francisco, CA. (For general location see Geological Survey map for California.) Existing project. Active authorized project provides for construction of a dam on East Fork of Russian River at Coyote Valley to a height of 160 feet; a dam on Dry Creek at Warm Springs to a height of 319 feet; and channel stabilization works on Russian River between mouth and mile 98, on lower reaches of several tributaries, and on Dry Creek downstream from dam. Project also provides for expansion of fish hatchery capacity at Dry Creek, Warm Springs, to compensate for fish losses on Russian River attributed to operation of Coyote Dam component of project. Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino), completed in 1959, is operated and maintained by the United States. (See tables 35-L and 35-M for latest approved estimated costs.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for Coyote Valley Dam and channel improvements accomplished to date. For the Dry Creek portion, local interests are required by the authorizing act to comply with the usual a., b., c. requirements for channel improvements and, in addition, prevent any encroachment in the channel of Dry Creek which would interfere with proper functioning of the channel improvement works; adjust all claims concerning water rights arising from the construction and operation of the improvements, including acquisition of water rights needed for preservation of fish and wildlife resources affected by the project; and reimburse the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, for that part of the construction cost, (27.8% of total construction cost, currently estimated at $104,020,000) and the annual operation, maintenance, and replacement costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, tentatively estimated at $460,000. The estimated annual cost to local interests for maintenance of channel improvement works is $80,000. Sonoma County Water Agency (formerly Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District) provided assurances of willingness and ability to meet requirements by Resolutions No. DR 00793-1, September 25, 1961, No. DR 4770-1, December 17, 1962, and No. DR 45759, August 5, 1974, for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel. By letter dated March 7, 1967, Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District further indicated their interest in optimization of the Dry Creek (Warm Springs) damsite to provide additional water supply storage. Reimbursement to the United States for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel costs allocated to 212,000 acre-feet of water supply storage is specified in a water supply contract with the local sponsor approved in October 1982. Local interests have expended approximately $1,000,000 to provide partial flood protection in project area and have constructed facilities at an approximate cost of $20,000,000 to distribute water from the completed Coyote Valley reservoir. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Coyote Valley Dam: None. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel: Engineering activities continued. Major items of contract work included: Continuation of Rockpile Road Upgrade, $801,284; physical completion of Yorty Creek Beach, $236,771; initiation and physical completion of remedial work at Buzzard Rock (now known as Liberty Glen) camping area, $141,488; continuation of downstream channel improvements, Phase III, $209,444; and initiation of downstream recreation area, $138,894. Maintenance: Coyote Valley Dam: Operation and maintenance continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of East Fork Russian River at Coyote Dam was near normal for the year. Maximum storage of 93,000 acre-feet occurred on March 18, 1989. Maximum bihourly inflow to reservoir was 4,900 cubic feet per second on March 18, 1989. Maximum release of 2,200 cubic feet per second occurred on March 6, 1989. During the year, 113,800 acre-feet was released for flood control, and 96,000 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel: Operation and maintenance continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Dry Creek at Warm Springs Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 193,900 acre-feet occurred April 9, 1989. Maximum bihourly inflow to reservoir was 6,800 cubic feet per second on March 18, 1989. Maximum release of 400 cubic feet per second occurred October 5, 1988. During the year, 68,000 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Project prevented $50,000 in damages from FY 1989 rainfloods. Historical summary. Entire project, exclusive of recreation facilities at completed project (Lake Mendocino), is about 96 percent complete. Coyote Valley Dam, initiated November 1958, was completed April 1959 (cost $17,550,000, of which $11,952,000 was Federal; and $5,598,000 contributed). Work, including removal of slides resulting from storms in 1958, was completed April 1959. Bank stabilization work on Russian River near Geyserville was completed in 1957 and channel improvements in remaining reaches on Russian River and East Fork of Russian River were completed in 1974 (cost $2,483,900). In April 1982, responsibility was transferred to the Sacramento District. 35-16 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT Warm Springs construction completions include fish hatchery in December 1980, reservoir clearing in July 1981, project overlook in May 1981, downstream stabilization sills in October 1981, dam closure in October 1982, spillway repair at Warm Springs Dam in September 1985, and boat launching facilities, Phase I, in September 1985. Initial filling of Warm Springs reservoir was commenced on November 1, 1984. Major items of work remaining include completion of upgrading Rockpile Road, minimal recreation facilities, boat ramp facilities, and vegetation management program with remaining boundary fencing. Responsibility for construction was transferred to Sacramento District in August 1983. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at Coyote Valley Dam in fiscal year 1984. 22. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM Location. Rises in Trinity Mountains in north-central California, flows generally southerly about 374 miles and empties into Suisun Bay, an arm of San Francisco Bay at Collinsville, CA. Works covered by this improvement are on Sacramento River and tributaries from Collinsville to Shasta Dam, about mile 312. Drainage area above Rio Vista is 26,500 square miles (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area for Sacramento River and Upper Butte Basin; Flournoy and Fruto quadrangles for Black Butte Lake; and Tuscan Buttes, Tehama, Redding, and Hooker quadrangles for Table Mountain Lake.) Existing project. Improvement of Sacramento River and tributaries, from Collinsville to Shasta Dam was authorized as a unit of a comprehensive plan for flood control and other related purposes in Sacramento River Basin. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries, for flood control purposes: Enlargement of existing levees on Sacramento River between vicinity of Moulton weir and Ord Bend; construction of new levees from present levee terminus to vicinity of Chico Landing; construction of a weir near Chico Landing, extension of Moulton weir, and construction of a bypass through Upper Butte Basin; construction of new levees in Lower Butte Basin; enlargement of existing levees in Sutter, Tisdale, Sacramento, and Yolo Bypasses; and levee construction and/or channel enlargement on following minor tributaries of Sacramento River: Antelope Creek; Chico and Mud Creeks and Sandy Gulch; Butte and Little Chico Creeks; Cherokee Canal; Elder Creek; Deer Creek (Tehama County); Thomes Creek; and Willow Creek. Improvement provides for about 155 miles of channel improvement and about 294 miles of levees with an average height of 12 feet and a freeboard of 3 feet. Improvement also provides for revetment as required for protection of bypass levee slopes against erosion. Total first cost for project is $18,300,000 (October 1988), of which $11,900,000 is Federal, and $6,400,000 non-Federal for lands and damages, including relocations. (See table 35-N on project units classified and excluded from cost estimate.) (b) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, CA: An extension of the existing Sacramento River Flood Control project which provides for construction of bank protection works and minor channel improvements as required on Sacramento River between Chico Landing and Red Bluff for flood control purposes. Estimated first cost (October 1987) for project work in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties is $31,000,000, of which $25,700,000 is Federal cost and $5,300,000 non-Federal cost for lands and damages including relocations and cash contribution of $3,435,000. (c) Sacramento River, CA, Bank Protection Project: Includes initial phase covering 430,000 lineal feet of bank protection and a second phase covering 405,000 lineal feet of bank protection under a long range program of bank protection, erosion control works, and setback levees at critical locations within limits of authorized or existing levees included in the Sacramento River Flood Control project to protect integrity of levee system for flood control purposes. Total estimated (October 1989) first cost for project is $140,800,000, (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) of which $98,600,000 is Federal (including $2,460,000 for recreation facilities) and $42,200,000 non-Federal comprising for lands and damages including relocations and $24,660,000 required cash contribution toward first cost. Construction in (a), (b), and (c) above supplements program of levee improvements as accomplished pursuant to 1917 Flood Control Act, as amended by subsequent acts, including 1941 Flood Control Act, and which are reported by California Debris Commission under Sacramento River, CA, flood control. (d) Authorization also provided for Black Butte Lake. For description of completed project see Annual Report for 1975. Federal first cost for project is $14,508,820, including $475,507 for basic recreation facilities. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost for recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $1,000,162. A concessionaire at Black Butte Marina provided public use facilities in accordance with lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost to date of $87,000. (e) Authorization also provided for construction of Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) project, an earthfill dam on Sacramento River about 3 miles north of Red Bluff, CA. This project unit was deauthorized August 5, 1977. For details, see Annual Report for 1978. Local cooperation. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Fully complied with for all work completed or under contract, and local interests indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. Levee construction (107 miles) total requirement for the "active" project has been completed, transferred to, and accepted by the State. (b) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies; local interests must also assume responsibility for flood plain zoning. Fully complied with for portions completed in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties; 35-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 completed work, bank protection at 36 sites, was transferred to and accepted by the State. (c) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests must also contribute an amount in cash that, when added to costs of lands, easements, rights-of-way and utility modifications, equals one-third of cost of each unit of remedial work; this contribution is estimated (October 1989) at $24,660,000. Local interests fully complied with requirements for all work completed or under contract, and indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. In addition, for reaches where local interests request bank stabilization in lieu of more feasible levee setbacks, local interests will contribute costs over and above costs of setbacks, and provide local contribution indicated above. Completed units transferred to and accepted by the State. (d) Black Butte Lake: None required for construction. Local interests must pay the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to the conservation functions of the project; these costs are estimated at 39.9 percent of first cost and 40.2 percent of annual costs. From March 2, 1960, to October 22, 1970, contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and the State of California provided for repayment of irrigation storage costs; Bureau administered contract in accordance with reclamation law. Local interests paid a total of $77,205 for irrigation services during this period. Public Law 502, 91st Cong., 2d sess., October 23, 1970, provided that Black Butte project be financially integrated with the Central Valley project, coordinated operationally with other Central Valley project storage units by the Bureau under the Secretary of the Interior, and that dam and reservoir at Black Butte be physically operated and maintained by the Corps in a manner compatible with recreational use of the reservoir. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries-Engineering activities continued. (b) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project-Engineering and design activities continued. (See table 35-0 for construction accomplished and contract costs.) (c) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff. Engineering activities continued. (d) Black Butte Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff above Black Butte Dam was below normal for the year. Maximum storage of 117,500 acre-feet occurred May 1, 1989. Maximum bihourly inflow to Black Butte reservoir was 4,100 cubic feet per second on March 24, 1989, and maximum outflow of 880 cubic feet per second occurred on May 12, 1989. During the year, 6,300 acre-feet was released for flood control and 121,200 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. (e) Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) Lake: None. Historical summary. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries (active portions): Construction was initiated in May 1949 on Deer Creek and Butte Creek units; Cherokee Canal, Elder Creek, Chico and Mud Creeks, and Sandy Gulch units have been completed. Active portion of this improvement is about 99 percent complete. Work remaining is bypass levee revetment as required. (b) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Construction of first unit was initiated in June 1963; initial phase of project was completed in November 1974. Phase II is underway, and overall project is about 90 percent complete. (c) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff: Active portion of project, bank protection in Tehama County, was initiated in June 1963 and completed in March 1964. Project was reopened in June 1968 to place additional necessary bank protection. Work at 36 sites was completed in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties as of September 1985 and transferred to State for maintenance. Bank protection on Sacramento River, Tehama County-one site, mile 215, (Unit 5), was completed November 1982, two sites, mile 209.5 and mile 217.5, (Unit 6), were completed in November 1983, and four sites, 241.0, 237.9, 237.7, and 237.5 (Unit 7) were completed in February 1985. (d) Black Butte Lake: Construction began in March 1960 and project is complete. Final land acquisition was completed in December 1966. Construction of main dam was initiated in June 1960 and completed in December 1963. Dam has been operating since November 1962 to provide the flood protection for which it was designed. Final cost allocation approved May 3, 1977. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980 and completed in FY 1986. Piezometer installation and slope for protection at the dam were completed in FY 1983. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. (e) Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) Lake: Project unit deauthorized as of August 5, 1977. 23. WALNUT CREEK, CA Location. Project is on Walnut Creek and lower reaches of its principal tributaries, Pacheco, Grayson, San Ramon, Las Trampas, Galindo, and Pine Creeks in Contra Costa County, CA. Improvement will extend from Suisun Bay to head of project about 1 mile above southern limits of city of Walnut Creek. City of Walnut Creek is about 10 miles south of Suisun Bay. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.)Lower San Luis Rey River Valley along San Luis Rey. Existing project. Comprises extension of existing levees, construction of new levees and concrete channels, channel rectification and enlargement, and utilization of improvements constructed or planned by local interests. Plan provides for about 21.8 miles of channel improvement, two reinforced-concrete drop structures, two stilling basins, and 13.8 miles of levees. Cost estimate (October 1989) is $94,100,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $67,900,000 is Federal cost and $26,200,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $20,625,000 for lands and damages and relocations except railroad facilities, and $5,575,000 required cash contribution for land enhancement benefits provided by the project). Local interests have expended about $3 35-18 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT million for flood control in the project area during the period 1955-1965, including the concrete conduits constructed through the city of Walnut Creek at an estimated cost of $1,000,000 considered a preproject condition to be incorporated in the Corps project. In addition, local developers have made channel improvements for Upper Pine Creek valued at $5,050,000. The cost thereof is not included in above costs of local cooperation. Improvement adopted by 1960 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 76, 86th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies, except that relocation of railroad facilities is a Federal responsibility. In addition, local interests must make a cash contribution to the United States, in amount of 7.4 percent of cost of construction for land enhancement benefits provided by project. Cash contribution is estimated (October 1989) at $5,575,000. Local interests are represented by Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; formal assurances, including evidence of financial and legal ability to fulfill requirement for the cash contribution, were accepted by the Sacramento District Engineer on November 15, 1963. The Flood Control District furnished all rights-of-way required to date and indicated that it will furnish all requirements as needed for future construction. The Flood Control District will arrange for highway bridge modifications and utility relocations before start of work by the Corps contractor. Payment of required contributed funds will be made in installments in amounts equal to 7.4 percent of the estimated construction expenditure for each fiscal year. Flood Control District and city of Walnut Creek have requested that recreation be added as a project purpose and will share costs in accordance with Water Resources Development Act of 1986. To date, $4,755,081 has been furnished. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design for the uncompleted portions of Walnut and San Ramon Creeks and upper Pine Creek is continuing. Construction on San Ramon Bypass Channel has been split into three contracts. Contract No. 1 had no costs in fiscal year 1989 due to review of contractor (Lionsgate) claims and court action. Claims were heard before Board of Contract Appeals. Final decision is pending. Contract No. 2 was continued at fiscal year contract cost of $1,108,578. Contract No. 3 was awarded on September 27, 1989. Construction on Upper Pine Channel was continued at a fiscal year contract cost of 645,736. Historical summary. Construction was initiated June 1964; project is about 90 percent complete. Total of 16.7 miles of channel improvement, 9.2 miles of levee construction, part of channel improvement landscaping, and Drop Structures No. 1 and 2 have been transferred to local interests for operation and muaintenance. Planning and design continued on rmaining reaches. Work remaining consists of channel improvement on Walnut Creek and San Ramon bypass (Ygnacio Valley Road to Rudgear Road along SPRR alignment) and upper Pine Creek. Construction responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. 24. WILDCAT AND SAN PABLO CREEKS, CA Location. Project is located in vicinity of San Pablo and Richmond, Contra Costa County, CA, about 20 miles northeast of San Francisco, CA. Existing project. Current plan of improvement consists of 16,700 lineal feet of channel improvements on Wildcat Creek and 11,700 lineal feet of channel improvements on San Pablo Creek. Improvements include channel deepening, levees, stilling basins, and flow control weirs. Additionally, about 32 acres will be planted for mitigation of fish and wildlife. Approved estimated cost of new work (1989) is $41,700,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $25,400,000 is Federal cost, and $16,300,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $1,350,000 cash contribution). Improvements adopted by House and Senate Public Works Committee Resolutions June 9 and 15, 1976, respectively, under provisions of sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 511, 94th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map).For details on units, see Annual Report for 1968. Local cooperation. In accordance with cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights of way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of project; pay one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities; pay 5 percent of the costs allocated to flood control and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County by Resolution 73-466, June 25, 1973, agreed to assume obligations of local cooperation. On November 9, 1976, the Board reaffirmed sponsorship by Resolution 76-960. Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Board of Supervisors formed an Assessment District, August 3, 1982, which assures availability of funds for local share of non-Federal portion of project costs for a modified plan of improvement. A flood control Local Cooperation Agreement satisfying all requirements of sec. 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-661) and consistent with the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662), was executed on June 20, 1986 between the Department of the Army and the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. By Resolution No. 1985-12-351, adopted December 17, 1985, the East Bay Regional 35-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Park and Recreation District stated support for development of trail and recreational improvements for the project and indicated its intent to share in 50 percent of the cost of such improvements and perform operation and maintenance responsibility. A recreation Local Cooperation Agreement will be required prior to initiation of that construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction on Reach 1, Contract 1, of channel improvement on Wildcat Creek was continued at a fiscal year contract cost of $1,831,558. Construction on Reach 1, Contract 2 was initiated at a fiscal year contract cost of $57,823. Historical summary. Local interests withdrew support of project in 1979. Project responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. After 1982-1983 floods, local interests again indicated support of the project, and in October 1983, project work was resumed by Sacramento District. A revised final environmental impact statement was filed March 28, 1986, and a General Design Memorandum was approved May 29, 1986. Flood Control Local Cooperation Agreement was executed June 20, 1986. Overall project is about 55 percent complete. 25. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Approved regulations for operation and maintenance of flood control works, part 208, title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, provide for inspection of completed projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance to determine status of project and insure compliance with regulations. During fiscal year, inspections were made of: Completed unit of Fairfield Vicinity Streams; completed units of Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries; completed units of Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff; completed units of Sacramento River flood control project, Kings River Channel Improvement (Pine Flat Lake project), and Walnut Creek project; American River levees; Merced County Stream group; Middle Creek (Lake County); Chester, North Fork Feather River; levee and channel improvements on Chowchilla River (Buchanan project) and Fresno River (Hidden project); Duck Creek diversion, Green Valley Creek, Littlejohn Creek, Mormon Slough, Bear Creek, Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, and North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, all in California; Truckee River, CA and NV; completed units of lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, CA; completed units of Red Bank and Fancher Creeks including Big Dry Creek Dam and diversion, CA; Reese River, Battle Mountain, NV; Sevier River, Redmond and vicinity, Jordan River, Big Wash near Milford, and Kays Creek, all in Utah; various emergency flood control works under authority of sec. 208, Flood Control Act of June 30, 1948, and September 3, 1954; Public Law 99, June 28, 1955, and antecedent legislation; and sec. 14 of Flood Control Act of July 24, 1946. Maintenance inspections conducted indicate that existing agreements and regulations are being complied with on completed flood control works. Continuing effort is required to improve maintenance practices and active steps are being taken by responsible State and local agencies to achieve desired results. Local agencies were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain these projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. Total cost of inspection for fiscal year of $1,422,785 included continuation of dam safety assurance program for Folsom Lake, CA ($664,119). 26. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Costs for preauthorization studies for fiscal year were $218,558. See Table 35-P for list of studies. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal cost for fiscal year was $370,309, all of which was for disaster preparedness. Emergency bank protection (sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.). Federal cost for fiscal year was $37,293. Bank protection was continued on Duchesne River, UT ($5,813) and on Spanish Creek, CA ($16,067) and was completed on Green River, Lincoln County, WY ($2,120) and Spring Creek near Springville, UT ($13,293). Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (sec. 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Cong.). No snagging and clearing activities this fiscal year. Flood insurance activities (sec. 1301-1377, 1968 Housing and Urban Development Act, Public Law 90-448 as amended). In coordination with flood control activities, five flood insurance studies were initiated, four flood insurance studies were continued, and five flood insurance studies were completed in accordance with the Inter-Agency Agreements EMW-E-2226, 2549, 2768 and 2994, respectively, at a fiscal year cost of $157,676 under Federal Emergency Management Agency reimbursable order. 27. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with sec. 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, summaries of monthly reservoir operations at Big Dry Creek, Boca, Camanche, Del Valle, Folsom, Friant (Millerton Lake), Indian Valley, Los Banos Detention, 35-20 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT New Bullards Bar, New Don Pedro, New Exchequer (Lake McClure), New Melones, Oroville, Prosser, Shasta, and Stampede, CA; East Canyon, Echo, Lost Creek, Pineview, Starvation, and Wanship, UT; and Blue Mesa, Lemon, Paonia, and Vallecito, CO, were prepared. Work was completed on Oroville, Starvation and McPhee water control manuals. Draft water control manual revisions were started and essentially completed on Don Pedro reservoir. Work was initiated on the new Ridgeway and Red Fleet reservoir manuals. Corps personnel provided advice as requested during flood control operations at all sec. 7 reservoirs. Fiscal year cost was $688,817. Total cost to September 30, 1989, was $4,329,783. Multiple-Purpose Projects including Power 28. NEW MELONES LAKE, CA Location. On Stanislaus River about three-quarters mile downstream from existing Melones Dam and about 35 miles northeast of city of Modesto. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of the area.). Existing project. Provides for construction of (a) an earth and rockfill dam about 625 feet high to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of about 2,400,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, power, general recreation, fish and wildlife, and other purposes, and (b) a powerplant below the dam with an installed capacity of 300,000 kilowatts. Upon completion of construction of dam and powerplant by the Corps, the project became an integral part of Central Valley project and is being operated and maintained by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to Federal reclamation laws, except that the flood control operation of the project shall be in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Maintenance of Stanislaus River channel from Goodwin Dam to San Joaquin River to a capacity of at least 8,000 cubic feet per second will also be Corps responsibility. Approved estimated (October 1989) Federal cost is $394,500,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. In addition, local interests expended $300,000 for levees along lower reaches of Stanislaus River. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 453, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). This act modified original authorization adopted by 1944 Flood Control Act. (H. Flood Control Committee Doc. 2, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) The 1944 Flood Control act established $8 million monetary limitation for partial accomplishment of project. Further monetary authorizations of $2.5 million, $5 million, $13 million, $2 million, $17 million, $18 million, $44 million, $83 million, $46 million, $6 million, and $61 million were provided for this project by Public Laws 235 and 780, 83d Cong., and 85-500, 90-17, 90-483, 91-282, 92-222, 93-251, 94-397, 95-104, and 95-189, making a total monetary authorization of $305,500,000 available for the basin plan comprising Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, CA. Since FY 1979, appropriations have not been subject to the river basin monetary limitation. Local cooperation. Based on approved preliminary cost allocation studies (July 1965) local interests will be required to pay 35.2 percent of first cost and 12.7 percent of annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation. In addition, 31.1 percent of first cost and 62.5 percent of annual cost would be allocated to power. Local interests must also maintain existing private levees along Stanislaus River from Goodwin Dam to San Joaquin River and prevent encroachment on channel and floodway between levees to preserve safe carrying capacity throughout the reach of at least 8,000 cubic feet per second. Recovery of costs allocated to irrigation and power will be the responsibility of the Bureau of Reclamation. Reimbursement of costs will be in accordance with Bureau policies and procedures for the Central Valley project. State of California officially adopted project by chapter 918 of statutes of 1963, and by chapter 1438 of those statutes authorized State Reclamation Board to furnish required assurances. The Board, by letter dated December 13, 1963, stated it would furnish required assurances when formally requested to do so. Assurances were requested by letter of December 30, 1977. On October 2, 1979, the Board reaffirmed its intent to furnish the required assurances. On January 6, 1983, the Board provided formal assurances of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering activities continued. Fiscal year costs for major items of work included: Continuation of land acquisition activities, $258,075; continuation of Glory Hole recreation area sanitary system contract, $1,030,411, and of two-mile bar recreation contract, $59,436; completion of Knights Ferry Covered Bridge, $243,113; and initiation of Peoria Mountain revegetation contract, $18,836. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued on Lower Stanislaus River. Historical summary. Construction was initiated in August 1966. Main dam contract which was awarded in March 1974 has been completed; dam dedication ceremonies were held July 14, 1979. Cultural resources preservation, water intake facilities, flood control and irrigation tailrace modification, reservoir area clearing, Tuttletown Phase I recreation area, Oakdale recreation, Glory Hole Phase I and Phase II recreation area, and operations access road contracts have all been completed. Glory Hole minimal recreation facilities contract has been completed. A boundary fencing contract, Lower Stanislaus Phase I and Phase II minimal recreation facilities contract, Lower Stanislaus Corporation Yard contract, and Lower Stanislaus Administration Building contract have been completed. Tuttletown minimal recreation facilities contract, McHenry recreation area contract, Tuttletown wastewater treatment contract, Knights Ferry recreation area contract, and Knights Ferry Covered Bridge contract have been completed. Overall project is nearing completion except for Lower Stanislaus River recreation facilities. 35-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Remaining recreation facilities were unscheduled pending development of cost sharing agreements and/or specific Congressional appropriation of funds. A Memorandum of Understanding between the Department of the Interior and the Department of the Army transferring the New Melones dam and reservoir from the Corps of Engineers to the Bureau of Reclamation was executed on November 20, 1979. Agreement provides that the Corps complete land acquisition actions and retain budgeting, design, and construction responsibility for reservoir clearing and recreation development; completion of cultural resources mitigation in project area was vested in the Department of the Interior. The California State Water Resources Control Board's Decision 1422 of April 1973 established conditions which impacted on the planned filling and operation of the project by the Department of the Interior. As a result, the Department of Interior brought suit against the State of California claiming State limitations on project operation were contrary to Congressional intent and authority. The case was heard before the U.S. District Court in Fresno, CA, and in early March 1981, a Federal judge ruled that the Federal Government could fill the New Melones reservoir for purpose of generating electrical power, but not for agricultural or other purposes. Both the Government and the California State Resources Control Board appealed this decision to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, CA. On December 20, 1982, the Court upheld all 25 requirements placed on the Federal Government by the State Water Resources Control Board. The decision reversed the lower court's decision to permit filling of the reservoir for generating electrical power. The Bureau of Reclamation subsequently filed for a permit from the State Water Resources Control Board to fill the reservoir. Permit was approved. The Bureau had originally started generating power on a limited basis on July 1, 1979; however, after the filling of the reservoir in spring of 1983, full power generating benefits have been attained. Project is about 99 percent complete. General Investigations 29. SURVEYS Total fiscal year costs were $4,197,387, of which $2,501,895 was for flood damage prevention studies (in addition, $1,347,487 was expended from required cost contributions for feasibility cost shared studies and $8,709 was expended from other non-Federal contributions); $5,000 for coordination with Soil Conservation Service; $14,000 for coordination with Bureau of Reclamation pertaining to projects under reclamation program (including PL 984); $116,000 for special investigations; $44,000 for Intragency Water Resources Development; $33,000 for review of FERC licenses; and $127,296 for planning assistance to states ($41,500, CA; $24,692, UT; $60,104, CO; and $1,000, WY). 30. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Technical assistance was performed for other Federal agencies as well as non-Federal agencies in connection with Flood Plain Management Services Program at fiscal year costs of $456,934. No Flood Plain Information Studies were prepared after FY 1980. Fiscal year costs for hydrologic studies were $7,000. 31. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT The Hydrologic Engineering Center was designated as a separate Field Operating Agency as of January 1, 1979, in accordance with OCE permanent orders 1-1, January 10, 1979, but Sacramento District is continuing to provide advisory and administrative support services to HEC as specified in local support agreement DACW05-79-A-0038 of March 1979. Fiscal year costs were $1,276,374, of which $427 was for planning methodologies, $842,883 was for analytical techniques, $99,990 for Water Source Interrelationships, $45,623 for risk assessment for Corps dams, $65,893 for earth resources satellites, $51,097 for planning assistance to states; $168,649 for hydrologic manual preparation, and $1,812 for Construction Productivity Advancement Research (CPAR) Program, all at the Hydrologic Engineering Center. 32. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN CACHE CREEK BASIN, CA Project is located on eastern slope of the Coast Range. Clear Lake unit is about 110 miles north of San Francisco and Settling unit is about 15 miles northwest of Sacramento. Plan of improvement consists of two project units: Upper basin at Clear Lake (selected plan)--widening and/or deepening 4.5 miles of existing 5 mile long Clear Lake outlet channel to a capacity of 8,000 cubic feet per second, and nonstructural measures; and lower basin at the mouth of Cache Creek--enlarging existing perimeter levees of Cache Creek Settling Basin an average of 12 feet to provide 50 years of sediment storage capacity and enlarging existing project levees from settling basin mouth upstream to County Road 102, reconstructing and enlarging existing Cobble weir, degrading the existing training levees and rebuilding them adjacent to the western perimeter levee to allow utilization of entire basin for sediment deposition, acquiring easements for 3,600 acres of existing settling basin and establishing a wildlife refuge; however, the refuge feature was reclassified to deferred category on April 11, 1988. The second project unit-Cache Creek Settling Basin-is reported under Improvement No. 6. General Design Memorandum for the Clear Lake Outlet Channel (Upper Basin) was continued at a fiscal 35-22 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT year cost of $356,768. Preconstruction planning estimate for the Outlet Works is $2,330,000. COTTONWOOD CREEK, CA Project will be located on main stem and the North, South, and Middle Forks of Cottonwood Creek on eastern slope of the Coast Range and southern slope of Trinity Range between cities of Redding and Red Bluff, CA, and was authorized by the 1970 Flood Control Act (Document not yet printed). Plan of improvement provides for two multiple-purpose reservoirs, one at Dutch Gulch (capacity 900,000 acre-feet) and one at Tehama (capacity 700,000 acre-feet), and includes base facilities for future installation of hydropower generating equipment. Advance Engineering and Design activities were essentially discontinued in FY 1985 as by the letter of June 25, 1985, the State of California indicated they could not financially participate in the project at this time. Final documentation of record of the Advance Engineering and Design studies was continued at a fiscal year cost of $38,738. COYOTE CREEK, CA (KNOWN AS COYOTE AND BERRYESSA CREEKS) Project is located in the cities of San Jose and Milpitas immediately south of San Francisco Bay in Santa Clara County, CA. Plan of improvement on Coyote Creek consists of overflow channels and offset levees. Improvement on Berryessa Creek includes two sedimentation basins at the upstream end of the concrete lined trapezoidal channel and offset levees. Combined plan would provide flood protection from Coyote and Berryessa Creeks to cities of San Jose and Milpitas, which include large industrial complexes and some residential development. Feasibility report (prepared by San Francisco District) was approved by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors on March 31, 1988. Preconstruction engineering and design studies were continued by Sacramento District. Plan of Action was submitted on September 12, 1988. General Design Conference was held on September 28-29, 1988 in Milpitas. General Design Memorandums were initiated on Coyote and Berryessa Creeks. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $2,000,000. TRUCKEE MEADOWS, NV Project is located in metropolitan area of Reno and Sparks in Washoe County, NV. Plan of improvement consists of about 7 miles of levees, 5 miles of floodwalls, 6 bridge replacements along Truckee River and includes limited channel excavation, a 900-acre detention basin, and backwater levees along Steamboat Creek, Boynton Slough, and the North Truckee Drain just north of the Interstate Highway 80 crossing. Plan also includes recreation facilities with bicycle and pedestrian paths, river overlooks, and picnic sites; mitigation measures (31 acres of riparian plantings to replace vegetation losses); and fish and wildlife features. Project will provide flood protection from Truckee River to cities of Reno and Sparks and Truckee Meadows urban areas. Record of Decision was signed by Assistant Secretary of the Army on December 6, 1987. General Design Conference was held on July 12-13, 1988. General Design Memorandum was continued. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $4,300,000. GUADALUPE RIVER, CA Project is located in the downtown area of San Jose in Santa Clara County, CA. Current plan of improvement includes widening and deepening one or both sides of Guadalupe River for 2.5 miles from Interstate Highway 280 to Interstate Highway 880 in downtown San Jose, CA, and consists of channel modifications with provisions for fish and wildlife mitigation. Project features include a 2,023-foot underground conduit bypass, a 2,495-foot concrete lined channel, a 9,129-foot earth trapezoidal channel lined with riprap, a one-sided widened channel, and mitigation plantings on the widened channel. Project is to provide 100-year flood protection from Guadalupe River to downtown San Jose, including approximately 600 commercial businesses, 1,500 private residences, 4 major traffic arteries, and the San Jose International Airport. General Design Memorandum was continued. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $2,450,000. NAPA RIVER, CA Project is located in city and county of Napa, CA. Current plan of improvement for Napa River from Edgerley Island to Trancas Street consists of channel widening and realignment, dredging, bank protection, construction of concrete step-walls through city of Napa, and fish and wildlife mitigation and recreation. Current plan of improvement for Napa Creek includes a series of 5 concrete box culverts and extends from Napa River to Jefferson Street, a distance of 2,500 feet. Project will provide high level flood protection from Napa River and Napa Creek to city of Napa. Local sponsors have expressed interest in developing a reduced scope plan more suitable to their financial capability. Preliminary evaluations indicate reduced scope plan would probably be economically justified. General Design Conference was held on January 12, 1989. Supplemental General Design Memorandum was initiated. Preconstruction planning cost is $5,000,000. 35-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 1989 1. Sacramento River CA (Contrib. Funds, Other) 2. Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA (Required Contrib. Funds) 3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost $1,807,800 1,841,271 800,000 649,054 12,513,000 12,140,776 $3,973,000 3,914,755 85,000 - - - $40,331,192 1 - - 40,331,192 1 $249,000 $150,700 43,296,331 2 267,263 188,435 43,277,483 3 - - 85,000 4 400,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 450,454 996,359 1,520,808 - - 750,000 - - 600,803 3,853,474 5 3,611,618 750,000 600,803 3,137,000 2,547,000 1,676,000 54,816,000 6 4,354,831 1,750,433 2,635,686 54,545,653 7 4. San Joaquin New Work River, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 5. Buchanan Dam- New Work H.V. Eastman Lake, Approp. Chowchilla River, Cost CA (Federal Maint. Funds) Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 6. Cache Creek New Work Settling Basin, CA Approp. Cost 7. Calaveras River New Work and Littlejohn Approp. Creek and Trib- Cost utaries including Maint. New Hogan Lake Approp. & Farmington Dam, Cost CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost 5,833,117 8 5,833,117 8 20,000 80,224 778,000 92,500 48,500 12,866,476 9 764,102 92,763 54,591 12,856,262 9 - - - - 27,369,597 - - - - 27,369,597 853,000 1,150,000 1,306,500 1,224,800 10,407,800 870,983 1,062,828 1,298,349 1,238,494 10,269,556 - - - - 111,187 - - - - 111,187 217,000 21,396 195,375/ 10 10 217,000 216,771 - - - - 23,723,144 S- - - 23,723,144 1,124,000 1,740,300 1,515,200 1,779,600 18,177,269 1,132,703 1,641,032 1,629,933 1,715,926 18,000,364 20,000 26,468 4,000 6,780 11 11 12 12 1,398,251 13 14 15 144 1,398,251 13 14 15 8. Corte Madera Creek, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 2,374,000 1,602,532 -50,000 41,977 1,325,000 1,223,000 1,869,610 310,625 - 20,000 11,109 4,052 -800,000 12,006,725 414,832 11,903,516 - 186,095 7,888 171,507 35-24 16 16 17 18 17 18 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 1989 (Contrib. Funds, Other) 9. Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 10. Hidden Dam - Hensley Lake, Fresno River, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 11. Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 12. Kaweah and Tule Rivers including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 13. Little Dell Lake, UT (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 14. Lower San Joaquin River, CA New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 270,000 121,420 905,000 285,206 874,000 897,340 - -20,000 103,880 - 582,000 3,892,000 998,510 2,264,005 - 27,000 - 9,618 200,000 620,000 - 608,438 2,939,000 4,260,133 9,000 13,115 1,886,000 961,970 786,921 19 762,222 20 9,480,000 8,954,183 36,000 22,733 2,706,000 21 1,570,408 22 - - - 30,555,426 - - - 30,555,426 918,000 1,102,800 1,126,100 11,005,400 893,031 1,129,940 1,096,138 10,922,659 - - - 165,112 23 - - - 165,112 23 2,426,000 3,882,598 2,519,690 3,863,211 - 20,000 - 10,320 1,893,000 1,918,526 135,000 80,405 2,164,000 2,076,605 105,000 114,581 - - 24,450,537 24 - - 24,450,537 24 1,810,000 2,145,000 31,277,596 25 26 1,794,140 2,027,598 31,007,666 25 26 80,000 105,000 643,000 27 69,885 109,422 627,627 28 2,180,700 2,314,446 185,000 184,483 1,335,000 2,500,000 1,750,000 1,274,320 1,443,225 2,482,603 - - 660,000 - - 496,240 300,000 3,260,000 710,000 - 2,250,170 1,983,921 448,000 415,547 - 34,997,230 29 - 34,997,230 29 2,125,600 27,443,825 30 2,053,516 27,283,692 30 51,000 538,420 31 32 34 107,190 532,443 31 32 35 7,025,000 15,419,900 4,213,530 12,070,861 2,840,000 3,500,000 1,762,627 2,258,867 50,465 4,320,465 36 25,546 4,259,636 37 900,000 100,000 -49,000 4,049,000 132,867 197,045 450,299 3,767,200 35-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 1989 15. Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, NV, and CA 16. Merced County Streams, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 17. Merced County Stream Group, CA 18. Pajaro River Basin, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 19. Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 20. Redbank and Fancher Creeks, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) 21. Russian River Basin, CA, Coyote Valley Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino) and Channel Improvements (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost - - - - 8,504,989 38 - - - - 8,504,989 38 252,000 272,000 283,000 266,100 4,519,450 359,725 282,598 285,589 273,026 4,495,667 180,000 450,000 100,000 3,602,000 121,269 319,218 121,958 333,016 - - - 2,582,500 - - - 615,811 81,000 109,537 20,000 10,396 10,702,000 7,245,461 2,582,500 615,811 - - - 2,751,259 - - - 2,751,259 113,000 107,000 117,000 1,777,506 118,837 104,771 122,833 1,762,468 480,000 101,162 61,000 650 21,000 1,622,000 673,441 549,000 102,234 16,250 25,890 2,713,000 237,189 127,268 5,663 39 39 40 40 7,084,968 41 3,271,768 41 610,000 230,152 37,250 42 31,553 42 - - - 43,356,265 43 44 45 - - - 43,356,265 43 44 45 1,492,000 1,395,000 2,054,500 1,387,000 23,084,785 46 1,464,946 1,365,827 2,042,413 1,450,874 22,993,298 46 - - - 110,000 47 - - - 110,000 47 820,000 813,805 685,000 468,756 10,000 1,100,000 908,733 250,000 138,073 4,053,000 1,101,483 202,500 124,396 6,687,065 48 3,292,766 48 462,500 262,469 - - - 14,435,869 49 S- - - 14,435,869 49 2,542,000 3,467,102 1,778,000 1,646,600 29,580,777 50 51 2,518,357 3,445,754 1,755,996 1,614,367 29,390,626 50 51 78,411 66,758 5,000 21,290 5,000 3,825 2,000 430 245,411 52 242,612 53 35-26 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 1989 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Improvements, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 22. Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA from Collinsville to Shasta Dam (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 23. Walnut Creek, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 24. Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 28. Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, CA including and Stanislaus Tuolumne Rivers, CA, New Melones Lake, CA (Federal Funds) Contrib. Funds, Other) New Work. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 8,615,000 8,878,305 1,772,000 1,758,290 3,381 4,042,500 3,921,536 941,000 1,011,304 1,600,000 923,511 90,000 101,299 4,591,000 3,667,875 710,000 641,386 -210,000 -232,098 12,670,000 8,577,136 1,962,000 1,864,917 55,000 60,698 7,574,000 6,714,273 2,058,000 2,007,449 400,000 969,483 100,000 78,785 7,700,000 6,049,719 1,026,834 625,832 2,323,166 1,672,179 526,000 2,800,000 404,415 2,606,849 160,000 15,158 - 140,472 150,000 265,000 - 302,467 5,719,000 2,855,897 550,200 529,709 6,830,000 7,915,389 593,000 608,037 6,600,000 9,292,267 2,307,000 2,378,477 73,000 57,926 9,216,000 7,968,616 1,123,500 1,136,243 2,476,000 609,953 40,000 62,582 3,935,000 6,398,725 130,000 474,213 3,674,950 3,858,569 4,661,000 1,104,454 575,000 71,359 260,000 184,140 4,664,000 3,312,754 637,000 620,542 8,099 1,900,000 2,701,746 2,244,700 2,254,939 20,000 31,714 4,450,000 5,634,386 1,242,100 1,183,415 1,210,000 1,921,720 15,000 17,604 4,400,000 2,544,540 260,000 238,792 1,958,714 1,513,579 1,621,000 2,515,019 -190,000 150,107 465,000 528,470 2,500,000 2,039,696 602,400 600,157 314,619,645 54 312,791,058 54 13,714,700 5 13,543,958 56 208,000 57 194,119 58 113,883,008 s9 60 112,599,522 so so60 17,300,934 61 17,135,881 61 22,641,538 21,285,013 2,806,362 62 63 2,806,324 62 63 64 59,482,430 65 57,142,620 66 4,755,081 67 4,584,949 68 10,831,901 69 9,833,556 69 11,538,000 8,413,485 550,158 361,939 1,150,000 70 1,015,077 71 361,150,996 72 356,950,762 73 4,742,600 4,687,815 80,000 74 12,585 76 35-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 1. Includes the following amounts for new work: Regular funds: Previous project, $185,198; existing project, $585,436 for shallow-draft and $39,560,558 for deep-draft. 2. Includes the following funds for maintenance: Regular funds: Previous project, $553,720; existing project, $15,786,207 for shallow-draft and $26,886,404 for deep-draft; and deferred maintenance funds, $70,000 for shallow-draft. 3. Includes the following costs for maintenance: Regular funds: Previous project, $553,720; existing project, $15,726,304 for shallow-draft and $26,927,459 for deep-draft; and deferred maintenance funds, $70,000 for shallow-draft. 4. Includes $85,000 contributed funds, other, from Sacramento-Yolo Port District for clearing and grubbing on dredged material deposit areas to be used on ship channel maintenance dredging work. 5. Includes unobligated carryover for continuation of planning and engineering (CP&E) funds as of September 30, 1985 ($33,474) for Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel to be included in project cost (for cost sharing) per TWX of September 9, 1985. 6. Includes $25,804,800 funds for Sacramento District and $29,011,200 for San Francisco District. 7. Includes $25,617,184 funds for Sacramento District and $28,928,468 for San Francisco District. 8. Includes $1,158,348 public work funds, of which $207,198 was for work done along 30-foot channel in Suisun Bay Channel; excludes $19,000 expended for engineering for inactive portion of 1950 modification. In addition, $1,342,500 was expended from required contributed funds. 9. In addition, $1,250 was expended from required contributed funds. 10. Contributed funds, other, from State of California for design and construction of downstream channel improvements on Ash and Berenda Sloughs below Buchanan Dam. 11. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at New Hogan Lake: Total to date $897,742. 12. Includes $99,000 special recreation use fees and costs at New Hogan Lake, and $195,000 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs (96X5125) at New Hogan Lake beginning in FY 1988. 13. For miscellaneous construction under local cooperation requirements, primarily Bear Creek, San Joaquin County; includes $108,056 as related to Duck and Littlejohn Creeks channel improvements as part of Farmington Dam project unit. 14. Includes $393,195 contributed funds, other, from California Department of Boating and Waterways for design and construction of boat launching and related facilities, and $30,000 for design and construction of a boarding float at North Shore recreation area at New Hogan Lake. 15. Includes $104,000 contributed funds, other, from Calaveras County Water District for New Hogan hydropower studies. 16. Includes $6,999,725 San Francisco District construction funds and costs for Corte Madera Creek. 17. $8,695 contributed funds transferred to Sacramento District in FY 1983. 18. Includes $97,400 San Francisco District required contributed funds and costs. 19. Contributed funds, other, from Marin County including $536,921 for miscellaneous bridge and road relocations and $250,000 for additional expenses for disposal sites at Corte Madera Creek. 20. Contributed funds, other, costs including $536,921 for miscellaneous bridge and road relocations and $225,300 for additional expenses for disposal sites at Corte Madera Creek. 21. Includes $2,685,000 contributed funds, other, from State of California for relocations (automotive type bridges) at Laurel Creek Diversion near Fairfield, and $21,000 from City of Fairfield for Phase III contract for channel development on Laurel Creek. 22. Includes $952,734 contributed funds, other, costs from State of California for relocations at Laurel Creek Diversion and $9,236 contributed funds, other, costs from City of Fairfield for Phase III contract. 23. Contributed funds, other, from State of California for miscellaneous design and construction at Hidden Dam. 24. Includes $2,199,085 Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at Isabella Lake, and $224,000 Code 713 funds and costs for improvement at Tillie Creek and Live Oak campgrounds. 25. Includes $407,640 special recreation use fees and costs at Isabella Lake. 26. Includes $131,900 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs (96X5125) at Isabella Lake beginning in FY 1985. 27. Includes $438,000 contributed funds, other, from California Department of Boating and Waterways for design and construction of boat launching and related facilities at Old Isabella Road and Isabella Peninsula and $205,000 for Isabella Dam hydropower studies. 28. Includes $189,627 contributed funds, other, costs for Isabella Dam hydropower studies. 29. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities: Success Lake: Total to date $747,048. Terminus Dam: Total to date $704,000. 30. Includes $165,000 special recreation use fees and costs at Success Lake. 31. Contributed funds, other, from the State of California Department of Boating and Waterways and costs for acquisition of a boarding float at Success Lake, $30,000 and at Terminus Dam, $12,420. 32. Includes $346,000 contributed funds, other, from the Kaweah River Power Authority, Visalia, CA, for Terminus Dam hydropower studies. 33. Includes $341,411 contributed funds, other, costs for Terminus Dam hydropower studies. 34. Includes $150,000 contributed funds, other, from DITT Inc., Paris, France, for hydropower studies at Success Lake. 35. Includes $148,612 contributed funds, other, costs for Success Lake hydropower studies. 36. Includes $4,320,465 contributed funds, from the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake City for relocation of State Highway 65 at Little Dell Lake. 35-28 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 37. Includes $4,259,636 contributed funds, other, costs for relocation of State Highway 65 at Little Dell Lake. 38. Includes $1,200, initiation of the plans and specifications for Code 710 recreation facilities, for FY 1978. Construction of recreation facilities at Martis Creek Lake under Code 710 was determined to be infeasible. 39. Includes contributed funds, other, for lands, easements and rights-of-way for Castle Dam from State of California. 40. In addition, $66,532 expended for new work from contributed funds, other, for miscellaneous construction under local cooperation requirements as related to acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations for Merced County Stream Group. 41. Includes $1,949,968 San Francisco construction funds and costs and $260,000 Sacramento general investigation funds and costs for Pajaro River. 42. Includes $37,250 contributed funds, other, from Santa Clara Valley Water District for bridge relocation at Pajaro River. 43. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at Pine Flat Lake: Total to date $1,595,100. 44. Includes Public Works Acceleration, Executive (PL 87-658) (Transfer to Corps of Engineers, Civil) 1963 funds and costs ($239,235) for recreation facilities. 45. Includes $19,600 Code 713 funds and costs for Pine Flat fish barrier. 46. Includes $158,300 special recreation use fees and costs at Pine Flat Lake, and $188,785 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs at Pine Flat Dam. 47. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services (non-project) accomplished at expense of State of California under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations at Pine Flat Lake. 48. Includes the unobligated carryover for continuation of planning and engineering (CP&E) funds as of September 30, 1985 ($29,065) and FY 1986 allocation for Redbank and Fancher Creeks to be included in project costs (for cost sharing) per TWX of September 9, 1985. 49. Excludes $5,598,000 contributed funds; $400,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Public Works Acceleration Program; and $1,628,411 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Code 711 at Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino. 50. Includes $94,459 special recreation use fees and costs (FY 1982-1983), but excludes prior special recreation fees and costs for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino. 51. Includes $993,680 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs at Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino for FY 1985, FY 1986, FY 1987, FY 1988, and FY 1989. 52. Includes $245,411 contributed funds, other, from city of Ukiah for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino, hydropower studies. 53. Includes $242,612 contributed fund, other, costs for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino, hydropower studies. 54. Includes $253,421,793 San Francisco construction funds and costs through August 1983 for Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 55. Includes $964,114 San Francisco maintenance funds and costs through April 1982 for Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 56. Includes $75,400 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs at Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 57. Includes $208,000 contributed funds, other, from Sonoma County for Dry Creek, Warm Springs, hydropower studies. 58. Includes $194,119 contributed fund, other costs for Dry Creek, Warm Springs hydropower studies. 59. Excludes $614,608 for Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) project, deauthorized August 5, 1977, and $531,000 for Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries portions which are considered inactive and deferred. 60. Includes Code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at Black Butte Lake: Total to date $1,000,162. 61. Includes $104,100 special recreation use fees and costs at Black Butte Lake. 62. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services (non-project) accomplished at expense of State of California under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way and utility alterations (primarily for Sacramento River and Major and Minor tributaries project). Includes State Highway Commission payment, $789,008, for use of excess excavation from Chico and Mud Creeks and Sandy Gulch (Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries) for freeway embankment through city of Chico. 63. Includes $41,984, contributed funds, other, from State of California for required modification of existing private facilities, Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff; $15,977 contributed funds, other, from State of California Department of Boating and Waterways for replacing a boarding float at Orland Buttes boat launching ramp at Black Butte Lake; and $330,000 contributed funds, other, from the city of Santa Clara for hydropower studies at Black Butte Lake. 64. Includes $329,962 contributed funds, other, costs for Black Butte hydropower studies. 65. Includes $8,849,825 San Francisco construction funds for Walnut Creek. 66. Includes $9,049,609 San Francisco construction costs for Walnut Creek. 67. Includes $450,268 San Francisco required contributed funds for Walnut Creek. 68. Includes $525,846 San Francisco required contributed costs for Walnut Creek. 69. Includes $400,348 San Francisco contributed funds, other, and contributed fund costs for Walnut Creek. 35-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 70. Includes $1,150,000 contributed funds, other, from Contra Costa Flood Control and Water Conservation District for replacement of sewerline in Richmond for Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks project. 71. Includes $1,105,077 contributed funds, other costs for replacement of sewerline in Richmond for Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks project. 72. Excludes funds applicable to other units of this basin authorization (Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries and Tuolomne River Basin, California). (See Table 35-E) 73. Includes $110,000 utilized for preparation of 1957 Economic Feasibility Report and of Revised Feasibility Report (FY 1960, 1961, and 1962) applicable to 1962 reauthorization of project. 74. Includes $80,000 contributed funds, other, from the Bureau of Reclamation for visitors center at Mark Twain area, New Melones lake. 75. Includes $12,585 contributed funds, other, costs from the Bureau of Reclamation for visitors center at Mark Twain area, New Melones Lake. 35-30 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 85 FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 Sep 30, 1989 1 Cache Creek Basin, New Work CA Approp. $574,000 $640,000 $280,000 293,000 $1,811,336 2 Cost 375,436 514,136 502,475 356,775 1,748,668 Cache Creek Sett- New Work ling Basin, CA Approp. - - - 486,000 486,000 Cost - - - 99,032 99,032 Caliente Creek, CA New Work Approp. - - - 60,000 60,000 Cost - - - 58,303 58,303 Cottonwood Creek, New Work Approp. -50,000 - - - 15,765,000 2 Cost 17,510 4,979 -29,988 38,738 15,759,197 Coyote and Berryessa New Work Creeks, CA Approp. - - 100,000 714,000 814,000 Cost - - 64,285 357,290 421,575 Dry Creek, New Work Roseville, CA Approp. - - - 59,000 59,000 Cost - - - - - Guadalupe River, New Work CA Approp. 25,000 739,000 625,000 661,000 2,050,000 2 Cost 16,822 435,345 821,612 717,234 1,991,013 Napa River, CA New Work Approp. - - - 750,000 750,000 2 Cost - - - 455,470 455,470 Truckee Meadows, New Work NV Approp. - - 440,000 1,528,000 1,968,000 Cost - - 180,377 1,105,270 1,285,648 1. Beginning in FY 1982, Advance Engineering and Design (Preconstruction, Engineering and Design) programs are funded under General Investigations Appropriations. 2. Includes FY 1985 unobligated carryover and FY 1986 allocation for CP&E funds and all AE&D funds to be included in project cost (for cost sharing) per TWX of September 9, 1985. 3. Excludes $2,639,955 funds and costs for a previous flood control project. (See Table 35-E.) 35-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 35-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. Mar. 3, 1899 July 25, 1912 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 Nov. 17, 1987 8. Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966 Nov. 17, 1986 SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA A depth of 7 feet below Sacramento. H. Doc. 186, 55th Cong., works. 2d sess., and 48, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Annual Report 1898, p. 2844 and 1899, p. 3171). For work above Sacramento. H. Doc. 76, 62d Cong., 1st sess. 1 The 10-foot channel up to Sacramento. H. Doc. 123, 69th Cong., 1st sess. A depth of 6 feet between Sacramento and Colusa Rivers and Harbors and 5 feet between Colusa and Chico Landing Committee Doc. 35, at a cost of $390,000 provided flow of rivers 73d Cong., 2d sess. is increased to minimum flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second after Shasta Reservoir is built. Authority for a special direct participation of Rivers and Harbors Federal Government of $12 million in cost Committee Doc. 35, of Shasta Reservoir. 73d Cong., 2d sess. Transfer of authority for expenditure of above $12 million from Secretary of War to Secretary of the Interior. Modified existing navigation project for Sacramento S. Doc. 142, 79th Cong., River, CA, to provide for construction of a ship 2d sess. channel 30 feet deep and 200 to 300 feet wide from deep water in Suisun Bay to Washington Lake, including such works as may be necessary to compensate for or alleviate any detrimental salinity conditions resulting from ship channel; a triangular basin of equal depth, 2,400 by 2,000 by 3,400 feet at Washington Lake; and connecting channel 13 feet deep and 120 feet wide, with lock and drawbridge, thence to Sacramento River. Deauthorization of shallow-draft channel, Colusa Sec. 1002, 1986 WRDA to Red Bluff, feature of project for navigation, Sacramento River, California. CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA Levees and channel improvements, lower 11 miles H. Doc. 545, 87th Cong., of Corte Madera Creek and tributaries, as 2d sess. modified by Chief of Engineers. Local cooperation requirements modified to Sec. 204, 1966 Flood provide 1.5 percent cash contribution toward Control Act. cost of Ross Valley unit. Modify existing project to direct construction of Unit Sec. 823, 1986 WRDA 4 from Lagunitas Road Bridge to Sir Francis Drake Boulevard, and to include construction of floodproofing measures in vicinity of Lagunitas Road Bridge to insure proper functioning of completed portions of authorized project. Further modify project to eliminate any channel modifications upstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): Channel improvements on lower 98 miles of Russian River and lower reaches of tributaries. Increased appropriation authorization for initial stage of project development. H. Doc. 585, 2d sess. 81st Cong., PL 404, 84th Cong., 2d sess. 35-32 21. May 17, 1950 Feb. 10, 1956 TABLE 35-B (Cont'd) SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake; Channel Improvements on Dry Creek below dam. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and channel; compensate for fish losses on the Russian River which may be attributed to the operation of the Coyote Dam component of the project through measures such as possible expansion of the capacity of the fish hatchery at the Warm Springs Dam component of the project. H. Doc. 547, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 95, 1974 WRDA May July 17, 1950 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 May 12, 1967 Mar. 7, 1974 June 19, 1975 SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM Modify Sacramento River Flood Control Project H. Doc. 649, 78th Cong., to provide for extensions in levees and other 2d sess. 2 structures along Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries; construct Black Butte Dam and Reservoir; construct low-level Table Mountain Dam and Reservoir with power facilities; and provision of monetary authorization of $15 million for initiation of modification. Improvements for protection of Upper Butte Basin H. Doc. 367, 81st Cong., (included full monetary authorization). 1st sess. 2 Extend existing Sacramento River Flood Control H. Doc. 272, 84th Cong., Project to Keswick Dam for purposes of zoning 2d sess. 2 area below dam and modification of project by construction of bank protection and incidental channel improvements between Chico Landing and Red Bluff (included full monetary authorization). Additional authorization of $17 million for comprehensive plan approved in act of December 22, 1944. Further modification of Sacramento River Flood S. Doc. 103, 80th Cong., Control Project by construction of initial 10- year phase of bank erosion control works and setback levees on Sacramento River and authorization of $14,240,000 for prosecution of modification. Additional authorization of $7 million for bank PL 90-17 protection approved in act of July 14, 1960. Initiation of construction of second phase of bank PL 93-251 erosion control works and setback levees on Sacramento River as approved in act of July 14, 1960, and additional authorization of $16 million for such purpose. 3 Deauthorization of Table Mountain Dam and H. Doc. 94-192, 94th Reservoir. 4 Cong., 1st sess. 1. Contains latest published map of section above Sacramento. For map of section below Sacramento, see H. Doc. 1123, 60th Cong., 2d sess. and S. Doc. 142, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 2. Contains latest published map. 3. Total monetary authorization available, exclusive of preauthorization studies from general investigations appropriations, amounts to $72,740,000. 4. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, PL 93-251, as amended by sec. 157, PL 94-587, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of project unit. 35-33 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 22. Dec. 22, 1944 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 35-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Feather River, CA 1951 - $ 5,7521 2 Middle River and Connecting Channels, CA Completed 1974 $ 8,3543 93,4944 Mokelumne River, CA Completed 1974 8,500 189,152 Navajo Reservoir, NM Completed - 2,1325 6 - Old River, CA Completed 1970 23,185 7 631,128 Stockton and Mormon Channels, CA Completed 1970 253,1518 218,854 Suisun Bay Channel, CA Completed 1974 200,928 o1011 3,316,62212 13 Suisun Channel, CA Completed 1973 217,677 733,48913 14 Suisun Point Channel, CA Completed 1965 191,728 5 15 - 1. Maintenance project, channels adequate for commerce. 2. Includes $10 for maintenance for previous project. Excludes $6,160 for previous project and $3,840 for existing project for maintenance expended from contributed funds. 3. Includes $1,600 for previous project. 4. Includes $790 for previous project. 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended. 6. All costs transferred from Los Angeles District in FY 1968. 7. Estimated cost to local interests was $3,600 for lands, damages and public landings. Remaining portion of project, consisting of side channel at Orwood and completion of project channels from mouth of Old River to Lammers Ferry road and from Crocker Cut to Holly Sugar Factory was deauthorized November 17, 1986, by WRDA of 1986. 8. Upon completion of Mormon Slough, Calaveras River, CA in February 1970, local interests accepted maintenance responsibility for Mormon Slough as well as for Stockton and Mormon Channels CA, and Federal maintenance was discontinued. No Federal maintenance costs have been incurred since FY 1969. 9. Includes $58,901 for previous project. 10. Excludes $59,551 expended from required contributed funds for previous project. 11. Excludes work accomplished under existing project at a cost of $207,198 from Public Works Administration funds allotted to San Joaquin River, CA. 12. Includes $59,817 for previous projects. Excludes $5,449 expended from required contributed funds for previous project. 13. Maintenance responsibility transferred to San Francisco District, January 1, 1974. 14. Includes reconnaissance and condition surveys of $5,496 and $483 for fiscal year 1963 and 1964, respectively. 15. Estimated cost (July 1964) to local interests was $12,000 for lands, damages, and spoil retention dikes. 35-34 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Alameda Creek, CA Completed American River, CA Completed Aquatic Plant Control, CA Completed Big Cry Creek Dam and diversion, CA Completed Big Wash, Milford, Beaver County, UT Completed Burch Creek, Weber County, UT Chester, CA Active/no FY 89 expenditure Coyote Creek, CA Completed Duck Creek, San Joaquin County, CA Completed East Weaver Creek, CA Completed Folsom Lake, American River, CA Completed Green Valley Creek, Solano County, CA Completed Kays Creek, UT Completed Kern River-California Adqueduct Intertie, CA Completed Klamath River, CA Completed Lake Camanche, CA Completed Lake Oroville, CA Completed Lakeport Lake, CA Active/no FY 89 expenditure Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, CA Completed Marysville Lake, CA Active/no FY 89 expenditure Merced River, CA Completed Middle Creek, CA Completed Mormon Slough, CA Completed Napa River Basin, CA Active/no FY 89 expenditure New Bullards Bar, CA Completed North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, CA Completed Pinole Creek, CA Completed Redwood Creek, Humboldt County, CA Completed Reese River, Battle Mountain, NV Completed Rheem Creek, CA Completed Rodeo Creek, CA Completed Salinas River, CA Inactive Salt Lake City, Jordan River, UT Completed San Leandro Creek, CA Completed San Lorenzo Creek, CA Completed San Lorenzo River, CA Completed Sevier River near Redmond, UT Completed Sonoma Creek, CA Inactive Truckee River and tributaries, Active/no FY 89 CA and NV expenditure 1978 1959 1967 1955 1961 1964 1981 1968 1967 1965 1957 1963 1973 1977 1972 1976 1981 1976 1976 1980 1976 1967 1976 1979 1972 1974 1968 1970 1969 1962 1966 1952 1961 1973 1962 1966 1952 1973 1968 $26,995,350 2,125,8 18 3 1,000 1,369,9314 217,879s 6 26,049 5 3,570,000 7 705,622 1 5 664,825 8 220,636 1 5 9 63,014,810 10 136,0265 11 407,989 s 12 1,503,073 s 13 4,838,000 1 10,252,950 14 70,425,470 15 2,353,003 18 27,835,263 17 - 18 10,918,796 19 2,643,499 20 2,965,402 21 2,639,955 1 22 12,890,625 23 904,278 6 24 26 885,750 1 6 4,620,070 1 28 133,339 6 27 400,000 1 5 28 974,100 1 s 94,213 1 29 1,227,570 o 1,000,000 1 31 5,130,821 1 32 4,314,406 133 919,000 34 781,500 1 36 1,038,960 35-35 $54,778 1 2 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 35-E (Cont'd) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 1. Project responsibility transferred from San Francisco District to Sacramento District April 1, 1982. 2. Scheduling of reservoir operations costs. 3. Excludes $54,919 other contributed funds for miscellaneous construction for local interests pursuant to requirements of local cooperation were $951,000 (1959) for lands and relocations. 4. Excludes $44,008 other contributed funds for construction in connection with bridge construction pursuant to requirements of local cooperation. Total cost to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation was $370,000 (1959) for lands and relocations. 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of sec. 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. 6. Excludes $22,000 for preauthorization studies. 7. Excludes $69,262 other contributed funds from State of California for two low water crossings and appurtenances at Chester. 8. Excludes $50,000 for preauthorization studies. Estimated costs to local interests were $665,000 for lands and damages including relocations. 9. Includes $174,938 Public Works Acceleration Program Funds. 10. Transferred to Bureau of Reclamation in May 1956 for operation and maintenance by that agency in conjunction with other units of Central Valley project. 11. Excludes $20,000 for preauthorization studies. 12. Includes $30,000 for preauthorization studies. Estimated costs (FY 1973) to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $150,117 for lands and damages including relocations. 13. Includes $73,000 for preauthorization studies. Non-Federal (Kern County Water Agency) cost for road relocation was $18,260 (required contributed funds). 14. Constructed by East Bay Municipal Utility District. Final Federal contribution of $51,202 made July 18, 1978 (total $10,111,684). Non-Federal costs $34,988,536. 15. Constructed by State of California. Final Federal contribution of $64,186 was made on February 9, 1981 (total $69,994,105) for flood control reservation. Project prevented $500,000 in damages from the FY 1989 rainfloods. 16. Lakeport Lake was deauthorized November 17, 1986, and was reauthorized November 17, 1988. 17.Cherry Valley and New Don Pedro Reservoirs constructed by local interests. Federal contributions of $9,000,000 and $5,464,000, respectively, for flood control reservation. Final Federal contribution of $308,898 was made on January 18, 1972, for New Don Pedro. Excludes $3,004,946, contributed funds, other, for miscellaneous engineering and construction (nonproject) at local interest expense under local cooperation requirements for acquisition of rights-of-way for levee and channel improvements on Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries. 18. Planning and any future development is uncertain awaiting State of California's position on support of Marysville project. 19. Constructed by Merced Irrigation District, Final Federal contribution of $839 was made December 2, 1975 (total $10,818,638) for flood control reservation. 20. Estimated costs (FY 1967) to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $1,340,000 for lands and damages including relocations. 21. Non-Federal cost $2,965,402 (FY 1976) for lands and relocations. Federal contribution of $599,336 made to State Reclamation Board. 22. This project was reclassified as "active" on August 3, 1987. 23. Constructed by Yuba County Water Agency. Final Federal contribution of $33,470 was made in FY 1972 (total $12,759,127) for flood control reservation. 24. Includes $41,800 for preauthorization studies. 25. Excludes $146,000 other contributed funds for miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way, relocation, and utility alterations. 26. Includes $107,000 costs for remedial work to drainage system completed in FY 1977. 27. Includes $19,000 for preauthorization studies. 28. Excludes $52,549 contributed funds. 29. Cost includes engineering and design prior to June 30, 1952 and costs of $4,288 (FY 1962 - 1963) to determine if project classification to an active category was justified. 30. Estimated costs to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $463,000 (July 1962) for lands and damages including relocations. Project prevented $500,000 in damages from the May-July 1989 snowmelt runoff. 31. Excludes $285,329 contributed funds. 32. Excludes $200,000 estimated value of work performed in lieu of cash contribution. 33. Excludes $421,182 contributed funds. 34. Excludes $48,000 required contributed funds toward first cost. Cost to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation, including required contributions, were $118,000 (1951). 35. Placed inactive 1974. 35-36 TABLE 35-G SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Alhambra Creek, CA 1981 1986 $300,000 - Bear River, CA 1980 1986 - - Eel River, CA 1971 1986 1,272,816 - Gleason Creek, NV 1977 1986 215,826 - Humboldt River and Tributaries, NV 1982 1986 1,532,932 - Little Valley Wash, Magna, UT 1951 1977 - - Mad River Basin, CA 1973 1986 4,243,750 - Spanish Fork River, UT 1955 1977 20,000 - Weber River and Tributaries, UT 1974 1972 75,120 - (Morgan County) TABLE 35-H SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA: TIDAL AND FLOOD CONDITIONS PREVAILING (See Section 1 of Text) Range in Feet Miles from Mean Extreme Ordinary Extreme Mouth of Tidal 1 Tidal 2 Flood 3 Flood 4 Place River Collinsville 0 4.3 7 8 10 Sacramento 59 2.0 2 3 20 28 Verona (Mouth of Feather River) 80 - Trace 22 30 Colusa 144 - - 26 32 Chico Landing 193 - - 20 25 Red Bluff 248 - - 24 30 1. Mean lower low water to mean higher high water. 2. Tide at low water season only. 3. Mean lower low water to flood stage. 4. Extreme low water to indicated flood condition. 35-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 35-I SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA: TOTAL COST OF NEW WORK FOR PROJECT 1 (See Section 4 of Text) Federal Non-Federal 2 Modification Corps of Engineers (Construction) Coast Guard (Construction) Required Cash Contribution Lands and Damages (including Relocations) Total Total Project Prior to 1950 Modification $4,009,938 $80,000 $1,307,500 $1,042,000 $2,349,500 $6,439,438 1950 Modification 1,823,179 - 35,000 135,000 170,000 1,993,170 Total $5,833,117 $80,000 $1,342,500 $1,177,000 $2,519,500 $8,432,617 1. Completed in May 1960. 2. Excludes $5,865,000 (Feb. 1954) local interests costs for Stockton Deep Water Channel terminal facilities required under terms of project authorization. TABLE 35-J SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA: PROJECTS UNITS (1950 MODIFICATION) RECLASSIFIED AND EXCLUDED FROM PROJECT COST (See Section 4 of Text) Non-Federal Federal Required Lands and Corps of Cash Damages (includ- Total Unit Engineer Contribution ing Relocations) Total Project Settling Basin above head of Burns Cutoff 1 $1,073,000 $30,000 $200,000 $230,000 $1,303,000 Burns Cutoff improvement; new turning basin; dredging Mormon Channel 2 5 7,882,0003 431,000 1,455,000 1,886,000 9,768,000 Upper Stockton Channel enlargement 4 5 535,000 34,000 15,000 49,000 584,000 1. July 1959 price index. 1977. Deauthorized August 5, 2. Deferred; July 1960 price index. 3. For lands and construction. 4. Deleted by 1965 River and Harbor Act authorization of San Francisco Bay to Stockton Channel, Sacramento District, Improvement No. 3. 5. Deauthorized November 17, 1986. 35-38 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-K MERCED COUNTY STREAM GROUP, CA, MAXIMUM INFLOW, STORAGE, AND OUTFLOW FOR PROJECTS (See Section 16 of Text) Maximum Inflow Maximum Maximum (c.f.s.) Storage Outflow Stream (bihourly) (acre-feet) (c.f.s.) Burns 1,300 30 1,000 Bear 630 90 530 Owens 330 70 80 Mariposa 1,140 570 400 TABLE 35-L RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: ESTIMATED COST FOR NEW WORK (See Section 21 of Text) Estimated Cost Non-Federal Project Feature Federal Contribution Total Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): Channel Improvements below Dam on lower 98 miles of Russian River $14,436,000 $5,598,000 $20,034,000 1 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake: Channel Improvements below Dam 257,600,000 104,020,000 361,620,000 Total $272,036,000 $109,618,000 $381,654,000 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects. 2. Reimbursement by local interests to Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage to be paid over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of storage is initiated and exclusive of lands and damages. 35-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 35-M RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: PROJECT FEATURES AND ESTIMATED COSTS (See Section 21 of Text) Height of Reservoir Nearest City Distance Dam and Capacity Estimated Name (California) Above Mouth Type (Acre-Ft) Cost Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Ukiah Mile 0.8-East Fork 160 Feet- 122,500 $17,550,000 1 Mendocino) of Russian River Earthfill Channel Improvements (East Ukiah Mile 0 to 0.8 East - - 2,484,000 Fork) Fork below Coyote Valley Dam Guerneville Mile 0 to 98, Russian - - - and lower 98 miles of River Russian River) Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Healdsburg Mile 14.4 Dry Creek 319 Feet- 381,000 358,220,000 Earthfill Channel Improvements (Dry Healdsburg Mile 1 to 14.4 Dry - - 3,400,000 Creek) below Dry Creek Creek (Warm Springs Dam) 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects. TABLE 35-N SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: PROJECT UNITS RECLASSIFIED AND EXCLUDED FROM COST ESTIMATE (See Section 22 of Text) Current Estimated Cost Unit Classification Federal Non-Federal Total 1944 Modification: Antelope Creek 2 Inactive $1,400,000 $340,000 $1,740,000 Lower Butte Basin 3 Deferred 7,286,000 2,285,000 9,571,000 Thomas Creek 2 Deferred 1,140,000 140,000 1,280,000 Willow Creek 2 Inactive 1,290,000 120,000 1,410,000 Bypass Levees 4 Deferred 7,100,000 940,000 8,040,000 Bypass Levees 4 Inactive 3,010,000 - 3,010,000 1950 Modification: Upper Butte Basin 2 Deferred 3,530,000 1,787,000 5,317,000 1. For lands and damages, including relocations. 2. July 1960 price level. 3. Excludes work applicable to extension of Moulton weir (July 1954 price level). 4. July 1961 price level. 35-40 SACRAMENTO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-0 SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: CONSTRUCTION ACCOMPLISHED AND CONTRACT COSTS (See Section 22 of Text) Required Contract Federal Contributed Total Contract 40B continuation (Bank protection, selected sites, Sacramento River, miles 187.1-191.6) -$137,215 $795,377 $658,162 Contract 41A (also known as 40C) completion (Bank protection, selected sites on Sacramento River, miles 19.2-23.2, and Sloughs) 20,736 2,828 23,564 Contract 42 initiation (Bank protection, selected sites on Sacramento River, miles 23.6-56.7, and Georgiana, Steamboat and Sutter Sloughs) 1,650,518 387,629 2,038,147 Contract 43 initiation (Bank protection, selected sites on Feather River, Colusa Basin Drain, and Sutter and Yolo Bypasses 1,829,875 515,007 2,344,882 35-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 35-P FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Section 26 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Stage Cost Ashley Creek near Vernal, UT 1 Reconnaissance $28,774 Bitter Creek at Rock Springs, WY Reconnaissance 6,119 Blacksmith Fork River, Logan, UT 1 Reconnaissance 19,825 Burch and Jewett Creeks near Corning, CA Reconnaissance 1,635 Carson River below Lahontan Dam, Fallon, NV Reconnaissance 5,892 Colorado River at Grand Junction, CO Reconnaissance 11,793 Colorado River at Riverside, CO Reconnaissance 431 Elder and Unionhouse Creeks, CA Reconnaissance 6,400 Henson Creek, Lake City, CO Reconnaissance 5,362 Morrison Creek, Beach-Stone Lakes, CA 1 Reconnaissance 1,065 Plateau Creek near Collbran, CO 1 Reconnaissance 8,037 Price River, Price, UT 1 Reconnaissance 1,864 Roaring Fork River near Basalt, CO 1 Reconnaissance 18,705 Sacramento River near Hamilton City, CA Reconnaissance 20,671 Sacramento River, Tehama, CA Reconnaissance 14,619 Salado Creek near Patterson, CA Reconnaissance 14,992 Weber River at Oakley, UT 1 Reconnaissance 24,841 West Antioch Creek vicinity Antioch, CA Reconnaissance 184 White River at Meeker, CO 1 Reconnaissance 27.4 19 $218,628 1. No further studies recommended. 35-42 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION The Pacific Ocean Division is an operating division with both district and division functions. Its civil works responsibilities encompass the State of Hawaii, the Territory of Guam, the Territory of American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. The division is unique in that the area of responsibility is totally comprised of islands dispersed over an ocean environment exceeding 6 million square miles. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Agat Harbor, Guam ........... ........ 2. Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii ...... 3. Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii . 4. Kawaihae Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii ........................ 5. Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii ..... 6. Maalaea Harbor, Maui, Hawaii ........... 7. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .... 8. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ......................... Erosion Control 9. Lepua Area, American Samoa ............ 10. Masefau Bay, American Samoa ........... 11. Sand Island Shore Protection Oahu, Hawaii ........................ 12. Beach Erosion Work Under Special Authorization ......................... Flood Control 13. Agana River, Guam ................. 14. Alenaio Stream, Hawaii, Hawaii .......... 15. Kahawainui Stream, Oahu, Hawaii ....... 16. Kahoma Stream, Maui, Hawaii .......... 17. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ......................... 18. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ...... ......... ...... Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 19. Nanpil River Hydropower, Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia .......... . Page 36-2 36-2 36-2 36-2 36-2 36-3 36-3 36-3 36-3 36-3 36-3 36-4 36-4 36-4 36-4 36-4 36-5 36-5 General Investigations 20. Surveys ............................ 21. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........ 22. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ............................... Page 36-5 36-5 36-6 Tables Table 36-A Cost and Financial Statement .... 36-7 Table 36-B Authorizing Legislation ......... 36-9 Table 36-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ....................... 36-11 Table 36-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ......... 36-12 Table 36-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................ 36-13 Table 36-F Not Applicable Table 36-G Deauthorized Projects ........... 36-14 Table 36-H Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107 ................. 36-15 Table 36-I Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Activities Pursuant to Section 14 .......... 36-15 Table 36-J Beach Erosion Control Activities Pursuant to Section 103 ......... 36-15 Table 36-K Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205 .................. 36-16 Table 36-L Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 208 .................. 36-16 Table 36-M Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................ 36-16 36-5 36-1 _ I_ I_ _I REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Navigation 1. AGAT HARBOR, GUAM Location. On the southwestern coast of the island of Guam, about 3,318 miles west of Honolulu, Hawaii (See NOAA Chart 81408) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-1 of the FY86 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-1 of the FY86 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The construction contract was completed in February 1989 and dedicated in March 1989. Negotiations for contractor claims are ongoing; financial completion pending. 2. BARBERS POINT HARBOR, OAHU, HAWAII Location. On the west coast of Oahu, about 25 miles from metropolitan Honolulu. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 4110 and 4133) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-1 of the FY84 Annual Report. Total project estimate is $63,600,000 of which Federal cost is $55,300,000 (including $372,500 in U.S. Coast Guard cost) and non-Federal cost is $8,300,000 including lands and rights-of-way and cash contribution of $2,500,000. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-1 of the FY85 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. See page 36-2 of the FY84 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Plans and specifications for project beautification and revetment construction were completed in January 1989. A construction contract was awarded in May 1989 for $488,000 of which Federal cost is $67,000 and non-Federal cost is $421,000. Construction was not initiated as of September 1989. Completion is scheduled for January 1990. Maintenance: Annual operational cost for the Regional Visitor Center located at Fort DeRussy was $52,957. 3. KAULANA BAY BOAT HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII Location. On the southern tip of the island of Hawaii in the Ka'u Judicial District about 80 road miles southwest of the city of Hilo. (See NOAA Chart 19320) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-2 of the FY84 Annual Report. Total project cost estimate is $828,000 of which Federal cost is $751,000 and non-Federal cost is $77,000. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-3 of the FY82 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. There is an existingboat launching ramp owned by the State of Hawaii and open to the public on an equal basis. Operations during fiscal year. A construction contract is scheduled for award in December 1989 pending completion of a Memorandum of Agreement between the State of Hawaii and the Historic Preservation Office. Plans and specifications were updated and a revised environmental assessment is underway. 4. KAWAIHAE SMALL BOAT HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII Location. Kawaihae Harbor is located on the west coast of the island of Hawaii, approximately 85 nautical miles northeast of Hilo, County of Hawaii. (See NOAA Chart 19320) Existing project. The authorized project consists of an 850-foot long, 120-foot wide, and 12-foot deep entrance channel; a 1.2 acre and 12-foot deep existing turning basin; a 640-foot long, 80-foot wide, and 8-foot deep access channel; a 1,225-foot long west protective revetment structure; a 1,050-foot long east protective revetted structure; a 400-foot long wave absorber; and a 2.5 acre, 650-foot long revetted offshore island. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) will be prepared during the plans and specifications phase. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. The estimated cost of preconstruction engineering and design (PED) is $328,000. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $149,759. PED was approximately 41% complete as of September 30, 1989. 5. LAUPAHOEHOE HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII Location. Laupahoehoe is located on a peninsula on the northeast coast of the island of Hawaii, about 25 road miles northwest of Hilo. (See NOAA Chart 19320) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-2 of the FY87 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-2 of the FY87 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. The current facility includes a single lane, concrete paved launch ramp, roadways and parking areas. 36-2 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION Operations during fiscal year. A construction contract to improve navigation safety was awarded in September 1989 for $235,000 of which Federal cost is $210,600 and non-Federal cost is $24,400. Construction is scheduled for completion in December 1989. 6. MAALAEA HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII Location. Maalaea Bay is situated on the southwest coast of Maui, approximately 7 miles south of Wailuku, the county seat of Maui. (See NOAA Chart 19350) Existing project. The authorized plan consists of improvements to an existing State owned facility, initially constructed by the State of Hawaii in 1952 and includes a 620-foot long extension of the south breakwater, a new 610-foot long, 150 to 180-foot wide, 12- to 15-foot deep entrance channel, a 1.7 acre and 12 foot deep turning basin and a 720-foot long, 80-foot wide and an 8-foot deep access channel. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) will be prepared during the plans and specifications phase. Terminal facilities. There is an existing 1,000-foot long south breakwater, a 870-foot long east breakwater, 300-foot long wharf, 90-foot wide entrance channel, and a single lane launch ramp, all constructed by the State of Hawaii. Operations during fiscal year. The estimated cost of preconstruction engineering and design (PED) is $395,000. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $125,660. PED was approximately 57% complete as of September 30, 1989. 7. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition surveys were conducted at Auasi Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa; Aunuu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa; Kahului Deep Draft Harbor, Hawaii; Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii; Ofu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa; and Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa, in March 1989 by the Portland Districtfor$49,924. 8. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPEC IAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization). See Table 36-H. Beach Erosion Control 9. LEPUA AREA, AMERICAN SAMOA Location. Lepua Village is located on the island of Tutuila, about two miles east of Pago Pago on the north side of the Pago Pago Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4190, Manua Islands) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-3 of the FY88 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-3 of the FY88 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was executed in October 1988. Bid opening was held in January 1989 with acceptable bids well in excess of the government estimate. Contractor's proposal was submitted for audit by the Defense Contract Audit Agency. Results were received in August 1989 and negotiations with the contractor were completed and a continuing contract was awarded in September 1989. Total amount of the contract is $1,459,640 of which $1,102,640 is Federal cost and $357,000 is non-Federal cost 10. MASEFAU BAY, AMERICAN SAMOA Location. Masefau Village is located on the north coast of the island of Tutuila. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4190, Manua Islands) Existing project. The proposed plan consists ofa 525 foot long revetment fronting the coastal road and elementary school in Masefau. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-3 of the FY88 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was executed in October 1988. Bid opening was held in January 1989 with acceptable bids well in excess of the government estimate. Contractor's proposal was submitted for audit by the Defense Contract Audit Agency. Results were received in August 1989 and negotiations with the contractor were completed and a continuing contract was awarded in September 1989. Total amount of the contract is $329,525 in Federal costs. 11. SAND ISLAND SHORE PROTECTION, OAHU, HAWAII Location. Sand Island is located on the southern coast of Oahu. Sand Island is approximately 520 acres in 36-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 area and shelters Honolulu Harbor from the open sea. It is connected to the Kapalama peninsula by a bascule bridge at its western end. There is approximately 4,700 feet of shoreline on the south side of the island adjacent to the State park. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4109) Existing project. The proposed plan provides for a revetment 1,350-feet long and an offshore breakwater 520-feet long. The estimated project first cost is $3,000,000 of which Federal cost is $1,500,000 and non-Federal cost is $1,500,000. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-4 of the FY88 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. Currently awaiting local permit clearances from the study sponsor. A construction contract is scheduled for award in January 1990. 12. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency streambank and shoreline protection activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 79-526 (Preauthorization). See Table 36-I. Beach Erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization). See Table 36-J. Flood Control 13. AGANA RIVER, GUAM Location. The Agana River basin and the City of Agana are located on the western end of the Island of Guam near the center of the Island. The Territory of Guam is located approximately 3,800 statute miles west of Honolulu. (See NOAA Chart 81048) Existing project. For a description of the project, see page 36-3 of the FY87 Annual Report. The estimated cost of the project is $5,280,000 of which Federal cost is $4,090,000 and non-Federal cost is $1,190,000. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-3 of the FY87 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Plans and specifications were initiated in October 1986 and is approximately 95% complete as of September 30, 1989. Execution of a Local Cooperation Agreement and construction has been postponed pending resolution of land issues and a financing plan by the Government of Guam. 14. ALENAIO STREAM, HAWAII, HAWAII Location. The Alenaio watershed is located in the South Hilo District on the island of Hawaii. Hilo is the principal urban center in the South Hilo district and the County seat for the County of Hawaii. (See NOAA Chart 81408) Existing project. The recommended project consists of approximately 1,640-feet of concrete-lined channel; relocating one public and six residential structures and incorporating floodplain management regulations for undeveloped areas. The flood control improvements will provide a 100-year level of protection. The estimated cost of preconstruction engineering and design is $750,000. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) will be prepared during the plans and specifications phase. Terminal facilities. None Operations during fiscal year. The estimated cost of preconstruction engineering and design (PED) is $750,000. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $261,384. The General Design Memorandum phase of PED was approximately 60% complete through September 30, 1989. 15. KAHAWAINUI STREAM, OAHU, HAWAII Location. The Kahawainui Stream watershed is located on the northeastern coast of the island of Oahu. Laie is the principal urban center in the Kahawainui watershed. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 4110) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-4 of the FY88 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-4 of the FY88 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded in November 1988 for $3,781,000 of which Federal cost is $3,090,000 and non-Federal cost is $691,000. Construction completion is scheduled in March 1990. Construction is approximately 69% complete as of September 30, 1989. 16. KAHOMA STREAM, MAUI, HAWAII Location. The Kahoma Stream drainage basin is located in Lahaina, Maui. Lahaina is on the west coast of Maui, about 4 miles from Kaanapali. The drainage basin of Kahoma Stream totals 5.3 square miles. (See NOAA Chart 19348) 36-4 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-5 of the FY84 Annual Report. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-4 of the FY86 Annual Report. Terminal Facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Local Cooperation Agreement was executed in June 1986. A construction contract was awarded in September 1986 for $12,180,999 with completion scheduled in March 1990. Construction is approximately 84% complete as of September 30, 1989. 17. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858. (Preauthorization). See Table 36-K. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 208 Public Law 83-780. (Preauthorization). See Table 36-L. Emergency flood control activities pursuant to Public Law 84-99. Federal cost during the fiscal year for Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies appropriation was $2,593,024 of which $222,069 was for disaster preparedness and $2,370,955 for rehabilitation. 18. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Federal costs incurred during the fiscal year total $21,454. For a listing of projects inspected, see Table 36-M. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 19. NANPIL RIVER HYDROPOWER, POHNPEI, FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA Location. Nanpil River is located on the island of Pohnpei in the Federated States ofMicronesia. (See State of Hawaii, the New Pacific map) Existing project. For a description of the existing project see page 36-4 of the FY85 Annual Report. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 36-5 of the FY85 Annual Report. Terminal Facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. A construction contract for $5,622,000 was completed in October 1987. A contract to provide training for the operation and maintenance of the project is underway and is scheduled to run through FY91. General Investigations 20. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $698,225 of which $84,641 was for navigation studies, $5,513 for flood damage prevention studies, $65,039 for shoreline protection studies, $311,033 for comprehensive studies, $76,060 for miscellaneous activities, and $155,938 for coordination with other agencies. 21. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services. Flood Plain Management Services Program comes under Section 206, PL 86-645, 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program provides information on floods and flood related information to improve planning for the careful use of the nation's flood plains, thereby reducing the potential for losses to life and property from floods and wave actions. Federal and non-Federal agencies and the private sector are assisted with flood hazard evaluation and planning information for flood and coastal hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, National Flood Insurance requirements, and Executive Order 11988 requirements for federal agencies. Such assistance may include flood information and timing, floodwater velocity, extent of flooding, duration of flooding, flood frequency and regulatory floodway limits. Services accomplished during fiscal year. Requests and responses for technical services and planning assistance totaled 1,330. Of this total, 169 were from other federal agencies, 840 from non-Federal agencies, and 321 from individuals, realtors, corporations, lending institutions, engineers, architects and others. Of the 1,330 requests, assistance resulted in 2,129 site specific responses. Costs for providing Flood Plain Management services during the fiscal year were $277,389. Hydrologic Studies. Storm studies cost was $4,889. Total costs for collection and study of basic data during the fiscal year were $282,277. 36-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 22. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN COCONUT POINT, NU'UULI, TUTUILA ISLAND, AMERICAN SAMOA Section 501 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the construction of a revetment to protect communal lands and public facilities at Coconut Point, Tutuila Island, American Samoa. Funds were provided to initiate a limited scope reconnaissance study. Additional information indicated 20 to 30 structures in critical areas, about 10 to 20 feet from the eroding shoreline. Formulation of a smaller plan that addresses only critical reaches of shoreline rather than the wider reaches originally evaluated could result in sufficient benefits to justify the project. A letter report was completed in August 1989 and concluded that shore protection measures were not economically justified and the study was subsequently terminated. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $25,561. 36-6 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To In Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 1. Agat Harbor, Guam (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, HI (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor, Hawaii, HI (Federal Funds) 4. Kawaihae Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, HI (Federal Funds) 5. Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii, HI (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Maalaea Harbor Maui, HI (Federal Funds) 9. Lepua Area, American Samoa (Federal Funds) 10. Masefau Bay, American Samoa (Federal Funds) 11. Sand Island Shore Protection, HI (Federal Funds) 13. Agana River, Guam (Federal Funds) 14. Alenaio Stream, Hawaii, HI (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 52,000 1,196,000 409,700 52,808 52,808 1,209,680 -4,155,000 -200,000 1,485,293 -87,348 58,485 110,159 -35,600 1,208 10,698 --- 1,093,987 207,854 --- 790,293 175,605 --- -154,000 28,044 40,616 --- 8,452 --- 12,000 --- 9,193 1,743 --- 170,000 --- 149,759 68,000 22,000 3,195,000 76,793 26,172 3,027,525 --- --- 365,000 --- --- 151,000 -115,986 181,416 181,416 --- 200,000 --- 125,660 8,000 60,000 23,067 24,966 6,062 31,050 --- 25,000 --- 21,679 --- 25,000 402 23,651 --- 250,000 --- 117,422 125,965 --- 300,000 --- 107,388 15,000 7,308 8,000 3,018 177 5,762 96,000 261,384 36-7 2,000,000 1,998,827 1,301,841 965,898 53,391,500 53,307,319 4,249,670 2,391,892 171,400 170,336 170,000 149,759 3,623,450 3,336,226 365,000 332,416 395,000 320,660 268,000 256,323 33,000 24,697 172,500 171,328 250,000 249,149 396,000 368,772 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 36-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To In Text Project Funding FY86 FY87 FY88 FY89 Sept. 30, 1989 15. Kahawainui Stream, New Work: Oahu, HI Approp. 160,000 30,000 --- 3,220,000 3,600,000 (Federal Funds) Cost 119,520 65,805 7,700 2,122,548 2,500,223 (Contributed Contrib. --- --- --- 510,000 510,000 Funds) Cost --- --- --- 307,910 307,910 16. Kahoma Stream, New Work: Maui, HI Approp. 87,000 5,800,000 2,087,000 1,607,000 10,350,000 (Federal Funds) Cost 82,959 2,350,275 3,297,665 3,056,250 9,545,665 (Contributed Contrib. --- 416,550 311,440 -209,164 518,826 Funds) Cost --- 104,911 164,744 146,882 416,537 19. Nanpil River New Work: Hydropower, Approp. 6,000,000 530,000 500,000 --- 7,204,000 Pohnpei, FSM Cost 1,786,232 4,090,598 703,045 290,511 7,024,924 (Federal Funds) 36-8 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. Oct. 27, 1965 4. Oct. 27, 1965 6. Aug. 3, 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 22, 1976 BARBERS POINT HARBOR, OAHU, HAWAII An entrance channel 42 feet deep, 450 feet wide, and 3,100 feet long; an inshore basin of about 46 acres, 28 feet deep, a breakwater on the north side of the entrance channel, if model study shows it to be necessary; spending beaches with wave absorbers within the harbor totaling 1,320 feet in length; and a main access channel 12 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 1,200 feet long to a smallboat harbor on the west side of the deep-draft harbor to be developed by local interests. KAWAIHAE SMALL BOAT HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII An 850-foot long, 120-foot wide, and 12-foot deep entrance channel; a 1.2 acre and 12-foot deep existing turning basin; a 640-foot long, 80-foot wide, and 8-foot deep access channel; a 1,225-foot long west protective revetstructure; a 1,050-foot long east protective revetted structure a 400-foot long wave absorber; and a 2.5 acre, 650-foot long revetted offshore island MAALAEA HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII A 620-foot long extension of the south breakwater, a new 610-foot length, 150 to 180-foot width, 12 to 15-foot depth entrance channel, a 1.7 acre and 12-foot depth turning basin and a 720-foot length, 80-foot width and an 8-foot deep access channel AGANA RIVER, GUAM A levee system and channel improvements extending seaward consisting of 1,300-feet of concrete-lined channel, 410-feet of riprap and unlined channel, 850-feet of earth levee, 1,700-feet of floodwall, interior drainage improvements, minor modifications to the Marine Drive Bridge and a new bridge at the Saylor Street crossing. ALENAIO STREAM, HAWAII, HAWAII Project consists of approximately 1,640-feet of concrete-lined channel; floodproofing five individual structures, relocation of one public and six residential structures and incorporating floodplain management regulations for undeveloped areas KAHOMA STREAM, MAUI, HAWAII A debris basin 100-feet wide and 700-feet long with a capacity of 22,000 cubic yards; a rock sill, a diversion levee which is 80-feet long to direct flows into the concrete channel; a concrete trapezoidal channel about 5,280-feet long; three concrete bridges with clear span of 50 feet; and revetted outlet extending 70 feet seaward of the stream mouth. H. Doc. 93, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Sec 301, PL 89-298 Cong., 1st sess. Sec 101, PL 90-438 Cong., 2nd sess. Sec 401, PL 99-662 Sec 401, PL 99-662 H. Doc 94-488, 94th Cong.,2nd sess. 36-9 13. 14. 16. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 36-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 19. Mar. 20, 1980 Dec. 8, 1983 NANPIL RIVER HYDROPOWER, POHNPEI, FSM Construction of a hydroelectric power facility. Appropriation of funds for a feasibility study and construction of a hydroelectric project. Sec. 101, PL 96-205 Sec. 2, PL 98-213 36-10 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Agana Small Boat Harbor, Guam Auasi Harbor, American Samoa Aunuu Harbor, American Samoa Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Heeia-Kea Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Hilo Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Honolulu Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Kahului Beach Road, Maui, Hawaii Kahului Harbor, Maui, Hawaii Kailua Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Kalaupapa Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii Kaunakakai Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii Kawaihae Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Keehi Lagoon, Oahu, Hawaii Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Lahaina Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii Manele Bay Small Boat Harbor, Lanai, Hawaii Maunalua Bay Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Ofu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa Pohoiki Bay, Hawaii, Hawaii Port Allen Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii Reeds Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii Rota Harbor, CNMI Saipan Small Boat Harbor, CNMI Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii Welles Harbor, Midway Island Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Deferred Completed Completed Active Inactive Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Active Completed Active Completed Completed Completed 1978 1982 1982 1978 1972 1982 1971 1985 1976 1984 1967 1968 1966 1981 1956 1981 1977 1986 1972 1987 1976 1976 1979 1984 1967 1985 1982 1985 1979 1950 $ 937,7981 1,033,015 2 1,783,129 3 527,047 4 1,481 5,423,440 781,036 5 16,044,095 6 751,867 7,203,2218 157,997 138,188 5,983,5019 3,348,000 10 193,000 186,937 372,00011 30,378 2,127,724 12 584,51313 980,01814 432,523 7 752,64515 16 2,000,000 17 194,000 1,991,569 18 1,940,011 19 2,448,056 20 $ 49,919 163,987 208,902 --- 3,681,053 63,693 2,087,112 --- 6,750,442 --- 3,127 292,441 61,800 41,857 --- 423,622 --- 9,227,500 30,707 668,354 --- 884,833 85,123 --- 65,000 98,363 2,111 1Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $282,474 for Construction. 2Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $86,563 for Construction. 3Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $231,437 for Construction. 4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $410,077 for Construction and $84,388 for Operation and Maintenance. 6In addition, Contributed Funds of $630,568 for Construction. 6In addition, Contributed Funds of $201,282 for Construction. 7Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 8In addition, Contributed Funds of $30,200 for Construction. 9In addition, Contributed Funds of $62,102 for Construction. 1�Abandonment authorized by R & H Act of 1965 (HD 98, 89th Congress, 1st Session). 11In addition, Contributed Funds of $370,845 for Construction. 12In addition, Contributed Funds of $223,261 for Construction. 13Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in November 1974. In addition, Contributed Funds of $405,471 for Construction. 1 4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $61,953 for Construction. 15In addition, Contributed Funds of $200,000 for Construction. '16Reclassified from deferred to active category on May 16, 1983. '7 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $774,373 for Construction. "1Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, Contributed Funds of $54,034 for Construction. 19In addition, Contributed Funds of $1,791,068 for Construction. 20 Completed in 1941 and Maintenance transferred to Department of Navy. 36-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 36-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Afono Area and Aoa Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 $ 254,0151 $ ... Asquiroga Bay, Guam Completed 1986 227,1812 ... Haleiwa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1967 240,148 3 --- Kaaawa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1976 176,488 "--- Kapaa Town, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1977 158,916 b -"- Kekaha Beach, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1981 999,9966 - Kihei Beach, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1972 154,313' --- Kualoa Regional Park, Oahu, Hawaii Terminated 1982 355,472 8--- Matafao Shoreline, American Samoa Completed 1984 225,000 2 ... Ofu Airstrip, American Samoa Completed 1987 189,500 --- Pago Pago Airport, American Samoa Completed 1984 174,941 2 Pago Pago to Nuuuli, American Samoa Deferred 1978 394,187 --- Poloa Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 136,04010 . Sand Island, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1981 301,879 " --- Vatia Area, American Samoa Completed 1978 154,30912 . Waikiki Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Deferred 1979 729,087 13 93,000 1Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $209,549 in Contributed Funds. 2Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 3In addition, $160,098 in Contributed Funds. 4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $97,075 in Contributed Funds. "Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $56,916 in Contributed Funds. 6Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $1,672,524 in Contributed funds. 7Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $1,672,524 in Contributed Funds. 8Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and terminated in April 1980 as a Circuit Court ruled sand mining to be illegal. In addition, $177,300 in Contributed Funds. 9Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $312,480 in Contributed Funds. 1�Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $101,547 in Contributed Funds. 1"Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $255,728 in Contributed Funds. 12Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $132,075 in Contributed Funds 13In addition $82,000 in Advanced Funds and $17,640 in Contributed Funds. 36-12 PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION TABLE 36-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1989 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Asan Village, Guam Completed 1986 $ 1,275,500 $ --- Hanapepe River, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1967 784,8671- Iao Stream, Maui, Hawaii Completed 1985 12,285,000 --- Kaneohe-Kailua Area, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1985 25,552,400 2 Kaunakakai Stream, Molokai, Hawaii Completed 1950 73,478 3 --- Kawainui Swamp, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1967 1,265,567 --- Kuliouou Stream, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1971 1,000,000 --- Namo River, Guam Completed 1982 2,416,314 3 --- Paauau Stream, Hawaii Completed 1985 1,978,514 --- Wailoa Stream and Tributaries, Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1966 1,044,888 --- 'In addition, $11,953 in Contributed Funds. 2Includes Non-Federal reimbursement of recreation construction cost of $5,668,300. In addition, $8,175 in Contributed Funds. 3Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition, $540,335 in Contributed Funds. 36-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 36-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report for: Authority Expended Expended Ala Wai Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1976 November 1986 $ 40,117 --- PL 99-662 Hana Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii 1967 November 1977 HD #94-413 Hanalei Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii 1967 November 1981 HD #97-59 Hanapepe Bay, Kauai, Hawaii 1965 November 1986 PL 99-662 Kaimu Black Sand Beach, Hawaii, Hawaii 1975 July 1981 86,235 Director of Civil Works Kapaakea Homestead Flood Control, 1979 July 1981 221,500 Molokai, Hawaii Director of Civil Works Kewalo Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii 1976 September 1975 98,800 Director of Civil Works Talofofo Bay Shore Protection, Guam --- August 1981 80,764 Director of Civil Works Waimea Beach, Kauai, Hawaii --- November 1986 --- PL 99-662 Wake Island Harbor, Wake Island 1950 November 1986 --- PL 99-662 36-14 TABLE 36-H PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Fiscal Year Costs Ewa Beach Landing, Oahu, Hawaii 15,030 Kahului Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii 38,066 Mahukona (North Kohala), Hawaii, Hawaii 15,312 TOTAL $68,408 TABLE 36-I EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 14, PUBLIC LAW 79-526, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Aunuu Harbor Erosion Control, American Samoa Kihei Shoreline Protection, Maui, Hawaii Lauliifou Shoreline Protection, American Samoa Olosega Bridge Protection, American Samoa Poloa Seawall, American Samoa Saipan Beach Road, CNMI Waimea River, Kauai, Hawaii TOTAL TABLE 36-J Fiscal Year Costs $ 26 803 31,764 27,088 28,806 29,215 1,841 $119,543 BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103, PUBLIC LAW 87-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Fiscal Year Costs Amouli-Tula, American Samoa Canneries to Breakers Point, American Samoa East Agana, Guam Lauliituai-Aumi, American Samoa Nua-Amaluia, American Samoa Tau-Faleasao, American Samoa TOTAL $67,359 59,253 20,812 75,782 60,834 40,573 $324,613 36-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 36-K FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Garapan Area, CNMI Kawainui Marsh, Oahu, Hawaii Kihei Area, Maui, Hawaii Lake Susupe, CNMI Malaekahana Stream, Oahu, Hawaii Malaeloa Stream, American Samoa Vaipito Stream, American Samoa Waiawa Stream, Oahu, Hawaii Waikomo Stream, Kauai, Hawaii Fiscal Year Costs $74,458 10 6,903 1,516 20,000 84,926 50,711 25,003 42,868 Total $306,395 TABLE 36-L FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 208, PUBLIC LAW 83-780, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Waimea River, Kauai, Hawaii Fiscal Year Costs $34,828 Total $34,828 TABLE 36-M INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Study Date Inspected Asan River, Guam Hanapepe River, Kauai, Hawaii Iao Stream, Maui, Hawaii Kaneohe-Kailua Dam, Oahu, Hawaii Kaunakakai Stream, Molokai, Hawaii Kawainui Swamp, Oahu, Hawaii Kuliouou Stream, Oahu, Hawaii Namo River, Guam Paauau Stream, Hawaii, Hawaii Wailoa Stream, Hawaii, Hawaii Waimea River, Kauai, Hawaii April 1989 November 1988 February 1989 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 October 1988 April 1989 April 1989 December 1988 December 1988 November 1988 February 1989 36-16 PORTLAND, OR DISTRICT * The territorial limits of the Portland District include the Pacific coastal drainage area of the State of Oregon, the portions of the States of Oregon and Washington which lie within the Columbia River watershed downstream of the Umatilla Bridge below McNary Dam, and south central Oregon west of the Malheur River and the Steens Mountains, but not including that part which drains into the Klamath Lake and River. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Bonneville Navigation Lock, Bonneville Dam, OR and WA .......................... 37-2 2. Chetco River, OR ......................... 37-2 3. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver, WA, and Portland, OR ........... 37-2 4. Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA ........... 37-3 5. Columbia River between Chinook, WA and Head of Sand Island ....................... 37-4 6. Columbia River at the Mouth, OR and WA ... 37-4 7. Columbia River between Vancouver, WA and The Dalles, OR. ................... 37-4 8. Coos Bay, OR ............................. 37-5 9. Coos and Millicoma Rivers, OR .............. 37-6 10. Coquille River, OR ................ ...... 37-6 11. Depoe Bay, OR .......................... 37-6 12. Elochoman Slough, WA ... .. ..... ..... 37-7 13. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization . 37-7 14. Port Orford, OR ........................ 37-7 15. Project Condition Surveys .................. 37-7 16. Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, OR ...... 37-7 17. Siuslaw River, OR ......................... 37-8 18. Skamokawa Creek, WA .................... 37-8 19. Skipanon Channel, OR ..................... 37-8 20. Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR ................. 37-9 21. Tongue Point, OR ........................ 37-9 22. Umpqua River, OR .................... 37-9 23. Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR .... 37-10 24. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR ............. 37-10 Flood Control 25. Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR ..... 26. Blue River Lake, OR ..................... 27. Cottage Grove Lake, OR ................. 28. Dorena Lake, OR ........................ 29. Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR ..... 30. Fall Creek Lake, OR ...................... 31. Fern Ridge Lake, OR ..................... 32. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ..................... 37-11 37-11 37-12 37-12 37-12 37-13 37-13 37-14 33. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects37-14 Page 34. Inspection of Non-Federal Flood Projects .... 37-14 35. Lower Columbia River Basin, OR and WA ... 37-14 36. Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, OR and WA. .......................... 37-15 37. Mt. St. Helens & Vicinity, WA ............. 37-15 38. Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, Castle Rock, WA ...................... 37-15 39. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 37-16 40. Willamette River Basin, OR ............... 37-16 41. Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR . 37-16 42. Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, OR .......... 37-17 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 43. Bonneville Lock and Dam -- Lake Bonneville, OR and WA. ............. 44. Cougar Lake, OR ........................ 45. Detroit Lake, OR ........................ 46. Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR ............ 47. Hills Creek Lake, OR ..................... 48. John Day Lock and Dam -- Lake Umatilla, OR and WA................ 49. Lookout Point Lake, OR .................. 50. Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR .... 51. The Dalles Lock and Dam -- Lake Celilo, WA and OR .................. 37-17 37-18 37-18 37-19 37-19 37-20 37-20 37-21 37-21 General Investigations 52. Surveys ................................ 37-22 53. Collection and Study of Basic Data .......... 37-22 Tables Table 37-A Table 37-B Table 37-C Table 37-D Table 37-E Table 37-F Cost & Financial Statement ....... 37-23 Authorizing Legislation ........... 37-30 Other Authorized Navigation Projects 37-37 Not Applicable Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................ 37-38 Other Authorized Multiple Purpose 37-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Projects, Including Power ......... 37-40 Table 37-G Deauthorized Projects ............ 37-41 Table 37-H Columbia and Lower Willamette River Below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR ................... 37-42 Table 37-I Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 .... 37-42 Table 37-J Project Condition Surveys ......... 37-42 Table 37-K Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR, Principal Features of Existing Canal and Locks ................ 37-43 Table 37-L Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858 .... 37-43 Table 37-M Flood Control Reservoir Operations 37-43 Table 37-N Lower Columbia River Basin, OR and WA, Levees and Improvements to Existing Works ................ 37-44 Table 37-0 Willamette River Basin Comprehensive Plan ............. 37-45 Table 37-P Principal Data Concerning Navigation Lock, Spillway Dam, and Powerplant 37-46 Navigation 1. BONNEVILLE NAVIGATION LOCK, BONNEVILLE DAM, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River 40 miles east of Portland, OR about 146 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. The existing lock chamber is 76 feet wide and 500 feet long with 24.2 feet depth of water over the sill. Construction of a new navigation lock just south of the existing lock was authorized in the FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act, Public Law 99-88, August 15, 1985. Inland Waterways Trust Fund will fund 50 percent of the project cost in accordance with the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. The new lock chamber will be 86 feet wide and 675 feet long with 19 feet depth of water over the sill. Estimated cost for construction of the new navigation lock is $328,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A contract for construction of the upstream guardwall was awarded in January 1989. Design effort continued for the lock structure throughout fiscal year 1989. 2. CHETCO RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Siskiyou Mountains of Coast Range at an elevation of 4,000 feet, flows for about 51 miles in a circuitous route, and empties into Pacific Ocean at Brookings, OR, 300 miles south of entrance to Columbia River and 345 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Charts 18600 and 18203.) Existing project. Provides for two jetties at the mouth of the river. Modification of 1965 authorized an entrance channel 120 feet wide by 14 feet deep; a barge turning basin about 250 feet wide, 650 feet long, and 14 feet deep; and a small boat access channel 100 feet wide by 12 feet deep. Also authorized was a 450-foot extension of north jetty with an increase in elevation of existing portion and a protective dike about 1,800 feet long with a top elevation of 18 feet. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 6.9 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Construction of jetties was completed December 1957. Removal of rock pinnacles and an abandoned bridge structure was accomplished in June 1959. Under authorized modification of October 1965, two contracts were completed. Construction of entrance channel and extension of north jetty was completed in July 1969. Construction of a protective dike, turning basin and small boat access channel was completed in March 1970. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Port of Brookings has developed tow large boat basins, one for commercial fishing boats and the other for sport boats, and a public boat launching ramp. There are four fish receiving docks and a sea-going barge dock for lumber loading and storage. There is also a privately owned marina and a Coast Guard Station. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 20,041 cubic yards of material was removed by the contract hopper dredge Westport. The channel flusher Sandwick spent six days working at the project. 3. COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA, AND PORTLAND, OR Location. The Columbia River rises in British Columbia, through which it flows for 425 miles. It enters the United States in northeastern Washington, and empties into the Pacific Ocean 645 miles north of San Francisco Bay and 160 miles south of Strait of Juan DeFuca. Total length of river is 1,210 miles. (See NOAA Charts 18520, 1852i, 18522, 18523, 18524, 18526, and 18531; also Geological Survey Map of Washington.) Willamette River rises in Cascade Range in western Oregon, flows northerly, and empties into Colombia River about 100 miles from the sea. Its length from source of Middle Fork is about 294 miles. Project embraces 103.5 miles of Columbia River below Vancouver, WA, and 14.6 miles of Willamette River below Portland, OR. (See NOAA Chart 18526 and Geological Survey Map, State of Oregon.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from River Mile 106.5 to 105.5, the distance between existing highway and railroad bridges; a channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, WA, River Mile 105.5 to mouth of Columbia River, River Mile 3; a turning basin at Vancouver, WA, 40 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and about 5,000 feet long; a turning basin at Longview, WA, 40 37-2 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT feet deep, average width of 1,200 feet, and about 6,000 feet long; and a channel 40 feet deep in the Willamette River with varying widths of 600 to 1,900 feet from the mouth (River Mile 0) to Broadway Bridge (River Mile 11.6) which encompasses Portland Harbor area, subject to provisions that channel from mouth of Willamette River to turning basin at Vancouver, WA, be limited to 500 feet in width until need for additional width is demonstrated by developed traffic. Existing project also provides for auxiliary channels 10 feet deep and 300 feet wide near Cathlamet, WA; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in St. Helens, (Oregon); and 30 feet deep and 500 feet wide connecting upper end of St. Helens Channel with main ship channel of Columbia; 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide along frontage of town of Rainier, OR, extended to its upper and lower ends to deep water in Columbia River, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide from this depth in Columbia River through old mouth of Cowlitz River to a point about 3,000 feet upstream from present terminus of harbor line; a channel from Longview Port dock downstream along pierhead line and past Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. plant at Longview to a connection with main ship channel below Mount Coffin, the downstream 2,400 feet of this channel to be 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide and remainder to be.28 feet deep and 250 feet wide; construction of a small boat mooring basin at Astoria, OR, to include a sheet pile, sand-filled breakwater about 2,400 feet long with a 30-foot roadway along its full length, and steel pile shore wings totaling about 1,460 feet long and for stone-and-pile dikes and revetments. Plane of reference in estuary from mouth of Harrington Point is mean lower low water; thence to Portland and Vancouver, adopted low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of Columbia is about 8 feet, and at Portland and Vancouver, about 3 feet at low stage of rivers. Extreme tidal ranges are about 13 and 3 feet, respectively. Annual freshets have little effect on stage of tide at mouth of Columbia; at Portland and Vancouver, they average about 12 feet, while highest know reached a stage of 33 feet above water at Portland. Work on the 40-foot channel in Columbia River from Portland, OR, and Vancouver, WA, to the sea was completed in 1976 except for observation of channel to determine if additional control structures or dredging will be required. Auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview was completed in 1949, and improvement of mouth of Cowlitz River and small boat mooring basin at Astoria were completed in 1950. Project depths are maintained all year except for the period immediately following the annual freshet in May-June when shoaling occurs at several locations. Timing of vessel movement with tidal fluctuations permit maximum draft conditions. In Columbia and Willamette Rivers between mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland a depth of 40 feet at low tide and 42 feet at high tide is practicable all year. In Columbia River between mouth of Willamette river and Vancouver, WA, depths of 40 and 42 feet at low and high tide, respectively, are practicable all year. (For details relating to previous project, see pages 1995 and 1998 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1746 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Portland, OR, there are six Port of Portland terminals consisting of 43 berths equipped to handle general cargo, bulk cargo, lumber, automobiles, lift-on-liftoff and roll-on-roll-off containers, and breakbulk vessels. The Port of Portland owns and operates a major ship repair yard, which includes the West Coast's largest, and the world's third largest, floating dry dock. Also available in the harbor area are privately operated facilities for receiving, storing and outloading petroleum, wood chips, grain, logs, sand and gravel, cement, and steel products. At Astoria, OR, there is a terminal with facilities for receiving and handling all types of general cargo. At Vancouver, WA, there are municipal facilities capable of berthing five ships simultaneously. Each berth is completely outfitted with mechanical and lift facilities for receiving and handling all types of cargo. The port has a low dock to handle roll-on-roll-off and side-port discharging vessels. The grain terminal has a storage capacity of 4,500,000 bushels. Port of Longview has a public terminal on Columbia River and a privately owned grain elevator with a capacity of 6,900,000 bushels. This port also has a heavy lift facility, with a capacity of 600 tons. Port of Kalama has two berthing areas, one port owned and one private. At other locations on Columbia River between Portland and Columbia River entrance there are sufficient private facilities to accommodate river vessels and fishing craft. These facilities, with planned extensions, are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details, see Port Series Nos. 33 and 34, Corps of Engineers, published in 1974 and 1975 respectively.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Regular maintenance continued through the year. A total of 7,946,800 cubic yards of material was removed. The U.S. hopper dredge Essayons removed 2,918,700 cubic yards, and U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 43,000 cubic yards. In addition, the pipeline dredge Oregon removed 3,699,700 cubic yards, the contract dredge Padre Island removed 163,500 cubic yards, and the contract dredge Smith Rice Super Scoop removed 1,121,900 cubic yards. 4. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA Location. Baker Bay is a shallow body of water about 15 square miles in extent on the north side of Columbia River near its mouth. The bay is separated from the river by Sand Island, a low-lying sand bar only a few feet above high tide level. (See NOAA Chart 18521.) Existing project. A mooring basin 10 and 12 feet deep, about 20 acres in extent with protecting breakwaters; and a west channel 16 feet deep and 200 feet wide for the first 2000 feet, then 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide to the boat basin; a channel east of Sand Island to Port of Ilwaco, a distance of about 4 miles. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 13 feet. Channel extending through easterly passage of Sand Island was completed in 1934. This portion of authorized project is 37-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 not passable and is not maintained at the present time. Dredging west channel to 8 feet was accomplished September 1948. Deepening west channel to 10 feet, and boat basin and breakwater construction at Ilwaco, WA, was finished December 1957, and again, deepening of the west channel to 16 feet completed in August 1985 under Section 107, finished the project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Wharves, floats, ramps, and berths, for fishing craft, barges and tow-boats. Small-boat basin and protecting breakwater provides moorings for numerous fishing and recreational craft all year. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 73,400 cubic yards of material was removed. The U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 10,000 cubic yards and the contract dredge Ross Island removed 63,400 cubic yards. 5. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WA, AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND Location. At easterly end of Baker Bay, lying on north side of Columbia River near mouth. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 6151.) Existing Project. Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, extending from head of Sand Island to Chinook; a turning and mooring basin at upper end of channel, 10 feet deep, 660 feet long, and ranging from 275 to 500 feet wide; reconstruction of easterly 393 feet of existing breakwater; and extension of existing breakwater easterly and thence northerly to connect with shore in vicinity of Portland Street, Chinook, WA. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet and extreme about 13 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1940. The 10-foot channel depth modification was accomplished September 1958. Rehabilitation of existing breakwater was completed September 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Chinook Packing Company owns a wharf for receiving fresh fish, and one additional fish buying company is located at Chinook. A portion of wharf is also used as a public landing. At upper end of channel there is a turning and mooring basin with facilities for mooring 350 fishing and recreational craft. Adequate terminal and mooring facilities include a public launching ramp, hoist with 10-ton capacity and suitable supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract clamshell dredge removed 117,600 cubic yards. 6. COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR AND WA Location. The Columbia River entrance is 645 miles north of San Francisco Bay. Project is about 120 miles downstream of Portland, OR, and Vancouver, WA. For description of Columbia River see Section 4. Existing project. Provides for a one-half- mile-wide channel across a bar 55 feet deep (mean lower low water) for the northernmost 2,000 feet, and 48 feet deep (mean lower low water) along the southern 640 feet, to be secured by two rubblemound jetties, spur jetty "A" on the north shore and by dredging. The north jetty is about 2.5 miles long and the south jetty about 6.6 miles long, spur jetty "A" is about 0.3 miles long. Tidal range on bar between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 13 feet. The originally authorized project depth of 40 feet was completed in 1918; south jetty completed in 1914 and north jetty in 1917. A spur jetty (jetty "A") was completed in 1939 (repaired in 1961) for the purpose of channel stabilization. Spur jetty "B" currently is classified "inactive." Dredging of the 48-foot bar channel started April 1956 was completed in September 1957. South jetty rehabilitation started June 1962 was completed September 1964. North jetty rehabilitation started January 1965 was completed April 1965. Additional rehabilitation of the south jetty was initiated in May 1982 and completed in September 1982. Deepening bar channel to 55 feet completed September 1984. Project dimensions were available at end of fiscal year. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1999, Annual Report for 1915 and page 1740 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $500,000 toward construction of the north jetty which was completed in 1917. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 4,672,200 cubic yards of material was removed. The U.S. hopper dredge Essayons removed 1,172,000 cubic yards of material, the contract dredge Padre Island removed 2,764,100 cubic yards, and the contract dredge Newport removed 736,100 cubic yards. 7. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA, AND THE DALLES, OR Location. On Columbia River, between Interstate Bridge at Vancouver, WA, 106.5 miles above mouth and The Dalles, OR, mile 191, a distance of 84.5 miles. For description of Columbia River, See Section 4, "Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, WA, and Portland, OR." Existing project. Channel 27 feet deep at low water and 300 feet wide between Vancouver, WA, and The Dalles, OR, 84.5 miles; a channel 10 feet deep at low water and 200 feet wide at upstream entrance to Oregon Slough, OR; a suitable turning basin adjacent to site of port development in vicinity of Camas and Washougal, WA; a boat basin at Hood River, OR, 500 by 1,300 feet and 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, with a connecting channel of same depth to deepwater, and a protecting breakwater on easterly side; a barge channel to waterfront at Bingen, WA, 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, 200 feet wide and about 1 mile long, and an access channel 7 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, 100 feet wide and about 1,000 feet long, to a natural mooring basin for small boats near east end of channel; and construction of The Dalles small boat basin, to provide a breakwater and shear boom protected basin about 400 by 800 feet in size with depth of 8 feet below a pool elevation of 72.5 37-4 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT feet at mean sea level. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at Vancouver is about 3 feet and at Bonneville about 0.2 foot at low stages of the river. Extreme tidal ranges are about 4 feet and 0.4 foot, respectively. Existing project is complete. Construction of The Dalles small boat basin, was completed in 1949. Channel dredging at upper end of Oregon Slough was accomplished in 1957. Project depth of 27 feet between Bonneville and The Dalles, OR, was achieved April 1959. The 27-foot channel depth between Vancouver, WA, and Bonneville, OR, was completed May 1938. Improvement of lower entrance of Bonneville Dam lock was completed in May 1961. At the present time, the channel is maintained to a depth of 16 feet, which is adequate for using traffic. Construction of a boat basin at Hood River, OR, and of Camas-Washougal, WA, turning basin was accomplished February 1962. Construction of a barge channel in Columbia River near Bingen, WA, was completed September 1963. Small boat recreation channel 100 feet wide 6 feet deep at South Channel Government Island completed 1985 under section 107. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. At Vancouver, WA, upstream of Interstate Highway bridge at River Mile 108.1 on site of former shipyard are numerous ship-building facilities equipped with railway and river moorage facilities. Also in this area are a paper-storage warehouse with barge slip, two boat building businesses, and a storage dock with gantry crane. Sites are available for development to suit lessee. At Camas, Wa, about 13.5 miles upstream from Vancouver, there is a private wharf used for transfer of papermill supplies and paper to and from barges, and facilities for discharging bulk oils from barges. At Port of The Dalles (mile 44 above Bonneville) there is a municipal wharf 125 by 1,100 feet for use by tugs and barges. There is a one-story timber and corrugated iron warehouse, 94 by 461 feet, on this wharf. A private elevator with a capacity of 40,000 bushels and a public elevator of 1,113,800- bushel capacity for handling bulk grain to barges are also at The Dalles. Public elevator has rail, truck, and water connections. There is a port owned rail connection about threefourths mile below municipal wharf where certain types of cargo may be handled between railroad cars and barges. At numerous locations along the entire waterway there are facilities for transfer of logs to water from trucks and public and private boat basins. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 11,780 cubic yards of material. 8. COOS BAY, OR Location. On Oregon coast 200 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 445 miles north of San Francisco Bay. It is about 13 miles long and 1 mile wide, with an area at high tide of about 15 square miles. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18587.) Existing project. Two rubblemound, high- tide jetties at entrance; a channel across the outer bar 45 feet deep and 700 feet wide, reducing gradually to 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide near River Mile 1 and continuing to about mile 9; thence a channel 35 feet deep and generally 400 feet wide to mile 15; an anchorage area 35 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at Empire (River Mile 5.5); turning basins at North Bend (River Mile 12.5) and Coalbank (River Mile 14.7) 35 feet deep, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; a channel 22 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Smith's Mill (River Mile 15) to Millington (River Mile 17); a small boat basin, about 500 by 900 feet at Charleston, with a connecting channel, 16 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 6,200 feet long, to deep water in Coos Bay, and construction of a protecting breakwater and bulkhead. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 7 feet and extreme is about 11 feet at both the entrance and at Coos Bay. South jetty was completed in 1928, north jetty in 1929, and 24-foot channel in 1937. The south jetty was restored in 1941 and 1942 by construction of a concrete cap for full length of the jetty. Excavation of channel to 30 feet deep and generally 300 feet wide from entrance of Isthmus Slough was completed in 1951. Dredging outer bar channel to a depth of 40 feet, decreasing to 30 feet at Guano Rock was completed in 1952. Construction of the Charleston Channel and smallboat basin was completed in September 1956. Rehabilitation of south jetty was started in June 1962 and completed December 1963. Repair of north jetty was completed in August 1989. Construction of the deeper and wider channel to mile 15 was completed in 1979. Deepening of Charleston channel and turning basin completed in 1985 under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1987 to Annual Report for 1915 and page 1728 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-5 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At North Bend there is a municipal dock 649 feet long fronting on channel, about 2,380 feet of privately owned mill docks, and three oil receiving terminals in vicinity. At Coos Bay there is a privately owned dock with a frontage of 1,345 feet, open to the public on equal terms; several small landings for fishing and harbor craft; and three lumber docks with 1,300,576, and 500-foot frontages, respectively. In the North Spit industrial area, there is one woodchip loading facility having a frontage of 1200 feet and a smaller T-dock operated by the Port of Coos Bay. At Eastside, on Isthmus Slough, there is a 200-foot dock. At Empire there is a privately owned lumber dock with frontage of 510 feet, and an oil terminal, owned by Port of Coos Bay, for receipt of petroleum products by barge. A barge slip also owned by the Port was completed in 1986. At Charleston there are wharves, for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish and a large seafood receiving and processing plant. There are also two municipally owned small-boat ba- 37-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 sins, open to all on equal terms, capable of mooring 250 fishing and recreation craft. Servicing facilities for small craft are available at all facilities, and public launching ramps have been constructed in Charleston area by private interests. A privately owned floating moorage on Joe Ney Slough has facilities for mooring about 50 fishing vessels. At Jordan Cove area there is a dock, 248 feet long, for wood chip ships. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port series No. 33, Corps of Engineers, published in 1975.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Total of 811,460 cubic yards removed. U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 334,550 cubic yards and the contract hopper dredge Westport removed 476,915 cubic yards of material. The sand-bypasser Sandwick displaced sand from shoal areas in Charleston entrance channel. Repair of the north jetty was completed in 1989. 9. COOS AND MILLICOMA RIVERS, OR Location. South Fork and Millicoma Rivers rise in Coast Range in southern Oregon, flow generally westerly and join to make Coos River, 5.3 miles above mouth of Coos River in Coos Bay. (See NOAA Chart 18587, Allegany and Daniels Creek Quadrangle.) Existing project. Originally authorized project: A channel depth of 3 feet, generally, from mouth of Coos River and 1 foot near head of navigation. Project as modified: Two channels 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide from mouth of Coos River to Allegany on Millicoma River, mile 13.8 and to Dellwood on South Fork, mile 14, and thence a channel 3 feet deep and 50 feet wide to mile 14.7 on South Fork, including stabilization works on Coos River. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at the mouth of Coos River is 7 feet and extreme about 11 feet. Tidal range at head of navigation in both forks is about 1 foot. Freshet stages usually reach a height of from 10 to 15 feet at Allegany, head of navigation on Millicoma River. Originally authorized project providing for a channel from mouth of Coos River to head of navigation in both forks, to provide a depth of 3 feet generally and 1 foot near head of navigation, was completed in 1899. In March 1966, construction of project was modified by 1948 River and Harbor Act was completed. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several small privately owned docks and landing places on the river are used by towboats and pleasure craft. There are no publicly owned docks. Present facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Major log processing yards are located at the head of navigation on both rivers. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The contract pipeline dredge Karen removed 14,000 cubic yards. 10. COQUILLE RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Coast Range, flows generally westerly for about 100 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean at Bandon, OR, 225 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 420 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18186.) Existing project. Two rubblemound high- tide jetties at river mouth, south jetty 2,700 feet long and the north, 3,450 feet long; and a channel 13 feet deep at mean lower low water and of suitable width from the sea to a point 1 mile above old Coquille River Lighthouse, and snagging to State highway bridge at city of Coquille. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth is 7 feet and extreme about 10 feet. Jetties were completed in 1908 and entrance channel in 1933. North jetty was reconstructed in 1942 and a 750-foot extension to easterly end was constructed in 1951. South jetty was repaired in 1954 and north jetty in 1956. Coquille Lighthouse rehabilitation was completed June 21, 1976. Port of Bandon constructed boat basin facility in conjunction with protective breakwater and entrance channel construction in 1985, under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1986 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1727 of Annual Report for 1938.) A plan to deepen the entrance channel of the Coquille River from 13 feet to 18 feet was approved in May 1988. Construction is planned to occur in 1991. Local cooperation. None required. However, restoration of lighthouse using Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects, funding required 50 percent cost sharing with non-Federal sponsor (Oregon State Parks). Terminal facilities. At Bandon: A privately owned mill dock used exclusively for shipping lumber on coastwise vessels, a publicly owned wharf, and a small-boat basin open to all on equal terms. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 13,190 cubic yards of material from entrance channel. 11. DEPOE BAY, OR Location. Harbor on Oregon coast 100 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5902.) Existing project. Two breakwaters north of entrance; an entrance channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide; an inner basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide and 8 feet deep with retaining wall along easterly side; and a stone spending beach. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1939 and project modification, enlarging the basin and deepening to 8 feet, was accomplished in June 1952 and August 1966. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. 37-6 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Terminal facilities. Facilities, in inner basin, consist of landings and floats to accommodate operators of excursion and commercial fishing boats. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract pipeline dredge Karen removed 14,030 cubic yards of material from the boat basin, and contract clamshell Kaward removed 1,000 cubic yards from sediment catch basin. 12. ELOCHOMAN SLOUGH, WA Location. A side channel of Columbia River, about 3.5 miles long, on Washington side about 75 miles below Portland, OR, (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 6152.) Existing project. A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from that depth in Columbia River near easterly end of slough to existing terminals near mouth of Elochoman River, a distance of about 1.5 miles with suitable turning basin of same depth at inner end. Detailed project report on a small-boat basin at Cathlamet, WA, covering modification of project under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended by Section 310 of the 1965 River and Harbor Act was approved February 9,1966 authorizing project for construction. Project provides for an entrance channel 50 feet wide and 6 feet deep, and a breakwater with a top width of 10 feet and elevation of 12 feet. Low water is plane of reference. Average tidal range during low water conditions in Columbia River is about 5 feet. Federal costs of modified project is $177,769. Existing project authorized by 1937 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc.510, 74th Cong.,2nd sess. contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Required local interests contribution of an estimated $19,600 is 11 percent of the Federal first cost of construction. An additional cash contribution of $67,031 was requested for accomplishment of local work consisting of dredging the mooring area by Federal contractor. Terminal facilities. Only terminals are privately owned wharves of Crown Willamette Paper Co., and International Wood Products Co. Present facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce Operations during fiscal year. Contract clamshell removed 59,043 cubic yards of material. 13. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). See Table 37-I. Aquatic plant control (Section 302, Public Law 89-298): Sampling and identification of aquatic plant infestation in Columbia River and Willamette River Basins were accomplished. Total costs for fiscal year were $3,342. 14. PORT ORFORD, OR Location. On Oregon coast 250 miles south of Columbia River entrance and 390 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (NOAA Chart 18203 and Geological Survey Quadrangle, Port Orford, OR) Existing project. Improvement of harbor by 55-foot extension of existing locally constructed breakwater and dredging of a turning basin, 340 feet long, 100 feet wide and 16 feet deep. Breakwater was completed October, 1968. Turning basin was completed September 1971. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A dock which is a timber piling structure about 210 by 70 feet, equipped with hydraulic crane for lifting boats from the water to dock for repairs and/or storage and removing fish catches from boats. Expansion of the dock structure to 210 x 220 feet is 90% complete. The installation of the second hydraulic crane was completed in FY 1986. About 150 fishing and private boats use this dock each year. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: During the summer months, the sand-bypasser Sandwick displaced shoal areas to provide longer periods of channel depths for navigation traffic. A contract submersible pump dredge removed 1,420 cubic yards of material which would provide users with adequate depths to utilize cranes during the winter months. 15. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Surveys were conducted during the fiscal year at a cost of $67,847; (See Table 37-J). 16. ROGUE RIVER HARBOR AT GOLD BEACH, OR Location. Rises in Cascade Range in southwestern Oregon; flows westerly through Coast Range, and empties into Pacific Ocean 264 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 381 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Chart 18202.) Existing project. Two jetties at entrance, and a channel 13 feet deep and 300 feet wide from ocean to a point immediately below State highway bridge, about 1 mile, including widening channel at a point about 0.25 mile below bridge to form a turning basin 13 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 650 feet long. At request of local interests, turning basin was located in south portion of estuary downstream from a point 0.25 mile below bridge. This change was effected to permit adequate terminal facilities to be constructed adjacent to turning basin. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Range of tide between mean lower low water nd mean higher high water is 7 feet, and extreme about 14 feet. Project as authorized has been completed. Construction of two jetties at entrance was completed September 1960. Dredging river channel by contract and entrance bar by government plant was completed October 1961. North jetty rehabilitation along channel side was completed October 1966. Breakwater construction and dredging, under contract awarded in September 1964, was 17 percent accomplished when flood of December 1964 destroyed all completed works. Contract was terminated as further construction at that location was considered unfeasible. Bank protection work at Wedderburn location was completed in October 1972. A breakwater, constructed by Port of Gold Beach, was 37-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 completed during 1973. In 1985, three pile dikes, located on the south side of channel oceanward of the boat basin entrance, were completed. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are various landings for fishing and recreational craft. At Wedderburn, across river from Gold Beach, is a facility to accommodate excursion passengers and small freight items destined for various private landings between Wedderburn and Agness, OR. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 90,140 cubic yards of material was removed. The contract hopper dredge Westport removed 60,000 cubic yards at the entrance bar. Contract pipeline dredge Karen removed 30,410 cubic yards of material at Gold Beach boat basin channel. 17. SIUSLAW RIVER, OR Location. Rises in coast range, flows about 110 miles westerly and empties into Pacific Ocean about 160 miles south of entrance of Columbia River and 485 miles north of San Francisco Bay, CA. (See NOAA Charts 19583 and 18580.) Existing project. Provides for 2 high- tide, rubblemound jetties 750 feet apart at the outer end, the north jetty 8,390 feet long (600 feet unconstructed) and the south jetty 4,200 feet long; an entrance channel 18 feet deep and 300 feet wide from deep water in ocean to a point 1,500 feet inside the outer end of existing north jetty; thence a channel 17 feet deep, 20C feet wide with additional widening at bends, and about 5 miles long, to a turning basin, 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide with additional widening at bends, and about 5 miles long, to a turning basin, 16 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 600 feet long, opposite Siuslaw dock at Florence; a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide from Florence to mile 16.5; and at River Mile 15.5 a turning basin 12 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 500 feet long. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of river is 7 feet and extreme about 11 feet. During low stages of river, tidal effect extends to Mapleton, 20.5 miles above mouth. (For details relating to previous project, see page 1988 of Annual Report for 1915.) A modification to the existing project was authorized by Public Law 96-367, October 1, 1980. North and south jetty modifications were completed in FY 85. Modifications provide for extending the north and south jetties by 1,900 and 2,300 feet respectively. The jetty extensions will terminate at approximately the minus 25-foot contour. Spur jetties were constructed on each jetty extension to reduce longshore currents from transporting material around the heads of the jetties. Each spur jetty is 400 feet long and originate approximately 900 feet shoreward of the jetty head. The north jetty spur is oriented 45 degrees to the north of the existing jetty alignment and the south jetty spur 45 degrees to the south of the jetty alignment. Work on the extension of the north and south jetties was completed on 31 December 1986. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Port dock at Florence, 150 feet wide and 350 feet long, is about 5.3 miles above river entrance and accommodates a fish-receiving station at east end of wharf which maintains a 2-ton capacity winch and supplies gasoline, oil and ice to fishermen. Other facilities at Florence consist of various floatways which provide docking facilities for fishing vessels and other small craft and a floating dock with accommodations for 75 commercial fishing vessels. Adjacent to commercial basin is mooring basin with accommodations for 200 sport boats of all sizes. Modern docks for loading ocean-going barges with packaged lumber is maintained at Mapleton and owned by the Davison Lumber Company. There are also a number of private landings and log booms between Cushman and Mapleton to accommodate river traffic. These facilities are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 116,800 cubic yards of material. 18. SKAMOKAWA CREEK, WA Location. Rises in Wahkiakum County, in southwestern part of the State of Washington, flows southwesterly and southerly about ten miles, and empties into the Columbia River about 34 miles above the mouth (see NOAA Chart 18523). Existing project. Provides for a channel 6.5 feet deep at low water and 75 feet wide, between Steamboat and Brooks Sloughs, about 1,600 feet long. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about seven feet and maximum variation of water level due to tides or freshets is about 12 feet. During ordinary freshets a stage of 12 feet is reached in creek at Skamokawa, WA. Project as authorized was completed in 1920. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are several privately owned docks on Skamokawa Creek, Steamboat Slough, and Brooks Slough for use of towboats, commercial fishing vessels, and pleasure craft. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The sandbypasser SANDWICK displaced shoals in the channel. 19. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR Location. In tidal waterway extending south 2.7 miles from deep water in Columbia River. Channel enters Columbia about 10 miles above mouth and 4 miles below Astoria, OR. (See NOAA Chart 18523.) Existing project. Channel 30 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide extending from deep water in Columbia River to railroad bridge at Warrenton, OR, distance of 1.8 miles, turning basin of same depth, mooring basin 12 feet deep at mean lower low water at Warrenton, OR, and channel 7 feet deep, generally 40 feet wide, with increased widths at log dumps and terminals, for 4,500 feet via cutoff channel above railroad bridge. Channel is maintained to 16 feet which is adequate for user traffic. Mean lower low water is plane of 37-8 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, extreme is about 13 feet. Project as authorized is complete. Dredging river channel and turning basin was completed in 1939. Construction of small-boat mooring basin at Warrenton, OR, was completed October 1957, and fill stabilization work was accomplished in August 1958. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. City of Warrenton owns wharf with a 300-foot frontage open to pubic on equal terms. One privately owned cannery wharf with a 300-foot frontage is used for unloading fish and handling fish nets. One privately owned boatyard has floats and moorage facilities for use by a maximum of 80 small boats. Small-boat basin has facilities for numerous fishing and recreation craft, and a privately owned lumber mill has a barge loading facility for chips and lumber. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 23,400 cubic yards of material. 20. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR Location. Bay is on Oregon coast about 50 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18520 and 18558.) Existing project. Provides for a jetty about 5,700 feet long on north side of entrance and a jetty 8,000 feet long on south side; a channel through bar 18 feet deep and of such width as can be practically and economically obtained; for a channel 200 feet wide and 18 feet deep from deep water in bay to Miami Cove; and for initial dredging to 12 feet deep of a small-boat basin and approach thereto at Garibaldi, OR. Project also provides for improvement of Bayocean Peninsula, OR, by construction of sand and rockfill dike 1.4 miles long, on alignment extending between Pitcher Point and town of Bayocean. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet, extreme is about 14 feet. Hobsonville Channel portion of project is inactive. Except for construction of Hobsonville Channel portion, classified inactive, channels were completed in 1927, north jetty in 1933, improvement of Bayocean Peninsula in 1956, and small-boat basin in 1958. Rehabilitation of north jetty was initiated April 1969 and was completed in September 1979. 18 foot channel to Miami Cove is inactive due to mill closure. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1989 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1474 of Annual Report for 1936.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-9 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Garibaldi: A facility owned by the Port of Bay City, for shipping lumber and receiving logs, a public landing suitable for mooring fishing vessels, towboats, and other craft. Small-boat basin has adequate facilities for mooring fishing and recreational craft. A privately owned boat ramp and moorage is available for recreational craft. At Bay City: A privately owned wharf used exclusively for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed. A reconnaissance report was initiated to evaluate deterioration of the north jetty. 21. TONGUE POINT, OR Location. The northwest corner of Oregon at river mile 18 on the Columbia River, five miles east of the city of Astoria, OR. Existing project. Tongue Point is located adjacent to the congressionally authorized Columbia River 40-foot deepdraft navigation channel. The harbor and port facilities were first developed in the 1930's as a U.S. navel base. After World War II the site served as a temporary berthing area. The improvements, however, have not been actively maintained for 25 years. The State of Oregon obtained the majority of the port development in 1980 from the Federal Government, including five finger piers. The remaining acres and three finger piers are still federally owned and used by the U.S. Department of Commerce as a Job Corps Center and the U.S. Coast Guard as a lifeboat station. Construction of a 34-foot deep by 350-foot wide channel 1.75 miles long from the existing Columbia River channel to Tongue Point docks was authorized in July 1989 under section 107 of the 1960 Rivers and harbors Act, as amended A 25-foot deep (mllw) by 1,050-foot wide turning basin is also being constructed and will be located near the piers. The estimated cost of the project is $4,328,259 of which $2,530,000 is federal costs and $1,798,259 non-federal. Local cooperation. The State of Oregon, acting through the Division of State Lands, is the non-federal sponsor. Terminal facilities. The State of Oregon owns five 30-foot wide concrete finger piers between 1,300 and 1,500 feet long. The site is served by a 12-inch water main, and electricity and sewage lines also exist at the site. Additional development of these existing port facilities, which will facilitate the movement of an estimated 225,000 automobiles annually, is the responsibility of the local sponsor. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A contract for construction of this project was awarded on July 20, 1989 and is scheduled for completion in FY 1990. 22. UMPQUA RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Cascade Range, flows westerly about 120 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean 180 miles south of Columbia River and 465 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18584.) Existing project. A jetty on north side of entrance about 8,000 feet long, a south jetty 4,200 feet long extending to a point 1,800 feet south of outer end of north jetty; dredging to provide a usable entrance channel 26 feet deep, and a river 37-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from mouth to Reedsport, a distance of about 12 miles with a turning basin at Reedsport 1,000 feet long, 600 feet wide, and 22 feet deep; deepening of channel at Winchester Bay to 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 3,100 feet, then adding 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 500 feet, and 12 feet deep by 75 feet wide for 950 feet beyond boat basin making up the East Boat Channel. A new West Boat Channel was added 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 4,300 feet and completed in 1984. Project was modified in 1951 to provide a channel in Scholfield River, but this portion of the project is currently inactive. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at river mouth is 7 feet, and extreme range is about 11 feet. North jetty was completed in 1930. Extension to original south jetty was completed in 1938. Dredging a 22-foot channel from mouth of river to Reedsport was completed in 1941. Gardiner Channel and turning basin was completed in 1949 and Winchester Bay Channel and mooring basin in 1956. Rehabilitation of south jetty was completed August, 1963. Extension of training jetty was completed October 9, 1980. Deepening Winchester Bay East Channel and new West Channel completed 1984 under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 2967 of Annual Report for 1898 and page 1732 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At Gardiner there is about 650 feet of wharf frontage. Also there is an oil unloading facility owned by International Paper Co. for exclusive use of tanker barges. Port of Umpqua owns one wharf with 456 feet of water frontage, of which 228 feet is usable for vessels and another with about 75 feet of water frontage which has not been used generally for commercial shipping. On Bolon Island across the river from Reedsport a wharf was constructed which has about 5 acres of open storage for lumber and available to all on equal terms. At Winchester Bay, 2 miles from river entrance there is a major sports and commercial fishing harbor. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 210,000 cubic yards of material. Contract clamshell Jamison DB Big John removed 30,950 cubic yards from Winchester Bay access channels. 23. WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR Location. Locks and dam covered by this project are at Willamette Falls, a rocky reef in Willamette River at Oregon City, OR, about 26 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. Canal and locks were originally constructed by private interest in 1873 and were purchased by the United States in April 1915 for $375,000. Final report on purchase and rehabilitation of canal and locks is in the Annual Report for 1923, when project was reported 98 percent complete. The project includes four locks a canal basin and an extra guard lock used to prevent flooding when river levels are high. The system acts as a fluid staircase between the upper and lower reaches of the Willamette River. Total length of existing canals and locks is about 3,500 feet. Principal features of existing canal and locks at Willamette Falls are set forth in Table 37-K. Ordinary fluctuation of stage of water above locks is 12 feet and extreme, due to flood conditions, 20 feet. Below locks, ordinary fluctuation is 15 feet and extreme 50 feet. Until the 1940's, the gates were opened manually. Now, the gates are operated by hydraulic pumps controlled by switches in two control stations with the aid of closed-circuit television and radio communication. All the gates have been replaced under minor rehabilitation funds. Existing locks and grounds are in good condition and in continuous operation. New service building was completed in 1988 costing $523,000. The project was placed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. James River Paper has a timber wharf about 850 feet long, extending to and supported by a concrete division wall built in lock canal by the United States. This wharf is used for receiving mill supplies and shipping paper and paper products. Operations during fiscal year. Normal operation and maintenance performed. Traffic through lock totaled 1,206,563 tons during the fiscal year. 24. YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR Location. Yaquina Bay is on Oregon coast, 113 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18581.) Existing project. Two high tide rubblemound jetties at entrance, north jetty 7,000 feet, and south jetty 8,600 feet long; a spur jetty on channel side of south jetty 4,700 feet from its sea end, 800 feet long; five groins channelward from south jetty; channel 40 feet deep for a general width of 400 feet across bar and at outer end of entrance channel; a channel 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide to a turning basin of same depth, 900 to 1,200 feet wide and 1,400 feet long, and a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 30-foot channel at about mile 2.4, thence upstream to abandoned railroad terminus at Yaquina, a distance of about 4.5 miles. Project also provides for two small boat mooring basins at Newport, OR. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. At mile 1.2 a 1,300 foot long breakwater protecting the Port of Newport South Beach Marina together with an entrance channel 8 feet long by 100 feet wide for a distance of 2,035 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in May 1952. Restoration of jetties was completed in 1934 and extension of north jetty 1,000 feet seaward was completed in 1940. Construction of mooring basin at Newport and dredging of channel and turning basin to project dimensions were completed during fiscal year 1949. Restoration of north jetty was again accomplished in 1956. Under modification of July 3, 1958, extension of north jetty was completed in September 1966, dredging of 40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river chan- 37-10 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT nel was completed in October 1968, and extension of south jetty was completed in June 1972. The north jetty was rehabilitated in 1988. (For details relating to previous projects see Annual Report for 1893, part 4, page 3314, and Annul Report for 1938, page 1736.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At McLean Point, on north side of bay, about 2 miles from entrance, Port of Newport has two berths capable of serving ocean-going vessels, one 435 feet long, the second 520 feet long. At the time the second berth was dredged, a retaining wall and fill of 6 acres were constructed adjacent to deep water. There now is 40 acres of filled land adjacent to deep water, and of this total, 7 acres were constructed in 1956-57. This facility has necessary carriers and lift trucks for handling lumber cargoes, warehouse for covered cargo storage, and is open to all on equal terms. Port of Newport also has a public wharf with 300 feet of frontage for servicing fishing boats. In addition, Port of Newport maintains 510 berths for mooring commercial and sport fishing vessels. There are several seafood companies on the bay which have their own facilities for handling fresh fish and crab. Supplies and petroleum products are readily available for small vessels. On south side of bay about 1.2 miles above entrance, Port of Newport has constructed South Beach Marina which can handle approximately 600 pleasure craft and shallow draft fishing boats. Public facilities include public automobile and boat trailer parking, boat launching ramp, fuel dock, fishing pier, and picnic area. A dry boat moorage of 120 boats, is completed. A swing hoist with 3- ton capacity is currently available and one with 60-ton capacity is planned. About 1.5 miles above entrance, Oregon Aqua Foods, subsidiary of Weyerhaeuser Company, maintains a commercial fish farm facility. About 2.0 miles above entrance, Oregon State University, in conjunction with the Marine Science Center on 52 acres, maintains a 220-foot pier for docking large and small research vessels and a 100-foot float for docking small boats. Docking facilities are restricted to research vessels and State of Oregon small boats. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 333,810 cubic yards was removed. U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 57,300 cubic yards and the contract hopper dredge Padre Island removed 276,510 cubic yards of material. 25. APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. In Jackson County, OR, on Upper Applegate River, a tributary of Rogue River, at River Mile 46, about 23 airline miles southwest of Medford, OR. Existing project. A gravel-fill embankment dam, 242 feet high from streambed to crest with an overall length of 1,300 feet. A gate- controlled concrete chute-type spillway on the left abutment, and a regulating outlet conduit, and intake tower with multilevel intakes on the left side of valley floor. Lake, 5 miles long, provides 75,000 acre-feet of usable storage for flood control and water conservation utilization. Project controls runoff from a drainage area of 223 square miles. In addition to flood control, reservoir is operated to provide irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, and recreation benefits. Recreation facilities were provided by the Corps of Engineers with operation and maintenance by the USFS under a memorandum of agreement. Project is complete and operating. Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon insure maintenance of stream flow released for fishery. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife made filing May 31, 1962 with State Engineer for water rights for use of stored water and natural flows for fish habitat improvement in amounts and at times specified in project authorization. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation has made a feasibility study of Applegate Irrigation Division. The results of the study indicate that at present there does not appear to be a feasible Federal irrigation project for the Applegate River valley. Local interests have furnished all local cooperation specified by the 1970 Flood Control Act. The assurances were approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 8, 1975. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance was performed. Freshets regulated by Applegate Lake on Applegate River and Rogue River are shown in Table 37-M. 26. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR Location. On Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, 1.8 miles above confluence of the two streams at the confluence of Quartz Creek and Blue River and about 42 miles easterly of Eugene, OR. Existing project. A gravel-fill embankmnent dam 1,329 feet long at crest including spillway and 319 feet above the lowest point of the general foundation. A concrete gravity chutetype spillway with two gates is located on left abutment. Outlet works are in left abutment. On left shore of reservoir an earth-and-gravel fill embankment, about 1,535 feet long and 70 feet high, closes a low saddle between Blue River and McKenzie River. Project controls runoff from drainage area of 88 square miles. Reservoir provides 85,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service under a Memorandum of Agreement. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1963 and operation for flood control was effective in October 1968. Settlement of claims was completed in May 1974. Eugene Water and Electric Board made an application on April 1982 for permit to install two small hydropower units at Blue River Lake project. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Blue River Lake project on Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, are shown in Table 37-M. 37-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 27. COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR Location. ON Coast Fork of Willamette River, 29 miles from mouth. Coast Fork rises in Douglas County, OR, on western slope of Cascade Range and northern slope of Calapooia Range, flows north for 49 miles, and unites with Middle Fork to form main Willamette River. Existing project. An earthfill dam, 1,750 feet long at crest, 114 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation, a concrete gravity free overflow spillway 264 feet long near the right abutment, and a concrete gravity non-overflow section 96 feet long forming the right abutment. Total length of dam is 2,110 feet. Outlet works, consisting of three gate- controlled conduits, pass through spillway section. Reservoir provides 30,060 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of drainage area of 104 square miles. Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflow for navigation and for other purposes. Recreational development consists of day use and overnight facilities at five sites operated by the Corps of Engineers. Construction of project initiated August 1940 was completed April 1952. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since September 1942. Local cooperation. Development of additional recreation facilities will require a local sponsor willing to cost share and assume all operation and maintenance of park facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract for supervisory control and data acquisition equipment is in progress. Normal operation and maintenance work continued. Freshets regulated by Cottage Grove Lake on Coast Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-M. 28. DORENA LAKE, OR Location. On Row River, OR, 7 miles from mouth. Row River rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range, flows northwest for 19 miles, and enters Coast Fork of Willamette River 19.5 miles above mouth. Existing project. An earthfill embankment dam, 3,352 feet long at crest and 145 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation. Concrete gravity free-overflow spillway, 200 feet long, forms right abutment. Outlet works on five slide-gate-controlled conduits pass through spillway section. Reservoir provides 70,500 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of 265 square miles. The Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigational and other purposes. Construction of project initiated June 1941 was completed October 1952 except for construction of additional recreation facilities that were funded under the Code 710 program. Future recreation facility construction will be accomplished in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County, OR. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since November 1949. Local cooperation. A multiple project cost sharing agreement has been in force with Lane County since Sept. 1976. It includes 4 projects and 14 parks. At Dorena Lake, 6 parks included in the agreement are managed by Lane County under a lease agreement. Future recreation development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract for supervisory control and data acquisition equipment is in progress. Normal operation and maintenance continued. Freshets regulated by Dorena Lake project on Row and Coast Fork Willamette Rivers are shown in Table 37-M. 29. ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. In Jackson County, OR at River Mile 1.7 on Elk Creek, a tributary of Rogue River, about 26.5 miles northerly from Medford, OR. Existing project. Construction work for the 249-foot high roller compacted concrete gravity dam, 2,600 feet long at the crest, with a gate controlled concrete chute spillway, regulating outlet conduits, power penstock and multiple use intake tower attached to the upstream face of the dam has been stopped due to a court injunction. The project would control runoff from a drainage area of 135 square miles, and provide future municipal and industrial water supply, irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, and recreation benefits. Construction of the project was initiated in February 1971. Work completed to date includes construction of roads and the main dam structure and outlet works to elevation 1563 (approximately 1/3 proposed height). All lands for the project have been acquired with the exception of the clearing of water rights for a seemingly abandoned irrigation canal which originates within the project boundaries. Environmental statements were filed with Council of Environmental Quality June 15, 1972 and Supplement No. 1 addressing water quality and social/demographic information was filed with EPA on December 24, 1980. Estimated cost of project is $168,000,000 of which $164,400,000 is federal and $3,600,000 is non-federal. In October 1985, the Corps was advised by Oregon Natural Resources Council (ONRC) and environmental group, they intended to file suit against the government to halt construction of Elk Creek, on specific environmental issues. A hearing on the motion for a preliminary injunction was scheduled before Oregon Federal District Court 16, December 86. On that date, the Court refused to grant the injunction to halt construction and bids were opened and the contract subsequently awarded to Ohbayashi Corp. An appeal was filed by ONRC in March, 1986 and heard by the 9th Circuit Court in July, 1986. On 23 June 1987, the Circuit Court reversed the decision of the District Court and returned the case to the District Court for appropriate injunctive relief. The resulting District court order issued in August and September 1987 allowed construction of the dam to El. 1563 ft. (approximately 1/3 the height of the dam), backfilling of the foundation key trench, aggregate processing, quarry restoration, and other miscellaneous work. The construction of the main dam to elevation 1563 was reached in mid-January 1988. The Department of 37-12 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Justice petitioned the 9th Circuit Court for a rehearing. On December 10th 1987 the 9th Circuit Court rejected the petition for a rehearing, requiring the termination of the existing main dam, and reservoir clearing contracts. The Department of Justice petitioned with the U.S. Supreme Court for a review of the decisions made by the 9th Circuit Court. The hearing before the U.S. Supreme Court was held May 1, 1989. The U.S. Supreme Court remanded the case back for injunctive relief. In September 1989, the District Court was requested by the Corps to remand the case back to the Corps for preparation of a supplemental EIS. To lift the injunction against the dam a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (EISS) is being prepared to address those issues. Additional studies are being conducted in water temperature and turbidity, and fish and wildlife. The Draft EISS is scheduled for public review at the end of calendar year 1990. Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon take action prior to construction to insure maintenance in stream of flow to be released for fishery. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation laws and policies. On February 24, 1966, State of Oregon Water Resources Board filed for withdrawal rights of 25 cubic feet per second to maintain a minimum flow for fish. Development of recreation facilities require a local sponsor willing to cost share in recreation development and assume all operations and maintenance of park facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Settling of contract claims, operation and maintenance during the construction phase of the project, and archeological investigations. 30. FALL CREEK LAKE, OR Location. On Fall Creek, a tributary of Middle Fork Willamette River, about 7 miles above confluence of the streams and about 19 miles southeasterly of Eugene, OR. Existing project. An earth-and-gravel fill embankment about 5,100 feet long at crest and 193 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation. A gated concrete gravity spillway is in left abutment. Outlet is in right abutment. Reservoir provides 115,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Construction of project began May 1962 and was essentially complete November 1965. Reservoir storage for flood control was effective October 1965. SKY Camp Lodge was completed October 1978. Future recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Bethel School District. Bethel School District has a subagreement with the Springfield Kiwanis Club for management of this facility. The Corps manages one park at the project. Local cooperation. Fall Creek Lake is included in the Lane County multiple project cost sharing agreement. Two parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreement. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Fall Creek Lake project on Fall Creek, a tributary of Middle Fork, Willamette River, are shown in Table 37-M. 31. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR Location. On Long Tom River, 23.6 miles from the mouth. Long Tom River rises in Lane county, OR, on eastern slope of Coast Range, flows north for 50 miles, and enters Willamette River 147 miles above its mouth. Existing project. A main dam 6,624 feet long at crest and 49 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation and two auxiliary dikes, 915 and 3,929 feet long, along northeasterly boundary of lake. Main dam consists of an earthfill embankment dam 6,330 feet long, a concrete gravity spillway near left abutment with a non-overflow structure 46 feet long, containing outlet works, and an overflow structure, 248 feet long, controlled by six automatic gates. Project includes rectification of channel of Long Tom River downstream of dam. Reservoir provides 110,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 275 square miles. Reservoir protects Long Tom River Valley and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley generally and to increase low water-flows for navigation and other purposes. Dam was originally constructed in 1941 to height of 47 feet. Provision of additional storage for flood control was obtained in 1965 by raising embankments 2 feet to 49 feet above lowest point of the general foundation. Construction of project initiated April 1940 was completed August 1951, except for provision of additional storage for flood control authorized in 1962 and completed April 1965, and construction of additional recreation facilities funded through the Code 710 program. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since December 1941. Development of future recreation facilities will be in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane county, and requires a 50 percent contribution by the county. Development is subject to availability of funds by the Government and the county. Local cooperation. Fern Ridge Lake is included in the Lane County multiple project cost sharing agreement. Three parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreements. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife manages 5,000 acres of land and water for migratory water fowl under a lease agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract for supervisory control and data acquisition equipment is in progress. Rehabilitation of outlet works was completed. Normal operation and maintenance continued. Freshets regulated by Fern Ridge Lake project on Long Tom River are shown in Table 37-M. 37-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 32. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). See Table 37-L. Emergency bank protection (Section 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.). Fiscal year costs for completion of preauthorization studies on Little Butte Creek, Eagle Point, Oregon were $4,968 and initiation of a preauthorization study on Nehalem River, Sunset Drainage District, Oregon $520. Preparation of plans and specifications were continued for Mill Creek, Oregon $14,238 and Winchester Bay, Oregon $898. Snagging and clearing for flood control (Section 208, Flood Control Act of 1954, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress). Fiscal year costs for preauthorization study on Tutuilla Creek, Oregon were $10,000. Beach erosion control (Section 103, River and Harbor Act of 1962, Public Law 874, 87th Congress). Fiscal year costs for initiation of a preauthorization study at Cape Lookout State Park, Oregon were $6,446. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for fiscal year were: $213,104, disaster preparedness; $1,198, emergency operations. Mt. St. Helens Emergency Measures. The May 18, 1980 eruption of Mt. St. Helens dramatically altered the hydraulic and hydrologic regimes of the Cowlitz and Toutle River valleys. Volcanic debris substantially reduced the river's hydraulic capacity to the point where major flooding could be expected even with normal runoff. A major recovery program for the Cowlitz and Toutle Rivers funded under advance measures was initiated a short time after the eruption and was essentially completed during FY 1982. Total cost of Mt. St. Helens emergency measures, from initiation through FY 1989, with some contract modifications remaining to be negotiated, is $245,967,730. The authorized navigation channel on the Cowlitz between River Mile 0 and 4.2 remains unusable due to continued sedimentation. 33. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Funds appropriated for inspection of completed local flood protection works are used to determine maintenance condition of completed works and to ascertain whether those works are being properly maintained by local interests. A total of 65 leveed areas and 264 bank protection works are inspected at various locations along both banks of Lower Columbia River below Bonneville Dam, along Oregon Coast, in eastern Oregon, in southern Oregon and in Willamette River Basin. Aerial inspection of revetments in Willamette River Basin are supplemented by an onsite inspection at locations requiring maintenance. A representative of sponsoring districts accompanied the Portland District representatives performing the levee inspections. Deficiencies in maintenance and need for repairs were discussed with sponsoring districts' representatives and a report was made to each sponsor with recommendations for improving maintenance. The program to improve maintenance of completed Federal projects initiated by House Appropriations Committee on Civil Functions was continued. Of the 65 leveed areas inspected during the fiscal year, four were reported deficient in maintenance. Fiscal year costs were $110,157. 34. INSPECTION OF NON-FEDERAL FLOOD PROJECTS Annual inspections and evaluations are made of flood control works constructed by non- federal agencies. These evaluations are to determine eligibility for assistance under PL 84-99, of damages by flooding. This evaluation consists of an engineering study to determine degree of flood protection being provided, a tabulation of improvements within the protected area for cost-benefit studies and an inspection to determine compliance with maintenance agreements executed by the project sponsor and the Government. These inspections also serve a valuable disaster preparedness function in terms of explaining to local sponsors there preparedness responsibilities. All local sponsors are advised of the result of these evaluations and inspections. Fiscal year costs were $3,811. This function was transfered to the Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies appropriations this fiscal year. 35. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River and minor tributaries, chant nels, and sloughs, between Sandy River, OR, about 15 miles east of Vancouver, WA, and mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. Plan for bank protection work, improvements to existing projects, and construction of flood control works in Lower Columbia River Basin provides for new construction and supplementing and extending projects constructed in Lower Columbia River Basin under authority of 1936 Flood Control Act: (a) Lower Columbia River Bank Protection, OR and WA provides for bank protection works at 96 locations on Columbia River and tributaries between Sandy River and mouth of Columbia River, totaling about 224,000 linear feet. Estimated total Federal cost is $25,100,000 and non-Federal cost is $1,720,000; (b) See Table 37-N on Levees and Improvements to Existing works; (c) Lower Columbia River Basin levees at new locations, Oregon and Washington, provides for construction of flood control works at: Washougal area, Clark County, WA, about 5.5 miles of levee and appurtenant works at a Federal cost of $1,803,488, and non-federal cost at $98,000; and Vancouver Lake area in vicinity of Vancouver, WA, about 18 miles of levee and appurtenant works at an estimated Federal cost (1980) of $19,500,000 and non-Federal cost at $900,000. This portion, Vancouver Lake, WA, has been reclassified "deferred". Total estimated Federal costs (1980) for both areas of work are $21,303,488 and non-Federal costs $998,000. Federal cost for all work under project, Lower Columbia River Basin, OR, and WA, is $67,531,776. Construction of improvement to existing project in Sandy Drainage District, OR, was completed by local interests at no 37-14 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT construction cost to the Government. Improvements of levees have been accomplished by contract at the following locations: Multnomah County Drainage District, No. 1, OR, June 1962; Suvie Island Drainage District, OR, October 1972; Woodson Drainage District, OR, December 1963; Rainier Drainage District, OR, June 1964; Cowlitz County Diking Improvement Districts, OR, April 1967; Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District, No 2, Wa, June 1974; Beaver Drainage District, Or, June 1978; Wahkiakum County consolidated Diking District #1, WA, October 1979; and Scappoose Drainage District, OR, September 1980. Washougal Area, WA (new location) levee construction has been completed. Under authorization for Lower Columbia River Basin bank protection works, construction has been completed at numerous locations. (See Section 34 for additional information). Local cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate completed works. Under Section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interest will be required to make a cash contribution for construction of each project. Total non-Federal cost for all work is $6,488,000. For details of status or requirements of local cooperation, see individual project reports. Operations during fiscal year. See individual projects. 36. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River and tributaries between Sandy River, OR, and mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. Provides for construction of 224,000 linear feet of bank protection works at 96 locations along Lower Columbia River below River Mile 125 and along principal tributaries in this reach, to protect existing improvements such as levees and developed industrial lands from further erosion. Existing project is a unit of general comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation, and other purposes in Columbia River Basin. Construction of project began in July 1961 and is 88 percent complete. .A total of 191,000 linear feet of bank protection work at 84 locations has been completed. Estimated Federal cost is $24,900,000. Local cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate completed works. Under Section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Local Interests will also be required to make a cash contribution for construction of each site. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation are $1,400,000. Operations during fiscal year. Work consisted of coordination with sponsors and evaluation of local erosion problems continued. 37. MOUNT ST. HELENS & VICINITY, WA Location. Along the Cowlitz and Toutle rivers from Spirit Lake at the base of Mt. St. Helens to the confluence of the Cowlitz with the Columbia River (River Mile 68) approximately 55 miles downstream from Portland, OR. Existing project. The May 18, 1980 eruption of Mt. St. Helens dramatically altered the hydraulic and hydrologic regimes of the Cowlitz and Toutle River valleys. Mudflows triggered by the eruption carried large volumes of sediment from the debris avalanche into these river valleys, reducing hydraulic capacity to the point where major flooding could be expected even with normal runoff. Storm runoff and surface drainage continue to deliver sediment from the debris avalanche into the rivers. Funds allocated under Public Law 84-99 were used for major recovery work on the Cowlitz and Toutle rivers. In late FY 1983, interim flood control measures were implemented under the authority of Public Law 98-63 to assure 100-year flood protection to developed areas along the Cowlitz River. Measures implemented are primarily dredging on the Cowlitz and Toutle rivers temporary levee improvements on the Cowlitz River, and a monitoring program. Local cooperation. Local sponsors are responsible for obtaining any additional lands easements and rights-of-way. The State of Washington has agreed to act as the local sponsor. State funds have been appropriated for acquisition of lands and related expenses for Mt. St. Helens recovery operations. The State of Washington has spent over $4,500,000 to procure disposal sites for dredged material. Operations during fiscal year. The settlement of contract claims was the only activity in the fiscal year. 38. MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA Location. On the North Fork Toutle River, 2 miles upstream from its confluence with the Green River, in Cowlitz County, southwest Washington. The river systems impacted by the project include Toutle, Cowlitz and Columbia Rivers. Most of the population affected by the problems reside in the communities of Longview, Kelso, Lexington, and Castle Rock, Washington. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Supplement Appropriations Act, 1985 (Public Law 88, 99th Congress, August 15, 1985). The Act includes authorization "... to construct, operate and maintain a sediment retention structure near the confluence of the Tout!e and Green River, Washington, with such design features and associated downstream actions as are necessary, in accordance with the Feasibility Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 1984." The project will provide a permanent solution to potential flooding on the Cowlitz River from sedimentation problems created by the eruption of Mt. St. Helens. The Decision document recommended construction of a single sediment retention structure (SRS) with a 125- foot high spillway at the Green River site on the North Fork Toutle River, improvements to the levee system at Kelso, Washington, and dredging downstream from the SRS. 37-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Local cooperation. Local interests are responsible for provision of all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for the sediment retention structure, dredging disposal areas, and levee improvements. Local interests are also responsible for all alterations and relocations of buildings, roads, bridges and other structures or utilities made necessary by implementation of the project. In addition, operation and maintenance of fish facilities, the levee system at Kelso and dredged material disposal sites will be the responsibility of local interests. Nonfederal cash contribution is $3,600,000 and the estimated non-federal land, easements, right-of-ways, and relocations costs are $21,000,000. Operations during fiscal year. Work on the Sediment Retention Structure continued and is scheduled for completion in FY 1990. Work on the fish collection facility contract continued and is scheduled for completion in FY 1990. Fish collection began in February 1989 at a partially completed facility. Contracts were awarded in August 1989 for dredging in the Cowlitz River and approximately 3,900,000 cubic yards of material was removed. The Kelso Levee improvement contract was completed. 39. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Corps of Engineers monitored flood control operations at five Bureau of Reclamation projects (Prineville, Ochoco, Emigrant, Scoggins, and Galesville) and one municipal power project operated by Tacoma City Light (Mossyrock). The Bureau of Reclamation projects were partially constructed with flood control funds, thereby subjecting project operation to monitoring by the Corps of Engineers under section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944. Monitoring of Mossyrock flood control operation is assigned to the Corps by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission as the Mossyrock license calls for specific flood control regulation. The five Bureau of Reclamation projects and Mossyrock project were operated during 1989 within the flood control regulations specified for each project. A water control manual for Scoggins Dam was completed in 1989. A water control manual for Galesville Dam is scheduled for completion in November of 1990. Total cost of monitoring the six projects during the fiscal year was $4,073. 40. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. Willamette River, formed by Coast and Middle forks which join a few miles above Eugene, OR, flows north 189 miles, and enters Columbia River 101.5 miles above its mouth. The basin has an area of 11,200 square miles and lies between Cascade Range on the east and Coast Range on the west. Major tributaries of Willamette River rise in Cascade Mountains and consist of Coast and Middle Forks and McKenzie, Calapooia, Santiam, Molalla, and Clackamas Rivers. Important tributaries that head in the Coast Range are Luckiamute, Yamhill, and Tualatin Rivers. Minor tributaries, all of which enter the main stream from the west, are Long Tom River, Marys River, and Rickreall Creek. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved general comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation, and other purposes in Willamette River Basin and authorized funds for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan recommended for initial accomplishment of plan recommended for initial development; the reservoirs and related works to be selected by Chief of Engineers. Subsequent Flood Control Acts, 1941 through 1974, authorized additional flood control and other works and increased monetary authority. Following projects were completed as authorized and are in continuous operation: Fern Ridge Lake, August 1951; Cottage Grove Lake, April 1952; Dorena Lake, October 1952; Detroit Lake, December 1960; Lookout Point Lake, June 1961; Hills Creek Lake, June 1963; Cougar Lake, March 1964; Fall Creek Lake, November 1965; Green Peter-Foster Lakes, June-December 1967 respectively; and Blue River Lake, October 1968. Under the authorization for construction of recreation facilities at completed projects, work has been accomplished at Fern Ridge, Cottage Grove, Dorena, Lookout Point, and Fall Creek Lakes. Under the memoranda of agreements with the U.S. Forest Service, recreation facilities also have been constructed at Detroit, Lookout Point, Cougar, Blue River, and Hills Creek Lakes, Recreational facilities were constructed at Green Peter-Foster Lakes with initial construction funds. Details of operation, construction, and financial status of projects are in individual reports. During low-water season, July-September, supplemental water releases are made from Willamette River Basin Reservoirs. Uses which benefit from increased downstream flows include irrigation, navigation, power, fisheries, pollution abatement, and recreation. Although optimum regulation cannot be provided for every purpose, water released from reservoirs during the low-water season for a particular purpose will usually provide benefits to other uses as well. Basic policy is to provide most beneficial overall regulation, consistent with established water-use priorities. (See Table 37-0 on Willamette River Basin comprehensive plan.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Local cooperation for other projects is in individual reports for those projects. Operations during fiscal year. See individual reports. 41. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR Location. On Willamette River and tributaries, between Cascade Range and Coast Range, from a point south of Eugene to Portland, OR. Existing project. Provides for clearing, sloping, and reveting riverbanks; construction of pile and timber bulkheads and drift barriers; minor channel improvements; and maintenance of existing works for control of floods and prevention of erosion at various locations along Willamette River and its tributaries. The current scope of the project is a total of 510,000 linear feet of bank protection at 236 locations. Estimated Federal cost is $29,400,000. Construction of project began in 1938 and is 96 percent complete. A total of 489,795 linear feet of bank protection work at 230 locations consisting of revetment of riverbanks, pile and timber bulkheads, drift barriers, and channel improvements, have been completed on Willamette River and tributaries. 37-16 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 and Section 103, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization were $2,200,000. Operations during fiscal year. Coordination and evaluation of local erosion problems continued. 42. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, HEPPNER, OR Location. On Willow Creek immediately upstream from Heppner and just downstream from junction of Balm Fork and Willow Creek in Section 35, Township 2 South, Range 26 East, Willamette Meridian. Existing project. Project provides flood protection to the city of Heppner and downstream area by controlling runoff from a drainage area of 96 square miles. The dam is a roller compacted concrete structure 160 feet high at crest elevation 2,130. Ancillary features include a center uncontrolled spillway with a maximum flood capacity of 93,300 cfs (cubic feet per second), an outlet works with a capacity of 500 cfs, a minor flow works and diversion works. Gross storage capacity of the project is 13,250 acre-feet, consisting of 7,750 acrefeet for exclusive flood control, 1,750 acre-feet for joint flood control and irrigation, 1,750 acre- feet exclusive irrigation, and 2,000 acre-feet dead storage for fish, wildlife, recreation, sediment accumulation, and aesthetics. Limited recreation facilities are being provided. Willow Creek Parks and Recreation District has leased recreation facilities at Willow Creek Lake. A courtesy handling dock was constructed by the Recreation District utilizing Oregon State Marine Board funds. A playfield area below the dam has been leased to the City of Heppner. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on December 20, 1979. The provisions of the Clear Water Act were met by a Section 404(b)(1) Evaluation and a public notice issued January 12, 1980, and a section 401 certification from the State of Oregon on February 15, 1980. Land acquisition is about 99 percent complete. Local cooperation. None required. Development of recreation facilities will require cost sharing with a non-federal local sponsor. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance performed. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 43. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM - LAKE BONNEVILLE, OR AND WA Location. Project is on Columbia River, 40 miles east of Portland, OR, about 146 miles above mouth of river. For description of Columbia River, see Section 4. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, and lock for power and navigation. Spillway dam extends across main channel from Cascade island shore to Bradford Island. Overflow crest at 24 feet above mean sea level is surmounted by 18 verticallift steel gates, 10 with remote control hoists placed between piers which extend to elevation 99 feet where a service roadway provides access, and two 350-ton gantry cranes for regulating gates. Powerhouse No. 1 extending across Bradford Slough to the Oregon shore has an installation of 10 units, consisting of one unit of 48,000 kilowatts, one unit of 59,500 kilowatts, and eight units of 60,000 kilowatts each, totaling 587,500 kilowatts. Ordinary and extreme fluctuations of river at lower lock gate are about 21 and 47 feet respectively. Project includes fish ladders to serve both main channel, Bradford Slough Channel, and Powerhouse II channel. Navigation lock and powerhouses are founded on andesite, and main dam rests on solidified sedimentary rock of volcanic origin. The pool created by dam provides a navigable channel 27 feet deep between Bonneville and The Dalles Dams, a distance of 47 river miles. Principal data concerning navigation lock spillway dam, and powerplant are set forth in Table 37-P. Dam, navigation lock, 10-unit power generating installation, fishways, and attendant buildings and grounds cost $83,239,395, of which $6,072,480 is for navigation facilities, $39,350,824 for power facilities and $37,816,091 for joint facilities, consisting of dam, fishways, buildings and grounds, and headwall section of power units 0 to 6, cost of which $2,106,000 is allocated to dam and lake facilities. In response to flow regulations and peakings from upstream plants operating under conditions of Canadian storage and Pacific Northwest-Southwest Intertie, two modifications were undertaken at the Bonneville project. The modification for peaking project was undertaken to minimize adverse environmental effects under rapidly changing flow conditions from upstream dams. The project was completed in 1978 at a cost of $27,195,000. The second modification provided for increased power installation by building a second powerhouse located on the Washington shore adjacent to the end of the existing spillway. The new powerhouse contains eight units of 66,500 kilowatts each and two fish attraction turbine generator units of 13,100 kilowatts each for a combined capacity of 558,200 kilowatts, bringing the entire Bonneville capacity to 1,145.7 megawatts. Additional fish facilities consist of the powerhouse collection system, second fish ladder on the Washington shore, transportation channel connecting the Cascade Island fish ladder with new exit control section, and fingerling bypass facilities which include fish screens in both the powerhouses. To provide for the anticipated increased visitor use, onsite visitor facilities are included. Under authority of the Bonneville Project Act (August 20, 1937), a letter from Bonneville Power Administration to North Pacific Division dated January 21, 1965, requested construction of a second powerhouse. Construction of project started October 1933, was completed February 1943. Modification of powerhouse control equipment started March 1957, was completed September 1958. First two power units were placed in operation during fiscal year 1938. Powerhouse with complete installation of 10 units, was in operation December 1943. Construction of modification for peaking work commenced in September 1970 and was completed in September 1978. 37-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Construction of second powerhouse is near completion. Final environmental impact statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in April 1972. In response to increasing visitation which now exceeds 800,000 a year at the dam site itself and 1,500,000 project wide, a visitor center with windows into the fish ladders, a 60-seat theatre, exhibits and displays was completed in 1975. Units 11 through 18 were on-line by October, 1982. The visitor facility for the new powerhouse (which does not require cost-sharing) is an integral part of that structure. The total cost for construction of the second powerhouse is $679,000,000. The first powerhouse, spillway, navigation lock and associated facilities have been designated as a National Historic District. A cost sharing agreement between The Corps and Skamania County has been finalized. Development of recreation facilities at Home Valley was completed this fiscal year. Through September 1989, power generation totaled 205.4 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $351,399,213 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required, except for non-Federal cost-sharing for development of recreational facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Research continued to find a solution for correction of deficiencies of fish guidance efficiency at the Second Powerhouse to reduce fingerling mortality incurred during annual downstream migration. Maintenance: The First Powerhouse modernization program continues to be implemented. Normal operation and maintenance was performed during period. During the fiscal year 5,073,605,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated, of which 5,046,417,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Traffic through the navigation lock consisting of rafted logs, petroleum products, grains, and miscellaneous cargo. Fiscal year traffic through lock is estimated to total 11,594,772 tons. 44. COUGAR LAKE, OR Location. At mile 4.4 on South Fork McKenzie River which joins McKenzie River about 56.5 miles above its confluence with Willamette River. Project is about 42 miles east of Eugene, OR. Existing project. A rockfill dam with an impervious earth core, about 1,738 feet long at crest and 445 feet high above the streambed. Reservoir is 6 miles long with storage capacity at full pool of 219,000 acre-feet and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 210 square miles. Spillway is on right abutment and outlet and power tunnels in left abutment. Outlet tunnel is provided with a chute and stilling basin. Powerplant consists of two 12,500 kilowatt units with minimum provisions for installing a third unit of 35,000 kilowatts for future peaking capacity. Improvement functions as a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. Also authorized (but unconstructed) is a reregulating dam, Strube Lake, below Cougar Lake, which would permit Cougar to operate as a peaking powerplant. The Strube dam would contain two units totalling 4,600 kilowatts. Construction of project initiated June 1956 is complete, excluding Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit for which planning is essentially complete. Also, plans and specifications for the first construction contract (relocations) have been completed. Generating units 1 and 2 were placed in commercial operation March 23 and February 4, 1964, respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was November 29, 1963. Through September 1989 power generation totaled 3.4 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville power Administration, $17,967,962 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Estimated Federal cost of Strube lake and Cougar Additional Unit is $114,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year, 178,123,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project, of which 177,358,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Cougar Lake on South Fork McKenzie River are shown on Table 37-M. 45. DETROIT LAKE - BIG CLIFF, OR Location. On North Santiam River with dam 50 miles from mouth 40 miles southeast of Salem, OR. North Santiam River flows north and west for 85 miles, and unites with South Santiam River to form Santiam River, which 10 miles downstream enters Willamette River 108 miles above its mouth. Existing project. Main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Detroit Dam is a concrete gravity structure about 1,522 feet long and 454 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Spillway is a gate-controlled overflow section, and outlet works are gate- controlled conduits through dam. Powerhouse with two units having a capacity of 50,000 kilowatts each is in right abutment immediately below dam. Reservoir has a storage capacity at full pool of 454,900 acre-feet and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 438 square miles. It is being operated as a unit in coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette Valley from floods, to increase low water flows in interest of navigation and irrigation, to generate power, and for other purposes. Reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Big Cliff site is concrete gravity type, about 191 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Power installation consists of one unit with a capacity of 18,000 kilowatts. Reservoir has a storage capacity of 5,930 acre-feet at full pool. Project is a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service, Oregon State Park System and the town of Detroit. 37-18 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Construction of project begun in May 1947 was completed December 1960. The two powerhouse generating units were placed in commercial operation June and October 1953. At Big Cliff powerhouse, single generating unit was placed online June 1954. Use of Big Cliff Dam for reregulating fluctuating flow from Detroit units was effected October 1953. Through September 1989 power generation totaled 17.7 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $58,602,684 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 395,292,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project of which 392,613,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by the Detroit Lake project on North Santiam River are shown in Table 37-M. 46. GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR Location. At approximate mile 5.5 on Middle Santiam River which joins South Santiam River about 56.8 miles above its confluence with Willamette River. Dam is about 30 miles southeast of Albany in Linn County, OR. Existing project. Main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Green Peter Dam is a concrete gravity structure, 1,400 feet long and 385 feet high above the lowest point of the general foundation with a gatecontrolled spillway. Outlet works consist of two conduits through spillway, discharging into a stilling basin. Powerplant, on right bank adjacent to spillway stilling basin, consists of two units with an installed capacity of 80,000 kilowatts. Reservoir provides storage capacity at full pool of 430,000 acre-feet, extending 6.5 miles up Quartzville Creek and some 7.5 miles up Middle Santiam River above creek junction, forming a Y- shaped pool. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 277 square miles. Foster Dam, 7 miles downstream from Green Peter Dam is located on South Santiam River about 38 miles above its confluence with Santiam River and 1.5 miles below its confluence with Middle Santiam River. Foster Dam consists of an earth, gravel, and rock-filled embankment, 146 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation and a concrete gravity gate controlled spillway and stilling basin for a total length of 4,800 feet. Power installation consists of two units with capacity of 20,000 kilowatts. Foster Lake has a storage capacity, at full pool, of 61,000 acre-feet. Project functions as a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. All construction on Green Peter-Foster Lakes project initiated June 1961 is completed. Green Peter Lake was placed in operation for useful flood control June 1967 as a unit of coordinated reservoir system for protection of the Willamette River Basin. First power- generation unit was placed on the line June 9, 1967 and second, June 28, 1967. Use of Foster Lake for reregulating fluctuating flows from Green Peter units was effective December 1967. First power generation unit was placed on-line August 22, 1968 and second, September 6, 1968. Through September 1989 power generation totaled 7.6 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $43,611,534 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Future recreation development at Foster or Green Peter will require cost sharing. Recreation facilities at Foster Lake includes 4 parks and 2 parks at Green Peter Lake. Five of these parks were developed by the Corps and are operated by Linn county under lease agreement. One park is operated by the Corps. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. During the fiscal year 353,348,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project of which 351,141,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Green Peter Lake project on Middle Santiam River are shown in Table 37-M. 47. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR Location. On the Middle Fork, Willamette River, 47.8 miles from mouth and 26.5 miles upstream from Lookout Point Dam. Middle Fork, Willamette River rises on west slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, Willamette River. Dam is about 45 miles southeast from Eugene, OR. Existing project. An earth-and-gravel-fill dam about 2,150 feet long at the crest and 338 feet above lowest point of the general foundation. A gate-controlled concrete gravity chute-type spillway is in right abutment. Diversion tunnel, outlet tunnel and power tunnel are in same abutment. Powerhouse with two 15,000 kilowatt units is located next to spillway. Hills Creek Lake is about 8.5 miles long and provides storage capacity at full pool of 356,000 acre-feet. Project controls runoff of drainage area of 389 square miles and is an integral unit of comprehensive plan for development of water resources of Willamette River Basin. Hills Creek Lake and Lookout Point Lake are operated as a unit for control of floods and generation of power on Middle Fork Willamette River. These projects, in conjunction with Dexter reregulating dam and Fall Creek Lake flood control system, will effectively control floods on Middle Fork and provide maximum efficient generation of hydroelectric power. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. Hills Creek power units are remote controlled from Lookout Point. Construction of project, initiated May 1956, was completed June 1963. The project was placed in service for useful flood control in November 1961. On May 2, 1962, the two power units were placed on-line. Through September 1989, power generation totaled 4.4 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $18,172,346 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required. 37-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year, 190,240,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project, of which 189,759,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Hills Creek Lake on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-M. 48. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM - LAKE UMATILLA, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River about 3 miles downstream from mouth of John Day River and about 215 miles above mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities with a slack-water lake about 75 miles long extending to McNary Lock and Dam. Included is relocation of railroads, highways, utilities, and communities affected by the impoundment. The project as originally authorized would have provided 2,000,000 acrefeet of flood control storage. As modified, the project provides 500,000 acre-feet of flood control storage between elevations 257 and 268. The structure is 5,900 feet in length and stands about 161 feet above streambed. Powerhouse has space for 20 generating units of 135,000 kilowatts each; 16 units have been installed for a present capacity of 2,160,000 kilowatts. Principal project data are set forth in Table 37-P. A detailed description of project as authorized and modified is on pages 1992 and 1993 of Annual Report for 1962 under the Walla Walla District. Construction began July 1958 and the project was opened to navigation April 1968. The main dam contract is complete. Lock rehabilitation work begun in FY 1980 was completed in FY 1986. Entire project is estimated to be 99 percent complete. Through September 1989 power generation totaled 217.7 billion kilowatt-hour. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $283,028,949 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Estimated Federal cost of new work is $512,523,000, consisting of $512,190,000 Corps of Engineers and $333,000 for Coast Guard navigation aids. Local cooperation. Recreation facilities at 5 parks are operated and maintained by local agencies under lease agreement with the Corps. Six developed recreation areas are operated and maintained by the Corps of Engineers. Any future recreation development will require cost sharing. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design activities on modifications to the fish bypass system and construction of the intake gantry crane continued. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 9,827,200,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated by the 16 generating units of which 9,809,843,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisting of petroleum products, grains, and miscellaneous cargo. During the fiscal year traffic through the locks is estimated to total 7,682,755 tons. Rehabilitation: Refurbishment of one generator winding and rebuilding (to strengthen) one turbine was completed. Work on the next scheduled unit was initiated. Work continued on installation of the new control system to increase reliability and ease of operation of the powerhouse. Work continued for the FY 1990 completion of station service improvement contract which will allow black start up of the powerhouse. 49. LOOKOUT POINT - DEXTER LAKES, OR Location. On Middle Fork, Willamette River at Meridian site, 21.3 miles from mouth. Middle Fork, Willamette River, rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, which is head of mainstem Willamette River. Dam is about 22 miles southeast from Eugene, OR. Existing project. A main dam at Meridian site and a reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Dexter site. Both dams are earth-and-gravel- fills with concrete spillways and have power generating facilities. Main dam is 258 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to deck and is 3,381 feet long at crest forming a reservoir 14.2 miles long providing storage of 456,000 acre-feet at full-pool level. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 991 square miles. Spillway, 274 feet long, is a gate-controlled overflow type, forming right abutment. Outlet works consisting of slide- gate-controlled conduits pass through spillway section. Powerhouse has three main generating units with a capacity of 120,000 kilowatts. Dexter reregulating dam has a maximum height of 107 feet above lowest point of the general foundation and is 2,765 feet long at crest, forming a full pool of 27,500 acre-feet extending upstream to main dam and providing pondage to regulate Lookout Point powerhouse water releases to a uniform discharge. Spillway consists of a gate-controlled overflow section 509 feet long forming right abutment. Flow regulation is accomplished by use of spillway gates and releases through powerhouse, which contains one 15,000-kilowatt unit. Lookout Point and Dexter Lakes are operated as a single unit of a coordinated system of reservoirs to protect Willamette River Valley against floods, to provide needed hydroelectric power, and to increase low water flows for navigation, irrigation, and other purposes. Existing project authorized as a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette River Basin. Construction of project initiated May 1947 was completed June 1961, except for construction of additional recreation facilities funded through the Code 710 program. Future recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the costsharing contract with Lane County and will require a 50 percent contribution by Lane County and is subject to funding availability by the Government and the County. At Lookout Point powerhouse, generating units 1,2, and 3 were placed in commercial operation December 1954, February 1955, and April 1955, respectively. At Dexter powerhouse the single unit was placed on- line May 1955. Dexter was placed in operation for reregulation in December 1954. 37-20 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Through September 1989 power generation totaled 14.1 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $62,874,898 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. A multiple project cost sharing agreement has been in force with Lane County since September 1976. It includes 4 projects and 13 parks. All these parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreement. Recreation opportunities are provided at 2 parks on Dexter Lake which are operated by Lane County via the multi-project cost-sharing agreement and lease instruments. The north shore of Lookout Point Lake is also leased to Lane County for recreation purposes; there is essentially no development. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year, 439,206,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 437,361,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Lookout Point Lake project on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 37-M. 50. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. On Upper Rogue River at mile 153.6 about 30 miles northeasterly from Medford, OR. Existing project. A rock and gravel-fill embankment dam about 327 feet high from streambed to crest, with an overall length of 3,750 feet with an impervious earth core and a gate-controlled concrete spillway. Powerhouse is on right abutment and houses two Francis-type turbines with installed capacity of 24,500 kilowatts each. Regulating outlet facility was provisions for temperature regulation for releases in interest of fishery enhancement is also on right bank. Reservoir 10 miles long provides 315,000 acre-feet of usable storage. Project provides control of runoff of drainage area of 674 square miles. In addition to hydroelectric power generation, project provides flood control; irrigation, future municipal and industrial (M&I) water supply, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control and recreation benefits. Construction of project initiated July 1967 is complete. Generating units 1 and 2 were placed in commercial operation July 6 and July 13, 1977, respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was February 18, 1977. Final environmental statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in June 1972. Recreation opportunities are provided by 4 parks at the project. The State of Oregon operates 2 parks, including a 200 unit campground, part of Stewart State Park. Through September 1989, power generation totaled 3.5 billion kilowatt- hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $18,985,976 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Authorizing act required that local agencies furnish assurances prior to construction that demands will be made for future use of water supply storage within a period that will permit repayment of costs, including interest, allocated to water supply within life of the project; that State of Oregon take action, prior to construction to insure maintenance in stream of flows to be released for fishery; in addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies; and costs allocated to power will be repaid on a system basis by revenue from sales of power in Pacific Northwest Federal system by Bonneville Power Administration. A survey in September, 1980 of M&I water supply needs showed nine communities with water supply needs. A contract for M&I supply has been completed with one of the communities. Assurances for municipal and industrial water supply were obtained from six communities in Rogue River Valley. On February 26, 1966 Oregon State Department of Fish and Wildlife agreed to operate Cole M. Rivers Fish Hatchery, the largest in Oregon, for mitigation and enhancement of fish. The Corps provides full funding for the operation and maintenance of the hatchery. The hatchery became operational in 1972. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 302,517,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated by project of which 299,737,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Lost Creek Lake on Rogue River are shown in Table 37-M. 51. THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM - LAKE CELILO, WA AND OR Location. On Columbia River at head of pool behind Bonneville Dam, about 192 miles above mouth of river and 88 miles east of Portland, OR. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, and appurtenant facilities. Improvement provides for navigation and hydroelectric power generation. Dam is designed for a normal pool at elevation 160 feet at mean sea level. Normal pool forms a reservoir extending upstream about 23 miles providing slackwater to John Day Dam site. The Dalles Dam is 8,700 feet long and consists of a rock, gravel, and sand river closure section from Oregon shore connecting to a nonoverflow section which in turn joins powerhouse, then concrete nonoverflow sections connecting spillway with powerhouse and spillway with navigation lock at right abutment on Washington shore. Fish-passing facilities including two ladders and a fish lock are provided. Powerhouse was constructed for 14 units initially with substructure for eight additional units, an ultimate total of 22 units. Initial installation, excluding two 13,500 kilowatt fish-water units, is 1,092,000 kilowatts. With eight units installed for a capacity of 687,800 kilowatts. The total generating capacity is 1,806,800 kilowatts. Structures are founded on Columbia River basalt. Principal data concerning lock, spillway, and powerhouse are set forth in Table 37-P. Major construction of project initiated February 1952, was completed October 1960 when unit No. 14 was placed in 37-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 commercial operation. Initial contract for additional units 15-22 was awarded in September 1967. Additional 8-unit phase was completed when unit 22 was placed in commercial operation in November 1973. Basic recreation facilities were developed with construction funds at 4 parks on Lake Celilo. These parks were further expanded with code 710 funds in the late 60's and early 70's. Two parks are operated by Washington State Park Commission under a lease agreement. Studies for adding power generation facilities to the North Shore Fish Ladder Auxiliary Water supply System were initiated in October 1979 and completed in December 1980. These facilities would provide baseload generation (3.5 megawatts) and would not impact the present operation of the North Fish Ladder. However, it was determined that it was not within the Chief of Engineer's authority to add these power facilities. A local interest, North Wasco County Public Utility Distric pursued the construction of these power facilities through the FERC license processes and awarded a construction contract in September 1989. Power-on-line is scheduled for August 1991. Seufert Visitor Center was completed in September 1980. Through September 1989, power generation totaled 225.4 billion kilowatt- hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $286,944,155 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Further recreation development will require cost sharing and assumption of operation and maintenance by local, non-federal sponsor. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design activities associated with preparation of a general design memorandum for juvenile fish bypass facilities were initiated. Maintenance: Unit 5 failed on 6 February 1989 and a contract was awarded to replace windings. Normal operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 7,642,608,000 kilowat-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 7,623,175,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Traffic through the navigation lock consisted of petroleum products, grains and miscellaneous cargo. During the fiscal year traffic through the locks is estimated to total 7,947,786 tons. General Investigations 52. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $632,399 of which $123,245 was for navigation studies, $24 for flood damage prevention studies, $279,392 for comprehensive studies, $103,024 for miscellaneous activities, and $126,714 for coordination with other agencies. 53. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA International water studies. The Columbia River Treaty between Canada and the United States of America relating to cooperative Development of the Water Resources of the Columbia River Basin was signed at Washington, D.C., on January 17, 1961, and the exchange of ramifications took place on September 16, 1964. Implementations of the Treaty by the United States and Canada entities under the guidance of the Permanent Engineering Board has continued. The two permanent committees established by the entities, the Operating Committee and the Hydrometeorological Committee, continue to function. Costs for support of both committee activities were $14,080 for the fiscal year. Flood plain management services. Flood Plan Management Services Program comes under Section 206 of the 1960 Flood Control Act, PL 86-645, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program encourages comprehensive flood plain management planning at all levels to reduce the potential for losses to life and property from floods. Federal and non- Federal agencies and the private sector are assisted with planning and development information for flood hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, Federal Insurance Program requirements, and Executive Order 11988 guidelines. Such assistance may include factual flood information (available or determined) and interpretation on flood frequencies, extent of flooding, flood-water velocity, duration of flooding and floodway limits. Services accomplished during fiscal year: Technical services and planning guidance responses furnished totaled 755. Of this total, 68 were from other Federal agencies; 122 from non-Federal agencies; and 565 from private sector realtors, corporations, lending institutions, engineers, architects, and others. Cost for providing these services during the fiscal year totaled $130,802. A preliminary evaluation of flood protection measures was developed and furnished to the city of Stanfield, OR. Subsequently, the city of Stanfield is developing a preliminary implementation plan incorporating street and utility rehabilitation/ upgrading plans into the flood protection plan and obtaining citizen input. The final flood control plan will be completed in FY 1990. Costs during the fiscal year totaled $28,914. 37-22 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 to In Text Sep.30, 1989 1. Bonneville Navigation New Work Lock, Bonneville Dam, OR and WA (Federal Funds) (Inland Waterway Trust Fund) 2. Chetco River, OR 3. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA 5. Columbia River Between Chinook, WA, and Head of Sand Island 6. Columbia River at The Mouth, OR and WA 7. Columbia River Between Vancouver, WA and The Dalles OR Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost 6,451,000 8,340,000 19,607,000 24,150,000 6,420,377 8,360,936 19,581,238 14,050,665 - 14,959,000 19,593,000 24,150,000 - 14,570,957 19,560,249 12,732,518 552,000 300,200 631,000 132,000 554,702 296,243 634,978 129,856 11,459,400 10,932,230 11,430,195 10,861,438 438,000 311,000 438,112 252,899 13,201,000 12,630,000 12,867,766 13,065,333 19,000 515,000 75,829 516,034 594,000 501,000 659,000 554,000 605,577 505,301 582,990 631,348 347,900 352,944 8,911,415 6,302,400 7,953,000 8,201,000 8,818,651 6,385,156 7,963,652 8,207,278 429,000 441,000 239,000 201,000 438,416 428,767 246,672 201,199 37-23 58,702,30751 48,413,21651 58,702,000 46,863,724 2,043,7131 2,043,7131 5,882,626 5,879,812 28,349,3042 28,349,3042 272,910,7563 272,882,728 3 665,9544 665,9544 941,252 941,252 3,880,185 3,879,944 220,2835 220,2835 5,357,813 5,357,772 24,913,6616 24,913,6616 106,747,4997 106,735,5057 7,322,878 7,322,878 5,989,5098 5,989,5098 12,147,9489 12,142,2989 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1989 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY89 to In Text Sep.30, 1989 8. Coos Bay, OR New Work (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 9. Coos and Millicoma Rivers, OR 10. Coquille River, OR 11. Depoe Bay, OR 12. Elochoman Slough, WA 14. Port Orford, OR 16. Rogue River Harbor At Gold Beach, OR Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Contrib Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost 3,041,000 3,085,466 3,933,300 3,740,000 10,584,000 3,886,842 3,787,393 10,573,892 170,000 51,600 144,000 144,000 175,970 50,373 137,266 152,741 333,000 339,000 198,000 114,000 341,125 336,007 184,652 129,841 27,000 45,000 29,397 43,260 140,000 134,729 59,000 57,942 208,000 295,000 247,000 189,000 210,184 293,510 248,451 188,579 354,000 917,800 614,000 705,000 368,738 824,626 704,787 708,632 37-24 TABLE 37-A (Continued) 29,750,09210 29,750,09210 77,481,95211 77,448,59011 2,335,966 2,335,966 486,680 486,680 350,23812 350,23812 2,033,610 2,033,475 693,36613 693,36613 5,694,94414 5,694,05014 367,364 367,364 932,876 925,316 18,64152 18,64152 75,648 74,590 758,692 15 758,69215 3,135,329 3,134,175 4,156,25216 4,156,25216 10,565,52017 10,565,01917 635,783 635,783 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 to In Text Sep.30, 1989 17. Siuslaw River, OR New Work (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 18. Skamokawa Creek, WA 19. Skipanon Channel, OR 20. Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp Cost 2,081,000 62,000 -25,000 1,821,733 315,633 -15,013 581,000 689,000 473,000 353,000 584,714 687,256 453,180 374,215 45,000 45,000 45,000 24,127 1,394 -8,921 11,953 - 31,000 - 30,103 292,000 294,000 291,905 284,590 59,000 20,000 68,044 20,691 897 10,000 224,000 19,783 224,676 28,000 27,333 57,500 59,942 29,502,21218 29,502,21218 11,999,09919 11,997,14819 879,285 879,285 493,611 493,611 2,400 2,400 414,782 414,782 280,854 280,854 3,357,014 3,356,869 22,434,82720 22,434,82720 3,023,29021 3,022,83621 2,839,799 2,839,799 21. Tongue Point, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 22. Umpqua River, OR New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib.. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost 956,000 965,341 32,500 219,000 25,934 121,926 89,500 1,723,900 1,141,000 1,665,197 1,211,354 37-25 . 2,030,000 2,123,166 1,779,100 261,787 2,281,500 2,271,026 1,868,600 261,787 661,000 662,499 17,718,87722 17,718,87722 24,933,889 24,932,990 2,500,677 2,500,677 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1989 TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 to In Text Sep.30, 1989 23. Willamette River at New Work Willamette Falls, OR 24. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR 25. Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin OR 26. Blue River Lake, OR 27. Cottage Grove Lake, OR 28. Dorena Lake, OR 29. Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR 30. Fall Creek Lake, OR Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. -- Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 496,000 748,000 1,160,000 610,000 510,761 746,399 1,163,445 619,085 493,000 1,834,400 7,399,000 686,000 523,138 1,817,346 7,395,427 713,859 9,300 47,546 550,000 556,380 996 6,767 11,238 625,000 399,000 437,000 605,461 396,186 460,286 213,000 284,000 163,000 135,000 219,165 267,968 178,769 135,957 708,000 896,000 635,000 663,000 730,380 854,918 641,975 690,448 382,000 619,000 472,000 705,115 405,563 544,805 520,149 711,406 32,226,000 9,100,000 30,437,000 5,911,000 20,345,020 26,012,598 29,918,249 6,361,434 255,000 341,000 398,000 361,000 258,853 337,548 387,439 359,851 520,00523 520,00523 16,476,82324 16,474,91524 234,794 234,794 19,242,04625 19,242,04625 28,594,70226 28,594,44326 12,005 12,005 91,642,489 91,642,489 4,217,70049 4,216,23449 32,038,22527 32,038,22527 2,495,991 2,495,228 4,013,12328 4,013,12328 10,172,67829 10,149,09529 14,568,26230 14,568,26230 6,216,289 6,193,894 99,540,579 99,240,776 22,118,2643' 22,118,264*' 5,146,415 5,130,097 37-26 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 to In Text Sep.30, 1989 31. Fern Ridge Lake, OR New Work 36. Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection OR & WA 37. Mt. St. Helens and Vicinity, WA 38. Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, Castle Rock, WA (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 41. Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR 42. Willow Creek Lake, OR 43. Bonneville Lock and Dam - Lake Bonneville OR and WA 44. Cougar Lake, OR 45. Detroit Lake, OR Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab Approp Cost 847,000 2,332,000 760,000 747,000 856,543 2,289,234 778,941 755,964 2,850,000 216,000 2,840,161 224,638 6,280,000 3,740,000 6,347,141 3,647,394 5,000 8,357 76,000 74,921 10,000 -80,000 163,122 -89,264 1,400,000 29,265,000 55,468,000 12,195,000 1,365,665 28,825,326 38,873,805 27,743,424 - 3,500,000 343,000 389,000 300,794 458,945 96,000 70,200 95,917 60,544 - 149,240 - 3,500,000 55,000 62,498 80,000 84,524 30,000 25,308 65,000 62,717 (See Walla Walla, WA District) 382,000 403,000 501,000 687,000 405,626 399,378 496,680 685,094 14,826,000 6,850,000 4,098,000 1,152,000 14,958,973 5,472,560 4,102,274 2,405,289 12,994,000 11,512,000 10,754,000 10,727,000 12,979,585 11,118,185 10,944,639 10,813,072 34 1,141,000 1,260,000 696,000 786,000 1,153,266 1,245,605 679,113 818,440 1,456,000 1,557,000 1,294,000 1,539,000 1,435,467 1,554,727 1,320,145 1,530,767 8,526,93532 8,526,93532 14,003,63433 13,984,29733 20,871,745 20,869,865 42,158,000 42,125,370 98,328,000 96,808,220 3,649,240 3,500,000 24,782,81634 24,778,12034 3,756,744 3,748,772 2,557,000 2,537,691 765,396,60435 765,189,84235 163,263,10136 162,877,58836 58,636,39337 58,636,39337 12,272,81650 12,272,45550 62,729,698 62,729,698 28,250,77248 28,225,75848 363,086 363,086 37-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1989 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 to In Text Sep.30, 1989 46. Green Peter-Foster New Work Lakes, OR 47. Hills Creek Lake, OR 48. John Day Lock and Dam - Lake Umatilla, OR and WA 49. Lookout Point Lake, OR 50. Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR 51. The Dalles Lock and Dam - Lake Celilo, WA and OR Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,688,000 1,925,000 1,667,370 1,887,327 1,824,000 1,773,000 1,823,898 1,822,417 446,000 658,000 518,000 595,000 457,531 643,258 532,759 592,142 8,685,000 1,930,000 350,000 8,665,982 1,941,379 280,217 39,000 55,598 6,125,000 8,103,000 7,248,000 8,019,500 6,257,535 8,037,902 7,230,856 7,983,895 4,450,000 3,800,000 3,940,000 2,725,000 4,418,339 3,766,284 3,861,592 2,702,857 2,194,000 2,520,000 2,321,000 3,085,000 2,156,310 2,461,925 2,343,553 3,144,995 4,700 7,270 132 8,652 7,688 2,420,000 2,636,000 2,586,000 2,657,000 2,466,125 2,627,487 2,536,371 2,646,763 1,210,000 488,415 8,927,000 7,095,000 7,731,000 7,695,000 9,027,285 6,866,803 7,747,465 7,721,519 1. Excludes $17,742 contributed funds for new work. 2. Includes $1,529,413 for previous project. 3. Includes $150,955 allotted from deferred maintenance funds, Code 700, $62,296 for public works accelerated program repair, and $1,214,865 for previous project. Excludes $24,320 expended from contributed funds prior to 1964. . 4. Excludes $31,636 contributed by city of Astoria and Bumble Bee Sea Foods, Astoria, OR (not part of regular project). Includes $223,026 expended from contributed funds prior to 1964 and $428,136 contributed by Port of Portland and $14,792 by Port of Vancouver. 5. Includes $84,930 rehabilitation funds. 6. Includes $1,986,253 for previous project and $608,111 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. Excludes $500,000 contributed funds. 7. Includes $2,186,000 for previous project and $1,188,625 under deferred maintenance, Code 700. 8. Includes funds under Code 721 (small authorized projects) $30,393. Entrance to Oregon slough; $161,897, Camas-Washougal Turning Basin; $227,908, Hood River Small Boat Basin; $157,470, Bingen, WA, Barge Channel; and $140,619, The Dalles Small Boat Basin. 9. Includes $2,033,408 under code 700 (Deferred Maintenance). 10. Includes $802,096 for previous project, Excludes contributed funds. 11.Includes $178,801 for previous project and $1,444,640 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. Excludes $8,387 contributed funds. 37-28 TABLE 37-A (Continued) 84,005,78838 84,005,78838 25,575,13239 25,558,55939 45,700,619 45,700,619 8,790,26740 8,784,03140 512,255,24641 512,112,92241 113,744,65942 113,478,42642 22,208,000 22,042,072 88,238,39543 88,238,39543 41,840,60544 41,785,12444 136,408,150 136,408,150 24,742,80045 24,620,17145 302,274,28846 301,552,70346 105,491,00847 105,211,23847 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 12. Excludes $80,000 (other funds) contributed for new work by Port of Coos Bay to cover additional cost of disposing of dredge spoils in Coos Bay, OR; includes $8,000 for previous project. 13. Includes $340,726 for previous project. Excludes $72,891 contributed funds. includes $36,00 under Code 711. 14. Includes $41,467 for previous project and $78,500 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. 15. Excludes $9,900 contributed funds. 16. Excludes $13,779 (other funds) contributed for additional landfill and extension of drainage lines. 17. Includes $21,000, Wedderburn Study Funds. 18. Includes $1,159,357 for previous project. 19. Includes $10,611 for previous project and $188,000 under code 700, Deferred Maintenance. 20. Includes $77,209 for previous project and $57,767 under Code 720 (Small Authorized Projects) Garibaldi Boat Basin. Excludes $592,622 contributed funds and $300,000 channel dredging by local interest. 21. Includes $71,498 for previous project. Excludes $6,450 expended from contributed funds. 22. Includes $39,242 for previous project. Excludes $6,450 expended from contributed funds. 23. Excludes $300,000 contributed funds. 24. Includes $452,110 on operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation and $150,000 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 25. Includes $707,313 for previous project and $170,000 appropriated from public works acceleration program for north jetty rehabilitation. 26. Includes $6,026 for previous project. 27. Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. 28. Includes $1,639,828 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 29. Includes $167,878 special recreation use fees. Includes $66,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements to navigable waters. 30. Includes $1,038,790 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 31. Includes $1,026,264 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 32. Includes $3,894,673 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project and $136,482 allotted under 721 (small authorized project) reservoir modification. Excludes $2,100 (other funds contributed). 33. Includes $9,750 allotted under Code 700, deferred maintenance. Includes $66,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements to navigable waters. 34. Excludes $93,733 contributed funds. 35. Includes $12,200,000 Public Works Administration funds, $20,240,700 National Recover Act Funds, $27,195,400 modification for peaking funds, $136,457 Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project funds and $627,593,352 allotted and $642,322,501 expended second powerhouse funds, $6,000 allotted, $6,000 expended power units funds. 36. Includes $540,000 deferred maintenance funds, Code 700 and $1,692,148 maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 37. Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. Includes $1,789,988 allotted and $1,789,954 expended for Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit. 38. Includes $113,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. 39. Includes $288,578 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 40. Includes $75,400 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 41. Includes $25,984 allotted and expended under 710, recreation facilities at completed projects. 42. Includes $1,361,900 for O&M and fish evaluation of Spring Creek Hatchery (funds revoked and paid to USFWS at OCE level, but a cost to project); includes $423,800 special recreation use fees. Includes $933,438 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 43. Includes $457,611 allotted and expended under 710, recreation facilities at completed projects. 44. Includes $293,578 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 45. Includes $288,578 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 46. Includes $1,140,747 allotted and expended under 710, recreation facilities at completed projects, and $52,997,220 allotted and expended additional units 15 - 22 funds. 47. Includes $721,490 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 48. Includes $237,078 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 49. Includes $66,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 50. Includes $161,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 51. Includes $24,307 under code 422 General Investigation. 52. Exculdes $86,586 contributed funds. 37-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1989 TABLE 37-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. BONNEVILLE NAVIGATION LOCK, BONNEVILLE DAM, OR AND WA Aug 15, 1985 Nov 17, 1986 Mar 02 , 1945 Oct 27, 1965 Dec 04, 1981 3. Feb 27, 1911 Jul 25, 1912 Jul 27, 1916 Aug 08, 1917 Sep 22, 1922 Mar 04, 1923 2 Mar 03, 1925 Mar 03, 1927 Jul 03, 1930 Sep 06, 19333 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 26, 1937 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 02, 1945 Mar 02, 1945 Jul 24, 1946 Construction of a new navigation lock just south P. L 99-88 of existing lock. Construction to be funded 50% from fuel taxes paid P.L 99-662 into Inland Waterways Trust Fund. CHETCO RIVER, OR To provide for the stabilization of the channel, by constructing jetties and dredging. Modification of channel entrance and channel improvements. Deepen channel 2 feet to 16 feet, extend the existing jetty system 750 feet for the North, and 1,250 feet for the South jetty. COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA AND PORTLAND, OR 2 pipeline dredges and accessories. Increasing main channel to 30 feet. Consolidating improvement below Portland, OR and between Vancouver, WA and mouth of Willamette. For the Cathlamet channel. Construct an additional dredge (dredge was not built) and accessories for better maintenance, and construct contraction works. Channel from deep water in Willamette Slough to deep water in Columbia River. Depth of 25 feet and width of 300 feet from mouth of Willamette River to Vancouver, WA Closing east channel at Swan Island in Willamette River on condition that main channel to be opened to project dimensions on west side of island by Port of Portland For a 35-foot channel 500 feet wide from Portland to the sea. A channel 28 feet deep and 300 feet wide from mouth of Willamette River to Vancouver, with 2 turning basins, each generally 28 feet deep by 800 feet wide by 2,000 feet long. A channel in Columbia River from mouth of Willamette to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, WA, 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with 2 turning basins at Vancouver. Maintenance of not to exceed 35 foot depth at low water in Portland Harbor and Willamette River between its mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland. Auxiliary channels, 30 feet deep, 300 feet and 500 feet at St. Helens. Extension of lower turning basin at Vancouver, WA, 1,000 feet downstream. An auxiliary channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide along waterfront at Rainier, OR. Improvement of old mouth of Cowlitz River. An auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview, WA. A small-boat mooring basin at Astoria, OR. H. Doc. 817, 77th Cong., 2d Sess S. Doc. 21, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 10, 96th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 1278, 61st Cong., 3d Sess. 1 H. Doc. 1278, 61st Cong., 3d Sess. 1 No Prior Report H. Doc. 120, 63d Cong., 1st Sess.1 H. Doc. 1009, 66th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 156, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc 126, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 195, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. 1 H. Doe. 249, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. 1 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. 1 H. Doc. 235, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 81, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. 1 H. Doc. 203, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.1 H. Doc. 341, 77th Cong., 1st. Sess.' H. Doc. 630. 77th Cong., 2d Sess. 1 H. Doc. 692, 79th Cong.,2d Sess. 37-30 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized A channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from mouth of Willamette River to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, WA, with 2 turning basins of same depth. A channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, WA, to mouth of Columbia River; a turning basin at Vancouver, WA, a turning basin at Longview, WA, and a channel 40 feet deep in Willamette River from mouth to Broadway Bridge which encompasses Portland Harbor area. H. Doe. 203, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 452, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. 1 Oct 23, 1962 Oct 23, 1962 Dec 11, 1933 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 02, 1945 May 17, 1950 Jun 20, 1938 Sep 03, 1954 Mar 03, 1905 Dec 22, 1944 Sep 03, 1954 Jul 30, 1983 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 02, 1945 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 24, 1946 Jun 25, 1910 Mar 02, 1919 Sep 22, 1922 Jan 21, 1927 Jul 03, 1930 COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR AND WA Extend South Jetty and construct North Jetty and dredging. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities Bar channel of 48-foot depth and spur jetty on north shore.9 Deepening the northernmost 2,000 feet of the channel cross section to 55 feet. H. Doc. 94, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 as amended H. Doc. 249, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. 1 P.L 98-63 COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA, AND THE DALLES, OR Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet from H. Committee D Vancouver, WA, to Bonneville, OR. 74th Cong., 2d S Construct Camas-Washougal turning basin. H. Doc. 218, 76t Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet wide H. Doc. 704, 79t from Bonneville, OR, to The Dalles, OR. Construct a boat basin at Hood River, OR, 10 feet deep, H. Doc. 704, 79t 500 feet wide, by 1,300 feet long. Construct a barge channel at Bingen, WA, 10 feet deep, H. Doc. 704, 79t] 200 feet wide, by 1 mile long, and an access channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, by 1,000 feet long to natural mooring basin. Construct The Dalles Harbor 8 feet deep, 400 feet wide S. Doc. 89, 79th by 800 feet long. COOS BAY, OR Dredging the Ocean Bar Channel. H. Doec. 958, 60tl A channel 22 feet deep to Smith's Mill. H. Doc. 325, 65t1 Restore North Jetty 9,600 feet long, construct a South Jetty H. Doc. 150, 67t about 3,900 feet long, extend 22-foot bay channel from Smith's Mill to Millington. Extend jetties to such lengths as may be practicable H. Doc. 320, 69t1 within estimate of total cost of jetties, $3,250,000 given in H. Doc. 150, 67th Cong. A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide, through H. Doc. 110, 70t Pigeon Point Reef, following a location along westerly side of bay. )oc. 94, ;ess.1 h Cong., 1st Sess. h Cong., 2d Sess. h Cong., 2d Sess. h Cong., 2d Sess. Cong., 1st Sess.1 h Cong.,lst Sess. h Cong., 1st Sess. h Cong., 2d Sess. h Cong., 1st Sess. h Cong., 1st Sess.1 37-31 Documents 5. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA East Channel Public Works Administration Main channel H. Doc. 44, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. West channel 8 feet deep. H. Doc. 443, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. West channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin with S. Doc. 95, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. protecting breakwaters. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WA AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND Channel 8 feet deep. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 50,75th Cong., 2d Sess. Channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin. S. Doc. 8, 83d Cong., 1st Sess.1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OFTHE ARMY ON-CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1989 TABLE 37-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug 30, 1935 Jul 24, 1946 Jun 30, 1948 Dec 31, 1970 For 24-foot channel from Pigeon Point Reef to Smith's Mill and a turning basin above Marshfield. Increased dimensions of channel across bar and to Isthmus Slough and turning basin opposite Coalbank Slough and at city of North Bend; anchorage basins at mile 3.5 and near mile 7. A mooring basin and connecting channel at Charleston. Increase dimensions to provide for bar channel 45 feet deep, inner channel 35 feet deep to mile 15, and deepening and widening existing turning basins and anchorage area. COOS AND MILLICOMA RIVERS, OR Dredging channel from mouth to head of navigation. For a 5 ft depth from mouth to head of navigation on the Millicoma River and South Fork. Except on South Fork above M. 14 where 3 ft will suffice. COQUILLE RIVER, OR Dredging shoals between mouth and Riverton, and removing obstruction between mouth of North Fork and Bandon. For a 13-foot channel from ocean to Bandon. Deepen channel to 16 feet between sea and eastern end of North Jetty. Present project depth between sea and eastern end of North Jetty. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. For 13-foot depth from sea to a point 1 mile above Coquille River Lighthouse and snagging to State Highway Bridge. DEPOE BAY, OR Construction of an inner basin 375 feet long, 125 feet wide H. Doc. 202, 75th Cong. and 5 feet deep, with entrance channel of same depth and 1st Sess. 50 feet wide. Construction of inner basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide and H. Doc. 350, 77th Cong. 8 feet deep, with entrance channel at same depth and 30 feet 1st Sess. wide. ELOCHOMAN SLOUGH, WA A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from that H. Doc. 510, 74th Cong. depth in Columbia River near easterly end of slough to 2nd Sess. existing terminals near mouth of Elochoman River, a distance of about 1.5 miles, with suitable turning basin of same depth at inner end. PORT ORFORD, OR Extension of existing breakwater by 550 feet. Dredging of turning basin 340 feet long, 100 feet wide, 16 feet deep. ROGUE RIVER HARBOR AT GOLD BEACH, OR Two jetties at entrance and improvement of channel. SIUSLAW RIVER, OR Build two high-tide stone jetties. Extends North Jetty 3,700 feet from old work constructed under previous project and provides for 4,200 foot south jetty. 12-foot deep channel. S. Doc. 62, 88th Cong., 2d Sess H. Doc 151, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doe. 83, 83d Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doe. 71, 51st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doe. 648, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Committee Print, Serial, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. 37-32 S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d Sess.1 S. Doc. 253, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc 646, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doe. 151, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 237, 53d Cong., 3d Sess. S. Doc. 124, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 673, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. doc. 207, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. ' H. Doc. 186, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee Print, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Food Control Act of 1944 as amended H. Doc. 672, 76th Cong., 2d Sess.1 Jun 03, 1896 Jun 30, 1948 10. Jun 25, 1910 Mar 02, 1919 Jul 03, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Dec 22, 1944 Mar 02, 1945 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 26 1937 11. 12. 14. 16. 17. Oct 27, 1965 Dec 31, 1970 Sep 03, 1954 Sep 19, 1890 Jun 25, 1910 Mar 03, 1925 TABLE 37-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized 18-foot bar channel and 16-foot river channel and a 600-foot extension of north Jetty. (600-foot extension classified deferred.) Phase I advance engineering and design for north and south jetty extensions. Extending north and south jetties about 2,000 and 2,500 feet, respectively. SKAMOKAWA CREEK, WA Channel 6.5 feet deep and 75 feet wide, at low water between Steamboat and Brooks Slough. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR Channel from deep water in Columbia River to railroad bridge, 30 feet deep. Channel extending upstream from railroad bridge a distance of 4,500 feet. Mooring basin 12 feet deep at Warrenton. H. Doc. 204, 85th Cong.,lst Sess.1 Final Report of Chief of Engineers P.L 96-367 H. Doe. 3, 63rd Cong.,lst Sess. H. Doc. 278, 70th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 201, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doec. 93, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. ' 18. 19. 37-33 Documents Jul 03, 1958 Oct 22, 1976 Oct 01, 1980 Mar 02, 1919 Jul 03, 1930 Aug 26, 1937 Jun 30, 1948 Jul 26, 1912 Mar 04, 1913 Mar 02, 1919 Mar 03, 1925 Mar 02, 1945 Jun 30, 1948 Sep 03, 1954 Oct 27, 1965 Jul. 18, 1989 Sep 22, 1922 Jan 21, 1927 Jul 03, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Jun 20, 1938 Mar 02, 1945 Mar 02, 1945 Jun 30, 1948 Sep 03, 1954 20. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR Construct North Jetty 5,700 feet long and dredging H. Doc. 349, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, to Bay City. Abandon that portion of project above Bay city. H. Doc. 760, 65th Cong., 2d Sess Abandon Bay City Channel and present project dimension H. Doc. 562, 68th Cong., 2d Sess. of channels and turning basins with regulating works as needed. Repair damage and check erosion on Bayocean Peninsula S. Doec. 35, 79th Cong., 1st Sess.4 caused by storm Jan. 1939. Dredging small-boat basin and approach at Garibaldi, OR, H. Doc. 650, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. to depth of 12 feet. Closure of breach in Bayocean Peninsula S. Doc. 128, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.1 Construct South Jetty, 80,000 feet long. S. Doc. 43, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 TONGUE POINT, OR Channel 34 feet deep and 350 feet wide from Columbia Section 107 of the 1960 River and River channel to Tongue Point docks, and a turning basin Harbor Act, as amended. located near the piers. UMPQUA RIVER, OR North Jetty, 7,500 feet long H. Doc. 913, 65th Cong., 2d Sess. Present project dimensions of North Jetty and dredging H. Doc. 320, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. ocean bar. A short south jetty H. Doc. 317, 70th Cong., 1st Sess.1 A full length south jetty and maintenance dredging Rivers and Harbors Committee to a 26-foot depth. Doc. 9, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth S. Doc. 158, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. ' to Reedsport. Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from river channel S. Doc. 86, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.1 to Gardiner, and turning basin 22 feet deep, 500 feet wide and 800 feet long. Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel to S. Doc. 191, 77th Cong., 2d Sess.' dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 10 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end. Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel to S. Doec. 154, 80th Cong., 2d Sess.1 dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 12 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end. Channel 12 feet deep, Scholfield River. s S. Doc. 133, 81st Cong., 2d Sess.1 21. 22. 1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1989 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 23. Jun 25, 1910 Aug 08, 1917 Jun 26, 19346 Mar 02, 1945 Mar 02, 1919 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 02, 1945 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 03, 1958 Jul 14, 1960 Oct 23, 1962 Mar 07, 1974 May 17, 1950 Nov 17, 1986 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 Oct 23, 1962 Oct 07, 1970 May 17, 1950 Dec 22, 1944 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 Oct 23, 1962 WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILIAMETTE FALLS, OR For purchase and rehabilitation of system and construction of concrete division wall. Deepening of locks. Operation and care of canal and locks provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Construction of New Willamette Falls Locks. * YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR Restoration and extension of jetties constructed under previous projects, rock removal at entrance, and dredging in bay up to railroad terminus at Yaquina. Extension of north jetty seaward 1,000 feet. 26-foot channel of suitable width across entrance bar, as far as rock bottom will allow, a 20-foot channel 300 feet wide along south side of bay to and including a turning basin 22 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 1,200 feet long. Construct a small-boat mooring basin at Newport, OR. 40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river channel extension of jetties at entrance. A small boat basin, south shore. APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Authorizes a rockfill embankment dam. Authorizes construction of project but no operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR Authorizes gravel-filled embankment dam. Authorizes Construction of hydroelectric power facilities COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR Earthfill dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. DORENA LAKE, OR Earthfill dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Roller compacted concrete dam. Authorized construction but not operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. FALL CREEK LAKE, OR Earth and gravel fill embankment dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR Earthfill embankment dam Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Raise height of dam to obtain additional storage. 24. 37-34 TABLE 37-B (Continued) H. Doc. 202, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. and Annual Report, 1900, P. 4374 H. Doc. 1060, 62d Cong., 3d Sess. 1 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 109, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee Print, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 119, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 S. Doc. 246, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 8, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. 1 Section 107, P.L 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Mar. 4, 1977 H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L 93-251 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L 99-662 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L 91-439 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doe. 544, 75th Cong. 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc 403, 87th Cong. 2d Sess. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. TABLE 37-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, OR AND WA Bank protection work, improvements to existing projects, and construction of flood control works in Lower Columbia River Basin. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR AND WA Provides bank protection on Columbia River below H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. river mile 125 and along principal tributaries. MT. ST. HELENS & VICINITY, WA Implement and maintain flood control measures on Cowlitz P.L. 98-63 and Toutle Rivers to assure flood protection for developed areas in the vicinity of such rivers against a one-hundred-year flood and to reduce sedimentation flow and the chance of blockage on the Columbia River. MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, CASTLE ROCK, WA Authorized construction of sediment and retention structures. P.L 99-88 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Jul 30, 1983 Aug 15, 1985 Jun 28, 1938 May 17, 1950 Jun 22, 1936 Jun 28, 1938 May 17, 1950 Oct 27, 1965 Completion, maintenance, and operation of Bonneville project under direction of Secretary of War and supervision of Chief of Engineers, subject to certain provisions herein relating to powers and duties of Bonneville Power Administrator. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities Authorizes relocation of town of North Bonneville to new town site. Acquisition of Steigerwald Lake wetland area COUGAR LAKE, OR Rockfill dam. Addition of power Strube Lake reregulating dam. DETROIT LAKE, OR Authorizes concrete gravity structure. Addition of power and regulating Big Cliff Dam with power. GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR Authorized Green Peter Dam in lieu of originally authorized Sweet Home Lake (1938) Addition of power at Green Peter and White Bridge Reregulating Dam. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. F.C. Act 1936 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 233, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. )R AND WA S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d Sess., (Report of Chief of Engineers dated Aug 21, 1933) Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended P.L 93-251 P.L 98-396 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L 83-780 P.L 87-874 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong.,3d Sess. P.L 858, 80th Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L 83-780 F. C. Act 1954 37-35 35. 36. 37. Documents 38. 40. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OR Comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation and other purposes in Willamette River basin. General improvements WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR Bank protection works, with channel clearing. Provide additional protection against flooding. Addition of 77 locations to scope of projects. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, HEPPNER, OR Storage project for flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM - LAKE BONNEVILLE, C Existing project was originally authorized Sep. 30, 1933, by Federal Emergengy Administration of Public Works. Existing project authorized by congress 41. 42. 43. 44. Aug 30, 1935 Aug 20, 1937 Dec 22, 1944 Mar 07, 1974 Aug 22, 1984 May 17, 1950 Sep 03, 1954 Oct 23, 1962 June 28, 1938 Jun 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Sep 03, 1954 45. 46. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1989 TABLE 37-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul 14, 1960 Changes location of reregulating dam from White S. Doc. 104, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. Bridge location to Foster. 47. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR May 17, 1950 Earth and gravel fill dam. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 48. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM - LAKE UMATILLA, OR AND WA May 17, 1950 Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and power. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, facilities, as amended Mar 24, 1965 John Day waterfowl management area. S. Doc. 28, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. 49. LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OR Jun 28, 1938 Earth-and-gravel filled dam. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, facilities, as amended May 17, 1950 Addition of power and authorization of Dexter Lake H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. as reregulating dam, 50. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Sep 21, 1962 Rock and gravel fill embankment dam, including power. H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Oct 15, 1966 Authorizes construction of project but not operation for P.L 89-689, Public Works irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. Approp. Act, 1967 51. THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM - LAKE CELILO, WA AND OR May 17, 1950 Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and power. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, facilities, as amended 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Public Resolution 105, 67th Cong. 3. Public Works Administration 4. Includes following work, classified inactive. A channel to Hobsonville 200 feet wide and 16 feet deep, with a turning basin 500 feet wide at Hobsonville, and regulating works as needed. 5. Inactive. 6. Permanent appropriations Repeal Act. 7. Flood Control Act 8. Classified Deferred 9. Spur Jetty "B" classified inactive. 37-36 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1989 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Alsea River, OR AstoriaTurning Basin, OR 1 Bandon Small Boat Basin, Coquille, OR 1 Bridges, Columbia River, Cascade Locks and Hood River, OR (Alteration) Cathlamet, WA 1 Charleston Channel, Coos Bay, OR 1 Clatskanie River, OR 2 Columbia River, Illwaco, WA 1 Cowlitz River, WA Cushman-Mapleton Channels (Siuslaw River), OR 1 Deep River, WA 2 Depoe Bay, OR 1 Grays River, WA 2 Hammonds Small Boat Basin, OR 1 Interstate Bridge, Columbia River, Portland, OR to Vancouver WA (Alteration) Interstate Highway Bridge(Barge Channel), OR 1 Kalama Turning Basin, Kalama, WA 1 Lake River, WA Lewis River, WA Long Tom River, OR Mooring for Battleship Oregon, OR Multnomah Channel, OR 2 Nehalem Bay, OR Nestucca River, OR Oregon Slough, (North Portland Harbor), OR 2 Salmon River, OR 2 Smith River, OR 2 South Channel, Government Island, OR 1 South Slough (Charleston), OR 1 The Cascades Canal, Columbia River, Or 12 The Dalles-Celilo Canal, Or and WA13 Umatilla Harbor, OR14 Westport Slough, OR 2 Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, OR Winchester Bay, Umpqua River, OR 1 Yaquina Bay and Harbor Small Boat Basin, Or 1 Yaquina River, OR 1 Yaquina River, OR Youngs and Claskanie River, Or Youngs Bay and Youngs River, OR 2 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completedm Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Abandoned Abandoned Abandoned Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1977 1985 1944 1971 1985 1969 1986 1985 1975 1963 1971 1941 1977 1961 1963 1986 1983 1985 1982 1987 1963 1949 1974 1985 1970 1939 1957 1952 1966 1985 1985 1979 1971 1984 1979 2,000 870,139 1,173,524 1,081,806 171,467 1,197,300 19,2403 1,589,231 277,4368 329,423 15,384 145,5885 2,500 519,0907 1,154,1628 15,281 302,000 2,700 58,132 437,669 9 302,00610 16,881 2,145 143,120 119,80011 26,821 3,903,780 4,716,205 16,276 862,918 1,616,369 891,69515 195,31318 28,800 2,000 9,348 26,237 16,648 194,8964 1,474,036 32,768 35,670 58,127 685,677 4,000 25,000 55,195 6,000 90,514 205,130 559,858 2,833,888 171,909 17,900,293 749,69417 34,449 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (sec. 107). 2. Channel adequate for present commerce. 3. Includes $15,537 for previous project 4. Includes $23,489 for previous project. 5. Excludes $42,000 contributed funds. 6. Includes $239,529 for Sec. 107 project. 7. Excludes $75,000 contributed funds. 8. Non-Federal funds, $1,204,100. 9. Includes $419,557 for Sec. 107 project. 10. Excludes $304,826 contributed funds. 11. Excludes $102,000 contributed funds. 12. Project abondoned due to flooding by Bonneville Dam pool. 13. Project abandoned due to flooding by The Dalles Dam pool 14. Project transferred to Portland Distnct from Walla Walla District FY 1974 and abandoned due to flooding by the John Day Dam pool. 15. Excludes $969,342 contributed funds. 16. Excludes $50,565 contributed funds 17. Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. 37-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1989 TABLE 37-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Se. 30, 1989 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Blind Slough Diking District, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1939 163,397 Consolidated Diking and Improvement District 1, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1941 163,291 Deep River Area, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1942 69,724 Deer Island Area, Columbia County, OR Completed 1943 574,123 Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 25,609 Diking District 5, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 25,609 Diking and Improvement District 5, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1940 161,381 Diking District 1 and 3 (Puget Island) and Little Island, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1941 258,795 Diking Improvement District 1, Pacific County WA Completed 1941 26,810 Diking and Improvement District 4, Wahkiakum County, OR Completed 1951 169,542 Drainage District 1, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1939 240,939 John Day River Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 33,080 Karlson Island, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1941 25,773 Knappa Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 18,789 Lewis and Clark River Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 158,419 Lower Cowlitz River Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1961 91,652 Magruder Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 61,186 Marshland Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 39,475 Midland Drainage District Columbia County, OR Completed 1939 77,7743 Multnomah Drainage District 1, OR Completed 1951 593,0344 Peninsula Drainage District 1, Multnomah County, OR Completed 1942 241,148 Port of Kalama, WA 1 Completed 99,844 Rainier Drainage District, Columbia county, OR Completed 1942 47,662 Sauvie Island Areas A and B, Multnomah County, OR Completed 1951 1,623,505 Scappoose Drainage District, OR Completed 1984 3,991,558 Skamokawa Creek Area, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1946 178,885 Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District No. 1, WA Completed 1985 5,289,833 Tenasillahe Island, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1939 133,778 Upper Grays River Area, WA Completed 1947 61,263 State Hwy 101 & 401, Columbia River, WA1 Completed 1985 504,64213 Walluski River, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 66,932 Warrenton Diking District, 1, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 69,503 Warrenton Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 74,596 Webb District Improvement Co.,Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 84,592 Westland District Improvement Co., Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 205,531 Westport Distric, Columbia and Clatsop Counties, OR Completed 1943 40,658 Woodson Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 22,797 Youngs River Dikes, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 248,802 Total Columbia River Basin 16,399,775 LEWIS RIVER BASIN Diking and Improvement District 11, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1943 172,521 COWLITZ RIVER BASIN Cowlitz County Drainage Improvement District 1, WA Completed 1939 42,978 Diking Improvement District 13, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1939 28,592 Huntington Avenue, Castle Rock, Wa1 Completed 1985 250,000 Total Cowlitz River Basin 442,735 37-38 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1989 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Beaver Drainage District, OR Completed 1984 3,131,944 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District No. 2, WA Completed 1977 1,661,367 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 2, WA Completed 1967 363,000 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 13, WA Completed 1967 65,345 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 15, WA Completed 1967 304,794 Cowlitz River, Hopkins Creek, WA1 Completed 236,860 Hayden Island, OR Inactive Midland Drainage District, OR Completed 1971 304,511 Multnomah County Drainage District 1, OR Completed 1964 1,499,186 Peninsula Drainage District 2, OR Active 1961 35,265 Rainier Drainage District, OR Completed 1967 593,945 Sandy Drainage District, OR Completed 1954 154,0126 Sauvie Island Drainage District, OR Completed 1966 674,137 Vancouver Lake Area, WA Deferred 1981 889,391 Wahkiakum Co. Diking District 4, WA Inactive 1971 48,619 Washougal Area Levees, Clark County, OR Completed 1973 1,803,488 Woodson Drainage District, OR Completed 1964 162,500 Total Lower Columbia River Basin 11,928,364 WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN Amazon Creek, OR Completed 1960 1,214,3006 Cascadia Lake, OR Deferred 1976 1,066,1147 Gate Creek Lake, OR Deferred 1972 840,0008 Holley Lake, OR Deferred 1963 241,992 Sandy River and Sleepy Hollow, OR1 Completed 276,700 Whelton Ditch, OR Inactive 1967 39,624 Willamette River Basin Channel Clearing and Snagging Inactive Total Willamette River Basin 3,678,731 ALL OTHER FLOOD CONTROL Arlington, Alkali Canyon, OR9 Abandoned 1950 23,439 Bear Creek, Medford, OR 1 Completed 23,050 Beaver Creek Near Tillamook, OR2 Completed 1967 106,198 Castle Rock, Cowlitz River, WA Completed 1957 104,921 Catching Inlet Drainage District Coos River, OR2 Completed 1959 182,655 Chewaucan River, Paisley, OR1 Completed 42,761 Clackamas River at Dixon Farm Location, OR Completed 1952 70,84510 Days Creek Lake, OR (Phase I) Deferred 1982 1,307,216 Depoe Bay, Lincoln County, OR1 Completed 22,963 Deschutes River, Bend, OR 2 Completed 1988 106,25016 John Day River (West), OR 1 Completed 1986 127,800 Johnson Creek, OR Active 1981 170,245 McDonald Dike Road, Nehalem River, OR1 Completed 1985 29,500 McKenzie River Near Walterville, OR2 Completed 1966 148,358 Miami River, OR' Completed 15,321 Mill Four Drainage District, Yaquina River, OR Completed 1948 118,433 Molalla River at Milk Creek Location, OR2 Completed 1955 55,007 Molalla River at Ressel Location, OR2 Completed 1952 55,189 Nestucca River, Condor Road, OR1 Completed 11,690 Nestucca River, Vicinity Pacific City, OR1 Completed 16,000 Pendleton Levees, Umatilla River, OR 11 (a) Riverside Area Units Deferred 1960 9,100 37-39 TABLE 37-E (Continued) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1989 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep, 30, 1989 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance (b) State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 1) Completed 1959 267,748 (c) State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 2)2 Completed 1960 161,540 Pendleton, Umatilla River, OR10 Completed 1939 143,263 Reedsport Levees, Umpqua River, OR2 Completed 1971 968,71612 Rogue River, OR1 Completed 86,230 Salmon Creek at Oakridge, OR2 Completed 1960 288,447 Salmon Creek Near Vancouver, WA 1 Completed 1985 435,00014 Siuslaw River, Lane County, OR 1 Completed 215,939 Stillwell Drainage District, Tillamook Bay, OR2 Completed 1961 176,351 Sumner Parker Airport, OR1 Completed 92,500 Trask River, Tillamook County, OR 1 Completed 1984 121,273 Tualatin, OR Completed 1985 1,803,094 Umatilla River, Stanfield, OR Completed 33,835 Umatilla River, Thorn Hollow, OR1 Completed 1985 154,600 Umpqua River and Tributaries, OR1 Completed 1952 428,881 Vicinity of Nehalem, Nehalem River, OR Completed 1952 45,677 West Makinster Rd., Wilson River, OR 1 Completed 1986 176,000 Wilson River, Vicinity Highway 101, OR1 Completed 30,000 Total All Other Flood Control 7,965,985 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 14). 9. Project transferred from Walla Walla District FY 1974 and 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205). abandoned due to flooding by the John Day Dam pool. Includes 3. Includes $26,241, Emergency Relief Act Funds $3,328 FY 1960 preauthorization costs, Sec. 205, P.L 80-85. See 4. Excludes $25,000 contributed funds FY 1960 Annual Report, page 1887 5. Previous completed project, $138,956; $15,056 engineering costs 10. Excludes $2,520 contributed funds project coistructed by local interests. 11. Reported by Walla Walla District prior to 1974 6. Excludes $154,751 contributed funds. 12. Excludes $230,070 contributed funds for new work and $31,284 7. Includes $112,000 pro rata share of site selection in lieu of Government furnished sheet steel pile. Sweet Home. 13. Includes $254,642 contributed funds. 8. Includes $95,000 pro rata share of site selection in lieu of 14. Includes $185,000 contributed funds. Quartz Creek Lake. 15. Excludes $5,822 contributed funds. TABLE 37-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to Sep., 30, 1989 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Restoration of Indian Fishing Grounds, Bonneville, OR Completed 1969 185,000 37-40 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Area East of Albany, OR 1977 Bachelor Island, WA 1977 Bear Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1966 1971 4,559 Calapooya River, OR 1959 1965 11,595 Cascadia Lake, OR 1987 954,114 1 Clatskanie River Area, Columbia County, OR 1960 1965 268 Clatskanie Drainage Dist. 1, OR 1964 1978 18,543 Clatsop County Drainage District 1, OR 1960 1974 4,472 Clatsop County Diking District 3, OR 1938 1961 258 Clatsop County Diking District 4, OR 1978 Clatsop County Diking District 6, OR 1961 1978 8,824 Columbia Drainage District No. 1, OR 1987 Columbia Slough, OR 1953 1978 21,352 Coquille River, OR 1948 1953 908 Cowlitz County Consolidate Diking Improvement District 1, OR 1977 Cowlitz River at Randle, WA 1962 1977 11,095 Coyote and Spencer Creek, Long Tom River, Or 1960 1970 6,819 Deer Island Drainage District, OR 1987 East Muddy and Lake Creek, OR 1959 1970 6,465 Ferguson Creek Long Tom River, Or 1978 Flat Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1977 Floodwall and Levees at Portland, OR 1977 Gate Creek Lake, OR 1987 745,0012 Holley Lake, OR 1963 1987 241,9923 John Drainage District, OR 1961 1979 23,754 John Day river, OR 1974 1974 210,220 Kalama River (South Area) Levee, Cowlitz County, WA 1969 1978 55,594 Lake River Delta Area, WA 1977 Lewis River Area, WA 1978 Magruder Drainage District, OR 1940 1974 774 Mud and Basket Slough Rickreall Creek, OR 1977 Pendleton Levees, Riverside Area, OR 1987 9,000 Peninsula Drainage District 1, OR 1942 1977 43,292 Pilot Rock, Birch Creek, OR 1963 1968 4,558 Prescott Area, Columbia County, OR 1941 1978 125 Prineville Area, Crooked River and Ochoco Creek, OR 1962 1977 11,318 Pudding River, OR 1950 1979 5,000 Shelton Ditch, Marion County, Or 1967 1987 39,624 Skamokawa (Steamboat Slough), WA 1939 1979 Soap Creek, WA 1977 Turner Prairie, Mill Creek, OR 1978 Umatilla River (Echo), OR 1960 1964 24,145 Umpqua River-Scholfield River, OR 1987 4,000 Waldo Lake Tunnel, OR 1958 West Muddy Creek and Mary's River, OR 1962 1970 4,056 Westport Slough, OR (Modification for 32-foot chanrnel) 1966 1977 Wiley Creek Lake, OR 1960 112,000 Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, OR (uncompleted portions) 1987 Willamette Falls Fishladder, OR 1961 Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR 1948 1987 142,883 1. Excludes Pro-rata share of $112,000 for Sweet Home Reservoir. 2. Excludes Pro-rata share of $95,000 for Quartz Creek Reservoir 3. Excludes $100,000 preauthorization study costs. 37-41 TABLE 37-H REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1989 COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVER BELOW VANCOUVER, WA, AND PORTLAND, OR TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEP. 30, 1989 (SEE SECTION 3 OF TEXT) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular 28,349,304 272,882,728 301,232,032 Public Works 446,296 14,414 460,710 Emergency Relief Administration 138,449 98,668 237,117 Total U.S. 28,934,049 272,995,810 301,929,859 Contributed Prior to 1964 223,026 24,320 247,346 Contributed (1975) 35 to 40-foot Channel 442,928 442,928 Total Contributed 665,954 24,320 690,274 Total All Funds 29,600,003 273,020,130 302,620,133 TABLE 37-I NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs (1989) Charleston Channel, OR 31,792 Columbia River, Henrici Bar, WA 76 Columbia River, Kalama, WA 302 Columbia River, Longview, WA 7,374 Columbia River, Vancouver, WA 2,356 Coos Bay, OR 42,531 Coquille River, Bandon, OR 61,829 Port of Morrow, Morrow, OR 3,440 Westport, OR 6,242 Wind River, WA 9,854 Yaquina Bay and Bar, OR -85 TOTAL $ 165,711 TABLE 37-J PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Project Date Survey Conducted Elochoman Slough, WA December 1989 Skamokawa Creek, WA November 1989 Tillamook, OR October 1989 Youngs Bay, OR January 1989 37-42 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-K WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF EXISTING CANAL AND LOCKS (See Section 23 of Text) Usable Lock Dimensions Series of 4 locks, each 175 feet by 37 feet 1 Lift of each lock Lock 1 (Lower), 22,5 feet; Lock 2, 8.7 feet; Lock 3, 10.9 feet and Lock 4 (Upper), 8.1 feet 2 Depth of Miter Sills at Lower Water Lower Lock, 8.4 feet; Upper Lock, 6 feet Character of foundation Rock Kind of Dam Fixed3 Type of Construction Concrete Year of Completion 1873; Purchased by United States Apr. 26, 1915 Cost Unknown; purchase price $375,000 1. A guard lock 210 by 40 feet, which is used only at higher states powerplants operated by Crown Zellerbach Corp., and Portland of water, is at upper end of canal basin. Ry., Light & Power Co., which is now being operated by Portland 2. A concrete division wall, 1,227 feet long, extending from Lock 4 General Electric Co. to Guard Lock, separates upper basin of canal from head race, 3. The dam is owned by private parties. which formerly led directly from basin and supplied water for TABLE 37-L FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs (1989) D River, Lincoln City, OR 8,406 Depoe Bay, OR 6,713 Libby Dike, Coal Bank Slough, OR 1,324 Peninsula Drainage District No. 1, OR 25,231 Rivergate, OR 11,412 Salmon Creek Levee, Oakridge, OR 2,146 Schooner Cr., Lincoln City, OR 5,309 Tutuilla Creek, OR 20 Waldport, OR 50,293 Warrenton Diking District No. 1, OR 6,099 Willamette River, Keizer, OR 2,049 TOTAL $119,002 TABLE 37-M FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS See Section Date of Peak Inflow Storage Used in Text Project Peak Inflow Cu. Ft./Sec. Acre/feet 25. Applegate Lake, OR March 9, 1989 2,550 12,000 26. Blue River Lake, OR January 11, 1989 7,250 13,530 27. Cottage Grove Lake, OR January 10, 1989 1,640 5,260 44. Cougar Lake, OR January 10, 1989 5,600 15,100 45. Detroit Lake, OR January 10, 1989 9,000 23,620 28. Dorena Lake, OR January 10, 1989 10,250 18,910 30. Fall Creek Lake, OR January 10, 1989 8,500 11,380 31. Fern Ridge Lake, OR January 11, 1989 4,100 6,830 46. Foster Lake, OR January 10, 1989 11,200 6,730 46. Green Peter Lake, OR January 10, 1989 12,300 48,140 47. Hills Creek Lake, Or January 10, 1989 8,700 18,630 49. Lookout Point Lake, OR January 10, 1989 16,700 39,240 50. Lost Creek Lake, Or March 21, 1989 5,500 8,000 37-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1989 TABLE 37-N LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, OR AND WA LEVEES AND IMPROVEMENTS TO EXISTING WORKS (See Section 35 of Text) Estimated Cost of Work Location Approved 1989 Beaver Drainage District, OR $ 2,857,366 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 2, WA 363,000 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 13, WA 65,345 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement Distict 15, WA 304,794 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District 2, WA 1,661,367 Midland Drainage District, OR 304,511 Multnomah County Drainage District 1, OR 1,499,186 Peninsula Drainage District No. 2, OR 3,770,000 Rainier Drainage District, OR 593,945 Sandy Drainage District, OR 15,0561 Sauvie Island Drainage District, OR 674,137 Scappoose Drainage District, OR 3,567,248 Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District 1, WA 5,289,833 Woodson Drainage District, OR 162,500 Total Estimated Cost, Federal Funds 21,128,288 Estimated Non-Federal Cost 3,770,000 Locations deauthorized or reclassified inactive and excluded from above cost estimate: Bachelor Island, WA (Deauthorized - 1977) Clatskanie Drainage District, OR (Deauthorized - 1978) Clatskanie River Area, OR (Deauthorized - 1965) Clatsop County Drainage District 1, OR (Deauthorized - 1974) Clatsop County Diking District 4, OR (Deauthorized - 1978) Clatsop County Diking District 6, OR (Deauthorized - 1978) Columbia Drainage District 1, OR (Deauthorized - 1987) Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District 1, WA (Deauthorized - 1977) Deer Island Drainage District, OR (Deauthorized - 1987) Hayden Island, OR (Inactive) John Drainage District, OR (Deauthorized - 1979) Kalama River Levee, WA (Deauthorized - 1978) Lake River Delta Area, WA (Deauthorized - 1977) Lewis River Area, WA (Deauthorized - 1977) Magruder Drainage District, OR (Deauthorized - 1977) Wahkiakum County Diking District 4, WA (Inactive) 1. Cost is for engineering only. Project was constructed by local interests. 37-44 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-0 WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (See Section 40 of Text) Estimated Federal Project Authorized Act Cost (1989) Blue River Lake, McKenzie Basin I 3 Cascadia Lake, South Santiam River4 5 11 Channel Clearing and Snagging on Willamette River and Major Tributaries8 Channel Improvements for Flood control Tributary to Willamette River1 8 Cottage Grove Lake, Coast Fork1 Major Drainage on 16 Streams Cougar Lake, South Fork McKenzie1 3 Detroit Lake, Including Big Cliff Lake, North Santiam River 1 Dorena Lake, Row River 1 Fall Creek Lake, Middle Fork 1 Fern Ridge Lake, Long Tom River 1 Gate Creek Lake, McKenzie Basin3 5 11 Green Peter-Foster Lakes, Middle Santiam1 4 Hills Creek Lake, Middle Fork1 Holley Lake, Calapooya Rivers 11 Lookout Point Lake, Including Dexter Lake, Middle Fork 1 Strube Lake & Cougar Additional Unit, (South Fork McKenzie) (Modification to Cougar Lake) Waldo Lake Tunnel and Reregulating Works North Fork, Middle Fork Willamette River Willamette River Bank Protection 1 May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Oct. 23, 1962, H. Doc. 403, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531 81st Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. June 28, 1938, H. Doc 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. and Sep 3, 1954, S. Doc 131, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. and June 30, 1948, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Oct. 23, 1962, H. Doc. 403, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. doc., 531 81st Cong., 2d Sess. and Sep. 3, 1954, S. Doc 131, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. and Jul y 14, 1960, S. Doc. 104 86th Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531 81st Cong., 2d Sess. May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. June 28, 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 2d Sess. and May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Oct. 23, 1962, H. Doc. 403, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 5318, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. June 22, 1936, Special Report Division Engr., June 28 1938, H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong. 3d Sess., and May 17, 1950, H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. $ 32,038,2252 104,000,000 (1975) 3,005,000 (1960) 1,214,3003 4,013,1232 9 56,750,4052 1 62,729,6982 14,568,2622 22,118,2642 1 8,526,9352 9 127,000,000 (1980) 84,005,7882 45,700,6192 13,300,000 88,238,3952 9 106,000,000 29,200,000 (1987) 1. See individual report for details of the project. 2. Actual cost 3. For construction in lieu of originally authorized Quartz Creek Lake. 4. For construction in lieu of originally authorized Sweet Home Lake. 5. Project classified deferred. 6. Project classified inactive. 7. Does not include Reclassified Locations. 8. Authorization rescinded August 28, 1958, Public Law 85-820. 9. Includes cost of Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects, (710) 10. Does not include $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake and Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Units. 11. Authorization rescinded November 17, 1986, Public Law 99- 662. 37-45 TABLE 37-P REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1989 PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT Project Bonneville Lock and Dam OR and WA -- Lake Bonneville (See Section 43 of Text) John Day Lock and Dam, OR and WA - Lake Umatilla (See Section 48 of Text) NAVIGATION LOCK Dimensions: Clear Width of Chamber Greatest Length Available for Full Width Lift (Vertical): At Extreme Low Water and Normal Pool Level At Normal River Stage At Extreme High Water Depth Over Miter Sills at Adopted Low Water Character of Foundation Open to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of construction Completed Capacity Elevation of Gate Sills on Crest of Spillway Height above Lowest Foundation Length of Dam Proper Length of Dam Overall Width at Base Gate Openings Crest Overflow (Above Mean Sea Level) Elevation(NormalXAbove Mean Sea Level) POWERPLANT Length (First Powerhouse) Length (Second Powerhouse) Width (First Powerhouse) Width (Second Powerhouse) Height (Roof to Bedrock) (First Powerhouse) Height (Roof to BedrockXSecond Powerhouse) Generator (Station Unit) Generators (First Powerhouse) Generators (Second Powerhouse) Fishwater Supply Units (Second Powerhouse) Total Rated Capacity Speed NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number 76 Feet 500 Feet 66 Feet 59 Feet About 30 Feet 24.2 Feet Andesite January 1938 Concrete Gravity 1938 1,600,000 CFS 23.3 Feet About 170 Feet 1,090 Feet 1,230 Feet 200 Feet 18 24 Feet Pool 72 Feet 1,027 Feet 953 Feet 190 Feet 235 Feet 190 Feet 200 Feet 1 @ 5,000 kw 1@ 48,000 kw 1@ 59,500 kw 8 @ 60,000 kw each 8 @ 66,500 kw each 2 @ 13,100 kw each 1,145,700 kw 75 Revolutions per Minute 86 Feet 669 feet 97 Feet 105 Feet 113 Feet 15 Feet April 1968 Concrete Gravity March 1968 2,250,000 cfs 210 Feet Tainter 50 ft. by 58.5 Ft. 20 37-46 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 37-P (continued) PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT Project The Dalles Lock and Dam, OR and WA -- Lake Celilo (See Section 51 of Text) POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Space for Additional Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Total Potential Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Flood Control Storage Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area At Elevation 268 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Type Lift Normal Net Clear Length Net clear Width Normal Depth Over Upper Sill Minimum Depth Over Lower Sill Opened To Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type Elevation of Crest Top of Crest Gates Number of Gates Size of Gates Height (Foundation to Crest) Design Flood POWERPLANT Powerhouse Dimensions Generators Main Units Fishwater Supply Units Total Rated Capacity Station Service Units 1,975 Feet 243 Feet 16 4 135,000 kw 2,160,000 kw 2,700,000 kw 235 Feet July 1968 268-257 Feet 276 Feet 500,000 Ac.-ft. 76.4 Miles 55,000 Acres 15 Ft. by 250 Ft. 200 miles Single Lift 87.5 Feet 675 Feet 86 Feet 20 Feet 15 Feet March 17, 1957 Controlled 121 Ft. msl 162 Ft. msl 23 50 by 43 Feet 120 Feet 2,290,000 cfs 240 by 2,150 feet 14 @ 78,000 kw each 8 @ 86,000 kw each 2 @ 13,500 kw each 1,807,000 kw 2 @ 3,000 kw each 37-47 SEATTILE, WA, DISTRICT This District comprises Washington State except southern and southeastern portions, northern Idaho, and northwestern Montana, embraced in drainage basins tributary to Pacific Ocean south of international boundary to Cape Disappointment, and to the Columbia River above Yakima River, inclusively. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Anacortes Harbor, WA ................... 38-1 2. Bellingham Harbor, WA ................... 38-2 3. Ediz Hook, WA ....................... 38-2 4. Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA .... 38-2 5. Friday Harbor, WA ..................... 38-3 6. Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA ........ 38-3 7. Lake Crockett, WA ....................... 38-4 8. Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA ........... 38-4 9. Navigation Work under Special Authorization .. 38-4 10. Olympia Harbor, WA ..................... 38-4 11. Project Condition Surveys ................. 38-5 12. Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA .... 38-5 13. Quillayute River, WA. .................... 38-5 14. Seattle Harbor, WA ...................... 38-6 15. Swinomish Channel, WA ................... 38-6 16. Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA38-6 Beach Erosion Control 17.Beach Erosion Work under Special Authorization ................... 38-7 18. Lincoln Park Beach, Seattle, WA ............ 38-7 Flood Control 19. Bitterroot River, Florence, MT ......... ... 38-7 20. Elwha Klallam Reservation, Elwha, WA ...... 38-7 21. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization 38-8 22. Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA ............... 38-8 23. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 38-8 24. Inspection of Completed PL-99 Works ....... 38-8 25. Little Quilcene River, near Quilcene, WA ..... 38-8 26. Mud Mountain Dam, WA ................. 38-9 27. Sauk River, Skagit County, WA .............. 38-9 28. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 38-9 29. Spokane River, Spokane, WA............... 38-9 30. Stillaguamish River, WA .................. 38-9 31. Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA ............... 38-10 32. Wynoochee Lake, WA .................... 38-10 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 33. Albeni Falls Dam, ID ................... 34. Chief Joseph Dam - Rufus Woods Lake, WA. 35. Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa, MT .......... General Investigations 36. Surveys ................................. 37. Collection and Study of Basic Data .......... 38. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ..... 38-10 38-11 38-11 38-12 38-12 38-12 Tables Table 38-A Cost & Financial Statement ....... 38-14 Table 38-B Authorizing Legislation ........... 38-20 Table 38-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 38-25 Table 38-D Not Applicable Table 38-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........... 38-26 Table 38-F Other Authorized Multiple Purpose Projects, Including Power ......... 38-29 Table 38-G Deauthorized Projects ............ 38-29 Table 38-H Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA Principle Features of Double Lock and Dam ....................... 38-29 Table 38-I Project Conditions Surveys ........ 38-30 Table 38-J Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858 .... 38-30 Table 38-K Not Applicable Navigation 1. ANACORTES HARBOR, WA Location. On northern point of Fidalgo Island in Puget Sound, 17 miles south of Bellingham, WA, and 64 miles north of Seattle. The main harbor is on Guemes Channel. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18427.) Existing project. Channel in Capsante Waterway, 12 feet deep and 150 to 250 feet wide, between east side of Q Avenue and deep water in Fidalgo Bay, a distance of 2,850 feet; and mooring basin 12 feet deep, 570 feet wide, and 960 feet long adjacent to north side of Capsante Waterway, protected by 38-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1989 two pile breakwaters, each 470 feet long, east and southeast of basin. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.2 feet. Extreme range is about 15.5 feet. Project was completed in July 1957. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1958.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 24 piers and wharves in the Port of Anacortes; 15 on Guemes Channel, 3 on Capsante Waterway, and 7 on Fidalgo Bay. Three wharves on Guemes Channel are open for public use; of these, one is publicly owned and operated and used for handling general cargo in foreign and domestic trade. In addition, two wharves are used for ferries plying to the San Juan Islands and to Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Both are publicly owned and operated. Two of the wharves on Capsante Waterway and basin are publicly owned and operated and used for receiving petroleum products, and as a moorage for fishing and pleasure craft. All other wharves are used for general industrial purposes. In addition, there are two oil-refinery wharves located to the south of Capsante Waterway that are privately owned and operated and used for handling petroleum products in foreign and domestic trade. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Conducted channel condition surveys and completed new photo base maps for the project features. 2. BELLINGHAM HARBOR, WA Location. Part of Bellingham Bay, an arm of Puget Sound, at Bellingham, in northwestern Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18424.) Existing project. Channel 30 feet deep in Whatcom Creek Waterway from deep water to head of harbor, 363.2 feet wide to 750 feet from inner end, thence 18 feet deep for inner 750 feet; Squalicum Creek Waterway, including dredging an entrance channel 200 feet wide and 26 feet deep from deep water in the bay to main pierhead line, and maintenance of southerly half and westerly end of Squalicum Creek basin to 26 feet deep, provided that no dredging can be done within 75 feet of wharves, piers, or similar structures; and small-boat basin adjacent to Squalicum Creek Waterway by construction and maintenance of two sections of rubblemound breakwater with combined length of 5,400 feet, including maintenance of minimum depths of 12 feet in entrance to basin. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.6 feet. Extreme range is about 16 feet. Project was completed in February 1961. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961. For details relating to previous project see page 797 of Annual Report for 1907.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-2 of FY 1980 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. Of the forty wharves and piers in Bellingham Harbor, 9 are on Whatcom Creek Waterway; 3 on Squalicum Creek Waterway; 3 on I&J Street Waterway; and 9 on Bellingham Bay. Two wharves on Whatcom Creek Waterway serve general cargo terminals. One is publicly owned and operated and is suitable for use by ocean-going vessels; the other one is privately owned and operated. There is one publicly owned terminal and small-boat harbor with 11 wharves handling private craft and fishing boats. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Conducted channel condition surveys and completed new photo base maps for the project features. 3. EDIZ HOOK, WA Location. Ediz Hook and the city of Port Angeles are on the Strait of Juan de Fuca in Clallam County, WA, about 100 miles northwest of Seattle. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18468.) Existing project. Provides for about 13,300 linear feet of rock revetment and 3,100 linear feet of rock blanketing, together with initial beach replenishment and annual nourishment. Project was completed in October 1978. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1979.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Of the 27 waterfront facilities at Port Angeles Harbor, 3 are located along the inner side of Ediz Hook. Functional uses of the piers include placing logs into water from trucks for shipment by rafting; mooring harbor pilot boats; mooring U. S. Coast Guard vessels, Naval Reserve vessels, and occasionally, oceanographic research vessels; and fueling government vessels. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Annual inspection and coordination with local sponsor. 4. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA Location. On Port Gardner Bay, at northern end of Possession Sound, an arm of Puget Sound at Everett, in northwestern Washington; and Snohomish River for 6.3 miles above mouth. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18443.) Existing project. Training dike extending from a point opposite 23d Street northward 12,550 feet to outlet of Snohomish River, with spur dike extending 400 feet to pierhead line from north end of main dike; spur dike extending 1,410 feet westward from Preston Point; removal of a section Sof training dike north of Snohomish River outlet; channel 150 to 425 feet wide and 15 feet deep from deep water in Port Gardner Bay to 14th Street dock; thence a settling basin 700 feet wide, 1,200 feet long, and 20 feet deep, thence a channel 150 feet wide and 8 feet deep upriver to head of Steamboat Slough, a total distance of about 6.3 miles; settling basin within upper channel reach about 1 mile long with a capacity of 1 million cubic yards and maintaining East Waterway to 30 feet deep. The 1968 modification included raising the southerly 4,100 feet of existing training dike, extending the training 38-2 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT * dike 1,500 feet farther south, and constructing a breakwater along the south and west sides of the existing small boat basin. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.1 feet. Extreme tidal range is about 19 feet. The boat basin breakwater has been deleted at the request of the local sponsor, and the remainder of the 1968 modification has been deferred indefinitely. Project was completed in April 1963, excluding the deleted and deferred portions. (For further details, see page 1683 of Annual Report for 1963. For details relating to previous projects, see page 704 of Annual Report for 1905, page 2005 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1883 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. There are 42 piers and wharves in the Port of Everett, 17 in Port Gardner and 25 on the Snohomish River. These include: 19 publicly owned terminals with four berths handling ocean-going vessels and 1 publicly owned terminal and small-boat basin handling fishing and pleasure craft. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. Puget Sound Dredged Disposal Analysis study costs resulted in an expenditure of $570,746. Maintenance, contract: A maintenance dredging contract for the Lower Snohomish River channel and downstream settling basin was awarded in August 1989, in the amount of $632,700. 281,000 cubic yards of material are expected to be removed, with completion in December 1989. 5. FRIDAY HARBOR MARINA, WA Location. Friday Harbor is located on the eastern shore of San Juan Island on the inland waters of nothwestern Washington, about 28 nautical miles east of Victoria, British Columbia, and 60 nautical miles north of Seattle, WA. San Juan Island is one of over 170 islands in the San Juan Archipelago. Friday Harbor is the San Juan Island County seat and a United States Customs Port of Entry. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18425.) Existing project. 1,600-foot concrete breakwater to protect the existing port facilities and to allow the Port of Friday Harbor to provide 294 additional permanent moorage spaces and 44 additional transient spaces. Construction was completed in March 1984. Local cooperation. Fully compiled with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-4 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year, Maintenance, hired labor: Conducted annual/after storm inspection of the breakwater structure. Coordinated the design and installation of two Government-furnished signs at the project. 6. GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA Location. Harbor lies at mouth of Chehalis River, in southwestern part of Washington, 45 miles north of entrance to Columbia River. Inner portion comprises two main channels, the south and the north, connecting harbor proper with Chehalis River at Aberdeen. Chehalis River rises in southwestern part of Washington about 40 miles east of Pacific Ocean, flows generally northwesterly and empties into eastern part of Grays Harbor. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18502.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel across the bar 600 feet wide and 30 feet deep, to be secured by a south jetty 13,734 feet long and a north jetty 17,200 feet long, both at an elevation of 16 feet, and by dredging; maintenance of channel 30 feet deep and 350 feet wide from deep water in Grays Harbor 14 miles to Cow Point; thence 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide, suitably widened at bends, to a point 13,700 feet upstream from Union Pacific Railroad bridge at Aberdeen, a distance of 4.125 miles; a turning basin 30 feet deep, 550 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at upstream end of 30-foot channel near Cosmopolis; a channel 14 feet deep and 100 feet wide in South Bay to Bay City; three breakwaters at, and maintenance of entrance channel to Westhaven Cove; and protection of Point Chehalis for an exposed length of about 7,500 feet. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Point Chehalis, 10.1 feet at Aberdeen, and 8.1 feet at Montesano. Extreme range is 17.5 feet at Point Chehalis, 17.8 feet at Aberdeen, and 23.8 feet at Montesano (river flood of 1935). Project was completed in March 1965 excluding deferred and inactive portions. Rehabilitation of 4,000 feet of the south jetty was completed in October 1966. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1967. For details relating to previous projects, see pages 2002-03 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1863 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 23 waterfront facilities (piers, wharves, and docks), exclusive of those available to recreational craft, at Grays Harbor, of which five are publicly owned. In foreign and domestic trade they serve various purposes which include the receipt and/or shipment of: logs and lumber, woodchips, conventional and containerized general cargo, seafood and fishing supplies, sand and gravel, and construction materials. Other uses include: mooring and icing fishing boats, mooring small vessels for outfitting and repair, and mooring company-owned tugs. Those piers operated by the U.S. Coast Guard moor government-owned vessels. (See Port Series No. 35, revised 1983.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. The Corps hopper dredge Yaquina dredged in Crossover Reach Channel in October/November 1988, removing 79,320 cubic yards of material at a cost of $684,527. Maintenance, contract: Maintenance dredging of the inner and outer harbors was completed in August 1989, at a cost of $1,529,300 with 1,126,700 cubic yards of material being removed. 38-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1989 7. LAKE CROCKETT, WA Location. The harbor is on the west side of Whidbey Island, about 35 nautical miles north of Seattle, WA. The lake lies parallel to Admiralty Bay and is separated from it by a narrow strip of gravel beach. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18441.) Existing project. Provides for a basin in Lake Crockett with an area of about 6 acres and 18 feet deep at mean lower low water, connected with Admiralty Bay by a channel of the same depth and 150 feet wide, protected by a breakwater. The diurnal tidal range in Admiralty Bay is 8.4 feet and the extreme range is about 16.5 feet. Project was completed in January 1948. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1948.) Recreational facilities at project under cost-sharing agreement with Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission include the following construction and improvements: construct a 35-unit camping loop and restroom, new boat ramp handling facility, breakwater, a restroom in the day-use area and porto-potti dumps for boats; and expand day-use facility and add riprap at the construction site. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. One publicly owned and privately owned passenger and automobile ferry landing within the dredged basin is open for public use, and is adequate for existing commercial traffic. The basin contains two publicly owned boat ramps open for public use. The ramps are adequate for recreational craft. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Scheduled work was fiscally completed.. 8. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA Location. Entirely within city of Seattle and extends from Puget Sound through Shilshole Bay, Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay, and Union Bay to deep water in Lake Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18447.) Existing project. Provides for a double lock and fixed dam from gated spillway and necessary accessory works, including fishladder, at the Narrows at entrance to Salmon Bay, about 1.25 miles from deep water in Puget Sound; for a channel 34 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Puget Sound to Burlington Northern Railway bridge, about 5,500 feet, with a passing basin 34 feet deep and log basin 8 feet deep at turn below railway bridge; then 34 feet deep and 150 feet to 200 feet wide to locks, about 900 feet; and a guide pier 600 feet long; for revetment of canal banks between locks and Lake Union and between Lakes Union and Washington; and for a channel 30 feet deep with a width of 100 feet from locks to Lake Union, 200 feet thence to Portage Cut, 100 feet through Portage Cut, and thence 200 feet wide through Union Bay to Lake Washington. Section included in project is about 10 miles long. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Extreme tidal range is 19.3 feet. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.3 feet, and between mean lower low water and extreme low water is 4.6 feet. Ordinary fluctuation in upper pool is about 22 inches; extreme fluctuation has been 3.6 feet. Principal features of double lock and dam (structures are at Seattle, WA) are set forth in Table 38-H. Project was completed in 1934. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1935. For details relating to previous projects, see page 2003 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1880 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The eight waterfront facilities at Lake Washington Ship Canal are used for fuel oil, seafood, marine repair, drydocking, outfitting, mooring fishing vessels and repairs to the locks' equipment. Project is a part of Seattle Harbor's inner harbor. (See Port Series No. 36, revised 1983.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Locks were operated and maintained all year, passing 18.792 commercial and 61,326 pleasure vessels, and 2,131,600 tons of commerce. Fishladder passed more than 500,000 fish and there were more than 1,000,000 project visitors. The Washington Department of Wildlife, National Marine Fisheries, and Army Corps of Engineers cooperatively relocated sea lions to the south coast of Washington State. 9. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs for preauthorization studies were: Coupeville, Whidbey Island, WA, $1,169 (terminated); Fisherman Bay, Lopez Island, WA, $1,300 (terminated); Gooseberry Point Small Boat Harbor, Hale Passage, WA, $153,682; Keystone Harbor, Admiralty Inlet, WA, $7,336; Port Townsend, WA, $14,819; and Sandy Point Harbor, Whatcom County, WA, $27 (terminated). Aquatic plant control (Section 302, Public Law 89-298). The program consists of control measures for selected water bodies currently infested with Eurasian watermilfoil and measures to prevent its spread into uninfested waters. Operations under the cost-share program included mechanical harvesting of 52 acres, maintaining 6 acres of fiberglass bottom screens at Lake Washington, Lake Union and Lake Sammamish, WA; rotovating 100 acres at Pend Oreille River, WA; and, chemically treating (with the aquatic herbicide fluridon) 240 acres at Swofford Pond in Cowlitz River drainage, WA. The FY 1989 work also included treatment effectiveness and carryover studies, cooperation with the University of Washington on a grass carp study, aquatic plant surveys, and public information efforts. Total costs for the fiscal year were $290,392. 10. OLYMPIA HARBOR, WA Location. Near southern end of Puget Sound at head of Budd Inlet, about 45 miles southwest of Tacoma. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 6462.) Existing project. Provides for a channel between deep water in Budd Inlet and port terminal, 30 feet deep at mean lower low water and 500 feet wide, with suitable additional width at bend, and a turning basin adjacent to port terminal 30 feet deep, 3,350 feet long, and 500 to 960 feet wide. 38-4 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Extreme tidal range is 22.5 feet. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.4 feet. Existing project was completed in 1939. Entrance channel and turning basin authorized by 1945 River and Harbor Act have been deferred. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1369 of Annual Report for 1934 and page 1873 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Modification authorized by River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945, requires that local interests furnish suitably bulkheaded areas for retention of dredged materials, when and as required. The Port of Olympia advised on January 25, 1949, that it could not comply with requirements at that time, but would do so on earliest possible date. Terminal facilities. Five port facilities are located in Olympia at Budd Inlet, exclusive of the numerous waterfront facilities in the ports used by recreational craft. The industrial docks are used for conventional general cargo, logs, timber products and miscellaneous mooring. (See Port Series No. 35, revised 1983.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Maintained project coordination. 11. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Preliminary and detailed surveys to determine navigation conditions at boat basins, small navigation projects, channels, and tributaries of major rivers not within major project boundaries. Soundings and visual inspections in subject areas are conducted in order to evaluate shoaling conditions. Channel centerline markers are inspected for visibility and proper operation in applicable areas frequented by boating traffic consisting mostly of recreationalists. In addition, all subject areas are inspected to insure that they are clean of snags and obstructions. Costs for the fiscal year were $277,646. Total costs to date are $2,649,686. (See Table 38-I.) 12. PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA Location. Puget Sound is in the western part of Washington. Cities of Seattle, Tacoma, Olympia, Everett, Bellingham, and many small towns are on its bays and inlets. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18400, 18441, and 18448.) Existing project. Maintenance of Puget Sound and its tributary waters by snagging and dredging; and removal, in cooperation with city of Seattle, of floating debris from the Seattle Harbor area. Work consists of collecting large pieces of drift, waterlogged pilings, logs and other debris considered hazardous to navigation from Puget Sound and Federally authorized channels. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 2003 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1869 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. None required. City of Seattle is cooperating in a program for control of floating debris in Seattle Harbor. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities at numerous localities on Puget Sound and its tributary waters are, in general, considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: The debris vessel Puget operated continuously throughout Puget Sound and its tributary waters and removed approximately 2,500 tons of floating debris and hazards to navigation. Debris was disposed of locally or loaded aboard barges and disposed of by contract. Snagging operations were accomplished at Blaine Harbor, Bellingham Harbor, Swinomish Channel, Skagit River, Everett Harbor, Snohomish River (upstream to town of Snohomish), Lake Washington Ship Canal, Lake Washington, Tacoma Harbor, Olympia Harbor, Duwamish River, and Elliott Bay. Maintenance, contract: 1,596 tons of harbor debris were disposed of at a cost of $67,504. Contractor recycled some of the debris and placed the remainder in a demolition landfill. 13. QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA Location. River is formed by junction of Soleduck and Bogachiel Rivers, in northwestern Washington, and flows westerly 5 miles to Pacific Ocean at La Push, about 30 miles south of Cape Flattery. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18480.) Existing project. Provides for: (a) jetty 15 feet high on easterly side of river mouth, and a dike on westerly side, with a view of stabilizing entrance; (b) channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending 2,000 feet upstream from deep water; (c) basin 10 feet deep, 300 to 425 feet wide, and 2,400 feet long upstream of channel; and (d) maintenance of an ocean spit. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at La Push is 8.3 feet. Extreme range is about 15 feet. The spit was nourished in conjunction with channel dredging contracts completed in 1973 and in 1977. The spit was rehabilitated with quarry rock in 1974, in 1979-80, and in 1982. In addition, a 500-foot breakwater section paralleling the channel and extending the spit was constructed. Project was completed in February 1960; however, the channel upstream of the boat basin has been classified as inactive. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1963.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that the requirement to provide a public landing open to all on equal terms in the boat basin was not complied with between May and July 1981, due to the closure of the Quileute Indian Reservation to the landing of salmon by sport and charter fishermen. Project sponsorship was transferred from the Port of Port Angeles to the Quileute Tribe Port Authority in 1983. Terminal facilities. There are 6 privately-owned docks at La Push, near the mouth of the Quillayute River. In addition, there is a protected boat basin owned by the Quileute Tribe Port Authority which is used by fishing boats, pleasure craft, and the Coast Guard, which has a separate pier. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of the river channel during the year. Completed plans and specifications for maintenance dredging and supervised the dredging and training wall contract. Maintenance, contract: Emergency repairs of the timber and rock training wall were completed in February after being undermined by a change in the thalweg of the adjacent river. A 128-foot section of timber wall was replaced and 38-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1989 8,400 cubic yards of rock was placed along the toe, all at a cost of $402,000. Maintenance dredging of 60,448 cubic yards from the entrance channel and boat basin was completed in March at a contract cost of $312,079. 14. SEATTLE HARBOR, WA Location. Harbor at Seattle, WA, includes all waterways within city limits. Chief anchorage basin is Elliott Bay, an arm of Puget Sound. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18450.) Existing project. Maintenance of East and West Waterways, 34 feet deep and 750 feet wide for 6,500 and 5,200 feet, respectively, from pierhead line in Elliott Bay; maintenance of East Waterway between upper end of 750-foot section and Spokane Street, 34 feet deep, 700 feet long, and 400 feet wide, and a turning basin, including head of East Waterway at junction of waterways south of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad bridge, to 30 feet deep, after these sections of waterway are dredged by local interests to full project dimensions; and dredging Duwamish Waterway 200 feet wide and 30 feet deep between West Waterway and First Avenue South, 150 by 20 feet between First and Eighth Avenues South, thence 150 feet by 15 feet to a point about 1.4 miles above 14th Avenue South Bridge, with turning basin 600 by 350 feet and 20 feet deep just south of First Avenue South Bridge, and turning basin 500 by 250 feet and 15 feet deep, and settling basin of about 100,000 cubic yards-capacity at upper end of waterway, a distance of 5.12 miles. Total length of waterways included in project is about 7.5 miles. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.3 feet. Extreme tidal range is 19.3 feet. Project was completed in 1931, excluding the settling basin at upstream end which is classified inactive and East Waterway above the 750-foot section. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1932.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local sponsor has no maintenance responsibility. Terminal facilities. There are 196 piers, wharves, and docks located on the inner and outer harbors at Seattle, WA. Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay and Lake Washington form the inner harbor; Elliott Bay and East, West and Duwamish Waterways form the outer harbor. (Lake Washington Ship Canal, a part of the inner harbor, is a separate project in this report.) These terminals serve a variety of purposes which include cargo handling, bunkering vessels, ferry service (vehicular, passenger and rail car), marine repair/ outfitting/drydocking/conversion, shipbuilding, handling supplies and equipment, and mooring company-owned equipment, excursion vessels, fire boats, fishing vessels, government equipment, harbor craft/tugs, and oceanographic research vessels. The numerous waterfront facilities in the port used exclusively by recreational craft are not included. (See Port Series No. 36, revised 1983.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys made of channels. Sediment sampling and testing was performed to characterize sediments proposed for open water disposal. Puget Sound Dredged Disposal Analysis study costs resulted in an expenditure of $10,000. 15. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA Location. An inland passage, 11 miles long, between Saratoga Passage and Padilla Bay, in northwestern part of Washington, about 60 miles north of Seattle. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18400, 18427 and 18421.) Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide and 12 feet deep for 11 miles from deep water in Saratoga Passage to deep water in Padilla Bay, by dredging and dike construction where necessary; and removal of projecting rocky points of McGlinn and Fidalgo Islands obstructing navigation at "Hole-in-the- Wall". Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.5 feet at south end of channel, 8.4 feet at north end, and 10 feet at La Conner. Extreme tidal range is about 19.5 feet at south end of channel and about 16 feet at north end. Project was completed in March 1965. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1965.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 18 wharves, docks, and piers on Swinomish Channel, all but 3 of which are privately owned. Of these, 1 is used for handling general cargo, 5 are used exclusively for moorage, unloading and servicing of fishing vessels; 2 are used for handling petroleum products; 3 facilities are used for log dumps; and 2 for handling non-metallic minerals. Three publicly owned facilities for launching, mooring, and servicing small craft are within the city limits of La Conner. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of various reaches of the channel. Puget Sound Dredged Disposal Analysis study costs resulted in an expenditure of $21,405. 16. WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND NASELLE RIVER, WA Location. Willapa Harbor consists of lower reaches of Willapa River and Bay, an inlet of Pacific Ocean about 30 miles north of mouth of Columbia River in Washington. Willapa River rises about 30 miles east of harbor, flows generally westerly, and empties into the bay. Naselle River enters the bay near its southerly end. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18504.) Existing project. Provides for: (a) channel over bar at mouth of Willapa Bay, 26 feet deep and at least 500 feet wide; (b) channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide from deep water in Willapa Bay to foot of Ferry Street at South Bend, thence 300 feet wide to westerly end of narrows, thence 250 feet wide to forks of river at Raymond, including a cutoff channel 3,100 feet long at narrows and a closing dike at Mailboat Slough; (c) channel 24 feet deep and 150 feet wide up south fork to deep basin above Cram Lumber Mill, and up north fork to 12th Street, with a turning basin 250 feet wide, 350 feet long, and 24 feet deep at latter point; (d) channel 10 feet deep and 40 feet wide from deep water in Palix River to Bay Center dock, with widening at shoreward end to provide a small mooring basin; (e) mooring basin 15 feet deep, 340 feet wide, and 540 feet long adjacent to port wharf at Tokeland; (f) entrance channel at Nahcotta 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide, and mooring basin 10 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 1,150 feet 38-6 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT long, protected by a rubblemound breakwater about 1,500 feet long; and (g) removal of snags, piles, and other obstructions in navigable channel of Naselle River between Naselle and mouth. Project includes about 26 miles of channel from entrance through Willapa River forks, 2,800 feet of Palix River-Bay Center channel, and 9 miles of Naselle River upstream of U.S. Highway 101 Bridge. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Toke Point, 9.9 feet at Raymond, 8.9 feet at Bay Center, and 10.8 feet near Naselle. Extreme range is 18 feet at Toke Point, 19.3 feet at Raymond, 16 feet at Bay Center, and 18 feet near Naselle. Project was completed in November 1958. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1959. For details relating to previous projects, see page 968 of Annual Report for 1910, page 2001 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1861 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 24 wharves on Willapa River and Harbor, including 5 in Willapa Bay, 4 in Bay Center, 12 in Raymond and South Bend, and 1 in Tokeland. Two of the wharves at Raymond and South Bend are suitable for use by ocean-going vessels. One of these is publicly owned and operated as a general cargo terminal, and one is located at a sawmill. The other wharves, including 3 that are publicly owned and operated, are used by shallow-draft vessels. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of various segments of the project. Maintenance, contract: A clamshell maintenance dredging contract for the Bay Center channel was completed in August 1989, at a cost of $209,289 with 33,159 cubic yards of shoal material removed. Beach Erosion Beach Erosion Control 17. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were: Coupeville, Whidbey Island, WA, $7,119. 18. LINCOLN PARK BEACH, SEATTLE, WA Location. Project is located within the city of Seattle, at Williams Point, and adjacent to the East Passage of Puget Sound. Existing project. Beach nourishment consisting of the initial placement of 34,000 tons of sand, gravel, and cobble fill seaward of the existing seawall, a distance of 2,300' along the southwest beach. The fill extends horizontally 10' seaward of the wall, then slopes downward on a 1V to 5H gradient to intersect the existing groundline 65' seaward of the wall. 250' of rock revetment, at Williams Point, consisting of 2 layers of 1,500- to 4,000-pound armor rock placed on a 2'-thick filter bed of quarry spalls, constructed with a 1V to 1.5H slope, a 10'-top width, and a top elevation approximately 1' above the existing seawall. The revetment is fronted by 2,000 tons of gravel and cobble fill, with the same top elevation, slope and seaward extent as the beach nourishment on the southwest beach. Periodic beach nourishment, consisting of placement of beach material to replenish the erosion loss, is required approximately every 5 years. Monitoring of beach nourishment consists of initial and periodic profile surveys, estimate alongshore/offshore volumes of material, installation of wind gage at site, and periodic beach sediment sampling. Estimated construction cost is $780,000 ($508,000 Federal; $272,000 non-Federal). Initial construction was completed in December 1988. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (city of Seattle) provides 35% of total project cost. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on June 15, 1988. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Completed operation and maintenance manual and postconstruction monitoring. New work, contract: Completed initial construction contract. Awarded post-construction evaluation contract. Flood Control 19. BITTERROOT RIVER, FLORENCE, MT Location. Project is located along the Bitterroot River in Ravalli County, 5.2 miles south of Florence, MT. Existing project. Plan of improvement provides for 900 liinear feet or riprap protection consisting of a blanket 36" thick on a 1V to 2H slope and a 15-foot-wide, 4.5-foot-thick weighted riprap toe. Construction was completed in May 1989, but final fiscal requirements remain to be completed. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (State of Montana) has provided 25% of project cost. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on December 16, 1988. Operations during the fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Completed plans and specifications. Avertised, awarded, and supervised construction contract. New work, contract: Construction of bank protection. 20. ELWHA KLALLAM RESERVATION, ELWHA, WA Location. Within the Elwha River basin on the Olympic peninsula of Washington State, and approximately 6 miles west of the city of Port Angeles in Clallam County. Existing project. A setback levee, 7,640 feet long, averaging 8 feet high with a 12-foot top width, to reduce flood damages along the lower Elwha River within the Klallam 38-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1989 Tribal Reservation. The landward levee slope would be covered with soil and the riverward slope would be protected with quarry spalls. Both slopes would be planted with native grasses. Top of levee would be surfaced with gravel to provide a suitable road for inspection and maintenance. Interior runoff reaching the levee would be drained through gated culverts and a 1,000-foot-long drainage ditch which would parallel the downstream portion of the levee. Ramps would be built across the levee to provide access to property and the existing hatchery fish holding pond would be relocated behind the levee. Estimated construction cost is $1,196,000 ($897,000 Federal; $299,000 non-Federal). Construction is scheduled to be completed in November 1989. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe) will provide 25% of project cost. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on November 23, 1988. Local sponsor will also provide operation and maintenance of the completed project. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Supervision and inspection of construction contract. New work, contract: Contract for project work was awarded in February 1989 in the amount of $859,332. 21. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were: Half Moon Bay, WA, $2,087; Neah Bay, Clallam County, WA, $14,472; Redondo Beach, WA, $1,448. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). See Table 38-J. Emergency flood-control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation.) Fiscal year costs were: Disaster Preparedness Program, $449,499. 22. HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WA Location. Green River, in northwestern Washington, flows westerly for 40 miles to Auburn, thence northerly 32 miles to its mouth in Elliott Bay at Seattle. Dam is at river mile 64, 6 miles southeast of Kanaskat, and 1 mile downstream from mouth of North Fork. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, "Cedar Lake Quadrangle, WA.") Existing project. Rockfill dam about 235 feet high, with gated spillway having a concrete weir at elevation 1176 feet above mean sea level aind top of gates at elevation 1206, creating a reservoir with capacity of 106,000 acre-feet. Dam along crest is about 675 feet long. Improvement is designed to control flooding in Green River Valley to alleviate agricultural and urban flood damage, and make possible further expansion of Seattle industrial area. It also supplements Tacoma water supply which was included as a betterment. Project was completed in June 1963. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1963.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Operation continued all year. Routine maintenance was accomplished on roads, gages, debris booms, turbidimeter, ditches, powerline, and other project features. The outlet works and stilling basin were inspected. Work continued on water quality surveys, water storage studies, and channel capacity study. 23. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections are made of Federally constructed local flood protection projects which are maintained by local interests; and agencies responsible for their operation and maintenance are advised of any needed repairs. During the fiscal year, inspections were made on Okanogan River at Omak and Oroville, Dungeness River at Sequim, Sammamish River, American Lake, Stillaguamish River and Yakima River, all in Washington State; Lightning Creek, Coeur d'Alene, and St. Maries projects in Idaho. Streambank vegetation evaluations were made at Omak and Oroville and on the Green River in Washington. Thirty Section 14 bank protection projects in WA, ID, and MT, were inspected in conjunction with flood control projects. Fiscal year costs were $68,417. Costs to date have been $887,328. 24. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PL-99 WORKS Levee inspections and evaluations to determine future eligibility were made on approximately 70 miles of levees on the Nooksack, Yakima, Naches, St. Joe, and Coeur d'Alene Rivers in WA and ID. Stationing and levee profiles were completed on the Snoqualmie, Tolt and Raging Rivers in WA. Fiscal year costs were $2,137. Total costs to date have been $471,244. (Function moved to appropriation, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies beginning Fiscal Year 1989.) 25. LITTLE QUILCENE RIVER, NEAR QUILCENE, WA Location. Project is located in Jefferson County, 1 mile northeast of Quilcene, WA, in Mt. Walker Quadrangle SE 1/4 sec 11, T. 27 N., R. 2W. Existing project. Approximately 200 linear feet of riprap bank protection was proposed to prevent further erosion of Wildwood Road which is adjacent to the Little Quilcene River. Protection would consist of a riprap blanket 36" thick on a 1V to 1.5H slope and a 12-foot-wide, 4-foot-thick weighted riprap toe. Estimated cost of the project was $48,500 ($36,375 Federal; $12,125 non-Federal). Project was cancelled due to an inability of local sponsor to provide all the real estate necessary for project construction. 38-8 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (Jefferson County) would have provided 25% of project cost. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Management funds expended to close out the project. 26. MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA Location. On White River, principal tributary of Puyallup River, near Mud Mountain, 28 miles above its confluence with Puyallup River, and 38 miles above mouth of Puyallup River. Dam is 6 miles southeast of Enumclaw, in northwestern Washington, and 38 miles east of Tacoma. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, "Cedar Lake Quadrangle, Washington.") Existing project. Rockfill dam, 700 feet long at crest elevation, rises 425 feet above bedrock. Reservoir has storage capacity of about 106,000 acre-feet. Outlet works are in right abutment and permit controlled discharge of 17,700 cubic feet per second through two concrete-lined tunnels with uncontrolled discharge over spillway having maximum capacity of 139,000 cubic feet per second. Improvement affords flood protection to White and Puyallup River Valleys and protects Tacoma industrial district in conjunction with Puyallup River project at Tacoma against floods about 50 percent greater than maximum discharge of record. Project was completed in June 1953, except for recreational facilities. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1953.) To date the Corps has constructed two vistas, a picnic area, and playground adjacent to the project office, a reservoir access point for hunters and fishermen, and a 1,760-foot trail leading to the lower vista area. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Project features were operated all year. Maintenance was accomplished on dam facilities, intake structure, gages, debris booms, power lines, roads, ditches, and fish facilities. Approximately 1,300 fish were transported from the fish collection facility. Dam Safety Assurance. New work, hired labor: A Feature Design Memorandum for correcting earthquake and debris blockage deficiencies in the outlet tower was completed. Major Rehabilitation. New work, hired labor: Supervision and inspection of construction contract. New work, contract: A contract for construction of a seepage control cutoff wall in the core of the dam was initiated. 27. SAUK RIVER, SKAGIT COUNTY, WA Location. Project is located in Skagit County, WA, 50 miles northeast of Seattle, WA. Work is identified on the left bank of the Sauk River approximately 5.5 miles downstream from Darrington, WA. Existing project. Plan of improvement provides for 680 feet of riprap bank protection to prevent threatened erosion on State Route 530. Protection consists of a riprap blanket 42 inches thick and a 15-foot-wide, 4.5-foot-thick weighted toe. Cost of the project was $152,400 ($119,600 Federal; $32,800 non-Federal). Work was physically complete on September 22, 1988. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (Washington State Department of Transportation) provided 25% of project cost. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on July 11, 1988. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Scheduled work was fiscally completed. 28. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Flood control storage space was available in Hungry Horse Reservoir, MT, Flathead Lake, MT (controlled by Kerr Dam), Grand Coulee project, WA, Upper Baker and Ross Reservoirs, WA. Guidance forecasts were made during the flood control season, as required. No Lost Valley storage replacement was requested at Rocky Reach, Priest Rapids, and Wells Dams. Daily and/or hourly data were collected and tabulated as required to check compliance with operating criteria. Coordination necessary in preparation or revision of reservoir regulation manuals was carried on during the year with agencies responsible for the operation of these projects. Fiscal year costs were $116,145. Total costs to date have been $2,149,055. 29. SPOKANE RIVER, SPOKANE, WA Location. Project is located on the right bank of the Spokane River at approximately River Mile 82.6, in the city of Spokane, WA, in Spokane NE Quadrangle NE 1/4 sec. 11, T. 25 N., R. 43 E. Existing project. Approximately 600 linear feet of riprap bank protection to prevent further erosion of Upriver Drive, a city of Spokane arterial street. Protection consists of a riprap blanket 36" thick on a 1V to 2H slope and a 15-footwide, 5-foot-thick weighted riprap toe. Total cost of the project was $154,400 ($115,800 Federal; $38,600 non-Federal). Construction was completed on December 7, 1987. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (City of Spokane) provided 25% of project cost. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on October 23, 1987. Additional bank protection work was accomplished at the request of and funded by the local sponsor at a cost of $44,790. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Scheduled work was fiscally completed. 30. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA Location. Formed by confluence of its north and south forks at Arlington, in northwestern Washington, Stillaguamish River flows westerly 22 miles to Puget Sound, entering Port Susan through Hat Slough and South Pass, and Skagit Bay through West Pass. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18441, and Geological Survey Quadrangles Stanwood, Marysville, and Stillaguamish, WA.) Existing project. Works to reduce bank erosion and channel changes on Stillaguamish River 15 miles between Ar- 38-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1989 lington and head of Hat Slough, and on Cook Slough, 3 miles long, as follows: Revetment at 26 places on river and Cook Slough; concrete weir (including a fishway) 275 feet long between steel-sheet-pile piers at head of Cook Slough to limit flow through slough; and two cutoff channels, each about 900 feet long, to eliminate sharp bends in Cook Slough. Tidal influence extends about 3 miles into improved section. Flood stages of 16 feet above low water at Cook Slough weir have been observed. Project was completed in July 1939. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1940.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Utilized in-house labor and equipment to replace rock riprap bank protection along 800 linear feet of segment #24. Maintenance, contract: Existing low water weir was modified by installing a fishway along the left bank caisson. Work was completed in October 1988. 31. TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA. Location. Puyallup River has its source in glaciers on western slopes of Mount Rainier, WA, flows northwesterly 50 miles, and empties into Commencement Bay, an arm of Puget Sound, at Tacoma. Work covered by this project is on Puyallup River, within city limits of Tacoma. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18453.) Existing project. A channel with a capacity of 50,000 cubic feet per second between East 11th Street Bridge and lower end of inter-county improvement, a distance of about 2.2 miles, by straightening channel, building levees, revetting channel and levees, and making necessary bridge changes. The 11th Street Bridge at lower end of project is 0.75 mile above mouth of Puyallup River. Diurnal tidal range at mouth of river is 11.8 feet and extreme range is 20 feet. Improvement was planned in conjunction with Mud Mountain Dam and affords protection against floods about 50 percent greater than maximum discharge of record. A real estate design memorandum, approved by Office of the Chief of Engineers on October 2, 1985, changed the project boundary to allow the Port of Tacoma to create a wetland adjacent to the project. This action resulted in the Corps acquiring approximately 2,450 linear feet of setback levee in fee simple. Maintenance funds to cover the increased length of the project have been provided by the Port of Tacoma for the project life. Project was completed in May 1950. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1950.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with.. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Removed brush from the entire project along slopes of levee. 32. WYNOOCHEE LAKE, WA Location. On Wynoochee River, a tributary of Chehalis River, about 28 miles north of Montesano, Grays Harbor County, WA. (See Geological Survey Quadrangles, Grisdale, Wynoochee Valley, and Montesano.) Existing project. Provides for a concrete and earthfill dam, 177 feet high, and reservoir of 70,000 acre-feet of total storage for water supply, flood control, irrigation, and fish and wildlife. Upstream fish facilities were operational in the fall of 1970. The project was completed and became operational in December 1972. Installation of power-generating facilities was not authorized, pending a reexamination report by the Chief of Engineers. In February 1966, the Federal Power Commission asserted that power production as part of the Wynoochee project was not feasible at that time. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1972.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-12 of FY 1981 Annual Report. The Water Resources Development Act of 1988 authorized the Secretary of the Army to transfer the Operations, Maintenance, Repair and Rehabilitation (OMR&R) of the Wynoochee project to the city of Aberdeen. The dam was built on a cost-share basis with the city which pays approximately 46% of the investment and O&M costs. The legislation relieves the city of the O&M payment when it assumes the OMR&R, to the extent the city personnel does the work. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Project facilities were operated all year. Maintenance was accomplished on dam and fish facilities, roads, ditches, culverts, and visitors' facilities. The project tank truck hauled upstream migrant fish past the dam. Study effort for orderly transfer of OMR&R of the project to the city of Aberdeen was initiated. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 33. ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID Location. Dam is on Pend Oreille River about 25 miles west of Sandpoint, in northern Idaho, and 50 miles northeast of Spokane, WA. Dam is 838 and 90 miles upstream from mouths of Columbia and Pend Oreille Rivers, respectively. (See Geological Survey topographic sheets, Sandpoint, ID, and Newport, WA.) Existing project. Provides flood control, hydroelectric power, and related water uses on Pend Oreille River as a part of the multiple-purpose plan for development of Columbia River Basin, including recreation development. At the dam, channel was formerly divided by an island and a low waterfall of about 7 feet. Dam is a gated, gravity-structure spillway in left channel and a power-house having an installation of 42,600 kilowatts in right channel, creating a reservoir with a usable storage capacity of 1,153,000 acre-feet. Project was completed in June 1957. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1957.) Recreational facilities for public use have been provided at Albeni Cove, Priest River, Riley Creek, Johnson Creek, Trestle Creek, Strongs Island, and Springy Point. (Strongs Island was closed in FY 1982 to reduce O&M costs.) (Refer to Albeni Falls Master Plan dated June 1981 for further planned development.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Reservoir was operated through its annual cycle of storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and electrical 38-10 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT maintenance was performed on spillways, dam, powerhouse, and equipment. Maintenance, contract: Work continued on the boundary monumentation. 34. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM, RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WA Location. On Columbia River in north central Washington, at River Mile 545, just upstream from mouth of Foster Creek, 1.5 miles upstream from Town of Bridgeport. (Geological Survey topographic sheet, Okanogan, WA, shows general locality.) Existing project. A concrete gravity structure which consists of a 19-gate spillway and a 27-unit powerhouse. The powerhouse has sixteen 88,274 kilowatt and eleven 95,000 kilowatt generators with nameplate capacity of 2,457,384 kilowatts. Additional work will be required to bring turbine efficiency for units 17-27 up to design standards. Uprating and plant modernization of units 1-16, and other miscellaneous project work, is essentially complete. Estimated cost of current construction project is $395,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Continued real estate acquisition. New work, contract: Contracts were awarded for data acquisition and control system, project final completion, station service governors, repaint powerhouse interior, and spillway spall repair. Contracts continuing through the fiscal year included generator stator rewind, transformers, main unit excitation system, powerhouse gallery drainage, project security, and turbine deficiency correction (units 17-27). Contracts completed during the fiscal year included installation and fire protection, project completion, station service system, and wildlife mitigation: mule deer study and mitigation evaluation. Maintenance, hired labor: Project was operated all year, and routine maintenance work was performed. Maintenance, contract: Major contracts awarded during the fiscal year included seal spillway pier cracks, install piezometers in right abutment, grout intake structure leaks, station service switchgear, and miscellaneous replacement orders. Contracts continuing through the fiscal year included repair and paint trashracks, paint generator tops and barrels, and irrigation outlet valve and trashrack. 35. LIBBY DAM - LAKE KOOCANUSA, MT Location. On Kootenai River in Lincoln County, MT, about 17 miles upstream from Libby, and 219 miles upstream from confluence of Kootenai and Columbia Rivers. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, Thompson Lakes, MT.) Existing project. Provides storage for local flood control protection in Montana and Idaho, and main stem flood control in Lower Columbia River, hydroelectric power generation at-site and at downstream plants through storage release. Project will be operated as a unit of comprehensive system for improvement of Columbia River basin for flood control, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa Project. Dam is a straight concrete gravity overflow type, 420 feet high, 3,055 feet long, with normal full pool at elevation 2459 feet above mean sea level. Powerhouse has an initial installed capacity of 420,000 kilowatts from four hydroelectric generating units with provision for four additional units, one of which is currently under construction. Lake Koocanusa is 90 miles long, backing water 42 miles into Canada and has a usable storage capacity of 4,965,000 acre-feet at 50 percent drawdown. Construction of dam was in accordance with treaty between United States and Canada relating to international cooperation in water-resource development of the Columbia River basin. Construction is complete. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Reservoir was operated through its annual cycle of storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and electrical maintenance was performed on spillway, dam powerhouse, and equipment. Maintenance, contract: Work continued to upgrade and maintain the left abutment instrumentation. Libby Additional Units Project. Provides for installation of 4 additional units at the Libby Dam powerhouse. Fabrication of generators for units 5 through 8 is complete; however, only the unit 5 generator was installed. Installation of the electrical equipment was limited to unit 5. Parts for units 6 through 8 have been stored at the site. Project is complete. Units 6 through 8 have been reclassified inactive. Operations during fiscal year. None. Libby Reregulating Dam Project. Provides for construction of a reregulating dam about 10 miles downstream of Libby Dam and associated relocation of about 9 miles of Burlington Northern Railroad, 7.5 miles of St. Regis log haul road, 0.5 mile of Forest Development Road, and 7.5 miles of Montana State Highway. Funds were provided for a construction start in 1977; however, courts have found that Congress did not authorize construction of the reregulating dam. Operations during fiscal year. In FY 82, all work was terminated due to court direction. Libby Reregulating Dam - Power Units Project. Provides for installation of three hydroelectric generating units at the reregulating dam with 78,900 kilowatt installed capacity. A General Design Memorandum 1, Phase II, Preliminary Design Report was approved by the Office, Chief of Engineers on March 3, 1981. 38-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1989 General Investigations 36. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $279,641 for navigation studies, $452 for flood damage prevention studies, $204 for comprehensive studies, $100,921 for review of authorized projects, $167,925 for miscellaneous activities, and $50,247 for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests, a total of $599,390. 37. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The work programmed for collection and study of basic data covers international water studies, flood plain management services, and hydrologic studies. Work on international water studies included checking Kootenay Lake storage computations to determine compliance of West Kootenay Power & Light Co. with orders of International Joint Commission, and coordination with International Kootenay Lake and Osoyoos Lake Boards of Control in enforcement of International Joint Commission orders. Coordination with the Osoyoos Lake Board of Control included technical assistance in review of operation plans for the recently constructed Osoyoos Lake control structure and Duck Lake. Technical assistance was provided other Federal and non-Federal agencies in flood hazard evaluation and related services as requested. Fiscal year costs were $2,690 for international water studies, $125,341 for flood plain management services, and $3,551 for hydrologic studies, a total of $131,582. 38. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Blair and Sitcum Waterways, Tacoma Harbor, WA Tacoma Harbor, Pierce County, is located in southern Puget Sound at Tacoma, WA, about 30 miles south of Seattle. The proposed plan of improvement provides for (a) modification of the existing Federal project for Blair Waterway to provide for the construction and maintenance of a 45-foot and a 41-foot channel including replacement of the East 11th Street Bridge and (b) Federal maintenance of the locally constructed Sitcum Waterway to depths of 40 and 35 feet. Work on the proposed project has ceased pending resolution of Indian land claims and possible elimination of replacement of the East 11th Street bridge. Legislation passed by Congress and signed by President Bush authorized full payment of $77,250,000. Washington State has authorized payment of its share. Remaining is the local community, Port of Tacoma and city of Tacoma. Estimated preconstruction engineering and design cost is $2,640,000. Fiscal year costs were $8,132. Total costs to date have been $1,310,000, including $300,000 appropriated and expended under Section 101(c). Centralia, WA The city of Centralia lies in west central Washington at the confluence of the Chehalis and Skookumchuck Rivers, about midway along the Chehalis River from its source in the Willapa Hills to its mouth at Aberdeen on Grays Harbor. The plan of improvement authorized in P.L. 99-662 would reduce flooding in the Skookumchuck River valley for the 22 miles between Skookumchuck Dam and the river mouth and along the Chehalis River downstream from Centralia for about 20 miles to Oakville. The improvement, as recommended in the feasibility report, consists of structural modifications (flood control outlet tunnel and spillway gate) which would enable the existing, private water supply dam to provide flood control storage during winter months. The 200-year flood on the Skookumchuck River at Centralia would be reduced from 13,300 cubic feet per second to 6,700 cubic feet per second (about a current 4-year flow). The 200-year flood plain would be reduced by 1,500 acres with water surface reductions of between 2 and 5 feet. Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) accomplished during the fiscal year included completion of the Plan of Action outlining preconstruction engineering and design studies, completion of the basic hydrologic analysis, initiation of coordination with the dam owner on appropriate flood control guide curves, initiation of comparative design analysis of dam modification options, and agreement by the city of Centralia to serve as local sponsor.. Estimated PED cost is $4,978,000. Fiscal year costs were $537,105. Total costs to date have been $736,964. Chehalis River at South Aberdeen and Cosmopolis, WA The cities of Aberdeen and Cosmopolis are located at the mouth of the Chehalis River in Grays Harbor County. The Chehalis River, about 125 miles in length, rises in the Willapa Hills in west central Washington. The plan of improvement, authorized in P.L. 99-662, as refined by the draft General Design Memorandum, would protect most of the left bank flood plain at the mouth of the Chehalis River in the cities of Aberdeen and Cosmopolis. The improvement would include segments of earthen embankment levee (2.2 miles) and steel sheetpile floodwall (0.9 miles), joining areas of high ground (1.1 miles). The project roughly follows the left bank of the Chehalis River from Devonshire Slough to Cosmopolis. The levee would protect 1,176 acres of the cities from inundation by the standard project flood. Accomplishments during the fiscal year included completion of the General Design Memorandum and Environmental Impact Statement. Estimated preconstruction engineering and design cost is $1,828,000. Fiscal year costs were $75,223. Total costs to date have been $1,321,935. Grays Harbor, Chehalis and Hoquiam Rivers, WA Grays Harbor is a large tidal estuary in southwestern Washington. The entrance is 45 miles north of the mouth of the Columbia River and 110 miles south of the Strait of Juan de Fuca. The estuary lies entirely within Grays Harbor County, State of Washington. The proposed plan of improvement consists of modifying the existing Federal project for Grays Harbor. The existing 38-12 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT 30-foot channel would be deepened to 46 feet across the ocean bar and widened in this reach from the existing 600 feet to a 1,000-foot-wide channel; the entrance reach would be widened and deepened from the existing 350-foot-wide by 30-foot-deep channel to a channel tapering landward from 1,000 to 600 feet wide and 46 to 36 feet deep; the existing 350-foot-wide channel from South reach to Cow Point would be deepened from 30 feet deep to 36 feet deep; and the Aberdeen and South Aberdeen reaches would be widened and deepened from the existing 200-foot-wide by 30-foot-deep channel to 250-300 feet wide by 36 feet deep. Two turning basins located at Aberdeen would be expanded and the existing railroad bridge would be modified to a horizontal clearance of 250 feet. Crab and fish mitigation are included in the project. During the fiscal year the General Design Memorandum (GDM) and Environmental Impact Statement Supplement (EISS) were completed. A contaminated sediments study was initiated in June 1989 to address concerns about Dioxin in the Grays Harbor sediments. Dredging from the ocean bar to Cow Point and construction of crab and fish mitigation are scheduled for Fiscal Year 1990. Estimated preconstruction engineering and design cost is $6,000,000. Fiscal year costs were $1,302,075. Total costs to date have been $5,597,382. 38-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE AR1AY ON CIVIL WORKS ACITVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep.30, 1989 1. Anacortes Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 2. Bellingham Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 3. Ediz Hook, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 4. Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 5. Friday Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 6. Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work. Contrib. Cost Maint Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint,. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. 185,000 167,000 258,000 175,612 157,312 264,577 - 188,000 3,147 170,000 -3,140 6,679 12,652 68,000 86,031 -5 7, 13, 12, 7, 16, -- 31,000 -- 17,865 -- 1,380 690 -- 291,000 492,000 910,500 970, 294,189 489,763 793,615 1,083,E 33 -- 13,E -- 13, -9,600 -- 222,345 - 222,345 1 ;000 1,149,239 472 1,149,212 -- 59,524 -- 59,524 -- 5,000 -- 5,000 -- 1,566,839 -- 1,566,839 2 000 1,333,069 859 1,332,918 3 -- 29,421 -- 29,421 -- 9,103 -- 9,103 -- 5,878,740 -- 5,878,740 000 1,162,860 773 1,159,498 -- 385,850 -- 385,850 - 131,965 -- 130,585 -- 1,775,745 -- 1,775,745 4 600 9,435,178 617 9,428,417 5 -- 116,618 -- 116,618 -- 584,090 -- 584,090 -- 1,575,500 -- 1,575,500 800 13,800 649 13,649 -- 1,267,881 -- 1,267,881 -- 5,155,796 38-14 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep.30, 1989 ( FRuirn2d s- (Yt6 - - -- 5155796 (Contrib. Funds) 7. Lake Crockett, WA 8. Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA (Contrib. Funds) 10. Olympia Harbor, WA 12. Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA 13. Quillayute River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) to vuava csa aa aa .spr 3,927,140 3,944,749 3,278,700 3,267,434 Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 3,307,000 2,941,, 3,316,169 2,889,2 36,000 40,915 480 87,297,851 250 87,240,713 7 -- 9,592 -- 9,592 8 -- 4,606,145 -- 4,606,145 -- 35,834 -- 35,834 -- 55,889 -- 55,889 -6,800 134 377,990 377,990 9 697,640 697,640 -- -- -- -- 4,611,436 -- -- -- -- 4,611,43610 3,755,000 3,641,000 6,185,950 4,715,000 75,665,860 3,778,291 3,640,034 6,079,426 4,627,269 75,365,50911 -- -- -- -- 7,465,230 133,987 10,373 -- -- 7,465,230 -- -- -- -- 250,000 -- -- -- -- 250,000 100,000 114,000 100,000 111,719 112 2,133 617,000 597,000 565,000 560,000 612,490 597,072 565,203 548,423 17,000 456,050 19,410 456,244 -- 902,000 5,415 901,651 359,315 359,31512 739,377 739,34113 43,337 43,337 18,134,302 18,111,27014 521,850 521,85015 10,494,071 10,493,647 20,000 20,000 - 38-15 - -- 155,500 -- 143,651 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACITVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 38-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep.30, 1989 14. Seattle Harbor. WA New Work (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 15. Swinomish Channel, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 16. Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 18. Lincoln Park Beach, Seattle, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 19. Bitterroot River, Florence MT. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 20. Elwha Klallam Reservation, Elwha River, WA (Contrib. Funds) 22. Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA (Federal Funds) Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,001,000 393,000 940,157 459,554 61,000 144,900 57,688 108,357 353,000 376,000 523,000 149,813 570,290 521,808 -- 115,650 4,953 113,884 10,000 24,422 83,100 91,253 -- 361,100 4,011 354,726 -- 355,000 177,000 1,464 115,101 358,921 -- -- 269,500 -- -- 12,965 199,303 -- 11,500 176,250 -- 10,902 163,488 -- -- 59,750 -- -- 56,302 68,000 20,000 155,000 963,000 70,712 19,091 154,383 860,712 -- -- -- 120,142 -- -- -- 95,315 170,335 170,335 7,791,646 7,750,033 69,333 69,333 20,000 20,000 808,332 808,33216 6,850,040 6,847,675 32,000 32,000 1,386,955 1,386,9557 13,639,196 13,632,167'1 78,372 78,372 722.500 664,511 269,500 212,628 187,750 174,390 59,750 56,302 1,523,900 1,418,369 120,142 95,315 -- -- -- -- 37,048,061 -- -- -- -- 37,048,061 727,000 805,500 701,000 713,000 11,777,801 616,769 918,895 721,875 597,463 11,655,39419 38-16 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep.30, 1989 (Contrib. Funds) -- 2,000,000 -- 2,000,000 25. Little Quilcene River, near Quilcene, WA 26. Mud Mountain Dam, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 27. Sauk River, Skagit County, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 29. Spokane River, Spokane, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 30. Stillaguamish River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 31. Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 32. Wynoochee Lake,WA New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost -- 9,000 -- 7,981 1,439,000 1,200,000 1,326,358 1,196,536 1,230,000 1,151,000 1,272,504 1,152,114 7,462 2,285 2,175,000 2,256,885 1,121,000 1,031,680 16,462 6,196 16,462 1,420,000 1,429,669 965,000 990,238 -- 520,000 1,500,000 13,400,000 -- 515,530 1,479,084 13,366,684 -- 7,500 118,700 -- 5,311 34,873 -- -- 39,500 -- -- 4,073 -- 9,000 113,138 -- 8,891 112,289 -- -- 79,311 -- -- 78,827 110,000 100,000 100,000 110,406 96,786 97,881 40,000 35,000 40,851 32,177 -- 54,405 50,000 52,358 6,165 -6,600 79,416 -6,722 28,705 958 484 97,600 38,459 30,( 29,E 1,032,000 1,382,000 1,295,000 1,646, 1,020,809 1,405,109 1,298,569 1,615,. 19,503,849 20 19,479,29721 21,427,476 21,319,80022 285,908 285,908 15,420,000 15,361,297 3,928 3,928 119,600 119,600 32,778 32,778 122,138 122,138 79,311 79,311 134,595 134,59523 1,872,447 1,807,952 21,000 21,000 -- 3,947,853 -- 3,947,85324 000 611,781 686 610,539 -- 54,405 -- 6,165 -- 23,494,445 -- 23,494,44525 000 15,232,446 314 15,163,83626 - 38-17 - New Work Contrib. Cost REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACITVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 38-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep.30, 1989 33. Albeni Falls Dam, ID New Work Approp. - -- -- -- 31,741,561 Cost -- -- -- -- 31,741,56127 Maint. Approp. 2,974,000 2,743,000 3,478,400 3,524,200 38,219,406 Cost 2,971,854 2,823,626 3,447,226 3,448,526 38,087,96328 34. Chief Joseph Dam- New Work Rufus Woods Lake, WA Approp. '11,023,000 6,200,000 5,145,000 4,370,000 521,748,235 29 Cost 10,091,596 7,151,901 5,161,387 4,344,812 521,710,51530 Maint. Approp. 6,608,000 6,885,000 8,183,000 9,134,400 97,072,912 Cost 6,525,685 7,054,829 8,068,534 8,840,800 96,632,06131 Major Rehab. Approp. - - - -- 297,630 Cost -- -- -- -- 297,630 35. Libby Dam, Lake New Work Koocanusa,MT Approp. 630,000 -- -- -- 543,858,44032 (Federal Funds) Cost 715,232 17,893 -- 791 543,856,97933 Maint. Approp. 3,653,000 3,746,100 3,699,000 4,084,000 36,989,579 Cost 3,654,719 3,782,076 3,615,043 4,100,378 36,859,72834 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. - - - -- 1,458,252 Cost -- -- -- -- 1,458,252*3 1. Excludes $2,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 2. Includes $56,582 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $13,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 3. Includes $1,092 appropriated and expended for previous project. 4. Includes $418,209 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $43,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 5. Includes $5,869 appropriated and expended for previous project. 6. Includes $124,945 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710) and $113,134 for previous project, appropriated and expended. Excludes $161,909 Navy funds, and $6,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 7. Includes $37,415 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $409,660 Emergency Relief funds and $57,000 Public Works Administration funds expended. 8. Excludes $111,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds expended. 9. Includes $117,750 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 10. Includes $779,655 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710) and $485,002 for previous project, appropriated and expended. Excludes $246,567 expended by State of Washington, $742,071 expended by King County, and $192,516 Public Works Administration funds expended. 11. Includes $1,631,195 (1916 to 1936) and $338,163 subsequently appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 12. Includes $183,257 for previous projects and $18,700 expended for restudy Fiscal Years 1968-1973, appropriated and expended. Excludes $105,467 Public Works Administration funds expended. 13. Includes $14,418 appropriated and expended for previous projects. 14. Includes $64,996 appropriated and expended for previous project. 15. Excludes Navy funds expended on dredging river channel in 1944 and Coast Guard funds expended for channel dredging in 1948 and 1949. 16. Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 17. Includes $228,084 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $40,000 Coast Guard funds and $192,314 Emergency Relief funds expended. 18. Includes $309,177 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $78,532 Public Works Administration funds expended. 19. Includes $66,678 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 20. Includes $87,785 appropriated for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710) and $6,234,000 for Dam Safety Assurance. Excludes $26,000 Emergency Relief funds. 21. Includes $87,785 expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710) and $6,209,448 for Dam Safety Assurance. Excludes $26,000 Emergency Relief funds expended. 22. Includes $198,578 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 23. Excludes $281,000 Works Progress Administration funds and $85,999 Emergency Relief funds expended. 24. Includes $5,035 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 25. Includes $102,200 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 26. Includes $66,678 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 27. Includes $971,947 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $136,736 Public Works Acceleration Act funds expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 28. Includes $174,776 Special Recreation Use Fees, appropriated and expended. Includes $424,820 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 29. Includes $144,338,252 appropriated for original project, $377,262,000 for additional units, and $147,983 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $58,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 30. Includes $144,338,252 expended for original project, 38-18 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT $377,224,280 for additional units, and $147,983 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $58,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 31.Includes $774,561 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 32. Includes $484,753,143 appropriated for the original project, $42,221,634 for additional units, $16,276,363 for reregulating dam, $475,000 for power planning, and $132,300 for Kelley Flats Airport. 33. Includes $484,753,143 appropriated for the original project, $42,220,173 for additional units, $16,276,363 for reregulating dam, $475,000 for power planning, and $132,300 for Kelley Flats Airport. 34. Includes $611,224 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 35. Excludes $161,849 expended by Federal Aviation Agency, $32,000 expended by Lincoln County- City of Libby Joint Airport Board, $8000 expended by Bonneville Power Administration, and $379,555 expended by U.S. Forest Service. - 38-19- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACITVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 38-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. ANACORTES HARBOR, WA Mar. 2, 1919 Sep. 3, 1954 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Sep. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 Mar. 7, 1974 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 June 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Aug. 13, 1968 July 14, 1960 as amended June 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Channel in Capsante Waterway. Mooring basin. BELLINGHAM HARBOR, WA Whatcom Creek Waterway 26- and 18-foot channels. Entrance channel in Squalicum Creek Waterway. Maintenance of southerly half and westerly end of Squalicum Creek Basin. Small-boat basin adjacent to Squalicum Creek Waterway. Whatcom Creek Waterway, 30-foot channel. EDIZ HOOK, WA Construction of 10,000 linear feet of rock revetment, together with initial beach replenishment and annual nourishment.Emergency interim measures necessary to prevent breaching of Ediz Hook prior to construction of authorized project. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA Training dike 10,500 feet long extending across bar at outlet of old river channel. Raise 6,000 feet of training dike, extend spur dike, widen gap in dike as required, maintain East Waterway and channel to gap. Abandon project for Snohomish River and provide settling basin near 14th Street. Spur dike at Preston Point, remove training dike north of river outlet, enlarge channel to 14th Street, and deepen settling basin. Widen channel from settling basin to gap; extend channel to head of Steamboat Slough; and a settling basin within upper channel reach. Raise and extend existing training dike; and construct breakwater on westerly and southerly sides of 14th Street small-boat basin.1 FRIDAY HARBOR MARINA, WA Construction of 1,600 feet of concrete floating breakwater GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA South jetty. A north jetty 9,000 feet long. The 18-foot channel. Extend north jetty 7,000 feet; length of south jetty fixed at 13,734 feet. A 6-foot channel above Cosmopolis. Dredging in bar channel. Dredging in bar channel. 16-foot channel from Cosmopolis to Montesano.2 Reconstruct north and south jetties to an elevation of 16 feet above mean lower low water. Maintain 26-foot channel below Aberdeen (as authorized by Public Works Administration Dec. 11, 1933) and combining projects for Grays Harbor and bar entrance and Grays Harbor, inner portion, and Chehalis River under a modified project for Grays Harbor and Chehalis River. H. Doc. 1117, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doec. 102, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1161, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 187, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 70, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 558, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 46, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 101, 93d Cong., 1st Sess., P.L. 93-251 H. Doec. 1108, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doec. 377, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doec. 546, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doe. 569, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 348, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 357, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, July 9, 1981 Annual Report, 1895, pp. 3517-3533. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doec. 2, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doec. 507, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 29, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 1125, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doec. 1729, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doec. 582, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doec. 315, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.2, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doe. 53, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess.; Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 2, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 38-20 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 facilities. Maintain 30-foot depth in channel from deep water in Report in Office, Chief of Engineers Grays Harbor to Port of Grays Harbor Commission terminal which was deepened from 26 to 30 feet with Navy funds. June 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended June 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 June 26, 19344 Aug. 30, 19355 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended July 24, 1956 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 10. 14-foot channel to Bay City; breakwater at Westhaven; protection of Point Chehalis; and maintenance of Westhaven entrance channel.3 Dredging and maintenance of a 30-foot channel and turning basin from Aberdeen to Cosmopolis. Additional breakwater, 1,400 feet long, at Westhaven Cove. LAKE CROCKETT, WA Small-boat basin. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. H. Doc. 635, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 412, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 30, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 303, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA For a double lock and fixed dam with gated spillway H. Doc. 953, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. and necessary accessory works at entrance to Salmon Bay; dredging a channel from locks to deep water in Puget Sound, and excavation by local interests of a channel from locks into Lake Washington. Dredging below locks and revetting canal banks. H. Doc. 800, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. Increased dimensions of channel between Puget Sound H. Doc. 324, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. and locks and a 600-foot extension of lower guide pier. Operating and care of locks and dam provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Enlarge channel between locks and Lake Washington. H. Doc. 140, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Construction, operation, and maintenance of Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 recreation facilities. Government Locks to be known as P.L. 84-779 Hiram M. Chittenden Locks. OLYMPIA HARBOR, WA Channel 22 feet deep and 150 feet wide. H. Doc. 244, 69th Cong. 1st Sess. Channels of 26-foot depth on east side of harbor. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Elimination from project of 12-foot channel on east Rivers and Harbors Committee and west sides of harbor, and for a channel 30 feet deep Doec. 21, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. and 300 feet wide between Budd Inlet and port terminal, with turning basin of same depth. Widen outer portion of channel to 500 feet, and Rivers and Harbors Committee widen entrance to turning basin. Doc. 75, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. Entrance channel 500 feet wide to and including a H. Doc. 699, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. turning basin 3,350 feet long and generally 960 feet wide, all at a depth of 30 feet at mean lower low water3 PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA Maintenance of the rivers tributary to Puget Sound by snagging and dredging; and removal of floating debris from Seattle Harbor. QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA Jetty (5 feet high) on easterly side of mouth, and a dike on westerly side, to stabilize entrance. Annual Report for 1893, page 3425 H. Doec. 125, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. - 38-21 - TABLE 38-B (Continued) Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 2, 1945 12. July 13, 1892 13. July 3, 1930 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACITVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 38-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 14. Maintenance dredging to provide a channel 6 feet H. Doc. 218, 78th Cong., 1st Sess. deep and of suitable width from ocean to within river mouth. Raising jetty to 15 feet; channel 10 by 100 feet, 2,000 feet H. Doc. 579, 81st Cong., 2d Sess long; moorage basin. 6 SEATTLE HARBOR, WA Maintenance of East and West Waterways 750 feet wide S. Doc. 313, 65th Cong., 3d Sess. and 34 feet deep, and of Duwamish Waterway 20 feet deep and 150 feet wide as far south as Eighth Avenue South Bridge. Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 July 13, 1892 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 July 27, 1916 Aug. 30, 19355 Aug. 30, 19357 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 as amended July 24, 1946 as amended June 30, 1948 as amended May 17, 1950 Aug. 6, 1958 July 24, 1946 as amended June 22, 1936 H. Doc. 108, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 126, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 211, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 31, 52d Cong., 1st Sess. and Annual Report for 1892, p. 2752 S. Committee Print, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 499, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND NASELLE RIVER, WA Channel 24 feet deep, 200 feet wide, in Willapa River, H. Doc. 706, 63d Cong., 2d Sess. and 150 feet wide in the forks. Maintenance of channel over bar to a depth of 26 feet Rivers and Harbors Committee and minimum width of 500 feet. Doc. 41, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. For cutoff channel at Narrows. Rivers and Harbors Committee Channel from deep water in Palix River to BayCenter dock. Widen Willapa River channel to 360 and 250 feet between South Bend and the forks; Tokeland and Nahcotta basins; and Naselle River clearance. LINCOLN PARK BEACH, SEATTLE, WA 250-foot rock revetment and 2,550 feet of sand and gravel nourishment. Periodic monitoring and replenishing beach nourishment. Doc. 37, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 481, 76th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 425, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 103, P.L. 87-874 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Oct. 18, 1983 BITTERROOT RIVER, FLORENCE, MT Construction of riprap bank protection. Sec. 14, P.L. 79-526 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 10,1988 ELWHA KLALLAM RESERVATION, ELWHA RIVER, WA 7,640-foot long levee, 8 feet high with 12-foot Sec. 205, P.L. 80-858 top width and bottom width of 45 feet. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Sep. 1, 1987 HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WA Eagle Gorge flood control dam on Green River. H. Doc. 271, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. Redesignation of project as Howard A. Hanson Dam. P.L. 85-592 LITTLE QUILCENE RIVER, NEAR QUILCENE, WA Construction of riprap bank protection. Sec. 14, P.L. 79-526 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 21, 1987 MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA Flood control dam on White River. S. Committee Print, Puyallup River, WA, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. 38-22 Enlargement of Duwamish Waterway. Maintenance of East Waterway between 750-foot section and Spokane Street, and turning basin at junction of East and Duwamish Waterways. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA Channel 4 feet deep and 100 feet wide, and dike construction. Enlargement of channel to present project dimensions. Removal of navigation hazards at "Hole-in-the-Wall". 15. 16. 18. 19. 20. 22. 25. 26. TABLE 38-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Dec. 22, 1944 as amended July 24, 1946 as amended July 24, 1946 as amended June 22, 1936 June 28, 1938 June 22, 1936 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 May 17, 1950 Dec 22, 1944 as amended July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 July 9, 1952 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Oct. 22, 1976 as amended on May 4, 1977 May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 Jan. 2, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized Documents Construction, operation, and maintenance of Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 recreation facilities. SAUK RIVER, SKAGIT COUNTY, WA Construction of riprap bank protection. Sec. 14, P.L. 79-526 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Mar. 2, 1987 SPOKANE RIVER, SPOKANE, WA Construction of riprap bank protection. Sec. 14, P.L. 79-526 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Dec. 19, 1986 STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA Improvement of flood channel by clearing and bank H. Doc. 657, 71st Cong., 3d Sess. revetment at 26 places; concrete weir at head of Cook Slough; and 2 cutoff channels in Cook Slough. Maintenance of improvements. P.L. 75-761 TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA Channel improvement to protect people and industrial S. Committee Print, Puyallup River, section of city of Tacoma. WA, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. Construction, operation, and maintenance of Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 recreation facilities. WYNOOCHEE LAKE, WA Dam and reservoir for water supply, flood control, irrigation, fish and wildlife, and recreation. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Transfer to State of Washington as a part of project costs, $696,000 for construction of fish hatchery facilities. Amend contract between city of Aberdeen and United States for use of storage space, permitting deferral of the major portion of the first 10-year payments. ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID Multi-purpose dam with powerhouse. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM - RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WA Multi-purpose dam and powerhouse on Columbia River at Foster Creek. Redesignation of the project as Chief Joseph Dam. Designation of reservoir as Rufus Woods Lake. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. School facilities for education of dependents of construction personnel. H. Doc. 601, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 S. Doc. 9, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 693, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 858, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 469, 82d Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 P.L. 94-587 P.L. 95-26 LIBBY DAM - LAKE KOOCANUSA, MT Multi-purpose dam and powerhouse, and reregulating H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. facilities. School facilities for education of dependents of construction P.L. 89-789 personnel, Libby project. Airport facility at Kelley Flats, MT. P.L 90-2398 Design standards for relocation of Montana State P.L. 90-4839 Highway 37 to be those adopted by State of Montana pursuant to provisions of Highway Safety Act of 1966. - 38-23 - 27. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACITVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 38-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents June 19, 1970 Participation with State of Montana in construction, P.L. 91-28210 operation and maintenance of fish hatchery facilities. Dec. 31, 1970 Designation of lake formed by the waters impounded P.L. 91-625 by Libby Dam as Lake Koocanusa. Dec. 31, 1970 Design and construction of sewage collection and P.L. 91-611 sewage treatment facility as part of relocation of municipal facilities of Rexford, MT; and compensation for railroad employees suffering long-term economic injury through reduction of income as result of the relocation of rail transportation facilities due to the construction of Libby Dam. Mar. 7, 1974 Phase I design memorandum stage for installation S. Doc. 29, 93d Cong., 1st Sess., of power generating facilities at Libby Reregulating Dam. P.L. 93-251 Mar. 7, 1974 Construction of fish production measures to P.L. 93-251 compensate for fish losses attributed to the project, and for acquisition of necessary real estate, construction of access roads and utilities (amends P.L. 91-282 by increasing limitation from $750,000 to $4,000,000). Mar. 7, 1974 Acquisition of land (not to exceed $2,000,000) for P.L. 93-251 prevention of wildlife grazing losses caused by the project. Mar. 7, 1974 Reimbursement (not to exceed $350,000) to Boundary P.L. 93-251 County, ID, for reconstruction of Deep Creek Bridge made necessary by duration of high flows during drawdown operations at Libby Dam. Mar. 7, 1974 Compensation (not to exceed $1,500,000) to Drainage P.L. 93-251 Districts and owners of leveed and unleveed lands in Kootenai Flats, Boundary County, ID, for damages caused by duration of higher flows during drawdown operations at Libby Dam. 1. Deferred. 2. Inactive. 3. A portion deferred. 4. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 5. Included in Public Works Administration program. 6. Maintenance of these items, as well as sandspit north of James Island, is included in this modification. 7. Included in Emergency Relief program, May 28, 1935. 8. Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1968, Section 502. 9. Flood Control Act of 1968, Section 212. 10. River Basin Monetary Authorization and Miscellaneous Civil Works Amendments Act of 1970, Section 7. 38-24 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1989 Full Report Operation See Annual and PROJECT Status Report for Construction Maintenance Anacortes Navigation Channel, WA 1 Completed 1977 825,263 6 -- Bellingham Harbor, WA (I&J Street Waterway)1 Completed 1966 125,634 7 -- Blaine Harbor, WA Completed 1958 346,650 8 -- Columbia River, Wenatchee to Kettle Falls, WA Completed 1923 274,391 7,693 East Bay Small Boat Basin, Olympia, WA1 Completed 1985 1,619,956 -- Edmonds Harbor, WA2 Completed 1987 -- 224,756 Flathead River, MT Completed 1901 9,811 -- Hammersley Inlet, WA Completed 1950 9,000 10,683 Hoquiam River, WA Completed 1950 18,92110 5,316 Kenmore Navigation Channel, WA1 Completed 1987 946,000 437,000 Kingston Harbor, WA Completed 1967 262,57011 5,00012 Kootenai River, ID and MT Completed 1933 9,255 5,643 Mats Mats Bay, WA1 Completed 1970 137,67913 -- Neah Bay, WA Completed 1982 2,057,266 1,854,058 Okanogan and Pend Oreille Rivers, WA Abandoned 1913 63,879 7,634 Poison Bay, Flathead Lake, MT Completed 1918 4,491 259 Port Angeles Harbor, WA3 Completed 1960 470,873 -- Port Gamble Harbor, WA Completed 1953 11,91114 13,337 Port Orchard Bay, WA4 Completed 1928 42,804 -- Port Townsend, WA Completed 1987 480,89915 78,787 Prototype Breakwater Test Program, WA1 Completed 1985 1,461,590 -- Shilshole Bay, Seattle, WA Completed 1962 2,575,09118 -- Skagit River, WA Completed 1950 99,83016 38,75817 Squalicum Small Boat Harbor, Bellingham, WA1 5 Completed 1981 1,744,02518 -- Tacoma Harbor, WA Completed 1987 2,383,89119 1,390,74520 Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, WA Completed 1987 73,322 378,378 Westhaven Cove Small Boat Basin, WA 1 Completed 1981 2,000,00021 -- 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 107, Public Law 86-645. 2. Constructed by local interests at a cost of $415,000. Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended for new work. Corps of Engineers is responsible for maintenance. 3. Maintenance by Port of Port Angeles. 4. No maintenance required. 5. Displayed as Bellingham, Squalicum Small Boat Harbor, WA in last report. 6. Excludes $457,200 contributed funds expended. 7. Excludes $2,500 Coast Guard funds expended. 8. Includes $8,005 appropriated and expended for previous project. 9. Excludes $2,184,766 contributed funds expended. 10. Excludes $32,373 Emergency Relief funds expended. 11. Excludes $390,753 contributed funds and $3,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 12. Mitigation of shore damages study. 13. Excludes $28,288 contributed funds and $9,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 14. Excludes $21,260 contributed funds expended. 15. Excludes $92,423 contributed funds expended. 16. Excludes $15,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 17. Includes $2,500 appropriated and expended for previous project. 18. Excludes $1,570,886 contributed funds expended. 19. Includes $159,585 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $1,147,208 contributed funds and $51,609 Public Works Administration funds expended. 20. Includes $5,347 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $222,500 contributed funds expended. 21. Excludes $1,230,035 contributed funds expended. - 38-25 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACITVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1989 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance American Lake, Vicinity of Fort Lewis, WA1 Completed 1957 59,582 8 -- Bear Creek, Flathead CountyBridge, near Essex, MT2 Completed 1971 1,424 -- Blackfoot River, Matt Little Road, MT2 Completed 1964 17,836 -- Bogachiel River, Highway 101, near Forks, WA2 Completed 1981 156,000 -- Bogachiel River, Undie Road, Forks, WA2 Completed 1981 57,000 -- Cedar River, King County, WA3 Completed 1953 3,229 -- Cedar River, Renton, WA2 Completed 1949 32,264 -- Chehalis River, City of ChehalisRaw Water Pumphouse, WA2 Completed 1966 35,454 -- Chehalis River, Independence Road, Thurston County, WA2 Completed 1965 47,916 -- Chehalis River, Montesano, WA2 Completed 1977 140,080 -- Clallam Bay, Sekiu, WA2 Completed 1977 48,698 -- Clallam River, Highway 112, WA2 Completed 1981 43,500 -- Clark Fork River, Drummond, MT2 Completed 1978 18,660 -- Clark Fork River, Missoula, MT2 Completed 1978 31,548 -- Clark Fork River, Superior, MT2 Completed 1971 28,356 -- Clark Fork River, Vicinity of Plains, MT2 Completed 1950 27,947 -- Clearwater River, Jefferson County Road, WA2 Completed 1968 50,000 7-- Clearwater River, Queets River Bridge, WA2 Completed 1950 49,165 -- Coeur d'Alene, Spokane River, ID Completed 1941 152,872 -- Coeur d'Alene River, Springston, ID2 Completed 1950 25,452 -- Coffee Creek, WA 3 Completed 1966 15,000 -- Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, ID, MT, and WA: Clark Fork River, Missoula, MT Completed 1983 384,862 8 -- Lightning Creek, Clark Fork, ID Completed 1959 42,726 -- Deschutes River, Gleason Road Bridge near Tumwater, WA2 Completed 1965 26,292 -- Deschutes River, Rich Road Bridge, near East Olympia, WA2 Completed 1967 22,956 -- Dungeness River, Area #5, WA2 Completed 1950 2,155 9 -- Dungeness River, Area #8, WA2 Completed 1950 2,895 -- Dungeness River, Clallam County, WA1 Completed 1964 52,04010 -- Dungeness River, Sequim, WA2 Completed 1981 99,000 -- Dungeness River, Clallam County, WA2 Completed 1986 47,500 -- Dungeness River, Taylor Cut-off Road, WA2 Completed 1961 14,093" -- Elwha River, Clallam County, WA2 Completed 1951 17,303 Entiat River, WA3 Completed 1971 49,300 -- Entiat River, Chelan County, WA2 Completed 1978 38,000 -- Flathead River, MT2 Completed 1972 20,940 -- Flathead River, Bradley Channel Area, MT2 Completed 1955 26,265 -- Flathead River, near Kalispell, MT2 Completed 1948 33,347 -- Flathead River, near Kalispell, MT Deferred 1981 300,00012 -- Flathead River, Old Steel Bridge, near Kalispell, MT2 Completed 1964 13,438 -- Flower and Parmenter Creeks, MT 3 Completed 1950 2,320 Foster Creek Road, Douglas County, WA2 Completed 1962 50,000 -- Green River between Kent and Auburn, WA and Allentown, WA2 Completed 1972 24,605 -- Green River, State Highway 181, WA2 Completed 1976 27,001 -- Henderson Bay, Purdy, WA2 Completed 1977 37,359 -- Hoh River, County Road 216, WA2 Completed 1980 143,000 -- Hoh River, U.S. Highway 101, WA2 Completed 1980 194,000 -- Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1360)2 Completed 1956 22,082'3 -- Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1361)2 Completed 1961 11,916 -- Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1362)2 Completed 1964 41,622 -- Hoh River, near Forks, WA2 Completed 1983 173,000'14 -- 38-26 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1989 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Hoko River, Sekiu, WA2 Completed 1977 21,083 -- Hood Canal, Hoodsport, WA2 Completed 1977 59,812 -- Hoquiam River, WA2 Completed 1977 52,600 -- Jackman Creek, Skagit River, WA 3 Completed 1962 24,000 -- Kootenai River, Bonners Ferry, ID2 Completed 1950 42,325 -- Kootenai River, Kootenai Flats Area, District #1, ID2 Completed 1965 14,885 -- La Conner, Swinomish Channel, WA2 Completed 1979 40,525 -- Methow River, WA (MET 1-74)2 Completed 1974 15,700 -- Methow River, WA (MET 2-74)2 Completed 1974 11,200 -- Methow River, WA (MET 3-74)2 Completed 1974 13,450 -- Methow River, Barclay Canal, WA2 Completed 1976 19,810 -- Methow River, State Highway No. 16 Bridge, Twisp, WA2 Completed 1949 31,783 -- Methow River, Twisp-Carlton Highway, Vicinity of Twisp, WA2 Completed 1951 33,30016 -- Methow River, Vicinity of Pateros, WA2 Completed 1951 11,7261' -- Middle Fork Nooksack River, Deming, WA2 Completed 1986 79,000 -- Mineral Creek, Lewis County, WA2 Completed 1972 11,836 -- Moclips River, Moclips, WA2 Completed 1977 17,608 -- Naches River, Naches, WA2 Completed 1982 59,000 -- Newaukum River, Lewis County, Hamilton, WA2 Completed 1972 24,792 -- Nisqually River, near Elbe, WA2 Completed 1948 37,636 -- Nisqually River, Thurston County, WA2 Completed 1960 26,790 -- Nisqually River, Vicinity of Elbe, WA2 Completed 1952 19,345 -- Nooksack River, WA 3 Completed 1948 24,006 -- Nooksack River, Acme, WA2 Completed 1985 77,300 -- Nooksack River, Guide Bridge Location, WA2 Completed 1950 6,07517 -- Nooksack River, above Highway 1Z Bridge, WA2 Completed 1960 10,807 -- North Fork Skykomish River, WA2 Completed 1981 222,500 -- Okanogan River, WA2 Completed 1974 10,100 -- Okanogan River at Outlet of Osoyoos Lake, WA3 Completed 1949 52,100 -- Okanogan River, Tonasket Creek and Osoyoo Lake, WA3 Completed 1953 7,987 -- Okanogan River, Omak, WA1 Completed 1981 2,231,030 -- Okanogan River, Oroville, WA1 Completed 1982 1,787,630 -- Pilchuck River, WA3 Completed 1948 25,401 -- Pilchuck River, WA2 Completed 1985 81,000 -- Pilchuck River, WA2 Completed 1971 10,713 -- Pilchuck River, Everett, WA2 Completed 1980 54,000 -- Pilchuck River, State Highway 92, Granite Falls, WA2 Completed 1971 30,973 -- Placer Creek, ID Completed 1986 5,865,000 -- Powell County High School, Deer Lodge, MT2 Completed 1964 11,291 -- Pysht River, Sekiu, WA2 Completed 1977 86,160 -- Queets River, Jefferson County Sewage Lagoon, WA2 Completed 1981 125,000 -- Quillayute River, Quileute Tribal Float and Bridge, WA2 Completed 1972 39,300 -- Quinalt River, Grays Harbor, WA2 Completed 1981 208,000 -- Quinalt River Road, Jefferson County, WA2 Completed 1961 15,9281" -- Rock Creek, Granite County, MT2 Completed 1974 49,657 -- Rock Creek, Missoula County, MT2 Completed 1973 31,565 -- Rock Creek Road, MT2 Completed 1980 50,000 -- Rye Creek, MT2 Completed 1973 22,819 -- St. Maries, St. Joe River, ID Completed 1942 357,698 -- St. Regis River, MT 3 Completed 1942 7,234 ' -- St. Regis River at St. Regis, MT 3 Completed 1951 2,983 -- Sammamish River, WA Completed 1967 2,582,53620 -- Sauk River, WA2 Completed 1974 20,860 -- - 38-27 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACITVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 38-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1989 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Sewage Treatment Plant, Missoula, MT2 Shelton Creek, WA1 Skagit River, WA (Avon Bypass) Skagit River, WA (Levee and Channel Improvements) Skagit River at Burlington Bend, WA2 Skagit River, Cape Horn Road, WA2 Skagit River, Deadman's Slough, WA2 Skagit River, Pressentin Creek, WA2 Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA2 Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (Job 66-1)2 Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (Job 67-1)2 Snohomish River, Lowell-Snohomish River Road, WA2 Snohomish River, Snohomish, WA2 Snoqualmie River, West Snoqualmie, WA2 Soleduck River Bridge, WA2 Soleduck River, near Mora Road Bridge, WA2 Startup, Skykomish and Wallace Rivers, WA 1 Stillaguamish River, South Fork, Mountain Loop Highway, near Robe, WA2 Stillwater River, MT2 Stillwater and Whitefish Rivers, MT2 Strong Creek, Hope, ID 2 Taholah, WA2 Upper Puyallup River, WA4 Wenatchee Canyons 1 and 2, WA5 West Fork Foster Creek, WA2 Willapa River at Raymond, WA Wynoochee River, County Road 141, WA2 Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA2 Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA (WR-1-72)2 Yakima, Yakima River, WA Yakima River, Cle Elum, WA2 Yakima River, below mouth of Teanaway River, near Cle Elum, WA2 Yakima River, West Richland, WA2 Yakima River, Yakima WA2 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 2, Public Law 406, 75th Congress, as amended. 4. Authorized by Works Progress Administration Project No. OP 65-93-917. 5. Authorized by Secretary of Army under authority of Section 201, Public Law 298, 89th congress, H. Doc. 91-370. 6. Excludes $10,000 contributed funds expended. 7. Excludes $24,728 contributed funds expended. 8. Includes $7,850 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $13,500 contributed funds expended. 9. Excludes $2,154 contributed funds expended. 10. Excludes $340,066 Public Works Acceleration Act funds expended. 11. Excludes $3,314 contributed funds expended. 12. Preconstruction planning only. 13. Excludes $21,807 contributed funds expended. 14. Excludes $189,000 Federal Highway Administration funds expended. 15. Excludes $6,786 contributed funds expended. 16. Excludes $11,726 contributed funds expended. 17 Excludes $6,075 contributed funds expended. 18. Excludes $4,843 contributed funds expended. 19. Excludes amount expended by Works Progress Administration which is not available. 20. Excludes $696,923 contributed funds and $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 21. Excludes $5,339 contributed funds expended. 22. Excludes $24,488 contributed funds expended. 23. Excludes $14,307 contributed funds expended. 24. Excludes $1,960 contributed funds expended. 25. Excludes $46,182 contributed funds expended. 26. Emergency Relief funds, Works Progress Administration. Excludes $13,704 contributed funds expended. 27. Includes $8,888 expended for restudy, FY 1967- 1972. 28. Excludes $21,311 contributed funds expended. 29. Excludes $17,988 Office of Emergency Preparedness funds expended. 38-28 Completed Completed Deferred Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1965 1979 1968 1982 1949 1966 1980 1980 1963 1966 1967 1969 1970 1977 1961 1963 1970 1964 1973 1977 1970 1979 1938 1977 1958 1982 1976 1969 1972 1948 1949 1947 1977 1983 50,00021 872,021 54,46812 1,934,792 50,000 46,489 93,000 137,000 40,753 17,719 50,00022 44,227 60,90023 15,565 16,43624 11,433 271,713 50,00025 17,457 34,513 8,442 223,893 71,49526 544,331 19,513 508,13027 111,072 50,00028 50,00029 381,961 8,047 48,272 36,768 125,500 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 38-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to Sep,. 30, 1989 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Report for Construction Maintenance Priest Rapids Dam, Columbia River, WA 1954 350,0001 1. For partnership planning. Excludes funds expended for acquisition Wanapum Dams, in accordance with Public Law 544, 83d Congress. of lands under partnership arrangement for Priest Rapids and Project constructed by Grant County Public Utility District. TABLE 38-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Calispell Creek, WA 1 1968 1968 $25,000 6 Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, ID, MT, and WA: Crab and Wilson Creeks, WA 2 1958 1964 $ 9,000 8 -- Entiat River, WA 3 1958 1986 -- -- Methow River, WA 3 1958 1986 -- -- Okanagon River, WA 3 1958 1986 1,100 B -- St. Regis River, MT 4 1958 1978 1,400 6 -- Wenatchee River, WA 4 1958 1978 -- -- Yakima River at Ellensburg, WA 3 1980 1986 44,300 7 -- Hammersley Inlet, WA (Uncompleted Portion) ' 1950 1978 -- -- Hoquiam, Aberdeen, and Cosmopolis, Chehalis River, WA 5 1948 1952 83,631 8 -- Port Angeles Harbor, WA (Uncompleted Portion) 4 1960 1977 -- -- Port Gamble Harbor, WA (Uncompleted Portion) 4 1953 1977 -- -- Quillayute River, WA (Uncompleted Portion) 3 1986 1986 -- -- Seattle Harbor, WA (Uncompleted Portion) 3 1986 1986 -- -- Skagit River, WA (Uncompleted Portion) 4 1950 1978 -- -- Spokane River, Spokane, WA 3 1939 1986 2,9448 -- Stillaguamish River, WA 3 1946 1986 4,234 * -- 1. Authority for project expired October 27,1968. March 7, 1974. 2. Authority for project expired in July 1964. 5. Authority for project expired in October 1952. 3. Deauthorized under authority of Section 1002, P.L. 99-662 dated 6. Preconstruction planning only. November 17, 1986. 7. Includes $14,300 expended for restudy, FY 1970. 4. Deauthorized under authority of Section 12, P.L 93-251 dated 8. Economic study only. TABLE 38-H LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF DOUBLE LOCK AND DAM (SEE SECTION 8) Section Large Lock Small Lock Miles above mouth 11/4 11/4 Clear width of chamber Feet 80 28 Maximum available length Feet 760 123 Lift Feet 26 26 Depth on upper miter silli Feet 331/2 16 Depth on intermediate miter sill2 Feet 29 -- Depth on lower miter sill2 Feet 29 16 Character of foundation Clay Clay Kind of dam Fixed dam with Fixed dam with gated spillway. gated spillway. Type of construction Concrete Concrete Year completed 1916 1916 Cost 3 3 1. Low water in upper pool. 2. Mean lower low water in Puget Sound. 3. Cost of double lock and dam was $2,382,200 and the emergency gates, completed in 1923, $262,300. - 38-29 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACITVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 38-I PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS (SEE SECTION 11) Name of Project Date Survey Conducted Washington: Anacortes Harbor, WA July 1989 Bellingham Harbor, WA July 1989 Port Townsend, WA November 1988 Seattle Harbor, WA October 1988 Water connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, WA July 1989 TABLE 38-J FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 858, 80TH CONGRESS, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs (1989) Cedar River, WA 164,719 ' Chehalis River, Salzer Creek, Wa 49,577 China Creek, Centralia, WA' 132 Clear & Clarks Creeks, Pierce County, WA2 36 Lower Green River, King County, WA 15,462 Newaukum River, WA 5,634 Okanogan River, WA 35,789 Snohomish River, Ebey Island, WA 33,434 Snoqualmie River, WA 16,911 Stillaguamish River, Snohomish County, WA 31,892 Sultan, WA 35,094 TOTAL $388,680 1. Unfavorable report. 2. Terminated. 3. Excludes $78,428 contributed funds expended. 38-30 WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT * This District consists of all Columbia River drainage and tributaries thereto between the head of the McNary pool (River Mile 345.4) and the Umatilla Bridge (River Mile 290.5) below McNary Dam, except the Yakima River Basin above the Van Giesen Street Bridge (River Mile 8.4) near Richland, WA. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization . 39-1 Flood Control 2. Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Protection Projects ................................ 39-1 3. Catherine Creek, OR ..................... 39-2 4. Clear & Burnt River, OR ................... 39-2 5. Colfax, Palouse River, WA ................. 39-2 6. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization39-2 7. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 39-2 8. Inspection of Completed PL-99 Works ....... 39-2 9. Jackson Hole, WY ........................ 39-3 10. Lucky Peak Lake, ID ....................... 39-3 11. Mill Creek Lake, WA .................. ... 39-3 12. Owyhee River, OR ........................ 39-4 13. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 39-4 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 14. Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program ........................ 39-4 15. Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID ............ 39-4 16. Ice Harbor Lock and Dam - Lake Sacajawea, WA ....................... 39-5 17. Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, ID and WA ...... 39-5 18. Little Goose Lock and Dam -- Lake Bryan, WA 39-6 19. Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA .......... 39-6 20. Lower Monumental Lock and Dam - Lake Herbert G. West,WA ................. 39-7 21. Lower Snake River Fish & Wildlife Compensation Plan, WA,OR, ID ........................ 39-7 22. McNary Lock and Dam - Lake Wallula, OR and WA ............................ 39-7 23. Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, OR, WA and ID ................. 39-8 General Investigations 24. Surveys .................................. 25. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........... 26. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design ...... Tables Tables 39-A Tables 39-B Tables 39-C Tables 39-D Tables 39-E Tables 39-F Tables 39-G Tables 39-H Tables 39-I Tables 39-J Tables 39-K 39-8 39-9 39-9 Cost & Financial Statement ....... 39-10 Authorizing Legislation ........... 39-12 Other Authorized Navigation Projects 39-15 Not Applicable Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................ 39-15 Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects ............ 39-16 Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Control Projects ............... 39-17 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................ 39-17 Principal Data Concerning Navigation Lock, Spillway Dam, Powerplant and Impoundment .................. 39-18 Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, OR, WA, and ID .... 39-22 Flood Control 1. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). No costs in Fiscal Year 1989. 2. COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS. Location. Improvements included in this project are along Columbia River and its tributaries. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1950 approved a general comprehensive plan for Columbia River Basin for -39-1- Navigation REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 flood control and other purposes based on plans in H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess., and authorized $75 million to be appropriated for partial accomplishment of certain projects. Of that authorization, an amount not to exceed $15 million was allotted for construction of local flood protection works throughout Columbia River Basin, subject to conditions that all work undertaken pursuant to authorization would be economically justified prior to construction, and local cooperation specified in 1936 Flood Control Act, as amended, should be required. (See Tables 39-B and 39-H for projects in Walla Walla District.) Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations during fiscal year. No projects were recommended for deauthorization during Fiscal Year 1989. 3. CATHERINE CREEK, OR Location. Catherine Creek is a tributary to the Grande Ronde River located 8 miles east of the city of La Grande, Union County, Or. Existing project. Organic debris such as fallen trees, brush, and a select number of large cottonwood trees were removed from the creek to increase its capacity to convey future floods. The work was funded under authority of Section 208 of the Flood Control Act of 1954. Local cooperation. The Catherine Creek Corridor Improvement District sponsored the project and complied with requirements set forth in Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of 1936 plus additional requirements set forth in the project document. Operations during fiscal year. None. 4. CLEAR & BURNT RIVER, OR Location. At the city of Huntington waste water lagoon, Malheur County, Oregon. Existing project. Place 800 feet of riprap along three cells of the lagoon system under authority of Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. City of Huntington sponsored the project and agreed to sponsorship requirements. Operations during fiscal year. None. 5. COLFAX, PALOUSE RIVER, WA Location. On the main stem North and South Forks of the Palouse River and includes a portion of Spring Flat Creek, a tributary stream, all within the city of Colfax, WA. Existing project. Project consists of 3,740 feet of concretelined channel, 4,910 feet of revetted channel, and 2,330 feet of unrevetted channel and drainage structures. Authorization was provided under PL 78-534, Section 10, Flood Control Act of 1944. Local cooperation. The city of Colfax has provided the necessary right of way and other sponsorship requirements. Operations during fiscal year. None. 6. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. Fiscal year costs were $139,112 which included $121,193 for feasibility studies and plans and specifications on the Malheur Lake project, OR and preauthorization studies of $78 for the Oakley Westside Channel, ID; $6,395 for the groundwater study at Ririe, ID; and $11,446 for the Salmon River study at Salmon, ID. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for fiscal year were $228,942 for disaster preparedness, and $271,747 for rehabilitation. Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Fiscal year costs were $2,116 for preauthorization studies for the Walla Walla River, Umatilla County, OR. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress). Fiscal year costs were $34,507 for preauthorization studies which included $5,161 Boise River, Canyon and Ada Counties, ID; $9,447 Malheur River, Vale, OR; $4,143 Palouse River, Colfax, WA; $6,464 Salmon River, Lemhi County, ID; $6,395 South Fork Boise River, Elmore County, ID; $1,906 Esquatzel Coulee Connell, WA; and $991 Prairie Creek Enterprise, OR. 7. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Federal law requires local interests to maintain and operate completed local protection projects in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of Army. Inspections were made to determine extent of compliance and to advise local interests as necessary of measures required to correct deficiencies. Geological and seismological investigations at Ririe Dam are complete and the Waterways Experiment Station (WES) is finalizing all data and findings. The report and final recommendations will be distributed in FY 90. See Table 39-I for inspections made during fiscal year. Fiscal year costs were $372,100. Total costs to September 30, 1989 have been $2,474,974. 8. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PL-99 WORKS Inspections are pursuant to Public Law 84-99 which directs the Corps to establish through inspection whether non- Federal flood control works will continue to provide the intended degree of flood protection and to determine if the maintenance program is adequate. FY 1989 costs for this program were $2,681. FY 1989 is the last year for expenditures on this - 39-2 - WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT program. The program will be carried under the Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies appropriations. 9. JACKSON HOLE, WY Location. On both banks of the Snake River, Teton County, west of Jackson, Wyoming. Existing project. 23.5 miles of levees consisting of: Right bank - a levee with full riprap protection from 10 miles upstream of the Jackson-Wilson Highway Bridge, to 3.5 miles below, a total of 13.5 miles. Left bank - a levee with full riprap protection extending from 10 miles upstream of Jackson- Wilson Highway Bridge to 5 miles upstream and tending 1.5 miles immediately upstream from the same bridge to 3.5 miles below the bridge, for a 10-mile total length. Project authorized by Public Law 516, Flood Control Act of 1950 for flood control protection by channel improvements consisting of channel rectification, levees, and revetment along Snake River in the vicinity of Wilson, Wyoming. Public Law 99-662 modified the original Public Law 516 to provide that the operation, maintenance, modifications, and additions to the project become Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. Non-Federal sponsors shall pay the initial $35,000 in cash or materials of any such costs expended in any one year, plus inflation as of the date of enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986.. Operations during fiscal year. An EIS scoping meeting was held to determine the physical, economic, and enironmental factors associated with operation and maintenance of the levees. The Fish and Wildlife Service provided a draft Coordination Act Report. A draft EIS was prepared. A Special Report was prepared for economic justification of Federal O&M of the levees. The O&M Decision Document was initiated. An In-Progress-Review was held on 4 May 1989 with Teton County Commissioners and Corps officials. 10. LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID Location. On Boise River in southwestern Idaho about 10 miles southeast of city of Boise, ID. Existing project. The project includes a rolled-earthfill dam about 250 feet high above streambed and 1,700 feet long at crest, with a lake providing a total storage at upper operating lake level of 306,000 acre-feet. Project provides for flood control, irrigation, and recreation. (For details, see page 2000 of Annual Report for 1962.) Construction of existing project was initiated November 1949 and completed June 1961. Since 1961, $132,839,000 in potential flood damages have been prevented by the project. During the detailed investigation of outlet capacity and the potential for adding hydropower to the existing project, a need for an auxiliary outlet became apparent. Construction of an auxiliary outlet was authorized in the Water Resource Development Act of 1976. In FY 1978, an "Interim Feasibility Report on Modification of Lucky Peak Dam and Lake" (power facilities) was submitted to the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors and approved. States, agencies, and the Chief of Engineers have commented on the report to the Secretary of the Army. The report was forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget in February 1982. A license to construct and operate power facilities at the project was issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Project #2832) to the Boise Project Board of Control on June 10, 1980 and modified on October 9, 1980 and 1982. Construction of the auxiliary outlet facility began in May 1984 and was completed in August 1986. Construction of modifications to the existing outlet tunnel and powerhouse excavation began in August 1986 and was completed January 1987. Powerhouse general contract construction began in April 1986. The project was completed and dedicated on October 7, 1988. Power on line for all units was August 18, 1988. Local cooperation. None Required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract awarded to purchase intake bulkhead. Operation and Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued, which included the dam structures and recreation areas. 11. MILL CREEK LAKE, WA Location. In and upstream from Walla Walla, WA, on Mill Creek, a tributary of Walla Walla River. Existing project. The project includes an off-stream earthfill storage dam about 125 feet high above streambed and 3,200 feet long at the crest, two concrete-lined outlet channels, an earthfill diversion dam, and division structures. Project provides for flood control and recreation. Authorizing legislation to provide a channel through the City of Walla Walla was added to the project in 1941. Recreation was added to the project purposes through the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was completed in 1942. Paving of the channel through City of Walla Walla was completed in 1948. Recreation facilities were completed in 1966. (For details, see page 2005 of Annual Report of 1962.) Since 1942, $7,518,000 in potential flood damages have been prevented by the combined storage and channel operation. The rehabilitation of the existing project was to correct the seepage and internal erosion by constructing a cutoff wall. The construction of the cutoff wall did not alleviate the seepage problem, thus requiring limited flood control use of the project. The seepage and internal erosion create ahigh vulnerability for dam failure. During FY 89, the reservoir was drained and will be filled only for flood control use. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. (For details, see page 2006 of Annual Report of 1962.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract was awarded for construction of sanitary facilities at Rooks Park. Operation and Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued, which included regulation of water control structures and care of recreation areas. - 39-3 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 12. OWYHEE RIVER, OR Location. The lower 12 miles of the Owyhee River from the junction with the Snake River, upstream 23 miles to the Owyhee River diversion dam, Malheur County, OR. Existing project. Remove organicdebris and gravels from the lower 12 miles of the Owyhee River under the authority of Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. The Owyhee River Water Control District sponsored the project and agreed to sponsorship requirements. Operations during fiscal year. None. 13. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Functional regulation of non-Corps projects was accomplished under several authorities. Regulation of Palisades, Little Wood, and Anderson Ranch Reservoirs in Idaho, and Bully Creek, Warm Springs, Agency Valley, and Mason Reservoirs in Oregon, was accomplished as authorized under Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, and coordinated with the Bureau of Reclamation. Flood control operations at Jackson Lake, Arrowrock Reservoir, and Lake Lowell were in accordance with formal agreements with the Bureau of Reclamation. Regulation of American Falls, Owyhee, Magic, Mackay, Cascade, and Deadwood Reservoirs, Idaho, for flood control was accomplished under informal agreements. Brownlee, Oxbow, and Hells Canyon Reservoirs provided flood control regulation in accordance with provisions of the Federal Power Commission license to Idaho Power Company. Fiscal year costs were $290,017. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 14. COLUMBIA RIVER JUVENILE FISH MITIGATION PROGRAM Location. At Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite on the Snake River in the states of Idaho and Washington and McNary on the Columbia River in the states of Oregon and Washington. Existing project. Congress passed and the President signed the FY 89 Energy & Water Development Act (P.L. 100-371) which mandated the expenditure of $8.7 million in FY 88 and $9.6 million in FY 89 for the design, testing, and construction of fish bypass facilities. Funds for FY 88 and 89 were expended on a project by project basis. However,the mitigation program starting in FY 91 will be considered one project and funds will be appropriated and expended as such. The program will consist of juvenile fish mitigation facilities which includes construction of juvenile fish passage facilities and a detailed mitigation study to be prepared in cooperation with regional interest, for juvenile fish losses at Corps dams on the Columbia and Snake Rivers. Completion of the bypass and transportation facilities will significantly increase the survival of migrating downstream juvenile fish. The mitigation study will determine the overall scope of the fish mitigation facilities for these Columbia and Snake River dams. The plan of improvement includes the following facilities: (a) Lower Monumental - submerged traveling fish screens, gate raise modification, gantry crane, collection bypass facility, and holding and loading facility (b) Little Goose - gantry crane, gate raise modification, submerged traveling fish screens, and holding and loading facilities Phase I and II (c) Lower Granite - deflectors, two fish transport barges, gate raise modification, fish support facility, wet separator, barge moorage facility expansion, and gantry crane (d) McNary - prototype screens, submerged traveling fish screens, gantry crane modifications, transport holding and loading facility, gate raise modification, and extended screen rehab facility. The total estimated Federal project cost is $139,000,000. Ice Harbor bypass facilities were not authorized for construction under the Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program. However in FY 88, 89 and 90, Congress authorized expenditures up to $400,000 to proceed with design of a bypass system. A two year mitigation analysis commencing in FY 91 will determine future facilities at this project. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Contract work continued for construction of two fish transport barges and contracts awarded for fixed deflectors at Lower Granite and holding and loading facilities Phase I and II at Little Goose. Engineering and design continues at Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, Lower Granite, and McNary for design of submerged traveling screens, gate raise modifications, gantry cranes, collection bypass facilities, holding and loading facilities, and moorage facilities expansion.The fish mitigation program is approximately 11 percent complete. 15. DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID Location. Dam is on North Fork Clearwater River 1.9 miles above its junction with Clearwater River, near Orofino, ID, and about 35 miles east of Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, and appurtenant facilities. Project provides for flood control, navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and area redevelopment. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 1600 and 1445 Mean Sea Level (MSL). The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 3,453,000 acre-feet, of which 2,000,000 acre-feet are effective for both local and regional flood control and for at-site and downstream power generation. In addition, the reservoir, extending 53 miles into rugged and relatively inaccessible timberland, provides important trans- portation savings in connection with movements of marketable logs. The reservoir is habitat for elk, deer, and other wildlife. Dam structure is about 3,300 feet long and about 717 feet high above streambed. Fish passage is not feasible due to the height of the dam. A hatchery has been built below the dam to assure continuance of anadromous fish runs. Powerhouse has two 90,000 kilowatt and one 220,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 400,000 kilowatts. Provisions have been made for three additional 220,000 kilowatt generating - 39-4 - WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT units for an ultimate installed capacity of 1,060,000 kilowatts. A reconnaissance report justifying the feasibility and cost benefits for the addition of a 200,000 kilowatt fourth generating unit was completed in FY 1978. Environmental and economic studies on additional generating units have been curtailed due to public opposition. Units 4,5,6 are now classified inactive and are eligible for deauthorization procedures. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction of the project started in April 1963 and was completed in 1986. Since the project became operational in June 1972, it has prevented about $737,000 of potential flood damages. Power generation through September 1989 has been 28.94 billion kilowatt hours. Eighty mini-recreation sites have been established along the reservoir shoreline. Each site includes at least a picnic table, U.S. Forest Service-type fireplace, and chemical toilet. Some of the sites have several picnic tables. Dent Acres and Freeman Creek recreation sites are open to the public. Facilities consist of a boat launching ramp, boat docks, cartrailer parking, comfort stations, and fully-developed overnight camping. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contracts continue for powerplant control. Operation and Maintenance: Wildlife habitat browse continued on project lands to provide winter browse for elk and deer. During fiscal year 1.89 billion kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the three generating units. Dworshak National Fish Hatchery (DNFH) operations continued to be impaired by IHN virus. Steelhead eggs were transferred to Kooskia and Hagerman National Fish Hatcheries (KNFH and HNFH). After devastating losses at DNFH, enough fingerlings were returned from KNFH to allow a release of 1,391,999 smolts in the spring. With 450,000 smolts returned from HNFH, the total mitigaton release in the spring of 1989 was 1,850,000 steelhead smolts 750,000 less than in 1988. The total weight released was 265,942 pounds compared with 434,521 in 1988. DNFH also released 1,653,252 spring chinook salmon (95,930 pounds). For the fourth successive year, rainbow trout (245,380 at 23,200 pounds) reared at HNFH were released in Dworshak Reservoir, about 1/4 of the mitigaton goal. For the 1990 release, over 6,000 adult steelhead were spawned at DNFH, producing over 12 million eggs. Again, 4.3 million eggs were distributed to KNFH and HNFH. For the first time, IHN was found at KNFH, and 85 percent of the steelhead being reared there were lost. However, without IHN at HNFH, 1.6 million fingerlings were returned to DNFH in later summer 1989. The projected release of survivors at all three hatcheries for 1990 will be very near the mitigation goal of 2.3 million. Approximately 1.8 million spring chinook were on hand in September 1989 for an expected release of 1.7 million in 1990. With near record runs of steelhead over Lower Granite Dam, over 14,000 adult steelhead were expected to return to the Clearwater River in the winter of 1989-1990. 16. ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM -- LAKE SACAJAWEA, WA Location. On Snake River, 9.7 miles above river mouth at head of Lake Wallula (McNary Reservoir) and 12 miles east of Pasco, WA. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, two fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities. Project provides for navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation, The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 440 and 435 Mean Sea Level (MSL). Lake Sacajawea extends upstream about 31.9 miles and provides slack water to Lower Monumental Lock and Dam. Dam structure is about 2,790 feet long and about 130 feet high above streambed. Fish passage facilities include two fish ladders. Powerhouse has three 90,000 kilowatt units and three 111,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 603,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam is 610 feet long and overflow crest at Elevation 391 MSL is surmounted by 10 radial gates, 50 feet wide and 51 feet high, which provides the capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Deck is at Elevation 453 MSL and provides a service road and track for a gantry crane. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide and 14 feet deep is provided from the mouth of the Snake River to the dam and from the dam to Lower Monumental Lock and Dam. Principal data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction of the original project started in December 1955 and was completed in 1971. Construction of the additional generating units was started in 1971 and completed in 1981. Power generation through September 1989 has been 62.15 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contracts continue for powerplant control. Contract awarded for emergency repair of the navigation lock gates and associated machinery. Operation and Maintenance: During fiscal year 2.36 billion kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the 6 generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisting of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo, amounted to 4,949,054 tons during calendar year 1988. 17. LEWISTON-CLARKSTON BRIDGE, ID AND WA Location. On the Snake River, River Mile 141.3, 1.7 miles upstream of the existing interstate bridge connecting the towns of Lewiston, ID and Clarkston, WA. Existing Project. The project consists of a new fixed highlevel four-lane highway bridge and approaches on U.S. Highway 12 across the Snake River constructed at a cost "not to exceed $21,000,000". In December 1981, Congress authorized an additional expenditure of $2,200,000 for construction of Lewiston's North Ramp. An approach roadway from the bridge to 16th Avenue in Clarkston, WA was authorized in July 1983 at an additional expenditure of $800,000. - 39-5 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Final Environmental Impact Statement Supplement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on July 16, 1979. Local cooperation. Non-Federal interests have provided without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction of the bridge and its approaches, and after construction have agreed to own, operate toll free, and maintain the bridge and approach facilities. The non-Federal costs for the land and relocation are $755,193. Operations during fiscal year. All work complete. 18. LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM - LAKE BRYAN, WA Location. Dam is 70.3 miles above mouth of Snake River at head of Herbert G. West Lake (Lower Monumental Reservoir), about 40 airline miles northerly of Walla Walla, WA, and 50 miles westerly of Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladder, and appurtenant facilities. Project provides for navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 638 and 633 Mean Sea Level (MSL). Lake Bryan extends upstream about 37.2 miles and provides slack water to Lower Granite Lock and Dam. Dam structure is 2,670 feet long and about 160 feet high above streambed. Fish passage facilities include one ladder with entrances on both shores with a fish channel through the spillway which connects to the powerhouse fish collection system and south shore ladder. Powerhouse has six 135,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 810,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam is 498 feet long and overflow crest at Elevation 581 MSL is surmounted by 8 radial gates, 50 feet wide and 60 feet high, which provides the capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 feet by 675 feet and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide and 14 feet deep is provided from the dam to Lower Granite Lock and Dam. Relocations along the lake included 32 miles of Camas Prairie Railroad, 6.8 miles of county roads, 2.2 miles of state highways, and Central Ferry Bridge. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction of the original project started in 1963 and was completed in 1976. Construction of the additional generating units started in 1974 and was completed in 1984. Power generation through September 1989 has been 49.50 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contracts continue for powerplant control. Operation and Maintenance: During fiscal year 2.45 billion kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the 6 generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisting of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo, amounted to 4,056,396 tons during calendar year 1988. 19. LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WA Location. At River Mile 107.5 on Snake River at head of Lake Bryan (Little Goose Reservoir) and about 33 miles downstream from Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladder, appurtenant facilities, and required about 8 miles of backwater levees along the Snake and Clearwater Rivers at Lewiston, ID. Project provides for slackwater navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 738 and 733 Mean Sea Level (MSL) in Lewiston, ID-Clarkston, WA area. Lower Granite pool extends upstream about 38 miles and provides slackwater to the Confluence of the Snake and Clearwater Rivers. Dam structure is about 3,200 feet long and about 146 feet high above streambed. Fish passage facilties include one ladder with entrances on both shores with a fish channel through the spillway which connects to the powerhouse fish collection system and south shore ladder. Powerhouse has six 135,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 810,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam is 512 feet long and overflow crest at Elevation 581 MSL is surmounted by 8 radial gates, 60 feet wide and 60.5 feet high, which provides the capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide and 14 feet deep is provided from the dam to the Confluence of the Snake and Clearwater Rivers. Principal data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction of the original project started in July 1965 and was completed in 1984. Construction of the additional generating units was started in 1974 and completed in 1979. Power generation through September 1989 has been 40.60 billion kilowatt hours. Approximately $4,119,300 in potential flood damages have been prevented since the levees became functional. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contracts continue for powerplant control. Operation and Maintenance: During fiscal year 2.54 billion kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the 6 generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock consisting of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo, amounted to 2,576,567 tons during calendar year 1988. As the first collection point on the Snake River, Lower Granite Dam is a primary component of the District's Juvenile Fish Transport Program. Transport began in the 1960's as a study of methods of bypassing juvenile steelhead and salmon around turbines of the Corps' Snake and Columbia River dams. Transport became a routine operation in 1980 while other structural modifications, installation of screens, and development of bypass systems continue. For the transport program, the District has collection facilities at Lower Granite, Little Goose, and McNary Dams. Juvenile salmon and steelhead collected at these dams are hauled by specially designed trucks or barges to release sites below Bonneville Dam. From there, they can travel unob- - 39-6 - WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT structed to the sea. In 1989, over 20,000,000 juvenile fish were collected. Due to fishery agency and Indian tribal policy, over 4.5 million, primarily yearling chinook, were bypassed back to the river after being collected. Another million were bypassed at Lower Granite Dam because there was inadequate barge capacity to haul them. In all, over 15 million fish were transported. Increased hatchery production and improved collection facilities, especially at Little Goose Dam, should result in record numbers of fish being collected and transported in 1990. 20. LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM - LAKE HERBERT G. WEST, WA. Location. On Snake River at head of Lake Sacajawea (Ice Harbor Reservoir), about 45 miles northeast of Pasco, WA, and 41.6 miles above river mouth. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, two fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities. Project provides for navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 540 and 537 Mean Sea Level (MSL). Lake Herbert G. West extends upstream about 28.7 miles and provides slack water to Little Goose Lock and Dam. Dam structure is about 3,800 feet long and about 135 feet high above streambed. Fish passage facilities include two fish ladders, one at each end of the dam. Powerhouse has six 135,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 810,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam is 508 feet long and overflow crest at Elevation 483 MSL is surmounted by 8 radial gates, 50 feet wide and 61 feet high, which provide capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. Deck is at Elevation 553 MSL and provides a service road and track for a gantry crane. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide and 14 feet deep is provided from the dam to Little Goose Lock and Dam. Relocations along the lake included railroads and highways. Principal data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction of the original project started in June 1961 and was completed in 1976. Construction of the additional generating units started in 1975 and was completed in 1981. Power generation through September 1989 has been 63.20 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contracts continue for powerplant control and generating Unit 2 repair. Contract awarded for repair of navigation lock gate and associated machinery. Operation and Maintenance: During fiscal year 2.33 billion kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the 6 generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisting of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo, amounted to 4,257,796 tons during calendar year 1988. 21. LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE COMPENSATION PLAN, WA, OR, ID Location. At various locations within the Columbia Snake River drainage in the States of Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. Existing project. The project consists of a series of fish hatcheries (all sites selected) and wildlife development areas at sites to be selected. The project will compensate for loss of wildlife habitat and anadromous and resident fishery inundated as a result of construction of four multiple-purpose dams and reservoirs on the Lower Snake River (Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, Lower Granite). The Walla Walla District operates the Juvenile Fish Transportation Program for the Columbia-Snake system. Three primary collection points have been established at Lower Granite, Little Goose, and McNary Dams, with fish sorting and handling facilities. Smolts collected at these facilities are taken by specially-designed barges and trucks to an area downstream of Bonneville Dam and released to make the rest of their journey to the sea. In 1988 a total of just over 20,000,000 juvenile fish were transported. Increased hatchery production and improved fish guiding efficiency (FGE) has resulted in increased numbers of fish to be transported. In 1980 the first release from the McCall, ID summer chinook hatchery was made, and the adult trapping facility which provides the fish egg supply of the McCall Hatchery became operational. The real estate design memorandum, and feature design memorandums on the McCall Hatchery, Hagerman Hatchery, Lookingglass Hatchery, Lyons Ferry Hatchery, Dworshak Hatchery Expansion, Irrigon Hatchery, Magic Valley Hatchery, Sawtooth Hatchery, Clearwater Hatchery, the offproject wildlife lands, and the site selection report have all been approved. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality on November 2, 1977. The Dworshak National Fish Hatchery, the Irrigon Hatchery, Wallowa Satellite Hatchery, Hagerman Hatchery, Lyons Ferry Hatchery, Lookingglass Hatchery, McCall Hatchery, Sawtooth Hatchery and Magic Valley Hatchery are in operation. The compensation plan is 73 percent complete. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $198,000,000. Local cooperation. None required Operations during fiscal year. New work: Work was completed at Powell Satellite and non-hatchery sports fishing (McFarland). Contracts were awarded for Crooked River facility, and Red River completion contract. Wildlife compensation contracts were awarded for the game bird alternative agreement. 22. McNARY LOCK AND DAM - LAKE WALLULA, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River 292 miles above mouth, near Umatilla, OR, and 3 miles above mouth of Umatilla River. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, two fish ladders, appurtenant facilities, and a - 39-7 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 system of levees and pumping plants. Project provides for slackwater navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between Elevations 340 and 335 Mean Sea Level (MSL). Lake Wallula extends upstream about 64 miles and provides slack water to Ice Harbor Lock and Dam. Dam structure is about 7,300 feet long and about 183 feet high above streambed. Fish passage facilities include two fish ladders. Powerhouse has fourteen 70,000 kilowatt generating units in operation for a capacity of 980,000 kilowatts. Spillway dam is 1,310 feet long and overflow crest at Elevation 291 MSL is surmounted by 22 vertical lift gates, 50 feet wide and 51 feet high, which provides the capacity to pass a design flood of 2,200,000 cubic feet per second. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250-feet wide and 14-feet deep is provided from the dam to the mouth of the Snake River. Relocations along the lake included railroad bridges over the Columbia and Snake Rivers in order to eliminate hazards to navigation. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction started May 1947 and was completed in 1982. Power generation through September 1989 has been 215.13 billion kilowatt hours. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contracts continue for powerplant control. Operation and Maintenance: During fiscal year 6.24 billion kilowatt hours of electrical power were generated by the 14 generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisting of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo, amounted to 8,199,337 tons during calendar year 1988. 23. SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING, OR, WA, AND ID Location. On Snake River downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, River Mile 230 Snake River, which is largest tributary of Columbia River, rises in Yellowstone National Park in western part of Wyoming, flows generally westerly for about 1,000 miles, and empties into Columbia River near Pasco, WA, 324 miles from Pacific Ocean. Existing project. The River and Harbor Act of 1945 authorized construction of dams as necessary for power incidental irrigation, and open channel improvements for purposes of providing slack-water navigation and irrigation between mouth of Snake River and "Lewiston, ID. That authorization modified previous authorizations only for the portion of improvement below Lewiston, ID. Acts of June 13, 1902, and August 30, 1935, as they pertain to open river improvement from Lewiston, ID, to Johnson Bar Landing, remain part of existing project. Improvements included in existing project are Ice Harbor Lock and Dam - Lake Sacajawea; Little Goose Lock and Dam - - Lake Bryan; Lower Granite Lock and Dam; Lower Monumental Lock and Dam - Lake Herbert G. West; and open-river improvement, Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. Each of the four locks and dams is described in an individual report, and cost and financial data for the entire project are shown on Table 39-A and 39-K. Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite are in full operation. (See individual reports for details.) (For further details see Annual Reports, page 2246 for 1903; page 1986 for 1906; page 1991 for 1915; and page 1981 for 1962.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. On Snake River from the mouth to Johnson Bar Landing there are 18 privately-owned barge terminals in use for shipping grain, petroleum products, fertilizers, wood products, cement, and other general cargo. There are also 5 marinas and 28 small-boat launching ramps, all open to public use. The facilities serve slack-water navigation to Snake River Mile 140, the site of Lewiston, ID. That slackwater reaches the Lewiston, ID-Clarkston, WA area since the lake behind Lower Granite Dam was filled in February 1975. Operations during fiscal year. See individual report for Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite Locks and Dams. On Snake River from Lewiston, ID, to Johnson Bar Landing, reconnaissance and condition surveys were conducted and survey markers were maintained. General Investigations 24. SURVEYS The Upper Snake River and Tributaries is the principal ongoing survey. The area covered by the study extends from the headwaters of the Snake River in Wyoming down to and including the Weiser River in Idaho. Interim studies were continued on Galloway Dam located on the Weiser River, Snake River in the vicinity of Jackson Hole, WY,and Big Lost River. An interim study of the Owyhee River Basin was terminated in FY1989 because studies showed there was no economically feasible projects in that basin. A reconnaissance study of the Palouse River Basin was completed in FY 1989. Palouse River is a tributary of the Snake River that rises in the Moscow mountains in northwestern Idaho and drains an area of about 2,800 square miles, mostly in eastern Washington. The only economically feasible projects would primarily provide for supplemental muncipal water supplies for the cities of Moscow, ID and Pullman, WA. Therefore it was determined that there was no Federal interest in continuing the study. The Columbia River and Tributaries is a survey study directed by the North Pacific Division in which the Walla Walla District is participating. Work on the CR&T study involved completion of the Clearwater River Basin interim study. No feasibility projects were found in the Clearwater Basin. A reconnaissance study investigating the flooding problems in the vicinity of Mud Lake, ID was completed in FY 1989. The Mud Lake area is a closed basin located on Camas Creek, 20 miles west and 50 miles north of Idaho Falls in Jefferson County, ID. The lake is formed by a 10-mile long dike constructed many years ago by local farmers. The dike allows the adjacent land to be farmed and provides a water elevation so - 39-8 - WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT that an irrigation canal can deliver water to farms. Above normal runoff in the basin threatens overtopping of the dike. The Corps' study investigated alternative measures (such as storage and diversion of flows) to alleviate the potential flooding that could occur with failure of the dike. Although some alternatives are feasible, local interests chose not to cost share the next study phase (feasibility) at this time. Total cost of surveys during fiscal year was $929,390. That sum was expended for: flood control studies, $658,979; special studies including Soil Conservation Service, Bureau of Reclamation, River Basin and Regional Planning Commissions, Cooperation with States, $32,261, Special Investigations and FERC Licensing Activities, $83,648, and restudy of deferred projects, $154,502. 25. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the fiscal year, flood hazard data for a number of locations in the District were collected and analyzed. Flood information was provided to several Federal agencies, to the States of Idaho, Oregon, and Washington, to various cities and counties in those states, and to some private organizations. Total cost of collection and study of basic data during fiscal year was $173,355 which was expended for flood plain management services $49,818, flood warning plan $42,103, and technical services, $80,234, and environmental data studies $1,200. 26. PRECONSTRUCTION, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN McNary Lock and Dam (Second Powerhouse), OR and WA McNary Second Powerhouse is a proposed addition on the south shore of McNary Lock and Dam on the Columbia River near Umatilla, OR. The project will increase the present 980,000 kilowatt generating capacity by an additional 774,000 kilowatts. Provisions are included for compensation of negative impacts on fish and wildlife. The project is estimated to cost $667,000,000 at October 1, 1986 price levels. The General Design Memorandum Phase I was prepared under the Water Resource Development Act of 1976, Public Law 94- 587, and submitted to the Secretary of the Army on July 1, 1981. Studies were initiated in FY 1982 and continued through FY 1984 on the General Design Memorandum Phase II and the Powerhouse Preliminary Design Report. There has been no further design activity on the project. The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Zintel Canyon Dam, WA The proposed project consists of a roller compacted concrete dam 90 feet high with uncontrolled spillway and a fixed maximum release outlet works that would create a detention reservoir of 1,260 acre-feet of capacity. The storage comprises 860 acre-feet for flood control and 400 acre-feet for sediment. In addition, the project also includes a conduit with a capacity of 400 cfs and a dike and floodgate across the Union Pacific Railroad to protect downtown Kennewick, WA. The plan of improvement will provide protection against heavy rainfall, snowmelt, and thunderstorm floods to the city of Kennewick, WA. Reevaluation of the project economics due to hydrology modifications resulted in a revised General Design Memo No. 2. The GDM has been forwarded to the Washington Level Review Board for approval. Fiscal Year Costs were $159,360. The total estimated Federal and Non-Federal project cost is $9,300,000. The estimated Federal cost is $7,000,000. Local cooperation. Non-Federal sponsors shall pay 25 percent of the total project cost or an estimated $2,300,000 in cash or materials. - 39-9 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 39-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section In Total to Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY89 Sep. 30,1989 3. Catherine Creek, OR New Work 4. Clear & Burnt River, OR 5. Colfax, Palouse River, ID 9. Jackson Hole, WY 10. Lucky Peak Lake, ID 11. Mill Creek Lake, WA 12. Owyhee River, OR 15. Dworshak Dam & Reservoir, ID 16. Ice Harbor Lock & Dam,WA 17. Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, ID & WA 18. Little Goose Lock & Dam, WA Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost m--- 12,932 88,500 63,974 11,215 -9,200 265 11,000 35,526 2,236 2,236 115,000 --- 96,159 65,000 52,958 20,000 50,833 1,101,999 1,560,698 1,078,000 852,000 1,136,570 1,492,378 855,418 1,068,450 616,000 613,230 2,517,000 2,517,177 68,000 35,014 50,000 559,901 499,000 573,000 1,047,550 494,044 575,148 1,046,431 -90,000 -89,857 -6,184 26,802 1,250 -1,023 1,974 28,800 28,800 99,500 99,500 5,810,240 5,810,240 2,388,270 2,388,270 200,000 200,000 19,652,0811 19,652,0811 13,696,5512 13,613,460 2 2,258,495 3 2,258,495 3 8,637,443 8,618,908 17,705,607 17,705,579 69,316 69,316 13,689 - 329,523,296 4 399 329,523,296 4 5,446,000 6,027,728 6,711,200 6,178,520 67,505,235 8 5,499,554 5,985,953 6,436,396 6,507,158 67,371,512 * ------ 690,000 167,930,757 6 ---- --- 248,487 167,489,244 8 4,868,671 5,609,800 5,643,100 7,346,305 5,183,795 5,290,932 5,342,425 7,876,699 68,841,979 7 68,715,326 7 -- 22,957,664 6,210 -- 22,957,664 56,460 --- 3,000,000 4,963,000 229,318,022 e --- --- 6,391,061 227,746,083 8 3,921,401 5,298,710 4,882,100 3,704,800 4,442,150 5,145,627 4,569,571 4,257,639 53,316,405 * 53,304,0058 - 39-10 - TABLE 39-A (Continued) WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section In Total to Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY89 Sep. 30,1989 19. Lower Granite Lock New Work & Dam, WA Approp. --- - 5,661,000 -563,000 372,878,315 10 Cost --- -- 19,405 3,781,755 371,581,473 10 Maint. Approp. 8,890,205 8,493,700 8,654,100 7,770,300 70,002,602 1 Cost 9,053,763 8,114,145 8,667,762 8,177,073 69,898,018 11 Maint Contrib. -- 20,000 -- - 20,000 Cost --- 20,000 -- - 20,000 20. Lower Monumental New Work Lock & Dam, WA Approp. --- -- 20,000 2,140,000 238,533,732 12 Cost --- -- -- 363,114 236,736,846 12 Maint Approp. 4,037,830 5,556,200 6,514,800 5,837,300 52,693,532 13 Cost 4,322,908 5,375,064 5,290,609 7,270,127 52,653,104 13 21. Lower Snake Fish & Wildlife New work Compensation, ID, OR & WA Approp. 14,971,000 16,100,000 5,313,000 8,687,000 149,236,909 Cost 15,096,848 16,303,537 5,391,184 8,567,973 149,068,986 (Contributed Funds) New Work Contrib. --- -- --- -- 223,965 Cost -- - -- -- 223,965 22. McNary Lock & Dam, - New Work Lake Wallula, OR & WA Approp. -- -- 20,000 1,180,000 323,715,105 14 Cost --- -- 18,801 1,022,277 323,556,183 14 Maint. Approp 9,977,999 13,440,800 9,389,800 8,865,480 159,037,115 '5 Cost 11,305,733 13,048,173 9,350,922 9,331,470 158,801,641 '1 (Contributed Funds) Maint. Contrib. - -- - - 43,707 Cost 43,707 --- -- --- 43,707 23. Snake RiverDownstream New Work from Johnson Bar Landing Approp. - -- 8,681,000 7,230,000 1,009,095,589 16 OR, WA & ID Cost -- - 19,405 10,784,417 1,003,988,409 16 Maint. Approp. 21,725,107 24,958,410 25,694,100 24,662,405 245,423,093 17 Cost 23,008,630 23,928,713 23,870,367 27,588,435 245,138,951 '7 1. Includes $570,831 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 2. Includes $66,700 allotted and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 3. Excludes $80,000 contributed funds, but includes $96,340 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. 4. Includes $2,046,100 regular project construction funds appropriated for and expended by Department of Interior in Fiscal Years 1969 through 1972 for hatchery operations. Includes $655,000 appropriated and expended for additional unit. 5.Includes $18,604,666 regular project operation and maintenance funds expended by Department of Interior starting FY 1972 for hatchery operations. FY 72-78 funds of $6,097,000 were charged to project as a cost, but not as an expenditure for accounting purposes. Includes $41,000 allotted and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees. Includes $120,000 allotted and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 6. Excludes $82,500 contributed for artificial spawning channel. Includes $36,748,021 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Includes $914,256 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Includes $690,000 appropriated and $248,487 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 7. Includes $43,000 allotted and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees; $641,063 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 8. Includes $60,941,807 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Includes $7,963,000 appropriated and $6,391,061 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 9. Includes $621,063 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 10. Includes $46,212,534 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Excludes $405,819 contributed funds on lock and dam project. Includes $63,800 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at completed projects. Includes $5,098,000 appropriated and $3,801,160 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 11. Includes $338,163 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of - 39-11 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Navigable Waters. 12. Includes $51,661,371 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Includes $2,160,000 appropriated and $363,114 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 13. Includes $372,376 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 14. Includes $1,976,586 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Includes $1,200,000 appropriated and $1,041,078 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 15. Includes $80,600 allotted and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees and $1,035,860 allotted and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 16. Includes $400,150 for new work on previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston), and $34,613 for new work appropriation used for maintenance prior to 1953. Excludes $167,500 contributed funds for new work consisting of $85,000 for new work on existing projects (Pasco to Riparia), plus $82,500 for new work on existing artificial spawning channel. 17. Includes $186,570 appropriated and expended for maintenance of previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston) and $382,005 appropriated and $381,928 expended open river Pasco to Lewiston and Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. - 39-12 - WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. - 39-13 - TABLE 39-B May 17, 1950 COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS Blackfoot Area, Snake River, ID. Levee left bank. H. Doc 531, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. Blackfoot River, ID. Levees, channel improvement, and rectification works. Boise Valley, Boise River, ID. Channel improvement and enlargement, levees, and revetments in Ada County. Canyon County unit was deauthorized April 18, 1967. Ada County unit was deauthorized in 1986. Camas Creek, ID. Channel deepening and rectification of a 20-mile reach of Camas Creek. Deauthorized in 1965. Gooding Area, Little Wood River, ID. Channel improvement. Grande Ronde Valley, OR. Levees and channel clearing, straightening and realignment; would complement stream regulation by upstream storage projects. Deauthorized in 1986. Heise-Roberts Extension, Snake River, ID. Channel clearing and rectification, levees, and bank protection. Henrys Fork Unit deauthorized in 1986. Jackson Hole, Snake River, WY. Flood protection. Kendrick, Potlatch River, ID. Revetted levee. Little Wood River, ID. Flood protection in immediate area. Deauthorized in 1965. Malheur River, OR. Channel rectification, levees, and bank protection at Vale. Willow Creek unit was deauthorized October 14, 1969. Palouse River, WA. Flood protection for urban and rural areas at Garfield and near Malden. Deauthorized in 1986. Payette Valley, ID. Channel rectification, levees, and bank protection along 38 miles of Payette River below Black Canyon Dam. Payette Valley was deauthorized October 3, 1978. Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, ID. Concrete-lined channel through Pocatello. Inkom-Marsh Creek unit was deauthorized October 14, 1969. Shelley Area, Snake River, ID. Bank protection. South Fork Clearwater River, ID. Emergency construction of levees and revetments. Deauthorized in 1986. Teton River, ID. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 1986. Tomanovich-Salmon City, Salmon, ID. Channel improvement. Weiser River, Weiser Area, ID. Intermittent channel realignment and improvement, levees, and bank protection, lower river area. Whitebird Creek, ID. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 1986. CATHERINE CREEK, OR Organic debris removal along Catherine Creek. Sec 208, P.L 83-780 Authorized by Chief Engineers Sep. 3, 1985 CLEAR & BURNT RIVER, OR Construction of riprap bank protection at city of Sec. 14, P.L 79-526 Huntington Waste Water Lagoon. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Jul 10, 1985 COLFAX, PALOUSE RIVER, WA Provides for flood control works in vicinity of and through Flood Control Act of 1944 Colfax, WA, by channel enlargement and modification, H. Doc 888, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. levees, floodwalls, revetments, and modification of railroad bridges. 3. Sep 24, 1954 Jul 24, 1946 Dec 22, 1944 5. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 10. LUCKY PEAK LAKE. ID Jul 24, 1946 Oct 22, 1976 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Sep 24, 1954 as amended Jul. 19, 1988 Jul 3, 1958 Oct 23, 1958 Aug 15, 1963 Mar 2, 1945 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Oct 22, 1976 Dec 29, 1981 Jul 30, 1983 Mar 2, 1945 Dec 31, 1970 Mar 2, 1945 Mar 2, 1945 May 25, 1978 Oct 22, 1976 as ammended Nov. 17, 1986 Dam for flood control, irrigation, and recreation. Second outlet for streamflow maintenance Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. MILL CREEK LAKE, WALLA WALLA, WA Off-stream storage project upstream fromWalla Walla. Channel improvement through Walla Walla; concretelined channel. OWYHEE RIVER, OR Gravel, brush and small tree removal from 12 miles of Owyhee River. P.L 79-526, Chief of Engineers Report dated May 13, 1946 P.L 94-587 Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 578, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 719, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 208, P.L 83-780 Authorized by Chief of Engineers Feb. 11, 1985. COLUMBIA RIVER JUVENILE FISH MITIGATION PROGRAM Design, test and construction of fish bypass facilities at P.L 100-371 Lower Monumental, Little Goose, Lower Granite and McNary dams. (BRUCES EDDY) DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID Preparation of detailed plans. S. Doc 51, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. Bruces Eddy dam and reservoir for flood control, H. Doc. 403, 87th navigation, power, recreation, and area redevelopment. Cong., 2nd Sess. Redesignation of project as Dworshak Dam and Reservoir. P.L 88-96 ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM - LAKE SACAJAWEA, WA Unit 1 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for H. Doc. 704, 75th navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. Cong., 3rd Sess. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec. 4, Flood Control of 1944 facilities. LEWISTON-CLARKSTON BRIDGE, ID AND WA Four-lane highway bridge and approaches. P.L 94-587 Increase of authorized amount to $23,200,000. P.L 97-140 Approach roadway from bridge to Sixteenth Avenue in P.L 98-63 Clarkston, WA. Increase of authorized amount to $24,000,000. LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM - LAKE BRYAN, WA Unit 3 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. Designation of reservoir as Lake Bryan. P. L. 91-638 LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WA Unit 4 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess dam for navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM - LAKE HERBERT G. WEST, WA Unit 2 of 4, Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for H. Doc. 704, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. navigation, power, recreation, and incidental irrigation. Designation of reservoir as Lake Herbert G. West. P. L 95-285 LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH & WILDLIFE COMPENSATION PLAN, WA, OR, AND ID Fish hatcheries and replacement of wildlife habitat. P.L 94-587 Changes to land acquisition authority. H.R. 6-P.L99-662 - 39-14 - TABLE 39-B (Continued) 11. 12. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. TABLE 39-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized Documents 22. Mar 2, 1945 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Nov 17, 1986 23. Jun 13, 1902 Jun 25, 1910 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 2, 1945 Table E Aug 18, 1941 Table E Dec 22, 1944 Table E Jul 11, 1956 Table E Oct 23, 1962 Table E Nov 7, 1966 9. & Table E Nov 17, 1986 McNARY LOCK AND DAM - LAKE WALLULA, OR AND WA Lock and dam for navigation, power, recreation, and irrigation Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Construction, operation and maintenance of a second powerhouse. SNAKE RIVER MOUTH TO JOHNSON BAR, OR, WA, AND ID Open-river navigation Riparia to Pittsburg Landing. Mouth to Riparia. Pittsburg Landing to Johnson Bar. H. Doc. 704., 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H.R. 6 - P.L 99-662 H. Doc. 127, 56th Cong., 2nd. Sess. H. Doc. 411, 55th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Supercedes previous legislation mouth to Lewiston, ID only. H. Doc. 704, 75th See Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Cong., 2d Sess. Lower Granite Locks and Dams. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Dayton, Touchet River, WA. Flood protection. H. Doc. 662, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess. Milton-Freewater, Walla Walla River, OR.Flood Protection. H. Doc. 719, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess. Heise-Roberts Area, Snake River, ID. H. Doc 452, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. Channel improvement. Malheur Improvement District, Snake River, OR. Flood protection. Pullman, Palouse River, WA. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 1986. Esquatzel Coulee, Connell, WA. Levees and protective work P.L 84-685 Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, WA. Channel improvement. Mission and Lapwai Creeks, ID. Construction of levee. Bear Creek, Kendrick, ID. Channel improvement. P.L 87-874 Lapwai Creek Culdesac, ID. Construct left bank levee. Lyman Creek near Rexburg, ID. Channelization. Tucannon River, Camp Wooten, WA. Levee and channel work. Blackfoot Reservoir, Blackfoot River, ID. Modification to increase spillway capacity. Deauthorized in 1986. Ririe Lake, Willow Creek, ID. Storage for flood control. Grande Ronde Lake, OR. Flood control, irrigation, water P.L 89-298 supply, anadromous fish, downstream and resident trout fishery, recreation and downstream power. Deauthorized in 1986. Zintel Canyon Dam, WA. Local protection reservoir to provide flood protection to portions of the city of Kennewick, WA. Cottonwood Creek Dam, ID. Protection to highly- P.L 89-789 developed urban and suburban areas against flash floods. Deauthorized in 1986. Stuart Gulch Dam, ID. Protection to highly-developed urban and suburban areas against flash floods. Deauthorized in 1979. Jackson Hole, WY. Flood control protection by channel P.L 99-662 improvement consisting of channel rectification, levees, and revetment along Snake River in vicinity of Wilson, Wyoming. Also operation, maintenance, modifications, and additions are Federal responsibility. Little Wood River, ID. Flood protection -39-15- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 39-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1989 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Columbia River and Tributaries Completed 1968 1,851,195 -- above Celilo Falls to Kennewick, WA 1 1. Obviated by The Dalles, John Day, and McNary projects. TABLE 39-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1989 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Asotin Creek, Asotin, ID 1 Completed 1951 12,019 Bear Creek, Kendrick, ID 1 Completed 1970 133,518 Big Wood River, ID5 Completed 1985 170,000 Boise River, ID Completed 1985 236,500 - Catherine Creek Lake, OR Deferred 1978 1,552,000 - Connell, WA 1 Completed 1967 60,000 Cottonwood Creek Community Church, Culdesac, ID2 Completed 1984 23,400 - Dayton, Touchet River, WA Completed 1966 380,617 - Dry Creek, WA1 Completed 1961 384,426 Esquatzel Coulee, Connell, WA 1 Completed 1967 232,792 Esquatzel Coulee, Mesa, WA1 Completed 1969 2,665 Gooding Area, ID1 Completed 1954 59,167 Graves Creek, ID' Completed 1953 75,469 - Heise-Roberts Area, Snake River, ID Completed 1955 1,575,838 - Jackson Hole, Snake River, WY Completed 1978 2,388,270 - Lapwai Creek, Culdesac, ID 1 Completed 1972 176,833 Lava Hot Springs, Portneuf River, ID' Completed 1973 113,296 Little Wood River, ID 6 Active Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, WA1 Completed 1972 17,592 Lyman Creek, ID' Completed 1971 230,315 - Malheur Improvement District, Snake River, OR Completed 1957 55,894 - Milton-Freewater, Walla Walla River, OR3 Completed 1968 1,786,753 Mission and Lapwai Creeks, ID1 Completed 1965 54,538 Orofino Creek & Clearwater River, Orofino, ID2 Inactive 1949 23,050 Rapid Creek, ID5 Completed 1985 19,500 Pataha Creek, Pomeroy, WA2 Completed 1977 110,815 Payette River, Emmett Sewage Lagoon, ID2 Completed 1967 39,172 Riverside Area, Pasco, WA' Completed 1972 28,839 - Ririe Lake, ID Completed 1983 39,677,448 - Sewage Lagoon, Vale, OR2 Completed 1985 75,000 Shobe Canyon, Heppner, OR' Completed 1970 5,000 Snake River, Blackfoot, ID' Completed 1980 131,700 Snake River, Heise Bridge Location, ID2 Completed 1952 8,501 Snake River, Stevens, Blackfoot, ID1 Completed 1968 32,425 South Fork, Boise River, ID5 Completed 1985 44,400 - South Fork Clearwater River, Kooskia-Stites, ID Completed 1973 61,055 - Tomanovich-Salmon City, ID' Completed 1955 128,635 Touchet River, Waitsburg, WA' Completed 1973 72,140 - 39-16 - TABLE 39-E (continued) WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1989 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Tucannon River, Wooten, WA 1 Completed 1971 73,932 Umatilla River, OR 1 Completed 1961 161,540 Wallowa River, Weaver Bridge, OR2 Completed 1960 16,118 Weiser River, ID5 Completed 1985 106,900 Willow Creek, ID1 Completed 1963 976 - Willow Creek Lake, OR Completed 1985 37,168,114 - Yakima River, West Richland, WA1 ,4 Completed 1964 238,890 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 205, PL 4. Includes $9,000 contributed funds. 80-858. 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 208, PL 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 14, PL 83-780. 79-526. 6. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to PL99-662. No 3. Exclusive of $6,300 contributed funds. funds authorized until FY90. TABLE 38-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECT For Last Full report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Asotin Dam, Snake River, ID & WA 1964 1975 - Blackfoot Reservoir, ID 1980 1986 267,626 Boise Valley, ID Ada County Unit 1963 1986 46,084 Canyon County Unit 1963 1967 10,600 - Camas Creek, ID 1960 1965 9,080 Cottonwood Creek Dam, Boise, ID 1972 1986 183,100 Grande Ronde Lake, OR 1966 1986 - Grande Ronde Valley, OR 1958 1986 102,458 Heise-Roberts Extension, ID Henrys Fork Unit 1968 1986 27,800 - Little Wood River, ID 1960 1965 21,334 - Lower Walla Walla River, WA 1953 1986 4,000 - Malheur River, OR Willow Creek Unit 1961 1969 13,000 - Mill Creek, WA 1958 1977 3,537 - Palouse River, WA 1958 1986 2,000 - Payette Valley, ID 1960 1978 23,178 - Portneuf River, Inkom-Marsh Creek, ID 1969 1969 - Pullman, Palouse River, WA 1964 1986 99,540 S.Fork Clearwater River, ID 1973 1986 3,899 Stuart Gulch Dam, Boise, ID 1974 1979 234,100 Teton River, ID 1955 1986 10,387 - Touchet River, WA 1957 1977 11,198 - Whitebird Creek, Columbia River Basin, ID 1957 1986 1,896 - 39-17 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 39-H COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 2 of Text) Estimated Federal Cost to Project Status Cost Sep. 30, 1989 Blackfoot Area, Snake River, ID Completed - 42,796 Blackfoot River, ID Completed - 391,143 Heise-Roberts Extension, ID Snake River Unit Completed - 3,375,158 Kendrick, Potlatch River, ID Completed - 59,942 Malheur River, OR Vale Unit Completed - 325,581 Mud Lake, ID Inactive 1,187,000 5,996 Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, ID Pocatello Unit Completed - 6,456,0321 Shelley Area, Snake River, ID Completed - 32,335 Weiser River, ID Deferred 1,565,000 37,757 Weiser River, ID Cambridge-Midvale Deferred - 75,000 TOTAL 10,801,740 1. Exclusive of $36,800 contributed funds. TABLE 39-I INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 7 of Text) Lyman Creek, ID August 1989 Palouse River, ID May1989 Payette River, ID May 1989 Salmon River, ID January 1989 Snake River, ID August 1989 Snake River, WY August 1989 Touchet River, WA April 1989 Walla Walla River,WA January 1989 - 39-18 - WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 39-J PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID (See Section 15 of Text) Ice Harbor Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 16 of Text) SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Space for additional Rating, Each Total Potential Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Flood Control Storage Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 1600 Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line Concrete Gravity September 1974 150,500 cfs 1613 feet Tainter 50 ft. by 55 ft. 2 428 feet 3 2 @ 90,000 kw 1 @ 220,000 kw 400,000 kw 3 3 @ 220,000 kw 1,060,000 kw 150 feet March 1973 1600-1445 feet 1605 feet 2,000,000 ac.-ft. 53 miles 17,090 acres 175 miles 86 feet 675 feet 97 feet 100 feet 103 feet 15 feet May 1962 Concrete Gravity January 1962 850,000 cfs 391 feet Radial 50 ft. by 51 ft. 10 671 feet 6 3 @ 90,000 kw 3 @ 111,000 kw 603,000 kw 226 feet December 1961 - 39-19 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 39-J PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT (Continued) Project Little Goose Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 18 of Text) IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 440 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line Lower Granite Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 19 of Text) IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 738 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation 440-437 feet 446 feet 31.9 miles 9,200 acres 14 ft. by 250 ft. 80 miles 86 feet 675 feet 93 feet 98 feet 101 feet 15 feet May 1970 Concrete Gravity January 1970 850,000 cfs 581 feet Radial 50 ft. by 60 ft. 8 656 feet 243 feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 244 feet March 1970 638-633 feet 646.5 feet 37.2 miles 10,025 acres 14 ft. by 250 Ft 92 miles 86 feet 675 feet 95 feet 100 feet 105 feet 15 feet May 1975 - 39-20 - WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 39-J PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT (Continued) Project SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line Concrete Gravity February 1975 850,000 cfs 581 feet Radial 50 ft. by 60.5 ft. 8 656 feet 243 feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 246 feet April 1975 Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, WA (See Section 20 of Text) IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 738 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation 738-733 feet 746.5 feet 38 miles 8,900 acres 14 ft. by 250 ft. 91 miles 86 feet 675 feet 97 feet 98 feet 103 feet 15 feet April 1969 SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line Concrete Gravity March 1969 850,000 cfs 483 feet Radial 50 ft. by 61 ft. 8 656 feet 243 feet 6 135,000 kw 810,000 kw 242 feet May 1969 - 39-21 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 39-J PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT (Continued) Project McNary Lock and Dam, OR and WA (See Section 22 of Text) IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 540 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 340 Acres Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline 540-537 feet 548 feet 28.7 miles 6,590 acres 14 ft. by 250 ft. 78 miles 86 feet 675 feet 67 feet 75 feet 83 feet 15 feet November 1953 Concrete Gravity October 1953 2,200,000 cfs 291 feet Vertical Lift 50 ft. by 51 ft. 22 1,348 feet 14 70,000 kw 980,000 kw 193 feet November 1953 340-335 feet 356.5 feet 64 miles 38,800 14 ft. by 250 ft. 242 miles - 39-22 - WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 39-K SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING OR, WA, AND ID (See Section 23 of Text) Estimated Cost (Corps New Work Maintenance Percent of Engineers to Sep. 30 1989 to Sep. 30, 1989 Corn- Constr. Project Funds Only) Approp. Cost Approp. Cost pleted Started Ice Harbor Lock & Dam Initial Project 129,578,480 129,578,480 129,578,480 68,841,979 68,715,326 100 FY 57 Code 710 Recreation Facilities 914,256 914,256 914,256 0 0 100 FY 57 Power Units 4-6 36,748,021 36,748,021 36,748,021 0 0 100 FY 71 Fish Bypass Program 789,0003 690.000 248,487 0 0 31 Totals 168,029,757 167,930,757 167,489,244 68,841,979 68,715,326 99 Little Goose Lock & Dam Initial Project 160,413,215 160,413,215 160,413,215 53,316,405 53,304,005 100 FY 63 Power Units 4-6 60,941,807 60,941,807 60,941,807 0 0 100 FY 74 Fish Bypass Program 25.500.0003 7.963.000 6.391.061 0 0 25 FY 89 Totals 246,855,022 229,318,022 227,746,083 53,316,405 53,304,005 92 Lower Granite Lock & Dam Initial Project 321,503,981 321,503,981 321,503,979 70,002,602 69,898,018 100 FY 65 Code 710 Recreation Facilities 63,800 63,800 63,800 0 0 100 FY 84 Power Units 4-6 46,212,534 46,212,534 46,212,534 0 0 100 FY 74 Fish Bypass Program 23.300.000* 5.098.000 3.801.160 0 0 16 FY 88 Totals 391,080,315 372,878,315 371,581,473 70,002,602 69,898,018 95 Lower Monumental Lock & Dam Initial Project 184,712,361 184,712,361 184,712,361 52,693,532 52,653,104 100 FY 61 Power Units 4-6 51,661,371 51,661,371 51,661,371 0 0 100 FY 75 Fish Bypass Program 34,300,0003 2,160,000 363.114 0 0 1 Totals 270,673,732 238,533,732 236,736,846 52,693,532 52,653,104 87 Open River Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing 34,613 34,613 ' 34,613 377,655 377,578 2 Open River Pasco to Lewiston 0 0 0 4,350 4.350 Totals Existing Project 1,076,673,439 1,008,659,439 1,003,588,259 245,236,523 244,952,381 100 Previous Projects Pasco to Lewiston 400,150 400,150 400,150 186,570 186,570 Totals Authorized Project 1,077,073,589 1,009,095,589 1,003,988,409 245,423,093 245,138,951 1. New work appropriations used for maintenance prior to 1953. 2. Includes $3,700 appropriated and $6,897 expended in FY 1989 for project condition survey cost. 3. Does not include mitigation analysis. - 39-23 - ALASKA DISTRICT * This District consists of the State of Alaska. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Anchorage Harbor, AK ..................... 2. Bar Point Harbor,Ketchikan, AK............. 3. Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK .............. 4. Dillingham Harbor, AK .................... 5. Homer Harbor, AK ...................... 6. Kake Harbor, AK ........................ 7. Metlakatla Harbor, AK ..................... 8. Ninilchik Harbor, AK .................... 9. Nome Harbor, AK ........................ 10. Project Condition Surveys ................... 11. St. George, AK .......................... 12. St. Paul Island Harbor ..................... 13. Thomas Basin, Ketchikan, AK ............... 14. Wrangell Harbor, AK ...................... 15. Wrangell Narrows, AK ..................... 40-1 40-1 40-2 40-2 40-2 40-2 40-3 40-3 40-3 40-4 40-4 40-4 40-4 40-5 40-5 Flood Control 16. Chena River Lakes, AK ................ ... 40-5 17. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ...................... 40-5 18. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .......................... 40-6 Navigation 1. ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK Location. Anchorage is in southcentral Alaska on the southeast shore of Knik Arm, north of Turnagain Arm near its junction with Cook Inlet. (See NOAA Charts 16660 and 16664.) Existing project. Provides for dredging along a 3,000-foot baseline adjacent to the Port of Anchorage dock to a depth of 35 feet below mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 29.0 feet and the extreme range is 42.0 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Port of Anchorage facility consists of a POL terminal at the southern end and three general cargo terminals northward. The northernmost terminal, completed during 1976 and 1977 was outside the Federal project limits. Extension of the limits from 2,070 feet northward to 3,000 feet was authorized by Public Law 94-587 and funded in FY 1978. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 19. Snettisham, AK........................... 40-6 General Investigations 20. Survey .................................. 21. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........... 22. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design ...... Tables Table 40-A Table 40-B Table 40-C Table 40-D Table 40-E Table 40-F Table 40-G Table 40-H Table 40-I Table 40-J Table 40-K .40-6 40-6 40-6 Cost & Financial Statement ........ 40-7 Authorizing Legislation ........... 40-9 Other Authorized Navigation Projects 40-11 Not Applicable Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................ 40-12 Not Applicable Deauthorized Projects ............ 40-12 Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ................... 40-12 Project Condition Surveys ......... 40-13 Not Applicable Not Applicable Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging has been accomplished across the entire project during FY 1989. Controlling depth at the harbor was at a project depth of - 36 feet MLLW. Regular maintenance dredging was accomplished by contract during July through August 1989. A total of 200,284 cubic yards of silt was removed. 2. Bar Point Harbor, Ketchikan, AK Location. Bar Point Harbor is in the northwest part of Ketchikan, AK on the south coast of Revillagigedo Island, on the north shore of Tongass Narrows in southeastern Alaska. It is 760 miles southeast of Anchorage and 700 nautical miles north of Seattle, Washington, via the Inside Passage. (See NOAA Chart 17430.) Existing project. The maintenance of a small boat basin of 17.91 acres in area, with depths of -10 and -15 feet mean lower low water; two rock breakwaters 700 and 1100 feet in length and two floating breakwaters, one 963 feet in length and two floating breakwaters, one 963 feet long and the other 120 feet long. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 12.0 feet and the extreme range is 26.0 feet. - 40-1 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Provides public anchorage spaces and mooring facilities for commercial, local, transient and refuge seeking fishing vessels. Has boat launch ramp and tidal grid. Power, water and limited telephone service available. Operations during fiscal year. Draft Letter Report was prepared to study excessive harbor wave energy. 3. Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK Location. On the north bank of the Kushokwin River. Approximately 53 miles upstream from Kuskokwin Bay, about 400 miles west of Anchorage. (See NOAA Chart INT 500.) Existing project. A small boat basin of 12 acres providing moorage for 1,200 small riverboats. Provides for the dredging of a 31 foot wide access channel and a maneuvering and turning channel with a depth of -4 feet. Local cooperation. Awaiting reply from city of Bethel regarding proposed maintenance dredging disposal sites in order to proceed with dredging contract. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. Initiation of plans and specifications for a maintenance dredging contract. 4. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK Location. At head of Nushagak Bay, an arm of Bristol Bay, on right bank of Nushagak River just below its confluence Wood River; about 470 miles northeasterly of Dutch Harbor and 300 miles southwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16660) Existing project. A small-boat basin 230,000 square feet in area with a depth of 0 - 0 above mean lower low water along Scandinavian Creek; with entrance channel 1,100 feet long and 40 feet wide in Scandinavian Creek; and a sill across the basin. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 19.8 feet. Extreme range is 30.0 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Four docks at the city of Dillingham; three privately owned, one owned by the city of Dillingham, and four publicly owned small boat floats in the project basin. Two docks are used by the city to unload barges which come into Dillingham. New floats for the harbor were installed in June 1982 and removed before fall freezeup. They are replaced each spring. Cargo and passengers from ocean vessels are unloaded at the docks or in the small-boat basin. Facilities are inadequate for number of boats using small boat harbor. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Regular maintenance was accompliahed by dredging from the end of May to the middle of June 1989. A total of 79,940 cubic yards of material was removed. 5. HOMER HARBOR, AK Location. In Kachemak Bay, on Kenai Peninsula, 152 miles by water southwest of Anchorage. Harbor site is land based near the extremity of Homer Spit which varies to one-quarter mile in width and extends 4.5 miles southeasterly from the mainland. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16645) Existing project. Provides for sheltered small-boat harbor, relocated and based within Homer Spit about 50 acres in area. Project depth varies from 10 feet mean lower low water in the most western segment of the harbor to 20 feet below mean lower low water in the entrance channel and the most eastern segment of the harbor; a north entrance channel; protected by a main rock breakwater 1,018 feet long and secondary rock breakwater 238 feet long. Tidal range between mean lower low and mean higher high water is 18.1 feet, with an extreme range of 30.4 feet. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1593 of Annual Report for 1964.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One publicly owned and operated wharf capable of handling oceangoing vessels serves for passengers and general cargo. small boat facilities in basin area include publicly owned mooring floats, a publicly owned wharf, and an industrial wharf. Construction has tripled size of the harbor. The city of Homer has tripled the size of its fish dock located at the southern end of the harbor. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Regular maintenance dredging was accomplished by contract. A total of 22,369 cubic yards were removed during July and August 1989. 6. KAKE HARBOR, AK Location. Kake Harbor is located in the city of Kake on the northwest corner of Kupreanof Island in southeastern Alaska, 39 air miles west of Petersburg, AK, and 850 water miles northwesterly of Seattle, WA. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart 8201.) Existing project. The authorized project consists of a 1,580- foot-long west breakwater and a 1,750-foot-long south breakwater. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.0 feet with an extreme range of 22 feet. Estimated project cost is $13,417,000 (September 1988), including $13,378,000 for general navigation facilities 22,000 for navigation aids and $17,000 for lands. Local interests will pay 10 percent of the costs initially plus 10 percent during a period of up to 30 years. Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement would be required with the city of Kake. Terminal facilities. At Kake, a publicly owned wharf with seaplane float equipped airplanes and shallow draft vessels is located within area of proposed basin. At cannery 1 mile from city, there are two privately owned deep draft piers; one for cargo, open to all local boat owners, the second for fuel, including a float for fuejing small boats. At Portage Cove, 2 miles from the city, the existing float was expanded into a small boat facility by the state in 1982. It consists of 2 mooring - 40-2 - ALASKA DISTRICT floats, a launch ramp, a grid and is protected by floating breakwater. Facilities are not considered adequate for present commerce due to the following deficiencies in small boat facilities: Shallow water at Portage Cove and its approaches; ice formation on the cove during the winter months causing major boat damage and limiting the use of the mooring float; and transportation problems between the city and present facility at Portage Cove. Operations during fiscal year. A temporary automatic meteorburst wind monitoring station was maintained to gather wind velocity and directional data more closely associated with the location of the project for comparison with data used in preparing the plans and specifications. Environmental data was gathered during 1983 and 1984 as preconstruction information to be compared with post-construction conditions. 7. METLAKATLA HARBOR, AK Location. Metlakatla is located in the southern portion of Port Chester, a small bay on the northwest coast of Annette Island in southeastern Alaska, 18 miles south of Ketchikan. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 8074, 8075, and 8102.) Existing project. Consists of two small boat basins. Existing basin is 2.18 acres in extent with a depth of 10 feet below mean lower low water, protected by a rubblemound breakwater 900 feet long. New basin consists of two rubblemound breakwaters, 1,255 and 1,150 feet long, and an entrance channel and maneuvering area, 1,100 feet long, 100 feet wide, dredged to a depth of 15 feet below mean lower low water and a basin area of 6.25 acres dredged to a depth of 15 feet below mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.7 feet, with an extreme range of 24 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Publicly owned facilities are one general cargo dock, one barge ramp, and a small boat float system in existing basin. Privately owned facilities are one oil pier and one industrial wharf. Facilities are not adequate for mooring the commercial fishing vessels operating from Metlakatla. Existing protected harbor area is fully utilized. Operations during fiscal year. Project complete. 8. NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK Location. At mouth of Ninilchik River in Cook Inlet, at the community of Ninilchik, AK about 40 miles upcoast from Homer and 112 miles southwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/ NOS Chart #16640.) Existing project. A small boat basin 320 feet long by 150 feet wide dredged to elevation of 2 feet above mean lower low water, with an approach channel 400 feet long and 50 feet wide dredged to an elevation of 9 feet above mean lower low water; protected by a pile jetty 410 feet long. Project was modified in design stage to delete pile jetty and revise harbor dimensions to 400 feet long by 125 feet wide, and was completed in November 1961. Modification, including river channel diversion, two armor rock jetties, and beach protection, was accomplished 1967 and 1969. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 19.1 feet, with an extreme range of 29.3 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities, limited to shallow-draft vessels and accessible from Cook Inlet only at half-tide or higher, are a cannery dock along Ninilchik River available for offloading fish, and small boat floats in project basin, provided by State of Alaska. Other supplies are landed on beach or brought by road from deep draft ports in the vicinity. Facilities are extremely inadequate for the number of boats presently using harbor. Expansion of facilities would require construction of additional protected harbor area. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging of the harbor and entrance channel was accomplished by contract with 6,749 cubic yards removed in 1989. 9. NOME HARBOR, AK Location. At mouth of Snake River at the city of Nome, AK, on northerly shore of Norton Sound, an arm of Bering Sea. It is a shallow open roadstead, 581 nautical miles north of Dutch Harbor and 545 air miles northwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16206.) Existing project. Provides for two jetties, the easterly 951 and the westerly not exceeding 676 feet long, at mouth of Snake River; a channel 8 feet at mean lower low water, 75 feet wide, from Norton Sound through Snake River to mouths of Bourbon and Dry Creeks, in city of Nome, ending in a turning basin of the same depth, 250 feet wide and 600 feet long; revetting banks of rivers; and protecting all existing waterfront improvements on easterly beach by means of rock mount seawall 3,350 feet long extending easterly from east jetty. Project has been completed except extension of jetties beyond present 400 and 240 feet, which is classified inactive. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 1.6 feet and extreme tidal range is 7.5 feet, but water levels are influenced more by wind than tide. Levels of 5 feet below mean lower low water have been observed during offshore winds, and a level of 14 feet above mean lower low water has been observed during a southerly storm. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Cargoes and passengers from ocean vessels are lightered to and from shore a distance of about 2 miles. Traffic enters dredged channel and is handled over revetment, where lighterage company has transfer facilities which are open to the public. Facilities considered inadequate for existing commerce. In July 1984, the city of Nome received Department of Army authorization (permit) to construct a 3,600-foot gravel filled causeway. Construction of the causeway began in July 1985. Due to lack of complete funding the length of the causeway was shortened to 2,700 feet. Construction was completed in May 1987. Use of this causeway for offloading petroleum products was delayed until the September 1987 arrival of a required berthing barge. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging by contract was accomplished throughout the ice-free season. In FY 1989 2,800 cubic yards were removed. - 40-3 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 10. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Preliminary and detailed surveys to determine navigation conditions at boat basins, small navigation projects, channels and tributaries of major rivers not within major project boundaries. Total costs for fiscal year were $484,699. (See Table 40-I) 11. ST. GEORGE, AK Location. The city of St. George is located on St. George Island, the southernmost island of the Pribilof Islands, near the edge of the southwest Bering Sea shelf. Existing project. Project was authorized in Section 107 of the River and Harbor act of 1960, PL 86-645, as amended. The work consists of dredging approximately 176,500 cubic yards of material in the maneuvering area from an average depth of + 3 feet mean lower low water to -18 feet mean lower low water and the entrance channel from an average depth of -14 feet mean lower low water to -20 feet below mean lower low water. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation during the fiscal year. A contract was awarded in December 1988. Notice to proceed was acknowledged February 24,1989 and the contractor mobilized to the island at the beginning of April 1989. As of October 1, 1989, the contractor was approximately 54 percent complete with the project. The contractor plans to remobilize in the spring of 1990 to complete the project. 12. ST. PAUL ISLAND, AK Location. St. Paul Island Harbor is located on the shore of Village Cove on the southern side of St. Paul Island, the largest and most populated island of the Pribilof group in the central southeast Bering Sea. Existing Project. A St. Paul Harbor project was authorized by Congress in Section 202 of Public Law 99-662, based on a 1982 Corps of Engineers feasibility report. Since that report was published, new wave and climatic information has been gained through field measurement and through a November 1984 storm that severely damaged a city built breakwater at St. Paul. American vessels have also assumed control of the groundfish harvest in the area more rapidly than expected, while crab stocks and catches have declined markedly. St. Paul also constructed 750 feet of breakwater and a 200-foot dock at the harbor site. The recommended plan therefore differs from the authorized project. The city has proposed to construct the project under Section 204(e) of Public Law 99-662. The recommended plan will add 1,050 feet of breakwater at the existing crest height, 37 feet MLLW. The plan will include an inner breakwater 1,000 feet long with a crest height of + 18 feet MLLW. The Natural depth of the channel (-25 to -30 feet MLLW) is sufficient to allow safe passage of the vessels for which the harbor is designed. A 6-acre mooring basin will provide a safe area for vessels during extreme wave conditions, although the vessels will be required to move away from the dock. The current estimated cost for the 204(e) project is $30,330,000, of which $15,748,000 would be reimbursed to the city of St. Paul by the Corps of Engineers after completion of the general navigation features. Local Cooperation. St. Paul Island Harbor is to be constructed under provisions of Section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662). The city of St. Paul is authorized to construct the navigational improvements, and would be reimbursed by the Corps of Engineers after completion of the general navigation improvements. A 204(e) agreement was signed by Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) Page on 30 June 1988. Terminal facilities. The city of St. Paul has constructed a breakwater 750 ft. long and 37 ft. high at the site, with a 200- foot-long concrete caisson dock. The main breakwater will be an extension of the existing breakwater. The new dock would be an extension of the existing dock. Existing facilities are not considered adequate to fully protect vessels during storms, or to allow for economic development along the waterfront of St. Paul. Operations during Fiscal Year 1988. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional model studies of the breakwater and of the harbor layout were completed at the Waterways Experiment Station, resulting in lowering of the main breakwater crest height and in the addition of the inner breakwater to reduce wave heights in the inner harbor. An Environmental Assessment was completed, and a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) was signed by the District Engineer. The General Design Memorandum was completed and approved. Plans and specifications were submitted by the local sponsor, and were approved after the appropriate modifications were made. The 204(e) agreement was signed by the local sponsor and by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works). The local sponsor received bids for the project and selected a contractor. However, the contract was not awarded because of the local sponsor's inability to secure complete financing for the project, and the bid was eventually voided. The city of St. Paul investigated additional sources of funding. 13. THOMAS BASIN, KETCHIKAN, AK Location. Thomas Basin is in the southeast part of Ketchikan, AK on the south coast of Revillagigedo Island on the north shore of Tongass Narrows in southeastern Alaska. It is 760 miles southeast of Anchorage and 700 nautical miles north of Seattle, WA, via the Inside Passage. (See NOAA Chart 17430.) Existing project. A small boat basin of 11.35 acres in area, with depth of -10 feet MLLW. It is protected by a 900 feet long rock breakwater with a concrete cap. The tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 12.0 feet and the extreme range is 26.0 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Sheltered moorage space is provided for 300 vessels. The harbor services commercial seiners, trollers, local, transient and refuge seeking fishing vessels. There is a tidal grid and a 2 ton jib boat crane. Power, water and limited telephone service is available. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Initiation of the letter report was held in abayance pending the outcome - 40-4 - ALASKA DISTRICT of the Wrangell Harbor breakwater repair, letter report, since the problems are very similar. No work was completed in FY-89. 14. WRANGELL HARBOR, AK Location. Wrangell Harbor is located on the west side of the northern end of Wrangell Island, 824 miles from Seattle and 160 miles from Juneau. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 8164, 8161, and 8201.) Existing project. This provides for a rubblemound breakwater 300 feet long to protect the southern portion of the outer harbor; dredging a mooring basin 600 feet long, 400 feet wide, and 10 feet deep below mean lower low water within the protected area; an inner basin in the tide flat area east of Shakes Island, 325 feet wide and 550 feet long and a connecting channel 120 feet wide and approximately 530 feet long and a connecting channel 120 feet wide and approximately 530 feet long from the outer mooring basin all at a depth of 10 feet at mean lower low water; and construction of a rock mound breakwater 320 feet long on the reef north of Shakes Island. The range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 15.7 feet. The extreme tidal range is 26 feet. Heavy swells, dangerous to small fishing boats, are caused by the wind, which causes an additional rise of about 1 foot. Construction of the breakwater north of Shakes Island was placed on inactive status as material to be used from the inner basin was unsuitable and the breakwater considered unnecessary for safe moorage of vessels. The cost of this portion was last revised in 1956 and estimated to be $6,500. (See table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are eight wharves and floats in Wrangell Harbor. Two privately owned wharves serving general cargo and passenger terminals, one of which includes a cold storage facility, are open for public use. The remaining wharves serve various industrial purposes. One of the floats is publicly owned and is open for public use for mooring and servicing small craft, and two privately owned floats serve oil handling facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A letter report was completed in June 1989 for final Division review. It recommended removing the concrete parapet wall and replacing it with an armor rock overlay to the seaward face of the breakwater. Division comments were received in July 1989 recommending additional analysis of the capability of the parapet wall to be patched. The life cycle cost analysis showed patching and armor overlay to be very close. All alternatives included repair of the breakwater head. No additional work was completed in FY-89. Study costs to date are $116,000. 15. WRANGELL NARROWS, AK Location. Wrangell Narrows is a constricted channel located between Mitkof Island and Kupreanof Island. It is approximately 24 miles long with its northern terminus ending at the city of Petersburg, AK located 730 miles southeast of Anchorage, AK and 700 nautical miles north of Seattle, WA, via the Inside Passage. (See NOAA Chart 17375.) Existing project. The main channel has been excavated to a 300 foot width and a depth of -24 mean lower low water throughout the length of the channel. Portions of the channel were surveyed in FY 88. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. This is a channel project and as such has no terminal facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Periodic surveys were conducted. The Corps of Engineers dredge Yaquina completed the maintenance dredging in FY89. Flood Control 16. CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK Location. In the vicinity of Fairbanks, AK, and encompassing the Tanana River, Chena River, Little Chena River, and their tributaries. (See USGS map Fairbanks, C1, D1, D2, and big delta D6.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Existing project. Moose Creek Dam has been constructed 17 miles east of Fairbanks with control works on Chena River. The dam itself extends from a bluff one mile north of the Chena River and south past the control works for approximately six miles to the Tanana River. The dam connects with a completed 22-mile levee system along the north boundary of the Tanana river to a point south and west of Fairbanks. Estimated Federal cost is $210,000,000, (excluding Little Chena Dam, presently deferred) and estimated non-Federal cost is $12,548,000. Operations during fiscal year. A construction contract for Moose Creek Dam gate modifications is currently underway. 17. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $640,795 for disaster preparedness and emergency operations. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong, as amended (preauthorization). 18. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections were made of flood control works at Gold Creek, Skagway River, Lowell Creek, Fairbanks, Galena, Bethel, Talkeetna River, and Klutina River during FY 1989. - 40-5 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 19. SNETTISHAM, AK Location. At mouth of Speel River, between Crater Lake to the west and Long Lake to the north, 29 nautical miles southeast of Juneau. (See Coast Geodetic Survey chart 8227.) Existing project. Snettisham is a multi-stage power project. The initial stage, which was completed in 1977, tapped Long Lake and included an underground powerhouse with two 23.4 megawatt units and a transmission line to Juneau, AK. The project was turned over to the Alaska Power Administration for operation and maintenance. The second stage, which is nearly complete, provided a tunnel to Crater Lake and added a third unit. The final phase will provide a dam on Long Lake to increase storage and the energy capability of Long Lake. The Long Lake Dam is currently unscheduled. The existing Long Lake (elevation 815 feet) water is transported through an approximately horizontal 13-foot diameter tunnel 8,400 feet long and a 1,400-foot penstock dropping at a 46 degree angle to the underground powerhouse at tidewater to drive two turbines with a combined generating capacity of 47,600 kilowatts. Power from two generators is supplied to Juneau by a 13.8 kilovolt overhead transmission line and a submarine cable traversing Taku Inlet. The Crater Lake stage of construction tapped Crater Lake (elevation 1,002 feet) to drive a third turbine installed in the existing underground powerhouse. An additional nameplated-rated generating capacity of 34,500 kilowatts was added. Estimated cost of Stage 1 and Stage 2 construction is $148,284,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The remote supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) contract was awarded in September 1989. Crater Lake Additions 2 (misc. powerhouse electrical improvements) and Transmission Line Improvements (overvoltage during switching) contracts are scheduled for award in May 1990. Crater Lake Additions 1 (trashrack design at Crater Lake tap opening) to be reevaluated when the lake is drawn down in April 1990. The study to determine economic viability of Long Lake Dam extension is complete. Conclusion to defer construction until Juneau power demand increases. Crater Lake Main Contract is essentially (complete. Successful lake tap occurred on October 21, 1988. Power-on-line initially occurred in May 1989, but was shut down for repairs to the spherical valve. Power was restored on November 1, 1989. Field testing of generator is scheduled for May 1990. Results of turbine efficiency tests are currently being evaluated. Repairs to the spherical valve are scheduled to begin June 1990. General Investigations 20. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs for surveys include $1,026,327 for flood control studies, $107,611 for coordination studies and $137,148 for miscellaneous activities. 21. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Technical assistance, information, flood plain management guidance and other flood plain management services have been provided to military and nonmilitary Federal agencies, local communities, State agencies, Architectural/Engineering firms, lending institutions and private individuals at a fiscal year cost of $143,626. Fiscal year cost for Hydrologic Studies were $20,182. 22. PRECONSTRUCTION, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Kodiak Harbor, AK The port of Kodiak is located 242 and 175 nautical miles south of Anchorage and Seward, respectively, and approximately 1,258 nautical miles northwest of Seattle. St. Herman Harbor is located at Near Island across Near Island Channel from Kodiak. The project authorized for construction consists of a 45 acre mooring basin with moorage facilities protected by a 1,900-foot rubblemound breakwater with a crest height of + 18 feet MLLW. The 45 acres of mooring area would provide single berthing for approximately 475 vessels up to 80 feet in length. The average depth of water in the mooring area is -45 feet MLLW. The authorized entrance channel is 2,000 feet long, of which 930 feet would be dredged 150 feet wide to a depth of -20 feet MLLW. The recommended plan has a 1.865 foot rubblemound split breakwater with a crest elevation of + 22 feet MLLW. The main entrance channel is located in the split breakwater and has a design width of 200 feet and design depth of -20 MLLW. Since the natural water depth at the main entrance channel is -55 feet MLLW, no dredging is required in this channel. A 100-foot rubblemound stub breakwater is recommended next to a secondary entrance channel at the north end of the harbor. this secondary entrance channel is to be 100-feet wide with a design depth of -12 feet MLLW, and will require 4.400 square yards of rock excavation. The current estimated cost of $18,806,000, of which $16,925,000 would be the Federal first cost and $1,881,000 is the non-Federal first cost (cash and lands easements rights of way). Local interests will pay 10 percent initially plus 10 percent during a period of up to 30 years, resulting in an ultimate non-Federal cost of $3,762,000. A Local Cooperation Agreement will be required with the city of Kodiak. Thirty-one piers, wharves, and docks are located in the port of Kodiak. Four are located in Womens Bay and two in Gibson Cove, west of the main part of the city. Twenty-four facilities are along the main waterfront of Kodiak, with thirteen on St. Paul Harbor and eleven on Kodiak Harbor, west and east of the Kodiak Small Boat Harbor, respectively. The remaining facility is the St. Herman Small boat harbor between Uski and Near Islands, directly south of the Kodiak Small Boat Harbor. Fiscal year costs were $528,250. - 40-6 - ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep.30, 1989 1. Anchorage Harbor, AK New Work 2. Bar Point Harbor, Ketchikan, AK 3. Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK 4. Dillingham Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 5. Homer Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 6. Kake Harbor, AK 7. Metlakatla Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 8. Ninilchik Harbor, AK Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,102,000 2,072,000 1,635,300 1,433,100 1,250,458 2,008,806 1,415,805 1,479,384 - 25,000 -- 9,187 --- 53,600 53,600 24,075 2.,55 10,800 28,222 -- - - 95,934 400,000 320,500 317,600 720,600 339,533 1,159 318,768 714,936 533,235 533,235 21,652,572 2 21,413,469 25,000 12,142 64,400 52,297 548,790 548,790 6,697,521 6,686,635 1,700 1,700 3,512,350 1 3,512,350 1 3,662,711 3,662,698 65,000 439,000 437,000 323,000 63,991 435,194 431,274 333,942 2,059 - - - 15,000 4,507 8,757 -- 115,000 67,698 75,668 1,000 84,161 150,923 20,000 36,504 550000 20,000 50,258 200,000 222,000 134,100 229,200 197,723 211,162 146,168 198,740 67,974 67,974 8,316,460 8,288,015 870,700 866,201 5,077,470 5,074,730 148,520 148,520 830,644 722,096 428,720 428,720 3,905,776 3,874,061 - 40-7 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1989, U.S. ARMY 1988 TABLE 40-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep.30, 1989 9. Nome Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 11. St. George, AK (Contrib. Funds) 12. St. Paul Harbor, AK 13. Thomas Basin, Ketchikan, AK 14. Wrangell Harbor, AK 15. Wrangell Narrows, AK 16. Chena River Lakes, AK (Contrib. Funds) 19. Snettisham, AK New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost *New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost 1,195,045 479,000 353,400 236,700 1,245,955 465,606 273,481 443,745 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 53,400 160,000 3,710,000 12,962 174,627 3,204,451 - 4,000 633,828 534,000 510,000 450,000 530,857 509,055 248,714 - --. - 75,000 -- 45,319 58,200 21,792 38,500 49,023 -30,000 14 52,500 21,787 - 231,200 1,263,800 - 201,660 1,257,306 3,478,000 3,590,751 13,500 871,881 7,200,000 6,819,420 887,000 847,469 .--- New Work Approp. 3,505,000 27,200,000 Cost 3,561,846 17,964,165 5,528,000 3,009,031 774,000 759,085 5,300,000 12,809,549 1,268,000 3,477,192 962,300 962,828 4,715,113 6,782,000 1. Includes $2,672 of Code 710 Rec. Funds and $1,509,678 for previous project. 2. Includes only actual Funds retained and cost incurred. 3. Includes $310,000 for previous project (Fairbanks). 4. Includes $1,624 for previous project (Fairbanks). - 40-8 - 1,348,240 1,348,240 9,219,052 9,207,617 167,500 167,500 4,000,000 3,392,040 637,828 0 1,494,000 1,288,626 28,200 21,806 537,020 537,020 497,352 447,481 1,494,900 1,458,966 213,991,765 3 213,270,157 3 6,463,124 4 6,352,178 4 2,182,300 2,145,929 136,236,556 132,423,306 ALASKA DISTRICT Table 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. July 3, 1958 2. Oct. 22, 1976 Sept 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 July 14, 1960 (as amended) July 3, 1958 3. July 2, 1958 Aug. 19, 1964 July 14, 1960 Aug. 13, 1968 ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK Deep winter harbor, adjacent to docks, dredge to 35 feet below mean lower low water, protected by two jetties. 1 Extension of project limits. BAR POINT HARBOR, KETCHIKAN, AK Dredge additional basin to 15 feet deep or to rock, and construct three breakwater 700, 1,100 and 450 feet long. Construct three breakwaters 1.208 feet, 165 feet, and 120 feet. Maintenance of 17.91 acre basin, two rock breakwaters and two floating breakwaters. H. Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.2 P.L 94- 587 H. Doc. 501, 82nd Cong., 2d Sess. Section 107, P.L 86- 645 Approved June 29,1978 Section 221, P.L 91- 611 BETHEL SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK Construct 7,700-foot-long small boat harbor and entrance Section 107, P.L 86- 645 channel by deepening, widening, and straightening the upper Authorized by the Chief of Engineers 6,800 feet of Brown's Slough. June 29,1978 Dredge 31 foot wide access channel and maneuvering and Section 221, P.L 91- 611 turning channel. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK Basin 230,000 square feet in area with depth of 2 feet above mean lower low water along Scandinavian Creek, with entrance channel 1,100 feet long and 40 feet wide. HOMER HARBOR, AK Basin 2.7 acres in area with depth of 12 feet below mean lower low water, and rock breakwater 1,260 feet long. Relocation and rehabilitation of project destroyed by March 27, 1964 earthquake, by construction of basin 10 acre in area with 12-foot depth over 2.75 acres and 15-foot depth over 7.25 acres protected by rock breakwaters, 1,018 feet and 238 feet long. Increased width and depth of entrance channel and an enlarged staging area. Basin enlarged from 16.5 to 50 acres. KAKE HARBOR, AK Basin 7-acre berthing area, 15 feet deep, inclosed by a 1,580-foot west rock breakwater and a 900-foot south rock breakwater. H. Doc. 390, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.2 H. Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st, Sess.2 P.L 88- 451 Section 107, P.L 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Nov. 13, 1981 S. Doc. 70, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. METLAKATLA HARBOR, AK Dredging small boat basin 2.18 acre in extent to a depth H. Doc. 138, 76th Cong., 91st Sess. of 10 feet below plane of mean lower low water; construction of rubblemound breakwater 900 feet long. Entrance channel and two rubblemound breakwaters Section 201, P.L 89- 298 inclosing a 7.0 acre basin. S. Doc. 92- 64, 92d Cong. 2d Sess. 2 Authorized Oct. 12, 1972 NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK Basin 320 feet long by 150 feet wide with depth of 2 feet H. Doc. 34, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. 2 above mean lower low water, approach channel 400 feet long and 50 feet wide with depth of 9 feet above mean lower low water, protected by 410- foot jetty. - 40-9 - 7. Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 27, 1965 July 3, 1958 8. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1989, U.S. ARMY 1988 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Sect ion Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents NOME HARBOR, AK Two jetties, easterly 335 feet and westerly 460 feet long H. Doec. 1932, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. 2 revetment, channel and basin 200 feet wide and 250 feet long. Extension of the jetties and enlarging basin to 250 feet H. Doe. 404, 71st cong., 2d Sess., wide and 600 feet long. 3 and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doec. 38, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. Seawall Reports of Chief of Engineers dated March 8, 1948 ST. GEORGE, AK Dredging the m,aneuvering ares from an average depth of Section 107 of The Rivers and + 3 feet MLLW to 18 feet below MLLW and dredging the Harbors Act of 1960, Public Law entrance channel from an average depth of 14 feet MLLW 86-645, as amended and Water to 20 feet below MLLW. Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662. ST. PAUL ISLAND, AK Add 1050 feet of breakwater at existing crest height, 37 feet mean low low water and 1,000 feet long with a crest height of + 18 mean low low water. THOMAS BASIN, KETCHIKAN, AK Breakwater 940 feet long to protect 11.35 acre basin dredged to 10-foot depth. WRANGELL HARBOR, AK Breakwater 300 feet long to protect southern portion of harbor. Mooring basin 600 feet long, 400 feet wide, and 10 feet deep. Inner basin and connecting channel from the existing mooring basin, both 10 feet deep at mean lower low water, and breakwater 320 feet long on the reef north of Snakes Island. Section 202, PL 99-662 H. Doec. 113, 70th Cong. 1st Sess.2 H. Doec. 161, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doec. 202, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doec. 284, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. WRANGELL NARROWS, AK Original channel 200 feet wide with depths of 21 feet in rock H. Doec. 179, 67th Cong. 2d Sess. and 27 feet at shoal No. 2. Enlargement of channel at shoat No. 1; easing curves for H. Doec. 647, 71st Cong., 3rd Sess 300 foot channel, 24 feet deep. Channel 300 feet wide and 24 feet deep at mean lower low H. Doec. 260, 76th Cong., 1st Sess water, with improvement of existing alignment and an anchorage basin 500 yards wide, and 26 feet deep. CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK Dam and reservoir on the main Chena River, a dam and detention reservoir on the Little Chena River, and a levee along the north side of the Tanana River.4 SNETTISHAM, AK Multi-purpose dam, with powerhouse and transmission facilities. S. Doe. 89, 90th Cong., 2d Sess.2 H. Doec. 40, 87th cong., 1st Sess.2 1. Purchase of dredge and deepwater jetties deauthorized November 6, 1977 under section 12, Public Law 93-251. 2. Contains latest published map. 3. Extension of jetties classified "inactive". 4. Little Chena Dam classified "deferred". -40-10- Table 40-B (Continued) 9. Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 30, 1935 June 16, 1948 Nov. 17, 1986 11. 12. 13. 14. Nov. 17, 1986 July 3, 1930 Sept. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 15. 16. Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 23, 1962 18. S. ). ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1989 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Apoon Mouth of Yukon River, AK1 Bar Point Harbor, AK2 Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK Cook Inlet Shoals, AK Cordova Harbor, AK Cordova, AK2 Craig Harbor, AK Douglas Harbor, AK Dry Pass, AK Egegik River, AK Elfin Cove, AK Gastineau Channel, AK Haines Harbor, AK2 Homer Harbor, AK2 Hoonah Harbor, AK Humboldt Harbor, AK Iliuliuk Harbor, AK Juneau Harbor, AK Kasilof Harbor, AK2 Ketchikan Harbor, AK Kodiak Harbor, AK Mekorykuk, AK Myers Chuck Harbor, AK Naknek River, AK Neva and Olga Straits, AK Old Harbor, Kodiak Island, AK2 Pelican Harbor, AK Petersburg Harbor, AK Port Alexander, AK Port Lions, AK2 Rocky Pass, AK St. Michael Canal, AK Seldovia Harbor, AK Sergius Whitestone, AK Seward Harbor, AK Sitka Harbor, AK Skagway Harbor, AK Valdez Harbor, AK Wrangell Narrows, AK Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed -Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1920 1983 1985 1977 1978 1986 1983 1963 1983 1972 1959 1964 1977 1987 1983 1977 1941 1974 1975 1979 1973 1986 1970 1961 1960 1972 1964 1972 1949 1986 1960 1916 1974 1973 1973 1973 1972 1968 1979 128,896 2,000,0003 1,520,272 1,220,000 843,534 9,642,000 1,033,5004 282,019 943,351 4,441 154,191 789,461 1,000,000 s 2,000,000 4,255,0006 3,679,6837 66,037 1,381,150 109,848 1,602,417 1,891,2128 1,372,139 9,700 20,789 155,009 370,415 369,683 252,932 17,000 1,825,311 337,668 377,062 1,051,8839 1,798,010 712,36910 1,611,009 133,180 649,74011 3,562,343 2,154 5,000 488,156 72,500 23,466 3,107 102,701 260,991 331,256 37,946 132,946 18,973 26,800 560 5,518 1,934 219,789 15,400 32,665 221,498 309,260 1. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107). 3. In addition, $272,779 of State funds. 4. Includes $656,240 for Sec. 107 project. 5. In addition, $925,500 of State funds. 6. In addition, $973,875 of State funds. 7. In addition, $857,000 of State funds 8. Includes $594,163 for rehabilitation. 9. Includes $400,000 for rehabilitation. 10. Includes $90,026 for rehabilitation and $2,528 Code 710. Recreation facilities at Completed projects. 11. Includes $73,000 for rehabilitation and $2,713 Code 710, Recreation facilities at Completed projects. - 40-11 - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS FOR FY 1989, U.S. ARMY 1988 TABLE 40-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1989 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Bethel Bank, Kuskokwim River' Completed 1985 553,970 Fairbanks, Tanana River & Chena Slough, AK Completed 1943 557,000 Gold Creek, AK Completed 1975 876,006 2 4,301 Klutina River, Cooper Center, AK a Completed 1973 260,681 Lowell Creek, AK' Completed 1945 416,382 a 30,771 Salmon River, AK Completed 1963 37,770 * ' 162,925 * Skagway River, AK Deferred * 1966 26,385 Talkeetna River, AK Completed 1981 516,694 1. Section 14 6. Includes $34,197 of PWA funds 2. In addition, $25,000 expended from contributed funds. 7. In addition, $7,000 expended from contributed funds. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205). 8. In addition, $27,400 expended from contributed funds. 4.During FY 88, $551,690 was expended from FC and CE. 9. Project eligible for deauthorization. 5. In addition $25,000 expended from contributed funds. TABLE 40-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Anchorage Harbor, AK (Uncompleted Portion) 1967 1977 Bradley Lake, AK 1983 1983 1982 46,701,000 Ketchikan Harbor, AK (West Breakwater) 1979 1979 Port Alexander, AK (Inner Harbor) 1949 1977 Tolovana River, AK (Snagging) 1931 1977 TABLE 40-H NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86- 645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Anchor Point, AK $ 88,565 Chenega Bay, AK 3,516 Chignik, AK 175,478 Dillinghan, AK 95,934 Fire Island, AK 7,500 Kenai, AK 1,225 Larsen Bay, AK 18,880 Manley Hot Sprixigs, AK 1,380 Mountain Point, AK 10,600 Ouzinkie Small Boat Harbor, AK 26,629 Pier III Shoal Removal Kodiak, AK 7,500 Point Mackenzie, AK 2,478 Port Graham, AK 985 Puffin Island Shoal Removal Kodiak, AK 7,500 Saxman, AK 46,524 Seldovia, AK 6,345 Whittier Small Boat Harbor, AK 14,605 TOTAL - 40-12 - ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 40-I PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Name of Project Date Survey Conducted Craig Harbor March 1989 Haines Harbor March 1989 Ilivlivk Harbor August 1989 King Cove Harbor June 1989 Metlakatla Harbor January 1989 Port Lions Harbor December 1988 Sitka Harbor March 1989 Skagway Harbor March 1989 Seward Harbor September 1989 - 40-13 - BOARD OF ENGINEERS FOR RIVERS AND HARBORS The Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors is a continuing body created by Section 3 of the 1902 River and Harbor Act. The board is selected by the Chief of Engineers and consists of seven senior engineer officers. The Deputy Chief of Engineers normally serves as chairman. The seven members are division engineers with membership rotated among divisions having civil works missions. The civilian staff members consist of an Acting Resident Member and three senior advisors. The board generally meets quarterly or on call of the chairman. The board under the direction of the Chief of Engineers: * Conducts independent review of reports as requested by Acts of Congress or resolutions of Congressional Committees, or as directed by the Chief of Engineers, concerning proposed works for development of the water resources of the United States; prepares reports and recommendations thereon in compliance with study directives, with regard to formulation of project scope, suitability of engineering plans, adequacy of costs, economic justification, and requirements of local cooperation including cost sharing and propriety of proposed construction by the federal government. * Reviews reports and makes recommendations for major modification or reconstruction of existing navigation improvements to ensure conformity with existing authorized improvements and essentiality for efficient and economical maintenance and operation. * Provides independent evaluation and counsel with respect to the environmental quality aspects of water resources development. * Provides assistance, as required, to HQUSACE in the development of policy and related procedures for the uniform application of standards in the project formulation process. * Provides advice on potential issues related to ongoing planning studies, as discussed during feasibility phase Issue Resolution Conferences. Total membership of the board is fixed by law at seven. In December 1982, the Chief of Engineers instituted a mechanism for predesignating future members, based on their time of service as division engineers, geographical factors, and other criteria. This procedure achieves a wider involvement of division engineers and their staffs with the proceedings of the board. Members Designate attend and participate in the meetings of the board, but are not permitted to vote on board actions. This procedure achieves a wider involvement of division engineers and their staffs with the proceedings of the board. The membership ofthe board as of September 30, 1989 was: Members: Major General Richard S. Kem, Deputy Chief of Engineers, Washington, DC Major General Robert M. Bunker, Division Engineer, South Atlantic, Atlanta, GA Brigadier General (P) John F. Sobke, Division Engineer, South Pacific, San Francisco, CA Brigadier General Arthur E. Williams, Division Engineer, Lower Mississippi Valley, Vicksburg, MS Brigadier General Robert H. Ryan, Division Engineer, Missouri River, Omaha, NE Brigadier General Theodore Vander Els, Division Engineer, North Central, Chicago, IL Brigadier General Robert C. Lee, Division Engineer, Southwestern, Dallas, TX Member Designate: Colonel (P) Paul W. Chinen, Division Engineer, Ohio River, Cincinnati, OH Official Board Actions. In compliance with resolutions of the Congress and instructions from the Chief of Engineers, the board approved three official report reviews during FY 1989. The favorable reports category includes favorable recommended projects for federal construction as well as projects for solving water resources problems for major metropolitan areas, even though they may not include recommendations for construction by any agency of the federal government. The board approved three projects at a estimated total first cost of $602,217,000, of which $341,933,000 is the first cost to the United States. A listing of the projects follows: Bayou La Batre, AL Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX Miami Harbor Channel, FL Recommending Unfavorable forFederal Construction: During FY 1989, the board concurred in the unfavorable recommendations of the reporting officers for federal construction on 12 projects: Buffalo Harbor, NY Clearwater, FL (Spoil Disposal) Eastern South Dakota & Upper Sioux, SD and IA Flagler County, FL Genesee River Basin, NY Great Lakes, Lake Ontario, and Lake Erie Kansas and Osage Rivers, KS Little Pee Dee and Pee Dee Rivers, NC & SC Mexico Beach, FL Peoria Lake and La Grange Pool, Illinois River, Henry to Naples, IL St. Marys River Basin, FL and GA Wild Rice-Marsh Rivers, MN Since 1902, the board has acted on 8,824 reports, recommending favorably on 3,935 and unfavorably on 4,889. 41-1 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION* The Mississippi River Commission (MRC) was created by an act of Congress on Jun. 28, 1879. The Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928, authorized the Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries (MR&T) Project. The Commission consists of three officers of the Corps of Engineers, one from the former Coast and Geodetic Survey (presently the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), and three civilians, two of whom must be civil engineers. All members are appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. During the fiscal year the Commissioners were: MG Thomas A. Sands, U.S. Army, President, appointed May 10, 1985, until his retirement in August 1989. BG Arthur E. Williams has served as Chairman since then. Mr. Sam E. Angel, appointed Sep. 25, 1979; Mr. R. D. James, civil engineer, appointed Dec. 1, 1981; Mr. Frank H. Walk, appointed Oct. 22, 1987; MG Charles E. Edgar III, appointed Oct. 22, 1987; RADM Wesley V. Hull, NOAA, appointed Jan. 4, 1988; COL Gerald E. Galloway, U.S. Army, appointed Oct. 28, 1989: COL John P. Carey served as Secretary of the Commission. The MRC is charged, under direction of the Secretary of the Army and supervision of the Chief of Engineers. with prosecution of improvements for flood control of the Mississippi River and of its tributaries and outlets in its alluvial valley, so far as they are affected by Mississippi River backwater, between Head of Passes, LA (mile 0), and Cape Girardeau, MO (1,006 miles AHP-Lower Mississippi mileage terminates at mile 954 AHP), and with prosecution of improvements in the interest of navigation between Cairo, IL (954 miles AHP), and Baton Rouge, LA (234 miles AHP); and for stabilization of the lower 7 miles of the right bank of the Ohio River, to former mouth of Cache River. It also is charged with prosecution of certain flood control works on the Mississippi River and tributaries, as far as they are affected by backwater, between Cape Girardeau, MO, and Rock Island, IL (1,437 miles AHP), and with prosecution of improvements on designated tributaries and outlets below Cape Girardeau for flood control, navigation, major drainage, and related water uses. Authorized operations of the Commission below Cape Girardeau are conducted by District Engineers of New Orleans, Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts within the areas described below, in accordance with approved directives and programs and congressional appropriations therefor. New Orleans District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required from Head of Passes, mile 0 to 320 AHP, construction of four salinity-control structures for fish and wildlife enhancement in lower Mississippi River Delta region; Bonnet Carre' and Morganza Floodways; maintenance and improvements of Mississippi River navigation channel from Baton Rouge, LA (mile 234 AHP), to mile 320; Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp); navigation improvement of Atchafalaya and Old Rivers from Mississippi River to Morgan City; control of Old and Atchafalaya Rivers; Atchafalaya Basin Floodways; flood control and drainage improvements in Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, in Bayou des Glaises, and in Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area; flood protection in eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, LA; and freshwater distribution from Atchafalaya River to Teche-Vermilion Basins. Vicksburg District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required from upper limits of New Orleans District (mile 320 AHP) in vicinity of Black Hawk, LA, to Coahoma-Bolivar County line, MS (mile 620 AHP) on left bank, and to vicinity of mouth of White River, AR (mile 599 AHP), on right bank including south bank Arkansas River levee to vicinity of Pine Bluff, AR, and north bank levee to vicinity of Tucker on left bank of Plum Bayou, AR; bank stabilization in lower 36.1 miles of Arkansas River; maintenance and improvement of Mississippi River navigation channel between miles 320 and 599 AHP; Vicksburg and Greenville Harbors; specific fish and wildlife facilities in Tensas, Yazoo, and Big Sunflower Basins; a demonstration erosion control project in the Yazoo Basin; flood control and drainage improvements in Red River backwater area including leveed portions east and west of Black River and south of Red River; Jonesville, LA, Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, Bayou Macon Basins and tributaries, AR and LA, and Bayou Lafourche, LA; Yazoo River Basin, MS, including backwater area; Big and Little Sunflower Rivers, Deer Creek, and Steele Bayou, MS; and Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR, including provision for agricultural water supply. * Authorizing legislation (Tables 42-D and 42-E) is listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 42-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 Memphis District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required, from upper limits of Vicksburg District to north bank of Little River diversion channel, MO (1,003 miles AHP), a few miles below Cape Girardeau, MO, on right bank, and to Cache River diversion channel (967 miles AHP) above Cairo, IL, on left bank, including levees and revetment on right bank of Ohio River, in Mounds-Mound City area, IL; except operations above Cairo, IL, do not include channel stabilization on the Mississippi River. Maintenance and improvement of Mississippi River navigation channel between mile 599 and 954 AHP and of Memphis Harbor, TN; specific fish and wildlife facilities in St. Francis Basin; levees in White River backwater area up to vicinity of Augusta, AR, and a pumping plant near mouth of White River; levees and pumping plants at De Valls Bluff and Des Arc, AR; channel improvements in Cache River Basin, AR; channel improvements in Big Creek and tributaries, AR; improvement works in St. Francis River Basin, MO and AR, including backwater area improvements in Belle Fountain Ditch and Drainage District No. 17, AR; Little River diversion channel, MO, and L'Anguille River, AR; Wolf River Basin, TN; Obion and Forked Deer River Basins, TN; Reelfoot Lake area, including channel improvement for Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9, TN and KY; West Kentucky tributaries, KY; Mud Lake pumping station, TN; and pumping plants and outlet structures in the Cairo-Mounds-Mounds City area, IL. Field operations of the commission restricted to levee construction under Sec. 6, 1928 Flood Control Act (local interests contributing one-third of costs and furnishing rights-of-way) are conducted within the following limits by two districts reporting directly to the Commission on matters within their jurisdiction--St. Louis District: Mississippi River (Sec. 6) levees from upper limits of Memphis District to Clemens Station, MO (1,254 miles AHP), on right bank, and Hamburg Bay, IL (1,215 miles AHP), on left bank, and Illinois River from its mouth to mile 120 at Havana, IL. Rock Island District: Mississippi River (Sec. 6) levees from upper limits of St. Louis District to Rock Island, IL (1,437 miles AHP). For work accomplished see Table 42-N. page 42-50, Annual Report for 1975. MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ALLUVIAL VALLEY BELOW CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO Location and description. The Mississippi River rises in Lake Itasca, MN, and flows generally southerly for 2,340 miles through the central portion of United States to empty into the Gulf of Mexico 115 miles below New Orleans. It is improved for barge navigation for 1,832 miles to Minneapolis, MN. The Mississippi River and its major tributaries, the Missouri, Ohio, St. Francis, White, Arkansas, Yazoo, and Red- Old Rivers, drain 1,245,000 square miles in all or part of 31 states between the Rocky and Appalachain Mountains and part of two Canadian provinces. Below Cape Girardeau, MO, 53 miles above Ohio River, river bottomlands widen abruptly into an alluvial valley of 35,460 square miles which was originally subjected to flood overflow. A major part of the alluvial valley has been protected from floods by levees which confine floodflows within a floodplain having an average width of 5 miles. (See map of alluvial valley of Mississippi River, scale 1:500,000.) Observations made by Mississippi River Commission to Sep. 30, 1982, show approximate all-time maximum and minimum discharges between levees as follows: Cairo to White River, 2,000,000 and 70,000 cubic feet per second; thence to Red River, 2,150,000 and 90,000 cubic feet per second; thence to the Gulf of Mexico, 1,500,000 and 50,000 cubic feet per second in Mississippi River and 660,000 and 11,000 cubic feet per second in Atchafalaya River. As the 1927 floodflow was not confined between levees, maximum discharges recorded do not include entire flow of the 1927 flood, maximum of record below White River. High water and flood stages usually occur in late winter or early spring, but great floods such as that of 1937 occurred as early as January. Low water stages generally prevail from August to December. Extreme all-time ranges in stages recorded at representative gages (rounded to nearest foot) are 60 feet at Cairo, 49 feet at Memphis, 57 feet at Red River Landing, and 21 feet at New Orleans (Carrollton). The river is nontidal above Red River Landing where tidal amplitude rarely exceeds 0.1 foot during extreme low water. Previous projects. For details see page 1944, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. The Mississippi River and Tributaries Project in the alluvial valley between Head of Passes, LA, and Cape Girardeau, MO, provides protection from floods by means of levees, floodwalls, floodways, reservoirs (in Yazoo and St. Francis Basins), bank stabilization, and channel improvements in and along the river and its tributaries and outlets insofar as affected by backwater of Mississippi River, including levee work on the main stem between Cape Girardeau and Rock Island. When completed, 23,621 square miles will be protected from the Mississippi River project flood. The project also provides for a 12- by 300-foot navigation channel between Baton Rouge, LA, and Cairo, IL; for salinity-control structures; and for channel realinement and improvement including bank stabilization and dikes to reduce flood heights, control natural tendency of river to lengthen by meandering, and protect levees from being destroyed by caving banks. Locations of major main stem Mississippi River improvements are shown in Table 42-A and those for off-main stem tributaries are shown in Table 42-B. Pertinent data on dams and lakes are shown in Table 42-C. Authorizing and incorporating legislation are shown in Tables 42-D and 42-E. Summary of presently estimated Federal cost of authorized improvements is shown in Table 42-F. Construction of the existing project began in 1928 and has continued throughout ensuing years. Based on the estimated cost of $15,418,030,000 (cost projected through the 42-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION construction period), and actual expenditures through Sep. 30, 1989, of $4,708,611,338, the entire project is about 77.9 percent complete. Recommended modifications. None. Local cooperation. The Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended, applies. Such requirements have, in general, been complied with by local interests. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 21, 1979/1982, for Ports of Baton Rouge and Lake Charles, LA; Port Series No. 20, 1981, for Port of New Orleans, LA; also folio of Flood Control and Navigation Maps of Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to the Gulf of Mexico (56th edition), 1988. Project cost. Total allotted for flood control, excluding maintenance charges through Aug. 18, 1941, chargeable under authorizations to Sep. 30, 1989, was $4,759,777,837. (See Table 42-S.) (See also Tables 42-R, 42-T, and 42-U for additional financial statements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Commission activities: The 333rd Session was held Apr. 17-21, 1989, on board the Motor Vessel MISSISSIPPI enroute on the Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to New Orleans, LA. Bank protection works, levees, and channel conditions were observed enroute. Public meetings were held at Cairo, IL; Memphis, TN; Vicksburg, MS; and New Orleans, LA, with approximately 190 people in attendance. This session adjourned at New Orleans, LA; at 10:00 a.m., Apr. 21, 1989. The 334th Session was held Sep. 11-15, 1989, on board the Motor Vessel MISSISSIPPI enroute on the Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to Morgan City, LA. Bank protection works, levees, and channel conditions were observed enroute. Public meetings were held at Cairo, IL; Memphis, TN; Greenville, MS; and Morgan City, LA, with approximately 190 people in attendance. This session adjourned at Morgan City, LA, at 10:40 a.m. on Sep. 15, 1989. Records of Proceedings of all sessions of the Mississippi River Commission are on file in the office of the President. Alluvial Valley Mapping General. Contoured quadrangles and general maps of the alluvial valley are available for departmental use and public distribution under prescribed regulations. Preparation, revision, and publication of quadrangle maps (scale 1:62,500) continued. Roadmap-type information brochures of principal portions of the overall project were published along with pamphlets on the subject of flood control and navigation. Maps and supplemental data sheets for active works were updated and published as required. The 1988 (56th) edition of the folio of flood control and navigation maps (scale 1:62,500) covering the Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to the Gulf of Mexico was revised and printed. The 1983-85 hydrographic survey of the Mississippi River (scale 1:20,000) was revised and reprinted. Approximately 5,046 flight-line miles of blackand- white aerial photography (various scales); 1,450 flight-line miles of color photography; and about 228 hours of oblique photography were flown along the Mississippi River and tributaries in the New Orleans, Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts. Work accomplished in the Districts: New Orleans District--The revision of Bonnet Carre, LA; Lac Des Allemands, LA; Napoleonville, LA; St. Bernard, LA; White Castle, LA; and Ysclosey, LA, quandrangle maps, 1:62,500 scale, were completed and will be printed in 1989. The 1989 (2nd) edition folio of flood control and navigation maps (scale 1:24,000) covering the Atchafalaya River was printed. The 1986-88 hydrographic survey of the Atchafalaya River 1:10,000 scale was completed and printed. Memphis District--Series conversion of U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000-scale to 1:62,500-scale quads of Dee, Melwood, Latour, Jonesboro, Vanndale, Wynne, Whitmore, Puxico, Park Place, Dyersburg, Halls, and Reelfoot Lake are complete. Vicksburg District--Series conversion of U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000-scale quadrangles to 1:62,500-scale quadrangles of McGehee, AR; Lake Village, AR; Eudora, AR; Wesson, AR; Potts Camp, MS; Denmark, MS; Bogalusa, LA; Sun, LA; Oden, AR; Athens, AR; Collinston, LA; Mangham, LA; Calvin, LA; Ashland, LA; Coushatta, LA; and Mansfield, LA; is in progress. Eva, LA; Monterey, LA; Jonesville, LA; Ferriday, LA; Harrisonburg, LA; Sicily Island, LA; Moreauville, LA; Marksville, LA; Colfax, LA; Jena, LA; Pollock, LA; Tullos, LA; Olla, LA; Fort Necessity, LA; Winnsboro, LA; Louann, AR; St. Joseph, LA-MS; Montgomery, LA; Provencal, LA; Campti, LA; Picayune, MS; Sumner, MS; Walthall, MS; and Pittsboro, MS were printed. Floods Streamflow observations during the fiscal year follow: Memphis District--Mississippi River crest stage of 46.7 feet at Cairo gage on Feb. 25, 1989, and maximum discharge of 1,101,600 cubic feet per second, occurred on Feb. 26, 1989, at Hickman, KY and crest stage of 30.5 feet at Memphis on Mar. 1, 1989, with maximum discharge of 1,198,400 cubic feet per second on Mar. 1, 1989. Vicksburg District--Flooding was widespread from January through July in the Vicksburg District during FY 89. Peak stages and discharges on the Vicksburg District's reach of the Mississippi River were as follows: Arkansas City, 34.9 feet on Mar. 8, 1989, and maximum discharge of 1,380,000 cubic feet per second; Vicksburg, 41.0 feet on Mar. 9, 1989, and maximum discharge of 1,400,000 cubic feet per second; and Natchez, 48.0 feet on Mar. 10, 1989, and maximum discharge of 1,400,000 cubic feet per second. 42-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 New Orleans District--On the Mississippi River, the Red River Landing gage recorded a maximum stage of 52.20 feet NGVD on Mar. 11, 1989, and the New Orleans gage recorded a maximum stage of 14.77 feet NGVD on Mar. 13, 1989. On the Atchafalaya River, the Simmesport gage recorded a maximum stage of 34.49 feet NGVD on Mar. 10, 1989. Studies and Investigations General investigations. Surveys and reports, authorized by laws and by Senate and House Public Works Committee resolutions, were made as required. Collection and study of basic data continued. No requests were received for modifications of the existing project, Mississippi River and Tributaries, authorized by the Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928, as amended (see Table 42-D). Reelfoot Lake, TN and KY, Reconnaissance Report including a negotiated cost sharing agreement and scope of feasibility studies was submitted to the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) for certification on Aug. 17, 1988. The report identified three economically feasible plans of improvement which, to differing degrees, addressed flood control, sediment control, water quality, water supply, fish and wildlife preservation and enhancement, recreation, regional development, and allied concerns of the area. On December 20, 1988, the Office of the Chief of Engineers determined that further Corps participation in a cost-shared feasibility study was not advisable at this time. As a result, certification of the reconnaissance report was not received. Engineering studies. A research program was continued for development of materials and more effective and economical design of regulation features for placing and stabilizing the Mississippi River in a suitable alinement. Potamology investigations of river behavior continue to be made. Investigations into the major causeand- effect relationships attributable to major changes in stage-discharge relationships on the Mississippi River as a result of both natural and man-made modifications are continuing. Mississippi River and Tributaries--Levees Operations and results during fiscal year. This feature consists of construction of new, and enlargement of existing, levees to approved grade and section; construction and restoration of levee berms; and construction, repair, and maintenance of roads on levees. Work accomplished is summarized in Table 42-N and further broken down as follows: New Orleans District--Enlarged 24.7 miles of levees and surfaced 9.2 miles of roads on levees in the Main Stem System. See Table 42-K. Vicksburg District--Completed 7.3 miles of berms and levees in the Main Stem System. See Table 42-L. Memphis District--Constructed 0.4 miles of levee extension, completed 0.8 miles of berms, and surfaced 0.4 miles of roads on levees in the Main Stem System. See Table 42-M. Condition as of Sep. 30. (See Tables 42-K, 42-L, 42-M, and 42-N.) There are 1,608.7 miles of levees authorized for the Mississippi River below Cape Girardeau, of which 1,601.9 are in place with 1,211.0 built to approved grade and section. The Main Stem Levee System consists of 2,201.5 miles, of which 2,195.7 are in place with 1,673.3 miles completed to approved grade and section. Included in this system are additional levees and structures along the south bank of Arkansas River (85.4 miles); along the south bank of Red River (59.2 miles, with 59.2 completed); and 449.2 miles in the Atchafalaya River Basin, with 449.2 in place with 317.7 completed to grade and section (see Table 42-N). Of the authorized 671.9 miles of berms, 515.3 are complete. Graveled or hard-surfaced roads have been constructed on 1,862.5 miles of these levees. There are an additional 1,608.2 miles of authorized tributary levees in the MR&T Project, of which 1,120.0, are in place with 906.0 to approved grade and section. Berms have been completed on 9.8 miles and 844.7 miles of graveled or hard-surfaced roads have been constructed on the levees. For last summary of levee work accomplished under Sec. 6, 1928 Flood Control Act, see Table 42-N, page 42-50, Annual Report for 1975. Mississippi River and Tributaries-- Channel Improvements Operations and results during fiscal year. Dredging: Mississippi River Main Stem--(See Table 42-G.) Work included dredging 51,904,300 cubic yards for maintenance of channel and harbor improvements. Minimum channel depth of 9 feet was maintained. Dredging was done with the following plant: New Orleans District, channel maintenance was performed by Government-owned dustpan dredge Jadwin. Vicksburg District, channel maintenance was performed by Government-owned dustpan dredge Jadwin and contract dredge Lenel Bean. The MR&T harbors, in the Vicksburg District, maintained were Greenville and Vicksburg by leased cutterhead dredge Natchez. Memphis District channel maintenance dredging was performed by Government-owned dustpan dredge Burgess, and leased dustpan dredge Lenel Bean. The MR&T Harbor maintained was Memphis Harbor (McKeller Lake), by leased cutterhead dredges Natchez, Fritz Jahncke, and Missouri H. Bank revetment and dikes: (See Table 42-H, 42-I, and 42-J.) Construction of 21.84 miles of new bank revetment and 150,733 squares of concrete mattress, for maintenance, along the Mississippi River was completed by Government plant and hired labor. Also, 4.42 miles of new dikes were constructed and 0 miles required for maintenance. The Ed Jones boat ramp was completed as a recreational facility on Obion-Tamm Revetment in Lauderdale County, Tennessee. The ramp was constructed of 42-4 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION articulated concrete mattress 40 feet wide and 310 feet long. This project was cost-shared on a 50-50 basis with Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency, the non- Federal project sponsor. No work was performed on tributaries. Other work performed in the interest of navigation, supplementing maintenance dredging on Mississippi River between Cairo, IL, and Baton Rouge, LA, included removal of snags, wrecks, and obstructions;. issuance of bulletins by the Vicksburg District providing information on available high-water velocities at selected locations; maintenance of bulletin boards showing daily gage readings at regular MRC gages; and contact pilot service furnishing navigation interests with latest information and advice on channel conditions and navigation interests. Cost of this work is given in Table 42-R. Condition as of Sep. 30. In carrying out authorized channel improvement program between Baton Rouge and Cairo, 16 cutoffs were developed between 1933 and 1942. These, combined with chute channel development and alignment improvements, decreased channel length between these cities by about 170 miles. However, current velocities increased the attack on the banks and the river began to regain its length. As a result, the net shortening between 1933 and 1962 was 114 miles of the theoretical 170-mile cutoff. There are now in place 920.99 miles of operative bank revetment and 227.60 miles of dikes on the lower Mississippi River. This amount of channel stabilization should prevent the river from regaining much more of its length due to meandering. A navigation channel 9 by 300 feet is being accomplished by revetment and dikes and maintained by dredging as required during the low- water season. Due to growing effectiveness of channel improvement program, average maintenance dredging requirements are steadily being reduced, and an increase in navigable depth is being obtained. Approximately 99.8 miles of foreshore protection have been constructed along the lower Mississippi River. There are 68.91 miles of revetment and 5.2 miles of dikes on tributary channels as listed in Tables 42-H, 42-I, and 42-J. New Orleans District ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor: Real estate activities and planning for construction were continued. New work by contract: Construction of floodside and landside berms and levee enlargement continued on the east and west protection levees. Two contracts on the west protection levee were completed over a distance of 6.0 miles with placement of 415,000 cubic yards; and on the east protection levee, one contract was completed over a distance of 6.2 miles with placement of 2,500,000 cubic yards. On the west protection levee one all-earth levee, totaling 6.7 miles, is under construction with placement of 580,000 cubic yards during this period. On the east protection levee 10.4 miles of levee enlargement and floodside and landside berms are under construction with placement of 1,730,000 cubic yards during this period. A contract for construction of the Blue Pointe Chute and American Pass channel training weirs was completed with placement of 120,000 tons of rock. Maintenance by hired labor: Operation and maintenance of Bayou Boeuf, Berwick, and Bayou Sorrel Locks, Morganza Control Structure, the West Atchafalaya Basin protection levee borrow pit, and numerous drainage structures as required, condition and operation studies, and water control management. Maintenance dredging was performed, resulting in the removal of 2,548,970 cubic yards by one leased cutterhead dredge from Berwick Bay harbor between March and August 1989; and removal of 117,212 cubic yards by leased cutterhead dredge from Three Rivers during August and September 1989. Conditions as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated Aug. 7, 1929, with commencement of the west protection levee from Bordelonville to Hamburg, LA. The project is 85.5 percent complete. The current estimated Federal cost is $1,462,000,000 and non- Federal cost is $8,000,000. Of the 449.2 miles of levees and floodwalls authorized for the Atchafalaya system, 317.7 miles are built to grade. See Table 42-K for status of levees. Major items remaining to be completed include completion of levees to grade and section, channel training works in the lower basin, realignment of the principal distributaries of the Atchafalaya River, and construction of two freshwater distribution structures. Approximately 37.4 miles of bank stabilization have been placed as shown in Table 42-H. BATON ROUGE HARBOR (DEVILS SWAMP), LA Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of the first 2.5 miles of the proposed 5.0 miles of channel was initiated in January 1958 and completed in July 1959, with 7,458,086 cubic yards excavated. The project is 16 percent complete, based on the current estimated Federal cost of $699,200 and cash contributions of $650,000. Completion of the remaining 2.5 miles is dependent on economic justification by developments on the initial channel. BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of water control management. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in June 1946 and is 57 percent complete, based on the current estimated Federal cost of $20,400,000 and 42-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 non-Federal cost of $323,000. See page 2031, Annual Report for 1961, for description of completed work. Work required to complete the project consists of enlargement of 13.5 miles of upper Bayou Boeuf, channel improvement of 25.3 miles of Bayou Cocodrie, enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from Washington, LA, to the west protection levee, and additional culverts through the west protection levee at 100 percent Federal cost in lieu of the previously authorized diversion channel from Washington to the Bayou Courtableau drainage structure. With the termination of the Eastern Rapides and South Central Avoyelles project, it has become necessary to provide an adequate outlet structure solely for the Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries project. The economic effects of this change along with current benefits estimates have caused the benefit-cost ratio for the project to be less than unity. As a result, the project has now been classified as "inactive." If economic conditions change, the project could be reactivated. BONNET CARRE' SPILLWAY, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor: Condition and operation studies, water control management, and ordinary maintenance of the control structure and spillway continued. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of the spillway was initiated in Fiscal Year 1929. The control structure was completed in 1931, levees were completed in 1932, and utility crossings were completed in 1936. The cost of the completed work is $14,212,200. It was necessary to operate the structure to reduce flood stages in 1937, 1945, 1950, 1973, 1975, 1979, and 1983. OLD RIVER, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of operation and maintenance of the lock and control structures as required, condition and operation studies, water control management, maintenance of cleared areas, levee shaping, operation of a picket boat at the inflow channels to the low-sill and auxiliary control structures, and engineering studies. Maintenance by contract: In September 1989, 104.490 cubic yards of shoal were dredged from the lock forebay. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began September 1955 and is complete at a Federal cost of $301,300,000. Principal items completed are as follows: Low-sill structure, June 1959; overbank structure, October 1959; auxiliary structure, September 1986; levees and levee enlargements, October 1963; inflow and outflow channels for the low-sill structure, February 1961; inflow and outflow channels for the auxiliary structure, August 1987; navigation lock completed December 1962 and opened to navigation March 1963, at which time Old River was closed to navigation with a rock and earthfill dam; highway approaches and bridge over the lock completed March 1965. Approximately 9.4 miles of bank protection have been constructed at the inflow and outflow channels. (See Table 42-H for details of bank protection.) Vicksburg District TENSAS BASIN, AR AND LA Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, and Bayou Macon, AR and LA. Planning and design on project features are complete. The Lake Chicot Pumping Plant and related features are complete and in operation. The riverside gate repair contract awarded August 26, 1988, is continuing and a contract for the bulkhead gate repairs was awarded August 18, 1989. A third contract for pump repairs at the pumping plant is scheduled for award the first quarter of FY 90. (b) Red River backwater area. Planning and design continued on project features. All channel work required to get flows to the Tensas Cocodrie Pumping Plant and gravity structure is complete. The gravity structure and the pumping plant are complete and are being operated and maintained by contract. One mitigation item, the construction of two water control weirs, was completed in May 1988. Contracts for three additional mitigation features were awarded in December 1988 and February 1989. Planning and design continue on the two remaining mitigation features. Tensas-Cocodrie, Item 4-A, levee enlargement, 6.3 miles in length, was completed in September 1988. Construction of Item 4-B was initiated Sep. 27, 1988, on 2.4 miles of levee enlargement and a contract for Item 2 is scheduled for July 1990. These contracts will complete the levee enlargement for the remaining 12.7 miles of the levee system. Fool River Bayou Pumping Plant has been awarded to Fromherz Engineering. The FDM for this feature is scheduled to be complete September 1990. Work on the Below Red River Phase II GDM has been delayed pending economic justification. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Beouf and Tensas Rivers, and Bayou Macon, AR and LA. Channel improvement has been accomplished on 741.7 miles of project streams, providing major drainage outlets for the tributary areas. Additionally, 61.0 miles of the Tensas River has been cleared and snagged. The GDM for the Tensas River Project, above mile 61, including Mill Bayou-Bayou Vidal is complete pending approval and resolution of review comments. (b) Red River backwater area. Levees in Tensas- Cocodrie area are complete except for levee raising of 12.7 miles. The work comprised 93.1 miles of new levee, excluding 2.1 miles of high ground where no 42-6 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION levees are required, and 86.9 miles of gravel road on levees. Work is underway on an item of levee raising consisting of 2.4 miles. Construction of 63.4 miles of levee, Larto Lake to Jonesville levee system, has been completed. A levee grade reevaluation study for all levee systems in the Red River Backwater area was completed in Mar. 1985. Based on results of that study, work is underway to complete enlargement of the Tensas-Cocodrie levee system. Levee Item 4-A has been completed, and levee Item 4-B has been awarded. Levee work on Sicily Island area consists of 56 miles of new levee, 4 miles of which have been completed. LOWER ARKANSAS BASIN, AR Condition as of Sep. 30. Arkansas River levees. A total of 56.2 miles of the 61.5 miles of north bank levees and all of the 85.4 miles of south bank levees have been completed to approved grade and section. These levees above mile 36.1 are protected by bankprotection works constructed as a feature of project for Arkansas River and tributaries, AR and OK. For present status of this work, see report of Little Rock District. Below mile 36.1, needed bank protection is constructed with project maintenance funds. Big Bayou Meto gates and lifting mechanism were replaced during FY 88. YAZ00 BASIN, MS Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Yazoo City and Belzoni protection works. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of levees, drainage facilities, and pumping plant. (b) Greenwood protection works. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of pumping plant, levees, and drainage facilities. (c) Main stem. Construction of the Bee Lake Drainage Structure is complete. Levee closure at Bee Lake is scheduled for award in FY 90. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of channels, levees, and drainage facilities. (d) Big Sunflower River, etc. A contract was awarded Oct. 31, 1986, on Item 66-A, Steele Bayou Channel Improvement, Miles 63.0 to 68.7. The next item of work is scheduled for award in December 1989. (e) Tributaries. Construction: (1) Levees. Levee work associated with the last item of work on Ascalmore-Tippo Project is complete. Levee work associated with Item 1 and Item 1-A Pelucia Creek is complete. Construction of the next item of work at Pelucia Creek, Item 2, is scheduled for award in February 1990. (2) Channels. An award for construction of the Alligator-Catfish, Round Lake, Water Control Structure was awarded Mar. 31, 1989. Construction on the remaining channel work on the Ascalmore-Tippo Project is complete. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of channels, levees, and drainage facilities. (f) Enid Lake. (See Table 42-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Rehabilitation of boat channels and snagging and clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 241.59 feet NGVD on Sep. 30, 1988, when storage in the flood control pool was 156,300 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow was 13,300 cubic feet per second on Jan. 19, 1988. On Sep. 30, 1988, pool elevation was 241.59 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 156,300 acre-feet. (g) Grenada Lake. (See Table 42-C.) Construction of remaining public-use facilities has been deferred pending development of cost-sharing agreements with local interests for construction and non-Federal operation and maintenance, consistent with projects for which recreation facilities are being constructed under the provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreational Act of 1965 (Public Law 89-72), as amended. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 205.40 feet NGVD on Sep. 25, 1988, when storage in the flood control pool was 273,100 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow was 7,050 cubic feet per second on Jan. 20, 1988. On Sep. 30, 1988, the pool elevation was 205.32 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 271,400 acre-feet. Construction of a levee to provide protection to the community of Coffeeville from high Grenada Lake stages was begun in FY 82. In addition to the levee, other features of Coffeeville project include: three drainage structures through the levee; portable pumps; area rehabilitation; and raising of a town street. Construction of the levee and two of the drainage structures was completed in FY 82. The remaining feature of the Coffeeville project was completed in early FY 84. (h) Sardis Lake (See Table 42-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 252.46 feet NGVD on Sep. 26, 1988, when storage in the flood control pool was 395,300 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow was 16,300 cubic feet per second on Jan. 21, 1988. On Sep. 30, 1988, the pool elevation was 251.98 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 383,300 acre-feet. An 8-mile reach of the Little Tallahatchie River from Sardis Dam to Highway 51 was clogged with sediment restricting releases from the lake. This reach has been dredged to restore the design capacity of the river. Six disposal sites were selected, located in upland hill areas to reduce the adverse impact on prime agricultural lands along the river and still be in compliance with environmental laws and regulations. Dredging was completed in August 1982. Sardis Lower Lake Weir was awarded May 10, 1989, and is approximately 71 percent complete. (i) Arkabutla Lake. (See Table 42-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and 42-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 operated. Clearing of tributary streams in the lake area was continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 241.03 feet NGVD on Jul. 5, 1989, and storage in flood control pool was 622,700 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow was 51,600 cubic feet per second on Jul. 2, 1989. On Sep. 30, 1989, the pool elevation was 221.80 feet NGVD, and storage in the flood control pool was 146,200 acre-feet. (j) Yazoo Basin backwater. The Yazoo area backwater levees are complete, including the backwater levee from the Mississippi River levee to the west levee of the lower Auxiliary Channel, the Little Sunflower River drainage structure, and the connecting channel from the Steele Bayou drainage structure to the Big Sunflower River. A Phase I GDM was completed in FY 82 which addresses rural flooding from ponded runoff inside the backwater levee. A GDM for a pumping station of 17,500 cfs to reduce this ponding was approved Jul. 12, 1985. Later budgetary guidance reduced the pumping plant capacity to 10,000 cubic feet per second. A contract for portions of the inlet and outlet channel excavation for the pumping plant has been completed. A construction schedule for the remaining project features is dependent upon the local sponsor meeting the cost sharing requirements specified in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The Satartia area backwater levee is complete. Rocky Bayou area levee Item IA was completed November 1987. Item lB was awarded in November 1986. Completed backwater levees will require raising to provide the degree of protection intended based on the project design flow line developed for the Mississippi River following the 1973 flood. Four Greentree Reservoirs and pumping stations are now complete. A decision on construction of the remaining reservoirs will be made in the future after the U.S. Forest Service has had a substantial period of time to monitor the operation of the existing facilities. (k) Upper Yazoo Projects. The first eight items of channel improvement, approximately 56 miles, and two drainage structures have been completed. This work extends from Yazoo City, MS, to about 15 miles upstream of Belzoni, MS. A contract for the next item of work, levee and channel Item 3A-1, was awarded May 2, 1988. East Hollie Lake Drainage Structure located about 18 miles north of Belzoni was awarded March 17, 1988. Mosquito Lake Drainage Structure, located about 11 miles south of Greenwood, was awarded Apr. 20, 1989. The Fort Pemberton Flood Control Structure is under construction and will be completed early FY 90. Planning is continuing on upstream channel and levee work. (1) Streambank erosion control. Construction of the following projects has been completed: Tillatoba and Hunter Creeks, Items 1 and 2; Hunter Creek, Item IA; South Fork Tillatoba Creek, Items 5A and 5B; North Fork Tillatoba Creek, Items A and 3A; Batupan Bogue, Items 4A, 4A-1, and 4A-2; Perry Creek, Items 6A and 6B; Johnson Creek, Items 9A, 9B, and vegetative treatment, Item 12; Goodwin Creek, Items 8A, 8B, and 8C; and Hotopha Creek, Item 7. All construction under this feature is complete. and a final report was submitted to the Secretary of the Army Jan. 5, 1982. All work constructed has been turned over to the local sponsors for operation and maintenance except for the instrumented system on Goodwin Creek where the structures were retained for possible future studies. The Demonstration Erosion Control Project (DEC), a joint project with the USDA Soil Conservation Service was initiated by FY 85 appropriations as a continuation on streambank erosion control efforts. The purpose of the project is to demonstrate the applicability of a systems approach to the design of erosion, sedimentation, and flood control works by applying this approach to six demonstration watersheds in the Yazoo Basin hill area. Condition as of Sep. 30. The first feature of Yazoo Basin project was started in 1936, and the total project is about 35 percent complete. A total of 50.9 miles of backwater levee has been completed to the interim grade. The ongoing Yazoo Basin Comprehensive Study will address other water resources problems and needs in the area to include urban and rural flood damage prevention, hydropower, and water supply. During FY 88, work continued in the DEC toward development of the systems plans and implementation of a monitoring program. The District completed the construction of 11 grade control structures; 32,500 linear feet of bank stabilization; and 4.1 miles of clearing, snagging, and debris removal. Construction was initiated on 2 grade control structures, 20 riser pipe grade control structures, and 0.3 mile of channel realignment and stone paving. LOWER RED RIVER--SOUTH BANK RED RIVER LEVEES, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of water control management and economic studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in FY 29 and is complete. All of the 59.2 miles of levees authorized are completed to approved grade and section. Memphis District ST. FRANCIS BASIN, AR AND MO Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Little River Drainage. Alteration of New Madrid County Route 282 for Ditch 281-9, awarded Apr. 18, 1988, 95 percent complete. Channel cleanout, Ditches 293 and 281-9, awarded Jul. 15, 1988, 42-8 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION complete May 12, 1989. Channel cleanout, Castor River Item 2, Parcel 2 awarded Jul. 29, 1988, 80 percent complete. (b) Upper St. Francis River. Belle Fountain Ditch, alteration of Missouri State Highway NN Bridge awarded Jul. 16, 1986, 40 percent complete. State Line Ditch 29 alteration of Arkansas State Highway 181 Bridge awarded Jul. 12, 1985, complete Feb. 9, 1989. Upper Buffalo Creek alteration of Missouri State Highway 164 and N awarded Jun. 27, 1985, complete Jun. 17, 1988. Alteration to Arkansas State Highways 77 and 119, Ditches 10 and 12 awarded Mar. 2, 1987, 96 percent. Alteration of seven powerlines Ditches 10 and 12 awarded Feb. 24, 1987, 70 percent. Oak Donnick Floodway alteration of railroad bridges awarded Jun. 5, 1987, 95 percent complete. Riprap protection and Ditch 61 channel extension, awarded Sep. 7, 1988, 34 percent. Blackfish Bayou, Item 3, awarded Jun. 17, 1987, 95 percent complete. Highway 18-State Line, Drainage District No. 17, awarded Aug. 30, 1988, complete Nov. 24, 1988. Honey Cypress Township Bridge, Miles 8.92 and 10.05, awarded Aug. 12, 1988, complete May 23, 1989. Main Ditch No. 9, County Bridge at Mile 0.79, awarded Aug. 29, 1988, complete May 12, 1989. Gravel surfacing below Highway 18, awarded Jul. 29, 1988, complete Apr. 20, 1989. Channel enlargement, Ditch No. 12, awarded Apr. 25, 1988, complete Sep. 29, 1988. Channel enlargement State Line Ditch 29 awarded Mar. 17, 1988, completed May 5, 1989. Upper Buffalo Creek, Item 2, awarded Feb. 29, 1988, complete Oct. 26, 1988. Alteration of Missouri State Highway 164 Bridge, Main Ditch No. 9, awarded Jul. 21, 1988, 70 percent complete. Belle Fountain, Channel Enlargement, awarded Jul. 28, 1989, 10 percent complete. Main Ditch 9, 2 County Bridges, Miles 2.91 and 5.88, awarded May 30, 1989, 10 percent complete. Ditch 19 Extension, Bridge 33.19, awarded Oct. 31, 1988, completed Jul. 28, 1989. (c) Lower St. Francis River. Ditch No. 60 at Highway 63 channel maintenance, awarded Aug. 12, 1988, complete Nov. 18, 1988. Cleanout Ditch No. 251, awarded Mar. 24, 1988, complete Nov. 8, 1988. Repair work Big Lake Area Control Structure awarded Sep. 28, 1987, complete Oct. 28, 1988. Blackfish Bayou, Item 3, awarded May 26, 1989, 27 percent complete. Below Marked Tree, Slope Restoration, Item 1, awarded Jun. 2, 1989, 52 percent complete. Channel Cleanout, Madison to Highway 64, awarded Sep. 30, 1988, 42 percent complete. Alteration Bridge Route 306, Blackfish Bayou, Item 3, awarded Sep. 5, 1989, 3 percent complete. Honey Cypress Creek Channel Improvement, awarded May 26, 1989, 18 percent complete. Ditch 1, Highway 77 Scour Repairs, awarded Jan. 12, 1989, completed Aug. 2, 1989. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Little River Drainage. Project was initiated during 1938 and is 90 percent complete. (b) Upper and Lower St. Francis River and Tributaries. Project was initiated during 1937 and is 81 percent complete. WHITE RIVER BACKWATER LEVEES Operations and results during fiscal year. Water service to Graham Burke Pumping Station, awarded Aug. 20, 1986, complete Sep. 30, 1988. Scour Repairs, Miles 37 and 39, awarded Apr. 17, 1989, and completed Aug. 10, 1989. LOWER WHITE RIVER Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. There were no contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. (b) Clarendon Levee. There were no contracts awarded or completed. Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. Project was initiated during 1946 and is 39 percent complete. (b) Clarendon Levee. Project was initiated during 1972 and is 36 percent complete. CACHE BASIN, AR Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1971 and is 4 percent complete. REELFOOT LAKE-LAKE NO. 9, TN AND KY Operations and results during fiscal year. Lake 9, KY/TN, awarded May 23, 1989, 50 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1974 and is 89 percent complete. WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES, TN Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Obion River, TN. Obion Rivers channel improvement is 64 percent complete. (b) Forked Deer River, TN. Forked Deer River channel improvement is 85 percent complete. Condition as of Sep. 30. West Tennessee Tributaries Project is 41 percent complete. WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY Operations and results during fiscal year. No contract awarded or completed during fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1978 and is 4 percent complete. 42-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES Madrid Bend, awarded Jun. 29, 1988, complete Dec. Operations and results during fiscal year. 20, 1988. R-0-5 Ac. Parcel 2, Cairo-Mound City, IL, awarded Dec. 18, 1987, complete Oct. 24, 1988. Levee work, CONSTRUCTION GENERAL Item No. L-859, Parcel No. 1, awarded Aug. 18, 1988, 95 percent complete. Levee extension, L-895, Levee Roadway Resurfacing, L-661-R.M., awarded Jun. 16, 1989, completed Aug. 29, 1989. 42-10 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-A MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Head of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 0-9571 Head of Passes, LA-Cairo, IL Dredging, revetment, and 10-81 11-25 38 45 118 81 44-91 81-96 91-104 96-279 104-234 127-129 129-234 235 279-287 287-303 303-314 314-572 437 437-721 490 537 646 605-666 672-993 The Jump-New Orleans, LA Baptiste Collette-Bayou Ostrica, LA Homeplace, LA Bohemia, LA Davis Pond, LA (formerly Myrtle Grove, LA) Caernarvon, LA Bohemia, LA-New Orleans, LA New Orleans, LA New Orleans, LA New Orleans-Morganza, LA New Orleans-Baton Rouge, LA Bonnet Carre' Floodway, LA Bonnet Carre' Baton Rouge, LA Baton Rouge Harbor Morganza Floodway, LA Morganza-Old River, LA Old River, LA control Old River-Cypress Creek, AR Vicksburg Harbor, MS Vicksburg-Lake View, MS Wilson Point, LA Greenville Harbor, MS Long Lake, Helena, AR Henrico-Helena, AR St. Francis River-Commerce, MO 3 contract work Main line levee, right bank Local levees, left bank Salinity control structure, right bank Salinity control structure, left bank Salinity control structure, right bank Salinity control structure, left bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Main line levee, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Main line levee, right bank Main line levee, left bank Regulating spillway, left bank Main line levee, left bank Devils Swamp barge channel Regulating spillway, right bank Main line levee, right bank Levee closure and enlargement, low and high water spillway structures, navigation lock, and approach channels, right bank Main line levee, right bank Harbor extension and industrial fill Main line levee, left bank Pumping Plant and drainage structure, right bank Harbor improvements and port area Culvert and floodgate, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, right bank Main line levee, right bank by Public Law by Public Law Modified by Public Law 87-874. Extends up south bank of Old River to Barbre Landing. Authorized by Public Law 83-780. Joins Arkansas River, south bank levee. Authorized by Public Law 70-391. Modified by Public Laws 79-526 and 83-780. Unpublished Vicksburg District's MRC report approved Apr. 14, 1966.2 Authorized by Public Law 85-500. Authorized by Public Law 79-526.2 42-11 Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Postauthorization change report, approved June 1987. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized 81-516. Authorized 81-516. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 42-A MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS (Continued) Mileage Above Head of Passes 722-725 721-734 803-873 857 Locality Industrial levee (Ensley Bottoms) Memphis Harbor, TN Tiptonville-Obion River Near Mud Lake, TN Improvement Leve Closu indi chat Main exte Riv Pump chat 890 - St. Johns Bayou, MO Draii clos 890 New Madrid Floodway, MO Draii clos 890-954 New Madrid-Birds Point, MO Flooc 902-922 Slough Bend, Hickman, KY Main 922 Hickman, KY Flooc 946 Peafield, MO Draii 9571 Cairo, Cairo drainage district Flooc 9571 Cairo, Cairo drainage district, Flooc Mounds, Mound City, and plan vicinity Thebes-Rock Island, IL Leve Cape Girardeau, MO to Rock Leve Island, IL 1. Cairo, IL, is on Ohio River about 3 miles above its mouth (Mississippi River mile 954 AHP). 2. Also see Table 42-D, "Authorizing Legislation." e and pumping station ire of Tennessee Chute, istrial fill, levee, harbor nnels, etc. 1 line levee, left bank, levee ension, and diversion Obion er pin g station and adjacent nnel improvements nage floodgate and levee ure nage floodgate and levee ure dway, right bank line levee, left bank dwall, left bank nage floodgate dwalls and levees dwalls, levees, and pumping nt es, both banks es Remarks Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Modified by Acts of Jul. 24, 1946 and Dec. 23, 1971. Authorized Dec. 15 and 17, 1970 under Sec. 201 of Oct. 27, 1965 FC Act. Modified by Jul. 24, 1946 Act. Modified by Sep. 3, 1954 Act. Authorized by Sep. 3, 1954 Act. Intermittent (Sec. 6). Intermittent (Sec. 6). 3. Commerce, MO, is on Upper Mississippi River, 39 miles above mouth of Ohio River. 42-12 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 0-54 27-54 54-117 20-27 25-117 27 0-27 31-57 80 53-117 117 117-129 117-129 105 105-120 115 116 5 5-105 29 29 40 40 40 Floodway Floodway Floodway ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA' Atchafalaya Basin. Morga uza and West Atchafalaya Flood ways West Atchafalaya Floodway between Red River and Alabama Bayou Morganza Floodway between Mississippi River and Alabama Bayou Atchafalaya Basin Floodway between Alabama Bayou and Morgan City East protection le ee (Morganza and Atchafalaya Flood ways) Lacour-Red Cross Morganza-Morgan City Bayou Latenache Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area Bayou Fordoche-Ramah Bayou Sorrell Bayou Sorrel Lock-Morgan City Morgan City Below Morgan City Below Morgan City Atchafalaya Basin Flood way lower protection lep'ee Calumet Below Morgan City Berwick' Patterson West protection leee (Atchafalaya Basin and West Atchafalaya Flood ways) Simmesport-Hamburg Mansura to Wax Lake Outlet Coulee des Grues West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Bayou Darbonne West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Including lower Morganza Floodway guide levee. Through upper Morganza guide levee and enlargement of outlet channel. Enlargement of Bayou Latenache. Approved Jun. 4, 1970. See Table 42-D. Levee landside borrow pit. Alternate route, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Port Allen to Morgan City. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway utilizes levee west side borrow pit channel. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Bypass route for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. East of lower river. Bayou Teche-Wax Lake Outlet. Inclosed area between Wax Lake Outlet and Berwick. Lower Atchafalaya River. Adjustment to provide fresh water. West Atchafalaya Floodway. Through West Atchafalaya protection levee. 42-13 Levee, upper Morganza guide Levee and Morgan City floodwall Drainage structure, Pointe Coupee, and channel enlargement Additional drainage facilities Drainage channel Lock Alternate navigation channel, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Lock in Bayou Boeuf' Channel relocation Levee, floodwall Floodgate, east Levees, floodwall, drainage structures, and pumping plants Lock Water system Levee fuse plug Protection levee Levee enlargement and floodgate extension Railway Railway Gated drainage structures Highway Highway REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 41 Bayou Courtableau 41 41 94 94 105 105 0-54 5-6 5-66 28-30 40-41 54-117 94-106 Mileage Above Mouth 0-8 50-133 96 133 0-17 17-40 40-51 51-60 17-42 87-107 40 60 West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Charenton Jaws-Lake Fausse Pointe Calumet Wax Lake Outlet Atchafalaya River Barbre Landing-Alabama Bayou Simmesport Simmesport-Bayou Garofier Melville Krotz Springs Below Alabama Bayou Mississippi River-Morgan City TECHE-VERMILION BASINS, LA Atchafalaya River to Teche- Vermilion Basins Courtableau Basin, LA, and outlets Charenton Canal West Atchafalaya protection levee borrow pit channel Bayou Courtableau spillway Bayou des Glaises BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES Bayou Courtableau Bayou Cocodrie Bayous Cocodrie-Boeuf diversion Bayou Boeuf Bayous Boeuf-Rapides diversion Upper Cocodrie Bayou Boeuf Bayou Lamourie to Kincaid Structures Lecompte Control Structure Bayou Rapides Control Structure Gated drainage control structures and channels Railway Railway Floodgate and approach channels Outlet, Charenton drainage canal and protection levee. Floodgate, west Drainage canal-railway and highway bridges East bank, levee Levee, ring, and drainage structure West bank, levee Levee, ring Levee, ring Channel enlargement 12- by 125-foot navigation channel Pumping station above Krotz Springs, conveyance channels, and appurtenant works Drainage channel Drainage channel Drainage control structure Diversion channel Enlargement and additional culverts Enlargement and realinement New channel New channel New channel Enlargement, clearing, and snagging Enlargement, realinement, clearing and snagging Fixed elevation weir Gated drainage structure 42-14 Borrow pit channel to Grand Lake through West Atchafalaya protection levee. Restoration of drainage west of West Atchafalaya Basin protection levee. Bayou Teche and Wax Lake Outlet. To lower flood heights. Increase channel capacities to decrease flood heights. Through Grand and Six Mile Lakes. Freshwater distribution from Atchafalaya River to Teche-Vermilion Basins. Outlet to gulf. Intercepting drainage channel. Washington to west protection levee. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks Bayou Lamourie Control Structure Various LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson Parish, LA AMITE RIVER, LA Amite River, LA LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK, RED RIVER LEVEES, LA Moncla-Hotwells Red River-Moncla to Lake Long EASTERN RAPIDES AND SOUTH-CENTRAL AVOYELLES PARISHES, LA Eastern Rapides and southcentral Avoyelles Parishes, LA TENSAS BASIN, AR AND LA Red River backwater area Tensas-Cocodrie area Larto Lake-Jonesville Sicily Island area Below Red River area Black River, LA Six Mile Bayou area Jonesville, LA Ouachita River Boeuf and Tensas Rivers a lnd Bayou Macon, AR, and LA Bocuf River, AR, and LA Below Bayou La Fourche Bayou LaFourche Boeuf River, AR, and LA above Bayou LaFourche Canal 19 Canal 19 extension Big and Colewa Creeks 87 (2, 3) Gated drainage structure Railway, highway, and local road bridges, and pipeline crossing Flood protection Bank protection Levee, south bank Levees Flood protection and drainage improvement Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plant Levees, drainage channels, and structures Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plants Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plants Drainage structure and appurtenant channel works Levees, floodwall, pumping plant, and interior drainage Levees, drainage channels, and structures Clearing Channel improvement and realinement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement 42-15 Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Eliminated by Public Law 89-298. Intermittent (Sec. 6). Authorized by Public Law 91-611. (4) (4) (4) (4) Unpublished VXD-MRC Letter Report dated May 31, 1977. MR&T authority. 2 Portion of levee built under Sec. 6. Incorporated in MR&T by Public Law 81-516.2 Monroe to Sandy Bayou and Bawcomville (Sec. 6). (5) (5) Authorized by Public Laws 78-534 and 79-526.2" ' (5) (") Authorized by Public Law 78-534.; 82-145 3-56 3-56 5 56 0-32 0-56 151-235 210-286 286-296 0-75 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 0-8 0-7 0-33 0-10 0-9 0-14 0-170 0-34 0-35 Lake Chicot 0-6 0-165 0-22 0-0.2 Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement To divert flows from Lake Chicot Tributaries of Boeuf River- Canal 19 Fleschmans Bayou Caney Bayou Big Bayou Canal 18 Kirsch Lake Canal Black Pond Slough Bayou Macon, AR, and LA Bayou Macon Canal 43 Canal 81 Pumping plant and drainage structure Tributa ry of Bay ou Macon Rush Bayou Tensas River, AR and LA Tensas River Tributa ryI of Tensas Ricer Mill and Vidal Bayous Gran t Ca na(11L,A Grant's Canal at Lake Providence LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, AR Yancopin-Pine Bluff Fletcher Bend, AR to Pine Bluff North Little Rock to Gillett (below Plum Bayou) GRAND PRAIRIE-BAYOU METO, AR Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR YAZOO BASIN, MS Yazoo Backwater area Yazoo River System below Arkabutla Lake Yazoo River between Yazoo City and Prichard Yazoo River between Yazoo City and Askew Will M. Whittington Auxiliary Channel Yazoo City protection Rocky Bayou area Belzoni protection Greenwood protection Arkabutla Iake Channel improvement Channel improvement Filling canal (6) (6) (5) (") (6) (") See Table 42-E (5) (5) Authorized by Public Law 90-483. (6) Authorized by Public Law 78-534. a Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Levee, south bank Revetment Levee, north bank (5) Water supply and drainage improvements Levees and pumping plants Channel improvement Levees, right bank Levees, left bank Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Including Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers. Intermittent. Intermittent. Floodway channel Levee, drainage structure, and pumping plant Channel clearing and enlargement Levee and floodwall Levees, channel improvement, drainage structures, and pumping plants Flood detention and conservation Improvement of 7.8 miles was approved Apr. 29, 1970. See Table 42-C. 42-16 Clearing 23-98 35-98 48-102 0-75 0-381 75-366 75-345 45-109 75 127 185 381 TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River 0-64 64 0-24 0-26 26 0-13 13 0-88 137-260 75-381 0-8.3 0-23 0-42 275-290 0-204 0-8 0-28 0-81 0-43 0-4 0-27 153-160 0-68 13-55 0-68 99 Locality Yalobusha River below Grenada Lake Grenada Lake Tallahatchie River-Little Tallahatchie River Little Tallahatchie River below Sardis Lake Sardis Lake Yocona River below Enid Lake Enid Lake Cassidy Bayou below Old Coldwater River Upper Yazoo Projects Area between main stem and hills including Bobo Bayou McKinney Bayou Alligator-Catfish Bayous Bear Creek Whiteoak Bayou Tallahatchie River, MS Big Sunflower Riter,f' etc. Big Sunflower River Hull Brake-Mill Creek Canal Hushpuckena River Quiver River Gin and Muddy Bayous, MS Bogue Phalia Ditchlow Bayou Little Sunflower River Deer Creek Steele Bayou Muddy Bayou LOWER WHITE RIVER AND BASIN, AR Laconia Circle-Old Town Lake Big Creek and tributaries Clarendon levee Improvement Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Levees, Panola-Quitman Floodway Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Floodway channel Levees and channel improvement Channel improvement and enlargement of pumping plant Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Two road crossings of Panola- Quitman Floodway, MS and for protection of Sheley Bridge Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Water-control structure 42-17 Remarks See Table 42-C. See Table 42-C. See Table 42-C. Including Moores Bayou, Cutoff Bayou, Whiting Lake and outlet. Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. As modified in GDM in 1967. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 90-147. Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 87-874. Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Modified in December 1970. See Table 42-D. Approved Mar. 3, 1970. See Table 42-D. Mile 605-645 Mississippi River. (6) Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Levee, backwater including outlet Pumping plant Channel improvement and structures Levee and outlet structures REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 108-192 122 143 0-196 0-90 260 0-225 225 0-105 86 0-36 0-29 0-17 0-12 0-108 0-25 0-20 0-15 Augusta to Clarendon De Valls Bluff Des Arc, AR CACHE BASIN, AR Cache River, AR Bayou DeView, AR ST. FRANCIS RIVER AND BASIN, AR, AND MO Inter-River Drainage District in Missouri Mouth of St. Francis River- Wappapello Dam Wappapello Lake Little River Basin Marked Tree, AR Tyronza River Big Slough Ditch Mayo Ditch Cross County Ditch Belle Fountain Ditch Drainage District No. 17 L'ANGUILLE RIVER, AR L'Anguille River and tributaries, Brushy and First Creeks WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES Wolf River and tributaries, TN Obion River and tributaries, North, South, Middle, and Rutherford Forks Forked Deer River and tributaries, North, Middle, and South Forks Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY Porter Gap, TN REELFOOT LAKE-LAKE NO. 9, TN AND KY Running Reelfoot Bayou, TN Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9, KY and TN Levees, outlet structures Levee, outlet structure, and pumping station Levee, outlet structure, and pumping station Channel improvement and structures Channel improvement and structures Channel improvement and two outlet structures Floodway, levees, drainage channels, and structures Flood detention and conservation Floodway, levees, drainage channels, and structures Marked Tree Siphon Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement and pumping station Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Pumping plant Flood control improvements Construction to main-stem standards, levee and appurtanent structures for flood control Channel improvement Channel improvements and pumping station 42-18 (5) (5) Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized Dec. 16, 1975. See Table 42-D. See Table 42-C. Authorized by Public Law 90-483. Authorized by Public Law 90-483. Authorized by Public Law 80-858. (6) Authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act. Authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act. Authorized by Resolutions Dec. 15 and 17, 1970.2 Authorized by Water Resources Act of Oct. 22, 1976.2 Section 102, 1976.2 Section 183, 1976.2 Authorized by Public Law 83-780. Authorized in December 1970, See Table 42-D. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-B (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY 0-47 Obion Creek, KY Channel improvement Authorized by Public Law 89-298. LITTLE RIVER DIVERSION CHANNEL, MO Delta to Ancell, MO Levees Mile 49 above Cairo. MISSOURI RIVER, MO 0-28 Mouth to St. Charles, MO Levees Intermittent (Sec. 6). ILLINOIS RIVER, IL 0-120 Mouth to Havana, IL Levees Intermittent (Sec. 6). OHIO RIVER, IL AND KY Cairo to Mound City and Mounds, Floodwall, levee, revetment, and IL pumping plant 1. General data concerning Bayou Boeuf, Bayou Sorrel, and Berwick locks where Atchafalaya Basin protection levees cross Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, alternate route to Plaquemine, LA and lower Atchafalaya River (extension of Bayou Teche Waterway), respectively, are in report of New Orleans district. 2. Also see Table 42-D, "Authorizing Legislation." 3. Public Law 81-516 modified requirements of local cooperation. 4. Authorized by Public Law 77-228. Modified by Public Law 89-298. 5. Authorized or incorporated in MR&T by Public Law 79-526.3 See Table 42-D. 6. Authorized by Public Law 85-500. 42-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 42-C MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY DAMS AND LAKES Grenada Enid Sardis Arkabutla Wappapello Name' Lake Lake Lake Lake Lake River Yalobusha Yocona Little Tallahatchie Coldwater St. Francis Nearest town to damsite Grenada Enid Sardis Arkabutla Wappapello Drainage area, square miles 1,320 560 1,545 1,000 1,310 Conservation pool: Area, thousand acres 10 6 11 5 4 Volume, thousand acre-feet 86 58 108 31 31 Elevation, feet, NGVD 193 230 236.0 209.3 354.7 Flood control pool: Area, thousand acres 65 28 58.5 33 23 Volume, thousand acre-feet 1,252 602 1,462 494 582 Runoff, inches 17.8 20.2 17.7 9.3 8.4 Outlet gates: Number 3 2 4 3 3 Size, feet 7.5 by 14 8 by 16 6 by 12 8.5 by 19 10 by 20 Capacity, thousand cubic feet per second 10.7 9.4 10.0 10.0 18.0 Spillway: Type, uncontrolled Chute Chute Chute Chute Gravity Length, feet 200 200 400 300 740 Elevation, crest, feet, NGVD 231 268 281.4 238.3 394.7 Discharge capacity, thousand cubic feet per second 52 50 132 89 229 Surcharge pool: Area, thousand acres 106 41 90 63 32 Volume, thousand acre-feet 1,385 554 1,447 858 521 Runoff, inches 19.7 18.5 17.6 16.1 7.5 Elevation, feet, NGVD 247.5 284.0 301.0 256.3 413.7 Dam: Type, earthfill Rolled Rolled Hydraulic Rolled Rolled Length, thousand feet 13.9 8.4 15.3 11.5 2.7 Elevation, crest, feet, NGVD 256.0 293.0 311.4 264.3 419.7 1. Grenada, Enid, Sardis and Arkabutla Lakes are in Yazoo River Basin, MS; Wappapello Lake is in St. Francis River Basin, MO. 42-20 TABLE 42-D MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Actor Authorization Work Authorized Document May 15, 1928 Jun. 19, 1930 Feb. 15, 1933 Apr. 23, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 15, 1936 Flood protection in alluvial valley of Mississippi River, revetment and contraction works and dredging to provide least channel depth of 9 feet and width of 300 feet below Cairo. Provided for allotment of the balance of emergency rescue funds to reimburse levee districts and others for expenditures in floodcontrol works during the 1927 and subsequent floods. Provided for ownership of lands in Bonnet Carrb Spillway and Floodway with proviso for granting rights-of-way, easements, and permits, in said lands Authorized payment for purchase of, or to reimburse states and local levee districts for the cost of, levee rights-of-way for flood control work in the Mississippi Valley, and for other purposes. Improvement of Wolf and Nonconnah Rivers, TN (Nonconnah Creek is correct title) Improvement of Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN Modification of the 1928 Act to provide for: Construction of a backwater levee at mouth of White River, AR Construction of Eudora floodway in lieu of Boeuf floodway; flood control, Yazoo River; construction of Morganza floodway; and an outlet to the Gulf of Mexico west of Berwick, LA, including a 6-year program for the improvement and regularization of the Mississippi River between Arkansas and Red Rivers, and Atchafalaya River; and construction of roads on levees and drainage adjustments incident to floodway levees. Provided for construction of floodwalls, levees, and revetments along Wolf River and Nonconnah Creek for protection of Memphis, TN Modify the Yazoo River project to substitute a combined reservoir floodway and levee plan. Construction of Mounds to Mound City levee and control works along Cache River, IL Modification of previous act pertaining to floodways and outlets and lands therein; including program for the improvement and regularization of the Mississippi River, between Cairo and Arkansas River, extension of levee road system; strengthening of levees. Enlarge main line levees to offset abandonment of floodways between Arkansas and Red Rivers, flood control works in backwater areas of Yazoo and Red Rivers, and in Bayous Rapides, Boeuf, and Cocodrie, LA Navigation channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide between Baton Rouge and Cairo; flood protection of Yazoo River Backwater Area in vicinity of Satartia, MS Continue prosecution of channel improvement and stabilization program, $200 million. Flood control on the Big Sunflower, Little Sunflower, Hushpuckena, and Quiver Rivers and their tributaries, and on Hull Brake-Mill Creek Canal, Bogue Phalia, Ditchlow Bayou, Deer Creek, and Steele Bayou, MS' Improve Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, AR' Improve Bayou Lafourche, LA Improve Yazoo River tributaries. North bank, Arkansas River levees (below Plum Bayou).' Unpublished report on record in OCE. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 359, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 509, 78th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 534, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 151, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 191, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 74th Cong., 1st sess. 42-21 H. Doc. 90, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Public 395, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Public 351, 72d Cong. Public 171, 73d Cong. R&H Comm. Doc. 26, 72d Cong., 1st sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 45, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished report dated Apr. 2, 1925. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Aug. 28, 1937 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Jul. 24, 1946 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 42-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Actor Authorization Work Authorized Levees on White River (Augusta to Clarendon).' Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, LA' Modify local cooperation requirements in St. Francis and Yazoo Basins. Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage improvements.' Improvement of St. Johns Bayou, MO Big Sunflower River, etc.' Tennessee Chute (Memphis Harbor), TN Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $100 million. Improve Mississippi River below Cape Girardeau, MO with respect to West Tennessee tributaries. Improve L'Anguille River, AR Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), LA' Flood protection at Des Arc, AR Improve St. Francis River and Basin, AR and MO Improve Cache River and Bayou DeView, AR and MO Improve Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR Flood protection, Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson Parish, LA' Filling Grant's Canal, Lake Providence, LA Additional protection to Red River Backwater Area. Extend Federal jurisdiction to cover levees in Orleans Parish, LA Bank protection, Amite River, LA Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $200 million. Jonesville, LA levee, retaining wall, and drainage structure.' Modify requirements for local cooperation in White River Backwater Area, AR Navigation improvement of Atchafalaya from Mississippi River to Morgan City, LA Modify project for Vicksburg-Yazoo Area (Harbor), MS Improve New Madrid Floodway, MO, including Peafield drainage floodgate. Control of Old and Atchafalaya Rivers and a lock for navigation. Improve Reelfoot Lake area, KY and TN Improve Greenville Harbor, MS 42-22 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Oct. 30, 1951 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Document H. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 757, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 138, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 51, 80th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 627, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 651, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 321, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 485, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 132, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 88, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 255, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 139, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 237, 82d Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 53, 82d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 85, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 183, 83d Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 478, 83d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 160, 83d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 15, 86th Cong., Ist sess. TABLE 42-D (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 18, 1965 Oct. 27, 1965 Extensions to project for Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon in Arkansas. White River backwater area pumping plant. Wolf River and tributaries for flood protection in Tennessee. Continue prosecution of project for channel improvement-$50 million. Modification-Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), LA Construct improvements in Gin and Muddy Bayous, Yazoo River Basin, MS Replace 2 bridges with adequate floodway over Boeuf River and Big Bayou in Boeuf Basin, AR Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $53 million. Modify and expand levees and channel improvement features of main stem project. Modify flood control improvements in following tributary areas and basins: Cairo-Mounds-Mounds City, St. Francis, Lower White, Boeuf-Tensas-Macon, Red River backwater, Yazoo headwater, Grand Prairie, and Bayou Meto. Acquire any modified easements required in New Madrid Floodway as provided by Sec. 4 of May 15, 1928 act. Operate and maintain pumping plant in Red River backwater area (Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant). Provide improvements in West Kentucky tributaries. Provide fish and wildlife facilities in St. Francis and Big Sunflower Basins; Yazoo Headwater and Backwater Areas; and Mississippi Delta region. Deauthorize Amite River, LA project. Modify St. Francis River, MO and AR, project within District No. 7, Poinsett County, AR Provide pumping plant and drainage structure at Wilson Point, LA Construction of improvements to supplement freshwater supply in Teche-Vermilion Basins in Louisiana. Bank revetment for protection of existing industrial facilities along Mississippi River below Baton Rouge, LA Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature to provide relocation of gas transmission lines at Federal expense. Continue emergency work, $87,135,000, which includes $100,000 for road crossing of Panola-Quitman Floodway, MS, and $80,000 for protection of Sheley Bridge, Tallahatchie River, MS Improvements in Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon Basin to divert flows that would otherwise enter Lake Chicot, AR Improvements in the Belle Fountain ditch and tributaries, MO, and Drainage District No. 17, AR Provide pumping plants and other drainage facilities in Cairo, IL, and vicinity. Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include cleanout along David Bayou, MS Modify Yazoo Backwater feature to include a control structure in Muddy Bayou, MS 42-23 H. Doc. 108, 85th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 26, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 76, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 86-645. Public Law 87-874. Public Law 87-874. Public Law 87-874. Public Law 89-42. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 57, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished Vicksburg District's MRC report Approved-Apr. 14, 1966. H. Doc. 524, 89th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 89-789. Public Law 89-789. Public Law 90-147. H. Doc. 168, 90th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 339, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 90-483. Unpublished MRC report dated May 8, 1968. Unpublished MRC report dated Feb. 2, 1970. Apr. 14, 19662 Nov. 7, 1966 Nov. 20, 1967 Aug. 13, 1968 Sep. 10, 1968; Mar. 3, 1970: REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 42-D (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Actor Authorization Work Authorized Document Apr. 29, 19703 Jun. 4, 19703 Dec. 31, 1970 Senate and House Public Works Resolutions adopted Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, respectively. 4 River Basin Monetary Act of Dec. 23, 1971 Jan. 19, 19732 TITLE I Water Resources Development Act of 1974. Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include drainage structure and channel improvement on Rocky Bayou, MS Provide for enlargement of Bayou Latenache from Pointe Coupee drainage structure to Alabama Bayou, LA Modify and expand project to include flood protection within the area of eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, LA, that are drained by Bayou des Glaises diversion channel and Lake Long, and their tributaries. Modify the project for West Kentucky tributaries (Obion Creek), KY, to provide for all relocations, at Federal expense, of all transmission lines required by the project. Report on Western Tennessee Tributaries, TN and KY, authorized: a. Modification of Reelfoot Lake feature to provide channel improvements on Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9 in KY and b. Modification of Mississippi levee feature to include a pumping station near Mud Lake floodgate and adjacent channel improvements. Modification of Big Sunflower Basin feature to provide additional improvements in Steele Bayou Basin, MS Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $97 million. Modification of Tiptonville-Obion River levee feature to relieve local interests of all responsibility except that of providing maintenance. Modification of the Mississippi levee feature to provide additional drainage facilities in Long Lake area, vicinity of Helena, AR Projects recommended by four completed reports were authorized for accomplishment of Phase I design memorandum of advance engineering and design on: a. Greenville Harbor, Greenville, MS b. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, MS (Natchez area). c. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, MS (Vicksburg-Yazoo area). d. Bushley Bayou Area of Red River Backwater Area, LA Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature (Obion and Forked Deer Rivers), TN, to acquire lands for fish and wildlife, recreation, and environmental purposes. Modification of the Yazoo Basin, MS, feature to provide for a streambank erosion control demonstration project for the delta and hill areas of basin. Modification of project to provide that the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, can substitute authorized mitigation lands, not yet acquired and no longer suitable, for like acreage in the same or adjacent subbasins of the project area. This section provides the authority to substitute authorized mitigation lands in: a. Tensas Basin, LA and AR, feature (Red River backwater). b. St. Francis Basin, AR and MO, feature. Modification of Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, LA, feature, to provide for: enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from Washington to west protection levee; right-of-way and spoil disposal areas at Federal expense; and necessary additional culverts through west protection levee. Unpublished MRC report dated Mar. 6, 1970. Unpublished MRC report dated Sep. 22, 1969. S. Doc. 91-113, 2d sess. Public Law 91-611. H. Doc. 91-414, 2d sess. S. Doc. 91-74, 2d sess. Sec. 1, Public Law 92-222. Sec. 7, Public Law 92-222. Unpublished Memphis District's MRC report dated Oct. 4, 1972. Sec. 1, Public Law 93-251. Mar. 7, 1974. S. Doc. 93-38, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-148, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-148, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-157, 1st sess. Sec. 3, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 32, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 42, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 87, Public Law 93-251. 42-24 TABLE 42-D (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Actor Authorization Work Authorized Document TITLE II River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974 River Basin Monetary Act of Oct. 2, 1975 Dec. 16, 19752 TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act 1976. TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1977. Water Resources Development Act of 1976. TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1978. Modification of Cache River Basin, AR, feature to provide for: acquisition by fee easements of lands for fish and wildlife management, recreation, and environmental purposes. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $211 million. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $158,000,000. Modification of St. Francis Basin, AR and MO, feature to provide relief from ponding of interior runoff in the Inter-River Drainage District of Missouri. Continue prosecution of project for comprehensive development during period Jul. 1- Sep. 30, 1976, $60,300,000. Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $231,497,000. Sec. 101(a) authorized accomplishment of Phase I - Advanced Engineering and Design Memoranda - On: a. St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO, project: Report of OCE - Sep. 26, 1975. b. Nonconnah Creek, TN" and MS, project: Report of OCE -Jun. 23, 1976, and as an independent part of the project: Improvements for flood control and allied purposes on Horn Lake Creek and tributaries, including Cowpen Creek, TN and MS. Modification of West Tennessee Tributaries feature (Obion and Forked Deer Rivers), TN, to: a. (Sec. 102) - Provide project for flood control for Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY: (H.D. 94-221) except that highway bridge relocations and alterations shall be at Federal expense. b. (Sec. 183) - Provide for construction of a levee and appurtenant works from mouth of Obion diversion channel to vicinity Highway 88 and thence to vicinity of Porter Gap, TN Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $253,081,000. Sec. 99, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 201, Public Law 93-251. Mar. 7, 1974. Sec. 1, Public Law 94-101. Unpublished Memphis District's MRC report dated Nov. 11, 1975. Public Law 94-180, Dec. 26, 1975. Public Law 94-355, Jul. 12, 1976. Public Law 94-587, Oct. 22, 1976. Public Law 95-96 Aug. 7, 1977. 42-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 42-D (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Dec. 9, 1977, 5th Ind. on VXD May 31, 1977, Letter Report.2 Jun. 28, 1980 Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act, 1981 Supplemental Appropriations Bill for FY Ending Sep. 30, 1985 (PL 99-88), and the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Modification of the Tensas Basin Project, Red River Backwater Area, to include a drainage structure and appurtenant channel works in the Six Mile Bayou area of Concordia Parish, LA The establishment of the Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge for the preservation and development of environmental resources and in lieu of mitigation acquisitions which otherwise would be required for certain water resources projects, within designated limits, in the basins of the Tensas, Boeuf, and Red Rivers in the State of Louisiana. For expenses necessary for prosecuting work of flood control projects, rescue work, repair, restoration or maintenance of flood control projects threatened or destroyed by flood, $232,519,000: Provided, That not less than $250,000 be available for control of bank erosion of streams in the Yazoo Basin, including the foothill area. Provided further, That funds for the Tensas Basin Red River Backwater Area, be used for flood control, etc. for Sicily Island and Below Red River including pumping stations. Authorizes and directs the Secretary of the Army acting through the Chief of Engineers to proceed with planning, design, engineering and construction of 41 water resources projects, including Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System. For the Atchafalaya Basin Floodway Systems project, cost-sharing is only required for the recreation feature of the project. The flood control and environmental features are Federal costs. Sec. 104(a), Authorization of Projects - Authorization of Construction: Incorporation of the project for flood control, Louisiana State Penitentiary levee, Mississippi River, LA: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated Dec. 10, 1982, at a total cost of $23,400,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $17,600,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $5,800,000. No acquisition of land for or actual construction of the project may commence until appropriate non-Federal interests shall agree to undertake measures to minimize the loss of fish and wildlife habitat lands in the project area. a. Bushley Bayou, LA. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the project for flood control, Bushley Bayou, LA. b. Eight Mile Creek, Paragould, AR. Project entails channel improvement along the creek with miniparks and hiking/ biking trails. c. Helena and Vicinity, AR. The Helena Basin is an urban basin containing approximately 3,500 acres which frequently and severely floods the city of Helena. A pumping station and sump with channel enlargement and a gated culvert was recommended. d. West Memphis and Vicinity, AR. Channel improvements along Ten Mile Bayou and Fifteen Mile Bayou for a total of 23.86 miles, with limited revegetation of right-of-way to maintain environmental stability. e. St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO. Flood control for urban and rural land. f. Nonconnah Creek and Johns Creek, TN and MS. Channel enlargement, recreation features with channel construction and environmental enhancement. Unpublished Vicksburg District report dated May 31, 1977, on Cynthia and Six Mile Bayous, LA Public Law 96-285, Jun. 28, 1980. Public Law 96-367, Oct. 1, 1980. FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Bill (PL 99-88), and Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986. 42-26 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document g. Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries, TN and MS. This is an urban flood control project located in extreme northwest Mississippi and southwest Tennessee. The plan of improvement consists of 3.5 miles of selective drift removal on lower Horn Lake Creek and 2.6 miles of vegetative clearing on Horn Lake Creek, 2.1 miles on Rocky Creek and 0.6 miles of vegetative clearing and 1.8 miles of channel enlargement on Cow Pen Creek. Hike/bike trails are included along Rocky Creek and Cow Pen Creek. Sec. 601(a) Authorization of Projects. Authorization of Construction: a. Yazoo Backwater Area, MS. Authorized the project for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses at the Yazoo Backwater Project, MS. The project shall include acquisition of 40,000 acres for mitigation of project-induced fish and wildlife losses. b. Greenville Harbor, MS. Authorized the project for navigation, Greenville Harbor, MS, as contained in the reports of Chief of Engineers, Nov. 15, 1977 and Feb. 2, 1982, at a total cost of $43,700,000 with an estimated first Federal cost of $28,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $15,700,000. c. Vicksburg, Harbor, MS. Authorized the project for navigation, Vicksburg Harbor, as contained in the report of the Chief of Engineers, Aug. 13, 1979, at a total estimated first Federal cost of $55,900,000 and an estimated non- Federal first cost of $23,300,000. d. Helena Harbor, Phillips County, AR. The recommended plan consists of dredging a navigation channel to provide access to 685 acres of landfill; construction of an overlook park; implementing landscaping and erosion control measures; and mitigation fish and wildlife losses. The project is scheduled to be constructed in two phases. e. White River Navigation to Batesville, AR. The plan of improvement recommmended in the Feasibility Report provides for construction and maintenance to provide a 200- foot wide, 9-foot deep channel available 95 percent of the time from mile 10 (Arkansas Post Canal) to mile 254, two scenic overlooks, a primitive camping area, and acquisition of about 1865 acres of woodlands for mitigation. However, section 52 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 deauthorized this project. f. Obion Creek, KY. To prevent headwater flooding along tributary streams and backwater flooding of alluvial lands. g. Memphis Harbor, Memphis, TN. This is a navigation project in the vicinity of Memphis, TN, which would consist of dredging and maintaining a 4.9 mile long, 500-foot minimum width, 9-foot deep general navigation channel with additional dredging as required and strategic placement of dredged material to create and provide navigation access to 1,000 acres to be developed as a waterfront industrial complex. Sec. 806. Reelfoot Lake, KY. This project is modified to provide that the Federal share of the cost of operating the pumping plant feature of such project shall be 50 percent. Sec. 836. Mud Lake, Western Tennessee Tributaries. This project is modified to provide that the requirements of local cooperation shall be (1) 50 percent of the value of the lands, easements, and rights-of-way, (2) to hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works, and (3) to maintain and operate all the works after completion. 42-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 42-D (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Jun. 4, 1987 Modification of Mississipppi Delta Region project to construct Unpublished New Orleans salinity control structure at Davis Pond (mile 118) rather than District report, Nov. 1, at Myrtle Grove (mile 59). 1984. 1. Incorporated into Mississippi River and tributaries project as shown in Table 42-E. 2. Date minor modification for blocked drainage was approved under delegated authority of the President, Mississippi River Commission, and in accordance with Sec. 10(p) of the 1946 Flood Control Act (Public Law 79-526). 3. Date minor modification was approved under discretionary authority of Chief of Engineers contained in May 15, 1928, Flood Control Act, as amended. 4. Projects approved under the provisions of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of Oct. 27, 1965. 42-28 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-E INCORPORATING AND AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION For Last Public Full Report Act of Law Authorizing See Annual Incorporation No. Act Description Report for Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Jun. 22, 1936 Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage 1941, p. 943 improvements, TN Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Jun. 22, 1936 Bayou des Glaises diversion ditch, LA 1946, p. 1029 Jul. 24, 1946 79-256 Jun. 22, 1936 From North Little Rock, AR, to Gillett, AR, on 1946, p. 1053 north bank of Arkansas River (portion below Plum Bayou). Jul. 24, 1946 79-256 Aug. 18, 1941 White River levees, Augusta to Clarendon and De 1946, p. 1083 Valls Bluff, AR Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Dec. 22, 1944 Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, LA 1945, p. 982 Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Dec. 22, 1944 Big Sunflower River, etc. 1946, p. 1061 Jun. 30, 1948 80-858 Jul. 24, 1946 Devils Swamp barge channel at Baton Rouge, LA 1948, p.1059 (Baton Rouge Harbor) May 17, 1950 81-516 Jun. 22, 1936 Jonesville, LA 1953, p.773 May 17, 1950 81-516 Jul. 24, 1946 Lake Pontchartrain-Jefferson Parish, LA 1953, p. 737 42-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 42-F SUMMARY OF PRESENTLY ESTIMATED FEDERAL FIRST COST OF AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS Estimated Cost' Project Title Fiscal Year 1989 Completed features 2 Mississippi River levees Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Sec. 6 levees, 1928 Flood Control Act Channel improvement Atchafalaya Basin, LA Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, LA Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, LA Old River, LA Lower Red River- South Bank Red River levees, LA Eastern Rapides and South-Central Avoyelles Parishes, LA Mississippi Delta Region, LA Tensas Basin, AR and LA Lower Arkansas River, AR Grand Prairie-Bayou Meto, AR (Flood Control & Water Supply) Yazoo Basin, MS Lower White River, AR (All except Big Creek & Tribs.) Lower White River (Big Creek & Tribs.) Cache Basin, AR St. Francis Basin, AR and MO Eight Mile Creek, AR L'Anguille Basin, AR West Tennessee Tributaries, TN Harris Fork Creek, TN & KY Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, TN & KY Reelfoot Lake, TN & KY (Completed) Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, TN & KY West Kentucky Tributaries, KY Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge Sardis Dam (Dam Safety Assurance) St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway Nonconnah Creek Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries Greenville Harbor Memphis Harbor (Ensley Berm) Helena Harbor Helena AR and Vicinity West Memphis AR and Vicinity Vicksburg Harbor, MS Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee Teche Vermilion Basin Mississippi and Louisiana Estuarine Areas TOTAL $ 199,238,000 1,310,000,000 5,124,000,0003 4,000,0003 3,257,000,000 1,470,000,000 149,000,000 20,400,0003 301,300,000 22,900,0003 50,000,0003 61,500,000 489,000,000 35,000,0003 130,900,0003 1,566,000,000 16,802,0003 45,090,0003 137,000,000 374,000,000 13,206,000 15,100,0003 120,000,000 14,964,0003 (10,500,000)3 440,000 10,060,000 24,000,0003 40,000,0003 29,300,000 77,000,000a 16,600,0004 2,130,0004 31,600,000' 4 23,000,0004 33,800,0004 12,300,00034 13,500,0004 55,900,0004 18,800,0004 35,700,0004 57,000,0005 $15,407,530,000 1. Inflation projected through the construction period. Harbors; Lake Pontchartrain; Wolf River; completed roads 2. Includes Bonnet Carre', Morganza, and New Madrid Floodways; Memphis, Greenville, and Vicksburg on main stem levees; channel construction works; Atchafalaya River and Basin; Wax Lake Outlet; Charenton Canal; Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, Boeuf Basin levees; Grant's Canal; De Valls Bluff, Jonesville, and Des Arc protection works; Baton Rouge Harbor; and miscellaneous features; Teche- Vermilion Basins, LA. 3. Incremental (not projected through the construction period.) 4. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986. 5. New start in FY 1991. 42-30 / 1 I i i _ I ____ ~ I I j j MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-G MISSISSIPPI RIVER MAIN STEM CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS Operations in 1,000 Cubic Yards Location Fiscal Year 1989 Mileage Above Head Channel District of Passes Construction Maintenance Total New Orleans Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp) 235 --- Main stem channel 234-320 - 3,840.0 3,840.0 Vicksburg Main stem channel 322-600 - 3,431.1 3,431.1 Vicksburg Harbor 437 - 249.1 249.1 Greenville Harbor 537 - 336.3 336.3 Memphis Main stem channel 600-954 - 40,955.1 40,955.1 Memphis Harbor, McKellar Lake 725 - 3,092.7 3,092.7 TOTAL - 51,904.3 51,904.3 42-31 TABLE 42-H BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1989) Operations This FY Construction Nonop- O erative t Above New Work Since T Head Bank Exten- Prior I Location of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (L (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) F pera- Live 'hru This FY inear 'eet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Venice, LA .................. Lower Childress- Fort Jackson, LA ............ Buras, LA ................. Tropical Bend, LA ........ Bayou Lamoque, LA ........ Port Sulphur, LA ............ Point Michel, LA ............. Bohemia, LA ................ Diamond, LA .............. Gravolet, LA ................. Junior, LA .................. Harlem, LA ................ Myrtle Grove, LA ............ tr Monsecour, LA ............... .' Alliance, LA ............... S Belair, LA ................... Jesuit Bend, LA ............ Linwood, LA .............. Oak Point, LA ............... Scarsdale, LA ............... English Turn, LA .......... Poydras, LA ................. Cutoff, LA ................. Third district reach, LA ...... Algiers Point, LA ............ Gouldsboro Bend, LA ....... Gretna Bend, LA ........... Greenville Bend, LA ........ Carrollton Bend, LA ........ Avondale Bend, LA ........ Kenner, LA ................ Luling, LA ................. Good Hope, LA ............... Waterford, LA ............... Montz, LA ................... Lucy, LA ................. .. Reserve, LA .................. Willow Bend, LA ........... Angelina, LA .............. Vacherie, LA .............. Belmont, LA ............... 12 22 25 30 33 39 44 46 49 51 54 56 59 61 62 65 68 71 72 75 78 82 88 93 95 96 97 100 104 109 114 119 126 128 132 136 138 141 145 148 152 R RRRL RRL RL RL RLRL RLRL RL RL RR RRL RL RL RL RL RL R L 1,387 2,807 2,671 708 7,380 4,437 2,033 12,730 56 532 25,852 20,302 8,120 58,709 1,037 1,939 2,212 712 3,323 7,672 14,203 14,917 3,455 4,974 9,746 8,515 3,727 15,823 7,962 1,500 14,157 11,300 4,624 - 27,802 m - 15,430 - 17,283 - 25,012 y - 7,264 4 - 36,995 b. - 21,932 0 - 14,981 j - 11,600 - 17,435 x - 23,599 m - 15,148 ' - 17,435 - 11,571 - 15,745 - 26,111 0 - 24,978 - 10,638 - 12,377 < 13,852 r - 19,718 - 45,864 0 - 21,256 4 - 27,167 - 7,728 - 4,960 > - 9,662 - 22,045 - 15,015 5 - 28,409 4 - 37,167 p - 36,288 - 18,888 16,732 O - 17,502 - 17,826 - 20,947 '� - 11,631 e - 31,727 - 26,025 - 25,575 0 0 Rich Bend, LA ............... Romeville, LA ............... St. Alice, LA ................ Burnside, LA .............. Aben, LA .................. St. Elmo, LA ................ Smoke Bend, LA ............. Marchand, LA ............. Philadelphia Point, LA ....... New River Bend, LA ......... White Castle, LA ........... St. Gabriel, LA ............. Plaquemine Bend, LA ........ Manchac, LA ............. Missouri Bend, LA ........... Arlington, LA ............... Port Allen, LA .............. Allendale, LA ................ Springfield Bend, LA ......... Arboth, LA ................ Faulkner Lake, LA ........... Grand Bay, LA ............. Bayou Sara, LA .............. Red Store, LA ............... Arrow Bend, LA ............ Boies Point, LA .............. Morganza, LA ............. Iowa Point, LA .............. Brunette Point, LA ........... Greenwood Bend, LA ....... Hog Point, LA ............. Carr Point, LA ............. Above Old River, LA ......... Fort Adams, MS ........... Point Breeze, LA ........... Coochie, LA ................ Palmetto, MS .............. Subtotal New Orleans District, Mississippi River ....... Dikes: Profit Island Chute Closure, LA ............. OLD RIVER CONTROL Standard revetment: Inflow channel ............... Inflow channel ............... Outflow channel ............. Auxiliary inflow channel ....... Auxiliary outflow channel ...... Total standard revetment, Old River .............. 157 161 165 170 172 174 177 180 183 185 193 201 209 215 222 227 231 238 244 250 253 258 265 269 272 275 279 282 285 289 296 304 305 308 313 317 322 RL RL RL RL RL R LRLRLRRLRLRLRLRRLRLRRRLRRL 4,341 4,404 1,637 6,292 10,251 5,382 4,483 3,496 1,439 4,800 46 18,345 54 15,948 296 8,384 75 33,016 54 31,715 208 24,324 79 17,979 62 19,898 36 2,904 - 12,796 483 2,766 17,202 7,156 6,038 33,163 25,966 27,052 29,304 11,700 10,240 17,075 16,436 5,379 43,665 42,658 31,292 37,777 38,976 22,632 12,244 17,627 25,502 25,690 13,190 17,382 7,090 27,698 11,315 13,600 16,094 20,513 11,375 8,038 14,987 13,368 8,600 4,800 17,219 13,565 17,150 30,864 2,297 12,720 7,818 73,105 (13.85 Miles) 252 315 315 315 312 312 L LR L&R L&R L&R 1,498 298,292 17,279 (3.27 Miles) 85,798 92,774 1,570,546 (297.45 Miles) 4,315 (.82 Mile) - - - - - - - 2,415 - - - - - - - 4,365 - - - - - - - 19,891 - - - - - - - 17,200 - - - - - - - 5,790 49,661 (9.41 Miles) -. TABLE 42-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1989) Operations This FY Construction eNroantoivpe- Above New Work Since Head Bank Exten- Prior Location of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear ( (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) )pera- a tive 1 Thru 0 This FY Linear Feet) y ATCHAFALAYA RIVER Standard revetment: Mile One, LA ............ Coville, Bayou, LA ........... Legonier, LA ................. Simmesport, LA .......... Kuhlman Bayou, LA ....... Odenburg, LA ........... Cason, LA ................... McCrea, LA ................ Woodside, LA .............. Provosty, LA ................ Crooked Bayou, LA ........... Mercier, LA ............... Barberton, LA ............. Evans Point, LA ............. Goudeau, LA ................ Morris Bayou, LA .......... Goodwood, LA ........... Red Cross, LA .............. Melville, LA ............... Cross Bayou, LA ............ Melville South, LA ........... Toles, LA ................... Petite Prairie, LA ............ Holloway Lake, LA ........... Bayou Sherman, LA ........ Krotz Springs, LA ........ Sherburne, LA ............. Bayou Big Graw, LA ......... Morgan City ............... Total standard revetment Below Confluence of Red and Atchafalaya Rivers 1 34679 12 13 14 17 18 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 33 35 36 37 38 40 43 46 115 L RL RL RRLRL RL RLRL RL RL RL RLL RRRL - - - - - - - 4,150 - - - - - - - 6,550 - - - - - - - 8,940 - - - - - - - 10,636 - - - - - - - 5,565 - - - - - - - 5,375 - - - 10,798 - - - 5,027 - - - 13,002 - - - 7,768 - - - 9,600 - - - - - - - 10,478 - - - 3,592 - - - 4,898 - - - 3,938 - - - 3,800 - - - 8,505 - - - 8,065 - - - 4,870 - - - 3,815 - - - 4,070 - - - 6,355 - - - 8,381 - - - 7,085 - - - 5,200 - - - 7,925 - - - 7,035 - - - 8,394 - - - 3,410 - - - - - - 197,227 (37.35 Miles) Dikes: None mC1 0.^ O mz C 0 CD C 00 LOWER RED RIVER Standard revetment: Long Lake, LA ............... Naples, LA ................ Turnbull Island, LA ........ Total standard revetment Below Confluence of Old River Outflow Channel and Red River 10 79 RRL - - 6,652 - - 6,190 - - 11,038 - - - - - - - 23,880 (4.52 Miles) Dikes: None 1. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). t CJ1 TABLE 42-I BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1989) Operations This FY Construction Nonop- Op erative t Above New Work Since T Head Bank Exten- Prior I Location of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY i Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Li (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)L (Squares)' Feet) F erayve hru 'his FY inear eet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Bougere Bend, LA ........... Dead Mans Bend, MS ......... Glasscock Cutoff,, MS-LA ..... Railroad Landing, MS ........ St. Catherine Bend, LA ....... Morville, LA ............... Natchez Island, MS .......... Carthage, MS.............. Vidalia Casting Field ......... Natchez Front, MS ......... Giles Cutoff, LA-MS ........ Gibson, LA ................. Ashland, LA-MS, TF ......... Kempe Bend, LA ............. Browns Field, LA ............ Goldbottom, MS .............. Hardscrabble, LA ............ Grand Gulf, MS ............ Point Pleasant, MS-LA ....... Togo Island, LA ............. Lake Karnac, LA-MS ....... Diamond Point, LA-MS ....... Reid-Bedford, LA .......... Racetrack, MS ........... Barge Line Terminal, MS ..... Vicksburg Harbor, MS ....... Delta Point, LA ............ King's Point-Opposite Delta Point, LA-MS ........ False Point, LA .............. Marshall-Brown's Point, LA-MS .................... Milliken Bend, LA ........ Belle Island, LA-MS ......... Goodrich, LA ................ Cottonwood Bar, MS, TF ..... Fitler-Cottonwood, MS ....... Hagaman, LA .............. Ben Lomond, MS ............. Baleshed Towhead-Stack Island, LA-MS ............. Lake Providence, LA ......... 329 335 342 346 350 356 357 361 363 364 366 371 374 383 389 392 398 403 413 415 419 423 429 433 437 437 437 439 443 446 453 460 467 470 474 481 486 488 489 RL RLRRRLLL RRL RRL RL RRL RRLLL R L R L RL RRLRL R R 6,424 4,900 670 3,195 1,715 - 23,465 - 15,791 - 3,588 - 7,322 - 3,233 - - - - - - - - - - - 280 408 130 2,254 730 1,935 2,800 6,529 1,127 1,042 496 8,484 1,914 730 3,613 0 0 ,.. .. - 26,055 n - 3,774 � - 6,865 - 12,265 H - 28,093 * - 14,855 - 2,180 - 14,700 O - 2,670 - 6,510 - 3,195 - 25,945 g - 27,092 m - 28,285 - 9,280 4 - 30,250 o - 22,530 Z - 53,948 n - 32,345 p - 7,064 - 19,260 M - 12,125 4 18,392 O 13,935 3,040 - 7,350 , - 7,650 n - 19,330 , - 12,860 - 19,580 - 44,650 m - 24,160 0 - 39,155 m - 21,360 i - 28,427 4 - 37,756 - 10,235 ? - 52,1242 - 11,600 Mayersville, MS .............. Sarah Island-Opossum Point, LA-MS ............... Carolina, MS ............... Cracraft, AR ................ Worthington, MS-AR ........ Walnut Point Kentucky Bend, MS ............. American Cutoff, MS-AR ..... Sunnyside-Lakeport, AR...... Vancluse, AR .............. Island 84, AR, MS .......... Warfield Point, MS ......... Leland-LaGrange, AR-MS .... Spanish Moss, AR .......... Tarpley Island, MS ........... Miller Bend, MS ............. Island 82, AR .............. Ashbrook Island, MS ......... Arkansas City-Yellow Bend, AR ................ Huntington Point, MS ........ Pair O'Dice, AR ............ Eutaw-Mounds, MS ........ Cypress Bend, AR ......... Catfish Point, MS ........... Ozark, AR-MS ............. Prentiss, AR-MS ........... Rosedale Bend, AR ........... Riverton, MS ................ Klondike, AR .............. Victoria Bend-Terrene, MS .... Lake Concordia, MS ........ Big Island, AR ............... Smith Point, MS ........... Dennis, MS ................ Cessions, MS ............... Total revetment, Vicksburg District, Mississippi River ......... Dikes: Jackson Point, MS ............ Opposite Warnicott Ldg, MS Natchez Island, LA-MS ....... Waterproof Bar, LA ........ Spithead Towhead, MS ....... Browns Field, LA .......... Cottage Bend, LA-MS ........ Bondurant Towhead, LA ..... Coffee Point, LA ........... Yucatan, MS ................ Togo Island, LA .............. Below Racetrack, MS ......... Racetrack Towhead, MS ...... False Point, LA ............ Marshall Cutoff, LA.......... 497 503 507 511 514 519 526 530 534 535 537 538 539 542 544 546 549 553 556 561 563 568 573 578 582 585 586 588 593 596 598 601 611 615 L RL RR LL RRLLL RRL RR RL RL RL RLLL RLLRLLL 34,992 - 23,825 - 11,080 - 22,210 - 8,350 - 45,653 - 2,980 - 33,685 - 4,300 - 13,475 - 4,320 - 14,150 - 4,580 - 2,000 - 29,360 - 3,080 - 3,455 7,022 - 17,790 650 2,311 1,700 28,661 (5.43 Miles) 330 352 358 379 386 388 389 394 405 410 416 430 431 441 448 LL RRL RL RRRLL RR R 77,718 5,196 6,882 24,183 (3) 2,949 5,388 - 40,560 4 - 17,067 - - 9,095 " - 40,188 - 26,585 g - 20,075 ( - 22,015 P - 20,315 - - 4,820 E - 12,500 < - 23,400 m - 29,245 3 - 8,340 C - 16,515 - 18,185 - 25,195 - - 10,910 t1 - 1,401,362 (265.41 Miles) - 4,306 - 5,351 - 10,885 - 14,321 - 3,6614 - 4,8354 - 14,049 - 4,421 - 8,648 - 9,010 - 8,256 - 11,7694 - 1,752 - 5,355 - 5,1664 C TABLE 42-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1989) Operations This FY Construction eNroantiovpe- Above New Work Since Head Bank Exten- Prior Location of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear ( (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Forest Home Towhead, LA .... Willow Cutoff, LA ......... Arcadia Point, MS ......... Point Lookout, LA ............ Ajax Bar, MS ............. Ben Lomond, MS ............ Balshed Ldg., MS .......... Wilson Point, LA ........... Corregidor, MS ............ Carolina, AR ................ Cracraft Lower, AR ........ Cracraft, AR ................ Leota, MS .............. Island, 86, AR ............. Seven Oaks, AR ............ Walnut Point, MS .......... Refuge, MS .............. Island 84, AR ................ Leland Bar, AR-MS .......... Leland Neck, AR-MS ......... Tarpley Cutoff, MS-AR ....... Island 82-Miller Bend, AR-MS .................. Ashbrook-Miller Bend, AR-MS .................... Ashbrook Cutoff, MS ....... Chicot Ldg., AR .............. Catfish Point, MS ......... Below Prentiss, MS .......... Malone Field, AR ......... Terrene, MS ............... White River Landing, AR ..... Montgomery Towhead, AR .... Victoria Bend, AR ......... Smith Point, MS ............. Island 70, MS .............. Total dikes, Vicksburg District, Mississippi River ....... 449 462 470 478 482 488 493 500 505 509 510 513 514 520 523 525 528 532 538 540 540 544 547 549 564 571 580 585 590 591 592 596 600 608 L RL RLLL RLL RRL RRLLL RL R 1,970 2,600 - 2,600 Operative Thru This FY Linear Feet) 0 0 4,5744 c 4,2754 9,4634 2,751 24,319 24,6674 10,938 O 3,592 6,730 y 2,897 9,614 3,809 7,571 14,433 5,754 0 4,725 5,278 4,580 16,878 4,315 - 10,318 O 13,646 13,015 8,728 17,451 n 5,290 7,813 7,549 7,921 m 2,201 r 6,071 O 5,0334 0 7,617 14,949 D 410,550 e (77.76 Miles) R&L L&R L RL RRL RRRLL 12,907 (2.44 Miles) 00 ARKANSAS RIVERS Standard Revetment: Menard Bend, AR .......... Como, AR ..................... Morgan Bend, AR ............ Yancopin, AR ............... Total standard revetment, Arkansas River ........ Dikes: Hopedale Cutoff, AR ......... Morgan Bend, AR ......... Fletcher Bend, AR ........... Total dikes, Arkansas River .... RED RIVER6 Standard revetment: 8 Dupre, LA ................. Bringol, LA ................ Egg Bend, LA ............ Cologne Bend, LA ......... Roxana, LA ................ Ryland, LA .................. Whittington, LA ............. Smith, LA ................. Latanier, LA ................ Hudson, LA ................ Robert, LA ................. Alexandria Front, LA ........ Callahan, LA ................. Cotton, LA ................. Rapides, LA ................. Boyce, LA ............... Total standard revetment, Red River ............ ..... Dikes7 : Choctaw Bayou Bend, LA ..... Bringol (Egg Bend), LA ...... Egg Bend,LA ............. Cologne Bend, LA ......... Echo, LA .................. Richardson, LA ............ 30 36 39 69 73 75 77 83 88 89 91 93 99 102 105 110 116 119 125 71 73 75 77 78 79 RL R 1,848 3,658 2,187 7,693 (1.46 Miles) RR RRRRRRR R R RRRRR . -2,690 . -4,000 . -2,400 . -650 . -3,325 . -3,925 . -2,900 . -2,700 - - - - - - 2,460 . -1,458 . -5,500 . -5,280 . -4,000 . -14,700 . -1,030 . -4,548 . -61,566 (11.66 Miles) RRRRRR 2,000 2,477 900 1,850 1,900 2,700 Miles Above Mouth 31 34 36 24 L RL R tC 11,770 11,720 5,250 2,800 31,540 (5.97 Miles) CI) I) C) C, TABLE 42-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1989) Operations This FY Construction Nonoperative Above New Work Since Head Bank Exten- Prior Location of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)l (Squares)' Feet) RED RIVER7 continued Dikes': Alexandria, LA ............. 105 R - - - - - - (Rock groin) Bertrand, LA .............. 122 R - - - - - - Total dikes, Red River ......- - - - - - (3.7 1. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). 2. Contains 7,814 linear feet of trenchfill revetment (stone). 3. Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. 4. Changed to correct previous errors. 0 Operative Thru This FY (Linear Feet) 270 7,630 19,727 74 Miles) 5. See report on Arkansas River and tributaries, AR and OK, under Little Rock District. 6. Mileages based on 1967 hydrographic survey. 7. Includes all types of dikes and retards. TABLE 42-J BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1989) Operations This FY Construction Nonop- Op erative t Above New Work Since T Head Bank Exten- Prior T Location of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Li (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares) (Squares1) Feet) F )eraive hru 'his FY near eet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard revetment: Big Island, AR ............. Scrubgrass Bend, AR ......... Henrico, AR ............ Cessions Towhead, AR ........ Knowlton, AR ............... Island 67, MS ............. Island 68 Bar, AR ............ Ludlow, AR ............... Rescue Landing, AR-MS ...... Fair Landing, AR........... Burke Landing, MS .......... Island 62, AR .............. Island 63, MS .............. Island 63 Bar, MS ............ Oldtown Bend, AR ........... Horseshoe, MS .............. Westover, AR .............. Delta-Friars Point, MS ....... Helena, AR ................. Trotters Landing, MS ....... Flower Lake, MS ............ St. Francis, AR ............. Harbert Point, MS ........... Walnut Bend, AR ............ Mhoon Bend, MS ............. Peters, AR ................. Commerce, MS .............. Porter Lake, AR ............ Pickett, MS-AR .............. Norfolk-Star, MS ............ Cow Island Bend, AR ......... Cow Island Bend (Upper), TN -Coahoma, TN ................ Ensley, TN ................ Dismal Point, AR .......... Bauxippi-Wyanoke, AR ....... Presidents Island, TN ...... Hopefield Point, AR, TN ...... Loosahatchie-Memphis, TN .... Loosahatchie Bar, TN ....... St. Clair, AR ................ Island 40, TN-AR ............ Brandywine, AR-TN ........ 598 600 606 615 620 621 622 626 629 632 637 638 639 639 644 647 650 655 660 665 667 672 675 680 685 692 695 700 703 709 714 716 717 723 724 730 733 736 737 740 742 744 750 RRRL RL RRL RL RLL RL RL RLL RL RL RL RRL RRLL RRL RL RRRR 4,620 15,288 - 5,702 12,709 - 3,905 - 7,315 - 25,040 - 10,615 - 16,900 - 8,735 - 6,445 - 10,390 - 27,020 - 25,690 - 19,070 - 9,030 - 11,5192 - 3,795 - 26,860 - 16,385 - 12,730 - 30,090 - 36,460 - 32,905 - 16,385 - 24,663 - 9,065 - 27,220 - 35,828 - 33,760 - 29,085 - 34,155 - 12,575 - 35,582 - 22,274 - 6,853 - 9,270 - 44,026 - 7,200 - 24,530 - 12,755 - 10,360 - 31,293 - 2,070 - 2,9303 - 30,750 - 18,010 TABLE 42-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1989) Operations This FY Construction Nonoperative Above New Work Since Head Bank Exten- Prior Location of R sion Lap RenforcementFY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear ( (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER continued Standard Revetment: Shelby Forest, TN ............ Dean Island, AR ............. Cedar Point-Densford, TN .... Chute of Island 35, TN ........ Lookout Bar, TN ........... Lookout, TN ................. Sunrise Towhead, TN ........ Lower Bullerton, AR ......... Kate Aubrey Towhead- Island 30, TN ............ Osceola, AR ................ Osceola, AR ................ Ashport-Keyes Point, TN ..... Kate Aubrey, TN ......... Island 26, TN ............... Bend of Island 25, TN ........ Barfield, AR ............... Obion-Tamm, TN ......... Huffman-Hickman, AR-TN .... Heloise, TN ................ Island 18, MO .............. Linwood Bend, TN ........... Blaker Towhead, TN ......... Bells Point, MO ............ Gayoso-Caruthersville, MO .... Island 15, TN .............. Hathaway Landing, TN ...... Robinson Bayou, MO ......... Fritz Landing, TN ........... Lee Towhead, MO .......... Bend of Island 14, TN ........ Above Lee Towhead, TN ...... Little Cypress, MO ........... Merriwether-Cherokee, TN .... Linda, MO ................... Below Toney's Towhead, TN .... Toney's Towhead, KY-TN ..... Kentucky Point, KY ........ New Madrid Bar, KY ........ New Madrid Bend, MO ....... La Forge, MO .............. 753 756 759 764 772 774 776 782 786 786 786 791 793 798 803 808 819 826 831 836 841 845 845 848 851 852 852 857 859 859 861 864 869 876 879 882 887 888 889 892 LRLRRRRR RP R L RRLRLRLRL L RRLL RLLLL RL RLLLRRR 325 1175 - - 6,890 1,7306 6,595 3,870 980 7,184 760 3,656 - 9,550 - 7,555 - 20,190 - 29,190 - 2,9903 - 5,005 - 14,615 - 28,350 - 30,808 - 1,3504 - 5,823 - 44,232 - 2,500 - 15,690 - 30,630 - 50,965 - 51,321 - 26,984 - 12,935 - 22,170 - 14,850 - 17,087 - 5,420 - 25,600 - 3,630 - 1,000 - 22,630 - 15,670 - 8,470 - 12,050 - 4,943 - 34,090 41,058 - 11,950 - 20,895 - 12,600 - 7,960 - 16,825 - 43,262 - 22,380 )perative Thru This FY Linear Feet) go 0 0 0 so 0 y 0M C, 0 M y x c O 2 c r O c y C y O d C co 0 oo e Slough Landing Neck, TN-KY .................... Winchester Towhead, MO ..... Island 9, KY-TN ........... Milton Bell, MO ............ Chute of Island 8, KY ....... Bend of Island 8, MO ......... Island 8, KY ............... Hickman-Reelfoot, KY ........ Beckwith Bend, MO .......... Williams, KY ................ Wolf Island, KY ............. Columbus, KY ............. Belmont, MO ................ Island 3 and 4, KY ......... Campbell, KY ............... Pritchard, MO ............. Mayfield Creek, KY .......... Wickliffe, KY ................ Cache-Cairo, IL (Ohio River) .... Total revetment, Memphis District, Mississippi River ....... ,. Dikes: c Henrico, AR ................. Below Knowlton, AR ......... Island 67, MS ................ Below Ludlow, AR ......... Sunflower, AR ............. Island 64, AR ................ Island 62, AR .............. Island 63 Bar, MS ............ Island 63, MS .............. Kangaroo Point, AR ........ Friars Point, MS ........... Montezuma Bar, MS ....... Montezuma Towhead, AR ..... Prairie Point, AR .......... Flower Lake, MS ........... St. Francis Towhead, MS ..... Below Walnut Bend, AR ...... Bordeaux Point, MS ........ Peters, AR ................. Commerce, MS ............. Basket Bar, AR ............ Buck Island, MS ........... Porter Lake, AR ........... Pickett, MS .......... Seyppel, AR ................. Cat Island, AR .............. Coahoma, TN ................ Armstrong, AR-TN ........ 899 900 905 908 913 914 914 919 924 927 934 937 938 940 943 948 949 953 958 LRLRLRRL RL RL RRL RLL R 5,255 13,580 (2.57 Miles) 603 616 621 624 627 630 638 639 640 649 652 657 656 668 668 671 676 681 693 694 696 700 701 704 706 710 718 720 R RLRL R RLL RLL RRLL RL RL RL RL RR L R 5,485 2,810 350 - 11,578 5,525 19,937 85 1,015 3,082 3,804 5,465 29,972 (R) 300 1,620 200 (9) 6,340 2,530 300 300 - 37,520' - 5,540 - 33,5857 - 14,375 - 12,620 - 9,800 - 18,515 - 43,359 - 14,588 - 10,015 - 19,205 - 3,825 - 5,785 - 19,970 - 6,865 - 15,045 - 8,935 - 8,455 - 26,152 1,890,910 (358.13 Miles) 6,310 C 15,718 e 4,320 0 5,040 O 5,520 7,330 E 23,180 g 2,600 c 5,640 p 5,730 Z 6,870 15,240 3,450 10,391 11,060 3,380 6,4202 4,920 7,830 8,810 5,060 4,705 17,480 7,180 12,250 15,590 4,640 18,690 TABLE 42-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1989) Operations This FY Construction eNroantoivpe- O Above New Work Since Head Bank Exten-Reinforceme Prior Location of R sion Lap FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear ( (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)' Feet) (Squares)' (Squares)' Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER continued Dikes: Dismal Point, AR ......... Hopefield Point, AR ........ Robinson Crusoe, TN ......... Loosahatchie Bar, TN ........ Above Loosahatchie, TN ...... Redman Point, AR ........... Randolph Point, TN .......... Poker Point, AR .............. Corona Bar, TN-AR ........ Densford, TN .............. Cedar Point, TN ............ Below Richardson Landing, TN .......................... Lookout, TN-AR ............. Plum Point, TN ............. Lake Neark, AR ............ Island 30 ..................... Kate Aubrey, TN ........... Keyes Point, TN ............ Ashport-Goldust, TN-AR ..... Forked Deer, TN ............. Island 25, AR .............. Nebraska Point, TN ........ Below Tamm Bend, TN ....... Wrights Point, AR ........... Island 21, Chute, TN ....... Head of Island 21, TN ........ Island 20, MO-TN ......... Island 18, TN .............. Tennemo, TN ............ Blaker Towhead, TN ......... Caruthersville-Linwood Bend, MO ................ Sandy Hook, TN ........... Island 15, TN .............. Robinson Bayou, MO ......... Hathaway, TN ............. Island 15 Neck, TN........... Above Lee Towhead, TN ...... Below Cherokee, TN ........ Stewart Towhead, MO ........ 724 736 738 739 742 743 747 748 755 757 759 767 771 784 786 787 791 791 795 798 804 808 813 820 824 828 831 837 842 843 844 850 851 853 854 854 859 866 871 RRRRL RL RRLL L RL RRRL RL RLL RLL RLLL RRL RLLLL R 2,140 150 690 150 150 14,,900700 2,800 4,590 )perative Thru This FY Linear Feet) - 25,510 - 1,330 - 21,9391 - 3,950 - 8,990 - 7,750 - 16,740 - 8,050 - 8,430 - 7,780 - 2,890 - 5,950 - 5,538 - 9,695 - 2,5451 - 3,010 - 11,270 - 19,775 - 17,330 - 8,5502 - 5,450 - 12,149 - 8,300 - 34,775 - 3,170 - 5,460 - 18,139 - 8,670 - 4,390 - 4,070 222 25,877 2,350 8,830 10,768 27,355 21,100 1,300 6,230 18,290 bI Ruddles Point, MO .......... Island 11, MO ................ New Madrid Bend, MO ....... Kentucky Point, KY .......... Morrison Towhead, MO ....... Hotchkiss Bend, MO .......... Below Island 9, TN ......... Donaldson Point, MO ......... Island 9, KY ............... Moore Island, KY-MO ........ Above Williams, KY .......... Campbell, KY ................ Pritchard, MO ............... Island 1, KY ............... Total dikes Memphis District, Mississippi River ......... 874 882 887 887 890 895 901 905 906 929 930 942 944 948 R R RL R RL RLRLL RL - - - - - - - 8,130 - - - - - - - 8,039 - - - - - - - 1,715 - - - - - - - 11,550 - - - - - - - 1,070 - - - - - - - 6,583 - - - - - - - 18,859 - - - - - - - 8,320 - - - - - - - 7,0109 - - - - - - - 4,685 - - - - - - - 1,1508 - - - - - - - 2,610 - - - - - - - 9,390 - - - - - - - 15,260 10,435 (1.98 Miles) 12,550 12,940 222 776,295 (147.03) Miles Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). Changed to correct previous errors. Lumber mattress revetment. Rock Groins. Ed Jones boat ramp construction. 6. Includes 140 feet not reported in FY 88. 7. Stone in pile dike. 8. Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. 9. Linear feet of triangular frame retards and pile dikes. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ----- TABLE 42-K PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1989) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles) Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Location Total Grade and Section In In Com- In Total System Corn- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Corn- This This Corn- This This System FY FY FY pleted' FY FY pleted FY FY MAIN STEM LEVEES Mississippi River Levees Fifth Louisiana Levee District ...... Levees ......................... Old River structures and levees ... Atchafalaya Basin Levee District ... Levees ....................... Morganza structure and levee .... Morganza forebay levee ......... Port Allen lock ................... Lafourche Basin Levee District Levees Plaquemines West Levee District Levees Buras Levee District ............... Levees ............................ Empire lock .................... Baton Rouge front levees ........... Pontchartrain Levee District ........ Levees ......................... Bonnet Carre' guide levees ....... Bonnet Carre' forebay levee ...... Bonnet Carre' structure .......... East Jefferson Levee District Levees . West Jefferson Levee District ....... Levees ......................... Floodwalls ..................... Harvey Canal Lock ............. Orleans Levee District .............. Left descending, east bank .......... Levees ................. ..... Floodwalls ......................... IHNC lock ....................... Right descending, west bank ........ Levees ............................ Algiers Canal lock ................ Lake Borgne Basin Levee District Levees Grand Prairie Levee District Levees Total Mississippi River ......... (16.8) 15.5 1.3 (126.3) 118.7 0.8 6.7 0.1 61.7 37.9 (34.1) 34.0 0.1 2.1 (124.9) 110.8 11.3 1.3 1.5 11.6 (20.0) 19.8 0.1 0.1 (27.2) (13.3) 4.6 8.6 0.1 (13.9) 13.8 0.1 11.6 37.4 511.6 (16.8) 15.5 1.3 (126.3) 118.7 0.8 6.7 0.1 61.7 37.9 (34.1) 34.0 0.1 2.1 (124.9) 110.8 11.3 1.3 1.5 11.6 (20.0) 19.8 0.1 0.1 (27.2) (13.3) 4.6 8.6 0.1 (13.9) 13.8 0.1 11.6 37.4 511.6 (-) (9.5) 9.5 0.2 (-) (-) (-) (1.0) (1.0) 1.0 (-) 0.1 4.7 15.5 (10.7) 9.4 1.3 (94.9) 87.3 0.8 6.7 0.1 24.1 28.7 (19.7) 19.7 0.9 (91.1) 77.0 11.3 1.3 1.5 10.8 (9.1) 8.9 0.1 0.1 (21.0) (9.0) 0.6 8.3 0.1 (12.0) 11.9 0.1 11.6 28.4 351.0 (-) (5.3) 5.3 0.1 (-) (4.7) 4.7 (-) (-) (-) (-) 10.1 (-) (-) (-) ((--)) (-) - (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (15.5) - 15.5 (1.0) (118.7) 1.0 118.7 0.1 61.7 - 37.9 (-) (34.0) - 34.0 - 2.1 (-) (110.8) - 110.8 - - - 11.6 (-) (19.9) - 19.8 - 0.1 (-) (18.4) (-) (4.6) - 4.6 (-) (13.8) - 13.8 - 11.6 - 37.4 1.1 479.6 N O N O y > c 0 0 3y 0 0n r O y �o co3 (-) (-) (-) (-) - (-) (-) (-) (-) (15.5) 15.5 (118.7) 118.7 61.7 37.9 (34.0) 34.0 2.1 (110.8) 110.8 11.6 (19.9) 19.8 0.1 (18.4) (4.6) 4.6 (13.8) 13.8 11.6 37.4 479.6 Other Levees Included in Mainstem Atchafalaya Basin Atchafalaya River and Bayou des Glaises ................ East bank Atchafalaya River ..... Bayou des Glaises .............. West bank Atchafalaya River ..... Simmesport Ring ............ Melville Ring ................... Krotz Springs Ring .............. Mansura Hills to Hamburg ....... West protection levee, Hamburg to Berwick drainage canal via Calumet .. . Levees west of Berwick, Berwick drainage canal to Charenton drainage canal Morganza upper guide levee ........ East protection levee, Morganza to Cutoff Bayou, including 19.5 miles of Morganza lower guide levee ........ Total Atchafalaya Basin ...... Total--Main Stem Levees ............. TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT Lake Pontchartrain, LA .............. Item A levees .................... Item B levees .................... Item C levees .................... Total Tributary Levees in MR&T Project GRAND TOTAL ............... (148.4) 52.5 7.9 60.1 1.6 4.1 1.7 20.5 (148.4) 52.5 7.9 60.1 1.6 4.1 1.7 20.5 (128.7) (128.7) (56.5) (8.9) (56.5) (8.9) (-) (143.9) - 52.5 - 7.9 - 55.6 - 1.6 - 4.1 - 1.7 - 20.5 (3.1) (87.8) (-) (-) (9.6) (8.9) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (-) (148.4) - 52.5 - 7.9 - 60.1 - 1.6 - 4.1 - 1.7 - 20.5 (-) (43.9) 20.2 12.0 11.7 (-) (127.7) (3.1) (87.5) (-) (-) (56.5) (8.9) (-) (-) (-) (8.9) (106.7) (106.7) (6.1) (67.5) (-) (-) (-) (105.0) (6.1) (65.2) 449.2 449.2 9.2 317.7 - - - 446.5 9.2 205.5 960.8 960.8 24.7 668.7 10.1 - 1.1 926.1 9.2 685.1 (17.4) (17.4) (-) (17.4) (-) (-) (-) (17.4) (-) (17.4) 5.0 5.0 - 5.0 - - - 5.0 - 5.0 10.1 10.1 - 10.1 - - - 10.1 - 10.1 2.3 2.3 - 2.3 - - - 2.3 - 2.3 17.4 17.4 - 17.4 - - - 17.4 - 17.4 978.2 978.2 24.7 686.2 10.1 1.1 943.5 1. Figures indicate landside seepage berms only. CI) CI) CI cl C. C 1 9.2 702.5 TABLE 42-L PROJECT LEVEES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1989) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles)' Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Location Total Grade and Section In In Com- Authorized In Total System Com- System plete Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Corn- This This Com- This This System FY FY FY2 pleted3 FY4 FY pleted FY FY MAIN STEM LEVEES Mississippi River Levees East bank in Mississippi ............. 178.35 178.3 - 109.1 156.9 2.8 114.0 168.4 - 168.4 Greenville Harbor dikes .............. 7.8 7.8 - 7.8 - - - West bank in Arkansas ............... 75.6 75.6 2.5 50.1 54.0 4.5 51.5 75.4 - 75.4 West bank in Louisiana (above Red River) . ................. 198.7 198.7 - 67.1 91.0 - 69.6 197.8 197.8 Total Mississippi River Levees ...... 460.4 460.4 - 234.1 301.9 7.3 235.1 441.6 441.6 Other Levees Included in Main Stem Lower Red River-South Bank Red River levees ................. (59.2) (59.2) (.1) (59.2) (-) (-) (-) (59.2) (-) (59.2) Hotwells to Moncla, LA, levees ...... 59.2 59.2 .1 59.2 - - - 59.2 - 59.2 Arkansas River, South bank ....... 85.4 85.4 - 85.4 24.7 - 24.7 84.1 - 81.1 Total Other Levees Included in Main Stem ............... .... 144.6 144.6 - 144.6 24.7 - 24.7 143.3 - 140.3 Total-Main Stem Levees .......... 605.0 605.0 2.4 378.7 326.6 7.3 259.8 584.9 - 581.9 TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT Arkansas River, North bank .......... 61.57 56.2 - 56.2 8.3 - 8.3 47.4 - 47.4 Red River Backwater Levees ....... 263.6 160.5 - 141.58 - - - 249.0 - 141.9 Yazoo River Basin . ................. (721.3) (356.5) (3.1) (157.0) - - - (717.3) (3.1) (323.6) Headwater ..................... 624.76 305.6 3.1 156.3 - - - 620.7 3.1 284.6 Backwater ...................... 96.6 50.9 - 0.7 - - - 96.6 - 39.0 Total Tributary Levess in MR&T Project ... 1,046.4 573.2 3.1 361.0 8.3 - 8.3 1,013.7 3.1 512.9 GRAND TOTAL ..................... 1,651.4 1,178.2 3.1 739.7 334.9 7.3 268.1 1,598.6 3.1 1,094.8 1. This tabulation does not include riverside berms which are considered an integral part of the levee section. Riverside berms will be constructed along with levee enlargements or seepage berm contracts. 2. Levee that has adequate freeboard based on the refined 1973 MR&T project flood flow line for the Mississippi River. Levees with more than 2 feet of freeboard are considered adequate. 3. Subject to change as planning progresses. Does not include existing berms which need restudy. 4. Based on refined 1973 MR&T project flood flow line. 5. Includes 1.4 miles of concrete floodwall and 0.3 mile of levee on Vicksburg city front. 6. Includes 36.9 miles of local protection works; 61.3 miles along Whittington Auxiliary Channel; 210 miles in Upper Yazoo Projects; 156.1 miles along main stem; and 160.4 miles on tributaries. 7. Includes 5.3 miles for Gillett new levee. 8. Reflects results of 1985 flowline reanalysis. O -3 O y d y Ca O y n CC C Ct O cax ca TABLE 42-M PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1989) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles)' Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Location Total Grade andSection In In Com- In Total System Com- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Com- This This Com- This This System FY FY FY pleted' FY FY pleted FY FY MAIN STEM LEVEES Mississippi River Mounds, IL ....................... Mound City, IL ................... Cairo Drainage District ........... City of Cairo ..................... Little River Drainage District ....... Levee District No. 2, Scott County, MO .................. Levee District No. 3, Mississippi County, MO .......... St. Johns Levee and Drainage District ................ St. Francis Levee District of MO ... City of Hickman, KY ............. Board of Levee Commissioners Fulton County, KY ................ Reelfoot Levee District of Lake and Obion Counties, TN ................ Madrid Bend Levee District, Lake Co., TN .................... Lake County Levee and Drainage District .................. Dyer Count Levee and Drainage District No. 1 ............ Tipton-Obion levee extension ........ St. Francis Levee District of AR .... Helena Improvement District No. 1 Cotton Belt Levee District No. 1 ... Laconia Drainage and Levee District Phillips County, AR ............... Laconia Levee District No. 1 of Desha County, AR ................. Laconia Circle Special Drainage District of Desha County, AR ...... Yazoo-Mississippi Delta Levee District ........................ 3.9 2.7 13.82 6.2 19.3 13.8 3.9 2.7 13.8 6.2 19.3 13.8 26.0 26.0 59.03 55.7 1.4 16.7 58.7 55.7 1.4 16.7 4.5 4.5 5.2 5.2 15.9 21.3 6.5 156.7 5.3 23.9 20.5 18.1 15.9 21.3 156.7 5.3 23.9 20.5 18.1 6.6 6.6 3.9 2.7 13.8 6.2 19.3 13.8 26.0 58.2 55.7 1.4 0.5 2.5 1.6 4.4 9.7 4.2 12.9 9.2 23.0 0.8 0.5 2.5 2.0 4.9 4.9 26.0 12.0 16.74 15.1 11.4 4.54 5.2 4 15.9 21.3 153.24 5.3 23.9 20.5 18.14 0.6 0.3 4.5 9.1 1.3 84.7 2.4 18.8 11.5 12.6 5.2 4.5 15.9 0.4 81.8 2.4 18.8 11.5 9.2 16.5 6.6 4 93.6 93.6 - 93.6 87.3 3.6 1.1 8.5 4.0 19.3 13.8 46.9 55.1 0.5 16.3 3.6 1.1 8.5 3.5 19.3 13.8 26.0 46.1 55.1 0 16.3 4.3 5.2 Z 15.9 21.3 156.7 4.2 23.9 20.5 16.5 21.3 6.5 156.7 4.7 23.9 20.5 87.3 93.6 -93.6 TABLE 42-M (Continued) PROJECT LEVEES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1989) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles)' Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Location Total Grade and Section In In Corn- In Total System Com- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Com- This This Com- This This System FY FY FY pleted' FY FY pleted FY FY Mississippi River Levees (continued) Madrid Bend L.D., Fulton Co., KY .................... 4.8 4.8 0.4 4.84 - - -4.8 0.4 4.8 Birds Point-New Madrid setback levee ...................... 35.3 35.3 - 35.3 23.8 - - 35.3 - 35.3 Total Mississippi River .......... 636.7 629.9 0.4 625.9 335.2 0.8 254.4 604.5 0.4 595.5 TOTAL MAIN STEM LEVEES ... 636.7 629.9 0.4 625.9 335.2 0.8 254.4 604.5 0.4 595.5 TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT St. Francis River .................. (308.2) (302.9) - (302.9) - - - (301.0) - (133.5) East bank ....................... 159.5 156.2 - 156.2 - - - 156.7 6.0 94.7 West bank ...................... 148.7 146.7 - 146.7 - - - 144.3 - 38.8 Little River ........ .............. (130.1) (130.1) - (130.1) - - - (128.9) (94.5) East bank (left) ................... 40.7 40.7 - 40.7 -40.7 27.0 40.1 West bank ........................ 35.1 35. 1 35 - - - 35.1 - 23.7 Elk Chute .......................... 39.9 39.9 - 39.9 - - - 39.7 - 17.3 West Basin and middle valley ...... 14.4 14.4 - 14.4 - - - 13.4 - 13.4 Lower White River ................. (95.6) (85.9) - (84.1) - - - (88.0) - (75.0) White River backwater levee . . 40.2 40.2 - 40.2 - - - 38.8 - 38.8 Augusta to Clarendon .............. 49.2 39.5 - 39.5 - - - 49.2 - 36.2 Clarendon levee .................... 6.2 6.2 - 4.4 - - - Memphis Harbor .................... 10.5 10.5 - 10.5 7.0 - 1.5 10.5 - 10.5 Total Tributary Levees in MR&T Project .................... 544.4 529.4 - 527.6 7.0 - 1.5 528.4 33.0 313.5 GRAND TOTAL ..................... 1,181.1 1,159.3 0.4 1,153.5 342.2 0.8 255.9 1,132.9 33.4 909.0 1. Subject to change as planning progresses. 2. Includes 5.1 miles of Cache River levee. This levee was enlarged to 1928 grades with Federal funds, but since that time has been classified as a secondary levee. 3. Includes 12.1 miles of Farrenburg levee. This levee was enlarged to 1928 grades with Federal funds, but since that time has been classified as a secondary levee. 4. Authority: CEMRC-ED-GS (CELMM-ED-GT 18 FEB 87) 3rd END 31 May 88. TABLE 42-N RECAPITULATION PROJECT LEVEE TABLES 42-K, -L, AND -M (FISCAL YEAR 1989) Levees and Floodwalls Berms (Miles) Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Total Location Total Grade and Section In In Com- In Total System Com- System plete Authorized Place Thru When Built plete When Built Thru for This This This Com- This This Com- This This System FY FY FY pleted FY FY pleted FY FY MAIN STEM LEVEES Mississippi River New Orleans District, Table 42-K ... 511.6 511.6 .15.4 351.0 10.1 - 1.1 479.6 - 479.6 Vicksburg District, Table 42-L ..... 460.4 460.4 - 234.1 301.9 -7.3 235.1 441.6 - 441.6 Memphis District, Table 42-M ...... 636.7 629.9 0.4 625.9 335.2 0.8 254.4 604.5 0.4 595.5 Total Mississippi River ........... 1,608.7 1,601.9 15.8 1,211.0 647.2 8.1 490.6 1,525.7 0.4 1,516.7 Other Levees Included in Main Stem Atchafalaya Basin Floodway-NOD ................ 449.2 449.2 9.2 317.7 - - - 446.5 9.2 205.5 Lower Red River- South Bank-VXD ............... 59.2 59.2 - 59.2 - - - 59.2 - 59.2 Arkansas River-South Bank-VXD ... 85.4 85.4 - 85.4 24.7 - 24.7 84.1 - 81.1 Total Other Levees Included in Main Stem . ................. 593.8 593.8 9.2 462.3 24.7 - 24.7 589.8 9.2 345.8 Total Main Stem Levees ........ 2,202.5 2,195.7 25.0 1,673.3 671.9 8.1 515.3 2,115.5 9.6 1,862.5 TRIBUTARY LEVEES IN MR&T PROJECT Lake Pontchartrain, LA,-NOD ........ 17.4 17.4 - 17.4 - - - 17.4 - 17.4 Yazoo River Basin-VXD ............. 721.3 356.5 3.1 157.0 - - - 717.3 - 320.5 Arkansas River-North Bank-VXD ..... 61.5 56.2 - 56.2 8.3 - 8.3 47.4 - 47.4 Red River Backwater-VXD .......... 263.6 160.5 - 147.8 - - - 249.0 - 145.9 St. Francis River-MD ............... 308.2 302.9 - 302.9 - - - 301.0 6.0 133.5 Little River-MD ................... 130.1 130.1 - 130.1 - - - 128.9 27.0 94.5 Lower White River-MD .............. 95.6 85.9 - 84.1 - - - 88.0 - 75.0 Memphis Harbor-MD ................ 10.5 10.5 - 10.5 7.0 - 1.5 10.5 - 10.5 Total Tributary Levees in MR&T Project .................... 1,608.2 1,120.0 3.1 906.0 15.3 - 9.8 1,559.5 33.0 844.7 Grand Total in Project ............ 3,810.7 3,315.7 28.1 2,579.3 687.2 8.1 525.1 3,675.0 42.6 2,707.2 Cl2 C12 Mme Mai 0C 0 z REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 42-0 CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: NEW ORLEANS (FISCAL YEAR 1989) DISTRICT In Total System Complete Year When Built Thru Location Initi- Com- This This Percent ated pleted FY FY Complete (Miles) Bayou des Glaise diversion channel ............... 1938 6.0 - 6.0 100 Bayous Rapides, Boeuf, and Cocodrie .............. 1946 92.6 - 63.4 75 Charenton drainage and navigation canal ......... 1939 6.3 - 6.3 100 Wax Lake Outlet ................................. 1938 15.7 - 15.7 100 Atchafalaya Basin Floodway ..................... 1933 244.2 - 186.4 76 Morganza Floodway ........................... 1941 3.3 - 3.3 100 Old River outflow channel ...................... 1956 8.3 - 8.3 100 Old River inflow channel ....................... 1960 2.3 - 2.3 100 Old River lock approach channels ................ 1961 2.2 - 2.2 100 Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp) ............. 1958 2.5 - 2.5 100 Teche-Vermillion Water Supply ................... - 6.3 - 6.3 100 42-52 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-P CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1989) In Total System Complete Year When Built Thru Location Initi- Com- This This Percent ated pleted FY FY Complete (Miles) BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, ETC., MS Big Sunflower River ............................ 1947 199.1 - 199.1 100 Quiver River ..................................... 1947 69.6 - 69.6 100 Deer Creek ...................................... 1947 7.0 - 7.0 100 Steele Bayou ..................................... 1947 54.9 - 54.9 100 Steele Bayou' .................................... 1965 71.2 5.5 68.5 90 Main Canal ...................................... 1959 21.1 - 21.1 100 M ain Canal2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 22.2 - - - Black Bayou ............. ....................... - 36.5 - - - Big Sunflower River tributaries .................. 1957 227.2 - 227.2 100 Quiver River tributaries ......................... 1960 35.4 - 35.4 100 YAZOO BACKWATER Yazoo Backwater ............................... 1960 39.9 - 39.9 100 YAZOO BASIN HEADWATER, MS Upper Yazoo Project ............................ 1976 179.0 2.4 58.1 32 Coldwater River ................................ 1941 54.6 - 54.6 100 Arkabutla Canal ............................... 1948 0.4 - 0.4 100 Tallahatchie Canal .............................. 1940 74.8 - 73.5 85 Little Tallahatchie River and Panola-Quitman Floodway ...................... 1939 48.0 - 48.0 100 Greenwood protection works ..................... 1971 2.9 - 2.9 100 Yacona River .................................. 1952 1.8 - 1.8 100 Bobo Bayou ..................................... 1944 16.1 - 16.1 100 Cassidy Bayou .................................. 1934 69.0 - 69.0 100 Cassidy Bayou 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . .. . . . - 26.0 - - - Bear Creek Diversion ............................ - 4.8 - Lake Cormorant ................................. - 20.9 - Hurricane Bayou ................................ - 2.5 - Opossum Bayou .................................. - 20.8 - Abaica Creek ................................ - 7.7 - Chicopa Creek ................................... - 7.0 - Bear Creek ..................... .... ...... - 23.3 - Rocky Bayou ................................... - 7.8 - Whiteoak Bayou ................................. - 55.9 - Miscellaneous ditches ................. ....... - 12.3 - - - Yalobusha River ............ ................ 1939 46.0 - 46.0 100 Yazoo River .................. ............... 1940 160.2 - 160.2 100 Whittington Auxiliary Channel ................... 1956 30.8 - 30.8 100 Tchula Lake ............... ..................... 1964 26.4 - 26.4 100 David-Burrell Bayou ............................. 1957 40.4 - 40.4 100 McKinney Bayou ......... ... .................. 1960 3.5 - 3.5 100 Hillside Floodway ............................... 1964 11.0 - 11.0 100 Yazoo City protection works ..................... 1953 1.6 - 1.6 100 Ascalmore-Tippo Bayous ........................ 1975 30.2 - 15.1 50 Alligator-Catfish Bayou .......................... 1973 8.3 - 8.2 99 Pelucia Creek .................. . .......... 1975 13.7 - 5.6 40 BOEUF & TENSAS RIVERS, ETC., LA AND AR Bayou Lafourche ............................... 1949 45.3 - 45.3 100 Bayou Lafourche 4 ,7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . 1972 43.0 - 4.4 10 Big & Colewa Creeks ........................... 1947 81.4 - 81.4 100 42-53 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 42-P CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 1989) In Total System Complete Year When Built Thru Location Initi- Com- This This Percent ated pleted FY FY Complete (Miles) BOEUF & TENSAS RIVERS, ETC., LA AND AR- continued Big & Colewa Creeks5' 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1965 86.8 - 51.5 60 Tensas River ................................... 1947 96.5 - 96.5 100 Tensas River ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1968 165.0 - 61.0 37 Boeuf River, AR and LA ....................... 1953 103.9 - 103.9 100 Fleschmans Bayou, AR .......................... 1963 6.6 - 6.6 100 Caney Bayou, AR ............................... 1964 7.4 - 7.4 100 Canal 18, AR .................................... 1963 10.3 - 10.3 100 Big Bayou, AR ................................. 1952 33.3 - 33.3 100 Black Pond Slough, AR ......................... 1962 14.3 - 14.3 100 Bayou Macon, AR and LA 1959 150.8 - 150.8 100 Rush Bayou, AR ............. ........ ....... 1964 6.7 - 6.7 100 Canal 19, AR .................................... 1957 50.2 - 50.2 100 Canal 43, AR .................................. 1956 34.5 - 34.5 100 Canal 81, AR ................................... 1957 32.7 - 32.7 100 Mill Bayou-Bayou Vidal-Bayou Vidal Cutoff ...... - 17.1 - - Kirsch Lake Canal ............................... - 9.3 - - Canal 19 Extension .............................. 1964 9.4 - 9.4 100 Lake Chicot Pumping Plant ..................... - 2.5 - 2.5 100 Mill Bayou .................................... 1955 4.8 - 4.8 100 RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant .................. 1976 6.9 - 6.9 100 Six Mile Bayou, LA ............................. - 1.5 - 1.5 100 GRAND PRAIRIE, AR .......................... - 338.1 - - BAYOU METO, AR ............................ - 164.9 - - 1. Includes further work on 54.9 miles and adds 16.3 6. Includes further work on 96.5 miles and adds 68.5 miles of channel to the project. 2. Includes further work on 21.1 miles and adds 1.1 miles of channel to the project. 3. Includes further work on 26.0 miles. 4. Includes further work on 38.6 miles and adds 4.4 miles of channel to the project. 5. Includes further work on 75.3 miles and adds 11.5 miles of channel to the project. additional miles of channel to the project. 7. Further work on these items has been deferred due to local oppositions and withdrawal of sponsorship by the levee district. 42-54 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-Q CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1989) In Total System Complete Year When Built Thru Location Initi- Corn- This This Percent ated pleted FY FY Complete (Miles) BIRDS POINT-NEW MADRID FLOODWAY Birds Point-New Madrid Intercepting Ditch Enlargement, Samos and Vicinity, MO .......... 1952 9.6 9.5 100 ST. FRANCIS BASIN Little River Drainage, MO. ....................... 1963 298.9 22.6 278.9 93 St. Francis River, MO and AR ................... 1953 638.5 23.2 441.0 69 West Memphis Drainage, AR ..................... 1951 19.8 - 19.8 100 Big Slough and Mayo Ditch, AR ................. 1960 28.0 - 28.0 100 Tyronza River, AR .............................. 1939 12.7 - 12.7 100 L'Anguille River, AR ............................. (1) 95.0 - - - LOWER WHITE RIVER BASIN, AR Cache River Basin, AR .......................... 1972 231.5 - 7.2 3 Big Creek and tributaries, AR .................... (1) 103.8 - - - WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES Obion Creek, KY ................................. (1) 41.7 WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES MS River, Western TN tributaries (Backwater Areas) (1946 Act) ................... 1952 34.3 - 34.3 100 Obion River Diversion Channel, TN (1946 Act) ................................. (1) 9.3 Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, KY and TN ........................................ 1974 15.8 - 3.0 19 Running Reelfoot Bayou, TN ...................... 1955 19.7 - 19.7 100 MS River Below Cape Girardeau; West TN tributaries. (1948 Act) ...................... 1961 225.0 - 89.8 41 Wolf River and tributaries, TN ................... 1960 25.5 - 25.5 100 1. Not started. 42-55 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 42-R COSTS DURING FISCAL YEAR 1989 Item Construction Maintenance Other FEDERAL FUNDS Flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries: St. Louis District: General investigations $ -- $ -- $ -- Advance engineering and design -- -- St. Francis Basin-Wappapello Lake -- 4,024,070 -- Subtotal 4,024,070 Memphis District: General investigations -- -- 3,272,244 Mississippi River levees 1,800,544 2,536,493 -- St. Francis Basin 11,260,082 7,914,325 -- Lower White River, Augusta to Clarendon 7,135 785,584 -- Clarendon Levee, Lower White, AR 8,759 -- -- White River Backwater -- 2,115,019 -- Cache Basin, Ark. 505,502 -- -- Channel improvement 20,223,122 22,146,133 -- West Tennessee tributaries 434,535 -- -- West Kentucky tributaries 6,885 -- -- Inspection of completed works -- 640,193 -- Mapping -- 251,118 -- Reelfoot Lake No. 9, TN-KY 2,939 -- -- Mud Lake, TN 37 -- -- Eight Mile Creek 229,396 -- -- Helena Harbor 832,121 --- L'Anguille River 46,203 -- -- Devalls Creek Pumping Station -- 2,951 -- Subtotal 35,357,258 35,606,232 3,272,244 Vicksburg District: General investigations -- -- 1,205,936 Advance engineering and design -- -- Mississippi River levees 2,845,769 956,554 -- Lower Arkansas River - 935,349 -- Tensas Basin 3,779,239 4,152,120 -- Yazoo Basin 21,237,930 21,955,964 - Channel improvement 28,462,509 12,122,331 -- Mapping -- 444,013 -- Inspection of completed works -- 165,600 -- Lower Red River--South Bank Red River Levee 496,303 36,496 -- Dam Safety Assurances 764,128 -- -- Subtotal 57,585,878 40,768,426 1,205,936 New Orleans District: General investigations -- -- 807,868 Advance engineering and design -- Mississippi River levees 10,606,523 5,159,462 - Mississippi Delta Region 5,584,995 -- -- Old River 1,872,804 5,054,804 - Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries -- 153,453 - Atchafalaya Basin 20,418,451 7,321,481 - Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System 6,675,942 -- -- Channel improvement 59,269,116 21,065,674 -- Inspection of completed works - 239,398 -- Mapping -- 193,855 -- Subtotal Total Federal Funds 104,427,831 39,188,127 807,868 197,370,967 119,586,856 5,286,048 42-56 TABLE 42-R (Continued) MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION COSTS DURING FISCAL YEAR 1989 Item Construction Maintenance Other CONTRIBUTED FUNDS Memphis District: Lauderdale County Boat Ramp 177,757 -- -- New Orleans District: Old River -- 64,994 -- Atchafalaya Basin -- -- Mississippi Delta Region 1,119,146 -- - Total Contributed Funds 1,296,903 64,994 -- Grand Total, Federal and Contributed Funds 198,667,870 119,651,849 5,286,048 42-57 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 42-S STATEMENTS OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1989 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1989 ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES CHARGEABLE AGAINST FLOOD CONTROL ACT LIMITATIONS: COMPLETED WORKS: Waterways Experiment Station Office, Chief of Engineers Rock Island District: S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 St. Louis District: S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal Memphis District: Des Arc, Ark. Contraction works DeValls Bluff, Ark. Mapping Memphis Harbor New Madrid Floodway Wolf River and tributaries Roads on levees (Mississippi River levees) S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal Vicksburg District: Boeuf Basin levees Channel realignment, Arkansas River Contraction works Eudora Floodway Vicksburg Harbor Greenville Harbor Grants Canal (Mississippi River levees) Mapping Jonesville, LA Roads on levees S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Subtotal New Orleans District: Baton Rouge Harbor, LA Atchafalaya River and Basin, LA Bonnet Carre' Spillway, LA Contraction works Mapping Roads on levees S. G. & O. prior to Aug. 18, 1941 Wax Lake Outlet and Charenton Canal Morganza Floodway and structure Lake Pontchartrain Atchafalaya Basin, rights-of-way and flowage, Bayou des Glaises setback Subtotal All other completed items: Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 Impounded savings Plant transferred to revolving fund OCE (portion of allotment transferred to revolving fund, Washington Dist.) Subtotal TOTAL COMPLETED WORKS $ 874,000 19,158 14,010 $ 874,000 19,158 14,010 169,352 169,352 -- 1,076,520 1,076,520 -- 178,925 178,925 -- 8,692,791 8,692,791 -- 231,215 231,215 -- 1,450,337 1,450,337 -- 18,736,432 18,736,432 -- 6,521,543 6,521,543 -- 1,723,620 1,723,620 -- 12,426 12,426 -- 1,998,766 1,998,766 -- 39,546,055 39,546,055 -- 2,764,605 2,764,605 -- 125,074 125,074 -- 1,972,183 1,972,183 -- 826,235 826,235 -- 4,664,515 4,664,515 -- 2,864,516 2,864,516 -- 7,070 7,070 -- 1,531,021 1,531,021 -- 172,950 172,950 -- 105,660 105,660 -- 2,350,201 2,350,201 -- 17,384,031 17,384,031 -- 699,185 699,185 -- 3,375,492 3,375,492 -- 14,212,198 14,212,198 -- 1,258,916 1,258,916 -- 1,112,967 1,112,967 -- 540,838 540,838 -- 2,701,566 2,701,566 -- 10,098,817 10,098,817 -- 35,992,117 35,992,117 -- 5,513,110 5,513,110 -- 387,917 387,917 -- 75,893,123 75,893,123 -- 4,995,215 4,995,215 -- 1,593,097 1,593,097 -- 24,924,578 24,924,578 -- 19,882 19,882 -- 31,532,772 31,532,772 -- 165,432,500 165,432,500 -- 42-58 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-S (Continued) STATEMENTS OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1989 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30, 1989 UNCOMPLETED WORKS: Rock Island District: Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 St. Louis District: Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Subtotal Memphis District: Mississippi River levees Mississippi River levees New Madrid Channel improvement: Revetments Dredging Dikes Reelfoot Lake Reelfoot Lake, Lake No. 9, TN-KY St. Francis Basin: Wappapello Lake St. Francis River and tributaries Big Slough and Mayo ditch Little River drainage Lower White River: Clarendon Levee Augusta to Clarendon, AR White River backwater levee, AR Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 West Tennessee tributaries Helena Harbor Cache Basin, AR West Kentucky tributaries Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN L'Anguille River Eight Mile Creek Subtotal Vicksburg District: Mississippi River levees (excludes Grants Canal, $7,070, shown under completed works) Section 6 Levees Lower Arkansas River: North Bank South Bank Tensas Basin: Lake Chicot pumping plant Tensas River Red River Backwater: Below Red River Red River backwater levee, LA Tensas, Cocodrie pumping plant Lower Red River South Bank Red River Levees Tensas National Wildlife Refuge, LA Channel improvement: Revetments Dredging Dikes Levees under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Yazoo Basin: Sardis Lake 579,462 1,897,980 2,477,442 173,989,354 98,000 347,865,307 57,499,400 135,666,000 439,434 7,895,000 9,019,908 215,975,682 965,429 50,977,592 505,715 1,788,846 10,624,501 108,651 39,333,900 4,562,000 9,823,000 1,440,000 107,000 196,000 1,593,000 1,070,473,720 204,398,990 9,000 7,049,414 15,676,286 93,963,400 41,507,200 629,800 60,960,646 54,460,900 785,400 39,800,000 403,602,065 23,549,260 99,932,040 958,175 26,502,400 579,462 1,897,980 2,477,442 173,766,072 98,000 347,812,324 57,499,399 133,865,904 439,434 7,881,074 9,019,908 214,393,994 965,429 50,955,445 505,474 1,786,981 10,624,501 108,651 38,683,029 1,418,769 9,299,799 1,424,635 91,352 118,162 1,489,425 1,062,247,764 203,560,491 9,000 7,049,414 15,676,286 92,585,336 41,480,091 602,537 57,028,319 53,536,553 756,281 39,800,000 402,473,991 23,549,260 99,264,287 958,175 26,502,400 42-59 223,282 -- 52,983 1 1,042,810 13,926 -- 1,581,687 -- 22,147 241 1,865 650,871 3,143,231 523,201 15,365 15,648 77,838 103,575 8,225,956 835,499 -- 1,378,064 27,110 27,263 3,932,326 924,347 29,119 1,128,074 667,753 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 42-S (Continued) STATEMENTS OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1989 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30,1989 Yazoo Basin: (Continued) Enid Lake Arkabutla Lake Grenada Lake Greenwood Belzoni Yazoo City Will M. Whittington auxiliary channel Big Sunflower, etc. Main Stem Upper Yazoo Projects Yazoo Basin-Tributaries Tributaries (Except Ascal-Tippo-Opossum Bayous) Tributaries-Bank Stabilization Ascalmore-Tippo-Opossum Bayous Yazoo Basin Backwater Yazoo Backwater Rocky Bayou Yazoo Backwater Pumping Plant Muddy Bayou Steambank Erosion Control, Eval. and Demo. Demonstration Erosion Control Dam Safety Assurances-Sardis Dam Subtotal New Orleans District: Teche-Vermilion Basin Water Supply Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries Channel improvement: Dredging Revetments Lower Red River (South Bank Levees) Levees Under Sec. 6, Flood Control Act of 1928 Mississippi River Levees Mississippi Delta Region Atachafalaya Basin Floodway: Atachafalaya Basin Atachafalaya River Navigation Atachafalaya Basin Floodway System Old River Subtotal TOTAL UNCOMPLETED WORKS ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (CONSTRUCTION) Memphis District: L'Anguille River Basin, AR Reelfoot Lake, Lake No. 9 Cache River Big Creek and Tributaries, Lower White River Clarendon Levee, Lower White River West Kentucky Tributaries Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Harris Fork Creek, KY & TN Subtotal Vicksburg District: Yazoo Basin, Big Sunflower River, Steele Bayou Tensas - National Wildlife Refuge, LA Subtotal 21,292,400 16,000,700 45,356,100 11,543,000 316,656 2,205,611 10,950,966 42,451,000 34,793,400 75,949,806 73,776,610 612,484 23,978,700 56,444,200 3,394,200 11,302,200 5,145,200 14,767,000 49,999,900 6,181,000 1,575,246,110 33,806,000 5,008,008 35,945,266 673,045,117 18,056,600 200,680 244,615,000 8,900,000 611,829,537 303,463 8,656,000 291,032,000 1,931,397,671 21,292,400 16,000,700 45,355,909 11,543,000 316,656 2,205,611 10,950,966 39,942,894 34,324,135 72,100,638 69,591,858 612,484 23,978,676 56,158,992 3,242,213 9,027,925 5,145,200 14,767,000 33,131,882 5,449,359 1,539,970,920 33,806,000 5,008,008 35,945,266 672,439,251 18,056,600 200,680 243,066,742 7,836,513 608,467,437 303,463 7,627,146 290,975,213 1,923,732,318 191 2,508,106 469,265 3,849,168 4,184,753 24 285,208 151,987 2,274,275 11,868,018 731,641 35,275,190 605,866 1,548,258 1,063,487 3,362,100 -- 1,028,854 56,787 7,665,353 4,579,594,942 4,528,428,443 51,166,499 150,000 150,000 -- 30,000 30,000 -- 420,000 420,000 -- 365,000 364,339 -- 65,000 65,000 -- 175,000 175,000 -- 350,000 350,000 -- 540,000 540,000 -- 2,095,000 2,095,000 -- 29,700 29,700 -- 200,000 200,000 -- 229,700 229,700 -- 4:2-60 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-S (Continued) STATEMENTS OF ALLOTMENTS AND ACCRUED EXPENDITURES FOR FLOOD CONTROL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, FROM MAY 15, 1928, THROUGH SEP. 30, 1989 Unexpended Accrued Balance District or Installation and Class of Work Allotments Expenditures Sep. 30,1989 New Orleans District: Mississippi Delta Region 69,753 69,753 -- Teche Vermilion Basin-Water Supply 1,109,000 1,109,000 -- East Rapides & S. Central Avoyelles Parishes 965,247 965,247 -- Subtotal 2,144,000 2,144,000 -- TOTAL ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 4,468,700 4,468,700 -- TOTAL COMPLETED WORKS, UNCOMPLETED WORKS AND ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 4,749,496,142 4,698,329,643 51,166,499 RECREATION FACILITIES-COMPLETED PROJECTS Eight-Year Program Funds St. Louis District: Wappapello Lake, MO 2,405,300 2,404,890 410 Wappapello Lake, MO, Rockwood Landing 203,286 203,286 -- Subtotal 2,608,586 2,608,176 410 Vicksburg District: Sardis Lake 1,584,339 1,584,339 -- Enid Lake 2,268,209 2,268,209 -- Arkabutla Lake 2,189,280 2,189,280 -- Grenada Lake 1,631,281 1,631,281 -- Subtotal 7,673,109 7,673,109 -- Total Eight-Year Program Funds 10,281,695 10,281,285 410 Total chargeable against Flood Control Act Limitations excluding flood control emergencies 4,759,777,837 4,708,611,338 51,166,499 Total maintenance since Aug. 18, 1941 1,942,582,855 1,935,834,122 6,748,734 Total rehabilitation 31,113,000 31,113,000 -- Total flood control emergencies 14,900,300 14,900,300 -- Total general investigations 76,120,881 74,773,617 1,347,264 Total flood control, MR&T appropriations 6,824,494,873 6,765,232,377 59,262,497 Appropriations in addition to flood control, MR&T Other appropriations itemized in footnote (1), pp. 2068-69, Annual Report for 1953 32,068,909 32,068,909 -- Grand total appropriated to Sep. 30, 1988 6,856,563,782 6,797,301,285 59,262,497 Note: Preauthorization study costs chargeable to the MR&T authorization have been transferred to completed work. Costs not chargeable have been exluded from this report. 42-61 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS' ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 42-T STATEMENTS OF EXPENDITURES FOR LEVEES BY STATE AND LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS THROUGH DEC. 31, 1988 Engineer District St. Louis Memphis Vicksburg New Orleans Total Expenditures $ 79,366,859 280,907,702 136,549,432 662,240,481 $1,159,064,474 42-62 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 42-U COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTi Total Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep. 30, 1989 Mississippi River General investigations: and tributaries Allotted 6,809,000 5,890,000 4,860,000 5,029,000 76,120,881 (Regular Funds)1 Cost 5,955,532 6,296,443 4,961,997 5,286,048 74,773,617 Construction (includes advance engineering and design): Allotted 194,438,000 192,260,000 191,020,000 210,139,000 4,579,594,942 Cost 196,535,725 168,890,918 198,487,453 197,370,967 4,528,428,443 Maintenance Allotted 100,480,000 112,403,000 120,874,000 121,878,000 1,942,582,855 Cost 102,958,345 110,409,871 121,485,216 119,586,856 1,935,834,121 Rehabilitations Allotted -- -- -- -- 31,113,000 Cost -- -- -- -- 31,113,000 Flood control emergencies (Maintenance): Allotted -- -- -- -- 14,885,992 Cost -- -- -- -- 14,885,992 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contributed 20,000 124,692 1,590,000 2,028,507 13,323,970 Cost 352,749 121,303 1,387,953 1,296,903 12,383,627 Maintenance Contributed 169,279 101,108 79,126 83,164 2,598,412 Cost 139,621 69,827 63,060 64,994 2,378,955 1. Appropriations were as follows: Appropriations chargeable against Flood Control Act authorizations: Flood Control, MR&T except for emergencies (excludes Maintenance allotments Aug. 18, 1941, through Sep. 30, 1989): Net total allotted for works under Mississippi River Commission: $4,749,076,370 Eight-Year Program Funds, Construction General: 10,281,695 Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 (not under MRC): 4,995,215 Transferred to revolving fund: 24,944,460 Impounded savings: 1,593,097 $4,790,890,837 Flood control emergencies: Net total allotted: 14,885,922 Impounded savings: 14,378 14,900,300 Additional funds not chargeable against Flood Control Act authorizations: Appropriations for Flood Control, MR&T, except for flood control emergencies: General investigations: 76,120,881 Maintenance allotments Aug. 18, 1941, through Sep. 30, 1989 1,942,582,855 2,018,703,736 Appropriations in addition to appropriations for Flood Control, MR&T (itemized in footnote (1), pp. 2068-69, Annual Report for 1953): 32,068,909 Budgetary and OCE Reserves: Grand total: 6,856,563,782 Reconciliation of appropriations and allotments: Total allotted to Sep. 30, 1989 6,825,016,632 Transferred to revolving fund: 24,944,460 Surveys under Sec. 10, Flood Control Act of 1928 (not under MRC): 4,995,215 Impounded savings withdrawn by Chief of Engineers: 1,607,475 Total Appropriations to Sep. 30, 1989: 6,856,563,782 Appropriations for past four reporting periods were as follows: FY 86: $301,727,000; FY 87: $310,553,000 FY 88: $316,754,000; FY 89: $337,046,000. 2. Totals for General Investigations include four projects transferred from Construction totals per DAEN-CWB-W, Aug. 4, 78, teletype. 42-63 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES TABLE 42-V ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96x3112) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 89 Categories ($) ($) SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention (112) New Orleans District Atchafalaya Basin Water & Land Res - 12026 64,865 Subtotal 64,865 Vicksburg District Boeuf-Tensas Basin, AR & LA - 81273 530,725 Natchez, MS- 12675 104,260 Yazoo River Basin, MS - 12074 374,642 Subtotal 1,009,627 Memphis District Birds Point-New Madrid Alt Study - 12642 493,672 Eastern AR Reg-Comprehensive Study - 81266 416,508 Mayfield Creek -10850 21,058 Reelfoot Lake, TN - 00086 7,487 St. Francis River Below Wappapello (Whiteman's Creek) - 22000 124,330 St. Francis River F&WL, AR&MO - 79690 7,895 Tuscumbia River Study - 12408 1,441 Subtotal 1,072,391 TOTAL (Category 110) 2,146,883 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 120) Vicksburg District 138,164 Memphis District 78,400 TOTAL (Category 120) 216,564 SUPPLEMENTAL PRE-AUTH STUDIES (Category 130) Flood Damage Prevention (132) Vicksburg District MS River East Bank Natchez - 76022 58,145 TOTAL (Category 130) 58,145 PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING & DESIGN (Category 160) Flood Control Projects (162) New Orleans District MS-LA Estuarine Area ADVCPE - 12193 743,003 Memphis District St. Johns Bayou & New Madrid Fdwy - 77005 439,087 Nonconnah Creek, TN & MS - 12417 310,374 Horn Lake Creek & Tribs/Cowpen Creek - 81282 151,286 Helena AR & Vicinity - 81280 289,637 L'Anguille River Basin - 00082 7,019 Lower White River Big Creek & Trib - 12472 352,209 West Memphis & Vicinity - 81281 571,852 TOTAL (Category 160) 2,864,467 GRAND TOTAL MR&T GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 5,286,059 42-64 U.S. ARMY CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING RESEARCH LABORATORY The U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (USACERL) at Champaign, Illinois conducts research in the planning, design, construction, operation and maintenance and environmental quality of facilities and installations. During FY89, USACERL had four major research accomplishments related to the Civil Works program. (1) For the expert system for corrosion resident materials, a database of stainless steel properties was prepared, materials in water resource projects were identified and a selection guide was prepared. This selection guide can be used with a computerized knowledge-based shell to assist the design engineer in the selection of components. The advisor shell was used to produce an expert system for material selection and field comments were obtained on performance of the system. (2) A new repair compound was developed to rehabilitate corrosion damaged areas in steel structures such as gates, floating mooring stations and ramps. Currently used rehabilitation compounds are epoxy based and cracked within a year. Fiber-reinforced glass compounds (CERHAB) consists of calcium silicate fiber in a glassy matrix. CERHAB develops chemical bonds with a corroded substrate and the rust on the steel surface is dissolved by the glassy matrix. (3) The magnitude of microbiological corrosion at Truman Dam and Lock 53 on the Ohio River was evaluated. Tests on bacterial corrosion are continuing. The rate of corrosion at these sites has been reported to be accelerated because of bacterial action. The sulfate reducing bacteria produces acidic byproducts which are surrounded by gels and are not washed away. (4) The Civil Works guide specification draft addressing the use of metalized coatings on hydraulic structures was completed in FY89. The draft contains guidance on safety, surface preparation, materials application, inspection and quality control. In addition, thermal spray metalic coatings were evaluated for corrosion protection of dam gates and severely abrasive water. It is estimated that zinc or zinc aluminum alloy coatings will provide greatly lenghtened periods of corrosion protection. Approximately 500,000 square feet of steel on Ohio River hydraulic structures will benefit from the adoption of the technology. 43-1 U.S. ARMY COLD REGIONS RESEARCH AND ENGINEERING LABORATORY BACKGROUND The U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL), located in Hanover, New Hampshire, was created in January 1961. It merged the Snow, Ice and Permafrost Research Establishment (created in 1949) and the Arctic Construction and Frost Effects Laboratory (created in 1953), both of which were outgrowths of the Army's World War II experience in Alaska, Iceland and Greenland. As the Army's center of expertise, CRREL conducts cold regions scientific and engineering research that addresses problems encountered by the Army and other DOD agencies wherever accomplishment of their mission is impacted by winter/cold regions effects. The major problem areas are: Ice-jam Floods Winter Navigation Remote Sensing for Civil Works Base Support Combat Operations Materiel Performance The total authorized strength of CRREL is 288 (277 civilian and 11 military), and its budget for FY89 was $27.1 million. CRREL has six main buildings in Hanover (a total of 285,322 square feet on 31 acres of land), including the main laboratory, the Ice Engineering Facility, the logistics and supply building, the plant and equipment building, the equipment storage building and the Frost Effects Research Facility. The main laboratory contains 24 coldrooms that can be operated at temperatures as low as -50�F, a computer center, chemistry laboratories, a cleanroom complex, a soils laboratory, and a remote sensing analysis center. Specialized equipment includes low temperature materials testingmachines, mass spectrometers, a low-temperature electron microscope, a dual-gamma NDT device, a Hopkinson- pressure-bar impact test device, and nuclear magnetic resonance equipment. The Ice Engineering Facility is one of the largest refrigerated hydraulics laboratories in the world. Within the IEF are a research area for large-scale refrigerated hydraulic models, arefrigeratedflume, a low temperature towing tank and a wind tunnel for simulating drifting snow. The Frost Effects Research Facility is a 29,000- square-foot refrigerated soils laboratory consisting of 12 test cells. Pavements, base and subbase courses, and buried utilities can be tested at full scale in the FERF. Six to eight natural freeze-thaw cycles can be simulated in a single year using refrigeration panels. The CRREL technical library is recognized as having the world's foremost collection of cold regions scientific and technical literature. More than 2000 requests for information are filled each year. Additionally, the Bibliography on Cold Regions Science and Technology is prepared at the Library of Congress under the sponsorship of CRREL. It contains over 140,000 citations of world cold regions literature, including approximately 50,000 Russian items. CRREL's basic and applied research covers a broad spectrum of cold regions studies. Basic research includes work in the physical, mechanical and chemical properties of snow and other forms of frozen precipitation, freshwater ice, sea ice and frozen ground. Basic research supports applied research in the major cold regions mission areas of Ice-jam Floods, Winter Navigation, Remote Sensing for Civil Works, Base Support, Combat Operations and Materiel Performance. Major Civil Works cold regions research topics include Ice Engineering, River Ice Management, Water Resources in Cold Regions, Remote Sensing, and Environmental Impact. CRREL has an international reputation and maintains close ties with the international research community and with Federal and State agencies, where it provides consulting services on a reimbursable basis. As the cold regions scientific and engineering expert for the Corps of Engineers, CRREL supports Corps districts and divisions by publishing field engineering reports, conducting demonstrations, sponsoring technical seminars for field engineers, making field visits to consult on engineering problems. OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FY89 In FY89 CRREL published and distributed 242 scientific and engineering reports (CRREL Reports; Engineer Technical Letters; Special Reports; Technical Notes; Fact Sheets; videotapes; Informa- 44-1 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1989 tion Exchange Bulletins; journal articles; conference papers and abstracts; other Corps, DA and government publications; and books and nongovernment publications). This past year, CRREL has responded to 1082 Installation Support requests (One-Stops). These requests span subjects from environmental quality for the Baltimore District to flood control and navigation at the Walla Walla District. In severe winters, ice jams are responsible for over $100 M in damages due to ice-induced flooding. Snowmelt runoff is necessary for river and ground water recharge but is also a source of spring flooding. Remote sensing technology is growing rapidly and provides the type ofinformation needed for many of the Corps engineering and operations missions. These are the major thrusts ofthe CRREL Civil Works R&D program. The Ice Engineering Program has developed the nation's principal guidance on winter navigation, river ice management and ice jam flood fighting. In the Water Resources in Cold Regions Program, distributed snowmelt routines are being developed along with in-situ sensors to monitor snowpack conditions. The Remote Sensing Program emphasizes the exploitation of real-time in-situ sensors, commercially available satellite imagery, and raster/vector data management capabilities. The program puts image-derived data to work driving models and assisting the Corps field offices in their day-to-day decisionmaking on water control operations and, when necessary, emergency operations. The CRREL code PRISM provides a small computer-based, advanced data management capability. It allows mixing of all types of data, raster- and vector-formatted information, and tailoring of mixed data sets to drive models or decision-making routines. The PRISM code uses parallel distributed processing (PDP) and neural networking to allow almost complete data flexibility, significant data compression and exceptional capabilities for desktop computers. During FY89 CRREL began a major technology transfer effort sponsored by HQ USACE and the Corps' Huntsville Division. This work is focused on revision of civil engineering and geotechnical criteria for design, construction and maintenance of roadways and airfields. This coordinated program involves CRREL, WES, and several Corps divisions. Principal topical areas for CRREL include pavement design and evaluation for seasonally frozen ground, structural design, and a reference handbook for pavements, foundations and drainage systems. ACCOMPLISHMENTS Ice Engineering Research has provided the design criteria for simple structures which prevent ice jam flooding. The newly constructed ice control structure on Oil Creek in Oil City, Pennsylvania, was one result of this work and received its best test this winter. The cold spell in December created a severe ice jam threat to the city. However, the new structure in conjunction with the ice boom on the Allegheny River controlled the ice and prevented the costly ice jam-related flooding. At Salmon, Idaho, a temporary ice boom was installed to confirm site selection. It appears one anchor may need to be moved to create an optimum ice retaining structure at that site. Construction of the castellated weir, laboratory tested and designed for Cazenovia Creek near Buffalo, New York, has been delayed due to cost sharing problems. This action emphasizes the need for additional research towards simpler, more cost efficient ice control structures. Consultation on ice problems is an ongoing effort primarily because there is little experience or expertise in Ice Engineering outside of CRREL. PC-based Data Retrieval Systems A PC-based automated system has been developed and implemented that provides critical data directly to the lock master for forecasting ice conditions. This will significantly reduce the time required to obtain the information needed to minimize the interruption of lock operations by adverse ice conditions. Inland Waterways Remote Sensing Demonstration Program The Rock Island District, in conjunction with CRREL, is conducting a demonstration of remote sensing technologies applicable to Corps water resources operations. The major objectives of this program are 1) to demonstrate the use of satellite and aerial images in water resources activities, including the comparison of information content, reliability, and cost of acquiring and analyzing such data; and 2) to demonstrate the operational use of state-of-the-art hydrometeorological and environmental sensors for the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) and other data relay systems. The Rock Island Inland Waterways Remote Sensing Program began in 1985 and is in its final year. During the program a complete operational remote 44-2 sensing GIS system was configured that will allow the water control data management and reservoir regulation groups to run real-time forecasting models in a workstation environment. The system will merge point, spatial and temporal data into a data storage system for use by the district field staff. In addition, four Engineer Technical Letters (ETLs), six reports, and four software programs were prepared which can also be used by all Corps districts in their day-to-day activities. Geotechnical instruments that will automate the data collection of many of the parameters required in the dam safety program have also been tested and recommendations made on the usefulness of the sensors to Corps projects. Major benefits to the Corps will be higher quality data at less cost and quicker reaction times for operations. The total cost of the six-year Remote Sensing Demonstration Program is approximately $1.55 million. The estimated annual cost savings will be $364,000 per year. The annual savings ofinhouse manpower requirements to the Rock Island District will be 4.0 work-years. Remote Sensing Program Snow, soil moisture, water quality and geotechnical sensors have been evaluated to obtain the highest quality data products for our models used in our water resources mission areas. These sensors provide real time information to the District offices allowing more effective forecasts of water conditions and the ability to regulate the reservoirs and navigable waterways to maximum efficiencies. The reduction in maintenance (sensor costs and manpower) of this data collection activity has reduced the costs at the rate of $1000 K/yr. It has also provided the data to reduce flooding and improve navigation at greatly reduced costs. A new data management package has been developed that allows rapid input of real-time in-situ sensor data and remotely sensed imagery to water control forecast models. The ability to rapidly integrate large volumes and varieties of data will be especially beneficial for reservoir regulation and emergency operations. The cost/benefit ofthis capability is now being established and is expected to be in the millions. Construction Productivity Advancement Research CRREL played a key role during 1989 in the development ofa new Civil Works research initiative to improve the productivity of the U.S. construction industry. Severe winter climates provide a significant challenge to construction. The Construction Productivity Advancement Research (CPAR) Program provides an excellent opportunity to combine the talents of the Laboratory with the experience of our civilian counterparts to mitigate the challenges presented by winter. CRREL has established three projects sharing the cost of research in cold regions pavements, concrete aggregates and landfill liners with industry and two state governments. Corps funding for these projects was $685,000 while our construction industry partners contributed about $4.5 million, making CRREL's efforts the most highly leveraged of all projects in the FY89 Corpswide program. Water Resources of Cold Regions Corps technology for the snowmelt component of flood forecasting is of 1950s vintage. A recent accomplishment is the application of the Corps Geographic Information System (GIS) to predicting the influence ofsnowmelt. This research also works toward calibrating existing flood forecast models to water temperature. Findings will be transmitted among the districts through publication of an ETL and updates to Engineering Manuals (i.e., Watershed Run-Off Analysis). Alaska, Rock Island, Baltimore and Detroit Districts have already participated in field tests or otherwise shown interest in the technology. Current research will determine the magnitude of bank erosion caused by interactive freeze-thaw processes, e.g., fluctuating surface waters and varying groundwater levels contribute to the erosion by providing a water source. Results from this program will be directly applicable to proposed work in assessing impacts of climate change. Improved techniques, models and sensors are the products to help measure and predict runoff, sediment transport, erosion, and water quality and their effects on hydrologic systems. GIS technology will be used to test snowmelt routines for applicability to COE flood forecasting operations. The utilization of new computer technology, especially GIS applications, in analyzing water resources engineering problems promises tremendous time-saving tools for being able to utilize spatial data bases that have not been feasible in the past. This added capability will improve the Corps' ability to make better hydrologic and water resources analyses. Estimated cost savings are $500,000 per year. 44-3 U.S. ARMY ENGINEER WATERWAYS EXPERIMENT STATION Organization and functions. The Waterways Experiment Station (WES) is a field operating agency of the Chief of Engineers operating under the staff supervision of the Director, Research and Development. COL Larry B. Fulton, Corps of Engineers, is Commander and Director. Dr. Robert W. Whalin, PE, is Technical Director. Dr. Dennis R. Smith is Assistant Technical Director. WES, the Corps of Engineers largest laboratory complex for research, testing, and development, consists of six technical laboratories: Hydraulics, Geotechnical, Structures, Environmental, Coastal Engineering Research Center, and Information Technology Laboratory. The Hydraulics Laboratory, the largest laboratory of its kind in the world, uses a wide range of working models and computer-based numerical models for research and analysis of dams, levees, river and harbor projects, soil and streambank erosion, thermal pollution, etc. The Geotechnical Laboratory conducts research in soil mechanics, structural foundation design, embankment design and slope stability, seepage analysis, military pavements, engineering geology, rock mechanics, expedient surfacing, earthquake engineering, and mobility and trafficability. The Structures Laboratory uses theoretical, analytical, experimental, and modeling approaches to research the effects of nuclear and non-nuclear explosions, the response of structures to natural and explosive disturbances, and various construction materials with emphasis on concrete, especially the testing, repair, artd preservation of existing concrete structures. The Environmental Laboratory researches the problems caused by man's activities with respect to the environment. Research programs include Dredged Material, Aquatic Plant Control, Environmental and Water Quality Operational Studies, Environmental Impact, Wetlands, and the Natural Resources Research Program. These and other programs of the Environmental Laboratory range through waste management, environmental regulations, and military aspects of terrain and camouflage. The Coastal Engineering Research Center conceives, plans, and conducts research and data collection in coastal/ ocean engineering and nearshore oceanography to: provide a better understanding of waves, winds, water levels, tides, and currents; and provide scientific and engineering data and design criteria for materials as they apply to navigation improvements, flood storm protection, beach erosion control, recreation, and protection of structures in the coastal zone. The Information Technology Laboratory is responsible for all communications, mainframe computer functions for both technical and administrative applications, graphic presentations, and printed media at the station. WES Laboratories are engaged in research and engineering investigations in support of the civil and military missions of the Chief of Engineers. On a reimbursable basis, WES performs basic and applied research, develops state-of-the-art methods and techniques, tests materials and equipment, and provides consulting services. Subject to the approval of the Chief of Engineers, studies and investigations may be undertaken for agencies outside the Department of the Army. WES maintains an extensive scientific and engineering reference library to serve the specialized needs of the Corps of Engineers and issues publications of general interest; operates DoD Information Analysis Centers in the fields of Pavements and Soils Trafficability, Concrete Technology, Hydraulic Engineering, Soils Mechanics, and Coastal Engineering; and maintains the Corps of Engineers Engineering Computer Programs Library. During Fiscal Year 1989, 245 WES numbered reports of individual studies conducted at or for WES, 3 instruction reports, 18 information exchange bulletins, 4 video reports, and 108 various special purpose technical documents (conference reports, special study reports, etc.) for WES and other offices were printed and distributed to Corps offices and interested outside agencies. Operations and results during the period. Work accomplished at WES is, in general, initially financed by the Corps of Engineers Revolving Fund, with direct reimbursement from agencies requesting research investigations and related services. The Station's total program during Fiscal Year 1989 was $136,414,500 which included $29,847,000 performed by contract. Of the total program $78,545,600 was oriented toward the civil sector and $57,869,000 to military. The plant replacement and improvement program was $6,855,000 for this period. 45-1 U.S. ARMY ENGINEER TOPOGRAPHIC LABORATORIES Organization and functions. The U.S. Army Engineer Topographic Laboratories (USAETL) began during World War I as a temporary Engineer Detachment formed to test aerial photographic mapping. Since that time, USAETL has grown to become a sophisticated, modern research and development complex. The laboratories perform research and development by applying the latest advances in electronics, information processing and related technologies in the environmental and topographic sciences to military and civil problems in mapping, surveying, land navigation and geographic information. USAETL is a field operating agency of the Corps of Engineers commanded by Colonel David F. Maune. USAETL is the only defense research and development laboratory that addresses the full range of developments in the topographic sciences, from basic research to a final product. Supportis provided to both Civil Works and Military elements of the Corps, the Army Materiel Command, Army Space Program Office, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and other federal Government organizations. To provide this support, USAETL is divided into six operational elements, three of which are developmental laboratories. The Geographic Sciences Laboratory performs research and development associated with the extraction and presentation of geographic data. The Topographic Developments Laboratory supports technology developments in surveying, map making, military geographic information systems and reproduction systems. The Space Programs Laboratory conducts research and development relating to the Army Space Program and acts as the Corps executive agent for space. The Research Institute performs most of the laboratories' basic and applied research. The Terrain Analysis Center prepares terrain studies needed by Army elements in the field. The Digital Concepts and Analysis Center serves as the primary point of contact to Army developers and users for digital topographic data. In recent years, the emphasis of USAETL's research and development program has shifted from historic map making and surveying equipment and related techniques to new topographic data systems. These systems are required to support emerging weapons systems and military geographic information systems needed by field commanders for improved command, control, communications and intelligence. The new systems frequently use data acquired by remote sensing, and much of the work at USAETL involves this technology. Researchers atUSAETL are investigating the types of data acquired through sensors and the means to exploit that data. Studies showing the possibility of automating digital image interpretation are an important aspect of this work. Other work is to investigate digital processing of remotely sensed data and define remote sensing inputs required for Army terrain graphics and terrain data bases. Operations and results during FY90. The total program for USAETL in FY90 was $97.6 million. This included work done for other agencies as well as for the Corps of Engineers. Of this total program, $62.3 million supported work performed by contract. Work in FY90 included $383,000 charged to civil works funds Civil works efforts by USAETL in FY90 included research to develop and demonstrate new equipment and techniques for the Surveying and Mapping Research, Dredging Research and Civil Works Guidance Update Programs. USAETL engineers continued development of the NAVSTAR Global Positioning System (GPS) for use by the Corps in a wide variety of engineering applications. Demonstration and consultation projects on GPS applications were completed in 12 districts. These included projects for geodetic surveying and implementation of GPS on hydrographic survey vessels. One project was for emergency support to the San Francisco District following the earthquake. A study was completed examining data communication alternatives for Corps-wide implementation of GPS for hydrographic survey vessels and dredges. A study was also completed to investigate the use of GPS to determine tides and water level heights. A demonstration and evaluation of a new, full bottom coverage, hydrographic survey system was conducted. The system evaluated was judged not survey-ready for typical Corps activities. This evaluation will help prevent future contract disputes from arising over the use of this system. Guidance was provided to the field operating agencies on surveying and mapping standards in the form of one Engineer Technical Letter, one Engineer Manual and one Guide Specification. These were on hydrographic surveying and datum transformations. A software package was developed and distributed to the field operating agencies for the manipulation and transformation of survey data. This will allow more efficient use of personal computers and Computer Aided Design and Drafting workstations by the surveyors. 46-1 THE WATER RESOURCES SUPPORT CENTER The Water Resources Support Center (WRSC), is a field operating agency under the staff supervision of the Director of Civil Works, Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The Center consists of the Institute for Water Resources, the Navigation Data Center, the Washington Level Review Center and support elements. It is located at the Humphreys Engineer Center, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, with satellite elements at other locations, including the Hydrologic Engineering Center at Davis, California; and the Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center part of the Navigation Data Center in New Orleans, Louisiana. The accomplishments of WRSC during FY 1989 are listed by Division. U.S. ARMY ENGINEER INSTITUTE FOR WATER RESOURCES (IWR) NAVIGATION DIVISION The IWR Navigation Division provides support to Corps field divisions and districts for project-specific and system studies of navigation improvements. It also provides support for the Inland Waterways Users Board and performs special studies as directed by the Office of the Chief of Engineers. The special studies address a variety of subjects where expertise in economic analysis is required, and range from assessment of transportation infrastructure to identification of economic impacts. Continuing Support Activities. The foundation for evaluation of navigation projects, both inland waterway and deep draft harbors, is the comparison of transportation costs with and without proposed improvements. The Division maintains and annually updates data on ocean and waterway vessel operating costs, the dimensions of those vessels, the distribution of ocean vessel sizes in the world fleet, and the configuration of barge tows on inland waterways. Coordination of Navigation Studies. The Inland Waterways Users Board, created by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, is charged with advising Congress on priorities for improving inland waterways. To provide information desired by the Board and by the Corps, the Division produced an "Inland Waterway Review" in FY88 that provided a 10-year look ahead at waterway system traffic, problems, performance and investment requirements. In FY89, the Division routinely provided the Users Board with a series of analyses of the Inland Waterways Trust Fund and the adequacy of the Fund to support construction of authorized and potential improvements. Special Studies. The Division also produced a comprehensive review of inland waterway issues and problems in FY 89. This was provided to the U.S. Department of Transportation for incorporation in the National Strategic Transportation Planning Study requested by Congress. FUSION CENTER The mission of the Fusion Center is to provide leaders and managers multi-disciplinary, collaborative planning and creative problem-solving expertise. The Center services more than 20 Corps' offices, more than 20 non- Corps, DoD organizations, and 3 non-DoD agencies. The Center's facility is specially designed to support collaborative workshops, and is operated with attention to people's physical and psychological, as well as their information processing needs during workshops. A team of four professionals with a blend of engineering, psychology, information management and Administrative training with four years experience as a group provide customer service. The following is a list of planning groups facilitated by the Center: Task Forces * DoD Environmental Initiative (DoD) * LEAD Team (USACE) * Long Range Stationing Study (DCSOPS/OACE) * Engineer Force Modernization Task Force (USAES) * Human Resources 2000 (Dir HQ) Projects * Human Resource Management in the Corps * Leadership Education and Development * Fusion Center Consortium * Corps' Futures Project Assistance * Future Corps' Civil Works Strategies * Army Resource Management 2000 * Corps' Senior Leadership Conferences * Outdoor Recreation (IWR) * Real Property Planning and Management (OACE, EHSC) Advice, consultation, facilitation, and workshop design * Internal Revenue Service * CERL * DoD Program Executive Offices 47-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 RESEARCH DIVISION The Research Division responds to the water planning research needs of the fields, as well as one-of-a-kind projects assigned by the Office of the Chief of Engineers. At the same time, research assistance is given to Corps' field divisions and districts. Staff members of the Research Division apply specialized knowledge in fields such as economics, environmental science, sociology and engineering, to develop and conduct a broad range of research aimed at producing practical and effective planning tools. Research outputs are applied in Civil Works (CW) throughout the Corps, and, in several cases, to military problems as well. During FY 89, the Research Division was responsible for two long range research programs: Planning Methodology and Risk Assessment Planning. Planning Methodologies and Risk Assessment is focused on developing economic, financial, environmental and social evaluation techniques for planning flood control, navigation, and other water resources projects. Work includes developing economic evaluation manuals, microcomputer applications, regional analysis models, navigation project evaluation procedures, and flood control evaluation. Research Division also performs reimbursable research studies for HQUSACE and field offices. FY 89 accomplishments in this program include the completion of a manual providing guidance to Corps' economists on the computation of agricultural flood damages, and the initiation of work on a manual to provide a description of the economic evaluation of coastal shore protection projects. In addition, research to investigate the feasibility ofdevelopingapproaches for flood warning system benefit estimation was initiated. In FY 1989, the risk research program continued to identify critical components of risk and uncertainty in Corps' flood control and navigation planning. Research was also tasked to develop more effective methods for communicating information about risk in planning studies. A model for assessing the risk-cost of alternative dredge material disposal sites was developed. The Institute's training program provides a means for transferring research results and state-of-the-art planning techniques to various Corps' users. Courses on topics ranging in scope from Conflict Management to Economic Analysis for Water Resource Planning were conducted during the year. During FY 89, approximately 500 persons attended 15 sessions of 8 training courses. POLICY STUDIES DIVISION In FY 89, the staff of the Policy Studies Division completed work on a number of important studies. A special report was completed on Corps' Activities in the 1988 Drought. This document together with previous work on the 1986 and 1977 drought and several studies on reallocation opportunities, formed the basis ofa drought workshop in FY 89. Internal policy scoping in anticipation of a national water management during drought study was also begun. A significant amount of effort was also devoted to use of Alternative Dispute Resolution techniques in the new partnership planning environment as well as claims settlement. Work was also underway on a variety of topics including climate change, beneficial use ofdredged material, life cycle project management, Vision 21, groundwater flooding, and water resources planning for military bases. WASHINGTON LEVEL REVIEW CENTER (WLRC) The Washington Level Review Center (WLRC) was established in WRSC in December 1988 to accelerate the Civil Works project development process and add efficiencies, while maintaining quality and controlling schedules and costs. WLRC was assigned the mission of reviewing feasibility reports required by the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors, Headquarters USACE, and the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works. Also, WLRC had responsibility for managing the Washington level review and processing of feasibility reports, WLRC reviews post authorization change reports, detailed project reports, general design memorandum, and other decision documents that the Director ofCivil Works may request. During FY 89, WLRC reviewed 78 documents. These consisted of 23 feasibility reports, 24 design memoranda, 3 detailed project reports, 6 post authorization change reports, 17 documents for feasibility review conferences, and 5 special reports. 47-2 HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING CENTER The mission of the Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC) is to increase the Corps technical capability in hydrologic engineering and planning and management. This is accomplished through research, training and technical assistance programs in hydrologic engineering and planning analysis, HEC maintains an awareness of the present needs and upcoming problems of the water resources community through continuous dialogue with Corps field offices and headquarters, universities, private industry, other Federal agencies and state and local governments. HEC bridges the gap between academic research and practical applications in the field. This year HEC made substantial commitments to move forward on several fronts: develop a new generation of hydrologic engineering computation products; document technical methods and guidance for field office reference; begin adapting HEC training courses to the reality of Corps-customer partnerships and life cycle project management; fine-tune and solidify our new program distribution policy; and continue to work closely with headquarters and field offices on high-priority projects. Substantial improvements have been made to the existing HEC-1, 2, 5, 6, and FDA packages. New releases of these programs for MS-DOS personal computers were made in late FY89 or are planned for early FY90. These packages include fully developed menu shell user interfaces and implementation of the data management and graphics display capabilities of the ItEC developed I)ata Storage System (DSS). Experiments were begun for program implementations on a UNIX PC operating system. An engineering workstation was ordered to let us work in that environment. The first major program to be developed employing software engineering techniques and designed specifically for the interactive PC environment is emerging from the design stage. The Interior Flood Hydrology program will be tested in mid-1990 and is planned for general release late in the year. Progress has been steady on products for the Corps guidance development project and cost-share partner communications. An ER establishing management principles for hydrologic engineering was completed and published. The new EM for river hydraulics is in the preliminary draft state. Sections of it have been used in training courses. Documents describing hydrologic performance of flood control projects, explaining flood risk, performing hydrologic frequency analysis, and documenting study guidelines for flood warning - preparedness programs were completed. Work began in earnest on several additional guidance products: catchment analysis EM hydrologic analysis by project purpose EM, degree-of-protection EP, and several ERs. Next FY HEC will continue increased emphasis on guidance development efforts. Seven PROSPECT courses were conducted for a total of 10 weeks of training. The courses covered a variety of hydrologic engineering and planning analysis topics. Attendance averaged about 30 students per course. The Hydrologic Engineering for Planning and Flood Loss Reduction Planning courses included presentations on the Corps two-phased planning process, partnership arrangements with local agencies, and life-cycle project management. Six workshops were also held comprising four weeks of sessions. Topics included flood damage analyses, reservoir simulation, and computer programs and methods in support of floodplain analysis. Reimbursable project work was undertaken for 18 Corps offices including districts, divisions, headquarters, and R&D laboratories. The total reimbursable program was $900.000 with individual projects ranging from a few thousand dollars to over $100.000. Projects included watershed modeling, river hydraulics, water quality, flood frequency analysis, water control software development, and participation in start-up activities for the National Drought Study. Several projects were undertaken in support of realtime water control activities. The planned program for FY 1990 includes increased emphasis on development of technical guidance in support of HQUSACE initiatives and concentrated efforts to move HEC computational products to the emerging workstation environment. Training activities are expected to rebound from the low in FY 1989. Technical assistance will continue to be substantial. The anticipated increase in R&D funding for FY 1990 did not materialize. In fact a decrease occurred. This continues the erosion in R&I) funding that has taken place over the past 10 years. NAVIGATION DATA CENTER The Navigation Data Center's mission is to collect, process, manage, and distribute information regarding the characteristics of the U.S. Waterway System, including use, operation and physical aspects. This information consists of a variety of statistical data relating to foreign and domestic waterborne commerce, vessel, and port and lock facility inventory descriptions and lockage operations. The Center's 1989 theme was development of a strategic plan intended to strengthen internal data partnerships between Waterborne Commerce, Lock Performance Monitoring, and Port Facilities. To ensure user-oriented design of the new data base management systems, a series of workshops and meetings with both the Corps and user community was completed in FY 1989. The implementation of each data area has begun, and each is at a different state of development. 47-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TIIE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 WATERBORNE COMMERCE STATISTICS CENTER The development of the new computer software is nearly complete and on schedule. Full implementation will begin in April 1990. WCSC now has the capability to provide statistics by state. Two new public domain data bases are now available. One data base contains originto- destination commodity flows for major commodity groups among 26 geographic areas, and the other among the 50 states, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. LOCK PERFORMANCE MONITORING SYSTEM (PMS) PMS continues the collection and archiving of data. Users meetings were initiated in FY 1989 to review PMS data requirements in conjunction with planning and operations personnel. These meetings have resulted in proposed changes and reduced data elements to be collected. The first set of changes regarding the shift log will be implemented in January 1990 and the second set will be implemented in January 1991. PORT FACILITIES Automated report preparation and port data base design are underway. Meetings held in FY 1989 with users, including Corps, other Federal agencies and the public, culminated in plans for data base management system and integration into the WCSC enforcement process. Port facility data for all reports, including over 9,000 facilities, has been input to the Ports data base. In FY 1989, four reports were issued: Number 12 41 43 44 Title Port of Houston, TX Port of Buffalo, Rochester, Oswego and Ogdenburg, NY Ports of Cleveland, OH Port of Toledo, OH 47-4 PERMANENT INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF NAVIGATION CONGRESS (PIANC) The Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses (PIANC) is an international organization consisting of approximately 40 national members, with headquarters in Brussels, Belgium. It is a clearinghouse where technology and experiences relating to ocean and inland navigation improvements are exchanged among engineers, scientists, port operators, and marina and vessel owners, to name a few. Its objective, broadly stated, is to promote the worldwide progress of inland and maritime navigation through the exchange of technical information on port and waterway development. The objective of the Association is met by holding International Congresses and by publishing quarterly technical bulletins and special reports. Special reports are published as a result of international research teams, called Working Groups, made up of those national members interested in the particular subject under study. Examples include methods of disposal of dredged material, an international survey of dry dock facilities and their characteristics, the beneficial use of dredged material, and other various topics relating to port and waterway development. The organization also serves as an excellent source of identifying individual and corporate expertise throughout the world on PIANC-related subjects. Personal interchange of ideas and information also is promulgated by members attending the International Congresses held once every four years. The affairs of the Association are managed by a Permanent International Commission (PIC), composed of delegates from each member government. It is in this way that member governments are represented in PIANC. The number of delegates is determined by the size of the national membership, but may not exceed ten per country. The United States has been a member of PIANC since 1902 and has since provided an annual appropriation for the support and maintenance of the organization. This includes an annual subvention to PIANC International and payment of the travel expenses of properly accredited national delegates (Commissioners) of the United States to meetings of the International Commission and Congresses. Total appropriations for the U.S. Section, PIANC are currently $45,000 per year, including the annual subvention of approximately $10,000 to PIANC International. The United States Section is administered, by law, under the auspices of the Department of the Army (Corps of Engineers). The U.S. Section is composed of both individual and corporate members who pay their own membership dues. Membership of the U.S. Section on December 31, 1989, totaled 567, consisting of 480 individual members and 87 corporate members. Like all other member nations, the United States National Commission constitutes the governing body of the National Section. The ex-officio Offices of the U.S. National Commission are: Chairman (Assistant Secretary of the Army (CW)); Chairman Pro Tempore (Director of Civil Works); and Secretary (Mr. DuWayne A. Koch). During calendar year 1989, U.S. National Commissioners were: Mr. J. Ron Brinson, President and Chief Executive Officer, Port of New Orleans; Mr. Charles F. Connors, Director of Maritime Services, Mofatt & Nichol, Engineers; Dr. Tudor T. Davies, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Dr. G. Edward Dickey, Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works); Mr. John M. Pisani, Maritime Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation; Mr. Charles R. Roberts, Director of Engineering, Port of Oakland; Mr. R. Erik Stromberg, President, American Association of Port Authorities; and Dr. Alan R. Thomas, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The U.S. Section representatives to the two Permanent Technical Committees (PTCs) and Working Groups of PTCs were as follows: Permanent Committee for Developing Countries - Dr. Anatoly B. Hochstein, LSU/GW Ports and Waterways Institute Permanent Technical Committee I (Inland Waterways and Ports) - Major General Robert F. Seedlock, USA (Ret.) Working Group 1, Economic Implications of Inland Waterway Development-George Antle, USACE IWR Working Group 2, Disposal of Dredged Materials - Charles C. Calhoun USACE WES Working Group 3, Consideration Or Risk in Determining Bank Protection - Alan D. Crowhurst, Maccaferri Gabions Working Group 4, Guidelines for the Design and Construction of Flexible Revetments Incorporating Geotextiles for Inland Waterways -Max Lamb, USACE LMVD Working Group 5, Container Transport with Inland Vessels - John M. Pisani, US DOT/MarAd Working Group 6, Problems Created by Salt Water Intrusion (from the sea or marine estruaries) in Inland Navigation - Christina E. Correale, USACE SAW Working Group 7, Management of Dredged Material from Inland Waterways - Charles C. Calhoun, USACE WES Working Group 8, Automatic Management ofCanalized Waterways and Its Hydraulic Problems- Jack R. Niemi, USACE LMS Working Group 9, Standardization of Inland Waterways' Dimensions, Dr. Anatoly B. Hochstein, LSU/GW Ports and Waterways Institute Working Group 10, Supervision and Control of Long Lateral Embankments - No U.S. Representative Working Group 11, Analysis of the Cost of Water Transportation and the Cost of Terminal Fees -George Antle, USACE IWR Working Group 12, Design, Installation and Maintenance of Natural Vegetation Bank Protections Utilizing Geotextile Reinforcement for Inland Waterways - Max Lamb, USACE LMVD 48-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1988 Permanent Technical Committee II (Maritime Ports and Seaways)- Dr. Ernst G. Frankel, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Working Group 1, Navigation in Muddy Areas - No U.S. Representative Working Group 2, Stability of Rubble Mound Breakwaters in Deeper Water - Eugene H. Harlow, Soros Associates Working Group 3, Ice Navigation - C. Allen Wortley, University Or Wisconsin Working Group 4, Dangerous Goods in Ports - No. U.S. Representative Working Group 5, Underkeel Clearance for Large Ships in Maritime Fairways with Hard Bottoms - Ronald C. Uhl in, Exxon International Working Group 6, Classification of Soils and Rocks to be Dredged - James W. Bean, C. F. Bean, Inc., New Orleans Working Group 7, Dimensions and Layout Or Channels - Leonard Van Houten, Greenwich, CT Working Group 8, The Damage Inflicted by Ships with Bulbous Bows on Underwater Structures - Wesley Allen, Jr., Georgia Ports Authority Working Group 9, Development of Modern Marine Terminals - Charles R. Roberts, Port of Oakland Working Group 10, Disposal of Dredged Material at Sea-Robert Engler, USACE WES WorkingGroup 11, Consequences ofNew Developments Or Car/Passenger Ferries - No U.S. Representative Working Group 12, Performance and Design Parameters of Rubble Mound Breakwaters - Robert Whalin, USACE WES Working Group 13, Floating Breakwaters ---John Oliver, USACE WES Working Group 14, Economic Methods of Channel Maintenance - DeWitt D. Barlow, Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Co. Working Group 15, Dry Docks - Michael Yachnis, Naval Facilities Engineering Command Working Group 16, Specification of Quantities and Related Risks on Maritime Transportation of Hazardous Chemicals and Wastes -Patrick Tobin, USEPA Working Group 17, Inspection, Maintenance and Repair of Maritime Structures Exposed to Material Degradation Caused by a Salt Water Environment - Charles F. Connors, Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers Working Group 18, Planning of (Commercial) Fishing Ports - No U.S. Representative Working Group 19, Beneficial Uses of Dredged Material - Jesse Pfeiffer, USACE CERD-C Working Group 20, Capacity Simulation Models for Approach Channels and Fairways in Harbors - Haruzo Eda, Stevens Institute of Technology Working Group 21, Flexible in the Marine Environment - Chatham, USACE WES Joint Subcommittee on Pleasure Navigation - John Moffatt & Nichol, Engineers Working Group 1, Ecological Conservation in Relation to Sport and Pleasure Navigation - Neil W. Ross, International Marina Institute Working Group 2, Wave Climate Criteria for the Design of Yacht Harbors and Marinas - Orson Smith, Clayton, NC Working Group 3, Provision of Navigation Aids for Pleasure Craft - Austin E. Brant, Jr., TAMS Working Group 4, Chartering Services - Their Growth and Impact on Sport and Pleasure Navigation - Eugene H. Harlow, Soros Associates Working Group 5, Standards for Construction, Equipment and Operation of Yacht Harbors and Marinas -William A. Jansen, Illinois Department of Conservation. 48-2 INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY WATERS BOARDS In order to carry out United States obligations under international agreements, the Office of the Chief of Engineers and several Corps Divisions and districts with jurisdiction over areas bordering Canada have representation numerous international boards, committees, and other groups. The majority of these boards were established by the International Joint Commission (IJC) as empowered in accordance with the provisions of the Boundary Waters Treaty of 1909 between the United States and Great Britain (for Canada). IJC boards fall into two broad categories: boards of control, which are more or less permanent and supervise compliance over an IJC order; and engineering, technical, or study boards, which are usually dissolved after completing and reporting on an investigation assignment. In addition to boards created by the Commission, other international boards and committees are created by treaties or other arrangement in matters concerned with the water resources ofjoint interest, and the members report directly to the Governments or establishing agency. International boundary waters boards and committees having Corps of Engineer memberships during the fiscal year are listed in Table 49-1. For an explanation of the constitution of the various boards and committees, see the FY 77 and FY 80 annual reports. An innovative study organization, neither a board nor a committee, was established to conduct a study offluctuating Great Lakes levels pursuant to a Reference to the IJC from the Governments of Canada and the United States, dated August 1, 1986. A discussion of that study organization, which was established during FY 87, follows Table 49-1. TABLE 49-1 IJC BOARDS OF CONTROL HAVING CE MEMBERS BOARD NAME YEAR ESTABLISHED UNITED STATES REPRESENTATION 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Int. Lake Superior Int. St. Croix River Int. Lake of the Woods Int. Lake Champlain Int. Kootenay Lake 6. Int. Rainy Lake 7. Int. Osoyoos Lake 8. Int. Niagara 9. Int. St. Lawrence River 10. Int. Skagit River 11. Int. Souris River 12. Int. Souris-Red Rivers Engineer 13. Int. Champlain-Richelieu 14. Int. Great Lake Diversios and Consumptive Uses Study 15. Int. Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board *Signifies U.S. Section Chairman. 1914 1915 1925 1937 1938 1941 1943 1953 1953 1967 1959 1948 1975 1977 1979 *Div. Engr., NCD *Div. Engr., NED *Dist. Engr., St. Paul *Dist. Engr., New York *1. Dist. Engr., Seattle 2. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Boise, ID *Dist. Engr., St. Paul 1. Dist. Engr., Seattle *2. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Tacoma, WA 3. Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission, Olympia, WA * 1.'Div. Engr., NCD 2. Dept. of Energy, FERC, Washington, D.C. *1. Div. Engr., NCD 2. St. Lawrence-Eastern Ontario Commission, Waterton, NY 3. NY Power Authority, Massena, NY *Dist. Engr., Seattle 1. Dist. Engr., St. Paul *2. ND State Engr., Bismark, ND 3. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Bismark, ND 1. Dist. Engr., St. Paul *2. Dept. of Interior, BOR, Washington, D.C. 3. Dept. of Interior, USGS, Reston, VA *1. New York Dept. Environ. Conser. 2. Dist. Engr., New York 3. Vermont Agency Environ. Conser. 4. New England River Basins Commision, Staff Associate 5. Dept. of Interior F&WS Boston, MA *1. Div. Engr., NCD 2. Michigan Dept. Nat. Res. 3. Illinois Dept. of Trans. 4. Pennsylvania Dept. of Envir. Res. 5. Dept. of Energy, FERC, New York, NY *1. CENCE-ED, Detroit, MI 2. Great Lakes Environmental Research Lab., NOAA, Ann Arbor, MI 3. USGS, Reston, VA 49-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FORFY 1988 OTHER INTERNATIONAL BOARDS OR GROUPS HAVING CE MEMBERS BOARD NAME 16. Int. Lake Memphremagog 17. Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data 18. Int. Niagara Committee 19. Columbia River Treaty Entities 20. Columbia River Treaty Permanent Engineering *Signifies U.S. Section Chairman. YEAR ESTABLISHED 1920 1953 1955 1964 1964 Study of Fluctuating Great Lakes Levels Under the August 1, 1986, Reference. On August 1, 1986, the Government of Canada and the United States issued a reference to the IJC to study methods to alleviate the adverse consequences of fluctuating water levels in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River basin. The IJC was requested to address the immediate high lake level crisis and identify and evaluate intermediate and long-term potential measures, while considering such vital matters as domestic waste supply and sanitation, navigation, agriculture, shore property, flood control, wildlife and others. The IJC is to determine the full costs and benefits of any works or measures and indicate how the various interests on either side of the boundary would be affected. Compensatory works or measure to offset costs to the interests which may be adversely affected by any proposed regulatory measures also must be determined. The IJC proceeded with its reference responsibilities on three tracks. First, it submitted an initial report to the federal governments on November 14, 1986, listing immediate actions that could be taken to lessen damages from the then current high water levels. Second, the IJC formed a taskforce to evaluate measures which could be implemented within approximately one year to reduce high lake levels. The third track is the comprehensive study of long-term measures. The U.S. Department of State requested, by letter dated November 24, 1986, that the Corps of Engineers provide lead agency support to the IJC effort on this study. The IJC appointed a Steering Committee and a Project Management Team in April 1987. Study Level United State Governance Level All Three U.S Steering Committee Lead U.S. IJC Project Management Team *Div. Engr., N Lead IJC staf Chairperson c Functional Group No. 1 *Chief, CENC Functional Group No. 2 *Wisconsin D Functional Group No. 3 *Dr. Leonard Functional Group No. 4 *David LaRoc Functional Group No. 5 *Dr. Michael *Signifies U.S. Co-chairman. 4 UNITED STATES REPRESENTATION *Dist. Engr., New York *1. Eng. Div., North Central Div. 2. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Rockville, MD * Div. Engr., NCD 1. Div. Engr., NPD *2. Bonneville Power Admin., Portland, OR *1. HQUSACE, CECW-ZB, Washington, D.C. 2. Dept. of Energy, Tulsa, AR In the study for evaluating the long-term solutions to the problem of fluctuating lake levels, four distinct levels of study management are embodied in four different groups. They are made up of representatives from the IJC and Federal and state agencies, as well as individuals from universities and private sector enterprises. * Governance level - the six IJC Commissioners. * Steering Committee level - two lead IJC Commissioners and their lead staff and the two co-chairs of the Project Management Team. * Project Management Team level - the United States and Canadian co-chairs and the chairpersons of all the functional study groups following. * Functional study groups level - there are five functional study groups: Group No. 1. Hydraulic, Hydrologic and Climate Group; Group No. 2. Coastal Zone Ecology, Resources, Uses and Management Group; Group No. 3. Socio-economic and Environmental Impact Assessment Group; Group No. 4. Public Participation and Communication Group; and Group No. 5. System Synthesis and Analysis Group Key United States representation is presented in the following tabulation. In addition to the positions listed therein, Corps of Engineers personnel also serve as vital members of the various taskforce and functional work groups conducting different parts and different levels of the study. os Representation SIJC Commissioners Commissioner; Div. Engr., Corps of Engineers JCD )f the Functional Groups Listed Below ID-ED NR, Bureau of Water Resources and Zoning Shabman, Virginia Polytechnical Institute he, Secretary, U.S. Section, IJC Ben-Eli, the Cybernetic Consulting Group, Inc. 9-2 INVESTIGATION OF PROJECTS UNDER FEDERAL POWER ACT The Federal Water Power Act of June 10, 1920, created the Federal Power Commission (in 1977 renamed the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, FERC) composed of the Secretaries of War, Interior, and Agriculture, with authority to grant permits and licenses for hydroelectric development in all water over which Congress has jurisdiction. The act further required that work of the commission be performed by and through the Departments of War, Interior and Agriculture and their engineering, technical, and other personnel except as may be otherwise provided by law. By an act of June 23, 1930, entitled "An Act to Reorganize the Federal Power Commission," Secs. 1 and 2 of the Federal Water Power Act of 1920 were amended. A commission was provided for, to be composed of five commissioners to be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The necessity of performing work through the Department of War, Interior and Agriculture was removed and the commission was authorized to appoint such officers and employees as necessary in executing its function. By Title II, Public Utility Act of 1935, the original Federal Water Power Act was made Part I of the Federal Power Act, and Parts II and III were added to the Act. On October 1, 1977, pursuant to the provisions of the Department of Energy Organization Act (DOE Act), Public Law 59-91 Stat. (August 4, 1977) an Executive Order No. 12009, 42 Fed. Reg. 46267 (September 15, 1977), the Federal Power Commission ceased to exist and its functions and regulatory responsibilities were transferred to the Secretary of Energy and the Federal Energy Commission (FERC) which, as an independent commission within the Department of Energy was activated on October 1,1977. Section 4(e) of the Federal Power Act provides that no water power license affecting navigable capacity of any navigable waters of the United States shall be issued until plans of the dam or other structures affecting navigation have been approved by the Chief of Engineers and Secretary of the Army. By an action, notice of which was published in the Federal Register Volume 40, Number 74, dated April 16, 1975, the Secretary of the Army delegated to the Chief of Engineers his authority under Sec. 4(e) of the Federal Power Act. The Chief of Engineers on September 5, 1980 delegated to the Corps division engineers the authority for Section 4(e) approval of plans for non-Federal hydropower affecting navigation. The following work of an engineering nature was accomplished by the Corps division and district offices under the direction of the Chief of Engineers during the fiscal year: (1) 290 applications from non-Federal entities for planning, design, construction and operation of hydropower projects were reviewed and appropriate recommendations in the interest of flood control, navigation, and structural safety, and environmental impacts, relative to Corps projects, were furnished to the FERC. (2) 36 licensed power plants were in various stages of design review for addition of power at Corps dams, and (3) 16 Corps approved non-Federal power plants were in active construction stages by the end of the fiscal year. The Corps bills FERC licensees for the costs incurred by the Corps for reviewing and approving final design, plans and specifications for construction of power plants at Corps projects. In FY89, the total cost reimbursement to the Corps for this service was $803,986. Review of license applications is funded by the Corps as aline item in the General Investigation Account, in FY89, the cost of this activity was $469,063. This cost was reported to FERC for the Commission's assessment of annual charges to licensees. 50-1 NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM National Emergency Preparedness Activities Authority. Executive Order 12656, as amended, assigns responsibilities to executive departments and agencies to undertake national emergency planning and preparedness to ensure an effective national capability to meet essential civilian and defense needs during major domestic emergencies and national security emergencies. Status: During FY 1989, the Corps of Engineers continued its efforts to improve its readiness posture and ability to respond to various national emergencies including major natural disasters. Emphasis continued to be placed on program activities requiring a long term commitment of resources. The Command Readiness Program initiated in FY 1988 as a means to address mobilization requirements and resources was expanded to include seminars conducted at the regional level. In addition the focus of the Command Readiness Program was expanded to include issues related to other potential national emergencies. Work to refine the Corps of Engineers Readiness Evaluation System (CERES) also continued throughout FY 1989. Other activities within the National Emergency Preparedness Program included maintenance of and planning for the development of emergency facilities to support continuity of operations, and planning to meet the nation's water resource requirements in the event of a national emergency. Executive Order 12656 has tasked the Corps of Engineers to be the Executive Agency responsible for emergency water planning. Significant progress was made in the development of preparedness guidance and execution plans at all levels. While the efforts undertaken identified additional shortfalls or problems to be addressed, the Corps program continues to move towards the goal ofen suring a national engineering and construction capability that can respond to any national emergency. The Corps of Engineers Corrective Action Program (CECAP) continued to function effectively as a method for addressing the shortfalls or problems identified and implementing appropriate corrective actions. Despite limited resources, USACE participated in several major earthquake exercises including Response 89 sponsored by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the South Pacific Division's Command Readiness Program and some funds were dedicated to developing and updatingthe earthquake plans. For fiscal year obligations and expenditures, see Table 51-C. STATUS OF THE PL 84-99 EMERGENCY FUND Fiscal Year 1989 Unallocated Balance-30 Sep 87 ................. $20,292,354 FY 89 Appropriation ................................. 20,000,000 Revocation FY 89 ............................... . ..... 4,010,155 Total Funds Available ................................. $43,302,504 Allocations Disaster Preparedness ............................ $12,345,600 Emergency Operations........................ 1,594,505 Rehabilitation .................. ............ 787,843 Emergency Water ......... ................... 490,344 Hazard Mitigation .......................... 6,290 Unallocated Balan ce-30 Sep 89 ............ $26,802,147 TABLE 51-C NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Obligations Unobligated Balance-30 Sep 87 ............. $ 905,171 Allotments ................ ............ ...... 7,986,519 Total Funds Available ................. .......... 8,891,690 Obligations................. ..... ....... 7,908,458 Unobligated Balance-30 Sep 88 ........ $.. 983,232 Expenditures Unexpended Balance-30 Sep 87 ............ $ A llotm ents......... ....... ......... 1,562,668 7,986,519 Total Funds Available ............................. 9,549,187 Expenditures .................................. 7,777,357 Unexpended Balance-30 Sep 88 .......... $ 1,771,830 51-1 NATURAL DISASTER PREPAREDNESS RESPONSE AND RECOVERY ACTIVITIES Activities. Disaster preparedness activities included the review and update of existing emergency response plans, training response personnel, continuation of the upgrading of emergency operation centers; procurement and maintenance of critical supplies and equipmentused during emergency response activities; coordination with Federal, State and local response agencies; and overall management of the preparedness, response and recovery program. Fiscal Year 1989 began just as Fiscal Year 1988 had ended with a continuation of drought problems across much of the country. USACE continued to provide emergency water assistance through the winter of 1988 and spring of 1989 to two communities in North Dakota and one in Illinois. As a result of the drought in Iowa, emergency water assistance was provided to nine communities in southern Iowa. The assistance started in late July and early August 1989 and continued into 1990. Also, in the fall, two communities in North Dakota were provided emergency water assistance, and assistance to one community continued into January 1990. During the winter and early spring, rains began to fall from eastern Texas across Arkansas and Missouri into the southern Ohio River Valley. The areas of most significant flooding occurred over southeast Missouri, eastern Arkansas, Tennessee, and Kentucky. USACE provided technical assistance to state and local flood fight efforts. Major flooding developed along the Red River of the North in Minnesota and North Dakota during April. In response to the near record flooding, USACE undertook construction of temporary levees and other measures to strengthen existing flood control projects which dramatically reduced flood damages. In response to localized flooding in early June over northwest Indiana, USACE assistance proved very effective. Through the month of June into July widespread heavy flooding occurred from east Texas through Arkansas, and Louisiana into northern Mississippi and most of the Ohio River Valley. While USACE provided significant technical assistance and flood fight materials to the areas of widespread flooding in southeast Texas, the long duration and record to near record flood levels minimized the effectiveness of state and local flood fight efforts. At the end ofJuly, Hurricane Chantal made landfall in the Galveston, Texas area. The direct impacts of Chantal were limited but it did exacerbate the problems over those parts of southeast Texas just beginning to recover from the earlier flooding. Three more tropical storms in the Atlantic Ocean became hurricanes during August and early September, but none impacted the United States. In mid September, Hurricane Hugo began marching through the islands in the eastern Caribbean leaving massive devastation in the Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico. Ultimately, the storm swept its fury into South and North Carolina. It caused few problems in the area of riverine flooding, however the storm surge caused massive damages along the South Carolina coast. Emergency assistance under USACE authority was limited. Our most significant mission was hauling drinkingto stricken areas in Puerto Rico. USACE was heavily involved in the massive recovery effort directed by FEMA in South Carolina and the Virgin Islands. USACE missions in South Carolina included debris clearance, removal of sunken vessels, emergency power generation, temporary ferry service, damage inspections, temporary beach dune restoration, and damage survey reports. In the Virgin Islands, USACE missions included damage survey reports, debris clearance, restoration of water supply, restoration ofpower systems, temporary repairs to homes, rehabilitation of public housing, and repairs to prisons. On top of all the flooding in the spring, came the Exxon Valdez catastrophic oil spill, 11 million gallons, in Alaska's Prince William Sound on March 24, 1989. USACE is a support agency to DOD under the National Contingency Plan. At the request of DOD to provide support to the oil spill recovery operations, USACE provided the hopper dredges Yaquina and Essayons. The dredges made a significant contribution to the oil spill recovery operations. The dredge Yaquina was used as a command post by the Coast Guard and Exxon. The dredge radar and communication equipment was used to coordinate oil recovery operations. The captain of the dredge provided technical and operational advice to the crew of the Soviet dredge that was also being used in the oil spill recovery operations. USACE R&D labs offered technical assistance on wind and wave data, oil containment and cleanup, and remote sensing and mapping. USACE also provided assistance in the oil spill recovery operations associated with the major oil spill in the Delaware River, near Philadelphia, PA, and the major oil spill in Galveston Bay, near Baytown, TX. 52-1 CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION This Commission, consisting of three Corps officers appointed by the President with the consent of the Senate, created by act of March 1, 1893 (27 Stat. L., p. 507), was organized in San Francisco, CA, on June 8, 1893, and has jurisdiction and duties extending over drainage area of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, comprising great central valley of California and extending from crest of the Sierra Nevada on the east to that of the Coast Range on the west, and from Mount Shasta and Pit River Basin on the north to Tehachapi Mountains on the south. These rivers empty into head of Suisun Bay ultimately discharging into the Pacific Ocean through connecting bays and straits and the Golden Gate. Duties of the Commission comprise regulation of hydraulic mining in drainage area of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, CA, so that debris will not be carried into navigable waters or otherwise cause damage; jurisdiction over construction and control of water storage facilities for domestic, irrigation, and power development purposes; and direction of improvements for control of floods on Sacramento River. On November 19, 1986, the Commission was abolished by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) and all authorities, powers, functions, and duties were transferred to the Secretary of the Army. All acquired lands and other interests presently under jurisdiction of the Commission were authorized to be retained and administered under direction of the Secretary. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Regulation of hydraulic mining and preparation of plans ................. 53-1 2. Sacramento River and tributaries, CA (debris control) .................... 53-2 3. Treatment of Yuba River debris situation-restraining barriers, CA ........ 53-2 Flood Control 4. Sacramento River, CA ................ 53-3 Navigation 1. REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING AND PREPARATION OF PLANS Location. Operations largely limited to territory between Mount Lassen on the north and Yosemite Valley on the south, on western watershed of Sierra Nevada. (See Geological Survey sheets for the area, 25 in number.) Existing project. Provides for regulating hydraulic mining operations, planning improvement of conditions upon Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers and their tributaries affected by such operations, and preparation of plans to enable hydraulic mining to be resumed in their drainage areas. In addition, the Secretary of the Army is authorized to enter into contracts to supply storage for water and use of outlet facilities from debris-storage reservoirs for domestic and irrigation purposes and power development upon such conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may approve. Applications of prospective miners are fully investigated Tables Table 53-A Cost and Financial Table 53-B Table 53-C Page Statement ................ 53-5 Authorizing Legislation ............... 53-7 Sacramento River, CA: Total Cost of Existing Project . . 53-8 by California Debris Commission and permits to operate are issued to those who provide satisfactory debris-restraining basins by construction of suitable dams where necessary or agree to make payment for storage in Government-constructed debris-restraining reservoirs constructed under act of June 19, 1934, as set forth below. For location and description of Governmentconstructed, debris-restraining reservoirs for general hydraulic mining, see Improvement 2. Local cooperation. Mineowners must bear all expenses incurred in complying with orders of the Commission for regulation of mining and restraint of debris. Operations and results during fiscal year. Minor administrative duties were accomplished. Administrative work overlaps that of improvements 2, 3, and 4, hereunder, and that of Sacramento District. Historical summary. The Commission received 1,292 applications for hydraulic mining licenses; 1 mine is licensed, but does not use storage behind Government debris dams. Work remaining is, in general, continuation of above or similar operations. 53-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 2. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA (DEBRIS CONTROL) Location. Project reservoirs are to be constructed in watersheds of Yuba, Bear, and American Rivers, CA (See Geological Survey sheets for basin areas, seven in number.) Existing project. For description of completed North Fork and Harry L. Englebright projects and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Initial recreation facilities were provided in FY 1959. Recreation areas at Harry L. Englebright Dam are maintained by the Corps. Recreation areas at North Fork Dam are no longer maintained and operated by Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District, but have been turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation (known as the Water and Power Resources Service between November 6, 1979, and May 18, 1981) on a permit basis. Total Federal cost of new work for construction of these reservoirs was $4,646,872, including $40,000 and $25,000, respectively, for basic recreation facilities at Englebright Dam and North Fork Dam. Reservoir project sites on Middle Fork of American River and on Bear River have been deauthorized and excluded from foregoing cost. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of that portion of the project. Estimated cost of that portion is $1,820,000 (1935). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Improvements made to facilities at North Fork Dam by Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District under a lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army and Auburn Boat Clubs (concessionaire) at an estimated cost of $46,000 since September 1953. On March 1, 1979, lands and waters at North Fork Dam were turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation on a 5-year renewable basis. On March 1, 1984, Permit No. DACWOS-4-79-527 was renewed for 5 years, was again renewed for 5 years on March 1, 1989, andwill be effective until February 28, 1994. Bureau will operate and maintain such use until Auburn project is completed, then a fee transfer will be made. Actual operation and maintenance of the recreation resource is being done by State of California by contract with the Bureau. Licenses. Under provisions of Contract No. W-1105-eng-2998 with Pacific Gas and Electric Co., payment is to be made to the Federal Government of $18,000 per year for the first 30 years (December 29, 1942 through December 28, 1972) and $48,000 per year between December 29, 1972, and December 28, 1992, in return for use of head at Englebright Dam and generation of hydroelectric power. Total payment through September 30, 1989, amounts to $1,326,393; these funds are paid to California Debris Commission and teposited for return to the Treasury. License No. 2246, effective April 9, 1970 (date New Narrows powerplant was put in operation) was issued by Federal Power Commission (known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission since January 9, 1978) to Yuba County Water Agency for hydroelectric power development of Yuba River by the company upstream from Englebright Dam. Under provisions of Contract No. DA-04-167-CIVENG-66-95 with Yuba County Water Agency, payment is to be made to the Federal Government of $100,000 per year for no more than 50 years. First payment (partial) of $73,151 was made April 1, 1971; total payment through September 30, 1989, amounts to $1,873,151. These funds are paid to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued at Harry L. Englebright Dam at a cost of $643,157, including recreation facilities. Dam safety assurance studies at Englebright Dam have been completed. Historical summary. Construction of dams was initiated in 1937; North Fork project was completed and in use at end of FY 1939, and Harry L. Englebright project was completed in January 1941. The two debris-control structures are in good condition. Public use of these reservoir recreation areas greatly overtaxes present capacities. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at Englebright Dam in FY 1981 and were completed in FY 1987. 3. TREATMENT OF YUBA RIVER DEBRIS SITUATION-RESTRAINING BARRIERS, CA Location. Works are on Yuba River between Marysville and where the river emerges from the foothills, near Hammonton, some 10 miles easterly from Marysville, or about 9 miles below the Narrows. (See Geological Survey Topographic map of Sacramento Valley, CA) Existing project. For description of completed project and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Total cost of new work was $723,259, of which $361,482 was U.S. funds and $361,777 required contributed funds by State of California. (For details of project in its original form, see Annual Report, 1917, p. 1810.) In February 1963, center section of dam failed and major rehabilitation of structure was completed in December 1964. Total cost for required rehabilitation was $1,660,000, of which $830,000 was Federal cost and $830,000 required contribution by State of California toward rehabilitation cost. During the December 24, 1964, floodflows on the Yuba River, the rehabilitated Daguerre Point Dam sustained considerable damage. (See 1965 Annual Report, p. 1647 "Operations and results during fiscal year.") The reconstructed portion of the dam completed earlier in December 1964 was undamaged by the flood. Permanent repair of Daguerre Point Dam abutment and fish facilities was completed in October 1965 at a cost of $447,808 with Federal and required State contributed funds on a matching basis. 53-2 CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION Local cooperation. Fully complied with for new work and major rehabilitation work. Total first cost to local interests for new work was $361,777 (required contribution by State of California). In addition, training walls were built on each bank below Daguerre Point for 11,250 feet and just above Daguerre Point, on the south bank, for 11,000 linear feet by two gold-dredging companies in connection with their dredging operations. To build these training walls would have cost the United States $450,000 (1902 estimate). Flood channels were also built by gold-dredging companies within confines of project works. Cost to the United States of equally effective works to restrain debris movement would have been more than $776,000 (1926 estimate). Total costs to local interests for initial and permanent major rehabilitation works were $830,000 and $223,904, respectively, (required contribution by State of California). State of California must contribute annually an amount equal to the Federal allotment for maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations included condition and operation studies by hired labor; and bank protection on Yuba River, consisting of a small rock groin at two locations upstream from Marysville completed by contract, $31,825. Historical summary. Construction of project works was initiated in November 1902. Construction of Daguerre Point Dam was completed in May 1906; diversion of river over dam was completed in 1910; training walls and dikes were completed in 1935. About 149 million cubic yards of debris are held in lower 7 miles of Yuba River between Marysville and downstream end of training walls. About 20 million cubic feet, are confined in river channel by Daguerre Point Dam. Additional millions of yards of loose material are in mine tailing fields adjacent to project training walls in upper 7-mile reach of project. Initial rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam begun in July 1963 was completed in December 1964. Contract for permanent rehabilitation of structure was initiated in July and completed in October 1965. Flood Control 4. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Location. Works- covered by this improvement are on Sacramento River and tributaries in north-central California from Collinsville to Ordbend, a distance of 184 miles. Previous project. For details see page 1815 of Annual Report for 1917, page 1995 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 2262 of Annual Report for 1907. Existing project. Sacramento River flood control project is a comprehensive plan of flood control for Sacramento River and lower reaches of its principal tributaries. Improvement extends along Sacramento River from Ordbend in Glenn County, CA, 184 miles downstream to its mouth at Collinsville at upper end of Suisun Bay, and comprises a system of levees, overflow weirs, drainage pumping plants, and flood bypass channels or floodways designed to carry surplus floodwaters without inundation of valley lands. About 980 miles of levee construction, with an average height of 15 feet and 98 miles of bank protection are involved in project. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 2115. (See table 53-B for authorizing legislation.) Estimated (October 1987) cost for original project (exclusive of supplemental levee improvements), including new work and maintenance, is $163,925,000 of which $68,925,000 is Federal cost and $95 million non-Federal ($90,050,562 for lands and damages and relocations and $4,949,438 required contributed funds for levee construction, bank protection works, and levee setbacks). Of this amount, $4,939,752 was for new work and $9,686 for maintenance. Estimated October 1989 total project cost is $180,045,000, of which $82,215,000 is Federal and $97,830,000 is non-Federal. Total estimate now includes remedial levee work for Yolo Bypass and Cache Slough (Unit 109); Colusa Basin Drain (Unit 132); Knights Landing Ridge Cut (Unit 127) and Marysville/Yuba City Area levees (engineering and design only), but excludes Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction. In addition to project requirements, local interests constructed several pumping plants for drainage of agricultural and urban land protected by project levees. Some channel clearing work was accomplished by State of California and other local interests to supplement project levee construction. Dredging below Cache Slough and reconstruction of Cache Creek settling basin weir are considered deferred and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1962) of these project units is $2,560,000 and $520,000, respectively, a total of $3,080,000 plus U.S. costs, for construction. Operation and maintenance of completed project will be responsibility of local interests; as units of project are completed, they are transferred to agencies of State of California for operation and maintenance. Existing project was adopted by 1917 Flood Control Act (H. Doc 81, 62d Cong., 1st sess., as modified by Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 63d Cong., 1st sess.), 1928 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 23, 69th Cong., 1st sess.), River and Harbor Act of 1937 (S. Committee print 75th Cong., 1st sess.), and 1941 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 205, 77th Cong., 1st sess.). Phase I - Sacramento River Flood Control System Evaluation recommended reconstruction of 32 miles of Sacramento area levees. Report was approved and in March 1989, Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction project was established under authority of Sacramento River Flood Control Project. New project is located within boundaries of Sacramento River Flood Control System in highly urbanized area around city of Sacramento, near confluence of Sacramento and American Rivers. It includes Natomas area levees from Natomas Cross Canal Bypass through Reclamation District 900 and portions of the Yolo Bypass east levee in West Sacramento; and, in South Sacramento, the east bank of Sacramento River from Miller Park to town 53-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 of Freeport. Estimated (October 1989) cost for Sacramento Urban project is $43,600,000 of which $21,800,000 is Federal and $21,800,000 is non-Federal (including a cash contribution of $2,180,000). Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with requirements for all work completed and indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work. Local interest costs from required contributed funds for project work total $4,949,438 for levee construction, bank protection works, and levee setbacks, of which $4,939,752 was for new work and $9,686 for maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regular funds: Engineering continued. Levee stage construction on Yolo Bypass and Cache Slough (Unit 109) was initiated at fiscal year contract cost of $2,823,538. Historical summary. Construction of existing project began in FY 1918 and is about 99 percent complete. Channel improvement to date has produced a channel with a capacity of 579,000 cubic feet per second in Sacramento River below Cache Slough. In addition, discharges up to 21,000 cubic feet per second can be diverted from Sacramento River through Georgiana Slough. Completed major project items include about 977 miles of levees; five weirs with a combined discharge capacity of 602,000 cubic feet per second; two cutoff channels; two sets of outfall gates; channel improvement and clearing in Sacramento River, Butte Creek, Putah Creek, and Sutter and Tisdale Bypasses; construction of two main bypasses or floodways and secondary bypasses at Tisdale and Sacramento weirs and at Wadsworth Canal; construction of Knights Landing ridge cut and of Cache Creek settling basin; installation of gaging stations; and enlargement of Sacramento River below Cache Slough. Cutoffs at Collins Eddy and between Wild Irishman and Kinneys Bends were made in 1918 and 1919, respectively. Sacramento weir was completed in 1917, Fremont weir in 1924, Tisdale and Moulton weirs in 1932, and Colusa weir in 1933. Outfall gates at Knights Landing were constructed in 1930 and at mouth of Butte Slough in 1936. Pumping plants on Sutter Bypass were completed in 1944. Work items with reference to clearing, snagging, rectification of channels, and bank protection on Sacramento River and tributaries in Tehama County and from Red Bluff southerly, provided for by 1941 Flood Control Act were accomplished in fiscal years 1947, 1948, 1949, and 1951. Work remaining comprises completion of levee stage construction, Yolo Bypass and Cache Slough (Unit 109) scheduled for completion in November 1989; Colusa Basin Drain (Unit 132); Knights Landing Ridge Cut (Unit 127); and Marysville/Yuba City Area levees. (See Table 53-C for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1989.) 53-4 CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION TABLE 53-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 86 FY 87 FY 88 FY 89 Sep 30, 1989 1. Regulation of Hydraulic Mining and Preparation of Plans 2. Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA (Debris Control) (Contributed Funds, Other) 3. Treatment of Yuba River Debris Situation Restraining Barriers, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other) 4. Sacramento River, CA including Sacramento River Flood Control Project and Sacramento Area Levee Reconstruction (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost $821,325 821,325 5,093,999 1 2 5,093,999 1 2 695,000 690,522 633,000 634,800 706,300 9,136,143 3 593,316 670,765 691,157 9,065,226 4 - - - 12,420 s - - - 12,420 s 361,482 361,482 24,000 44,177 37,000 15,778 85,000 20,000 1,812,6566 65,648 36,360 1,780,833 6 1,053,904 1,053,904 361,777 361,777 26,500 41,476 36,865 14,901 104,250 54,096 - 1,801,838 43,163 1,769,059 1,053,904 1,053,904 34,000 7 34,000 7 201,500 165,245 248,000 2,435,000 3,485,000 74,295,835 8 9 159,929 158,963 3,536,455 71,921,019 8 1,979,104 1,979,104 10,724,085 10 10,724,085 10 9,686 11 9,686 11 1. Exclusive of $644,503 appropriation and cost on inactive portion of project. 2. Includes $477,127 for recreational facilities at North Fork ($32,473) and Harry L. Englebright ($414,654), Code 710 appropriations and costs. 3. Includes $7,864,061 from regular funds and $1,272,082 from Hydraulic Mining in California funds. 4. Includes $7,793,144 from regular costs and $1,272,082 from Hydraulic Mining in California costs. 53-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 53-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 5. Funds from State of California Department of Navigation and Ocean Development for acquisition of a boarding float at Englebright Dam. 6. Includes deferred maintenance funds in amount of $207,500. 7. Miscellaneous engineering and construction accomplished at expense of local interests in connection with rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam necessitated by December 1964 floodflows. 8. Includes appropriation and cost of $680,000 for new work for previous project and $1,486,469 public works funds for new work for existing project. 9. Includes $1,200,000 Federal Funds for Sacramento Area Levee Reconstruction project (transferred from Sacramento River Flood Control project) in FY 1989. 10. Includes $680,000 required contribution funds for previous project; $4,939,752 required contributed funds for existing project; and $310,801 voluntary contribution for bank protection for existing project. 11. Includes $9,686 required contributed funds for existing project. 53-6 TABLE 53-B CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. Ex. Doc. 267, 51st Cong., 2d sess., Ex. Doc. 98, 47th Cong., 1st sess. 1 (Amendment of sec. 13, Act of Mar. 1, 1893.)1 Mar. 1, 1893 Feb. 27, 1907 53-7 REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING AND PREPARATION OF PLANS Created California Debris Commission and authorized: (a) Hydraulic mining under its regulation in drainage areas of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, if possible without injury to navigability of these river systems or to lands adjacent thereto; and (b) preparation of plans by Commission for improvement of navigability of these river systems, and flood and debris-control therein. Authorized California Debris Commission to permit hydraulic mining without construction of impounding works, provided there is no injury to navigability of above river systems or lands adjacent thereto. Amended act of Mar. 1, 1893, which provides for construction of debris dams or other restraining works by California Debris Commission and collection of a 3-percent tax on gross proceeds of each mine using such facilities, so as to eliminate this tax and substitute an annual tax per cubic yard mined, obtained by dividing total capital cost of each dam, reservoir, and rightsof- way, by total capacity of reservoir for restraint of debris; and authorized revocation of Commission orders permitting such mining, for failure to pay this annual tax within 30 days after its due date; and also authorized receipt of money advances, from mineowners to aid such construction, to be refunded later from annual payments of yardage taxes on material mined. Added at end of sec. 23 of above act, a provision that the Secretary of the Army is authorized to enter into contracts to supply storage for water and use of outlet facilities from debris-storage reservoirs for domestic and irrigation purposes and power development, upon such conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may approve, these payments are to be deposited to credit of such reservoir project, reducing its capital cost to be repaid by tax on mining operations. Abolished the California Debris Commission and transferred all authorities, powers, functions, and duties to the Secretary of the Army. Authorized all acquired land and other interests presently under jurisdiction of the Commission to be retained and administered under direction of the Secretary. Sec. 1001, 1986 WRDA June 19, 1934 June 25, 1938 Nov. 17, 1986 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 TABLE 53-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 4. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Dec. 22, 1944 Additional levee construction and reconstruction, H. Doc. 649, 78th Cong., and May 17, 1950 including levee protection of Upper Butte Basin, 2d sess., and 367, 81st and multipurpose reservoirs. 2 Cong., 1st sess. July 3, 1958 Bank protection and incidental channel improve- H. Doc. 272, 84th Cong., ments, Sacramento River from Chico Landing 2d sess. to Red Bluff, and local interests flood plain zoning above Chico Landing. 2 July 14, 1960 Bank protection works at critical locations, S. Doc. 103, 86th Cong., Sacramento River. 2 2d sess. 1. For latest published map, see Annual Report for 1913, p. 3170, and Rivers and Harbors Committee Document 50, 74th Cong., 1st sess. TABLE 53-C 2. This supplemental work is reported in detail under Sacramento District, Improvement No. 22. Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular $69,754,550 $1,979,104 $71,733,654 Public Works 1,486,469 -- 1,486,469 Total U.S. $71,241,019 $1,979,104 $73,220,123 Contributed Project Work 4,939,752 9,686 4,949,438 Contributed, Other 5,104,333 -- 5,104,333 Total All Funds $81,285,104 $1,988,790 $83,273,894 1. Includes $429,671 representing book value of plant purchased with previous project funds and transferred to existing project without reimbursement. 53-8 SACRAMENTO RIVER CA: TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 (See Section 4 of Text) APPENDIX A FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) ALASKA Chena River Lakes ARIZONA Adobe Alamo Cave Buttes Dreamy Draw New River Painted Rock Tat Momolikot Whitlow Ranch ARKANSAS Blakely Mountain Dam Blue Mountain DeGray DeQueen Dierks Gillham Millwood Narrows Dam Nimrod CALIFORNIA Black Butte Brea Buchanan Dam- H.V. Eastman Lake Carbon Canyon Coyote Valley Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Fannington Fullerton Hansen Narry L. Englebright Hidden Dam- Hensley Lake Isabella Lopez Martis Creek Merced County Stream Group: Bear Burns Mariposa Owens Mojave River New Hogan North Fork Pine Flat Prado San Antonio Santa Fe Sepulveda Yukon -Kuskokwim Gila Colorado Gila Gila Gila Gila Gila Gila Ouachita Arkansas Ouachita Red Red Red Red Ouachita Arkansas Sacramento Santa Ana San Joaquin Chena River Skunk Creek Bill Williams River Cave Creek Dreamy Draw New River Gila River Santa Rosa Wash Queen Creek Ouachita Petit Jean River Caddo Rolling Fork River Saline River Cossatot River Little River Little Missouri Fourche La Fave River Stony Creek Brea Creek Chowchilla River Santa Ana Carbon Canyon River Russian East Fork Russian River Russian San Joaquin Santa Ana Los Angeles Sacramento San Joaquin San Joaquin Los Angeles Sacramento San Joaquin San Joaquin San Joaquin San Joaquin Majave San Joaquin Sacramento San Joaquin Santa Ana Santa Ans SSan Gabriel Los Angeles Dry Creek Littlejohn Creek East Fullerton Creek Big Tujunga Wash Yuba River Fresno River Kern River Pacoima Wash Martis Creek Bear Creek Bums Creek Mariposa Creek Owens Creek Mojave Calaveras American River Kings River Santa Ana River San Antonio Creek San Gabriel River Los Angeles River Fairbanks Phoenix Wenden Phoenix Phoenix Phoenix GilaB end Casa Grande Superior Hot Springs Paris Arkadelphia DeQueen Dierks Gillham Ashdown Murfreesboro Plainview Orland Fullerton Chowchilla Brea Ukiah Healdsburg Farmington Fullerton Los Angeles Marysville Madera Bakersfield San Fernanado Reno Merced Merced Merced Merced Victorville Valley Springs Auburn Piedra Corona Upland Duarte Van Nuys 1981 2,000 NPP FR 1982 18,350 1968 1,046,310 1979 46,600 1973 320 1985 43,520 1959 2,476,340 1974 198,550 '960 34,500 1955 2,768,500 1947 257,900 1971 881,900 1977 136,100 1975 96,800 1975 221,800 1966 1,854,930 1949 407,900 1942 336,010 1963 160,000 1942 4,010 1975 150,000 1961 6,610 1959 122,500 1983 381,000 1952 52,000 1941 760 1940 25,450 1941 69,000 1975 90,000 1953 570,000 1954 440 1971 20,400 1954 7,700 1950 7,000 1948 15,000 1949 3,600 1971 89,670 1963 325,000 1939 14,700 1954 1,000,000 1941 196,240 1956 7,700 1948 22,110 1941 17,430 NPP FR 560 FRWX NPP FRX NPP FRX NPP F NPP FRWX NPP GWX NPP FX 20,900 FP 2,910 FRWX 6,400 FRZRS 1,680 FSQRW 1,360 FSRAW 1,370 FSQW 29,200 FSW 2,500 FP 3,550 FSWX Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 50 40,200 109 2,275 283 975 109 2,275 50 448 104 2,320 1281 4,780 75.5 12,500 149 637 235 1,100 Earth 115 2,800 Earth 243 3,400 Earth 160 2,360 Earth & Rock 153 2,500 Earth & Rock 160 1,750 Earth 88 17,554 Concrete 175 941 Concrete 97 1,012 770 FIRX Earth 156 2,970 NPP FRX Earth 87 1,765 470 FIRW Earth & Rock 205.5 1,800 NPP FERX 1,700 FRX 500 FRSW NPP F NPP FRX 120 FRWX 400 DR 5,000 FIRW 1,850 FIRW NPP FX 71 FSR NPP F NP F NPP F NPP F NPP FRWX 715 FIRX 280 DR NPP FIRX NPP FRX NPP FX NPP FRX NPP FRX Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete Concrete Concrete Earth Earth Earth Earth 99 2,610 160 3,500 319 3,000 60 7,800 45 575 97 10,475 280 1,142 163 5,730 185 4,952 50 1,300 113 2,670 92 1,830 55 4,075 88 1,330 75 790 200 2,200 429 1,820 155 620 429 1,820 106 2,280 160 3,850 92 23,800 57 15,444 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) CALIFORNIA (Continued) San Joaquin Tule River San Joaquin Kaweah River San Gabriel San Gabriel River ;and Rio Hondo Bear Creek South Platte River Cherry Creek Arkansas River Purgatoire River Branch Brook West Branch, Farmington River Hancock Brook Hop Brook Natchaug River Northfield Brook Naugatuck River Quinebaug River Columbia Boise River Kaskaskia River Farm Creek Fondulac Creek Kaskaskia River Big Muddy River East Fork of Whitewater River Mill Creek Raccoon Creek Wabash River Mississinewa Salt Creek Patoka River Salamonie Iowa River Des Moines River Chariton River Des Moines River Porterville Visalia El Monte Denver Denver Denver Lamar Trinidad Thomaston Riverton Plymouth Middlebury Willimantic Thomaston Thomaston Thompson Boise Carlyle East Peoria East Peoria Shelbyville Benton Brookville Tere Haute Rockville Huntington Peru Harrodsburg Ellsworth Wabash Iowa City Des Moines Centerville Des Moines Success Terminus Whittier Narrows COLORADO Bear Creek Chatfield Cherry Creek John Martin Trinidad CONNECTICUT Black Rock Colebrook River Hancock Brook Hop Brook Mansfield Hollow Northfield Brook Thomaston West Thompson IDAHO 400 FIRX Earth 345 FIRX Earth NPP FRWX Earth 109 1,412 852 1,844 280 20 760 40 21 450 8 NPP 200 FRX FRX FRX FIR Earth Earth Earth Concrete & Earth FIRX Earth FR FRSX FRW FR FRW FRW F FRW Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 1960 85,000 '1961 150,000 1967 35,150 1978 30,810 1974 231,429 1950 93,920 1943 615,500 1977 123,500 1970 8,700 1969 97,700 1960 4,030 1968 6,970 1952 52,000 1965 2,430 1960 42,000 1965 26,800 1956 306,000 1967 983,000 1951 15,500 1951 3,780 1970 684,000 1970 294,000 1974 359,600 1952 228,120 1960 132,800 1969 153,100 1967 368,400 1964 441,000 1978 301,600 1966 263,600 1958 492,000 1969 1,830,000 1969 552,000 1975 602,000 26,000 NPP NPP 11,100 18,900 2,250 1,400 1,100 500 1,100 3,280 2,010 976 1,820 8,950 11,000 74,000 FSNRWA Earth F Earth F Earth FSNRW Earth FQRSW Earth FRSW Earth& Rock FRX Earth FRX Earth FRW Earth FRW Earth FARS Earth FRSQW Earth & Rock FRW Earth FARW Earth FARWQ Earth FNRWXQ Earth FARWQ Earth A-2 MissouriB Missouri Missouri Arkansas Aikansas Housatonic Connecticut Housatonic Housatonic Thames Thames Housatonic Thames Lucky Peak 2,850 FIR Earth ILLINOIS Carlyle Fanndale Fondulac Shelbyville Rend Lake INDIANA Brookville Cagles Mill Cecil M. Harden Huntington Mississinewa Monroe Patoka Salamonie Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio 142 3,490 250 2,375 56 19,960 180 5,300 148 12,400 141 14,300 106 13,274 200 6,610 154 933 223 1,300 57 630 97 520 68 12,420 118 810 142 2,000 70 2,550 250 1,700 67 6,570 80 1,275 67 1,000 108 3,000 54 10,600 182 3,000 150 950 117 1,790 91 5,332 137 8,100 93 1,400 84 1,550 133 6,100 100 1,400 110 5,676 16 10,600 125 6,750 IOWA Coralville Red Rock Rathbum Saylorville Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Missouri Upper Mississippi APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) KANSAS Clinton Council Grove El Dorado Elk City Fall River Hillsdale John Redmond Kanopolis Marion Melvemrn Milford Pearson Skubitz Big Hill Perry Pomona Toronto Tuttle Creek Wilson KENTUCKY Barren River Buckhorn Carr Fork Cave Run Dewey Fishtrap Grayson Green River Martins Fork Paintsville Nolin Rough River Taylorsville Yatesville LOUISIANA Bayou Badcau Caddo Lake Wallace Lake MARYLAND Jennings Randolph Lake MASSACHUSETTS Barre Falls Birch Hill Buffumville Charles River Natural Valley Storage Conant Brook East Brimfield Hodges Village Knightville Littleville Missouri Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Missouri Arkansas Missouri Arkansas Missouri Mouri Arkansas Missouri Missouri Arkansas Missouri Missouri Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Cumberland Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Red Red Red Potomac Connecticut Connecticut Thames Charles Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Wakarusa River Grand (Neosho) Walnut River Elk River Fall River Big Bull Creek Grand (Neosho) Smoky Hill River Cottonwood River Marias des Cygnes Republican River Big Hill Creek Deleware River 110 Mile Creek Verdigris River Big Blue River Saline River Barren River Middle Fork of Kentucky River Carr Fork Licking River Johns Creek Levisa Fork, Big Sandy River Little Sandy Green River Martins Fork Paint Creek Nolin River Rough River Salt River Blain Creek Bayou Bodcau Cypress Bayou Cypress Bayou North Branch Potomac River Ware River Millers River Little River Charles River Conant Brook Quinebaug River French River Westfield River Middle Branch, Westfield River Lawrence Council Grove El Dorado Independence Fall River Hillsdale Burlington Marquette Marion Melvem Junction Cherryvale Perry Pomona Toronto Manhattan Wilson Glasgow Buckhorn Hazard Farmers Paintsville Pikeville Grayson Campbells -ville Harlan Paintsville Kyrock Leitchfield Taylorsville Yatesville Shreveport Shreveport Shreveport Bamum Barre So. Roylaston Charlton Millis Monson Fiskdale Oxford Huntington Chester 1977 397,200 1964 112,882 1981 236,200 1966 287,300 1949 256,400 1981 160,000 1964 628,540 1948 450,000 1968 141,770 1972 363,000 1965 1,160,000 1981 39,740 1969 770,000 1963 230,000 1960 200,800 1962 2,346,000 1964 776,000 1964 815,200 1960 168,000 1976 47,700 1974 614,100 1949 93,000 1968 164,360 1967 118,990 1969 723,200 1978 21,00 1983 73,500 1963 609,400 1958 334,400 1983 291,670 1988 86,951 1949 357,300 1971 175,000 1946 96,100 1981 130,900 1958 24,000 1941 49,900 1958 12,700 1983 35,000 1966 3,740 1960 30,000 1959 12,800 1941 49,000 1965 32,400 7,000 FSWAXR Earth 3,310 FSQR Earth 8,000 FSQR Earth 4,122 FSQ Earth 2,350 FSX Earth 4,580 FSQR Earth 9,710 FSQR Earth 3,815 FRWX Earth 6,210 FRQS Earth 6,930 FRQWX Earth 15,600 FRSXWQ Earth&Rock 1,190 FSR Earth 12,500 FRSXW Earth&Rock 4,000 FRSWXQ Earth&Rock 2,660 FX Earth 15,800 FRWXQAN Earth&Rock 9,000 FIRWXNA Earth&Rock 4,340 FARS Earth 550 FQRW Earth 530 FQRW Earth & Rock 6,790 FQRW Earth & Rock 1,100 FARW Earth 569 FARW Rock 1,050 FQRW Earth & Rock 5,070 FRSQW Earth & Rock 578 FQ Concrete 261 FQRW Earth & Rock 2,890 FAR Earth & Rock 2,180 FRX Earth & Rock 1,625 FQRW Earth & Rock 3,921 FQRW Earth & Rock NPP FRW 32,700 NFRS 2,300 FQRS Earth Concrete & Earth Earth 114 9,250 96 6,500 99 20,930 107 4,840 94 6,015 75 11,600 86.5 21,790 131 15,360 67 8,375 98 9.700 126 6,300 83 3,902 96 7,750 85 7,750 90 4,712 175 7,500 160 5,600 146 3,970 162 1,020 130 720 148 2,740 118 913 195 1,100 120 1,460 142 2,350 97 574 160 1,600 174 990 124 1,530 164 1,280 105 760 70 12,850 3,700 30 4,994 952 FQRS Earth & Rock 296 2,130 NPP FRW NPP FRW 200 FRW NPP F NPP F 360 FRW NPP FRW NPP FRW 275 FRWS Earth & Rock 62 885 Earth & Rock 56 1,400 Earth & Rock 66 3,255 Nonstructural -- -- Earth & Rock 85 1,050 Earth & Rock 55 520 Earth & Rock 55 2,140 Earth & Rock 160 1,200 Earth & Rock 1,164 1,360 A-3 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) MASSACHUSETTS (Continued) Tully West Hill Westville MINNESOTA Big Stone Lake- Whetstone River Lac Qui Parle Chippewa River LacQui Parle Marsh Lake Orwell Red Lake MISSISSIPPI Arkabutla Lake Enid Lake Grenada Lake Okatibbee Sardis Lake MISSOURI Clearwater Long Branch Longview Pomme de Terre Smithville Wappapello NEBRASKA Harlan County Paipillion Creek and Tributaries Glenn Cunningham (Site 11) Standing Bear Lake (Site 16) Salt Creek & Tributaries Olive Creek (Site 2) Blue Stem (Site 4) Wagon Train (Site 8) Stagecoach Site (9) Yankee Hill (Site 10) Conestoga (Site 12) Town Lake (Site 13) Pawnee (Site 14) Holmees Park Lake (Site 17) Branched Oak (Site 18) Connecticut Tully River Blackstone West River Thames Quinebaug River Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Upper Mississippi Red River of the North Red River of the North Lower Mississippi Lower Mississippi Lower Mississippi Pascagoula Lower Mississippi White Grande Chariton Missouri Missouri Missouri Lower Mississippi Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri M:i;ssouri Misouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Missouri Minnesota River Chippewa River Minnesota River Minnesota River Otter Tail River Red Lake River Coldwater River Yocona River Yalobusha River Okatibbee Creek Little Tallahatchie River Black River Little Charlton Little Blue River Momme de Terre River Little Platte River St. Francis River Republican River Knight Creek Trib of Big Papillion Creek S. Trib. Olive Br. Creek N. Trib Olive Br. Creek N. Trib. Hickman Creek S. Trib. Hickman Creek Cardwell Creek Holmes Creek Middle Creek N. Middle Creek Antelope Creek Oak Creek Fryville Uxbridge Sturbridge Ortonville Montevideo Montevideo Montevideo Fergus Falls Red River Arkabutla Enid Grenada Meridian Sardis Piedmont Macon Kansas City Hermitage Smithville Wappapello 1949 22,000 1960 12,350 1961 11,100 1973 45,000 1950 (2) 1950 122,800 1953 14,100 1953 14,100 1951 3,270,000 1943 525,300 1951 660,000 1954 1,337,400 1969 142,400 1940 1,570,000 1948 413,700 1980 65,000 1986 46,900 1961 650,000 1982 2456,500 1941 613,200 Republican City 1952 850,000 Omaha Omaha Kramer Sprague Holland Hickman Denton Denton Pleasantdale Emerald Lincoln Raymond 1975 17910 1973 5,220 1964 5,470 1963 10,260 1963 9,280 1964 6,640 1966 7,560 1964 10,640 1966 8,080 1965 29,520 1963 6,510 1968 97,560 300 FRW Earth & Rock 62 NPP FRW Earth & Rock 51 23 FRW Earth & Rock 78 12,700 NPP 6,500 210 210 279,000 5,100 6,100 9,800 1,280 10,700 1,630 2,430 930 7,820 7,190 4,100 FRW FRWX FRWX FARS FARS FARSX F F F FQSR F FRWX FRSQW FRWQ FRWX FSQRW FR Earth 25 Earth & Rock 21 Earth & Rock 21 Earth & Rock 19.5 Eaarth & Rock 47 Earth & Rock 15.5 Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Earth & Rock Earth & Rock Earth Earth&Rock Earth&Rock Earth Earth & Rock 81 99 102 67 117 154 71 120 155 95 109 1,570 2,400 560 13,700 17,97 4,100 11,800 1,355 36,500 11,500 8,400 13,900 6,543 15,300 4,225 3,800 1,900 4,630 4,200 2,700 13,600 FIRWX Earth & Rock 107 11,827 391 FQEX Earth 67 1,940 137 FRX Earth 70 1.460 174 316 303 196 208 230 255 728 100 1,780 FR FR FR FB FR FR FR FR FR FR Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 45 57 52 48 52 63 58 65 55 70 3,020 2,760 1,650 2,250 3,100 3,000 2,075 5,000 7,700 5,200 A-4 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) NEW HAMPSHIRE Blackwater Edward MacDowell Franklin Falls Hopkinton-Everett Otter Brook Surry Mountain NEVADA Mathews Canyon Pine Canyon NEW MEXICO AAbiquiu Conchiti Conchas Galisteo Jemnez Canyon Two Rivers: Diamond "A" Dam Rocky Dam Santa Rosa Dam & Reservoir NEW YORK Almond Arkport East Sidney Mount Morris Whitney Point NORTH CAROLINA B. Everett Jordan Falls W. Kerr Scott NORTH DAKOTA Baldhill Borman-Haley Homme Pipestem OHIO Alum Creek Berlin Caesar Creek Clarence J. Brown Deer Creek Delaware Dilon Merrimack Merrimack Merrimack Merrimack Merrimack Connecticut Connecticut Blackwater River Nubanusit Brook Pemigewasset River Contoocook River Piscataquog River Otter Brook Ashuelot River Colorado Mathews Canyon Colorado Pine Canyon Rio Grande Rio Grande Arkansas Rio Grrande Rio Grande Rio Grande Rio Grande Pecos Susquehanna Susquehanna Susquehanna Genesee Susquehanna Cape Fear Neuse Yadkin- Pee Dee Red River of the North Missouri Red River of the North James River Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Rio Charma Rio Grande Canadian River Galistco Creek Jemez River Rio Hondo Rocky Arroyoo Pecos Canacadea Creek Canisteo Creek Ouleout Creek Genesee River Otselic River New Hope Neuse Yadkin Sheyenne River Webster West Peterborough Feanklin West Hopkinton East Weare Keene Keene Caliente Caliente Abiquio Pena Blanca Tucumcari Albuquereque Bemailillo Roswell Santa Rosa Homell Arkport Franklin Mount Morris Whitney Point Durham Raleigh Wilkesboro Valley City North Fork, Grand River Haley South Branch of Park River Park River Pipestem Creek Jamestown Alum Creek Mahoning Creek Caesar Creek Buck Creek Deer Creek Licking River Licking River Africa Deerficld Wilmington Springfield New Holland Zanesville Zanesville 1941 46,000 1950 12,800 1943 154,000 1962 71,500 1962 87,500 1958 18,300 1941 32,500 NPP NPP NPP 200 120 85 265 FRW FRW FRW FRW FRW FRW FRW Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 75 67 140 76 115 133 86 1957 6,270 NPP FX Earth 1957 7,750 NPP FX Earth 1963 1,212,000 1975 596,300 1939 529,000 1970 89,000 1953 102,700 1963 168,000 1979 447,000 1949 14,600 1940 7,900 1950 33,550 1952 337,000 1942 86,440 1982 753,500 1983 3374450 1963 153,000 1950 70,000 1967 92,980 1951 3,660 1974 146,880 1975 134,800 1943 91,200 1978 242,200 1974 63,700 1968 102,500 1961 273,000 1961 273,000 NPP 1,200 3,000 NPP NPP NPP FXS FRWX FI FX FX FX Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Earth Earth Earth NPP FIX Earth 124 NPP 210 170 1,200 14,300 11,300 1,470 325 1,750 51 885 348 240 13,300 1,010, 727 1,325 1,325 FRW F FRW FR FRW Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete Earth FQRSWX Earth FQRSWX Earth FARSX Earth FARS Earth FSRWK Earth FARS Earth FRWX Earth FRSW Concrete & Earth FARSWQ Concrete & Earth FRSQW Earth & Rock FQRW Earth & Rock FRW Earth FRWX Earth FRWX Earth 1,150 1,030 1,740 790 2,000 1,288 1,670 71 800 92 884 325 241 200 156 135 96 212 212 90 113 130 210 95 112 92 148 61 79 67 108 93 96 165 72 93 118 118 1,540 28,300 19,400 2,820 760 4,885 2,940 1,950 1,260 1,200 2,010 1,028 4,900 1,330 1,915 1,740 1,650 5,730 865 4,000 10,000 5,750 2,750 6,620 3,880 1,400 1,400 A-5 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) OHIO (Continued) Michael J. Kirwan Mosquito Creek Muskingum River Reservoirs: Atwood Beach City Bolivar Charles Mill Clendening Dover Leesville Mohawk Mohicanville Piedmont Pleasant Hill Senecaville Tappan Wills Creek North Branch, Kakosing River Lake Paint Creek Tom Jenkins West Fork Mill Creek William H. Harsha OKLAHOMA Arcadia Birch Canton Copan Fort Supply Great Salt Plains Heyburn Hugo Hulah Kaw Ooologah Optima Pine Creek Sardis Skiatook Waurika Wister OREGON Applegate Blue River Cottage Grove Dorena Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Red Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas Red Red Arkansas Red Arkansas West Branch, Mahoning River Mosquito Creek Indian Fork Sugar Creek Sandy Creek Black Fork Brushy Fork Tuscarawas River McGuire Creek Walhondoing River Lake Fork Stillwater Creek Clear Fork Seneca Fork Little Stillwater Creek Wills Creek North Branch of Kakosing River Paint Creek East Branch, Sunday Creek Mill Creek Little Miami River Deep Fork River Birch Creek North Canadian River Little Caney River Wolf Creek Salt Fork, Arkansas River Polecat Creek Kiamichi River Caney River Arkansas River Verdigris River North Canadian River Little River Jackfork Creek Hominy Creek Beaver Creek Poteau River Rogue River Applegate River Columbia Columbia Columbia Blue River Coast Fork, Willamette River Row River Newton Falls 1966 78,700 Cortland 1944 104,100 New Cumberland Beach City Bolivar Mufflin Tippecanoe Dover Leesville Nellie Mohicanville Piedmont Perrysville Senecaville Tappan Conesville Fredericktown New Petersburg Gloucester Mount Healthy Williamsburg Edmond Bamsdall Canton Copan Fort Supply Cherokee Sapulpa Hugo Bartlesville Ponca City Oologah Hardesty Wright City Clayton Skiatook Waurika Wister Medford Blue River Cottage Grove Cottage Grove 1937 49,700 1937 71,700 1938 149,600 1936 88,000 1937 54,000 1938 203,000 1937 37,400 1937 285,000 1936 102,000 1937 65,000 1938 87,700 1937 88,500 1936 61,60-0 1937 196,000 1973 14,900 1972 145,000 1951 26,900 1952 11,380 1978 284,500 1986 92,010 1977 58,200 1948 377,100 1983 227,700 1942 100,700 1941 271,400 1950 55,395 1974 966,700 1951 289,000 1976 1,348,000 1963 1,519,000 1978 229,500 1969 465,780 1984 468,060 1985 500,700 1977 343,500 1949 427,900 580 700 1,540 420 NPP 1,350 1,800 350 1,000 NPP NPP 2,270 850 3,550 2,350 900 98 710 394 200 18,760 1,820 1,137 7,910 4,850 1,820 8,690 880 13,250 3,570 17,040 29,460 5,340 3,750 13,610 10,190 10,100 5,360 FAQRSW Earth FARSWQ Earth FRX FRX FR FRX FRX FRX FRX FR FR FRX FRX FRSX FRX FRX FRW FRSQW FRSWX FRX FRSQW FSR FSQRW FSI FSQRW FSX FRWX FRWXS FSQRW FSAX FSQRW FSN FSRW FSQWR FSRW FSQRW FISQWR FSAX Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth & Rock Concrete Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth 1981 82,000 988 AFIQRSW Gravel Embankment 1968 85,000 975 FINR Earth 1942 30,060 1,155 FINR Concrete & & Earth 1949 70,500 1,885 FINR Concrete & Earth 83 47 65 64 87 48 64 83 74 111 46 56 113 45 52 87 71 118 84 100 200 104 5,250 97 3,190 68 15,140 70 7,730 85 111,865 68 6,010 89 2,920 101 10,200 94 5,200 125 9,466 137 4,000 120 15,200 124 7,712 81 14,138 143 3,590 106 16,600 99 5,700 242 1,300 319 1,329 114 2,110 145 3,352 A-6 9,900 5,650 3,700 5,600 6,300 1,390 950 824 1,694 2,330 1,220 1,750 775 2,350 1,550 1,950 1,400 700 944 1,100 1,450 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) OKLAHOMA (Continued) Fall Creek Fern Ridge Willow Creek PENNSYLVANIA Alvin R. Bush Ayleswerth Creek Beltzville Blue Marsh Conemaugh Cowanesque Crooked Creek Curwensville East Branch, Clarion River Foster Joseph Sayers Francis E. Walter (Bear Creek) Gen. Edgar Jadwin Indian Rock Kinzua Loyalhanna Mahoning Creek Prompton Raystown Shenanago Stillwater Tioga-Hammond Lakes Hammond Lakes Tionesta Union City Woodcock Creek Youghiogheny River SOUTH DAKOTA Cold Brook Cottonwoiod Springs Lake Traverse: Reservation Control Dam White Rock TEXAS Addicks Aquilla Bardwell Barker Columbia Columbia Columbia Susquehanna Susquehanna Delaware Delaware Ohio Susquehanna Ohio Susquehanna Ohio Susquehanna Delaware Delaware Susquehanna Ohio Ohio Ohio Delaware Susquehanna Ohio Susquehanna Susquehanna Susquehanna Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Missouri Missouri Red River of the North Red River of the North San Jacinto Brazos Trinity San Jacinto Middle Fork, Long Tom River Willow Creek Kettle Creek Aylesworth Creek Pohopco Creek Tulephoken Creek Conemaugh River Cowanesque River Crooked Creek West Branch, Susquehanna River East Branch, Clarion River Bald Eagle Creek Lehigh River Dyberry Creek Codorus Creek Allegheny River Loyalhanna Creek Mahoning Creek Lackawaxem River Raystown Branch, Juniata River Shenanago River Lackawanna River Tioga River Crooked Creek Tionesta Creek French Creek French Creek Youghiogheny River Cold Brook Cottonwood Springs Creek Bois de Sioux River Bois de Sioux River South Mayde Creek Aquilla Creek Waxahachie creek Buffalo Bayou Eugene Eugene Heppner Renovo Archbald Lehighton Reading Saltsburg Larenceville Ford City Curwensville Wilcox Blanchard White Haven Honesdale York Warren Saltsburg New Bethlehem Honesdale Huntingdon Sharpsville Uniondale Tioga Tioga Tionesta Union City Meadville Confluence Hot Springs Hot Springs Wheaton Wheaton Addicks Hillsboro Ennis Baker 1965 115,000 1941 110,000 1983 13,250 1962 75,000 1970 1,700 1971 68,250 1978 50,010 1952 274,000 1980 89,000 1940 93,900 1965 124,200 1952 84,300 1969 99,000 1961 110,700 1960 24,500 1942 28,000 1965 "1,180,000 1942 95,300 1941 74,200 1960 52,000 1973 762,000 1966 191,400 1960 12,000 1978 62,000 1978 63,000 1940 133,400 1970 47,640 1973 20,000 1943 254,000 19534 7,200 1970 8,385 1941 164,500 1941 85,500 1948 204,500 1983 146,000 1965 140,000 1945 207,000 1,865 10,305 96 160 NPP 947 960 300 410 350 790 90 1,730 80 NPP NPP 1,900 210 170 290 8,300 1,910 85 470 680 480 NPP 118 450 FINR FINR FRN Rockfill Rockfill & Concrete Roller Compacted Concrete FRW Earth & Rock F Earth & Rock FQRSW Earth & rock FAQRS Earth & Rock FW Concrete & Earth FR Earth & Rock FRW Earth FR Earth FARQW Earth FRW Earth FNRW Earth & rock F Earth FRW Earth PFAQRW Concrete & Earth FRW Concrete & Earth FRW Concrete FNRW Earth FRW Earth & Rock FAQRW Concrete FS Earth FR Earth & Rock FR Earth & Rock FRW Earth F Earth FQRA Earth FARWQ Earth 36 FRWX Earth 41 FRWX Earth 10,925 6,500 FRX FRX Earth Earth NPP FX Earth 3,280 FSX Earth 3,570 FRSX Earth NPP FX Earth A-7 193 49 160 165 90 170 98 137 151 143 131 184 100 234 112 83 1'77 114 162 140 225 68 77 140 122 154 88 90 184 5,100 6,624 1,780 1,350 1,270 4,300 1,775 1,265 3,100 1,480 2,850 1,725 6,835 3,000 1,273 1,000 1,877 960 926 1,230 1,700 720 1,700 2,710 6,450 1,050 1,420 4,650 1,610 127 925 123 1,190 14 16 9,100 14,400 49 61,166 104.5 11,890 82 15,400 37 72,844 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) TEXAS (Continued) Belton Benbrook Canyon Ferrells Bridge Dam- Lake O' the Plains Granger Dam and Lake Grapevine Hords Creek Joe Pool Lake Kemp Lavon Lewisville Navarro Mills North San Gabriel Dam, Lake Georgetown O.C. Fisher Pat Mayse Proctor Ray Roberts Somerville Stillhouse Hollow Waco Wright Patman VERMONT Ball Mountain North Hartland North Springfield Townshend Union Village VIRGINIA John W. Flannagan Gathright Dam & Lake Moomaw North Fork of Pound River WASIIINGTON Howard A. Hanson Mill Creek Mud Mountain Wynoochee Brazos Trinity Guadalupe Red Brazos Trinity Colorado Trrinity Red Trinity Trinity Trinity Brazos Colorado Red Brazos Trinity Brazos Brazos Brazos Red Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Connecticut Ohio James Chehalis Green Columbia Puyallup Chehalis Leon River Clear Fork, Trinity River Guadallupe River Cypress Creek San Gabriel River Denton Creek Hords Creek Mountain Creek Wichita River East Fork, Trinity River Elm Fork, Trinity River Richland Creek North Fork, San Gabriel River North Concho River Sanders Creek Leon River Elm Fork Yegua Creek Lampasas River Bosque River Sulphur River West River Ottauguechee River Black River West River Ompompanoosuc River Pound River Jackson Wynoochee River Green River Mill Creek White River Wynoochee River Belton Fort Worth New Braunfels Jefferson Granger Grapevine Coleman Grand Prairie Wichita Falls Fort Worth Lewisville Corsicana Georgetown San Angelo Paris Comanche Denton Somerville Belton Waco Texarkana Jamaica North Hartland Springfield Townshend Union Village Haysi Alleghany Montesano Kanaskat Walla Walla Enumclaw Montesano 1954 1,097,600 1952 258,600 1964 366,400 1959 842,100 1980 244,200 1952 425,500 1948 25,310 1966 304,000 1972 502,900 1953 748,200 1954 989,700 1962 212,200 1980 130,800 1952 396,400 1967 189,100 1963 374,200 1987 1,064,000 1967 507,500 1968 630,400 1965 726,400 1957 2,654,300 1961 54,600 1960 71,420 1960 51,067 1961 33,700 1950 38,000 1963 145,700 1979 123,739 1972 70,000 1961 106,000 1942 8,300 1953 106,000 1972 70,000 12,300 3,770 346,400 18,700 4,400 7,280- 510 7,470 15,590 21,400 23,280 5,070 1,310 5,440 5,993 4,610 29,350 11,460 6,430 7,270 20,300 75 220 290 100 NPP 310 2,532 1,150 FIRSX FNRXA FRSX FRS FRSWX FNRSXA FARSX FRSX FX FRSW FRSX FRSX FRSWX FRSX FRSW FRSX FRSX FRSX FRSX FRSX FRSX FRW FRW FRW FRW FRW FAWR FQR FSARI 1,600 FAS 225 FR NPP FR 1,150 FSARI A-8 192 5,524 130 9,130 224 4,410 97 10,600 115 16,320 137 12,850 91 6,800 109 22,360 115 8,890 81 19,483 125 32,888 82 6,700 164 6,700 128 40,885 96 7,080 86 13,460 109 14,965 80 26,175 200 15,624 140 24,618 100 18,500 Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Rock Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Concrete & Earth Earth & Rock Concrete & Earth Rock Earth Rock Concrete & Earth 265 185 120 133 170 250 257 177 235 145 425 177 915 1,520 2,940 1,700 1,100 960 1,172 1m700 675 3,200 700 1,700 APPENDIX A (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 Permanent Pool Characteristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Acreage) Community Placed in Storage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acre-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) WEST VIRGINIA Beech Fork Bluestone Bumsville East Lynn R. D. Bailey Summersville Lake Sutton Tygart River WISCONISIN Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Ohio Beech Fork New River Little Kanawha Twelve Pole Creek Guynabdot River Gauley River Elk River Tygart River Lavalette Hinton Burnsville East Lynn Justice Summersville Sutton Grafton 1977 37,540 1952 631,000 1977 65,400 1970 82,500 1979 203,700 1965 413,800 1960 265,300 1938 287,700 450 FRW Earth 86 1,080 1,800 FRWX Concrete 180 2,048 550 FQRW Earth & Rock 89 1,400 823 FQRW Earth & Rock 122 650 440 FQRW Earth & Rock 310 1,397 407 FANR Rock 390 2,280 270 FNAR Concrete 220 1,921 620 FNAR Concrete 230 1,921 Chippewa Eau Galle Spring Valley 1969 43,600 A-9 Eau Galle 150 FR Earth 122 1,800 FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS CONSTRUCTED OR CONTRIBUTED TO BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUT OPERATED BY OTHERS: SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 Pod Charatceristics of Dam Cal. Year Total (Ac eage) Community Placed in Strage or No Project Height Length Name River Basin Stream in Vicinity Useful Op. (Acae-Ft.) Pool (NPP) Functions Type (Feet) (Feet) CALIFORNIA Big Dry Creek Comanche2 Cherry Valley3 Del Valle Eaton Wash New Bullards Bar2 New Don Pedro3 New Exchequer2 Oroville 2 Tahchevah Creek COLORADO Pinon Canyon CONNECTICUT East Branch Hall Meadow Brook Mad River Sucker Brook San Joaquin Big Dry Creek San Joaquin Mokelumne River Tuolumne Cherry Creek Alameda Arroyo Del Valle Rio Hondo Eaton Wash Sacramento Yuba River San Joaquin Tuolomne River San Joaquin Merced River Sacramento Feather River Whitewater Tahchevah Creek Colorado Pinon Canyon Arroyo Housatonic East Branch, Naugatuck River Housatonic Hall Meadow Brook Connecticut Mad River Connecticut Sucker Brook Fresno Clements Sonora' Livermore Pasadena Marysville Modesto Merced Oroville Palm Springs Trinidad Torrington Torrington Winchester Winchester 1948 16,250 NPP 1963 431,500 NPP 1956 268,000 475 1968 77,000 200 1937 960 NPP 1968 960,00 1,910 1970 2,030,000 3,520 1966 1,026,000 1,900 1964 3,539,000 5,838 1965 960 NPP 1964 4,350 NPP 1964 4,350 NPP 1962 8,620 NPP 1963 9,700 10 1970 1,480 NPP F Earth 40 20,038 FRS Earth & Rcck 171 2,450 FS Earth & Rock 315 2,500 FRS Earth 223 880 F Earth 82 1,795 FIRPW Concrete 645 2.323 FISP Earth & Rock 565 1,920 FIR Rock 480 1,200 FIRSW Earth 770 6,850 F Earth 42 3,610 FRW Earth FR F FR F 92 700 Eart! 92 100 Earth & Rock 73 1,200 Earth 178 940 Earth 68 1,160 IDAHO Upper Snake Willow Crc Potomac Upper Mississippi Oswego Savage Bear Creek Onondaga Creek Red North Fork, Red Arkansas Grand (Neosho) River Arkansas Grand (Neosho) River Beaver Big Wash Winooski Jail Branch Winooski Waterbury Winooski North Branch, Idaho Falls 1979 100,500 364 Western Port 1952 20,000 360 Hannibal 1962 8,700 NPP Syracuse 1949 18,200 NPP Altus 1948 152,429 6,260 Locust Grove 1964 444,500 10,0006 Disney Milford East Barre Waterbury Wrightsville 1941 2,197,000 46,5006 1961 1,200 NPP 1938 12,050 NPP 1938 37,000 890 1938 20,300 570 FIR Earth 184 840 FRS Earth & Rock 184 1,050 F Earth 65 1,450 F Earth FISR Concrete FRP Concrete & Earth FRP Concrete F Earth F Earth FRH Earth FR Earth 67 1,782 98 1,112 147 4,494 147 6,565 34 2,814 65 1,460 158 1,800 115 1,525 A-10 Ririe MARYLAND Savage River MISSOURI Bear Creek NEW YORK Onandaga OKLAHOMA Altus4 Lake Hudson5 Grand Lake O' the Cherokees UTAH Big Wash VERMONT East Barre Waterbury Wrightsville FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIRS CONSTRUCTED OR CONTRIBUTED TO BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BUT OPERATED BY OTHERS SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 (Continued) NOMENCLATURE FOR PROJECT FUNCTIONS A - Low Flow Augmentation D - Debris Control F - Flood Control I - Irrigation N - Navigation P - Power Q - Water Quality Control R - Public Recreation (Annual Attendance exceeding 5,000) S - Water Supply W - Fish and Wildlife (Federal or State) X - Water Conservation and Sedimentation 1 Acres of Water surface at top of permanent pool 2 Federal Government contributed for flood storage 3 Cherry Valley Reservoir: Planned and constructed by local interests as initial phase; provided flood control on itnerim basis. Second and final phase,N ew Don Pedro Reservoir: Federal Government contributed for flood protection, construction and operation by City and County of San Fransisco, and Turlock and Modesto Irrigation Districts. 4 Construction by Bureau of Reclamation. Participation by Department of the Army to finance flood control portion. 5 Construction by Grand River Dam Authority. Participation by Department of the Army to finance flood control portion. 6 Top of power pool. A-11 APPENDIX B FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1989 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Alton to Gale Levee System, Mississippi River, IL and MO.................... ...... Arcadia Lake, OK ................................... ........ Ardsley, NY ..................................... ........... Arkansas-Red Basins Chloride Control (Area VIII), Ok, TX, and KS (Stage I)............................................. Ascalmore-Tippo Items, MS ............................................ Atchafalaya Basin, LA ...................................... .... B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, NC............................... Bassetta Creek, MN.................................. ....... Big Blue River, Saline Co., NE, Tuxedo Park Road & Bridge (Sec 14)............................................................ Big South Fork National River & Recreation Area, KY and TN....................................... Big Wood River, ID (Sec 208)............................................ Bitterroot River, Florence, MT (Sec 14).............................. Black River, Butler County Road 607, MO (Sec 14) ......... Black River, Hwy HH, Wayne Co., MO............................. Blue River Channel, Kansas city, MO................................. Boggy Creek, TX .................................... ........ Boise River, ID (Sec 208) .................................. ........... Browns Creek, Nashville, TN.............................................. Brush Bayou, LA............................... ... ........... Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX..................................... Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX, Addicks and Barker, Dam Saftey Assurance.................................... Candy Lake, OK .................................... ........ Cannon River at Fairbault, MN (Sec 14) .......................... Canton Bridge, Trigg Co., KY.......................................... Catherine Creek, OR (Sec 208)......................................... Clear Creek, TX ....................................... ......... Central and Southern, FL.................................................... Chariton River, Schuyler Co., MO, Eason Br. (Sec 14)...... Chaska, MN................................... ............ Chena River Lakes, AK ........................................ Cooper Lake and Channels, TX ........................................ Copan Lake, OK .................................... ........ Corte Madera Creek, CA................................... .... County Line Road Bridge, Mantachie, MS (Sec 14)........... Cowanesque Lake, PA ..................................... .... Cuyahoga River, Riverview Rd, OH (Sec 14)...................... Dade County, FL .............................................................. Deleware Coast Protection, DE......................................... Demonstration Erosion Control, MS................................... 1983 1980 1987 1976 1984 1928 1967 1987 1986 1979 1984 1989 1985 1988 1984 1985 1984 1988 1977 1956 1986 1976 1986 1986 1985 1988 1950 1989 1988 1973 1958 1973 1966 1989 1987 1989 1975 1971 1985 1986 1990 1987 (2) 1982 1986 1985 1989 1989 1989 1981 1983 1990 1992 Indefinite4 1989 19883 1987* 2010 1993 1992 1987 1988 1985 1989 1986 1989 1998 1990 1985 1990 1980 Indefinite 1990 Deferred 1989 1987 1986 1995 1997 1989 1994 1989 1994 1989 Indefinite 1990 1990 1990 2032 2021 Indefinite Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Chloride Control Local Protection Floodway and Levees Reservoir Local Protection Streambank Protection National Recreation Area Snagging and Clearing Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Snagging and Clearing Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Dam Safety Reservoir S treambank Protection Streambank Protection Snagging and Clearing Local Protection Local protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Reservoirs and Levee Reservoir, channel improvement Reservoir Local Protection Streambank Protection Water Supply Modification Streambank Protection Shore Protection Local Protection Local Protection 4 Remaining recreation unscheduled pending settlement of lawsuit filed against Edmond, OK for payment of completed recreation work. Public use areas, Stages III-B and III-C, are unscheduled pending resolution of repayments by the sponsor for completed facilities. 3 Completion of Stage I (Truscott facilities) only. Stage II (Ross facilities) indefinate. APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1989 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Devils Lake, ND (Sec 205) ................................................. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake & Channel.................... Dry Creek, Goodlettsville, TN.......................................... Dunbar (Sewage Facilities), WV (Sec 14)........................ East Branch, Cooper River, Pompion Hill Chapel near Huger, SC (Sec 14)........................................... East St. Louis and Vicinity, IL............................................ East St. Louis and Vicnity, IL - Rehabilitation.................... El Dorado Lake, KS ...................................... ...... El Paso, TX ..................................... ............ Elizabeth, NJ ..................................... ........... Elk Creek Lake, OR ...................................... ...... Elkhorn River, West Point, NE (Sec 205)............................ Ellicot Creek, NY ..................................... ........ Elwha Klallam Reservation, Elwha, WA (Sec 205) ........... Emerson, Manitoba-Noyes, MN (Sec 205)....................... Enslava Creek, Mobile, AIL(Sec 205) ................................ Evansville, IN................................. ............ Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA ......................................... Falls Lake, NC.................................... ................ Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY............................... (Remainder) ..................................... .............. Fisher Ferry Road, MS (Sec 205) ..................................... Fountain Creek, Pueblo, CO ............................................ Four Rivers Basin, FL ..................................... ..... Fourche Bayou, Vicinity of Little Rock, AR ..................... Galena Emergency Bank Stabilization, AK........................ Grafton Pumping Station, ND (Sec 14) ............................ Great Bend,KS.............................. ............. Great Falls MT.................................. .......... Greenwood Bendway, Site 3, MS ..................................... Greenwood Bendway, Site 4, MS ..................................... Greenwood Bendway, Site 5, MS ..................................... Gulf Breeze, Santa Rosa Co., FL (Sec 14)........................... Guntersville Lake, Guntersville, AL ................................. Halstead,KS..................................... Hannibal, MO................................... ............ Hills Point Road, Dorchester Co., MD (Sec 14).................. Hintonville Road Bridge, Perry Co., MS (Sec 14)............... Humboldt, TN (Sec 205)........................................ Hurricane Creek , Prentiss Co., MS (Sec 14)....................... Isle ofWight Bay, Ocean City,MD (Sec 14)......................... Joe Pool Lake, TX ..................................................... Kahawainui Stream, Oahu, HI.............................................. Kahoma Stream, Maui, HI ............................................. Kaskaskia Island Drainage & Leeve Dist., IL..................... Kea Creek, Minden, IA (Sec 14).......................................... Lake Chicot Pumping Plant, AR ....................................... Lake Erie State Park, Brocton NY (Sec 14).................. Lake Michigan, Edgewater/Rogers Park, IL...................... Lake Pontchartrain, LA ................................................. Lake Pulaski, Wright County, MN (Sec 205) .................... 1983 1967 1988 1986 1986 1974 1988 1974 1971 1972 1971 1989 1986 1987 1988 1988 1939 1985 1973 1963 1963 1987 1987 1966 1987 1987 1988 1987 1982 1986 1987 1987 1989 1988 1989 1989 1989 1989 1986 1989 1989 1975 1989 1986 1980 1988 1981 1989 1987 1967 1986 1986 1989 1983 Indefinite 1990 1987 1987 1987 1986 1986 1995 1981 1989 1973 Indefinite Indefinite Indefinite 1991 1989 1990 1990 1991 1994 1992 1983 1994 Indefinite Indefinite 1990 1990 1986 Indefinite 1991 1988 1988 1990 1993 1987 1987 1988 1988 1988 1989 1989 1993 1992 1989 1989 1990 1988 1988 1990 1990 1986 1993 1990 1990 1986 1989 1989 19914 1990 1988 Indefinite 1989 1989 Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection S treambank Protection Streambank Protectio Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection S treambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Riverbank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Riverbank Protection Riverbank Protection Riverbank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Shoreline Protection Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Shoreline Protection Shoreline Protection Local Protection Local Protection B-2 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1989 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX ................................... Larose to Golden Meadow, LA......................................... Lead Bayou, MS (Sec 205)............................... .............. Lepua Area, Tutila Island, American Samoa........................ Levisa & Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River & Cumberland River, KY, WV & VA............................. Liberty State Park, Levee and Seawall, NJ (Sec 205)......... Little Blue, River, Adams Co., NE, Overy Bridge (Sec 14)......................................................................... Little Blue River, Adams Co., NE, Pauline Bridge (Sec 14)......................................................................... Little Blue River, Adams Co., NE, Pimpel Bridge (Sec 14) .......................................... ............... Little Blue River Channel, MO ......................................... Little Blue River Lakes, MO............................................... Little Dell Lake, UT.................................... ....... Little Kanawha River, Glenville, WV (Sec 14) .................. Little Red River, Clinton, AR (Sec 205)........................... Little River, Belfast, ME (Sec 14)....................................... Lincoln Park Beach, Seattle, WA......................................... Long Branch Lake, MO .................................... .... Los Coches Creek, San Diego County CA (Sec 205)......... Lower Columbia River Bank Protection, OR and WA....... Lower Heart River, Mandan, ND (Sec 205)..................... Lower San Joaquin River, CA (Snagging & Clearing)....... Madison River, Quake Lake,MT (Sec 14)............................ Magby Creek, Columbus, MS (Sec 205)............. ........... Mankato and N. Mankato, MN ......................................... Manistee, Bar Lake, MI (Sec 14)......................................... Marne Creek, Yankton, SD (Sec 14)................................... Martin Creek, Prentiss Co., MS ........................................ Marysville, MI (Sec 14)................................... ..... Masefau Bay, Tutuila Island, American Samoa................... Mauvaise Terre, IL................................ ......... McGee Creek Drainage and Levee Dist., IL ..................... Medicine Bow River, Elk, MT, WY (Sec 14)................... Merced County Streams, CA .............................................. Middle River at Argyle, MD (Sec 205)............................... Milan, IL ..................................... ............. Mill Creek, OH ................................................................... Minnesota River at Henderson, MN (Sec 205) ................. Mingo Creek, OK.................................... ......... Miss. River Channel Improvements (AR, IL, KY, LA, MI, MO & TN)............................................................. Miss. River Levees.............................................................. Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS, and MO ......... Monongahela River, Granville, WV (Sec 14)................... MLt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA................................ Mudline to Pineville, MS ............................................... Murder Creek, Brewton, AL (Sec 205)............ ........... Muskegon (Filtration Plant), MI (Sec 14)........................... 1987 1972 1982 1989 1981 1987 1986 1986 1986 1975 1978 1985 1986 1985 1988 1988 1973 1986 1961 1987 1985 1988 1989 1971 1989 1986 1986 1989 1989 1985 1979 1985 1985 1985 1980 1981 1988 1988 1928 1928 1948 1986 1986 1984 1986 1989 1988 1993 1992 1988 1991 Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Shoreline Protection Indefinite Local Protection 1988 Shore Protection 1986 1987 1987 1987 1987 1987 1988 1990 1991 1987 1986 1987 1989 1989 1989 1980 Indefinite 1987 1990 Indefinite 1989 1989 1993 1989 1989 1990 1989 1989 1990 1987 1988 1987 1989 1990 1990 1987 1985 1986 1987 Indefinite 1989 1988 1988 1999 1990 1995 (4) (4) 1985 1989 2010 2008 Indefinite 1987 1991 1985 1991 1989 S treambank Protection S treambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Reservoir Reservoirs Streambank Protection Local Protection S treambank Protection Beach Nourishment Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Snagging and Clearing S treambank Protection Snagging and Clearing Local Protection Shoreline Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Shoreline Protection Shoreline Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Reservoirs Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Channel Improvement Main Line Levees Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Shoreline Protection B-3 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1989 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Muskingham River Lakes, OH ........................................ Muskingum River Lakes, OH (Dam Safety Assurance)........................................... New Orleans to Venice, LA ............................................. Newark, OH ..................................... ........... North Branch Chicago River, IL....................................... North Portage Path, Akron, OH (Sec 14)............................. North Raccoon River, Ia State Hwy, 7 Bridge, Buena Vista, IA................................... ....... North River, Co. Route 116, Klein Bridge, Marion co., MO................................... ....... Oil Creek Ice Control Project, Oil City, PA ..................... Osage River, Miller Co., MO, Road HH (Sec 14).............. Otter Creek, Shannon Hills, AR (Sec 205) ....................... Owyhee River, OR (Sec 208) ........................................... Paintsville Lake, KY ...................................... ...... Pajano River, CA................................... ......... Panola-Quitman Item C, MS ............................................ Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lake, NE.......................... Passaic River Basin, NJ and NY (Sec 205)....................... Pearl River, MS ............................................. Pelucia Creek, Item 1, MS ............................................. Pelucia Creek, Item 1A, MS ............................................ Pennypack Creek, Hatboro, PA........................................... Perkins Street Bridge, TN (Sec 14)...................................... Perley Brook, Fort Kent, ME (Sec 14)................................. Perry County L & D Nos. 1, 2, 3, MO.............................. Pettibone Park, LaCrosse, WI (Sec 14)............................. Phoenix, AZ, and Vicinity (including New River) ............. Platte River, North Bend, NE (Sec 205)............................... Platte River, Ginger Cove, NE (Sec 14)............................... Poquessing Creek, Bucks Co., PA .................................... Porter Bayou, MS (Sec 205) ............................................ Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR..................................... Presque Isle Peninusula, PA................................................ Proctor Creek, Atlanta, GA (Sec 205).................................. Pt. Leflore, MS ......................................... ......... Puerco River, Gallup, NM................................. ............ R. D. Bailey Lake, WV .............................................. Raccoon Creek, Baconton, GA (Sec 205)............................ Rapidan River, Orange, VA (Sec 14).................................. Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, NJ, Matawan and Union Beach Sections........................................ Ray Roberts Lake, TX.................................... ...... Redbank & Fancher Creeks, CA....................................... Red Lake River at Gentilly, MN.......................................... Red River Emergency Bank Protection ............................ Red River of the North at Breckenridge, MN (Sec 14)....... Red River of the North at Argusville, ND (Sec 205).......... Reserve Sewage Lagoon, NM (Sec 14) .............................. Rio Grande Floodway, Truth or Consequences, NM........... 1976 1982 1969 1976 1988 1989 1987 1987 1987 1986 1984 1986 1973 1987 1984 1972 1987 1984 1985 1987 1988 1987 1989 1977 1988 1980 1988 1988 1987 1982 1975 1975 1989 1985 1988 1967 1989 1983 1965 1975 1987 1989 1971 1988 1985 1986 1989 1989 1989 1986 1984 1983 1974 1989 1989 1985 1989 1989 1989 1988 1975 1986 1988 1995 2013 1989 1991 1990 1989 1989 1989 1987 1986 1987 1991 1988 1986 1991 1988 1985 1987 1987 1989 1990 1989 1985 1989 1992 1989 1989 1988 1988 1993 1989 1990 1986 1990 1988 1990 1987 Indefinite 1987 1992 1993 1990 Indefinite 1989 1989 1987 1989 1989 1987 1991 Major Rehabilitation Modernization of Dams Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection S treambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection S treambank Protection Local Protection Snagging and Clearing Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Reservoirs Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection S treambank Protection Local Protection S treambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection S treambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Beach Replentishment Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection S treambank Erosion Local Protection Reservoir Reservoir StreambankProtection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection B-4 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1989 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Richmond, VA................................... 1989 Rochester, MN ..................................... 1987 Rockford, IL (Kent Creek)..................................... 1979 Roosevelt Campobello International Park, Lubel, ME........ 1988 Sabana Grande, PR (Sec 205) .............................. ......1.9.8.7. Sacramento River Bank Protection, CA ..............1.9.63.......... Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, CA ...... 1963 Sacramento River Flood Control, CA.............................. 1918 Sacramento River, Major and Minor Tributaries, CA ......19.4.9 Saginaw River, MI ..................................... 1965 San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX...............19.5.7............ Sangamon River, Sewage Treatment Facility Riverton, IL............... ................. 1987 San Lui s Rey River, San Luis Rey River, Buoin, CA........ 1987 San Vincente Arroyo, Silver Spring, NM ..............19.8.8........ Sardis Lake, OK ..................................... 1976 Sauk River, Skagit County, WA (Sec 14).............1.98.8............. Savan Gut, VI (Sec 205) ..................................... 1987 Saxon Harbor, WI (Sec 111)................................... 1989 Saylorville Lake, IA..................................... 1965 Scotts Creek, newberry, SC (Sec 205)............................. 1986 Scottsville, VA (Sec 215)................................ 1986 Sewer Line Protection, Valley, AL (Sec 14)....................... 1985 Sicily Island, LA, Levee .........................19.8.3....................... Silver Creek, Rome, GA (Sec 205).................1.9.89................... Skiatook Lake, OK ..................................... 1974 Smithville Lake, MO............................................. 1974 Soldier River, Ute, IA (Sec 205)...................1.98.8..................... Sope Creek, Marietta, GA........................1.9.8.6..................... South Fork, Boise River, ID (Sec 208) ...............1.9.8.4.......... South Quincy, IL ..................................... 1987 South Racoon River, 8" Water Supply Line, Stuart, IA....... 1987 Southwestern Jefferson County, KY .................1.9.74................ Sowashee Creek, Meridian, MS.....................19.8.8................ Spring Brook Creek, Pittston Township, PA (Sec 14).....1.98.9.. State Road and Ebner coulees, WI...................19.8.8.............. Steele Bayou, MS ..................................... 1966 St. Francis Basin .................................... 1938 Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV .....................1.9.77................... Swan Creek, Taney County, MO (Sec 14)............1.9.8.4........... Sweetwater River, CA......................................... .......1.9.92... Tallahatchie River, Site 1, MS .....................1.98.8.................. Taylors Bayou, TX ......................................................... 1982 Taylorsville Lake, KY .................................... 1974 Telegraph Canyon Creek, Chula Vista, CA (Sec 205)......... 1988 Tennessee River (Mile 650) Downtown Is. Airport, TN .... 1986 Tensas Cocodrie Pumping Plant, LA 11 ..............1.9.8.3............ 5 Project consists of Levee upgrade and enlargement. 6 Durham Prong Diversion local support problem. 1992 1989 1989 1989 1989 1979 1989 1988 1983 1989 1989 1977 1986 1985 1982 1989 1989 1983 (4) 1986 1983 1989 1993 1995 1989 1989 1990 1994 Indefinite 1989 1988 1992 1991 1989 1992 1988 1990 1989 1990 1990 1993 1988 1988 1989 20005 1990 1988 1986 1989 1990 1985 1991 1989 1989 1992 1990 1993 2010 1999 1988 1986 1992 1988 1992 1990 1989 1987 Indefinite 6 Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Shoreline Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Reservoir S treambank Protection Local Protection Shoreline Mitigation Reservoir Local Protection Local Protection Sewer Line Protection Local Protection Local Protection Reservoir Reservoir Streambank Protection Local Protection Snagging and Clearing Local Protection Streanbank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Local protection Local Protection Tributary levees & channels Reservoir Streambank Protection Local Protection Riverbank Protection Local Protection Reservoir Local Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection B-5 APPENDIX B (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1989 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Tensas Cocodrie, LA, Levee (5)........................................ Texas City and Vicinity, TX (1958 authorization) ............. Tombigbee River Tributaries, AL and MS ....................... Tunkhannock Creek, Tunkhannock Creek, PA (Sec 14)..... Tynes Branch, Houston School Road Bridge, Itawamba Co., MS ........................................................................ Upper Scioto River, Marion County, OH (Sec 205)........... Upper Yazoo Projects, MS............................................. U.S. Hwy. 11 Bridge, Fosters, AL (Sec 14)........................ U.S. Hwy. 82 Bridge, Columbus, MS (Sec 14) .................. U.S. Interstate 59 Bridges, Fosters, AL (Sec 14)................ Valley Creek, AL (Sec 14).................................................. Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX.................................... Walnut Creek, CA .................................... ....... Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN (Sec 14)..... Waterman Creek, O'Brien County, IA (Sec 205)................. Westerly Creek, Colorado............................... ...... West Fork, Des Moines River, Petersburg Township Bridge 32527, Jackson Co., MN................................... West Little Pine Creek, Etna, PA...................................... West Tennessee Tributaries ........................................... Wheeler Creek, Gainesville, TX (Sec 205)......................... Wharton's Bend Road, Coosa River,AL (Sec 14)................ White River, Batesville, AR (Sec 14) ................................. White River, Jacksonport, AR (Sec 205).......................... White River, Newport, AR (Sec 14).................................... White River, St. Paul, AR (Sec 208).................................... Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA..................................... Wilamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR...................... Winona, MN................................... ............ Wolf River at 2nd Street, Memphis, TN (Sec 14)................ Wood River Drainage and Levee District, IL ................... Wyoming Valley, PA................................... ...... Yatesville Lake, KY.................... ........ 1974 1962 1965 1989 1986 1986 1976 1985 1985 1985 1985 1968 1964 1986 1988 1988 1986 1986 1960 1983 1989 1984 1984 1988 1988 1980 1938 1979 1988 1953 1983 1964 1987 1986 1986 1986 1986 1989 1988 1987 (4) 1094 1986 1986 1989 1985 1989 1962 1976 19957 1987 Indefinite 1990 1987 1987 2013 1986 1986 1987 1986 1988 1900 1987 1989 1991 1989 1987 Indefinite 1984 1990 1986 1986 1989 1990 Indefinite Indefinite 1988 1990 1986 1986 1992 Local Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Bridge Protection Local Protection Local Protection S treambank Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Sewerline Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Streambank Protection Local Protection S treambank Protection Local Protection Tributary Channels Local Protection S treambank Protection Local Protection Local Protection Streambank Protection Snagging and Clearing Local Protection Local Protection Local Protectin Local Protection Local Protection Rehabilitation of levee system Reservoir B-6 7 Item 2A temporarily deferred. APPENDIX C NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Miles Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Normal length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth in Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Typel (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL Claiborne Lock & Dam Millers Perry lock and Dam Jones Bluff Lock and Dam Aoleghny River, PA and NY Lock and Dam No. 2 Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 5 Lock and Dam No. 6 Lock and Dam No. 7 Lock and Dam No. 8 Lock and Dam No. 9 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, GA, AL and FL Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam George W. Andrews Lock and Dam Walter F. George Lock and Dam Atlantic Intracoastal Wastierway Albemarle and Chesapeake Canal Route: Great Bridge Lock Dismal Swamp Canal Route: Deep Creek Lock South Mills Lock Bayou Teche, LA Berwick Lock Keytoane Lock Black Rock Chantel and Tonawonda Harbor, NY Black Rock Lock Black Warrior, Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL Coffeeville (Jackson) Lock and Dam Demopolis Lock and Dam Armstad I. Selden Lock and Dam WinmB. acon Oliver Lock andDam Holt Lock and Dam John Hilis Bankhead Lock and Dam (New Lock) Canaveral Harbor, FL Canaverl Lock Cape Pear River, NC Lock and Dam No. 1 Lock and Dam No. 2 William O. Huske Lock and Dam Central and Southmrn Florida S-61 Lock S-65 Lock S-65A Lock S-65B Lock S-65CLock 81.82 Qaibone, AL 142.32 Camden, AL 254.42 Benton, AL 6.7 Aspinwall, PA 14.5 Cheswick, PA 24.2 Natrona, PA 30.4 Freeport, PA 36.3 Cinton, PA 45.7 Kittanning, PA 52.6 Templeton, PA 62.2 Rimer, PA 107.64 Chattahoochoe, FL 182.85 Columbia, GA 182.85 Port Gaines, GA 11.56 GOat Bridge, VA 10.66 Deep Crk, VA 33.26 South Mills, NC 1.53 Berwick, LA 72.53 New Iberia, LA 0.0 Buffalo, NY 116.610 Coffeeville, AL 213.210 Demopolis, AL 261.110 Eutaw, AL 338.110 Tuscaloosa, AL 347.010 Holt, AL 365.1 Adger, AL 2.7 Cocoa, FL 67.0 Kings Bluff, NC 40 99.0 Browns Landing, NC 40 123.0 Tolars Landing, NC 40 0.0 St. Cloud, FL 56.0 Froatproof, FL 46.0 Avon Park, FL 32.0 Scbring, FL 25.0 Sebring, FL 30 30 30 30 30 84 600 30 16 13 Movable 3,1603 1973 84 600 45 16 13 Movable 9,9003 1969 84 600 45 16 13 Movable 14,9623 1974 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 11 13 10 12 12 13 18 22 11 12 9 10 11 11 14 11 12 Fixed 11 Fixed 10 Pixed 11 Fixed 11 Fixed 10 Fixed 10 Fixed 11 Fixed 1,393 193420 1,436 19342 876 1927 780 1927 1,140 1928 916 1930 984 1931 950 1938 60.5 9 200 103.1 9 200 88.0 9 200 7.8 9 9.7 9 6.2 9 5.9 9 9.4 9 6.9 9 9.6 9 9.8 9 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 82 450 33 14 14 Movable 5,924 1957 46.7 6 100 82 450 25 19 13 Movable 620 1963 28.5 6 100 82 450 88 18 13 Movable 13,371 1963 85.0 6 100 72 530 3 167 16 7 None 52 300 12 127 52 300 12 127 45 307 79 36 162 9 97 9 12 7 None 127 None 97 None 8 Fixed 68 625 5 21.6 21.6 None 1932 12 90 1940 6 50 1941 6 1950 175 1913 50 8 80 34.5 6 80 1914 7.1 21 200 110 600 33 13 13 Movable 1,185 1965 96.6 9 200 110 600 40 13 13 Fixed 1,485 1962 47.9 9 200 110 600 22 13 13 Movable 1,832 1962 77.0 9 200 95 460 28 12 12 Fixed 700 1940 8.9 9 200 110 600 64 19 13 Movable 1,138 1969 18.1 9 200 110 600 68 13 13 Fixed 1,170 1975 42.7 9 200 90 600 14 14 None 200 11 9 9 Fixed 200 9 12 12 Fixed 300 90 90 90 90 90 9 9 Fixed 6 Nane 6 None 6 Namc 6 None 6 None 1965 12 125 275 1915 32.0 8 100 229 1917 24.0 8 100 220 1935 20.0 8 100 1963 1964 1967 1965 1965 8 28.0 3 10.0 3 14.0 3 7.0 3 20 30 30 30 30 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 Locks Dams Authorized Chansel Miles Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Normal Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth in Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Type 1 (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Central and Southern Florida (continued) S-65D Lock S-65B Lock S-308B S-310 Chicago Harbor, IL Chicago Lock Columbia River, OR and WA Bonaeville Lock and Dam The Dales Lock and Dam John Day Lock and Dam McNary Lock and Dam Cros-Florida Barge Canal Inglia Lock, Dam and Spillway Bureka Lock and Dam Harry H. Buckman Lock Cumberland River, KY and TN Barkley Dam Cheatham Lock and Dam Old Hickory Lock and Dam Cordell Hull Dam and Reservoir Fox River, WI DePee Lock DePre Dam Little Kaukauna Lock Little Kaukauna Dam Rapide Crochn Lock Rapids Croche Dam Kaukauna Fifth Lock Kaukauna Fourth Lock Kaukauna Third Lock Kaukauna Second Lock Kaukaunm First Lock Kaukauna Dam Kaukauna Guard Lock Little Chute canombineLdo ck Lower Upper Little Chute Second Lock Little Chute First (Guard) Lock Little Chute Dam Cedars Lock Cedars Dam Appleton Fourth Lock Appleton Lower Dam Appleton Third Lock Appleton Second Lock Appleton FPirsLt ock Appleton Upper Dam Menash Lock Menaha Dam Freshwater Bayou, LA Freshwater Bayou Lock Gaeon and Barren Rivers, KY Geen River. Lock and Dam No. 1 Lock and Dam No. 2 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Inner Harbor Navigation Chamnel Lock Harvey Lock 16.0 12.0 38.7 0.0 Oktechobee, FL Okeechobee, FL Port Mayaca, FL Gewistm, FL 0.0 Chicago, IL 146.0 Bonneville, OR 190.0 The Dalles, OR 215.0 Rufus, OR 292.0 Umatilla, OR 168.611 Inglis, FL 20.0 Sparr, FL 90.4 Palatka, FL 30 30 56 50 90 90 400 60 80 600 76 86 86 86 84 84 84 30.6 Kuttawa, KY 110 148.7 Ashland City, TN 110 216.2 Old Hickory, TN 84 313.5 Carthage, TN 84 7.1 7.2 13.0 13.1 19.2 19.3 22.8 23.1 23.3 23.4 23.6 24.0 24.0 25.4 25.4 26.4 26.5 26.6 27.3 27.4 30.7 30.9 31.3 31.6 31.9 32.2 37.8 37.8 19.08 DePe, WI DePe, WI DePere, WI DePeze, WI Wrightstown, WI Wrightatown, WI Kaukauna, WI Kaukauna, WI Kaukauna, WI Kaukauna, WI Kaukauna, WI Kaukauna, WI Kaukauna, WI Little Chute, WI Little Chute, WI Little Chute, WI Little Chute, WI Little Chute, WI Little Chute, WI Little Chute, WI Appleton, WI Appleton, WI Appleton, WI Appleton, WI Appleton, WI Appleton, WI Menasha, WI Menasha, WI Intracoastal City, LA 9.1 Spottville, KY 63.1 Calhoun, KY 92.612 98.312 New Orleans, LA Harvey, LA 36 36 36 36 37 31 35 35 40 35 36 35 35 35 35 35 35 34 34 84 500 675 675 675 600 600 600 800 800 400 65 88 110 75 28 20 20 57 26 60 6 6 14 13 6 6 14 13 None None Movable Movable 23 23 None 32 15 15 15 18 14 14 11 14 14 24 15 15 20 15 15 13 12 10 Movable Movable Movable Movable 1964 1964 1977 1980 9.0 3 4.0 3 5.0 8 .5 6 30 30 100 50 1939 .15 21 470 2,680 1938 8,735 1957 5,900 1968 7,365 1953 Movable 5,100 1968 Movable 3,830 1971 None 1972 Movable 9,959 1964 Movable 801 1959 Movable 3,605 1957 47.5 27 25,0 14 76.0 14 64.0 14 300 250 250 250 11.0 12 150 12 150 21.2 12 150 118.1 9 150 67.5 9 150 97.3 9 150 400 59 14 13 Movable 1,138 1973 71.9 9 150 146 146 146 144 144 144 144 144 147 144 144 144 144 144 145 145 144 600 9 7 8 9 10 10 10 11 9 11 11 14 7 10 8 9 10 10 8 10 8 9 7 7 7 6 7 6 8 8 12 10 10 9 66 66 7 7 8 8 6 9 7 6 7 6 7 8 16 16 None 84 600 12 12 11 Fixed 84 600 14 15 12 Fixed 75 640 99 75 425 109 317 12 7 317 12 7 1936 Movable 986 1929 1938 Movable 588 1926 1934 Movable 461 1930 1898 1879 1879 1903 1883 Movable 603 1931 1891 1879 1879 1881 1904 Movable 562 1932 1888 Movable 654 1933 1907 Movable 549 1934 1900 1901 1884 Movable 691 1940 1899 Movable 401 1937 5.9 6 6.2 6 3.6 6 0.3 6 0.2 6 0.1 6 0.2 6 0.4 6 1.4 6 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 6 100 6 100 1.0 6 100 0.7 6 3.4 6 0.6 6 0.3 6 0.3 6 5.1 6 28.3 6 401 1968 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 12 125 482 1956 54.0 9 200 519 1956 45.4 9 200 None None 1923 1935 12 150 12 125 C-2 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Miles Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Conmmunity of Length for Normal Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth in Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Typol (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (continued) Algiers Lock Bayou Bouef Lock Bayou Sorrel Lock Part Allen Lock Calcasieu Lock Brazos River Floodgates Colorado River Bast Lock West Lock Hudson River, NY Troy Lock and Dam Illinois Waterway, IL LaGrange Lock and Dam Peoria Lock and Dam Starved Rock Lock and Dam Marseilles Lock Marseilles Dam DresdenI sland Lock and Dam Brandon Road Lock and Dam Lockpt Lock Thomas J. O'Brien Lock and Dam Inland Route, MI Crooked River Lock and Weir Kanawha River, WV Winfield Lock and Dam Marnwt Lock and Dam London Lock and Damrn Kaskaskia River, IL Kaskaskia Lock and Dam Kentucky River, KY Lock and Dam No. 1 Lock and Dam No. 2 Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 5 Lock and Dam No. 62 Lock and Dam No. 724 Lock andDam No. 8 Lock and Dam No. 9 2 4 Lock and Dam No. 10 Lock and Dam No. 11 Lock and Dam No. 12 Lock and Dam No. 13 Lock and Dam No. 142 Lake Washington Ship Canal Kiram M. Chittenden Lock Large Lock Small Lock McCellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, AR and OK Norell Lock and Dam Wilbur D. Mills, Lock No. 2 Dam No. 2 ss.o 12 88.012 93.3 131.013 228.512 238513 404.113 Algiers, LA Marpn City, LA Plaquemine, LA Port Allen, LA Leake Charles, LA Freeport, TX 75 75 56 84 75 75 797 1,158 800 1,198 1,205 109 69 109 45 69 137 137 14 137 137 157 444.8 MatagordaT,X 75 1,200 59 444.8 Matagorda,TX 75 1,200 59 153.8 Troy, NY 13 13 14 14 13 15 15 15? Noane None NNaannao Nane None None None None 16 16 12 12 16 12 1956 1956 1952 1961 1950 1943 1954 1954 45 493 17 16 13 Fixed 1,495 1917 150 150 125 125 200 125 12 125 12 125 2.2 14 200 80.2 Beardstown, IL 110 600 10 16 13 Movable 1,066 1939 77.5 9 300 157.7 Peoria, IL 110 600 11 16 12 Movable 536 1939 73.3 9 300 231.0 Uitca, IL 244.6 Marseilles, IL 247.0 Marseilles, IL 271.5 Morris, IL 286.0 Joliet, IL 291.1 LockportIL, 326.5 Chicago, IL 30.0 Alansn, MI 31.1 67.8 82.8 Winfield, WV Mamet. WV London, WV 110 600 19 17 14 Movable 1,280 1933 13.6 9 110 600 24 19 14 1933 26.9 9 Movable 819 1933 24.6 300 300 110 600 22 17 12 Movable 1,616 1933 14.5 9 300 110 600 34 18 14 Movable 2,373 1933 110 600 40 12 15 None 1933 110 1,000 2 14 14 Movable 257 1960 17.8 66 1 6.9 7.9 SSP Weir 83 1967 56 56 56 360 360 360 28 24 24 18 18 18 12 12 12 Movable 834 1937 Movable 707 1934 Movable 707 1934 5.1 9 300 9 300 6.9 9 300 4.0 5 30 36.7 9 300 15.0 9 300 7.8 9 300 .8 Ellis Grove, IL 84 600 32 18 11 Movable 130 1973 35.0 9 225 4.0 31.0 42.0 65.0 82.2 96.2 117.0 139.9 157.5 176.4 201.0 220.9 239.9 249.0 Carrlton, KY Lockport, KY Gest, KY Frankfort, KY Tyrone, KY High Bridge, KY High BridgeK,Y Camp Nelson, KY Valley View, KY Ford, KY Irvine, KY Raverma, KY Willow, KY Heidelberg, KY 1.3 Seattle, WA 13 Seattle, WA 10.3 13.3 40.5 Arkansas Post, AR Arkansas Post. AR Arkansas Post, AR 38 38 38 38 38 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 52 145 145 145 145 145 147 147 146 148 148 148 148 148 148 8 14 13 13 15 14 15 19 17 17 18 17 18 17 8 8 96 10 9 9 11 11 9 10 10 10 9 15 6 7 6 6 6 7 6 7 6 6 6 6 6 80 760 26 33.5 29 28 123 26 16 16 110 110 Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed 424 1839 400 1939 465 1844 534 1844 556 1844 413 1891 350 1897 257 1900 362 1907 472 1907 208 1906 240 1910 248 1915 248 1917 Movable 235 1916 600 30 16 15 Fixed *4,577 1967 600 20 18 14 1967 Movable *42,073 1968 27.0 6 11.0 6 23.0 6 17.2 6 14.0 6 20.8 6 22.9 6 17.6 6 18.9 6 24.6 6 19.9 6 19.0 6 9.1 6 9.6 6 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 17.0 34 150 3.0 9 250 36.9 9 250 C-3 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 Locks Dams Authoried Chamnnel Miles Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Normal Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth in Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Typel (fet) Opened (miles) (feet) (fet) McQellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, AAR and IK (continued) Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 5 David D. Terry Lock and Dam Murray Lock and Dam Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam Lock and Damn No. 9 Dardanelle Lock and Dam Ozark-Jetta Taylor Lock* and Dam Lock and DamnN o. 13 W. D. Mayo Lock and Damn Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir Webbers Falls Lock and Dam Chouteau Lock and Dam Newt Graham Lock and Dam Mississippi River Between Ohio and Missouri Rivers Lock and Dam No. 27 Mississippi River Between Missouri River and Minneapolis MN Locak and Dam No. 26 Lock and Dam No. 25 Lock and Dam No. 24 Lock and Dam No. 22 Lock and Dam No. 21 Lock and Dam No. 20 Lock and Dam No. 19 Lock and Dam No. 18 Lock and Dam No. 17 Lock and Dam No. 16 Lock and Dam No. 15 Lock and Dam No. 14 Lock and Dam No. 13 Lock and Dam No. 12 Lock and Dam No. 11 Lock and Dam No. 10 Lock and Dam No. 9 Lock and Dam No. 8 Lock and Dam No. 7 Lock and Dam No. 6 Lock and Dam No. SA Lock and Dam No. 5 Lock and Dam No. 4 Lock and Dam No. 3 Lock and Dam No. 2 Lock and Dam No. 1 St. Anthony Falls Lower Lock and Dam Upper Lock and Dam 50.2 Grady, AR 66.0 Pine Bluff, AR 863 Redfield, AR 108.1 Little Rock, AR 125.4 Little Rock, AR 155.9 Conway, AR 176.9 Morriltom, AR 205.5 Russellville, AR 256.8 Ozark, AR 292.8 Port Smith, AR 319.6 Port Smith, AR 336.2 SSallisawOK 366.6 Webbers Palls, OK 4014A Muskogee, OK 4421.7 Inola. OK 185.114 Granite City, IL 202.915 Alton, IL 241.4 1 5 Cap Au Gris, MO 273.415 Qarksville, MO 301.215 Saverton, MO 324.915 Quincy, IL 343.215 Canton, MO 364.215 Keokuk,IA 410.515 Burlington, IA 437.115 New Boston, IL 457.215 Muscatine, IA 482.915 Rock Island, IL 493.115 IeClaize, IA 493315 LeCIaire, IA 522.515 5inton, IA 556.715 Bellevue, IA 583.015 Dubuque, IA 615.115 Guttenberg, IA 647.915 Lynxville, IA 679.215 Genoa, WI 702.515 Dresbach, MN 714315 Trempealeau, WI 728.515 Winona, MN 738.115 Minneiska, MN 752.815 Alma, WI 796.915 Red Wing, MN 815.215 Hastings, MN 847.615 Minneapolis,, MN St. Paul 853315 Minneapolis, MN 853.915 Minneapolis, MN 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 600 20 18 600 14 18 600 17 18 14 Movable *6,1110 14 Movable 5,745 1968 14 Movable *7,455 1968 600 18 18 14 Movable *8,890 1968 600 18 18 14 Movable (3,930 1969 600 16 18 600 19 18 600 54 18 600 34 18 600 20 18 600 20 14 14 Movable *1,580 1969 14 Movabe *1,505 1969 14 Movable **1,815 1969 15 Movable *12,480 1969 14 Movable *4,725 1969 15 Movable 7,400 1970 110 600 48 18 14 Movable 7,230 1970 110 600 30 19 110 600 21 15 16 Movable 4,370 1970 14 Movable 11,690 1970 110 600 21 15 14 Movable 11,630 1970 1968 15.8 9 20.3 9 250 21.8 9 250 17.3 9 250 30.5 9 250 21.0 9 250 28.6 9 250 51.3 9 250 36.0 9 250 26.8 9 250 16.6 9 250 30.4 9 250 34.8 9 250 20.2 9 150 23.7 9 150 110 1,200 21 16 15 Fixed 3,240 1953 17.8 9 200 110 600 24 19 360 24 16 110 600 15 19 110 600 15 19 110 600 10 18 110 600 10 17 110 600 10 15 110 1,200 38 15 110 600 10 17 100 600 8 16 110 600 9 17 110 600 16 27 110 360 16 27 80 320 11 18 110 600 11 21 110 600 11 19 110 600 9 17 110 600 11 19 110 600 8 15 110 600 9 16 110 600 11 22 110 600 8 18 110 600 7 17 110 600 6 18 110 600 9 18 110 600 7 17 110 600 8 17 110 600 12 22 500 12 16 56 400 38 13 56 400 38 13 56 56 10 Movable 1,725 1938 10 12 Movable 1,296 1939 12 Movable 4,280 1940 14 Movable 1,024 1938 12 Movable 1,066 1938 12 Movable 2,144 1936 13 Fixed 4,434 1913 14 Movable 1.350 1937 13 Movable 921 1939 12 Movable 1,099 1937 11 Movable 1,203 1934 11 11 1922 14 Movable 1,343 1939 13 Movable 1,066 1939 13 Movable 849 1938 13 Movable 1,278 1937 12 Movable 763 1937 13 Movable 811 1937 14 Movable 935 1937 12 Movable 940 1937 13 Movable 893 1936 13 Movable 682 1936 12 Movable 1,619 1935 13 Movable 1,367 1935 14 Movable 365 1938 13 Movable 822 1930 15 1948 8 Fixed 574 1932 10 1917 400 25 14 10 Movable 188 1956 400 49 16 14 Fixed 3,584 1963 38.5 9 200 32.0 9 200 27.8 9 200 23.7 9 NS 18.3 9 NS 21.0 9 NS 46.3 9 NS 26.6 9 NS 20.1 9 NS 25.7 9 NS 10.4 9 NS 29.2 9 NS 34.2 9 NS 26.3 9 NS 32.1 9 NS 32.8 9 NS 31.3 9 NS 23.3 9 NS 11.8 9 NS 14.2 9 NS 9.6 9 NS 14.7 9 NS 44.1 9 NS 18.3 9 NS 32.4 9 NS 5.7 9 NS 0.6 9 100 3.8 9 100 C-4 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Miles Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Canurnity of Length for Narmal Length Year Length Depth Width Poject Mouth in Vkicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Type1 (feet) Opened (miles) (foeet) (eeOt) Mosnoala River, PA and WV Locks and Dam No. 2 Locks and DamNo. 3 Locks and Dam No. 4 Maxwell LIcks and Dam Locks and Dam No. 7 Locks and Dam No. 8 Morgantown Lock and Dam Hildebrand Lock and Dam Opekisks Lock and Dam Ohio River Locks and Dam No. 53 Locks and Dam No. 52 Smithland Locks and Dam Uniontown Locks and Dam Newburgh Locks and Dam Camelta Locks and Dam McAlpine Locks and Dam Markland Locks and Dam Captain Anthony Meldabl Locks and Dam Oreemnp Locks and Dam Gallipolis Locks and Dam Racine Locks andDam Belleville Locks and Dam Willow Island Locks and Dam Hannibal Locks and Dam Pike Iland Locks and Dam New Cumberland Locks and Dam Motgacnry Island Locks and Dam DashfildLso cks and Dam Emswoath Locks and Dam Okechoboo Waterway, FL St. Lucle Lock and Dam Moore Haven Lock Orta Lock and Dam W. P. Pranklin Lock and Coerol Stmructre Old River, LA Old River Lock 11.2 Braddock, PA 23.8 Blisabeth, PA 41.5 Mmmsan, PA 61.2 Maxwell, PA 85.0 Oeensbaro, PA 90.8 Pbit Marion, PA 102.0 Margntown, WV 108.0 Morantown, WV 115.4 Margantown, WV 184 Mound City, IL 42.1 Brockport, L 353 Smithland, KY 135.0 Uniontown, KY 204.9 Newbargh, IN 2603 Cannelto, IN 374.2 Louisville, KY 4495 Markland, IN 544.8 Chilo, OH 640.0 GOeenup, KY 701.8 Hogan, WV 743.5 Ltat Falls, OH 777.1 Rodsville, OH 8193 Waverly, WV 854.6 New Martinsvilo ,WV 896.7 Warwood, WV 926.6 Stratton, OH 9493 Industry, PA 967.7 Olenwillard, PA 974.8 Emswcrth, PA 15.1 Stuat, FL 78.0 Moore Havn, PL 93.6 LaBell, PFL 121A PoFtMyers,FL 304.0 Simnmsport, LA 56 110 56 56 56 56 84 84 56 56 84 84 84 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 56 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 56 110 56 110 56 50 50 50 56 360 9 720 9 360 8 720 8 360 17 720 17 720 20 720 20 360 15 360 19 600 17 600 21 600 22 600 12 1,200 12 600 12 1,200 12 1,200 22 1,200 22 1,200 22 600 22 1,200 16 600 16 1,200 25 600 25 1,200 37 600 37 360 37 1,200 35 600 35 1,200 30 600 30 1,200 30 600 30 600 23 360 23 1,200 22 600 22 1,200 22 600 22 1,200 20 600 20 1,200 21 600 21 1,200 21 600 21 1,o00 21 600 21 600 18 360 18 600 10 360 10 600 18 360 18 250 13 250 2 250 11 400 3 16 16 12 12 20 20 21 21 11 15 18 14 18 15 15 15 15 34 34 34 34 32 32 38 38 49 19 19 50 50 45 45 45 45 18 18 37 37 37 37 35 35 38 38 17 17 17 17 16 16 13 13 17 16 14 10 12 13 16 Fixed 748 1951 16 195321 12 FPxed 670 1907 12 19071 11 Movable 535 1932 11 193221 15 Movable 460 1964 15 1964 10 Fixed 610 192521 10 Movable 560 192521 / 2 2 15 Movable 410 1950 15 Movable 530 1959 14 Movable366 1964 7.0 10 Movable 3.978 1929 10 Temporary Lock 1980 11 Movable 3,073 1928 11 Temporary Lock 1969 12 Movable 3,560 1980 12 12 Movable 3,516 1975 12 16 Movable 2,272 1975 16 13 Movable 1,965 1972 13 12 Movable 8,627 1961 11 1921 11 1930 15 Movable 1,395 1963 15 1963 15 Movable 1,756 1962 15 1962 15 Movable 1,287 1962 15 15 Movable 1,132 1937 15 15 Movable 1,202 1970 15 15 Movablel,206 1969 36.4 15 15 Movable 1,128 1973 15 17 Movable 1,098 1972 17 18 Movable 1.306 1965 18 15 Movable 1.315 1961 15 15 Movable 1379 1936 15 18 Fixed 1,585 1929 18 13 Movable 1.717 1921 13 12 Movable 170 1941 11 Noas 1953 11 Movable 104 1937 - Movable 1,150 1965 75 1.200 35 11 11 Nae 12.6 9 300 17.7 9 300 19.7 9 300 23.8 9 300 5.8 9 300 11.2 9 300 6.0 9 300 7.4 9 300 9 300 23.7 9 300 35.8 9 300 99.7 9 300 69.9 9 300 55.4 9 300 116.3 9 400 75.3 9 300 95.3 9 300 9 300 95,2 9 300 61.8 9 300 41.7 9 300 33.6 9 300 9 300 35.3 9 1,000 36.0 9 300 29.9 9 300 . 22.7 9 300 18.4 9 300 7.1 9 300 6.2 9 300 15.1 8 80 15.6 8 90 15.6 8 90 7.9 8 90 1963 12 125 C-5 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Miles Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Normal Length Year Length Depth Width Project Mouth in Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Type1 l (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Ouchita and Black Rivers, AR & LA Jonesville Lock and Dam (Black River) Columbia Lock and Dam (Ouachita River) Calion Lock (Ouachita River) Felsenthal Lock (Ouachita River) lParl River, MS and LA Lock 1 Lock 2 Lock 3 Red River Watrway Lock 1 Sacranento River, CA Barge Canal Lock 25.0 Jonesville, LA 117.2 Columbia, LA 281.7 226.8 29.417 Iarl River, LA 40.717 Bush, LA 43.917 Sun, LA 43.8 42.8 West Sacramento, 86 CA 84 600 30 18 14 Movable 450 1972 84 600 18 18 13 Fixed 92.2 9 100 400 1972 106.2 9 100 84 600 12 18 13 Movable 350 1984 84 600 13 18 13 Movable 350 1984 65 65 65 310 26.7 310 15 310 11 10 10 10 10 None 10 None 10 None 84 685 38 22 13 Fixed 600 13 13 None 1951 1951 1951 50.3 9 100 55.2 9 100 11.1 7 80 3.2 7 80 13.2 7 80 550 1984 44.2 9 200 1961 1.5 13 120 Snake River, WA Ice Harbor Lock and Dam Little Goose Lock and Dam Lower Granite Lock and Dam Lower Monumental Lock and Dam St. Mary's River, MI South Canal: MacArthur Lock Poe Lock North Canal: Davis Lock Sabin Lock SavannahG, A New SavannahB luff Lock and Dam Tennessee River, TN, AL, MS, and KY18 Kentucky Lock and Dam Pickwick Landing Lock and Dam Auxiliary Lock Main Lock Waterway Connecting Tombigbee andT ennessee Rivers, AL and MS Gainesville Lock and Dam Aliceville Lock and Dam Columbus Lock and Dam Aberdeen Lock and Dam Lock A and Spillway Lock B and Spillway Lock C and Spillway Lock D and Spillway Lock B and Spillway Bay SpringsL ock andD am Wilson Lock and Dam Main Lock Auxiliary Lock GeneraJl oe Wheeler Lock and Dam Main Lock Auxiliary Lock 920 Pasco, WA 703 Starbuck, WA 1073 Pomeroy, WA 41.6 Kahlotus, WA 86 86 86 86 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, 80 MI 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, 110 MI 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, 80 MI 47.0 Sault Ste. Marie, 80 MI 187.2 Augusta, GA 56 22.4 Gilbertsville, KY 110 206.7 Hamburg, TN 110 206.7 Hamburg, TN 110 49.1 Gainesville, AL 110 89.8 Aliceville, AL 110 117.6 Columbus, MS 110 140.4 Aberdeen, MS 110 154.1 Amory, MS 110 1593 Smithville, AL 110 174.0 Pulton, MS 110 181.4 Fulton, MS 110 189.7 Belmont, MS 110 194.9 Tupelo, MS 110 259.4 PlorenceA, L 110 259.4 Florence, AL 60 274.9 Plorence, AL 110 274.9 Rorence, AL 60 675 89 675 93 675 93 675 94 15 15 15 15 800 22 31 1,200 22 32 1,350 22 24 1,350 22 24 15 Movable 1961 14 15 Movable 1970 14 15 Movable 1975 14 15 Movable 1969 14 31 Nne 32 None 23 None 23 None 1943 1968 1914 1919 360 15 14 12 Movable 360 1936 600 56 11 13 Taintcr 7,976 1944 600 55 10 13 Bulkhead 7,385 1937 1,000 55 10 13 Bulkhead 7,385 1984 600 36 600 27 600 27 600 27 600 30 600 25 600 25 600 30 600 30 600 84 15 15 15 15 15 18 18 18 18 18 15 Movable 15,460 1978 15 Movable 14,790 1979 15 Movable 10,040 1981 15 Movable 10,640 1984 15 Movable - 1985 18 Movable -- 1985 18 Movable - 1985 18 Movable - 1985 18 Movable - 1985 18 None 10,640 1985 600 94 13 13 Bulkhead 3,728 1959 292 94 11 11 Bulkhead 3,728 1927 600 48 13 13 Bulkhead 5,738 1963 400 48 15 13 Bulkhead 5,738 1962 250 250 250 250 27 16.2 9 90 184.3 9 300 52.7 9 300 52.7 9 300 49.1 9 300 40.7 9 300 27.8 9 300 22.8 9 300 13.7 9 300 14.7 9 300 7.4 9 300 8.3 9 300 5.2 9 300 64.5 9 300 15.5 9 300 15.5 9 300 74.1 9 300 74.1 9 300 C-6 APPENDIX C (Continued) NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 Locks Dams Authorized Channel Miles Width Available Lift at Depth on Sills Above Community of Length for Normal Length Year Length Depth Width Project Month a Vicinity Chamber Width Pool Level Upper Lower Typel (feet) Opened (miles) (feet) (feet) Waterway Connecting Tambighbee and Tennessee Rivers, AL and MS (continued) Guriterville Lock and Dam Main Lock Auxliary Lock Nickajack Lock and Dam Chickamaugsa Lock and Dam Watts Bar Lock and Dam Port Loudon Lock and Dam Melton Hill Lock and Dam (Cinch River) Willamette River at Willamutte Falls, OR Lock No. 1 Lock No. 2 Lock No. 3 Lock No. 4 Guard Lock 349.0 Gunsmville, AL 349.0 Guntersville, AL 424.7 Ohttanooa, TN 471.0 Catanooga, TN 529.9 Bweederon. TN 6023 Lenoir City, TN 23.1 Kingston,TN 600 39 13 400 39 13 600 39 13 360 49 10 360 58 12 360 72 12 75 400 54 13 26.0 Oregon City, OR 40 210 20 26.0 Oregon City, OR 40 210 10 26.0 Oregon City, OR 40 210 10 26.0 Oregon City, OR 40 210 10 26.4 Oregon City, OR 40 210 10 13 Tainter 3,837 1965 12 Taintor 3,837 1939 11 Tainter 3,763 1967 14 Taintnr 5,654 1940 12 Tainer 2,646 1942 12 Tairter 3,687 1943 13 Tainter 1,072 1963 8 None 8 None 8 None 8 None 8 None 1872 1872 1872 1872 1872 75.7 9 300 75.7 9 300 46.3 9 300 58.9 9 300 72.4 9 300 49.8 9 300 38.2 9 30019 6 150 .4 23.6 6 NS 1 Fixed; crest without gates or other facility to control streamflow. Movable; includes any type of crest gates, tainter gates, wickets, or others to control streamflow. 2Above mouth of Mobile River. 3 includes length of earth dikes. 4 From mouth of Apalachicola River. 5 From mouth of Chattahoochee River. 6 Above Norfolk, VA. 7 With reference to mean low water, or low mean Gulf as case may be. 8 From Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. 9 Average high and low water conditions, lift varying widely, depending on tides and river stages. 10From foot of Government Street, Mobile, AL. 1 1 From mouth of St. Johns River. 12Above Head of Passes. From New Orleans, LA. 1 4 Salt water barrier in down position. Will clear 15-foot vessels in normal position. 1 5 Above the Ohio River. 1 6 Channel completed to depth of 6.5 feet. 17From mouth of West Pearl River. 18Temesse River locks operated by the Corps, dams operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority. 1 9 300-foot width from lock to mouth of Clinch River and 175-foot width upstream from lock to Clinton, TN. 2 0 Dates shown represent replacement structures. 21Dates shown represent reconstruction for locks and dams Nos. 2.8 inclusive. Da was rebuilt in 1959. Old 110 X 358 lock replaced in 1957. Inoperable, caretaker status September 7,1982. Inoperable, caretaker status October 1, 1981. * Includes length of left and right embankments ** Includes length of left embankment C-7 APPENDIX D NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1989 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Agat Small Boat Harbor, Guam (Sec 107) ................... AIWW - Replacement of Federal Hwy Bridges in NC..... Baltimore Harbor (50 foot), MD & VA............................ Barnegat Inlet, NJ ........................................... Bonneville Navigation Lock, OR & WA......................... Brandon Road Lock and Dam, Illinois Waterway, IL ....... Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN................................. Calumet-Sag. Mod., Illinois Waterway, IL and IN, Part 1. Channel to Newport News, VA (1965 Mod.) .................. Channel to Newport News, VA (1986 Mod.) ................... Charleston Harbor, SC ..................................... .... Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX ..................................... Dashields L/D, Ohio River, PA........................................... Delaware River in the Vicinity of Camden, NJ ................ Emsworth Locks and Dams, Ohio River, PA ................... Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area, IN and KY ..................................... ... ........... Finney Creek at Wachapreague, VW.................................. Freeport Harbor, TX ...................................... ...... Gallipolis Locks and Dam, Ohio River............................... Grays Landing Lock & Dam (Lock & Dam 7) Monongahela River, PA........................................ Jonesport Harbor, ME .................................... ..... Kaskaskia River, IL.......................................................... Kill Van Kull - Newark Bay, NJ and NY ......................... Krebs Lake, M S (Sec 107)................................. ........... LaGrange Lock and Dam, Illinois Waterway, IL ............... Lake Erie, Sturgeon Point, Evans, NY (Sec 107) ............... Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii, HI ..................................... Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, Little Rock, AR................ Lock and Dams 3, 5A, 6,7,8 and 9, MN, WI and IA .......... Lock and Dam 17, IL ...................................... ..... 1987 1974 1987 1985 1985 1983 1988 1955 1967 1987 1988 1972 1986 1987 1980 1984 1988 1987 1985 1986 1987 1966 1986 1983 1986 1988 1988 1987 1989 1989 1989 Dredging and breakwater 1986 1 Indefinite Streambank Protection 1990 Deepdraft channel deepening 1992 Jetty realignment and dredging 1993 New larger lock 1988 Major rehabilitation of lock and dam 1989 1990 Major rehabilitation of breakwaters 1968 Indefinite Channel improvements and relocation 1968 Indefinite Deferred anchorage construction 1989 1988 Dredge 50 ft. Channel 1994 Dredging and channel wideningand deepening 1990 Dredging 1990 Major rehabilitation of ocks and dams 1088 1988 Dredging 1985 Major rehabilitation of lock and dam 1988 1974 1983 1988 1987 Indefinite Protection of a National Natural Landmark 1988 Dredging 1992 Dredging, jetty construction, and recreation 1995 Replacement of existing locks and major rehabilitation of the dam 1995 Construct new lock & dam to replace existing lock & dam 7 1990 Breakwater, dredging of new channel and anchorage 1986 Lock, dam and channel 1989 Deepdraft channel - widening and deepening 1984 Dredging, navigation channel 1990 Major Rehabilitation of Lock and Dam 1989 Breakwaters, dredging 1988 Breakwater 1988 Dredging, deepening, channel and turning basin 2000 Major rehabilitation of electrical/mechanical systems 1992 Major maintenance of lock and dam APPENDIX D (Continued) NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1989 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Lock and Dam 18, IA................... ...... Lock and Dam 20, MO ....................................... Lock and Dam 21, IL ..................................... ...... Lock and Dam 22, MO ..................................... ..... Marseilles Dam, Illinois Waterway, IL............................... McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, AR .. Melvin Price Lock and Dam, MO..................................... Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers IL and MO................. ................ Mississippi River, Gulf Outlet, LA ................................... Mississippi River, Ship Channel, Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA .................................................... Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to mouth .......................... Montgomery Locks & Dams, Ohio River, PA.................... Moriches Inlet, NY ...................................... ....... Mouth of Colorado River, TX (Gulf Intracoastal W aterway) ....................................... ................ Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, HI ........................................... New York Harbor, NY and NJ............................................ Newburgh Locks & Dam, Ohio River, IN and KY............. Norfolk Harbor Channel, VA (1965 Mod.)......................... Norfolk Harbor Channel, VA (1986 Mod) ....................... Norfolk Harbor, Thimble Shoal Channel, VA................... Oakland Harbor, CA ...................................... ...... 1989 1986 1987 1987 1985 1963 1974 1910 1958 1987 1912 1983 1987 1984 1985 1976 1965 1966 1987 1987 1987 Ocean City Harbor and Inlet, MD....................................... 1983 Ouachita and Black River, AR and LA............................ 1964 Norfolk Harbor Channel, VA (1986 mod) ........................ Peoria Lock and Dam, Illinois Waterway, IL ................... Port Everglades Harbor, FL ........................................... Port Hueneme, CA ........................................... Port Ontario Harbor, NY........................................ Portsmouth Harbor & Piscataqua River, ME and NH ........ Red River WW, Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA........ 1987 1986 1979 1970 1987 1989 1974 1989 1968 1990 1993 Major maintenance of lock and daml 1990 Major Rehabilitation of Lock and Dam 1989 Major Rehabilitation of Lock and Dam 1989 Major Rehabilitation of Lock and Dam 1989 Major rehabilitation of lock and dam 1989 Locks and dams 1992 Replacement 2000 Regulating works 1984 Dredging and jetties 1987 2 Indefinite 3 Dredging 55-foot channel 1980 Indefinite Navigation and bank stabilization complete. Fish and Wildlife mitigation authorized by Sec 601 of WRDA of 1986 (P.L. 99-0662) 1987 Major rehabilitation of locks & dams 1989 Dredging and jetty repair 1987 Incremental 1969 1967 1936 1984 1989 1972 19842 1992 Breakwaters, dredging, and recreation 1987 Breakwater repair Indefinite Collection and removal of drift 1974 Replacement of locks and dams 46 and 47 Indefinite Deferred anchorage const. 1988 Dredge 50 ft. channel 1988 Dredge outbound element 1994 Channel deepening and widening turning basin 1985 Rehabilitation of south jetty 1994 Replacement of six locks and dams, channel deepening to 9 feet and realignment 1989 Dredge 50 ft. outbound element 1990 Major Rehabilitation of lock and dam 1987 Dredging 1987 Dredging 1988 Breakwaters, channel excavation 1992 Dredging (widening channel) Indefinite Lock and dam construction. Channel improvement and realignment D-2 APPENDIX D (Continued) NAVIGATION PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION DURING FISCAL YEAR 1989 Fiscal Year Fiscal Placed in Completed or Year Useful Scheduled for Project Started Operation Completion Nature of Project Richmond Harbor, CA ..................................... .... Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA.............. St. George, AK.................................. .......... St. Paul, AK ................. .................. San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA............................... San Francisco Bay to Stockton, VA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)...................... ........... Savannah Harbor Widening, GA ...................................... Shallow Creek, MD (Sec 107) .......................................... Smith Island, M D (Sec 107) ............................... ........... Smithland Locks and Dam, IL, IN, and KY ..................... Tampa Harbor, FL (Main Channel) .................................. Thimble Shoal Channel, VA ............................................ Tenn River, Decatur Morgan County Port, AL.................. Tombigbee River, Columbus Port, MS (Sec 107) ............. 1985 1986 1989 1989 1948 1971 1990 1987 1982 1971 1976 1987 1988 1987 Tongue Point, OR ............................................................... 1989 Wallisville Lake, TX ..................................... 1967 Zippel Bay, Lake of the Woods County, MN .................. 1986 1982 1980 1989 1987 1994 Channel deepening and turning basin 1994 Deep draft channel, widening and deepending 1990 Dredging 1990 Dredging and breakwater Indefinite Dredging and breakwater Indefinite Deep draft channel, widening, deepening and dredging 1991 Widening channel 1988 Dredging 1983 Channel cut with breakwater 1987 Replacement of existing locks and dams 50 and 51 1987 Dredging 1989 Dredge 50 ft. outbound element 1989 Channel excavation 1989 Navigation channels & turning basin 1990 Dredging Indefinite Multipurpose lake (navigation, salinity control, water supply, fish & wildlife, & recreational) 1988 Breakwaters and Jetties 1 Walter Jones and Joseph P. Knapp completed; Core Creek has been funded for initiation of construction; Hobucken has been funded for initiation of design; Fairfield has not been funded 2 Phase I, forty-five foot channel to New Orleans, LA. Forty-five foot channel to Mile 181 (Donaldsonville, LA) placed in useful operation in 1988. 3 Awaiting further LCA's to extend project to Baton Rouge, LA, and to go deeper than 45 feet. 4 Lock and Dam No. 1 placed in useful opeation in 1984. Construction is continuing on Lock and Dam Nos 2 and 3, and has not been initiatied on Lock & Dam Nos 4 and 5. D-3 APPENDIX E MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 FloodC ontrol and/or Total Nay. Feature Storage Placed Initial Existing Scheduled Ultima Conmunity Capability iauseful Power Installation Installation Installation Project cHeight Length Poject River inVicinity (acre-feot) OperationCY In FY (KW) (KW) (KW) Functions Type 2 (feet) (fret) Albeni Falls, ID Pend Oreille Allatoaom Lake,GA Etowah BarkleyDan & Cumberland Lake Barkeley, KY KY & TN Beaver Lake, AR Whit Big BaendD am (Lake Sharpel), SD Missouri Blakely Mountain Ouachita Dam-lala Ouachita, AR Bo neville L&D Columbia Lake Bonnoville, OR & WA Broken Bow Lake, Mountain Fork OK Buford Dam, Chattahoochee Lanier, GA Bull Shoals Lake White AR & MO COarene Cannon Salt Dam Carters Dam, GA Coosawatte Center Hill Lake, Caney Fork TN CLeatham L&D, TN Cumberland Chief Joseph Dam Columbia (Rufus Woods Lake),WA Clarks Hill Lake Savannah GA & SC Cooper River, Santee Charleston Harbor, SC Cordell Hull L&D, Cumberland TN Cougar Lake, OR S. Fork McKenzic Dale Hollow Lake, Obey TN & KY Dardanrlle L&D, Arkansas AR DeGray Lake, AR Caddo DenisonDamn(Lake Red Texamna), TX & OK Detroit Lake, OR, North Santiam including Big Cliff Lake, OR Dworshak Dam N. Fork, & Reservoir, Clearwaer ID Eufaula Lake, OK Canadian Fort Gibson Grand (Neosho) Lake Fort Peck Lake, Missouri MT Fort Randal Dam Missouri (Lake Francis Case), SD Garrison Dam Missouri (Lake Sakakawea), ND Gavis Point Damn Missouri (Lewis & Clark Lake), SD & NE Green Peter Middle Santiam Lakc,OR, including Foster Lake, OR Grees Ferry Little Red Lake, AR Harry S. Truman 'Osap Dam & Res. Hartwell Lake, Savannah GA & SC Hills Creek Lake, Middle Fork OR Wilamett IceH arbor L&D (Lake Sacajawea), WA Snake Newport,WA 1,153,000 1952 1955 42,600 Caranville,GA 670,000 1950 1950 74,000 Frand Rivers, 2,082,000 1964 1966 130,000 Eureka Springs, ChanberlainSD Mt. Pine, AR 1,952,000 1,883,000 2,768,000 1963 1965 1964 1965 1953 1956 42,600 NFPR C 90 1,055 74,000 FPRW C 190 1,250 130,000 NPFR CE 157 9,959 112,000 FPSR CE 228 2,575 468,000 FPRIW E 95 10,570 75,000 FPRW E 235 1,100 112,000 468,000 75,000 Bonnevile,OR 537,000 1938 1938 1,145,700 Broken Bow, OK Buford, GA MountainHome AR Perry, MO Carters, GA Lancaster,TN Ashland City, TN Bridgeport, WA 1,368,230 2,554,000 5,408,000 1,428,000 472,756 2,092,000 104,000 593,000 1968 1970 1956 1957 1952 1953 1983 1985 1975 1975 1948 1951 1952 1958 1955 1956 100,000 86,000 340,000 58,000 500,000 135,000 36,000 2,457,384 Augusta, GA 2,900,000 1952 1953 280,000 St. Stephen, SC 2,560,000 N/A 1985 84,000 Carthage, TN Blue River, OR Celina, TN Dardanelle, AR Arkadelphia, AR Denison, TX 310,900 219,000 1,706,000 486,200 831,900 5,312,300 1973 1974 1963 1964 1943 1949 1969 1965 1969 1972 1944 1945 100,000 25,000 54,000 124,000 68,000 70,000 Mill City, OR 461,000 1953 1954 118,000 OrofrinoI,D 3,453,000 1972 1973 400,000 Eufaula, OK 3,825,400 1964 1964 Ft. Gibson, OK 1,284,400 1949 1953 Glasglow, MT 18,909,000 1938 1944 Lake Andes, SD 5,574,000 1953 1954 Riverdale, ND 24,137,000 Yanktan, SD 90,000 45,000 185,250 320,000 1954 1956 430,000 504,000 1956 1957 100,000 Sweet Home, OR 491,000 Heber Spings Warsaw, MO Hartwell, GA Oakridge, OR Pasco, WA 2,844,000 5,202,000 2,842,700 356,000 1967 1967 100,000 1962 1964 1982 1982(4) 1961 1962 1961 1962 96,000 160,000 344,000 30,000 417,000 1962 1962 603,000 1,145,700 NPR C 122 2,690 100,000 FPWSR E 225 2,750 86,000 NFPW E 192 5,400 340,000 FPR C 258 2,256 58,000 FNPRSW CE 138 1,700 500,000 FPRW ER 450 1,950 135,000 FPR CE 250 2,160 36,000 NPR C 75 801 2,457,384 PIR C 230 5,998 280,000 NFPRSW CE 200 5,680 84,000 NPW CE 86 876 100,000 NPR CE 93 1,306 64,600 NFPRI ER 445 1,738 54,000 FPR C 200 1,717 124,000 NPR C 68 2,683 108,000 FNPRS E 243 3,400 175,000 FPRSN E 165 17,200 118,000 NFPRI C 382 1,528 1,060,000 PNFR C 717 3,300 90,000 ENPS E 114 3,200 67,500 FP CE 110 2,990 185,250 NFPRIW E 251 21,026 320,000 NFPRIW E 165 10,700 430,000 NFPRIW E 210 11,300 100,000 NFPRIW E 74 8,700 100,000 PFNIR C 340 1,380 96,000 FPRS C 243 1,704 160,000 FPRW CE 96 5,000 344,000 NFPRS (E 204 17,852 30,000 NFPRI GE 304 2,150 603,000 NPRI CE 130 2,790 APPENDIX E (Continued) MULTIPUROPSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 Flood Control andlar Total Nay. Featuze Storae Plaed Initial Existing Scheduled Ultimate Community Capability in useful Power Istallatimn Installation Installation Project Length Height Project River in Vicinity (ac-feet) 1 OperationCmY In FY (KW) (KW) (KW) Functions Type 2 (feet) (bet) Gavim PointDam Missouri (Lewis & Clark Lake), SD & NE Green hter Middle Santiam Lake,OR, including Foster Lake, OR Greers Ferry Little Red Lake, AR Hany S. Truman Osag Dam & Res. Hartwell Lake, Savannah GA & SC Hills Creek Lake, Middle Fork OR Wilamte Ice Harbor L&D Snake (Lake Sacajawea), WA Jim WoodruffDam Appalachicola (Lake Seminole), FL, GA & AL John Day L&D Columbia (Lake Umatilla), OR &WA John H. Kerr Roanoke Dam & Reservoir, NC & VA Robert F. Henry Alalmm L&D, AL J. ercy Priest Stones Dam & Reservoir, TN Keystone Lake, Arkansas OK Lake Greeson, AR Little Missouri Laurel River, KY Laurel Libby DamnL, ake Kooteni Koocanusa, MT Little Goose L&D Snake (Lake Bryan), WA Lookout Pbint Middle Fork Lake including Wilamntte Dexter Lake, OR Lost Crck Lake, Rogue OR Lower Granite Snake L&D, WA Lower Snake Manumental L&D (Lake Herbert G. West), WA McNary L&D Columbia (Lake Wallula) OR & WA Millers Ferry Alabama L&D, AL Nanpil River Nanpil River Hydropower, FPolnpeiF, SM New Melons Stanislaus Lake, CA 6 Norfork Lake, AR North Fork & MO Oahe Dam (Lake Missouri Oahe), SD & ND Old Hickory L&D, Cumberland TN Ozark-Jeta Arkansas Taylor L&D, AR Philpott Lake, VA Roanoke Robert S. Kerr Arkansas L&D and Reservoir, OK Sam Raybum Dam Angelimn & Reservoir, TX St. Mary's River, Gscat Lakes MI YanktanS,D Sweet HomneO, R 491,000 Heber Spings Warsaw, MO Hartwell, GA Oakridge, OR Puco, WA Chattahoochee, FL 367,300 Rufus, OR 504,000 1956 1957 100,000 1967 1967 100,000 2,844,000 5,202,000 2,842,700 356,000 1962 1964 1982 1982(4) 1961 1962 1961 1962 96,000 160,000 344,000 30,000 417,000 1962 1962 603,000 1957 1957 30,000 2,500,000 1968 1969 2,160,000 Boydton, VA 2,750,300 1952 1953 204,000 Benton, AL 234,200 1972 1975 68,000 Nashville, TN 652,000 1967 1970 28,000 Tulsa, OK 1,737,600 Murfreesboro,AR 407,900 London, KY 435,600 Libby, MT 5,809,000 Starbuck, WA 565,000 Lowell, OR 483,000 Trail, OR 1964 1968 1950 1950 1973 1978 1972 1975 1970 1970 1954 1955 70,000 25,500 61,000 525,000 810,000 135,000 465,000 1977 1977 49,000 Pomnroy, WA 484,000 1975 1975 810,000 Kahlotus, WA 376,000 1969 1969 810,000 Umatilla, OR 1,550,000 1953 1954 980,000 Camden, AL Pohnpei, FSM 331,8090 1969 1979 1 1987 1988 100,000 NFPRIW E 74 8,700 100,000 PFNIR C 340 1,380 96,000 FPRS C 243 1,704 160,000 FPRW CE 96 5,000 344,000 NFPRS CE 204 17,852 30,000 NFPRI GE 304 2,150 603,000 NPRI CE 130 2,790 30,000 NPRW CE 67 6,150 2,700,000 NPRFI CE 161 5,900 204,000 FPRW CE 144 22,285 68,000 NPRW CE 101 14,962 28,000 FPRW CE 147 2,716 70,000 FNPWS E 121 4,600 25,500 FPRW C 183.5 941 61,000 FPRW R 282 1,420 840,000 FPR C 420 3,055 810,000 NPRI E 160 2,670 135,000 NFPRI CE 243 3,381 49,000 DFPISWR CE 345 3,600 810,000 NPRIF CE 146 3,200 810,000 NPRI E 135 3,800 1,754,000 NPRI CE 183 7,300 75,000 2,000 Oakdale, CA 2,400,000 1978 1979 300,000 Norfolk, AR Pierre, SD Hendersonville, TN OzarkAR Bassett, VA Sallisaw, OK Jasper, TX Sault Ste. Marie MI 1,983,000 23,337,000 545,000 148,400 318,500 522,700 1943 1944 1959 1962 1954 1957 1969 1973 1951 1954 1970 1971 3,997,600 1965 1966 --- 1855 1952 80,550 595,000 100,000 100,000 14,000 110,000 52,000 18,400 75,000 NPRW CE 2,000 P C 90 11,380 17 70 300,000 FIPRW ER 625 1,560 163,000 FPRS C 216 2,624 595,000 NFPRIW E 245 9,300 100,000 NPR CE 98 3,605 100,000 NPR C 58 2,480 14,000 FPR C 220 892 110,000 NPR E 75 7,230 52,000 FPWR CE 120 19,430 18,400 NP Cantrol Gate E-2 APPENDIX E (Continued). MULTIPUROPSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER OPERABLE SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 Food Control and/r Total Nay. Feature Storage Placed Initial Existing Scheduled Ultimate Cormmunity Capability in useful Power Installation Installation Installation Project Length Height Poject River in Vicinity (acre-fet) 1 Operation CY In FY (KW) (KW) (KW) Functions Type 2 (feet) (feet) Sam Raybum Dam Angeli Jasper, TX 3,997,000 1965 1966 52,000 52,000 FPWR CE 120 19,430 & Reservoir, TX Snettiham, AK 7 Spedol Juneau, AK 352,400 1973 46,700 27,0008 73,700 P C 9 18 338 Stockton Lake, MO Sac Stocktm, MO 1,674,000 1969 45,200 45,200 FPRW CE 128 5,100 Table Rock Whie Branson, MO 3,462,000 1958 1959 200,000 200,000 FPR Ce 252 6,423 Lake, AR & MO Tenkiller Lake, Illinois Gore, OK 1,230,800 1952 1953 40,000 40,000 PP E 197 3,000 OK The Dalles LAD Columbia The Dalles, OR 53,000 1957 1957 1,806,800 1,806,800 NPR CR 300 8,875 (Lake Cello), WA & OR Walter PFG. eorge Chattahooche Fort Gaines, GA 934,000 1963 1963 130,000 130,000 NPRW CE 114 13,585 L&D, GA & FL Webber PFalls Arkansas Wevbbers Falls, OK 170,100 1970 1973 60,000 60,000 NP E 84 4,370 L&D, OK West Point Chattahooche West Point, GA 604,500 1975 1975 73,375 108,375 FPRW CE 97 7,250 Lake, AL & GA Whitney Lake, TX Brazos Whitney, TX 1,999,500 1953 1954 30,000 30,000 FPR CE 159 17,695 Wolf Qeek Dam Cumberland Jamestown, KY 6,089,000 1950 1952 270,000 270,000 FPR CE 258 5,736 Cumberland), KY 1 Total of all storage functions, including inactive and dead storage to normal full pool level 2: gravel; R: rock; C: concrete; E: earth 4All units ae synchronized-to-line and two units have passed the pumrpbactke st. However, due to damaging effects to fish, no further pumping will be doane for their testing or operation until a solution to the problem is found. 6 Being operated for the Department of Interior by the Bureau of Reclamation 7 Being operated by the Alaska Power Administartion 8 Cratr Lak Unit 9 Weir for Long Lake 10Pormerly larks Hill Lake 11Single Purpose Power. Special Appropriation By Congress Nomnclature for Project Functions D--Debria Control P--Power F--Flood Control R--Public Recreation Annual Attendance exceeding 5,000 I--Irrigation S-Water Supply N--Navigation W--Fish and Wildlife (Federal or State) E-3 APPENDIX F MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER UNDER CONSTRUCTION, SEPTEMBER 30, 1989 Nameplate Capacity Fiscal Scheduled Scheduled Year for for Scheduled Ultimate Project Started Operation Completion Functions Installation Installation Bonneville Second Powerhouse, OR and WA ............................ 1974 1881 1991 PR 558,200 558,200 Clarence Cannon Dam, Salt River, MO.................................. 1966 1985 1990 FNPRSW 58,000 58,000 Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO ........................... 1965 19821 19921 FRPW 160,000 160,000 New Melones Lake, CA2 ................. .. .. ... .. ... .. . . . . . . . .. . . .... 1966 1979 Indefinite DFIPRW 300,000 300,000 Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, Savannah River, GA and SC .................................. 1975 1985 1991 FRP 600,000 600,000 Cooper River, Charleston Hbr, SC................................... 1977 1985 1986 NWDP 84,000 84,000 Snettisham, AK................... .................... 1967 1989 1989 P 73,700 27,000 KEY D - F . I - N - P - R - S - W . Redevelopment Flood Control Irrigation Navigation Power Recreation Water Supply Fish and Wildlife 1 All units are synchronized-to-line and two units have passed the pumpback test. However, due to damaging effects to fish, no further pumping will be done for either testing or operation until a solution to the problem is found. 2 New Melones Lake was turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation for operation onNovember 20, 1979. Corps retains responsibility for facilities along the lower Stanisalaus River. Remaining construction consists of recreation facilities and minor feature closeouts. F-1 MAJOR FLOOD AND DAMAGES SUFFERED DURING FISCAL YEAR 1989 (In Millions of Dollars) Month Location Lives Lost Damages Suffered Jan 89 Feb 89 Apr 89 May 89 May 89 Jun 89 Jun 89 Jun 89 Jun 89 Subtotals Totals (All floods in U.S.) Utah Ohio, Tennessee and Lower Mississippi Valleys Tennessee Texas Virginia, Maryland and District of Columbia Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi Eastern United States Texas, Louisiana Mid-Atlantic 12 * 6 Extensive Flash Floods 20 11 1 11 7 54 10 500 * More than 540 72 1,100 * Exact dollar amounts not known, but damages are in the millions OTHER MAJOR WEATHER EVENTS AND DAMAGES Lives Event Number Lost Tropical Cyclones 11 58 Tornadoes 570 32 Drought 1 Blizzards - Winter Storms 2 20 Totals 884 110 G-1 Damages Suffered 9.6 0.6 0.1 10.3 FISCAL YEAR 1989 FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS BY REGION FY 1980 FY 1981 FY 1982 FY 1983 FY 1984 FY 1985 FY 1986 FY 1987 FY 1988 FY 1989 10-Year FY 1990 Percent Average 1980-89 New England Mid-Atlanti c Gulf & S. Atlantic Ohio Tennessee Great Lakes Upper Mississippi Souris-Red-Rainy Missouri Arkan sas-Red-White Lower Mississippi Rio Grande Texas and Gulf Colorado Great Basin California Columbia N. Pacific Alaska Hawaii 75,911 16,740 28,086 289,655 0 9,594 0 0 2.243 108,025 4,087,675 46,260 14,910 117,761 0 1,981,428 514,257 2,117 4,254 53,661 239,970 9,496 839,029 625 665 463,321 0 250 168,293 63,094 24,171 10,419 25,703 2,486,292 18,823 357,665 30,340 26,450 24,802 302,140 16,607 2,499 24,398 49,384 27,756 21,301 41,774 219,938 11,438 30,014 45,659 57,057 231,431 188,802 207,363 556,603 268,796 633,658 172,866 63,538 285,510 289,822 248,699 0 0 0 0 45 570 4,376 0 16,176 2,117 3,082 9,842 27,836 5,856 24,593 30,107 28,071 51,245 9,587 24,982 22,207 16,849 11,622 96,150 251,594 66,209 57,941 113,777 430,592 1,576 6,761 103,622 516,506 0 0 2,700 1,314 1,721 18,966 52,015 411 68,814 14,594 7,156 89,862 370,993 435,296 1,077,828 32,555 860,513 1,504,538 2,669 176,066 455,256 250,873 11,617 55,960 161,010 88,788 168,558 174,737 996,615 161,923 186,727 211,396 456,041 3,067 552,850 20,386,036 10,294,428 9,820,704 9,336,140 666,758 1,453,371 5,970,206 6,257,124 10,820,837 889 2,526 29,918 98,419 127,698 87,139 113,621 21,528 2,755 53,075 42,531 83,436 441,874 17,537 8,513 28,840 208,168 190,914 6,026 535,689 153,591 4,105,103 0 0 13,000 90,630 14,300 0 0 0 0 23,569 0 0 800 15,015 18,600 2,200 16,300 0 0 500 6,062 500 680 307,013 1,075,869 102,360 72,800 13,910,920 154,858 98 4,770 1,761,080 9,500 633,016 1,939,909 547,510 979,308 94,350 1,521,659 125,995 296,159 918,874 757,104 962,433 4,473 4,741 4,885 5,055 6,846 6,828 17,000 0 8,000 5,994 0 220 800 624 0 0 220 220 8,540 82 1,496 1,085 7,298,916 1,160,486 4,272,241 23,238,796 16,766,085 10,768,210 27,317,770 5,195,212 2,063,314 8,260,978 10,634,201 17,577,953 Region Ct of the 10-Year Average 37 125 86 146 76 498 49 216 173 80 2,673 0 8 1 127 0 73 Total DISTRIBUTION BY DISTRICT FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) District Vicksburg Memphis New Orleans St. Louis Kansas City Omaha Baltimore New York Norfolk Philadelphia Buffalo Chicago Detroit Rock Island St. Paul New England Alaska Portland Seattle Walla Walla Huntington Louisville Nashville Pittsburgh. Pacific Ocean Charleston Jacksonville Mobile Savannah Wilmington Sacramento Los Angeles San Francisco Albuquerque Fort Worth Galveston Little Rock Tulsa Total FY 1988 $000 1,059,110 229,113 4,681,183 0 157,726 18,340 2,674 18,975 1,930 1,223 21,328 5,750 3,654 732 69,093 250 8,000 899,537 2,035 17,302 78,884 146,160 16,176 60,466 82 1,434 456 0 850 27,274 5,270 0 0 2,755 470,269 65,420 25,553 161,174 8,260,978 G-3 DISTRIBUTION BY DISTRICT FLOOD DAMAGES PREVENTED BY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) Damages Prevented by Corps-Controlled State Projects Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii and Guam Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland and District of Columbia Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota' Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands Total 0 8,000 0 401,796 4,770 0 1,892 0 456 850 82 14,900 7,925 56,145 76 105,716 96,767 5,007,949 0 3 237 3,654 14,989 549,885 117,726 27 17,427 00 3,336 2,755 39,507 18,362 30,808 89,977 123,272 840,765 27,845 0 1,434 457 9,651 537,403 500 2,298 11,243 62,403 18,592 0 751 0 8,232,186 Damages Prevented by Corps-Controlled Emergency Operations 000 435 000000000 5,000 000000 00 7,006 0000000000 16,323 0000000000000 00 28 0 28,792 Total Flood Damages Prevented by the Corps of Engineers 000 401,700 4,770 0 1,892 0 456 850 82 14,900 7,925 61,145 76 105,716 96,767 5,007,949 03 237 3,654 21,995 549,885 117,726 27 17,427 00 3,336 2,755 39,507 18,362 47,131 89,977 123,272 840,765 27,845 0 1,434 457 9,651 537,403 500 2,298 11,243 62,403 18,592 0 779 0 8,260,978 G-4 FISCAL YEAR 1989 FLOOD DAMAGES SUFFERED (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS) Lives Property Agricultural Location Lost Damage Losses Alabama 0 178 ** Alaska 0 6,000 ** Arizona 2 32,020 616 Arkansas 4 2,320 ** California 0 35,538 3,200 Colorado 0 481 ** Connecticut 0 800 ** Delaware 3 1,800 ** Florida 0 2,100 ** Georgia 0 1,782 ** Hawaii and Guam 1 3,382 ** Idaho 0 178 ** Illinois 0 * 1,800 Indiana 0 716 ** Iowa 0 3,731 3,555 Kansas 2 907 2,487 Kentucky 4 27,401 44 Louisiana 2 122,118 200,000 Maine 0 3,200 ** Maryland and 5 1,800 ** District of Columbia Massachusetts 0 * ** Michigan 0 178 2 Minnesota 0 17,600 ** Mississippi 2 3,636 ** Missouri 1 16,067 ** Montana 1 2,000 19 Nebraska 9 21,842 8,130 Nevada 0 23 ** New Hampshire 0 * ** New Jersey 2 1,800 ** New Mexico 0 2,378 ** New York 0 22,109 18,162 North Carolina 4 18,120 1,952 North Dakota 0 16,000 ** Ohio 4 62,240 ** Oklahoma 1 2,121 ** Oregon 0 82 16 Pennsylvania 1 7,106 ** Rhode Island 0 * ** South Carolina 0 370 ** South Dakota 0 16 ** Tennessee 9 11,466 14 Texas 15 340,746 352 Utah 0 15,387 16 Vermont 0 50 ** Virginia 6 21,312 18,051 Washington 0 320 ** West Virginia 0 1,010 ** Wisconsin 0 160 ** Wyoming 0 1,602 ** Puerto Rico and 0 * ** Virgin Islands Total 72 823,421 257,383 Total Losses (Property and Agricultural 1.1 Billion This table summarizes estimated values for flood events. Damage totals for major floods, especially those that occurred at the end of fiscal year, are frequently not well-refined in time for inclusion in this report. Lesser floods are not always consistently reported. These data are representative of state-by-state distribution of total flood damages, but may not represent the final loss value for each state. * Property damage unavailable but flooding occurred **Agricultural losses unavailable G-5 FISCAL YEAR 1989 TROPICAL CYCLONES ($ MILLION) Name Hurricane Joan' Tropical Storm Keith Tropical Storm Allison Tropical Storm Barry Hurricane Chantal Hurricane Dean Hurricane Erin Hurricane Felix Hurricane Gabrielle Hurricane Hugo Tropical Storm Iris C Month and Year Oct 1988 Nov 1988 Jun 1989 Jul 1989 Jul/Aug 1989 Jul/Aug 1989 Aug 1989 Aug/Sep 1989 Aug/Sep 1989 Sep 1989 Sep 1989 Location Caribbean Nicaragua Caribbean Florida Gulf of Mexico Texas/Louisiana Atlantic Gulf of Mexico Texas Atlantic Atlantic Atlantic Atlantic Atlantic Leeward Islands Virgin Islands Puerto Rico South Carolina Atlantic U.S. Deaths 0 112 134 86 26' U.S. Damage $3 million S500 million3 S100 millions $9,000 million8 1. In the South Caribbean 216 daths, 270 serious injuries, 122 missing, 211,500 homeless, total damages estimated near S2 billion. 2. All deaths by drowning due to heavy rains. 3. Most damage due to agricultural lossses and property damage as a result of flooding. 4. Includes 3 deaths by drowning on U.S. Mainland, 7 confirmed and 3 presumed dead due to capsized vessel being used in the evacuation of a Gulf of Mexico oil rig. 5. Most damage due to agrucultural losses and property damage as result of flooding. 6. All daths occurred in various states along the New England coast. 7. Inlcudes: 2 deaths on Puerto Rico, 3 deaths on U.S. Virgin Islands, 21 deaths on U.S. Mainland; these are NHC statistics, Red Cross statistics; 22 deaths on Puerto Rico, 7 deaths on U.S. Virgin Islands, 49 deaths on U.S. Mainland for a total number of 78 deaths for U.S. and its territories. 8. Includes: $2 billion in damages for Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, $7 billion for U.S. Mainland. An additional %.5 billion in damages occurred on other Caribbean Islands. POTENTIAL FLOOD DAMAGES IN THE UNITED STATES 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 Fiscal Year L1 D Flood damages suffered Flood damages prevented Potential flood damages in the United States since Fiscal Year 1979. The potential damages for each year is the sum of the damages suffered and the damages prevented. The 1979-88 average is shown for comparison. rJ) hA Erio O S0 � .1 0 0 0 'I Ft O� r 1 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1989 INDEX The following abbreviations are used in the index LMK LMM LMN LMS MR+T MRK MRO NAB NAN NAO NAP NCB NCC NCD NCE NCR NCS NED VICKSBURG, MISS., DISTRICT MEMPHIS, TENN., DISTRICT NEW ORLEANS, IA., DISTRICT ST. LOUIS, MO., DISTRICT MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES PROJECT KANSAS CITY, MO., DISTRICT OMAHA, NEBR, DISTRICT BALTIMORE, MD., DISTRICT NEW YORK, N.Y. DISTRICT NORFOLK, VA., DISTRICT PHILADELPHIA, PA., DISTRICT BUFFALO, N.Y., DISTRICT CHICAGO, ILL, DISTRICT MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. DETROIT, MICH., DISTRICT ROCK ISLAND, ILL., DISTRICT ST. PAUL, MINN., DISTRICT NEW ENGLAND DIVISION NPA ALASKA DISTRICT A Aberdeen, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 Aberdeen Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Abilene, Kans. (MRK) 27-16, 27-19 Abiquiu Dam, N. Mex. (SWA) 32-4, 32-11, 32-13 Absecon Inlet, N.J. (NAP) 3-2, 3-15, 3-19, 3-24 Accotink Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-36 Adams, Hossic River Basin, Mass. (NAN) 2-36 Adams Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Adams Levee, Ind. (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-21, 16-26 Addison, N.Y. (NAB) 4-14, 4-27 Additional Features Entering Into Cost of Project (NCD) 25-1 Adena, Ohio (Short Creek) (ORP) 18-21 Adkin Branch, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Afono Area and Aoa Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-11 NPP NPS NPW ORD ORH ORL ORN ORP POD SAJ SAM SAN SAS SAW SPK SPL SPN SWA SWF SWG SWL SWT PORTLAND, OREG., DISTRICT SEATTLE WASH., DISTRICT WALLA WALLA, WASH., DISTRICT OHIO RIVER DIVISION HUNTINGTON, W. VA. DISTRICT LOUISVILLE, KY., DISTRICT NASHVILLE, TENN., DISTRICT PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT PACIFIC OCEAN DIVISION JACKSONVILLE, FLA., DISTRICT MOBILE, ALA., DISTRICT CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT SAVANNAH, GA., DISTRICT WILMINGTON, N.C., DISTRICT SACRAMENTO, CALIF., DISTRICT LOS ANGELES, CALIF., DISTRICT SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF., DISTRICT ALBUQUERQUE, N. MEX., DISTRICT FORT WORTH, TEX., DISTRICT GALVESTON, TEX., DIVISION LITTLE ROCK, ARK., DISTRICT TULSA, OKLA., DISTRICT Agana River, Guam (POD) 36-2, 36-7, 36-9 Agana Small Boat Harbor, Guam (POD) 36-2, 36-10 Agat Harbor, Guam (POD) 36-7 Aitkin, Minn. (NCS) 24-33 AIWW-Mooring Basins, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 AIWW, Norfolk-St. Johns River, Fla. (SAJ) 4-96 AIWW-Peltier Creek (SAW) 6-28 AIWW-Tidal Lock in Snows Cut, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Airport, Glendale, W.Va. (ORP) 18-26 Ala Wai Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Alabama River, Selma, Ala. (SAM) 10-49 Alabama River at Montgomery, Ala. (SAM) 10-48 Alabama Coosa Rivers, Ala. and Ga. (SAM) 10-20, 10-35, 10-45, 10-50 Alameda Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-34 Alamo Lake, Bill Williams River, Az. (SPL) 33-5, 33-13, 33-20 Alamogordo Diversion Channel, Tularosa (Closed) Basin, N. Mex. (SWA) 32-14 I-1 Albemarle and Chesapeake Canal (NAO) 5-18 Albeni Falls Dam, Idaho (NAS) 38-10, 38-17, 38-22 Albuquerque Diversion Channels, N. Mex. (SWA) 32-1, 32-10 Albuquerque Unit (SWA) 32-14 Alenaio System, Hawaii (POD) 36-6 Alford, Green River, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-42, 1-50 Algoma Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-55, 21-60 Alhambra Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-36 Allatoona Dam, Coosa River Basin, Ga. (SAM) 10-23, 10-35 Allatoona Lake, Coosa River Basin, Ga. (SAM)10-46 Allegany, N.Y. Unit I (Allegheny River) (ORP) 18-21 Allegany, N.Y. Unit II (Five Mile Creek Area) (ORP) 18-21 Allegheny River, Pa. (ORP) 18-2, 18-11, 18-15, 18-19, 18-25 Allegheny River, Pa., Locks and Dams (ORP) 18-22 Allegheny River, Oil City, Pa. (ORP) 18-26 Allentown, Lehigh River, Pa. (NAP) 3-26 Allenville, Ariz. (SPL) 33-25 Alley Bay, Beals, Maine (NED) 1-42 Alligator Creek Basin, CL, Fla. (SAJ) 9-54 Alloway Creek, NJ. (NAP) 3-25 Alluvial Valley Mapping (MR+T) 42-3 Alma Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 25-7, 25-10 Almond Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-14, 4-27 Almond Village, N.Y. (NAB) 4-40 Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-18, 12-19, 12-20 Alpena Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-55, 21-60 Alpine, Tex. (SWA) 32-14 Alpine Dam and Page Park Dam, Rockford, Ill. (NCR) 23-15 Alsea River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-37 Altamaha, Oconee, and Ocmulgee Rivers, Ga. (SAS) 8-1, 8-11, 8-12 Alton, Ind. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Alum Creek Lake, Ohio (ORH) 17-2, 17-12, 17-17 Alvin R. Bush Dam, Pa. (NAB) 4-19, 4-28 Amazonia, Mace Creek, Mo. (MRK) 27-21 American Lake, Vicinity of Fort Lewis, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 American River, Calif. (SPK) 35-34 Ames Dam and Reservoir, Skunk River, Iowa (NCR) 23-14 Amesbury, Powwow River, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-42, 1-51 Amite River, La. (MR + T) 42-15 Amite River and Bayou Manchac, La. (LMN) 11-16 Amite River and Tributaries, La. (LMN) 11-18 Amouli-Tula, Tutuila Island, American Samoa (POD) 36-14 Amsterdam, Ohio (ORP) 18-20, 18-25 Anacortes Harbor, Wa. (NPS) 38-1, 38-14, 38-19, 38-24 Anacostia River and Flats (NAM) 4-37 Anacostia River and Tributaries, Flood Protection and Navigation Improvements, D.C. and Md. (NAB) 4-39 Anacostia River and Tributaries, Prince Georges Co., Md. (NAB) 14-39 Anacostia River Basin (NAB) 4-42 Anaheim Bay Harbor, Orange Co., Ca. (SPL) 33-24 Anahuac Channel, Tex. (SWE) 31-8 Anchorage Harbor, Alas. (NPA) 40-1, 40-8, 40-10 Anchorage Harbor, Alas. (Uncompleted Portion) (NPA) 40-13 Anchorages (NAO) 5-17, 5-21 Anclote River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46, 9-47 Andalusia Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 25-7 Anderson, Ind. (White River) (ORL) 16-21 Anderson Park (NAO) 5-20 Andover, Dyke Creek, N.Y. (NCB) 20-39 Andover Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-44 Andrews River, Mass. (NED) 1-3, 1-25, 1-33 Angler-use sites, Meramec Basin, Mo. (LMS) 14-14 Annapolis Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-34, 4-41 Ansonia-Derby, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-42, 1-50 Anthony Shoals, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Apalachee Bay, Fla. to New Orleans, La. (SAM) 10-40 Apalachicola Bay. Fla. (SAM) 10-3, 10-31, 10-37 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, Ala., Ga., and Fla. (SAM) 10-23, 10-35, 10-46, 10-51 Apalachicola River to St. Andrew Bay, Fla. (SAM) 10-40 Apoon Mouth of Yukon River, Alas. (NPA) 40-12 Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin, Ore. (NPP) 37-10, 37-25, 37-34, 37-43 Appomattox River, Va. (NAO) 5-19, 5-21 Apponaug Cove, R.I. (NED) 1-38 Appoquinimink River, Del. (NAP) 3-24, 3-27 Approach Channel to Main Turning Basin (SWE) 31-36 Aquia Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-37 I-2 INDEX Aquashicola Reservoir, Penn. (NAP) 3-27 Aquatic Plant Control Charleston, S.C., Distr. (SAN) 7-1, 7-8, 7-10, 7-14 Galveston, Tex., Distr. (SWG) 31-2, 31-15, 31-18, 31-30 Jacksonville, Fla., Distr. (SAJ) 9-2, 9-26, 9-32, 9-47 Mobile, Ala., Distr. (SAM) 10-3, 10-31, 10-37 New England Div. (NED) 1-3, 1-25, 1-33 New Orleans Distr. (LMN) 11-16 New York Distr. (NAN) 2-2, 2-22, 2-27 Philadelphia, Penn. (NAP) 3-25 Sacramento, Calif., Distr, (SPK) 35-34 Savannah, Ga., Distr. (SAS) 8-2, 8-11, 8-15 Wilmington, N.C., Distr. (SAW) 6-2, 6-18, 6-25 Aquilla Lake, Tex. (SWF) 30-2, 30-15, 30-19 Ararat River, Mount Airy, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Arcadia Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-2, 21-31, 21-43 Arcadia Lake, Okla. (SWT) 29-2, 29-16 Arch Creek, Dade County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-55 Archers Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Ardsley, N.Y. (NAN) 2-17, 2-25, 2-31 Area V, Estelline Springs, Tex. (SWT) 29-11 Area VIII, Tex. (SWT) 29-11 Area East of Albany Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Arecibo Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-2, 9-26, 9-32 Arkport Dam, N.Y. (NAB) 4-15, 4-27 Arkansas City, Kan. (SWT) 29-19 Arkansas River Basin, Ark., Okla., and Kan. (SWL) 28-2, 28-11, 28-14, 28-19, 28-20, 28-21, 28-22 Arkansas River Basin Multiple Purpose Plan (SWT) 29-20 Arkansas River, Dikes, Levees, and Revetments (MR+T) 42-39 Arkansas River, Russellville, Morrilton, Ark. (SWL) 28-18 Arkansas-Red River Basins, Kan., Okla., Tex. (SWT) 29-2, 29-11, 29-16 Arlington, Alkali Canyon, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Arlington Lake, Mo. (MRK) 27-17 Amrnolds Bay, Vt. (NAN) 2-39 Armuchee Creek, Ga., (SAM) 10-48 Aroostook River, Ft. Fairfield, Me. (NED) 1-47 Arroyo, Colo., Rio Hondo, Tex. (SWG) 37-31 Arthur V. Ormond Lock and Dam (No.9) (SWL) 28-2, 28-19 Asan River, Guam (POD) 36-15 Asan Village, Guam (POD) 36-12 Asbury Park to Manasquan, NJ. (NAN) 2-17 Asharoken Beach, Huntington, N.Y. (NAN) 2-39 Ashland, Ky. (ORH) 17-21, 17-23 Ashland Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 21-2, 21-31, 21-43 Ashley River, S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 20-2, 20-17, 20-22 Asotin Creek, Asotin, Ind. (NPW) 39-15 Asotin Dam, Snake River, Ind. and Wash. (NPW) 39-16 Asquiroga Bay, Guam (POD) 36-11 Assunpink Creek Basin, NJ. (NAP) 3-12 Astoria Deep Draft Anchorages, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Astoria Turning Basin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-37 Atchafalaya Basin, La. (MR+T) 42-5, 42-13, 42-30 Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, La. (MR+T) 42-30 Atchafalaya Basin Floodway between Alabama Bayou and Morgan City (MR+T) 42-13 Atchafalaya River Bayous Chene Boeuf, and Black, La. (LMN) 11-16 Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to Gulf of Mexico (LMN) 11-16 Atchison Co. Levee District No. 1 (MRO) 26-18 Atchison, Kans. (MRK) 27-16 Athalia, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 Athens, Ohio (ORH) 17-21, 17-23 Atlantic Beach Channels, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Atlantic City, N.J. (NAP) 3-26 Atlantic Coast of Maryland and Assateague Island, Va. (NAB) 4-22 Atlantic Coast of NJ. Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlets (NAN) 2-36 Atlantic Gulf Ship Canal, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla. (NAO) (SAW) (SAN) (SAS) (SAJ) 5-2, 5-11, 5-15, 5-18, 5-21, 6-3, 6-18, 6-22, 7-2, 7-9, 7-10, 8-2, 8-11, 8-13, 9-2, 9-26, 9-32 Atlantic Ocean Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-5, 5-12, 5-16 Au Sable Harbor at Au Sable River (Oscoda), Mich. (NCE) 21-3, 21-31, 21-43 Auasi Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-10 Auburn, N.Y., Owasco Outlet (NCB) 20-37 Auglaize River, Cemetary, Defiance, Ohio (NCB) 20-39 Augusta, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Augusta, Ky. (ORH) 17-21 Augusta Levee, Kans. (SWT) 29-19 Aunuu Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-10, 36-14 Aurora, Ind. (ORL) 16-21, 16-26 I-3 Aurora, Westerly Creek-Kelley Road Dam, Colo. (MRO) 26-19 Authorized Bridge Alteration (NED) 1-10 Avoca, N.Y. (NAB) 4-15, 4-27 Avon Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Aylesworth Creek Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-14, 4-26 B B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, N.C. (Formerly New Hope Lake, N.C.) (SAW) 6-15, 6-20 Bachelor Island, Wash. (NPP) 37-41, 37-44 Back Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Bad River, Bank Protection, Fort Pierre, S. Dak. (MRO) 26-19 Bagaduce River, Maine (NED) 1-38, 1-42, 1-44 Bainbridge, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39, 4-42 Baker Brook, Mass. (NED) 1-44 Bakers Haulover Inlet, Fla. (SAJ) 9-3, 9-26, 9-32 Ball Mountain Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-13, 1-23, 1-28, 1-48, Baltimore Harbor, Md. Collection and Removal of Drift (NAB) 4-4, 4-24, 4-31 Baltimore Harbor and Channels, Md. and Va. (NAB) 4-3, 4-24, 4-30, 4-40 Baltimore Harbor and Channels (Norfolk District) (NAO) 5-2, 5-11, 5-15, 5-25 Bandon Small Boat Basin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-37 Bank Revetments and Dikes: Memphis District (MR+T) 42-41 Bank Revetments and Dikes: New Orleans District (MR+T) 42-34 Bank Revetments and Dikes: Vicksburg District (MR+T) 42-36 Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification, Ark. (SWL) 28-2, 28-11 Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification, Arkansas River, Ark. and Okla. (SWT) 29-20 Banner Special Drainage and Levee Districts (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Baptiste Collette-Bayou Ostrica, La. (MR+T) 42-11 Bar Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-44, 1-46 Bar Lake, Mich. (NCE) 21-25 Bar Point Harbor, Ketchikan, Alas. (NPA) 40-2, 40-8, 40-10, 40-12 Baraga Co., Mich. (NCE) 21-25 Barataria Bay Waterway, La. (LMN) 11-16 Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii (POD) 36-2, 36-7, 36-9 Barbourville, Ky. (ORN) 15-13, 15-19 Barbre Landing-Alabama Bayou (MR+T) 42-14 Barcelona Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 20-35 Bardwell Lake, Tex. (SWF) 30-3, 30-15, 30-19 Barkley Dam and Lake Barkley, Ky. and Tenn. (ORN) 15-14 Barnard, Kans. (MRK) 27-16 Bamegat Inlet, NJ.(NAP) 3-2, 3-15, 3-19 Bamegat Light, NJ. (NAP) 3-26 Bamett Creek, Ky. (Rough River) (ORL) 16-24 Baron Fork, Ok. (SWT) 29-21 Barre Falls Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-13, 1-28, 1-48 Barren River Lake, Ky. (ORL) 16-4, 16-13 Bartley, Nebr. (MRK) 27-16, 27-19 Bass Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38, 1-46 Bass Harbor Bar, Maine (NED) 1-38 Bassett Creek, Minn. (NCS) 24-3, 24-22 Bastrop Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 31-30 Batavia and Vicinity to Nawanda Creek, N.Y. (NCB) 20-37 Batavia, Ill. (NCC) 22-8 Bath, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39, 4-42 Baton Rouge Harbor, segment between Mi. 2.5 and 5.0, La. (LMN) 11-16 Baton Rouge Harbor (MR+T) 42-11 Baton Rouge Harbor (Devil's Swamp), La. (MR+T) 42-5, 42-31 Battle Creek, Bank Protection, Battle Creek, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Battle Creek, Kalamazoo River, Mich. (NCE) 21-27 Baudette Harbor, Minn. (NCS) 24-27 Bay City Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 25-27 Bay Ridge and Red Hook Channels, N.Y. (NAN) 2-2, 2-22, 2-27, 2-33 Bay River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Bayard, W. Va. (NAB) 4-39, 4-42 Bayfield Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 21-55, 21-60 Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, Ark. and La. (LMK) 12-3, 12-9, 12-11, 12-15, 12-17 Bayou Bodcau and Tributaries, Ark. and La. (LMK) 12-4, 12-9, 12-11, 12-18 Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-18, 12-19,12-20 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, La. (LMK) 12-19, 12-20 Bayou Boniface, La. (LMN) 11-16 I-4 INDEX Bayou Choupique, La. (LMN) 11-18 Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries, La. (MR+T) 42-5, 42-14, 42-30 Bayou Coden, Ala. (SAM) 10-3, 10-5, 10-31, 10-37 Bayou Cumbest, Jackson Co., Miss. (SAM) 10-49 Bayous D'Arbonne and Corney, La. (LMK) 11-15 Bayou des Glaises diversion ditch, La. (MR+T) 42-29 Bayou Dorcheat, Loggy Bayou, and Lake Bisteneau, La. (LMN) 11-16 Bayou Dupre, La. (LMN) 11-16 Bayou Galere, Miss. (SAM) 10-48 Bayou Grosse Tete, La. (LMN) 11-16 Bayou La Batre, Ala. (SAM) 10-4, 10-31, 10-37, 10-50 Bayou Lacombe, La. (LMN) 11-16 Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche Jump Waterway, La. (LMN) 11-16 Bayou La Lautre, St. Malo's, and Yscolskey, La. (LMN) 11-16 Bayou Metro, Ark. (MR+T) 42-54 Bayou Nicholas, Coushatta, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-18, 12-18 Bayou Plaquemine Brule, La. (LMN) 11-16 Bayou Pierre, La. (LMK) 12-19, 12-20 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-18, 12-18, 12-20 Bayou Queue de Tortue, La. (LMN) 11-16 Bayou Rapides, La. (LMN) 11-18 Bayou Rigolette, La. (LMN) 11-14 Bayou Segnette Waterway, La. (LMN) 11-16 Bayou Teche, La. (LMN) 11-16 Bayou Teche and Vermilion River, La. (LMN) 11-16 Bayou Terrebonne, La. (LMN) 11-16 Bayou Vermilion, La. (LMN) 11-16 Bayport Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-55 Bayport, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Baytown, Tex. (SWG) 31-31 Beals Harbor, Me. (NED) 1-23, 1-38 Bear Creek, Adel, Ga. (SAJ) 9-54 Bear Creek, Kendrick, Ind. (NPW) 39-14, 39-15 Bear Creek, Medford, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Bear Creek, Mt. (NPS) 38-25 Bear Creek Dam (City of Hannibal, Mo.) (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Bear Creek Lake, Col. (MRO) 26-2, 26-9, 26-12 Bear Creek, Long Tom River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Bear River, Calif. (SPK) 35-36 Bear River, Smiths Fork, Wyo. (SPK) 35-40 Beards Brook Reservoir, N.H. (NED) 1-44 Beatrice, Big Blue River, Nebr. (MRK) 27-17 Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-4, 6-18, 6-23 Beaver and Mahoning Rivers, Pa. and Ohio (ORP) 18-19 Beaver Bay, Minn., (NCE) 21-55 Beaver Brook, Keene, N.H. (NED) 1-13, 1-23, 1-28, 1-36, 1-44, 1-49 Beaver Brook, Londonderry, N.H. (NED) 1-47 Beaver Creek, Montezuma, Ga. (SAM) 10-48 Beaver Creek, Platte Co., Nebr. (MRO) 26-23 Beaver Creek Near Tillamoor, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Beaver Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-44 Beaver Lake, Ark. (SWL) 28-8, 28-13, 28-24 Beaver Lake, Steams Co., Minn. (NCS) 24-34 28-8, 28-13 Beaver River, Bridgewater, Penn. (ORP) 18-26 Beaver River, Ohio (ORP) 18-25 Bedford, East Fork, 102 River, Iowa (MRK) 27-16 Beech Fork Lake, W.Va. (ORH) 17-3, 17-12, 17-17 Belfast Harbor, Me. (NED) 1-24, 1-38 Belford, N.J. (NAN) 2-38 Belhaven Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-5, 6-18 Bell Foley Lake, White River, Ark. (SWL) 28-17, 28-24 Bell Island, Norwalk, Conn. (NED) 1-47 Bellaire, Ohio (ORP) 18-21 Bellamy River, N.H. (NED) 1-38 Belle Fourche, Belle Fourche River, S. Dak. (MRO) 26-19 Belle Fourche, Cheyenne River, S. Dak. (MRO) 26-15 Belle Glade, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Belle River, Mich. (NCE) 21-55, 21-60 Belleville Locks and Dam, Ohio (ORD) 19-8 Bellevue, Ky. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Bellevue-Papillion Creek Levees (MRO) 26-18 Bellingham Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-2, 38-14, 38-19, 38-24 Bellville Point, Ga. (SAS) 8-15 Belpre, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 Belton Lake Modification, Tex. (SWF) 30-11 Beltzville Lake, Penn. (NAP) 3-11, 3-17, 3-22 Belton Lake, Tex. (SWF) 30-3, 30-15, 30-19 Benbrook Lake, Tex. (SWF) 30-3, 30-15, 30-19 Benett-McDonald-Smithland D.D., Little Sioux River, Iowa (MRO) 26-20 I-5 Bennington, Vt. (NAN) 2-36 Bennington Reservoir, N.H. (NED) 1-44 Benwood, W.Va. (ORP) 18-20, 18-24 Berkeley Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-12 Berkeley Marina, Calif. (SPN) 34-12 Berlin Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio (ORP) 18-4, 18-11, 18-16 Berlin, Ohio (ORP) 18-25 Berrien County, (St. Josephs Shore) Mich. (NCE) 21-57 Berwick Bay Bridge (LMN) 11-16 Bethel Bank Stabilization (NPA) 40-9 Bethel Harbor (NPA) 40-14 Bethel Small Boat Harbor, Ark. (NPA) 40-2, 40-8, 40-10 Bethlehem, Lehigh River, Penn. (NAP) 3-26 Bettendorf, Iowa (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Betterton Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Beverly Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Big Bay Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-3, 21-31, 21-43 Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, S.D. (MRO) 26-7, 26-11, 26-14, 26-18 Big Bend, W.Va. (ORH) 17-22 Big Black River, Miss. (LMK) 12-15, 12-20 Big Blue Lake, Ind. (ORL) 16-22, 16-28 Big Blue River, Blue Springs, Nebr. (Sewerline and Rd) (MKK) 27-21 Big Blue River, Seward, Nebr. (MRK) 27-16 Big Brown Creek, Prentiss Co., Miss. (SAM) 16-48 Big Choctaw Bayou, La. (LMK) 12-20 Big Creek and L'Anguille River, White River Basin, Ark. (LMM) 13-5 Big Creek Canal, Millington, Tenn. (LMM) 13-5 Big (Cunningham) Creek, Ohio (NCB) 20-35 Big Cry Creek Dam and Diversion, Calif. (SPK) 35-34 Big Darby, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 Big Fossil Creek, Tex. (SWF) 30-22 Big Hole River, Pennington Bridge, Near Twin Bridges (MRO) 26-19 Big Horn River, Two Leggin Bridge near Hardin (MRO) 26-19 Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Big Pigeon and Little Pigeon Bayous, La. (LMN) 11-16 Big Pine Lake, Ind. (Walbash River) (ORL) 16-20 Big Pine Lake, Tex. (SWT) 29-19 Big Rapids, Mich. (NCE) 21-25 Big River Basin, Vicinity of Kansas City (MRK) 27-16 Big River Reservoir, RI. (NED) 1-40 Big Run, Penn. (ORP) 18-20, 18-25 Big Sandy Lake, Tex. (SWF) 30-22 Big Sandy River, W. Va. and Ky., including Levisa and Tug Forks (ORH) 17-20 Big Sioux River at Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 26-15 Big Sioux River, Fink Bridge, near Flandreau, S. Dak. (MRO) 26-19 Big Sioux River, Harrisburgh, S. Dak. (MRO) 26-19 Big Sioux River, Jefferson, S. Dak. (MRO) 26-19 Big Sioux River, North Sioux City, S. Dak. (MRO) 26-19 Big Sioux River, Plymouth Co, Iowa (MRO) 26-21 Big Sioux River, Plymouth Co, S. Dak. (MRO) 26-19 Big Sioux River, Schofield Bridge, near Flandreau, S. Dak. (MRO) 26-19 Big Sioux River, Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 26-2 Big Sioux River, Union Co, S. Dak. (MRO) 26-19 Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, Ky. and Tenn. (ORN) 15-4, 15-9 Big Spring, Tex. (SWF) 30-22 Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, Minn. and S. Dak. (NCS) 24-4, 24-22 Big Stranger Creek, Kan. (MRK) 27-16 Big Suamico River, Wis. (NCE) 21-3, 21-31, 21-43 Big Sunflower River, Miss. (LMK) (MR+T) 12-5, 42-17, 42-29, 42-53 Big Swan Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Big Thompson River, Johnstown, Colo. (MRO) 26-19 Big Timber Creek, NJ. (NAP) 3-24 Big Walnut Lake. Ind. (ORL) 16-28 Big Walnut Lake. Ind. (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-20 Big Wash, Milford Beaver Co, Utah (SPK) 35-34 Big Wood River, Idaho (NPW) 39-15, 39-17 Billings, Mt. (MRO) 26-17 Biloxi Harbor, Miss. (SAM) 10-4, 10-31, 10-38 Biloxi River at Lorraine Road, Harrison County, Miss. (SAM) 10-48 Binghamton, N.Y. (NAB) 4-15, 4-27 Birch, W. Va. (ORH) 17-21 Birch Hill Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-13, 1-23, 1-28, 1-48 Birch Lake, Okla. (SWT) 29-3, 29-11, 29-17 Bird Rock Area, La Jolla, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Birds Point-New Madrid Floodway, Mo. (MR+T) 42-55 I-6 INDEX Biscayne Bay, Fla., Hurricane Protection (SAJ) 9-54 Bitter Creek at Rock Springs, Wyo. (SPK) 35-40 Black Bayou-Pine Island Area, La. (LMN) 11-18 Black Bayou Lake, La. (LMK) 12-19 Black Bayou Reservoir, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-18, 12-20 Black Bear and Miller Lakes, Minn. (NCS) 24-4, 24-22 Black Creek, Gadsden, Ala. (SAM) 10-48 Black Fork at Hendricks, W. Va. (ORP) 18-20 Black River (Alcona Co.), Mich. (NCE) 21-55 Black River, La. (MR+T) 42-15 Black River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25, 6-27 Black River, Wayne Co, Mo. (SWL) 28-4, 28-11 Black River, Wis. (NCS) 24-27, 24-30 Black River at North Bend, Wis. (NCS) 24-33 Black River Basin, Ark. and Mo. (SWL) 28-18 Black River, Butler County Road 607, Mo. (SWL) 28-17 Black River Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-31, 21-57 Black River Harbor, (Upper Penisula) Mich. (NCE) 21-3, 21-31, 21-43 Black River Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) (NCE) 20-35, 21-31 Black River Lake, Wis. (NCS) 24-30 Black River, Poplar Bluff, Mo., to Knobel, Ark. (SWL) 28-17 Black River (Port Huron), Mich. (NCE) 21-3, 21-43 Black Rock, Waterbury, Ct. (NED) 1-50 Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 20-2, 20-17, 20-22, 20-40 Black Rock Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-3, 1-25, 1-33, 1-44 Black Rock Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-17, 1-29, 1-49 Black Walnut Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Black Walnut Point, Md. (NAB) 4-39 Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, Ala. (SAM) 10-5, 10-31, 10-38, 10-52 Black Warrior River, U.S. Hwy. 11 Bridge, Fosters, Ala. (SAM) 10-48 Blackbird Creek, Decatur, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Blackbird Creek near Macy, Nebr. (MRO) 26-15 Blackboy Creek, Tulsa Co., Okla. (SWT) 29-21 Blackfoot Area, Snake River, Idaho (NPW) 39-12, 39-16 Blackfoot Reservoir, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-16, Blackfoot-River, Idaho (NPW) 39-12, 39-14, 39-16, 39-17 Blackfoot River, Mont. (NPS) 38-25 Blacksmith Fork River, Logan, Utah (SPK) 35-40 Blackstone, Mass. (NED) 1-23 Blackstone River Basin, Mass. and R.I. (NED) 1-11, 1-47 Blackstone River, Millbury, Mass. (NED) 1-42, 1-48 Blackwater Dam, N.H. (NED) 1-18, 1-30, 1-51 Blackwater River, Fla. (SAM) 10-47, 10-50 Blackwater River, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Blaine, Maine (NED) 1-23 Blaine Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-24 Blair and Sitcum Waterways, Tacoma Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-11 Blakely Mountain Dam-Lake Ouachita, Ark. (LMK) 12-17, 12-20 Blanchard River, Ottawa, Ohio (NCB) 20-39 Blind Slough Diking District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-38 Blockhouse Creek, Cedar Park, Tex. (SWF) 30-23 Blue Marsh Lake, Pa. (NAP) 3-11, 3-17, 3-22 Blue Mountain Lake, Ark. (SWL) 28-4, 28-11, 28-22 Blue River Channel, Kansas City, Mo. (MRK) 27-2, 27-9, 27-12 Blue River Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-10, 37-26, 37-34, 37-43, 37-45 Bluestone Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 17-3, 17-12, 17-17 Bluff Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-47 Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors, Members, Board Actions, Recommendations (BERH) 41-1, 41-2 Bodega Bay, Calif. (SPN) 34-6 Bodie Island, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, Ark. and La. (MR+T) 42-6, 42-53, 42-54 Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, La. (MR+T) 42-29 Boeuf River, La. ( LMN) 12-15 Bogachiel River, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Boggy Bayou Shoreline, Valparaiso, Fla., (SAM) 10-49 Boggy Creek, Austin, Tex. (SWF) 30-3, 30-15, 30-19 Boise River, Idaho (NPW) 39-15, 39-17 Boise Valley, Idaho (NPW) 39-12, 39-16 Boligee Canal, Boligee, Ala. (SAM) 10-48 Bolivar, N.Y. (ORP) 18-25 Bolles Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-4, 21-31, 21-43 Bon Secour River, Ala. (SAM) 10-7, 10-31, 10-39, 10-50 I-7 Bonnes Coulee, Velva, N.D. (NCS) 24-28, 24-33 Bonnet Carre, Baton Rouge (MR+T) 42-11 Bonnet Carre, Floodway, La. (MR+T) 42-11 Bonnet Carre Spillway, La. (MR+T) 42-6 Bonneville Lock and Dam-Lake Bonneville, Oreg. & Wash (NPP)37-2, 37-16, 37-23, 37-27, 37-35, 37-46 Bonpas Creek, Ill.(Wabash River) (ORL) 16-21, 16-26 Bonum Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-37 Boone County (Ohio River, Rabbit Hash), Ky. (ORL) 16-19 Booneville Lake, Ky. (Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-20 Boothbay Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38, 1-53 Boston Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38, 1-52 Boswell Lake, Okla. (SWT) 29-19 Boulder, Colo. (MRO) 26-17 Bound Brook, Scituate, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Bowman-Haley Lake, N. Dak. (MRO) 26-2, 26-9, 26-12 Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, Pa. (ORP) 18-21 Bradford, Pa. (ORP) 18-20, 18-25 Bradford, Tenn. (LMM) 13-5 Bradley Lake, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Bramwell, W. Va. (ORH) 17-23 Branford Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-38, 1-53 Branson Cove, Va. (NAB) 4-37 Brant Rock Beach, Marshfield, Mass. (NED) 1-44 Braymer Lake, Shoal Creek, Mo. (MRK) 27-16 Brazos Island Harbor, Tex. (SWG) 31-2, 31-15, 31-18, 3f-32, 31-33 Brazos River, Tex., Velasco to Old Washington (SWG) 31-30 Breckenridge, Minn. (NCS) 24-33 Breton Bay, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Brevard County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-18, 19-30, 9-40 Brevoort Levee, Ill. (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-19, 16-29 Bridge Alterations Authorized Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 22-17 Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN) 15-4 Bridgeport, Mich. (NCE) 21-25 Bridgeport Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-38, 1-44 Bridges, Columbia River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-37 Bridgewater, Va. (NAB) 4-42 Brigantine Islnad (NAP) 3-26 Brilliant, Ohio (ORP) 18-21 Bristol Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-38 Broad Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37, 4-41 Broad Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Broad Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Broad Creek River, Del. (NAB) 4-37 Broadkill River, Del. (NAP) 3-24 Broadwater Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-40 Broadway Lake, S.C. (SAS) 8-11, 8-14 Brockway, Pa. (Allegheny River Basin) (ORP) 18-21 Brockway Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-44 Broken Bow, Mud Creek, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Broken Bow Lake, Okla. (SWT) 29-8, 29-15, 29-18 Bromley, Ky. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Bronx River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34, 2-37 Brook County, Hooverson Heights, W.Va. (ORP) 18-26 Brookfield Lake, Yellow Creek, Mo. (MRK) 27-16 Brookgreen Gardens, S. C. (SAN) 7-14 Brooklyn, W. Va. (ORH) 17-22 Brookport, Ill. (ORL) 16-19, 16-24, 16-29 Brookville, Pa. (ORP) 18-20, 18-25 Brookville Lake, Ind. (ORL) 16-5, 16-13 Broward County, Fla., Beach Erosion Control and Hillsboro Inlet, Fla., Navigation Project (SAJ) 9-19, 9-30, 9-40 Brown, Clarence J., Dam and Reservoir, Ohio (ORL) 16-7, 16-14 Brown Co, Gregg Creek, Kan., Granda Bridge (MRK) 27-21 Brown Co, West Fork Wolf River, Kan., Avenue Rd. Bridge (MRK) 27-21 Browns Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33, 2-34, 2-37 Browns Creek, Nashville, Tenn. (ORN) 15-19 Brownville-Nemaha Levee (MRO) 26-18 Brownwood Channel Improvement, Tex. (SWF) 30-22 Brunswick County Beaches, N.C. (Cape Fear to North Carolina-South Carolina State Line) (SAW) 6-27 Brunswick Harbor, Ga. (SAS) 8-3, 8-11, 8-13 Brush Creek, Jeannette, Pa. (ORP) 18-26 Brush Creek, Kansas City, Mo. (MRK) 27-2, 27-9, 27-12 Buchanan Dam-H. V. Eastman Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-5, 35-24 Buck Creek, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Buckhannon, W. Va. (ORP) 18-19, 18-20, 18-25 Buckhorn Creek, Campbellsville, Ky., (ORL) 16-31 I-8 INDEX Buckhorn Lake, Ky. (ORL) 16-5, 16-13 Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, Maine (NED) 1-38, 1-46, 1-53 Bucksport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Buena Vista, Iowa (NCR) 23-17 Buena Vista, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 Buena Vista, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Buffalo, Johnson Co., Diversion Channel, Wyo. (MRO) 26-17 Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, Tex. (SWG) 31-10, 31-16, 31-28 Buffalo Creek, Meadow Grove, Nebr. (MRO) 26-15 Buffalo Creek, Scranton, N. Dak. (MRO) 26-15 Buffalo Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 20-3, 20-17, 20-23 Buffalo River, Miss. (LMK) 12-20 Buffalo River, West Seneca, N.Y. (NCB) 20-39 Buffumville Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-21, 1-31, 1-52 Buford Dam, Lake Sidney Lanier, Ga. (SAM) 10-24, 10-35 Bull Run, Pa. (NAB) 4-39 Bull Shoals Lake, Ark. (SWL) 28-8, 28-13 Bull Shoals, White River, Ark. (SWL) 28-24 Bullock Neck, East Providence, R.I. (NED) 1-46 Bullocks Point Cove, R.I. (NED) 1-38 Bunker Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Bunker Hills Creek, Watauga, Tex., (SWF) 30-23 Burch Creek, Weber County, Utah (SPK) 35-34 Burgettstown-Slovan, Pa. (ORP) 18-20, 18-25 Burial Hill Beach, Westport, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Burketts Creek, Amory, Miss. (SAM) 10-48 Burlington, Iowa (NCR) 23-15 Burlington, Ohio (ORH) 17-21 Burlington Dam, N. Dak. (NCS) 24-28 Burlington Harbor, Vt. (NAN) 2-34 Burns Harbor, Ind. (NCC) 22-17 Bums Small Boat Harbor, Ind. (NCC) 22-10 Bums Waterway Harbor, Ind. (NCC) 22-2, 22-10, 22-12, 22-14 Bumrns Waterway SBH, Ind. (NCC) 22-2, 22-16 Bumsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, W. Va. (ORH) 17-2, 17-12, 17-17 Burr Oak, Prairie River, Mich. (NCE) 21-27 Burton Creek, Bryan, Tex. (SWF) 30-23 Bush, Alvin R., Dam, Pa. (NAB) 4-9, 4-28 Butler, Pa. (ORP) 18-20, 18-25 Butler Co. Drainage District 3, Mo. (SWL) 28-17 Buttermilk Bay Channel, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Buttermilk Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-2, 2-22, 2-27, 2-33 Butternut Creek, DeWitt, N.Y. (NCB) 20-39 Byram River at Pemberwick, Conn. (NAN) 2-36 C C-51 East End (SAJ) 9-52 Cache Basin, Ark. (MR+T) 42-9, 42-18, 42-30 Cache Creek Basin, Calif. (SPK) 35-30, 35-22 Cache Creek Basin, Calif., (Cache Creek Settling Basin) (SPK) 35-5, 35-24 Cache La Poudre River, Ft. Collins, Colo. (MRO) 26-19 Cache La Poudre River, Windsor, Colo. (MRO) 26-19 Cache River, Heron Pond, Ill. (ORL) 16-31 Cache River Diversion, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Cache River Levee, Ill. (ORL) 16-29 Caddo Lake, La. (LMK) 12-18 Caddo Lake Dam, La. (LMK) 12-20 Cadet Bayou, Miss. (SAM) 10-47, 10-50 Cadle Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-40 Caemarvon, La. (MR+T) 42-11 Caesar Creek Lake, Ohio (ORL) 16-5, 16-14 Cagles Mill Lake, Ind. (ORL) 16-6, 16-14 Cahaba River, Ala. (SAM) 10-47 Cairo, Cairo Drainage Districts (MR+T) 42-12 Cairo, Cairo Drainage District, Mounds, Mound City and Vicinity (MR+T) 42-12 Cairo, W. Va. (ORH) 17-23 Calabash Creek, N.C. (SAN) 7-14 Calapooya River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Calaveras River and Little John Creek and Tributaries, including New Hogan Lake and Farmington Darn, Calif. (SPK) 35-6, 35-24 Calcasieu River and Pass, La. (LMN) 11-16 Calcasieu River at Coon Island, La. (LMN) 11-16 Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, La. (LMN) 11-16 Calcasieu River Salt Water Barrier, La. (LMN) 11-16 Caledonia, Genesse River, N.Y. (NCB) 20-37 Calf Pasture Beach Park, Conn. (NED) 1-41 California (Cincinnati), Ohio (ORL) 16-21, 16-26 California Debris Commission (CDC) 53-1 Calion, Ark. (LMK) 12-14, 12-17 Calloway Branch, Hurst, Tex. (SWF) 30-22, 30-23 Cal.-Sag Channel, Pt. II, Illinois Waterway, Ill., & Ind. (NCR) 23-14 I-9 Calumet (MR+T) 42-13, 42-14 Calumet Harbor and River, Ill. and Ind. (NCC) 22-2, 22-10, 22-12, 22-16 Calumet River Bridges, Ill. (NCC) 22-17 Camas Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-12, 39-16 Cambridge Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-4, 4-24, 4-31 Cambridgeport Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-44 Camden Harbor, Me. (NED) 1-38 Camp Branch/Lynches Lake, Lake City, S.C. (SAN) 7-16 Camp Ground Lake, Ky. (Salt River) (ORL) 16-20 Camp Perry, Ohio (NCB) 20-37 Campbells Island, Ill. (NCR) 23-14 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-18, 12-18, 12-20 Canadaigua Lake, N.Y. (NCB) 20-39 Canadaway Creek, Fredonia, N.Y. (NCB) 20-39 Canal Point, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Canapitsit Channel, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Canaveral Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-3, 9-26, 9-32, 9-43 Candy Lake, Okla. (SWT) 29-3, 29-11, 29-17 Cane Creek State Park, Ohio (NCB) 20-40 Cane River, La. (LMN) 11-16 Caney Creek, Miss. (LMK) 12-11 Caney Fork River, Tenn. (ORN) 15-13 Caney River, Okla. (SWT) 29-21 Canisteo, N.Y. (NAB) 4-16, 4-27 Cannelton, Ind. (ORL) 16-19, 16-24, 16-29 Cannelton Locks and Dam, Ind. (ORD) 19-9 Cannon, Clarence, Dam and Reservoir, Mo. (LMS) 14-6, 14-9, 14-12 Cannon River at Fairbault, Minn. (NCS) 24-4, 24-22 Cannonball River, Shields, Nebr. (MRO) 26-23 Canoe Creek, Henderson, Ky. (ORL) 16-30, 16-31 Canton, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-42 Canton, Mo. (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Canton Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 28-22, 29-3, 29-11, 29-17, 29-20 Canton (Nimishillen), Ohio (ORH) 17-23 Canyon Lake, Tex. (SWF) 30-4, 30-15, 30-19 Cape Charles City Harbor, Va. (NAO) 5-3, 5-11, 5-15 Cape Cod Canal, Mass. (NED) 1-3, 1-25, 1-33 Cape Fear River, N.C., above Wilmington (SAW) 6-5, 6-18 Cape Fear River Basin, N.C. (SAW) 6-11, 6-30 Cape Florida State Park, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Cape Girardeau, Jackson Metropolitan Area, Mo. (LMS) 14-10 Cape Girardeau, Mo., No. 2 (LMS) 14-14 Cape Henry Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-2, 5-15 Cape Lookout, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Cape May City, N.J. (NAP) 3-26 Cape May Inlet, N.J. (NAP) 3-15 Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp., NJ. (NAP) 3-3, 3-19 Cape Porpoise Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Cape Vincent Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 20-35, 20-40 Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORD) 19-8 Carbon Cliff, Ill. (NCR) 23-17 Carden's Bottom Drainage District No. 2, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 28-17 Carl L. Estes Dam and Lakes, Tex. (SWF) 30-22 Carlyle Lake, Ill. (LMS) 14-4 Carolina Beach, N.C. (SAW) 6-31 Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N.C. (SAW) 6-12, 6-20 Carr Fork Lake, Ky. (ORL) 16-6, 6-14 Carrabelle Bar and Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-47 Carrabelle Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-50 Carroll County Levee and Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 23-14 Carrollton, Ky. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Carters Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Carters Dam and Reservoir, Ga. (SAM) 10-21, 10-35, 10-45 Caruthersville Harbor, Mo. (LMM) 13-4 Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, Me. (NED) 1-38 Carvins Creek, Roanoke, Va. (SAW) 6-31 Cascades Canal, Oreg. (NPP) 37-37 Cascadia Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39, 37-41, 37-45 Caseville Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-4, 21-31, 21-43 Caseyville, Ky. (ORL) 16-21, 16-26 Cashie River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Casino Beach, Chicago, Ill. (NCC) 22-17 Cassville Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 25-7 Castine, Me. (NED) 1-23 Castle Rock, Wash. (NPP) 37-39 Castlewood Lake, Douglas Co., Colo. (MRO) 26-17 Catching Inlet Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Cathance River, Me. (NED) 1-38 Catherine Creek, Oreg. (NPW) 39-2, 39-9, 39-12 Catherine Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPW) 39-15 Cathlamet, Wash. (NPP) 37-37 Cattaraugus Creek, N.Y. (NCB) 20-35 Cattaraugus Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 20-3, 20-17, 20-24 Cattletsburg, Ky. (ORH) 17-21, 17-23 Cave Run Lake, Ky. (ORL) 16-6, 16-14 I-10 INDEX Cave-In-Rock, Ill. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Cayuga Creek, Cheektowaga, N.Y. (NCB) 20-37 Cazenovia Creek, Buffalo, N.Y. (NCB) 20-39 Cecil M. Harden Lake, Ind. (ORL) 16-6, 16-14 Cedar Bayou, Tex. (SWG) Cedar Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 31-30 Cedar Canyon Dam, Rapid City, S. Dak. (MRO) 26-15 Cedar Creek, Sussex City, Del. (NAP) 3-24 Cedar Falls, Cedar River, Ia. (NCR) 23-16 Cedar Keys Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46, 9-47 Cedar Point, Ga. (SAS) 8-15 Cedar Point Lake, Kan. (SWT) 29-19 Cedar River, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-29 Cedar River Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-55 Cedar River, Spaulding, Nebr. (MRO) 26-23 Celina Dam, Ky. (ORN) 15-14 Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. (ORN) 15-6, 15-9, 15-18 Central and Southern Florida (SAJ) 9-30, 9-41, 9-48, 9-49, 9-50, 9-51, 9-52 Central City Lake, Wapsipinicon River, Ia. (NCR) 23-14 Centralia, Wash. (NPS) 38-12 Ceredo-Kenova, W. Va. (ORH) 17-21, 17-23 Chadakoin River, Jamestown, N.Y. (ORP) 18-26 Chagrin River, East Branch, Baldwin Rd., Ohio (NCB) 20-39 Chagrin River, East Branch, Sperry Rd., Ohio (NCB) 20-39 Chagrin River, East Branch, SR 615, Ohio (NCB) 20-39 Chambersburg, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 Chambers Creek, Hurst, Tex. (SWF) 30-23 Channel between North and South Hero Island, Lake Champlain, Vt. (NAN) 2-34 Channel Connecting Plain Dealing Creek and Oak Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-40 Channel Connecting Thoroughfare Bay with Cedar Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Channel Connecting York River, Va. with Back Creek to Slaights Wharf (NAO) 5-19 Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N.C. (SAW) 6-5, 6-18 Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, Fla. (SAJ) 9-4, 9-26, 9-32 Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Channel from Phoebus, Va. to Deep Water in Hampton Roads (NAO) 5-19 Channel from PT of Turnout Channels to Approach (SWG) 31-36 Channel Improvements (MR+T) 42-30, 42-52, 42-53, 42-55, Channel Islands Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-2, 33-11, 33-17 Channel to Aransas Pass (SWG) 31-36 Channel to Barroom Bay (SWG) 31-36 Channel to Conn Brown Harbor (SWG) 31-36 Channel to Harlingen via South Turnabout from Main Channel (SWG) 31-36 Channel to Liberty, Tex. (SWG) 31-8 Channel to Main Turning Basin (SWG) 31-36 Channel to Newport News, Va. (NAO) 5-5, 5-12, 5-16, 5-19, 5-21 Channel to Palacios (SWG) 31-36 Channel to Port Bolivar, Tex. (SWG) 31-30 Channel to Port Mansfield (SWG) 31-36 Channel to Rockport (SWG) 31-36 Channel to Victoria Main Channel via East Turnout (SWG) 31-36 Channel West Side of Main Channel (SWG) 31-36 Channels and Harbors (ORL) 16-31 Channels in the Straits of MacKinac (NCE) 21-55, 21-60 Chaplin River, Perryville, Ky. (ORL) 16-19 Charenton (MR+T) 42-14 Chariton River, Mo. (1944 Act) (MRK) 27-16 Chariton River, Schuyler Co., Miss., Eason Bridge (MRK) 27-21 Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, Mo. (1965 Act) (MRK) 27-16 Charles River Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-42 Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), Mass. (NED) 1-11, 1-27, 1-36 Charlestown, N.H. (NED) 1-23, 1-42, 1-49 Charleston Channel, Oreg. (NPP) 37-37, 37-42 Charleston Harbor, S.C. (SAN) 7-2, 7-8, 7-10, 7-14, 7-17 Charlevoix County, East Jordan River, Mich. (NCE) 21-25 Charlevoix Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-4, 21-31, 21-43 Charlotte County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-40 Charlotte Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-4, 9-26, 9-32, 9-46 Chartiers Creek, Pa. (ORP) 18-3, 18-11, 18-25 Chaska, Minn. (NCS) 24-5, 24-22 I-11 Chatfield Lake, Colo. (MRO) 26-2, 26-9, 26-12 Chatham (Stage) Harbor, Mass. (NED)1-38, 1-53 Chattahoochee River, Eufaula, Ala. (SAM) 10-14, 10-33, 10-44 Chattooga Dams and Lakes, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-16 Cheat River, W. Va. (ORP) 18-19 Cheatham Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 15-14 Cheboygan Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-5, 21-32, 21-44 Cheesequake Creek, NJ. (NAN) 2-33, 2-37 Chefuncte River and Bogue Falia, La. (LMN) 11-16 Chehalis River, Wash. (NPS) 38-12, 38-25 Chena River Lakes, Alaska (NPA) 40-4, 40-5, 40-11 Cherry and Red Fork Creeks Channel Improvement, Okla. (SWT) 29-19, 29-20 Cherry Creek Lake, Colo. (MRO) 26-3, 26-9, 26-12, 26-18 Cherryfield, Maine (NED) 1-23, 1-42 Chesapeake, Ohio (ORH) 17-21 Chesconessex Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Cheshire, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 Chester, Calif. (SPK) 35-34 Chester River, Md. (NAB) 4-5, 4-24, 4-31 Chester River, Delaware County, Pa. (NAP) 3-27 Chetco River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-2, 37-23, 37-30 Chewaucan River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Chicago Harbor, Ill. (NCC) 22-3, 22-10, 22-12, 22-16 Chicago River, Ill. (NCC) 22-3, 22-10, 22-12, 22-16 Chicago River, Ill. (North Branch) (NCC) 22-6, 22-11 Chickamauga Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 15-17 Chickasaw Bogue Creek, U.S. Highway 43 Bridge, Linden, Ala. (SAM)10-48 Chicopee, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-42, 1-44, 1-49 Chicopee Falls, Mass. (NED) 1-42, 1-49 Chief Joseph Dam-Rufus Woods Lake, Wash. (NPS) 38-10, 38-17, 38-22 Chignik, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Chikaskia River, Okla. (SWT) 29-21 Chillicothe, Ohio (ORH) 17-21, 17-23 Chilo, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 Chincoteague Bay, Va. (NAO) 5-19, 5-21 Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge, Va. (NAO) 5-19, 5-21 Chincoteague Inlet, Va. (NAO) 5-3, 5-11, 5-15, 5-21 Chippewa Harbor, Isle Royale, Mich. (NCE) 21-55 Chittenango Creek and Tributaries, N.Y. (NCB) 20-37 Chittenango Creek, Sullivan, N.Y. (NCB) 20-39 Chocolate Bayou Channel (SWG) 31-36 Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, La. (LMN) 11-18 Choctawhatchee Bay to Pensacola Bay, Fla. (SAM) 10-35 Choctawhatchee Bay to West Bay, Fla. (SAM) 10-40 Choctawhatchee River, Fla. and Ala. (SAM) 10-47 Choptank River, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Chouteau Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 28-20, 29-20, 29-21 Chouteau, Nameoki, and Venice Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Chowan River, N.C. (NAO) 5-19 Chowan River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Christiansted Harbor, V.I. (SAJ) 9-47 Chwa Creek, Wa. (NPS) 38-29 Cibolo Creek, Tex. (SWA) 32-14 Cincinnati, Ohio (ORL) 16-19, 16-24, 16-29 Cincinnati, Ohio (Unit 2) (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Cincinnati, Ohio (Unit 4) (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Cincinnatus, N.Y. (NAB) 4-42 City Creek Levee, San Bernardino Co., Calif. (SPL) 33-25 City Dam, Little Caney River, Kan. (SWT) 29-21 City of Aurora, Westerly Creek, Colo. (MRO) 26-15 Clackamas River at Dixon Farm Location, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Claiborne County Port, Miss. (LMK) 12-15 Claibome Lock and Dam, Ala. (SAM) 10-21, 10-35, 10-45 Clairborne Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Clallam Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Clallam River, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Clanton, Ala. (SAM) 10-48 Claremont Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-44 Clarence Cannon Dam and Reservoir, Mo. (LMS) 14-6, 14-9, 14-12 Clarence J. Brown Dam and Reservoir, Ohio (ORL) 16-7, 16-14 Clarendon to Laconia Circle, White River Basin, Ark. (LMM) 13-5 Clarington, Ohio (ORP) 18-21 Clark Fork River, Mont. (NPS) 38-25 Clark Point Beach, New Bedford, Mass. (NED) 1-41 Clarkson, Maple Creek, Nebr. (MRO) 26-15 Clarkson, Middle Fork, Maple Creek, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Clarksville, Ark. (SWL) 28-17 Clatskanie Drainage District 1, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 1-12 INDEX Clatskanie River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-37, 37-44 Clatskanie River Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41, 37-42, 37-44 Clatsop County Diking District 3, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Clatsop County Diking District 4, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Clatsop County Diking District 6, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Clatsop County Drainage District 1, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Clatsop Drainage Districts 2 and 5, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Clear and Clarks Creeks, Wa. (NPS) 38-29 Clear and Burnt River, Oreg. (NPW) 39-2, 39-9, 39-12 Clear Creek, Tex. (SWG) 31-11, 31-16, 31-28 Clear Creek and Clear Lake, Tex. (SWG) 31-30 Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Clear River, Burrillville, R.I. (NED) 1-24, 1-42, 1-48 Clearwater Lake, Mo. (SWL) 28-4, 28-11, 28-24 Clearwater Pass, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46, 9-47 Clearwater River, Idaho (NPW) 39-17 Clearwater River, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Cleveland and Lakewood, Ohio (NCB) 20-36 Cleveland Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 20-3, 20-17, 20-24 Cleves, Ohio (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Clewiston, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Cliff Walk, Newport, R.I. (NED) 1-41 Clifton, W. Va. (ORH) 17-22 Clifty Creek Lake, Ind. (ORL) 16-22 Clinch River, Tenn. and Va. (ORN) 15-13 Clinton, Ind. (ORL) 16-21 Clinton, Ind. (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-25 Clinton, Ia. (NCR) 23-15 Clinton Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-38, 1-53 Clinton Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 25-7 Clinton Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 23-12 Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, Kan. (MRK) 27-2, 27-9, 27-11 Clinton River, Mich. (NCE) 21-5, 21-32, 21-44 Cloverport, Ky. (ORL) 16-21, 16-26 Clyde, R.I. (NED) 1-44 Clyde Park, Mont. (MRO) 26-18 Coal Creek, Okla. (SWT) 29-21 Coal Creek and Tributaries (Lake City), Tenn. (ORN) 15-13 Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Coal Grove, Ohio (ORH) 17-21 Coal River, W. Va. (ORH) 17-21 Coan River, Va. (NAB) 4-40 Coast of California, Point Mugu to San Pedro Breakwater, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Coasters Island Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-38 Cobb Brook, Westminster, Vt. (NED) 1-47 Cobscook Bay, Maine (NED) 1-38 Cocheco River, N.H. (NED) 1-38, 1-42 Cochiti Lake, N. Mex. (SWA) 32-5, 32-11, 32-13 Cochitito Rio Puerco Unit (not including Albuquerque Unit) (SWA) 32-14 Cochrane, Wis. (NCS) 24-33 Cockrells Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Coconut Pt., Nu'uuli, Tutuila Island, American Samoa (POD) 36-6 Coeur D'Alene, Idaho (NPS) 38-25 Cohansey River, NJ. (NAP) 3-3, 3-15, 3-19 Cohasset Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Colchester, Conn. (NED) 1-23 Cold Regions Research Engineering Laboratory (CRREL) 44-1 Cold Spring Inlet, NJ. (NAP) 3-3, 3-15, 3-19 Colebrook River Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-13, 1-23, 1-28, 1-48 Colfax, Grant Parish, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-18, 12-19, 12-20 Colfax, Palouse River, Wash. (NPW) 39-2, 39-9, 39-12 Collection and Study of Basic Data Alaska District (NPA) 40-7 Albuquerque, N. Mex., District (SWA) 32-10 Baltimore, Md., District (NAB) 4-22 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 20-16 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 22-9 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 21-30 Fort Worth, Tex., District (SWF) 30-13 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 31-14 Huntington, W. Va., District (ORH) 17-11 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-25 Kansas City, Mo., District (MRK) 27-20 Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL) 28-10 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL) 33-9 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL) 16-12 Memphis, Tenn., District (LMM) 13-6, 13-12 Mississippi River and Tributaries Project (MR+T) 42-64 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-27 Nashville, Tenn. District (ORN) 15-8 I-13 New England Division (NED) 1-24 New Orleans District (LMN) 11-20 New York District (NAN) 2-21 Norfolk, Va., District (NAO) 5-10, 5-14 Omaha, Nebr., District (MRO) 26-22 Pacific Ocean District (POD) 36-5 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-14 Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP) 18-10 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-21 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR) 23-6 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-22 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN) 34-5 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-9 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-11 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS) 14-6, 14-16 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 24-21, 24-35 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 29-10, 29-22 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-8, 12-22 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW) 39-8 Wilmington, N.C., District (SAW) 6-17 Colliers, W. Va. (ORP) 18-25 Collinsville, Ala. (SAM) 10-48 Colonial Beach, Va. (NAB) 4-38 Colorado River, Matagorda, Tex. (SWG) 31-31 Colorado River at Grand Junction, Colo. (SPK) 35-40 Colorado River Channel (SWG) 31-36 Colorado Springs, Colo. (Templeton Gap Floodway) (SWA) 32-14 Columbia, La. (LMK) 12-14, 12-17 Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver, Wash., and Portland, Oreg. (NPP) 37-2, 37-23, 37-30, 37-38, 37-42 Columbia Drainage and Levee District No. 3, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Columbia Drainage District 1, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41, 37-44 Columbia River, Wash. (NPP) 37-42 Columbia River and Tributaries above Celilo Falls to Kennewick, Wash. (NPW) 39-14 Columbia River at Baker Bay, Wash. (NPP) 37-23, 37-31 Columbia River at the Mouth, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-4, 37-23, 37-31 Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Protection Projects (NPS) (NPW) 38-28, 39-1, 39-12, 39-16 Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, Idaho, Mont., and Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-30 Columbia River between Chinook, Wash., and Head of Sand Island (NPP) 37-4, 37-23, 37-31 Columbia River between Vancouver, Wash., and The Dalles, Oreg. (NPP) 37-4, 37-23, 37-31 Columbia River Treaty Entities 49-2 Columbia River Treaty Permanent Engineering Board 49-2 Columbia River, Wenatchee to Kettle Falls, Wash. (NPS) 38-24 Columbia Slough, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Columbus, Loop River, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Columbus, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 Columbus Flood Control Project, Lost Creek, Columbus, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Compo Beach, Westport, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Conant Brook Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-14, 1-28, 1-48 Conchas Lake, N. Mex. (SWA) 32-2, 32-10 Concordia, Ky. (ORL) 16-21, 16-26 Conemaugh River Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa. (ORP) 18-4, 18-12, 18-16, 18-25 Conesus Lake, Livonia, N.Y. (NCB) 20-15, 20-21, 20-34 Conetoe Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Coney Island Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Coney Island Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-37 Conklin-Kirkwood, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39, 4-42 Conneaut Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 20-4, 20-17, 20-25 Connecticut River, Comish, N.H. (NED) 1-23 Connecticut River, Northampton, Mass. (NED) 1-47 Connecticut River, North Stratford, N.H. (NED) 1-42 Connecticut River, W. Stewartstown, NH (NED)1-42 Connecticut River (above Hartford), Conn. (NED) 1-24, 1-38 Connecticut River Basin, Vt., N.H., Mass. and Conn. (NED) 1-12, 1-23, 1-48 Connecticut River below Hartford, Conn. (NED) 1-4, 1-24, 1-25, 1-33, 1-44, 1-53 Connell, Wash. (NPW) 39-15 Conoho Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Consolidated Diking and Improvement District 1, Cowlitz County, Wash. (NPP) 37-38 Construction Engineering Research Laboratory (CERL) 43-1 Construction General (MR+T) 42-10 Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio River (ORD) (ORH) (ORL) (ORP) 16-2, 17-2, 18-2, 19-1, 19-5, 19-6 I-14 INDEX Contentnea Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-25, 6-27, 6-28 Conway County Drainage - Levee District 1, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 28-17 Conway County Levee District No. 6, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 28-17 Conway County Levee Districts Nos. 1, 2 and 8 Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 28-17 Cook Inlet Shoals, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Cooley Canal Lucas Co., Ohio (NCB) 20-38 Cooper Lake and Channels, Tex. (LMN) (SWF) 11-18, 30-4, 30-15, 30-19 Cooper River, NJ. (NAP) 3-24 Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, S.C. (SAN) 7-3, 7-8, 7-11 Cooper River, Pompion Hill Chapel, S.C. (SAN) 7-16 Cooper River Seismic Modification, S.C. (SAN) 7-3, 7-8, 7-11 Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data Board (NCE) 21-29, 49-2 Coos and Millicoma Rivers, Oreg. (NPP) 37-6, 37-24, 37-32 Coos Bay, Oreg. (NPP) 37-5, 37-24, 37-31, 37-42 Coosa River, Montgomery to Gadsden, Ala. (SAM) 10-22, 10-35 Copan Lake, Okla. (SWT) 29-4, 29-12, 29-17 Copes Comer Lakes, N.Y. (NAB) 4-40 Coquille River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-6, 37-24, 37-32, 37-41, 37-42 Coralville Lake, Iowa (NCR) 23-3, 23-7, 23-11 Coraopolis, Pa. (ORP) 18-21 Corbin (Lynn Camp Creek), Ky. (ORN) 15-13, 15-19 Cordell Hull Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 15-14 Cordova Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12, 40-14 Core Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Corea Harbor, Gouldsboro, Maine (NED) 1-38 Coming, N.Y. (NAB) 4-16, 4-28 Coming-Monkey Run, N.Y. (NAB) 4-42 Comrnucopia Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 21-5, 21-32, 21-44 Corpus Christi, Tex., Channel to Navy Seaplane Base, Encinal Peninsula (SWG) 31-30 Corpus Christi Beach, Tex. (Restoration Project) (SWG) 31-9, 31-16, 31-28 Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Tex. (SWG) 31-2, 31-15, 31-18, 31-32, 31-33, 31-38 Corsica River, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Corson Inlet and Ludlam Beach, NJ. (NAP) 3-26 Corte Madera Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-7, 35-24, 35-31 Cortland, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39, 4-42 Cottage Grove Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-11, 37-26, 37-34, 37-43, 37-45 Cottonwood Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-23, 35-30 Cottonwood Creek Community Church, Culdesac, Idaho (NPW) 39-15 Cottonwood Creek Dam, Boise, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-16 Cottonwood Slough Pumping Plant, Ill. (LMM) 13-5 Cotuit Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-44 Cougar Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-17, 37-27, 37-35, 37-43, 37-45 Coulee des Gaues (MR+T) 42-13 Council Bluffs, Iowa (MRO) 26-15, 26-18 Council Bluffs, Missouri River, Iowa (MRO) 26-20 Council Grove Lake, Kan. (SWT) 29-4, 29-12, 29-17 County Line Rd. Branch, Mantachie, Miss. (SAM) 10-49 Courtenay Channel, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Cove Island, Stamford, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Covered Bridge, Housatonic River, Sheffield, Mass. (NED) 1-17, 1-24, 1-29, 1-36 Covington, Ky. (ORL) 16-19, 16-24, 16-29 Cow Castle Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Cow Creek Channel Improvement, Kans. (SWT) 29-19 Cowanesque Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-8, 4-28 Coweta Creek, Okla. (SWT) 29-21 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District 1, Wash. (NPP) 37-41, 37-44 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement Districts 2, 13 and 15, Wash. ; NPP) 37-44 Cowlitz County Drainage Improvement District 1, Wash. (NPP) 37-44 Cowlitz River, Wash. (NPP) 37-37, 37-38, 37-39 Cowlitz River at Randle, Wash. (NPP) 37-41 Cowpens Swamp, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Cox Run, Wellsburg, W.Va. (ORP) 18-26 Coyote and Berryessa Creeks, Calif. (SPK) 35-23, 35-30 Coyote and Spencer Creeks, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Coyote Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-23, 35-30, 35-34, Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino) and Channel Improvements, Calif. (SPK) 35-38 Crabtree Swamp, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Craig Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12, 40-15 I-15 Crane Creek, Melbourne, Fla. (SAJ) 9-54 Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Cranes Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Crawford County Levee District, Ark. (SWL) 28-17 Crawford County Levee District, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 28-17 Creede, Willow Creek, Colo. (Floodway) (SWA) 32-14 Crescent City Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-6 Cribbs Mill Creek, Tuscaloosa, Ala. (SAM) 10-49 Criehaven Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Crisfield Harbor Md. (NAB) 4-5, 4-24, 4-32, 4-38 Crooked and Dry Jordan Creeks, Harrison, Ark. (SWL) 28-25 Crooked Creek, Bennettsville, S.C. (SAN) 7-16 Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa. (ORP) 18-4, 18-12, 18-16, 18-25 Crooked Creek Lake and Levee, Ark. (SWL) 28-18 Croocked-Perkins Creeks, Paducah, Ky. (ORL) 16-31 Cross Creek, Paducah, Ky. (ORL) 16-31 Cross-Florida Barge Canal (SAJ) 9-4, 9-26, 9-32, 9-43, 9-44 Cross Lake, N.Y. (NCB) 20-39 Cross Rip Shoals Nantucket Sound, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Cross Village, Mich. (NCE) 21-55 Crown Point, N.Y. (NAN) 2-39 Crows Run, Conway, Pa. (ORP) 18-26 Crutcho Creek Channel Improvement, Okla. (SWT) 29-19 Crystal River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Cucamonga Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 32-25 Cuckold Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-40 Cuivre River, Mo. (LMS) 14-13 Cumberland, Ky. (ORN) 15-9, 15-18 Cumberland, Md., and Ridgeley, W. Va. (NAB) 4-13, 4-26, 4-35, 4-42 Cumberland River above Nashville (ORN) 15-11, 15-14 Cumberland River below Nashville (ORN) 15-11 Cumberland River, Tenn. and Ky. (ORN) 15-2, 15-9, 15-15 Cummings Park, Stamford, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Cunninghill Cove, Md. (NAB) 4-40 Curia Creek Drainage District, Independence County, Ark. (SWL) 28-17 Current River, and Tributary A, Van Buren, Mo. (SWL) 28-25 Curry Creek Dam and Lake, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Curtis Merritt Harbor (Formerly Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge), Va. (NAO) 5-21 Curwensville Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-1, 4-20, 4-28 Cushman-Mapleton Channels, Oreg. (NPP) 37-37 Cuttyhunk Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Cuyahoga River, Akron Peninsula Rd., Ohio (NCB) 20-39 Cuyahoga River, Brecksville Rd., Ohio (NCB) 20-39 Cuyahoga River, North Portage Path, Akron, Ohio (NCB) 20-39 Cuyahoga River, Riverview Rd., Northampton, Ohio (NCB) 20-39 Cuyahoga River Basin, Ohio (NCB) 20-37 Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, Tex. and Shreveport, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-16, 12-15 Cypress Creek, Ky. (ORL) 16-30 Cypress Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 D Dade County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-23, 9-30, 9-40 Dade County, North of Haulover Beach, Fla. (SAJ) 9-23, 9-30, 9-40 Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. and Ky. (ORN) 15-7, 15-9, 15-18 Dallas Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 30-22 Dam "A" Lake, Tex. (SWF) 30-22 Dam and Bridge, Neosho River, Kan. (SWT) 29-21 Dam Safety Program, New York District (NAN) 2-21 Damariscotta River, Maine (NED) 1-38 Dams and Reservoirs (SAW) 6-30 Dan River, Madison Wastewater Treatment Plant, N.C. (SAW) 6-12, 6-20 Dana Point Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-23 Danbury, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-42, 1-50 Dansville and Vicinity, Canaseraga Creek, N.Y. (NCB) 20-37 Dardanelle Lock - Dam (No. 10), Ark. (SWL) 28-9, 28-13, 28-20 Darien Harbor, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Dashields Locks and Dams, Pa. (ORD) 19-7 Dauphin Island Bay, Ala. (SAM) 10-7, 10-32, 10-39 Davenport, Iowa (NCR) 23-14 I-16 INDEX Davenport Center Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-40 Davenport Harbor, Iowa (Lindsay Park) (NCD) 25-7, 25-10 David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6), Ark. (SWL) 28-3, 28-19 Davids Creek Lake, Iowa (MRO) 26-17 Davis, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Davis Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-19, 5-21 Davis Pond, La. (MR+T) 42-11 Day, John, Lock and Dam-Lake Umatilla, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-19, 37-28, 37-35, 37-46 Day, John, River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-38, 37-41 Days Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Dayton, Ky. (ORL) 16-19, 16-24, 16-29 Dayton Touchet River, Wash. (NPW) 39-14, 39-15 Dayton, Wyo. (MRO) 26-17 Daytona Beach Side Channel, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 De Soto, Mississippi River, Wis. (NCS) 24-33 De Witt, Big Blue River and Turkey Creek, Nebr. (MRK) 27-21 Deadman's Gulch, Sturgis, S.D. (MRO) 26-16, 26-19 Deep Creek, Edgecombe County, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Deep Creek, Accomack Co., Va. (NAO) 5-19 Deep Creek, Newport News, Va. (NAO) 5-19, 5-21 Deep River, Wash. (NPP) 37-37 Deep River Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-38 Deer Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio (ORH) 17-3 Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, W.Va. (ORH) 17-3, 17-12, 17-17 Deer Creek Prairie Levee, Ind. (ORL) 16-21 Deer Creek Prairie Levee, Ind. (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-25 Deer Island Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-38 Deer Island Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41, 37-44 Deer Island Thoroughfare, Maine (NED) 1-38 Degognia and Fountain Bluff Levee and Drainage District, Ill. (LMS) 4-14 DeGray Lake, Ark. (LMK) 12-17, 12-20 DeKalb, Ill. (NCR) 23-15 DeKalb, Kishwaukee River, Ind. (NCR) 23-16 Delaware Bay to Millville (fixed bridge to upper end of project) 3-24 Delaware Coast Protection, Del. (NAP) 3-12, 3-17, 3-22 Delaware Creek, Dallas, Tex. (SWF) 30-23 Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin , Ohio (ORH) 17-4, 17-12, 17-17 Delaware River at Pennsville, NJ. (NAP) 3-24 Delaware River between Philadelphia, Pa., and Trenton, NJ. (NAP) 3-4, 3-15, 3-19 Delaware River in Vicinity of Camden, NJ. (NAP) 3-5, 3-16, 3-20 Deleware River, Mouth of Neversink (NAP) 3-27 Delaware River, Pa., NJ. and Del., Philadelphia to the Sea (NAP) 3-4, 3-15, 3-20 Delphi, Ind. (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-19, 16-24, 16-29 Dennis Creek, NJ. (NAP) 3-24 Depoe Bay, Oreg. (NPP) 37-37, 37-39 Dequeen Lake, Ark. (SWL) 28-5, 28-12, 28-23 Derby, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-42, 1-50 Derby, Ind. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Des Moines, Iowa (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, Mo. (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, Iowa (NCR) 23-3, 23-7, 23-11 Des Moines River, Iowa (NCR) 23-16 Des Moines River,. Bridge 32527, Minn. (NCR) 23-17 Deschutes River Bend, Oreg. (NPP) 37-11, 37-26, 37-34 Deschutes River, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Deshler, Snake, and Spring Creeks, Nebr. (MRK) 27-21 Detour Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-5, 21-32, 21-44 Detroit Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-18, 37-27, 37-35, 37-43, 37-45 Detroit River, Mich. (NCE) 21-6, 21-32, 21-44, 21-57 Detroit River, Channels and Shoals, Mich. (NCE) 21-58 Devils Lake, N. Dak. (NCS) 24-5, 24-22 Devil's Swamp, barge channel at Baton Rouge, La. (MR+T) 42-29 Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ky. (ORH) 17-4, 17-13, 17-17 Dickey Lake, Maine (NED) 1-44 Dickinson Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 31-30 Dierks Lake, Ark. (SWL) 28-5, 28-12, 28-23 Diking and Improvement District 4, Wahkiakum County, Wash. (NPP) 37-38 Diking and Improvement District 5, Cowlitz County, Wash. (NPP) 37-38 I-17 Diking and Improvement District 11, Cowlitz County, Wash. (NPP) 37-38 Diking Districts 1 and 3 (Puget Island) and Little Island, Wash. (NPP) 37-38 Diking Districts 2, 3, and 5, Clatsop County, Oreg. (NPP) 37-38 Diking Improvement District 1, Pacific County, Wash. (NPP) 37-38 Dillingham Emergency Bank Stabilization, Alaska (NPA) 40-6, 40-9, 40-11 Dillingham Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-2, 40-8, 40-10 Dillingham Small Boat Harbor, Ark. (NPA) 40-13 Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio (ORH) 17-4, 17-13, 17-17 Dillonvale, Ohio (Short Creek) (ORP) 18-21 Disaster Preparedness Program (MRK) (SAM) 10-1, 27-7, 27-21, 52-1 Dismal Swamp Canal (Deep Creek), Va. (NAO) 5-18 Dismal Swamp Canal (South Mills, N.C.) (NAO) 5-18 Dively Drainage-Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Dodge City, Kans. (SWT) 29-19, 29-20 Doe and Watanga River, Elizabethtown, Tenn. (ORN) 15-19 Dog and Fowl Rivers, Ala. (SAM) 10-7, 10-32, 10-40 Dog Creek, Okla. (SWT) 29-21 Doheny Beach State Park (Doheny State Beach), Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Dorena Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-11, 37-26, 37-34, 37-43, 37-45 Double Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 31-30 Double Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-24 Douglas Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Dover, Ky. (ORH) 17-21 Downeyville Lake, Ind. (ORL) 16-28 Downeyville Lake, Ind. (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-20 Drainage District 1, Clatsop County, Oreg. (NPP) 37-38 Dredging Operations (SWG) 31-38 Drinkwater Sewer, Mo. (LMM) 13-5 Drum Inlet, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Drury Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Dry Branch, Irving, Tex. (SWF) 30-23 Dry Branch, Salem, Va. (SWF) 6-31 Dry Brook Creek, Poland, N.Y. (ORP) 18-26 Dry Branch Creek, Grand Prairie, Tex. (SWF) 30-23 Dry Creek, Goodlettsville, Tenn. (ORN) 15-19 Dry Creek, Hawarden, Iowa (MRO) 26-16 Dry Creek (Warm Springs), Calif. (SPK) 35-26, 35-38 Dry Creek, Wash. (NPW) 39-15 Dry Fork and East Fork Lakes, Fishing River, Mo. (MRK) 27-16 Dry Pass, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Dry Run, Iowa (NCS) 24-28 DuBois, Pa. (ORP) 18-20, 18-25 Dubuque, Iowa (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 Dubuque Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 25-7 Duck Creek Channel Improvement, Tex. (SWF) 30-22 Duck Creek, Elwood, Ind. (ORL) 16-31 Duck Creek, San Joaquin Co., Calif. (SPK) 35-34 Duck Island Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-38, 1-53 Duck Point Cove, Md. (NAB) 4-37, 4-41 Duck River, Tenn. (ORN) 15-13 Duluth-Superior Harbor, Minn. and Wis. (NCE) 21-6, 21-30, 21-32, 21-45 Dune Acres, Ind. (NCC) 22-8 Duneland Beach, LaPorte Co., Ind. (NCC) 22-8 Dungeness River, Wash. (NPS) 38-25, 38-29 Dunkirk Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 20-3, 20-17, 20-26 Dunn Branch, Woodbine, Camden County, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Duval County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-19, 9-30, 9-41 Duxbury Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, Idaho (NPW) 39-4, 39-13, 39-18 Dyersburg, Tenn. (LMM) 13-5 Dyersburg, Tenn. (Southwest) (LMM) 13-5 Dymers Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-19 E Eagle Bay and Fort Yates Highway Bridges, N. Dak. (MRO) 26-16 Eagle Creek, Ohio (ORP) 18-25 Eagle Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Eagle Creek Lake, Ky. (ORL) 16-20 Eagle Creek Reservoir, Ohio (ORP) 18-20 Eagle Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-55, 21-60 East Barre Dam, Vt. (NAN) 2-36 East Bay (Hanna Reef), Tex. (SWG) 31-30 East Bay Small Boat Basin, Olympia, Wash. (NPS) 38-24 East Boothbay Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 East Bow Creek, Cedar Co., Wyo. (MRO) 26-23 I-18 INDEX East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa. (ORP) 18-5, 18-12, 18-17, 18-25 East Branch Dam, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-42, 1-50 East Brimfield Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-21, 1-23, 1-31, 1-52 East Cape Girardeau and Clear Creek Drainage District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 East Chester Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-3, 2-22, 2-27, 2-34 East Fork, Tex. (SWF) 30-22 East Fork of Boyer River, Near Vail, Iowa (MRO) 26-21 East Fork White River, Brownstown, Jackson Co., Ind. (ORL) 16-30 East Hartford, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-42, 1-49 East Lake, Ohio, Chagun River (NCB) 20-37 East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, W. Va (ORH) 17-5, 17-13, 17-18 East Moline, Ill. (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 East Molokai, Molokai, Hawaii (POD) 36-14 East Muddy and Lake Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 East Muddy Creek, Mo. (MRK) 27-16 East Nishnabotna River, near Griswold, Iowa (MRO) 26-20 East Nishnabotna River, Page Co. Bridge, near Essex, Iowa (MRO) 26-20 East Nishnabotna River, Red Oak, Iowa (MRO) 26-2 East Pass Channel from Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, Fla. (SAM) 10-8, 10-32, 10-40 East Peoria, Ill. (NCR) 23-16 East Peoria Drainage and Levee District (NCR) 23-12, 23-15 East Peoria Sanitary District, Ill. (NCR) 23-15 East Point, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-8, 12-20 East Poplar Bluff-Poplar Bluff, Mo. (SWL) 28-17 East Rainelle, W. Va. (ORH) 17-21, 17-23 East River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-3, 2-22, 2-27, 2-33 East Rockaway Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-4, 2-22, 2-28, 2-37 East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part I) (NAN) 2-16, 2-25, 2-31 East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part II) (NAN) 2-36 East Sidney Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-16, 4-28 East St. Louis and Vicinity, Ill. (LMS) 14-3, 14-8, 14-10 East Weaver Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-34 East, West, and Duwamish Waterways, Seattle Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-12 Eastchester Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33 Eastern Branch, Va. (NAO ) 5-16 Eastern Rapides and South-Central Avoyelles Parishes, La. (MR+T) 42-15, 42-30 Eastport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-44 Eau Galle River, Wis. (NCS) 24-6, 24-22, 24-33 Eau Gallie Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-5, 9-26, 9-32 Echo Bay Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Edenton Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Edgar Jadwin, General, Dam and Reservoir, Pa. (NAP) 3-13, 3-17 Edgartown Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Edisto River, S.C. (SAN) 7-14, 7-15 Edisto River, North Fork, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Edisto River, Vicinity Canadays Landing, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Ediz Hook, Wash. (NPS) 38-2, 38-14, 38-19, 38-29 Edgartown Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-44 Edmonds Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-24 Edward MacDowell Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-18, 1-30, 1-51 Eel River, Calif. (SPK) 35-36 Eel River, Ind. (ORL) 16-30 Egegik River, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Eight Mile Creek, Ark. (MR+T) 42-30 Eighteen Mile Island, Ky. (ORL) 16-30 El Dorado Lake, Kan. (SWT) 29-4, 29-12, 29-17, 29-19 El Paso, Tex. (SWA) 32-2, 32-10, 32-12 El Tuque Beach, Ponce, P.R. (SAJ) 9-48 Elder and Unionhouse Creeks, Calif. (SPK) 35-40 Eldred, Ill. (LMS 14-14 Eldred, Pa. (ORP 18-25 Eldred and Spankey Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-10 Elfin Cove, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Elizabeth, NJ. (NAN) 2-36, 2-37 Elizabeth River, Hillside, N.J. (NAN) 2-18 Elizabethtown, Ill. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Elk and Little Elk Rivers, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Elk City Lake, Kan. (SWL) (SWT) 28-22, 29-4, 29-12, 29-17, 29-20 Elk Creek, Clyde, Kan. (MRK) 27-16 Elk Creek Harbor, Pa. (NCB) 20-35 Elk Creek, Jackson, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 I-19 Elk Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-11, 37-26, 37-34 Elk Creek, Willis, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Elk River, Ala. and Tenn. (ORN) 15-13 Elk River, Minn. (NCS) 24-28, 24-33 Elk River, W. Va (ORH) 17-20 Elkhom River, Beemer, Nebr. (MRO) 26-23 Elkhom River, Norfolk, Nebr. (MRO) 26-23 Elkhorn River, Q Street Bridge, near Gretna, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Elkhorn River, Ray Bridge, near Norfolk, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Elkins, W. Va. (ORP) 18-3, 18-11, 18-16 Elkins, W. Va. (Monongahela River Basin) (ORP) 18-24 Elkland, Pa. (NAB) 4-39, 4-42 Elkport, Iowa (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 Elks Creek, Clarksburg, W.Va. (ORP) 18-26 Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Ellicott Creek, N.Y. (NCB) 20-13, 20-20, 20-33 Ellicott Creek, Lehn Springs, N.Y. (NCB) 20-39 Ellicotts Creek, Moundville, Ala. (SAM) 10-49 Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Elm Creek, Burt Co., Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Elm Fork Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 30-22, 30-23 Elm River, Decatur, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Elmira, N.Y. (NAB) 4-6, 4-28 Elochoman Slough, Wash. (NPP) 37-37, 37-42, Elwha River, Wash. (NPS) 38-7, 38-16, 38-21, 38-25 Emergency Bank Protection Activities Albuquerque, N. Mex., District (SWA) 32-10 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 20-39 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL) 16-31 Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN) 15-19 Omaha, Nebr., District (MRO) 26-7 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-12 Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP) 18-26 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR) 23-6, 23-17 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-20 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN) 34-4 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS) 14-14 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 24-34 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-7, 12-9 Emergency Bank Stabilization Activities (LMM) 13-2 Emergency Flood Control Activities Albuquerque, N. Mex., District (SWA) 32-9 Kansas City, Mo., District (MRK) 27-21 Memphis, Tenn., District (LMM) 13-12 New Orleans District (LMN) 11-10 Norfolk, Va., District (NAO) 5-10, 5-14 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR) 23-6 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-20 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN) 34-4 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-29 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS) 14-6 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 24-34 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 29-8 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-8 Emergency protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Chester, Ill., bridge (LMS) 14-14 Emergency protection for Illinois approach, Chain of Rocks Bridge (LMS) 14-14 Emergency repairs to levees on Mississippi, Illinois, and Kaskaskia Rivers (LMS) 14-14 Emergency Shore Protection (NCE) (MRK) 21-25, 27-21 Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection (Authorized and Special Authorization) Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 31-13 Kansas City, Mo., District (MRK) 27-7, 27-21 New York, N.Y., District (NAN) 2-21 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-4, 36-14 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-7 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 29-21 Emerson, Indian Creek, Mills County, Iowa (MRO) 26-21 Emerson, Manitoba-Noyes, Minn. (NCS) 24-6, 24-22 Empire-Stratton, Ohio (ORP) 18-21 Emsworth Locks and Dams, Pa. (ORD) 19-7 Enderlin, N. Dak. (NCS) 24-7, 24-22, 24-33 Endicott-Johnson City and Vestal, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39, 4-42 Engineer Topographic Laboratories (ETL) 46-1 Engineer Waterways Experiment Station 45-1 Engineering and Design, Activities, Continuation of Planning, Planning, Preconstruction Alaska District (NPA) 40-7 Baltimore, Md., District (NAB) 4-22 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 20-16 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-1 Chicago, I1l., District (NCC) 22-9 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 21-30 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 31-14 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-46 Kansas City, Mo., District (MRK) 27-20 I-20 INDEX Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL) 28-10 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL) 33-9 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL) 16-12 Mississippi River and Tributaries (MR+T) 42-60, 42- 61, 42-64 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-27, 10-28 New England Division (NED) 1-24 New Orleans District (LMM) 11-20 Omaha, Nebr., District (MRO) 26-22 Pacific Ocean District (POD) 36-6 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR) 23-6 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-22, 35-30 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN) 34-5 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-9 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-11 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS) 14-16 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 24-21, 24-35 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 29-10, 29-22, 29-33 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-22 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW) 39-8 Wilmington, N. C., District (SAW) 6-17 England Pond Levee, Ill. (Wabash River)(ORL) 16-19, 16-24, 16-29 English, Ind. (Little Blue River) (ORL) 16-19, 16-30 English Coulee, Grand Forks, N. Dak. (NCS) 24-34 Enid, Okla. (SWT) 29-19 Entiat River, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Erie Harbor, Pa. (NCB) 20-5, 20-18, 20-26, 20-40 Erosion, Beach (Authorized and under Special Authorization Baltimore, Md., District (NAB) 4-13, 4-38, 4-39 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 20-13, 20-36 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-6, 7-15 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 22-6, 22-17 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 21-25, 21-26 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 31-10 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-21 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL) 33-24 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-14, 10-47, 10-49 New England Division (NED) 1-11, 1-41, 1-46 New Orleans District (LMN) 11-10 New York District (NAN) 2-16, 2-17, 2-36 Norfolk, Va., District (NAO) 5-8, 5-20 Pacific Ocean District (POD) 36-4, 36-11, 36-14 Philadelphia, Penn., District (NAP) 3-11, 3-12, 3-26 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN) 34-4, 34-12 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-6 Wilmington, N.C., District (SAW) 6-26 Erosion, Streambank (SAN) 7-16 Escambia and Conecuh Rivers, Fla. and Ala. (SAM) 10-47 Escambia Bay, Fla. (SAM) 10-50 Eslava Creek, Mobile, Ala.(SAM) 10-14, 10-33, 10-44 Espanola Valley Unit (SWA) 32-14 Esquatzel Coulee, Wash. (NPW) 39-14 Esquatzel Coulee, Connell, Wa. (NPW) 39-14, 39-15 Esquatzel Coulee, Mesa, Wa. (NPW) 39-15 Essex River, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Estate Mon Bijou-St. Croix, V.I. (SAJ) 9-54 Estes, Carl L., Dam and Lake, Tex. (SWF) 30-22 Euclid Creek, Cleveland, Ohio (NCB) 20-15, 20-21, 20-34 Eufaula Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 28-22, 29-9, 29-15, 29-18, 29-20 Evansdale, Iowa (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 Evanston, Ill. (NCC) 22-17 Evansville, Ind. (ORL) 16-3, 16-13, 16-24, 16-29 Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, Wash. (NPS) 38-2, 38-14, 38-19 Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, N.C. (SAW) 6-11, 6-15 Everglades Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Ewa Beach Landing, Oahu, Hawaii (POD) 36-14 Exeter River, N.H. (NED) 1-38 Existing levees and extensions from Bastrop, La. to mouth of Boeuf River and at Monroe, La. (LMK) 12-7 F Fabius River Drainage District, Mo. (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 Fair Haven, Mich. (NCE) 21-25 Fair Haven Beach State Park, Lake Ontario, N.Y. (NCB) 20-36 Fairbanks, Tanana River and Chena Slough, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Fairbury, Little Blue River, Nebr. (MRK) 27-16 Fairfield Vicinity Streams, Calif. (SPK) 35-7, 35-25 Fairport Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 20-5, 20-18, 20-27 Fajardo Harbor, P.R; (SAJ) 9-47 Fall Brook Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-40 Fall Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-12, 37-26, 37-34, 37-43, 37-45 Fall River Basin, S. Dak. (MRO) 26-3, 26-9, 26-12 1-21 Fall River Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38, 1-44 Fall River Lake, Kan. (SWL) (SWT) 28-22, 29-4, 29-12, 29-17, 29-20 Falls Lake, N.C. (SAW) 6-13, 6-16, 6-20 Falmouth Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Falmouth Lake, Ky. (Licking River) (ORL)16-20 Fancy Bluff Creek, Ga. (SAS) 8-15 Far Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-5, 6-18 Farm Creek, Ill. (NCR) 23-4, 23-7, 23-11 Farmers Levee and Drainage District (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 Farmers Levee and Drainage District (Sangamon River), Ill. (NCR) 23-14 Farmington, Des Moines River, Iowa (NCR) 23-17 Farmington, N.H. (NED) 1-23 Farmington River, Conn. (NED) 1-24 Faulkner County Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 28-17 Feather Creek, Clinton, Ind. (ORL) 16-31 Feather River, Calif. (SPK) 35-33 Features of Existing Project (NCE) 21-58 Felsenthal, Ark. (LMK) 12-4 Ferguson Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Fern Ridge Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-12, 37-26, 37-43, 37-45 Femandina Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-5, 9-27, 9-33 Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O' The Pines, Tex. (LMN) (SWF) 11-18, 30-5, 30-15, 30-19 Filberts Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Finney Creek at Wachapreague, Va. (NAO) 5-3, 5-11, 5-15, 5-21 Fire Island Inlet to Jones Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-4, 2-22, 2-28, 2-33, 2-36, 2-39 Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 Fish River, Baldwin Co., Ala. (SAM) 10-49 Fisher, O. C., Dam and Lake, Tex. (SWF) 30-8, 30-16, 30-20 Fisherman's Wharf Area, San Francisco Harbor, Halfmoon Bay, Calif. (SPN) 34-6 Fishing Bay, Md. (NAB) 4-5, 4-24, 4-32 Fishing Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Fishing Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Fishing Creek, Pine Grove, W. Va. (ORH) 17-23 Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ky. (ORH) 17-5, 17-13, 17-18 Fitchburg, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-42 Five Mile, Brookside, Ala. (SAM) 10-49 Fivemile River Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-38, 1-44 Flannagan, John W., Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Va. (ORH) 17-5, 17-13, 17-18 Flat Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Flat Rock and Valley View Creeks, Okla. (SWT) 29-19, 29-20 Flathead River, Mont. (NPS) 38-24, 38-25 Fletcher and Sunshine Gardens Levee, Ind. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Flint, Flint River, Mich. (NCE) 21-27 Flood Control, Allotments and Accrued Expenditures for Mississippi River and Tributaries (MR+T) 42-58 Flood Control and Coastal Emergency Activities Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-27 Omaha, Nebr., District (MRO) 26-22 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 29-21 Flood Control Work (Activity), Authorized and Under Special Authorization Alaska District (NPA) 40-13 Baltimore, Md., District (NAB) 4-21 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 2-37, 2-39 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-7, 7-15, 7-16 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 22-17 Fort Worth, Tex., District (SWF) 30-11, 30-22, 30-23 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 31-31 Huntington, W.Va., District (ORH) 17-10, 17-21 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-21, 9-25, 9-50, 9-54 Kansas City, Mo., District (MRK) 27-7, 27-16, 27-21 Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL) 28-5, 28-7, 28-18 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL) 33-25 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL) 16-12, 16-19, 16-20, 16-25, 16-26, 16-31 Memphis, Tenn., District (LMM) 13-2, 13-5 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-20, 10-27, 10-48, 10-49 Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN) 15-6, 15-13, 15-19 New England Division (NED) 1-24, 1-42, 1-47 New Orleans District (LMN) 11-10, 11-18, 11-20 New York District (NAN) 2-21 Norfolk, Va., District (NAO) 5-10, 5-14, 5-20 Omaha, Nebr., District (MRO) 26-15, 26-16, 26-23 Pacific Ocean District (POD) 36-12, 36-15 Philadelphia, Pa., District (NAP) 3-12, 3-26, 3-27 Pittsburgh, Pa., District (ORP) 18-9, 18-20, 18-26 I-22 INDEX Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-38, 37-43 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR) 23-6, 23-12, 23-14, 23-16, 23-17, 23-18 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-7, 8-16 Seattle, Wash., District 38-25, 38-29 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS) 14-3, 14-6, 14-14 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 24-28, 24-34 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 29-8, 29-19, 29-21 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-7, 12-8, 12-20, 12-22 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW) 39-2, 39-15 Wilmington, N.C., District (SAW) 6-14, 6-27, 6-31 Flood Damage Prevention Studies Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 20-16 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-1, 7-14, 7-17 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 22-8, 22-17 Kansas City, Mo., District (MRK) 27-20 Mississippi River (MR+T) 42-64 Omaha, Nebr., District (MRO) 26-21 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS) 14-16 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 24-35 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 29-22 Flood Hazard Information (SAM) 10-54 Flood Insurance Activities Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 21-30 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-54 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-20 Flood Insurance Studies and Flood Hazard Information Reports, Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-54 Flood Plain Management (NAN) (SAN) 2-37, 7-17 Floods (MR+T) 42-3 Floodwall and Levees at Portland, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Florence Levee, Kan. (SWT) 29-20 Floyd River, Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 26-16 Flushing Bay and Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-5, 2-22, 2-28, 2-33 Fly Creek, Ala. (SAM) 10-8, 10-32, 10-40, 10-50 Follansbee, W. Va. (ORP) 18-21 Folly Brook, Wethersfield, Conn. (NED) 1-42, 1-49 Folly River, S.C. (SAN) 7-8, 7-11, 7-19 Folsom Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-34 Forest Heights, Md. (NAB) 4-39, 4-42 Forest River, N. D. (NCS) 24-33 Forestville, Mich. (NCE) 21-57 Forked Deer River, Tenn., including South Fork (LMM) 13-4 Forsyth, Mont. (MRO) 26-16 Forsythe, Yellowstone River, Mont. (MRO) 26-18 Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5 and Stringtown Drainage and Levee District No. 4, 11. (LMS) 14-14 Fort Clinch State Park, Fla. (SAJ) 9-54 Fort Cobb Reservoir, Okla. (SWT) 29-21 Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N.C. (SAW) 6-26 Fort Gibson Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 28-22, 29-9, 29-15, 29-18, 29-20 Fort Kent, Maine (NED) 1-23, 1-42 Fort Leavenworth, Kan., Bridge Removal (MRK) 27-15 Fort Loudon Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 15-17 Fort Lupton, Lagoon (Co.) (MRO) 26-23 Fort Macon State Park, N.C. (SAW) 6-26 Fort Madison Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 25-7, 25-10 Fort Myers Beach, Fla. (SAJ) 9-5, 9-27, 9-33, 9-46 Fort Niagara State Park, N.Y. (NCB) 20-36 Fort Peck Lake, Mont. (MRO) 26-7, 26-11, 26-14, 26-18 Fort Pierce, Fla. (SAJ) 9-27 Fort Pierce Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-6, 9-33 Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, S. D. (MRO) 26-7, 26-11, 26-15, 26-18 Fort Scott Lake, Marmaton River, Kan. (MRK) 27-16, 27-19 Fort Smith, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 28-17 Fort Supply Lake, Okla. (SWT) 29-4, 29-12, 29-17 Fort Toulouse, Ala. (SAM) 10-28, 10-46 Fort Wayne, Ind. (NCE) 21-30 Fort Wayne Mechanic St. Dike, St. Marys River, Ind. (NCE) 21-27 Fort Worth Floodway (Clear Fork), Tex. (SWF) 30-22 Fort Worth Floodway (West Fork), Tex. (SWF) 30-22 Foster Creek Road, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, Pa. (NAB) 4-20, 4-28 Foster Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Fountain Creek, Pueblo, Colo. (SWA) 32-3, 32-10, 32-12 Four River Basins, Fla. (SAJ) 9-24, 9-31, 9-42, 9-53 Fourche Bayou Basin, Little Rock, Ark. (SWL) 28-5, 28-12 Fourche Creek, Little Rock, Ark. (SWL) 28-17 Fourmile Run, Va. (NAB) 4-39, 4-42 Fourpole Creek, W.Va. (ORH) 17-23 Fourteen Slough, Stockton, Calif. (SPK) 35-40 I-23 Fowl River, Ala. (SAM) 10-50 Fox Point Hurricane Barrier, R.I. (NED) 1-23, 1-42 Fox River, McHenry Co., ll. (NCC) 22-8 Fox River, Wis. (NCE) 21-7, 21-32, 21-45, 21-59 Fox River Locks and Dams, Wis. (NCE) 21-59 Francis E. Walter Dam, Pa. (NAP) (NAB) 3-12, 3-17, 3-22, 4-20, 4-22, 4-29, 4-36 Frankenmuth, Cass River, Mich. (NCE) 21-27 Frankfort, Black Vermillion River, Kan. (MRK) 27-16 Frankfort, Ky. (Benson Creek) (Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-20, 16-24 Frankfort, (N. Frankfort) (Kentucky River), Ky. (ORL) 16-19, 16-24, 16-29 Frankfort Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-7, 21-33, 21-45 Franklin, W. P., Lock and Dam, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49 Franklin Falls Dam, N.H. (NED) 1-8, 1-30, 1-51 Frazer-Wolf Point, Mont. (MRO) 26-16 Frazeysburg, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 Freeport, Ill. (NCR) 23-14 Freeport, Pa. (Allegheny River) (ORP) 18-21 Freeport and Vicinity, Tex. Hurricane-Flood Protection (SWG) 31-31 Freeport Harbor, Tex. (SWG) 31-3, 31-15, 31-20, 31-32, 31-33, 31-38 Fremont, Ohio, Sandusky River (NCB) 20-37 French Broad and Little Pigeon Rivers, Tenn. (ORN)15-13 Frenchboro Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Freshwater Bayou, La. (LMN) 11-16 Friday Harbor Marina, Wash. (NPS) 38-24 Friendly, W. Va. (ORH) 17-22 Friendsville, Md. (ORP) 18-20, 18-25 From North Little Rock, Ark. to Gillett, Ark. on north bank of Arkansas River (portion below Plum Bayou) (MR+T) 42-29 From North Little Rock to Gillett, Ark. (above Plum Bayou) (SWL) 28-17 Fry Creek, Okla. (SWT) 29-19 Fullerton, Ky. (ORH) 17-21 Fulton, Ill. (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 G Galax, Va. (ORH) 17-21, 17-23 Gale Creek, Oreg., Ill. (NCR) 23-16 Galena, Ill. (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 Galena Emergency Bank Stabilization, Alaska (NPA) 40-6, 40-9, 40-11 Galisteo Dam, N. Mex. (SWA) 32-5, 32-11, 32-13 Gallipolis, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 Gallipolis Locks and Dam, W. Va. (ORD) 19-8 Galveston Harbor and Channel, Tex. (SWG) 31-4, 31-15, 31-21, 31-32, 31-33, 31-38 Gapway Swamp, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) (SAW) 6-27, 7-15 Garapan Area, CNMI (POD) 36-15 Garden City, Tulsa, Okla. (SWT) 29-21 Gardner, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-42, 1-49 Gardners Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Garland City, Ark. (LMN) (LMK) 11-18, 12-18, 12-20 Gamett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, Kan. (MRK) 27-17, 27-19 Garrison Dam-Lake Sakakawea, N. Dak. (MRO) 26-8, 26-11, 26-15, 26-18 Gasconade River, Mo. (MRK) 27-15 Gastineau Channel, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Gate Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39, 37-41, 37-45 Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, Va. (NAO) 5-9, 5-14, 5-17 Gauley River, W. Va. (ORH) 17-20 Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, Nebr. and S. Dak. (MRO) 26-8, 26-11, 26-15, 26-17, 26-18 Gaysville Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-44 Genegantslet Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-40 General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, Pa. (NAP) 3-13, 3-17, 3-23 General Joe Wheeler Dam (ORN) 15-17 Geneva-On-The-Lake, Ohio (NCB) 20-5, 20-18, 20-28 Genoa Sewer Facility, Wayne County, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Gentilly, Minn. (NCS) 24-28 George, Walter F., Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga. (SAM) 10-46 George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga. (SAM) 10-25, 10-35, 10-41 Georges River, Maine (NED) 1-38 Georgetown Harbor, S.C. (SAN) 7-4, 7-8, 7-11 Gering Valley, Gering Drain and Tribs., Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Gering Valley, Nebr. (MRO) 26-16 Gibson Creek, Tenn. (ORN) 15-19 I-24 INDEX Gila River Basin, Ariz. (SPL) 33-5, 33-13, 33-25 Giles Creek, Elkhorn, Nebr. (MRO) 26-17 Gill Township Levee, (Wabash River), Ind. (ORL) 16-19, 16-29 Gillham Lake, Ark. (SWL) 28-6, 28-12, 28-23 Gill's Creek, Lancaster, S.C. (SAN) 7-17 Gilmore Creek, Winona, Minn. (NCS) 24-34 Girty's Run (Allegheny Co.), Penn. (ORP) 18-26 Girty's Run, Millvale, Pa. (ORP) 18-20 GIWW; Apalachicola Bay to St. Marks River, Fla. (SAM) 10-48 Glader Blvd., Minn. (NCS) 24-34 Glasgow, Mont. (MRO) 26-16, 26-18 Gleason Creek, Nev. (SPK) 35-36 Glen Cove Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33, 2-37 Glen Cove Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Gloucester Harbor and Annisquam River, Mass. (NED) 1-38, 1-46 Goat Island, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-16 Golconda, Ill. (ORL) 16-19, 16-24, 16-29 Gold Creek, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Goldsboro, Neuse River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Goleta, Calif., and Vicinity (SPL) 33-9, 33-25 Goodfood Creek, Chickasaw County, Miss. (SAM) 10-15, 10-33, 10-44 Gooding Area, Idaho (NPW) 39-15 Gooding Area, Littlewood River, Ind. (NPW) 39-12 Goose Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Gordons Creek, Hattiesburg, Miss. (SAM) 10-48 Gordons Landing, Lake Champlain, Vt. (NAN) 2-34 Goshen Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-25 Governor's Run, Md. (NAB) 4-40 Gowanus Creek Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Grafton, N. Dak. (NCS) 24-28 Grafton Pumping Station, N.Dak. (NCS) 24-7, 24-22 Grafton Small Boat Harbor, Ill. (LMS) 4-13 Grahn, Ky. (ORH) 17-23 Grand Bayou Pass, La. (LMN) 11-16 Grand Haven Harbor and Grand River, Mich. (NCE) 21-8, 21-32, 21-45, 21-57 Grand Isle and Vicinity, La. (LMN) 11-6, 11-11, 11-14 Grand Lake O' the Cherokees, Okla. (SWT) 29-20 Grand Marais Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-8, 21-55, 21-60 Grand Marais Harbor, Minn. (NCE) 21-33, 21-46 Grand Prairie, Ark. (MR+T) 42-54 Grand Prairie, Tex., Sanitary Landfill (SWF) 30-22 Grand Prairie, Tex., Streambank Erosion at Meyers Road (SWF) 30-5, 30-15, 30-19 Grand Prairie-Bayou Meto, Ark., (Flood Control and Water Supply) (MR+T) 42-16, 42-30 Grand River, Grandville, Mich. (NCE) 21-57 Grand River, Union Co., Nebr. H17 Bridge (MRK) 27-21 Grand Tower Drainage and Levee Distnct, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Grand Traverse Bay Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-9, 21-33, 21-46 Grande Ronde Lake, Oreg. (NPW) 39-14 Grande Ronde Valley, Oreg. (NPW) 39-12, 39-16 Grandview, Ind. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Grandview Bay Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 20-40 Granite Falls, Minn. (NCS) 24-34 Grant Parish, below Colfax, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-18, 12-19, 12-20 Granville, Pa. (ORP) 18-20, 18-25 Grapevine Lake, Tex. (SWF) 30-6, 30-16, 30-19 Grasse River (Massena), N.Y. (NCB) 20-35 Grassy Branch, Millsap, Tex. (SWF) 30-23 Grassy Creek, Jackson County, Ind. (Muscatatuck River) (ORL) 16-19, 16-30 Graves Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-15 Grays Creek Canal, Shelby Co., Tenn. (LMM) 13-5 Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, Wash. (NPS) 38-3, 38-12, 38-14, 38-19 Grays Reef, Mich. (NCE) 21-60 Grays Reef Passage, Mich. (NCE) 21-55 Grays River, Wash. (NPP) 37-37 Grayson Lake, Ky. (ORH) 17-5, 17-13, 17-18 Grayville, Ill. (ORL) 16-19 Great Bend, Kan. (SWT) 29-4, 29-12, 29-17 Great Chazy River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34, 2-39 Great Coharie Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-31 Great Egg Harbor Inlet and Peck Beach, N J. (NAP) 3-26 Great Falls, Mont. (MRO) 26-3, 26-9, 26-12 Great Kills Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Great Lakes Information Management (NCE) 21-29 Great Lakes to Hudson River Waterway, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Great Machipongo Inlet, Va. (NAO) 5-21 Great Machipongo River, Va. (NAO) 5-21 Great Miami River, Ind. (ORL) 16-27, 16-30, 16-31 I-25 Great Pee Dee River, S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Great Salt Plains Lake, Okla. (SWT) 29-5, 29-12, 29-17 Great Salt Pond, RI. (NED) 1-38, 1-44 Great Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 20-6, 20-17, 20-28, 20-40 Great South Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Green and Barren Rivers, Ky. (ORL) 16-2, 16-13, 16-17, 16-23 Green Bay Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 21-9, 21-33, 21-46 Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, Iowa (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 Green Brook, Green Brook, N.J. (NAN) 2-39 Green County, Route 88, Penn. (ORP) 18-26 Green Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-4, 1-25, 1-34, 1-46, 1-53 Green Island Levee and Drainage District, Iowa (NCR) 23-14 Green Peter-Foster Lakes, Oreg. (NPP) 37-18, 37-27, 37-35, 37-43, 37-45 Green River, Ky. (ORL) 16-27 Green River, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Green River Lake, Ky. (ORL) 16-7, 16-14, 16-30 Green Valley Creek, Solano Co., Calif. (SPK) 35-34 Greene, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39, 4-42 Greenfield Bayou Levee, Ind. (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-20, 16-24 Greenport Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Greens Creek, Petal, Miss. (SAW) 10-49 Greenup, Ky. (ORH) 17-21 Greenup Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORD) 19-6, 19-8 Greenvale Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-19, 5-21 Greenville, Tex. (SWF) 30-22 Greenville Harbor, Miss. (MR+T) 42-30, 42-31 Greenwich Bay, R.I. (NED) 1-38 Greenwich Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-38 Greenwich Point Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-44 Greers Ferry Lakes, Ark. (SWL) 28-9, 28-13, 28-24 Greggs Creek, Glasgow, Mo., Sewage �Lift Station and Sewerline (MRK) 27-21 Gregory Drainage Distnct, Mo. (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 Greilickville Harbor, Mich. (Formerly Traverse City Harbor) (NCE) 21-55, 21-60 Greybull, Wyo. (MRO) 26-16, 26-19 Griffithsville-Yawkey, W.Va. (ORH) 17-23 Grove Lake, Soldier Creek, Kan. (MRK) 27-17 Guadalupe River, Calif. (SPK) 35-23, 35-30 Guadalupe River (Remove Log Jams), Tex. (SWG) 31-31 Guayanes Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-47 Guilford Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-38, 1-53 Guilford Point Beach (Jacobs Beach), Guilford, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Gulf Beach, Milford, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Gulf Breeze, Fla. (SAM) 10-49 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla. and Mexican Border (SAM) 10-9, 10-31, 10-32, 10-40 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla., and Mexican Border (Galveston, Tex., District) (SWG) 31-5, 31-15, 31-22, 31-32, 31-36, 31-38 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, Fla., and Mexican Border (New Orleans Dist.) (LMN) 11-16 Gulf Intracostal Waterway, Coloosahat-Chee River to Anclote River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-27 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway St. Marks to Tampa Bay, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Gulf Street, Milford, Conn. (NED) 1-16, 1-24, 1-29, 1-36 Gulfport Harbor, Miss. (SAM) 10-9, 10-27, 10-32, 10-40 Gull Lake Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 24-31 Guntersville Lock, Ala. (ORN) 15-17 Guttenberg, Iowa (NCS) 24-28 Guyandotte River, W. Va. (ORH) 17-20 Gypsum, Gypsum Creek, Kan. (MRK) 27-16 H Hackensack River. N. Milford, N.J. (NAN) 2-39 Hackleman Corners Lake, Cedar Creek, Mo. (MRK) 27-17 Haikey Creek, Okla. (SWT) 29-21 Haines Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12, 40-15 Haistead, Kan. (SWT) 29-12 Haleiwa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii (POD) 36-11 Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Hall Meadow Brook Dam, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-42, 1-50 Halstead, Kan. (SWT) 29-5, 29-17 I-26 INDEX Hamburg L-575, Nishnabotna River, Iowa (MRO) 26-20 Hamlin Beach Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 20-35 Hamlin Beach State Park, N.Y. (NCB) 20-36 Hammersley Inlet, Wash. (NPS) 38-24, 38-28 Hammonassett Beach, Madison, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Hammond Bay Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-9, 21-33, 21-43 Hammond Small Boat Basin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-37 Hammondsport, Oswego River Basin, N.Y. (NCB) 20-40 Hampton Beach, Hampton, N.H. (NED) 1-41 Hampton Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-19, 5-21 Hampton Harbor, N.H. (NED) 1-5, 1-25, 1-34 Hampton Institute, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Hampton Roads and Harbors of Norfolk and Newport News, Va.- Collection and Removal of Drift (NAO) 5-4, 5-11, 5-15 Hampton Roads Harbor, Supervision of (NAO) 5-13 Hana Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Hanalei Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-12, 36-13 Hanapepe Bay, Kauai, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Hanapepe River, Kauai, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Hancock Brook Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-17, 1-30, 1-50 Hanging Rock, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 Hannibal, Mo. (NCR) 23-4, 23-7, 23-11 Hannibal Harbor, Mo. (NCD) 25-8, 25-10 Hannibal Locks and Dams, W. Va. (ORD) 19-6, 19-7 Hannibal SBH, Mo. (NCR) 23-12 Hanover, Hennepin Co., Minn. (NCS) 24-8, 24-23, 24-33 Hansen Dam, L.A. Co., D.D., Calif. (SPL) 33-25 Hanson, Howard A., Dam, Wash. (NAS) 38-7, 38-16, 38-21 Harbor Beach Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-10, 21-34, 21-46 Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, R.I. (NED) 1-38, 1-44 Harbor of Refuge, Delaware Bay, Del. (NAP) 3-24 Harbor of Refuge, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Harbor Office at Morro Bay, Calif. (SPL) 33-23 Harbor Springs, Mich. (NCE) 21-25 Harden, Cecil M., Lake, Ind. (ORL) 16-6, 16-14 Harkers Island Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Harlan County Lake, Republican River, Nebr. (MRK) 27-3, 27-9, 27-12, 27-19 Harlem River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Harpers Ferry, W. Va. (NAB) 4-40 Harpswell, Maine (NED) 1-23 Harraseeket River, Maine (NED) 1-38 Harriet Island Harbor, St. Paul, Minn. (NCD) 25-7 Harris Fork Creek, Tenn. and Ky. (MR+T) 42-30 Harrisburg, Ill. (ORL) 16-19, 16-24, 16-29 Harrison County, Miss. (SAM) 10-47 Harrisonville Levee and Drainage District, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Harrisville Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-10, 21-34, 21-47 Harrodsburg, Ky. (Town Creek) (ORL) 16-30 Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, Mo. (MRK) 27-8, 27-11, 27-15, 27-16, 27-19 Harsha, William H., Lake, Ohio (ORL) 16-11, 16-16, Hartford, Conn. (NED) 1-42, 1-49 Hartford, Vt. (NED) 1-42, 1-49 Hartford, W. Va. (ORH) 17-22 Hartland, Maine (NED) 1-23 Hartwell Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-11 Hartwell Lake, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-8, 8-12, 8-15, 8-16 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, La. (LMN) 11-18 Hastings Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 25-7, 25-10 Hatchie River, Alcom Co., Miss. (LMM) 13-5 Haverhill, Mass. (NED) 1-23 Havre, Mont. (MRO) 26-16, 26-18 Hawarden, Dry Creek, Iowa (MRO) 26-20 Hawesville, Ky. (ORL) 16-19, 16-24, 16-29 Hay Creek, Birdsboro, Pa. (NAP) 3-26 Hay (West Harbor), Fisher's Island, N.Y. (NED) 1-38 Hayden Island, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Hays, Big Creek, Kan. (MRK) 27-17 Hays, Lincoln Co., Kan. (MRK) 27-21 Haysi, Va. (ORH) 17-21 Hayward Creek, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-42 Hazard, Ky. (ORL) 16-19 Head of Passes, La.-Cairo, Ill. (MR+T) 42-11 Heeia-Kea Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Heise-Roberts Area, Snake River, Idaho (NPW) 39-12, 39-14, 39-15 Heise-Roberts Extension, Idaho (NPW) 39-16 Helena, Ark. and Vicinity (MR+T) 42-30 Helena Harbor, Ark. (LMN) 13-4 Helena Harbor (MR+T) 42-30 I-27 Hellens Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-40 Helm Lake, Ill. (ORL) 16-22, 16-28 Hemingway Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-16 Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, Ark. (LMN) (LMK) 11-18, 12-19, 12-20 Hempstead Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-6, 2-23, 2-28 Henderson, W. Va. (ORH) 17-22 Henderson Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Henderson County Drainage Districts Nos. 1, 2 and 3, Il. (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 Henderson River, Ill. (NCR) 23-14 Hendrick's Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-38 Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, Il. (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 Henry, Robert F., Lock and Dam, Ala. (SAM) 10-35, 10-45 Herbert Hoover Dike Revetment (SAJ) 9-52 Herefort Inlet (NAP) 3-26 Hergot Drainage and Levee District (NCR) 23-15 Herkimer, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 Herreid, Spring Creek, S. Dak. (MRO) 26-16, 26-19 Herring Bay and Rockhold Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-6, 4-24, 4-32 Herring Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-6, 4-24, 4-32 Herring River, Scituate, Mass. (NED) 1-24 Heyburn Lake and Polecat Creek, Okla. (SWT) 29-5, 29-13, 29-17 Hickman, Ky. (MR+T) 42-12 Hickman Harbor, Ky. (LMM) 13-4 Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake, Fresno River, Calif. (SPK) 35-8, 35-25 Higginsport, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 Highland Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 31-31 Highway 12, Colo. (SWA) 32-14 Highway 39 Bridge, Gainesville, Ala. (SAM) 10-15, 10-33, 10-44 Hills Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-19, 37-27, 37-43, 37-45 Hillsborough Bay, Fla. (SAJ) 9-54 Hillsborough River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-39 Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, Kan. (MRK) 27-3, 27-9, 27-12, 27-19 Hilo Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Hingham Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Hintonville Rd. Bridge, Perry Co., Miss. (SAM) 10-49 Hiwassee River, Tenn. (ORN) 15-14 Hockingport, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 Hodges Dam, San Dieguito River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-27 Hodges Village Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-21, 1-23, 1-31, 1-52 Hoh River, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Hoko River, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Holbrook Levee, Little Colorado River, Colorado River Basin, Ariz. (SPL) 33-25 Holes Creek, West Carollton, Ohio (Great Miami River) (ORL) 16-19 Holland Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-10, 21-34, 21-47 Holley Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39, 37-41, 37-45 Holly, Colo. (SWA) 32-14 Hollywood-Ardmore Beach along Lake Michigan, Ill. (NCC) 22-17 Holmes Bay, Whiting, Maine (NED) 1-42 Holmes Creek, Fla. (SAM) 10-47 Holston River, Tenn. (ORN) 15-13 Holyoke, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-42, 1-49 Homeplace, La. (MR+T) 42-11 Homer Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-2, 40-8, 40-10 Hominy Swamp, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Homme Lake and Dam, N. Dak. (NCS) 24-8, 24-23 Homochitto River, Miss. (LMK) 12-15, 12-20 Homosassa River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Honey Creek Levee, Ind. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Honey Hill Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-44 Honga River and Tar Bay (Barren Island Gaps), Md. (NAB) 4-6, 4-24, 4-32 Honokohau Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Honolulu Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Hood Canal, Wash. (NPS) 38-25 Hoonah Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12, 40-15 Hooper, Elkhorn River, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Hooper, Nebr. (MRO) 26-16 Hooper Bay, Ark. (NPA) 40-13 Hoosic Falls, Hoosic River Basin N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 Hop Brook Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-17, 1-30, 1-50 Hopkins Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-16 Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, N.H. (NED) 1-19, 1-30, 1-51 Hoquiam River, Wash. (NPS) 38-24, 38-25 Hords Creek Lake, Tex. (SWF) 30-6, 30-16, 30-19 Horn Harbor, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries, (MR+T) 42-30 Hornell, N.Y. (NAB) 4-17, 4-28 Horseshoe Cove, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46, 9-47 1-28 INDEX Hoskins Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-19, 5-21 Hot Springs, Fall River Channel, S. Dak. (MRO) 26-19 Houlka Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-48 Houma Navigation Canal, La. (LMN) 11-16 Housatonic River, Conn. (NED) 1-38, 1-44 Housatonic River, Northampton, Mass. (NED) 1-47 Housatonic River, Pittsfield, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Housatonic River, Salisbury, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Housatonic River, Sheffield, Mass. (NED) 1-24, 1-42 Hausatonic River, Shelton, Conn. (NED) 1-47 Housatonic River Basin, Conn. and Mass. (NED) 1-7, 1-50 Houston, Minn. (NCS) 24-8, 24-23 Houston School Road Bridge, Itawamba County, Miss. (SAM) 10-15, 10-33, 10-44 Houston Ship Channel, Tex. (SWG) 31-6, 31-15, 31-24, 31-32, 31-34, 31-38 Howard A. Hanson Dam, Wash. (NAS) 38-7, 38-16, 38-21 Howards Mill Lake, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Hudson Harbor, Wis. (NCS) 24-30 Hudson River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Hudson River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-6, 2-23, 2-28, 2-32, 2-33, 2-37 Hudson River Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33, 2-34 Hugo Lake, Okla. (SWT) 29-5, 29-12, 29-17 Hulah Lake, Okla. (SWT) 29-5, 29-12, 29-17 Hull, Cordell, Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 15-14 Humboldt, Tenn. (LMM) 13-1, 13-3 Humboldt Bay, Calif. (SPN) 34-12 Humboldt Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12, 40-14 Humboldt Harbor and Bay, Calif. (SPN) 34-6 Humboldt River and Tributaries, Nev. (SPK) 35-36 Hunt Drainage District and Lima Lake Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 Hunting Island Beach, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Huntingdon, Tenn. (LMM) 13-5 Huntington, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-42, 1-49 Huntington, W. Va. (ORH) 17-21, 17-23 Huntington Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34, 2-37 Huntington Lake, Ind. (ORL) 16-7, 16-14 Huot, Minn. (NCS) 24-33 Huron Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 20-6, 20-17, 20-28 Hurricane Barrier Operations, New England Division (NED) 1-23 Hurricane Creek, Ashdown, Ark. (SWL) 28-25 Hutchins, Ky. (ORH) 17-23 Hutchinson Levee and Channel, Kan. (SWT) 29-19, 29-20 Hyannis Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Hyde County Dike, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Hydraulics and Hydrology of the Great Lakes (NCE) 21-29 Hydrologic Engineenng Center (HEC) 47-1 Hydrologic Studies (SAN) (LMK) (SWT) 7-17, 12-22, 29-22 I Iao Stream, Maui, Hawaii (POD) 36-12, 36-15 Ice Harbor at Marcus Hook, Pa. (NAP) 3-25 Ice Harbor at New Castle, Del. (NAP) 3-25 Ice Harbor Lock and Dam-Lake Sacajawea, Wash. (NPW) 39-4, 39-9, 39-13, 39-18, 39-22 Ida Grove, Iowa (MRO) 26-16 Ida Grove, Maple River-Odebott Creek (MRO) 26-20 Iliuliuk Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Illinois and Michigan Canal, Ill. (NCR) 23-16 Illinois and Mississippi Canal, Ill. (NCR) 23-2, 23-7 Illinois River, Ill. (MR+T) 42-19 Illinois River, Liverpool, Ill. (NCR) 23-17 Illinois Waterway, Ill. and Ind. (NCR) 23-2, 23-7, 23-9, 23-14 Illinois Waterway, Ill. and Ind., Additional Features Entering into Cost (NCR) 23-19, 23-20 Illinois Waterway, Ill. and Ind., Duplicate Locks (NCR) 23-14 Illinois Waterway. Ill.and Ind., Lock and Dam Construction, Foundations, Cost (NCR) 23-18 Illinois Waterway. Ill. (St. Louis District) (LMS) 14-2 Illinois Waterway Navigation Project (Perkin, Ill.) (NCR) 23-14 Illinois Waterway: Existing Locks and Dams (NCR) 23-18, 23-20 Imperial Beach, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Indian Camp Creek and Tribs., Noxabee, Miss. (SAM) 10-49 Indian Creek, Corydon, Ind. (ORL) 16-19, 16-30 Indian Creek Area, Illinois River, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Indian Creek Lake, Emerson, Iowa (MRO) 26-17 Indian Grave Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 Indian Island, Maine (NED) 1-23 I-29 Indian Lake, Blue River, Kan. (MRK) 27-17 Indian River County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-19, 9-30, 9-41 Indian River Inlet and Bay, Del. (NAP) 3-6, 3-16, 3-20 Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore Bank Protection, Beverly Shores, Ind. (NCC) 22-5, 22-14 Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore Emergency Stone Repairs, Beverly Shores, Ind. (NCC) 22-11 Indiana Harbor, Ind. (NCC) 22-4, 22-10, 22-13, 22-16 Indiana Shoreline, Ind. (NCC) 22-5, 22-11, 22-14 Indianapolis, Ind. (ORL) 16-29 Indianapolis, Ind. (Fall Creek Section) (White River) (ORL) 16-19 Indianapolis, Ind. (Warfleigh Section) (White River) (ORL) 16-19 Indianola, Nebr. (MRK) 27-16 Indianola, Republican River, Nebr. (MRK) 27-19 Industrial Area, Waterbury, Conn. (NED) 1-47 Industrial Levee (Ensley Bottoms) (MR+T) 42-12 Industry, Pa. (ORP) 18-21 Inez, Ky. (ORH) 17-23 Inland Route, Mich. (NCE) 21-11, 21-34, 21-47 Inland Waterway from Chincoteague Bay, Va., to Delaware Bay, Del. (NAP) 3-24 Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, Del. and Md. (NAP) 3-6, 3-16, 3-20 Inland Waterway from Franklin to Mermentau River, La. (LMN) 11-16 Inland Waterway, Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, Del. (NAP) 3-24 Inspection of Completed Beach Erosion Projects (NED) 1-11, 1-23 Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects Alaska District (NPA) 40-6 Albuquerque, N. Mex., District (SWA) 32-8 Baltimore, Md., District (NAB) 4-21 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 20-15 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-7 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 21-27 Fort Worth, Tex., District (SWF) 30-11, 30-22 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 31-13 Huntington, W. Va., District (ORH) 17-10, 17-19 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-25 Kansas City, Mo., District (MRK) 27-7, 27-11, 27-19 Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL) 28-6 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL) 33-8, 33-28 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL) 16-12, 16-29, 16-30 Memphis, Tenn., District (LMM) 13-2 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-20 Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN) 15-6, 15-9 New Orleans District (LMN) 11-10 New York District (NAN) 2-21 Omaha, Neb., District (MRO) 26-6 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-5, 36-15 Philadelphia, Penn., District (NAP) 3-13 Pittsburgh, Penn., District (ORP) 18-9, 18-25 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-13 Rock Island, ill., District (NCR) 23-15, 23-16 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-20 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN) 34-4 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-11 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-8 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS) 14-6 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 24-20, 24-33 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 29-8, 29-20 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-7 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW) 39-2, 39-17 Wilmington, N.C., District (SAW) 6-14 Inspection of Completed Local Protection Projects (MRO) (NPP) 26-11, 26-18, 26-19, 37-13 Inspection of Completed PL-99 Work, (NPW) (NPS) 38-8, 39-2 Inspection of Completed Projects (NAB) 4-42 Inspection of Non-Federal Levees (NAP) (MRO) (MRK) 3-13, 26-11, 27-7, 27-11 Institute for Water Resources 47-2 Intercounty D. D., Little Sioux River, Ia. (MRO) 26-20 International Boundary Waters Boards, 49-1 Intemational Champlain-Richelieu Board 49-1 International Great Lakes Diversions and Consumptive Uses Study Board (NCE) 21-29, 49-1 International Great Lakes Technical Information Network Board (NCE) 21-29, 49-1 International Joint Commission Board of Control 49-1 International Kootenay Lake Board of Control 49-1 International Lake Champlain Board of Control 49-1 International Lake Memphremagog Board 49-2 Intemational Lake of the Woods Control Board 49-1 International Lake Superior Board of Control (NCE) 21-28, 49-1 International Niagara Board of Control and International Niagara Working Committee (NCE) 21-29, 49-1 International Niagara Committee 49-2 International Osoyoos Lake Board of Control 49-1 I-30 INDEX International Rainy Lake Board of Control 49-1 International Skagit River Board of Control 49-1 International Souris River Board of Control 49-1 International Souris-Red Rivers Engineering Board 49-1 International St. Croix River Board of Control 49-1 International St. Lawrence River Board of Control (NCE) 21-29,49-1 Interstate Bridge, Portland, Oreg. (NPP) 37-37 Interstate Highway Bridge (Barge Channel), Oreg. (NPP) 37-37 Interstate 59 Bridges, Fosters, Ala. (SAM) 10-48 Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-6, 9-27, 9-33 Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, Fla. (SAJ) 9-7, 9-27, 9-33 Intracoastal Waterway, Miami to Key West, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Intracoastal Waterway, Mississippi River to Bayou Teche, La. (LMN) 11-16 Investigations of Projects Under the Federal Power Act 50-1 Iola Levee, Kans. (SWT) 29-19, 29-20 Iowa Falls, River Road, Iowa (NCR) 23-17 Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, Iowa (NCR) 23-13, 23-16 Iowa River, Wapello, Iowa (NCR) 23-17 Ipswich Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Ipswich River, Mass. (NED) 1-44 Iron'dale, Ala. (SAM) 10-49 Irondequoit Bay, N.Y. (NCB) 20-6, 20-18, 20-29 Ironton, Ohio (ORH) 17-21, 17-23 Iroquois River, Sugar Creek, Watscka, Ill. (NCR) 23-17 Irving Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 30-22 Irving Township at Nichols Rd., Jackson Co., Wis. (NCS) 24-28, 24-33 Irving Township, Jackson Co., Wis. (NCS) 24-28, 24-33 Irvington Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-37 Isabella Lake, Kemrn River, Calif. (SPK) 35-9, 35-25 Island Avenue, Quincy, Mass. (NED) 1-42 Island Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Island Creek, St. Georges Island, Md. (NAB) 4-7, 4-25, 4-32 Island End River, Chelsea, Mass. (NED) 1-38 Island Levee, Ind. (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-20, 16-24 Isle Au Haut Thoroughfare, Maine (NED) 1-38 Isle of Shoals Harbor, Maine and N.H. (NED) 1-38 Islesboro (The Narrows), Maine (NED) 1-23, 1-42 Israel R., Lancaster, N.H. (NED) 1-49 Issaquah Creek, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Ithaca, N.Y., Cascadilla Creek (NCB) 20-40 Ithaca, N.Y., Cayuga Inlet (NCB) 20-37 Ithaca, N.Y., Fall Creek (NCB) 20-40 J J.C. Park, New Albany, Ind. (ORL) 16-31 J.Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Tenn. (ORN) 15-7, 15-9, 15-18 J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir (formerly Clarks Hill Lake), Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-7, 8-12, 8-14, 8-16 Jackson, Ky. (Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-19, 16-24, 16-30 Jackson County Levee District 2, White River, Ark. (SWL) 28-17 Jackson Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Jackson Hole, Snake River, Wyo. (NPW) 39-3, 39-9, 39-12, 39-14, 39-15 Jackson Port, Jackson, Ala. (SAM) 10-6, 10-31, 10-39 Jacksonburg, Fishing Creek, W.Va. (ORH) 17-23 Jacksonville Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-7, 9-27, 9-34 Jacksonville Harbor (Mill Cove), Fla. (SAJ) 9-8, 9-27, 9-34 Jacksonville Harbor, Fla., St. Johns River, Fla. opposite the City of Jacksonville (SAJ) 9-34 Jadwin, General Edgar, Dam and Reservoir, Pa. (NAP) 3-13, 3-17 Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-7, 2-23, 2-28, 2-33, 2-34 James River, Va. (NAO) 5-4, 5-11, 5-15, 5-21 James River, Yankton, S. Dak. (MRO) 26-23 James W. Trimble Lock and Dam (No. 13), Ark. (SWL) 28-3, 28-20 Jamestown Reservoir, N. Dak. (MRO) 26-16 Janesville and Indian Ford Damrns, Wis. (NCR) 23-14 Jarvis Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Jaws-Lake Fousse Pointe (MR+T) 42-14 Jefferson River, Bank Protection, near Waterlo, Mont. (MRO) 26-19 Jefferson River, Willow Creek Bridge, near Three Forks, Mont. (MRO) 26-19 Jeffersonville-Clarksville, Ind. (ORL) 16-19, 16-24, 16-29 1-31 Jemez Canyon Dam, N. Mex. (SWA) 32-5, 32-11, 32-13 Jenkins, Tom, Dam, Ohio (ORH) 17-19 Jenkins, Tom, Reservoir, Ohio (ORH) 17-10, 17-14 Jenks LLP, Okla. (SWT) 29-19, 29-20 Jennings Beach, Fairfield, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Jennings Randolph Lake, Md. and W. Va. (NAB) 4-13, 4-27, 4-35 Jeremy Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-4, 7-8, 7-11 Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, Ga. and Fla. (SAM) 10-25, 10-35, 10-46 Joe Creek Channel Improvement, Okla. (SWT) 29-19, 29-20, 29-21 Joe Pool Lake (Lakeville Lake), Tex. (SWF) 30-6, 30-16, 30-19 John Day Lock and Dam-Lake Umatilla, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-19, 37-28, 37-35, 37-46 John Day River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-38, 37-41 John Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41, 37-44 John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, Va. and N.C. (SAW) 6-5, 6-16, 6-20 John Martin Reservoir, Colo. (SWA) 32-3, 32-10 John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, Kan. (SWT) 29-5, 29-13, 29-17 John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Va. (ORH) 17-5, 17-13, 17-18 Johns Pass, Fla. (SAJ) 9-9, 9-27, 9-34, 9-46 Johnson Bay, Lubec, Maine (NED) 1-42 Johnson Bayou, La. (SWG) 31-30 Johnson Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Johnson Creek, Arlington, Tex. (SWF) 30-23 Johnson Creek, Grand Prairie, Tex. (SWF) 30-23 Johnsonburg, Pa. (ORP) 18-20, 18-25 Johnsonburg, Penn. (Allegheny River Basin) (ORP) 18-24 Johnstown, Penn. (ORP) 18-4, 18-11, 18-16 Johnstown, Penn. (Allegheny River Basin) (ORP) 18-24 Jones Bluff Lock and Dam, Ala. (SAM) 10-45 Jones Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33, 2-34 Jonesport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-5, 1-26, 1-34 Jonesville, La. (LMK) (MR+T) 12-14, 42-15, 42-29 Jordan, B. Everett, Dam and Lake, N.C. (SAW) 16-20 Josias River, Maine (NED) 1-39 Joyce Creek, Camden County, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Julian, Rock Creek, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Jump, The, New Orleans, La. (MR+T) 42-11 Juneau (Aurora Harbor) (NPA) 40-14 Juneau Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 K Kaaawa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii (POD) 36-11 Kahawainui Stream, Oahu, Hawaii (POD) 36-4, 36-7 Kahoma Stream, Maui, Hawaii (POD) 36-5, 36-7, 36-9 Kahului Beach Road, Mauri, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Kahului Harbor, Mauri, Oahu, Hawaii (POD) 36-10, 36-14 Kailua Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Kaimu Black Sand Beach, Hawaii, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Kake Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-2, 40-8, 40-10 Kalama River (South Area) Levee, Wash. (NPP) 37-41, 37-44 Kalamazoo River (Battle Creek), Mich.(NCE) 21-56 Kalamazoo River (Kalamazoo), Mich. (NCE) 21-56 Kalaupapa Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Kanawha River, W. Va. (ORH) 17-2, 17-12, 17-17 Kaneohe-Kailua Area, Oahu, Hawaii (POD) 36-12 Kaneohe-Kailua Dam, Oahu, Hawaii (POD) 36-15 Kankakee River, Ill. and Ind. (NCC) 22-17 Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, Kan. (MRK) 27-3, 27-9, 27-12, 27-19 Kansas City, Kansas River, Kan. (1962 Mod.) (MRK) 27-16 Kansas Citys on Mo. and Kansas Rivers, Mo. and Kan. (MRK) 27-16 Kansas River and Minor Tributaries (MRK) 27-19 Kansas River Navigation, Kan. (MRK) 27-17 Kapaa Town, Kauai, Hawaii (POD) 36-11 Kapaakea Homestead Flood Control, Molokai, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Karlson Island, Oreg. (NPP) 37-38 Kasilof Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-3, 14-8, 14-11, 14-14 Kaskaskia River, Ill. (LMS) 14-2, 14-8, 14-10 Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor Hawaii, Hawaii (POD) 36-2, 36-7, 36-10 Kaumalapau Harbor, Lanai, Hawaii (POD) 36-14 Kaunakakai Harbor, Molokai, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 I-32 INDEX Kaunakakai Stream, Molokai, Hawaii (POD) 36-12, 36-15 Kaw Lake, Okla. (SWT) 29-5, 29-13, 29-17 Kawaihae Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Kawainui Marsh, Oahu, Hawaii (POD) 36-15 Kawainui Swamp, Oahu, Hawaii (POD) 36-12, 36-15 Kaweah and Tule Rivers, including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-10, 35-25 Kawkawlin River, Mich. (NCE) 21-55 Kawkawlin, Kawkawlin River, Mich. (NCE) 21-27 Kays Creek, Utah (SPK) 35-34 Keach Drainage and Levee District. Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Keehi Lagoon, Oahu, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Keene, N.H. (NED) 1-23, 1-42, 1-49 Kehoe Lake, Ky. (ORH) 17-21 Keithsburg Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 23-15 Kekaha Beach, Kauai, Hawaii (POD) 36-11 Kelly Creek, Monett, Ark. (SWL) 28-25 Kelleys Island, Ohio (NCB) 20-35 Kenai, Ark. (NPA) 40-13 Kendrick, Potlatch River, Idaho (NPW) 39-12 Kenmore Navigation Channel, Wash. (NPS) 38-24 Kennebec River, Maine (NED) 1-24, 1-39, 1-44 Kennebunk River, Maine (NED) 1-39 Kennedy Twp. and McKees Rocks Borough, Penn. (ORP) 18-26 Kenosha Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 21-11, 21-34, 21-47 Kentucky Lock, Ky. (ORN) 15-17 Kentucky River, Ky. (ORL) 16-2, 16-13, 16-27 Kentucky River, Locks and Dams (ORL) 16-23 Keokuk Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 25-8 Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, Calif. (SPK) 35-34 Kerr, John H., Dam and Reservoir, Va. and N.C. (SAW) 6-5, 6-16, 6-20 Kerr, Robert S., Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 28-20, 29-16, 29-18, 29-20 Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCC) 23-16 Ketchikan Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12, 40-13 Kewalo Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Kewaunee Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 21-11, 21-35 Kewaunee River, Wis. (NCE) 21-47, 21-57 Keweenaw, Eagle River, Mich. (NCR) 21-25 Keweenaw Waterway, Mich. (NCE) 21-12, 21-35, 21-47 Key Creek, Minden (WW Lagoon), Iowa (MRO) 26-23 Key West, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Key West Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Keyport Harbor, NJ. (NAN) 2-33, 2-34, 2-38 Keystone, Okla. (SWL) 28-22 Keystone Lake, Okla. (SWT) 29-9, 29-15, 29-18 29-20 Kickapoo River, Gay Mills, Wis. (NCS) 24-28 Kihei Beach, Mauri, Hawaii (POD) 36-11 Kihei Shoreline Protection, Maui, Hawaii (POD)36-14 Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Kill Van Kull-Newark Bay Channel, NJ. and N.Y. (NAN) 2-8, 2-23, 2-29 Kindred Lake, N. Dak. (NCS) 24-30 Kings Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Kingston Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-24 Kingston Harbor (North Plymouth), Mass. (NED) 1-39 Kingston-Edwardsville, Pa. (NAB) 4-39, 4-42 Kingstree Branch, Williamsburg County, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Kinley Creek, Lexington County, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Pa. and N.Y. (ORP) 18-5, 18-12, 18-17, 18-25 Kirwan, Michael J., Dam and Reservoir, Ohio (ORP) 18-6, 18-12, 18-17, 18-25 Kishwaukee River at De Kalb, Ill. (NCR) 23-13 Kissimmee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Kittanning, Pa. (ORP) 18-25 Kittanning, Pa. Part I (ORP) 18-20 Kittanning, Pa. Part I (Allegheny River) (ORP) 18-24 Kittanning, Pa. Part II (Allegheny River) (ORP) 18-21 Kitzmiller, Md. (NAB) 4-39, 4-42 Klamath River, Calif. (SPK) 35-34 Klutina River, Copper Center, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Knappa Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-38 Knapps Narrows, Md. (NAB) 4-7, 4-25, 4-33 Knife River, Minn. (NCE) 21-60 Knife River, Stanton, N. Dak. (MRO) 26-23 Knife River Harbor, Minn. (NCE) 21-55 Knights Valley Lake, Calif. (SPN) 34-13 Knightville Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-14, 1-23, 1-28, 1-48 Knobb's Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Kodiak Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-7, 40-12 Kootenai River, Idaho and Mont. (NPS) 38-24, 38-26 Krotz Springs (MR+T) 42-14 Kualoa Regional Park, Hawaii (POD) 36-11 Kuliouou Stream, Oahu, Hawaii (POD) 36-12, 36-15 I-33 L L'Anguille Basin, Ark. (MR+T) 42-30 L'Anguille River, Ark. (MR+T) 42-18 La Conner, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 La Crosse, Wis. (NCS) 24-30 La Farge Lake and Channel Improvement, Wis. (NCS) 24-9, 24-23 La Grange Bayou, Fla. (SAM) 10-47, 10-50 La Grange Gut, Frederiksted, V.I. (SAJ) 5-54 LaPlatte R. Shelbume Bay, Vt. (NAN) 2-38 La Pointe Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 21-55 La Trappe, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Labette County Bridge, Kans. (SWT) 29-21 Lac La Belle Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-55, 21-60 Lac Qui Parle Lake, Minnesota River, Minn. (NCS) 24-9, 24-23, 24-34 Lacey Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 23-16 Lacey, Langellier, West Mantanzas and Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 23-13 Lackawanna, N.Y. Smokes Creek (NCB) 20-37 Lackawanna River Basin, Pa. (NAB) 4-13, 4-35 Lacour-Red Cross (MR+T) 42-13 Lafayette Lake, Ind. (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-20 Lafayette River, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Lago De Cerrillos, P.R. (SAJ) 9-42 Lago De Portugues, P.R. (SAJ) 9-42 Lagoon Pond, Martha's Vineyard, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Lahaina Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Lake Andrusia, Mississippi River, Minn. (NCS) 24-9, 24-23 Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, N. Dak. (NCS) 24-10, 24-23 Lake Borgne and Chef Menteur-Bulkheads Jetties (LMN) 11-16 Lake Brownwood Modification, Tex. (SWF) 30-22 Lake Camanche, Calif. (SPK) 35-34 Lake Cantlin, Minn. (NCS) 24-34 Lake Carnelian, Steamrns Co., Minn. (NCS) 24-34 Lake Charles Deep Water Channel, La. (LMN) 11-13, 11-16 Lake Charlotte, Minn. (NCS) 24-34 Lake Chautauqua and Chadakoin River, N.Y. (ORP) 18-21 Lake City, Tenn. (ORN) 15-19 Lake City Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 25-7, 25-10 Lake Crescent and Dunns Creek, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Lake Crockett, Wash. (NPS) 38-3, 38-15, 38-20, 38-29 Lake Darling, N. Dak. (NCS) 24-28 Lake Douglas, Ga. (SAM) 10-48 Lake Elsinore, Riverside Co., Calif. (SPL) 33-28 Lake Erie, Athol Springs, Hamburg, N.Y. (NCB) 20-30 Lake Erie, Domonakas Library, Sheffield Lake, Ohio (NCB) 20-93 Lake Erie, Eastland, Ohio (NCB) 20-39 Lake Erie, Fredonia, N.Y. (NCB) 20-39 Lake Erie, Liwood Park, Vermilion, Ohio (NCB) 20-39 Lake Erie, Middle Bass Island, Deist Rd., Ohio (NCB) 20-39 Lake Erie-Ohio Canal, Ohio and Penn. (ORP) 18-21 Lake Erie, Sheffield, Ohio (NCB) 20-38 Lake Erie, State Park, Brocton, N.Y. (NCB) 20-3 Lake Erie, Sturgeon Pt., Evans, N.Y. 28-209 Lake Fork Lake, Sabine River, Tex. (SWF) 30-22 Lake George, Hobart, Ind. (NCC) 22-9, 22-15 Lake Gunterville, Ala. (ORN) 15-19 Lake Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lake Hudson, Okla. (SWT) 29-20 Lake Kemp, Tex. (SWT) 29-6, 29-13, 29-17 Lake Lanier Reregulation Dam (SAS) 8-9 Lake Massasecum, Bradford, N.H. (NED) 1-47 Lake Michigan, Edgewater/Rogers Park Communities, Chicago, Ill. (NCC) 22-6, 22-11, 22-14 Lake Michigan-Lake Bluff, Ill. (NCC) 22-17 Lake Michigan-Lake Forest, Ill. (NCC) 22-17 Lake Michigan, Lake Shore, Fullerton, Ill. (NCC) 22-8 Lake Michigan, Temple Emanuel, Ill. (NCC) 22-8 Lake Michigan Shoreline, Cleveland, Wis. (NCB) 21-25 Lake Michigan Shoreline, Cudahy, Wis. (NCB) 21-25 Lake Michigan Shoreline, Muskegon, Mich. (NCB) 21-25 Lake Michigan Shoreline, S. Milwaukee, Wis. (NCE) 21-25 Lake Michigan Shoreline, Whitefish Bay, Wis. (NCB) 21-25 Lake Montauk Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33, 2-34 Lake Ogleton, Md. (NAB) 4-40 Lake Ontario, Lake Rd., Webster, N.Y. (NCB) 20-39 I-34 INDEX Lake Ontario, Rochester Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 20-38 Lake Oroville, Calif. (SPK) 35-34 Lake Pontchartrain, La. (MR+T) 42-15 Lake Pontchartrain-Jefferson Parish, La. (MR+T) 42-29 Lake Pontchartrain, North Shore, La. (LMN) 11-14 Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, La., (Hurricane Protection) (LMN) 11-6, 11-11, 11-14 Lake Providence Harbor, La. (LMK) 12-15 Lake Pulaski, Wright Co., Minn. (NCS) 24-11, 24-23 lake River, Wash. (NPP) 37-37, 37-42 Lake River Delta Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-41, 37-44 Lake Shelbyville, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Lake Sidney Lanier, Ga. (SAM) 10-46 Lake St. Clair, Mich., Channels (NCE) 21-12, 21-35, 21-48 Lake Susupe, CNMI (POD) 36-15 Lake Texoma, Tex. and Okla. (ORD) (SWT) 19-9, 29-15, 29-18 Lake Traverse, Minn. and S. Dak. (NCS) 24-27 Lake Traverse and Bois De Sioux River, S. Dak. and Minn. (NCS) 24-11, 24-23 Lake Washington Ship Canal, Wash. (NPS) 38-4, 38-15, 38-20, 38-28 Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, Tex. (SWT) 29-6, 29-13, 29-17 Lakeport Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-36 Lakes, Levees, and Recreational Facilities (LMS) 14-13 Lakeshore Park, Ashtabula, Ohio (NCB) 20-20, 20-33 Lakeview Park, Lorain, Ohio (NCB) 20-36 Lamoille River, Vt. (NAN) 2-36, 2-37 Lamprey River, N.H. (NED) 1-39 Lancaster, Mass. (NED) 1-23 Lancaster, N.Y. Cayuga Creek (NCB) 20-37 Lancaster, Israel River, N.H. (NED) 1-42 Langellier Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCC) 23-16 Lansing (Grand River), Mich. (NCE) 21-57 Lansing Harbor, Iowa (NCD) 25-7, 25-10 Lapwai Creek, Culdesac, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-15 Larchmont Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Largo Sound Channel, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Lamed, Kans. (SWT) 29-19, 29-20 Larose to Golden Meadow, La. (Hurricane Protection) (LMN) 11-7, 11-11, 11-14 Las Animas, Colo. (SWA) 32-14 Las Cruces, N. Mex. (SWA) 32-14 Las Tunas Beach, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Las Vegas Wash Tributaries, Nev. (SPL) 33-27 Latrobe, Pa. (ORP) 18-20, 18-25 Latrobe, Pa. (Allegheny River Basin) (ORP) 18-24 Latta Brook Road, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39 Lauliifou Shoreline Protection, American Samoa (POD) 36-16 Lauliituai-Aumi, Tutuila Island American Samoa (POD) 36-14 Laupahoehoe Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii (POD) 36-2, 36-7 Laurel, Miss. (SAM) 10-49 Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ky. (ORN) 15-7, 15-9, 15-18 Lava Hot Springs, Portneuf River, Idaho (NPW) 39-15 Lavaca-Navidad River, Tex. (SWG) 31-31 Lavon Lake, Tex. (SWF) 30-7, 30-16, 30-19 Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement, Tex. (SWF) 30-7, 30-16, 30-20 Lawrence, Kansas River, Kan. (MRK) 27-16, 27-19 Lawrenceburg, Ind. (ORL) 16-19, 16-24, 16-29 Lawyers Creek, Kamiah, Idaho (NPW) 39-17 Lazer Creek Lake, Ga. (SAM) 10-48 Lead Bayou, Miss. (LMK) 12-4, 12-9, 12-11 Leading Creek, W. Va. (ORH) 17-21 Leaf and Bowie Rivers, Hattiesburg, Miss. (SAM) 10-15, 10-34, 10-44 Leaf and Chickasawhay River, Miss. (SAM) 10-47 Leaf River, County Rd. Bridge, Mahned, Miss. (SAM) 10-48 Leavenworth, Ind. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Lebanon Junction. Ky. (Salt River) (ORL) 16-19, 16-29 Le Claire Lock (Canal), Iowa (NCD) 25-5 LeSueur, Minn. (NCS) 24-33 Lee County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lee, Housatonic River, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-42 Leech Lake Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 24-31 Leesville, Va., Roanoke River, Sec. 32, Demo. Project (SAW) 6-20 Leetonia, Ohio (ORP) 18-20 Leetsdale, Pa. (ORP) 18-21 Leipsic River, Del. (NAP) 3-25 Leith's Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Leith's Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Leland Bowman Lock, La. (formerly Vermilion Lock) (LMN) 11-16 Leland Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-12, 21-35, 21-48 I-35 Lemon Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Lepua Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-3, 36-7 Les Cheneaux Islands, Channels, Mich. (NCE) 21-55, 21-60 Letart, W. Va. (ORH) 17-22 Letart Falls, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, Il. (No. 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,10,13) (LMS) 14-14 Levee Districts between Cowden and Vandalia, Ill. (LMS) 14-14 Levee Unit 1, Eel River, Ind. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Levee Unit 2, Eel River, Ind. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Levee Unit 2, East Fork White River, Ind. (ORL) 16-21 Levee Unit 3, East Fork White River, Ind. (ORL) 16-21 Levee Unit 1, Ill. (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-21 Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River, Ill. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, Ill. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Levee Unit 17, Ind. (ORL) 16-25 Levee Unit 2, Wabash River, Ill. (ORL) 16-21 Levee Units 3 and 4, Wabash River, Ill. (ORL) 16-21 Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, Ill. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Levee Unit 17, Wabash River Basin, Ind. (ORL) 16-21 Levee Unit 1, White River, Ind. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Levee Unit 2, White River, Ind. (ORL) 16-25 Levee Unit 7, White River, Ind. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Levee Unit 9, White River, Ind. (ORL) 16-21 Levee Unit 10, White River, Ind. (ORL) 16-21 Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, Ind. (ORL) 16-19, 16-29 Levee Unit No. 8, Ind. (White River) (ORL) 16-9, 16-29 Levees (NAP) (MR+T) 3-13, 42-4, 42-10, 42-46 to 42-51 Levees, Missouri River (MRO) 26-21 Levees Expenditures (MR+T) 42-62 Levels of the Great Lakes (NCE) 21-29 Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, W. Va., Va., and Ky. (ORH) 17-6, 17-13, 17-18 Lewis and Clark River Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-38 Lewis River, Wash. (NPP) 37-37, 37-38, 37-42 Lewis River Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-41, 37-44 Lewisport, Ky. (ORL) 16-19, 16-24 Lewiston-Clarkston Bridge, Idaho and Wash. (NPW) 39-5, 39-9, 39-13 Lewisville Dam, Tex. (SWF) 30-7, 30-16, 30-20 Lexington Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-12, 21-35, 21-48 Libby Dam-Lake Koocanusa, Mont. (NAS) 38-10, 38-18, 38-22 Libby Dike, Coal Bank Slough, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Liberty Local Protection Project, Tex. (SWG) 31-31 Libertyville Estates, Ill. (NCC) 22-8 License Fees Collected Through Fiscal Year 1988 (NCD) 25-9 Lick Creek, Hartford, City (Blackford Co.), Ind. (ORL) 16-30, 16-31 Lick Run, Baldwin, Penn. (ORP) 18-26 Lick Run, Roanoke, Va. (SAW) 6-27 Licking River, Ky. (ORL) 16-18, 16-27, 16-30, 16-31 Lido Key, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Lighthouse Point Park, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Limestone Creek, Fayettville, N.Y. (NCB) 20-39 Lincoln, N.H. (NED) 1-23 Lincoln lake, Ind. (ORL) 16-22 Lincoln Park Beach, Wash. (NPS) 38-7, 38-16, 38-21 Lincoln Salt Creek and Tribs., Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Linton, N. Dak. (MRO) 26-16 Lisbon, N. Dak. (NCS) 24-34 Lisle, N.Y. (NAB) 4-7, 4-28 Little Bay, Tex. (SWG) 31-30 Little Bay De Noc, Gladstone Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-55 Little Beaver Creek, Kettering, Ohio (ORL) 16-31 Little Blue River, Clay Co., Nebr. (MRK) 27-21 Little Blue River, Jefferson Co., Nebr., Rd. at Endicott (MRK) 27-21 Little Blue River, Jefferson Co., Nebr., Crystal Springs Bridge at Fairbury (MRK) 27-21 Little Blue River, Nuckolls Co., Nebr. (MRK) 27-21 Little Blue River, Steele City, Nebr., Sewage Lagoons (MRK) 27-21 Little Blue River, Thayer Co., Nebr., Gilead North Bridge (MRK) 27-21 Little Blue River, Washington Co., Kan., County Rd. (MRK) 27-21 Little Blue River, Washington Co., Kan., Spence Rd. (MRK) 27-21 Little Blue River Channel Improvement, Little Blue River, Mo. (MRK) 27-3, 27-9 I-36 INDEX Little Blue River Lakes, Little Blue River, Mo. (MRK) 27-4, 27-9, 27-13 Little Caillou Bayou, La. (LMN) 11-16 Little Calumet River, Ill. (NCC) 22-17 Little Calumet River, Ind. (NCC) 22-7, 22-11, 22-14 Little Calumet River Basin (Caddy Marsh Ditch), Ind. (NCC) 22-17 Little Colorado River at Holbrook, Ariz. (SPL) 33-9 Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, Ala. (SAM) 10-44, 10-48, 10-49 Little Creek, Kent Island, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Little Dell Lake, Utah (SPK) 35-11, 35-25 Little Egg Harbor, NJ. (NAP) 3-25 Little Goose Lock and Dam-Lake Bryan, Wash. (NPW) 39-5, 39-9,39-13, 39-19, 39-22 Little Harbor, N.H. (NED) 1-39 Little Harbor, Woods Hole, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Little Harpeth River, Brentwood, Tenn. (ORN) 15-19 Little Kanawha River, W. Va. (ORH) 17-20 Little Lake Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-13, 21-35, 21-48 Little Machipongo River, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Little Manatee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Little Massard Creek, Fort Smith, Ark. (SWL) 28-6, 28-12 Little Miami River, Ohio (ORL) 16-27, 16-30 Little Missouri River, Ark. (LMK) 12-15 Little Missouri River below Murfreesboro, Ark. (LMK) 12-17 Little Neck Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 LittleNemaha River, Nemaha Co., Nebr. (MRO) 26-17 Little Papillion, Little Papillion Creek, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Little Papillion, Nebr. (MRO) 26-16 Little Quilcene River, Wash. (NPS) 38-8, 38-16, 38-21 Little Red River District 1, Ark. (SWL) 28-17 Little Red River and Tributaries, Clinton, Ark. (SWL) 28-6, 28-12 Little Red River, White County Road Bridge, Judsonia, Ark. (SWL) 28-17 Little River, Del. (NAP) 3-24 Little River, La. (LMK) 12-15 Little River at Cayuga Island, N.Y. (NCB) 20-35 Little River Basin (Little Rock District), Ark. (SWL) 28-6, 28-12, 28-23 Little River Belfast, Me. (NED) 1-19, 1-31, 1-36 Little River (Creek), Va. (NAO) 5-19 Little River Dike, Westfield, Mass. (NED)/1-42 Little River Diversion Channel, Mo. (MR+T) 42-19 Little River Inlet, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-4, 7-8, 7-12 Little Rock Levee, Ark. (East End Fourche Bayou) (SWL) 28-17 Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 28-3, 28-11 Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Little Sioux River, Anthon, Iowa (MRO) 26-21, 26-23 Little Sioux River, Iowa (MRO) 26-4, 26-12 Little Sioux River and Tributaries, Iowa (MRO) 26-9 Little Sioux River at Spencer, Iowa (MRO) 26-33 Little Sodus Bay Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 20-7, 20-18, 20-29 Little Sugar Creek, Charlotte, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Little Tallahatchie River, Miss. (LMK) 12-15 Little Tennessee River, Tenn. (ORN) 15-13 Little Valley Wash, Magna, Utah (SPK) 35-36 Little Wabash River, Wayne Co., Ill. (ORL) 16-31 Little Walnut Creek, Austin, Tex. (SWF) 30-23 Little Wicomico River, Va. (NAB) 4-37, 4-41 Little Wood River, Idaho (NPW) 39-12, 39-16, 39-17 Littleville Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-14, 1-23, 1-28, 1-48 Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 23-13, 23-16 Local Protection Projects (NED) 1-48, 1-49, 1-50, 1-51, 1-52 Lock and Dam No. 1, Minn. (NCD) 25-5 Lock and Dam No. 2, Ark. (SWL) 28-19 Lock No. 2 and Wilbur D. Mill Dam (No.2), Ark. (SWL) 28-3 Look and Dam No. 2, Minn. (NCD) 25-5 Lock and Dam No. 3, Ark. (SWL) 28-3, 28-19 Lock and Dam No. 3, Minn. (NCD) 25-5 Lock and Dam No. 4, Ark. (SWL) 28-3, 28-19 Lock and Dam No. 4, Wis. (NCD) 25-5 Lock and Dam No. Lock and Dam No. Lock and Dam No. Lock and Dam No. Lock and Dam No. Lock and Dam No. Lock and Dam No. Lock and Dam No. Lock and Dam No. 5, Ark. (SWL) 28-3, 28-19 5, Minn. (NCD) 25-5 5A, Minn. (NCD) 25-5 6, Wis. (NCD) 25-5 7, Minn. (NCD) 25-5 8, Wis. (NCD) 25-5 9, Wis. (NCD) 25-5 11, Ark. (SWL) 28-20 11, Iowa (NCD) 25-5 Lock and Dam No.-12, Iowa (NCD) 25-5 I-37 Lock and Dam No. 13, Ark. (SWT) 29-20 Lock and Dam No. 13, Iowa (NCD) 25-5 Lock and Dam No. 14, Iowa (NCD) 25-5 Lock and Dam No. 15, Ill. (NCD) 25-5 Lock and Dam No. 16, Iowa (NCD) 25-5 Lock and Dam No. 17, Ill. (NCD) 25-6 Lock and Dam No. 18, Iowa (NCD) 25-6 Lock and Dam No. 19, Iowa (NCD) 25-6 Lock and Dam No. 21, Ill. (NCD) 25-6 Lock and Dam No. 22, Mo. (NCD) 25-6 Lock and Dam No. 24, Mo. (NCD) 25-6 Lock and Dam No. 25, Mo. (NCD) 25-6 Lock and Dam No. 26, Ill. (NCD) 25-6 Lock and Dam No. 26 (Replacement) (LMS) 14-10 Lock S-53, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49 Lock S-55, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49 Lock S-57, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49 Lock S-58, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49 Lock S-59, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49 Lock S-60, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49 Lock S-61, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49 Lock S-62, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49 Lock S-63, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49 Lock S-63A, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49 Lock S-65, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49 Lock S-65A, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49 Lock S-65B, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49 Lock S-65C, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49 Lock S-65D, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49 Lock S-65E, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49 Lock S-96, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49 Lock S-96A, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49 Lock S-157, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49 Lock S-158, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49 Lock S-193, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49 Lock S-308B, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49 Lock S-310, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49 Lock Haven, Pa. (NAB) 4-22, 4-39 Locklies Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Lockwoods Folly River, N.C. (SAW) 6-6, 6-18 Lodge Creek, Chinook, Mont. (MRO) 26-23 Logan, Ohio (ORH) 17-21 Logan Creek, Bancroft, Nebr. (MRO) 26-23 Logan Creek, Bank Protection, near Bancroft, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Logan Creek, Wakefield, Nebr. (MRO) 26-23 Lone Rock, Ark. (SWL) 28-18 Long Beach Island, N.J. (NAP) 3-26 Long Branch Lake, Little Carlton River, Mo. (MRK) 27-4, 27-10, 27-13 Long Island Intracoastal Waterway, N.Y. (NAN) 2-8, 2-23, 2-29 Long Lake Area, Helena, Ark. (LMM) 13-5 Long Tom River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-37 Longboat Pass, Fla. (SAJ) 9-9, 9-28, 9-34, 9-46 Lookout Point Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-19, 37-28, 37-35, 37-43, 37-45 Lorain Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 20-7, 20-19, 20-29 Lorean Branch, Hurst, Tex. (SWF) 30-23 Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, Calif. (SPL) 33-2, 33-11, 33-17, 33-23 Los Angeles County Drainage Area, Calif. (SPL) 33-5, 33-13, 33-20 Los Coches Creek, Calif. (SPL) 33-6, 33-13, 33-21 Lost Creek at Columbus, Nebr. (MRO) 26-4, 26-10, 26-12, 26-23 Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 Lost Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-20, 37-28, 37-35, 37-43 Lost River, Minn. (NCS) 24-28, 24-33 Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee (MR+T) 42-30 Louisville, Ky. (ORL) 16-19, 16-21, 16-24, 16-29 Louisville Lake, Ill. (ORL) 16-20, 16-28 Loup River, Columbus, Nebr. (MRO) 26-16 Lovell, (Sewage Lagoon) Wyo. (MRO) 26-23 Loves Park, Ill. (NCR) 23-8, 23-11 Lowell, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-42, 1-51 Lowell Creek, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Lower Arkansas River, Ark. (MR+T) 42-16, 42-30 Lower Arkansas River Basin, Ark. (MR+T) 42-7 Lower Auchumpkee Creek, Ga. (SAM) 10-48 Lower Big Sioux River, Iowa and S. Dak. (MRO) 26-16 Lower Branch Rush River, N. Dak. (NCS) 24-28 Lower Columbia River Basin, Oreg. and Wash. (NPP) 37-13, 37-14, 37-26, 37-34, 37-39, 37-44 Lower Cowlitz River, Wash. (NPP) 37-38 Lower Creek, Lenoir, N.C. (SAW) 6-31 Lower Dry Creek, Lowden, Wash. (NPW) 39-14, 39-15 Lower Grand River, Mo. (MRK) 27-16 Lower Granite Lock and Dam, Wash. (NPW) 39-5, 39-10, 39-13, 39-14, 39-19, 39-22 Lower Green River, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Lower Guyandotte River Basin, W. Va. (ORH) 17-21 I-38 INDEX Lower Heart River, N. Dak. (MRO) 26-10, 26-12, 26-16 Lower Heart River, Mandan, N. Dak. (MRO) 26-23 Lower Machodoc Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-37 Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, Lake Herbert G. West, Wash. (NPW) 39-6, 39-10, 39-13, 39-20, 39-22 Lower Red River-South Bank, Red River Levees, La. (MR+T) 42-30 Lower Red River Standard Revetments (MR+T) 42-35 Lower Rio Grande Basin, Tex. (SWG) 31-11, 31-28 Lower San Francisco Bay, Calif. (SPN) 34-12 Lower San Joaquin River, Calif. (SPK) 35-11, 35-25 Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, Calif. (SPK) 35-27, 35-34 Lower Snake River, Fish and Wildlife Compensation Plan, Wash., Oreg., Idaho (NPW) 39-6, 39-10, 39- 13 Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, Md. (NAB) 4-7, 4-25, 4-33 Lower Walla Walla River, Wash. (NPW) 39-16 Lower Walnut Creek, Austin, Tex. (SWF) 30-23 Lower White River (MT+T) 42-9 Lower White River, Ark. (all except Big Creek and Tribs.) (MR+T) 42-30 Lower White River (Big Creek and Tribs.) (MR+T) 42-30 Lower White River and Basin, Ark. (MR+T) 42-17, 42-55 Lower Woonsocket, R.I. (NED) 1-42, 1-48 Lowes Wharf, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa. (ORP) 18-6, 18-12, 18-17, 18-25 Lubec, Maine (NED) 1-23 Lubec Channel, Maine (NED) 1-39 Lucky Peak Lake, Idaho (NPW) 39-3, 39-9, 39-13 Ludington Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-13, 21-26, 21-35, 21-48 Lyman Creek, Ind. (WPW) 39-15 Ludlow, Ky. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Ludlow Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-44 Lukfata Lake, Okla. and Ark. (SWT) 29-19 Lusk Creek, Ill. (ORL) 16-30 Lyford Levee, Ind. (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-19, 16-29, 16-31 Lyman Creek near Lexburg, Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Lynches River and Clark Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Lynn Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-39, 1-44 Lynn-Nahant Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-41 Lynnhaven Inlet, Va. (NAO) 5-19, 5-21 Lytle and Warm Creeks, Santa Ana River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-25 Lytle Creek, Murfreesboro, Tenn. (ORN) 15-19 M Maalaea Small Boat Harbor, Maui, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 MacDowell, Edward, Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-18, 1-30, 1-51 Machias River, Me. (NED) 1-24, 1-39, 1-42 Mackay Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-25, 6-28 Mackinac Island Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-13, 21-36, 21-48 Mackinaw City Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-55, 21-60 Macon, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Macy, Blackbird Creek, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Mad Creek, Muscatine, Iowa (NCR) 23-16 Mad River, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-42, 1-48 Mad River, Waterbury, Conn. (NED) 1-47 Mad River Basin, Calif. (SPK) 35-36 Madeline Island, Lake Superior, Wis. (NCE) 21-26 Madison, Ind. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Madison, Union and Taylor Creeks, Nebr. (MRO) 26-16 Madison Bay, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Madison Parish Port, La. (LMK) 12-15 Madison River, Madison Co., Mount.(State Hwy 287) (MRO) 26-23 Madison, Union and Taylor Creeks, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Magby Creek, Columbus, Miss. (SAW) 10-49 Magruder Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-38, 37-41, 37-44 Mahnomen, Minn. (NCS) 24-33 Mahoning Creek, Penn. (ORP) 18-25 Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Penn. (ORP) 18-6, 18-12, 18-17 Mahoning River, Warren Twp., Ohio (ORP) 18-26 Maiden Creek Reservoir, Pa. (NAP) 3-27 Main Street, Wellsburg, W. Va. (ORP) 18-26 Main Turning Basin (SWG) 31-36 I-39 Maintenance and Repair Fleet and Marine Terminals, Ark. (SWL) 28-3 Malaeloa Stream, American Samoa (POD) 36-15 Malden River, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Malheur Improvement District, Snake River, Oreg. (NPW) 39-15 Malheur River, Oreg. (NPW) 39-12, 39-14, 39-16, 39-17 Maline Creek, Mo. (LMS) 14-11 Mamaroneck Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Manasquan River, N.J. (NAP) 3-24 Manatee County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Manatee Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-9, 9-28, 9-34 Manatee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47, 9-54 Manchester, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 Manchester Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-44 Mandan, N. Dak. (MRO) 26-16 Mandan, Lower Heart River, N. Dak. (MRO) 26-19 Manele Bay Small Boat Harbor, Lanai, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Manet Beach, Quincy, Mass. (NED) 1-24 Manhasset Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Manhattan, Kansas River, Kan. (MRK) 27-16, 27-19 Maniece Bayou, Ark. (LMN) (LMK) 11-18, 12-8, 12-20 Manistee Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-14, 21-36, 21-48 Manistique Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-14, 21-36, 21-48 Manitowoc Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 21-14, 21-36, 21-49 Mankato and North Mankato, Minn. (NCS) 24-11, 24-23 Mankato, North Mankato, and LeHillier, Minn. (NCS) 24-33 Mann's Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Manokin River, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Mansfield Hollow Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-21, 1-23, 1-31, 1-52 Mansura to Wax Lake Outlet (MR+T) 42-13 Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-6, 6-19 Mantua Creek, NJ. (NAP) 3-24 Maple River, N. Dak. (NCS) 24-30, 24-33 Maple Swamp, S.C. (SAN) 7-16 Mapleshade, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 Mapusagatuai Stream, American Samoa (POD) 36-15 Marais Des Cygnes River, Osawatomie, Kan., Water Supply Facilities (MRK) 27-21 Marblehead Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-44 Marengo, Iowa (NCR) 23-13, 23-16 Marginal Way, Ogunquit, Maine (NED) 1-24, 1-42 Markham Ferry, Okla. (SWL) 28-22 Marietta, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 Marina Del Rey, Calif. (SPL) 33-2, 33-11, 33-18 Marion, Ind. (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-21, 16-28 Marion, Kans. (SWT) 29-6, 29-17, 29-20 Marion County Drainage District, Mo. (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 Marion Lake, Kan. (SWT) 29-6, 29-13, 29-17 Markland Locks and Dam, Ind. (ORD) 19-6, 19-9 Marmarth, N. Dak. (MRO) 26-16 Marmarth, Little Missouri River, N. Dak. (MRO) 26-19 Marne Creek, Yankton, S. Dak. (MRO) 26-19, 26-23 Marquette Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-15, 21-36 Marsh Creek, Geneva, N.Y. (NCB) 20-37 Marshall, Minn. (NCS) 24-11, 24-23 Marshalltown, Iowa (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 Marshland Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-38 Martin, John, Reservoir, Colo. (SWA) 32-3, 32-10 Martin, Ky. (ORH) 17-21 Martin Creek Miss., Prentiss County (SAM) 10-16, 10-34, 10-44 Martins Ferry, Ohio (ORP) 18-21 Martins Fork Lake, Ky. (ORN) 15-5, 15-9, 15-18 Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, Nev. and Calif. (SPK) 35-12, 35-25 Marysville, Kan. (MRK) 27-17 Marysville Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-34 Marysville, St. Claire River, Mich. (NCB) 21-26 Masefau Bay, American Samoa (POD) 36-3, 36-7 Mason, W. Va. (ORH) 17-22 Mason and Menard Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 Mason Creek, Va. (SAW) 6-31 Mason J. Niblack Levee, Ind. (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-19, 16-24, 16-29 Massillon, Ohio (ORH) 17-6, 17-13, 17-18 Matafao Shoreline, American Samoa (POD) 36-11 Matagorda Ship Channel, Tex. (SWG) 31-6, 31-16, 31-24, 31-34, 31-38 Matawan Creek, NJ. (NAN) 2-33, 2-34 Matinicus Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 Mats Mats Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-24 Mattapoisett Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-44 Mattituck Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33, 2-34 Mauckport, Ind. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 I-40 INDEX Maumee Bay, Oregon, Ohio (NCB) 20-39 Maumee Bay State Park, Ohio (NCB) 20-12, 20-20, 20-33 Maumee River, above Toledo, Ohio (NCB) 20-40 Maumee River, Defiance, Ohio (NCB) 20-39 Maunalua Bay Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Maurice River, N.J. (NAP) 3-24, 3-25, 3-27 Mauvaise Terre Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-4, 14-8, 14-11 Mayaguez Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-10, 9-28, 9-34 Mayo, W. D., Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 28-20, 29-20 Maysville, Ky. (ORH) 17-21, 17-23 McAlpine Locks and Dam (ORD) 19-6, 19-9 McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System (SWT) 29-11, 29-16 McCook Lake, S. Dak. (MRO) 26-16 McDonald Dike Road, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 McCorkie Creek, Wash. (NPP) 37-43 McGee Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-5, 14-8, 14-11 McGinnis Levee, Ind. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 McKees Rocks, Pa. (ORP) 18-21 McKenzie Creek, Piedmont, Mo. (SWL) 28-25 McKenzie River near Walterville, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 McKinney Bayou, Finn Bayou Segment, Ark. (LMN) (LMK) 11-8, 12-18, 12-20 McLean Bottom Levee District No. 3, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 28-17 McNary Lock and Dam-Lake Wallula-Oreg. and Wash. (NPW) 39-7, 39-8, 39-10, 39-13, 39-21 Meadow Grove, Buffalo Creek, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Medomak River, Maine (NED) 1-39 Medora (Sewage Lagoon), N. Dak. (MRO) 26-23 Meherrin River, N.C. (NAO) 5-19 Melbourne Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-10, 9-28, 9-34 Meldahl, Captain Anthony, Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORD) 19-8 Melton Hill Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 15-17 Melvern Lake, Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, Kans. (MRK) 27-4, 27-10, 27-13, 27-19 Melvern Lake and Pomona Lake (Road Improvement), Kan. (MRK)27-16, 27-19 Melville (MR+T) 42-14 Melvin Price Locks and Dam, Ill. (NCD) 25-6 Melvin Price Locks and Dam, (2nd lock) Ill. (NCD) 25-6 Memorial Drive, McKinley Park, Wis. (NCB) 21-26 Memorial Drive, Muskegon, Mich. (NCB) 21-26 Memphis District Bank Revetments and Dikes (MR+T) 42-41, 42-44 Memphis District, Levees (MR+T) 42-49, 42-62 Memphis District, Channel Improvements (FY 1988) 42-55 Memphis Harbor, Tenn. (MR+T) 42-12, 42-31 Memphis Harbor (Ensley Berm) (MR+T) 42-30 Memphis, Wolf River, and Nonconnah Creek, Tenn. (LMM) 13-5 Menemsha Creek, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Menominee Harbor and River, Mich. and Wis. (NCE) 21-15, 21-36, 21-49 Meramec Park Lake, Mo. (LMS) 14-14 Meramec River Basin, Mo. (LMS) 14-4, 14-11, 14-13 Merced County Stream Group, Calif. (SPK) 35-13, 35-26 Merced County Streams, Calif. (SPK) 35-12, 35-26 Merced River, Calif. (SPK) 35-34 Mercer Lake, Welden River, Mo. (MRK) 27-16 Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-11, 14-15 Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 23-13, 23-16 Merkie Creek, Okla. (SWT) 29-21 Merizo Harbor, Guam (POD) 36-14 Mermentau River, La. (LMN) 11-17 Mermentau River, Bayou Nezpique, and Bay Des Cannes, La. (LMN) 11-17 Merriam, Turkey Creek, Kan. (MRK) 27-17 Merriconeag Sound, Harpswell, Maine (NED) 1-42 Merrimack River, Mass. (NED) 1-39, 1-51 Merrimack River Basin, N.H. and Mass. (NED) 1-18, 1-23, 1-51 Metamora Lake, Ind. (ORL) 16-22 Methow River, Wash. (NAS) 38-26 Metlakatla Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-3, 40-8, 40-10 Metropolis, Ill. (ORL) 16-21, 16-26 Miami Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-10, 9-28, 9-34, 9-46 Miami River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 Miami River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Miami River Basin, Pleasant Run, Vicinity Fairfield, Ohio (ORL) 16-18, 16-19 Mianus River, Conn. (NED) 1-39 Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio (ORP) 18-6, 18-12, 18-17, 18-25 I-41 Michigan City Harbor, Ind. (NCC) 22-4, 22-10, 22-13, 22-16 Middle Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Middle Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-34 Middle Fork Nooksack River, Deming, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Middle Nodaway River, Adair Co., Iowa, Bridge No. 56240 (MRK) 27-21 Middle Pebble Creek, Snyder, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Middle River, Adair Co., Iowa (NCR) 23-17 Middle River and Connecting Channels, Calif. (SPK) 35-33 Middle River and Dark Head Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Middle River at Argyle, Minn. (NCS) 24-12, 24-23 Middle School, Wellsburg, W. Va. (ORP) 18-26 Middleport, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, Ky. (ORN) 15-5, 15-9 Middlesboro, Ky. (Diversion Canal) (ORN) 15-19 Middlesboro, Ky. (Yellow Creek) (ORN) 15-13, 15-14, 15-19 Middleton Shoals, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-16 Midland Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-38, 37-39, 37-44 Milan, Ill. (NCR) 23-4, 23-7, 23-11, 23-16 Miles City, Mont. (MRO) 26-16 Milford Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-5, 1-26, 1-34, 1-44, 1-53 Milford Lake, Republican River, Kan. (MRK) 27-5, 27-10, 27-13, 27-19 Milk River, Blaine Co., (Finley Bridge) Mont. (MRO) 26-23 Milk River, Malta, Mont. (MRO) 26-23 Milk River, Malta (Sewerline), Mont. 26-23 Mill Brook, Brownsville, Vt. (NED) 1-14, 1-24, 1-28, 1-36, 1-49 Mill Creek, Dalton, Ga. (SAM) 10-49 Mill Creek, Fort Smith, Ark. (SWL) 28-6, 28-12 Mill Creek, Jefferson County, Ky. (ORL) 16-19, 16-30 Mill Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-40 Mill Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Mill Creek, Ohio (ORL) 16-3, 16-13, 16-22, 16-27 Mill Creek, Sumrall, Miss. (SAM) 10-49 Mill Creek, Tex. (SWG) 31-31 Mill Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Mill Creek, Warrenville Tswp, Ohio (NCB) 20-39 Mill Creek, Wash. (NPW) 39-16 Mill Creek Lake, Wash. (NPW) 39-3, 39-9, 39-13 Mill Creek Levee (MRO) 26-18 Mill Four Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Mill Lake, Blue River, Mo. (MRK) 27-17 Mill Run, Sinclairsville, N.Y. (ORP) 18-26 Millbury, Mass. (NED) 1-23 Miller, Ohio (ORH) 17-21 Miller Pond Drainage District, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, Ala. (SAM) 10-22, 10-35, 10-45 Millersburg, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 Millford Haven, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Millican Lake, Tex. (SWF) 30-8, 30-16, 30-20 Mills, Wilbur D. Dam (SWL) 28-19 Millwood, W. Va. (ORH) 17-22 Millwood Lake, Ariz. (SWL) 28-7, 28-12 Millwood Lake, Little River Basin, Ark. (SWL) 28-23 Milton, Ky. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Milton, Pa. (NAB) 4-42 Milton-Freewater, Walla Walla River, Oreg. (NPW) 39-14, 39-15 Milton Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Milwaukee Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 21-15, 21-37, 21-49 Milwaukee South Shore Park, Wis. (NCE) 21-26 Mineral Creek, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Mingo Creek, Okla. (SWT) 29-6, 29-14, 29-17 Mingo Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Mingo Junction, Ohio (ORP) 18-21 Mining City Lake, Ky. (Green River) (ORL) 16-20 Minneapolis, Minn. (NCR) (NCD) (NCS) 23-3, 24-2, 25-1, 25-4, 25-10 Minneota, Minn. (NCS) 24-22, 24-28 Minnesota River, Minn. (NCS) 24-2, 24-22, 24-26 Minnesota River at Henderson, Minn. (NCR) 24-12, 24-23 Minnesota River at Le Sueur, Minn. (NCS) 24-28 Minnewawa River, Marlborough, N.H. (NED) 1-47 Minot, N. Dak. (NCS) 24-28, 24-33 Mispillion River, Del. (NAP) 3-7, 3-16, 3-20 Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, R.I. (NED) 1-41 Mission and Lapwai Creeks, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-15 Mission Hills, Rock and Brush Creeks, Kan. (MRK) 27-21 Mission Zanja Creek, Redlands, Calif. (SPL) 33-6, 33-14, 33-21 Mississinewa Lake, Ind. (ORL) 16-8, 16-15 Mississippi Delta Region, La. (MR+T) 42-30 1-42 INDEX Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 8, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 10, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 12, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Mississippi River, Alma, Wis. (NCS) 24-34 Mississippi River, Alton to Gale, Ill., Underseepage Measures (LMS) 14-15 Mississippi River, Baton Rouge, La. (LMN) 11-2 Mississippi River and Alluvial Valley below Cape Girardeau, Mo. (MR+T) 42-2 Mississippi and Leech Rivers, Minn. (NCS) 24-27 Mississippi River and Tributaries (MR+T) 42-63 Mississippi River and Tributaries, Active General Investigations (MR+T) 42-46 Mississippi River and Tributaries-Authorizing Legislation (MR+T) 42-21 to 42-28 Mississippi River and Tributaries-Channel Improvements (MR+T) 42-4 Mississippi River and Tributaries-Levees (MR+T) 42-4 Mississippi River and Tributaries-Statement of Allotments and Accrued Expenditures for Flood Control (MR+T) 42-58 Mississippi River at Alton, Ill. (LMS) 14-13 Mississippi River at St. Louis, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Mississippi River Bank Revetments and Dikes (MR+T) 42-6, 42-32, 42-38, 42-41, 42-44 Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to Gulf of Mexico, La. (LMN) 11-2, 11-11, 11-13 Mississippi River between Brainerd and Grand Rapids, Minn. (NCS) 24-27 Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minn. (NCR) (NCS) (NCD) 23-3, 24-2, 25-1, 25-4, 25-10 Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minn. (St. Louis Dist.) (Includes L and D 26 Replacement) (LMS) 14-2 Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers, Mo. and Ill. (LMS) 14-2, 14-8, 14-10 Mississippi River Commission (MR+T) 42-1 Mississippi River Delta at and below New Orleans, La., (New Orleans to Venice, La.; Hurricane Protection) (LMN) 11-2 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, La. (LMN) 11-3, 11-11, 11-13 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, La. (LMN) 11-17 Mississippi River Levees (MR+T) 42-10, 42-30, 42-46 to 42-51 Missouri River Levee System, Iowa, Nebr. Kan., and Mo. (MRK) 27-10, 27-13 Mississippi River Main Stem Channel Improvements (MR+T) 42-3 Mississippi River, Morgan City (MR+T) 42-14 Mississippi River near Aitkin, Minn. (NCS) 24-28 Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, La. (LMN) 11-17 Mississippi River Project Levees (MR+T) 42-46, 42-48, 42-49, 42-51 Mississippi River Ship Channel, Gulf to Baton Rouge, La. (LMN) 11-4, 11-11, 11-13 Mississippi River Tributary Dams and Lakes (MR+T) 42-20 Missouri Fish and Wildlife Mitigation (MRK) 27-16 Missouri National Recreational River, Nebr. and S. Dak. (MRO) 26-4, 26-10, 26-12 Missouri River, Mo. (MR+T) 42-19 Missouri River at New Haven, Mo. (MRK) 27-16 Missouri River, Aten, Nebr. (MRO) 26-16 Missouri River, Bank Protection, Greenwood, S. Dak. (MRO) 26-19 Missouri River, Bank Stabilization, Fort Benton, Mont. (MRO) 26-19 Missouri River, Cedar Co., Nebr. (MRO) 26-23 Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, N. Dak. (MRO) 26-18 Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, Nebr. to Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 26-5, 26-10, 26-13 Missouri River, Levees (MRO) 26-21 Missouri River Levee System (MRK) 27-18 Missouri River Levee System, Iowa, Nebr., Kan., and Mo. (Rulo, Nebr. to Mouth) (MRK)(MRO) 26-5, 26-10, 26-13, 26-18, 27-5, 27-19 Missouri River Levee System, (Sioux City, Iowa, to Rulo, Nebr.) (MRO) 26-18 Missouri River Levee System, Kan., Units R402, R393-395, and R414 (MRK) 27-17 Missouri River Main Stem (MRK) 27-19 Missouri River, Marina, Sioux City, Iowa (MRO) 26-20 Missouri River, Niobrara, Nebr. (MRO) 26-16 Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa, to Fort Benton, Mont. (MRO) 26-15 I-43 Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa, to Mouth (Rulo, Nebr. to Mouth) (MRK) (MRO) 26-2, 27-2, 27-9, 27-12 Missouri River, Sioux City, Iowa, to Rulo, Nebr. (MRO) 26-9, 26-12 Mitigation of Shore Damages (NCE) 21-26 Mixons Creek, Lamar Co., Miss. (SAW) 10-49 Mobile Bay, Ala. to New Orleans, La. (SAM) 10-35 Mobile Harbor, Ala. (SAM) 10-10, 10-32, 10-41 Mocassin Swamp, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Moccasin Springs, Mo. (LMS) 14-13 Moclips River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Mojave River Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-7, 33-14, 33-21 Mokelumne River, Calif. (SPK) 35-33 Molalla River at Milk Creek location, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Molalla River at Ressel location, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Moline, Ill. (NCR) 23-14 Moline Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 25-7 Monona-Harrison Ditch Control, Monona County, Iowa (MRO) 26-21 Monongahela River, Granville, W. Va. (ORP) 18-26 Monongahela River, Penn. and W. Va. (ORP) 18-2, 18-11, 18-15, 18-24, 18-25 Monongahela River, Pa. and W. Va. Locks and Dams (ORP) 18-23 Monoosnoc Brook, Mass. (NED) 1-44, 1-51 Monoosnoc Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-44, 1-51 Monroe, La., floodwall extension (LMK) 12-17 Monroe and West Monroe, La. and Ouachita Parish, La. (LMK) 12-11 Monroe Bay and Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-37 Monroe County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-41 Monroe Floodwall, La. (LMK) 12-20 Monroe Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-6, 21-30, 21-37, 21-50 Monroe Lake, Ind. (ORL) 16-8, 16-15 Montcalm, W. Va. (ORH) 17-23 Monterey Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-12 Montgomery Locks and Dams, Pa. (ORD) 19-7 Montgomery to Gadsden, Coosa River Channel, Ala. (SAM) 10-28 Montour Falls, Oswego River Basin, N.Y. (NCB) 20-37 Moore Haven Lock, Fla. (SAJ) 9-49 Moorefield, W. Va. (NAB) 4-40 Moores Ferry, W. Va. (ORH) 17-21 Moorhead, Minn. (NCS) 24-30 Mooring for Battleship Oregon, Oreg. (NPP) 37-37 Moosabec Bar, Maine (NED) 1-39 Morehead City Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-7, 6-19, 6-28 Morgan City and Below (MR+T) 42-13 Morgan City and Vicinity, La. (LMN) 11-8, 11-11, 11-14 Morganza Floodway, La. (MR+T) 42-1, 42-13, 42-14 Morganza-Morgan City (MR+T) 42-13 Morganza Floodway between Mississippi River and Alabama Bayou (MR+T) 42-13 Morganza-Old River, La. (MR+T) 42-11 Moriches Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-9, 2-23, 2-29 Mormon Slough, Calif. (SPK) 35-34 Morrison, Bear Creek, Colo. (MRO) 26-17 Morrison Creek Beach Stone Lakes, Calif. (SPK) 35-20 Morristown Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 20-35 Morro Bay Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-2, 33-11, 33-18 Moscow, Ohio (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio (ORP) 18-7, 18-12, 18-17, 18-25 Mosquito Creek Levee (MRO) 26-18 Mosquito Keg Creek Levee (MRO) 26-18 Moss Bluff Lock, Fla. (SAJ) 9-53 Moss Landing Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-6 Mott, N. Dak. (MRO) 26-16 Mouth of Colorado River (SWG) 31-36 Mound City Locks and Dam, Ill. (ORD) 19-10 Mound State Park, Ala. (SAM) 10-39 Mounds and Mound City, Ohio River Basin, Ill. (LMM) 13-5 Moundsville, W. Va. (ORP) 18-21 Moundville, Ala. (SAM) 10-28 Mount Baldy, Indiana Dunes Nat'l. Lake Shore, Ind. (NCC) 22-17 Mount Carmel, Ill. (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-19, 16-29 Mount Clemens, Clinton River, Mich. (NCE) 21-56 Mount Clemens Spillway and Cutoff Canal, Clinton River, Mich. (NCE) 21-27 Mount St. Helens and Vicinity, Wash. (NPP) 37-14, 37-26, 37-34 Mount St. Helens Sediment Control, Wash. (NPP) 37-15, 37-26, 37-34 Mountain Brook Dam, N.H. (NED) 1-44 Mountain Pt., Ark. (NPA) 40-13 1-44 INDEX Mouth of Yazoo River, Miss. (LMK) 12-15 Mouth to Riparia (NPW) 39-14 Moyock Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Mt. Holly, N.J. (NAP) 3-26 Mt. Morris Lake, N.Y., Genesee River (NCB) 20-14, 20-21, 20-33 Muckey Creek, Mapleton, Iowa (MRO) 26-23 Mud and Basket Slough, Rickreall Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Mud Creek, Broken Bow, Nebr. (MRO) 26-16 Mud Lake, Idaho (NPW) 39-16 Mud Lake Pumping Station, Tenn. (MR+T) 42-30 Mud Mountain Dam, Wash. (NAS) 38-8, 38-16, 38-21 Mud River, W. Va. (ORH) 17-22 Muddy Creek Dam, Pa. (ORP) 18-21 Muddy Creek, Evans, N.Y. (NCB) 20-39 Muddy Creek near Syracuse, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Muddy Hook and Tyler Coves, Md. (NAB) 4-37, 4-41 Mulberry Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Mullet Key, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power Alaska District (NPA) 40-6 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 21-56 Fort Worth, Tex., District (SWF) 30-11 Kansas City, Mo., District (MRK) 27-8 Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL) 28-8 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-20, 10-45, 10-51 Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN) 15-6, 15-14 New England Division (NED) 1-43 Omaha, Nebr., District (MRO) 26-17 Philadelphia, Penn., District (NAP) 3-27 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-16, 37-40 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-21 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-10, 38-28 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS) 14-6 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 29-8 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW) 29-4 Wilmington, N.C., District (SAW) 6-14 Multnomah Channel, Oreg. (NPP) 37-38, 37-44 Multnomah Drainage District 1, Oreg. (NPP) 37-37, 37-39 Muncie, Ind. (ORL) 16-19, 16-29 Munday Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 30-22 Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, Ala. (SAM) 10-16, 10-34, 10-44, 10-48 Murder Creek, East Brewton, Ala. (SAM) 10-48 Murderkill River, Del. (NAP) 3-8, 3-16, 3-20, 3-24 Murfreesboro Dam and Lake (LMK) 12-20 Murray County Bridge, Okla. (SWT) 29-21 Murray Lock and Dam No. 7, Ark. (SWL) 28-3, 28-19 Murrells Inlet, S.C. (SAN) 7-5, 7-9, 7-12 Muscatatuck River, Crothersville, Ind. (ORL) 16-30 Muscatine, Iowa (Mad Creek) (NCR) 23-13 Muscatine Harbor, Iowa (NCD) (NCR) 23-12, 25-7, 25-10 Muscatine Island, Iowa (NCR) 23-8 Muscatine Island Levee District and Muscatine Louisa County Drainage District No. 13, Iowa (NCR) 23-12, 23-13, 23-16 Muscooten Bay, Ill. (NCR) 23-12 Muskegon Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-17, 21-37, 21-50 Muskingum River, Ohio (ORH) 17-20 Muskingum River Dams and Lakes Ohio (ORH) 17-14 Muskingum River Lakes, Ohio (ORH) 17-6, 17-18 Muskogee, Okla. (SWT) 29-21 Mustinka River, Minn. (NCS) 24-32, 24-33 Myers Chuck Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Myrtle Beach, S.C. (SAN) 7-17 Mystic, Conn. (NED) 1-44 Mystic River, Conn. (NED) 1-39, 1-44, 1-53 Mystic River, Mass. (NED) 1-39 N Naches River, Naches, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Nagel Drainage District, Little Sioux River, Iowa (MRO) 26-20 Nags Head, N.C. (SAW) 6-31 Nahunta Swamp, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Naknek River, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Namo River, Guam (POD) 36-12, 36-15 Nan Cove, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Nandua Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Nanpil River Hydropower, Pohnpei, Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands (POD) 36-5, 36-8, 36-9 Nansemond River, Va. (NAO) 5-19, 5-21 Nantasket Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-41 Nanticoke River, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Nanticoke River at Bivalve, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Nanticoke River (including Northwest Fork), Del. and Md. (NAB) 4-37 Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), Mass. (NED) 1-39, 1-44 Nantucket Inner Harbor-Polpis, Mass. (NED) 1-46 I-45 Napa River, Calif. (SPN) 34-6 Napa River Basin, Calif. (SPK) 35-34 Napatree Beach, R.I. (NED) 1-44 Naquako River, P.R. (SAJ) 9-54 Narragansett Pier, R.I. (NED) 1-44 Narraguagus River, Maine (NED) 1-39 Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Ark. (LMK) 12-17, 12-20 Narrows of Lake Champlain, N.Y. and Vt. (NAN) 2-9, 2-23, 2-29, 2-33 Nashua, N.H. (NED) 1-23, 1-42, 1-51 Nasketucket Harbor, Fairhaven, Mass., (NED) 1-46 Natchez Port Area, Miss. (LMK) 12-20 Natchitoches Parish, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-18, 12-19, 12-20 Nation Levee, Kan. (SWT) 29-21 National Emergency Preparedness Activities (NAP) (NCB) (NCC) (NCE) (MRO) (SAM) (SWG) 3-14, 10-27, 20-15, 21-9, 22-5, 26-8, 31-14, 51-1, 51-2 Natural Disaster Preparedness, Response and Recovery Activities 52-1, 52-2 Navajo Reservoir, N. Mex. (SPK) 35-33 Navarro Mills Lake, Tex. (SWF) 30-8, 30-16, 30-20 Navasota Lake, Tex. (SWF) 30-22 Navigation Activities (NED) 1-47 Navigation Data Center 47-1 Navigation Locks and Dams, Ark. (SWL) 28-11 Navigation Studies (NCB) 20-16 Navigation Work Under Special Authorization Alaska District (NPA) 40-13 Baltimore, Md., District (NAB) 4-12 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 20-11, 20-38 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-6, 7-14 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 21-25 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-18 Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL) 28-4 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL) 16-3 Memphis, Tenn., District (LMM) 13-1 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-14, 10-49 Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN) 15-4 New Orleans District (LMN) 11-5, 11-17 New York District (NAN) 2-16 Norfolk, Va., District (NAO) 5-7, 5-13 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-3 Philadelphia, Penn., District (NAP) 3-8 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-6 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-6 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-4 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS) 14-6 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-3 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW) 39-1, 39-14 Wilmington, N.C., District (SAW) 6-29 Nawiliwili Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 NCD Master Plan for Water Control Data System (NCE) 21-29 Neabsco Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Neah Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-24 Neale Sound, Md. (NAB) 4-7, 4-25, 4-33 Near Dardanelle, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 18-27 Near Island Channel (NPA) 40-14 Near Mud Lake, Tenn. (MR+T) 42-12 Near Springfield on Sangamon River, Ill. (NCR) 23-13 Neavitt Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Nebraska City Levee (MRO) 26-18 Neches River and Tributaries, Salt Water Barrier at Beaumont, Tex. (SWG) 31-30 Needles, San Bernardino, Co., Calif. (SPL) 33-25 Nehalem Bay, Oreg. (NPP) 37-37, 37-42 Neodesha Lake, Kan. (SWL) (SWT) 28-22, 29-19, 29-20 Neon-Fleming, Ky. (Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-19, 16-30 Neshaminy State Park Harbor, Pa. (NAP) 3-24 Neshannock Creek, New Castle, Penn. (ORP) 18-26 Nestucca River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-37, 37-39 Neuse River, N.C. (SAW) 6-12, 6-25, 6-28 Neuse River Barrier, N.C. (SAW) 6-28, 6-30 Neuse River, 300 foot-wide channel in front of New Bern, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Neuse River, Oriental, N.C. (SAW) 6-31 Neva and Olga Straits, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Neville Island, Pa. (ORP) 18-21 New Albany, Ind. (ORL) 16-19, 16-24, 16-29 New Amsterdam, Ind. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, Mass. (NED) 1-39, 1-44 New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acusmhnet, Mass. (NED) 1-19, 1-30, 1-36 New Bedford-Fairhaven Hunicane Barrier, Mass. (NED) 1-23 New Boston Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 25-7 I-46 INDEX New Buffalo Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-17, 21-37, 21-50 New Bullards Bar, Calif. (SPK) 35-34 New Cumberland, W. Va. (ORP) 18-21 New Cumberland Locks and Dam, Stratton, Ohio (ORD) 19-7 New Fairfield, Conn. (NED) 1-23 New Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 New Harmony, Ind. (ORL) 16-21 New Harmony Bridge, Ill. and Ind. (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-19, 16-20, 16-24, 16-25 New Haven Breakwater, Conn. (NED) 1-39 New Haven Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-5, 1-26, 1-34, 1-44 New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway (NAP) 3-8, 3-16, 3-20 New Kensington and Parnassus, Pa. (ORP) 18-21 New London, Conn. (NED) 1-19, 1-23, 1-31, 1-36 New London Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-39, 1-46 New London Hurricane Barrier (NED) 1-23 New Madrid-Birds Pt., Mo. (MR+T) 42-12 New Madrid Floodway, Mo. (MR+T) 42-12 New Madrid Harbor, Mo. (LMM) 13-4 New Martinsville, W. Va. (ORH) 17-22 New Matamoras, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 New Melones Lake, Calif. (SPK) 35-21 New Orleans, La. (MR+T) 42-11, 42-31 New Orleans-Baton Rouge, La. (MR+T) 42-11 New Orleans District, Bank Revetments and Dikes, Atchafalaya River (MR+T) 42-34 New Orleans District, Bank Revetments and Dikes, Mississippi River (MR+T) 42-32 New Orleans District, Levees (MR+T) 42-46, 42-62 New Orleans District, Channel Improvements (MR+T) 42-52 New Orleans-Morganza, La. (MR+T) 42-11 New Orleans to Venice, La., Hurricane Protection (LMN) 11-8, 11-14, New Pass, Sarasota, Fla. (SAJ) 9-11, 9-28, 9-35, 9-46 New Richmond, Ohio (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 New River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 New River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 New River, Va. and W. Va. (ORH) 17-20 New River Inlet, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 New Rochelle Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 New York and New Jersey Channels, (NAN) 2-10, 2-24, 2-30, 2-33, 2-38 New York Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33 New York Harbor-Collection and Removal of Drift (NAN) 2-11, 2-24, 2-30 New York Harbor-Entrance Channels and Anchorage Areas (NAN) 2-12, 2-24, 2-30 New York State Barge Canal (NAN) (NCB) 2-13, 20-8, 20-19, 20-30 Newark, Ohio (ORH) 17-5, 17-14, 17-18, 17-21, 17-23 Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic Rivers, N.J. (NAN) 2-10, 2-24, 2-29, 2-33, 2-37 Newaukum River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Newbegun Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Newburgh, Ind. (Ohio River) (ORL) 16-19 Newburgh Locks and Dam, Ind. (ORD) 19-9 Newbury Neck, Surry, Me. (NED) 1-24 Newburyport Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-6, 1-26, 1-34, 1-44 Newmarket Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Newport, White River, Ark. (SWL) 28-17 Newport, Ky. (ORL) 16-19, 16-24, 16-29 Newport-Wilder, Ky. (ORL) 16-20 Newport, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 Newport Bay Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-23, 33-28 Newport Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-39 Newport News, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Newport News Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-19, 5-21 Newport-Wider, Ky. (ORL) 16-20 Newry-Old Pickens Dam and Lake, S.C. (SAS) 8-16 Newt Graham Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 28-21, 29-20 Newtown Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-33, 2-34 Niagara Remedial Works, N.Y. (NCB) 20-35 Niagara River, N.Y. (NCB) 20-35 Niagara River, Compensating Works, N.Y. (NCB) 20-40 Niantic Bay and Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-39 Niblack, Mason J., Levee, Wabash River, Ind. (ORL) 16-19, 16-29 Nicholasville, (Townfork) Vicinity, Ky. (ORL) 16-30 Nichols, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39, 4-42 Nickajack Lock, Tenn. (ORN) 15-17 Nimrod Lake, Ark. (SWL) 28-7, 28-12, 28-22 Ninilchik Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-3, 40-8, 40-10 Niobrara River, (Carnes Bridge) Nebr. (MRO) 26-23 Nishnabotna River at Hamburg, Iowa (MRO) 26-16 Nisqually River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 I-47 Nixon Creek, Tenn. (LMM) 13-5 Noank Harbor, Groton, Conn. (NED) 1-46 Nolin Lake, Ky. (ORL) 16-9, 16-15 Nome Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-3, 40-8, 40-11 Nomini Bay and Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-37 Nonconnah Blvd., Nonconnah Creek, Tenn. (LMM) 13-5 Nonconnah Creek (MR+T) 42-30 Nonconnah Creek, Interceptor Sewer, Memphis, Tenn. (LMM) 13-5 Nonewaug River, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Nookagee Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-44 Nooksack River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26, 38-29 Norfolk, Nebr. (MRO) 26-16 Norfolk Floodwall, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Norfolk Harbor, Va. (NAO) 5-12, 5-16, 5-21 Norfolk Harbor and Channels (Deepening) (NAO) 5-4, 5-12, 5-16 Norfolk Harbor Channels, Va. (NAO) 5-5 Norfolk, North Fork, Elkhorn River, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Norfork Lake, Ark. (SWL) 28-9, 28-13, 28-24 Normal, Ky. (ORH) 17-21 Norrell Lock and Dam (No. 1) - Entrance Channel, Ark. (SWL) 28-4, 28-19 North Adams, Hoosic River Basin, Mass. (NAN) 2-36 North Alexander Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 North Andover and Lawrence, Mass. (NED) 1-44 North Branch, Chicago River, Ill. (NCC) 22-7, 22-14 North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, Ohio (ORH) 17-7, 17-14, 17-18 North Branch Reservoir Chicago River, Ind. (NCC) 22-11 North Canaan, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-42, 1-50 North Canadian River, Okla. (SWT) 29-21 North Chicago, Ill. (NCC) 22-6 North Edisto River, S.C. (SAN) 7-14 North Ellenville, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 North Fork Gunnison River, Paonia, Co. (SPK) 35-40 North Fork of Pound River Lake, Va. (ORH) 17-8, 17-14, 17-18 North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, Calif. (SPK) 35-34 North Fork Skykomish River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 North Hampton Beach, North Hampton, N.H. (NED) 1-44 North Hartland Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-14, 1-23, 1-28. 1-48 North Little Rock, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 28-17 North Nantasket Beach, Hull, Mass. (NED) 1-46 North Nashua River, Fitchburg, Mass. (NED) 1-24, 1-42 North Nashua River, Lancaster, Mass. (NED) 1-42, 1-51 North Pease River Bridge 655, Okla. (SWT) 29-21 North Platte River, Bank Stabilization, Minatare, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 North River Dike, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 North River, Klein Bridge, Mo. (NCR) 23-17 North River, Marion County, Mo. (NCR) 23-17 North Sandy Pond, Oswego Co., N.Y. (NCB) 20-38 North Scenic Rd., Buffalo Twp, Penn. (ORP) 18-26 North Scituate Beach, Scituate, Mass. (NED) 1-41 North Second St., Memphis, Tenn. (Wolf River Bridge) (LMM) 13-5 North Shore of Long Island, Suffolk County, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 North Springfield Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-14, 1-28, 1-48 North Stratford, N.H. (NED) 1-23, 1-49 North Wildwood, N.J. (NAP) 3-26 Northampton, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-42, 1-49 Northeast (Cape Fear) River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25, 6-27 Northeast Harbor, Maine, (NED) 1-39, 1-46 Northeast River, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Northfield, Ill. (NCC) 22-8 Northfield Brook Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-17, 1-30, 1-50 Northport Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-55 Northport Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Norwalk, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-42 Norwalk Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-39 Norwalk-Wilton, Conn. (NED) 1-44 Norwich, Conn. (NED) 1-42, 1-52 Norwich, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39, 4-42 Nottoway River, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Nowood River, Manderson, Wyo. (MRO) 26-33 Noxubee River, Miss. (SAM) 10-47 Noxubee River Relief Bridge, Shuqualak, Miss. (SAM) 10-6, 10-34, 10-44 Noyo River and Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-5, 34-6 Nua-Amaluia, Tutuila Island, American Samoa (POD) 36-14 Nutwood Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-5, 14-8, 14-11 1-48 INDEX O O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake, Tex. (SWF) 30-8, 30-16, 30-20 Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin, S. Dak. and N. Dak. (MRO) 26-8, 26-11, 26-15, 26-18 Oak Bluffs Harbor, Oak Bluffs, Mass. (NED) 1-46 Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-41 Oak Orchard Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 20-8, 20-19, 20-30 Oakdale, Pa. (ORP) 18-20 Oakford Special Drainage District (NCR) 23-13, 23-15 Oakland, Iowa (MRO) 26-23 Oakland Beach, Warwick, R.I. (NED) 1-41 Oakland Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-1, 34-6, 34-10, 34-13 Oates Creek, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Obey River, Tenn. (ORN) 15-13 Obion River, Tenn. (LMM) 13-4 Occohannock Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Occoquan Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-37, 4-41 Ocean City, N.J. (NAP) 3-26 Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, Md. (NAB) 4-5, 4-8, 4-33 Ocean Grove Beach, Swansea, Mass. (NED) 1-46 Ocean Springs Harbor, Miss. (SAM) 10-49 Oceana, W. Va. (ORH) 17-21 Oceanside, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Oceanside Beach, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Oceanside Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-3, 33-11, 33-18 Ocholockonee (Ochlockney) River, Ga. and Fla. (SAM) 10-47 Oconto Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 21-55, 21-60 Ocracoke Inlet, N.C. (SAW) 6-8, 6-19 Ocracoke Inlet Jetty, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Ocracoke Island, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Oelwein, Fayette County, Iowa 23-17 Offats Bayou (SWG) 31-36 Ofu Airstrip, American Samoa (POD) 36-11 Ofu Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-10 Ogdensburg Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 20-35, 20-40 O'Hare Reservoir, Ill. (NCC) 22-8, 22-11, 22-14 Ohio River, Ill. and Ky. (ORL) (MR+T) 16-30, 16-31, 42-19 Ohio River, Ind. (ORL) 16-31 Ohio River Basin (ORH) (ORL) 16-24, 16-25, 16-26, 17-14 Ohio River Basin (Huntington District) (ORH) 17-8 Ohio River Basin (Louisville Dist.) (ORL) 16-9, 16-15, 16-17 Ohio River Basin (Nashville District) (ORN) 15-6, 15-12, 15-18 Ohio River Basin (Pittsburgh District) (ORP) 18-7, 18-12, 18-17, 18-24, 18-25 Ohio River, Locks and Dams (ORD) 19-6, 19-7 Ohio River, McMechen, W. Va. (ORP) 18-26 Ohio River, River Ave., Chester, W. Va. (ORP) 18-26 Oil City, Pa. (ORP) 18-20 Okabena Creek at Worthington, Minn. (NCR) 23-13 Okanogan and Pend Oreille Rivers (NPS) 38-24 Okanogan River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26, 38-29 Okanogan River, Omak, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Okanogan River, Oroville, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Okatibbee Dam, Miss. (SAM) 10-34 Okatibbee Lake, Miss. (SAM) 10-16, 10-44 Okeechobee Waterway, Fla. (SAJ) 9-11, 9-28, 9-35, 9-45, 9-46, 9-48 Oklahoma City Floodway, Okla. (SWT) 29-19 Oklawaha River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-12, 9-28, 9-36, 19-46 Olcott Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 20-8, 20-19, 20-30 Old Field Swamp, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Old Harbor (Kodiak) Alas. (NPA) 40-14 Old Harbor, Kodiak Island, Alas. (NPA) 40-12 Old Hickory Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 15-14 Old Highway 82 Bridge, Columbus, Miss. (SAM) 10-48 Old River, Calif. (SPK) 35-33 Old River, La. (MR+T) 42-6, 42-30 Old River, La. control (MR+T) 42-11 Old River, Standard Revetments (MR+T) 42-33 Old River-Cypress Creek, Ark. (MR+T) 42-11 Old Town Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-47 Oldmans Creek, NJ. (NAP) 3-27 Olean, N.Y. (ORP) 18-20 Olean, N.Y. (Allegheny River) (ORP) 18-24 Olinda Trail, Chisago Lakes Township, Minn. (NCS) 24-34 Olive Hill, Ky. (ORH) 17-23 Oliver Lock and Dam (Replacement), Ala. (SAM) 10-6, 10-31, 10-39 Olosega Bridge Protection, American Samoa (POD) 36-14 Olympia Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-4, 38,-15, 38-20, 38-29 Omaha, Missouri River, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 I-49 Omaha, Nebr. (MRO) 26-16, 26-18 Onaga Lake, Vermillion Creek, Kan. (MRK) 27-17 Onandaga Creek, Nedrow, N.Y. (NCB) 20-37 Onancock River, Va. (NAO) 5-19, 5-21 Oneida Creek, Oneida, N.Y. (NCB) 20-39 Oneida Lake, N.Y. (NCB) 20-39 Oneonta, N.Y. (NAB) 4-42 Ontonagon Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-17, 21-38, 21-50 Oologah Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 28-22, 29-6, 29-14, 29-17, 29-20 Oostanaula and Coosawatee River, Ga. (SAM) 10-47 Open Channel Work, Ohio River (ORD) (ORH) (ORL) (ORP) 16-3, 17-2, 18-3, 19-3, 19-5, 19-6 Open River Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing (NPW) 39-22 Open River Navigation Riparia to Pittsburg Landing (NPW) 39-14 Open River Pasco to Lewiston (NPW) 39-22 Opposite Hamburg Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 25-10 Optima Lake, Okla. (SWT) 29-7, 29-14, 29-17 Oquawka, Mississippi River, Ill. (NCR) 23-17 Orange River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Orange Road, Mercer Co., Penn. (ORP) 18-26 Oregon Slough (North Portland Harbor), Oreg. (NPP) 37-37 Orleans, Ind. (ORL) 16-21 Ormond, Arthur V. L and D (SWL) 28-19 Oro Grande Wash Channel Improvements, Calif. (SPL) 33-25 Orofino Creek and Clearwater River, Idaho (NPW) 39-15 Orowoc Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Orwell Reservoir (Otter Tail River) (NCS) 24-32 Osage River, Kan. and Mo. (MRK) 27-19 Osage River, Mo., Lock and Dam (MRK) 27-15 Osawatomie, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, Kan. (MRK) 27-19 Osawatomie, Pottawatomie Creek, Kan. (MRK) 27-16 Osborne Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, Miss. (SAM) 10-48 Osceola Harbor, Ark. (LMM) 13-4 Oswego Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 20-9, 20-19, 20-30, 20-40 Other Work under Special Authority (NCS) (SPK) 24-20, 35-23 Ottowa, Ill. (NCR) 23-17 Ottawa, Ohio (NCB) 20-14, 20-21, 20-33 Ottowa Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, Kan. (MRK) 27-16, 27-19 Ottawa River Harbor, Mich. and Ohio (NCB) 20-35 Otter Brook Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-15, 1-23, 1-28, 1-48 Otter County Drainage District No. 2 (MRO) 26-18 Otter Creek, Vt. (NAN) 2-34 Otter Creek and Tributaries, Shannon Hills, Ark. (SWL) 28-17 Otter Tail River, Minn. (NCS) 24-32, 24-33 Ottumwa, Iowa (NCR) 23-13 Ouachita and Black Rivers, Ark. and La. (Felsenthal Canal) (LMK) 12-15 Ouachita and Black Rivers, Ark. and La., Locks and Dams (LMK) 12-14 Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, Ark. (LMK) 12-2, 12-9, 12-11 Ouachita River (MR+T) 42-15 Ouachita River and Tributaries, Ark. and La. (LMK) 12-5, 12-12, 12-17 Ouachita River Levees, La. (LMK) 12-4, 12-9, 12-17 Ouzinkie Small Boat Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Overton-Red River Waterway, La. (LMK) 12-15 Owasco Inlet and Outlet, Montville and Dry Creek, State Ditch and Crane Brook, N.Y. (NCB) 20-37 Owasco Inlet, Groton, N.Y. (NCB) 20-39 Owego, N.Y. (NAB) 4-42 Owen, Wis. (NCS) 24-34 Owensboro, Ky. (ORL) 16-20, 16-24 Owl's Head Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 Owyhee River, Oreg. (NPW) 39-4, 39-9, 39-13 Oxford, Md. (NAB) 4-38 Oxford, N.Y. (NAB) 4-17, 4-28 Oxford Junction, Wapsi River, Iowa (NCR) 23-17 Oyster Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-19, 5-21 Oyster Creek, Tex. (SWG) 31-30 Ozan Creek, Ark. (LMIK) 12-7 Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No. 12), Ark. (SWL) 28-9, 28-13, 28-20 Ozark Natl. Rec. Area, Bell Foley and Greers Ferry (SWL) 28-18 Ozona, Channel and Turning Basin, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 P Paauau Stream, Hawaii (POD) 36-12, 36-15 Paducah, Ky. (ORL) 16-19, 16-24, 16-29 Pagan River, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Pago Pago Airport, American Samoa (POD) 36-11 I-50 INDEX Pago Pago to Nuuuli, American Samoa (POD) 36-11 Paint Creek at Chillicothe, Ohio (ORH) 17-23 Paint Creek at Washington Court House, Ohio (ORH) 17-23 Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, Ohio (ORH) 17-8, 17-14, 17-19 Paint Rock River, Ala. (ORN) 15-13, 15-19 Painted Post, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39, 4-42 Painted Rock Dam, Ariz. (SPL) 33-5, 33-20 Paintsville Lake, Ky. (ORH) 17-8, 17-14, 17-19 Pajaro River, Calif. (SPK) 35-13 Pajaro River Basin, Calif. (SPK) 35-26 Palm Beach, side channel and basin 9-47 Palm Beach County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-20 Palm Beach County, Fla., from Lake Worth Inlet to South Lake Worth Inlet (SAJ) 9-8 Palm Beach County, Fla., from Martin County Line of Lake Worth Inlet and from South Lake Worth Inlet to Broward County Line (SAJ) 9-30, 9-41 Palm Beach Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-12, 9-28, 9-36 Palmer River, Swansea, Mass. (NED) 1-47 Paloa Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-11 Palouse River, Wash. (NPW) 39-12, 39-16, 39-17 Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N.C. (SAW) 6-8, 6-19 Pamunkey River, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Panacea Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-47, 10-50 Panama City Beaches, Fla. (SAM) 10-28, 10-42 Panama City Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-11, 10-32, 10-42, 10-50 Pantego Creek and Cucklers Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Panther Creek, Curdsville, Ky. (Green River) (ORL) 16-19, 16-30 Panther Creek, Sangamon River, Chandlerville, Ill. (NCR) 23-17 Panther Creek, W. Va. (ORH) 17-21 Paper Mill Creek, Pt. Reyes Station, Calif. (SPK) 35-40 Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, Nebr. (MRO) 26-5, 26-10, 26-13 Papillion Creek-Platte River Levee (MRO) 26-18 Parceles Figueroa, P.R. (SAJ) 9-54 Parish Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-8, 4-25, 4-33 Park City, Kan. (SWT) 29-20 Park River, Hartford, Conn. (NED) 1-42, 1-49 Park River, N. Dak. (NCS) 24-33 Parker Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-19, 5-21 Parker Lake, Okla. (SWT) 29-7, 29-14, 29-17 Parkersburg, W. Va. (ORH) 17-21, 17-23 Parrotts Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Parsons, Hambleton, Hendricks, W. Va. (ORP) 18-26 Pascack Brook, N.J. (NAN) 2-39 Pascagoula Harbor, Miss. (SAM) 10-11, 10-33, 10-42 Pascagoula River, Miss. (SAM) 10-27, 10-47 Pasquotank River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Pass Christian, Miss. (SAM) 10-50 Pass Christian Harbor, Miss. (SAM) 10-47 Pass Manchac, La. (LMN) 11-17 Pass-a-Grille Pass, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Passaic River Basin, NJ. and N.Y., Phase I (NAN) 2-20, 2-31, 2-39 Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project, Me. (NED) 1-43 Pat Mayse Lake, Tex. (SWT) 29-7, 29-14, 29-17 Pataha Creek, Pomeroy, Wash. (NPW) 39-15 Patchogue River, Conn. (NED) 1-39 Patman, Wright, Dam and Lake, Tex. (LMN) (SVT) 11-19, 30-11, 30-17, 30-21 Patoka Lake, Ind. (ORL) 16-9, 16-15, 16-27 Patoka River, Ind. (ORL) 16-30 Patriot, Ind. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Patterson (MR+T) 42-13 Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, Mo. (MRK) 27-16 Patuxent River, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Pauls Valley, Okla. (SWT) 29-21 Paw Paw Lake, Mich. (NCE) 21-26, 21-41, 21-53 Pawcatuck, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-42 Pawcatuck Hurricane Barrier 1-23 Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay, R. I. and Conn. (NED) 1-45 Pawcatuck River, R.I. and Conn. (NED) 1-39, 1-45 Pawtucket, R.I. (NED) 1-45 Pawtuxet Cove, R.I. (NED) 1-39 Pawtuxet River, Warwick, R.I. (NED) 1-42, 1-48 Pax, W. Va. (ORH) 17-23 Payette River, Emmett Sewage Lagoon, Idaho (NPW) 39-15, 39-17 Payette Valley, Idaho (NPW) 39-12, 39-16 Peacock Creek, Liberty County, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Peafield, Miss. (MR+T) 42-12 Pearl River, Jackson East, Jackson, Miss. (LMK) 12-20 Pearl River, Miss. and La. (LMK) 12-12, 12-15, 12-21 Pearl River Basin, Miss. and La. (LMK) 12-5 Pearl River Basin, Shoccoe Dam, Miss. (LMK) 12-12 Pearl River, Slidell, St. Tammany Parish, La. (LMK) 12-6, 12-9, 12-12 Pearl River Vicinity of Jackson (LMK) 12-9 I-51 Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, Kan. (SWT) 29-7, 29-14, 29-17 Pebble Creek, Scribner, Nebr. (MRO) 26-5, 26-10, 26-13, 26-23 Pecan Creek, Gainesville, Tex. (SWF) 30-23 Pecatonica River at Darlington, Wis. (NCR) 23-15 Peconic River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Pecos, Tex. (SWA) 32-14 Peekskill Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Pekin-LaMarsh Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 23-13, 23-16 Pelican Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Pembina River, N. Dak. (NCS) 24-28 Pembina River Lake, N. Dak. (NCS) 24-28 Pembroke Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Pemigewasset River, Holderness, N.H, (NED) 1-47 Pendleton, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Pendleton Levees, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39, 37-41 Peninsula Drainage District 1, Oreg. (NPP) 37-38, 37-41, 37-43 Peninsula Drainage District 2, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39, 37-44 Penny Slough, Ill. (NCR) 23-13, 23-16 Penobscot River, Me. (NED) 1-39, 1-42, 1-53 Pensacola Bay, Fla. to Mobile Bay, Ala. (SAM) 10-40 Pensacola Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-12, 10-33, 10-43, 10-50 Pensacola Harbor Modification, Fla. (SAM) 10-48 Pensacola Lake, Okla. (SWL) 28-22 Pensaukee Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 21-55, 21-60 Pentwater Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-18, 21-38, 21-50, 21-57 Peoria, Ill. (NCC) 23-14 Pepin Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 25-7 Pepper Creek, Del. (NAP) 3-24 Pepperell Cove, Me. (NED) 1-39, 1-45 Perdido Pass Channel, Ala. (SAM) 10-12, 10-33, 10-43 Perkins Cove, Ogunquit, Me. (NED) 1-46 Perley Brook, Ft. Kent, Me. (NED) 1-20, 1-24, 1-31, 1-37 Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses (PIANC) 48-1, 48-2 Perquimans River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25, 6-27 Perry County Drainage and Levee Districts Nos. 1, 2, and 3, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Perry Lake, Delaware River, Kan. (MRK) 27-5, 27-10, 27-13, 27-19 Perry Lake Area (Road Improvements), Kan. (MRK) 27-16 Perryville, Ky. (ORL) 16-29 Perth Amboy, NJ. (NAN) 2-36 Peru Dike (MRO) 26-18 Petaluma River, Calif. (SPN) 34-7 Peters Creek, Roanoke, Va. (SAW) 6-31 Petersburg Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Petit Jean River, Ark. (SWL) 28-17 Petite Anse, Tigre, and Carlin Bayous, La. (LMN) 11-17 Petoskey Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-55, 21-60 Pettibone Park, La Crosse, Wis. (NCS) 24-13, 24-23 Peyton Creek, Tex. (SWG) 31-31 Phillippi Creek Basin, Fla. (SAJ) 9-54 Phillips Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-42, 1-51 Philpott Lake, Va. (SAW) 6-15, 6-16, 6-20 Phoenix, Ariz., and Vicinity (including New River) (SPL) 33-5, 33-20 Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Kansas City Dist) (MRK) 27-5, 27-13 Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Omaha Dist) (MRO) 26-5, 26-13, 26-18 Pickwick Landing Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 15-17 Pierce, Elkhorn River, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Pierce, Nebr. (MRO) 26-16 Pig Island Gut, Me. (NED) 1-39, 1-46, 1-53 Pike Island Locks and Dams, W. Va. (ORD) 19-7 Pilchuck River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Pilot Rock, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Pine and Mathews Canyons Dams, Nev. (SPL) 33-7, 33-14, 33-22 Pine Bluff, Ark. (LMK) 12-17 Pine Creek, Angle Inlet, Minn. (NCS) 24-27 Pine Creek Lake, Okla. (SWT) 29-7, 29-14, 29-17 Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, Calif. (SPK) 35-14, 35-26 Pine Ford Lake, Mo. (LMS) 14-4, 14-8 Pine Mountain Lake, Ark. (SWL) 28-17 Pine Point Harbor, Scarborough, Me. (NED) 1-46 Pine River, Mich. (NCE) 21-55 Pine River Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-60 Pine River Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 24-31 Pinellas County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-20, 9-30, 9-41 Pineville, Ky. (ORN) 15-13, 15-19 Pineville, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-18 12-20 Pineville, Red River, La. (LMK) 12-19 Pinole Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-34 I-52 INDEX Pinon Canyon Dam, Trinidad, Colo. (SWA) 32-14 Pioneer Lake, Kan. (MRK) 27-17 Pipestem Lake, N. Dak. (MRO) 26-6, 26-10, 26-14 Piscataquog River, Goffstown, N.H. (NED) 1-47 Pithlachascotee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Pittsburgh, Pa. (Golden Triangle) (ORP) 18-21 Pittsburgh, Pa. (North Side) (ORP) 18-21 Pittsburgh, Pa. (The Strip) (ORP)18-21 Pittsburgh Harbor, Pa. (ORP)18-19 Pittsburg Landing to Johnson Bar (NPW) 39-14 Pittsfield, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-50 Placer Creek, Idaho (NPS) 38-26 Plainfield, Iowa (NCR) 23-17 Plainview Local Flood Protection Project (SWF) 30-22 Plateau Creek near Collbran, Colo. (SPK) 35-40 Platte River, Ashland, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Platte River, Douglas Co. (Ginger Cove Sewage Lagoon), Nebr. (MRO) 26-23 Platte River, Mo., Channel Improvement (MRK) 27-16 Platte River, North Bend, Nebr. (MRO) 26-23 Platte River and Lost Creek, Schuyler, Nebr. (MRO) 26-16 Platte River and Tributaries, Nebr. (MRO) 26-16 Platte River, Bank Protection, Louisville, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Platte River, Brandy, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Platte River, Hansen-Chris Lakes, Bellevue, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Platte River, M.U.D. Protection, Cedar Island, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Platte River near Schuyler, Nebr. (MRO) 26-16 Plattsburgh Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Pleasant Bay, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Pleasant Creek, Johnson Co., Ind. (ORL) 16-31 Pleasant Point, Perry, Me. (NED) 1-24, 1-42 Pleasant River, Maine (NED) 1-39 Pleasant Valley Levee (MRO) 26-18 Pleasanton Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 30-22 Plum Creek, Ky. Spence Co. (ORL) 16-30 Plum Creek at New Haven Township, Minn. (NCS) 24-33 Plum Creek, Bank Stabilization, Aurora, Colo. (MRO) 26-19 Plum Island, Mass. (NED) 1-41 Plymouth, Pa. (NAB) 4-39, 4-42 Plymouth Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-4, 1-6, 1-20, 1-46 Poca, W. Va. (ORH) 17-22 Pocomoke River, Md. (NAB) 4-8, 4-25, 4-33 Poesten Kill, Troy, N.J. (NAN) 2-39 Pohoiki Bay, Hawaii, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Point Graham, Ark. (NPA) 40-13 Point Judith Pond and Harbor of Refuge, R.I. (NED) 1-7, 1-26, 1-34, 1-45 Point of Pines, Revere, Mass. (NED) 1-47 Point Lookout Harbor (Au Gres River), Mich. (NCE) 21-18, 21-38, 21-50 Point Place, Toledo, Ohio (NCB) 20-14, 20-21, 20-34 Point Pleasant, W. Va. (ORL) 17-21, 17-23 Point Remove Levee and Drainage District, Conway County, Ark. (SWL) 28-17 Pokegama Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 24-31 Pollock Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Poloa Seawall, American Samoa (POD) 36-14 Poison Bay, Flathead Lake, Mont. (NPS) 38-24 Pomeroy, Ohio (ORL) 17-22 Pomme De Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, Mo. (MRK) 27-6, 27-10, 27-14, 27-19 Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, Kan. (MRK) 27-6, 27-10, 27-14 Pomona Lake, Osage River Basin, Kan. (MRK) 27-19 Ponce, P.R. (SAJ) 9-42 Ponce De Leon Inlet, Fla. (SAJ) 9-13, 9-29, 9-36 Ponce Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-13, 9-29, 9-36 Ponce Regional, P.R. (SAJ) 9-54 Pontiac Diversion, R.I. (NED) 1-45 Pool, Joe, Lake (Lakeview Lake), Tex. (SWF) 30-6, 30-16, 30-19 Port Alexander, Alaska (NPA) 40-12, 40-13 Port Allen Harbor, Kauai, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Port Angeles Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-24, 38-28 Port Arthur and Vicinity, Tex., Hurricane-Flood Protection (SWG) 31-11, 31-16, 31-28 Port Austin Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-18, 21-38, 21-50 Port Bay, N.Y. (NCB) 20-35 Port Chester Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Port Clinton Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 20-35 Port Dickinson, N.Y. (NAB) 4-42 Port Everglades Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-14, 9-29, 9-37, 9-46 Port 5 Facility, Bridgeport, Conn. (NED) 1-42 Port Gamble Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-24, 38-28 I-53 Port Henry Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Port Hueneme, Calif. (SPL) 33-3, 33-12, 33-18, 33-28 Port Isabel (SWG) 31-37 Port Jefferson Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Port of Kalama, Wash. (NPP) 37-38 Port Ontario Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 20-9, 20-19, 20-31 Port Orchard Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-24 Port Orford, Oreg. (NPP) 37-6, 37-24, 37-32 Port Royal Harbor, S.C. (SAN) 7-5, 7-9, 7-12 Port San Luis, Calif. (SPL) 33-23 Port Sanilac Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-18, 21-26, 21-38, 21-50 Port St. Joe Harbor, Fla. (SAM) 10-47 Port Townsend, Wash. (NPS) 38-24, 38-31 Port Washington Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 21-55 Port Wing Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 21-19, 21-39, 21-50 Portage, Pa. (ORP) 18-20 Portage Lake Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-18, 21-38, 21-50 Portchester Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-38 Porter Bayou, Miss. (LMK) 12-6, 12-9, 12-12 Portersville Bay Shoreline, Ala. (SAM) 10-49 Portland, Ind. (Salamonie River) (ORL) 16-19, 16-30 Portland, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 Portland Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 Portneuf River and Marsh Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-12, 39-16, 39-17 Portsmouth Harbor, Va. Channel to Nansemond Ordnance Depot (NAO) 5-19 Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, Maine and N.H. (NED) 1-7, 1-26, 1-35 Portsmouth-New Boston, Ohio (ORH) 17-21, 17-23 Portugues and Bucana Rivers, P.R. (SAJ) 9-24, 9-31, 9-42 Portville, N.Y. (ORP) 18-20 Portville, N.Y. (Allegheny River) (ORP) 18-24 Posten Bayou, Ark. and La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-18, 12-18, 12-20 Poteet Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 30-22 Potlatch River, Ind. (NPW) 39-17 Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, D.C., Collection and Removal of Drift (NAB) 4-9, 4-25, 4-33 Potomac River and Tributaries at and below Washington, D.C., Elimination of Waterchestnut (NAB) 4-37 Potomac River Aquatic Plant Control, Md., Va., D.C. (NAB) 4-9, 4-25, 4-34 Potomac River at Alexandria, Va. (NAB) 4-37 Potomac River at Lower Cedar Point, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Potomac River at Mount Vernon, Va. (NAB) 4-37, 4-41 Potomac River below Washington, D.C. (NAB) 4-9, 4-26, 4-34 Potomac River North Side of Washington Channel, D.C. (NAB) 4-37 Potowomut River, R.I. (NED) 1-39 Pottawatomie County, Okla. (SWT) 29-21 Pottstown, Pa. (NAP) 3-26 Poverty Point, La. (LMN) 12-20 Powder River, Arvada, Wyo. (MRO) 26-23 Powell County High School, Mont. (NPS) 38-26 Powellhurst Basin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Powhatan Point, Ohio (ORP) 18-21 Prairie Du Chien, Wis. (NCD) (NCS) 24-13, 24-23, 25-7 Prairie Du Chien, Harbor, Wis. (NCD) 25-10 Prairie du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Prairie du Rocher and Vicinity, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Prattville, Autauga Creek, Ala. (SAM) 10-48 Preconstruction Engineering and Design (SAW) 6-17 Prescott Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Presque Isle Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-19, 21-39, 21-51 Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, Pa. (NCB) 20-12, 20-20, 20-33 Prestile Stream, Blaine, Maine (NED) 1-42 Preston Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Prestonburg, Ky. (ORH) 17-23 Prestonville, Ky. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Prevention of Obstructions and Injurious Deposits, Baltimore, Md. (NAB) 4-10, 4-26, 4-34 Price River Price, Utah (SPK) 35-40 Priest, J. Percy, Dam and Reservoir, Tenn. (ORN) 15-7, 15-9, 15-18 Priest Rapids Dam, Wash. (NPS) 38-28 Princeton, W. Va. (ORH) 17-21, 17-23 Principal Data Concerning Navigation Lock, Spillway Dam, Powerplant and Impoundment (NPW) 39-18 Prineville Area, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Proctor, Otter Creek Basin, Vt. (NAN) 2-38 Proctor, W. Va. (ORP) 18-21 Proctor Creek, Atlanta, Ga. (SAM) 10-49 Proctor Lake, Tex. (SWF) 30-8, 30-16, 30-20 I-54 INDEX Proctorville, Ohio (ORH) 17-21 Project Condition Surveys (NPA) 40-4, 40-14 Prompton Lake, Pa. (NAP) 3-14, 3-18, 3-23 Prospect Beach, West Haven, Conn. (NED) 1-41, 1-46 Prosperity Lake, Mo. (SWL) 28-18 Prototype Breakwater Test Program, Wash. (NPS) 38-24 Providence River and Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-39, 1-45 Provincetown Beach (Herring Cove), Mass. (NED) 1-45 Provincetown Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-39, 1-45, 1-46 Provo River, Utah Co., Utah (SPK) 35-40 Pudding River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Pueblo Arkansas River, Colo. (Floodway Levee Extension) (SWA) 32-14 Puerco River, Gallup, N.M. (SWA) 32-3, 32-11, 32-12 Puget Sound and Its Tributary Waters, Wash. (NPS) 38-5, 38-15, 38-20 Pullman, Palouse, Wash. (NPW) 39-16 Pullman Palouse River, Wash. (NPW) 39-14 Pultneyville Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 20-35 Pumpkinvine Creek, Emerson, Ga. (SAM) 10-48 Pungo Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Pungo River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Punta Salinas, P.R. (SAJ) 9-48 Punxsutawney, Pa. (Allegheny River Basin) (ORP) 18-24 Punxsutawney, Pa., Ohio River Basin, Pa. (ORP) 18-4, 18-11, 18-16 Put In Bay, Ohio (NCB) 20-35, 20-38 Pysht River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Q Quail Wash Levee, Joshua Tree, San Bernardino, Calif. (SPL) 33-25 Queens Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-19, 5-21 Queenstown Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Queets River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Quillayute River, Wash. (NPS) 38-5, 38-15, 38-20, 38-26, 38-28, 38-29 Quinalt River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Quinby Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-19, 5-21 Quincy, Ill., Harbor Access Channel (NCR) 23-12 Quincy, Mass. (NED) 1-23 Quincy Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 25-8 Quincy Shore Beach, Quincy, Mass. (NED) 1-41 Quinnippiac River, Wallingford, Conn. (NED) 1-47 R R and H Act (NCB) 20-40 R. D. Bailey Lake, W. Va. (ORH) 17-9, 17-15, 17-19 Raccoon Creek, N.J. (NAP) 3-24 Raccoon Creek, Baconton, Ga. (SAM) 10-49 Raccoon Creek, D and L Townships, Ill. (ORL) 16-31 Raccoon Creek Levee, Ind. (ORL) 16-21 Raccoon Levee, Ind. (ORL) 16-25 Raccoon River, Des Moines, Iowa (NCR) 23-17 Racine, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 Racine Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 21-57 Racine Locks and Dam, Ohio (ORD) 19-6, 19-8 Rahway, NJ. (NAN) 2-36, 2-38 Rahway, South Branch, NJ. (NAN) 2-36 Rainier Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-38, 37-39, 37-44 Rancocas River, N.J. (NAP) 3-27 Randleman Lake, N.C. (SAW) 6-11, 6-20 Rapid City, Cedar Canyon Dam, S. Dak. (MRO) 26-19 Rapid Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-15 Rapid Creek, Rapid City, S. Dak. (MRO) 26-16, 26-19 Rappahannock River, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Rappahannock River at Bowlers Wharf, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Rappahannock Shoal Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-2, 5-15 Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, N.J. (NAN) 2-36 Raritan River, NJ. (NAN) 2-34, 2-38 Raritan River to Arthur Kill Cutoff Channel, N.J. (NAN) 2-14, 2-24, 2-30 Rathbun Lake, Charitob River, Iowa (MRK) 27-6, 27-10, 27-14 Rathbun Lake Fish Hatchery (MRK) 27-16 Ravenswood, W. Va. (ORH) 17-21 Rawls Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-16 Ray Roberts Lake, Tex. (SWF) 30-9, 30-16, 30-20 Raybumrn, Sam, Dam and Reservoir, Tex. (SWF) 30-12, 30-17, 30-20 Raystown Lake, Pa. (NAB) 4-14, 4-26, 4-36 Recapitulation Project Levee Tables (FY 1988) (MR+T) 42-51 Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys Baltimore, Md., District (NAB) 4-12, 4-41 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 20-11 I-55 Charleston, S.C., District (SAN) 7-6 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 22-5, 22-17 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 21-25, 21-60 Galveston, Tx., Division (SWG) 31-9 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-18, 9-46 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL) 33-28 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-50 New England Division (NED) 1-53 New York District (NAN) 2-16, 2-33, 2-38, 2-39 Norfolk, Va., District (NAO) 5-21 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-2 Philadelphia, Penn., District (NAP) 3-14 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN) 34-4 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-6 Wilmington, N.C., District (SAW) 6-29 Red Brook Harbor, Bourne, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Red Creek, N.Y. (NCB) 20-40 Red Lake and Clearwater Rivers, Minn. (NCS) 24-33 Red Lake and Red Lake River, Minn. (NCS) 24-27 Red Lake Falls, Minn. (NCS) 24-33 Red Lake River, Minn., including Clearwater River, Minn. (NCS) 24-13, 24-24 Red Lake River at Huot, Minn. (NCS) 24-28 Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, Minn. (NCS) 24-28 Red River, Tenn. (ORN) 15-13 Red River at East Grand Forks, Minn. (NCS) 24-32 Red River at Fargo, N. Dak. (NCS) 24-32 Red River at Grand Forks, N. Dak. (NCS) 24-32 Red River Backwater (MR+T) 42-54 Red River Backwater Area (MR+T) 42-6, 42-15 Red River below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District): New Projects (LMK) 12-18 Red River below Denison Dam including Little River Basin, Okla. and Ark. (SWL) 28-15 Red River below Denison Dam, Levees and Bank Stabilization (Vicksburg District) (LMK) (SWI) 12-7, 12-10, 12-13, 29-19 Red River below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) (LMK) 12-16, 12-18, 12-19 Red River below Fulton, Ark. (LMK) 12-15 Red River, Clay City, Ky. (ORL) 16-31 Red River Emergency Bank Protection (LMK) 12-2, 12-9, 12-11 Red River in Vicinity of Shreveport, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-18, 12-19, 12-21 Red River Lake, Ky. (Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-20 Red River of the North, Minn. and N. Dak. (NCS) 24-27 Red River of the North, Argusville, N. Dak. (NCS) 24-14, 24-24 Red River of the North at Breckenridge, Minn. (NCS) 24-14, 24-24, 24-28 Red River of the North at Halstad, Minn. (NCS) 24-28 Red River of the North at Oslo, Minn. (NCS) 24-28 Red River of the North at Pembina, N. Dak. (NCS) 24-28 Red River of the North Drainage Basin, Minn., S. Dak. and N. Dak. (NCS) 24-14, 24-24, 24-32 Red River Parish, La. (LMN) (LMIK) 11-8, 12-19, 12-20 Red River Standard Revetments (MR+T) 42-39 Red River Waterway, La. (LMK) 12-12 Red River Waterway, La., Ark., Okla., and Tex. (LMK) 12-15 Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, La. (LMK) 12-2, 12-9, 12-11 Red River Waterway, Shreveport, La., to Daingerfield, Tex. (LMK) 12-15 Red River Waterway-Shreveport, La. to Index, Ark. (LMK) 12-7, 12-10, 12-13 Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, Iowa (NCR) 23-4, 23-7, 23-11 Red Run, Clinton River, Mich. (NCE) 21-27 Red Run Drain-Lower Clinton River, Mich. (NCE) 21-57 Red Wing Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 25-7, 25-10 Redbank and Fancher Creeks, Calif. (SPK) 35-15, 35-26 Redbank Creek Lake, Pa. (ORP) 18-21 Redbird Creek, O'Neil, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Reddies River Lake, N.C. (SAN) (SAW) 6-27, 7-15 Redmond, John, Dam and Reservoir, Kan. (SWT) 29-5, 29-13, 29-17 Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), Calif. (SPL) 33-3, 33-9, 33-12, 33-19 Redwater River and Hay Creek, Bell Fourche, S.D. (MRO) 26-17 Redwood City Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-7 Redwood Creek, Humboldt County, Calif. (SPK) 35-34 Redwood River below Marshall, Minn. (NCS) 24-28, 24-33 Reeds Bay Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii , Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Reedsport Levees, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Reedy River, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 I-56 INDEX Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, Tenn. and Ky. (MR+T) 42-9, 42-18, 42-30 Reese River, Battle Mountain, Nev. (SPK) 35-34 Reevesville, Ill. (Reeves River) (ORL) 16-19, 16-24, 16-29 Regulation of Hydraulic Mining and Preparation of Plans (CDC) 53-1, 53-5, 53-7 Regulatory Functions Program (SAM) 10-27 Regulatory, Sunken Vessel Removal and National Emergency Preparedness Activities 51-1, 51-2 Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet, Del. (NAP) 3- 26 Removal of Aquatic Growth, La. (LMN) 11-17 Removal of Aquatic Growth from Navigable Waters in the State of Florida (SAJ) 9-14, 9-29, 9-37, 9-46 Removal of Sunken Vessels 51-1 Removing Snags and Wrecks from Mississippi River below Mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers (LMK) (LMM) 12-15, 13-4 Removing Water Hyacinths, Mobile District (SAM) 10-47 Rend Lake, Big Muddy River, Ill. (LMS) 14-5, 14-9, 14-11 Reno Beach-Howard Farms Area, Ohio (NCB) 20-15, 20-21, 20-34 Republican River, Clifton, Kan., Sewage Lagoons (MRK) 27-21 Republican River, Nebr. and Kan. (MRK) 27-19 Research and Development (LMS) (SAS) 8-9, 14-16 Reservoirs (ORL) (ORN) 15-18,16-20 Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, Minn. (NCS) 24-2, 24-22, 24-26, 24-31 Revere Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-10, 1-27, 1-36 Reynoldsville, Pa. (ORP) 18-20 Rheem Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-34 Rhodes Point to Tylerton, Md. (NAB) 4-10, 4-26, 4-34 Rialto Channel, Rialto, Calif. (SPL) 33-28 Rice Creek, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, Ga. and S.C. (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake) (SAS) 8-8, 8-12, 8-15 Richardson Co. Drainage Dist. No. 8 (MRO) 26-18 Richland Creek, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Richland Lake, Mo. (MRK) 27-17 Richmond, Va. (NAO) 5-9, 5-14, 5-17 Richmond Filtration Plant, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Richmond Harbor, (Deepening) Calif. (SPN) 34-2, 34-7, 34-10 Richmond Harbor, Me. (NED) 1-39 Richmond's Island Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 Richwood and Fenwick, W. Va. (ORH) 17-23 Ridgecrest, Kern Co., Calif. (SPL) 33-25 Ridgway, Pa. (Allegheny River Basin) (ORP) 18-24 Ridgway, Pa. (Elk Creek) (ORP) 18-20 Ridgway and Vicinity, Pa. (On Clarion River) (ORP) 18-20 Right and Left Forks of Beaver Creek, Ky. (ORH) 17-23 Rillito River in the Vicinity of Tucson, Gila River and Tributaries, Ariz. (SPL) 33-10 Rio Anton Ruiz-Runta Santiago, P.R. (SAJ) 9-54 Rio Cibuco, Vega Baja, P.R. (SAJ) 9-5 Rio Descolabrada, Santa Isabel (SAJ) 9-54 Rio Grande Basin, N. Mex. (SWA) 32-4, 32-11, 32-12 Rio Grande Floodway, N. Mex. (SWA) 32-6, 32-11, 32-12, 32-13 Rio Guamani, Guayana, P.R. (SAJ) 9-54 Rio Manati, Barceloneta, P.R. (SAJ) 9-54 Rio Niqua, Arroyo, P.R. (SAJ) 9-54 Rio Puerto Nuevo, P.R. (SAJ) 9-42 Rio Tallaboa-Penuelas, P.R. (SAJ) 9-54 Ripley, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 Ripley, W. Va. (ORH) 17-23 Rippowam River, Stamford, Conn. (NED) 1-47 Ririe Lake, Idaho (NPW) 39-15 Ririe Lake, Willow Creek, Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Rising Sun, Ind. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 102 River, Nodaway Co., Missouri, Co. Bridge (MRK) 27-21 River Rouge, Mich. (NCE) 21-56 Rivers and Harbors Contributed Funds (SAM) 10-29 Riverdale, West Springfield, Mass. (NED) 1-15, 1-29, 1-36, 1-49 Riverland Levee District, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Riverside Area, Pasco, Wash. (NPW) 39-15 Riverview, W. Va. (ORH) 17-22 Roanoak Lake, Tex. (SWF) 30-22 Roanoke River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Roanoke River, 50 mile long Channel from Palmyra Landing to Weldon (SAW) 6-28 Roanoke River Basin, Va. and N.C. (SAW) 6-14, 6-30 Roaring Fork River near Basalt, Colo. (SPK) 35-40 Roaring River, Wilkes County, N.C. (SAN) 7-15 Roaring River Lake, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, Ala. (SAM) 10-22, 10-35, 10-45 I-57 Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 28-20, 29-16, 29-18, 29-20 Roberts, Ray, Lake, Tex. (SWF) 30-9, 30-16, 30-20 Robinson Run, Oakdale, Penn. (ORP) 18-26 Rochester and McCleary's Bluff Levee, Ill. (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-19, 16-24, 16-29 Rochester, Minn. (NCS) 24-15, 24-24 Rochester, Pa. (ORP) 18-21 Rochester Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 20-9, 20-19, 20-31 Rochester Lake, Cedar River, Iowa (NCR) 23-15 Rock Creek, Kan. (SWT) 29-21 Rock Creek, Mont. (NPS) 38-26 Rock Creek, Morrison, Ill. (NCR) 23-17 Rock Hall Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Rock Island, Ill. (NCR) 23-13, 23-16 Rock Island District (NCD) 25-3, 25-4 Rock Island Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 25-7 Rock River Agricultural Levees, Ill. (NCR) 23-14 Rockfish Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Rockford, Ill. (NCR) 23-5, 23-7, 23-11 Rockland Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39, 1-45 Rockland Lake, Tex. (SWF) 30-11, 30-17, 30-20 Rockport, Ind. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Rockport and Old Harbors, Rockport, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Rockport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-8, 1-27, 1-35, 1-53 Rockport Harbor and Pigeon Cove, Rockport, Mass. (NED) 1-8, 1-27, 1-35 Rocky Ford Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 23-13 Rocky Pass, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Rocky River Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 20-35 Rocy Fork, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 Rodeo Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-34 Rogers City Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-57 Rogue River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, Oreg. (NPP) 37-7, 37-24, 37-32 Roland Drainage District, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 28-17 Rolling Fork Road, Sevier County, Ark. (SWL) 28-17 Rollinson Channel, N.C. (SAW) 6-8, 6-19 Rome, Coosa River, Ga. (SAM) 10-48 Rome, Ind. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Rome Mohawk River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-38 Rondout Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-14, 2-24, 2-30 Roosevelt Campobello International Park, Lubec, Me. (NED) 1-11, 1-24, 1-27, 1-36 Root Creek, Bolivar, N.Y. (ORP) 18-20 Rose Creek Channel Improvements, San Diego, Calif. (SPL) 33-25, 33-28 Roseau River, Minn. (NCS) 24-15, 24-24 Rosedale Harbor, Miss. (LMK) 12-15 Rosendale, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 Roseville, Ohio (ORH) 17-9,17-14, 17-19, 17-23 Rosiclare, Ill. (ORL) 16-19, 16-29 Rossview Lake, Tenn. and Kan. (ORN) 15-14 Rossville, Cross Creek, Kan. (MRK) 27-21 Rota Harbor, Northern Marianas (POD) 36-10 Rouge River, Mich. (NCE) 21-19, 21-27, 21-39, 21-51, 21-57 Rough River, Ky. (ORL) 16-18, 16-24, 16-30 Rough River Lake and Channel Improvements, Ky. (ORL) 16-9, 16-15 Roughans Pt., Revere, Mass. (NED) 1-20, 1-31, 1-37 Rouses Point, Lake Champlain, N.Y. (NAN) 2-34 Rouseville, Pa. (ORP) 18-20 Rowlesburg Lake, W. Va. (ORP) 18-20 Royal River, Maine (NED) 1-39 Ruby River, Wheatly Bridge, near Twin Bridges, Mont. (MRO) 26-19 Rudee Inlet (NAO) 5-6, 5-13, 5-17 Ruffy Brook, Minn. (NCS) 24-30 Rush River, N. Dak. (NCS) 24-32, 24-33 Rushford, Minn. (NCS) 24-28 Russell, Ky. (ORH) 17-21, 17-23 Russell and Allison Levee, Ill. (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-19, 16-24 Russell, Richard B., Dam and Lake, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-8, 8-12, 8-15 Russian River Basin, Calif. (SPK) 35-16, 35-26, 35-31, 35-38 Rutland, Otter Creek, Vt. (NAN) 2-36 Rutledge Hollow Creek Channel Improvement, Poteet, Tex. (SWF) 30-22 Rye Creek, Mont. (NPS) 38-26 Rye Harbor, N.H. (NED) 1-39 S S-53, Eau Gailie (SAJ) 9-49 S-55, Christmas (SAJ) 9-49 S-57, Ashton (SAJ) 9-49 S-58, Ashton (SAJ) 9-49 S-59, Kissimmee (SAJ) 9-49 S-60, Ashton (SAJ) 9-49 1-58 INDEX S-61, St. Cloud (SAJ) 9-49 S-62, Ashton (SAJ) 9-49 5-63, Ashton (SAJ) 9-49 S-63A, Ashton (SAJ) 9-49 S-65 Lock, Frostproof (SAJ) 9-49 S-65A Lock, Avon Park (SAJ) 9-49 S-65B Lock, Sebring (SAJ) 9-49 S-65C Lock, Sebring (SAJ) 9-49 S-65D Lock, Okeechobee (SAJ) 9-49 S-65E Lock, Okeechobee (SAJ) 9-49 S-157, Sebastian (SAJ) 9-49 S-158, Titusville (SAJ) 9-49 S-193, Okeechobee (SAJ) 9-49 S-308B, Pohakee (SAJ) 9-49 S-310, Clewiston (SAJ) 9-49 Sabana Grande, P.R. (SAJ) 9-54 Sabine - Neches Waterway, Tex. (SWG) 31-7, 31-16, 31-25, 31-32, 31-34, 31-38 Sabine River and Tributaries, Tex. (Echo to Morgan Bluff) (SWG) 31-30 Sabula, Iowa (NCR) 23-13, 23-16 Sackets Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 20-35, 20-40 Saco, Mont. (MRO) 26-16, 26-18 Saco River, Me. (NED) 1-9, 1-27, 1-35, 1-45 Sacramento River, Calif. (SPK) (CDC) 35-2, 35-24, 35-31, 53-3, 53-5, 53-6, 53-8 Sacramento River, Calif.: Tidal and Flooding Conditions 35-36 Sacramento River, Tehama, Calif. (SPK) 35-40 Sacramento River and Tributaries, Calif. (CDC) (Debris Control) 53-2, 53-5 Sacramento River and Tributaries, Calif., from Collinsville to Shasta Dam (SPK) 35-17, 35-27, 35-32, 35-39 Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, Calif. (SPK) 35-2, 35-24 Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton, S. Dak. (MRO) 26-16, 26-19 Sag Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Saginaw River, Mich. (NCE) 21-20, 21-26, 21-39, 21-41, 21-51, 21-54 Saint John River Basin, Maine (NED) 1-20 Saipan Beach Rd., CNMI (POD) 36-14 Saipan Small Boat Harbor, Northern Marianas (POD) 36-10 Sakonnet Harbor, R.I. (NED) 1-38, 1-45 Sakonnet River, R.I. (NED) 1-39 Salamanca, N.Y. (ORP) 18-20 Salamanoa (Power Transmission Tower), N.Y. (ORP) 18-26 Salamonie Lake, Ind. (ORL) 16-10, 16-15, 16-30, 16-31 Salem Church Lake, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Salem Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-39, 1-45 Salem River, N.J. (NAP) 3-9, 3-17, 3-21 Salina, Smoky Hill River, Kan. (MRK) 27-16, 27-19 Salinas River, Calif. (SPK) 35-34 Saline Point, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-8, 12-19, 12-21 Saline River, Ark. (LMK) 12-15 Saline River and Tributaries, Ill. (ORL) 16-19, 16-30 Salisbury, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-50 Salkahatchie River, S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Salmon Creek at Oakridge, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40, 37-43 Salmon Creek near Vancouver, Wash. (NPP) 37-40 Salmon River, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Salmon River, Idaho (NPW) 39-17 Salmon River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-37 Salmon River, Colchester, Conn. (NED) 1-42, 1-49 Salt Creek, Ohio (ORH) 17-21 Salt Creek and Tributaries, Nebr. (MRO) 26-6, 26-11, 26-14 Salt Creek Sewage Treatment Plant, Lincoln, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Salt Fork, Okla. (SWT) 29-21 Salt Lake City, Jordan River, Utah (SPK) 35-34 Saluda River, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Salyersville, Ky. (Licking River) (ORL) 16-19 Salzer Creek, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, Tex. (SWF) 30-12, 30-17, 30-20 Sammamish River, Wash. (NAS) 38-26 San Acacia to Bosque del Apache Unit (SWA) 32-14 San Antonio Channel Improvement, Tex. (SWF) 30-9, 30-17, 30-20 San Antonio Floodway, Tex. (SWF) 30-22 San Bernard River Channel (SWG) 31-36 San Diego Creek, Alice, Tex. (SWG) 31-31 San Diego Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-3, 33-12, 33-19 San Diego River and Mission Bay, Calif. (SPL) 33-4, 33-12, 33-19 San Diego River Channel and Levee, San Diego, Calif. (SPL) 33-28 San Diego River (Mission Valley), San Diego Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-25 I-59 San Diego (Sunset Cliffs), Calif. (SPL) 33-24 San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, Calif. (SPN) 34-3, 34-7 San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) (SPK) (SPN) 34-2, 34-7, 35-3, 35-24 San Francisco Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-7 San Francisco Harbor and Bay (Removal of Drift), Calif. (SPN) 34-7 San Francisco Harbor (Islais Creek), Calif. (SPN) 34-12 San Gabriel River, Tex. (SWF) 30-9, 30-17, 30-20 San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Calif. (SPL) 33-24 San Joaquin River, Calif. (SPK) 35-4, 35-24 San Joaquin River, Calif.: Cost of New Work for Project (SPK) 35-37 San Joaquin River, Calif.: Project Units (1950 Modification) Reclassified and Excluded from Project Costs (SPK) 35-37 San Joaquin River, Madera Co., Rd. 4 Bridge, Calif. (SPK) 35-40 San Juan, P.R. (SAJ) 9-48 San Juan Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-27 San Juan Harbor, P.R. (SAJ) 9-16, 9-29, 9-38, 9-46 San Leandro Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-34 San Leandro Marina, Calif. (SPN) 34-7 San Leandro Marina (Breakwater), Calif. (SPN) 34-12 San Eorenzo Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-34 San Lorenzo Creek, (Upper Portion) Calif. (SPN) 34-13 San Lorenzo River, Calif. (SPK) 35-34 San Luis Rey River, San Luis Rey River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-7, 33-14, 33-22 San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, Calif. (SPN) 34-7, 34-13 San Rafael Creek, Calif. (SPN) 34-7 Sand Cove, Gouldsboro, Me. (NED) 1-43 Sand Creek Channel Improvement, Kan. (SWT) 29-19, 29-20 Sand Hill Cove Beach, R.I. (NED) 1-41 Sand Hill River, Minn. (NCS) 24-32, 24-33 Sand Island, Oahu, Hawaii (POD) 36-11 Sand Island Shore Protection, Oahu, Hawaii (POD) 36-3, 36-7 Sand Lake, Okla. (SWT) 29-19 Sandburg Creek, Spring Glen, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 Sanders Creek, Boscobal, Wis. (NCS) 24-34 Sandusky Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 20-10, 20-20, 20-32, 20-35 Sandusky River, Ohio (NCB) 32-35 Sandusky River, Ream Rd., Sandusky, Ohio (NCB) 20-39 Sandusky River, Twsp. Rd. 234, Sandusky Twsp, Ohio (NCB) 20-39 Sandy Bay, Cape Ann, Mass. (NED) 1-39, 1-45 Sandy Bay (Harbor of Refuge), Cape Ann, Mass. (NED) 1-39 Sandy Creek, Jackson, Tenn. (LMM) 13-5 Sandy Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39, 37-44 Sandy Hook Bay, NJ. (NAN) 2-35 Sandy Hook Bay at Leonardo, NJ. (NAN) 2-33, 2-35 Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, N.J. (NAN) 2-17, 2-25, 2-31, 2-36 Sandy Lake Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 24-31 Sandy River and Sleepy Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Sangamon River (Mouth), Ill. (NCR) 23-13 Sangamon River, Riverton, Ill. (NCR) 23-17 Sanitary District of Beardstown, Ill. (NCR) 23-16 Sans Bois Navigation Channel, Okla. (SWT) 29-20 Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), Calif. (SPL) 33-7, 33-14, 33-22, 33-27 Santa Ana River Basin, Calif., Devil, East Twin, and Warm Creeks Channel Improvements (SPL) 33-25 Santa Ana River Mainstem, Calif. including Santiago Creek, Santa Ana River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-10 Santa Barbara Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-4, 33-12, 33-28 Santa Clara River, Fillmore, Calif. (SPL) 33-28 Santa Clara River Levee Improvement, Santa Clara River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Santa Cruz County, Calif. (SPN) 34-12 Santa Cruz Harbor, Calif. (SPN) 34-3, 34-8, 34-11 Santa Fe River and Arroyo Mascaras, N. Mex. (SWA) 32-14 Santa Maria Valley Levees, Santa Maria River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Santa Paula Creek Channel and Debris Basins (including Mud Creek), Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, N. Mex. (SWA) 32-7, 32-11 Santa Rosa-Ft. Walton, Fla. (SAM) 10-49 Santee River, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Sapelo Harbor, Ga. (SAS) 8-15 Sarasota County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-41 Sardis, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 1-60 INDEX Sardis Dam (Dam Safety Assurance) (MR+T) 42-30 Sardis Lake, Okla. (SWT) 29-7, 29-14, 29-17 Sasanoa River, Maine (NED) 1-39 Sasco Hill Beach, Fairfield, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Satilla River, Ga. (SAS) 8-15 Saugatuck Harbor and Kalamazoo River, Mich. (NCE) 21-22, 21-40, 21-52 Saugerties Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-15 Saugus and Pine Rivers, Mass. (NED) 1-46 Sauk River, Wash. (NPS) 38-8, 38-17, 38-21, 38-26 Sauvie Island Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-38, 37-39, 37-44 Savage River Dam, Md. (NAB) 4-39, 4-42 Savan Gut-St. Thomas, V.I. (SAJ) 9-54 Savanna Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 25-7 Savannah City Park, Tenn. (ORN) 15-19 Savannah Harbor, Ga. (SAS) 8-4, 8-10, 8-11 Savannah River above Augusta, Ga. (SAS) 8-15 Savannah River at Augusta, Ga. (SAS) 8-15 Savannah River Basin, Ga. and S.C. (SAS) 8-7, 8-16 Savannah River Basin at Oates Creek, Ga. (SAS) 8-9 Savannah River below Augusta, Ga. (SAS) 8-5, 8-11, 8-14 Saw Mill Run, Penn. (ORP) 18-20 Saw Mill Run, Salamanca, Penn. (ORP) 18-26 Sawmill Branch, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Sawmill R. Elmsford and Greenburgh, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 Saxman, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Saxon Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 21-23, 21-40, 21-53 Saxonville, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-43, 1-51 Saxtons River, Rockingham, Vt. (NED) 1-23 Saylersville, Ky. (Licking River) (ORL) 16-19, 16-20 Saylorville Lake, Iowa (NCR) 23-5, 23-8, 23-11 Scajaquada Creek, N.Y. (NCB) 20-37 Scappoose Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-38, 37-44 Scarboro River, Maine (NED) 1-39 Scenic Drive, Duck Lake, Mich. (NCE) 21-26 Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations Albuquerque, N. Mex., District (SWA) 32-8 Baltimore, Md., District (NAB) 4-21 Fort Worth, Tex., District (SWF) 30-11 Kansas City, Mo., District (MRK) 27-7, 27-11 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL) 33-8 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-27 Omaha, Nebr., District (MRO) 26-6, 26-11 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-15 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-20 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 29-8 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW) 39-4 Wilmington, N.C., District (SAW) 6-15 Schuyler, Nebr. (MRO) 21-20 Schuyler, Lost Creek and Platte River, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Schuylkill River, Pa. (NAP) 3-9, 3-17, 3-21 Schuylkill River above Fairmount Dam, Pa. (NAP) 3-24 Schulykill River-Fairmont Park, Pa. (NAP) 3-9 Scioto River at Portsmouth, Ohio (ORH) 17-20 Sciotoville, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 Scituate Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-39, 1-46 Scott, W. Kerr, Dam and Reservoir, N.C. (SAW) 6-14, 6-17, 6-20 Scott County Drainage and Levee District, Illinois River, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Scotts Creek, S.C. (SAW) 7-6, 7-9, 7-13 Scotts Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-17 Scottsville, Va. (NAO) 5-9, 5-14, 5-17 Scranton, Pa. (NAB) 4-39, 4-42 Scranton, Buffalo, N. Dak. (MRO) 26-19 Scuppernong River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25, 6-28 Sea Bright to Ocean Township, N.J. (NAN) 2-17 Seahom Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 23-13, 23-16 Searsport Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39, 1-53 Seaside Park, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Seattle Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-5, 38-15, 38-20, 38-28, 38-29 Sebasticook River, Hartland, Maine (NED) 1-43 Sebewaing River, Mich. (NCE) 21-23, 21-40, 21-41, 21-53 Sebewaing, Sebewaing River, Mich. (NCE) 21-27, 21-54 Sec. 6 levees, 1928 Flood Control Act (MR+T) 42-30 Seekonk River, R.I. (NED) 1-39 Seldovia Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12, 40-14 Selkirk Shore State Park, Lake Ontario, N.Y. (NCB) 20-36 Seminole Basin-Largo, Fla. (SAJ) 9-54 Seneca Lake, Geneva, N.Y. (NCB) 20-38 Seneca Lake, Watkins Glen, N.Y. (NCB) 20-39 Seneca River, Seneca Falls, N.Y. (NCB) 20-39 Sergius Whitestone, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 1-61 Sergius Whitestone Narrows (NPA) 40-14 Sespe Creek at Fillmore, Ventura Co., Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Sesuit Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-19, 1-27, 1-35 Sevier River near Redmond, Utah (SPK) 35-34 Sewage Lagoons, Vale, Oreg. (NPW) 39-15 Sewage Treatment Plant, Missoula, Mont. (NPS) 38-26 Seward, Nebr. (MRK) 27-16 Seward Harbor, Alaska (NFA) 40-12 Sewer Outfall, Glendale, W. Va. (ORP) 18-26 Sewerline Protection, Valley, Ala. (SAM) 10-17, 10-34, 10-44 Shad Landing State Park, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Shallotte River, N.C. (SAW) 6-8, 6-19 Shallow Creek, Baltimore, Md. (NAB) 4-10, 4-26, 4-34 Shark River, N.J. (NAN) 2-35 Shawneetown, Ill. (ORL) 16-19, 16-21, 16-26, 16-29 Sheboygan, Wis. (NCE) 21-26 Sheboygan Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 21-23, 21-40, 21-53 Sheepshead Bay, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35, Sheffield, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-50 Sheffield Lake Community Park, Ohio (NCB) 20-40 Sheffield Water Intake, Ala. (ORN) 15-19 Shelburne, N.H. (NED) 1-23, 1-43 Shell Creek, County Rd. near Columbus, Nerb. (MRO) 26-20 Shell Creek, Nebr. (MRO) 26-17 Shell Lake, Wis. (NCS) 24-34 Shelley Area, Snake River, Idaho (NPW) 39-12, 39-16 Shelton Creek, Wash. (NAS) 38-26 Shelton Ditch, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa. and Ohio (ORP) 18-7, 18-12, 18-18, 18-25 Shepard Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, Minn. (NCS) 24-28, 24-33 Sherburne, N.Y. (NAB) 4-42 Sheridan, Wyo. 26-16, 26-19 Sherwood Island State Park, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Sheyenne River, N. Dak. (NCS) 24-16, 24-24, 24-30, 24-33 Sheyenne River, Harwood, N.Dak. (NCS) 24-34 Sheyenne River, Valley City, N. Dak. (NCS) 24-16, 24-24 Shidler Lake, Okla. (SWT) 29-19 Shields River, near Clyde Park, Mont. (MRO) 26-16 Shilshole Bay, Seattle, Wash. (NPS) 38-24 Shipyard River, S.C. (SAN) 7-5, 7-9, 7-12 Shoal Harbor and Compton Creek, N.J. (NAN) 2-33, 2-35 Shoals, Ind. (East Fork White River) (ORL) 16-21 Shobe Canyon, Heppner, Oreg. (NPW) 39-15 Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration, Philadelphia, Penn. District (NAP) 3-11 Shoreline Frotection Studies (NCB) (NCC) (SAN) 7-17, 20-16, 22-8 Short Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Shoshone River, Bank Protection, Lovell, Wyo. (MRO) 26-19 Shoshone River, Byron, Wyo. (MRO) 26-19 Shot Pouch Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Shrewsbury River, N.J. (NAN) 2-33, 2-35 Shrimp Basin (SWG) 31-36 Shufebarger Levee, Ind. (ORL) 16-21 Shumebarger Levee, Ind. (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-25 Shupe Run, Mt. Pleasant, Penn. (ORP) 18-26 Sid Simpson Project, Ill. (NCR) 23-13 Sidney, Nebr. (MRO) 26-23 Sierra Madre Wash Channel, La. Co. drainage area, Calif. (SPL) 33-27 Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-41, 1-45 Silver Creek, Rome, Ga. (SAM) 10-49 Silver City, Mich. (NCE) 21-26 Silver Lake Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-9, 6-19, 6-23 Simmesport (MR+T) 42-13, 42-14 Simmons Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Simpson Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Sims Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 31-12, 31-17, 31-28 Singing Hills Creek, Watauga, Tex. (SWF) 30-23 Sion Farm, St. Croix, V.I. (SAJ) 9-54 Sioux City, Floyd, Iowa (MRO) 26-20 Sioux City, small navigation project (MRO) 26-15 Sioux City Marina, Iowa (MRO) 26-9 Sioux Falls, S. Dak. (MRO) 26-16 Sioux Falls, Big Sioux River, S. Dak. (MRO) 26-19 Sistersville, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 Sitka Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Siuslaw River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-7, 37-24, 37-32, 37-40 Six Runs Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Sixes Bridge Lake, Md. and Pa. (NAB) 4-41 Skaggs Ferry, Black River, Ark. (SWL) 28-17 1-62 INDEX Skagit River, Wash. (NPS) 38-24, 38-26, 38-28 Skagway Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 Skagway River, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Skamokawa Creek, Wash. (NPP) 37-8, 37-25, 37-38 Skamokawa Creek Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-32, 37-42 Skamokawa (Steamboat Slough), Wash. (NPP) 37-41 Skiatook Lake, Okla. (SWT) 29-8, 29-14, 29-17 Skipanon Channel, Oreg. (NPP) 37-8, 37-25, 37-33 Slaughter Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 Slough Bend, Hickman, N.Y. (MR+T) 42-12 Slovan, Pa. (ORP) 18-20 Small Boat Harbor Opposite Chester, Ill. (LMS) 14-13 Small Boat Harbor Opposite Hamburg, Ill. (LMS) 14-13 Small Craft Basin (SWG) 31-36 Smelt Brook, Mass. (NED) 1-43 Smith Creek, Colo. (SWA) 32-14 Smith Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-38 Smith Creek, Pamlico County, N.C. (SAW) 6-19 Smith Ferry, Pa. (ORP) 18-21 Smith River, N.H. (NED) 1-24 Smith River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-37 Smithfield, W. Va. (ORH) 17-23 Smithland, Ky. (ORL) 16-20, 16-24 Smithland Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORD) 19-9 Smiths Creek (Wilmington), N.C. (SAW) 6-9, 6-25 Smithville Channel, Little Platte River, Mo. (MRK) 27-16 Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, Mo. (MRK) 27-6, 27-10, 27-14 Smithville Lake, Trimble Wildlife Area (MRK) 27-16 Smoky Hill, Saline, and Solomon Rivers, Abilene, Kan. (MRK) 27-19 Smyma River, Del. (NAP) 3-27 Snagging and Clearing Activities Louisville, Ky., District (ORL) 16-31 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-45 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR) 23-6, 23-17 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-20 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-8 Snake River, Alvarado, Minn. (NCS) 24-34 Snake River, Blackfoot, Ind. (NPW) 39-15 Snake River, Heise Bridge Location, Ind. (NPW) 39-15 Snake River, Idaho (NPW) 39-17 Snake River, Stevens, Blackfoot, Ind. (NPW) 39-15 Snake River, Wyo. (NPW) 39-17 Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, Oreg., Wash., and Idaho (NPW) 39-7, 39-10, 39-22 Snake River Mouth to Johnson Bar, Oreg.,Wash. and Idaho (NPW) 39-14 Snettisham, Alaska (NPA) 40-6, 40-9, 40-11 Snohomish River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26, 38-29 Snoqualmie River, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Sny Basin, Ill. (NCR) 23-13, 23-16 Sny Island Levee Drainage District, Ill. (NCR) 23-13, 23-16 Soap Creek, Wash. (NPP) 37-41 Socastee Creek, Horry County, S.C. (SAN) 7-16 Socorro Diversion Channel, Tributaries of Rio Grande, N. Mex. (SWA) 32-14 Soddy Daisy, Tenn. Repair (ORN) 15-19 Soldier River, Ute, Iowa (MRO) 26-23 Soldiers and Palmetto Creek, Ala. (SAM) 10-49 Soleduck River Bridge, Wash. (NPS) 38-26 Somerville Lake, Tex. (SWF) 30-10, 30-17, 30-20 Sonoma Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-34 Sope Creek, Marietta, Ga. (SAM) 10-17, 10-34, 10-45 Souris River, Velva, N. Dak. (NCS) 24-17, 24-24 Souris River Basin, N. Dak. (NCS) 24-17, 24-24 South Amsterdam, Mohawk River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 South Bank Arkansas River, (Head Fourche Island to Pennington Bayou), Ark. (SWL) 28-17 South Bank Arkansas River, Little Rock to Pin Bluff, Ark. Tucker Lakes (SWL) 28-17 South Beardstown and Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 23-14, 23-16 South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 23-14 South Beloit, Ill. (NCR) 23-15 South Bristol Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 South Channel, Goverment Island, Oreg. (NPP) 37-37 South Coventry Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-45 South Creek, Martinburg, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 South Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 South Ellenville, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 South Fork, Boise River, Idaho (NPW) 39-15 South Fork, Bon Secour River, Ala. (SAM) 10-49 South Fork, Ewing, Nebr. (MRO) 26-23 South Fork Catawba River, Cramerton, N.C. (SAW) 6-31 South Fork, Clearwater River, Kooskia-Stites, Idaho (NPW) 39-12, 39-15, 39-16 South Fork of Cumberland River, Ky. (ORN) 15-13 -63 South Fork of the Santa Clara River, Calif. (SPL) 33-26 South Haven Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-23, 21-40, 21-53 South Mesquite, Mesquite, Tex. (SWF) 30-23 South Milwaukee Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 21-57 South Orange, NJ. (NAN) 2-36 South Platte River, Adams County, Colo. (MRO) 26-6 South Platte River, Adams County, No. Washington St., Water and Sanitary Dist., Colo. (MRO) 26-19 South Platte River Basin, Colo. (MRO) 26-14 South Platte River, Commerce City, Colo. (1-270) (MRO) 26-23 South Platte River, Commerce City, Colo. (I-76) (MRO) 26-23 South Platte River, Commerce City, Colo. (State Hwy 244) (MRO) 26-23 South Platte River, lift, Colo. (MRO) 26-19 South Platte River, Kersey, Colo. (MRO) 26-19 South Platte River Levees and Channel Improvements, Chatfield Lake to Ft. Morgan, Colo. (MRO) 26-16 South Platte River, Merino, Colo. (MRO) 26-19 South Platte River, Platteville, Colo. (MRO) 26-19 South Plymouth Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-41 South Point, Ohio (ORH) 17-21 South Portsmouth, Ky. (ORH) 17-21 South Prairie Creek, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 South Quincy, Ill. (NCR) 23-8 South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 23-5, 23-11, 23-14, 23-16 South River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 South River, Conway, Mass. (NED) 1-43, 1-49 South River Drainage District, Mo. (NCR) 23-14, 23-16 South Scenic Rd., Buffalo Twp., Penn. (ORP) 18-26 South Slough (Charleston), Oreg. (NPP) 37-37 South St. Paul, Minn. (NCS) 24-33 South Table Creek, Nebraska City, Neb. (MRO) 26-23 South Tunbridge Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-45 South Williamson, Ky. (ORH) 17-23 Southeast Missouri Port, Missouri (LMS) 14-3, 14-8, 14-10 Southern Branch, Va. (NAO) 5-16 Southern New York Flood Control Projects (NAB) 4-14, 4-36 Southport Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Southport Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-39 Southwest Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-39 Southwestern Jefferson County, Ky. (ORL) 16-4, 16-13 Sowashee Creek, Meridian, Miss. (SAM) 10-17, 10-34, 10-45, 10-48 Spanish Fork River, Utah (SPK) 35-36 Spanish Oak Creek, Cedar Park, Tex. (SWF) 30-23 Spewrell Bluff Lake, Ga. (SAM) 10-48 Spicket River, Salem, N.H. (NED) 1-47 Spokane, Wash. (NAS) 38-9, 38-17, 38-21, 38-28 Spring City, Tenn. (ORN) 15-19 Spring Lake, NJ. (NAN) 2-39 Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 23-14, 23-16. Springdale, Mass. (NED) 1-43, 1-49 Springfield, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-43, 1-47, 1-49 Springfield, S.D., Water Intake (MRO) 26-17 Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, Conn. (NED) 1-43, 1-50 Squaw Chute at Quincy, Ill. (NCR) 23-12 Squirrel Creek, Okla. (SWT) 29-21 Squirrel Hollow, Okla. (SWT) 29-21 St. Albans Harbor, Lake Champlain, Vt. (NAN) 2-35 St. Anthony Falls, Lower Lock and Dam, Minn. (NCD) 25-5 St. Anthony Falls, Upper Lock, Minn. (NCD) 25-5 St. Augustine Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-15, 9-29, 9-46 St. Catherines Sound, Md. (NAB) 4-10, 4-26, 4-34 St. Claire River, Channels, Mich. (NCE) 21-58 St. Claire River Compensating Works, Mich. (NCE) 21-57 St. Clair River, Mich. (NCE) 21-20, 21-39, 21-51, 21-58 St. Croix, River, Maine (NED) 1-39 St. Croix River, Minn. and Wis. (NCS) 24-27 St. Francis and L'Anguille Rivers and Blackfish Bayou, Ark. (LMM) 13-4 St. Francis Basin, Ark. and Mo. (MR+T) 42-8, 42-30 St. Francis River and Basin, Ark. and Mo. (MR+T) 42-18 St. Francis River, Highway 90, Ark. (LMM) 13-5 St. Georges Island, Ark. (NPA) 40-13 St. Georges Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37, 4-41 St. James, Beaver Island, Mich. (NCE) 21-55 St. James Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-60 St. Jeromes Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-11, 4-26, 4-34 St. Johns Bayou, Mo. (MR+T) 42-12 St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway (MR+T) 42-30 1-64 INDEX St. Johns County, Fla. (SAJ) 9-41 St. Johns River, Fla., Jacksonville to Lake Harney (SAJ) 9-15, 9-29, 9-37, 9-46 St. Johns River and Tributaries and Withlacoochee, Kissimmee, and Crystal Rivers, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46 St. Jones River, Del. (NAP) 3-24, 3-25 St. Joseph Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-21, 21-39, 21-51 St. Joseph River, Mich. (NCE) 21-55 St. Louis County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 St. Louis District (NCD) 25-3 St. Louis, levees, costs (MR+T) 42-62 St. Lucie Inlet, Fla. (SAJ) 9-15, 9-29, 9-37, 9-46 St. Maries, Idaho (NAS) 38-26 St. Marks River, Fla. (SAM) 10-47, 10-50 St. Marys, (Allegheny River Basin) Pa. (ORP) 18-21 St. Marys, W. Va. (ORH) 17-22 St. Marys River, Ga. and Fla., and North River, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 St. Marys River (MacArthur Lock Guard Gates), Mich. (NCE) 21-57 St. Marys River, Mich. (NCE) 21-21, 21-40, 21-52, 21-56 St. Michael Canal, Alaska (NPA) 40-12 St. Michaels Harbor, Md. (NAB) 40-37 St. Patricks Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 St. Paul, Minn. (NCS) 24-18, 24-24, 24-33 St. Paul and South St. Paul, Minn. (NCS) 24-28 St. Paul District (NCD) 25-3, 25-4 St. Paul Harbor, Ark. (NPA) 40-8 St. Paul Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 25-10 St. Paul Island, Ark. (NPA) 40-4, 40-11 St. Peters Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-37 St. Petersburg Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46, 9-47 St. Thomas Harbor, V.I. (SAJ) 9-47 Stamford, Conn. (NED) 1-20, 1-23, 1-31, 1-37, 1-39 Stamford Barrier, Conn. (NED) 1-23 Stamford Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Starlings Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-19, 5-21 Startup, Wash. (NAS) 38-26 State Highway 156, Okla. (SWT) 29-21 State Road and Ebner Coulees, Wis. (NCS) 24-17, 24-24, 24-28 Staten Island, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co. Bridge Across Arthur Kill, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Ste. Genevieve, Mo. (LMS) 14-11 Ste. Genevieve County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Stebbins, Ark. (NPA) 40-13 Steinhatchee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Stikine River, Alaska (NPA) 40-4, 40-8, 40-11 Stillaguamish River, Wash. (NPS) 38-9, 38-17, 38-22 38-27, 38-28, 38-29 Stillhouse Hollow Dam, Tex. (SWF) 30-10, 30-17, 30-20 Stillwater and Whitefish Rivers, Mont. (NPS) 38-27 Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, Pa. (NAB) 4-18, 4-28, 4-36 Stillwater River, Mont. (NPS) 38-27 Stillwell Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Stockton and Mormon Channels, Calif. (SPK) 35-33 Stockton Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-40 Stockton Lake, Sac River, Mo. (MRK) 27-8, 27-11, 27-15, 27-19 Stone Harbor, N.J. (NAP) 3-26 Stonehouse Creek, Jefferson Co., Kan. (MRK) 27-16 Stoner Creek, Ky. (ORL) 16-30 Stonewall Jackson Lake, W. Va. (ORP) 18-7, 18-13, 18-18, 18-25 Stonington Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-40, 1-45, 1-46 Stonington Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-40, 1-45, 1-53 Stony Brook, Wilton, N.H. (NED) 1-43 Stony Creek, Branford, Conn. (NED) 1-40 Stratford, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Streambank Erosion under Special Attention (SAN) 7-7 320 Street N. Rock River, Rock Island, Ill. (NCR) 23-17 Strington, Ft. Chartres and Ivy Landing, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Strong Creek, Idaho (NPS) 38-27 Strube Lake - Cougar Additional Unit, (South Fork McKenzie) (Modification to Cougar Lake) Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Stuart, Ill. (NCR) 23-17 Stuart, Va. (SAW) 6-13, 6-20 Stuart Gulch Dam, Boise, Idaho (NPW) 39-14, 39-16 Stumpy Point Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Sturgeon Bay and Lake Michigan Ship Canal, Wis. (NCE) 21-24, 21-41, 21-53 Sturgeon Point, Evans, N.Y. (NCB) 20-11, 20-33 Sturgis, Ky. (ORL) 16-19, 16-24, 16-29 Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1 and Bay 1-65 Island Drainage and Levee District No. 1, Ill. (NCR) 23-14, 23-16 Sucker Brook Dam, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-43, 1-48 Sudbury River, Mass. (NED) 1-24 Sugar Creek, Bellbrook, Ohio (ORL) 16-31 Sugar Creek, Valdosta, Ga. (SAJ) 9-54 Sugar Creek Levee, Ind. (ORL) 16-21 Sugar Creek Levee, Ill. (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-25 Sugar Hill Reservoir, N.H. (NED) 1-45 Suisun Bay Channel, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-8, 35-33 Suisun Channel, Calif. (SPK) (SPN) 34-8, 35-33 Suisun Point Channel, Calif. (SPK) 35-33 Sullivan Falls Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-40 Sullivan Run, Butler, Penn. (ORP) 18-26 Sulphur Branch, Euless, Tex. (SWF) 30-23 Sulphur Creek, Heber Springs, Ark. (SWL) 28-25 Sulphur River, Ark. and Tex. (LMN) 11-17 Sulphur River Levees, Tex. (SWF) 30-22 Sultan, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Summersville Lake, Ohio River Basin, W. Va. (ORH) 17-9, 17-15, 17-19 Sumner Parker Airport, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Sumpawanus (Babylon Creek) Inlet, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Sun Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-48 Sun River, Great Falls, Mont. (MRO) 26-18 Sunbright, Tenn. (Whiteoak Creek) (ORN) 15-19 Sunbury, Pa. (NAB) 4-39, 4-42 Sunken Vessel Removal 51-1 Sunrise Park, Lake Bluff, Ind. (NCC) 22-6 Sunset Harbor (Bolsa Chica Bay), Calif. 33-23 Supervision of New York Harbor (Prevention of Obstruction and Injurious Deposits) (NAN) 2-15 Supervision of Norfolk Harbor (Prevention of Obstruction and Injurious Deposits) (NAO) 5-7 Supervisor of New York Harbor (NAN) 2-25, 2-32 Surry Mountain Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-15, 1-23, 1-29, 1-48 Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters (NCE) 21-28, 21-41 Surveys Alaska District (NPA) 40-7 Albuquerque, N. Mex., District (SWA) 32-10 Baltimore, Md., District (NAB) 4-22 Buffalo, N.Y., District (NCB) 20-16 Chicago, Ill., District (NCC) 22-8 Detroit, Mich., District (NCE) 21-30 Fort Worth, Tex., District (SWF) 30-13 Galveston, Tex., District (SWG) 31-13 Huntington, W. Va., District (ORH) 17-11 Jacksonville, Fla., District (SAJ) 9-25 Kansas City, Mo., District (MRK) 27-20 Little Rock, Ark., District (SWL) 28-10 Los Angeles, Calif., District (SPL) 33-9 Louisville, Ky., District (ORL) 16-12 Memphis, Tenn., District (LMM) 13-2, 13-6 Mississippi River Commission (MR+T) 42-46 Mobile, Ala., District (SAM) 10-27 Nashville, Tenn., District (ORN) 15-1, 15-8 New England Division (NED) 1-24 New Orleans District (LMN) 11-20 New York District (NAN) 2-37 Norfolk, Va., District (NAO) 5-10, 5-14 Omaha, Nebr., District (MRO) 26-21 Pacific Ocean Division (POD) 36-5 Philadelphia, Penn., District (NAP) 3-14 Pittsburgh, Penn., District (ORP) 18-10 Portland, Oreg., District (NPP) 37-7, 37-21 Rock Island, Ill., District (NCR) 23-6 Sacramento, Calif., District (SPK) 35-22 San Francisco, Calif., District (SPN) 34-5 Savannah, Ga., District (SAS) 8-9 Seattle, Wash., District (NPS) 38-11 St. Louis, Mo., District (LMS) 14-16 St. Paul, Minn., District (NCS) 24-21, 24-35 Tulsa, Okla., District (SWT) 29-10, 29-22 Vicksburg, Miss., District (LMK) 12-22 Walla Walla, Wash., District (NPW) 39-7 Wilmington, N.C., District (SAW) 6-17 Susquehanna Basin at Harrisburg, Pa. (NAB) 4-22 Susquehanna River above and below Havre De Grace, Md. (NAB) 4-38 Susquehanna River at Williamsport, Pa. (NAB) 4-38 Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects, N.Y. and Pa. (NAB) 4-18, 4-36 Sutton Lake, Ohio River Basin, W. Va. (ORH) 17-9, 17-15, 17-19 Suwannee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-47 Swan Creek, Toledo, Ohio (NCB) 20-39 Swan Creek Bank Stabilization, Taney County, Mo. (SWL) 28-17 Swanton Harbor, Vt. (NAN) 2-38 Sweetwater Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Sweetwater River, Sweetwater River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-7, 33-14, 33-22 I-66 INDEX Swift Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Swift Creek, Pitt and Craven Counties, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Swinomish Channel, Wash. (NPS) 38-6, 38-16, 38-21 Swoyersville, and Forty Fort, Pa. (NAB) 4-39, 4-42 Sykesville, Pa. (ORP) 18-20 Syracuse, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 Syracuse, Oswego River Basin, N.Y. (NCB) 20-37 T Table Rock Lake, Mo. (SWL) 28-10, 28-13, 28-24 Tacoma, Puyallup River, Wash. (NPS) 38-9, 38-17, 38-22 Tacoma Harbor, Wash. (NPS) 38-24 Tahlequah Creek (SWT) 29-21 Tahola, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Talkeetna River, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Tallabinella Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-17, 10-34, 10-45 Tallahala Creek Dam, Pascagoula River, Miss. (SAM) 10-18, 10-34, 10-45 Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers, Miss. (LMK) 12-15 Tallapoosa River, Ala. (SAM) 10-47 Tallow Hill, Ga. (SAS) 8-16 Talofofo Bay Shore Protection, Guam (POD) 36-13 Tama, Iowa (NCR) 23-17 Tamaqua, Pa. (NAP) (NAB) 3-26, 4-22, 4-29, 4-36 Tampa and Hillsborough Bays, Fla. (SAJ) 9-38 Tampa Harbor, Fla. (SAJ) 9-17, 9-29, 9-38, 9-39 Tampa Harbor Branch Channels (SAJ) 9-40 Tampa Harbor East Bay Channel (SAJ) 9-40 Tangeman, Little Nemaha River, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Tangier Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-7, 5-13, 5-17 Tangier Island Shore Protection (NAO) 5-8, 5-13, 5-17 Tangipahoa River, La. (LMN) 11-17 Tanque Verde Creek, Tucson, Ariz. (SPL) 33-28 Tar River, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Tar River and Tributaries, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Tar River, Princeville, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Tarentum, Pa. (ORP) 18-20 Tarrytown Harbor, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Taskinas Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Tau-Faleaso, Tau Island, American Samoa (POD) 36-14 Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa (POD) 36-10 Taunton River, Mass. (NED) 1-40 Tawas Bay Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-55, 21-60 Tawas City, Mich. (NCE) 21-26 Taylor Point, Bourne, Mass. (NED) 1-46 Taylors Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 31-12, 31-17, 31-28 Taylorsville, Ky. (Salt River) (ORL) 16-19, 16-24, 16-29 Taylorsville Lake, Ky. (ORL) 16-10, 16-16 Teche-Vermilion Basins, La. (MR+T) 42-14, 42-30 Telegraph Canyon Creek, Chula Vista, Calif. (SPL) 33-8, 33-14, 33-22 Tell City, Ind. (ORL) 16-19, 16-24, 16-29 Temple Creek, Elk Creek, Penn. (NCB) 20-39 Ten Mile Creek, De Sota, Tex. (SWF) 30-23 Ten Mile Creek, Duncanville, Tex. (SWF) 30-23 Tenants Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-40 Tenkiller Ferry Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 28-22, 29-9, 29-16, 29-18, 29-20 Tenmile Creek at Marianna, Pa. (ORP) 18-20 Tennessee River, Tenn., Ala., and Ky. (ORN) 15-3, 15-9, 15-11, 15-17, 15-18 Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, Ala. and Miss. (ORN) (SAM) 10-13, 10-33, 10-43, 10-53, 15-4, 15-9,15-12 Tennessee-Tombigbee Wildlife Mitigation (SAM) 10-44 Tensas Basin, Ark. and La. (MR+T) 42-6, 42-15, 42-30 Tensas River and Bayou, Macon, La. (LMK) 12-15 Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge (MR+T) 42-30 Terrain Analysis Center 51-1 Terre Haute, Ind. (ORL) 16-21 Terre Haute, Ind. (Conover Levee) (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-19, 16-29 Terre Noire Creek, Ark. (LMK) 12-17 Terry, David D., Lock and Dam, Ark. (SWL) 28-19 Teton River, Idaho (NPW) 39-12, 39-16 Texas City and Vicinity, Tex., Hurricane-Flood Protection (SWG) 31-12, 31-17, 31-28 Texas City Channel, Tex. (SWG) 31-7, 31-16, 31-26, 31-32, 31-39 Thames River, Conn. (NED) 1-40, 1-45 Thames River Basin, Conn., R.I., and Mass. (NED) 1-21, 1-23, 1-52 Thatcher Brook, Hill Street Bridge, Gowanda, N.Y. (NCB) 20-39 The Dalles Lock and Dam-Lake Celilo, Wash. and Oreg. (NPP) 37-21, 37-28, 37-36, 37-47 I-67 The Island Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-45 The Jump-New Orleans, La. (MR+T) 42-11 The Water Resources Support Center 47-1 Thebes-Rock Island, Ill. (MR+T) 42-12 Thimble Shoal Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-6, 5-13, 5-17 Thirty Mile Creek, Harlem, Mont. (MRO) 26-23 Thomas Basin, Ketchiken, Ark. (NPA) 40-5, 40-9, 40-11 Thomaston Dam, Conn. (NED) 1-18, 1-30, 1-50 Thoroughfare Swamp, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Three Forks, Mont. (MRO) 26-18 Three Islands Reservoir, Tenn. (ORN) 15-14 Three Mile Creek, Mobile, Ala. (SAM) 10-18, 10-28, 10-34, 10-45 Three Rivers, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-43, 1-49 Three Rivers, Tex. (SWG) 31-31 Thumpertown Beach, Eastham, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Thurman-Hamburg Levee (MRO) 26-18 Tickfaw, Natalbany, Ponchatoula, and Blood Rivers, La. (LMN) 11-17 Ticonderoga River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-38 Tijuana River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Tilghman Island Harbor, Md. (NAB) 4-38, 4-41 Tillamook Bay and Bar, Oreg. (NPP) 37-8, 37-25, 37-33, 37-42 Timber Creek, Double Oak, Tex. (SWF) 30-23 Tinker Creek and Tributaries, Va. (SAW) 6-31 Tioga-Hammond Lakes, Pa. (NAB) 4-19, 4-28 Tionesta Lake, Ohio River Basin, Pa. (ORP) 18-8, 18-13, 18-18, 18-25 Tiptonville-Obion River (MR+T) 42-12, 42-29 Tishtony Creek, Mantachie, Miss. (SAM) 10-49 Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam, Ark. (SWL) 28-4, 28-19 Tocks Island Lake, Pa., N.J., and N.Y. (NAP) 3-27 Tocks Island (Relocation of U.S. Route 209 only), Pa. (NAP) 3-27 Todd Swamp, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Toledo Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 20-10, 20-20, 20-32 Tolovana River, Alaska (NPA) 40-13 Tolu, Ky. (ORL) 16-21, 16-26 Tom Jenkins Dam, Ohio River Basin, Ohio (ORH) 17-19 Tom Jenkins Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, Ohio (ORH) 17-10, 17-14 Tomahawk Lake, Blue River, Kan. (MRK) 27-17 Tomanovich-Salmon City, Idaho (NPW) 39-12, 39-15 Tombigbee River, (East Fork) Miss. and Ala. (SAM) 10-19, 10-34, 10-45 Tombigbee River at Columbus Port, Miss. (SAM) 10-13, 10-33, 10-43 Tombigbee River Tributaries, Miss. and Ala. (SAM) 10-19, 10-34, 10-45 Toms River, NJ. (NAP) 3-24, 3-27 Tongue Point, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Tongue River Lake, N. Dak. (NCS) 24-28 Topeka, Kansas River, Kan. (MRK) 27-16, 27-19 Toppenish/Simcoe Creek, Wash. (NPS) 38-29 Topsail Beach and Surf City, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 Toronto Lake, Kan. (SWL) (SWT) 28-22, 29-8, 29-15, 29-18, 29-20 Torrington, East Branch, Conn. (NED) 1-32, 1-43, 1-50 Torringon, West Branch, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-43, 1-50 Totuskey Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Touchet River, Waitsburg, Wash. (NPW) 39-15, 39-16, 39-17 Toulmins Spring Branch, Pritchard, Ala. (SAM) 10-49 Toussaint River, Carrol Twsp, Ohio (NCB) 20-38 Towanda Lake, Kan. (SWT) 29-19 Town Beach, Plymouth, Mass. (NED) 1-41 Town Beaches, Conn. (NED) 1-46 Town Bluff Dam-B. A. Steinhagen Lake, Tex. (SWF) 30-12, 30-17, 30-20 Town Bluff Hydropower, Tex. (SWF) 30-12, 30-17, 30-20 Town Branch Creek, Lockhart, Tex. (SWF) 30-23 Town Brook, Quincy and Braintree, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-32, 1-37 Town Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-38 Town Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-6, 7-9, 7-12 Town Creek, Americus, Ga. (SAM) 10-48 Town Creek, Harrodsburg, Ky. (ORL) 16-19 Town Neck Beach, Sandwich, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Town River Bay, Mass. (NED) 1-24 Townsend Inlet and Seven Mile Beach, N.J. (NAP) 3-26 Townshend Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-15, 1-29, 1-48 Trabuco Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-27 Trace Creek, Waverly Park, Tenn. (ORN) 15-19 Tradewater River, Ky. (ORL) 16-18 Tranquitas Creek, Kingsville, Tex. (SWG) 31-31 Tranters Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-28 I-68 Trask River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Treasure Island, Mo. (LMM) 13-5 Treatment of Yuba River Debris Situation-Restraining Barriers Calif. (CDC) 53-2, 53-5 Tred Avon River, Md. (NAB) 4-11, 4-26, 4-34 Trempealeau River at Arcadia, Wis. (NCS) 24-33, 24-34 Trent River, N.C. (SAW) 6-25, 6-27, 6-28 Trenton Lake, Thompson River, Mo. (MRK) 27-16 Trexler Lake, Pa. (NAP) 3-27 Tributaries and Canals of Boeuf River (MR+T) 42-16 Tributary of Kill Creek, DeSoto, Kan., Sewage Treatment Plant (MRK) 27-21 Trim Cane Creek, Miss. (SAM) 10-48 Trimble, James W., L&D (No. 13) Ark. (SWL) 28-20 Trinidad Lake, Colo. (SWA) 32-7, 32-11 Trinity River and Tributaries, Tex. (SWG) 31-6, 31-8, 31-27, 31-32, 31-39 Trinity River Project, Tex. (SWF) 30-2, 30-15, 30-21 Triplett Creek, Morehead, Ky. (Licking River) (ORL) 16-19, 16-30 Tri-Pond Levee, Ill. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Tri-Pond Levee, Ill. (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-25 Trout Brook, Dover, Mass. (NED) 1-47 Troublesome Creek, Hindman, Ky. (ORL) 16-30 Troy, Ind. (ORL) 16-21, 16-25 Truckee Meadows, Nev. (SPK) 35-23, 35-30 Truckee River and Tributaries, Calif. and Nev. (SPK) 35-34 Truman, Harry S., Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, Mo. (MRK) 27-8, 27-11, 27-15, 27-16, 27-19 Trumbull Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-43 Trussville, Ala. (SAM) 10-48 Truth or Consequences (Hot Springs) Unit, N. Mex. (SWA) 32-6, 32-11, 32-13, 32-14 Tualatin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Tucannon River, Camp Wooten, Wash. (NPW) 39-14 Tucannon River, Wooten, Wash. (NPW) 39-15, 39-17 Tuckahoe River, Md. (NAB) 4-38 Tucker Creek, Conway, Ark. (SWL) 28-25 Tuckerton Creek, NJ. (NAP) 3-24 Tug and Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, W. Va., Va., and Ky. (ORN) 15-5, 15-9 Tully Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-16, 1-23, 1-29, 1-48 Tulsa and West Tulsa Levee, Okla. (SWT) 29-19, 29-20, 29-21 Turkey Creek, Okla. (SWT) 29-21 Turkey Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Turkey River, Jefferson Township, Iowa (NCR) 23-17 Turner Creek, Corinth, Miss. (LMM) 13-5 Turner Prairie, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Turning Basin Extension (SWG) 31-36 Turpentine Run, St. Thomas, V. I. (SAJ) 9-54 Turnout Channels, E. Side of Main Channel (SWG) 31-36 Turnout Channels, W. Side of Main Channel (SWG) 31-36 Tutuila Island Canneries to Breakers Pt., American Samoa (POD) 36-6 Tutuilla Creek, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Turtle Creek, Pa. (ORP) 18-20 Turtle Creek Channel Improvement, Yukon, Okla. (SWT) 29-19 Tuskahoma Lake, Okla. (SWT) 29-19 Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, Kan. (MRK) 27-6, 27-11, 27-15, 27-19 Tuttle Creek Lake Road and Bridge, Kan. (MRK) 27-16, 27-19 Tuttle Creek Lake (Road Improvement), Kan. (MRK) 27-17, 27-19 Twelvemile Bayou, La. (LMN) (LMK) 11-19, 12-20, 12-21 Twenty Mile Creek, Airport Rd. Bridge, Frankstown, Miss. (SAM) 10-48 Twin Valley Lake, Wild Rice River, Minn. (NGS) 24-18, 24-24 Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare, Md. (NAB) 4-11, 4-26, 4-34 Two Harbors, Minn. (NCE) 21-24, 21-41, 21-53 Two Rivers Dam, N. Mex. (SWA) 32-8, 32-12 Two Rivers Harbor, Wis. (NCE) 21-24, 21-41, 21-53 Tyaskin Creek, Md. (NAB) 4-38 Tybee Island, Ga. (SAS) 8-6, 8-11, 8-14 Tygart Lake, W. Va. (ORP) 18-3, 18-11, 18-16 Tygart River, Phillipi, W. Va. (ORP) 18-26 Tylers Beach, Va. (NAO) 5-19, 5-21 Tyrone, Pa. (NAB) 4-39 U Umatilla Harbor, Oreg. (NPP) 37-37 Umatilla River (Echo), Oreg. (NPP) (NPW) 37-40, 37-41, 39-15 Umpqua River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-8, 37-25, 37-33 I-69 I1 JJLA Unadilla, N.Y. (NAB) 4-39, 4-42 Union City, Penn. (ORP) 18-25 Union City Dam, Pa. (ORP) 18-8, 18-13, 18-18 Union Lake, Mo. (LMS) 14-15 Union River, Maine (NED) 1-40 Union Township Drainage District, Mo. (NCR) 23-14 Union Village Dam, Vt. (NED) 1-16, 1-29, 1-48 Uniontown, Ky. (ORL) 16-19, 16-24, 16-29 Uniontown, Penn. (ORP) 18-20 Uniontown, Penn. (Monongahela River Basin) (ORP) 18-24 Uniontown Locks and Dam, Ky. (ORL) 19-9 University Wash and Spring Brook, Riverside, Calif. (SPL) 33-27 Unnamed Tributary to Pymatuning (ORP) 18-26 Upper Chipola River, Fla., from Mariana to its mouth (SAM) 10-47 Upper Gordons Creek, Hattiesburg, Miss. (SAM) 10-49 Upper Grand River, Mo. (MRK) 27-16 Upper Grays River Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-38 Upper Iowa River, Iowa (NCS) 24-28 Upper Little Arkansas River, Kan. (SWT) 29-19 Upper Machodoc Creek, Va. (NAB) 4-38 Upper Marlboro, Md. (NAB) 4-39, 4-42 Upper Mississippi River Environmental Management Program (LMS) 14-6 Upper Mississippi River Environmental Management Program, Ill., Iowa, Minn., Mo., Wis. (NCR) 23-3, 23-7, 23-10 Upper Pointe Coupee Loop Area (MR+T) 42-13 Upper River Rouge, Mich. (NCE) 21-56 Upper Thorofare, Md. (NAB) 4-38 Upper White Oak Bayou, Tex. (SWG) 31-7, 31-12, 31-28 Upper White River, Ark. (SWL) 18-16 Upper Zacate Creek, Loredo, Tex. (SWF) 30-23 Urban Areas at Alton, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Urbanna Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-19 U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory 44-1, 44-2 U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratory 43-1 U.S. Army Engineer Topographic Laboratories 46-1 U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station 45-1 U.S. Highway 51, Tenn. (LMM) 13-5 Utica, Ind. (ORL) 16-22, 16-26 Utica, Ohio (ORH) 17-21, 17-23 V Vaipito Stream, American Samoa (POD) 36-15 Valdez Harbor, Alaska (NPA) 40-12, 40-14 Valley City Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Valley Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 23-16 Valleyview, Ill. (NCC) 22-8 Van Buren, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 28-17 Van Meter, Iowa (NCR) 23-14, 23-16 Vanceburg, Ky. (ORH) 17-21 Vancouver Lake Area, Wash. (NPP) 37-39 Vatia Area, American Samoa (POD) 36-11 Vaughn, Mont. (MRO) 26-16, 26-18 Velva, N. Dak. (NCS) 24-28, 24-33 Ventnor, Margate and Longport, N.J. (NAP) 3-26 Ventura Harbor, Calif. (SPL) 33-4, 33-12, 33-20, 33-28 Ventura-Pierpont Area, Calif. (SPL) 33-24 Ventura River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Verdigris River, Kan. (SWT) 29-21 Vermilion Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 20-35 Vermillion River and Tribs., S. Dak. (MRO) 26-17 Vermillion River, Hastings, Minn. (NCS) 24-28, 24-33 Vermillion River, Pontiac, Ill. (NCR) 23-17 Vermillion River, Vermilion (MRO) 26-19 Verona Lake, Va. (NAB) 4-39 Veteran's Memorial Levee, Mississippi River, Hastings, Minn. (NCS) 24-28, 24-33 Vevay, Ind. (ORL) 16-22, 16-25 Vicinity of Nehalem, Oreg. (NPP) 37-40 Vicksburg District, Bank Revetments and Dikes, Mississippi River (MR+T) 42-36 Vicksburg District, Bank Revetments and Dikes, Red River (MR+T) 42-39 Vicksburg District, Channel Improvements (FY 1988) (MR+T) 42-53 Vicksburg District, levees (MR+T) 42-48, 42-62 Vicksburg Harbor, Miss. (MR+T) 42-11, 42-30, 42-31 Vicksburg Lake View, Miss. (MR+T) 42-11 Victory Lake, Vt. (NED) 1-45 Villa Park Dam, Calif. (SPL) 33-27 I-70 INDEX Village Creek, Birmingham, Ala. (SAM) 10-19, 10-34, 10-45 Village Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Village Creek, Jackson-Lawrence Counties, Ark. (SWL) 28-17 Village Creek, White River, and Mayberry Levee District, Ark. (SWL) 28-17 Village of New Athens, Ill. (LMS) 14-15 Village of Saxtons, Vt. (NED) 1-43 Vince and Little Vince Bayous, Tex. (SWG) 31-13, 31-17, 31-28 Vincennes, Ind. (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-19, 16-20, 16-22, 16-24, 16-26, 16-29 Vineyard Haven, Mass. (NED) 1-40 Vinton Waterway, La. (LMN) 11-17 Virginia Beach, Va. (NAO) 5-8, 5-14, 5-17 Virginia Beach Streams Canal Number 2, Va. (NAO) 5-9, 5-14, 5-17 Virginia Key and Key Biscayne, Fla. (SAJ) 9-48 Volga, Iowa (NCR) 23-16 W W. Br. Limeston Creek, Manlius, N.Y. (NCB) 20-39 W.D. Mayo L and D (No. 14) (SWL) 28-20, 29-20 W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N.C. (SAW) 6-14, 6-17, 6-20 W.P. Franklin Lock & Dam (SAJ) 9-49 Wabash River, Ind. (ORL) 16-27, 16-30, 16-31 Wabash Railroad Bridges, Illinois River, Meredosia, and Valley City, Ill. (LMS) 14-13 Wabash River Basin, Ind., Ill., and Ohio (ORL) 16-18 Wabasha Harbor, Minn. (NCD) 25-7, 25-10 Waccamaw River, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Waccamaw River and Seven Creeks, N.C. and S.C. (SAN) (SAW) 6-27, 7-14 Waco Lake, Tex. (SWF) 30-10, 30-21 Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District No. 1, Wash. (NPP) 37-38, 37-44 Wahkiakum County Diking District 4, Wash. (NPP) 37-39, 37-44 Waianae Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii (POD) 36-10 Waiawa Stream, Oahu, Hawaii (POD) 36-15 Waikiki Beach, Oahu, Hawaii (POD) 36-11 Wailoa Stream and Tributaries, Hawaii, Hawaii (POD) 36-12, 36-15 Waimea Beach, Kauai, Hawaii (POD) 36-13 Waimea River, Kauai, Hawaii (POD) 36-5, 36-8, 36-15 Wake Island Harbor, Wake Island (POD) 36-13 Waldo Lake Tunnel and Reregulating Works, Oreg. (NPP) 37-45 Waldport, Oreg. (NPP) 37-43 Wallabout Channel, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35 Wallace, W. Va. (ORP) 18-20 Wallace Channel, Pamlico Sound, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Wallace Lake, La. (LMK) 12-16, 12-19, 12-20, 12-21 Wallis Sands State Beach, Rye, N.H. (NED) 1-41 Wallisville Lake, Tex. (SWG) 31-9 Wallkill River, N.Y. (NAN) 2-39 Wallowa River, Weaver Bridge, Oreg. (NPW) 39-15 Walluski River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-38 Walnut Bottom Run, Beaver Falls, Penn. (ORP) 18-26 Walnut Creek, Calif. (SPK) 35-18, 35-27 Walnut Creek, Clive, Iowa (NCR) 23-17 Walnut Creek, Hood County, Tex. (SWF) 30-23 Walnut Creek, Sequin, Tex. (SWF) 30-23 Walnut Creek Tribs., Austin, Tex. (SWF) 30-23 Walnut River, Kan. (SWT) 29-21 Walter, Francis E. Dam, Pa. (NAP) (NAB) 3-17, 3-22, 4-20, 4-22, 4-29, 4-36 Walter F. George Lock and Dam, Ala. and Ga. (SAM) 10-26, 10-35, 10-46 Wapello Co., Iowa (NCR) 23-17 Wappinger Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35, 2-36 Ware, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-43, 1-49 Wareham Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-40 Wareham-Marion, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Wares Creek, Bradenton, Fla. (SAJ) 9-54 Warner Rd., St. Paul, Minn. (NCS) 24-33 Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, Minn. (NCS) 24-28 Warren River, R.I. (NED) 1-40 Warrenton Diking Districts 1, 2, and 3, Oreg. (NPP) 37-38, 37-43 Warroad Harbor and River, Minn. (NCS) 24-2, 24-22, 24-26, 24-30 Warroad River and Bulldog Creek, Minn. (NCS) 24-30 Warsaw Harbor, Ill. (NCD) 25-8 Warwick Cove, R.I. (NED) 1-40 Warwick River, Md. (NAB) 4-38 Warwood, W. Va. (OPR) 18-21 1-71 Washington, D.C. and Vicinity (NAB) 4-22, 4-39 Washington, Pa. (ORP) 18-20 Washington Aqueduct (NAB) 4-21 Washington Canal and South River, NJ. (NAN) 2-35 Washington Harbor, D.C. (NAB) 4-12, 4-26, 4-35 Washington Island, Wis. (NCE) 21-55 Washington Island (Harbors at Wisconsin) (NCE) 21-60 Washita River, Okla. (SWT) 29-21 Washougal Area Levees, Wash. (NPP) 37-39 Water Resources Support Center (WRSC) 47-1 Water Valley, Ark. and Mo. (SWL) 28-18 Water Works, Park and Pool, Wellsburg, W. Va. (ORP) 18-26 Waterbury, Conn. (NED) 1-23 Waterbury, Vt. (NAN) 2-38 Waterbury Reservoir, Vt. (NAN) 2-36 Waterbury-Watertown, Conn. (NED) 1-43, 1-50 Wateree River, S.C. (SAN) 7-14 Waterford, N.Y. (NAN) 2-38 Waterloo, Elkhorn River, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 Waterloo, Iowa (Bridges) (NCR) 23-14, 23-16 Waterloo, Nebr. (MRO) 26-16 Waterman Creek, O'Brien Co., Iowa (MRO) 26-23 Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, S.C. (SAW) 6-9, 6-19, 6-23, 6-29 Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, Wash. (NPS) 38-24 Waterway Connecting Swanquarter Bay with Deep Bay, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Waterway from Empire, La., to Gulf of Mexico (LMN) 11-17 Waterway from Indian River Inlet to Rehoboth Bay, Del. (NAP) 3-24 Waterway from Intracoastal Waterway to Bayou Dulac, La. (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, La.) (LMN) 11-5, 11-11, 11-14 Waterway from Little Choptank River to Choptank River, Md. (NAB) 4-40 Waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, La. (LMN) 11-17 Waterway-Norfolk, Va. to Sounds of N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Waterway on the Coast of Virginia (NAO) 5-7, 5-13, 5-17, 5-21 Watkins Glen, N.Y. (NCB) 20-40 Watkins-Waubonsie Ditch Levees (MRO) 26-18 Watts Bar Lock and Dam, Tenn. (ORN) 15-17 Waukegan Harbor, Ill. (NCC) 22-5, 22-11, 22-14, 22-16 Waurika Lake, Okla. (SWT) 29-8, 29-15 Waverly, W. Va. (ORH) 17-22 Wax Lake Outlet, La. (MR+T) 42-14 Waycake Creek, NJ. (NAN) 2-35 Webb District Improvement Co., Oreg. (NPP) 37-38 Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 28-20, 29-10, 29-16, 29-18, 29-20 Weber River and Tributaries, (Morgan Co.) Utah (SPK) 35-36 Weber River at Oakley, Utah (SPK) 35-40 Weber River near Morgan City, Utah (SPK) 35-40 Weeks Bay, Ala. (SAM) 10-49 Weiser River, Weiser Area, Idaho (NPW) 39-12, 39-15, 39-16 Weiser River, Ind. Cambridge-Midvale (NPW) 39-16 Welcome Creek, S.C. (SAN) 7-16 Welles Harbor, Midway Island (POD) 36-10 Wellfleet Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-40 Wells Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-9, 1-27, 1-35, 1-40 Wellsburg, W. Va. (ORP) 18-21 Wellsville, Ohio, Sec. I (ORP) 18-20, 18-24 Wellsville, Ohio, Sec. II (ORP) 18-20, 18-24 Wenatchee Canyons 1 and 2, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Wessagusset Beach, Weymouth, Mass. (NED) 1-41 West Antioch Creek Vicinity, Antioch, Calif. (SPK) 35-40 West Atchafalaya Basin, La. (MR+T) 42-13 West Atchalafaya Floodway, La. (MR+T) 42-13, 42-14 West Atchafalaya Floodway between Red River and Alabama Bayou (MR+T) 42-13 West Bank Hurricane Protection Levee, Jefferson Parish, La. (LMN) 11-15 West Branch Chisholm Creek Channel Improvement, Kan. (SWT) 29-19 West Branch of Susquehanna River, Pa. (NAB) 4-19, 4-36 West Branch, Westfield River, Mass. (NED) 1-43 West Bridgewater, Pa. (ORP) 18-21 West Brookfield Reservoir, Mass. (NED) 1-45 West Cache Creek, Okla. (SWT) 29-21 West Canaan Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-45 West Des Moines, Iowa (NCR) 23-8, 23-12 West Fork, W. Va (ORH) 17-21 I-72 INDEX West Fork, Foster Creek, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 West Fork Big Blue River, Fillmore Co., N.E., Bridge No. 205 (MRK) 27-21 West Fork Big Blue River, Fillmore Co., N.E., Bridge No. 1125 (MRK) 27-21 West Fork Big Blue River, Fillmore Co., N.E., County Rd. (MRK) 27-21 West Fork Grand River, Ringgold Co., Iowa, Parker Bridge (MRK) 27-21 West Fork Grand River, Ringgold Co., Iowa, Redding Bridge (MRK) 27-21 West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, Ohio (ORL) 16-11, 16-16 West Glendive, Mont. (MRO) 26-18 West Harbor, Ohio (NCB) 20-10, 20-20, 20-33 West Haven Beaches, Conn. (NED) 1-46 West Hickman Area, Hickman, Ky. (LMM) 13-5 West Hill, Worcester, Mass. (NED) 1-47 West Hill Dam, Mass. (NED) 1-11, 1-27 West Kentucky Tributaries, Ky. (MR+T) 42-10, 42- 19, 42-30, 42-55 West Little Pine Creek, Etna, Penn. (ORP) 18-26 West Magnesia Canyon Channel, Calif. (SPL) 33-8, 33-15, 33-23 West Matanzas Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (NCR) 23-16 West Memphis Ark. and Vicinity (MR+T) 42-30 West Muddy Creek and Marys River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 West Nishnabotna River, Atlantic, Iowa (MRO) 26-23 West Nishnabotna River, Malvern, Iowa (MRO) 26-23 West Nishnabotna River, Mills Co. Bridge, near Hastings, Iowa (MRO) 26-20 West Nishnabotna River, Mills Co. Bridge, near Malvem, Iowa (MRO) 26-20 West Nishnabotna River near Hastings, Iowa (MRO) 26-20 West of Morrilton, Arkansas River, Ark. (SWL) 28-18 West Oneonta Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-41 West Papillion Creek, Douglas, Douglas Co., Nebr. (MRO) 26-23 West Point, Chattahoochee River, Ga. (SAM) 10-48 West Point, Elkhorn River, Nebr. (MRO) 26-20 West Point, Ky. (ORL) 16-20, 16-26 West Point, Nebr. (MRO) 26-16 West Point Lake, Ga. and Ala. (SAM) (SAS) 8-9 West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, Ga. and Ala. (SAM) 10-26, 10-36, 10-46 West River, Tripp Co., S. Dak. (MRO) 26-23 West River, West Haven, Conn. (NED) 1-22, 1-32, 1-37 West Run, Munhall, Penn. (ORP) 18-26 West Springfield, Mass. (NED) 1-16, 1-23, 1-29, 1-36, 1-49 West Stewartstown, N.H. (NED) 1-23 West Tennessee Tributaries, Tenn. (MR+T) 42-9, 42-18, 42-30, 42-55 West Terre Haute, Ind. (Wabash River) (ORL) 16-19, 16-24, 16-29 West Thompson Lake, Conn. (NED) 1-21, 1-23, 1-31, 1-52 West Union, Middle Island, W. Va. (ORH) 17-23 West Warren, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-43, 1-49 Westchester Creek, N.Y. (NAN) 2-35, 2-38 Westcott Cove, Conn. (NED) 1-40 Westerly, R.I. (NED) 1-45 Western Branch, Va. (NAO) 5-16 Westfield, Mass. (NED) 1-45 Westhaven Cove Small Boat Basin (Westport Marina), Wash. (NPS) 38-24 Westland District Improvement Co., Oreg. (NPP) 37-38 Weston, Vt. (NED) 1-23, 1-43, 1-49 Weston Mills, Olean, N.Y. (ORP) 18-20 Weston Mills, Portville, N.Y. (ORP) 18-20 Westport, Conn. (NED) 1-45 Westport, Ky. (ORL) 16-22, 16-25 Westport District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-38 Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, Conn. (NED) 1-40, 1-45 Westport River, Mass. (NED) 1-40 Westport Slough, Oreg. (NPP) 37-37, 37-41 Westville Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-22, 1-32, 1-52 Wethersfield, Conn. (NED) 1-23 Weymouth Back River, Mass. (NED) 1-40 Weymouth-Braintree, Mass. (NED) 1-23 Weymouth-Fore and Town Rivers, Mass. (NED) 1-40 Whartons Bend Rd., Coosa River, Ala. (SAM) 10-49 Wheeler Creek, Tex. (SWF) 30-22 Wheeler, General Joe, Lock and Dam, Ala. (ORN) 15-17 Wheeling, W. Va. (ORP) 18-21 Wheeling, W. Va. (North Wheeling) (ORP) 18-21 Wheeling, W. Va. (Wheeling Island) (ORP) 18-21 Whiskey and Rock Creeks, Kan. (SWT) 29-21 White Lake Harbor, Mich. (NCE) 21-25, 21-41, 21-53 1-73 White Oak Creek, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 White River, Ark. (below Newport) (LMM) 13-4 White River Basin above Beaver Lake, Ark. (SWL) 28-18 White River Basin: Ark. and Mo. Lakes (SWL) 28-24 White River, Batesville, Ark. (SWL) 28-8, 28-12, 28-25 White River, Ind. (ORL) 16-18, 16-30 White River, Newport, Ark. (SWL) 28-8, 28-12, 28-25 White River, St. Paul, Ark. (SWL) 28-8, 28-12, 28-25 White River at Highway 14, 1/4 mile east of Oil Trough, Ark. (SWL) 28-18 White River Backwater Levees (MR+T) 42-9 White River Bank Stabilization, Batesville, Ark. (SWL) 28-18 White River Basin (Little Rock District), Ark. and Mo. (SWL) 28-7, 28-13, 28-15 White River, Jacksonport, Ark. (SWL) 28-18 White River levees, Augusta to Clarendon and De Valls Bluff, Ark. (MR+T) 42-29 Whitebird Creek, Columbia River Basin, Idaho (NPW) 39-12, 39-16 Whitefish Point, Mich. (NCE) 21-55, 21-60 Whites and Ewing Creeks, Tenn. (ORN) 15-19 Whitesburg, Ky. (North Fork Kentucky River) (ORL) 16-30 Whitetie River, Grundy Co., Ill. (NCR) 23-17 Whitiwater, Kan. (SWT) 29-21 Whitewater River, Ind. (ORL) 16-30, 16-31 Whitewater River, San Bernadino and Riverside Co., Calif. (SPL) 33-8, 33-15, 33-23 Whitewater River Basin, Calif. (SPL) 33-26 Whiting, Maine (NED) 1-23 Whitings Creek, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek, Ariz. (SPL) 33-5, 33-20 Whitmanville Lake, Mass. (NED) 1-43, 1-51 Whitney Creek, Whitney, Tex. (SWF) 30-23 Whitney Lake, Tex. (SWF) 30-12, 30-17, 30-21 Whitney Point Lake, N.Y. (NAB) 4-18, 4-28 Whitney Point Village, N.Y. (NAB) 4-18, 4-28 Whittaker Creek, Oriental, N.C. (SAW) 6-29 Whittier, Alas. (NPA) 40-13 Wichita and Valley Center Channel Improvement, Kan. (SWT) 29-19, 29-20, 29-21 Wickford Harbor, RI. (NED) 1-40 Wicomico River, Md. (NAB) 4-12, 4-26, 4-35 Wiedmer Chemical Drainage and Levee District, Mo.(LMS) 14-15 Wilbur D. Mills Dam (SWL) 28-19 Wiggins, Miss. (SAM) 10-49 Wiggle Creek, Homer (MRO) 26-20 Wilcox, Pa. (ORP) 18-21 Wild Rice and Marsh Rivers, Minn. (NCS) 24-32, 24-33 Wild Rice River, Mahnomen Co., Minn. (NCS) 24-33 Wild Rice River, Norman Co., Minn. (NCS) 24-33 Wild Rice River, South Branch and Felton Ditch, Minn. (NCS) 24-19, 24-24, 24-33 Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, Calif. (SPK) 35-19, 35-27 Wilders, Ky. (ORL) 16-24 Wiley Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPP) 37-41 Wilkes-Barre, Hanover Township, Pa. (NAB) 4-39, 4-42 Willamette Falls Fishladder, Oreg. (NPP) 37-9, 37-41, 37-43 Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-37, 37-41, 37-42 Willamette River at Willamette Falls, Oreg. (NPP) 37-25, 37-33, 37-41 Willamette River Basin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-15, 37-35, 37-39, 37-45 Willamette River Basin, Oreg.-Bank Protection (NPP) 37-16, 37-27, 37-35, 37-45 Willamette River Basin Channel Clearing and Snagging (NPP) 37-39 Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, Wash. (NPS) 38-6, 38-16, 38-21 Willapa River at Raymond, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Willard Beach, South Portland, Me. (NED) 1-41 William Bacon Oliver Lock and Dam (Replacement), Ala. (SAM) 10-28 William H. Harsha Lake, Ohio (ORL) 16-11, 16-16 William L. Springer Lake, Decatur, Ill. (NCR) 23-15 Williamson, W. Va. (ORH) 17-21, 17-23 Williamsport, Pa. (NAB) 4-39, 4-42 Williamstown, W. Va. (ORH) 17-22 Williamsville Reservoir, Vt. (NED) 1-45 Williston, N.D., Water Intake (MRO) 26-17 Willoughby Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Willow Creek, Ind. (NPW) 39-15 I-74 IINIJLA Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, Oreg. (NPP) (NPW) 37-27, 37-35, 39-16 Willow Creek Lake, Oreg. (NPW) 39-15 Willow Creek, Mason City, Iowa (NCR) 23-17 Willow Island Locks and Dam, W. Va. (ORD) 19-7 Wilmington Harbor, Del. (NAP) 3-7, 3-10, 3-22 Wilmington Harbor, N.C. (SAW) 6-10, 6-20, 6-29 Wilmington, Ill. (NCC) 22-8 Wilmore, Pa. (ORP) 18-20 Wilson Creek, Sumter County, S.C. (SAN) 7-15 Wilson Harbor, N.Y. (NCB) 20-35 Wilson Lake, Saline River, Kan. (MRK) 27-7, 27-11, 27-15, 27-19 Wilson Lock, Ala. (ORN) 15-17 Wilson Point, La. (MR+T) 42-11 Wilson Point Harbor, Conn. (NED) 1-40 Wilson River, Oreg. (NPD) 37-40 Wilton, N.H. (NED) 1-23 Winchester Bay, Oreg. (NPP) 37-37 Winfield L & D (ORH) 17-12 Winfield Levee, Kan. (SWT) 29-19 Winnibigoshish Reservoir, Minn. (NCS) 24-31 Winnipesaukee Lake, N.H. (NED) 1-40, 1-47 Winona, Minn. (NCS) 24-19, 24-24 Winona Basin, Minn. (NCD) 25-10 Winona Harbors, Minn. (NCD) 25-7 Winooski River, Vt. (NAN) 2-36 Winslow (Tributaries of Little Colorado River) Little Colorado River Basin, Ariz. (SPL) 33-26 Winsted, Conn. (NED) 1-23, 1-43, 1-49 Winter Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-40 Winter Harbor, Va. (NAO) 5-19 Winthrop Beach, Mass. (NED) 1-41, 1-45 Winthrop Harbor, Mass. (NED) 1-40, 1-46 Wisconsin River, Wis. (NCS) 24-27 Wishart Point Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-20 Wister Lake, Okla. (SWL) (SWT) 28-22, 29-8, 29-15 Withlacoochee River, Fla. (SAJ) 9-46, 9-47 Wolf and Jordan Rivers, Miss. (SAM) 10-47, 10-50 Wolf-Coffee Lake, Blue River, Kan. (MRK) 27-17 Wolf Creek Dam-Lake Cumberland, Ohio River Basin, Ky. (ORN) 15-8, 15-10 Wolf Creek, U.S. Highway 45 Bridge, Prentiss County, Miss. (SAM) 10-48 Wolf Creek, Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, Miss. (SAM) 10-48 Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), Tenn. (LMM) 13-4 Wood Island Harbor and Pool at Biddleford, Me. (NED) 1-10, 1-27, 1-35, 1-46 Wood River Drainage and Levee District, Ill. (LMS) 14-5, 14-9, 14-11 Woodbridge Creek, NJ. (NAN) 2-35 Woodbury, Conn. (NED) 1-23 Woodbury Creek, NJ. (NAP) 3-24 Woodcock Creek Lake, Pa. (ORP) 18-9, 18-13, 18-18, 18-25 Woodlands, W. Va. (ORP) 18-21 Woodmont Beach, Conn. (NED) 1-46 Woodmont Shore, Milford, Conn. (NED) 1-41 Woodruff, Jim, Lock and Dam, Ga. and Fla. (SAM) 10-25, 10-35, 10-46 Woods Hole Channel, Mass. (NED) 1-40 Woodson Drainage District, Oreg. (NPP) 37-38, 37-39, 37-44 Woonsocket, R.I. (NED) 1-23, 1-43, 1-48 Worcester, Mass. (NED) 1-23, 1-48 Worcester Diversion, Mass. (NED) 1-43 Worthington, Minn. (NCR) 23-16 Wrangell Harbor, Alas. (NPA) 40-5, 40-9, 40-11, 40-14 Wrangell Narrows, Alas. (NPA) 40-5, 40-9, 40-11, 40-12, 40-14 Wright Patman Dam and Lake, Tex. (LMN) (SWF) 11-19, 30-11, 30-17, 30-21 Wright's Creek, N.C. (SAW) 6-25 Wrightsville Beach, N.C. (SAW) 6-27 Wrightsville Dam, Vt. (NAN) 2-36 WTP, Great Miami River, Ross, Ohio (ORL) 16-30 Wynoochee Lake, Wash. (NPS) 38-10, 38-17, 38-22 Wynoochee River, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Wyoming Valley, Pa. (NAB) 4-22, 4-39 Y Yadkin River Basin, N.C., S.C. (SAW) 6-14, 6-30 Yakima River at Union Gap, Wash. (NPS) 38-12, 38-27 Yakima River, Cle Elum, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Yakima River, West Richland, Wash. (NPS) (NPW) 38-27, 38-29, 39-15, 39-17 Yakima River, Yakima, Wash. (NPS) 38-27 Yalobusha River, Miss. (LMK) 12-16 Yaquina Bay and Harbor, Oreg. (NPP) 37-9, 37-25, 37-33, 37-42 I-75 Yaquina Bay and Harbor Small Boat Basin, Oreg. (NPP) 37-37 Yaquina River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-37 Yatesville Lake, Ky. (ORH) 17-10, 17-14, 17-19 Yazoo Basin, Miss. (MR+T) 42-7, 42-16, 42-30 Yazoo Basin Headwater, Miss. (MR+T) 42-53 Yazoo River, Miss. (LMK) 12-16 Yazoo Backwater Area (MR+T) 42-53 Yellow Jacket Creek, Hogansville, Ga. (SAM) 10-48 Yellowstone River, Bank Protection, Billings, Mont. (MRO) 26-19 Yellowstone River, Glenrdive, Mont. (MRO) 26-16, 26-23 Yellowstone River, Greycliff Bridge, Mont. (MRO) 26-19 Yellowstone River, Livingston, Mont. (MRO) 26-23 Yellowstone River, near Miles City, Mont., Water Intake and Sewage Lagoon (MRO) 26-19 Yellowstone River, Reedpoint Bridge, Mont. (MRO) 26-19 Yellowstone River, Springdale Bridge, Mont. (MRO) 26-19 Yellowstone River, Voges Bridge, near Big Timber, Mont. (MRO) 26-19 Yellowstone River, Water Plant, Livingston, Mont. (MRO) 26-18 Yellowstone River, Yellowstone Co. Bridge, near Billings, Mont. (MRO) 26-19 Yonkers, N.Y. (NAN) 2-36 York Harbor, Maine (NED) 1-40 York, Indian Rock Dam, Pa. (NAB) 4-21, 4-29, 4-36 York River, Va. (NAO) 5-20 York Spit Channel, Va. (NAO) 5-2, 5-15 Youghiogheny River, Penn. and Md. (Canalization) (ORP) 18-21 Youghiogheny River Lake, Ohio River Basin, Penn. and Md. (ORP) 18-9, 18-13, 18-18, 18-25 Youngs and Klaskanine River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-39 Youngs Bay and Youngs River, Oreg. (NPP) 37-42 Youngs River Dikes, Oreg. (NPP) 37-38 Youngstown, Ohio (ORP) 18-20 Z Zacate Creek Channel Improvement, Tex. (SWF) Zintel Canyon Dam, Wash. (NPW) 39-8, 39-14 Zippel Bay, Lake of the Woods County, Minn. (NCS) 24-3, 24-22 Zippel Bay Harbor, Minn. (NCS) 24-27 Zumbro River, Minn. (NCS) 24-28, 24-33 Zumbro River at Genoa, Minn. (NCS) 24-34 Zumbro River at Jarrett and Millville, Minn. (NCS) 24-20, 24-24 30-22, 30-23 Zanesville, Ohio (ORH) 17-22 I-76 3 131b4 00 B&bP4 7